|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M108374200 on October 8, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 50, 46953-46960, December 14, 2001
Alternatively Folded Choriogonadotropin Analogs
IMPLICATIONS FOR HORMONE FOLDING AND BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY*
Yongna
Xing,
Win
Lin,
Mei
Jiang,
Rebecca V.
Myers,
Donghui
Cao,
Michael P.
Bernard, and
William R.
Moyle
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Robert Wood
Johnson (Rutgers) Medical School, New Jersey 08854
Received for publication, August 30, 2001, and in revised form, October 2, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Most heterodimeric proteins are stabilized by
intersubunit contacts or disulfide bonds. In contrast, human chorionic
gonadotropin (hCG) and other glycoprotein hormones are secured by a
strand of their -subunits that is wrapped around -subunit loop 2 "like a seatbelt." During studies of hCG synthesis in COS-7 cells,
we found that, when the seatbelt was prevented from forming the
disulfide that normally "latches" it to the -subunit, its
carboxyl-terminal end can "scan" the surface of the heterodimer and
become latched by a disulfide to cysteines substituted for residues in
the -subunit. Analogs in which the seatbelt was latched to
residues 35, 37, 41-43, and 56 of -subunit loop 2 had similar
lutropin activities to those of hCG; that in which it was latched to
residue 92 at the carboxyl terminus had 10-20% the activity of hCG.
Attachment of the seatbelt to -subunit residues 45-51, 86, 88, 90, and 91 reduced lutropin activity substantially. These findings show
that the heterodimer can form before the -subunit has folded
completely and support the notions that the carboxyl-terminal end of
the seatbelt, portions of -subunit loop 2, and the end of the
-subunit carboxyl terminus do not participate in lutropin receptor
interactions. They suggest also that several different architectures
could have been sampled without disrupting hormone activity as the
glycoprotein hormones diverged from other cysteine knot proteins.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The heterodimeric placental glycoprotein hormone
hCG1 binds LHR and stimulates
ovarian steroid synthesis during early pregnancy (1). The structure of
hCG is known (2, 3), but the structures of the LHR and the hormone
receptor complex remain to be elucidated. Each hCG subunit is divided
into three elongated loops by cystine knots (2, 3), and the heterodimer
is stabilized by a part of the -subunit termed the "seatbelt"
(2) that is wrapped around -subunit loop 2. The composition of the
seatbelt determines the receptor binding specificity of hCG (4-6), but
it is not known if this portion of the hormone contacts the receptor.
The LHR is a G protein-coupled receptor that contains a large
extracellular domain that binds hCG with high affinity and specificity
(7). Based on its leucine-rich repeat motif (7), the LHR extracellular domain is usually presumed to be horseshoe-shaped, similar to ribonuclease inhibitor (8).
The surfaces of hCG most likely to contact the LHR remain debated. The
carboxyl-terminal end of the -subunit, which is adjacent to a
portion of the seatbelt in the heterodimer (2, 3), has been found to
influence the affinity of all the glycoprotein hormones for their
receptors (1, 9) and was proposed to be a receptor contact more than 25 years ago (1). Based partially on this observation, Jiang et
al. (10) suggested that the long axis of hCG docks with the
concave surface of a horseshoe-shaped extracellular domain. In their
view, the hormone is perpendicular to the extracellular domain of the
receptor such that the -subunit carboxyl-terminal end, parts of
-subunit loop 2, and the seatbelt form key contacts with the concave
surface of the receptor extracellular domain. Remy et al.
(11) suggest that similar portions of the hormone contact a region
nearer the rim of the extracellular domain. In this model the position
of the hormone is tilted relative to that of Jiang et al.
(10) such that the ends of -subunit loops 1 and 3 contact residues
in the receptor transmembrane domain to initiate signal transduction.
This explained the finding that an antibody to the -subunit bound
hCG when the hormone was complexed with the receptor extracellular
domain but not with the intact receptor (12). A third view of the
hormone-receptor complex (13) suggested that the long axis of hCG is
oriented parallel to the plane of the extracellular domain such that
the hormone contacts its rim at two widely separated sites.
Contacts with the amino-terminal half of the extracellular domain
contribute to the high affinity of the hormone for the receptor
(14) and those near the carboxyl-terminal end influence receptor
binding specificity (15).
In principle, these models should be readily distinguished using
site-directed mutagenesis to identify portions of the hormone and
receptor that contact one another. Unfortunately, mutations of the
-subunit carboxyl terminus and -subunit seatbelt alter the
positions of the subunits within the heterodimer (13, 16) and have made
it difficult to interpret the influence of these key parts of the
hormone on its function. Efforts to test the role of the -subunit in
hormone-receptor interaction led us to design a scanning mutagenesis
strategy useful for identifying residues that do not contact the LHR.
We prepared hCG analogs in which the seatbelt is cross-linked by a
disulfide to specific residues in -subunit loop 2 and carboxyl
terminus. In these analogs, -subunit residues at the end of the
seatbelt and at the beginning of the carboxyl terminus are located
adjacent to specific parts of the -subunit where they would be in a
position to disrupt contacts between the -subunit and the receptor.
Cross-linked -subunit residues of analogs that had high activities
in LHR binding assays would be expected not to participate in key
receptor interactions. Each model of the hormone-receptor complex makes specific predictions about contacts between the -subunit and the
LHR. Thus, a finding that one or more of these predictions is likely to
be erroneous would suggest the model is wrong. Analogs that had little
or no LHR activity are much less informative, because it is not
possible to determine if the cross-link reduced hormone activity by
disrupting a key receptor contact, by changing the conformation of the
heterodimer, or both.
