Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M104752200 on October 1, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 48, 45433-45442, November 30, 2001
A Low Abundance Pool of Nascent p21WAF1/Cip1 Is
Targeted by Estrogen to Activate Cyclin E·Cdk2*
Owen W. J.
Prall
,
Jason S.
Carroll§, and
Robert L.
Sutherland¶
From the Cancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical
Research, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia
Received for publication, May 24, 2001, and in revised form, August 9, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Estrogens regulate cell proliferation in target
tissues, including breast cancer by stimulating G1-S
phase transition. Activation of cyclin E·Cdk2 through abrogation of
the ability of p21WAF1/Cip1 to bind to and inhibit
cyclin-CDKs is a pivotal event in this process in MCF-7 breast cancer
cells. A proposed mechanism is p21 sequestration into cyclin
D1·Cdk4/6 complexes driven by estrogen-induced transcriptional
activation of cyclin D1 gene expression. However, we now
show that some E2-induced cyclin E·Cdk2 activation occurs in the absence of increased cyclin D1 levels and requires decreased p21
protein synthesis. Both mechanisms operate in the absence of major
changes in total p21 protein levels and instead target a low abundance
subset of newly synthesized p21. E2-induced activation of
cyclin E·Cdk2 is mimicked by targeted inhibition of nascent p21
expression by antisense p21 oligonucleotides. Cyclin E·Cdk2 activation is completely inhibited by a combination of antisense cyclin
D1 oligonucleotide transfection and elimination of the decrease in
nascent p21 by infection with adenoviral-p21. These findings strongly
support a central role for p21 in the early phase of
E2-induced mitogenesis and highlight a major functional role for newly synthesized CDK inhibitory proteins.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Numerous lines of evidence indicate that activation of cyclin
E·Cdk2 is crucial to G1 to S phase progression. Increased
cyclin E expression and cyclin E·Cdk2 activity have also been
implicated in the development of breast cancer. Cyclin E overexpression
induces mammary gland hyperplasia and carcinoma in mice (1), and
deregulated cyclin E·Cdk2 activity causes chromosome instability in
human breast epithelial cells (2). Furthermore, the levels of cyclin E
and cyclin E-associated kinase activity in breast cancer cell lines are
commonly elevated (3, 4) and correlate with poor outcome in breast
cancer patients (5, 6). Estrogen-dependent activation of
the estrogen receptor (ER)1
is essential for normal breast and uterine cell proliferation (7) and
approximately two-thirds of breast tumors retain estrogen sensitivity.
However, the molecular mechanisms through which estrogen stimulates the
proliferation of breast cancer cells have not been fully defined.
Estrogens stimulate the expression of growth factor genes, which may
exert indirect effects on proliferation through autocrine and paracrine
mechanisms. In addition they induce the expression of several early-
and intermediate-response genes with demonstrated roles in cell cycle
progression, e.g. c-fos, jun-B, c-myc, and cyclin D1 (8). More recently, estrogens have been shown to stimulate the Src/Ras/MAP kinase pathway via mechanisms that
require functional ER (9, 10). Although the interactions between these
components of the estrogen response remain to be fully elucidated,
there is now compelling evidence that activation of cyclin E·Cdk2
plays a pivotal role in linking ER signaling to S phase entry
(11-14).
In fibroblast cell lines cyclin E·Cdk2 is activated prior to S phase
entry (15, 16), and is both necessary (17-19) and sufficient (20-22)
for the G1-S phase transition. At least two mechanisms for
cyclin E·Cdk2-dependent S phase entry have been proposed:
phosphorylation of pRB, thus relieving pRB/E2F-mediated promoter
repression of genes required for S phase entry (23, 24), and a less
clearly defined pRB/E2F-independent pathway (25-27). Considerable
biochemical and genetic evidence indicates multiple levels of
regulation of cyclin E·Cdk2, including transcriptional activation of
cyclin E gene expression, association with the Cip/KIP family of CDK inhibitor proteins (p21Cip1/WAF1,
p27KIP1, p57KIP2) and inhibition/activation
through phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of specific amino acids on
Cdk2 (28, 29).
Mitogens regulate cell proliferation by stimulating progression through
G1 phase of the cell cycle, however, descriptions of the
molecular mechanisms of cyclin E·Cdk2 activation employed by
different mitogens are relatively limited and largely confined to
fibroblast cell lines. Cyclin E·Cdk2 activation in MCF-7 cells occurs
4-6 h after estradiol (E2) treatment, increases to 3-fold above control levels at 8 h, and increases to ~7-fold at 16 h (12). E2 treatment fails to induce detectable changes in
the total cellular pools of cyclin E, p21, or p27 during the early phase of cyclin E·Cdk2 activation (12, 13). Rather, E2
induces only a small number of highly active cyclin E·Cdk2 complexes, which are free of the CDK inhibitor p21. Interestingly, p21 is the
major cyclin E·Cdk2 inhibitory protein during early cyclin E·Cdk2
activation in this model with little contribution from p27 (12, 13).
Cyclin E·Cdk2 activation coincides with a decrease in the ability of
endogenous p21 to associate with cyclin E·Cdk2 in vitro,
but the mechanism remains undefined (12, 13). Furthermore, the Cdk2
component of these active cyclin E·Cdk2 complexes is phosphorylated
on threonine 160, a target of CDK-activating kinase (CAK). Because CAK
activity is unaltered by estrogen treatment, Cdk2 phosphorylation is
most likely due to the absence of p21, which inhibits phosphorylation
of this residue by CAK (30). Active cyclin E·Cdk2 complexes in MCF-7
cells are associated with the pRb-related pocket protein p130 (14).
p130 can bind cyclin E through an RXL motif also
present in p21, suggesting that these proteins may compete for
association with cyclin E·Cdk2. These observations strongly suggest
that the reduction in p21-associated cyclin E·Cdk2 is critical to
cyclin E·Cdk2 activation by E2. However, there are no
major changes in the levels of p21, p130, cyclin E, or Cdk2 in cyclin E
complexes following E2 treatment (12).
Increased expression of cyclin D1 has been proposed to inactivate p21
by sequestration in cyclin D1·Cdk4/6·p21 complexes, thereby
making p21 unavailable for association with cyclin E·Cdk2 (13). A
p21/p27-sequestering role for cyclin D1 has also been implicated in
mediating the effects of transforming growth factor
and INK4
protein inhibition on G1 phase progression (31-34). However, although ectopic expression of cyclin D1 causes increased cyclin D1·Cdk4·p21 association, it is not sufficient to mimic E2-dependent cyclin E·Cdk2 activation
quantitatively (14). Further evidence for the existence of a cyclin
E·Cdk2-activating mechanism independent of cyclin D1·Cdk4
sequestration comes from our data demonstrating that c-Myc can induce
activation of cyclin E·Cdk2 and cell cycle progression in
antiestrogen-arrested MCF-7 cells without concurrent increases in
cyclin D1·Cdk4·p21 complexes (14). We now identify a low abundance
pool of p21 that readily associates with cyclin E·Cdk2 in
vitro and is targeted by E2 in vivo by dual mechanisms: sequestration by cyclin D1; and decreased p21 protein synthesis secondary to decreased p21 gene transcription. The
unexpected finding that substantial increases in cyclin E·Cdk2
activity were caused by decreases in this small nascent pool of p21 may
have broader relevance to activation of cyclin E·Cdk2 by other mitogens.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell Culture--
Exponentially proliferating MCF-7 cells (from
Michigan Cancer Foundation, Detroit, MI) were growth-arrested by
pretreatment for 48 h with 10 nM of the steroidal
antiestrogen ICI 182780 (7
-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluropentylsulfinyl)nonyl]estra-1,3,5-(10)-triene-3,17
-diol; a gift from Dr. Alan Wakeling, Astra-Zeneca Pharmaceuticals,
Macclesfield, UK) and then treated with 100 nM
E2 or ethanol vehicle control as described previously (12).
