|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M108757200 on October 1, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 49, 45564-45572, December 7, 2001
The Anti-inflammatory Cytokine, Interleukin (IL)-10, Blocks the
Inhibitory Effect of IL-1 on Long Term Potentiation
A ROLE FOR JNK*
Áine
Kelly,
Aileen
Lynch,
Emily
Vereker,
Yvonne
Nolan,
Patrice
Queenan,
Elizabeth
Whittaker,
Luke A. J.
O'Neill , and
Marina A.
Lynch§
From the Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience,
Department of Physiology and Department of
Biochemistry, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
Received for publication, September 11, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Several effects of the proinflammatory cytokine,
interleukin-1 (IL-1 ), have been described in the central nervous
system, and one area of the brain where marked changes have been
reported is the hippocampus. Among these changes are an IL-1 -induced
inhibition of long term potentiation (LTP) in perforant path-granule
cell synapses and an attenuation of glutamate release in synaptosomes prepared from the hippocampus. Evidence suggests that, at least in
circulating cells, the anti-inflammatory cytokine, IL-10, antagonizes certain effects of IL-1. We investigated the effect of IL-10 on IL-1 -induced inhibition of LTP and glutamate release. The evidence presented indicates that IL-1 stimulates the stress-activated protein kinase, c-Jun-activated protein kinase (JNK), and IL-1 receptor-associated kinase, which may explain its inhibitory effect on
release and LTP, and that IL-10 reversed the IL-1 -induced stimulation of JNK activity and inhibition of release and LTP. We
observed that IL-10 abrogated the stimulatory effect of IL-1 on
superoxide dismutase activity and reactive oxygen species production, whereas the H2O2-induced inhibition of
LTP was also blocked by IL-10. We present evidence that suggests that
the action of IL-10 may be mediated by its ability to induce shedding
of the IL-1 type I receptor.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Interleukin-1 (IL-1 )1 is a proinflammatory
cytokine that is released from antigen-presenting cells during
infection or inflammation, and although its effects were originally
considered to be confined to the immune system, it is now known to
exert profound effects in the central nervous system. These effects
include modulation of thermoregulation, sleep, and appetite, which are
perhaps consistent with the relatively high expression of the
signal-generating IL-1 type 1 receptors
(IL-1R1) in hypothalamus (1-5). However, IL-1 also inhibits
transmitter release (6, 7) and calcium channel activity (7, 8) in the
hippocampus, and it has been shown to inhibit long term potentiation
(LTP) in CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus in vitro (9-11) and in
dentate gyrus in vivo (12-15); these effects are consistent
with the high distribution of IL-1R1 in hippocampus (1-5). The
inhibitory effects of IL-1 in hippocampus have been linked with
stimulation of the stress-activated kinases, p38 and JNK (14, 16),
which have also been shown to be activated by IL-1 in other cells
(17-20). Evidence suggests that activation of IL-1 receptor-activated
kinase (IRAK) is closely linked with JNK activation (21). Among the
documented consequences of enhanced activity of JNK and/or p38 in some
cells are growth arrest and deterioration of cell function or even cell
death (22, 23).
In contrast to the proinflammatory effects of IL-1 , IL-10 has
been shown to possess anti-inflammatory properties. Like IL-1 , IL-10
was originally identified as a product of certain cells of the immune
system, i.e. T helper cells, B cells, monocytes, and
macrophages (24, 25), although more recently it has been suggested that
IL-10 is produced by cells in the hypothalamus and pituitary (26).
IL-10 is co-released with IL-1 following injection of
lipopolysaccharide (LPS (27, 28)), but it has been shown to inhibit the
production of IL-1 and TNF in LPS-activated macrophages (24).
IL-10 has also been shown to reverse the IL-1-induced fever that
follows LPS injection (29), whereas IL-1 induces slow wave sleep
(30), IL-10 reduces sleep (31). At the level of the hippocampus, it has
been shown that recovery following traumatic brain injury was improved
by treatment with IL-10, and this was associated with decreased
concentration of IL-1 in hippocampus (32).
The evidence therefore indicates that IL-10 inhibits certain actions of
IL-1 , in some cases by inhibiting IL-1 production and/or release.
In an effort to examine this question further, we set out to establish
whether IL-10 might antagonize the inhibitory effect of IL-1 on
synaptic function in the hippocampus. The data indicate that IL-10
abrogates the IL-1 -induced inhibition of glutamate release and LTP
and its stimulatory effect on JNK. We propose that this action of IL-10
may be mediated by its ability to prevent reactive oxygen species
production by IL-1 .
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Animals--
Male Wistar rats (BioResources Unit, Trinity
College, Dublin, Ireland) were used in these experiments. Animals were
housed in groups of 4-6 under a 12-h light schedule; ambient
temperature was controlled between 22 and 23 °C, and rats were
maintained under veterinary supervision.
