JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M105374200 on September 14, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 49, 45662-45668, December 7, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/49/45662    most recent
M105374200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bulteau, A.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Friguet, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bulteau, A.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Friguet, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Proteasome Inhibition in Glyoxal-treated Fibroblasts and Resistance of Glycated Glucose-6-phosphate Dehydrogenase to 20 S Proteasome Degradation in Vitro*

Anne-Laure BulteauDagger , Philippe Verbeke§, Isabelle PetropoulosDagger , Alain-François Chaffotte, and Bertrand FriguetDagger ||

From the Dagger  Laboratoire de Biologie et Biochimie Cellulaire du Vieillissement, Université Denis Diderot, Paris 7, 2 Place Jussieu, CC 7128, 75251 Paris Cedex 05, France, the § Laboratory of Cellular Ageing, Department of Molecular and Structural Biology, University of Aarhus, Gustav Wieds Vej 10-C, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark, and the  Unité de Biochimie Cellulaire, CNRS-URA1129, Institut Pasteur, 28 Rue du Docteur Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France

Received for publication, June 11, 2001, and in revised form, September 10, 2001

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Glycation and glycoxidation protein products are formed upon binding of sugars to NH2 groups of lysine and arginine residues and have been shown to accumulate during aging and in pathologies such as Alzheimer's disease and diabetes. Because the proteasome is the major intracellular proteolytic system involved in the removal of altered proteins, the effect of intracellular glycation on proteasome function has been analyzed in human dermal fibroblasts subjected to treatment with glyoxal that promotes the formation of Nepsilon -carboxymethyl-lysine adducts on proteins. The three proteasome peptidase activities were decreased in glyoxal-treated cells as compared with control cells, and glyoxal was also found to inhibit these peptidase activities in vitro. In addition, the activity of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, a crucial enzyme for the regulation of the intracellular redox status, was dramatically reduced in glyoxal-treated cells. Further analysis was performed to determine whether glycated proteins are substrates for proteasome degradation. In contrast to the oxidized glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, both Nepsilon -carboxymethyl-lysine- and fluorescent-glycated enzymes were resistant to degradation by the 20 S proteasome in vitro, and this resistance was correlated with an increased conformational stability of the glycated proteins. These results provide one explanation for why glycated proteins build up both as a function of disease and aging. Finally, Nepsilon -carboxymethyl-lysine-modified proteins were found to be ubiquitinated in glyoxal-treated cells suggesting a potential mechanism by which these modified proteins may be marked for degradation.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Glycation and glycoxidation products are formed by the binding of sugars or of aldehyde/ketone adducts to the accessible free epsilon -NH2 group of the basic amino acid constituents of a protein (1, 2). The end result of this process is the formation of several forms of advanced glycation/glycoxidation end products (AGE)1 that alter the structure and function of proteins. Glycation and glycoxidation are well known to occur in the extracellular compartment during aging and in pathologies such as diabetes and Alzheimer's disease (3-6). In the cytosol, the glycation process is more complex due to the fact that glycation agents can be generated not only by the catabolism of sugars but also by lipid, amino acid, as well as ascorbate metabolism (2, 7). Nepsilon -Carboxymethyl-lysine (CML) and fluorescent AGE, such as pentosidine, are two forms of AGE known to accumulate in cells during aging (6, 8). CML brings additional negative charge to the glycated protein, whereas pentosidine and cyclic AGE formation leads to intra/intermolecular cross-links. In contrast to the complex network of antioxidant defenses that limit the deleterious effects of oxidation on macromolecules (9), the cellular defenses against other post-translational damage such as glycation have not been extensively studied (10, 11). Indeed, no specific proteolytic pathway has been shown to degrade cytosolic AGE. Because these structures are present in aggregates of cross-linked proteins called AGE-pigment-like fluorophores, mainly accumulating in lysosomes during aging (8, 12, 13), a defect in the lysosomal degradation pathway has been suggested (6, 14, 15). In addition, AGE have been shown to be resistant to ATP-dependent proteolysis (16), and proteasome activity is impaired in kidney and liver of rats during diabetes, a condition that favors glycated protein formation (17).

The proteasome is the main cytosolic proteolytic complex responsible for the degradation of damaged protein and general protein turnover (18, 19). The 20 S proteasome, which is ubiquitin and ATP-independent, is involved in 70-80% of the selective recognition and degradation of the mildly oxidized proteins in the cytosol (19, 20). The 26 S proteasome, formed upon association of the 19 S regulatory complex with the 20 S catalytic core, has also been proposed to play a role in oxidized protein degradation in ubiquitin and ATP-dependent pathways (21, 22). An age-related decline of the peptidase activities of both the 20 S and 26 S proteasome has been reported in cells and tissues during aging in rat (23-25) or in human (26-29). Therefore, the reported decrease of the 20 S proteasomal activity may explain, at least in part, the accumulation of highly oxidized and aggregated proteins in the cytosol of cells observed during aging (30). Finally, it has been demonstrated that 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE) cross-linked proteins, as well as lipofuscin/ceroid fluorescent pigments, act as inhibitors of the proteasome (31-33) which may also contribute to the accumulation of these damaged proteins in aged cells.

