|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M106061200 on October 3, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 49, 46111-46117, December 7, 2001
Mitochondrial and Cytosolic Isoforms of Yeast Fumarase Are
Derivatives of a Single Translation Product and Have Identical Amino
Termini*
Ehud
Sass,
Eran
Blachinsky,
Sharon
Karniely, and
Ophry
Pines
From the Department of Molecular Biology, Hebrew University Medical
School, Jerusalem 91120, Israel
Received for publication, June 29, 2001, and in revised form, August 20, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have previously proposed that a single
translation product of the FUM1 gene encoding fumarase is
distributed between the cytosol and mitochondria of Saccharomyces
cerevisiae and that all fumarase translation products are
targeted and processed in mitochondria before distribution. Alternative
models for fumarase distribution have been proposed that require more
than one translation product. In the current work (i) we show by using
sequential Edman degradation and mass spectrometry that fumarase
cytosolic and mitochondrial isoenzymes have an identical amino terminus
that is formed by cleavage by the mitochondrial processing
peptidase, (ii) we have generated fumarase mutants in which the
second potential translation initiation codon (Met-24) has been
substituted, yet the protein is processed efficiently and retains its
ability to be distributed between the cytosol and mitochondria, and
(iii) we show that although a signal peptide is required for fumarase targeting to mitochondria the specific fumarase signal peptide and the
sequence immediately downstream to the cleavage site are not required
for the dual distribution phenomenon. Our results are discussed in
light of our model of fumarase targeting and distribution that suggests
rapid folding into an import-incompetent state and retrograde movement
of the processed protein back to the cytosol through the translocation pore.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Dual targeting of a protein encoded by a single gene to different
subcellular locations has been shown to occur by a number of
mechanisms. There is a wealth of reports on situations where a single
gene gives rise to a number of translation products that differ in the
targeting information they bear, e.g. a signal sequence or
lack of such a signal. This has been shown to be attained by multiple
transcription initiation sites (1), by multiple translation initiation
sites (2, 3), and more recently by splicing out of such signals (4-6).
On the other hand there are only a limited number of examples in which
a single translation product has been shown to be distributed between
two subcellular locations (7-11). The molecular mechanisms underlying
these situations have not been fully elucidated. Dual targeting of
cytochrome P4502B1 by two targeting signals to the endoplasmic
reticulum and mitochondria is controlled by phosphorylation of the
protein, which activates its mitochondrial targeting signal and
functionally inhibits its endoplasmic reticulum targeting signal. The
NADH-cytochrome b5 reductase (Mcr1p) is sorted
to the outer mitochondrial membrane or the mitochondrial intermembrane
space in yeast due to what appears to be an incomplete translocation
through the outer membrane.
Cytosolic and mitochondrial fumarase isoenzymes are encoded by the same
gene (FUM1) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (12). We have previously suggested that these proteins follow a unique mechanism
of subcellular localization and distribution. There is only one
translation product of FUM1, which is targeted to mitochondria by an amino-terminal presequence and which is then removed
by the mitochondrial processing peptidase
(MPP)1 (7). This notion is
based on previous work (7): (i) the appearance of single precursor or
mature fumarase bands on SDS-polyacrylamide gels and (ii) mutagenesis
of potential translation initiation codons. Our working model proposes
that a subset of the processed fumarase molecules are fully imported
into the matrix, whereas the majority (~70%) are partially
translocated so that their amino termini become accessible to MPP.
These latter molecules are released back into the cytosol as soluble
active enzyme by retrograde movement through the translocation pore
(13). Another unique feature of fumarase is that in
vivo its translocation into the mitochondrial matrix occurs only
while it is being translated and in vitro it requires the
presence of mitochondria during translation (7, 13).
Alternative models for fumarase distribution have been proposed. Wu and
colleagues (12, 14) detected in S. cerevisiae a number of
RNA transcripts of the FUM1 gene. They suggested that these
transcripts encode two fumarase products, one harboring a mitochondrial
signal peptide and the other lacking this sequence, thereby encoding a
cytosolic protein. In rat liver Tuboi and colleagues (15) proposed that
the transcript of the single fumarase gene can be translated from two
in-frame AUGs thereby giving rise to two products, one harboring and
one lacking a mitochondrial signal peptide. Importantly both of the
above alternative models of distribution predict the existence of two
fumarase primary translation products.
Since the amino termini of fumarase isoenzymes, according to our model
and the alternative models above, are predicted to differ, we have made
an effort to characterize the fumarase amino terminus and determine its
role in fumarase processing and subcellular distribution. In this
report we have determined the MPP cleavage site of fumarase and
fumarase mutants in vivo. We conclude that for wild type
fumarase this cleavage site determines the single amino terminus for
all fumarase molecules in mitochondria and the cytosol, thus providing
evidence for our single translation product model. In addition, we
found that although a mitochondrial targeting sequence is required for
interaction of the protein with mitochondria the specific fumarase
targeting signal and the immediate sequence downstream are not crucial
for the dual distribution phenomenon.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Strains and Plasmids--
The S. cerevisiae strain
used was DMM1-15A (leu2 ura3 ade2 his5) (7). Strains
harboring the appropriate plasmids were grown overnight at 30 °C in
SD (synthetic depleted) medium containing 0.67% (w/v) yeast
nitrogen base without amino acids (Difco Laboratories) and 2% glucose
or galactose (w/v) supplemented with the appropriate amino acids (50 µg/ml). Plasmids pFT2 (pFUM), pFUM24V (pILATG24), and pFSE24
(pFUM SP) are described elsewhere (7, 16). Plasmids pFUM24S25F,
pFUM24S, pFUM24I, pCYB2-FUM, pFUM 9, pFUM 11, pFUM 13, and
pFUM31G33G and plasmids encoding six histidine-tagged versions of
fumarase are described in this study.