Phosphorylation of Mitogen-activated Protein Kinases and
IRAK--
The activities of ERK (33) and JNK (16) were analyzed in
P2 preparations obtained from dentate gyrus. Tissue samples
were equalized for protein concentration (34) and diluted so that the
same concentration of protein (1 mg/ml) was loaded onto each lane. In
experiments in which the effect of vasoactive intestinal protein (VIP)
was assessed, P2 preparations were made in the presence of
VIP (1 µM) allowing incorporation of the peptide into
synaptosomes before membranes resealed. In other experiments, samples
(which were/were not prepared in the presence of VIP) were preincubated for 15 min in IL-1 (1 ng/ml), IL-10 (10 ng/ml),
H2O2 (200 µM), or a combination
of some of these agents; in all circumstances, control samples were
incubated in vehicle (Krebs solution containing 1.8 mM
CaCl2) only. In a separate series of experiments,
synaptosomes were prepared from dentate gyrus of rats that were
injected intracerebroventricularly with saline or IL-1 (3.5 ng/ml)
or H2O2 (200 µM). Aliquots (10 µl, 1 mg/ml) were added to sample buffer (10 µl; Tris-HCl, 0.5 mM, pH 6.8; glycerol 10%; SDS, 10%; -mercaptoethanol,
5%; bromphenol blue, 0.05% w/v), boiled for 5 min, and loaded onto
gels (10% SDS for ERK; 12% for JNK). Proteins were separated by
application of 30 mA constant current for 25-30 min, transferred onto
nitrocellulose strips (225 mA for 75 min), and immunoblotted with the
appropriate antibody. To assess ERK activity, proteins were
immunoblotted overnight at 4 °C with an antibody specific for the
phosphorylated form of ERK (Promega; 1:4,000 in phosphate-buffered
saline/Tween (0.1% Tween 20; PBS-T) containing 2% non-fat dried
milk). To assess JNK activity, proteins were immunoblotted with an
antibody that specifically targets phosphorylated JNK (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology; 1:2,000 in PBS-T (0.1% Tween 20) containing 2% non-fat
dried milk) for 2 h at room temperature. To assess IRAK, proteins
were immunoblotted with a rabbit polyclonal anti-IRAK-1 antibody
(1:4,000 Tris-buffered saline/Tween (0.1% Tween 20 containing 0.1%
bovine serum albumin) for 2 h at room temperature. In all cases,
nitrocellulose strips were washed and incubated for 2 h at room
temperature with secondary antibody (horseradish peroxidase-linked
anti-rabbit antibody; 1:10,000 dilution (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in
the case of ERK, horseradish peroxidase-linked anti-rabbit antibody;
1:1,000 dilution (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in the case of IRAK, and peroxidase-linked anti-mouse IgG; 1:2,000 dilution (Sigma) in the case
of JNK). Protein complexes were visualized by ECL detection (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) in the case of ERK and JNK and Supersignal (Pierce)
in the case of IRAK. Immunoblots were exposed to film for 3-4 h in the
case of ERK, overnight in the case of JNK, and 10 s in the case of
IRAK and processed using a Fuji x-ray processor. Protein bands were
quantitated by densitometric analysis.
Release of Glutamate--
The impure synaptosomal
preparation, P2, was prepared as described previously (35)
and resuspended in oxygenated Krebs solution containing 2 mM CaCl2. Synaptosomes were preincubated for 15 min at 37 °C in oxygenated Krebs solution containing 2 mM CaCl2 or Krebs solution to which 1 ng/ml
IL-1 , 10 ng/ml IL-10, or both were added. In some experiments,
synaptosomes were prepared in the presence of VIP (1 µM)
as described above and were subsequently incubated with or without
IL-1 (1 ng/ml) or H2O2 (200 µM). Tissue samples were aliquoted onto Millipore filters
(0.45 mm), rinsed under vacuum, and then incubated in 250 µl of
oxygenated Krebs solution at 37 °C for 3 min in the presence or
absence of 40 mM KCl. The filtrate was collected and stored
at 80 °C for later analysis (36). Triplicate samples (50 µl) or
glutamate standards (50 µl; 50 nM to 10 µM
prepared in 100 mM Na2HPO4 buffer,
pH 8.0) were added to glutaraldehyde-coated 96-well plates, incubated, and washed. Ethanolamine (250 µl; 0.1 M in 100 mM Na2HPO4 buffer) was used to bind
any unreacted aldehydes, and donkey serum was used to block nonspecific
binding. Antiglutamate antibody (raised in rabbit; 100 µl; 1:5,000 in
PBS-T; Sigma) was added, incubated, washed, and reacted with secondary
antibody (anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-linked antibody; 100 µl;
1:10,000 in PBS-T; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
3,3',5,5'-Tetramethylbenzidine liquid substrate was added as chromogen;
samples were incubated for exactly 60 min at room temperature, and
H2SO4 (4 M; 50 µl) was added to
stop the reaction. Optical densities were determined at 450 nm using a
multiwell plate reader, and values were calculated with reference to
the standard curve, corrected for protein (34) and expressed as µmol
of glutamate/mg of protein.
Analysis of IL-1R1 Expression--
Samples (dentate gyrus
synaptosomes), which were preincubated for 20 min at 37 °C in
IL-1 (1 ng/ml), IL-10 (10 ng/ml), or both, were assessed for IL-1R1
expression by gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting. Following
incubation, samples underwent one freeze-thaw cycle and were
centrifuged (10,000 × g for 10 min). The supernatant
was used to assess soluble IL-1R1, and the pellet, which was
resuspended in Krebs solution containing 2 mM
CaCl2, was used to assess membrane-associated IL-1R1. In both cases, samples were equalized for protein concentration, and then
proteins were separated by application of 30 mA constant current for
25-30 min, transferred onto nitrocellulose strips (225 mA for 75 min),
and blocked overnight at 4 °C in PBS-T containing 6% non-fat dried
milk. After appropriate washing (5 times 10-min washes in PBS-T),
membranes were incubated in the primary antibody (rabbit anti-rat
IL-1R1 IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:1,000 in PBS-T containing 2%
non-fat dried milk)) for 45 min at room temperature and 45 min at
37 °C, washed (4 times 10-min washes in PBS-T), incubated in the
secondary antibody (horseradish peroxidase-linked anti-rabbit, 1:2,000
in PBS-T containing 2% non-fat milk) for 45 min at room temperature
and 45 min at 37 °C, and washed. Protein complexes were visualized
by ECL detection (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) by exposing immunoblots
to film for overnight at 4 °C and processed using a Fuji x-ray
processor. Protein bands were quantitated by densitometric analysis.
Induction of LTP in Vivo--
Rats were anesthetized by
intraperitoneal injection of urethane (1.5 g/kg intraperitoneal); the
absence of a pedal reflex was considered to be an indicator of deep
anesthesia. LTP was induced unilaterally in perforant path-granule cell
synapses as described previously (12, 13). Briefly, a bipolar
stimulating electrode and an unpopular recording were stereotaxically
positioned in the perforant path (4.4 mm lateral to ) and dorsal
cell body region of the dentate gyrus (2.5 mm lateral and 3.9 mm
posterior to Bregma), respectively. Rats were injected
intracerebroventricularly (2.5 mm posterior, and 0.5 mm lateral, to
Bregma) with saline, IL-1 (3.5 ng/ml) alone, or together with IL-10
(35 ng/ml or 1 µg/ml) or with H2O2 (200 µM) alone, or together with IL-10 (1 µg/ml); injection
volume was 5 µl in all cases. Test shocks were given at 30-s
intervals and recorded for 10 min before and 40 min after tetanic
stimulation (3 trains of stimuli; 250 Hz for 200 ms; 30 s
intertrain interval). Tetanic stimulation was delivered 40 min after injection.
