Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M103075200 on September 26, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 48, 45394-45402, November 30, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/48/45394    most recent
M103075200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beher, D.
Right arrow Articles by Shearman, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beher, D.
Right arrow Articles by Shearman, M. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Pharmacological Knock-down of the Presenilin 1 Heterodimer by a Novel gamma -Secretase Inhibitor

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRESENILIN BIOLOGY*

Dirk BeherDagger §, Jonathan D. J. WrigleyDagger , Alan Nadin, Geneviève Evin||, Colin L. Masters||, Timothy Harrison, José L. Castro, and Mark S. ShearmanDagger

From the Dagger  Departments of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology and  Medicinal Chemistry, Merck Sharp & Dohme Research Laboratories, The Neuroscience Research Centre, Terlings Park, Harlow, Essex CM20 2QR, United Kingdom and the || Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, and Neuropathology Laboratory, Mental Health Institute of Victoria, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia

Received for publication, April 6, 2001, and in revised form, August 28, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Intramembranous cleavage of the beta -amyloid precursor protein by gamma -secretase is the final processing event generating amyloid-beta peptides, which are thought to be causative agents for Alzheimer's disease. Missense mutations in the presenilin genes co-segregate with early-onset Alzheimer's disease, and, recently, a close biochemical linkage between presenilins and the identity of gamma -secretase has been established. Here we describe for the first time that certain potent gamma -secretase inhibitors are able to interfere with the endoproteolytic processing of presenilin 1 (PS1). In addition, we identified a novel gamma -secretase inhibitor, {1S-benzyl-4R-[1-(5-cyclohexyl-2-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[e][1,4]diazepin-3(R,S)-ylcarbamoyl)-S-ethylcarbamoyl]-2R-hydroxy-5-phenyl-pentyl}-carbamic acid tert-butyl ester (CBAP), which not only physically interacts with PS1, but upon chronic treatment produces a "pharmacological knock-down" of PS1 fragments. This indicates that the observed accumulation of full-length PS1 is caused by a direct inhibition of its endoproteolysis. The subsequent use of CBAP as a biological tool to increase full-length PS1 levels in the absence of exogenous PS1 expression has provided evidence that wild-type PS1 endoproteolysis is not required either for PS1/gamma -secretase complex assembly or trafficking. Furthermore, in cell-based systems CBAP does not completely recapitulate PS1 loss-of-function phenotypes. Even though the beta -amyloid precursor protein cleavage and the S3 cleavage of the Notch receptor are inhibited by CBAP, an impairment of Trk receptor maturation was not observed.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Alzheimer's disease (AD)1 is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder of the central nervous system characterized by an extracellular deposition of amyloid-beta peptide (Abeta ) (1, 2) in parenchymal senile plaques. Systematic genetic studies have led to the identification of three genes causative for familial forms of the disease, leading to increased production of a longer Abeta peptide species, Abeta (1-42), which is more prone to aggregation than the shorter and more predominant species, Abeta (1-40) (for review, see Refs. 3 and 4). The first gene identified was the beta -amyloid precursor protein (beta APP) (5-7) from which Abeta is generated by two sequential proteolytic cleavages mediated by beta - and gamma -secretases. An alternative processing pathway involves the cleavage of beta APP within the Abeta sequence by alpha -secretase and prevents amyloid formation (8). alpha -Secretase cleavage appears to be mediated by members of the disintegrin and metalloprotease family TACE (9) and ADAM-10 (10). Recently, a membrane-bound aspartyl protease has been cloned and characterized as beta -secretase (BACE, Asp-2) (11-15). Novel evidence has highlighted a critical role of presenilin as the most likely candidate for gamma -secretase itself. Mutations in the presenilin 1 and 2 (PS1 and PS2) genes are known to account for the majority of familial Alzheimer's disease cases (16-19). Studies performed with neurons from PS1-knock-out embryos have shown that PS1 is essential for gamma -secretase activity (20). Presenilins are polytopic membrane proteins that undergo endoproteolytic processing within their putative loop region, yielding N-terminal and C-terminal polypeptides (PS1-NTF and PS1-CTF) thought to consist of six and two transmembrane domains, respectively (21). Mutagenesis of either of two aspartate residues in transmembrane domains 6 or 7 of PS1 inactivates gamma -secretase and blocks endoproteolysis (22, 23). Because these aspartates are critical for PS1 function, it has been proposed that PS1 is either a novel membrane-bound aspartyl protease or an essential di-aspartyl cofactor for the enzyme (23). This is further supported by the findings that PS1 is linked with gamma -secretase activity in the detergent-solubilized state (24) and that photoactivated derivatives of L-685,458, a highly specific and potent aspartyl protease transition state analogue inhibitor of gamma -secretase (25), bind selectively and directly to PS1 fragments (26). Others have reported similar covalent labeling of affinity probes to presenilins using either a transition-state mimic (27) or a novel peptidomimetic gamma -secretase inhibitor (28). Moreover, evidence has been generated that full-length PS1 (PS1-FL) might be a zymogen (26), which could be activated by a putative autocleavage event within its loop region (29). One prediction of this model is that an inhibitor of gamma -secretase that binds to PS1 should interfere with its endoproteolysis. We report that a novel gamma -secretase inhibitor, CBAP, not only blocks PS1 endoproteolysis, but upon chronic treatment, induces a "pharmacological knock-down" of PS1 fragments. We have subsequently used CBAP to gain novel insights into the assembly and trafficking of the high molecular weight PS1/gamma -secretase complexes, without artificial overexpression of the polypeptide. Furthermore, we provide evidence that the proteolytic activity associated with PS1/gamma -secretase necessary for the cleavage of beta APP and the S3 cleavage of the Notch receptor can be dissociated from its function in membrane protein trafficking. This suggests that phenotypes resulting from the absence of presenilin expression are not completely recapitulated by gamma -secretase inhibition.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Antibodies-- Monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies were obtained from the following sources and diluted for Western blot analyses as indicated: anti-beta APP (22C11, Roche Molecular Biochemicals, 0.5 µg/ml), anti-calnexin (StressGen, 1:2,500), anti-beta -catenin (Transduction Laboratories, 1:1,000), anti-c-Myc (9E10, Calbiochem, 1:400), anti-beta -COP (Sigma, 1:500), biotinylated anti-Abeta 4G8 (Senetek), polyclonal anti-rat Grp 78 (BiP, Calbiochem, 1:4,000), horseradish peroxidase-conjugated polyclonal goat anti-mouse and anti-rabbit antibodies (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, 1:5,000), and polyclonal antiserum R7334 (raised against residues 659-694 of beta APP695, provided by M. Kounnas (Merck Research Laboratories, San Diego, CA), 1:750). PS1-FL and its fragments were detected using a polyclonal antiserum raised against the PS1 loop region (1:2,500) (21), polyclonal antiserum 00/2 raised against the loop peptide 301-317 (30) (1:2,000), and polyclonal antiserum 98/1 raised against residues 1-20 of PS1 (1:2,500) (31).

Complementary DNA Constructs-- A 2,070-base pair HindIII-SnaBI restriction fragment encoding the c-Myc-tagged NotchDelta E(M1727V) (32) was subcloned into the HindIII-EcoRV-digested pcDNA3.1/Zeo(+) expression vector (Invitrogen).