Our rationale for attempting to prepare analogs having an architecture
in which the seatbelt is attached to the -subunit was based partly
on the proposal made by Ruddon et al. (17) that the seatbelt
latch disulfide forms after the -subunit has docked with the hCG
-subunit during hCG synthesis in cells. Following docking, seatbelt
residue Cys-110 is thought to scan the surface of the
heterodimer until it encounters -subunit residue Cys-26 with which
it forms the disulfide that latches the seatbelt to -subunit loop 1 and that stabilizes the heterodimer. Conversion of -subunit Cys-26
to alanine is known to prevent heterodimer formation, presumably
because it blocks formation of the seatbelt latch disulfide (18). We
anticipated that Cys-110 of this -subunit analog might form
disulfides with cysteines that had been substituted for various
residues in the -subunit, resulting in an intersubunit disulfide
cross-link. As shown here, many -subunit analogs that contained an
additional free cysteine combined with a -subunit analog in which
Cys-26 was converted to alanine. These were much more stable than hCG
at low pH and, remarkably, some were as active as hCG in receptor
binding and signal transduction assays.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
hCG was purified from a urinary extract as described previously
(19). The sources of all monoclonal antibodies used in these studies
have been identified (13, 16, 20). hCG and antibodies were
radioiodinated to a specific activity of ~50 µCi/µg in tubes coated with 1.5 µg of IODO-GEN (Pierce, Rockville, IL). Procedures for Western blotting have also been described previously (20). The
rabbit antisera used in cAMP measurements were obtained from Strategic
BioSolutions (Newark, DE). cAMP was radiolabeled as described before
(21).
The amino acid sequences of the analogs used in these studies are
illustrated in Fig. 1. DNA sequences
encoding these analogs were prepared by standard methods, including
cassette and PCR mutagenesis similar to those that have been described
(4, 13). The proteins were produced by transient expression in COS-7
cells in serum-free media as noted (4) and quantified by sandwich immunoassays (22) employing -subunit antibody A113 for capture and
radioiodinated -subunit antibody B110 for detection. The biological
activities of the analogs were determined in receptor binding and
signal transduction assays employing CHO cells that had been
transfected with the rat LHR (23). These assays were performed
on samples that had been concentrated ~100-fold by ultrafiltration (Centriprep YM-10, Millipore, Bedford, MA) followed by dialysis against
phosphate-buffered saline or by pouring the culture media into a
dialysis bag and placing the bag on a bed of Aquacide II (Calbiochem,
La Jolla, CA) until the samples were dry. The latter samples were
rehydrated by dialyzing them in phosphate-buffered saline, and the
concentration of the analog was determined using the
A113/125I-B110 sandwich immunoassay. Statistical analyses
were performed with Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). To
learn if the analogs had become cross-linked by a disulfide, we added concentrated HCl to reduce the pH below 2 for 30 min at 37 °C, a
condition known to promote the dissociation of the hCG heterodimer (1).
The pH was neutralized by the addition of 0.017 volume of 1 M Tris (pH 7.5) plus an amount of NaOH equivalent to the HCl used for acidification, and the concentration of heterodimer was
determined using the A113/125I-B110 sandwich
immunoassay.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Amino acid sequences of analogs used in these
studies. Constructs encoding these sequences were prepared by
standard methods and verified prior to transfection in COS-7 cells. The
name of the -subunit analog is shown above the amino acid
that was modified.
|
|
 |
RESULTS |
The Seatbelt Can Be "Latched" to the -Subunit at Several
Sites--
We did not detect any heterodimer in the media of COS-7
cells that had been co-transfected with vectors encoding the native -subunit and hCG- C26A, the -subunit analog in which Cys-26 had
been converted to alanine (Table I). This
observation confirms the result obtained by Suganuma et al.
(18) and is consistent with the idea that the stability of the native
hCG heterodimer depends on the seatbelt being "latched" to Cys-26
of -subunit loop 1. The amounts of heterodimers secreted into the
medium by COS-7 cells that had been co-transfected with vectors
encoding hCG- C26A and several -subunit constructs were comparable
to that of hCG (Table I). These included -subunit analogs having an
additional cysteine at or near the -subunit carboxyl terminus (i.e. T86C, Y88C, S92C) or in parts of -subunit
loop 2 (i.e. R35C, Y37C, L41C, R42C, S43C,
T46C, L48C). The use of -subunit analogs containing a cysteine
in place of residues 5, 45, 47, 49, 51, 56, 64, 90, or 91 (i.e. Q5C, K45C, M47C, V49C, K51C, E56C,
S64C, H90C, K91C) led to the accumulation of less heterodimer in the medium. We failed to detect reproducible secretion of
heterodimer when hCG- C26A was expressed with the native -subunit
or analogs L12C, N15C, F17C, G22C, P38C, P40C,
K44C, N52C, V53C, M71C, G73C, and Y89C (Table I).
To reduce the possibility that the differences we observed in
heterodimer formation were caused by limitations of our assay procedures, we compared the abilities of the -subunit analogs to be
expressed with the native hCG -subunit using similar assay protocols. The -subunit antibodies used to capture these analogs in
sandwich assays, A113 and A116, recognize epitopes located primarily on
opposite surfaces of -subunit loop 1 (13, 24) and bind the free
-subunit as well as that combined with the hCG and hCG- C26A
-subunits. Except for Y89C, each of the -subunit analogs was
captured by one or both of these antibodies when expressed with the
native -subunit (not shown). The -subunit antibodies used to
monitor these analogs recognize sites on loops 1 and/or 3, a portion of
the native hCG -subunit detected readily before and after it has
combined with the -subunit. The B111 epitope includes the seatbelt
latch (20, 25). Although this antibody bound each of the -subunit
analogs when they were combined with the native hCG -subunit (not
shown), it was unable to recognize hCG- C26A (Fig.