Analysis of Reactive Oxygen Species Formation--
The formation
of reactive oxygen species was assessed by analyzing formation of the
highly fluorescent 2',7-dichlorofluorescein from the non-fluorescent
probe, 2'7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (Molecular Probes (37)). The
synaptosomal pellet, P2, was prepared from hippocampus and
resuspended in 1 ml of ice-cold 40 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.4. Samples were incubated at 37 °C for 15 min in the presence of
2'7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (10 µl; final concentration 5 µM; from a stock solution of 500 µM in
methanol) to which IL-1 (1 µg/ml) and/or IL-10 (10 ng/ml) was
added. To terminate the reaction, the dye-loaded synaptosomes were
centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 8 min. The pellet was
resuspended in 3 ml of ice-cold 40 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.4. Fluorescence was monitored at a constant temperature of 37 °C
immediately before stimulation with IL-1 (1 ng/ml) and 15 min
post-stimulation, at 488 nm excitation (bandwidth 5 nm), and 525 nm
emission (bandwidth 20 nm). Reactive oxygen species formation was
quantified from a standard curve of 2',7-dichlorofluorescein in
methanol (range 0.05 to 1 µM). Protein concentration was
determined (34), and the results were expressed as nmol/mg
protein/min.
Analysis of Superoxide Dismutase Activity--
Superoxide
dismutase activity was determined according to the method described
previously (38). Briefly, hippocampal slices were homogenized in Krebs
solution containing CaCl2 and centrifuged at 15,000 for 10 min. Aliquots (800 µl) of incubation buffer (50 mM
potassium buffer (pH 7.8) containing 1.8 mM xanthine, 2.24 mM nitro blue tetrazolium, 40 units of catalase, 7 µl/ml
xanthine oxidase, and 1.33 mM diethylenetriaminepentaacetic
acid) were added to samples of supernatant (100 µl) at different
dilutions (1:2, 1:5, 1:10, 1:20, 1:50, and 1:100) and analyzed by UV
spectroscopy at 560 nm. In some experiments, slices were incubated for
30 min at 37 °C in IL-1 (100 pg/ml) in the presence/absence of
IL-10 (10 ng/ml) to analyze the effect of the cytokines on superoxide dismutase activity. Enzyme activity was assessed as the rate of reduction of nitro blue tetrazolium, which was inhibited with increasing concentrations of protein. One unit of activity was defined
as the amount of protein necessary to decrease the rate of the
reduction of nitro blue tetrazolium by 50%.
 |
RESULTS |
Fig. 1A shows that
IL-1 (1 ng/ml) increased JNK activity as indicated by an increase in
the phosphorylated form of JNK; this effect is demonstrated in one
sample immunoblot and also in the mean data obtained from seven
experiments that indicate a statistically significant effect of IL-1
(p < 0.05; Student's t test for paired means). IL-10 reversed the stimulatory effect of IL-1 on JNK activity. In contrast to its effect on JNK, neither IL-1 alone nor
in combination with IL-10 affected ERK phosphorylation (Fig. 1B).

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
IL-1 significantly increased activity of JNK
(A, p < 0.05; Student's t test
for paired means), but not ERK (B), in hippocampal
synaptosomes, and this effect was suppressed by IL-10. The histograms
represent the means (± S.E.) of 7 observations; the data were
calculated by densitometric analysis and are expressed as arbitrary
values. Sample immunoblots are shown in which the effect of IL-1 is
shown in the presence (lane 4) or absence (lane
2) of IL-10; lane 1 represents the control
(Con) condition and lane 3 the effect of IL-10
alone. C, KCl (40 mM) significantly increased
glutamate release (**, p < 0.01; Student's
t test for paired samples; n = 6), but this
effect and unstimulated glutamate release were inhibited by
preincubation of synaptosomes in IL-1 (1 ng/ml; +, p < 0.05 compared with untreated synaptosomes; Student's t
test for unpaired samples). Preincubation with IL-10 (10 ng/ml)
reversed the inhibitory effect of IL-1 on release, whereas release
in the presence of IL-10 alone was comparable with the control.
D, IL-1 increased expression of the 100-kDa
phosphorylated form of IRAK as indicated by the sample immunoblot
(compare lanes 1 and 2, control and
IL-1 -treated, respectively). Co-incubation in the presence of IL-10
(lane 4) reversed the IL-1 -induced effect, whereas IL-10
alone (lane 3) did not markedly change protein expression.
Statistical analysis of the mean values obtained from densitometric
analysis indicated that IL-1 significantly increased expression of
IRAK (p < 0.05; ANOVA) but that mean values in the
other 3 groups were similar. E, analysis of the data
obtained by calculating the ratio of the 100-kDa phosphorylated form of
IRAK to the 80-kDa unphosphorylated form revealed an IL-1 -induced
significant increase that was reversed by co-incubation in the presence
of IL-10.
|
|
Data from previous experiments indicated that IL-1 inhibited
KCl-stimulated [3H]glutamate release in hippocampus (7)
and that increased JNK activity was coupled with decreased endogenous
glutamate release (14, 16); therefore, we analyzed the effect of
IL-1 (1 ng/ml) alone and in the presence of IL-10 (10 ng/ml) on
endogenous glutamate release. Fig. 1C indicates that
although incubation of hippocampal synaptosomes in the presence of 40 mM KCl significantly enhanced glutamate release (**,
p < 0.01; ANOVA), this effect was blocked when IL-1
was incubated in the incubation medium. The data also indicate that
unstimulated release was decreased by IL-1 (+, p < 0.05; ANOVA). IL-10 completely abrogated the effects of IL-1 so that
both unstimulated and KCl-stimulated release were similar to values
observed under control conditions.