In this study, the fate of the proteasome has been evaluated after treatment of human dermal fibroblasts with the carbonyl compound glyoxal under conditions that promote the formation of CML-modified proteins (34, 35). The status of the cytosolic enzyme glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) has also been investigated because it is the first enzyme in the pentose phosphate pathway that catalyzes the formation of NADPH, important for the maintenance of intracellular redox balance (36-38). Furthermore, it has been demonstrated previously that G6PDH activity is decreased with age (39), is affected by oxidation, and that the oxidized enzyme is susceptible to proteolysis by the 20 S proteasome in vitro (40). Therefore, the susceptibility of CML- and fluorescent AGE-modified G6PDH to degradation by the 20 S proteasome has been investigated. In contrast to the oxidized protein, both the CML- and fluorescent AGE-modified enzymes were resistant to degradation by the 20 S proteasome. To explain the observed resistance of glycated protein to proteolysis by the 20 S proteasome, we have investigated several structural parameters of CML- and fluorescent AGE-G6PDH as compared with the oxidized and native forms by using biophysical characterization.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Chemicals and Antibodies-- G6PDH from Leuconostoc mesenteroides was purchased from Worthington. Casein fluorescein isothiocyanate (38 µg of FITC/mg of protein) was purchased from Sigma. If not specified otherwise, all other chemicals were purchased from Sigma and were of highest analytical grade available.

Rabbit anti-CML polyclonal antibody raised against CML-modified bovine serum albumin was provided by Dr. H. Bakala (Université Denis Diderot, Paris 7). Rabbit immune sera raised against 20 S rat proteasome were obtained from Assay Research (Silver Spring, MD) as described previously (23).

Quantification and Isolation of CML-modified Proteins from Fibroblasts-- Primary cultures of human dermal fibroblasts were obtained from M. Moreau (Inserm U505, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 6) and were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mM glutamine, 100 units of penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Two days after seeding, cells were treated with 0.25 mM glyoxal for 1 week. The medium was changed every 2 days. Cells remaining viable during incubation were determined by their ability to exclude trypan blue, and the viability of untreated and glyoxal-treated cells was about the same (more than 99%). Cells were collected, suspended in 10 mM Hepes, pH 8, supplemented with 50 mM NaCl, 500 mM sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 0.2% (v/v) Triton X-100, 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol and sonicated 5 times for 5 s at 4 °C. Cellular debris and organelles were removed from the crude extract by centrifugation for 1 h at 10,000 × g at 4 °C. A competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed as described previously (27) to measure the amount of CML-modified protein in glyoxal-treated fibroblasts.

Purification of CML-modified proteins was achieved using a CNBr-activated Sepharose column coupled with polyclonal anti-CML antibodies. Crude cellular extracts were loaded on the column previously equilibrated with PBS, pH 7.4, and then washed with the same buffer. The CML-modified proteins were eluted with 0.1 M glycine, pH 2.8, and the fractions were immediately neutralized with 2 M Tris-HCl, pH 8. The eluted proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE on a 12% gel and electrotransferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The blot was then processed utilizing polyclonal anti-CML antibody (1/1000) and anti-ubiquitin antibody (1/500) (Dako, Trappes, France).

Preparation of the Different Modified Forms of G6PDH-- CML-modified G6PDH was prepared by reductive methylation of G6PDH (41). Briefly, 6 mg of G6PDH was incubated with 45 mM glyoxylic acid and 150 mM sodium cyanoborohydride for 24 h at 37 °C in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.8. Fluorescent AGE-modified G6PDH was prepared using the procedure of Grandhee and Monnier (42) with minor modifications. G6PDH (6 mg) was incubated with 100 mM ribose and 1 mM diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 9.0. After 1 week of incubation at 37 °C, samples were diluted 10 times with PBS, pH 7.4, and dialyzed twice for 24 h against the same buffer. Total cyclic fluorescent AGE were characterized by fluorescence analysis (excitation, 370 nm; emission, 440 nm) in a Kontron SFM 25 spectrofluorimeter (Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, France), and pentosidine content was measured using the method from Odetti et al. (43). Protein concentration was determined by the Lowry method (Bio-Rad), and the samples were stored at -20 °C. Metal-catalyzed oxidation of the enzyme was achieved as described previously (32). Prior to use, the various forms of G6PDH were chromatographed through a PD-10 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) equilibrated with PBS, pH 7.4. The eluted fractions were concentrated by using a Centricon-30 system (Millipore, Bedford, MA).

Measurement of G6PDH Activity-- The enzymatic reaction was performed at 25 °C by incubating 25, 50, or 75 ng of the different forms of G6PDH diluted in 1 ml of 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.8, 100 mM KCl in the presence of 10 mM NADP+ and 100 mM glucose 6-phosphate. G6PDH activity was determined by following the appearance of NADPH spectrophotometrically at 340 nm for 5 min.

G6PDH activity in crude cellular extracts was determined by the same method using 250 µg of protein. Assaying G6PDH activity in biological samples is complicated by the presence of endogenous 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, the second enzyme of the pentose phosphate pathway that also produces NADPH. Therefore, the activity of G6PDH was determined after inactivation of 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase by maleimide at a final concentration of 5 mM (44).