Cell Culture and Cell Lines-- Human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell lines either untransfected or stably transfected with SPA4CT (33) were maintained under standard conditions. For treatment with compounds, cells were plated at 60% confluence into 10-cm diameter dishes 1 day prior to treatment. Compounds were dissolved in Me2SO and added the next day, yielding a final Me2SO concentration of 0.1% (v/v). For generation of an HEK293 cell line stably overexpressing both beta APP695 and murine NotchDelta E polypeptides, an HEK293 cell line stably overexpressing beta APP695 (25) was transfected with NotchDelta E(M1727V) pcDNA3.1/Zeo(+) using standard calcium phosphate methods. Transfectants were cultured in the presence of 1 µg/ml puromycin (Sigma) to maintain beta APP expression and 100 µg/ml zeocin (Life Technologies, Inc.) to select for NotchDelta E(M1727V) expression. After dilution, individual surviving colonies were picked and screened for the expression of both beta APP695 and NotchDelta E(M1727V) by Western blotting.

Membrane Preparation and Solubilization of Membrane Proteins for Analysis of PS1 Polypeptides-- The cells were broken by trituration in 1 ml of TBS (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl), and membranes were sedimented by centrifugation for 30 min at 65,000 rpm in a TLA-100.2 rotor (Beckman) at 4 °C. Membrane proteins were solubilized in TBS, 1% Triton X-100, 1× EDTA-free protease inhibitor mixture (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) by trituration, and after incubation for 30 min on ice, insoluble debris was removed by centrifugation for 10 min at 20,000 × g, 4 °C. Protein concentrations of the supernatants were determined using the bicinchoninic acid assay (34) in a 96-well plate format according to the manufacturer's instructions (Pierce & Warriner).

Extraction of Protein from Whole Cells for the Analysis of NotchDelta E Processing-- Cell extracts from whole cells were prepared by sonication for 5 min in TBS, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% Nonidet-P40, 0.2% SDS, 1 mM EDTA, 1× EDTA-free protease inhibitor mixture after incubation for 30 min at 4 °C. Insoluble debris was removed by centrifugation for 10 min at 20,000 × g and protein levels normalized as described above.

Western Blot Analyses-- Equal amounts of protein were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Probing of the membranes was carried out with various antibodies, as indicated in the figure legends, using the enhanced chemiluminescence system (ECL, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Quantitation of bands using a computerized image analysis system (MCID, Imaging Research Inc.) was performed as described previously (35).

Quantification of Abeta Peptides in Conditioned Cell Culture Media-- Abeta peptides secreted into the media were quantified by an ECL assay as described (24) in an analogous 96-well plate format (Refs. 36 and 37; Origen M-SeriesTM analyzer, Igen).

Subcellular Fractionation and Sucrose Density Gradient Centrifugation-- Human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells were harvested, pre-swollen by incubation for 8 min in 20 mM HEPES-HCl, pH 7.3, 10 mM KCl, and collected by centrifugation for 10 min at 1,000 × g. Cells were homogenized in 20 mM HEPES-HCl, pH 7.3, 90 mM KCl, and nuclei and cellular debris were removed by centrifugation for 10 min at 1,000 × g. Cellular membranes were sedimented by centrifugation for 1 h at 45,000 rpm (50.2 Ti rotor, Beckman), resuspended in 1 ml of 0.2 M sucrose, 5 mM HEPES-HCl, pH 7.3, and layered on top of a linear continuous sucrose gradient (0.2-2 M). Gradients were centrifuged overnight at 100,000 gav (27,000 rpm, SW28.1 rotor, Beckman). Fractions were collected (11×1.5 ml) from the bottom, diluted into 5 mM HEPES-HCl, pH 7.3, and membranes sedimented by centrifugation for 1 h at 45,000 rpm (50.2 Ti rotor, Beckman). The final pellets were homogenized in 100 µl of phosphate-buffered saline, 5% glycerol (v/v) and stored at -80 °C prior to immunoblot analysis.

UV Cross-linking of Photoreactive gamma -Secretase Inhibitors-- Membranes from SH-SY5Y cells were prepared as described for sucrose gradients and solubilized using 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.3, 2 mM EDTA, 1% CHAPSO (w/v) (26). UV-photolabeling using the photoprobe L-852,646 at a final concentration of 20 nM and the competing inhibitors L-685,458 and CBAP at 2 µM final concentration, respectively, was carried out as described (26). Biotinylated proteins were captured using streptavidin-coated magnetic beads (Dynal), precipitated by magnetic separation, and subjected to immunoblotting after addition of SDS-PAGE sample buffer.

Rate Zonal Glycerol Velocity Gradient Centrifugation-- CHAPSO-solubilised membranes from SH-SY5Y cells were prepared as described for sucrose density gradients and solubilized in 0.15 M NaCl, 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.3, 1% CHAPSO (w/v) according to described procedures (26). Prior to loading, solubilized membranes were diluted with an equal volume of buffer (0.15 M NaCl, 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.3) yielding 0.5% CHAPSO (w/v) final concentration (which is the optimum CHAPSO concentration for recovery of solubilized gamma -secretase activity from SH-SY5Y membranes).2 After centrifugation for 15 min at 4 °C and 50,000 rpm (TLA-120.2 rotor, Beckman), 400 µl of supernatant was applied to the top of a 10-40% (v/v) linear glycerol gradient. After centrifugation for 26 h at 4 °C and 28,000 rpm (SW28.1 rotor, Beckman), 17 fractions were collected (16 1-ml fractions and 1 0.4-ml fraction) from the bottom. Bovine serum albumin (15 µg) was added to 250-µl aliquots of each fraction, followed by precipitation with five volumes of acetone chilled to -20 °C.

Primary Cortical Cultures and Pulse-Chase Analysis of Trk Receptor Maturation-- Primary rat cortical neurons were prepared as described previously (38). Cells (1.75 × 106) were plated into 6-cm dishes and incubated for 2 days with a change of media and addition of fresh compound after the first day. Pulse-chase labeling in the presence of CBAP (10 µM) or vehicle Me2SO was performed as described (39), and solubilized Trk receptors were immunoprecipitated with a rabbit polyclonal anti-Trk receptor agarose conjugate (Trk C, sc-139, cross-reactive with Trk A, B, and C; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) prior to SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography.