Because JNK activation is reported to be closely coupled with
IRAK phosphorylation in certain cell types (21), we addressed the
question of a similar coupling in hippocampus and reported that,
although IL-1 significantly increases the 100-kDa phosphorylated form of IRAK (Fig. 1D; p < 0.05; ANOVA),
IL-10 inhibits this IL-1 -associated effect. When the 80-kDa
unphosphorylated form of IRAK was assessed, no significant change with
IL-1 , IL-10, or the combination of both was observed (data not
shown); however, analysis of the ratio of 100-kDa IRAK to 80-kDa IRAK
revealed a significant increase with IL-1 which was suppressed by
IL-10 (Fig. 1E; p < 0.05; ANOVA). The data
are consistent with the idea that JNK activation by IL-1 and the
inhibition of this effect by IL-10 is linked with, and may be a
consequence of, IRAK activation.
The inhibitory effect of IL-1 on glutamate release represents
one factor that might contribute to its inhibitory effect on LTP. It
might be argued that, if this is the case, the effect of IL-1 on LTP
may also be suppressed by IL-10. Fig. 2
indicates that, in saline-treated rats, there was an immediate increase in the population epsp slope following tetanic stimulation and that this increase persisted for the duration of the experiment. The
mean percentage change (± S.E.) in the last 5 min of the experiment was 140.14 ± 2.47 (compared with the value in the 5 min prior to
the tetanus). Intracerebroventricular injection of IL-1 inhibited both the early and later components of LTP; in this group, the mean
percentage change in population epsp slope in the last 5 min of the
experiment was 96.44 ± 1.30 (Fig. 2B;
p < 0.001; ANOVA). IL-10 attenuated the effect of
IL-1 in a dose-dependent manner; thus the mean
percentage changes in population epsp slope (± S.E.) in the last 5 min
of the experiment were 105.5 ± 0.75 and 117.3 ± 0.91, respectively, in rats treated with IL-1 and 35 ng/ml IL-10 and in
rats treated with IL-1 and 1 µg/ml IL-10; these values were
significantly different from the value in IL-1 -treated rats
(p < 0.001; ANOVA). However, the data also show that
IL-10 exerted an inhibitory effect on LTP; the mean percentage change in the last 5 min of the experiment in IL-10-treated rats was 113.1 ± 0.37, which was significantly lower than that in
saline-treated controls (p < 0.001; ANOVA).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Intracerebroventricular injection of IL-1 (3.5 ng/ml) inhibits both the early and late response to tetanic stimulation
(A, arrow). The inhibitory effect of IL-1 was
dose-dependently antagonized by intracerebroventricular
injection of IL-10 (35 ng/ml and 1 µg/ml), whereas IL-10 also
attenuated the response to tetanic stimulation. B, the mean
percentage changes in epsp slope in the last 5 min of the experiment
are compared in histogram form, and this reveals that there was a
significant inhibitory effect of IL-1 (p < 0.001)
but that this effect was significantly reversed by both 35 ng/ml
(p < 0.01; ANOVA) and 1 µg/ml (p < 0.001; ANOVA) IL-10. However an inhibitory effect of IL-10 is also
observed, although this effect was less marked than that of IL-1
(p < 0.001; ANOVA). Values are the means of 5 or 6 experiments in each group and are expressed as the percentage change in
population epsp slope after tetanic stimulation (compared with the mean
value immediately prior to tetanic stimulation).
|
|
We considered that one mechanism by which IL-10 might act to
inhibit the effect of IL-1 was by modulating expression of IL-1R1. Fig. 3 indicates that incubation of
tissue in the presence of IL-10 significantly decreased expression of
IL-1R1 in membrane fractions (p < 0.05; Student's
t test for paired means) and significantly increased its
expression in cytosolic fractions (p < 0.05;
Student's t test for paired means).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Incubation of dentate gyrus in the presence of
IL-10 (1 µg/ml) significantly decreased expression of membrane IL-1R1
(p < 0.05; Student's t test for paired
values; compare lane 1 (control (Con)) with
lane 2 (IL-10)) and significantly increased
expression of cytosolic IL-1R1 (p < 0.05; Student's
t test for paired values; compare lane 1 (control) with lane 2 (IL-10)).
|
|
Because previous data indicated that IL-1 increased reactive
oxygen species production in hippocampus (12, 13), it seemed reasonable
to propose that IL-10 might antagonize this effect. Fig.
4A indicates that IL-1
significantly increased reactive oxygen species accumulation
(p < 0.05; Student's t test for paired values), and this was reversed by co-incubation in the presence of
IL-10 (10 ng/ml). In parallel, IL-1 significantly increased superoxide dismutase activity (p < 0.05; Student's
t test for paired values; Fig. 4B), and this
effect was also reversed by IL-10, although it is acknowledged that the
S.E. values in this case are rather large.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
IL-1 (1 ng/ml) significantly enhanced reactive
oxygen species production (A, ROS) and superoxide dismutase
(B, SOD) activity in hippocampus (p < 0.05 in both cases; Student's t test for paired samples;
n = 6). IL-10 (10 ng/ml) blocked the effect of IL-1
on both measures.
|
|
We report that H2O2 mimicked the
stimulatory effect of IL-1 on JNK; thus intracerebroventricular
injection of IL-1 (3.5 ng/ml; Fig.
5A) or
H2O2 (200 µM; Fig. 5C)
increased JNK activity as shown by the sample immunoblots; analysis of
the mean values obtained from densitometric analysis indicated a
significant stimulatory effect of both agents (p < 0.05; Student's t test for paired values). These effects of
IL-1 and H2O2 were mimicked in
vitro; thus incubation of hippocampal tissue in the presence of
IL-1 (Fig. 5B) or H2O2 (Fig.
5D) increased JNK as indicated by the sample immunoblots; densitometric analysis revealed that these effects were
statistically significant (p < 0.05; Student's
t test for paired values).

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Intracerebroventricular injection of IL-1
(A, 3.5 ng/ml) or H2O2
(C, 200 µM) significantly increased activation
of JNK in hippocampal tissue (p < 0.05; Student's
t test for independent means). This effect was mimicked
in vitro, when IL-1 (B, 1 ng/ml) or
H2O2 (D, 200 µM) was
included in the incubation medium (p < 0.05;
Student's t test for independent means). Mean values
(arbitrary units) obtained from densitometric analysis of at least 6 replicate experiments are presented. In each sample immunoblot the
stimulatory effect of either IL-1 or H2O2
(right-hand lane) is shown.
|
|
If IL-1 mediates its effects by increasing reactive oxygen species
production, and if IL-10 inhibits the effect of IL-1 by antagonizing
this, then the inhibitory effect of IL-1 on LTP should be mimicked
by H2O2, which generates reactive oxygen
species, and IL-10 should suppress this effect of
H2O2. Fig.