In some experiments a specific Cdk2 inhibitor, roscovitine
(Calbiochem-Novabiochem, Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia), was
added directly to cell culture medium. Working dilutions of roscovitine
were prepared in Me2SO at 1000-fold the required
final concentration in cell culture medium. Analysis of cell cycle
phase distribution by DNA flow cytometry was performed as described
previously (14). The derivation of MCF-7 cell lines stably transfected
with the p
MT-cyclin D1 plasmid was described previously (MCF7.7cycD1
(14, 35)).
Gel Filtration Chromatography, Immunoprecipitation, and
Immunoblotting--
Immunoprecipitation and protein separation by gel
filtration chromatography on a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 200 column
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) were performed as
previously described (14). p21-containing complexes were
re-immunoprecipitated from p21 immunoprecipitates with cyclin D1
antibodies by heating at 95 °C for 2 min in 100 µl of elution
buffer (25 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 0.4% SDS, 2 mM
2-
-mercaptoethanol), neutralization with 10 mM
iodoacetamide (Sigma Chemical Co, St. Louis, MO), and dilution
to 1 ml with lysis buffer A containing 2% Triton X-100. Cyclin D1 was
then re-immunoprecipitated from the supernatant with rabbit cyclin D1
antisera (12). Preparation of whole cell lysates as well as
immunoblotting, GST pull-downs and cyclin E·Cdk2 activity assays were
as previously described (14). Monoclonal antibodies directed against
the following proteins were employed: cyclin D1 (DCS-6, Novacastra
Laboratories Ltd., Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK), pRB (G3-245, PharMingen,
San Diego, CA), p21 (catalog number C24420, Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY), p27 (catalog number K25020, Transduction Laboratories), p53 (sc-126, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA), and GST
(B-14, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Rabbit polyclonal antibodies against
cyclin E (C-19), p21 (C-19), p27 (C-19), p107 (C-18), and p130 (C-20)
and their corresponding immunogenic peptides were obtained from Santa
Cruz Biotechnology.
Cyclin E·Cdk2 Kinase Assay--
Lysates prepared with lysis
buffer A as described above, or gel filtration fractions were
precleared with protein A-Sepharose (1 h, 4 °C) and then
immunoprecipitated with protein A-Sepharose conjugated to anti-cyclin E
polyclonal antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., C-19) for 1 h at 4 °C. One round of immunoprecipitation was sufficient to
recover >95% cyclin E. Preincubation with the immunizing peptide
blocked immunoprecipitation of cyclin E, associated proteins, and
kinase activity (data not shown). The immunoprecipitates were then
washed once with ice-cold lysis buffer A, twice with ice-cold lysis
buffer A containing 1 M NaCl, once again with ice-cold lysis buffer A and then three times with ice-cold 50 mM
HEPES, pH 7.5, 1 mM dithiothreitol. The kinase reaction was
initiated by resuspending the beads in 30 µl of kinase buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 2.5 mM EGTA, 10 mM MgCl2, 20 µM ATP, 10 µCi of [
-32P]ATP, 0.1 mM orthovanadate, 1 mM NaF, 10 mM
-glycerophosphate) containing 10 µg of histone H1 (Sigma). This
amount of substrate was found to be in excess and not limiting for
kinase activity. After incubation with frequent agitation for 30 min at
30 °C, the reactions were terminated by the addition of 15 µl of
3× SDS sample buffer (187 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 30% (v/v)
glycerol, 6% SDS, 15% (v/v)
-mercaptoethanol). The samples were
then incubated at 95 °C for 2 min and separated using 12% SDS-PAGE,
and the dried gel was exposed to PhosphorImager screens (Molecular
Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA). Kinase activity detected by this method was
consistent with Cdk2-mediated activity, i.e. it was
substantially inhibited by incubation with GST-p21, roscovitine, or
olomucine but not by GST or GST-p16.
Protein Half-life Analysis--
35S labeling and
pulse-chase assays were performed by incubating cells in medium
containing [35S]methionine-cysteine. This medium was
replaced with medium containing non-radioactive methionine-cysteine
after which cells were harvested at intervals from 30 to 180 min.
Incorporation of 35S was analyzed by immunoprecipitation,
SDS-PAGE, and autoradiography. Alternatively, protein synthesis was
inhibited with 20 µg/ml cycloheximide, and remaining protein was
analyzed by Western blot.
Northern Blotting and Nuclear Run-off Transcription
Assays--
Northern blot analysis was performed as previously
described (12). Sample loading was assessed by hybridization to
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. The origin of cDNAs used
was as follows: p21, Dr. Bert Vogelstein, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD;
cyclin E, Dr. Steven Reed, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA.
RNase protection analysis of p21, p27, and cyclin E was performed with
RiboQuant kits (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Nuclear run-off analysis was performed
according to standard techniques (36). Briefly, MCF-7 nuclei were
incubated with ATP, CTP, GTP, and [
-32P]UTP to allow
the elongation of partial transcripts. RNA was then isolated and
precipitated with 50% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid/300 mM
sodium pyrophosphate and washed with 5% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid/30
mM sodium pyrophosphate until the supernatant contained no
free 32P. RNA was reprecipitated and resuspended in TES
buffer (10 mM TES, pH 7.4, 10 mM EDTA, 0.2%
(w/v) SDS). Slot-blot membranes were hybridized with equivalent cpm
levels of [
-32P]UTP-labeled RNA for 36 h at
65 °C. Membranes were washed extensively, treated with RNase A, and
analyzed by exposure to PhosphorImager screens (Molecular Dynamics).
Plasmids on the slot-blot membranes were: pUC, pUC-actin, pBS, and
pBS-p21 (Dr. Steven Elledge, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX).
Antisense Oligonucleotide Transfection--
Oligonucleotides
(stocks of 200 µM) and CellFECTIN (1 mg/ml, Life
Technologies, Inc.) were mixed together at a ratio of 0.2 nmol of
oligo:1 µg of CellFECTIN in serum-free RPMI 1640 for 15 min at
37 °C then added to antiestrogen-arrested cells with 5% fetal calf
serum. At least 95% of MCF-7 cells that were growth-arrested by ICI
182780 were transfected with fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled oligonucleotides using this protocol as analyzed by flow cytometry (data not shown). The oligonucleotides (GeneWorks, Australia) used
were: for p21, antisense (AS) to the region around the initiating codon
5'-TCC CCA GCC GGT TCT GAC AT-3' (37), sense (SN) 5'-ATG TCA GAA CCG
GCT GGG GA-3', and scrambled (SC) 5'-ACG CGT TCA CTG CCT ACG TC-3'; for
cyclin D1, AS 5'-GCT GGT GTT CCA TGG CTG GG-3' (human equivalent to a
rat cyclin D1 AS oligonucleotide (38)), SN 5'-CCC AGC CAT GGA ACA CCA
GC-3', SC 5'-CGG TCG GAT TCG GCG TGT TG-3'. A search of available data
bases confirmed that the only sequences matched were p21 and cyclin D1
for p21 AS and cyclin D1 AS, respectively. Oligonucleotides contained
5'- and 3'-phosphorothioate modifications to minimize exonucleolytic
degradation. Potentially toxic effects were minimized by only briefly
exposing cells to an antisense oligonucleotide-CellFECTIN mixture (see
figure legends for details) and then removed. Cells were then washed
once and incubated in RPMI 1640/5% fetal calf serum with 10 nM ICI 182780 ± 100 nM E2 as appropriate.
Adenoviral Infection--
The human p21 adenovirus (Ad-p21
C)
was obtained from Dr. Joseph Nevins (Duke University Medical Center)
and amplified in HEK293 cells. Viruses were purified by CsCl density
gradient centrifugation, and titers determined by a focus forming assay
using standard techniques (39). MCF-7 cells were rescued from ICI
182780-induced growth arrest with E2 as described above and
infected with Ad-p21
C from 3-8 h. Protein lysates were prepared
8 h after E2 treatment.
 |
RESULTS |
A Minor Proportion of p21-containing Complexes Mediate Inhibition
of Cyclin E·Cdk2--
Active cyclin E·Cdk2 complexes generated by
E2 treatment of MCF-7 breast cancer cells are deficient in
the CDK inhibitor p21Cip1/WAF1, but associate with the
pRb-related protein p130 (12-14). This coincides with decreased
p21-dependent "inhibitory activity" toward GST·cyclin
E·Cdk2 and decreased association between endogenous p21 and
GST-cyclin E·Cdk2 in vitro (12, 13). A series of
experiments was undertaken to define the mechanism(s) by which
E2 treatment stimulated the formation of active cyclin
E·Cdk2·p130 complexes in preference to inactive cyclin E·Cdk2-p21
complexes. The efficiency with which endogenous p21 associated with
recombinant GST-cyclin E·Cdk2 in vitro was investigated
following E2 treatment. The expression of total p21 in cell
lysates decreased 10 h after E2 treatment and reached
16% of control levels at 16 h (Fig.