2) or any of the cross-linked
heterodimers (Table I). B110 is unable to bind hCG at the same time as
B111, but its epitope does not involve residues in the seatbelt and it
recognizes analogs such as hCG- C26A in which the seatbelt is not
latched or heterodimers such as L41C/hCG- C26A in which the
seatbelt is latched to the -subunit (Fig. 2). The B112 epitope
includes residue Asn-77 on a surface of -subunit loop 3 (20, 25). This surface of the -subunit is distant from the seatbelt latch disulfide, an observation that explains why B111 and B112 bind hCG at
the same time. Unlike B111, B112 binds the free hCG- C26A subunit and
heterodimers containing hCG- C26A (Fig. 2). B112 and B110 recognized
each of the cross-linked heterodimers that had been captured by A113 in
an equivalent fashion (Table II). Based on this observation and the fact that we have much greater access to
B110 than B112, we routinely used B110 to quantify the analogs described here even though its affinity for hCG is lower than that of
B112.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Western blots illustrating the ability of
antibodies A113, B110, B111, and B112 to detect the
L41C/hCG- C26A heterodimer
before and after treatment with 10 M urea. Equal
amounts of highly purified hCG or unpurified L41C/hCG- C26A (200 ng) in concentrated culture medium were subjected to electrophoresis on
12% polyacrylamide gels in the presence of 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate
and in the presence or absence of 10 M urea. Each
panel illustrates a separate blot. Proteins transferred to
nitrocellulose were detected with the radioiodinated antibody indicated
at the top of each panel. Note that B111 is unable to
recognize the hCG- C26A free subunit or heterodimers in which the
seatbelt is latched to the -subunit. Note also that we were unable
to detect homodimers of L41C or hCG- C26A, even after overexposure
of the blots as shown here. The former would have been detected as a
band between that of the heterodimer and the free -subunit in the
panel at the left (27). The latter would have been detected
as a band above that of the heterodimer in panels
2 and 4 but below that of the unknown high
molecular weight material detected as a feint band in
panel 4 (27).
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Detection of analogs in A113/125I-B112 and
A113/125I-B110 sandwich immunoassays
The same samples were analyzed in each assay relative to hCG as a
standard. As can be seen here, both assays gave essentially the same
result.
|
|
We subjected the media to a brief acid treatment to learn if the
analogs produced by the COS-7 cells had an intersubunit cross-link that
made them more stable than hCG. As expected from the known acid
instability of the glycoprotein hormones (26), transient treatment of
hCG at low pH caused its subunits to dissociate, making it no longer
detectable in A113/125I-B110 sandwich assays (Table I).
Unlike hCG, each of the heterodimeric analogs tested was readily
measured in the A113/125I-B110 sandwich assay following
acid treatment, showing that its subunits were tethered by an
intersubunit disulfide. We also tested the stability of the analog
containing a cross-link to -subunit residue 41 to 10 M
urea denaturation. Western blots (Fig. 2) revealed that urea treatment
caused the complete dissociation of hCG but had no influence on the
analog detected using A113, B110, or B112.
Due to the presence of a free thiol in each free subunit, it was
conceivable that we might observe the formation of stable disulfide
cross-linked  and  homodimeric analogs. Unlike hCG -subunit analogs that were engineered to form homodimers by
replacing loop 2 with its -subunit counterpart (27), hCG- C26A did
not appear to form significant amounts of homodimers (Fig. 2). We have
also described methods for preparing -subunit homodimers in
mammalian cells (27). Although we did not test the ability of each of
the -subunit analogs to form homodimers, we were unable to detect
the formation of L41C homodimers in Western blots (Fig. 2).
Production of the Cross-linked Heterodimers Was Correlated with the
Accessibility of the Carboxyl-terminal End of the Seatbelt to the
Cysteine That Had Been Introduced into the -Subunit--
With the
exception of Y89C, we observed that each -subunit analog combined
with the native hCG -subunit and was secreted into the medium (not
shown), albeit not always at the same level as hCG. This showed that
most cysteine substitutions did not disrupt the folding of the
-subunit analog, prevent docking of the -subunit with the hCG
-subunit, or block the passage of heterodimer through the secretory
pathway. Comparisons of the amounts of cross-linked heterodimers
produced (Table I) with the positions of the -subunit cysteines and
their distances from parts of the seatbelt in hCG (Table
III) suggested that secretion of these
analogs was limited by their abilities to form a disulfide with
hCG- C26A. Residues of -subunit analogs that combined well with
hCG- C26A were located in a circumscribed surface on the -subunit
centered near the midpoint of the seatbelt (Fig.
3). This suggested that movements of the
carboxyl-terminal half of the seatbelt (i.e. between
-subunit residues 101 and 110) were required for formation of the
intersubunit disulfide cross-links.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Distance between C carbons of residues in hCG
Values shown were measured from the crystal structure of hCG except for
that of S92C, which is indeterminate. The distance between the C
carbons of C26 and C110 is typical for that of a disulfide bond.
Distances between the C carbons of C26- A91 and C26- G101
reflect the minimum length of a strand needed to connect these residues
in hCG. Some values could not be determined due to the fact that parts
of the -subunit carboxyl terminus are not visible in the crystal
structure of hCG.
|
|

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Relaxed stereo representation of the surface
of hCG that appears to be scanned by the seatbelt during assembly of
the heterodimer. The - and -subunit backbones are shown in
dark and light gray ribbons, respectively. The
carboxyl-terminal half of the seatbelt is shown as a black
ribbon. The locations of the C carbons of cysteine
substitutions that enabled modest or efficient combination of
-subunit analogs with hCG- C26A are shown as dark
spheres. The lighter gray spheres refer to residues
that gave lesser amounts of heterodimer. The small pale
spheres refer to cysteine substitutions that did not lead to
heterodimer formation. Note that -subunit residues 90, 91, and 92 are too disordered to be seen in the crystal structure of hCG, and the
arbitrary positions of these residues shown here are intended only to
emphasize their apparent abilities to be latched to the seatbelt.
|
|
Not every analog containing a cysteine within the circumscribed area of
Fig. 3 was incorporated into cross-linked heterodimers with equal
efficiency. Those that formed heterodimers well contained cysteines
located on a surface of the -subunit that is unobstructed in the
heterodimer (2, 3). Those that formed heterodimers less well contained
cysteines that would appear to be partially blocked in the heterodimer
(i.e. 44, 52) or that might alter the ability of -subunit
loop 2 to attain a conformation needed for docking with the -subunit
(i.e. substitution of cysteines for Pro38 and Pro40).
Because the conformation of -subunit loop 2 in the free -subunit
is known to be highly disordered (28), this observation suggested that
docking of the subunits may stabilize the conformation of -subunit
loop 2 to one that is roughly similar to the conformation seen in the
native heterodimer.