6A indicates that LTP was
induced and sustained in saline-treated rats but blocked in rats that
received an intracerebroventricular injection of
H2O2; the mean percentage changes in population
epsp slope (± S.E.) in the last 5 min of the experiment (compared with
the value in the 5 min prior to the tetanus) were 141.2 ± 0.81 and 102.4 ± 0.83 in saline-treated and
H2O2-treated rats, respectively (Fig.
6B). Intracerebroventricular injection of IL-10 (1 µg/ml) reversed the inhibitory effect of H2O2, but
values were not completely restored to control values; thus
the mean percentage change in population epsp slope in the last 5 min
of the experiment was 129.9 ± 1.58 (Fig. 6B).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Intracerebroventricular injection of
H2O2 (200 µM) inhibits both the early and late
response to tetanic stimulation (arrow).
A, the inhibitory effect of
H2O2 was antagonized by intracerebroventricular
injection of IL-10 (1 µg/ml). The values presented are means of at
least five determinations. B, the mean percentage changes in
epsp slope in the last 5 min of the experiment are compared in
histogram form, and this reveals that there was a significant
inhibitory effect of H2O2 (p < 0.001; ANOVA) but that this effect was significantly reversed by both 1 µg/ml IL-10 (p < 0.001; ANOVA; comparison of the
effect of H2O2 with and without IL-10).
|
|
Both IL-1 and H2O2 induced parallel changes
in JNK activation and glutamate release, but confirmation of a causal
relationship between the two measures requires assessment of the effect
of a JNK inhibitor on IL-1 -induced inhibition of glutamate release. Although not specific, VIP has been shown to inhibit JNK in some cells,
and here we assessed the possibility that it might inhibit IL-1 - and
H2O2-induced JNK activation in hippocampus.
Fig. 7, A and C,
shows sample immunoblot in which the stimulatory effect of IL-1
(Fig. 7A) and H2O2 (Fig.
7C) on JNK phosphorylation are clearly shown (compare
lanes 1 and 2; control and IL-1 - or
H2O2-treated, respectively); these sample
immunoblots also show that VIP inhibited the IL-1 - and
H2O2-induced effects (lane 4),
whereas VIP alone exerted no marked effect (lane 3).
Densitometric analysis allowed comparison of the data obtained from 5 or 6 replicate experiments; statistical analysis of these data revealed
significant increases in JNK activity induced by IL-1 and
H2O2 (p < 0.05; ANOVA in each
case) and VIP-associated reversal of these stimulatory effects. In an
effort to establish a causal relationship between IL-1 - and
H2O2-induced inhibition of glutamate release
and JNK activation, we investigated the effect of VIP on IL-1 - and
H2O2-induced inhibition of glutamate release.
Fig. 7, B and D, shows that the inhibitory effects of both IL-1 and H2O2 on
KCl-stimulated glutamate release were blocked by VIP. Thus incubation
of synaptosomes in the presence of KCl significantly enhanced glutamate
release in control conditions and when tissue was incubated in the
presence of IL-1 and VIP or and H2O2 and VIP
(p < 0.05; ANOVA in all cases). However, the effect of
KCl was inhibited by IL-1 or and H2O2 and to
a lesser extent by incubation in the presence of VIP alone.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
The IL-1 -induced and
H2O2-induced (A and
C) increases in JNK activation and decreases in
KCl-stimulated glutamate release (B and
D) are abrogated by VIP. A, IL-1 (1 ng/ml) and H2O2 (200 µM)
significantly increased JNK activation (p < 0.05;
ANOVA), and this effect was blocked by vasoactive intestinal peptide (1 µM), which alone exerted no effect. The stimulatory
effects on JNK activation are shown in the two sample immunoblots
(compare lane 2 with lane 1 in A and
C); these effects contrast with the lack of change following
incubation in the presence of VIP alone (lane 3) or VIP
combined with IL-1 or H2O2 (lane
4). B and D, addition of KCl (40 mM) to the incubating medium significantly enhanced
glutamate release in synaptosomes prepared from dentate gyrus
(p < 0.05; ANOVA), and this effect was inhibited by
IL-1 (1 ng/ml) and H2O2 (200 µM). VIP (1 µM) suppressed the
IL-1 -induced and H2O2-induced inhibition of
glutamate release so that the KCl-associated stimulatory effect was
restored, but VIP alone also exerted an inhibitory effect on
KCl-stimulated release.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We set out to investigate whether the
anti-inflammatory cytokine, IL-10, might reverse the inhibitory effects
of the proinflammatory cytokine, IL-1 , on synaptic function in the
hippocampus. The data indicate that the IL-1 -induced inhibition of
LTP in perforant path-granule cell synapses was abrogated by IL-10, and
the evidence suggests that this is likely to be a consequence of the
ability of IL-10 to overcome the coupled stimulatory effects of IL-1 on reactive oxygen species production and JNK activity. Our evidence is
consistent with the idea that these changes might be consequent upon
the IL-10-induced decrease in expression of membrane IL-1R1.
IL-1 significantly attenuated unstimulated and
KCl-stimulated release of endogenous glutamate in hippocampal
synaptosomes. This is consistent with a previous report (7) from this
laboratory in which we observed an inhibitory effect of IL-1 on
release of radiolabeled glutamate. IL-10 completely reversed the
inhibitory effect of IL-1 on both unstimulated and KCl-stimulated
glutamate release. In parallel, the stimulatory effect of IL-1 on
JNK activation in hippocampal tissue was blocked by co-incubation in
the presence of IL-10. We have reported previously (14, 16) that
IL-1 stimulated JNK activity in hippocampal tissue, supporting the findings of others (19) in a variety of different cell types. To our
knowledge, this is the first report indicating that IL-10 suppresses
the activation of JNK by IL-1 in brain tissue. The findings
(a) that JNK activity and glutamate release are negatively correlated (14, 16), and (b) that IL-10 blocks both the
stimulatory effect of IL-1 on JNK and the inhibitory effect on
release suggest that activation of JNK may be directly responsible for
impaired glutamate release. We have attempted to address this question more thoroughly by investigating the effect of VIP, which has been
shown to inhibit the effect of JNK in several cell types including
macrophages (39), on glutamate release. We established that, in
parallel with its ability to inhibit IL-1 -induced JNK activation in
hippocampus, as in other cells (39), VIP suppressed the inhibitory
effect of IL-1 on glutamate release. These findings provide further
evidence that JNK activation negatively impacts on glutamate release
and that this effect may be the root of the inhibitory effect of
IL-1 on release.