1A), thus lagging behind
cyclin E·Cdk2 activation, which was first detected at 6 h in
this experimental paradigm (12, 13). However, decreased association
between p21 and GST-cyclin E·Cdk2 was evident 6 h after
E2 treatment (~40% of control levels, Fig.
1A), coinciding with the earliest detectable cyclin E·Cdk2
activation and decrease in in vitro cyclin E·Cdk2
inhibitory activity (12). The extent of the association between p21 and
cyclin E·Cdk2 was further reduced at later times reaching ~10% of
control levels at 16 h (Fig. 1A) coincident with
maximal cyclin E·Cdk2 activity (12). At all time points the magnitude
of the decrease in p21/cyclin E·Cdk2 association exceeded that of the
decrease in total p21 protein. This in vitro assay was
likely to provide an indication of the efficiency with which endogenous
p21 associated with cyclin E·Cdk2 in vivo, suggesting that
E2 abrogated the cyclin E·Cdk2 inhibitory activity of p21
by a mechanism that was independent of its effect on total p21 levels.
Although an E2-regulated activity that modified the
recombinant cyclin E·Cdk2 and altered its affinity for p21 could not
be ruled out by these experiments, the most likely explanation for this
effect was that E2 modified the abundance or function of
the subset of p21 that was readily available for association with
cyclin E·Cdk2. Alternatively, the abundance or function of a molecule
that competed with p21 for association with cyclin E·Cdk2 could have
been modified.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
E2-induced activation of cyclin
E·Cdk2 coincides with decreased levels of inhibitory complexes
containing p21. MCF-7 cells were arrested with the antiestrogen
ICI 182780 (10 nM) for 2 days prior to stimulation with 100 nM E2 (+) or vehicle ( ) at 0 h, and
lysates were prepared at various times thereafter. A,
lysates were incubated with recombinant GST-cyclin E·Cdk2. GST
complexes were retrieved on glutathione-agarose beads, and
coprecipitating p21 was detected by immunoblot. Lysates were also
analyzed by immunoblotting for total p21. B, lysates were
prepared after 8 h of E2 treatment and immunodepleted
with antibodies to p130 or p107. Depleted lysates were analyzed for
p130 and p107, and p21 was retrieved by GST-cyclin E·Cdk2 pull-down
as described in A. In C, lysates were prepared
after 8 h and separated on a HiLoad 16/60 gel filtration column.
Fractions (concentrated by acetone precipitation) were analyzed for
total p21 and p21 retrieved by GST-cyclin E·Cdk2 pull-down. The
approximate molecular mass of protein complexes can be estimated by
comparison with the elution volume of the protein standards shown
(ferritin 440 kDa, aldolase 158 kDa, ovalbumin 43 kDa). D,
p21 levels (total and that recovered by GST-cyclin E·Cdk2 pull-down)
were quantitated by densitometry, and the relative pull-down efficiency
for each fraction was calculated and graphed (na denotes not
applicable, because p21 was not detected in these fractions).
E, lysates were prepared from MCF-7 cells arrested for
48 h with ICI 182780, boiled for 5 min, separated by gel
filtration, and immunoblotted for p21.
|
|
Shared cyclin E-binding motifs, RXL, in p21 and p130 (40,
41) ensure that their association with cyclin E is mutually exclusive
and potentially competitive. Therefore, we investigated the possibility
that E2 may target p130 and promote association of cyclin
E·Cdk2 with p130 in preference to p21. Reduced association of p21
with GST-cyclin E·Cdk2 was still evident when lysates were immunodepleted of >95% p130 (Fig. 1B). In some
experimental models the p107 and p130 pocket proteins are functionally
redundant (42). However, E2 treatment reduced p21/cyclin
E·Cdk2 association when lysates were immunodepleted of p107, or both
p107 and p130 (Fig. 1B), excluding the possibility that p107
may compensate for the loss of p130. Together these data indicated that
E2 decreased p21/cyclin E·Cdk2 association independently
of cyclin E, Cdk2, p130, and p107 and were consistent with
E2 directly targeting p21 to reduce its ability to bind to
cyclin E·Cdk2.
Modifications to the quaternary structure of p21 that could alter its
cyclin E·Cdk2 binding affinity were next examined by analyzing the
size distribution of p21-containing protein complexes by gel filtration
chromatography. Fractionation of lysates by this method indicated that
there was a substantial decrease in p21-containing complexes eluting
below ~100 kDa (low molecular weight p21 (LMW p21)) in lysates from
cells harvested 8 h after E2 treatment (Fig.
1C), although at this time total p21 levels were similar in
control- and E2-treated lysates (Fig. 1A). There was a small increase in p21 in fraction 6 from E2-treated
lysates, suggesting that some of the decrease in LMW p21 may be due to sequestration and redistribution to larger complexes. However, the
decrease in LMW p21 could not be wholly accounted for by this mechanism, indicating that E2 treatment also decreased
synthesis and/or increased degradation of LMW p21. LMW p21 accounted
for only ~15% of total p21, and thus the loss of this pool in
E2-treated cells would not be expected to alter p21 levels
measured by immunoblot analysis of the total lysate.
GST pull-down experiments were used to examine the efficiency with
which endogenous p21 associated with GST-cyclin E·Cdk2 in the same
gel filtration fractions. These experiments identified that p21 <100
kDa (i.e. LMW p21) was most efficiently recovered by
GST·cyclin E·Cdk2 pull-down (Fig. 1, C and
D); i.e. the relative efficiency of p21 recovery
from fractions 8-12 was ~6- to 12-fold that from fractions 5 and 6, which contained the highest levels of total p21 (Fig. 1D).
This was most evident when comparisons were made between fractions 4 and 8 (or between fractions 3 and 11) from vehicle-treated lysates,
which contained similar levels of total p21 (Fig. 1C), but
substantially more p21 was recovered by GST-cyclin E·Cdk2 pull-down
in the LMW fractions (Fig. 1D, fractions 8 and
11). Importantly, the majority of LMW p21 was not monomeric,
because free p21 in lysates that were boiled eluted predominantly in
fraction 12 (~30 kDa, Fig. 1E). Therefore there were at
least three distinct p21-containing complexes identified by these
experiments: 1) high abundance, poorly recovered by cyclin E·Cdk2
pull-down (multimeric, eluting >100 kDa); 2) low abundance, efficiently recovered by cyclin E·Cdk2 pull-down (multimeric, eluting
30-100 kDa); and 3) very low abundance, efficiently recovered by
cyclin E·Cdk2 pull-down (monomeric, eluting ~30 kDa). These properties accounted for the decrease in p21/GST-cyclin E·Cdk2 association in vitro in the absence of detectable changes in
total p21 (Fig. 1A); i.e. LMW p21 (primarily
complex types 2 and some type 3) comprised only a small fraction of
total p21 but was efficiently recovered by GST-cyclin E·Cdk2
pull-down and was markedly decreased in abundance following estrogen
treatment (Fig. 1, C and D). Therefore, the
estrogen-induced decrease in cyclin E·Cdk2 inhibitory activity was
likely caused by the decrease in LMW p21 abundance. The two possible
mechanisms for this that were mentioned above (sequestration into
complexes that eluted in fraction 6, and decreased expression through
either decreased synthesis and/or increased degradation) were further investigated.