20 S Proteasome: Purification, Peptidase Activities, and Western Blot Analysis-- 20 S proteasome was purified from human placenta according to the procedure described previously (40) with minor modifications (45). Peptidase activities of the proteasome were assayed using fluorogenic peptides, succinyl-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-amidomethylcoumarin (LLVY-AMC) for the chymotrypsin-like activity, N-t-butyloxycarbonyl-Leu-Ser-Thr-Arg-amidomethylcoumarin (LSTR-AMC) for the trypsin-like activity, and N-benzyloxycarbonyl-Leu-Leu-Glu-beta -naphthylamide (LLE-NA) for the peptidylglutamyl-peptide hydrolase activity as described previously (27) with minor modifications. The mixture, containing 20 µg of crude homogenate total protein in 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, was incubated at 37 °C with the appropriate peptide substrate (LLVY-AMC at 25 µM or LLE-NA at 150 µM or LSTR-AMC at 40 µM) in a final volume of 200 µl. Enzymatic kinetics were conducted in a temperature-controlled microplate fluorimetric reader (Fluostar Galaxy, bMG, Stuttgart, Germany). Excitation/emission wavelengths were 350/440 nm and 340/410 nm for aminomethylcoumarin and beta -naphthylamine, respectively. Proteasome activities were determined as the difference between total activity and the remaining activity of the crude extract in the presence of 20 µM proteasome inhibitor N-Cbz-Leu-Leu-leucinal (MG132). For inactivation experiments, 2 µg of purified proteasome were incubated with various concentrations of glyoxal for 30 min at room temperature. After preincubation, proteasome peptidases activities were determined as described above. The proteasome amount was estimated by Western blot analysis of cytosolic extracts. 20 µg of total proteins were separated on a 12% SDS-PAGE. Immunoblot experiments were then performed using anti-20 S proteasome polyclonal antibody (1/2500).

Proteolytic Degradation of the Various Forms of G6PDH and FITC-Casein-- Proteolysis of the various forms of G6PDH at different concentrations was achieved in the presence of 0.3 µM of purified 20 S proteasome at 37 °C in PBS, pH 7.4. At different times, a 20-µl aliquot was removed and submitted to a 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid precipitation. The mixture was centrifuged at 4 °C at 15,000 × g for 30 min, and the supernatant containing the released peptides was neutralized by adding 100 µl of 2 M potassium borate, pH 10. The amount of amino groups was determined after addition of fluorescamine (3 mg/ml in acetone) by measuring the emission intensity of the fluorescent derivatives (excitation, 375 nm; emission, 475 nm). Proteolysis of FITC-casein (50 µg/ml) was performed with 0.3 µM proteasome at 37 °C in the absence or presence of 18 µM of the various forms of G6PDH. At different times, a 20-µl aliquot was removed and processed as described above. The proteolysis rate was estimated by measuring the emission intensities of FITC fluorescent peptides at 515 nm (excitation at 495 nm).

8-Anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonic Acid (ANSA) Binding-- The various forms of G6PDH (at 0.4 µM) were incubated with 100 µM ANSA in 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.8, and 100 mM KCl at 37 °C for 30 min. The fluorescence emission spectrum from 430 to 600 nm (excitation at 370 nm) was recorded for ANSA alone and for ANSA in the presence of the different forms of G6PDH in a Kontron SFM 25 spectrofluorimeter (Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, France). Fluorescence increase occurring upon binding of ANSA to protein was obtained after subtraction of the emission spectrum of ANSA alone.

Circular Dichroism Spectra-- Native and modified forms of the protein were diluted to a final concentration of 1 mg/ml in 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, and dialyzed against the same buffer overnight at 4 °C. CD spectra were recorded in a Jobin-Yvon CD6 spectropolarimeter (Longjumeau, France) at 20 °C, using 1-cm or 0.1-mm path length cells for the near (250-320 nm) and far (190-260 nm) UV analysis, respectively. Each spectrum results from averaging five successive individual scans with a 0.5-nm step and an integration time of 2 s per step. Buffer contribution was eliminated by subtraction of the corresponding spectrum acquired under the same conditions.

Thermal Inactivation-- 0.02 µM native, oxidized or CML-modified G6PDH was incubated at 45 °C in 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.8, 100 mM KCl. At the indicated times, 50 µl of the mixture was added to 900 µl of 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.8, 100 mM KCl, at 25 °C to terminate the thermal inactivation, and the residual activity was measured as described above.

Urea Denaturation-- Denaturation was performed by incubating 0.3 µM of the different forms of G6PDH in 20 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.2, with increasing concentration of urea (from 0 to 8 M). The mixture was gently stirred for 3 h at 20 °C. At each urea concentration, the fluorescence emission spectrum (300-450 nm, excitation 290 nm) of the samples was determined. The native enzyme fraction was obtained from the ratio F - Fd/Fn - Fd and plotted as a function of urea concentration. F is the fluorescence at 320 nm of the sample at a given concentration of urea; Fn and Fd are the fluorescence intensities (320 nm) of the sample at 0 M and 8 M urea, respectively.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Protein Modification and Proteasome Activity in Glyoxal-treated Cells-- The effects of intracellular glycation on proteasome peptidase activities were analyzed in primary cultures of human dermal fibroblasts treated for 1 week with 0.25 mM glyoxal. These conditions induced the formation of CML-modified proteins without affecting cell viability. Indeed, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with anti-CML polyclonal antibody, intracellular CML-protein adducts exhibited a 5-fold increase in the treated cells as compared with the control cells (data not shown). The three main proteasome peptidase activities, chymotrypsin-like, trypsin-like, and peptidylglutamyl-peptide hydrolase activities, were monitored in cellular extracts of treated and untreated fibroblasts. As shown in Fig. 1A, all three activities decreased significantly in the glyoxal-treated cells as compared with the control cells. To determine whether the observed decline in the proteasome peptidase activities was due to a decreased proteasome content, the amount of proteasome was estimated by Western blot analysis of cellular extracts, using an anti-proteasome polyclonal antibody (Fig. 1A). No change in proteasome content was detected in treated cells indicating that the loss of proteasome activity is likely due to an alteration of proteasome function. To determine whether the observed decline of proteasome activity could be explained by direct inactivation of the 20 S proteasome by glyoxal, peptidase activities were assayed after incubation of purified proteasome with various concentrations of this compound. The results presented in Fig. 1B indicate that all three proteasome peptidase activities were inhibited with 0.1 mM glyoxal and to a higher extent with increasing concentrations.