The findings of previous studies have suggested that IRAK
phosphorylation, which occurs downstream of IL-1R1 activation, is closely linked with JNK activation (21), and in an effort to establish
this coupling in hippocampal tissue, we investigated the change in
expression of the phosphorylated 100-kDa form of IRAK in hippocampal
tissue that had been incubated in IL-1 with/without IL-10. The data
indicated that, in parallel with the IL-1 -induced enhancement of JNK
phosphorylation, IL-1 also increased expression of the
phosphorylated form of IRAK and concomitantly increased the ratio of
phosphorylated to unphosphorylated IRAK. These observations suggested
that the primary effect of IL-10 was upstream of JNK activation, at
least at the level of IRAK activation. Indeed the present finding that
IL-10 decreased expression of membrane-associated IL-1R1 suggests that
the primary effect of IL-10 may be to induce shedding of the IL-1R1 in
a manner that may be analogous to shedding of the decoy IL-1RII (40).
It seems reasonable to propose that a reduction in membrane IL-1R1 will
lead to down-regulation of downstream signaling events and may explain
the ability of IL-10 to block IL-1 -induced activation of JNK (14,
16).
Results from previous studies (14, 16) have indicated that
LTP in perforant path-granule cell synapses is accompanied by an
increase in glutamate release and that LTP is impaired when glutamate
release is inhibited and when JNK is activated. Thus we have reported
that the compromised LTP in aged rats (16), rats treated
intracerebroventricularly with IL-1 (14), or rats treated
intraperitoneally with lipopolysaccharide (41) is accompanied by
increased JNK activation and decreased release. We argued that if
increased JNK activation and decreased glutamate release are responsible for IL-1 -induced inhibition of LTP, then IL-10, which reverses these effects of IL-1 in vitro, should block the
inhibitory effect of IL-1 on LTP. The data presented here confirm
our previous observations that IL-1 inhibits LTP (12-14, 16) and
demonstrate that IL-10 acts in a dose-dependent manner to
abrogate this effect of IL-1 . We propose that the inhibitory effect
of IL-10 on IL-1 -induced changes in vitro suggests that
IL-10 may mediate its effect by blocking the stimulatory effect of
IL-1 on JNK and its inhibitory effect on glutamate release. Three
previous studies are relevant to this observation. First, it has been
reported that when anergy was induced in a T cell line, IL-10
production was increased, whereas JNK activity was blocked (42),
suggesting a negative correlation between IL-10 and JNK activity, which
is consistent with the present findings. Second, it has been shown
that, in monocytes, IL-10 inhibited LPS-induced increase in activation of another mitogen-activated protein kinase, p38 (43). Third, IL-10 has
been shown to inhibit the effect of TNF in monocyte-derived dendritic cells, and this antagonism has been attributed to the ability
of IL-10 to block the effect of TNF on mitogen-activated protein
kinases, including JNK (44).
In addition to the finding that IL-10 abrogates the inhibitory
effect of IL-1 on JNK activation, the results of this study suggest
that IL-10 may exert antioxidant effects. We observed that IL-1
increased reactive oxygen species production in the hippocampus and
that this effect was suppressed by IL-10. This effect of IL-10 is
consistent with earlier findings indicating a negative correlation
between IL-10 and reactive oxygen species production in leukocytes
(45). Indeed it has been proposed (46) that the protective role of
IL-10 following an acute inflammatory stimulus might be associated with
its ability to limit superoxide accumulation in endothelial cells. The
present data suggest that this role of IL-10 might be a consequence of
its ability to overcome the IL-1 -induced increase in activity of
superoxide dismutase. The stimulatory effect of IL-1 on superoxide
dismutase in hippocampus concurs with earlier data that demonstrated
that the cytokine up-regulated Mn-superoxide dismutase gene expression
in cultured rat hepatocytes (47) and increased the activities of both
Mn- and Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutases in rat pancreatic islets (48).
It is significant that H2O2, which
generates reactive oxygen species production (16, 49), mimics the
effect of IL-1 in hippocampus in at least two respects; first, it
activates JNK activity both in vivo and in vitro,
and second, it also inhibits LTP. It has been known for several years
that JNK activity is up-regulated in response to stress, including
oxidative stress (17, 22, 50), and therefore the finding that
intracerebroventricular injection of H2O2
activated JNK in hippocampus was not surprising; indeed the stimulatory
effect of H2O2 on JNK activation in
vitro confirms our earlier observations (14, 16).
Intracerebroventricular injection of H2O2
inhibited both the early and later responses to tetanic stimulation of
the perforant path. The effect of H2O2
administration on LTP in vivo or its effect in dentate gyrus
has not been reported previously, although it has been shown to inhibit
LTP in guinea pig CA1 in vitro (51), and we have previously
coupled an increase in reactive oxygen species accumulation with a
compromise in LTP in dentate gyrus of aged rats and following
intracerebroventricular injection of IL-1 (12, 13). The present data
indicate that IL-10 blocked the inhibitory effect of
H2O2 on LTP. Thus IL-1 induced reactive oxygen species production and H2O2 mimicked the
effect of IL-1 in inhibiting LTP and activating JNK, and these
effects were reversed by IL-10. On the basis of these observations, it
seems reasonable to propose that IL-1 may exert its effects by
increasing reactive oxygen species production leading to JNK
activation. Confirmation of a pivotal role for JNK in inhibition of
glutamate release and LTP must await the availability of a JNK
inhibitor; however, our observation that VIP suppressed the inhibitory
effects of IL-1 and H2O2 provides
preliminary evidence of a causal link between activation of JNK and
inhibition of glutamate release.