Increased Cyclin D1 Synthesis Is Sufficient but Not Necessary for
Full Cyclin E·Cdk2 Activation--
LMW p21 may have been sequestered
by cyclin D1 and thereby unavailable for association with cyclin
E·Cdk2. E2 treatment stimulates synthesis of cyclin D1
and the formation of cyclin D1·Cdk4·p21 complexes (12, 13, 43). We
have previously derived clonal MCF-7 cell lines stably transfected with
a heavy metal-responsive cyclin D1 gene (MCF7.7cycD1). In
these cells zinc-induced expression of cyclin D1 is accompanied by the
formation of cyclin D1·Cdk4·p21 complexes, reduced levels of LMW
p21, and increased cyclin E·Cdk2 activity (14). However, cyclin
E·Cdk2 activation is only quantitatively mimicked when cyclin D1 is
expressed ectopically at ~2 × the level produced by
E2 treatment (14), consistent with a role for an additional
mechanism(s) for cyclin E·Cdk2 activation. Zinc-induced ectopic
cyclin D1 expression had no effect on total p21 levels, but caused
redistribution of LMW p21 into gel filtration fraction 7 (Fig.
2A). Therefore, it was likely
that the increase in p21 in fraction 7 following ectopic cyclin D1
expression (Fig. 2A) and in fractions 6 and 7 following
E2 treatment (Fig. 1C) represented cyclin
D1·Cdk4·p21 complex formation.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Cyclin D1 antisense oligonucleotides
partially inhibit E2-induced cyclin E·Cdk2
activation. A, a clonal MCF-7 cell line (MCF-7.7cycD1)
stably transfected with a metallothionein gene promoter-cyclin D1
cDNA construct (14) was growth-arrested by treatment with 10 nM ICI 182780 for 48 h, then cyclin D1 expression was
induced by treatment with 50 µM ZnSO4.
Protein lysates were prepared after 8 h and analyzed for p21
levels in the total lysate or in HiLoad 16/60 gel filtration fractions
as described in Fig. 1C. In B, MCF-7 cells were
growth-arrested by treatment with 10 nM ICI 182780 for
48 h then rescued with 100 nM E2. After
1.5 h of E2 treatment, cells were transfected with
cyclin D1 oligonucleotides (SN, sense; SC,
scrambled; AS, antisense) using CellFECTIN liposomal
reagent. The concentration of SN and SC control oligomers corresponded
to the highest concentration of AS oligomers. The transfection mixture
was replaced with medium (containing 10 nM ICI 182780 ± 100 nM E2 as appropriate) 1.5 h later.
Lysates were prepared after 8 h of E2 treatment and
analyzed for cyclin D1 expression by immunoblot, cyclin E·Cdk2 kinase
activity (using histone H1 as a substrate), and p130 phosphorylation
status. Immunoreactive bands corresponding to three differentially
phosphorylated forms of p130 are indicated. The uppermost
band is an unidentified cross-reacting protein that is a useful
loading control.
|
|
Because ectopic expression of cyclin D1 is unable to quantitatively
mimic the effect of E2 on cyclin E·Cdk2 activation (14), cyclin D1-independent mechanisms may contribute to the activation of
cyclin E·Cdk2 by E2. To directly test this hypothesis,
antisense cyclin D1 oligonucleotides were employed to inhibit the
increased cyclin D1 expression following E2 treatment.
E2-induced activation of cyclin E·Cdk2 was inhibited by
~25% following the transfection of sufficient antisense cyclin D1
oligomers to abrogate the majority of the increase in cyclin D1
expression following E2 treatment (lane 5, Fig.
2B). In vivo phosphorylation of a cyclin E·Cdk2 target, p130, was also evident when the increase in cyclin D1 expression was abrogated. Indeed, E2-induced activation of
cyclin E·Cdk2 and p130 phosphorylation were still evident following
suppression of cyclin D1 expression to below control levels by this
method (lane 6, Fig. 2B). These results with
ectopic cyclin D1 expression and antisense cyclin D1 oligomers both
indicated that cyclin E·Cdk2 activation by E2 occurred in
part through a mechanism that was independent of an increase in cyclin
D1-mediated sequestration of LMW p21. Cyclin E·Cdk2 activation
following expression of ectopic c-Myc in MCF-7 cells also occurs via a
cyclin D1-independent mechanism (14). It was likely that a basal level
of cyclin D1 was necessary for complete cyclin E·Cdk2 activation,
because the most marked inhibition of cyclin D1 synthesis did prevent
some cyclin E·Cdk2 activation.
LMW p21 Is Recently Synthesized--
A second potential
p21-targeting mechanism was that the E2-induced decrease in
LMW p21 was caused by changes in p21 synthesis/degradation. We first
investigated whether LMW p21 was recently synthesized when compared
with the total pool of p21. Gel filtration chromatography was performed
on lysates from cells incubated with a 15-min pulse of
35S-labeled methionine-cysteine 8 h after
E2 treatment. p21 immunoprecipitates from each fraction
were analyzed for total p21 protein and 35S-labeled p21
(Fig. 3). Because the half-life for p21
in these cells was ~130 min (data not shown), labeling for 15 min
incorporated 35S predominantly into newly synthesized p21.
In vehicle-treated cells total p21 eluted as a single asymmetric peak
at ~120 kDa with ~15% eluting <100 kDa (Figs. 1C and
3). 35S-Labeled p21 in vehicle-treated cells also eluted as
a single peak but had a molecular mass of ~70 kDa, with
~40% eluting at a molecular mass of <100 kDa (Fig. 3). This
indicated that nascent p21 was preferentially distributed to LMW
fractions. Following E2 treatment there was a decrease in
the level of total p21 eluting <100 kDa (Figs. 1C and 3)
and a more substantial decrease in 35S-labeled p21 eluting
<100 kDa (Fig. 3). Therefore, although the proportion of LMW p21 that
was recently synthesized could not be calculated from this experiment,
a likely reason for the decrease in LMW p21 following E2
treatment was a decrease in the level of nascent p21.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Low molecular weight p21 protein complexes
contain nascent p21. The experimental design is described in Fig.
1. After 8 h of E2 treatment, cells were incubated
with [35S]methionine-cysteine-containing medium for 15 min. Cell lysates were prepared from E2-treated and control
cells, and proteins were separated by gel filtration chromatography as
described in Fig. 1C. p21 immunoprecipitates were prepared
from gel filtration fractions, separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred
to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were sequentially analyzed for
35S-labeled p21 (by using PhosphorImager screens and
autoradiography) and total p21 by immunoblot, and their relative
expression was plotted.
|
|
Estrogen Inhibits p21 Synthesis--
The effect of E2
on the level of newly synthesized p21 was then examined by incubating
cells with a 15-min pulse of 35S-labeled
methionine-cysteine at 2-10 h after E2 treatment.
Immunoprecipitates of p21 were analyzed for 35S-labeled p21
by autoradiography and immunoblotted for total p21 (Fig.
4A). E2 treatment
had no effect on the uptake and incorporation of the
Tran35S-label into total cellular protein or a
specific control cytoskeletal protein, cortactin (Fig. 4B).
Decreased incorporation of 35S into p21 was evident 4 h after E2 treatment (~68% of control) and progressively
declined (~52% of control at 10 h, Fig. 4, A and
C; see also Figs.
5D and 7A). The
decrease in nascent p21 occurred prior to a major detectable decrease
in expression of total p21 (Figs. 1A and 4A) and
coincided with decreased p21/cyclin E·Cdk2 association in the GST
pull-down experiments (Fig. 1A). The prominently labeled
36-kDa co-immunoprecipitating protein, which was increased following
E2 treatment (Fig. 4A), was identified by
re-immunoprecipitation experiments as cyclin D1 (Fig. 4A,
top right panel), which is transcriptionally up-regulated
between 2 and 4 h after E2 treatment (12, 13, 43). The
reduction in 35S-labeled p21 may have been due to decreased
stability of newly synthesized p21 following E2 treatment,
however, the half-lives of p21 incorporating 35S during a
15-min pulse were identical in E2- and vehicle-treated cells (Fig. 4D). Therefore, the decrease in nascent p21
identified in these experiments provided strong evidence that
E2 treatment decreased the rate of p21 protein
synthesis.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
E2 inhibits p21 protein
synthesis. The experimental design is described in Fig. 1. Cells
were incubated with [35S]methionine-cysteine-containing
medium for 15 min at various times after E2 treatment.