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Effect of glyoxal on proteasome function. A, proteasome peptidase activities and content in glyoxal-treated cells. Primary culture of human dermal fibroblasts was treated with 0.25 mM glyoxal for 1 week. The chymotrypsin-like (black bars), peptidylglutamyl-peptide hydrolase (striped bars), and trypsin-like (white bars) activities were assayed in cytosolic extracts either in treated cells (G) or in control cells (C) using fluorogenic peptide substrates, LLVY-AMC at 25 µM, LLE-NA at 150 µM, and LSTR-AMC at 40 µM, respectively. The measurement of peptidase activities in the untreated cells (C) was taken as 100%. The error bars represent the S.E. of the mean of three independent experiments. p values (t test) for glyoxal-treated cells versus control are as follows: *, p <=  0.01, and dagger , p <=  0.002. Soluble proteins (20 µg) from glyoxal-treated or untreated fibroblasts were subjected to SDS-PAGE on a 12% gel and electrotransferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The blot was processed with anti-proteasome polyclonal antibodies. B, effect of glyoxal on proteasome peptidase activities in vitro. Proteasome purified from human placenta was incubated for 30 min with glyoxal at indicated concentrations. Chymotrypsin-like (black bars), peptidylglutamyl-peptide hydrolase (striped bars), and trypsin-like (white bars) activities were determined using fluorogenic peptide substrates LLVY-AMC at 25 µM, LLE-NA at 150 µM, LSTR-AMC at 40 µM, respectively. The results are expressed as percentage of the activities of the proteasome incubated without glyoxal.

To examine whether CML-modified proteins are substrates for ubiquitin conjugation, an immunopurification of the crude extracts from glyoxal-treated and control cells was achieved on an anti-CML polyclonal antibody affinity column. After elution, the purified proteins were submitted to Western blot analysis using anti-CML and anti-ubiquitin antibodies. As shown in Fig. 2, the major bands corresponding to CML-modified proteins are also ubiquitinated, indicating these proteins may be marked for degradation by the 26 S proteasome. Among cytosolic enzymes that may be targets for glyoxal-induced modification, the fate of G6PDH was investigated because this enzyme has an essential lysine residue in its active site. Moreover, it plays a critical role in maintenance of intracellular redox status, and this enzyme is a well characterized model for the effects of various forms of modifications on susceptibility to proteasome degradation. We observed a 60% loss in G6PDH activity in glyoxal-treated cells defining this enzyme as a target for glyoxal-induced inactivation and also as a good model for further investigation of glycated protein degradation by the proteasome.


View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Ubiquitination of CML-modified proteins in glyoxal-treated cells. Cellular proteins from glyoxal-treated cells were immunopurified on an anti-CML affinity column. The eluted proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE on a 12% gel, electrotransferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane, and immunoblotted with anti-CML and anti-ubiquitin antibodies. The blot depicted is representative of three separate experiments.

Characterization of the Various Modified Forms of G6PDH-- Because CML-modified and fluorescent AGE-modified proteins are known to accumulate with age, these glycated forms of G6PDH were prepared and used to assess their susceptibility to proteolysis by the 20 S proteasome in vitro as described under "Experimental Procedures." Oxidatively modified G6PDH was also prepared to be used as a positive control. The formation of CML on protein was revealed by immunoblotting experiments using anti-CML antibodies. Amino acid analysis indicates a loss of 4 lysines in the CML-modified G6PDH and a loss of 9 lysines plus 4 arginines in the fluorescent AGE-modified form (data not shown). Pentosidine content (2.25 nmol/mg of enzyme) was measured by high performance liquid chromatography analysis, and the presence of other cyclic AGE structures was detected by spectrofluorometry. No intermolecular cross-links were detected after SDS-PAGE indicating that this modified G6PDH exhibits only pentosidine or other cyclic AGE cross-links within the same polypeptide (data not shown). The activities of both oxidatively modified and CML-modified G6PDH declined 50%, whereas the fluorescent AGE-modified form was completely inactivated.

Proteolysis of Native and Various Modified Forms of G6PDH by the Proteasome-- The rates of proteolysis for the native and modified forms of G6PDH were determined by monitoring the appearance of small peptides containing free amino groups generated after incubation of the various forms of G6PDH with purified 20 S proteasome (Fig. 3A). This method has been validated previously for native and modified G6PDH because it has been established that the loss of up to 13 lysines (upon modification by HNE) per molecule of G6PDH did not affect the values of the rates of proteolysis (31). As demonstrated previously, treatment of the enzyme with metal-catalyzed oxidation resulted in an increase in susceptibility to proteasome-mediated degradation (40). In contrast, the CML-modified protein was degraded to the same extent as the native protein, whereas the fluorescent AGE-modified form was more resistant to proteolysis than the native form. Kinetic parameters for degradation of the various forms of G6PDH (Table I) were calculated from direct linear plots (not shown) according to the representation of Eisenthal and Cornish-Bowden (46). The apparent KM for the CML-modified G6PDH was almost the same as for the native enzyme (41.8 and 42.7 µM, respectively), whereas fluorescent AGE-modified and oxidized G6PDH exhibited a lower KM (13 and 8 µM, respectively). The kcat value was about the same for the native, the CML-modified, and the oxidized G6PDH, whereas this turnover number was decreased for the fluorescent AGE-modified G6PDH. To determine whether these modified proteins behave as inhibitors of the proteasome, competition experiments using FITC-casein as substrate were performed in the presence of 18 µM of the various modified forms of G6PDH. As a substrate of the proteasome, the oxidatively modified protein was competing to almost 50% for the degradation of casein, whereas the CML- and the fluorescent AGE-modified protein did not exhibit an enhanced inhibitory effect as compared with the native enzyme (Fig. 3B).