The Position of the Seatbelt in These Cross-linked Heterodimers
Differs from That of hCG and Single-chain Analogs Lacking the Seatbelt
Latch Disulfide--
Attachment of the seatbelt to the -subunit was
expected to change the position of the seatbelt markedly. As noted
earlier, none of the altered seatbelt analogs tested was detected in a sandwich assay employing A113/125I-B111 (Table I). This
result confirmed that the carboxyl-terminal end of the seatbelt in all
the mutant analogs occupies a position different from that in hCG.
Others have shown that the disulfide between -subunit residues 26 and 110 that latches the -subunit is not required for hormone
folding or for receptor binding activities of single-chain analogs (29,
30). To learn if the carboxyl-terminal end of the seatbelt has a
similar location in a single-chain hCG analog lacking the seatbelt
latch disulfide as it has in hCG, we compared hCGsc C26A, C110A-
(Fig. 1C) and hCG in A113/125I-B110 and
A113/125I-B111 sandwich assays. Each was readily detected
by both of these antibodies (Table I), although the relative ability of
the single-chain analog to be recognized by B111 was only half that of
hCG. The finding that hCGsc C26A, C110A- can be recognized by B111
at all, however, suggests that linkage of the carboxyl-terminal end of
the -subunit to the amino-terminal end of the -subunit partially offsets the function of the C26A- C110 disulfide in stabilizing the conformation of this epitope. It also showed that the failure of
B111 to recognize analogs containing hCG- C26A was not due merely to
the substitution of Cys-26 by alanine.
The Subunit Cores of These Analogs Appear to Be Oriented Similarly
to Those of the Subunits in hCG--
In the hCG heterodimer,
-subunit loops 1 and 3 contact portions of -subunit loop 2;
-subunit loops 1 and 3 are near -subunit loop 2. To learn if
these "core" portions of the subunits had similar positions in the
cross-linked heterodimers as they do in hCG, we compared the abilities
of several analogs to be recognized by antibodies to epitopes
that are obscured by the subunit interface (Table
IV). All the analogs were detected
readily by A113 and B110, antibodies that recognize epitopes on the
free - and - subunits that are distant from one another in the
heterodimer (Tables I and IV). None of the analogs tested were
recognized simultaneously by antibody pairs A113 and B101 or A113 and
B123, however. B101 recognizes -subunit loop 2 in both the
heterodimer and the free -subunit. In the heterodimer, the A113 and
B101 epitopes are adjacent, and, as a consequence, the two antibodies are unable to bind hCG at the same time (Table IV). The finding that
A113 and B101 were unable to bind to the analogs simultaneously suggested that loop 1 is adjacent to loop 2, similar to its location in hCG. B123 binds a site on -subunit loops 1 and 3 that is
obscured in the heterodimer by -subunit loop 2. The finding that
A113 and B123 were unable to bind to the analogs at the same time
suggested that the position of the B123 epitope is obscured by 2
similarly as it is in hCG. These observations are most readily explained by the view that relocating the end of the seatbelt to the
-subunit did not alter the relative positions of the subunit cores, at least grossly. This also suggests that the seatbelt is
not the only factor that contributes to the stability of the heterodimer.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table IV
Binding of selected analogs in alternate sandwich assays
Analogs were captured with A113, an antibody to the -subunit, and
detected with radiolabeled antibodies to the -subunit. B110 binds an
epitope on -subunit loops 1 and 3 distant from the -subunit. B101
binds an epitope on -subunit loop 2 that overlaps that with A113 in
the native heterodimer. B123, a free -subunit-specific antibody,
binds -subunit loops 1 and 3 at an opposite surface that faces
-subunit loop 2 and that is on the opposite surface of these loops
from that recognized by B110. B123 does not recognize the hCG
heterodimer.
|
|
Many Cross-linked Heterodimers Had High Receptor-binding and Signal
Transduction Activities Despite Their Altered Architectures--
We
tested the biological activities of analogs that had been produced in
sufficient quantities in receptor binding and signal transduction
assays. Analogs in which the seatbelt was cross-linked to -subunit
loop 2 residues 35, 37, 41, 42, 43, or 56 had high affinities for the
LHR and at least 30% the potency of hCG in signal transduction assays
(Figs. 4 and
5; Table
V). The remaining analogs in which the
seatbelt was attached to -subunit loop 2 were less potent than this,
and those with cross-links to 47, 49, and 51 also had reduced
abilities to simulate cAMP accumulation (Figs. 4 and 5; Table V). The
analog in which the seatbelt appeared to be latched to -subunit
carboxyl-terminal residue 92 (i.e. S92C/hCG- C26A) had
10 and 20% the activity of hCG in signal transduction and LHR binding
assays (Figs. 4 and 5; Table V). Analogs in which the seatbelt was
attached to residues 86-91 (i.e. T86C/hCG- C26A,
Y88C/hCG- C26A, H90C/hCG- C26A, K91C/hCG- C26A) near the
carboxyl terminus had only 3-9% the activity of hCG in binding assays
and even less in signal transduction assays (Figs. 4 and 5). We were
unable to detect any signal transduction activity of
H90C/hCG- C26A at the concentrations available. The heterodimer in
which the seatbelt appeared to be latched to a residue in -subunit loop 3 (i.e. S64C/hCG- C26A) had half the activity of
hCG in receptor binding assays (Figs. 4 and 5) but less than 10% the activity of hCG in signal transduction assays.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Abilities of selected analogs to prevent the
binding of 125I-hCG to CHO cells that express the rat
LHR. Analogs or hCG were mixed with 125I-hCG (~1.5
ng), and the mixture was added to the receptor bearing cells for 1 h at 37 °C as described previously (15). Binding was terminated by
diluting the cell mixture to 2 ml with ice-cold 0.9% NaCl solution
containing 1 mg of bovine serum albumin per milliliter. Values shown
represent the amount of radiolabel bound to the cells normalized to the
maximal value observed in the absence of hCG (100%) and to the minimal
value observed in the presence of 1 µg of hCG (0%). These data were
pooled from at least two independent studies for each analog, and in
most cases are derived from three to five experiments using at least
two different analog preparations. The bars shown for all
analogs extend to the limits of the S.E. The data for hCG are shown as
the broken line. The small symbols represent
individual points for the hCG curves and are illustrated to reflect
assay variability.
|
|

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Abilities of selected analogs to stimulate
the accumulation of cAMP in CHO cells that express the rat LHR.