A, p21 immunoprecipitates were prepared and analyzed for
35S-labeled p21 and total p21 as described in Fig. 3
(top left panel). To confirm that the 36-kDa band was cyclin
D1, p21 was immunoprecipitated and divided into two aliquots. One
aliquot was re-immunoprecipitated for cyclin D1, then
immunoprecipitated proteins from both samples were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE/autoradiography (top right panel). B,
total cellular lysate and immunoprecipitates of p21 and cortactin were
analyzed for incorporation of 35S label into protein as
described in Fig. 3. C, the expression of
35S-labeled p21 after E2 treatment (top
left panel, Fig. 4A) and total p21 (bottom
panel, Fig. 4A) was quantitated by densitometry and
compared with time-matched controls. The points on the graph
represent the mean value from three to six independent experiments ± S.E. , 35S-labeled p21; , total p21. D,
the half-life of nascent p21 was determined by pulse-chase analysis
8 h after E2 treatment. Following 15 min of
35S labeling, the medium was replaced with non-radioactive
medium and lysates were prepared up to 180 min later.
35S-Labeled p21 was analyzed as described in Fig. 3, and
the relative expression was plotted on a logarithmic scale. ,
E2-treated t1/2 ~ 130 min; ,
vehicle-treated. t1/2 ~ 120 min.
|
|

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
E2 inhibits p21
transcription. The experimental design is described in Fig.
1. A and B, RNA was prepared and p21 and 36B4
abundance were analyzed by Northern blot. Relative p21 mRNA
expression (corrected for loading variation by 36B4 mRNA
expression) is presented graphically. C, nuclei were
harvested at various times after E2 treatment, and nascent
mRNA transcripts were elongated in the presence of
[32P]UTP. RNA was isolated and used to probe slot-blot
membranes with pUC and pBS plasmids containing cDNAs for actin or
p21 or no cDNA (there was no hybridization to empty pUC or pBS
plasmid, data not shown). Slot-blot membranes were washed extensively
and analyzed on PhosphorImager screens. The average level of expression
of nascent p21 transcripts from two experiments was quantitated and was
graphed relative to nascent actin transcripts (empty bars,
+E2; filled bars, E2). Error
bars indicate the range of ratios. D, cells were
treated with either roscovitine (25 µM) or vehicle
(Me2SO) at 0 or 6 h after E2 treatment.
After a total of 8 h of E2 treatment, cells were
incubated for 15 min with
[35S]methionine-cysteine-containing medium.
Immunoprecipitates of p21 were prepared from cell nuclei and analyzed
for 35S-labeled p21.
|
|
Northern blot analysis showed that the level of p21 mRNA decreased
by ~30% 4 h after E2 treatment, and thereafter fell
to ~30% of control levels at 24 h (Fig. 5, A and
B), coinciding with the decrease in p21 protein synthesis
(Fig. 4C). The same result was obtained by RNase protection
analysis of mRNA from an independent experiment (data not shown).
Because the half-life of p21 protein in E2-treated and
control cells was ~130 min (data not shown), it was not surprising
that this level of inhibition of p21 synthesis was not detected as a
decrease in total p21 protein until 8 h after estrogen treatment
(Fig. 1A). Nuclear run-off transcription assays indicated
that this effect was likely mediated by decreased p21
transcription rather than decreased p21 mRNA stability, because the
level of p21 mRNA transcripts synthesized in the nuclear run-off transcription assay fell to ~60% of control by 6 h (mean of two independent experiments, Fig. 5C). It was possible that the
decrease in p21 synthesis was a consequence rather than a cause of
cyclin E·Cdk2 activation. To test this, cells were treated with
roscovitine, a specific chemical inhibitor of cyclin E·Cdk2.
Roscovitine treatment from 0 to 8 h or 6 to 8 h produced some
decrease in p21 expression but did not prevent the decrease in p21
synthesis following E2 treatment (Fig. 5D).
Collectively, these results suggested that E2 decreased the
rate of p21 protein synthesis by inhibition of p21 gene
transcription. Reduced levels of nascent p21 protein occurred
independently of cyclin E·Cdk2 activation and coincided with
decreased LMW p21, decreased p21/cyclin-Cdk2 association in
vitro, and activation of endogenous cyclin E·Cdk2. Therefore,
inhibition of p21 synthesis was likely to constitute a cyclin
D1-independent mechanism for cyclin E·Cdk2 activation by estrogen.
Decreased p27 Synthesis Is Secondary to Cyclin E·Cdk2
Activation--
Following E2 treatment, p21 contributes
the majority of cyclin E·Cdk2 inhibitory activity with little
contribution from p27 (12, 13). However, the cyclin
E·Cdk2-binding activity of p27 is also down-regulated by
E2 (11, 12), and this process may contribute to the
maintenance of cyclin E·Cdk2 activation. Therefore, we investigated
the mechanism for this decrease in p27 inhibitory activity
(p57Kip2 expression could not be detected in MCF-7 cells by
RNase protection analysis and was therefore unlikely to play a major
role in E2 regulation of cell cycle progression). Similar
to p21, the pool of p27 that was highly efficiently recovered by
GST·cyclin E·Cdk2 pull-down was largely confined to relatively LMW
p27-containing complexes, which were decreased in abundance following
E2 treatment (Fig.
6A). In contrast to p21, there
was no evidence for sequestration of LMW p27 and elution at a different
molecular weight. This may be because the increase in association
between cyclin D1 and p27 following E2 treatment is
substantially less than that between cyclin D1 and p21 (12). Instead,
decreased expression of LMW p27 was likely to be due to changes in p27
protein synthesis and/or stability. Surprisingly, p27 mRNA
expression and protein synthesis rates were slightly increased (Fig.
6B and data not shown) following E2 treatment,
however, p27 protein stability was decreased (p27 protein half-life in
antiestrogen-arrested control cells was >180 min and ~110 min after
10 h of E2 treatment (Fig. 6C)). Although these assays analyzed total p27 rather than LMW p27 specifically, they
suggested that the decrease in LMW p27 may have been secondary to
decreased p27 stability. Proteasome-mediated degradation of p27 can be
activated by cyclin E·Cdk2-dependent phosphorylation of
p27 (44). Indeed, the cyclin E·Cdk2 inhibitor roscovitine was
sufficient to completely prevent the E2-induced decrease in p27 recovered by GST·cyclin E·Cdk2 pull-down (Fig. 6D).
Most importantly, this result indicated that, in contrast to the
decrease in availability of p21 for association with cyclin E·Cdk2,
decreased p27 availability was likely to be a consequence, and not a
cause, of E2-induced cyclin E·Cdk2 activation.
E2 treatment stimulated a small increase in cyclin E
synthesis, which was blocked by roscovitine, indicating that this was
also secondary to cyclin E·Cdk2 activation (data not shown).
Therefore, the order of events following E2 treatment were:
1) decreased p21 synthesis and increased cyclin D1 synthesis, which
both reduced the abundance of LMW p21; 2) cyclin E·Cdk2 activation;
and 3) increased p27 degradation and cyclin E synthesis.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Decreased levels of inhibitory complexes of
p27 are a consequence of cyclin E·Cdk2 activation. The
experimental design is described in Fig. 1. A, lysates were
prepared after 8 h of E2 treatment and separated on a
HiLoad 16/60 gel filtration column. Fractions were analyzed for total
p27 and p27 retrieved by GST·cyclin E·Cdk2 pull-down. B,
cells were incubated with
[35S]methionine-cysteine-containing medium
for 15 min at various time points after E2 treatment. p27
immunoprecipitates were prepared and analyzed for
35S-labeled p27 and total p27. The expression of
35S-labeled p27, total p27, and p27 mRNA expression
(analyzed by RNase protection and corrected for loading variation by
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA expression) after
E2 treatment (compared with time-matched controls) are
presented. C, cells were treated with cycloheximide after
10 h of E2 treatment, and p27 levels were analyzed by
Western blot. The percentage of p27 remaining is presented. ,
E2-treated; , vehicle-treated. D, cells were
treated with 25 µM roscovitine or Me2SO
vehicle 6 h after E2 treatment, and lysates were
prepared at 8 h and analyzed for total p27 expression and p27
retrieved by GST-cyclin E·Cdk2 pull-down.
|
|
Inhibition of p21 Synthesis Is Sufficient and Necessary for Cyclin
E·Cdk2 Activation--
Experiments were performed to determine
whether a decrease in p21 synthesis, but without a major decrease in
total p21 protein expression, was sufficient to activate cyclin
E·Cdk2. Transfection of p21 antisense phosphorothioate
oligonucleotides into antiestrogen-arrested cells produced
concentration-dependent decreases in nascent p21 and
activation of cyclin E·Cdk2 (Fig.