pFum24S25F, pFum24S, and pFum24I were constructed by standard
polymerase chain reaction using the naturally occurring
HindIII site in pFT2 and using the following primers
(HindIII site underlined): pM24S25F,
5'-CCCAAGCTTAATATAAGAAGATCGTTCTCC-3'; pM24S,
5'-CCCAAGCTTAATATAAGAAGATCGAACT-3'; pM24I,
5'-CCCAAGCTTAATATAAGAAGAATCAAC-3'. pCyb-Fum, pFum 29-37 ( 9), pFum 27-37 ( 11), pFum 25-37 ( 13), and pFum31G33G
were constructed by overlap-extension polymerase chain reaction (17) with the following primers corresponding to site of mutation or fusion:
pCyb-Fum, 5'-CGAGGAGTTTAGATCTAGGGTAGAACCGTACG-3' and
5'-CTAGATCTAAACTCCTCGTTCAGAAC-3' (templates, pFT2, and
pb2- 19(167)-DHFR (18)); pFum 29-37 ( 9), 5'-CTCCTCGTTCATACACGTGCCTGCTC-3' and 5'-GCACGTGTATGAACGAGGAGTTCATTC-3'; pFum 27-37 ( 11), 5'-GAATGAATTCCATACACGTGCCTGCTG-3' and
5'-CACGTGTATGGAATTCATTCTTCTTATATTAAGC-3'; pFum 25-37 ( 13),
5'-GAAGAATGATACACGTGCCTGCTG-3' 5'-CACGTGTATCATTCTTCTTATATTAAGC-3'; pFum31G33G, 5'-CAGAACTGGTACCGGTGCATTTGG-3' and
5'-CCAAATGCACCGGTACCAGTTCTG-3'. Fumarase derivatives with six
carboxyl-terminal consecutive histidine residues were constructed
by standard polymerase chain reaction using naturally
occurring 5'-sites of the fumarase gene in pFT2 and the following
primer for the 3'-end of the FUM1 open reading frame:
5'-CACGGGCCCTTAGTGATGGTGATGGTGATGTTTAGGA-
CCTAGCATGTG-3'.
Labeling and Fractionation--
Induced cultures (in galactose)
were harvested and labeled with 10 µCi/ml
[35S]methionine and further incubated for 30 min at
30 °C. When required, 20 µM CCCP was added at the
start of labeling. The labeled cells were collected by centrifugation,
resuspended in Tris/EDTA buffer (pH 8.0) containing 1 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, broken with glass
beads for 2 min, and centrifuged to obtain the supernatant fraction.
Supernatant and pellet fractions were denatured by boiling in 1% SDS,
immunoprecipitated with anti-fumarase rabbit antiserum and protein
A-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and then analyzed by
SDS-PAGE.
Fumarase was assayed by the method of Kanarek and Hill (19) at 250 nm
with L-malic acid as substrate. Citrate synthase was assayed by following the reduction of acetyl-CoA in the presence of
5,5'-dithiobis(nitrobenzoic acid) at 412 nm (20). Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase was assayed by following the formation of NADH in the
presence of glucose 6-phosphate at 340 nm (21). Protein was determined
by the method of Bradford (22).
Protein Sequencing and Mass Spectrometry--
Histidine-tagged
fumarase derivatives were expressed in yeast under the GAL10
promoter, cell-free extracts were prepared, and the proteins
were affinity-purified using Co2+
(CLONTECH) or Ni2+ (Qiagen) columns.
amino-terminal sequence analysis was performed by automated Edman
degradation using standard chemistry on an Applied Biosystems Procise
sequencer (Model 492).
Fumarase derivatives were cleaved by adding 20 µl of the purified
protein sample to 80 µl of BNPS-skatole (1.3 mg/ml of acetic acid),
and the solution was incubated at 47 °C for 1 h (23, 24). The
reaction was stopped by precipitation with 10% trichloroacetic acid, and the precipitate was washed three times with acetone and dried.
For matrix-assisted laser-desorption time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF),
peptides were deposited on a metal target as co-crystals with
-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (Aldrich). The mass spectrometry analysis was done using MALDI-TOF (2E, Micromass UK) in the positive ion mode.
For electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (MS) the peptides were
resolved by reverse-phase chromatography on a 1- × 150-mm Vydac C-18
column. The peptides were separated by a linear gradient of 4-65%
acetonitrile in 0.025% trifluoroacetate A at 1%/min and a flow
rate of 40 µl/min. The liquid from the column was electrosprayed into
an ion-trap mass spectrometer (LCQ, Finnigan, San Jose, CA). Mass
spectrometry was performed in the positive ion mode using repetitively
full MS scan followed by collision-induced dissociation of the most
dominant ion selected from the first MS scan. The mass spectrometry
data was compared with simulated proteolysis and collision-induced
dissociation of the proteins in the "genpept" using the Sequest
software (J. Eng and J. Yates, both from University of Washington and
Finnigan, San Jose, CA).
 |
RESULTS |
Activity and Processing of Fumarase Mutants--
The fumarase
amino terminus contains the mitochondrial targeting signal, and the
deletion of the signal peptide results, as expected, in exclusive
cytosolic localization (7, 12, 25). We previously reported that a
mutant fumarase in which Met-24 was exchanged for valine is distributed
between the cytosol and mitochondria even though less fumarase is
targeted to mitochondria (7). In contrast, Wu et al. (14)
have reported that a mutant fumarase in which Met-24 is exchanged for
isoleucine is targeted exclusively to mitochondria. In the current
study we have constructed a fumarase mutant gene with this Met-24 to
isoleucine substitution (Table I).