Analogs or hCG were added to the CHO cells for 20 min at 37 °C. The
reaction was stopped by immersing the incubation tubes in a 70 °C
water bath, and the cAMP released into the medium was measured by
radioimmunoassay (21). Values shown have been pooled from at least two
independent studies with each analog, and in most cases the data have
been combined from three to five assays. The minimum (0%) was
determined in the absence of hCG, and the maximal response (100%) was
determined in the presence of 10-30 ng of hCG. For reasons that remain
unknown, factors present in the culture medium inhibit this assay. This
prevented us from determining the efficacies of analogs that were
produced inefficiently or that had low receptor binding activity. The
data illustrated for analogs 47- 26 and 49- 26 are for three
of five studies in which these analogs elicited a significant response.
Two studies in which we failed to observe a response to these analogs
were excluded from the estimates of potency shown in Table V. The curve
for E56C- C26A, which is between those for hCG and L41C- C26A
is not shown.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table V
Potencies of the analogs relative to hCG
All values are based on the concentration of analog determined by
sandwich immunoassay using hCG as the standard. The same hCG standard
was used in sandwich assays, receptor binding assays, and signal
transduction assays.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Structures of the Analogs Having Altered Seatbelts--
We did not
attempt to verify the acid-stable intersubunit cross-link
experimentally, a difficult task beyond the scope of these studies.
Several observations lead us to believe that the hCG analogs described
here are stabilized by a disulfide between -subunit Cys-110 and the
cysteine that had been incorporated into the -subunit. First,
hCG- C26A failed to combine with the native -subunit (Table I), a
phenomenon that argues against the ability of seatbelt residue
Cys-110 to interrupt an existing -subunit disulfide. Second, most
of the -subunit analogs combined efficiently with the native hCG
-subunit, but none of the resulting heterodimers were more stable
than hCG at low pH (data not shown), a phenomenon that argues against
the ability of the free thiol in the -subunit to disrupt an existing
-subunit disulfide or to interfere with -subunit folding. Third,
the ability of hCG- C26A to combine with -subunit constructs was
low when the distance of the cysteine from -subunit residue Gly-101
was equal to or greater than that between -subunit residues Gly-101
and Cys-26, the length of the carboxyl-terminal half of the hCG
seatbelt (2, 3) or when the cysteine was on a surface of the
-subunit that would require the seatbelt to be wrapped around the
-subunit before it could form the intersubunit disulfide. The former
explains the low yield of heterodimers containing G22C, M71C, or
G73C (Table I); the latter explains the low yield of heterodimers containing Q5C, L12C, N15C, and F17C. And fourth,
hCG- C26A combined inefficiently with -subunit analogs containing
a cysteine located at sites predicted to be near the subunit interface
in hCG (2, 3). These include -subunit analogs Q5C, Q27C, N52C, V53C, and V76C. Coupled with the finding that the
heterodimers were not recognized simultaneously by A113/B101 and
A113/B123 (Table IV), these observations show that similar surfaces of
the subunits face one another more or less as they do in hCG, even though the position of the seatbelt differs significantly from that in
hCG as seen by the inability of the heterodimers to be recognized by
antibody B111 (Table I). Considered together, these findings also
suggest that the intersubunit disulfide forms only after the subunits
have docked.
Implications of These Observations for hCG Assembly in the
Endoplasmic Reticulum--
The ability of the -subunit analogs to
combine with hCG- C26A showed that the seatbelt does not need to be
latched to its natural site before the -subunit docks with the
-subunit. This result is consistent with the model of hCG assembly
proposed by Ruddon et al. (17) and shows that the
conformation of the seatbelt is not restricted to the position it
occupies in hCG (2, 3). These data also support a prediction implicit
in the Ruddon model, namely that contacts between the subunits can
stabilize the heterodimer until the seatbelt latch disulfide is formed.
Although these observations show that hCG assembly can occur prior to
formation of the seatbelt latch disulfide as suggested by Ruddon
et al. (17), it remains to be determined if this is more
than a salvage pathway that can rescue hCG assembly. We have found that
the subunits can combine readily in vitro in oxidizing
conditions while the seatbelt disulfide remains latched (31), and it is
conceivable that most subunit assembly occurs after the seatbelt has
latched unless the latch disulfide has been prevented from forming as
described here.
The position of the amino-terminal portion of the seatbelt in these
analogs remains unknown. We did not observe the formation of
heterodimers in which the seatbelt was latched to -subunit residues
beyond the distance capable of being scanned by the carboxyl-terminal half of the seatbelt (Tables I and III). This suggests that the amino-terminal half of the seatbelt is not as mobile as the
carboxyl-terminal half or that the amino-terminal half of the seatbelt
contributes to interactions between the subunits needed for docking
when the seatbelt is not latched. This observation is also consistent
with the proposal that the small seatbelt loop is formed prior to
docking of the subunits (17).
Implications of These Observations for Hormone Activity and Models
of Receptor Binding--
The finding that the hCG seatbelt latch
disulfide can be relocated from its natural position on -subunit
loop 1 to several sites on the -subunit has important implications
for the role of the seatbelt in hCG-lutropin receptor interactions. To
our knowledge, this is the first report suggesting that the seatbelt can be latched to the -subunit. The high lutropin activities of
several analogs suggest strongly that the region of hCG near the
seatbelt latch does not participate in key receptor contacts. Previous
studies with single-chain gonadotropin analogs have also led to the
suggestion that the region of the seatbelt near the latch disulfide is
not needed for lutropin activity (29, 30, 32). Although this conclusion
is consistent with the data described here, the finding that a
single-chain hCG analog lacking this disulfide was recognized well by
B111 (hCGsc C26A, C110A- , Table I) suggests that fusing the
subunits together offsets the role of the seatbelt latch disulfide in
stabilizing this region of the protein. Thus, single-chain analogs may
be less useful for studying the structure and function of this region
of the glycoprotein hormones.