Synthetic Chemistry-- L-685,458 (25), L-852,646 (26), and L-682,679 (40) were prepared as described previously. Compounds 1-4 were prepared by analogous methods and compounds 5 and 6 as described (28). Compound 7, {1S-benzyl-4R-[1-(5-cyclohexyl-2-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[e] (1, 4)diazepin-3(R,S)-ylcarbamoyl)-S-ethylcarbamoyl]-2R-hydroxy-5-phenyl-pentyl}-carbamic acid tert-butyl ester (CBAP), was synthesized as follows. (R,S)-3-Amino-5-cyclohexyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-1,4-benzodiazepin-2-one.2HBr was prepared by the reaction of 2-aminophenyl cyclohexyl ketone (41) with alpha -benzotriazol-1-yl-N-(benzyloxycarbonyl)glycine (42) using the reported procedure (43). A solution of 3-amino-5-cyclohexyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-1,4-benzodiazepin-2-one.2HBr (210 mg, 0.50 mmol) in dimethylformamide (1 ml) was treated with 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC, 96 mg, 0.50 mmol), 1-hydroxybenzotriazole hydrate (HOBT, 75 mg, 0.55 mmol), triethylamine (0.14 ml, 1.0 mmol), and butoxycarbonyl-L-alanine (93 mg, 0.50 mmol) and stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate; washed with citric acid solution, sodium bicarbonate solution, and brine; dried (MgSO4); filtered; and evaporated in vacuo. The crude product was dissolved in trifluoroacetic acid, stirred at room temperature for 10 min, and evaporated in vacuo. Purification by column chromatography (silica, eluant: CH2Cl2-MeOH-NH3 (90:10:1)) gave the alanyl-amide (135 mg, 82%) as a white solid. A solution of the foregoing alanyl-amide (33 mg, 0.1 mmol), 2R-benzyl-5S-tert-butoxycarbonylamino-4R-(tert-butyldimethylsilanyloxy)-6-phenylhexanoic acid (44) (53 mg, 0.1 mmol), EDC (22 mg, 0.11 mmol), and HOBT (0.11 mmol) in dimethylformamide was stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate; washed with citric acid solution, sodium bicarbonate solution, and brine; dried (MgSO4); filtered; and evaporated in vacuo. The crude product was dissolved in tetra-n-butylammonium fluoride (1.0 M solution in tetrahydrofuran, 1 ml) and stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction mixture was dissolved in ethyl acetate, washed with water, dried (MgSO4), filtered, and evaporated in vacuo. Purification by column chromatography (silica, eluant: ethyl acetate) gave CBAP (31 mg, 44%) as a white solid. Compounds 7 (CBAP) and 8 are both mixtures of diastereoisomers at the benzodiazepine C-3 position. All new compounds gave satisfactory analytical and spectroscopic data.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Structure-Activity Relationship for Inhibition of PS1 Endoproteolysis and gamma -Secretase Activity-- Following our initial observation that treatment of SH-SY5Y cells for 16 h with 10 µM amount of the specific gamma -secretase inhibitor L-685,458 results in an increase in PS1-FL steady-state levels (Fig. 1A), we compared a variety of derivatives for their potential to inhibit PS1-FL endoproteolysis with their ability to inhibit beta APP gamma -secretase activity, monitored by inhibition of Abeta peptide production (Fig. 1). Most importantly, compounds that were inactive in regard to the inhibition of gamma -secretase, such as the diastereoisomer L-682,679 or the desbenzyl derivative (compound 1) did not block the cleavage of PS1-FL (Fig. 1A). Compounds 2 and 3 are also effective inhibitors of PS1-FL endoproteolysis and gamma -secretase activity, indicating that, for both activities, changes to the backbone amino acid side chains of L-685,458 are well tolerated. Surprisingly, compound 4 with an extension to the dipeptidyl moiety of L-685,458 is inactive in the PS1 cleavage assay (Fig. 1B), but still a potent inhibitor of gamma -secretase activity. Compounds 5 and 6 do not contain the hydroxyethylene isostere but have been described as very potent inhibitors of gamma -secretase activity (28). Both compounds increase PS1-FL polypeptide levels, suggesting that structurally unrelated inhibitors can cause an inhibition of PS1-FL cleavage. Compound 7 (CBAP), a chimeric molecule containing the L-685,458 isostere and a benzodiazepine group, was the only compound identified of a large number of inhibitors (n approx  70; Fig. 1 and data not shown) that, under the standard experimental protocol, produced a strong increase in PS1-FL levels while concomitantly causing a detectable reduction in the levels of PS1-NTF (Fig. 1B). The specificity of this effect was further confirmed because the derivative compound 8 (Fig. 1B), lacking the alanine residue neighboring the isostere, is inactive for both inhibition of Abeta peptide production and PS1-FL cleavage.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Structure-activity relationship for inhibition of gamma -secretase activity and PS1 endoproteolysis. IC50 values for inhibition of Abeta (40) and Abeta (42) production were determined using SH-SY5Y cells stably transfected with SPA4CT. Reduction of Abeta production was measured relative to Me2SO-treated controls, and the data represent the average of two independent experiments using duplicate measurements in each. IC50 values were calculated by nonlinear regression fit analysis using ActivityBase software (IDBS). Cytotoxicity was measured in the corresponding cells by a colorimetric cell proliferation assay (CellTiter 96TM AQ assay, Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. No overt cytotoxicity was observed at any concentration for any of the compounds tested (data not shown). For analysis of the inhibition of PS1-FL cleavage, untransfected SH-SY5Y cells were incubated under comparable experimental conditions for 16 h with 10 µM compound as indicated. Equal amounts of solubilized membranes (50 µg protein) from each dish were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with polyclonal 98/1 antiserum detecting PS1-FL and PS1-NTF. For each compound the identical exposure from the same blot for vehicle control (lane 1), 10 µM L-685,458 (lane 2), and 10 µM compound (lane 3) is shown. Vertical bars indicate that lanes have been spliced. PS1-FL polypeptides are indicated by filled arrowheads and PS1-NTF by open arrowheads. Note that compounds 5 and 6 have originally been described as compounds D and E (28).

It is noteworthy that, in the cellular assay system used, all compounds analyzed inhibit both Abeta (40) and Abeta (42) peptide production with almost identical potencies. Using a colorimetric cell proliferation assay, no overt cytotoxicity was observed in the cells for any of the compounds tested.

Pharmacological Knock-down of PS1 Fragments by CBAP-- Following a chronic 7-day treatment of SH-SY5Y cells with CBAP, a stable increase in PS1-FL accumulation was observed, together with an almost complete inhibition of PS1 fragment formation (Fig. 2, A and B). Only very weak PS1-NTF immunoreactivity was detectable (Fig. 2A), and, when corresponding immunoblots were probed with an anti-loop antiserum, PS1-CTF immunoreactivity was absent (Fig. 2B; this slight discrepancy reflects the differing affinities of the antisera used). As controls, cells were treated with vehicle, L-685,458, or compound 5 or 6 (Fig. 2), but only CBAP was able to reduce PS1 fragment levels beyond the limit of detection for the antibody directed against the PS1-CTF. We describe this unique effect of CBAP as a pharmacological knock-down of PS1 fragments. As an added control, all samples were immunoblotted for the unrelated beta -COP Golgi protein (Fig. 2C). Identical immunoreactivities were observed in all samples, which excludes variations in the protein normalization procedure and nonspecific effects of the gamma -secretase inhibitors on the cells.


View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Chronic treatment of cells with CBAP induces a pharmacological knock-down of PS1 fragments. The expression of PS1 in SH-SY5Y cells was analyzed after a treatment for 7 days with Me2SO (DMSO) vehicle or with 10 µM amounts of L-685,458, CBAP, or compound 5 or 6. Equal amounts of solubilized membranes (50 µg of protein) from each dish were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with polyclonal 98/1 antiserum detecting PS1-FL and PS1-NTF (A), polyclonal PS1 anti-loop antiserum detecting PS1-FL and PS1-CTF (B), or a monoclonal antibody detecting beta -COP (C).

Time Course and Dose Response of Inhibition of PS1 Endoproteolysis and gamma -Secretase Activity-- L-685,458 and CBAP appear to exert an immediate inhibitory action on both PS1 endoproteolysis and beta APP gamma -secretase activity, as seen by an increase in PS1-FL and inhibition of Abeta peptide secretion after only 2 h (the earliest time point when Abeta was measurable; Fig. 3, A and B). Abeta peptide release reaches a maximum after 6-8 h in the vehicle-treated cells, whereas the inhibitor-treated cells do not release any detectable quantities of Abeta peptide at any time point (Fig. 3B). The accumulation of PS1-FL continues during the period analyzed, because it requires the re-synthesis of PS1, which is the critical rate-limiting step for the stabilization experiments (Fig. 3A). Taken together with the results of the chronic treatment study (Fig. 2), these data indicate that CBAP does not act as a gamma -secretase inhibitor simply by blocking PS1 endoproteolysis; gamma -secretase enzyme activity is completely inhibited almost immediately after addition of the compound to the cells, whereas a significant knock-down of the PS1 fragments, which are believed to represent the active enzyme, requires treatment for several days. Mechanistically, inhibition of gamma -secretase activity and PS1 endoproteolysis by CBAP appear to occur simultaneously. This inhibition is dose-dependent (Fig. 3, C and D), but the potency for Abeta inhibition is not equipotent with inhibition of PS1 endoproteolysis. The accumulation of beta APP alpha -CTF (Fig. 3C) and inhibition of Abeta peptide production (Fig. 1) occur at concentrations lower than that needed to cause an accumulation of PS1-FL (Fig. 3C). ED50 values for PS1-FL accumulation for both L-685,458 and CBAP are in the low micromolar range (Fig. 3D), whereas both inhibit Abeta peptide production at nanomolar concentrations (Fig. 1).


