|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M105777200 on September 11, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 49, 45654-45661, December 7, 2001
T Cell Regulation of p62dok (Dok1) Association
with Crk-L*
Maria Paola
Martelli ,
Jonathan
Boomer,
Ming
Bu, and
Barbara E.
Bierer§
From the Laboratory of Lymphocyte Biology, NHLBI, National
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Received for publication, June 21, 2001, and in revised form, September 10, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
In addition to engagement of the T cell
receptor-CD3 complex, T lymphocytes can be activated by a variety of
cell surface molecules including the ~50-kDa surface receptor CD2.
While the majority of biochemical signaling elements are triggered by
either CD2 or TcR-CD3 receptors, a small number of proteins are engaged by only one receptor. Recently, p62dok (Dok1), a member of the
Dok family of adapter molecules, has been reported to be activated by
CD2 and not by CD3 engagement. Here we have examined the role of
p62dok in CD2-dependent signaling in Jurkat T
cells. As previously reported, we find that ligation of the CD2
molecule by mitogenic pairs of anti-CD2 mAbs led to phosphorylation of
p62dok. While CD2-induced p62dok tyrosine
phosphorylation was independent of both the p36/38 membrane adapter
protein linker of activated T cells (LAT) and the ZAP70/Syk family of kinases, it was dependent upon the Src family of kinases including Lck and Fyn. We find further that CD2 engagement induced the
association of tyrosine-phosphorylated p62dok to Crk-L. The
CD2-dependent association of p62dok to Crk-L was
independent of expression of the ZAP70/Syk family of kinases. Of note,
while T cell receptor-CD3 engagement did not induce either
p62dok phosphorylation or Crk-L association in Jurkat T cells,
it did inhibit CD2-dependent p62dok-Crk-L
complexes; this TcR-CD3-mediated regulation was dependent upon ZAP70
kinase activity. Our data suggest that phosphorylation of
p62dok and its interaction with other signaling proteins may
depend upon integrated signals emanating from the CD2 receptor,
utilizing a ZAP70/LAT-independent pathway, and the TcR-CD3 receptor,
which is ZAP70/Syk-dependent.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
T cell antigen receptor
(TCR)1 engagement by specific
antigen embedded within MHC proteins or by anti-CD3 mAb triggers a
complex network of biochemical signal transduction events that
direct the functional program of the T cell (1). Early T cell
biochemical signaling involves Src (Lck and Fyn)-related tyrosine
kinase activity leading to ZAP70 kinase activity (2-5). Engagement of
TcR-CD3 complexes leads to the recruitment of adaptor molecules and
enzymes (protein tyrosine and serine/threonine kinases and
phosphatases) in a multicomponent signaling complex in specialized
membrane domains termed lipid rafts (6, 7). Signal transduction
culminates in transcriptional activation leading to cytokine
production and cellular proliferation.
The canonical early biochemical events that follow TcR-CD3 engagement
may be mimicked by ligation, via mitogenic combinations of mAbs, of the
CD2 molecule, a 50-55-kDa glycoprotein expressed on the surface of
essentially all human T and natural killer cells (8-10). Pairs of
anti-CD2 mAbs induce activation of the Src (Lck/Fyn) kinases, ZAP70
kinase, the adaptor molecules LAT and Cbl, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, inter alia, leading to
transcriptional activation of nuclear factor of activated T cells
(NFAT) and cytokine (e.g. interleukin-2) production
(11-20). Indeed, the remarkable similarity between these signaling
pathways led to the observation that the CD2 pathway required
expression of chain family members of the TcR-CD3 complex for
activity (12, 21-27). While CD2 is a coreceptor that functions to
enhance T cell adhesion (23, 28-30), relatively few intracellular
signaling events have been characterized that differentiate CD2
signaling from TcR-CD3 engagement (31, 32).
In order to identify CD2-dependent (apparently
TcR-CD3-independent) signaling events, we characterized early
biochemical signaling in the model Jurkat T cell line deficient in
expression of the LAT adaptor molecule, a molecule previously shown to
be required for NFAT and interleukin-2 transcriptional activation
through both the CD2 and TcR-CD3 receptors and to be necessary for
normal T cell development. We demonstrate preferential,
CD2-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of a 62-kDa protein
identified as p62dok. CD2-mediated p62dok tyrosine
phosphorylation was also independent of expression of the ZAP70/Syk
kinases but, as previously shown (33), dependent upon Src kinase
activity. We demonstrate further that CD2-mediated signal transduction
results in the association of p62dok with Crk-L but that this
association is negatively regulated by CD3 engagement, the latter
utilizing a signal transduction pathway that requires expression of
ZAP70 kinase.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cells and Reagents--
Jurkat cell lines were cultured in RPMI
1640 (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated
fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 10 mM Hepes, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin
(Life Technologies), and 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol (Bio-Rad), termed complete RPMI medium. The Jurkat T cell leukemia cell
line (clone J77) was a gift of K. Smith (Cornell University, New York,
NY). The ZAP70/Syk-deficient Jurkat clone, P116, and the
ZAP70-reconstituted clone, P116-ZAP70 (34), were the kind gift of
Robert Abraham (Duke University, Durham, NC). The LAT-deficient Jurkat
cells, ANJ3, and the LAT-reconstituted clone, ANJ3-LATwt (35), were the
gift of L. E. Samelson (NCI, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, MD). The JCaM1.6 cells reconstituted with wild type Lck
(JCaM1.6-Lck) (36) were the generous gift of David B. Straus
(University of Chicago). The Lck kinase was expressed under the control
of a tetracycline-repressible TetR-VP16 fusion protein in the
JCaM1.6 transfectant (36) and was grown in complete RPMI medium
containing 1 mg/ml Geneticin (Life Technologies, Inc.) and 250 µg/ml
hygromycin B (Calbiochem). Treatment with tetracycline (Calbiochem) (1 µg/ml) for at least 4 days was used to down-regulate Lck expression.
Neither cell viability nor CD3, CD2, or CD28 cell surface receptor
expression was affected by tetracycline treatment (data not shown)
(19).
Surface expression of both CD3 and CD2 on all cell lines was routinely
evaluated by direct immunofluorescence, as previously described (19,
20), using a Coulter Epics flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter Inc.). CD3
and CD2 expression were equivalent between wild type Jurkat, P116, and
P116-ZAP70 and between ANJ3 and ANJ3-LATwt (data not shown). CD3 and
CD2 cell surface expression remained constant with time.
The purified rabbit anti-p62dok antiserum was the generous gift
of N. Carpino and R. Kobayashi (Cold Spring Harbor, New York, NY). The
anti-CD2 mAbs T112 and T113 were the kind gift
of E. Reinherz (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA); the murine anti-human CD3 mAb OKT3 was purchased from the American Type Culture
Collection (Manassas, VA) and used as purified ascites fluid.
The rabbit polyclonal anti-PI3K (p85 subunit) antiserum, the
anti-phosphotyrosine mAb 4G10, and the murine anti-Crk-L mAb were
purchased from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid, NY); the
rabbit polyclonal anti-Crk-L and anti-Cbl antisera, the anti-phosphotyrosine (PY99) mAb directly conjugated to agarose beads,
and unconjugated protein A-agarose beads were purchased from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA).