The activities of single-chain hCG analogs led Jackson et
al. (33) to argue that the activities of the glycoprotein hormones are not dependent on the "complete native quaternary interactions" between their subunits. The studies described here show clearly that
the position of at least a part of the seatbelt can be altered without
disrupting lutropin receptor interactions (Table V), a finding that
could be taken as support for this concept. Linking the seatbelt to the
-subunit did not appear to cause a gross change in the alignment of
the subunits compared with that in hCG, however, even in analogs that
had only trace amounts of lutropin activity (Table IV). Thus, with the
exception of the seatbelt, all the analogs described here appeared to
have similar quaternary configurations, despite the fact that they lack
constraints imposed on the -subunit by the arrangement of the
seatbelt in the native hormones.
Modeling suggested that the carboxyl terminus of the seatbelt in
L41C/hCG- C26A, one of the most active analogs (Table V), is
likely to be located within 4-5 Å of the site that it occupies in hCG
(Fig. 6). Thus, despite its inability to
be recognized by antibody B111, it is conceivable that much of the
seatbelt of this analog adopts a conformation very similar to that of
hCG (Fig. 6, top right panel). In contrast, the
carboxyl-terminal half of the seatbelt would not be expected to have
the same conformations in hCG and Y37C/hCG- C26A,
R35C/hCG- C26A, or E56C/hCG- C26A, analogs that also have
high activity, because the carboxyl-terminal end of these seatbelts are
likely to be located 14-19Å away from its natural site (Table III).
The finding that the seatbelt can be attached to -subunit residues
35, 37, 41, 42, or 56 without reducing hCG receptor binding suggests
the carboxyl-terminal half of the hCG seatbelt does not participate in
essential LHR contacts. It is also consistent with the findings that
this portion of the seatbelt can be replaced by its human
follitropin counterpart with little influence on LHR
interactions (5, 34). This portion of the seatbelt has been shown to
control the positions of the hCG subunits (16), and its ability to
influence the receptor interactions of lutropins and thyrotropins (5,
6, 35) through its contacts with -subunit loop 2 may reflect this
property.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Models illustrating the location
of the seatbelt in hCG and some of the analogs described here.
These models were made using Sybyl (Tripos, St. Louis, MO) and
illustrate the smallest changes in the seatbelt that would enable
-subunit Cys-110 to form a disulfide with the -subunit cysteine
depicted. Gray scale: light gray line,
-subunit; dark gray ribbon, -subunit; black thin
lines, disulfide bonds; dark spheres, cysteine residues
in the disulfide that stabilizes the heterodimer. Note that the
carboxyl-terminal residues of the -subunit are disordered in the
crystal structure and are not drawn here. These would be quite bulky
and extend from the seatbelt in the vicinity of the dark
spheres.
|
|
The high activities of analogs containing S43C and K45C (Table V)
suggest that the small helix in -subunit loop 2 also does not
participate in LHR contacts. The activities of the analog containing
K51C also suggest that this portion of -subunit loop 2 does not
contact the receptor, in agreement with conclusions reached earlier
(36).
The activities of analogs in which the seatbelt is attached to other
parts of -subunit loop 2 have important implications for models in
which residues in this loop are thought to contact the receptor (13).
Unlike analogs in which the seatbelt was cross-linked to -subunit
loop 2 residues just discussed, those in which it was cross-linked to
-subunit loop 2 residues 46-51 had much lower receptor binding and
signal transduction activities. The least active analogs were those in
which the seatbelt was attached to -subunit residues 47 or 48, a
portion of the hormone predicted to contact the receptor (13).
Nonetheless, the finding that all analogs in which the seatbelt is
latched to a residue in -subunit loop 2 retained detectable activity
makes it difficult for us to retain our notion that several residues of
-subunit loop 2 participate in essential receptor contacts (13).
Although we continue to think that -subunit loop 2 is near the
hormone-receptor interface, the results of these studies suggest that
residues in this portion of the hormone make fewer essential
hormone-receptor contacts than we originally envisioned.
The carboxyl-terminal end of the -subunit has been long thought to
participate in receptor contacts (1). The activities of analogs in
which the seatbelt is latched to residues at or near the carboxyl
terminus, albeit low, offer additional insights into the role of this
hormone region in receptor interactions. The very end of the
-subunit carboxyl terminus appears to be exposed in the lutropin
receptor complex as shown by the finding that a few residues can be
added to this site without disrupting hormone activity (37). This
portion of the hormone may be near the receptor interface, however, as
shown by the finding that the presence of hCG -subunit residues
118-145, a region that contains several glycosylated serine residues
in hCG, reduced the activity of hCG ~50-fold (38). The
receptor-binding and signal-transduction activities of
S92C/hCG- C26A, an analog in which the seatbelt is likely to be
cross-linked to the -subunit carboxyl terminus, was between these
extremes (Table V). This finding surprised us considerably and led us
to test and compare the activities of several preparations of this
analog (Figs. 4 and 5). The residual activities of S92C/hCG- C26A
and analogs in which the seatbelt was attached to residues near the
-subunit carboxyl terminus, which are higher than has been reported
following truncation of the -subunit (1, 9), are more readily
explained by models of the hCG-receptor complex in which the hormone is thought to bind to the rim of the receptor extracellular domain (11,
13) than to other sites (10). Because the large carboxyl-terminal end
of the -subunit in these analogs is likely to be located near the
carboxyl-terminal end of the -subunit, it is difficult to imagine
how the -subunit carboxyl terminus could contact the transmembrane
domain as proposed (39). Furthermore, it is hard to envision how the
seatbelt could reach these -subunit residues without passing between
the receptor and other portions of the hormone thought to contact the
receptor in models other than those in which the hormone is oriented
parallel to the plane of the receptor extracellular domain (13).