Additional fumarase mutants were constructed in which Met-24 was
exchanged for serine, and a double mutant was constructed that has, in
addition to the Met-24 to serine substitution, an Asn-25 to
phenylalanine substitution (the rationale for this is provided
below).
Table I summarizes the specific activity of fumarase and its
derivatives in extracts of yeast cells. As previously described these
proteins were expressed from the galactose-inducible GAL10 promoter, which in the case of wild type fumarase controls high expression yet with full processing and a similar distribution in the
cell as that obtained with expression from the chromosomal gene (7).
Wild type fumarase (Fum1) and fumarase lacking a mitochondrial signal
peptide (Fum SP) exhibit similar high fumarase specific activity. In
contrast, for mutants in which the second methionine was substituted
for valine (Fum24V) or isoleucine (Fum24I), the specific activity
was only about 10-15% of wild type fumarase.
The reason for this low activity of Fum24I and Fum24V became apparent
when the processing of these derivatives was examined. Cultures of
yeast expressing the appropriate proteins were induced in galactose
medium and labeled with [35S]methionine in the absence or
presence of CCCP (a proton ionophore). Existence of the mitochondrial
membrane potential is required for fumarase mitochondrial import, and
accordingly this ionophore blocks processing by MPP (26). In the
absence and presence of CCCP fumarase appears as a lower and a higher
molecular weight band corresponding to mature (m) and
unprocessed precursor (p) fumarases, respectively (Fig.
1B, compare WT and + CCCP). The size of Fum SP does not change upon
treatment with CCCP, and the same is true for Fum24V and Fum24I (Fig.
1B, compare and + CCCP of
SP, 24V, and 24I, respectively).
The interpretation of the results is that these proteins are not
processed due to the lack of a signal peptide (Fum SP, lower
molecular weight band, bottom arrow) or the lack of a MPP
cleavage site (Fum24V and Fum24I, higher molecular weight bands,
top arrow).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Processing of wild type and mutant
fumarases. A, partial sequence of the fumarase amino
terminus presenting alterations that were made (shown above
the Fum sequence) and the amino acid sequence surrounding the rat MdhIp
MPP cleavage site (shown below the Fum sequence). The
double-headed arrow indicates MPP cleavage sites.
B, blocking of fumarase processing by inhibiting import into
mitochondria. Yeast cells induced in galactose medium and expressing
Fum, Fum SP, Fum24V, Fum24I, Fum24S25S, and Fum24S were labeled with
[35S]methionine for 15 min either in the absence ( ) or
presence (+) of 20 µM CCCP. Total cell extracts were
prepared, immunoprecipitated with fumarase antiserum, and analyzed on
SDS-PAGE. Arrows show positions of the precursor
(p) (top) and mature fumarase (m)
(bottom). WT, wild type.
|
|
To be able to draw firm conclusions as to the role of the second
potential initiation codon in fumarase distribution it was important to
eliminate the Met-24 codon without destroying the MPP cleavage site (as
occurs in the case of Fum24I and Fum24V). In examining known MPP
cleavage sites of mitochondrial proteins, that of rat malate
dehydrogenase I (MdhIp) turned out to be the most useful for planning
fumarase mutations (27). By substituting fumarase Met-24 and Asn-25
with serine and phenylalanine, respectively, we essentially constructed
the MdhI-MPP site within the fumarase precursor sequence (see
illustration in Fig. 1A). This fumarase mutant and a mutant
with only the Met-24 to serine substitution exhibited more than 85% of
the wild type enzyme activity in cell extracts (Table I). More
important was the finding that both mutants were processed efficiently
as shown by labeling experiments with and without CCCP (Fig.
1B, compare lanes and + CCCP
of Fum24S25F and Fum24S). Fum24V and Fum24I remain unprocessed and exhibit low specific activities, whereas wild type and mutant enzymes
Fum24S25F and Fum24S, which are processed efficiently, exhibit high
specific activities (Table I). This indicates that the amino-terminal
signal peptide is inhibitory to fumarase activity as has been shown for
many other precursor proteins.
Subcellular Distribution of Fumarase Mutant Proteins in Yeast
Cells--
To examine the distribution of mutant fumarases, induced
cells expressing these proteins were subjected to subcellular
fractionation. The distribution of enzymatic activity is shown in Fig.
2A, and the distribution of
fumarase proteins as detected by Western blot analysis is shown in Fig.
2B. As previously reported (7, 12) about 70% of the
fumarase activity (Fig. 2A) and protein (Fig. 2B)
is localized in mitochondria, whereas fumarase lacking the signal
peptide is found exclusively in the cytosol. For the enzymatic activity, mitochondrial citrate synthase and cytosolic
glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase were routinely used to determine
cross-contamination of fractions, and mitochondrial Hsp60 served as our
control for Western analysis (Fig. 2B). For fumarase mutants
defective for processing (Fum24I and Fum24V), the majority of the
activity and protein was detected in the cytosolic fraction even though
a reproducible small amount (about 8-10%) is fully imported into
mitochondria. Fumarase mutants that are processed even though Met-24 is
eliminated (Fum24S25F and Fum24S) are distributed in the cell with
about 50-60% in mitochondria. These results indicate that although
substitution of Met-24 can cause a significant change in the
distribution of fumarase in the cell it does not eliminate the dual
targeting phenomenon itself.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Distribution of fumarase activity and protein
in subcellular fractions. Induced cultures expressing the
indicated fumarase derivatives were subjected to subcellular
fractionation. A, fumarase enzymatic activity in fraction
aliquots was determined, and the percentage of the total found in
mitochondria is presented. B, fumarase was immunodetected by
Western blot analysis using anti-fumarase antiserum. T,
total extract; C, cytosol; M, mitochondria.
