|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M106221200 on October 9, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 50, 46729-46736, December 14, 2001
The Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Locus of the Duck
GENOMIC ORGANIZATION AND EXPRESSION OF D, J, AND C REGION
GENES*
Mats L.
Lundqvist ,
Darlene L.
Middleton ,
Starr
Hazard§, and
Gregory W.
Warr ¶
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology and § Biomolecular Computing Resource, Medical
University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425
Received for publication, July 5, 2001, and in revised form, October 5, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The region of the duck IgH locus extending from
upstream of the proximal diversity (D) segment to downstream of the
constant gene cluster has been cloned and mapped. A sequence contig of 48,796 base pairs established that the organization of the genes is
D-JH-µ- - . No evidence for a functional
homologue (or remnant) of a gene was found. The gene is in
inverted transcriptional orientation; class switch to IgA expression
thus requires inversion of the ~27-kilobase pair region that includes
both µ and genes. The secreted forms of duck and µ are each
encoded by 4 constant region exons, and the hydrophobic C-terminal
regions of the membrane receptor forms of and µ are encoded by
one and two transmembrane exons, respectively. Putative switch (S)
regions were identified for duck µ and by comparison with chicken
Sµ and S sequences and for duck by comparison with mouse S .
The duck IgH locus is rich in complex variable number tandem repeats,
which occupy ~60% of the sequenced region, and occur at a much
higher frequency in the IgH locus than in other sequenced regions of
the duck genome.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Antibodies, found only in the vertebrates (1), are molecules that
show enormous diversity in structure. The greatest diversity is
associated with their almost limitless repertoire of antigen-binding sites, which are encoded by the
V,1 (D), and J genes.
However, the constant (C) regions of the Ig molecules also show
diversity within an individual. The antibody heavy chains specify the
functions associated with the different classes of antibody, such as
complement activation, recognition by phagocytic cells, and secretion
across mucous membranes. Within the vertebrates, the V, (D), J, and C
genes are arranged in many different patterns. In cartilaginous fishes,
the genes encoding both heavy and light chains are arranged in multiple
small clusters, each of which contains a single V, one or two D
elements (in the case of the heavy chain), a single J, and a single C
gene. In contrast, in bony fishes, amphibia, and mammals the IgH loci
typically show the so-called translocon arrangement, in which groups of V, D, J, and C genes occur sequentially, from 5' to 3' within the locus
(reviewed in Ref. 2).
The birds are, apart from the mammals, the most highly evolved
vertebrate lineage, and their Ig genes show some of the most unusual
arrangements and forms of expression. The IgL and IgH loci of chicken
each possess only a single functional V and J segment but have up to
100 V region pseudogenes located upstream of the functional V gene (3,
4). The major mechanism creating the large and effective repertoire of
the chicken antibody molecule is gene conversion, from the upstream
pseudogene segments into the functional V gene. Gene conversion occurs
both before B cells encounter antigen and during antigen-induced
diversification of the binding site, a process in which point mutation
events are also involved (5, 6). Birds possess homologues of IgM and IgA (7-9) and a third class of antibody, IgY (10-12). Avian IgY (sometimes termed IgG) shows homologies with both IgG and IgE of
mammals. Extant avian IgY is likely descended from the evolutionary precursor of both IgG and IgE (10, 13).
Ducks and their relatives have unusual antibody structure and
expression, with consequences for their function. Their immune responses are often ineffectual (14), a feature that is explained, in
part, by the properties of their antibodies. Although ducks produce a
typical avian IgY, they can also generate large amounts of a truncated
IgY, termed IgY( Fc) because it is missing the two C-terminal domains
of its H ( ) chains (11, 12). This structural abnormality of the duck
IgY( Fc) would result in the loss of biological effector functions
(such as complement activation) associated with the Fc region. The
IgA-dependent mucosal immune response of ducks is also
problematic, being delayed in its development following hatching (9,
15), as compared with the chicken, in which IgA secretion develops more
rapidly (16).