Implications of These Observations for the Evolution of the
Glycoprotein Hormones--
The finding that several structural analogs
of hCG have high biological activities suggests that different types of
hormone intermediates could have been produced during the evolution of lutropins. The glycoprotein hormones have essential roles in the reproduction and development of all vertebrates and would be subjected to extremely high selection pressures. With the exception of some piscine hormones in which the seatbelt appears to be latched to a
cysteine near the amino-terminal end of the -subunit (40), the amino
acid sequences of the vertebrate glycoprotein hormones suggest each
member of this family folds similarly to hCG. As is apparent from the
instability of heterodimers missing the seatbelt latch disulfide (18),
the hCG subunit cores do not have high affinity for one another, at
least once they have left the endoplasmic reticulum. Unless these
proteins originated from dimers of subunits that had high affinities
for one another, it seems likely that they could have evolved from
intermediates lacking seatbelts only if their subunits were expressed
in tandem (30) or if they were produced downstream of dimerization
domains (23, 27). The latter mechanism appears to be responsible for
the assembly of inhibins and activins, other cystine knot proteins with
key roles in reproduction and development (41). The observations
described here suggest a new mechanism for the evolution of the
heterodimer. The attractiveness of this mechanism depends on the
finding that it does not require a specific seatbelt latch disulfide
for high hormone activity, a phenomenon that would greatly enhance the probability that a given mutant would lead to reproductive success. Additional selection pressure would have led to the migration of the
latch disulfide to its current position on the -subunit.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. William Munroe (Hybritech Inc.,
a subsidiary of Beckman Coulter, Inc., San Diego, CA) and Dr. Robert
Canfield (Columbia University, New York, NY) for antibodies used in
these studies.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants HD14907 and HD38547.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Obstetrics
and Gynecology, Robert Wood Johnson (Rutgers) Medical School, 675 Hoes
Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854. Tel.: 732-235-4224; Fax: 732-235-4225;
E-mail: moyle@umdnj.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 8, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108374200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
hCG, human
choriogonadotropin;
LHR, lutropin receptor;
CHO, Chinese hamster
ovary.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Pierce, J. G.,
and Parsons, T. F.
(1981)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
50,
465-495[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Lapthorn, A. J.,
Harris, D. C.,
Littlejohn, A.,
Lustbader, J. W.,
Canfield, R. E.,
Machin, K. J.,
Morgan, F. J.,
and Isaacs, N. W.
(1994)
Nature
369,
455-461[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Wu, H.,
Lustbader, J. W.,
Liu, Y.,
Canfield, R. E.,
and Hendrickson, W. A.
(1994)
Structure
2,
545-558[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Campbell, R. K.,
Dean Emig, D. M.,
and Moyle, W. R.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
760-764[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Moyle, W. R.,
Campbell, R. K.,
Myers, R. V.,
Bernard, M. P.,
Han, Y.,
and Wang, X.
(1994)
Nature
368,
251-255[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Grossmann, M.,
Szkudlinski, M. W.,
Wong, R.,
Dias, J. A.,
Ji, T. H.,
and Weintraub, B. D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
15532-15540[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Segaloff, D. L.,
and Ascoli, M.
(1993)
Endocr. Rev.
14,
324-347[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Kobe, B.,
and Deisenhofer, J.
(1993)
Nature
366,
751-756[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Chen, F.,
Wang, Y.,
and Puett, D.
(1992)
Mol. Endocrinol.
6,
914-919[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Jiang, X.,
Dreano, M.,
Buckler, D. R.,
Cheng, S.,
Ythier, A.,
Wu, H.,
Hendrickson, W. A.,
Tayar, N. E.,
and el Tayar, N.
(1995)
Structure
3,
1341-1353[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Remy, J.-J.,
Couture, L.,
Pantel, J.,
Haertle, T.,
Rabesona, H.,
Bozon, V.,
Pajot-Augy, E.,
Robert, P.,
Troalen, F.,
Salesse, R.,
and Bidart, J.-M.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
125,
79-91[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Pantel, J.,
Remy, J.-J.,
Salesse, R.,
Jolivet, A.,
and Bidart, J.-M.
(1993)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
195,
588-593[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Moyle, W. R.,
Campbell, R. K.,
Rao, S. N. V.,
Ayad, N. G.,
Bernard, M. P.,
Han, Y.,
and Wang, Y.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
20020-20031[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Braun, T.,
Schofield, P. R.,
and Sprengel, R.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
1885-1890[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Bernard, M. P.,
Myers, R. V.,
and Moyle, W. R.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
335,
611-617
|
| 16.
|
Wang, Y. H.,
Bernard, M. P.,
and Moyle, W. R.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
170,
67-77[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Ruddon, R. W.,
Sherman, S. A.,
and Bedows, E.
(1996)
Prot. Sci.
8,
1443-1452
|
| 18.
|
Suganuma, N.,
Matzuk, M. M.,
and Boime, I.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
19302-19307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Bahl, O. P.
(1969)
J. Biol. Chem.
244,
567-574
|
| 20.
|
Moyle, W. R.,
Matzuk, M. M.,
Campbell, R. K.,
Cogliani, E.,
Dean Emig, D. M.,
Krichevsky, A.,
Barnett, R. W.,
and Boime, I.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
8511-8518[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Brooker, J.,
Harper, J. F.,
Terasaki, W. L.,
and Moylan, R. D.
(1979)
Adv. Cyclic Nucleotide Res.
10,
1-33[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Moyle, W. R.,
Ehrlich, P. H.,
and Canfield, R. E.
(1982)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
79,
2245-2249[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Lin, W.,
Ransom, M. X.,
Myers, R. V.,
Bernard, M. P.,
and Moyle, W. R.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
152,
91-98[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Myers, R. V.,
Wang, Y.,
and Moyle, W. R.
(2000)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1475,
390-394[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Cosowsky, L.,
Rao, S. N. V.,
Macdonald, G. J.,
Papkoff, H.,
Campbell, R. K.,
and Moyle, W. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
20011-20019[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Li, C. H.,
and Starman, B.