|
|
Sequential Edman Degradation of Fumarase--
To characterize
fumarase products we constructed genes encoding histidinyl-tagged
fumarase derivatives. Fum-6h was essentially identical to the nontagged
form in its specific activity, processing by MPP, tetramerization, and
distribution in the cell (30). Fum-6h and tagged versions of
fumarase derivatives, Fum SP-6h, FumS24F25-6h, FumI24-6h, were
purified from yeast cell extracts by affinity chromatography. As shown
in Fig. 3A as with the
nontagged versions Fum SP-6h migrated faster and FumI24-6h migrated
slower than Fum-6h on SDS-PAGE. The purified proteins were subjected to
sequential Edman degradation, and the results are summarized in Fig.
3B. Mature fumarase whose sequence starts with asparagine is
cleaved between amino acids Met-24 and Asn-25. If Met-24 and Asn-25 are
exchanged for Ser-24 and Phe-25 the derivative protein is cleaved
efficiently by MPP at the corresponding site between Ser-24 and
Phe-25.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Determination of the fumarase amino-terminal
protein sequence. A, cultures of yeast expressing
Fum-6h (a), Fum SP-6h (b), and Fum24I-6h
(c) and fumarase derivatives tagged with six histidines were
purified by affinity chromatography. The clear difference in migration
on SDS-PAGE between the fumarase derivatives is indicated by
arrows. Molecular mass markers 58, 48.5, and 36.5 kDa are
indicated. B, predicted (from DNA), determined
(N-Free), and inferred (N-Blocked) fumarase
sequences. Fumarase derivatives tagged with six histidines and
affinity-purified were subjected to sequential Edman degradation.
WT, wild type. Black stacked circles indicate
potential ribosome translation initiation positions.
|
|
For FumI24-6h and Fum SP-6h, which are not processed by MPP, the
methionine from which translation was initiated is expected to remain
at the amino terminus of the protein. These two proteins even at
high concentrations were resistant to Edman degradation and did not
provide any sequence information. The interpretation of these results
is that these proteins have a modified amino-terminal amino acid. The
modification of these polypeptides is not surprising, and in fact the
fumarase precursor has been predicted to be N-acetylated by
the N-acetyltransferase Mak3 on the basis of its
amino-terminal sequence (MLRF, Refs. 28 and 29). The Fum SP amino
terminus (MNSS) is most probably N-acetylated by the
N-acetyltransferase Nat3, which has been shown to
N-acetylate among other sequences MNNS and MNFL of CYC-872
and CYC-849, respectively (29). This blocking raises the theoretical
possibility that strains expressing Fum-6h may express, in addition to
processed Fum-6h, a product whose translation started from Met-24,
which would be blocked and undetected by Edman degradation.
Mass Spectrometry of Amino- and Carboxyl-terminal Peptides
Generated by BNPS-Skatole--
To rule out this possibility of a
blocked fumarase species and to fully identify the products, we
subjected Fum-6h products to mass spectrometry analysis. The strategy
for identification of fumarase products in the yeast cell was to use
MALDI-TOF MS as a tool for examining short peptides from the termini of
fumarase. Unmutated Fum and Fum SP both tagged with six histidines
were analyzed. The reagent BNPS-skatole was chosen for this analysis since it cleaves fumarase only twice after the two tryptophans (Trp-46
and Trp-477) in this protein, thereby producing a predicted 16-amino
acid carboxyl-terminal peptide and a predicted 22- or 23-amino acid
amino-terminal fragment depending on whether the protein was processed
by MPP (after Met-24) or whether translation initiated at Met-24 (Fig.
4A). As shown in panels
a and c of Fig. 4B and as predicted for Fum
and Fum SP, a single fragment corresponding to the carboxyl-terminal
16 amino acids of these proteins is identical with a molecular mass of
1945 Da (includes a 16-Da addition due to oxidation of the
single methionine). In contrast the amino-terminal fragments of Fum and
Fum SP differ showing molecular masses corresponding to 22 amino
acids (2584 Da) and 23 amino acids (2775 Da), respectively (panels b and d of Fig. 4B,
respectively). The Fum 22-amino acid fragment includes a 14-Da addition
due to formation of an oxolactone by oxidative halogenation on the
terminal tryptophan of the cleaved peptide, which is a known
modification caused by the BNPS-skatole treatment (23, 24). The
Fum SP 23-amino acid fragment includes this same 14-Da modification,
a 16-Da addition due to oxidation of the methionine, and a 42-Da
addition due to acetylation of the amino-terminal methionine. The
difference in mass between Fum and Fum SP after taking the
modifications into consideration corresponds to that of the amino acid
methionine (131 Da), while the lower mass from Fum SP (2714 Da) is
most probably the result of different undetermined modifications.