The search for a genetic basis to the inept antibody response of the
duck has been informative. The IgY( Fc) molecule results from the
utilization (by alternative pathways of RNA processing) of a novel,
small terminal exon within the gene (11, 12). Furthermore, the and genes have been shown to be in head-to-head configuration
within the IgH locus (17). This arrangement would require that class
switching to produce either IgA or IgY in the duck involves the
inversion of a segment of the IgH locus, rather than the usual
deletional mechanism of class switching (18) seen in mammals. Detailed
knowledge of the structure of the duck IgH locus will be required if a
full understanding of the unusual features of its organization,
recombination, and expression is to be achieved. Presented here are the
results of a study to establish the structure of the IgH locus in the
duck (Anas platyrhynchos), including the organization of the
D, JH, and C region genes, the mechanism of expression of
the membrane receptor forms of IgM and IgA, and the genetic basis for
class switching.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Library Screening--
Approximately 5 × 105
plaque-forming units of an unamplified recombinant duck genomic library
(12), constructed in DASH®II from erythrocyte DNA from one Super M
strain duck (duck number 5, Cherry Valley Farms, Rothwell,
Lincolnshire, UK) (12), was plated on Escherichia coli
strain XL1-Blue MRA (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The library was lifted
on Nytran® filters (Schleicher & Schuell) and hybridized with probes
for the C regions of duck µ, , and (9, 12). Probes were
generated by PCR amplification and labeled with
[ -32P]dATP (19). Following hybridization, filters were
washed 3 times for 20 min at 52 °C in 1× SSC and 0.1% SDS and
dried. X-OmatTM AR films (Eastman Kodak Co.) were exposed
to the filters for ~60 h at 80 °C and developed.
Mapping and Sequencing of Recombinant Duck Genomic Clones--
DNA was isolated from plaque-purified recombinant genomic
clones containing Ig C region genes (12, 17) and subjected to
restriction enzyme digestion. Fragments were separated on agarose gel
by electrophoresis and subcloned into pBluescript (Stratagene, La
Jolla, CA). The sequencing strategy involved cloning overlapping restriction fragments from the phage inserts. Subclones were completely sequenced (Biotechnology Resource Laboratory, Medical University of
South Carolina) on both strands using a combination of double-stranded nested deletions (Nested Deletion Kit, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and
transposon-mediated sequencing (Primer Island System, Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, CA). Sequences were assembled into a
contig using the SeqMan program (DNAstar Inc., Madison, WI). The exons
encoding the constant domains of the secreted and transmembrane (TM)
forms were identified by comparison with cDNA sequences. The exon
encoding the TM region was identified through a blastx search
(www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/blast.cgi) of the region of the locus
3' of the C 4 exon and confirmed by RT-PCR analyses.
Genomic PCR--
The Cµ4 to µTM1 intron was amplified from
genomic DNA (prepared from the erythrocytes of Super M strain ducks by
Dr. David Higgins, Hong Kong University) (12) using specific primers
(G-1411, Cµ4 forward, 5'-CAGCTCAACGCCCACGAGA-3', and for
µTM1 reverse, G-1530, 5'-CTTGATCAAGGTGACGGTGG-3') with the
Advantage® GC Genomic PCR kit (CLONTECH, Palo
Alto, CA). The C 2 to T intron was amplified from genomic DNA using
the forward primer G-1283, 5'-GGTGCGTCGCCGGAGGTGAACCAA-3', and
the reverse primer G1284, 5'-GGAGGACAACAAAGGTGGTCAGAA-3'. The PCRs
were performed using 100 ng of genomic duck DNA as template, with
initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, 30 cycles of 94 °C for
25 s, 65 °C for 1 min, 68 °C for 8 min, and a final step of
68 °C for 15 min. The amplified fragments were gel-purified and
directly sequenced (C 2 to T intron) or ligated into pGemT®-Easy vector (Cµ4 to µTM1 intron) (Promega, Madison, WI) and subjected to
sequencing as described above.
Reverse Transcription and PCR Analysis--
Total RNA from the
spleen and duodenum of two 6-week-old Super M ducklings was prepared
(9) by Dr. David Higgins, Hong Kong University. To detect the duck m
message, the RNA was reverse-transcribed using the SMARTTM
IV oligonucleotide and PowerScriptTM
(CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA). Amplification of the
first strand cDNA was then carried out using a two-step protocol
(20 cycles of 94 °C, 1 min, 68 °C 6 min, following an initial
denaturation of 94 °C for 3 min) using the 5'-PCR and CDSIII/3'-PCR
primers (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA). A PCR to
specifically amplify regions of the m sequence was then carried out
on the amplified PCR product utilizing an initial denaturation at
94 °C for 3 min, followed by 25 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s,
55 °C for 30 s, and 68 °C for 1 min. One reaction used
primers G-778 (forward, 5'-GTGACTTGGACCCAGCAG-3') and
G-1752 (reverse 5'-AGGGTGACGCCGGTGCTGTA-3'), and the
second reaction used primers G-1805 (forward,
5'-CACGGTTTCCCCAGAATGC-3') and G-1819 (reverse,
5'-ATCAGAGGACCTGTGGAGACACC-3'). To detect the duck µm sequence,
3'-RACE (20) was performed. The primer used for reverse
transcription was G-413
(5'-TCTGAATTCTCGAGTCGACATC(T)17-3'), and the anchor
primer was G-414 (5'-TCTGAATTCTCGAGTCGACATC-3'), and the
gene-specific primer was G-1411 (5'-CAGCTCAACGCCCACGAGA-3'). PCR
products were separated by electrophoresis in a 1.2% agarose gel,
purified using the Nucleospin kit (CLONTECH, Palo
Alto, CA), and directly sequenced.