(1964)
Nature
202,
291-292[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Moyle, W. R.,
Myers, R. V.,
Wang, Y.,
Han, Y.,
Lin, W.,
Kelley, G. L.,
Ehrlich, P. H.,
Rao, S. N. V.,
and Bernard, M. P.
(1998)
Chem. Biol. (Lond.)
5,
241-254
|
| 28.
|
De Beer, T.,
Van Zuylen, C. W.,
Leeflang, B. R.,
Hard, K.,
Boelens, R.,
Kaptein, R.,
Kamerling, J. P.,
and Vliegenthart, J. F.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
241,
229-242[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Heikoop, J. C.,
van Beuningen-de, V. M.,
van, d., B.,
and Grootenhuis, P. D.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
245,
656-662[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Ben-Menahem, D.,
Kudo, M.,
Pixley, M. R.,
Sato, A.,
Suganuma, N.,
Perlas, E.,
Hsueh, A. J.,
and Boime, I.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
6827-6830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Xing, Y.,
Williams, C.,
Campbell, R. K.,
Cook, S.,
Knoppers, M.,
Addona, T.,
Altarocca, V.,
and Moyle, W. R.
(2001)
Prot. Sci.
10,
226-235[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Galet, C.,
Chopineau, M.,
Martinat, N.,
Combarnous, Y.,
and Guillou, F.
(2000)
J. Endocrinol.
167,
117-124[Abstract]
|
| 33.
|
Jackson, A. M.,
Berger, P.,
Pixley, M.,
Klein, C.,
Hsueh, A. J.,
and Boime, I.
(1999)
Mol. Endocrinol.
13,
2175-2188[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Han, Y.,
Bernard, M. P.,
and Moyle, W. R.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
124,
151-161[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Campbell, R. K.,
Bergert, E. R.,
Wang, Y.,
Morris, J. C.,
and Moyle, W. R.
(1997)
Nat. Biotech.
15,
439-443[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Einstein, M.,
Lin, W.,
Macdonald, G. J.,
and Moyle, W. R.
(2001)
Exp. Biol. Med.
226,
581-590[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Marichatou, H.,
Martinat, N.,
Guillou, F.,
and Combarnous, Y.
(2000)
Eur. J. Endocrinol.
142,
402-405[Abstract]
|
| 38.
|
Furuhashi, M.,
Shikone, T.,
Fares, F. A.,
Sugahara, T.,
Hsueh, A. J.,
and Boime, I.
(1995)
Mol. Endocrinol.
9,
54-63[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Ji, I.,
and Ji, T. H.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
20851-20854[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Li, M. D.,
and Ford, J. J.
(1998)
J. Endocrinol.
156,
529-542[Abstract]
|
| 41.
|
Woodruff, T. K.,
and Mather, J. P.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Physiol
57,
219-244[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Xing, W. Lin, M. Jiang, D. Cao, R. V. Myers, M. P. Bernard, and W. R. Moyle
Use of Protein Knobs to Characterize the Position of Conserved {alpha}-Subunit Regions in Lutropin Receptor Complexes
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 22, 2004;
279(43):
44427 - 44437.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. P. Bernard, W. Lin, D. Cao, R. V. Myers, Y. Xing, and W. R. Moyle
Only a Portion of the Small Seatbelt Loop in Human Choriogonadotropin Appears Capable of Contacting the Lutropin Receptor
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 22, 2004;
279(43):
44438 - 44441.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. R. Moyle, Y. Xing, W. Lin, D. Cao, R. V. Myers, J. E. Kerrigan, and M. P. Bernard
Model of Glycoprotein Hormone Receptor Ligand Binding and Signaling
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 22, 2004;
279(43):
44442 - 44459.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Xing, R. V. Myers, D. Cao, W. Lin, M. Jiang, M. P. Bernard, and W. R. Moyle
Glycoprotein Hormone Assembly in the Endoplasmic Reticulum: I. THE GLYCOSYLATED END OF HUMAN {alpha}-SUBUNIT LOOP 2 IS THREADED THROUGH A {beta}-SUBUNIT HOLE
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 20, 2004;
279(34):
35426 - 35436.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Xing, R. V. Myers, D. Cao, W. Lin, M. Jiang, M. P. Bernard, and W. R. Moyle
Glycoprotein Hormone Assembly in the Endoplasmic Reticulum: II. MULTIPLE ROLES OF A REDOX SENSITIVE {beta}-SUBUNIT DISULFIDE SWITCH
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 20, 2004;
279(34):
35437 - 35448.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Xing, R. V. Myers, D. Cao, W. Lin, M. Jiang, M. P. Bernard, and W. R. Moyle
Glycoprotein Hormone Assembly in the Endoplasmic Reticulum: III. THE SEATBELT AND ITS LATCH SITE DETERMINE THE ASSEMBLY PATHWAY
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 20, 2004;
279(34):
35449 - 35457.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Xing, R. V. Myers, D. Cao, W. Lin, M. Jiang, M. P. Bernard, and W. R. Moyle
Glycoprotein Hormone Assembly in the Endoplasmic Reticulum: IV. PROBABLE MECHANISM OF SUBUNIT DOCKING AND COMPLETION OF ASSEMBLY
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 20, 2004;
279(34):
35458 - 35468.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Narayan, J. Gray, and D. Puett
Yoked Complexes of Human Choriogonadotropin and the Lutropin Receptor: Evidence that Monomeric Individual Subunits Are Inactive
Mol. Endocrinol.,
December 1, 2002;
16(12):
2733 - 2745.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Garcia-Campayo, T. R. Kumar, and I. Boime
Thyrotropin, Follitropin, and Chorionic Gonadotropin Expressed as a Single Multifunctional Unit Reveal Remarkable Permissiveness in Receptor-Ligand Interactions
Endocrinology,
October 1, 2002;
143(10):
3773 - 3778.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. W. Szkudlinski, V. Fremont, C. Ronin, and B. D. Weintraub
Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone and Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Receptor Structure-Function Relationships
Physiol Rev,
April 1, 2002;
82(2):
473 - 502.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|