|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M103075200 on September 26, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 48, 45394-45402, November 30, 2001
Pharmacological Knock-down of the Presenilin 1 Heterodimer by a
Novel -Secretase Inhibitor
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRESENILIN BIOLOGY*
Dirk
Beher §,
Jonathan D. J.
Wrigley ,
Alan
Nadin¶,
Geneviève
Evin ,
Colin L.
Masters ,
Timothy
Harrison¶,
José L.
Castro¶, and
Mark S.
Shearman
From the Departments of Biochemistry & Molecular
Biology and ¶ Medicinal Chemistry, Merck Sharp & Dohme Research
Laboratories, The Neuroscience Research Centre, Terlings Park, Harlow,
Essex CM20 2QR, United Kingdom and the Department of Pathology,
University of Melbourne, and Neuropathology Laboratory, Mental Health
Institute of Victoria, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
Received for publication, April 6, 2001, and in revised form, August 28, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Intramembranous cleavage of the
-amyloid precursor protein by -secretase is the final processing
event generating amyloid- peptides, which are thought to be
causative agents for Alzheimer's disease. Missense mutations in the
presenilin genes co-segregate with early-onset Alzheimer's disease,
and, recently, a close biochemical linkage between presenilins and the
identity of -secretase has been established. Here we describe for
the first time that certain potent -secretase inhibitors are able to
interfere with the endoproteolytic processing of presenilin 1 (PS1). In
addition, we identified a novel -secretase inhibitor,
{1S-benzyl-4R-[1-(5-cyclohexyl-2-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[e][1,4]diazepin-3(R,S)-ylcarbamoyl)-S-ethylcarbamoyl]-2R-hydroxy-5-phenyl-pentyl}-carbamic acid tert-butyl ester (CBAP), which not only physically
interacts with PS1, but upon chronic treatment produces a
"pharmacological knock-down" of PS1 fragments. This indicates that
the observed accumulation of full-length PS1 is caused by a direct
inhibition of its endoproteolysis. The subsequent use of CBAP as a
biological tool to increase full-length PS1 levels in the absence of
exogenous PS1 expression has provided evidence that wild-type PS1
endoproteolysis is not required either for PS1/ -secretase complex
assembly or trafficking. Furthermore, in cell-based systems CBAP does
not completely recapitulate PS1 loss-of-function phenotypes. Even though the -amyloid precursor protein cleavage and the S3 cleavage of the Notch receptor are inhibited by CBAP, an impairment of Trk receptor maturation was not observed.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Alzheimer's disease
(AD)1 is a progressive
neurodegenerative disorder of the central nervous system characterized
by an extracellular deposition of amyloid- peptide (A ) (1, 2) in
parenchymal senile plaques. Systematic genetic studies have led to the
identification of three genes causative for familial forms of the
disease, leading to increased production of a longer A peptide
species, A (1-42), which is more prone to aggregation than the
shorter and more predominant species, A (1-40) (for review, see
Refs. 3 and 4). The first gene identified was the -amyloid precursor
protein ( APP) (5-7) from which A is generated by two sequential
proteolytic cleavages mediated by - and -secretases. An
alternative processing pathway involves the cleavage of APP within
the A sequence by -secretase and prevents amyloid formation (8).
-Secretase cleavage appears to be mediated by members of the
disintegrin and metalloprotease family TACE (9) and ADAM-10 (10).
Recently, a membrane-bound aspartyl protease has been cloned and
characterized as -secretase (BACE, Asp-2) (11-15). Novel evidence
has highlighted a critical role of presenilin as the most likely
candidate for -secretase itself. Mutations in the presenilin 1 and 2 (PS1 and PS2) genes are known to account for the majority of familial
Alzheimer's disease cases (16-19). Studies performed with neurons
from PS1-knock-out embryos have shown that PS1 is essential for
-secretase activity (20). Presenilins are polytopic membrane
proteins that undergo endoproteolytic processing within their putative
loop region, yielding N-terminal and C-terminal polypeptides (PS1-NTF
and PS1-CTF) thought to consist of six and two transmembrane domains,
respectively (21). Mutagenesis of either of two aspartate residues in
transmembrane domains 6 or 7 of PS1 inactivates -secretase and
blocks endoproteolysis (22, 23). Because these aspartates are critical
for PS1 function, it has been proposed that PS1 is either a novel
membrane-bound aspartyl protease or an essential di-aspartyl cofactor
for the enzyme (23). This is further supported by the findings that PS1
is linked with -secretase activity in the detergent-solubilized state (24) and that photoactivated derivatives of
L-685,458, a highly specific and potent aspartyl protease
transition state analogue inhibitor of -secretase (25), bind
selectively and directly to PS1 fragments (26). Others have reported
similar covalent labeling of affinity probes to presenilins using
either a transition-state mimic (27) or a novel peptidomimetic
-secretase inhibitor (28). Moreover, evidence has been generated
that full-length PS1 (PS1-FL) might be a zymogen (26), which could be
activated by a putative autocleavage event within its loop region (29). One prediction of this model is that an inhibitor of -secretase that
binds to PS1 should interfere with its endoproteolysis. We report that
a novel -secretase inhibitor, CBAP, not only blocks PS1
endoproteolysis, but upon chronic treatment, induces a
"pharmacological knock-down" of PS1 fragments. We have
subsequently used CBAP to gain novel insights into the assembly and
trafficking of the high molecular weight PS1/ -secretase complexes,
without artificial overexpression of the polypeptide. Furthermore, we
provide evidence that the proteolytic activity associated with
PS1/ -secretase necessary for the cleavage of APP and the S3
cleavage of the Notch receptor can be dissociated from its function in
membrane protein trafficking. This suggests that phenotypes resulting
from the absence of presenilin expression are not completely
recapitulated by -secretase inhibition.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Antibodies--
Monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies were
obtained from the following sources and diluted for Western blot
analyses as indicated: anti- APP (22C11, Roche Molecular
Biochemicals, 0.5 µg/ml), anti-calnexin (StressGen, 1:2,500),
anti- -catenin (Transduction Laboratories, 1:1,000), anti-c-Myc
(9E10, Calbiochem, 1:400), anti- -COP (Sigma, 1:500), biotinylated
anti-A 4G8 (Senetek), polyclonal anti-rat Grp 78 (BiP, Calbiochem,
1:4,000), horseradish peroxidase-conjugated polyclonal goat anti-mouse
and anti-rabbit antibodies (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, 1:5,000), and
polyclonal antiserum R7334 (raised against residues 659-694 of
APP695, provided by M. Kounnas (Merck Research
Laboratories, San Diego, CA), 1:750). PS1-FL and its fragments were
detected using a polyclonal antiserum raised against the PS1 loop
region (1:2,500) (21), polyclonal antiserum 00/2 raised against the
loop peptide 301-317 (30) (1:2,000), and polyclonal antiserum 98/1
raised against residues 1-20 of PS1 (1:2,500) (31).
Complementary DNA Constructs--
A 2,070-base pair
HindIII-SnaBI restriction fragment encoding the
c-Myc-tagged Notch E(M1727V) (32) was subcloned into the HindIII-EcoRV-digested pcDNA3.1/Zeo(+)
expression vector (Invitrogen).
Cell Culture and Cell Lines--
Human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma
cell lines either untransfected or stably transfected with SPA4CT (33)
were maintained under standard conditions. For treatment with
compounds, cells were plated at 60% confluence into 10-cm diameter
dishes 1 day prior to treatment. Compounds were dissolved in
Me2SO and added the next day, yielding a final
Me2SO concentration of 0.1% (v/v). For generation of an
HEK293 cell line stably overexpressing both APP695 and
murine Notch E polypeptides, an HEK293 cell line stably overexpressing APP695 (25) was transfected with
Notch E(M1727V) pcDNA3.1/Zeo(+) using standard calcium phosphate
methods. Transfectants were cultured in the presence of 1 µg/ml
puromycin (Sigma) to maintain APP expression and 100 µg/ml zeocin
(Life Technologies, Inc.) to select for Notch E(M1727V) expression.