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effect of G6PDH modifications on proteasome-mediated proteolysis. A, proteolysis of native and modified forms of G6PDH (at 18 µM) by the proteasome was performed and monitored as described under "Experimental Procedures." The rates of proteolysis are presented as percentage of the value obtained for native G6PDH (bars represent the mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments). B, proteolysis of FITC-casein by the proteasome in the presence of various forms of G6PDH. Proteolysis of FITC-casein was determined in the presence of native and modified G6PDH. The rate of FITC-casein degradation alone was set as 100%. The bars represent the S.E. of the mean for three independent experiments.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Kinetic parameters for degradation of G6PDH substrates by the 20 S proteasome
Data represent mean values ± S.E. obtained from three separate experiments.

Binding of the Hydrophobic Fluorescent Probe ANSA to the Modified Forms of G6PDH-- Because glycated proteins build up both as a function of disease and aging, it was important to investigate potential reasons why these proteins are not recognized and degraded by the proteasome. Hydrophobic surface exposure has been proposed to be the recognition signal for 20 S proteasome degradation. To determine whether the glycated forms of G6PDH expose hydrophobic regions at their surface, we have monitored the binding of the hydrophobic fluorescent probe ANSA which exhibits an increase and a shift in fluorescence when associated with surface-exposed hydrophobic sequences (Fig. 4). As opposed to free radical oxidation of protein which results in increased ANSA binding, no binding was observed with the CML- and fluorescent AGE-modified G6PDH. Oxidative modification of G6PDH has also been shown to promote dissociation of the dimeric enzyme that may explain hydrophobic surfaces exposure at the monomer-monomer interface (40). As expected, no dissociation of the dimer was observed for both the native and the glycated forms of the enzyme using gel filtration on a Superose 6 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) (data not shown).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Spectrofluorimetric analysis of ANSA binding to the various forms of G6PDH. Emission spectra (excitation 370 nm) of ANSA (100 µM) in the presence of various forms of G6PDH (0.4 µM) were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." The increase in fluorescence intensity resulting from the binding of ANSA to the enzyme was determined by subtracting the emission spectrum of ANSA from that of ANSA in the presence of the different forms of enzyme. From top to bottom: oxidized, native, and fluorescent AGE- and CML-G6PDH.

Structural Properties of the Modified Forms of G6PDH-- Structural changes that may occur upon G6PDH modification were analyzed by far- and near-UV CD for secondary and tertiary structural alterations, respectively. The CD spectra of oxidized, fluorescent AGE- and CML-modified were nearly identical in the far-UV region, indicating no change in secondary structure (Fig. 5A). The slight change observed for the oxidized protein at 190 nm is not accompanied by a change at 222 nm. It is therefore unlikely that any significant modification of the helical content of the protein has occurred upon oxidation. However, the oxidized enzyme exhibited a decreased signal intensity in the near-UV region, at 280 and 287 nm (Fig. 5B), suggesting alterations in tertiary structure. In contrast, the spectrum of the CML- and the fluorescent AGE-modified proteins remained close to the native form, indicating no major modification of their tertiary structure. The spectral deviations observed for the fluorescent AGE-modified enzyme at wavelengths greater than 290 nm can be explained by the absorbance properties of the AGE adducts. To assess potential changes in the structural stability of the modified forms of G6PDH, thermal denaturation experiments were performed at 45 °C as depicted in Fig. 6A. Because the thermal denaturation was followed by monitoring the enzymatic activity, the fluorescent AGE-modified protein could not be assayed. Interestingly, the CML-modified G6PDH was found to be even more heat-resistant than the native protein, whereas oxidized protein exhibited enhanced thermolability. The conformational stability of the native and the various modified forms of G6PDH was assayed by equilibrium denaturation experiments in the presence of increasing concentrations of urea. As shown in Fig. 6B, glycated forms of G6PDH appeared more structurally stable than native enzyme, whereas the oxidized form of the enzyme was far less stable. Moreover, the shape of the denaturation curves obtained for both CML- and fluorescent AGE-modified G6PDH is indicative of a heterogenous population of modified enzymes with different conformational stabilities.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   CD spectral analysis of the different forms of G6PDH. A, far-UV CD spectra were recorded as described under "Experimental Procedures." From top to bottom: fluorescent AGE- (down-triangle), CML- (triangle ), native (---), and oxidized (open circle ) G6PDH. B, near-UV CD spectra were recorded as described under "Experimental Procedures." From top to bottom at 287 nm: oxidized (open circle ), CML-(triangle ), fluorescent AGE-(down-triangle), and native (---) G6PDH.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Thermal and conformational stabilities of the different forms of G6PDH. A, heat inactivation of the different forms of G6PDH. Native, oxidized, or CML-modified G6PDH (0.02 µM) was incubated at 45 °C for the indicated times. Heat inactivation was terminated, and the residual G6PDH activity was determined as described under "Experimental Procedures." , CML-modified G6PDH; diamond , native G6PDH; , oxidized G6PDH. The points represent the means, and the bars the S.E. of the mean for three independent experiments. B, urea-induced denaturation of the various forms of G6PDH. Denaturation was performed by incubating 0.3 µM of the different forms of G6PDH with an increased amount of urea (from 0 to 8 M) and was followed by monitoring the fluorescence emission spectrum of the samples (300-450 nm, excitation 290 nm). The folded enzyme fraction was determined at 320 nm and plotted as a function of urea concentration as described under "Experimental Procedures." diamond , native G6PDH; , oxidized G6PDH; , CML-modified G6PDH; +, fluorescent AGE-modified G6PDH.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Modifications of protein by glycation/glycoxidation, as evidenced by the presence of CML, pentosidine, and vesperlysine adducts on proteins, are formed during the progression of various diseases and as a result of normal aging (4-6, 47). The present study was undertaken to determine whether the glycation process and the subsequent accumulation of glycated proteins affect the proteasomal system, which is responsible for intracellular degradation of ubiquitinated and oxidized proteins (18, 19). Indeed, proteasome function has been reported to be impaired during human aging as a result of both the decreases of its intrinsic activity and protein content (27, 30). Contributing factors may include the occurrence of structural modifications (28) or the inhibitory effects of cross-linked HNE-modified protein and lipofuscin (31-33). Protein glycation was induced by treatment of human dermal fibroblasts with glyoxal, a carbonyl compound, under conditions known to promote the formation of CML-modified proteins in cultured rat sensory neurons (35) and fetal lung cells (15). In this latter study, the proteolytic activity as well as the expression of lysosomal cathepsin D were shown to decrease, indicating that AGE formation and/or subsequent oxidative stress can alter the lysosomal protein degradation pathway. In the present study, we provide evidence that the proteasomal system is impaired in glyoxal-treated cells. Chymotrypsin-like, trypsin-like, and peptidylglutamyl-peptide hydrolase activities of the proteasome are significantly decreased, although no change in proteasome content could be detected (Fig. 1A). In vitro incubation of purified 20 S proteasome with glyoxal indicated that glyoxal can inactivate all three proteasome peptidase activities (Fig. 1B). This finding raises the possibility that the proteasome is a target for glyoxal-mediated inactivation in vivo. However, the sensitivity of proteasome peptidase activities to glyoxal appears to be slightly different in glyoxal-treated cells as compared with that of 20 S proteasome in vitro; the peptidylglutamyl-peptide hydrolase activity is the most sensitive to inhibition in vivo and the least sensitive in vitro. This apparent discrepancy can be explained by the fact that within cells the proteasome, one of the protein targets for glyoxal, is also present as a complex with the 19 S regulatory particle to form the 26 S proteasome. Moreover, cellular AGE-modified proteins have been shown to promote oxidative stress (48-50), and the proteasome peptidylglutamyl-peptide hydrolase activity is known to be readily inactivated by oxidants (23). In addition, an inhibitory effect of glycated proteins, as reported previously for HNE cross-linked proteins and lipofuscin (32, 33), cannot be excluded.