Analysis of Sequences and Prediction of Class Switch
Regions--
An initial analysis of repeat sequences within the duck
IgH locus and in the duck 2-crystallin gene (Ref. 21,
GenBankTM accession number U06050) and the adjacent
duck S-acyl fatty-acid synthase thioesterase and
acyl-CoA-binding protein genes (Refs. 22 and 23, GenBankTM
accession numbers M21635 and S73733) was carried out using DotPlot within the Megalign (DNAstarTM) program. In
addition, the duck IgH sequence was compared with the switch regions of
chicken µ and genes (Ref. 24, GenBankTM
accession numbers AB029075 and AB029077, respectively) and with the
switch region of the mouse gene (Ref. 25,
GenBankTM accession number D11468). The nature of
repeat sequences within the putative duck switch regions was also
analyzed using a local copy of the EMBOSS program etandem
(www.uk.embnet.org/Software/EMBOSS/). The significance of
differences in the degree of allelic polymorphism in the duck gene
and in other immune-related and nonimmune-related genes was assessed as
follows. The coding sequences of alleles of duck , µ, ,
interferon- , Mx, S-acyl fatty-acid synthase thioesterase
and serum amyloid A type B (GenBankTM accession
numbers AJ314754, U27222, U27213, X65218, X65219, X78355, X78356,
AF087134, AF100929, Z21549, Z21550, M12101, M21635, U59909, and U64985)
were aligned using Megalign (DNAstarTM). The aligned
sequences for each gene were then randomly subsampled by the SeqBoot
program in PHYLIP (Ref. 26,
evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html) to generate 1000 bootstrap replicates of the original alignments. The data were then
analyzed for DNA distances using the DNADIST program in PHYLIP. The
Kimura two-parameter model option was employed with a
transition/transversion ratio of 2.0. The resulting 1000 distance
estimates were then used to compare the average distance between the
alleles and those of other duck genes by paired t tests.
 |
RESULTS |
Organization of D, JH, and Constant Region Genes--
The
physical map of the IgH locus of the duck extending from, at the 5'
end, the proximal D segment to downstream of the gene is shown in
(Fig. 1). Nucleotide sequences of
recombinant clones 13.1, 3.2, 2.1, and 12.2 formed a contig that
included the and genes and the 3' region of the µ gene but
which did not overlap with the sequence of clone 5.1, which
included the D and JH segments and the 4 exons encoding the
secreted form of µ. The 3.8-kb fragment 00-106, generated by genomic
PCR between exons µ4 and µTM1, filled the gap and linked these
sequences (Fig. 1). The sequenced region spans more than 48 kb of the
duck IgH locus and includes, in addition to a D and a JH
segment, the µ gene, an inverted gene, and the exons that encode
the Fc form of the chain. The region downstream of the terminal
(T) exon of the gene showed frequent recombinations and deletions
upon attempted subcloning, and a reliable sequence could not be
determined. The intron between the C 2 and T exons was also unstable
upon cloning, and its sequence was confirmed by direct sequencing of an
850-bp fragment derived by genomic PCR. The 36-nt-long D segment is
open in all three reading frames (Fig. 2)
and is flanked on both sides by nearly canonical recombination signal
sequences (RSS) with 12-nt spacers. The RSS 5' of the
JH segment is less conserved and has a 23-nt spacer. The
duck D and JH RSS thus follow the 12/23 rule that ensures
correct VH-D-JH recombination.

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Physical map of the IgH locus of the duck
showing the recombinant genomic phage from which the contig was
derived. The sequenced part of the contig, indicated by a
dotted line, has a length of ~48 kb and starts 5' of the D
segment and ends 3' of the short terminal exon of the gene. The
coding exons are shown as black boxes. Transcriptional
orientation is shown by the arrows above the genes. The
sequence has been deposited in EMBL under accession number
AJ314754.
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Nucleotide and inferred amino acid sequence
of the D- and the JH segments. The RSS are
bold and underlined, and the splice donor site of
the JH-segment is indicated by double slashes.