7A). Concentrations of p21 antisense oligomers that produced an approximately equal decrease in
newly synthesized p21 to that following E2 treatment
activated cyclin E·Cdk2 but not to the same extent as E2
(compare lanes 4 and 5 with 1). More
pronounced inhibition of p21 synthesis (lane 6) matched
cyclin E·Cdk2 activation by E2. These concentrations of
p21 antisense oligonucleotides did not produce observable decreases in
total p21 after 8 h, although they did at later times (data not
shown). Cyclin E·Cdk2 activation was accompanied by p130
phosphorylation in vivo. Although antisense-mediated
inhibition of p21 synthesis is unlikely to completely mimic
E2 treatment, these experiments provided strong evidence
that targeted inhibition of nascent p21 by E2 can induce
substantial activation of cyclin E·Cdk2.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Decreased p21 synthesis and increased cyclin
D1 synthesis are required together for E2-induced cyclin
E·Cdk2 activation. A, MCF-7 cells were
growth-arrested by treatment with 10 nM ICI 182780 for
48 h then transfected with p21 oligonucleotides (SN,
sense; SC, scrambled; AS, antisense) using
CellFECTIN liposomal reagent. The concentration of SN and SC control
oligomers corresponded to the highest concentration of AS oligomers.
After 4 h the transfection mixture was replaced with medium
containing 10 nM ICI 182780 ± 100 nM
E2. Lysates were prepared 8 h later and analyzed by
immunoblot for p21 expression, nascent p21 (as described in Fig. 4),
cyclin E·Cdk2 kinase activity (using histone H1 as a substrate) and
p130 phosphorylation status. B, MCF-7 cells were
growth-arrested by treatment with 10 nM ICI 182780 for
48 h then treated with 100 nM E2. After
3 h, adenovirus carrying the p21 C mutant cDNA or control
virus was added to the medium. The m.o.i. of control virus corresponded
to the highest m.o.i. of the p21 C mutant virus. Cells were harvested
8 h after E2 treatment and analyzed for p21 expression
and cyclin E·Cdk2 kinase activity (H1). Relative cyclin
E·Cdk2 kinase activity is shown. C, cells were transfected
with cyclin D1 oligonucleotides from 1.5 to 3 h after
E2 treatment (SN, sense; AS,
antisense), then infected with adenovirus carrying p21 C mutant
cDNA or control virus. Cells were harvested 8 h after
E2 treatment and analyzed by immunoblot for expression of
cyclin D1, p21 and p130, and for cyclin E·Cdk2 kinase activity
(H1).
|
|
We next tested whether inhibition of p21 synthesis was required for
cyclin E·Cdk2 activation by E2. An adenovirus expressing human p21 (Ad-p21
C) was used to quantitatively replace the
E2-induced decrease in endogenous p21. This mutant p21
lacks the C-terminal 21 amino acids but preserves the CDK-binding
domain and N-terminal cyclin-binding domain sufficient for full
inhibition of CDK activity (40, 45). Identification of endogenous- and
adenoviral-synthesized p21 was facilitated by their differential
electrophoretic mobility (p21
C migrates at ~19 kDa). Cells were
infected with various m.o.i. of Ad-p21
C 3 h after
E2 treatment, and cyclin E·Cdk2 activity was analyzed at
8 h. Infection efficiency was >95% for all m.o.i. used when
adenovirus carrying green fluorescence protein was employed in similar
experiments (data not shown). As expected, increased synthesis of
p21
C produced concentration-dependent inhibition of
cyclin E·Cdk2 activity (Fig. 7B). Most importantly,
relatively small changes in p21 expression markedly inhibited cyclin
E·Cdk2 activity, because increases of only 10 and 17% inhibited the
increase in cyclin E·Cdk2 activity by 42 and 58%, respectively
(lanes 7 and 8, Fig. 7B). These small
increases in p21 quantitatively replaced the decrease in total p21
observed 8 h after E2 treatment (as estimated by gel
filtration, Fig. 1C), indicating that E2
treatment induced some cyclin E·Cdk2 activation independently of
decreased p21 expression.
Taken together, these data indicated that decreased p21 protein
synthesis, prior to a detectable decrease in total p21 protein expression, was sufficient for cyclin E·Cdk2 activation following E2 treatment and was necessary for complete cyclin E·Cdk2
activation. However, because manipulation of p21 expression did not
quantitatively mimic cyclin E·Cdk2 activation following
E2 treatment, E2 must also activate cyclin
E·Cdk2 by a p21-independent pathway.
Full Activation of Cyclin E·Cdk2 Requires Inhibition of p21
Synthesis and Increased Cyclin D1 Synthesis--
Previous experiments
in which we increased or decreased the expression of cyclin D1 (14) or
p21 (Figs. 2B and 7B) indicated the presence of
cyclin D1-independent and p21-independent pathways for
E2-induced cyclin E·Cdk2 activation. Therefore we tested
whether inhibition of cyclin D1 synthesis and a concurrent increase in p21 synthesis would quantitatively inhibit the E2-induced
increase in cyclin E·Cdk2 activity. Cells were therefore treated with
E2 and then transfected with antisense cyclin D1 oligomers
and infected with Ad-p21
C. Either treatment alone inhibited the
E2-induced increase in cyclin E·Cdk2 activity by ~50%,
and together they eliminated any increase in activity (Fig.
7C). Therefore, estrogen appears to utilize both molecular
events to induce full activation of cyclin E·Cdk2.
 |
DISCUSSION |
E2-dependent Transcriptional Regulation of
p21 and Cyclin D1 Are Both Required for Full Activation of Cyclin
E·Cdk2--
The proliferative effect of estrogens on breast
epithelial cells is important for both breast development and
oncogenesis. A critical target of E2 is the cyclin E·Cdk2
complex, which stimulates G1-S phase transition. Cyclin
E·Cdk2 has been well studied in normal fibroblasts where it is also
required for proliferation and is activated following exposure to serum
or peptide growth factors by increased cyclin E expression (15, 16).
However, in contrast to fibroblasts, estrogen-induced cell cycle
progression in the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line is not associated with
large increases in cyclin E expression (11-13), and increased cyclin E
synthesis is secondary to cyclin E·Cdk2
activation.2 Alternative
mechanisms for cyclin E·Cdk2 activation include activation by the
Cdc25A phosphatase and Cdk2 phosphorylation/dephosphorylation by CAK,
and negative regulation of CDK inhibitor proteins. A recent paper has
addressed the complex relationship between cyclin E·Cdk2 and Cdc25A
during E2-induced cell cycle reentry (46). E2
induces the expression of Cdc25A mRNA and protein, and full Cdk2
activity is dependent upon Cdc25A expression and activation (46).
However, Cdc25A activation is in turn dependent upon cyclin E·Cdk2
activity. Therefore, Cdc25A maintains and amplifies cyclin E·Cdk2
activity (and cyclin E·Cdk2 amplifies Cdc25A activity in a positive
feedback loop) but is not likely to be an initiator of cyclin E·Cdk2
activation. Similarly, E2 treatment stimulates
CAK-dependent phosphorylation of Cdk2, but this is
secondary to cyclin E·Cdk2 activation (12, 13), and therefore this
mechanism is also likely to maintain, but not initiate, the cyclin
E·Cdk2 activity.
In contrast, we now show that E2-induced activation of
cyclin E·Cdk2 is dependent upon the inhibition of transcription of the CDK inhibitor p21WAF1/Cip1, but not vice versa, and
therefore inhibition of p21 transcription is a strong
candidate for the mechanism that initiates cyclin E·Cdk2 activation.
We and others (47, 48) have recently proposed that p21 is essential for
antiestrogen-mediated inhibition of cyclin E·Cdk2 activity. p21 is
also required to maintain a quiescent, G0 state in normal
foreskin fibroblasts (49). The major cyclin E·Cdk2 inhibitory protein
during early cyclin E·Cdk2 activation in the MCF-7 breast cancer cell
model is p21 (and not p27 or p57), association between p21 and cyclin
E·Cdk2 is inhibited by estrogen treatment, and active cyclin E·Cdk2
complexes are deficient in p21 (12, 13). Our data demonstrate that p21
exists in three distinct protein complexes in MCF-7 cells, which were
differentiated by complex size, i.e. <30, 30-100, and
>100 kDa. In MCF-7 cell lysates p21 was confined predominantly to the
two larger complexes, of which the 30-100 kDa forms were the least
abundant but made the greatest contribution to the p21 available for
association with GST-cyclin E·Cdk2. E2 treatment targeted
this LMW p21 pool and resulted in substantial changes in cyclin
E·Cdk2 activity without major changes in the abundance of total
cellular p21. Because LMW p21 was primarily a nascent protein, it could
also be preferentially targeted by experimental manipulation. In such experiments, the expression of p21 was manipulated quantitatively to
mimic the effects of E2 treatment. Treatment with p21
antisense oligonucleotides was sufficient to activate cyclin E·Cdk2,
and reversing the effect of E2 on p21 by infection with a
p21-expressing adenovirus prevented E2-induced cyclin
E·Cdk2 activation. We and others (47, 48) have performed what is
conceptually the reverse experiment and shown that antisense to p21 can
inhibit the growth-arrest induced by potent specific antiestrogens. LMW
p21 was targeted in vivo by two
E2-dependent mechanisms: sequestration of p21
through increased cyclin D1 expression and decreased p21 protein
synthesis. The early activation of cyclin E·Cdk2 could only be
partially prevented by quantitatively reversing either of these events
but was completely prevented by reversing both events simultaneously. Therefore, it is necessary to extend the current model of
E2-induced cyclin E·Cdk2 activation, which proposes that
p21 is sequestered away from cyclin E·Cdk2 by increased cyclin D1
expression (13, 14), to include decreased nascent p21 via inhibition of
p21 transcription and protein synthesis. Our results
indicate that this mechanism is of equivalent importance to that of
increased cyclin D1 expression and represents a novel cyclin
E·Cdk2-activating mechanism. This mechanism may have been overlooked
previously, because, in contrast to cyclin D1, changes in p21 mRNA
expression are not rapidly reflected in p21 protein levels due to the
relatively long half-life of p21 protein.
We focused on initial phases of cyclin E·Cdk2 activation, but our
results also indicate that cyclin E transcription and p27 degradation are likely to contribute to subsequent increases in activity. These molecules were both downstream of initial cyclin E·Cdk2 activation in our model but may then serve to further activate cyclin E·Cdk2 in positive feedback loops. Cyclin E
transcription can be E2F-dependent and initiated by cyclin
E·Cdk2 phosphorylation of pRB (50, 51), whereas cyclin E·Cdk2 can
phosphorylate p27 and stimulate its degradation (44, 52). Coupling of
p21 synthesis to p27 expression has been recently reported in
astrocytes in which antisense p21 oligonucleotides prevented
interleukin-4-mediated inhibition of Cdk2 activity and elevation of p27
expression (53), thus providing precedence for the proposed model of
cyclin E·Cdk2 activation induced by E2.
The Functional Subset of p21 Is Newly Synthesized--
The two
smallest p21-containing protein complexes (30-100 and <30 kDa)
contained p21 that was efficiently recovered by GST-cyclin E·Cdk2
pull-down assays. Monomeric p21 was confined to <30 kDa complexes that
were in very low abundance in vivo, and the 30-100 kDa p21
complexes contained newly synthesized p21. This suggests that p21
molecules pass through at least three distinct phases following
synthesis: nascent p21 molecules rapidly associate with unidentified
proteins (forming the 30-100 kDa complexes) and are available for
binding to and inhibiting cyclin·CDK complexes; as cyclin·CDK
complexes become available, their association with p21 results in the
accumulation of the >100 kDa complexes. Cyclin·CDK·p21 are
relatively stable, because they can be disrupted by boiling (12) but
not by antibodies raised against the CDK-binding site on p21 (54). This
stable interaction would account for the relatively low availability of
p21 from the >100 kDa complexes for binding to cyclin E·Cdk2
in vitro.
We have previously reported that only a small proportion of the total
cyclin E is associated with active Cdk2 in breast cancer cell lines and
is also associated with p130 (4, 12). This pool of "active" cyclin
E, like the inhibitory complexes of p21, is also recently
synthesized.3 Association
between active cyclin E and p130 in our model (14) is likely to occur
as a consequence of the decrease in available p21. p130 and p21
associate with cyclin E through their RXL motifs. Prior to
E2 treatment the relatively high rate of p21 protein synthesis ensures that cyclin E associates with, and is inhibited by,
nascent p21. Following E2 treatment the decreased abundance of LMW p21 permits the activation of recently synthesized cyclin E and
allows association with another RXL protein. The high levels of p130 in G0/G1 phase-arrested MCF-7 cells
(47) is likely to ensure association of cyclin E·Cdk2 with p130
rather than other RXL-containing proteins, e.g.
p27, p57, p107, E2F1-3, and Cdc25A (40, 55, 56). We consistently
observe association between p130 and active cyclin E·Cdk2 following
estrogen treatment, or ectopic expression of c-Myc or cyclin D1
expression in MCF-7 cells (14). Because p130 can inhibit cyclin
E·Cdk2 activity (57, 58), the mechanism that permits activation of
p130-associated cyclin E·Cdk2 in MCF-7 cells remains unknown.
In summary, we present data identifying inhibition of nascent p21 as a
novel mechanism for cyclin E·Cdk2 activation following estrogen
stimulation. Recent evidence demonstrating that p21 gene expression is repressed by c-Myc (59, 60) provides a potential mechanism through which estrogen and other mitogens may repress p21 transcription and activate cyclin E·Cdk2. Thus this
study provides a previously undefined mechanism of action of estrogen, which may have broad relevance to cell cycle control by diverse mitogenic hormones and growth factors.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Ruth Lyons, Ly Q. Nguyen, and Drs.
Eileen M. Rogan and Lee Carpenter for assistance with some experiments
and Dr. Elizabeth A. Musgrove for critically reviewing this manuscript. Dr. Joseph R. Nevins generously provided the adenoviral p21, and Dr.
Boris Sarcevic provided the recombinant GST·cyclin E·Cdk2 complexes.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by grants from the National
Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) and the New
South Wales Cancer Council.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported by an NHMRC Medical Postgraduate Research Scholarship
and a Leo & Jenny Cancer Foundation Cancer Research Grant.
§
Supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Cancer Research
Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, Darlinghurst, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia. Tel.:
61-2-9295-8322; Fax: 61-2-9295-8321; E-mail:
r.sutherland@garvan.org.au.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 1, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M104752200
2
O. W. J. Prall, unpublished data.
3
O. W. J. Prall, unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ER, estrogen
receptor;
E2, estradiol;
CDK, cyclin-dependent
kinase;
CAK, CDK-activating kinase;
ICI 182780, 7
-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluropentylsulfinyl)nonyl]estra-1,3,5-(10)-triene-3,17
-diol;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis;
TES, 2-{[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]amino}ethanesulfonic
acid;
AS, antisense;
SN, sense;
SC, scrambled;
Ad, adenovirus;
LMW, low
molecular weight;
m.o.i., multiplicity of infection.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bortner, D. M.,
and Rosenberg, M. P.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
453-459
|
| 2.
|
Spruck, C. H.,
Won, K. A.,
and Reed, S. I.