We also found that G6PDH in glyoxal-treated cells exhibits a dramatic decrease in activity. This inactivation could be due to the formation of CML on the active site lysine residue. This would be expected to result in a decline in reduced glutathione regeneration and subsequent alterations in redox control modulation. This, in turn, would affect the activity of GSH- and NADPH-dependent enzymes involved in the detoxification of reactive carbonyls, main precursors of AGE (11). The drop of G6PDH activity may also explain, at least in part, the increase in intracellular oxidative stress associated with AGE formation (49, 50). Interestingly, G6PDH activity, shown to be sensitive to oxidative stress (36-38), decreased with age (39).

G6PDH is a target for glyoxal-mediated inactivation that has been extensively studied with respect to the effects of various post-translational modifications on susceptibility to degradation by the 20 S proteasome (40, 51). Therefore, the susceptibility of glycated G6PDH to degradation by the 20 S proteasome was investigated in vitro. Two forms of glycated G6PDH, non-fluorescent, minimally modified by CML and highly modified by fluorescent AGE with intramolecular cross-links such as pentosidine, were assayed for the degradation by the 20 S purified proteasome. As opposed to oxidatively modified G6PDH which is a good substrate of the 20 S proteasome, these two forms of glycated proteins are no more susceptible to proteolysis by the proteasome than the native enzyme (Fig. 3A). In fact, as shown in Table I, almost similar kcat and KM values were obtained for CML-modified and native G6PDH. Due to a lower kcat, fluorescent AGE-modified G6PDH appeared more resistant than the native enzyme, despite a lower KM. Finally, in contrast to oxidized G6PDH, both native, CML-, and fluorescent AGE-modified G6PDH exhibited about the same specificity constant kcat/KM. These findings provide one explanation for the observed resistance of glycated proteins to proteolysis. The formation of intramolecular cross-links generated by cyclic fluorescent adducts, such as pentosidine, may explain this resistance toward proteasome degradation, as already observed with HNE cross-linked G6PDH (31, 32, 40).

Oxidized protein degradation by the 20 S proteasome has been studied extensively by different groups (20, 52-55). Mild oxidation leads to an increased proteolytic susceptibility, whereas highly oxidized protein becomes resistant to degradation by the 20 S proteasome. It has been shown that mildly oxidized proteins exhibit decreased thermal and thermodynamic stability (56, 57) and bind more efficiently the hydrophobic fluorescent probe ANSA (40). Both the exposure of hydrophobic surface on modified proteins and the loss of secondary structure have been proposed to act as a recognition signal for binding and degradation of the substrate protein by the 20 S proteasome (19, 54, 55). Because glycated proteins are poor substrates of the 20 S proteasome, structural studies of the glycated forms of G6PDH aimed at assessing their secondary and tertiary structure as well as their conformational stability were performed. These structural properties were then compared with those of the native and oxidized forms of the enzyme. As opposed to oxidized G6PDH, hydrophobic amino acids are not exposed at the surface of glycated proteins, as shown in ANSA-binding experiments (Fig. 4). Moreover, the secondary as well as the tertiary structures of these proteins, as monitored by far- and near-UV CD, respectively (Fig. 5, A and B), were nearly identical to those of the native counterpart. CML-modified G6PDH is more thermostable than the native enzyme (Fig. 6A), and both CML- and fluorescent AGE-modified G6PDH exhibit an increased resistance toward urea denaturation (Fig. 6B). Furthermore, the shape of the transition curves indicates that both CML- and fluorescent AGE-modified enzymes represent a heterogeneous population of modified proteins. Indeed, depending on the nature and the number of intramolecular cross-links (pentosidine and versperlysine), the fluorescent AGE-modified proteins may have different conformational stabilities. Additional negative charges brought by the carboxymethylation reaction may stabilize the protein conformation as well. Taken together, these findings show that, as opposed to oxidative modification that promotes an increased flexibility and decreased conformational stability of the protein, glycation of G6PDH induces an increased structural stability that correlates with the observed resistance of these modified proteins to degradation by the 20 S proteasome.