Although the data presented in this study represent a significant
advance in our understanding of the mechanism of action of IL-10, it
must be acknowledged that a few previous studies have reported that
IL-10 opposes the effect of IL-1. For example, IL-10 has been shown to
reduce tissue damage following experimentally induced traumatic brain
injury, and because this was associated with lower IL-1 expression, it
was concluded that this was due to an inhibition of IL-1 expression by
IL-10 (32). Similarly, injection of IL-10 reduced LPS-induced fever
(29) and the behavioral effects (52) induced by LPS. Because these
effects of LPS are also attributed to increased production and/or
release of IL-1, these observations have been interpreted as an
indication of the ability of IL-10 to counteract the effect of IL-1. It
remains to be established whether, in the latter two studies, IL-10
inhibited production of IL-1 as it does in macrophages (24) or whether it antagonizes the effect of IL-1. In this context, it is significant that IL-10 (at the same concentration used in the present study) has
been shown to inhibit the IL-1 -induced increase in IL-6 production in astrocytes (53) and RANTES (regulated on activation normal T cell
expressed and secreted) mRNA expression in microglia (54).
Our data demonstrate that the inhibitory effects of IL-1 on
hippocampal synaptic function can be abrogated by the anti-inflammatory cytokine, IL-10. We propose that this action is dependent on its ability to overcome the pro-oxidant effects of IL-1 that lead to
activation of JNK and the consequent inhibition of glutamate release and LTP.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the Higher Education Authority
(Ireland), European Union BioMed-2 Program Contract BMH4-CT97-2492, Enterprise Ireland, and the Health Research Board (Ireland).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 353-1-608 1770;
Fax: 353 1-679 3545; E-mail: lynchma@tcd.ie.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 1, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108757200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
IL-1 , interleukin-1 ;
IL-1R1, IL-1 type 1 receptor;
LTP, long term
potentiation;
IRAK, IL-1 receptor-activated kinase;
JNK, c-Jun
NH2-terminal kinase;
LPS, lipopolysaccharide;
TNF, tumor
necrosis factor;
VIP, vasoactive intestinal protein;
ERK, extracellular
signal-regulated kinase;
ANOVA, analysis of variance;
epsp, excitatory postsynaptic potential.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Lechan, R. M.,
Toni, R.,
Clark, B. D.,
Cannon, J. G.,
Shaw, A. R.,
Dinarello, C. A.,
and Reichlin, S.
(1990)
Brain Res.
514,
135-140[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Ban, E.,
Milon, G.,
Prudhomme, N.,
Fillion, G.,
and Haour, F.
(1991)
Neuroscience
43,
21-30[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Cunningham, E. T., Jr.,
Wada, E.,
Carter, D. B.,
Tracey, D. E.,
Battey, J. F.,
and De Souza, E. B.
(1992)
J. Neurosci.
12,
1101-1114[Abstract]
|
| 4.
|
Parnet, P.,
Amindari, S.,
Wu, C.,
Brunke-Reese, D.,
Goujon, E.,
Weyhenmeyer, J. A.,
Danzer, R.,
and Kelley, K. W.
(1994)
Mol. Brain Res.
27,
63-70[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Ericsson, A.,
Liu, C.,
Kasckow, J.,
Hart, R. P.,
and Sawchenko, P. F.
(1993)
Soc. Neurosci. Abstr.
19,
95
|
| 6.
|
Rada, P.,
Mark, G. P.,
Vitek, M. P.,
Manago, R. M.,
Blume, A. J.,
Beer, B.,
and Hoebel, B. G.
(1991)
Brain Res.
550,
287-290[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Murray, C. A.,
McGahon, B.,
McBennett, S.,
and Lynch, M.
(1997)
Neurobiol. Aging
18,
343-348[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Plata-Salaman, C. R.,
and ffrench-Mullen, J. M. H.
(1994)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
266,
1-10[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Bellinger, F. P.,
Madamba, S.,
and Siggins, G. R.
(1993)
Brain Res.
628,
227-234[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Katsuki, H.,
Nakai, S.,
Hirai, Y.,
Akaji, K.,
Kiso, Y.,
and Satoh, M.
(1990)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
181,
323-326[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Cunningham, A. J.,
Murray, C. A.,
O'Neill, L. A. J.,
Lynch, M. A.,
and O'Connor, J. J.
(1996)
Neurosci. Lett.
203,
1-4[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Murray, C.,
and Lynch, M. A.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
2974-2981[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Murray, C.,
and Lynch, M. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
12161-12168[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Vereker, E.,
O'Donnell, E.,
and Lynch, M. A.
(2000)
J. Neurosci.
20,
6811-6819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Lynch, M. A.
(1998)
Prog. Neurobiol. (New York)
56,
1-19
|
| 16.
|
O'Donnell, E.,
Vereker, E.,
and Lynch, M. A.
(2000)
Eur. J Neurosci.
12,
345-352[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Raingeaud, J.,
Gutpa, S.,
Rogers, J. S.,
Dickens, M.,
Han, J.,
Ulevitch, R. J.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
7420-7426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Rizzo, M. T.,
and Carlo-Stella, C.
(1996)
Blood
88,
3792-3800[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Uciechowski, P.,
Saklatvala, J.,
von der Ohe, J.,
Resch, K.,
Szamel, M.,
and Kracht, M.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
394,
273-278[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Derijard, B.,
Hibi, M.,
Wu, I.-H.,
Barrett, T.,
Su, B.,
Deng, T.,
Karin, M.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1994)
Cell
76,
1025-1037[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
O'Neill, L. A. J.,
and Greene, C.
(1998)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
63,
650-657[Abstract]
|
| 22.
|
Park, D. S.,
Stefanis, L.,
Yan, C. Y. I.,
Farinelli, S. E.,
and Greene, L. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
21898-21905[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Maroney, A. C.,
Glicksman, M. A.,
Basma, A. N.,
Walton, K. M.,
Knight, E., Jr.,
Murphy, C. A.,
Bartlett, B. A.,
Finn, J. P.,
Angeles, T.,
Matsuda, Y.,
Neff, N. T.,
and Dionne, C. A.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
104-111[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Fiorentino, D. F.,
Bond, M. W.,
and Mosmann, T. R.