Cell Stimulation and Immunoprecipitation--
For stimulation,
Jurkat cells (1 × 107/test) were washed in RPMI 1640 (without additives), resuspended in serum-free RPMI 1640 medium, and
incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Cells were then either left
unstimulated, stimulated with OKT3 (1 µg), or stimulated with
T112 plus T113 purified ascites (1:100
dilution) at 37 °C for the indicated times followed by rapid
centrifugation and resuspension of the pellet in 1 ml of ice-cold lysis
buffer (1% Brij 97, 150 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris,
pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
Na3VO4, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml
aprotinin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). After
incubation on ice for 20 min, cell lysates were clarified by
centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C.
When indicated, 30 µl of postnuclear lysate from each sample was set
aside prior to immunoprecipitation.
For immunoprecipitations, 1 µg of specific antibody and 20 µl of
protein A-agarose beads were added together to the clarified cell
lysates and incubated at 4 °C for 2 h. Clarified cell lysates from the same conditions of stimulation incubated with 20 µl protein A-agarose beads alone served as the control for carryover of
stimulating mAbs, as indicated. For immunoprecipitation of
phosphotyrosine-containing proteins, 20 µl of anti-Tyr(P)
(PY99) directly conjugated to agarose beads were used. The beads were
then washed three times with washing buffer (0.1% Brij 97, 150 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris pH 7.5, 1 mM
Na3VO4). Proteins were boiled in SDS sample
buffer, separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE),
transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (Millipore Corp., Bedford,
MA), and probed with primary antibodies followed by horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Polypeptides recognized in
the Western blot were detected using the enhanced chemiluminescence
(ECL) methods according to the manufacturer's instructions (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech). Each result shown is representative of between two
and six independent experiments; representative blots are shown.
 |
RESULTS |
p62dok Was Tyrosine-phosphorylated upon CD2 but Not CD3
Stimulation in Jurkat T Cells Independently of either LAT Protein or
ZAP70/Syk Kinase Expression--
We have previously shown that CD2,
like TcR-CD3, required both the LAT adapter protein and ZAP70/Syk
kinase expression for NFAT transcriptional activation (19, 20). In
order to characterize early signaling moieties recruited by CD2 and not
by TcR-CD3 engagement, we studied Jurkat T cells that were deficient in
expression of the adapter protein LAT or ZAP70/Syk kinases, molecules
known to be required for competent signal transduction leading to NFAT and interleukin-2 transcription (35-37). LAT-deficient mutants of the
Jurkat T-cell line (ANJ3) were compared with the LAT-reconstituted clone, ANJ3-LATwt. Cells were left unstimulated or stimulated via
mitogenic pairs of anti-CD2 mAbs or anti-CD3 mAb directed against
the TCR-CD3 complex; anti-phosphotyrosine antisera were used to probe
postnuclear lysates (Fig. 1A).
A prominent phosphoprotein of 62-64 kDa was observed in the
LAT-deficient cells, diminished upon reexpression of the LAT adapter
protein, and enhanced by CD2 engagement. Comparably treated cells were
subjected to anti-phosphotyrosine immunoprecipitation followed by
Western blot analysis using an anti-p62dok specific antibody
(Fig. 1B) to demonstrate that the 62-64-kDa protein was
detected by p62dok antisera. Reciprocal immunoprecipitation
experiments confirmed that p62dok was indeed
tyrosine-phosphorylated upon CD2 stimulation independently of LAT
kinase expression (Fig. 1C, upper
panel). Reprobing the stripped membrane with
anti-p62dok antisera confirmed equivalent loading of the
immunoprecipitated protein in all lanes (Fig. 1C,
lower panel). This demonstration of CD2-induced
p62dok tyrosine phosphorylation in Jurkat T cells is consistent
with an earlier observation by Hubert et al. (31), who
identified a p62 RasGAP-associated protein phosphorylated by CD2
engagement, an observation recently confirmed by others (33, 38-40).
Here, we extend these findings to demonstrate that the induction of p62dok tyrosine phosphorylation was independent of LAT
expression; indeed, the basal and stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation
of p62dok was enhanced in the absence of LAT expression,
suggesting reciprocal regulation of the protein by an as yet
uncharacterized pathway.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
CD2-mediated p62dok tyrosine
phosphorylation is independent of LAT protein expression.
A, the LAT-deficient Jurkat T cell line ANJ3 and ANJ3
reconstituted with wild-type LAT (ANJ3-LATwt) (106 cells)
were either left unstimulated or stimulated at 37 °C for 5 min using
anti-CD3 or pairs of anti-CD2 mAbs and lysed in 100 µl of 1% Brij 97 lysis buffer. 30 µl of PNL (0.3 × 106 cell
equivalents) were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with the
anti-phosphotyrosine mAb 4G10. Tyrosine phosphorylation of a 62-64-kDa
protein is shown by the arrow. B and
C, either ANJ3 or ANJ3-LATwt cells (107
cells/lane) were stimulated as indicated in A. PNL were
immunoprecipitated using either 20 µl of anti-phosphotyrosine (PY99)
mAb-agarose-conjugated antibody (B) or 1 µg of rabbit
anti-p62dok antibody (C), separated by SDS-PAGE, and
immunoblotted with 4G10 (upper panels). The same membranes
were stripped and reblotted with a rabbit anti-p62dok-specific
antibody (lower panels). The heavy chain of the
precipitating antibody (C, lower panel) is
indicated by the asterisk.
|
|
Given that LAT phosphorylation and function depends upon the ZAP70/Syk
kinase family in T cells, we wished to determine whether CD2-dependent p62dok tyrosine phosphorylation would
be dependent upon ZAP70 kinase activity. Antiphosphotyrosine
immunoprecipitates from resting or stimulated wild type Jurkat (J77)
cells or the ZAP70/Syk-deficient Jurkat mutant (P116) cells were
analyzed using an anti-p62dok specific antibody (Fig.
2A). p62dok was
basally tyrosine-phosphorylated in Jurkat T cells. Upon CD2 engagement,
but not upon CD3 ligation, the amount of tyrosine-phosphorylated p62dok precipitated was increased, and the appearance of a
slower migrating species was observed. The same pattern, but even
greater tyrosine phosphorylation following CD2 ligation, was observed
in the ZAP70/Syk kinase-deficient P116 T cells. Reciprocal
immunoprecipitation confirmed that CD2-dependent
p62dok tyrosine phosphorylation was independent of ZAP70/Syk
kinase expression (Fig. 2B).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The CD2-mediated p62dok tyrosine
phosphorylation is independent of ZAP70/Syk kinase expression.