View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Kinetics and dose dependence of inhibition of gamma -secretase activity and PS1-FL endoproteolysis. A, immunoblotting of solubilized membranes (50 µg of protein) from SH-SY5Y cells stably transfected with SPA4CT demonstrates the time course of inhibition of PS1-FL cleavage in the presence of Me2SO (DMSO) vehicle, L-685,458 (10 µM), or CBAP (10 µM). PS1-FL and PS1-NTF were stained with the 98/1 antiserum. B, Abeta (40) peptide secretion from the identical cells was quantitated by homogenous time-resolved fluorescence (Delta R = ratio sample - ratio background) as described (54). To obtain a dose-response profile, SH-SY5Y cells stably transfected with SPA4CT were incubated overnight with increasing concentrations of compounds as indicated. C, equal amounts of solubilized membranes (50 µg of protein) were immunoblotted for PS1-FL and PS1-NTF using antiserum 98/1 or for beta APP C-terminal fragments using antiserum R7334. A dose-dependent inhibition of Abeta peptide production was observed in the corresponding media (data not shown), which reflected the accumulation of beta APP alpha -CTF. D, shorter exposures of the immunoblots shown in C were quantified by densitometry and the Me2SO control values subtracted from each data point to plot the increase of PS1-FL immunoreactivity in response to increasing compound concentrations (conc.). PS1-FL accumulation is expressed as relative optical densities of the bands multiplied by their areas (D×A).

CBAP Binds Directly to PS1-- L-852,646, a photoaffinity ligand derivative of L-685,458, can be covalently cross-linked to PS1-NTF (26). Because CBAP was able to induce a pharmacological knock-down of PS1 fragment formation by stabilizing PS1-FL, we wished to determine whether this compound was directed to the same binding site as L-852,646. In the absence of a competing ligand, PS1-NTF was labeled, whereas, when added to the reaction in 100-fold excess, both CBAP and L-685,458 specifically inhibited the photolabeling of PS1-NTF (Fig. 4). Based on the displacement of the photoprobe by both inhibitors, we conclude that they bind to the same or overlapping binding sites on the PS1-NTF.


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   gamma -Secretase inhibitors L-685,458 and CBAP bind to PS1-NTF. After UV-cross linking in the presence of the biotinylated, photoreactive gamma -secretase inhibitor L-852,646 and streptavidin bead precipitation, samples were probed with polyclonal 98/1 antiserum for PS1-NTF. Only in the absence of competing compounds was PS1-NTF precipitated by streptavidin beads (lane 1), whereas 100-fold excess of either L-685,458 (lane 2) or CBAP (lane 3) abolished the precipitation.

gamma -Secretase Inhibitors and Presenilin Knock-out Phenotypes-- Because of the intimate relationship between gamma -secretase and presenilins, we investigated whether gamma -secretase inhibitors are able to recapitulate aberrant phenotypes associated with the inactivation by mutagenesis or knock-out of PS1. Our main aim was to discriminate PS1/gamma -secretase-mediated substrate cleavage from PS1 functions associated with membrane protein trafficking. Release of the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) upon activation of the Notch receptor requires presenilins (45) and is blocked by weak gamma -secretase inhibitors, such as the peptide aldehydes MDL28170 and MG132, and the difluoroketone peptide analogue MW167 (45). Western blot analyses of c-Myc-tagged NICD from HEK293 beta APP695/NotchDelta E cells that were exposed to increasing concentrations of inhibitors for 16 h demonstrated that all compounds tested in this assay inhibited the formation of NICD in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5A). This inhibition led to an accumulation of the NotchDelta E protein, the substrate for this gamma -secretase-like cleavage reaction. Furthermore, in the same cells, this effect coincided with a dose-dependent accumulation of beta APP-CTFs (Fig. 5B) and inhibition of Abeta (40) and Abeta (42) production (Fig. 5, C and D). Upon treatment with the inhibitors, an accumulation of mainly the beta APP alpha -CTF was detected (Fig. 5B) as verified by immunoprecipitation Western blotting using monoclonal antibodies 4G8 and W0-2 (data not shown). A predominant alpha -secretase processing pathway for beta APP in the chosen cell line was anticipated, as similar data have been described for the HEK293 beta APP695 cell line (25), which was used as a starting point to generate the HEK293 beta APP695/NotchDelta E cell line.


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   gamma -Secretase inhibitors block Notch S3 and beta APP gamma -cleavage with similar potencies. HEK293 cells stably transfected with beta APP695 and mNotchDelta E(M1727V) were exposed for 16 h to increasing concentrations of compounds. Note the different concentration ranges used. Equal amounts of extracted protein (30 µg) were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted for mNotchDelta E(M1727V) and NICD using anti-c-Myc antibody 9E10 (A) or for beta APP C-terminal fragments and transmembrane beta APP using antiserum R7334 (B). C and D, Abeta (40) (C) and Abeta (42) (D) peptides in the corresponding conditioned media were quantified and compared (E) with the inhibition of NICD formation determined by densitometric analysis of shorter exposures of the immunoblots shown in A. All data are expressed as percentage of Me2SO control values. F, IC50 values for inhibition of Abeta (40), Abeta (42), and NICD generation were calculated by nonlinear regression fit analysis of the graphs shown in C-E using GraphPad PrismTM software (conc., concentration).

The above findings confirm that this class of compounds acts mechanistically as inhibitors of the gamma -secretase cleavage of two substrates: beta APP and Notch. The IC50 values obtained (Fig. 5F) reveal that for each compound potencies for inhibition of beta APP and Notch gamma -secretase cleavage are closely comparable. Compound 6 was the most potent inhibitor analyzed and acts as a subnanomolar inhibitor for both cleavages (0.24-0.37 nM, Fig. 5F).

Deficits in Trk receptor maturation have been reported in neurons from PS1 knock-out animals (39). To determine whether presenilin/gamma -secretase activity was involved in this process and whether CBAP was able to induce similar deficits, a pulse-chase analysis of rat primary cortical neurons was performed. Under vehicle control conditions (Fig. 6) after a 30-120-min chase period, the majority of immature Trk receptors migrating at ~110 kDa underwent maturation to higher glycosylated species, as seen by a shift of the apparent molecular mass to ~120-130 kDa. In CBAP-treated neurons, the mobility pattern observed in the gel and the time course were identical to the vehicle control (Fig. 6). Thus, we conclude that gamma -secretase inhibition does not impair Trk receptor maturation and that this process requires presenilin expression and function independent of protease activity.


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Trk receptor maturation is not affected by gamma -secretase inhibitors. Primary rat cortical neurons were pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine (20 min) and chased in the presence of an excess of nonradioactive methionine for 30, 60, and 120 min. The experiment was performed either in the presence of vehicle Me2SO (DMSO, lane 1) or CBAP (10 µM, lane 2). Mature and immature Trk polypeptides immunoprecipitated from cell lysates are indicated by arrows.