View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
MALDI-TOF MS analysis of BNPS-skatole-cleaved
fumarases. Fum-6h and Fum SP-6h expressed in yeast and purified
as described in Fig. 3 were subjected to cleavage with BNPS-skatole and
analyzed by mass spectrometry. A, partial sequence of the
fumarase precursor showing (i) predicted BNPS-skatole cleavage sites
(solid arrows), (ii) the determined MPP cleavage site
(hollow arrow), and (iii) potential translation initiation
sites (broken arrows). B, MALDI-TOF mass spectra
detection of the Fum-6h (top panels) and Fum SP-6h
(bottom panels) carboxyl-terminal (a and
c) and amino-terminal (b and d)
fragments of BNPS-skatole-cleaved fumarases. Predicted masses are
indicated by arrows. SP, signal peptide.
Black stacked circles are as in Fig.
3B.
|
|
To fully characterize the amino-terminal peptide of Fum-6h (2586 Da)
this product was identified and analyzed by electrospray mass
spectrometry, and fragmentation of this peptide was undertaken by
collision-induced dissociation. Shown in Fig.
5A are double and triple ions
of this peptide, and shown in Fig. 5B are characteristic internal fragment ions confirming the identity of the peptide. These
analyses indicate that the wild type yeast produces fumarase molecules
with a single amino-terminal sequence and distributes them within the
cell. This amino terminus of Fum is determined by the MPP cleavage of
the fumarase precursor between amino acids Met-24 and Asn-25 (Figs.
3B and 4A).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Identification of the BNPS-skatole Fum
amino-terminal peptide by electrospray ion trap mass spectrometry.
Peptides were separated by reverse phase HPLC chromatography and either
electrosprayed directly from the HPLC column into an electrospray ion
trap mass spectrometer (panel A) or following
collision-induced fragmentation (panel B). Doubly charged
(dc) and triply charged (tc) ions are labeled
accordingly. Masses corresponding to the amino-terminal peptide
(residues 25-46) are indicated by arrows in
panel A, and the major fragment ions attributed to b and y
series ions are indicated in panel B.
|
|
Deletion and Swapping of Fumarase Amino-terminal
Sequences--
Our working model for fumarase distribution proposes
that the fumarase amino terminus of cytosol-destined precursors are
only partially translocated and then cleaved by MPP (see the
Introduction and Refs. 7 and 13). In addition fumarase translocation
into the mitochondrial matrix appears to be cotranslational in
vivo and in vitro (7, 13). Although Met-24 is not
required for fumarase distribution certain substitutions of the 24th
amino acid residue appear to have significant effects on distribution; thus, it seemed reasonable that secondary targeting information may be
found within the amino terminus of fumarase. The first element we
examined was the fumarase mitochondrial targeting sequence. We fused
the cytochrome b2 (Cyb2p) mitochondrial
targeting signal to mature fumarase. For this a DNA sequence encoding
39 amino acids (which includes the Cyb2 signal peptide and its MPP
cleavage site) was fused to a DNA sequence encoding Fum1 starting from amino acid Asn-25 (Fig. 6A).
This hybrid Cyb2-Fum exhibited more than 90% of the wild type Fum
specific activity and was processed efficiently as detected by labeling
experiments in the presence and absence of CCCP (Fig. 6B,
compare and + CCCP). As shown in Fig. 6, subcellular
fractionation experiments reveal that about 60% of the Cyb2-Fum
enzymatic activity (Fig. 6C) and protein (Fig. 6D) are fully localized to mitochondria, and the rest are
cytosolic, a pattern that is reminiscent of Fum24S25F and Fum24S. These
results indicate that although a signal peptide is crucial for
mitochondrial targeting, the specific fumarase-targeting signal is not
crucial for maintaining the fumarase dual targeting phenomenon.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Processing and subcellular distribution of
Cyb2-Fum. A hybrid protein consisting of the Cyb2 signal peptide,
the Cyb2 MPP cleavage site, and the mature wild type fumarase was
expressed in yeast. A, the amino-terminal of Fum1 and Cyb2
is shown with the MPP cleavage sites (double-headed arrow)
and the point of fusion between the two sequences (curved
arrow) indicated. B, processing was determined by
labeling in the presence and absence of CCCP as described in Fig. 1.
C, subcellular distribution determination of enzymatic
activity was as described in Fig. 2. D, Western blot
analysis of subcellular fractions was as described in Fig. 2.
T, total extract; C, cytosol; M,
mitochondria.
|
|
Many secondary targeting signals appear in the protein sequence
immediately following the amino-terminal primary signal of mitochondrial proteins. For example, the c1 and
b2 cytochromes in yeast contain a mitochondrial
intermembrane space hydrophobic-sorting sequence immediately following
the amino-terminal matrix targeting sequence. The fumarase signal
sequence is followed by a highly charged and conserved sequence
(RTETDAFGEIHVPADK). In fact we had speculated that this sequence may weaken the interaction of the translocating protein with mtHsp70 and thereby delay completion of the import process. We have examined this by specific substitutions and deletions of various portions of this charged sequence. We have
constructed three deletions within the fumarase open reading frame
which remove 9, 11, and 13 codons from the sequence following the MPP
cleavage site ( 25-37, 27-37, and 29-37). As shown in Fig.
7A these deletions include the
first four charged amino acids following the cleavage site. In another
construct, the acidic amino acids Glu-31 and Asp-33 were substituted by
glycines. All of these mutant proteins were detected in yeast extracts
of induced cells by Western blot analysis but were devoid of fumarase
enzymatic activity. Fum 29-37 ( 9) is processed efficiently as
detected by labeling experiments in the presence and absence of CCCP
(Fig. 7B, compare and + CCCP of
9). The same is true for Fum31G33G (not shown). In
contrast, Fum 25-37 ( 13) shows a significant defect in processing
(Fig. 7B, compare and + CCCP of
13), which is not very surprising since in this mutant
Asn-25 is replaced by isoleucine at the MPP cleavage site. Fum 27-37
displays a very minor defect in processing, which is not always
detected (not shown). As shown in Fig. 7C, subcellular
fractionation experiments reveal that more of the Fum 29-37 ( 9)
than the wild type molecules are fully imported into mitochondria (60%
compared with 30%, respectively). In contrast for Fum 25-37 ( 13)
only a small portion of the molecules is fully imported (Fig.