A, either wild type Jurkat T cells (J77) or the
ZAP70/Syk-deficient Jurkat cells, P116 (107 cells/lane),
were left unstimulated or stimulated with either the mitogenic pair of
anti-CD2 mAbs T112 and T113 or anti-CD3 mAb
OKT3 at 37 °C for 5 min. PNL were prepared as described under
"Experimental Procedures," subjected to immunoprecipitation with 20 µl of agarose-conjugated anti-phosphotyrosine (PY99) mAb, separated
by SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with a rabbit
anti-p62dok-specific antibody. B, P116 cells
(107 cells/lane) were stimulated as indicated in
A. PNL were then subjected to immunoprecipitation with 1 µg of rabbit anti-p62dok antibody, separated by SDS-PAGE, and
immunoblotted with the anti-phosphotyrosine antibody 4G10 (upper
panel). The membrane was then stripped and reblotted with
anti-p62dok antibody (lower panel). The heavy chain
of either the stimulating (upper panel) or the precipitating
antibody (lower panel) is indicated by an
asterisk.
|
|
CD2-mediated p62dok Tyrosine Phosphorylation was Dependent
on Lck Expression in Jurkat T Cells--
The identity of the upstream
tyrosine kinase required for CD2-dependent tyrosine
phosphorylation of p62dok remains unclear. Previous reports
have concluded that the Src-related Lck kinase is able to mediate
p62dok tyrosine phosphorylation (33); murine p62dok was
tyrosine-phosphorylated in human CD2-expressing cells derived from
Fyn+/+ mice (38). To explore the specific role of Lck in
CD2-mediated p62dok tyrosine phosphorylation, we used the
CD2-positive Lck-reconstituted clone of JCaM1.6, the Lck-deficient
Jurkat cell line in which Lck kinase was expressed under the control of
a tetracycline-repressible TetR-VP16 fusion protein. Prolonged (~8
days) tetracycline (1 µg/ml) treatment of these cells induced
complete inhibition of Lck expression, as evaluated by Western blot
(data not shown) (19). Untreated or tetracycline-treated cells were
either left unstimulated or stimulated via either CD2 or CD3 receptors
for the indicated periods of time, and the pattern of
tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins was analyzed. As expected, both basal
and receptor-mediated protein tyrosine phosphorylation were severely
diminished by inhibition of Lck expression. In particular, the
CD2-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of a 62-64-kDa protein (Fig.
3A), recognized as
p62dok by immunoprecipitation studies (Fig. 3B), was
affected. In these Jurkat T cells, Fyn kinase is expressed at low
levels. The residual phosphorylation of p62dok and of other
proteins (e.g. p97 and p120) observed upon CD2 and not upon
CD3 stimulation in the tetracycline-treated cells (Fig. 3, longer
exposure) may be due to CD2-dependent Fyn activation. Taken
together, these data demonstrate that, in Jurkat T cells, CD2-mediated
p62dok tyrosine phosphorylation was regulated, at least in
part, by the Src-kinase family member Lck.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Lck kinase expression is required for
p62dok tyrosine phosphorylation upon CD2 stimulation in Jurkat
T cells. A, the Lck-deficient JCaM 1.6 cells
reconstituted with wild type Lck (JC1-Lckwt) were either left untreated
(Ø) or treated with tetracycline (Tet) 1 µg/ml for 8 days. Either untreated or Tet-treated cells (106
cells/test) were then either left unstimulated or stimulated via either
CD2 or CD3 for the indicated periods of time. Cells were lysed in Brij
97 1% lysis buffer, and PNL from equivalent cell numbers (0.3 × 106) were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with
4G10. Tyrosine phosphorylation of a 62-64-kDa protein is shown by the
arrow. A longer exposure of the same gel is shown at the
right. B, Lck-reconstituted JCaM 1.6 cells were
treated as in A and then either left unstimulated or
stimulated via either CD3 or CD2 for the indicated time periods. PNL
were subjected to immunoprecipitation with 20 µl of
agarose-conjugated anti-phosphotyrosine (PY99) mAb, separated by
SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with a rabbit anti-p62dok-specific
antibody.
|
|
Tyrosine-phosphorylated p62dok Coprecipitated with Crk-L
upon CD2 Stimulation in T Cells--
Hyperphosphorylated
p62dok was recently shown to coprecipitate with Crk-L in
Bcr/Abl-transformed cells (41, 42); whether p62dok associated
with Crk-L in the absence of the Bcr/Abl kinase or in the absence of
transformation was not examined. We have recently shown that, like CD3
stimulation, CD2 stimulation of Jurkat T cells induced the association
of Crk-L with the proto-oncogene c-Cbl and the p85 subunit of PI3K in a
multicomponent complex (20). Here we questioned whether the
CD2-stimulated tyrosine-phosphorylated p62dok protein in Jurkat
T cells was found to associate with Crk-L, Cbl, or the p85 subunit of
PI3K. For this purpose, wild type Jurkat T cells were either left
unstimulated or stimulated for 5 min via either TcR-CD3 or CD2, after
which Crk-L protein was immunoprecipitated from cell lysates using a
rabbit anti-Crk-L-specific antibody. As previously described (20), the
phosphoproteins p120 c-Cbl and the p85 subunit of PI3K were found to
coprecipitate with Crk-L upon either TcR-CD3 or CD2 stimulation (Fig.
4A, upper panel). Upon CD2 stimulation but not upon TcR-CD3 engagement, a phosphoprotein of ~62-64-kDa was found to coprecipitate with Crk-L (Fig.
4A, upper panel). The 62-64-kDa phosphoprotein
was identified as the docking protein p62dok by reblotting the
stripped membrane with a rabbit anti-p62dok-specific antibody
(Fig. 4A, lower panel). Since the identification of p62dok was performed on stripped membranes, further analysis
was performed. Immunoprecipitations using a mouse anti-Crk-L-specific
antibody followed by protein A-agarose or with protein A-agarose alone (to control for carryover of the stimulating antibody) from clarified postnuclear lysates of unstimulated or CD3- or CD2-stimulated Jurkat T
cells were blotted directly with a rabbit anti-p62dok-specific
antibody (Fig. 4B, upper panel). Again,
p62dok protein was detected in Crk-L immunoprecipitates
specifically from CD2-stimulated cells (Fig. 4B, upper
panel). Reblotting the stripped membrane with an
anti-phosphotyrosine antibody demonstrated that the
Crk-L-associated p62dok was tyrosine-phosphorylated
(Fig. 4B, middle panel). Quantitatively similar
amounts of Crk-L protein were immunoprecipitated in each lane (Fig.
4B, lower panel). Kinetic analysis demonstrated
that, following CD2 stimulation, p62dok associated with Crk-L
transiently, peaking at early (2-5 min) time points and undetectable
15 min after stimulation (data not shown).

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Tyrosine-phosphorylated p62dok
coprecipitates with Crk-L upon CD2 stimulation of Jurkat T cells.
A, wild type Jurkat cells (107cells/test) were
left unstimulated or stimulated with either T112 plus
T113 or OKT3 for 5 min. Cells were then lysed, and
clarified PNL were immunoprecipitated with 1 µg of rabbit anti-Crk-L
antibody, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with the
anti-phosphotyrosine 4G10 mAb (upper panel). The bands
corresponding to tyrosine-phosphorylated c-Cbl, p85 PI-3 kinase
(p85PI3K), and p62dok, confirmed by reprobing the
stripped membrane with specific antisera (not shown), are shown at
arrows. The same membrane was stripped and reblotted with a
rabbit anti-p62dok specific antibody (lower panel).