Complex Formation and Sorting of PS1-FL-- It is known that, in PS1-transfected cells, both cleavage and sorting of PS1 are rate-limited, causing an accumulation of PS1-FL in the ER (46, 47). Furthermore, PS1 fragments are known to be incorporated into high molecular weight complexes, whereas in transfected cell lines wild-type PS1-FL is detected in complexes of lower molecular weight (48). Because CBAP gave us the opportunity to increase the ratio of PS1-FL versus fragments without changing the endogenous expression levels of PS1, we aimed to determine whether endoproteolysis of PS1 serves as a signal for assembly of high molecular weight complexes or trafficking of the fragments into the Golgi compartment.

Glycerol velocity gradient centrifugation of CHAPSO-solubilized PS1 was performed under conditions where inhibitor treatment resulted in an increase in PS1-FL, but with significant amounts of fragments remaining (serving as an internal control). Western blot analysis of the gradient fractions revealed that both PS1 fragments and PS1-FL accumulated in a complex of identical molecular mass at ~350 kDa (peak immunoreactivity spanning fractions 8-11; Fig. 7, A and B). Both gradients essentially showed an identical distribution of all PS1 polypeptides, as well as the marker proteins beta APP and beta -catenin. PS1-NTF and PS1-CTF were co-enriched in the same fractions, confirming that the PS1 complex was preserved under the conditions used. These data provide evidence that PS1-FL is incorporated into high molecular weight complexes in a similar manner to its fragments.


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Incorporation of PS1-FL and its fragments into identical complexes and sorting of PS1-FL. SH-SY5Y cells were treated with vehicle Me2SO (A) or CBAP (10 µM) (B) for 2 days and PS1 complexes analyzed by glycerol velocity gradient centrifugation. Acetone precipitates of each fraction were immunoblotted for beta APP, PS1-CTF (00/2), PS1-FL, and PS1-NTF (98/1) as indicated. Following antibody stripping, the beta APP filter was re-probed for beta -catenin. Marker proteins separated on identical gradients are indicated by arrows. C, SH-SY5Y cells were treated with CBAP (10 µM) for 3 days and cellular organelles separated by sucrose density gradient centrifugation. Aliquots of individual fractions were immunoblotted for beta APP, beta -COP, and PS1-FL and -NTF as indicated. Following antibody stripping, the same filter was re-probed for calnexin.

To analyze the sorting of PS1-FL, membranous organelles from CBAP-treated SH-SY5Y cells were separated by sucrose density gradient centrifugation and the individual fractions probed for PS1 and marker proteins by Western blotting (Fig. 7C). In contrast to the selective accumulation of PS1-FL polypeptides in the ER fraction that is observed in PS1-transfected cell lines (47, 48), we found that, remarkably, PS1-FL was detected across the whole gradient and that this distribution was identical to its fragments. Both uncleaved polypeptide and PS1-NTF were present in ER fractions, as defined by the enrichment of the ER marker protein calnexin (fractions 2-4; Fig. 7C), and Golgi fractions, containing the Golgi-specific protein beta -COP (49) (fraction 5; Fig. 7C) and higher glycosylated, mature beta APP (fractions 4-6; Fig. 7C). These data indicate that cleavage of PS1-FL into its fragments is not required for its trafficking from ER to Golgi compartments.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Our data demonstrate that certain potent and structurally diverse gamma -secretase inhibitors either identified by ourselves such as L-685,458, or others (compounds 5 and 6; Ref. 28) cause a cellular accumulation of PS1-FL. This effect is immediate, indicating that as soon as one of these compounds enters cells it inhibits separate processing events simultaneously: presenilin/gamma -secretase cleavage of beta APP and Notch and PS1-FL endoproteolysis.

Detailed structure-activity relationship analyses of these two processes led to the discovery of a novel L-685,458 derivative, CBAP, which enabled us to determine the principle mechanism underlying our initial observations. The accumulation of PS1-FL could be explained by interfering nonspecifically with its degradation by the proteasome system. This system has been shown to degrade PS1-FL rapidly (50), leading to half-lives of ~1.5 h for the full-length polypeptide in PS1-transfected cells (51). However, the knock-down of PS1 fragments, observed exclusively upon chronic treatment of cells with CBAP, unambiguously demonstrates that the inhibitors directly block the endoproteolytic cleavage of the PS1-FL polypeptide into its fragments. Mechanistically, this could be explained in a number of ways: (i) direct inhibition of the putative enzyme responsible for the cleavage of PS1-FL ("presenilinase"), (ii) indirect inhibition of presenilinase cleavage as a consequence of binding to and changing the conformation of PS1-FL, and (iii) binding to PS1-FL and interfering with intramolecular autoproteolysis. Although our data do not provide conclusive evidence to determine which of these possibilities is correct, we have made several key observations. First, L-685,458 shows greater than 100-fold selectivity over other classes of proteases, including aspartyl proteases such as HIV-1 and cathepsin D (25), and structural modifications that abolish gamma -secretase inhibition concomitantly lead to a loss of an inhibition of PS1 processing (e.g. compounds 1 and 8). Accordingly, for endoproteolytic cleavage to be mediated by a molecularly distinct presenilinase, this enzyme would require a pharmacological profile very similar to gamma -secretase itself, an explanation that as yet would appear unlikely.

Two of the above possibilities require active site-directed transition state analogue inhibitors to bind to PS1-FL, considered to be a zymogen. We have no direct biochemical evidence to date that any of our inhibitors bind to PS1-FL, and previous work has shown that PS1-FL could not be cross-linked in vitro to specific photoprobes derived from L-685,458 (26) using membranes from cells overexpressing PS1. It still remains to be seen whether photoprobes may be able to cross-link to PS1-FL in cells. If untransfected cells are used, where PS1 trafficking and complex formation should resemble the in vivo situation, the minute amounts of holoprotein present in these cells will make this an extremely difficult task. Hence, it cannot be ruled out completely that, at high concentrations, certain inhibitors bind to PS1-FL in vivo. The compounds described herein have been identified and selected based on their ability to inhibit Abeta peptide production, and it is therefore not surprising that the potencies for Abeta inhibition do not necessarily mirror the inhibition of PS1 endoproteolysis. Furthermore, it is likely that processing of PS1-FL into its fragments results in a conformationally distinct entity. Complexes containing PS1-FL and those containing its fragments are therefore likely to constitute independent binding sites, and only compounds with a reasonable affinity for the former would be able to block the endoproteolysis of PS1. This could explain why some potent inhibitors of Abeta formation, such as compound 4 and others (data not shown), were not able to block PS1-FL cleavage and why higher concentrations of compounds are needed to inhibit PS1 endoproteolysis compared with gamma -secretase inhibition.

Using CBAP as a tool to shift the steady-state levels of PS1 fragments toward the full-length polypeptide in vivo, we could address the question of accumulation of PS1-FL in the ER of transfected cell lines and the structural requirements for PS1/gamma -secretase complex formation. PS1 fragments are known to be components of a high molecular weight complex, which may include beta -catenin (48), the recently cloned transmembrane glycoprotein nicastrin (52), and possibly others. Analyses of cells overexpressing PS1 suggested that under this paradigm exogenous wild-type PS1-FL is present in a different complex of lower molecular weight (48). When solubilized PS1 from CBAP-treated cells was analyzed by rate-zonal glycerol velocity gradient centrifugation, we observed that both endogenous wild-type PS1-FL and its fragments are incorporated in a complex of identical molecular mass (~350 kDa). We explored this further by determining the structural requirements for trafficking of PS1 from the ER to Golgi compartments. Subcellular fractionation of organelles from CBAP-treated cells provided evidence that both PS1 fragments and PS1-FL follow the same sorting pathway. This is again in contrast to the clear separation of PS1 fragments and PS1-FL described previously in transfected cell lines (47). Accordingly, our data argue that the accumulation of PS1-FL in the ER fraction of transfected cells is not caused by the lack of cleavage but must be a direct result of the artificial overexpression of the polypeptide. Taken together these data support the hypothesis of a "limiting stoichiometric cofactor" (46), which would be necessary for the protein to exit the ER compartment. Because PS1-FL is incorporated into a high molecular weight complex in inhibitor-treated cells, it is likely that this factor binds to PS1-FL immediately after its synthesis, enabling the protein to be shuttled to the Golgi compartment. Cleavage into its fragments might be facilitated by the factor, or it may occur during the subsequent transport from the ER to the Golgi compartment, but our data clearly demonstrate that it is neither a structural requirement for trafficking nor for complex assembly.