(1999)
Nature
401,
297-300
|
| 3.
|
Keyomarsi, K.,
O'Leary, N.,
Molnar, G.,
Lees, E.,
Fingert, H. J.,
and Pardee, A. B.
(1994)
Cancer Res.
54,
380-385
|
| 4.
|
Sweeney, K. J.,
Swarbrick, A.,
Sutherland, R. L.,
and Musgrove, E. A.
(1998)
Oncogene
16,
2865-2878
|
| 5.
|
Nielsen, N. H.,
Arnerlov, C.,
Emdin, S. O.,
and Landberg, G.
(1996)
Br. J. Cancer
74,
874-880
|
| 6.
|
Porter, P. L.,
Malone, K. E.,
Heagerty, P. J.,
Alexander, G. M.,
Gatti, L. A.,
Firpo, E. J.,
Daling, J. R.,
and Roberts, J. M.
(1997)
Nat. Med.
3,
222-225
|
| 7.
|
Couse, J. F.,
and Korach, K. S.
(1999)
Endocr. Rev.
20,
358-417
|
| 8.
|
Dickson, R. B.,
and Lippman, M. E.
(1995)
Endocr. Rev.
16,
559-589
|
| 9.
|
Migliaccio, A.,
Di Domenico, M.,
Castoria, G.,
de Falco, A.,
Bontempo, P.,
Nola, E.,
and Auricchio, F.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
1292-1300
|
| 10.
|
Migliaccio, A.,
Piccolo, D.,
Castoria, G.,
Di Domenico, M.,
Bilancio, A.,
Lombardi, M.,
Gong, W.,
Beato, M.,
and Auricchio, F.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
2008-2018
|
| 11.
|
Foster, J. S.,
and Wimalasena, J.
(1996)
Mol. Endocrinol.
10,
488-498
|
| 12.
|
Prall, O. W. J.,
Sarcevic, B.,
Musgrove, E. A.,
Watts, C. K. W.,
and Sutherland, R. L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
10882-10894
|
| 13.
|
Planas-Silva, M. D.,
and Weinberg, R. A.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
4059-4069
|
| 14.
|
Prall, O. W. J.,
Rogan, E. M.,
Musgrove, E. A.,
Watts, C. K. W.,
and Sutherland, R. L.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
4499-4508
|
| 15.
|
Koff, A.,
Giordano, A.,
Desai, D.,
Yamashita, K.,
Harper, J. W.,
Elledge, S.,
Nishimoto, T.,
Morgan, D. O.,
Franza, B. R.,
and Roberts, J. M.
(1992)
Science
257,
1689-1694
|
| 16.
|
Dulic, V.,
Lees, E.,
and Reed, S. I.
(1992)
Science
257,
1958-1961
|
| 17.
|
Ohtsubo, M.,
Theodoras, A. M.,
Schumacher, J.,
Roberts, J. M.,
and Pagano, M.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
2612-2624
|
| 18.
|
Tsai, L. H.,
Lees, E.,
Faha, B.,
Harlow, E.,
and Riabowol, K.
(1993)
Oncogene
8,
1593-1602
|
| 19.
|
van den Heuvel, S.,
and Harlow, E.
(1993)
Science
262,
2050-2054
|
| 20.
|
Wimmel, A.,
Lucibello, F. C.,
Sewing, A.,
Adolph, S.,
and Muller, R.
(1994)
Oncogene
9,
995-997
|
| 21.
|
Ohtsubo, M.,
and Roberts, J. M.
(1993)
Science
259,
1908-1912
|
| 22.
|
Resnitzky, D.,
Gossen, M.,
Bujard, H.,
and Reed, S. I.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
1669-1679
|
| 23.
|
Weinberg, R. A.
(1995)
Cell
81,
323-330
|
| 24.
|
Nevins, J. R.
(1998)
Cell Growth Diff.
9,
585-593
|
| 25.
|
Lukas, J.,
Herzinger, T.,
Hansen, K.,
Moroni, M. C.,
Resnitzky, D.,
Helin, K.,
Reed, S. I.,
and Bartek, J.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
1479-1492
|
| 26.
|
Alevizopoulos, K.,
Vlach, J.,
Hennecke, S.,
and Amati, B.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
5322-5333
|
| 27.
|
Leng, X.,
Connell-Crowley, L.,
Goodrich, D.,
and Harper, J. W.
(1997)
Curr. Biol.
7,
709-712
|
| 28.
|
Morgan, D. O.
(1995)
Nature
374,
131-134
|
| 29.
|
Sherr, C. J.,
and Roberts, J. M.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
1501-1512
|
| 30.
|
Aprelikova, O.,
Xiong, Y.,
and Liu, E. T.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
18195-18197
|
| 31.
|
Jiang, H.,
Chou, H. S.,
and Zhu, L.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
5284-5290
|
| 32.
|
Reynisdottir, I.,
and Massague, J.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
492-503
|
| 33.
|
Reynisdottir, I.,
Polyak, K.,
Iavarone, A.,
and Massague, J.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
1831-1845
|
| 34.
|
McConnell, B. B.,
Gregory, F. J.,
Stott, F. J.,
Hara, E.,
and Peters, G.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
1981-1989
|
| 35.
|
Wilcken, N. R. C.,
Prall, O. W. J.,
Musgrove, E. A.,
and Sutherland, R. L.
(1997)
Clin. Cancer Res.
3,
849-854
|
| 36.
|
Greenberg, M. E.,
and Bender, T. P.
(1999)
in
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology
(Ausubel, F. M.
, Brent, R.
, Kingston, R. E.
, Moore, D. D.
, Seidman, J. G.
, Smith, J. A.
, and Struhl, K., eds)
, pp. 4.10.1-4.10.10, John Wiley & Sons, New York
|
| 37.
|
Poluha, W.,
Poluha, D. K.,
Chang, B.,
Crosbie, N. E.,
Schonhoff, C. M.,
Kilpatrick, D. L.,
and Ross, A. H.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
1335-1341
|
| 38.
|
Ko, T. C., Yu, W.,
Sakai, T.,
Sheng, H.,
Shao, J.,
Beauchamp, R. D.,
and Thompson, E. A.
(1998)
Oncogene
16,
3445-3454
|
| 39.
|
Falck-Pedersen, E.
(1998)
in
Cells: A Laboratory Manual
(Spector, D. L.
, Goldman, R. D.
, and Leinwand, L. A., eds)
, pp. 90.1-90.28, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 40.
|
Adams, P. D.,
Sellers, W. R.,
Sharma, S. K.,
Wu, A. D.,
Nalin, C. M.,
and Kaelin, W., Jr.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
6623-6633
|
| 41.
|
Shiyanov, P.,
Bagchi, S.,
Adami, G.,
Kokontis, J.,
Hay, N.,
Arroyo, M.,
Morozov, A.,
and Raychaudhuri, P.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
737-744
|
| 42.
|
Cobrinik, D.,
Lee, M. H.,
Hannon, G.,
Mulligan, G.,
Bronson, R. T.,
Dyson, N.,
Harlow, E.,
Beach, D.,
Weinberg, R. A.,
and Jacks, T.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
1633-1644
|
| 43.
|
Altucci, L.,
Addeo, R.,
Cicatiello, L.,
Dauvois, S.,
Parker, M. G.,
Truss, M.,
Beato, M.,
Sica, V.,
Bresciani, F.,
and Weisz, A.
(1996)
Oncogene
12,
2315-2324
|
| 44.
|
Sheaff, R. J.,
Groudine, M.,
Gordon, M.,
Roberts, J. M.,
and Clurman, B. E.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
1464-1478
|
| 45.
|
Chen, J.,
Jackson, P. K.,
Kirschner, M. W.,
and Dutta, A.
(1995)
Nature
374,
386-388
|
| 46.
|
Foster, J. S.,
Henley, D. C.,
Bukovsky, A.,
Seth, P.,
and Wimalasena, J.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
794-810
|
| 47.
|
Carroll, J. S.,
Prall, O. W. J.,
Musgrove, E |