We have shown that CML-modified proteins in glyoxal-treated cells are also ubiquitinated (Fig. 2). Interestingly, HNE-modified proteins generated upon oxidative stress were also found to be ubiquitinated (58). These observations raise the possibility that the ubiquitin-26 S proteasome pathway is implicated in the removal of these modified proteins. However, our in vitro results suggest that even if ubiquitinated chains are recognized by the 19 S complex, glycated proteins, as well as HNE-modified proteins, are resistant to degradation by the 20 S catalytic core of the proteasome. Future studies will address whether ubiquitination of CML-modified proteins is a marking step for their degradation by the 26 S proteasome. On the other hand, ubiquitination of glycated proteins, if not a 26 S proteasome-targeting signal, may also be a signal for their targeting to other pathways such as protein degradation by the lysosomal pathway (59, 60).

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We are very grateful to Hilaire Bakala for help in the purification of CML-modified proteins.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by funds from the MENRT (Institut Universitaire de France and Université Denis Diderot, Paris 7) and by European Union QLRT "Protage" Grant QLK6-CT1999-02193.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel./Fax: 33-1-44-27-82-34; E-mail: bfriguet@paris7.jussieu.fr.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 14, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105374200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: AGE, advanced glycation end product; CML, Nepsilon -carboxymethyl-lysine; HNE, 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal; G6PDH, glucose-6-phophate dehydrogenase; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis LLVY-AMC, succinyl-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-amidomethylcoumarin; LSTR-AMC, N-t-butyloxycarbonyl-Leu-Ser-Thr-Arg-amidomethylcoumarin; LLE-NA, N-benzyloxycarbonyl-Leu-Leu-Glu-beta -naphthylamide; ANSA, 8-anilino-1-naphtalenesulfonic acid.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Monnier, V. M., Nagaraj, R. H., Portero-Otin, M., Glomb, M., Elgawish, A. H., Sell, D. R., and Friedlander, M. A. (1996) Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 11, 20-26
2. Miyata, T., van Ypersele de Strihou, C., Kurokawa, K., and Baynes, J. W. (1999) Kidney Int. 55, 389-399[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Araki, N., Ueno, N., Chakrabarti, B., Morino, Y., and Horiuchi, S. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 10211-10214[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Vlassara, H., Bucala, R., and Striker, L. (1994) Lab. Invest. 70, 138-151[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Brownlee, M. (1995) Annu. Rev. Med. 46, 223-234[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Sell, D. R., Primc, M., Schafer, I. A., Kovach, M., Weiss, M. A., and Monnier, V. M. (1998) Mech. Ageing Dev. 105, 221-240[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Verbeke, P., Clark, B. F., and Rattan, S. I. (2000) Exp. Gerontol. 35, 787-794[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Ling, X., Sakashita, N., Takeya, M., Nagai, R., Horiuchi, S., and Takahashi, K. (1998) Lab. Invest. 78, 1591-1606[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Beckman, K. B., and Ames, B. N. (1998) Physiol. Rev. 78, 547-581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Thornalley, P. J. (1998) Chem. Biol. Interact. 111-112, 137-151
11. Abordo, E. A., Minhas, H. S., and Thornalley, P. J. (1999) Biochem. Pharmacol. 58, 641-648[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Horie, K., Miyata, T., Yasuda, T., Takeda, A., Yasuda, Y., Maeda, K., Sobue, G., and Kurokawa, K. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 236, 327-332[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Kimura, T., Takamatsu, J., Miyata, T., Miyakawa, T., and Horiuchi, S. (1998) Pathol. Int. 48, 575-579[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Miyata, S., Liu, B. F., Shoda, H., Ohara, T., Yamada, H., Suzuki, K., and Kasuga, M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 4037-4042[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Kasper, M., Schinzel, R., Niwa, T., Munch, G., Witt, M., Fehrenbach, H., Wilsch-Brauninger, M., Pehlke, K., Hofer, A., and Funk, R. H. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 261, 175-182[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Suarez, G., Etlinger, J. D., Maturana, J., and Weitman, D. (1995) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 321, 209-213[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Portero-Otin, M., Pamplona, R., Ruiz, M. C., Cabiscol, E., Prat, J., and Bellmunt, M. J. (1999) Diabetes 48, 2215-2220[Abstract]
18. Coux, O., Tanaka, K., and Goldberg, A. L. (1996) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65, 801-847[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Grune, T., Reinheckel, T., and Davies, K. J. (1997) FASEB J. 11, 526-534[Abstract]
20. Davies, K. J. (2001) Biochimie (Paris) 83, 301-310[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Taylor, A., and Davies, K. J. (1987) Free Radic. Biol. Med. 3, 371-377[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Shang, F., and Taylor, A. (1995) Biochem. J. 307, 297-303
23. Conconi, M., Szweda, L. I., Levine, R. L., Stadtman, E. R., and Friguet, B. (1996) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 331, 232-240[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Shibatani, T., Nazir, M., and Ward, W. F. (1996) J. Gerontol. Biol. Sci. 51A, B316-322