We have used the inhibitors described herein to determine which aberrant phenotypes in PS1 inactivated or deleted systems are related to a loss of protease function, against those caused by the physical absence of the PS1 polypeptide. All inhibitors analyzed were found to block the intramembranous cleavage of NotchDelta E polypeptide at the S3 site, thereby inhibiting NICD formation. These results support previous findings (45) and strengthen the view that PS1 forms an essential component of the active site of gamma -secretase. Moreover, neither a preferential inhibition of one of the beta APP gamma -cleavages at position 40 or 42 nor the Notch S3 cleavage was observed. Inhibition of beta APP gamma -cleavage without affecting Notch processing has been reported for a class of inhibitors containing an isocoumarin core, characteristic of chymotrypsin inhibitors (53). The compounds described in that study, however, were 10,000-200,000-fold less potent inhibitors than the ones described here. It will be interesting to see in the future if selectivity of the isocoumarin-type inhibitors can be maintained over a larger concentration range and if derivatives can be identified that are several orders of magnitude more potent. In contrast to the Notch data, treatment of cortical neurons with gamma -secretase inhibitors did not recapitulate the impairment in Trk receptor maturation, another aberrant phenotype that has been described in PS1 knock-out animals (39). This indicates that inhibition of protease activity does not affect this function of presenilin, which points toward a role for PS1 in membrane protein trafficking (39).

The discovery of novel properties of gamma -secretase inhibitors related to secretase activity and presenilin endoproteolysis provides highly specific tools, which can be utilized to obtain a better understanding of the biological impact of inhibiting presenilin, beta APP, and Notch processing. Resolving this issue is of utmost interest, as specific gamma -secretase inhibitors that block PS1-associated protease functions are expected to be valuable therapeutic agents to combat AD pathology.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Janetta Culvenor for 98/1 and 00/2 antisera, Maria Kounnas for the R7334 antiserum, Sangram Sisodia for providing the anti-PS1 loop antiserum, Christine Haldon for tissue culture expertise, Jamie Bilsland and Sarah Harper for preparation of primary neurons, Adrian Smith and Joseph Neduvelil for the synthesis of compound 2 and L-852,646, respectively, and Ian Churcher for compounds 5 and 6. We are grateful to David Williams for technical assistance and to Neil Wilkie and Scott Pollack for providing their protocol for Trk receptor immunoprecipitation.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-1279-440478; Fax: 44-1279-440712; E-mail: dirk_beher@merck.com.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 26, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M103075200