After dilution, individual surviving colonies were picked and screened
for the expression of both APP695 and Notch E(M1727V)
by Western blotting.
Membrane Preparation and Solubilization of Membrane Proteins for
Analysis of PS1 Polypeptides--
The cells were broken by trituration
in 1 ml of TBS (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM
NaCl), and membranes were sedimented by centrifugation for 30 min at
65,000 rpm in a TLA-100.2 rotor (Beckman) at 4 °C. Membrane proteins
were solubilized in TBS, 1% Triton X-100, 1× EDTA-free protease
inhibitor mixture (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) by trituration, and
after incubation for 30 min on ice, insoluble debris was removed by
centrifugation for 10 min at 20,000 × g, 4 °C.
Protein concentrations of the supernatants were determined using the
bicinchoninic acid assay (34) in a 96-well plate format according to
the manufacturer's instructions (Pierce & Warriner).
Extraction of Protein from Whole Cells for the Analysis of
Notch E Processing--
Cell extracts from whole cells were prepared
by sonication for 5 min in TBS, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% Nonidet-P40,
0.2% SDS, 1 mM EDTA, 1× EDTA-free protease inhibitor
mixture after incubation for 30 min at 4 °C. Insoluble debris was
removed by centrifugation for 10 min at 20,000 × g and
protein levels normalized as described above.
Western Blot Analyses--
Equal amounts of protein
were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and
transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Probing of the membranes was
carried out with various antibodies, as indicated in the figure
legends, using the enhanced chemiluminescence system (ECL, Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech). Quantitation of bands using a computerized image
analysis system (MCID, Imaging Research Inc.) was performed as
described previously (35).
Quantification of A Peptides in Conditioned Cell Culture
Media--
A peptides secreted into the media were quantified by an
ECL assay as described (24) in an analogous 96-well plate format (Refs.
36 and 37; Origen M-SeriesTM analyzer, Igen).
Subcellular Fractionation and Sucrose Density Gradient
Centrifugation--
Human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells were harvested,
pre-swollen by incubation for 8 min in 20 mM HEPES-HCl, pH
7.3, 10 mM KCl, and collected by centrifugation for 10 min
at 1,000 × g. Cells were homogenized in 20 mM HEPES-HCl, pH 7.3, 90 mM KCl, and nuclei and
cellular debris were removed by centrifugation for 10 min at 1,000 × g. Cellular membranes were sedimented by centrifugation for 1 h at 45,000 rpm (50.2 Ti rotor, Beckman), resuspended in 1 ml of 0.2 M sucrose, 5 mM HEPES-HCl, pH 7.3, and layered on top of a linear continuous sucrose gradient (0.2-2
M). Gradients were centrifuged overnight at 100,000 gav (27,000 rpm, SW28.1 rotor, Beckman).
Fractions were collected (11×1.5 ml) from the bottom, diluted into 5 mM HEPES-HCl, pH 7.3, and membranes sedimented by
centrifugation for 1 h at 45,000 rpm (50.2 Ti rotor, Beckman). The
final pellets were homogenized in 100 µl of phosphate-buffered saline, 5% glycerol (v/v) and stored at 80 °C prior to immunoblot analysis.
UV Cross-linking of Photoreactive -Secretase
Inhibitors--
Membranes from SH-SY5Y cells were prepared as
described for sucrose gradients and solubilized using 20 mM
HEPES, pH 7.3, 2 mM EDTA, 1% CHAPSO (w/v) (26).
UV-photolabeling using the photoprobe L-852,646 at a final
concentration of 20 nM and the competing inhibitors
L-685,458 and CBAP at 2 µM final
concentration, respectively, was carried out as described (26).
Biotinylated proteins were captured using streptavidin-coated magnetic
beads (Dynal), precipitated by magnetic separation, and subjected to
immunoblotting after addition of SDS-PAGE sample buffer.
Rate Zonal Glycerol Velocity Gradient
Centrifugation--
CHAPSO-solubilised membranes from SH-SY5Y cells
were prepared as described for sucrose density gradients and
solubilized in 0.15 M NaCl, 25 mM HEPES, pH
7.3, 1% CHAPSO (w/v) according to described procedures (26). Prior to
loading, solubilized membranes were diluted with an equal volume of
buffer (0.15 M NaCl, 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.3)
yielding 0.5% CHAPSO (w/v) final concentration (which is the optimum
CHAPSO concentration for recovery of solubilized -secretase activity
from SH-SY5Y membranes).2
After centrifugation for 15 min at 4 °C and 50,000 rpm (TLA-120.2 rotor, Beckman), 400 µl of supernatant was applied to the top of a
10-40% (v/v) linear glycerol gradient. After centrifugation for
26 h at 4 °C and 28,000 rpm (SW28.1 rotor, Beckman), 17 fractions were collected (16 1-ml fractions and 1 0.4-ml fraction) from the bottom. Bovine serum albumin (15 µg) was added to 250-µl
aliquots of each fraction, followed by precipitation with five volumes of acetone chilled to 20 °C.
Primary Cortical Cultures and Pulse-Chase Analysis of Trk
Receptor Maturation--
Primary rat cortical neurons were prepared as
described previously (38). Cells (1.75 × 106) were
plated into 6-cm dishes and incubated for 2 days with a change of media
and addition of fresh compound after the first day. Pulse-chase
labeling in the presence of CBAP (10 µM) or vehicle Me2SO was performed as described (39), and solubilized Trk
receptors were immunoprecipitated with a rabbit polyclonal anti-Trk
receptor agarose conjugate (Trk C, sc-139, cross-reactive with Trk A,
B, and C; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) prior to SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography.
Synthetic Chemistry--
L-685,458 (25),
L-852,646 (26), and L-682,679 (40) were
prepared as described previously. Compounds 1-4 were prepared by
analogous methods and compounds 5 and 6 as described (28). Compound 7, {1S-benzyl-4R-[1-(5-cyclohexyl-2-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[e] (1, 4)diazepin-3(R,S)-ylcarbamoyl)-S-ethylcarbamoyl]-2R-hydroxy-5-phenyl-pentyl}-carbamic acid tert-butyl ester (CBAP), was synthesized as follows.
(R,S)-3-Amino-5-cyclohexyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-1,4-benzodiazepin-2-one.2HBr was prepared by the reaction of 2-aminophenyl cyclohexyl ketone (41)
with -benzotriazol-1-yl-N-(benzyloxycarbonyl)glycine (42) using the reported procedure (43). A solution of
3-amino-5-cyclohexyl-1,3-dihydro-2H-1,4-benzodiazepin-2-one.2HBr (210 mg, 0.50 mmol) in dimethylformamide (1 ml) was treated with 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC, 96 mg, 0.50 mmol), 1-hydroxybenzotriazole hydrate (HOBT, 75 mg, 0.55 mmol), triethylamine (0.14 ml, 1.0 mmol), and
butoxycarbonyl-L-alanine (93 mg, 0.50 mmol) and stirred
overnight at room temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted with
ethyl acetate; washed with citric acid solution, sodium bicarbonate
solution, and brine; dried (MgSO4); filtered; and
evaporated in vacuo. The crude product was dissolved in
trifluoroacetic acid, stirred at room temperature for 10 min, and
evaporated in vacuo. Purification by column chromatography (silica, eluant: CH2Cl2-MeOH-NH3
(90:10:1)) gave the alanyl-amide (135 mg, 82%) as a white solid. A
solution of the foregoing alanyl-amide (33 mg, 0.1 mmol),
2R-benzyl-5S-tert-butoxycarbonylamino-4R-(tert-butyldimethylsilanyloxy)-6-phenylhexanoic acid (44) (53 mg, 0.1 mmol), EDC (22 mg, 0.11 mmol), and HOBT (0.11 mmol) in dimethylformamide was stirred overnight at room temperature.
The reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate; washed with citric
acid solution, sodium bicarbonate solution, and brine; dried
(MgSO4); filtered; and evaporated in vacuo. The crude product was dissolved in tetra-n-butylammonium
fluoride (1.0 M solution in tetrahydrofuran, 1 ml) and
stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction mixture was
dissolved in ethyl acetate, washed with water, dried
(MgSO4), filtered, and evaporated in vacuo.
Purification by column chromatography (silica, eluant: ethyl acetate)
gave CBAP (31 mg, 44%) as a white solid. Compounds 7 (CBAP) and 8 are
both mixtures of diastereoisomers at the benzodiazepine C-3 position.
All new compounds gave satisfactory analytical and spectroscopic data.
 |
RESULTS |
Structure-Activity Relationship for Inhibition of PS1
Endoproteolysis and -Secretase Activity--
Following our initial
observation that treatment of SH-SY5Y cells for 16 h with 10 µM amount of the specific -secretase inhibitor L-685,458 results in an increase in PS1-FL steady-state
levels (Fig. 1A), we compared
a variety of derivatives for their potential to inhibit PS1-FL
endoproteolysis with their ability to inhibit APP -secretase
activity, monitored by inhibition of A peptide production (Fig. 1).
Most importantly, compounds that were inactive in regard to the
inhibition of -secretase, such as the diastereoisomer L-682,679 or the desbenzyl derivative (compound 1) did not
block the cleavage of PS1-FL (Fig. 1A). Compounds 2 and 3 are also effective inhibitors of PS1-FL endoproteolysis and
-secretase activity, indicating that, for both activities, changes
to the backbone amino acid side chains of L-685,458 are
well tolerated. Surprisingly, compound 4 with an extension to the
dipeptidyl moiety of L-685,458 is inactive in the PS1
cleavage assay (Fig. 1B), but still a potent inhibitor of
-secretase activity. Compounds 5 and 6 do not contain the
hydroxyethylene isostere but have been described as very potent inhibitors of -secretase activity (28). Both compounds increase PS1-FL polypeptide levels, suggesting that structurally unrelated inhibitors can cause an inhibition of PS1-FL cleavage. Compound 7 (CBAP), a chimeric molecule containing the L-685,458
isostere and a benzodiazepine group, was the only compound identified
of a large number of inhibitors (n 70; Fig. 1 and
data not shown) that, under the standard experimental protocol,
produced a strong increase in PS1-FL levels while concomitantly causing
a detectable reduction in the levels of PS1-NTF (Fig. 1B).
The specificity of this effect was further confirmed because the
derivative compound 8 (Fig. 1B), lacking the alanine residue
neighboring the isostere, is inactive for both inhibition of A
peptide production and PS1-FL cleavage.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Structure-activity relationship for
inhibition of -secretase activity and PS1
endoproteolysis. IC50 values for inhibition of
A (40) and A (42) production were determined using SH-SY5Y cells
stably transfected with SPA4CT. Reduction of A production was
measured relative to Me2SO-treated controls, and the data
represent the average of two independent experiments using duplicate
measurements in each. IC50 values were calculated by
nonlinear regression fit analysis using ActivityBase software (IDBS).
Cytotoxicity was measured in the corresponding cells by a colorimetric
cell proliferation assay (CellTiter 96TM AQ assay, Promega) according
to the manufacturer's instructions. No overt cytotoxicity was observed
at any concentration for any of the compounds tested (data not shown).
For analysis of the inhibition of PS1-FL cleavage, untransfected
SH-SY5Y cells were incubated under comparable experimental conditions
for 16 h with 10 µM compound as indicated. Equal
amounts of solubilized membranes (50 µg protein) from each dish were
separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with polyclonal 98/1 antiserum
detecting PS1-FL and PS1-NTF. For each compound the identical exposure
from the same blot for vehicle control (lane 1), 10 µM L-685,458 (lane 2), and 10 µM compound (lane 3) is shown.
Vertical bars indicate that lanes have been
spliced. PS1-FL polypeptides are indicated by filled
arrowheads and PS1-NTF by open
arrowheads. Note that compounds 5 and 6 have originally been
described as compounds D and E (28).
|
|
It is noteworthy that, in the cellular assay system used, all compounds
analyzed inhibit both A (40) and A (42) peptide production with
almost identical potencies. Using a colorimetric cell proliferation assay, no overt cytotoxicity was observed in the cells for any of the
compounds tested.
Pharmacological Knock-down of PS1 Fragments by CBAP--
Following
a chronic 7-day treatment of SH-SY5Y cells with CBAP, a stable increase
in PS1-FL accumulation was observed, together with an almost complete
inhibition of PS1 fragment formation (Fig. 2, A and B). Only
very weak PS1-NTF immunoreactivity was detectable (Fig. 2A),
and, when corresponding immunoblots were probed with an anti-loop
antiserum, PS1-CTF immunoreactivity was absent (Fig. 2B;
this slight discrepancy reflects the differing affinities of the
antisera used). As controls, cells were treated with vehicle, L-685,458, or compound 5 or 6 (Fig. 2), but only CBAP was
able to reduce PS1 fragment levels beyond the limit of detection for the antibody directed against the PS1-CTF. We describe this unique effect of CBAP as a pharmacological knock-down of PS1 fragments. As an
added control, all samples were immunoblotted for the unrelated -COP
Golgi protein (Fig. 2C). Identical immunoreactivities were observed in all samples, which excludes variations in the protein normalization procedure and nonspecific effects of the -secretase inhibitors on the cells.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Chronic treatment of cells with CBAP induces
a pharmacological knock-down of PS1 fragments. The expression of
PS1 in SH-SY5Y cells was analyzed after a treatment for 7 days with
Me2SO (DMSO) vehicle or with 10 µM
amounts of L-685,458, CBAP, or compound 5 or 6. Equal
amounts of solubilized membranes (50 µg of protein) from each dish
were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with polyclonal 98/1
antiserum detecting PS1-FL and PS1-NTF (A), polyclonal PS1
anti-loop antiserum detecting PS1-FL and PS1-CTF (B), or a
monoclonal antibody detecting -COP (C).
|
|
Time Course and Dose Response of Inhibition of PS1 Endoproteolysis
and -Secretase Activity--
L-685,458 and CBAP appear
to exert an immediate inhibitory action on both PS1 endoproteolysis and
APP -secretase activity, as seen by an increase in PS1-FL and
inhibition of A peptide secretion after only 2 h (the earliest
time point when A was measurable; Fig.
3, A and B). A
peptide release reaches a maximum after 6-8 h in the vehicle-treated
cells, whereas the inhibitor-treated cells do not release any
detectable quantities of A peptide at any time point (Fig.
3B). The accumulation of PS1-FL continues during the period
analyzed, because it requires the re-synthesis of PS1, which is the
critical rate-limiting step for the stabilization experiments (Fig.
3A). Taken together with the results of the chronic
treatment study (Fig. 2), these data indicate that CBAP does not act as
a -secretase inhibitor simply by blocking PS1 endoproteolysis;
-secretase enzyme activity is completely inhibited almost
immediately after addition of the compound to the cells, whereas a
significant knock-down of the PS1 fragments, which are believed to
represent the active enzyme, requires treatment for several days.
Mechanistically, inhibition of -secretase activity and PS1
endoproteolysis by CBAP appear to occur simultaneously. This inhibition
is dose-dependent (Fig. 3, C and D),
but the potency for A inhibition is not equipotent with inhibition
of PS1 endoproteolysis. The accumulation of APP -CTF (Fig.
3C) and inhibition of A peptide production (Fig. 1) occur
at concentrations lower than that needed to cause an accumulation of
PS1-FL (Fig. 3C). ED50 values for PS1-FL
accumulation for both L-685,458 and CBAP are in the low
micromolar range (Fig. 3D), whereas both inhibit A peptide production at nanomolar concentrations (Fig. 1).

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Kinetics and dose dependence of inhibition
of -secretase activity and PS1-FL
endoproteolysis. A, immunoblotting of solubilized
membranes (50 µg of protein) from SH-SY5Y cells stably transfected
with SPA4CT demonstrates the time course of inhibition of PS1-FL
cleavage in the presence of Me2SO (DMSO)
vehicle, L-685,458 (10 µM), or CBAP (10 µM). PS1-FL and PS1-NTF were stained with the 98/1
antiserum. B, A (40) peptide secretion from the identical
cells was quantitated by homogenous time-resolved fluorescence
( R = ratio sample ratio background) as
described (54). To obtain a dose-response profile, SH-SY5Y cells stably
transfected with SPA4CT were incubated overnight with increasing
concentrations of compounds as indicated. C, equal amounts
of solubilized membranes (50 µg of protein) were immunoblotted for
PS1-FL and PS1-NTF using antiserum 98/1 or for APP C-terminal
fragments using antiserum R7334. A dose-dependent
inhibition of A peptide production was observed in the corresponding
media (data not shown), which reflected the accumulation of APP
-CTF. D, shorter exposures of the immunoblots shown in
C were quantified by densitometry and the Me2SO
control values subtracted from each data point to plot the increase of
PS1-FL immunoreactivity in response to increasing compound
concentrations (conc.). PS1-FL accumulation is expressed as
relative optical densities of the bands multiplied by their areas
(D×A).
|
|
CBAP Binds Directly to PS1--
L-852,646, a
photoaffinity ligand derivative of L-685,458, can be
covalently cross-linked to PS1-NTF (26). Because CBAP was able to
induce a pharmacological knock-down of PS1 fragment formation by
stabilizing PS1-FL, we wished to determine whether this compound was
directed to the same binding site as L-852,646. In the
absence of a competing ligand, PS1-NTF was labeled, whereas, when added
to the reaction in 100-fold excess, both CBAP and L-685,458 specifically inhibited the photolabeling of PS1-NTF (Fig.
4). Based on the displacement of the
photoprobe by both inhibitors, we conclude that they bind to the same
or overlapping binding sites on the PS1-NTF.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
-Secretase inhibitors L-685,458
and CBAP bind to PS1-NTF. After UV-cross linking in the presence
of the biotinylated, photoreactive -secretase inhibitor
L-852,646 and streptavidin bead precipitation, samples were
probed with polyclonal 98/1 antiserum for PS1-NTF. Only in the absence
of competing compounds was PS1-NTF precipitated by streptavidin beads
(lane 1), whereas 100-fold excess of either
L-685,458 (lane 2) or CBAP (lane 3)
abolished the precipitation.
|
|
-Secretase Inhibitors and Presenilin Knock-out
Phenotypes--
Because of the intimate relationship between
-secretase and presenilins, we investigated whether -secretase
inhibitors are able to recapitulate aberrant phenotypes associated with
the inactivation by mutagenesis or knock-out of PS1. Our main aim was
to discriminate PS1/ -secretase-mediated substrate cleavage from PS1
functions associated with membrane protein trafficking. Release of the
Notch intracellular domain (NICD) upon activation of the Notch receptor requires presenilins (45) and is blocked by weak -secretase inhibitors, such as the peptide aldehydes MDL28170 and MG132, and the
difluoroketone peptide analogue MW167 (45). Western blot analyses of
c-Myc-tagged NICD from HEK293 APP695/Notch E cells
that were exposed to increasing concentrations of inhibitors for
16 h demonstrated that all compounds tested in this assay inhibited the formation of NICD in a dose-dependent manner
(Fig. 5A). This inhibition led
to an accumulation of the Notch E protein, the substrate for this
-secretase-like cleavage reaction. Furthermore, in the same cells,
this effect coincided with a dose-dependent accumulation of
APP-CTFs (Fig. 5B) and inhibition of A (40) and A (42) production (Fig. 5, C and D). Upon
treatment with the inhibitors, an accumulation of mainly the APP
-CTF was detected (Fig. 5B) as verified by
immunoprecipitation Western blotting using monoclonal antibodies 4G8
and W0-2 (data not shown). A predominant -secretase processing
pathway for APP in the chosen cell line was anticipated, as similar
data have been described for the HEK293 APP695 cell line
(25), which was used as a starting point to generate the HEK293
APP695/Notch E cell line.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
-Secretase
inhibitors block Notch S3 and APP
-cleavage with similar potencies. HEK293 cells
stably transfected with APP695 and mNotch E(M1727V)
were exposed for 16 h to increasing concentrations of compounds.
Note the different concentration ranges used. Equal amounts of
extracted protein (30 µg) were separated by SDS-PAGE and
immunoblotted for mNotch E(M1727V) and NICD using anti-c-Myc antibody
9E10 (A) or for APP C-terminal fragments and
transmembrane APP using antiserum R7334 (B). C
and D, A (40) (C) and A (42) (D)
peptides in the corresponding conditioned media were quantified and
compared (E) with the inhibition of NICD formation
determined by densitometric analysis of shorter exposures of the
immunoblots shown in A. All data are expressed as percentage
of Me2SO control values. F, IC50
values for inhibition of A (40), A (42), and NICD generation were
calculated by nonlinear regression fit analysis of the graphs shown in
C-E using GraphPad PrismTM software
(conc., concentration).
|
|
The above findings confirm that this class of compounds acts
mechanistically as inhibitors of the -secretase cleavage of two
substrates: APP and Notch. The IC50 values obtained
(Fig. 5F) reveal that for each compound potencies for
inhibition of APP and Notch -secretase cleavage are closely
comparable. Compound 6 was the most potent inhibitor analyzed and acts
as a subnanomolar inhibitor for both cleavages (0.24-0.37
nM, Fig. 5F).
Deficits in Trk receptor maturation have been reported in neurons from
PS1 knock-out animals (39). To determine whether presenilin/ -secretase activity was involved in this process and whether CBAP was able to induce similar deficits, a pulse-chase analysis of rat primary cortical neurons was performed. Under vehicle
control conditions (Fig. 6) after a
30-120-min chase period, the majority of immature Trk receptors
migrating at ~110 kDa underwent maturation to higher glycosylated
species, as seen by a shift of the apparent molecular mass to
~120-130 kDa. In CBAP-treated neurons, the mobility pattern observed
in the gel and the time course were identical to the vehicle control
(Fig. 6). Thus, we conclude that -secretase inhibition does not
impair Trk receptor maturation and that this process requires
presenilin expression and function independent of protease
activity.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Trk receptor maturation is not affected
by -secretase inhibitors. Primary rat
cortical neurons were pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine
(20 min) and chased in the presence of an excess of nonradioactive
methionine for 30, 60, and 120 min. The experiment was performed either
in the presence of vehicle Me2SO (DMSO,
lane 1) or CBAP (10 µM, lane 2).
Mature and immature Trk polypeptides immunoprecipitated from cell
lysates are indicated by arrows.
|
|
Complex Formation and Sorting of PS1-FL--
It is known that, in
PS1-transfected cells, both cleavage and sorting of PS1 are
rate-limited, causing an accumulation of PS1-FL in the ER (46, 47).
Furthermore, PS1 fragments are known to be incorporated into high
molecular weight complexes, whereas in transfected cell lines wild-type
PS1-FL is detected in complexes of lower molecular weight (48). Because
CBAP gave us the opportunity to increase the ratio of PS1-FL
versus fragments without changing the endogenous expression
levels of PS1, we aimed to determine whether endoproteolysis of PS1
serves as a signal for assembly of high molecular weight complexes or
trafficking of the fragments into the Golgi compartment.
Glycerol velocity gradient centrifugation of CHAPSO-solubilized PS1 was
performed under conditions where inhibitor treatment resulted in an
increase in PS1-FL, but with significant amounts of fragments remaining
(serving as an internal control). Western blot analysis of the gradient
fractions revealed that both PS1 fragments and PS1-FL accumulated in a
complex of identical molecular mass at ~350 kDa (peak
immunoreactivity spanning fractions 8-11; Fig.
7, A and B). Both
gradients essentially showed an identical distribution of all PS1
polypeptides, as well as the marker proteins APP and -catenin.
PS1-NTF and PS1-CTF were co-enriched in the same fractions, confirming
that the PS1 complex was preserved under the conditions used. These
data provide evidence that PS1-FL is incorporated into high molecular
weight complexes in a similar manner to its fragments.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Incorporation of PS1-FL and its fragments
into identical complexes and sorting of PS1-FL. SH-SY5Y cells were
treated with vehicle Me2SO (A) or CBAP (10 µM) (B) for 2 days and PS1 complexes analyzed
by glycerol velocity gradient centrifugation. Acetone precipitates of
each fraction were immunoblotted for APP, PS1-CTF (00/2), PS1-FL,
and PS1-NTF (98/1) as indicated. Following antibody stripping, the
APP filter was re-probed for -catenin. Marker proteins separated
on identical gradients are indicated by arrows.
C, SH-SY5Y cells were treated with CBAP (10 µM) for 3 days and cellular organelles separated by
sucrose density gradient centrifugation. Aliquots of individual
fractions were immunoblotted for APP, -COP, and PS1-FL and -NTF
as indicated. Following antibody stripping, the same filter was
re-probed for calnexin.
|
|
To analyze the sorting of PS1-FL, membranous organelles from
CBAP-treated SH-SY5Y cells were separated by sucrose density gradient
centrifugation and the individual fractions probed for PS1 and marker
proteins by Western blotting (Fig. 7C). In contrast to the
selective accumulation of PS1-FL polypeptides in the ER fraction that
is observed in PS1-transfected cell lines (47, 48), we found that,
remarkably, PS1-FL was detected across the whole gradient and that this
distribution was identical to its fragments. Both uncleaved polypeptide
and PS1-NTF were present in ER fractions, as defined by the enrichment
of the ER marker protein calnexin (fractions 2-4; Fig. 7C),
and Golgi fractions, containing the Golgi-specific protein -COP (49)
(fraction 5; Fig. 7C) and higher glycosylated, mature APP
(fractions 4-6; Fig. 7C). These data indicate that cleavage
of PS1-FL into its fragments is not required for its trafficking from
ER to Golgi compartments.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Our data demonstrate that certain potent and structurally diverse
-secretase inhibitors either identified by ourselves such as
L-685,458, or others (compounds 5 and 6; Ref. 28) cause a cellular accumulation of PS1-FL. This effect is immediate, indicating that as soon as one of these compounds enters cells it inhibits separate processing events simultaneously: presenilin/ -secretase cleavage of APP and Notch and PS1-FL endoproteolysis.
Detailed structure-activity relationship analyses of these two
processes led to the discovery of a novel L-685,458
derivative, CBAP, which enabled us to determine the principle mechanism
underlying our initial observations. The accumulation of PS1-FL could
be explained by interfering nonspecifically with its degradation by the
proteasome system. This system has been shown to degrade PS1-FL rapidly
(50), leading to half-lives of ~1.5 h for the full-length polypeptide
in PS1-transfected cells (51). However, the knock-down of PS1
fragments, observed exclusively upon chronic treatment of cells with
CBAP, unambiguously demonstrates that the inhibitors directly block the
endoproteolytic cleavage of the PS1-FL polypeptide into its fragments.
Mechanistically, this could be explained in a number of ways: (i)
direct inhibition of the putative enzyme responsible for the cleavage
of PS1-FL ("presenilinase"), (ii) indirect inhibition of
presenilinase cleavage as a consequence of binding to and changing the
conformation of PS1-FL, and (iii) binding to PS1-FL and interfering
with intramolecular autoproteolysis. Although our data do not provide
conclusive evidence to determine which of these possibilities is
correct, we have made several key observations. First,
L-685,458 shows greater than 100-fold selectivity over
other classes of proteases, including aspartyl proteases such as HIV-1
and cathepsin D (25), and structural modifications that abolish
-secretase inhibition concomitantly lead to a loss of an inhibition
of PS1 processing (e.g. compounds 1 and 8). Accordingly, for
endoproteolytic cleavage to be mediated by a molecularly distinct
presenilinase, this enzyme would require a pharmacological profile very
similar to -secretase itself, an explanation that as yet would
appear unlikely.
Two of the above possibilities require active site-directed transition
state analogue inhibitors to bind to PS1-FL, considered to be a
zymogen. We have no direct biochemical evidence to date that any of our
inhibitors bind to PS1-FL, and previous work has shown that PS1-FL
could not be cross-linked in vitro to specific photoprobes
derived from L-685,458 (26) using membranes from cells
overexpressing PS1. It still remains to be seen whether photoprobes may
be able to cross-link to PS1-FL in cells. If untransfected cells are
used, where PS1 trafficking and complex formation should resemble the
in vivo situation, the minute amounts of holoprotein present
in these cells will make this an extremely difficult task. Hence, it
cannot be ruled out completely that, at high concentrations, certain
inhibitors bind to PS1-FL in vivo. The compounds described herein have been identified and selected based on their ability to
inhibit A peptide production, and it is therefore not surprising that the potencies for A inhibition do not necessarily mirror the
inhibition of PS1 endoproteolysis. Furthermore, it is likely that
processing of PS1-FL into its fragments results in a conformationally distinct entity. Complexes containing PS1-FL and those containing its
fragments are therefore likely to constitute independent binding sites,
and only compounds with a reasonable affinity for the former would be
able to block the endoproteolysis of PS1. This could explain why some
potent inhibitors of A formation, such as compound 4 and others
(data not shown), were not able to block PS1-FL cleavage and why higher
concentrations of compounds are needed to inhibit PS1 endoproteolysis
compared with -secretase inhibition.
Using CBAP as a tool to shift the steady-state levels of PS1 fragments
toward the full-length polypeptide in vivo, we could address
the question of accumulation of PS1-FL in the ER of transfected cell
lines and the structural requirements for PS1/ -secretase complex
formation. PS1 fragments are known to be components of a high molecular
weight complex, which may include -catenin (48), the recently cloned
transmembrane glycoprotein nicastrin (52), and possibly others.
Analyses of cells overexpressing PS1 suggested that under this paradigm
exogenous wild-type PS1-FL is present in a different complex of lower
molecular weight (48). When solubilized PS1 from CBAP-treated cells was
analyzed by rate-zonal glycerol velocity gradient centrifugation, we
observed that both endogenous wild-type PS1-FL and its fragments are
incorporated in a complex of identical molecular mass (~350 kDa). We
explored this further by determining the structural requirements for
trafficking of PS1 from the ER to Golgi compartments. Subcellular
fractionation of organelles from CBAP-treated cells provided evidence
that both PS1 fragments and PS1-FL follow the same sorting pathway.
This is again in contrast to the clear separation of PS1 fragments and
PS1-FL described previously in transfected cell lines (47). Accordingly, our data argue that the accumulation of PS1-FL in the ER
fraction of transfected cells is not caused by the lack of cleavage but
must be a direct result of the artificial overexpression of the
polypeptide. Taken together these data support the hypothesis of a
"limiting stoichiometric cofactor" (46), which would be necessary
for the protein to exit the ER compartment. Because PS1-FL is
incorporated into a high molecular weight complex in inhibitor-treated
cells, it is likely that this factor binds to PS1-FL immediately after
its synthesis, enabling the protein to be shuttled to the Golgi
compartment. Cleavage into its fragments might be facilitated by the
factor, or it may occur during the subsequent transport from the ER to
the Golgi compartment, but our data clearly demonstrate that it is
neither a structural requirement for trafficking nor for complex assembly.
We have used the inhibitors described herein to determine
which aberrant phenotypes in PS1 inactivated or deleted systems are
related to a loss of protease function, against those caused by the
physical absence of the PS1 polypeptide. All inhibitors analyzed were
found to block the intramembranous cleavage of Notch E polypeptide at
the S3 site, thereby inhibiting NICD formation. These results support
previous findings (45) and strengthen the view that PS1 forms an
essential component of the active site of -secretase. Moreover,
neither a preferential inhibition of one of the APP -cleavages at
position 40 or 42 nor the Notch S3 cleavage was observed. Inhibition of
APP -cleavage without affecting Notch processing has been
reported for a class of inhibitors containing an isocoumarin core,
characteristic of chymotrypsin inhibitors (53). The compounds described
in that study, however, were 10,000-200,000-fold less potent
inhibitors than the ones described here. It will be interesting to see
in the future if selectivity of the isocoumarin-type inhibitors can be
maintained over a larger concentration range and if derivatives can be
identified that are several orders of magnitude more potent. In
contrast to the Notch data, treatment of cortical neurons with
-secretase inhibitors did not recapitulate the impairment in Trk
receptor maturation, another aberrant phenotype that has been described in PS1 knock-out animals (39). This indicates that inhibition of
protease activity does not affect this function of presenilin, which
points toward a role for PS1 in membrane protein trafficking (39).
The discovery of novel properties of -secretase inhibitors related
to secretase activity and presenilin endoproteolysis provides highly
specific tools, which can be utilized to obtain a better understanding
of the biological impact of inhibiting presenilin, APP, and Notch
processing. Resolving this issue is of utmost interest, as specific
-secretase inhibitors that block PS1-associated protease functions
are expected to be valuable therapeutic agents to combat AD pathology.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Janetta Culvenor for 98/1 and 00/2
antisera, Maria Kounnas for the R7334 antiserum, Sangram Sisodia for
providing the anti-PS1 loop antiserum, Christine Haldon for tissue
culture expertise, Jamie Bilsland and Sarah Harper for preparation of primary neurons, Adrian Smith and Joseph Neduvelil for the synthesis of
compound 2 and L-852,646, respectively, and Ian Churcher
for compounds 5 and 6. We are grateful to David Williams for technical assistance and to Neil Wilkie and Scott Pollack for providing their
protocol for Trk receptor immunoprecipitation.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
44-1279-440478; Fax: 44-1279-440712; E-mail:
dirk_beher@merck.com.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 26, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M103075200
2
D. Beher, unpublished observation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
AD, Alzheimer's disease;
APP, -amyloid precursor protein;
A , amyloid- peptide;
PS1/2, presenilin 1/2;
PS1-FL, full-length
presenilin 1;
NTF, N-terminal fragment;
CTF, C-terminal fragment;
NICD, Notch intracellular domain;
HEK293, human embryonic kidney 293;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
ER, endoplasmic reticulum;
CHAPSO, 3-[(3-chloramidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-2-hydroxy-1-propanesulfonate;
CBAP, {1S-benzyl-4R-[1-(5-cyclohexyl-2-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[e][1,4]diazepin-3(R,S)-ylcarbamoyl)-S-ethylcarbamoyl]-2R-hydroxy-5-phenyl-pentyl}-carbamic acid tert-butyl ester;
EDC, 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride;
HOBT, 1-hydroxybenzotriazole hydrate;
TBS, Tris-buffered saline.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Glenner, G. G.,
and Wong, C. W.
(1984)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
120,
885-890
|
| 2.
|
Masters, C. L.,
Simms, G.,
Weinman, N. A.,
Multhaup, G.,
McDonald, B. L.,
and Beyreuther, K.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
4245-4249
|
| 3.
|
Hardy, J.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2095-2097
|
| 4.
|
Hardy, J.
(1997)
Trends Neurosci.
20,
154-159
|
| 5.
|
Kang, J.,
Lemaire, H. G.,
Unterbeck, A.,
Salbaum, J. M.,
Masters, C. L.,
Grzeschik, K. H.,
Multhaup, G.,
Beyreuther, K.,
and Muller-Hill, B.
(1987)
Nature
325,
733-736
|
| 6.
|
Chartier-Harlin, M. C.,
Crawford, F.,
Houlden, H.,
Warren, A.,
Hughes, D.,
Fidani, L.,
Goate, A.,
Rossor, M.,
Roques, P.,
and Hardy, J.
(1991)
Nature
353,
844-846
|
| 7.
|
Goate, A.,
Chartier-Harlin, M. C.,
Mullan, M.,
Brown, J.,
Crawford, F.,
Fidani, L.,
Giuffra, L.,
Haynes, A.,
Irving, N.,
and James, L.
(1991)
Nature
349,
704-706
|
| 8.
|
Esch, F. S.,
Keim, P. S.,
Beattie, E. C.,
Blacher, R. W.,
Culwell, A. R.,
Oltersdorf, T.,
McClure, D.,
and Ward, P. J.
(1990)
Science
248,
1122-1124
|
| 9.
|
Buxbaum, J. D.,
Liu, K. N.,
Luo, Y.,
Slack, J. L.,
Stocking, K. L.,
Peschon, J. J.,
Johnson, R. S.,
Castner, B. J.,
Cerretti, D. P.,
and Black, R. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
27765-27767
|
| 10.
|
Lammich, S.,
Kojro, E.,
Postina, R.,
Gilbert, S.,
Pfeiffer, R.,
Jasionowski, M.,
Haass, C.,
and Fahrenholz, F.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
3922-3927
|
| 11.
|
Vassar, R.,
Bennett, B. D.,
Babu-Khan, S.,
Kahn, S.,
Mendiaz, E. A.,
Denis, P.,
Teplow, D. B.,
Ross, S.,
Amarante, P.,
Loeloff, R.,
Luo, Y.,
Fisher, S.,
Fuller, J.,
Edenson, S.,
Lile, J.,
Jarosinski, M. A.,
Biere, A. L.,
Curran, E.,
Burgess, T.,
Louis, J. C.,
Collins, F.,
Treanor, J.,
Rogers, G.,
and Citron, M.
(1999)
Science
286,
735-741
|
| 12.
|
Hussain, I.,
Powell, D.,
Howlett, D. R.,
Tew, D. G.,
Meek, T. D.,
Chapman, C.,
Gloger, I. S.,
Murphy, K. E.,
Southan, C. D.,
Ryan, D. M.,
Smith, T. S.,
Simmons, D. L.,
Walsh, F. S.,
Dingwall, C.,
and Christie, G.
(1999)
Mol. Cell Neurosci.
14,
419-427
|
| 13.
|
Lin, X.,
Koelsch, G.,
Wu, S.,
Downs, D.,
Dashti, A.,
and Tang, J.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
1456-1460
|
| 14.
|
Sinha, S.,
Anderson, J. P.,
Barbour, R.,
Basi, G. S.,
Caccavello, R.,
Davis, D.,
Doan, M.,
Dovey, H. F.,
Frigon, N.,
Hong, J.,
Jacobson-Croak, K.,
Jewett, N.,
Keim, P.,
Knops, J.,
Lieberburg, I.,
Power, M.,
Tan, H.,
Tatsuno, G.,
Tung, J.,
Schenk, D.,
Seubert, P.,
Suomensaari, S. M.,
Wang, S.,
Walker, D.,
and John, V.
(1999)
Nature
402,
537-540
|
| 15.
|
Yan, R.,
Bienkowski, M. J.,
Shuck, M. E.,
Miao, H.,
Tory, M. C.,
Pauley, A. M.,
Brashier, J. R.,
Stratman, N. C.,
Mathews, W. R.,
Buhl, A. E.,
Carter, D. B.,
Tomasselli, A. G.,
Parodi, L. A.,
Heinrikson, R. L.,
and Gurney, M. E.
(1999)
Nature
402,
533-537
|
| 16.
|
Levy-Lahad, E.,
Wasco, W.,
Poorkaj, P.,
Romano, D. M.,
Oshima, J.,
Pettingell, W. H., Yu, C. E.,
Jondro, P. D.,
Schmidt, S. D.,
and Wang, K.
(1995)
Science
269,
973-977
|
| 17.
|
Levy-Lahad, E.,
Wijsman, E. M.,
Nemens, E.,
Anderson, L.,
Goddard, K. A.,
Weber, J. L.,
Bird, T. D.,
and Schellenberg, G. D.
(1995)
Science
269,
970-973
|
| 18.
|
Rogaev, E. I.,
Sherrington, R.,
Rogaeva, E. A.,
Levesque, G.,
Ikeda, M.,
Liang, Y.,
Chi, H.,
Lin, C.,
Holman, K.,
and Tsuda, T.
(1995)
Nature
376,
775-778
|
| 19.
|
Sherrington, R.,
Rogaev, E. I.,
Liang, Y.,
Rogaeva, E. A.,
Levesque, G.,
Ikeda, M.,
Chi, H.,
Lin, C.,
Li, G.,
and Holman, K.
(1995)
Nature
375,
754-760
|
| 20.
|
De Strooper, B.,
Saftig, P.,
Craessaerts, K.,
Vanderstichele, H.,
Guhde, G.,
Annaert, W.,
Von Figura, K.,
and Van Leuven, F.
(1998)
Nature
391,
387-390
|
| 21.
|
Thinakaran, G.,
Borchelt, D. R.,
Lee, M. K.,
Slunt, H. H.,
Spitzer, L.,
Kim, G.,
Ratovitsky, T.,
Davenport, F.,
Nordstedt, C.,
Seeger, M.,
Hardy, J.,
Levey, A. I.,
Gandy, S. E.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
Copeland, N. G.,
Price, D. L.,
and Sisodia, S. S.
(1996)
Neuron
17,
181-190
|
| 22.
|
Kimberly, W. T.,
Xia, W.,
Rahmati, T.,
Wolfe, M. S.,
and Selkoe, D. J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
3173-3178
|
| 23.
|
Wolfe, M. S.,
De Los, A. J.,
Miller, D. D.,
Xia, W.,
and Selkoe, D. J.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
11223-11230
|
| 24.
|
Li, Y. M.,
Lai, M. T.,
Xu, M.,
Huang, Q.,
DiMuzio-Mower, J.,
Sardana, M. K.,
Shi, X. P.,
Yin, K. C.,
Shafer, J. A.,
and Gardell, S. J.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
6138-6143
|
| 25.
|
Shearman, M. S.,
Beher, D.,
Clarke, E. E.,
Lewis, H. D.,
Harrison, T.,
Hunt, P.,
Nadin, A.,
Smith, A. L.,
Stevenson, G.,
and Castro, J. L.
(2000)
Biochemistry
38,
8698-8704
|
| 26.
|
Li, Y. M.,
Xu, M.,
Lai, M. T.,
Huang, Q.,
Castro, J. L.,
DiMuzio-Mower, J.,
Harrison, T.,
Lellis, C.,
Nadin, A.,
Neduvelil, J. G.,
Register, R. B.,
Sardana, M. K.,
Shearman, M. S.,
Smith, A. L.,
Shi, X. P.,
Yin, K. C.,
Shafer, J. A.,
and Gardell, S. J.
(2000)
Nature
405,
689-694
|
| 27.
|
Esler, W. P.,
Kimberly, W. T.,
Ostaszewski, B. L.,
Diehl, T. S.,
Moore, C. L.,
Tsai, J. Y.,
Rahmati, T.,
Xia, W.,
Selkoe, D. J.,
and Wolfe, M. S.
(2000)
Nat. Cell Biol.
2,
428-434
|
| 28.
|
Seiffert, D.,
Bradley, J. D.,
Rominger, C. M.,
Rominger, D. H.,
Yang, F.,
Meredith, J. E., Jr.,
Wang, Q.,
Roach, A. H.,
Thompson, L. A.,
Spitz, S. M.,
Higaki, J. N.,
Prakash, S. R.,
Combs, A. P.,
Copeland, R. A.,
Arneric, S. P.,
Hartig, P. R.,
Robertson, D. W.,
Cordell, B.,
Stern, A. M.,
Olson, R. E.,
and Zaczek, R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
34086-34091
|
| 29.
|
Wolfe, M. S.,
Xia, W.,
Ostaszewski, B. L.,
Diehl, T. S.,
Kimberly, W. T.,
and Selkoe, D. J.
(1999)
Nature
398,
513-517
|
| 30.
|
Evin, G.,
Sharples, R. A.,
Weidemann, A.,
Reinhard, F. B.,
Carbone, V.,
Culvenor, J. G.,
Holsinger, R. M.,
Sernee, M. F.,
Beyreuther, K.,
and Masters, C. L.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
8359-8368
|
| 31.
|
Culvenor, J. G.,
Evin, G.,
Cooney, M. A.,
Wardan, H.,
Sharples, R. A.,
Maher, F.,
Reed, G.,
Diehlmann, A.,
Weidemann, A.,
Beyreuther, K.,
and Masters, C. L.
(2000)
Exp. Cell Res.
255,
192-206
|
| 32.
|
Kopan, R.,
Schroeter, E. H.,
Weintraub, H.,
and Nye, J. S.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
1683-1688
|
| 33.
|
Dyrks, T.,
Dyrks, E.,
Monning, U.,
Urmoneit, B.,
Turner, J.,
and Beyreuther, K.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
335,
89-93
|
| 34.
|
Hill, H. D.,
and Straka, J. G.
(1988)
Anal. Biochem.
170,
203-208
|
| 35.
|
Beher, D.,
Elle, C.,
Underwood, J.,
Davis, J. B.,
Ward, R.,
Karran, E.,
Masters, C. L.,
Beyreuther, K.,
and Multhaup, G.
(1999)
J. Neurochem.
72,
1564-1573
|
| 36.
|
Khorkova, O. E.,
Patel, K.,
Heroux, J.,
and Sahasrabudhe, S.
(1998)
J. Neurosci. Methods
82,
159-166
|
| 37.
|
Yang, H.,
Leland, J. K.,
Yost, D.,
and Massey, R. J.
(1994)
Bio/Technology
12,
193-194
|
| 38.
|
Bilsland, J. G.,
and Harper, S. J.
(1998)
J. Neurosci. Methods
84,
121-130
|
| 39.
|
Naruse, S.,
Thinakaran, G.,
Luo, J. J.,
Kusiak, J. W.,
Tomita, T.,
Iwatsubo, T.,
Qian, X.,
Ginty, D. D.,
Price, D. L.,
Borchelt, D. R.,
Wong, P. C.,
and Sisodia, S. S.
(1998)
Neuron
21,
1213-1221
|
| 40.
|
deSolms, S. J.,
Giuliani, E. A.,
Guare, J. P.,
Vacca, J. P.,
Sanders, W. M.,
Graham, S. L.,
Wiggins, J. M.,
Darke, P. L.,
Sigal, I. S.,
and Zugay, J. A.
(1991)
J. Med. Chem.
34,
2852-2857
|
| 41.
|
Chambers, M. S.,
Hobbs, S. C.,
Fletcher, S. R.,
Matassa, V. G.,
Mitchell, P. J.,
Watt, A. P.,
Baker, R.,
Freedman, S. B.,
Patel, S.,
and Smith, A. J.
(1993)
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
3,
1919-1924
|
| 42.
|
Katritzky, A. R.,
Urogdi, L.,
and Mayence, A.
(1990)
J. Org. Chem.
55,
2206-2214
|
| 43.
|
Sherrill, R. G.,
and Sugg, E. E.
(1995)
J. Org. Chem.
60,
730-734
|
| 44.
|
Nadin, A.,
Sanchez Lopez, J. M.,
Neduvelil, J. G.,
and Thomas, S. R.
(2001)
Tetrahedron
57,
1861-1864
|
| 45.
|
De Strooper, B.,
Annaert, W.,
Cupers, P.,
Saftig, P.,
Craessaerts, K.,
Mumm, J. S.,
Schroeter, E. H.,
Schrijvers, V.,
Wolfe, M. S.,
Ray, W. J.,
Goate, A.,
and Kopan, R.
(1999)
Nature
398,
518-522
|
| 46.
|
Thinakaran, G.,
Harris, C. L.,
Ratovitski, T.,
Davenport, F.,
Slunt, H. H.,
Price, D. L.,
Borchelt, D. R.,
and Sisodia, S. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
28415-28422
|
| 47.
|
Zhang, J.,
Kang, D. E.,
Xia, W.,
Okochi, M.,
Mori, H.,
Selkoe, D. J.,
and Koo, E. H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
12436-12442
|
| 48.
|
Yu, G.,
Chen, F.,
Levesque, G.,
Nishimura, M.,
Zhang, D. M.,
Levesque, L.,
Rogaeva, E.,
Xu, D.,
Liang, Y.,
Duthie, M.,
George-Hyslop, P. H.,
and Fraser, P. E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
16470-16475
|
| 49.
|
Duden, R.,
Griffiths, G.,
Frank, R.,
Argos, P.,
and Kreis, T. E.