(1989)
J. Exp. Med.
170,
2081-2095[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Moore, K. W.,
O'Garra, A.,
DeWall,
Malefyt, R.,
Vieira, O.,
and Mosmann, T. R.
(1993)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
11,
165-190[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Rady, P. L.,
Smith, E. M.,
Cadet, O.,
Opp, M. R.,
Tyring, S. K.,
and Huges, T. K., Jr.
(1995)
Cell. Mol. Neurobiol.
15,
289-296[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Durez, P.,
Abramowicz, D.,
Gerard, C.,
Van Mechelen, M.,
Amraoui, Z.,
Dubois, C.,
Leo, O.,
Velu, T.,
and Goldman, M.
(1993)
J. Exp. Med.
177,
551-555[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Van der Poll, T.,
Jansen, J.,
Levi, M.,
Ten Cate, H.,
Ten Cate, J. W.,
and Van Deventer, J. H.
(1994)
J. Exp. Med.
180,
1985-1988[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Leon, L. R.,
Kozak, W.,
and Kluger, M. J.
(1998)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
856,
69-75[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Shoham, S.,
Davenne, S.,
Cady, A. B.,
Dinarello, C. A.,
and Krueger, J. M.
(1987)
Am. J. Physiol.
253,
R142-R149[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Opp, M. R.,
Smith, E. M.,
and Hughes, T. K.
(1995)
J. Neuroimmunol.
60,
165-168[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Knoblach, S. M.,
and Faden, A. I.
(1998)
Exp. Neurol.
153,
143-151[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
McGahon, B.,
Maguire, C.,
Kelly, A.,
and Lynch, M. A.
(1999)
Neuroscience
90,
1167-1175[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
McGahon, B.,
and Lynch, M. A.
(1996)
Neuroscience
72,
847-855[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Ordronneau, P.,
Abdullah, L.,
and Petruse, P.
(1991)
J. Immunol. Methods
142,
169-176[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Lebel, C. P.,
and Bondy, S. C.
(1990)
Neurochem. Int.
17,
435-440[CrossRef]
|
| 38.
|
Spitz, D. R.,
and Oberley, L. W.
(1989)
Anal. Biochem.
179,
8-18[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Delgado, M.,
and Ganea, D.
(2000)
J. Neuroimmunol.
110,
97-105[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Vannier, E.,
Kaser, A.,
Atkins, M. B.,
Fantuzzi, G.,
Dinarello, C. A.,
Mier, J. W.,
and Tilg, H.
(1999)
Eur. Cytokine Netw.
10,
37-42[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Vereker, E.,
Campbell, V.,
Roche, E.,
McEntee, E.,
and Lynch, M. A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
26252-26528[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Chou, Y. K.,
Robey, I.,
Woody, C. N.,
Li, W.,
Offner, H.,
Vandenbark, A. A.,
and Davey, M. P.
(1998)
Cell. Immunol.
188,
125-136[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Niiro, H.,
Otsuka, T.,
Ogami, E.,
Yamaoka, K.,
Nagano, S.,
Akahoshi, M.,
Nakashima, H.,
Arinobu, Y.,
Izuhara, K.,
and Niho, Y.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
250,
200-205[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Sato, K.,
Nagayama, H.,
Tadokoro, K.,
Juji, T.,
and Takahashi, T. A.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
162,
3865-3872[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Dandona, P.,
Mohanty, P.,
Hamouda, W.,
Aljada, A.,
Kumbkarni, Y.,
and Garg, R.
(1999)
Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.
66,
58-65[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Gunnett, C. A.,
Heistad, D. D.,
Berg, D. J.,
and Faraci, F. M.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
279,
H1555-H1562
|
| 47.
|
Antras-Ferry, J.,
Maheo, K.,
Morel, F.,
Guillouzo, A.,
Cillard, P.,
and Cillard, J.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
403,
100-104[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Borg, L. A.,
Cagliero, E.,
Sandler, S.,
Welsh, N.,
and Eizirik, D. L.
(1992)
Endocrinology
130,
2851-2857[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Qin, S.,
Ding, J.,
Takano, T.,
and Yamamura, H.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
262,
231-236[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Lo, Y. Y. C.,
Wong, J. M. S.,
and Cruz, T. F.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
15703-15707[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Pellmar, T. C.,
Hollinden, G. E.,
and Sarvey, J. M.
(1991)
Neuroscience
44,
353-359[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Bluthe, R. M.,
Castanon, N.,
Pousset, F.,
Bristow, A.,
Ball, C.,
Lestage, J.,
Michaud, B.,
Kelley, K. W.,
and Danzer, R.
(1999)
Psychoneuroendocrinology
24,
301-311[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Pousset, F.,
Cremona, S.,
Danzer, R.,
Kelleym, K. M.,
and Parnet, P.
(1999)
Glia
26,
12-21[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Hu, S.,
Chao, C. C.,
Ehrlich, L. C.,
Sheng, W. S.,
Sutton, R. L.,
Rockswold, G. L.,
and Peterson, P. K.
(1999)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
65,
815-821[Abstract]
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Srinivasan, J.-H. Yen, D. J. Joseph, and W. Friedman
Cell Type-Specific Interleukin-1{beta} Signaling in the CNS
J. Neurosci.,
July 21, 2004;
24(29):
6482 - 6488.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Lynch, M. Moore, S. Craig, P. E. Lonergan, D. S. Martin, and M. A. Lynch
Analysis of Interleukin-1{beta}-induced Cell Signaling Activation in Rat Hippocampus following Exposure to Gamma Irradiation: PROTECTIVE EFFECT OF EICOSAPENTAENOIC ACID
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 19, 2003;
278(51):
51075 - 51084.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Minogue, A. W. Schmid, M. P. Fogarty, A. C. Moore, V. A. Campbell, C. E. Herron, and M. A. Lynch
Activation of the c-Jun N-terminal Kinase Signaling Cascade Mediates the Effect of Amyloid-{beta} on Long Term Potentiation and Cell Death in Hippocampus: A ROLE FOR INTERLEUKIN-1{beta}?
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 18, 2003;
278(30):
27971 - 27980.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|