2 D. Beher, unpublished observation.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: AD, Alzheimer's disease; beta APP, beta -amyloid precursor protein; Abeta , amyloid-beta peptide; PS1/2, presenilin 1/2; PS1-FL, full-length presenilin 1; NTF, N-terminal fragment; CTF, C-terminal fragment; NICD, Notch intracellular domain; HEK293, human embryonic kidney 293; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; CHAPSO, 3-[(3-chloramidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-2-hydroxy-1-propanesulfonate; CBAP, {1S-benzyl-4R-[1-(5-cyclohexyl-2-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[e][1,4]diazepin-3(R,S)-ylcarbamoyl)-S-ethylcarbamoyl]-2R-hydroxy-5-phenyl-pentyl}-carbamic acid tert-butyl ester; EDC, 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride; HOBT, 1-hydroxybenzotriazole hydrate; TBS, Tris-buffered saline.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Glenner, G. G., and Wong, C. W. (1984) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 120, 885-890
2. Masters, C. L., Simms, G., Weinman, N. A., Multhaup, G., McDonald, B. L., and Beyreuther, K. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 4245-4249
3. Hardy, J. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 2095-2097
4. Hardy, J. (1997) Trends Neurosci. 20, 154-159
5. Kang, J., Lemaire, H. G., Unterbeck, A., Salbaum, J. M., Masters, C. L., Grzeschik, K. H., Multhaup, G., Beyreuther, K., and Muller-Hill, B. (1987) Nature 325, 733-736
6. Chartier-Harlin, M. C., Crawford, F., Houlden, H., Warren, A., Hughes, D., Fidani, L., Goate, A., Rossor, M., Roques, P., and Hardy, J. (1991) Nature 353, 844-846
7. Goate, A., Chartier-Harlin, M. C., Mullan, M., Brown, J., Crawford, F., Fidani, L., Giuffra, L., Haynes, A., Irving, N., and James, L. (1991) Nature 349, 704-706
8. Esch, F. S., Keim, P. S., Beattie, E. C., Blacher, R. W., Culwell, A. R., Oltersdorf, T., McClure, D., and Ward, P. J. (1990) Science 248, 1122-1124
9. Buxbaum, J. D., Liu, K. N., Luo, Y., Slack, J. L., Stocking, K. L., Peschon, J. J., Johnson, R. S., Castner, B. J., Cerretti, D. P., and Black, R. A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 27765-27767
10. Lammich, S., Kojro, E., Postina, R., Gilbert, S., Pfeiffer, R., Jasionowski, M., Haass, C., and Fahrenholz, F. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 3922-3927
11. Vassar, R., Bennett, B. D., Babu-Khan, S., Kahn, S., Mendiaz, E. A., Denis, P., Teplow, D. B., Ross, S., Amarante, P., Loeloff, R., Luo, Y., Fisher, S., Fuller, J., Edenson, S., Lile, J., Jarosinski, M. A., Biere, A. L., Curran, E., Burgess, T., Louis, J. C., Collins, F., Treanor, J., Rogers, G., and Citron, M. (1999) Science 286, 735-741
12. Hussain, I., Powell, D., Howlett, D. R., Tew, D. G., Meek, T. D., Chapman, C., Gloger, I. S., Murphy, K. E., Southan, C. D., Ryan, D. M., Smith, T. S., Simmons, D. L., Walsh, F. S., Dingwall, C., and Christie, G. (1999) Mol. Cell Neurosci. 14, 419-427
13. Lin, X., Koelsch, G., Wu, S., Downs, D., Dashti, A., and Tang, J. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 1456-1460
14. Sinha, S., Anderson, J. P., Barbour, R., Basi, G. S., Caccavello, R., Davis, D., Doan, M., Dovey, H. F., Frigon, N., Hong, J., Jacobson-Croak, K., Jewett, N., Keim, P., Knops, J., Lieberburg, I., Power, M., Tan, H., Tatsuno, G., Tung, J., Schenk, D., Seubert, P., Suomensaari, S. M., Wang, S., Walker, D., and John, V. (1999) Nature 402, 537-540
15. Yan, R., Bienkowski, M. J., Shuck, M. E., Miao, H., Tory, M. C., Pauley, A. M., Brashier, J. R., Stratman, N. C., Mathews, W. R., Buhl, A. E., Carter, D. B., Tomasselli, A. G., Parodi, L. A., Heinrikson, R. L., and Gurney, M. E. (1999) Nature 402, 533-537
16. Levy-Lahad, E., Wasco, W., Poorkaj, P., Romano, D. M., Oshima, J., Pettingell, W. H., Yu, C. E., Jondro, P. D., Schmidt, S. D., and Wang, K. (1995) Science 269, 973-977
17. Levy-Lahad, E., Wijsman, E. M., Nemens, E., Anderson, L., Goddard, K. A., Weber, J. L., Bird, T. D., and Schellenberg, G. D. (1995) Science 269, 970-973
18. Rogaev, E. I., Sherrington, R., Rogaeva, E. A., Levesque, G., Ikeda, M., Liang, Y., Chi, H., Lin, C., Holman, K., and Tsuda, T. (1995) Nature 376, 775-778
19. Sherrington, R., Rogaev, E. I., Liang, Y., Rogaeva, E. A., Levesque, G., Ikeda, M., Chi, H., Lin, C., Li, G., and Holman, K. (1995) Nature 375, 754-760
20. De Strooper, B., Saftig, P., Craessaerts, K., Vanderstichele, H., Guhde, G., Annaert, W., Von Figura, K., and Van Leuven, F. (1998) Nature 391, 387-390
21. Thinakaran, G., Borchelt, D. R., Lee, M. K., Slunt, H. H., Spitzer, L., Kim, G., Ratovitsky, T., Davenport, F., Nordstedt, C., Seeger, M., Hardy, J., Levey, A. I., Gandy, S. E., Jenkins, N. A., Copeland, N. G., Price, D. L., and Sisodia, S. S. (1996) Neuron 17, 181-190
22. Kimberly, W. T., Xia, W., Rahmati, T., Wolfe, M. S., and Selkoe, D. J. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 3173-3178
23. Wolfe, M. S., De Los, A. J., Miller, D. D., Xia, W., and Selkoe, D. J. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 11223-11230
24. Li, Y. M., Lai, M. T., Xu, M., Huang, Q., DiMuzio-Mower, J., Sardana, M. K., Shi, X. P., Yin, K. C., Shafer, J. A., and Gardell, S. J. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 6138-6143
25. Shearman, M. S., Beher, D., Clarke, E. E., Lewis, H. D., Harrison, T., Hunt, P., Nadin, A., Smith, A. L., Stevenson, G., and Castro, J. L. (2000) Biochemistry 38, 8698-8704
26. Li, Y. M., Xu, M., Lai, M. T., Huang, Q., Castro, J. L., DiMuzio-Mower, J., Harrison, T., Lellis, C., Nadin, A., Neduvelil, J. G., Register, R. B., Sardana, M. K., Shearman, M. S., Smith, A. L., Shi, X. P., Yin, K. C., Shafer, J. A., and Gardell, S. J. (2000) Nature 405, 689-694
27. Esler, W. P., Kimberly, W. T., Ostaszewski, B. L., Diehl, T. S., Moore, C. L., Tsai, J. Y., Rahmati, T., Xia, W., Selkoe, D. J., and Wolfe, M. S. (2000) Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 428-434
28. Seiffert, D., Bradley, J. D., Rominger, C. M., Rominger, D. H., Yang, F., Meredith, J. E., Jr., Wang, Q., Roach, A. H., Thompson, L. A., Spitz, S. M., Higaki, J. N., Prakash, S. R., Combs, A. P., Copeland, R. A., Arneric, S. P., Hartig, P. R., Robertson, D. W., Cordell, B., Stern, A. M., Olson, R. E., and Zaczek, R. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 34086-34091
29. Wolfe, M. S., Xia, W., Ostaszewski, B. L., Diehl, T. S., Kimberly, W. T., and Selkoe, D. J. (1999) Nature 398, 513-517
30. Evin, G., Sharples, R. A., Weidemann, A., Reinhard, F. B., Carbone, V., Culvenor, J. G., Holsinger, R. M., Sernee, M. F., Beyreuther, K., and Masters, C. L. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 8359-8368
31. Culvenor, J. G., Evin, G., Cooney, M. A., Wardan, H., Sharples, R. A., Maher, F., Reed, G., Diehlmann, A., Weidemann, A., Beyreuther, K., and Masters, C. L. (2000) Exp. Cell Res. 255, 192-206
32. Kopan, R., Schroeter, E. H., Weintraub, H., and Nye, J. S. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 1683-1688
33. Dyrks, T., Dyrks, E., Monning, U., Urmoneit, B., Turner, J., and Beyreuther, K. (1993) FEBS Lett. 335, 89-93
34. Hill, H. D., and Straka, J. G. (1988) Anal. Biochem. 170, 203-208
35. Beher, D., Elle, C., Underwood, J., Davis, J. B., Ward, R., Karran, E., Masters, C. L., Beyreuther, K., and Multhaup, G. (1999) J. Neurochem. 72, 1564-1573
36. Khorkova, O. E., Patel, K., Heroux, J., and Sahasrabudhe, S. (1998) J. Neurosci. Methods 82, 159-166
37. Yang, H., Leland, J. K., Yost, D., and Massey, R. J. (1994) Bio/Technology 12, 193-194
38. Bilsland, J. G., and Harper, S. J. (1998) J. Neurosci. Methods 84, 121-130
39. Naruse, S., Thinakaran, G., Luo, J. J., Kusiak, J. W., Tomita, T., Iwatsubo, T., Qian, X., Ginty, D. D., Price, D. L., Borchelt, D. R., Wong, P. C., and Sisodia, S. S. (1998) Neuron 21, 1213-1221
40. deSolms, S. J., Giuliani, E. A., Guare, J. P., Vacca, J. P., Sanders, W. M., Graham, S. L., Wiggins, J. M., Darke, P. L., Sigal, I. S., and Zugay, J. A. (1991) J. Med. Chem. 34, 2852-2857
41. Chambers, M. S., Hobbs, S. C., Fletcher, S. R., Matassa, V. G., Mitchell, P. J., Watt, A. P., Baker, R., Freedman, S. B., Patel, S., and Smith, A. J. (1993) Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 3, 1919-1924
42. Katritzky, A. R., Urogdi, L., and Mayence, A. (1990) J. Org. Chem. 55, 2206-2214
43. Sherrill, R. G., and Sugg, E. E. (1995) J. Org. Chem. 60, 730-734
44. Nadin, A., Sanchez Lopez, J. M., Neduvelil, J. G., and Thomas, S. R. (2001) Tetrahedron 57, 1861-1864
45. De Strooper, B., Annaert, W., Cupers, P., Saftig, P., Craessaerts, K., Mumm, J. S., Schroeter, E. H., Schrijvers, V., Wolfe, M. S., Ray, W. J., Goate, A., and Kopan, R. (1999) Nature 398, 518-522
46. Thinakaran, G., Harris, C. L., Ratovitski, T., Davenport, F., Slunt, H. H., Price, D. L., Borchelt, D. R., and Sisodia, S. S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 28415-28422
47. Zhang, J., Kang, D. E., Xia, W., Okochi, M., Mori, H., Selkoe, D. J., and Koo, E. H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 12436-12442
48. Yu, G., Chen, F., Levesque, G., Nishimura, M., Zhang, D. M., Levesque, L., Rogaeva, E., Xu, D., Liang, Y., Duthie, M., George-Hyslop, P. H., and Fraser, P. E. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 16470-16475
49. Duden, R., Griffiths, G., Frank, R., Argos, P., and Kreis, T. E. (1991) Cell 64, 649-665
50. Steiner, H., Capell, A., Pesold, B., Citron, M., Kloetzel, P. M., Selkoe, D. J., Romig, H., Mendla, K., and Haass, C. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 32322-32331
51. Ratovitski, T., Slunt, H. H., Thinakaran, G., Price, D. L., Sisodia, S. S., and Borchelt, D. R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24536-24541
52. Yu, G., Nishimura, M., Arawaka, S., Levitan, D., Zhang, L., Tandon, A., Song, Y. Q., Rogaeva, E., Chen, F., Kawarai, T., Supala, A., Levesque, L., Yu, H., Yang, D. S., Holmes, E., Milman, P., Liang, Y., Zhang, D. M., Xu, D. H., Sato, C., Rogaev, E., Smith, M., Janus, C., Zhang, Y., Aebersold, R., Farrer, L. S., Sorbi, S., Bruni, A., Fraser, P., and George-Hyslop, P. (2000) Nature 407, 48-54
53. Petit, A., Bihel, F., Alves da Costa, C., Pourquie, O., Checler, F., and Kraus, J. L. (2001) Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 507-511
54. Clarke, E. E., and Shearman, M. S. (2000) J. Neurosci. Methods 102, 61-68