7C), which is similar to the situation with other mutant
fumarases, which show a defect in processing. Taken together these
results strongly suggest that the 11-amino acid sequence immediately
following the MPP cleavage site is not crucial for fulfillment of the
fumarase dual targeting phenomenon.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Processing and subcellular distribution of
fumarase deleted for sequences immediately downstream of the MPP
cleavage site. Fum, Fum 13, and Fum 9 were expressed in yeast.
A, the amino-terminal sequence of Fum1 is shown with the
deletions ( 9, 11, and 13) and the double substitution
(Fum31G33G) indicated. The hollow arrow indicates the MPP
cleavage site. B, processing was determined by labeling in
the presence and absence of CCCP as described in Fig. 1. C,
subcellular distribution was determined by cell fractionation and
Western blotting as described in Fig. 2. T, total extract;
C, cytosol; M, mitochondria.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Our working model is that the FUM1 gene directs the
expression of a single translation product. In the present study full identification of fumarase products with respect to their
amino-terminal sequences was achieved. Wild type fumarase is cleaved by
MPP between Met-24 and Asn-25, whereas a mutant fumarase lacking the
Met-1 codon and a signal peptide initiates translation at the Met-24 codon and retains methionine at its amino terminus. Edman degradation followed by mass spectrometry shows that all the fumarase molecules in
the yeast cell have an identical amino terminus starting with Asn-25
without traces of the Met-24 variant. Since this fumarase distributes
normally between the cytosol and mitochondria in yeast, these results
provide evidence for the single translation product hypothesis.
A second type of experiment to show the existence of a single fumarase
translation product has used mutants in which the Met-24 codon was
eliminated by mutagenesis. Stein et al. (7) and Wu et
al. (14) have previously substituted Met-24 with valine and isoleucine, respectively. Wu et al. (14) claimed on the
basis of enzyme activity alone that a Met-24 to isoleucine mutant is targeted exclusively to mitochondria, yet we find that most of the
protein is located in the cytosol. As shown in this study both these
mutant fumarases are not processed by MPP in vivo. Thus
conclusions based on these mutants should be carefully reexamined. For
example we have previously shown that unprocessed fumarase has a
tendency to precipitate out of solution and in the case of Fum24I may
have come out of solution with mitochondria upon centrifugation.
Nevertheless, in this study we have successfully constructed and
expressed other Met-24 mutants, Fum24S25F and Fum24S, which are
processed in vivo by MPP. These mutant fumarases when
expressed in yeast are distributed between the cytosol and mitochondria
ruling out alternative distribution mechanisms that require the second
Met-24 codon for translation initiation of a second fumarase product
(see the Introduction) and support the single translation product model.
A third type of experiment supporting a single fumarase translation
product was based on blocking processing by MPP. This was achieved
either by directly inhibiting the MPP or by blocking fumarase import
into mitochondria thereby making the precursor unavailable for cleavage
by the protease (7). Our conclusions were based on detection of a
single band on SDS-PAGE corresponding to mature fumarase in yeast cells
and when fumarase processing is blocked detection of a single band
corresponding to the precursor. These results held true for fumarase
expressed from the chromosome as well as from a plasmid. The same
results are obtained with mutants described in this study and in
particular with Fum24S25F and Fum24S, which are processed efficiently
and distributed between the cytosol and mitochondria. In this regard,
we have previously shown that expression of fumarase from the
GAL10 promoter, which initiates transcription
upstream to the first potential translation initiation codon, allows
distribution of the enzyme in the cell similarly to the
chromosomally expressed gene. This finding and the fact that a
SP-fumarase like protein cannot be detected in wild type yeast cells
indicates that the minority of the shorter mRNA molecules detected
by Wu and colleagues (12, 14) do not appear to direct the
translation of fumarase (starting from Met-24). This appears to be true
under the conditions of our experiments, yet such RNAs may be expressed
in other circumstances. As pointed out above the scenario suggested by
Tuboi (15) for rat fumarase in which translation can initiate
from either of the two 5' proximal methionine codons does not apply to
yeast fumarase (Met-1 and Met-24) since a product starting from Met-24
cannot be detected.
Essential information required for fumarase distribution in the cell
does not appear to reside within the first 37 amino acids of the
precursor since (i) exchange of the fumarase mitochondrial targeting
peptide for that of cytochrome b2 and (ii)
deletion of amino acids immediately following the MPP cleavage site
(through Glu-37) do not eliminate the fumarase dual targeting
phenomenon. Thus, essential information required for fumarase
distribution is expected to be found further downstream inside the
mature protein sequence. This notion fits our working model that
suggests that targeting and distribution involves rapid fumarase
folding (outside mitochondria) into a conformation incompatible with
further import, which in turn leads to retrograde movement of the
processed protein back through the translocation pore. The hypothesis
of retrograde movement of the fumarase single translation product is
supported by previously published data in vivo and in
vitro (13). The notion that folding outside mitochondria is an
important factor in its final subcellular location is supported by the
apparent rapid folding of fumarase in vitro (13) and other
preliminary data. In this regard, experiments currently in progress
show that a number of differently located deletions within the core of
the fumarase subunit causes nearly full import of fumarase into
mitochondria.2 In addition,
overexpression of SSA1, a yeast cytosolic Hsp70 homolog, causes the
localization of 2-fold more fumarase in mitochondria.2
It is interesting to note that the strongest effects of
modifications of the amino terminus on fumarase distribution were
mutations of the MPP cleavage site. While mutations in which the
fumarase precursor is still efficiently processed (Fum24S25F and
Fum24S) exhibit only a minor change in distribution, mutants defective in processing (Fum24I, Fum24V, and Fum 25-37) are primarily targeted to the cytosol. These results can most easily be explained by assuming
that noncleavage of the precursor may slow down import providing
additional time for more of the polypeptide to fold outside
mitochondria into an import-incompetent conformation. Future studies
will have to determine whether posttranslational modifications occur in
the downstream polypeptide sequence. Such posttranslational
modifications and/or molecular chaperones may in fact affect the
fumarase conformation and determine its distribution in the cell.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Walter Neupert for collaboration and
support throughout this study. We thank Ariel Gaaton (Hebrew
University, Jerusalem, Israel) for the Edman degradation and Tamar Ziv
and Arie Admon (Technion, Haifa, Israel) for the mass spectrometry. We
thank Yudit Karp for assistance and Eitan Bibi and Doron Rapaport for critical reading of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This research was supported by the German-Israeli Foundation
for Scientific Research and Development (GIF) (to W. Neupert and
O. P.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 972-2-6757203;
Fax: 972-2-6758918; E-mail: ophry@md.huji.ac.il.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 3, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M106061200
2
E. Sass, S. Karniely, and O. Pines, unpublished.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
MPP, mitochondrial
processing peptidase;
CCCP, carbonyl cyanide
p-chlorophenylhydrazone;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis;
BNPS, 3-bromo-3-methyl-2-(2-nitrophenylmercapto)-3H-indole;
MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser-desorption time-of-flight;
MS, mass
spectrometry;
HPLC, high pressure liquid
chromatography.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Natsoulis, G.,
Hilger, F.,
and Fink, G. R.
(1986)
Cell
46,
235-243[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Slusher, L. B.,
Gillman, E. C.,
Martin, N. C.,
and Hopper, A. K.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
9789-9793[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Gillman, E. C.,
Slusher, L. B.,
Martin, N. C.,
and Hopper, A.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
2382-2390[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Tong, W. H.,
and Rouault, T.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
5692-5700[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Kurys, G.,
Tagaya, Y.,
Bamford, R.,
Hanover, J. A.,
and Waldmann, T. A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
30653-30659[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Huang, L. J.,
Wang, L.,
Ma, Y.,
Durick, K.,
Perkins, G.,
Deerinck, T. J.,
Ellisman, M. H.,
and Taylor, S. S.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
951-959[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Stein, I.,
Peleg, Y.,
Even-Ram, S.,
and Pines, O.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
4770-4778[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Haucke, V.,
Ocana, C. S.,
Honlinger, A.,
Tokatlidis, K.,
Pfanner, N.,
and Schatz, G.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
4024-4032[Abstract]
|
| 9.
|
Anandatheerthavarada, H. K.,
Biswas, G.,
Mullick, J.,
Sepuri, N. B.,
Otvos, L.,
Pain, D.,
and Avadhani, N. G.
(1998)
EMBO J.
18,
5494-5504[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Addya, S.,
Anandatheerthavarada, H. K.,
Biswas, G.,
Bhagwat, S. V.,
Mullick, J.,
and Avadhani, N. G.
(1997)
Cell Biol.
139,
589-599
|
| 11.
|
Bhagwat, S. V.,
Biswas, G.,
Anandatheerthavarada, H. K.,
Addya, S.,
Pandak, W.,
and Avadhani, N. G.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
24014-24022[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Wu, M.,
and Tzagoloff, A.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
12275-12282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Knox, C.,
Sass, E.,
Neupert, W.,
and Pines, O.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
25587-25593[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Wu, M.,
Wong, S.-M.,
Tan, H.-M.,
and Ting, R.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
215,
578-590[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Suzuki, T.,
Yoshida, T.,
and Tuboi, S.
(1992)
Eur. J. Biochem.
207,
767-772[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Pines, O.,
Even-Ram, S.,
Elnathan, N.,
Battat, E.,
Aharonov, O.,
Gibson, D.,
and Goldberg, I.
(1996)
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
46,
393-399[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Ho, S. N.,
Hunt, H. D.,
Horton, R. M.,
Pullen, J. K.,
and Pease, L. R.
(1989)
Gene (Amst.)
77,
51-59[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Koll, H.,
Guiard, B.,
Rassow, J.,
Ostermann, J.,
Horwich, A. L.,
Neupert, W.,
and Hartl, F. U.
(1992)
Cell
68,
1163-1175[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Kanarek, L.,
and Hill, R. L.
(1964)
J. Biol. Chem.
5,
465-474
|
| 20.
|
Weitzman, P. D. J.
(1969)
Methods Enzymol.
13,
22-24
|
| 21.
|
Worthington, C. C.
(ed)
(1988)
Worthington Manual
, Worthington Biochemical Corp., Freehold, NJ
|
| 22.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Rahali, V.,
and Gueguen, J.
(1999)
J. Protein Chem.
18,
1-12[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Vestling, M. M.,
Kelly, M. A.,
and Fenselau, C.
(1994)
Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.
8,
786-790[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Peleg, Y.,
Rokem, J. S.,
Goldberg, I.,
and Pines, O.
(1990)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
56,
2777-2783[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Nelson, N.,
and Schatz, G.
(1979)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
76,
4365-4369[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Ogishima, T.,
Niidome, T.,
Shimokata, K.,
Kitada, S.,
and Ito, A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
30322-30326[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Tercero, J. C.,
Dinman, J. D.,
and Wickner, R. B.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
3192-3194[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Polevoda, B.,
Norbeck, J.,
Takakura, H.,
Blomberg, A.,
and Sherman, F.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
6155-6168[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Blachinsky, E.
(2001)
Processing of the Single Translation Product of the FUM1 Gene (Fumarase) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. M.Sc. thesis
, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Regev-Rudzki, O. Yogev, and O. Pines
The mitochondrial targeting sequence tilts the balance between mitochondrial and cytosolic dual localization
J. Cell Sci.,
July 15, 2008;
121(14):
2423 - 2431.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Mukhopadhyay, C.-s. Yang, B. Wei, and H. Weiner
Precursor Protein Is Readily Degraded in Mitochondrial Matrix Space if the Leader Is Not Processed by Mitochondrial Processing Peptidase
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 21, 2007;
282(51):
37266 - 37275.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-Y. Huang, Y. Kuei, H.-Y. Chao, S.-J. Chen, L.-S. Yeh, and C.-C. Wang
Cross-species and Cross-compartmental Aminoacylation of Isoaccepting tRNAs by a Class II tRNA Synthetase
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 20, 2006;
281(42):
31430 - 31439.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Porras, C. A. Padilla, M. Krayl, W. Voos, and J. A. Barcena
One Single In-frame AUG Codon Is Responsible for a Diversity of Subcellular Localizations of Glutaredoxin 2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 16, 2006;
281(24):
16551 - 16562.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Lu, N. Garrido, J. N. Spelbrink, and C. K. Suzuki
Tid1 Isoforms Are Mitochondrial DnaJ-like Chaperones with Unique Carboxyl Termini That Determine Cytosolic Fate
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 12, 2006;
281(19):
13150 - 13158.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Regev-Rudzki, S. Karniely, N. N. Ben-Haim, and O. Pines
Yeast Aconitase in Two Locations and Two Metabolic Pathways: Seeing Small Amounts Is Believing
Mol. Biol. Cell,
September 1, 2005;
16(9):
4163 - 4171.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. O'Brien, R. Dirmeier, M. Engle, and R. O. Poyton
Mitochondrial Protein Oxidation in Yeast Mutants Lacking Manganese-(MnSOD) or Copper- and Zinc-containing Superoxide Dismutase (CuZnSOD): EVIDENCE THAT MnSOD AND CuZnSOD HAVE BOTH UNIQUE AND OVERLAPPING FUNCTIONS IN PROTECTING MITOCHONDRIAL PROTEINS FROM OXIDATIVE DAMAGE
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 10, 2004;
279(50):
51817 - 51827.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Valadi, K. Granath, L. Gustafsson, and L. Adler
Distinct Intracellular Localization of Gpd1p and Gpd2p, the Two Yeast Isoforms of NAD+-dependent Glycerol-3-phosphate Dehydrogenase, Explains Their Different Contributions to Redox-driven Glycerol Production
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 17, 2004;
279(38):
39677 - 39685.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-J. Chang and C.-C. Wang
Translation Initiation from a Naturally Occurring Non-AUG Codon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 2, 2004;
279(14):
13778 - 13785.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Daran-Lapujade, M. L. A. Jansen, J.-M. Daran, W. van Gulik, J. H. de Winde, and J. T. Pronk
Role of Transcriptional Regulation in Controlling Fluxes in Central Carbon Metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A CHEMOSTAT CULTURE STUDY
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 5, 2004;
279(10):
9125 - 9138.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. E. Outten and V. C. Culotta
Alternative Start Sites in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae GLR1 Gene Are Responsible for Mitochondrial and Cytosolic Isoforms of Glutathione Reductase
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 27, 2004;
279(9):
7785 - 7791.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Contamine, D. Zickler, and M. Picard
The Podospora rmp1 Gene Implicated in Nucleus-Mitochondria Cross-Talk Encodes an Essential Protein Whose Subcellular Location Is Developmentally Regulated
Genetics,
January 1, 2004;
166(1):
135 - 150.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Sass, S. Karniely, and O. Pines
Folding of Fumarase during Mitochondrial Import Determines its Dual Targeting in Yeast
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 14, 2003;
278(46):
45109 - 45116.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-A. Robin, S. K. Prabu, H. Raza, H. K. Anandatheerthavarada, and N. G. Avadhani
Phosphorylation Enhances Mitochondrial Targeting of GSTA4-4 through Increased Affinity for Binding to Cytoplasmic Hsp70
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 23, 2003;
278(21):
18960 - 18970.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Chabregas, D. D. Luche, M.-A. Van Sluys, C. F. M. Menck, and M. C. Silva-Filho
Differential usage of two in-frame translational start codons regulates subcellular localization of Arabidopsis thaliana THI1
J. Cell Sci.,
January 15, 2003;
116(2):
285 - 291.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-A. Robin, H. K. Anandatheerthavarada, G. Biswas, N. B. V. Sepuri, D. M. Gordon, D. Pain, and N. G. Avadhani
Bimodal Targeting of Microsomal CYP2E1 to Mitochondria through Activation of an N-terminal Chimeric Signal by cAMP-mediated Phosphorylation
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 18, 2002;
277(43):
40583 - 40593.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|