The first and last nucleotides of the sequences are numbered according
to EMBL accession number AJ314754.
|
|
The splice boundaries of the exons of the secreted forms of duck µ,
(9), and (the Fc splice variant (11)) were identified (Fig. 3) by comparisons to
corresponding cDNA sequences (GenBankTM U27213,
U27222, and X65218, respectively). Although many of the splice-donor
sites (Fig. 3) show substantial divergence from the consensus
(AG GTGAG), in all cases the GT/AG splicing rule is observed. The
identification of the exons encoding the µm and m forms (which
also revealed the cryptic donor splice sites for the membrane receptor
forms of µ and ) is described below.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Exon boundaries of the
µ, , and
genes. Intron/exon boundaries are identified
by double slashes. Cryptic splice sites in the fourth µ and exons are underlined and indicated by a single
slash. Stop codons are shown in bold type. The first
and last base on each line is numbered according to
GenBankTM accession number AJ314754. To the
right in the figure (3'/5'), the acceptor and
donor splice frames are given. The cryptic splice sites are both in the
second reading frame. The boundaries of the first 3 exons of the gene, previously reported (12), are confirmed here.
|
|
A Duck Homologue of ?--
In primates, rodents and teleost
fish a gene, encoding the H chain of IgD, is found immediately
downstream of the µ gene. The distance between the
cleavage/polyadenylation sequences of the duck µ and genes is
2535 bp, which is a sufficient distance to include an additional C
region gene. Extensive homology searches (using blastx) and open
reading frame analyses did not give any indications of a gene (or
remnants of a gene) in the µTM2/ TM intergenic region, the
C 1/C 1 intergenic region, or elsewhere within the sequenced contig
established in this study.
Identification of µm and m Transcripts--
The membrane
receptor forms of duck µ and were identified by RT-PCR
approaches. The µm form was readily identified by 3'-RACE using a
forward Cµ4-specific primer (G-1411) and an anchor primer (G-414) with duck spleen cDNA. The 547-bp product was
subjected to direct sequencing (Fig.
4A), identifying the cryptic
splice donor site in Cµ4 and the µTM1 and µTM2 exons (Fig. 3).
The inferred amino acid sequence of the µTM (Fig. 4A)
showed an extracellular connecting peptide, a hydrophobic transmembrane
region, and a cytoplasmic tail with the classical -KVK motif at the C
terminus. The conserved CART motif (27), involved in the signal
transduction through protein-protein interactions with the CD79a/b
complex, was present in the hydrophobic membrane-spanning region.

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
cDNA sequences encoding the C-terminal
region of the membrane receptor form of duck µ (A) and (B) heavy chain. Primers used in the
amplification of the fragments are underlined and
identified. The borders between the C4 and the TM regions are indicated
by vertical bars. The cleavage/polyadenylation signal of
µTM is shown in lowercase. Amino acid residues forming the
CART motif are shown in boldface type. The sequence of µTM
has been deposited in EMBL under accession number AJ314755. The final
sequence of TM was deduced by the direct sequencing of two fragments
amplified with the G-778/G-1752 and the G-1805/G-1819
primer pairs, respectively, and has been submitted to EMBL under the
accession number AJ314756.
|
|
Attempts to detect the TM form of the duck message using 3'-RACE
with forward primers in the C 4 domain were unsuccessful; the
secreted form of the message was the only PCR product detected. Open
reading frames that could encode an TM segment were then sought by
analysis of the genomic sequence 3' of C 4. A candidate sequence was
identified between bases 22,680 and 22,852. To determine whether this
sequence was expressed, RT-PCR was performed on duck duodenum mRNA
using a forward primer specific for C 4 (G-778) and a reverse
primer within the putative TM exon (G-1752, Fig. 4B).
A product of ~350 bp was amplified and sequenced. This sequence confirmed that the genomic region putatively identified as encoding the
TM exon was expressed and identified the cryptic donor splice site
within C 4 (Fig. 3). It was then possible to amplify the 3' end of
the TM message in RT-PCR by using a forward primer overlapping the
C 4/TM splice site (G-1805) and a reverse primer 3' of the
termination codon (G-1819), confirming that the duck TM
segment is encoded by a single exon (Fig. 4B). The duck TM exon is shorter than the TM exons of mouse and human in both the
cytoplasmic and extracellular regions. However, the highly conserved
residues of the CART motif are present in the membrane-spanning region
(Fig. 4B).
Identification of Switch Regions--
The switch from expression
of IgM antibodies to the production of IgY or IgA involves chromosomal
recombination at switch (S) regions typically characterized by long
(several kb) regions of complex VNTR-like sequences. A DotPlot analysis
of the duck IgH locus gave a surprising result (Fig.
5A); the locus is very rich in
repeats of the VNTR type, which accounts for ~60% of the sequence
even as assessed at relatively high stringency ( 90% identity). The
repeats also show strong local clustering. The expected locations of
functional switch regions would be in the JH/Cµ1 intron
for Sµ and in the C 1/C 1 intergenic region for both S and
(because of the reverse orientation of the gene) S . The three
largest blocks of VNTRs in the locus occur immediately upstream of
exons Cµ1, C 1, and C 1. The functional Sµ and S regions
have been identified in the chicken (24), and DotPlot comparison of the
duck IgH sequence with the Sµ and S sequences of the chicken (Fig.
6, A and B,
respectively) strongly suggests that the large blocks of VNTRs
immediately upstream of Sµ and S in the duck (Fig. 6, A
and B) are candidates for functional S regions. The S of
chicken is not known. Although DotPlot comparisons of mouse S with
the duck IgH sequence (Fig. 6C) did not yield clear results,
the heaviest density of similarities was seen in two sites within the
to intergenic region. One of these sites was already identified
as the likely S region (Fig. 6B). The second site was the
large block of VNTR immediately upstream of (Fig. 6C)
and is a candidate for the duck S region. An analysis of the
putative switch regions, using the EMBOSS program etandem, identified a
number of repeated motifs for each region (Table I). The arrangement of these motifs
within each putative S region is summarized in Fig. 6D. The
presence of large numbers of complex VNTR in the duck IgH locus raises
the question of whether this is a general feature of duck genes or
might be restricted to the IgH locus. Few duck genes have been
sequenced. The three genomic sequences that have been deposited in
GenBankTM and are of substantial length are the
2-crystallin gene (5,069 bp), the adjacent S-acyl
fatty-acid synthase thioesterase, and acyl-CoA-binding protein genes
(together forming a contig of 12,800 bp). Analyses of these sequences
by DotPlot (Fig. 5B), with parameters identical to those
used to examine the IgH locus showed, in contrast to the IgH locus
(Fig. 5A), a very low prevalence of VNTRs.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
A, analysis by DotPlot of repeat
sequences in the duck IgH locus (GenBankTM accession number
AJ314754). The locations of the µ, , and, genes are indicated
above and to the right of the graph.
B, analysis by DotPlot of repeat sequences (left)
in the region of the duck 2-crystallin ( 2) gene
(GenBankTM accession number U06050), and
(right) the duck S-acyl fatty acid synthase
thioesterase (FAST) and acyl-CoA-binding protein (ACBP)
genes (GenBankTM accession numbers M21635 and
S73733). The genes are indicated by boxes, and the reported
CR1 repeat region adjacent to the 2-crystallin gene (21) is
indicated with an oval. The analyses were performed in
MegAlign (DNAstarTM) using DotPlot software, with a window
size of 22 nt and an identity threshold of 90%.
|
|

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Identification of potential S regions in the
duck IgH locus. DotPlot comparisons were performed between the
duck sequence and chicken Sµ (A), chicken S
(B), and mouse S (C). The graphs were
constructed in MegAlign (DNAstarTM) with window and
identity thresholds set to 20 nt/80% (A), 20 nt/75%
(B), and 16 nt/80% (C).
GenBankTM accession numbers are as follows: chicken
Sµ, AB029075; chicken S ( ), AB029077; and mouse S , D11468.
The proposed Sµ, S , and S have been projected
(ovals) onto a map of the duck locus (D) and are
found 5' of each corresponding gene. The organization of the repeated
consensus motifs, identified with the EMBOSS etandem program and listed
in Table I, is shown in transcriptional orientation under the
corresponding putative S region. The arrows above
the genes indicate transcriptional orientations.
|
|
Allelic Variations--
Comparisons of the previously published
cDNA sequences of duck µ, , and clones and the genomic
sequence permitted an analysis of sites of allelic polymorphisms
(Table II). This analysis showed an unexpectedly high concentration of polymorphic sites in the gene: 37 sites of substitution were observed in the gene, as
compared with 10 and 7 in the µ and genes, respectively (Table II). The substitutions in the gene are found in all 5 exons but are
concentrated in the first part of the C 2 exon, where 11 of the 37 substitutions are found within a 30-bp region. The overall rate of
allelic polymorphism observed in the duck gene (2.6%) was
determined (as described under "Experimental Procedures") to be
significantly greater (p < 0.001) than that calculated
for all duck Ig genes (0.67%) or for the duck non-Ig sequences
(0.29%) that have been described to date. Thus, whereas Ig genes are
known to evolve relatively rapidly (28), the duck gene seems to be
evolving at a particularly accelerated rate.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The IgH locus can be subject to four processes that
modify its coding sequence in the course of B cell development and the immune response as follows: site-specific recombination (of V/D/J), point mutations, gene conversions (in some species), and
region-specific recombination (of C region genes). Knowledge of the
structure and expression of the IgH locus in ducks sheds light on the
genetic basis of their poorly functional antibody response and on the evolution of this complex locus in the vertebrates. The observations on
the duck IgH locus made in this study include the following: 1) the
unusual organization (µ- - ) of the C region genes, 2) the
inversion that has accompanied the apparent transposition of the gene in the locus, 3) the absence of a duck gene, and 4) the
remarkable prevalence of VNTR sequences in the locus. These observations, in total, point to a unique structure for this locus and
have significance for the expression of a functional antibody response
in the duck. The genes mapped and sequenced in this study are in the
order D-JH-µ- - , suggesting strongly that the duck, like the chicken, possesses a single JH segment (4). The
inverted transcriptional orientation of the duck gene, while
definitively shown here, was the only logical interpretation of
previous mapping analyses (17) and, interestingly, may be widespread in
the birds, as PCR-based approaches have indicated a similar arrangement
in the chicken (29). The current position and orientation of the duck
gene is most readily explained by an ancient translocation event
that also inverted the gene as it was inserted into its present
position. This follows from the observation that mammalian genes
are found as the 3'-most C region genes and in the same transcriptional
orientation as the other C region genes (30). The translocation and
inversion of must have occurred in a common ancestor of chickens
and ducks, but whether this feature is restricted to the galloanserine
lineage (31) or shared by all birds is unknown. The position
immediately downstream of the µ gene is the site in which all known
genes are found (32, 33). The insertion of the gene in this
position downstream of µ may have disrupted the gene and
accounted for the apparent absence of from the present day IgH
locus of the duck. No evidence has been found to support the presence
of a gene, or the discernible remnant of one, in the duck IgH
locus. The absence of an IgD from ducks provides further evidence for
the functional redundancy of this class of antibody (34).
All Igs can be expressed, by alternative RNA processing, in either
secreted forms or as membrane-bound receptors for antigen on B cells.
Typically, the hydrophobic transmembrane tail of the receptor form of
Igs is encoded by 2 exons (TM1 and TM2) that splice into a cryptic site
in the terminal secreted C region exon (35). The membrane receptor form
of IgA has been studied previously only in mammals, where the
transmembrane region has been shown, uniquely, to be encoded by only a
single exon (36). The results presented here show, similarly, a single
TM exon in the duck gene. Thus, the single TM exon in the
vertebrate gene must have developed prior to the divergence of the
lineages that would give rise to birds and mammals. In the case of the
mammalian gene, the low frequency of the m message has been
suggested to reflect, at least in part, the long (~2.5 kb) intron
separating the TM exon from C 3 (37). The homologous C 4/TM intron
in the duck is close to 5 kb long and may, by the same reasoning, be
responsible for the low frequency of m message and in part explain
the difficulty in detecting it, even in RT-PCR. However, undefined
cis-acting elements present in the mammalian C 3/TM intron also
appear to influence the regulation of mRNA processing (38).
Thus, the principal difference between the IgA of mammals and that of
birds (only ducks and chickens have been examined in detail) is that in
mammals the chain is shorter by one C region domain, reflecting the
loss of the original C 2 exon (39), which has been replaced by a
flexible hinge region.
The information presented here allows further examination of the
likelihood that the structure of the IgH locus is the cause of the
"inept" antibody response in the duck. In one instance it is clear
that the structure of the IgH locus leads to expression of a deficient
antibody. The IgY( Fc) antibody, which lacks the functionally
important Fc region, results from an alternative pathway of processing
of the primary transcript from the gene, in which the small
terminal exon between the exons encoding 2 and 3 (Fig. 1) is used
(12). In a second instance, the inverted position of the gene in
the duck raises the possibility that its orientation is related to the
delayed production of IgA observed in ducks (9, 15). This is because
the expression of requires, of necessity, an inversional mechanism
of class switching, as opposed to the typical deletional rearrangement.
The frequency of inversions during Ig class switching in the IgH locus
has been shown, in a mouse cell line, to be lower than that of deletion events (40). Inversions occurred in ~23% of the rearrangements, indicating that deletions are apparently, in mammals, the favored outcome of class switch events at the IgH locus. However, the simple
correlation of an inverted gene with a delayed switch to IgA
production is not supported by the evidence from the chicken. The gene in chickens also appears, from indirect evidence based on PCR
approaches (29), to be inverted. However, IgA production in chickens
develops rapidly after hatching (16), indicating that an inverted gene is not, per se, linked to inefficiencies of expression.
Thus, delayed IgA expression in the duckling must result from other
causes, such as the cytokine control of the mechanisms driving class
switching to IgA.
Birds are considered to have a condensed genome, about one-third the
size of that of mammals (41). Although the IgH locus in ducks is
shorter overall than in mammals, each duck C region gene is
considerably larger than its mammalian homologue. For example, the
mouse µ gene covers ~4 kb (42), whereas the duck µ gene measures
close to 10 kb in length, a difference that is attributable to
differences in intron length. In the case of the gene, lengths are
~6 kb in the mouse versus 11 kb in the duck, a difference
attributable both to longer introns and to the presence of an
additional exon in the duck gene. Whereas the overall condensation of
the avian genome is generally considered to have been accompanied by a
loss of repetitive DNA (43, 44), the data presented here show that the
duck IgH locus is, unexpectedly, very rich in VNTRs, which account for
~60% of its sequence (Fig. 5A), a much higher value than
seen in mammalian IgH loci. Whereas other sequenced regions of the duck
genome (Fig. 5B) contain much lower numbers of VNTRs than
the IgH locus, the interpretation of these comparisons is complicated
by the fact that VNTRs are asymmetrically distributed on chromosomes.
For example, a telomeric bias in VNTR distribution has been reported on
human chromosome 22 and chromosome 1 of Caenorhabditis elegans, but a centromeric bias is present in chromosome 4 of Arabidopsis thaliana (45). As only a small proportion of the duck genome has been sequenced, it is not possible to conclude definitively that a high content of VNTRs is unique to the IgH locus.
However, VNTRs are often associated with sites of recombination (46),
and the VNTRs in the duck IgH locus may, in addition to a role in the
Ig class switch mechanism, have facilitated the inversion and
translocation of the gene that is a prominent feature of this locus.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Kathy Magor and Dr. Ellen Hsu
for critical reading of the manuscript and helpful suggestions. We also
thank Dr. Robert Chapman for generously performing the analysis of
allelic variation.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant RO1AI45111, the United States Department of Agriculture Grant NRICGP 96352053663, and by the Medical University of South Carolina.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the DDBJ/GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AJ314750, AJ314751, AJ314752, AJ314753, AJ314754, AJ314755,
and AJ314756.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of South
Carolina, 173 Ashley Ave., P. O. Box 250509, Charleston, SC 29425. Tel.: 843-792-0597; Fax: 843-792-4850; E-mail: warrgw@musc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 9, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M106221200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
V, variable segment;
D, diversity segment;
J, joining segment;
JH, joining
segment of the IgH locus;
C, constant;
TM, transmembrane;
RSS, recombination signal sequence;
S, switch region;
RACE, rapid
amplification of cDNA ends;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-PCR;
kb, kilobase pairs;
bp, base pairs;
nt, nucleotide(s);
VNTR, number tandem repeats;
T, terminal.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Du Pasquier, L.
(2000)
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
248,
159-185
|
| 2.
|
Bengtén, E.,
Wilson, M.,
Miller, N.,
Clem, L. W.,
Pilström, L.,
and Warr, G. W.
(2000)
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
248,
189-219[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
McCormack, W. T.,
Tjoelker, L. W.,
and Thompson, C. B.
(1991)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
9,
219-241[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Reynaud, C.-A.,
Bertocci, B.,
Dahan, A.,
and Weill, J.-C.
(1994)
Adv. Immunol.
57,
353-377[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Arakawa, H.,
Furusawa, S.,
Ekino, S.,
and Yamagishi, H.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
2540-2546[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Arakawa, H.,
Kuma, K.,
Yasuda, M.,
Furasawa, S.,
Ekino, S.,
and Yamagishi, H.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
160,
4232-4241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Mansikka, A.
(1992)
J. Immunol.
149,
855-861[Abstract]
|
| 8.
|
Dahan, A.,
Reynaud, C.-A.,
and Weill, J.-C.
(1983)
Nucleic Acids Res.
11,
5381-5389[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Magor, K. E.,
Warr, G. W.,
Bando, Y.,
Middleton, D. L.,
and Higgins, D. A.
(1998)
Eur. J. Immunol.
28,
1063-1068[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Parvari, R.,
Avivi, A.,
Lentner, F.,
Ziv, E.,
Tel-Or, S.,
Burstein, Y.,
and Schechter, I.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
739-744[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Magor, K. E.,
Warr, G. W.,
Middleton, D.,
Wilson, M. R.,
and Higgins, D. A.
(1992)
J. Immunol.
149,
2627-2633[Abstract]
|
| 12.
|
Magor, K. E.,
Higgins, D. A.,
Middleton, D. L.,
and Warr, G. W.
(1994)
J. Immunol.
153,
5549-5555[Abstract]
|
| 13.
|
Warr, G. W.,
Magor, K. E.,
and Higgins, D. A.
(1995)
Immunol. Today
16,
392-398[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Higgins, D. A.,
and Warr, G. W.
(1993)
Avian Pathol.
22,
211-236
|
| 15.
|
Ng, P. L. K.,
and Higgins, D. A.
(1986)
Immunology
58,
323-327[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Leslie, G. A.,
Stankus, R. P.,
and Martin, L. N.
(1976)
Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol.
51,
175-185[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Magor, K. E.,
Higgins, D. A.,
Middleton, D. L.,
and Warr, G. W.
(1999)
Immunogenetics
49,
692-695[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Stavnezer, J.
(1996)
Adv. Immunol.
61,
79-146[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Feinberg, P. A.,
and Vogelstein, B.
(1983)
Anal. Biochem.
132,
6-13[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Frohman, M. A.,
Dush, M. K.,
and Martin, G. R.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
8998-9002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Li, X.,
Wistow, G. J.,
and Piatigorsky, J.
(1995)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1261,
25-34[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Sasaki, G. C.,
Chessbrough, V.,
and Kolattukudy, P. E.
(1988)
DNA (New York)
7,
449-457[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Rose, T. M.,
Schultz, E. R.,
Sasaki, G. C.,
Kolattukudy, P. E.,
and Shoyab, M.
(1994)
DNA Cell Biol.
13,
669-678[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Kitao, H.,
Arakawa, H.,
Kuma, K.,
Yamagishi, H.,
Nakamura, N.,
Furusawa, S.,
Matsuda, H.,
Yasuda, M.,
Ekino, S.,
and Shimizu, A.
(2000)
Int. Immunol.
12,
959-968[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Davis, M. M.,
Kim, S. K.,
and Hood, L. E.
(1980)
Science
209,
1360-1365[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Felsenstein, J.
(1989)
Cladistics
5,
164-166
|
| 27.
|
Campbell, K. S.,
Bäckström, B. T.,
Tienfenthaler, G.,
and Palmer, E.
(1994)
Semin. Immunol.
6,
393-410[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Barker, W. C.,
McLaughlin, P. J.,
and Dayhoff, M. O.
(1972)
Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure
, Vol. 5
, pp. 31-39, National Biomedical Research Foundation, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D. C.
|
| 29.
|
Zhao, Y.,
Rabbani, H.,
Shimizu, A.,
and Hammarström, L.
(2000)
Immunology
101,
348-353[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Flannagan, J. G.,
and Rabbitts, T. H.
(1982)
Nature
300,
709-713[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
van Tuinen, M.,
Sibley, C. G.,
and Hedges, S. B.
(2000)
Mol. Biol. Evol.
17,
451-457[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Wilson, M.,
Bengten, E.,
Miller, N. W.,
Clem, L. W.,
Du Pasquier, L.,
and Warr, G. W.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
4593-4597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
White, M. B.,
Shen, A. L.,
Word, C.,
Tucker, P. W.,
and Blattner, F. R.
(1985)
Science
228,
733-737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Roes, J.,
and Rajewsky, K.
(1993)
J. Exp. Med.
177,
45-55[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Ross, D. A.,
Wilson, M. R.,
Miller, N. W.,
Clem, L. W.,
and Warr, G. W.
(1998)
Immunol. Rev.
166,
143-151[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Yu, L.,
Peng, C.,
Starnes, S. M.,
Liou, R. S.,
and Chang, T. W.
(1990)
J. Immunol.
145,
3932-3936[Abstract]
|
| 37.
|
Seipelt, R. L.,
and Peterson, M. L.
(1995)
Mol. Immunol.
32,
277-285[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Coyle, J. H.,
and Lebman, D. A.
(2000)
J. Immunol.
164,
3659-3665[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Tucker, P. W.,
Slightom, J. L.,
and Blattner, F. R.
(1981)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
78,
7684-7688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Jäck, H.-M.,
McDowell, M.,
Steinberg, C. M.,
and Wabl, M.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
1581-1585[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Wachtel, S. S.,
and Tiersch, T. R.
(1993)
Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B
104,
207-213[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Brüggemann, M.
(1987)
in
Molecular Genetics of Immunoglobulin
(Calabi, F.
, and Neuberger, M. S., eds)
, pp. 51-80, Elsevier Science Publications B. V., Amsterdam
|
| 43.
|
Longmire, J. L.,
Hahn, D. C.,
and Roach, J. L.
(1999)
J. Hered.
90,
574-578[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Primmer, C. R.,
Raudsepp, T.,
Chowdhary, B. P.,
Möller, A. P.,
and Ellegren, H.
(1997)
Genome Res.
7,
471-482[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Vergnaud, G.,
and Denoeud, F.
(2000)
Genome Res.
10,
899-907[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Brusco, A.,
Saviozzi, S.,
Cinque, F.,
Bottaro, A.,
and DeMarchi, M.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
163,
4392-4398[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Zhao, Q. Pan-Hammarstrom, S. Yu, N. Wertz, X. Zhang, N. Li, J. E. Butler, and L. Hammarstrom
Identification of IgF, a hinge-region-containing Ig class, and IgD in Xenopus tropicalis
PNAS,
August 8, 2006;
103(32):
12087 - 12092.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Hansen, E. D. Landis, and R. B. Phillips
Discovery of a unique Ig heavy-chain isotype (IgT) in rainbow trout: Implications for a distinctive B cell developmental pathway in teleost fish
PNAS,
May 10, 2005;
102(19):
6919 - 6924.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Zhao, I. Kacskovics, Q. Pan, D. A. Liberles, J. Geli, S. K. Davis, H. Rabbani, and L. Hammarstrom
Artiodactyl IgD: The Missing Link
J. Immunol.,
October 15, 2002;
169(8):
4408 - 4416.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|