B, wild type Jurkat cells were stimulated as in
A. Postnuclear lysates were immunoprecipitated with 1 µg
of mouse anti-Crk-L antibody (lanes 1-3) or
incubated with protein A-agarose alone (lane
4-6), resolved by SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with a rabbit
anti-p62dok-specific antibody (upper panel). The
stripped membrane was probed with the anti-phosphotyrosine 4G10 mAb
(middle panel). Comparable amounts of Crk-L protein were
immunoprecipitated, confirmed by blotting the stripped membrane with a
rabbit anti-Crk-L-specific antibody (lower panel).
|
|
To determine whether the Crk-L-p62dok complex
coprecipitated c-Cbl and/or the p85 subunit of PI3K in a multicomponent
complex, we performed a series of reciprocal immunoprecipitation
experiments. While both CD2 and CD3 stimulation induced the association
of both c-Cbl and p85 PI3K with Crk-L (data not shown) (20), no p62dok protein was detected in c-Cbl or p85 PI3K
immunoprecipitates (data not shown). While these negative results do
not preclude an association under different experimental conditions,
they leave open the possibility that 1) the p62dok-Crk-L
complex is distinct from the Crk-L-c-Cbl-p85PI3K complex
previously described or 2) the association of c-Cbl or p85 PI3K with
p62dok is too weak to withstand the conditions of immunoprecipitation.
The CD2-induced p62dok/Crk-L Association Was Independent of
LAT Protein and ZAP70/Syk Kinase Expression--
Knowing that
CD2-mediated p62dok tyrosine phosphorylation was independent of
LAT protein expression (Fig. 2), we asked whether the
p62dok/Crk-L association was also independent of LAT. Crk-L
immunoprecipitates from resting or CD2- or CD3-stimulated LAT-deficient
Jurkat cells ANJ3 and the LAT-reconstituted clone ANJ3-LATwt were
immunoblotted with an anti-phosphotyrosine-specific antibody (Fig.
5, upper panel). Independent
of LAT protein expression, phosphoproteins of 120 and 85 kDa,
corresponding to c-Cbl and p85PI3K, respectively
(demonstrated by reblotting the stripped membrane with specific
antibody; data not shown), coprecipitated with Crk-L. A 62-64-kDa
phosphoprotein, recognized as p62dok (data not shown), was also
detected in the complex upon CD2 stimulation of either the
LAT-deficient or LAT-reconstituted Jurkat cells. Similar amounts of
Crk-L were immunoprecipitated in each lane, as confirmed by
stripping and reprobing the membrane with an anti-Crk-L specific
antibody (Fig. 5, lower panel). A similar experiment was
performed using the ZAP70/Syk-deficient Jurkat T cell line P116 and the
ZAP70-reconstituted cells P116-ZAP70. As shown in Fig.
6, p62dok coprecipitated with
Crk-L upon CD2 stimulation independently of ZAP70/Syk kinase
expression.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Tyrosine-phosphorylated p62dok
coprecipitates with Crk-L upon CD2 stimulation of Jurkat T cells
independently of LAT protein expression. The LAT-deficient Jurkat
T cell line ANJ3 and the ANJ3 reconstituted with wild-type LAT
(ANJ3-LATwt) Jurkat cells (107 cells/lane) were left either
unstimulated or stimulated with either T112 + T113 or OKT3 for 5 min. Crk-L immunoprecipitation was
performed as described in the legend to Fig. 4A. Crk-L
immunoprecipitates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with the
anti-phosphotyrosine 4G10 mAb (upper panel). The stripped
membrane was blotted with an anti-Crk-L-specific antibody to confirm
immunoprecipitation of comparable amounts of Crk-L protein (lower
panel). The bands corresponding to tyrosine-phosphorylated c-Cbl,
p85PI3K, and p62dok are shown by the
arrow.
|
|

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Tyrosine-phosphorylated p62dok
coprecipitates with Crk-L upon CD2 stimulation of Jurkat T cells
independently of ZAP70/Syk kinases expression. The
ZAP70/Syk-deficient Jurkat T cell line P116 and the P116 reconstituted
with wild-type ZAP70 (P116-ZAP70) Jurkat cells (107
cells/test) were left either unstimulated or stimulated with either
OKT3 for 5 min or T112 + T113 for 2 and 5 min.
Crk-L immunoprecipitation was performed as described above. Crk-L
immunoprecipitates were then resolved by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted
with a rabbit anti-p62dok specific antibody (upper
panel). The same membrane was also blotted with an
anti-Crk-L-specific antibody (lower panel).
|
|
TcR-CD3 Engagement Regulated the CD2-dependent
p62dok/Crk-L Association--
While the functional role of the
CD2-induced p62dok-Crk-L complex in T cells has not yet been
elucidated, it is clear that CD2 functions as a coreceptor in cellular
adhesion and to modulate signal transduction events in
TcR-CD3-stimulated cells. Because our data supported a model in which
CD2 regulated p62dok/Crk-L association independently of TcR-CD3
(and ZAP70) engagement, we questioned whether TCR-CD3 ligation
modulated the CD2-mediated and -specific association of p62dok
with Crk-L. Wild type Jurkat T cells were either left unstimulated or
stimulated for 2 and 5 min with either anti-CD3 mAb, mitogenic pairs of
anti-CD2 mAbs or a combination of anti-CD3 and pairs of anti-CD2 mAbs.
Clarified postnuclear lysates were subjected to anti-Crk-L-specific
immunoprecipitation and blotted directly with an
anti-p62dok-specific antibody (Fig.
7, upper panel). Surprisingly,
compared with CD2-stimulated cells, the amount of p62dok that
coprecipitated with Crk-L upon stimulation via both CD2 and CD3 was
significantly reduced. The stripped membrane was blotted with an
anti-Crk-L-specific antibody to confirm immunoprecipitation of equal
amounts of protein (Fig. 7, lower panel). These data suggested that ligation of the TcR-CD3 complex modulated the
quantitative association of p62dok with Crk-L following CD2
stimulation.

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Modulation of CD2-induced
p62dok/Crk-L association by TCR-CD3 stimulation. Wild type
Jurkat cells (107 cells/test) were left unstimulated or
stimulated with either the anti-CD2 mAbs T112 + T113 or the anti-CD3 mAb OKT3 or a combination of
T112 + T113 and OKT3 for 2 and 5 min. Cells
were then lysed, and clarified PNL were immunoprecipitated with 1 µg
of mouse anti-Crk-L antibody, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted
with a rabbit anti-p62dok-specific antibody (upper
panel). Immunoprecipitation of comparable amounts of Crk-L protein
was confirmed by blotting the membrane with a rabbit
anti-Crk-L-specific antibody (lower panel).
|
|
TcR-CD3 Regulation of CD2-induced p62dok/Crk-L Association
Required ZAP70/Syk Kinase Expression--
Many of the downstream
signal transduction events mediated by TcR-CD3 engagement appear to
require ZAP70/Syk kinase expression (2, 34). We wished to determine
whether ZAP70/Syk kinase expression was required for TcR-CD3-mediated
regulation of the CD2-induced p62dok/Crk-L association. In the
absence of ZAP70/Syk kinase expression but following
CD2-dependent stimulation, p62dok coprecipitated
with Crk-L (Fig. 8; see Fig. 6); the
amount of p62dok coprecipitating with Crk-L was not
modified by coligation of CD3 with CD2. The modulation of
p62dok/Crk-L association required expression of ZAP70/Syk
kinases (Fig. 8).

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
ZAP70/Syk kinase expression is required for
the TCR-CD3-mediated modulation of the CD2-induced p62dok/Crk-L
association. Either the ZAP70/Syk-deficient Jurkat cells P116 or
wild type Jurkat cells (107 cells/lane) were left
unstimulated or stimulated with either T112 + T113 or OKT3 or a combination of T112 + T113 and OKT3 for 5 min. Clarified PNL were either
subjected to immunoprecipitation with 1 µg of mouse anti-Crk-L
antibody or incubated with protein A-agarose alone, resolved by
SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with a rabbit anti-p62dok specific
antibody (upper panel). 30 µl of PNL (0.3 × 106 cell equivalents) from unstimulated cells were also
electrophoresed. Immunoprecipitation of comparable amounts of Crk-L
protein was confirmed by blotting the membrane with a rabbit anti-Crk-L
specific antibody (lower panel). The differing
amounts of p62dok coprecipitating with Crk-L upon CD2
stimulation in the ZAP70/Syk-deficient P116 cells compared with the
wild type Jurkat (clone J77) cells correlates with the basal expression
of p62dok in the two cell lines, as shown in the PNL controls
(right lanes).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we analyzed the signaling requirements for the
induction of CD2-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of the
Ras GTPase-activating protein-associated adapter protein p62dok
and its inducible association with Crk-L. Inductive tyrosine phosphorylation of p62dok following CD2 stimulation has been
noted recently by a number of laboratories (31, 33, 38-40); here we
extend these findings to demonstrate that this signaling pathway is
independent of ZAP70/Syk kinase and of LAT expression and leads to the
association with Crk-L but can be regulated, in a ZAP70/Syk
kinase-dependent fashion, by engagement of the TcR-CD3 complex.
We have shown that CD2-dependent p62dok tyrosine
phosphorylation appeared to depend, at least in part, on the
Src-related kinase Lck, confirming the reports of Nemorin and Duplay
(33). In the JCaM.1 cells used here, deficient in Lck expression but
expressing low levels of Fyn kinase, minimal inductive tyrosine
phosphorylation could be observed following CD2 stimulation in the
absence of Lck kinase, suggesting that another kinase is capable of
p62dok tyrosine phosphorylation. We suggest that this kinase
may be the Src-related kinase Fyn. This suggestion would be consistent with the observation that, in murine cells, p62dok
phosphorylation appeared to be dependent upon expression of Fyn (38).
While p62dok tyrosine phosphorylation was dependent upon an
upstream tyrosine kinase (e.g. Lck/Fyn), it was independent
of ZAP70/Syk expression and of the adapter protein LAT (Figs. 1, 2, 5,
and 6).
The biochemical events initiated by engagement of the CD2 receptor
overlap extensively with those initiated by the TcR-CD3 complex,
including activation of and/or recruitment of tyrosine kinases such as
the Src-related kinases Lck and Fyn, ZAP70 kinase, and Tec-related
kinases; of serine/threonine kinases such as protein kinase C and the
MAP kinases; of phospholipid kinases such as PI3K; of phosphatases such
as calcineurin; and of adapter proteins such as LAT and Cbl (11-20).
In most studies reported, the differences in signaling pathways
initiated by cross-linking the TcR-CD3 complex or by mitogenic pairs of
anti-CD2 mAbs are quantitative, and, indeed, many biochemical events
depend upon common intermediates (ZAP70, LAT). It is important to
appreciate that ZAP70-dependent functions may be subserved
by Syk kinase. Studies using cell lines derived from patients with
genetic deficiencies in ZAP70 expression have demonstrated variable
CD2-dependent signaling (43, 44); in these cell lines, Syk
expression may have compensated for ZAP70 deficiency. The Jurkat P116
cell lines used in the studies reported here are deficient in
expression of both ZAP70 and Syk kinases (data not shown; see Ref. 34).
We were unable to detect p62dok tyrosine phosphorylation
following CD3 engagement in either ZAP70-or LAT-deficient cells, and,
indeed, CD3 engagement inhibited CD2-mediated p62dok
association with Crk-L; this CD3-dependent regulation
required ZAP70 kinase expression. It is important to note that, in our studies, ligation of CD3 occurred concurrently with that of CD2; other
outcomes may result from stimulating one receptor in advance of the
other (39). It will be interesting to determine whether, with
additional experimentation and other systems analyzed, the induction of
p62dok phosphorylation remains a qualitative difference between
CD2 and TcR-CD3 signaling.
The role of p62dok has been most extensively analyzed to date
in cells overexpressing the Bcr-Abl fusion protein common to almost all
patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (45). The 210-kDa chimeric
Bcr-Abl protein is a fusion between Bcr sequences and the Abl tyrosine
kinase, the fusion conferring increased Abl tyrosine kinase activity
and transforming ability (46-48). A major tyrosine-phosphorylated protein in CML cells (49-52), the RasGAP-associated p62dok
protein was first cloned from cells transformed by oncogenic Abl (53,
54). Phosphorylation of p62dok has been shown to correlate with
fibroblast transformation (55, 56) but not with acquisition of growth
factor independence (41). In transformed cells, proteins associating
with p62dok have been extensively characterized, and two
previous reports have noted the association of p62dok with
Crk-L. In p210bcr-abl-expressing cells, p62dok
has been shown to be both constitutively tyrosine-phosphorylated and
constitutively associated with the Src homology 2 domain of Crk-L (41,
42). In the Jurkat T cells used here, cells other than CML and not
transformed by p210bcr-abl, neither tyrosine phosphorylation of
p62dok nor association with Crk-L was detected in the absence
of stimulation. Inductive p62dok tyrosine phosphorylation and
association with Crk-L in T lymphocytes was demonstrated only following
CD2 stimulation. Like p210bcr-abl-transformed cells, these
events required the activity of an Src-tyrosine kinase. Inductive
phosphorylation of p62dok has also been observed following
inhibitory Fc RIIB signaling in B cells (57-59) as it has in
response to growth factor receptor signaling (49, 52, 60, 61). In these
latter systems, however, the participation of Crk-L was not observed or investigated.
The biological role of p62dok in T cell activation is not yet
defined. p62dok has been shown to associate with RasGAP (33,
54) and, because of this association, postulated to regulate Ras
activity (41, 54, 58, 62-64). Crk-L, via C3G and Rap1 GTPase, itself
an antagonist of Ras (see Ref. 65), has also been shown to regulate Ras
activity (66-72). Whether p62dok affects Ras pathways by
modulating RasGAP activity or by its association with Crk-L and, via
Crk-L, C3G and Rap1, or both, is the subject of ongoing investigation.
In immune and hematopoietic cells, the available data suggest that
p62dok may serve largely to down-regulate T cell responses as
has been demonstrated for both p62dok and other members of the
Dok family. As mentioned above, inhibitory B cell signaling via the
Fc RIIB receptor induced p62dok phosphorylation (57, 58).
Analysis of primary B cells derived from mice rendered genetically
deficient in p62dok expression demonstrated that p62dok
expression was required for the negative regulation by Fc RIIB of B
cell proliferation and was shown to suppress mitogen-activated protein
kinase activation (62). Similarly, overexpression of p56dok2
(Dok-2) (73) has also been shown to negatively regulate
mitogen-activated protein kinase activity in cell lines (74, 75). In
macrophages, increased expression of p56dok2 inhibited cell
proliferation and diminished p56dok2 expression (by stable
expression of p56dok2 antisense mRNA) accelerated
proliferation (76). Since transcription of p56dok2 has been
shown to increase in response to cytokine treatment (74, 76), it has
been suggested that p56dok2 participates in a negative feedback
loop in which p56dok2, induced by cytokines, subsequently
inhibits cytokine-dependent proliferation (76). In T cells,
stable overexpression of p62dok inhibited both CD2- and
CD3-induced NFAT and interleukin-2 transcriptional activation (40),
although the mechanism remained unexplained.
Both p62dok and Crk-L have been shown to play a role in cell
migration (42, 77-80). We suggest that one functional role for the
inducible p62dok-Crk-L complex mediated by CD2 may be to
regulate cell migration, perhaps through integrin binding as has been
shown in other systems (78, 81), and adhesion, the latter potentially
dependent upon the CD2-binding protein CD2AP (82)/CMS (83). While the
avidity of CD2 to CD58 can be up-regulated by activation (84, 85), basal adhesion of CD2 to CD58, broadly expressed on a variety of
hematopoietic and other cells, has been documented (29, 86). If
p62dok is a negative regulator of T cell activation,
CD2-dependent p62dok phosphorylation may exert
tonic suppression of T cell activation and promote T cell circulation
in the absence of recognition of specific antigen-MHC complexes. Upon
antigen-specific recognition, signaling through the TcR-CD3 receptor
would serve both to down-regulate CD2-dependent
p62dok/Crk-L association and to release the T cell from inhibition.
We first pursued the analysis of CD2-dependent signaling
events in cells deficient in ZAP70 and LAT expression in order to isolate signaling intermediates that were not necessarily conserved between the TcR-CD3 complex and CD2. We have not yet identified a
biological consequence of p62dok tyrosine phosphorylation in
the absence of ZAP70 or LAT expression, in part because many biological
outcomes (NFAT transcriptional activation, cytokine production,
proliferation) depend upon integrated and coordinately regulated
signals involving a number of these signaling moieties (e.g.
ZAP70 and LAT) (19). Therefore, the involvement of p62dok, if
any, in these functions cannot be ascertained in cell lines deficient
in these proteins. In the presence of ZAP70 or LAT, it is difficult to
isolate or attribute a specific role of p62dok distinct from
other components, since quantitative signaling differences will impact
upon the response observed. We are further limited in that the
biological outcomes following overexpression (or genetic deletion) of a
protein may not accurately reflect its in vivo role. Indeed,
this concern is illuminated by the recent report that p62dok
overexpression inhibited both CD2- and CD3-induced NFAT and
interleukin-2 transcriptional activation but that only CD2-induced, and
not CD3-induced, calcium influx, phospholipase C 1 phosphorylation, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation were inhibited (40). The inhibition of distal read-outs (both dependent on ZAP70 and
LAT expression) remained unexplained. We are currently developing
systems appropriate for this study.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Robert Abraham for providing P116
and the ZAP70-reconstituted P116 cells, Larry Samelson for providing
LAT-deficient ANJ3 and wild-type LAT-reconstituted ANJ3wt cells,
and David E. Straus for providing the Lck-reconstituted JCaM1.6 cells.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported by a fellowship from Fondazione, "Istituto
Pasteur-Fondazione Cenci-Bolognetti," University of Rome "La
Sapienza," Italy.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: NHLBI, Bldg. 10, Rm.
6C208, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD 20892. Tel.: 301-402-6786; Fax:
301-480-1792; E-mail: biererb@nih.gov.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 11, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105777200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
TCR, T cell antigen
receptor;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
IP, immunoprecipitation;
LAT, linker of activated T cells;
PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
PNL, postnuclear lysates.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Kane, L. P.,
Lin, J.,
and Weiss, A.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
12,
242-249[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Chu, D. H.,
Morita, C. T.,
and Weiss, A.
(1998)
Immunol. Rev.
165,
167-180[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Tamir, I.,
and Cambier, J. C.
(1998)
Oncogene
17,
1353-1364[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
van Leeuwen, J. E.,
and Samelson, L. E.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
11,
242-248[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Dustin, M. L.,
and Chan, A. C.
(2000)
Cell
103,
283-294[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Bromley, S. K.,
Burack, W. R.,
Johnson, K. G.,
Somersalo, K.,
Sims, T. N.,
Sumen, C.,
Davis, M. M.,
Shaw, A. S.,
Allen, P. M.,
and Dustin, M. L.
(2001)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
19,
375-396[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Posey Morley, S. C.,
and Bierer, B. E.
(2001)
Adv. Immunol.
77,
1-43[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Meuer, S. C.,
Hussey, R. E.,
Fabbi, M.,
Fox, D.,
Acuto, O.,
Fitzgerald, K. A.,
Hodgdon, J. C.,
Protentis, J. P.,
Schlossman, S. F.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1984)
Cell
36,
897-906[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Ohno, H.,
Ushiyama, C.,
Taniguchi, M.,
Germain, R. N.,
and Saito, T.
(1991)
Immunology
146,
3742-3746
|
| 10.
|
Bierer, B. E.,
and Hahn, W. C.
(1993)
Semin. Immunol.
5,
249-261[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Pantaleo, G.,
Olive, D.,
Poggi, A.,
Kozumbo, W. J.,
Moretta, L.,
and Moretta, A.
(1987)
Eur. J. Immunol.
17,
55-60[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Samelson, L. E.,
Fletcher, M. C.,
Ledbetter, J. A.,
and June, C. H.
(1990)
J. Immunol.
145,
2448-2454[Abstract]
|
| 13.
|
Ley, S. C.,
Davies, A. A.,
Druker, B.,
and Crumpton, M.
(1991)
Eur. J. Immunol.
21,
2203-2209[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Carmo, A. M.,
Mason, D. W.,
and Beyers, A. D.
(1993)
Eur. J. Immunol.
23,
2196-2201[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Bell, G. M.,
Fargnoli, J.,
Bolen, J. B.,
Kish, L.,
and Imboden, J. B.
(1996)
J. Exp. Med.
183,
169-178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
King, P. D.,
Sadra, A.,
Han, A.,
Liu, X. R.,
Sunder-Plassmann, R.,
Reinherz, E. L.,
and Dupont, B.
(1996)
Int. Immunol.
8,
1707-1714[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Marie-Cardine, A.,
Fischer, S.,
Gorvel, J. P.,
and Maridonneau-Parini, I.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
20734-20739[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Lin, H.,
Hutchcroft, J. E.,
Andoniou, C. E.,
Kamoun, M.,
Band, H.,
and Bierer, B. E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
19914-19921[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Martelli, M. P.,
Lin, H.,
Zhang, W.,
Samelson, L. E.,
and Bierer, B. E.
(2000)
Blood
96,
2181-2190[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Lin, H.,
Martelli, M. P.,
and Bierer, B. E.
(2001)
Int. Immunol.
13,
13-22[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Monostori, E.,
Desai, D.,
Brown, M. H.,
Cantrell, D. A.,
and Crumpton, M. J.
(1990)
J. Immunol.
144,
1010-1014[Abstract]
|
| 22.
|
Spruyt, L. L.,
Glennie, M. J.,
Beyers, A. D.,
and Williams, A. F.
(1991)
J. Exp. Med.
174,
1407-1415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Moingeon, P.,
Lucich, J. L.,
McConkey, D. J.,
Letourneur, F.,
Malissen, B.,
Kochan, J.,
Chang, H. C.,
Rodewald, H. R.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
1492-1496[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Gassmann, M.,
Amrein, K. E.,
Flint, N. A.,
Schraven, B.,
and Burn, P.
(1994)
Eur. J. Immunol.
24,
139-144[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Verhagen, A. M.,
Schraven, B.,
Wild, M.,
Wallich, R.,
and Meuer, S. C.
(1996)
Eur. J. Immunol.
26,
2841-2849[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Steeg, C.,
Von Bonin, A.,
Mittrucker, H. W.,
Malissen, B.,
and Fleischer, B.
(1997)
Eur. J. Immunol.
27,
2233-2238[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Von Bonin, A.,
Ehrlich, S.,
and Fleischer, B.
(1998)
Immunology
93,
376-382[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Moingeon, P.,
Chang, H. C.,
Wallner, B. P.,
Stebbins, C.,
Frey, A. Z.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1989)
Nature
339,
312-314[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Hahn, W. C.,
and Bierer, B. E.
(1993)
J. Exp. Med.
178,
1831-1836[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Green, J. M.,
Karpitskiy, V.,
Kimzey, S. L.,
and Shaw, A. S.
(2000)
J. Immunol.
164,
3591-3595[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Hubert, P.,
Debre, P.,
Boumsell, L.,
and Bismuth, G.
(1993)
J. Exp. Med.
178,
1587-1596[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Sunder-Plassmann, R.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
24249-24257[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Nemorin, J. G.,
and Duplay, P.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
14590-14597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Williams, B. L.,
Schreiber, K. L.,
Zhang, W.,
Wange, R. L.,
Samelson, L. E.,
Leibson, P. J.,
and Abraham, R. T.
(1998)
Mol. Cell Biol.
18,
1388-1399[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Zhang, W.,
Irvin, B. J.,
Trible, R. P.,
Abraham, R. T.,
and Samelson, L. E.
(1999)
Int. Immunol.
11,
943-950[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Denny, M. F.,
Patai, B.,
and Straus, D. B.
(2000)
Mol. Cell Biol.
20,
1426-1435[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Finco, T. S.,
Kadlecek, T.,
Zhang, W.,
Samelson, L. E.,
and Weiss, A.
(1998)
Immunity
9,
617-626[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Fukai, I.,
Hussey, R. E.,
Sunder-Plassmann, R.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(2000)
Eur. J. Immunol.
30,
3507-3515[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Harriague, J.,
Debré, P.,
Bismuth, G.,
and Hubert, P.
(2000)
Eur. J. Immunol.
30,
3319-3328[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Nemorin, J. G.,
Laporte, P.,
Berube, G.,
and Duplay, P.
(2001)
J. Immunol.
166,
4408-4415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Bhat, A.,
Johnson, K. J.,
Oda, T.,
Corbin, A. S.,
and Druker, B. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32360-32368[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Sattler, M.,
Verma, S.,
Pride, Y. B.,
Salgia, R.,
Rohrschneider, L. R.,
and Griffin, J. D.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
2451-2458[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Meinl, E.,
Lengenfelder, D.,
Blank, N.,
Pirzer, R.,
Barata, L.,
and Hivroz, C.
(2000)
J. Immunol.
165,
3578-3583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Ueno, H.,
Matsuda, S.,
Katamura, K.,
Mayumi, M.,
and Koyasu, S.
(2000)
Eur. J. Immunol.
30,
78-86[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Lee, S. J.
(2000)
Br. J. Haematol.
111,
993-1009[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Chopra, R.,
Pu, Q. Q.,
and Elefanty, A. G.
(1999)
Blood Rev.
13,
211-229[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Maru, Y.
(2000)
Int. J. Hematol.
73,
308-322
|
| 48.
|
Sattler, M.,
and Griffin, J. D.
(2001)
Int. J. Hematol.
73,
278-291[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Ellis, C.,
Moran, M.,
McCormick, F.,
and Pawson, T.
(1990)
Nature
343,
377-381[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Lugo, T. G.,
Pendergast, A. M.,
Muller, A. J.,
and Witte, O. N.
(1990)
Science
247,
1079-1082[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Bouton, A. H.,
Kanner, S. B.,
Vines, R. R.,
Wang, H. C.,
Gibbs, J. B.,
and Parsons, J. T.
(1991)
Mol. Cell Biol.
11,
945-953[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Moran, M. F.,
Polakis, P.,
McCormick, F.,
Pawson, T.,
and Ellis, C.
(1991)
Mol. Cell Biol.
11,
1804-1812[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Carpino, N.,
Wisniewski, D.,
Strife, A.,
Marshak, D.,
Kobayashi, R.,
Stillman, B.,
and Clarkson, B.
(1997)
Cell
88,
197-204[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Yamanashi, Y.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1997)
Cell
88,
205-211[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Wisniewski, D.,
Strife, A.,
Wojciechowicz, D.,
Lambek, C.,
and Clarkson, B.
(1994)
Leukemia
8,
688-693[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Oda, T.,
Tamura, S.,
Matsuguchi, T.,
Griffin, J. D.,
and Druker, B. J.
(1995)
Leukemia
9,
295-301[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Vuica, M.,
Desiderio, S.,
and Schneck, J. P.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
186,
259-267[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
Tamir, I.,
Stolpa, J. C.,
Helgason, C. D.,
Nakamura, K.,
Bruhns, P.,
Daeron, M.,
and Cambier, J. C.
(2000)
Immunity
12,
347-358[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 59.
|
Yoshida, K.,
Yamashita, Y.,
Miyazato, A.,
Ohya, K.,
Kitanaka, A.,
Ikeda, U.,
Shimada, K.,
Yamanaka, T.,
Ozawa, K.,
and Mano, H.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
24945-24952[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 60.
|
Guo, D.,
Jia, Q.,
Song, H. Y.,
Warren, R. S.,
and Donner, D. B.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
6729-6733[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 61.
|
Berg, K. L.,
Siminovitch, K. A.,
and Stanley, E. R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
35855-35865[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 62.
|
Yamanashi, Y.,
Tamura, T.,
Kanamori, T.,
Yamane, H.,
Nariuchi, H.,
Yamamoto, T.,
and Baltimore, D.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
11-16[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 63.
|
Kashige, N.,
Carpino, N.,
and Kobayashi, R.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
2093-2098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 64.
|
Songyang, Z.,
Yamanashi, Y.,
Liu, D.,
and Baltimore, D.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
2459-2465[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 65.
|
Bos, J. L.,
de Rooij, J.,
and Reedquist, K. A.
(2001)
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.
2,
369-377[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 66.
|
Gotoh, T.,
Hattori, S.,
Nakamura, S.,
Kitayama, H.,
Noda, M.,
Takai, Y.,
Kaibuchi, K.,
Matsui, H.,
Hatase, O.,
and Takahashi, H.
(1995)
Mol. Cell Biol.
15,
6746-6753[Abstract]
|
| 67.
|
Smit, L.,
van der Horst, G.,
and Borst, J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
8564-8569[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 68.
|
Ichiba, T.,
Kuraishi, Y.,
Sakai, O.,
Nagata, S.,
Groffen, J.,
Kurata, T.,
Hattori, S.,
and Matsuda, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
22215-22220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 69.
|
Kiyokawa, E.,
Mochizuki, N.,
Kurata, T.,
and Matsuda, M.
(1997)
Crit. Rev. Oncol.
1997,
329-342
|
| 70.
|
McLeod, S. J.,
Ingham, R. J.,
Bos, J. L.,
Kurosaki, T.,
and Gold, M. R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
29218-29223[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 71.
|
Ichiba, T.,
Hashimoto, Y.,
Nakaya, M.,
Kuraishi, Y.,
Tanaka, S.,
Kurata, T.,
Mochizuki, N.,
and Matsuda, M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
14376-14381[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 72.
|
Sakkab, K.,
Lewitzky, M.,
Posern, G.,
Schaeper, U.,
Sachs, M.,
Birchmeier, W.,
and Feller, S. M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
10772-10778[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 73.
|
Di Cristofano, A.,
Carpino, N.,
Dunant, N.,
Friedland, G.,
Kobayashi, R.,
Strife, A.,
Wisniewski, D.,
Clarkson, B.,
Pandolfi, P. P.,
and Resh, M. D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
4827-4830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 74.
|
Nelms, K.,
Snow, A. L.,
Hu-Li, J.,
and Paul, W. E.
(1998)
Immunity
9,
13-24[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 75.
|
Jones, N.,
and Dumont, D. J.
(1999)
Curr. Biol.
9,
1057-1060[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 76.
|
Suzu, S.,
Tanaka-Douzono, M.,
Nomaguchi, K.,
Yamada, M.,
Hayasawa, H.,
Kimuyra, F.,
and Motoyoshi, K.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
5114-5122[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 77.
|
Feller, S. M.,
Posern, G.,
Voss, J.,
Kardinal, C.,
Sakkab, D.,
Zheng, J.,
and Knudsen, B. S.
(1998)
J. Cell. Physiol.
177,
535-552[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 78.
|
Noguchi, T.,
Matozaki, T.,
Inagaki, K.,
Tsuda, M.,
Kukunaga, K.,
Kitamura, Y.,
Kitamura, T.,
Shii, K.,
Yamanashi, Y.,
and Kasuga, M.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
1748-1760[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 79.
|
Uemura, N.,
and Griffin, J. D.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
37525-37532[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 80.
|
van Dijk, T. B.,
van den Akker, E.,
Parren-van Amelsvoort, M.,
Mano, H.,
Löwenberg, B.,
and von Lindern, M.
(2000)
Blood
96,
3406-3413[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 81.
|
Becker, E.,
Huynh-Do, U.,
Holland, S.,
Pawson, T.,
Daniel, T. O.,
and Skolnik, E. Y.
(2000)
Mol. Cell Biol.
20,
1537-1545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 82.
|
Dustin, M. L.,
Olszowy, M. W.,
Holdorf, A. D.,
Li, J.,
Bromley, S.,
Desai, N.,
Widder, P.,
Rosenberg, F.,
van der Merwe, P. A.,
Allen, P. M.,
and Shaw, A. S.
(1998)
Cell
94,
667-677[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 83.
|
Kirsch, K. H.,
Georgescu, M. M.,
Shishido, T.,
Langdon, W. Y.,
Birge, R. B.,
and Hanafusa, H.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
6211-6216[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 84.
|
Hahn, W. C.,
Rosenstein, Y.,
Calvo, V.,
Burakoff, S. J.,
and Bierer, B. E.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
7179-7183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 85.
|
Hahn, W. C.,
Burakoff, S. J.,
and Bierer, B. E.
(1993)
J. Immunol.
150,
2607-2619[Abstract]
|
| 86.
|
Arulanandam, A. R.,
Kister, A.,
McGregor, M. J.,
Wyss, D. F.,
Wagner, G.,
and Reinherz, E. L.
(1994)
J. Exp. Med.
180,
1861-1871[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Dong, B. Corre, E. Foulon, E. Dufour, A. Veillette, O. Acuto, and F. Michel
T cell receptor for antigen induces linker for activation of T cell-dependent activation of a negative signaling complex involving Dok-2, SHIP-1, and Grb-2
J. Exp. Med.,
October 30, 2006;
203(11):
2509 - 2518.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Niu, F. Roy, F. Saltel, C. Andrieu-Soler, W. Dong, A.-L. Chantegrel, R. Accardi, A. Thepot, N. Foiselle, M. Tommasino, et al.
A nuclear export signal and phosphorylation regulate dok1 subcellular localization and functions.
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
June 1, 2006;
26(11):
4288 - 4301.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Boulay, J.-G. Nemorin, and P. Duplay
Phosphotyrosine Binding-Mediated Oligomerization of Downstream of Tyrosine Kinase (Dok)-1 and Dok-2 Is Involved in CD2-Induced Dok Phosphorylation
J. Immunol.,
October 1, 2005;
175(7):
4483 - 4489.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Lee, C. Andrieu, F. Saltel, O. Destaing, J. Auclair, V. Pouchkine, J. Michelon, B. Salaun, R. Kobayashi, P. Jurdic, et al.
I{kappa}B kinase {beta} phosphorylates Dok1 serines in response to TNF, IL-1, or {gamma} radiation
PNAS,
December 14, 2004;
101(50):
17416 - 17421.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Sitko, C. I. Guevara, and N. A. Cacalano
Tyrosine-phosphorylated SOCS3 Interacts with the Nck and Crk-L Adapter Proteins and Regulates Nck Activation
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 3, 2004;
279(36):
37662 - 37669.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. H. Castilla, P. Perrat, N. J. Martinez, S. F. Landrette, R. Keys, S. Oikemus, J. Flanegan, S. Heilman, L. Garrett, A. Dutra, et al.
Identification of genes that synergize with Cbfb-MYH11 in the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia
PNAS,
April 6, 2004;
101(14):
4924 - 4929.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Ito, H. Okazawa, K. Maruyama, K. Tomizawa, S.-i. Motegi, H. Ohnishi, H. Kuwano, A. Kosugi, and T. Matozaki
Interaction of SAP-1, a Transmembrane-type Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase, with the Tyrosine Kinase Lck: ROLES IN REGULATION OF T CELL FUNCTION
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 12, 2003;
278(37):
34854 - 34863.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|