25. Hayashi, T., and Goto, S. (1998) Mech. Ageing Dev. 102, 55-66[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Ponnappan, U., Zhong, M., and Trebilcock, G. U. (1999) Cell. Immunol. 192, 167-174[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Petropoulos, I., Conconi, M., Wang, X., Hoenel, B., Bregegere, F., Milner, Y., and Friguet, B. (2000) J. Gerontol. 55, B220-B227
28. Bulteau, A., Petropoulos, I., and Friguet, B. (2000) Exp. Gerontol. 35, 767-777[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Chondrogianni, N., Petropoulos, I., Franceschi, C., Friguet, B., and Gonos, E. S. (2000) Exp. Gerontol. 35, 721-728[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Friguet, B., Bulteau, A. L., Chondrogianni, N., Conconi, M., and Petropoulos, I. (2000) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 908, 143-154[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Friguet, B., Stadtman, E. R., and Szweda, L. I. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 21639-21643[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Friguet, B., and Szweda, L. I. (1997) FEBS Lett. 405, 21-25[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Sitte, N., Huber, M., Grune, T., Ladhoff, A., Doecke, W. D., Von Zglinicki, T., and Davies, K. J. (2000) FASEB J. 14, 1490-1498[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Glomb, M. A., and Monnier, V. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 10017-10026[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Niwa, H., Takeda, A., Wakai, M., Miyata, T., Yasuda, Y., Mitsuma, T., Kurokawa, K., and Sobue, G. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 248, 93-97[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Ursini, M. V., Parrella, A., Rosa, G., Salzano, S., and Martini, G. (1997) Biochem. J. 323, 801-806
37. Preville, X., Salvemini, F., Giraud, S., Chaufour, S., Paul, C., Stepien, G., Ursini, M. V., and Arrigo, A. P. (1999) Exp. Cell Res. 247, 61-78[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Ho, H. Y., Cheng, M. L., Lu, F. J., Chou, Y. H., Stern, A., Liang, C. M., and Chiu, D. T. (2000) Free Radic. Biol. Med. 29, 156-169[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Agarwal, S., and Sohal, R. S. (1994) Mech. Ageing Dev. 75, 11-19[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Friguet, B., Szweda, L. I., and Stadtman, E. R. (1994) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 311, 168-173[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Reddy, S., Bichler, J., Wells-Knecht, K. J., Thorpe, S. R., and Baynes, J. W. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 10872-10878[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Grandhee, S. K., and Monnier, V. M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 11649-11653[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Odetti, P., Fogarty, J., Sell, D. R., and Monnier, V. M. (1992) Diabetes 41, 153-159[Abstract]
44. Deutsch, J. (1983) in Methods of Enzymatic Analysis (Bergmeyer, H. V., ed), 3rd Ed., Vol. 3 , pp. 190-197, VCH Publishers, Deerfield Beach, FL
45. Kroll, M., Arenzana-Seisdedos, F., Bachelerie, F., Thomas, D., Friguet, B., and Conconi, M. (1999) Chem. Biol. 6, 689-698[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Eisenthal, R., and Cornish-Bowden, A. (1974) Biochem. J. 139, 715-720[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Tessier, F., Obrenovich, M., and Monnier, V. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 20796-20804[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Lee, C., Yim, M. B., Chock, P. B., Yim, H. S., and Kang, S. O. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 25272-25278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Nishikawa, T., Edelstein, D., Du, X. L., Yamagishi, S., Matsumura, T., Kaneda, Y., Yorek, M. A., Beebe, D., Oates, P. J., Hammes, H. P., Giardino, I., and Brownlee, M. (2000) Nature 404, 787-790[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Thornalley, P. J. (1998) Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-Grand) 44, 1013-1023
51. Ullrich, O., Reinheckel, T., Sitte, N., and Grune, T. (1999) Free Radic. Biol. Med. 27, 487-492[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Rivett, A. J. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 300-305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Pacifici, R. E., Salo, D. C., and Davies, K. J. (1989) Free Radic. Biol. Med. 7, 521-536[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Ferrington, D. A., Sun, H., Murray, K. K., Costa, J., Williams, T. D., Bigelow, D. J., and Squier, T. C. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 937-943[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Lasch, P., Petras, T., Ullrich, O., Backmann, J., Naumann, D., and Grune, T. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 9492-9502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
56. Rivett, A. J., and Levine, R. L. (1990) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 278, 26-34[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Fisher, M. T., and Stadtman, E. R. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 1872-1880[Abstract/Free Full Text]
58. Okada, K., Wangpoengtrakul, C., Osawa, T., Toyokuni, S., Tanaka, K., and Uchida, K. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 23787-23793[Abstract/Free Full Text]
59. Lenk, S. E., Susan, P. P., Hickson, I., Jasionowski, T., and Dunn, W. A., Jr. (1999) J. Cell. Physiol. 178, 17-27[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
60. Ciechanover, A., Orian, A., and Schwartz, A. L. (2000) J. Cell. Biochem. 34 (suppl.), 40-51


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
T. M. BUETLER, H. LATADO, A. BAUMEYER, and T. DELATOUR
Dicarbonyls Stimulate Cellular Protection Systems in Primary Rat Hepatocytes and Show Anti-inflammatory Properties
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., April 1, 2008; 1126(1): 113 - 117.