(1991)
Cell
64,
649-665
|
| 50.
|
Steiner, H.,
Capell, A.,
Pesold, B.,
Citron, M.,
Kloetzel, P. M.,
Selkoe, D. J.,
Romig, H.,
Mendla, K.,
and Haass, C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32322-32331
|
| 51.
|
Ratovitski, T.,
Slunt, H. H.,
Thinakaran, G.,
Price, D. L.,
Sisodia, S. S.,
and Borchelt, D. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
24536-24541
|
| 52.
|
Yu, G.,
Nishimura, M.,
Arawaka, S.,
Levitan, D.,
Zhang, L.,
Tandon, A.,
Song, Y. Q.,
Rogaeva, E.,
Chen, F.,
Kawarai, T.,
Supala, A.,
Levesque, L., Yu, H.,
Yang, D. S.,
Holmes, E.,
Milman, P.,
Liang, Y.,
Zhang, D. M.,
Xu, D. H.,
Sato, C.,
Rogaev, E.,
Smith, M.,
Janus, C.,
Zhang, Y.,
Aebersold, R.,
Farrer, L. S.,
Sorbi, S.,
Bruni, A.,
Fraser, P.,
and George-Hyslop, P.
(2000)
Nature
407,
48-54
|
| 53.
|
Petit, A.,
Bihel, F.,
Alves da Costa, C.,
Pourquie, O.,
Checler, F.,
and Kraus, J. L.
(2001)
Nat. Cell Biol.
3,
507-511
|
| 54.
|
Clarke, E. E.,
and Shearman, M. S.
(2000)
J. Neurosci. Methods
102,
61-68
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. E. Clarke, I. Churcher, S. Ellis, J. D. J. Wrigley, H. D. Lewis, T. Harrison, M. S. Shearman, and D. Beher
Intra- or Intercomplex Binding to the {gamma}-Secretase Enzyme: A MODEL TO DIFFERENTIATE INHIBITOR CLASSES
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 20, 2006;
281(42):
31279 - 31289.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. E. Kang, I. S. Yoon, E. Repetto, T. Busse, N. Yermian, L. Ie, and E. H. Koo
Presenilins Mediate Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/AKT and ERK Activation via Select Signaling Receptors: SELECTIVITY OF PS2 IN PLATELET-DERIVED GROWTH FACTOR SIGNALING
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 9, 2005;
280(36):
31537 - 31547.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Nakaya, T. Yamane, H. Shiraishi, H.-Q. Wang, E. Matsubara, T. Sato, G. Dolios, R. Wang, B. De Strooper, M. Shoji, et al.
Random Mutagenesis of Presenilin-1 Identifies Novel Mutants Exclusively Generating Long Amyloid {beta}-Peptides
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 13, 2005;
280(19):
19070 - 19077.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. J. Wrigley, I. Schurov, E. J. Nunn, A. C. L. Martin, E. E. Clarke, S. Ellis, T. P. Bonnert, M. S. Shearman, and D. Beher
Functional Overexpression of {gamma}-Secretase Reveals Protease-independent Trafficking Functions and a Critical Role of Lipids for Protease Activity
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 1, 2005;
280(13):
12523 - 12535.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Beher, E. E. Clarke, J. D. J. Wrigley, A. C. L. Martin, A. Nadin, I. Churcher, and M. S. Shearman
Selected Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Their Derivatives Target {gamma}-Secretase at a Novel Site: EVIDENCE FOR AN ALLOSTERIC MECHANISM
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 15, 2004;
279(42):
43419 - 43426.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X.-X. Yan, T. Li, C. M. Rominger, S. R. Prakash, P. C. Wong, R. E. Olson, R. Zaczek, and Y.-W. Li
Binding Sites of {gamma}-Secretase Inhibitors in Rodent Brain: Distribution, Postnatal Development, and Effect of Deafferentation
J. Neurosci.,
March 24, 2004;
24(12):
2942 - 2952.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Lleo, O. Berezovska, P. Ramdya, H. Fukumoto, S. Raju, T. Shah, and B. T. Hyman
Notch1 Competes with the Amyloid Precursor Protein for {gamma}-Secretase and Down-regulates Presenilin-1 Gene Expression
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 28, 2003;
278(48):
47370 - 47375.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. H. Searfoss, W. H. Jordan, D. O. Calligaro, E. J. Galbreath, L. M. Schirtzinger, B. R. Berridge, H. Gao, M. A. Higgins, P. C. May, and T. P. Ryan
Adipsin, a Biomarker of Gastrointestinal Toxicity Mediated by a Functional {gamma}-Secretase Inhibitor
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 14, 2003;
278(46):
46107 - 46116.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Aguzzi and C. Haass
Games Played by Rogue Proteins in Prion Disorders and Alzheimer's Disease
Science,
October 31, 2003;
302(5646):
814 - 818.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Nyabi, M. Bentahir, K. Horre, A. Herreman, N. Gottardi-Littell, C. Van Broeckhoven, P. Merchiers, K. Spittaels, W. Annaert, and B. De Strooper
Presenilins Mutated at Asp-257 or Asp-385 Restore Pen-2 Expression and Nicastrin Glycosylation but Remain Catalytically Inactive in the Absence of Wild Type Presenilin
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 31, 2003;
278(44):
43430 - 43436.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Melchor, R. Pawlak, and S. Strickland
The Tissue Plasminogen Activator-Plasminogen Proteolytic Cascade Accelerates Amyloid-{beta} (A{beta}) Degradation and Inhibits A{beta}-Induced Neurodegeneration
J. Neurosci.,
October 1, 2003;
23(26):
8867 - 8871.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Li, G. J. Fici, C.-A. Mao, R. L. Myers, R. Shuang, G. P. Donoho, A. M. Pauley, C. S. Himes, W. Qin, I. Kola, et al.
Positive and Negative Regulation of the {gamma}-Secretase Activity by Nicastrin in a Murine Model
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 29, 2003;
278(35):
33445 - 33449.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. D. Plant, J. P. Boyle, I. F. Smith, C. Peers, and H. A. Pearson
The Production of Amyloid {beta} Peptide Is a Critical Requirement for the Viability of Central Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
July 2, 2003;
23(13):
5531 - 5535.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. R. Farmery, L. O. Tjernberg, S. E. Pursglove, A. Bergman, B. Winblad, and J. Naslund
Partial Purification and Characterization of {gamma}-Secretase from Post-mortem Human Brain
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 27, 2003;
278(27):
24277 - 24284.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X.-P. Shi, K. Tugusheva, J. E. Bruce, A. Lucka, G.-X. Wu, E. Chen-Dodson, E. Price, Y. Li, M. Xu, Q. Huang, et al.
{beta}-Secretase Cleavage at Amino Acid Residue 34 in the Amyloid {beta} Peptide Is Dependent upon {gamma}-Secretase Activity
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 30, 2003;
278(23):
21286 - 21294.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Weihofen, M. K. Lemberg, E. Friedmann, H. Rueeger, A. Schmitz, P. Paganetti, G. Rovelli, and B. Martoglio
Targeting Presenilin-type Aspartic Protease Signal Peptide Peptidase with gamma -Secretase Inhibitors
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 2, 2003;
278(19):
16528 - 16533.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. S. Grimm, D. Beher, S. F. Lichtenthaler, M. S. Shearman, K. Beyreuther, and T. Hartmann
gamma -Secretase Cleavage Site Specificity Differs for Intracellular and Secretory Amyloid beta
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 4, 2003;
278(15):
13077 - 13085.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Gianni, N. Zambrano, M. Bimonte, G. Minopoli, L. Mercken, F. Talamo, A. Scaloni, and T. Russo
Platelet-derived Growth Factor Induces the beta -gamma -Secretase-mediated Cleavage of Alzheimer's Amyloid Precursor Protein through a Src-Rac-dependent Pathway
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 7, 2003;
278(11):
9290 - 9297.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|