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. E. Clarke, I. Churcher, S. Ellis, J. D. J. Wrigley, H. D. Lewis, T. Harrison, M. S. Shearman, and D. Beher
Intra- or Intercomplex Binding to the {gamma}-Secretase Enzyme: A MODEL TO DIFFERENTIATE INHIBITOR CLASSES
J. Biol. Chem., October 20, 2006; 281(42): 31279 - 31289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. E. Kang, I. S. Yoon, E. Repetto, T. Busse, N. Yermian, L. Ie, and E. H. Koo
Presenilins Mediate Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/AKT and ERK Activation via Select Signaling Receptors: SELECTIVITY OF PS2 IN PLATELET-DERIVED GROWTH FACTOR SIGNALING
J. Biol. Chem., September 9, 2005; 280(36): 31537 - 31547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Nakaya, T. Yamane, H. Shiraishi, H.-Q. Wang, E. Matsubara, T. Sato, G. Dolios, R. Wang, B. De Strooper, M. Shoji, et al.
Random Mutagenesis of Presenilin-1 Identifies Novel Mutants Exclusively Generating Long Amyloid {beta}-Peptides
J. Biol. Chem., May 13, 2005; 280(19): 19070 - 19077.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. D. J. Wrigley, I. Schurov, E. J. Nunn, A. C. L. Martin, E. E. Clarke, S. Ellis, T. P. Bonnert, M. S. Shearman, and D. Beher
Functional Overexpression of {gamma}-Secretase Reveals Protease-independent Trafficking Functions and a Critical Role of Lipids for Protease Activity
J. Biol. Chem., April 1, 2005; 280(13): 12523 - 12535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Beher, E. E. Clarke, J. D. J. Wrigley, A. C. L. Martin, A. Nadin, I. Churcher, and M. S. Shearman
Selected Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Their Derivatives Target {gamma}-Secretase at a Novel Site: EVIDENCE FOR AN ALLOSTERIC MECHANISM
J. Biol. Chem., October 15, 2004; 279(42): 43419 - 43426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
X.-X. Yan, T. Li, C. M. Rominger, S. R. Prakash, P. C. Wong, R. E. Olson, R. Zaczek, and Y.-W. Li
Binding Sites of {gamma}-Secretase Inhibitors in Rodent Brain: Distribution, Postnatal Development, and Effect of Deafferentation
J. Neurosci., March 24, 2004; 24(12): 2942 - 2952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Lleo, O. Berezovska, P. Ramdya, H. Fukumoto, S. Raju, T. Shah, and B. T. Hyman
Notch1 Competes with the Amyloid Precursor Protein for {gamma}-Secretase and Down-regulates Presenilin-1 Gene Expression
J. Biol. Chem., November 28, 2003; 278(48): 47370 - 47375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. H. Searfoss, W. H. Jordan, D. O. Calligaro, E. J. Galbreath, L. M. Schirtzinger, B. R. Berridge, H. Gao, M. A. Higgins, P. C. May, and T. P. Ryan
Adipsin, a Biomarker of Gastrointestinal Toxicity Mediated by a Functional {gamma}-Secretase Inhibitor
J. Biol. Chem., November 14, 2003; 278(46): 46107 - 46116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
A. Aguzzi and C. Haass
Games Played by Rogue Proteins in Prion Disorders and Alzheimer's Disease
Science, October 31, 2003; 302(5646): 814 - 818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
O. Nyabi, M. Bentahir, K. Horre, A. Herreman, N. Gottardi-Littell, C. Van Broeckhoven, P. Merchiers, K. Spittaels, W. Annaert, and B. De Strooper
Presenilins Mutated at Asp-257 or Asp-385 Restore Pen-2 Expression and Nicastrin Glycosylation but Remain Catalytically Inactive in the Absence of Wild Type Presenilin
J. Biol. Chem., October 31, 2003; 278(44): 43430 - 43436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. P. Melchor, R. Pawlak, and S. Strickland
The Tissue Plasminogen Activator-Plasminogen Proteolytic Cascade Accelerates Amyloid-{beta} (A{beta}) Degradation and Inhibits A{beta}-Induced Neurodegeneration
J. Neurosci., October 1, 2003; 23(26): 8867 - 8871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Li, G. J. Fici, C.-A. Mao, R. L. Myers, R. Shuang, G. P. Donoho, A. M. Pauley, C. S. Himes, W. Qin, I. Kola, et al.
Positive and Negative Regulation of the {gamma}-Secretase Activity by Nicastrin in a Murine Model
J. Biol. Chem., August 29, 2003; 278(35): 33445 - 33449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
L. D. Plant, J. P. Boyle, I. F. Smith, C. Peers, and H. A. Pearson
The Production of Amyloid {beta} Peptide Is a Critical Requirement for the Viability of Central Neurons
J. Neurosci., July 2, 2003; 23(13): 5531 - 5535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. R. Farmery, L. O. Tjernberg, S. E. Pursglove, A. Bergman, B. Winblad, and J. Naslund
Partial Purification and Characterization of {gamma}-Secretase from Post-mortem Human Brain
J. Biol. Chem., June 27, 2003; 278(27): 24277 - 24284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X.-P. Shi, K. Tugusheva, J. E. Bruce, A. Lucka, G.-X. Wu, E. Chen-Dodson, E. Price, Y. Li, M. Xu, Q. Huang, et al.
{beta}-Secretase Cleavage at Amino Acid Residue 34 in the Amyloid {beta} Peptide Is Dependent upon {gamma}-Secretase Activity
J. Biol. Chem., May 30, 2003; 278(23): 21286 - 21294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Weihofen, M. K. Lemberg, E. Friedmann, H. Rueeger, A. Schmitz, P. Paganetti, G. Rovelli, and B. Martoglio
Targeting Presenilin-type Aspartic Protease Signal Peptide Peptidase with gamma -Secretase Inhibitors
J. Biol. Chem., May 2, 2003; 278(19): 16528 - 16533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. S. Grimm, D. Beher, S. F. Lichtenthaler, M. S. Shearman, K. Beyreuther, and T. Hartmann
gamma -Secretase Cleavage Site Specificity Differs for Intracellular and Secretory Amyloid beta
J. Biol. Chem., April 4, 2003; 278(15): 13077 - 13085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Gianni, N. Zambrano, M. Bimonte, G. Minopoli, L. Mercken, F. Talamo, A. Scaloni, and T. Russo
Platelet-derived Growth Factor Induces the beta -gamma -Secretase-mediated Cleavage of Alzheimer's Amyloid Precursor Protein through a Src-Rac-dependent Pathway
J. Biol. Chem., March 7, 2003; 278(11): 9290 - 9297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/48/45394    most recent
M103075200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beher, D.
Right arrow Articles by Shearman, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beher, D.
Right arrow Articles by Shearman, M. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement