Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M108508200 on October 3, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 50, 47361-47370, December 14, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/50/47361    most recent
M108508200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Figueiredo, P.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Figueiredo, P.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, W. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Inhibition of Transferrin Recycling and Endosome Tubulation by Phospholipase A2 Antagonists*

Paul de Figueiredo, Anne Doody, Renée S. Polizotto, Daniel Drecktrah, Salli Wood, Melanie Banta, Marian S. Strang, and William J. BrownDagger

From the Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853

Received for publication, September 5, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We report here that a broad spectrum of phospholipase A2 (PLA2) antagonists produce a concentration-dependent, differential block in the endocytic recycling pathway of transferrin (Tf) and Tf receptors (TfRs) but have no acute affect on Tf uptake from the cell surface. At low concentrations of antagonists (~1 µM), Tf and TfR accumulated in centrally located recycling endosomes, whereas at higher concentrations (~10 µM), Tf-TfR accumulated in peripheral sorting endosomes. Several independent lines of evidence suggest that this inhibition of recycling may result from the inhibition of tubule formation. First, BFA-stimulated endosome tubule formation was similarly inhibited by PLA2 antagonists. Second, endocytosed tracers were found in larger spherical endosomes in the presence of PLA2 antagonists. And third, endosome tubule formation in a cell-free, cytosol-dependent reconstitution system was equally sensitive PLA2 antagonists. These results are consistent with the conclusion that endosome membrane tubules are formed by the action of a cytoplasmic PLA2 and that PLA2-dependent tubules are involved in intracellular recycling of Tf and TfR. When taken together with previous studies on the Golgi complex, these results also indicate that an intracellular PLA2 activity provides a novel molecular mechanism for inducing tubule formation from multiple organelles.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Endocytic compartments serve important sorting functions for the segregation and delivery of membrane-bound receptors, their cognate ligands, and soluble cargo to specific intracellular destinations (1, 2). Early light and electron microscopic studies revealed that some membrane receptors become concentrated into endosomal tubules, 50-70 nm in diameter and extending from the main vesicular/vacuolar body of endosomes, before recycling back to the plasma membrane (3-16). These results suggested that tubules may serve to segregate membrane and receptors away from the bulk fluid volume of the vacuolar part of the endosome. From other studies, Maxfield and colleagues (2, 17, 18) proposed that recycling of endocytosed TfRs1 occurs in part by the iterative formation and budding of narrow 50-70-nm tubules from endocytic compartments. These studies supported the idea that tubule formation provides a mechanism for the separation of membrane from soluble luminal contents based simply on differences in membrane surface-to-volume ratios (19, 20).

In addition to membrane tubules, evidence has shown that cytoplasmic coat proteins, such as clathrin, COPI coatomers, and the Vps5-Vps17 complex in yeast cells, are also involved in mediating recycling from endosomal and lysosomal compartments by forming coated vesicles (15, 16, 21-28). Moreover, members of the ADP-ribosylation factor family of GTP-binding proteins appear to regulate endocytic trafficking, perhaps by mediating coat protein binding (29-34). Thus, in a manner analogous to trafficking in the secretory pathway, various types of ADP-ribosylation factor-regulated coated vesicles may also package receptors and membrane for recycling in the endocytic pathway. As with COPI and clathrin-coated vesicles of the Golgi complex and trans-Golgi network (TGN), respectively, binding of coat proteins to endosomal membranes is sensitive to brefeldin A (BFA) (15, 23, 25), a potent inhibitor of trafficking through the secretory pathway (35). As a result of BFA's action, some endosomes are stimulated to form extensive membrane tubules, as do Golgi and TGN membranes (36-41). However, unlike its effects on the secretory pathway, BFA does not significantly inhibit endocytic uptake or trafficking through endocytic compartments (37, 41, 42).

Our understanding of the exact roles that tubules and vesicles play in endocytic recycling is incomplete because, as yet, no trafficking intermediates have been definitively characterized. One possibility is that endosome tubules provide a mechanism for bulk segregation of membrane (including receptors) from fluid content, whereas coated vesicles provide additional specificity for receptor packaging and membrane fission (1, 2). Tubules and vesicles could work in concert with coated vesicles budding from the tips of tubules, or they could work independently (3, 15, 37, 39).

The mechanisms of endosome tubule formation are not known; however, they are probably different from that of coated vesicle formation because tubulation is enhanced in the presence of BFA, i.e. when coat proteins are prevented from binding. By way of comparison, recent studies on Golgi membranes have strongly suggested that tubulation, both in vivo and in a cell-free reconstitution system, requires the action of a cytosolic Ca2+-independent PLA2 activity (43-45). Moreover, we found that constitutive and BFA-stimulated retrograde trafficking from the Golgi complex to the endoplasmic reticulum was strongly inhibited by a variety of compounds that antagonize cytoplasmic Ca2+-independent PLA2 enzymes (43, 46). In vitro studies suggest that the PLA2 acts directly on the membranes to induce tubule formation (44, 45). These results raise the possibility that endosomes and Golgi membranes utilize the same mechanisms to induce tubules, which are involved in different membrane trafficking events. Here we provide evidence that tubulation of endosome membranes, both in vivo and in an in vitro cell-free reconstitution system, was potently inhibited by a variety of PLA2 antagonists, which also significantly inhibited recycling of Tf-TfR complexes from various endosomal compartments in vivo.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials and Cells

Stock solutions of the following reagents were prepared and stored at -20 °C: BFA (10 mg/ml in ethanol), N-ethylmaleimide (0.1 M), nocodazole (6 mg/ml in Me2SO), and AMP-PNP (0.1 M) were obtained from Sigma; GTPgamma S (50 mM) was from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. Nu-Serum was from Collaborative Research (Bedford, MA), and Calf Serum-Supplemented was from Life Technologies, Inc. 125I-Tf was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Phospholipase and other inhibitors were obtained from the following sources: N-(p-amylcinnamoyl)anthranilic acid, 2-(p-amylcinnamoyl)amino-4-cholorbenzoic acid (ONO-RS-082), and (E)-6-(bromomethylene) tetrahydro-3-(1-naphthalenyl)-2H-pyran-2-one (or bromoenol lactone (BEL)) were from Biomol Research Laboratories, Inc. (Plymouth Meeting, PA); quinacrine, p-bromophenacyl bromide, and all other common reagents were from Sigma. The following antibodies were generously supplied: monoclonal anti-TfR antibodies (HTR-H68) by Dr. Ian Trowbridge (Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA) and polyclonal antibodies against beta 1,4 galactosyltransferase by Dr. Eric Berger (University of Zurich, Switzerland). Fluorescein-Tf (FITC-Tf) and rhodamine-Tf (Rhod-Tf) were prepared exactly as described (47).

Rat clone 9 hepatocytes and HeLa cells were grown in modified Eagle's medium (MEM) with 10% Nu-Serum or Calf Serum-Supplemented and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Mouse RAW 264.7 macrophages were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. All cells were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air, 5% CO2.

Binding, Endocytosis, and Trafficking of 125I-Tf, Fluorescent Tf, and Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP)

HeLa cells were grown for 2 days to ~70-80% confluence in 12-well plates for 125I-Tf binding, uptake, and recycling experiments or on glass coverslips for fluorescent Tf uptake and recycling experiments. For all binding, uptake, and recycling experiments, cells were first rinsed three times in MEM (without serum) and incubated in the same for 30 min at 37 °C. Also, unless otherwise indicated, MEM did not contain serum, which inhibits the effects of PLA2 inhibitors. The subsequent procedures for assaying binding, uptake, and recycling described below were modified from previous studies (48).

Biochemical Determination of 125Tf Trafficking-- To measure the effects of PLA2 inhibitors on the relative amounts of TfRs found on the cell surface, cells were incubated in the presence or absence of 10 µM BEL in MEM for 45 min at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator. Plates were then transferred to a cold room and placed on ice, and cells were rinsed three times with ice-cold MEM containing a 1:10 dilution of the normal sodium bicarbonate (MEM1/10). All subsequent surface binding procedures were done at 4 °C. Cells were briefly rinsed with an acid wash (500 mM NaCl, 0.2 N acetic acid, pH 2) to remove any surface-bound Tf and then rinsed three times with MEM1/10, which restored the pH to 7.4. Medium was removed and then replaced with 0.5 ml of MEM1/10 containing a saturating amount of 125I-Tf (467 ng of Tf/well = 0.208 µCi/well). Cells were incubated for 2 h with gentle shaking. The medium was removed, and cells were washed six times with MEM1/10 (by which time the last wash had only background levels of 125I). Cells were extracted by the addition of 1 N NaOH and gentle shaking for 30 min. The extract was collected and counted in a gamma  counter.

To measure the effects of PLA2 inhibitors on the endocytic uptake of Tf from the cell surface, 12-well plates were placed on ice, rinsed with ice-cold acid wash and then washed three times with ice-cold MEM. The medium was removed, and cells were incubated in the presence or absence of 10 µM BEL in ice-cold MEM for 10 min on ice. The medium was replaced with 0.5 ml of MEM plus 10 µM BEL (37 °C), as appropriate, which also contained 125I-Tf (amounts described above for surface binding). Cells were allowed to internalize the bound 125I-Tf for 10 min at 37 °C. Following removal of the medium, cells were rinsed with ice-cold acid wash, washed six times with ice-cold MEM, and then extracted with 1 N NaOH as above.

To measure the effect of PLA2 inhibitors on the recycling of Tf from internal compartments back to the cell surface, cells were incubated with MEM containing 125I-Tf (0.17 µCi/ml) for 45 min at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator. The medium was removed, and cells were washed six times in ice-cold MEM (while on ice) and then incubated in the presence or absence of 10 µM BEL in MEM for 5 min at 4 °C. The medium was removed; 0.5 ml of 37 °C efflux medium (MEM containing 0.1 mM desferrioxamine, 3 µg/ml Tf) with or without 10 µM BEL as appropriate was added; and cells were further incubated for various periods of time at 37 °C. At the end of each time period, medium was collected, and intracellular 125I-Tf was harvested by extracting cells in 1 N NaOH. The amounts of 125I-Tf in both the medium and intracellular samples were determined.

Morphological Analysis of Fluorescent Tf Trafficking-- To visualize the endocytosis and trafficking of fluorescent Tf, cells were treated essentially as above for biochemical labeling experiments. In some cases, various specific pulse-chase protocols were conducted, which will be described below. Cells were incubated in FITC-Tf (20 µg/ml) and/or Rhod-Tf (30 µg/ml) to label various endocytic compartments. In many cases after labeling with fluorescent Tf, cells were fixed and processed for immunofluorescence to localize TfR as described (47) or the trans-Golgi/TGN membrane protein, galactosyltransferase (using polyclonal antibodies at a 1:600 dilution). In most cases, fluorescently labeled cells were viewed with standard epifluorescence optics; however, in a few specific instances, where noted, cells were viewed by scanning confocal microscopy with a Bio-Rad 600 confocal microscope.

Endocytosis of soluble HRP and its visualization by diaminobenzidine cytochemistry for electron microscopy were performed as previously described (47).

Preparation of Endosomes

A suspension of 12-nm colloidal gold particles (Au12) was prepared as described (49), stabilized with bovine serum albumin (BSA), resuspended in MEM (for clone 9 cells) or Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (for RAW 264.7 cells), and stored at 4 °C until used. Monolayers of clone 9 hepatocytes or RAW 264.7 macrophages were grown to confluence in 4-7 220-mm2 plastic tissue culture plates. To label endosomes with Au12-BSA, cells were briefly rinsed once with MEM at 37 °C and incubated with prewarmed Au12-BSA suspension (in MEM; 75 ml/dish) for 15 min (clone 9) or 10 min (RAW 264.7) at 37 °C. Labeling was terminated by rapidly pouring off the Au12-BSA suspension and washing cells three times with ice-cold MEM; plates were kept on ice as the cells were harvested with a rubber policeman. All subsequent steps in the preparation procedure were carried out at 4 °C. The cells were harvested in a table top centrifuge (IEC) for 5 min, and the supernatant was discarded. The pellet of packed cells was thoroughly resuspended in homogenization buffer (250 mM sucrose, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) and centrifuged as above. This step was repeated once, and the supernatant was discarded. The cells were resuspended in homogenization buffer to yield a 20% (v/v) cell suspension and homogenized by passage (2-4 times) through a Balch/Rothman ball bearing homogenizer (50). The homogenate (~8 ml) was centrifuged as above to yield a postnuclear supernatant. This centrifugation step was repeated if the postnuclear supernatant contained any nuclei as detected by phase-contrast microscopy. The postnuclear supernatant (4 ml) was layered on top of a sucrose step gradient in Beckman SW28.1 centrifuge tubes containing the following concentrations of sucrose at each step (3.4 ml/step): 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2 M sucrose. Each sucrose solution was buffered with 1 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4. Additionally, the 0.5 M sucrose step contained 500 mM KCl, which served to wash endosomes as they moved through the gradient and lowered the background level of in vitro tubulation. The gradients were centrifuged at 113,000 × g for 2 h in a Beckman SW28.1 rotor. Material at the 1.0/1.5 M sucrose interface contained the highest concentration of Au12-BSA-loaded endosomes, was collected with a Pasteur pipette, and was either used immediately or slowly frozen and stored at -80 °C. Tubulation-competent endosomes had a useful shelf life of ~2 days at -80 °C.

Preparation of Bovine Brain Cytosol

Bovine brain cytosol used in these in vitro studies was prepared as previously described (51). Two fractions of brain cytosol from this preparation were used in these studies. The first, called "crude cytosol" was the supernatant obtained immediately after centrifuging the brain homogenate at 95,500 × g for 2 h. The second fraction, called "bovine brain cytosol" or BBC, was prepared from the above supernatant by precipitation with 60% ammonium sulfate, reconstitution in buffer, and dialysis as described (51). Unless otherwise indicated, all experiments used this BBC preparation. Typically, 1.5 kg of brains yielded over 600 ml of cytosol with a protein concentration of ~25 mg/ml.

In Vitro Tubulation Assay

The tubulation of isolated endosomes was visualized by a whole mount EM-negative stain assay as used to document the tubulation of Golgi membranes (52). In a typical assay, 12.5 µl of bovine brain cytosol was mixed with 87.5 µl of tubulation buffer (final concentrations in the complete assay mixture: 50 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 25 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4) containing various combinations of other reagents such as ATP and/or GTP. This buffer mixture and either fresh or thawed endosome-enriched fractions were equilibrated to 37 °C for 15 min. Tubulation was initiated by slowly adding an equal volume (20 µl) of the cytosol/buffer mixture to the endosome-enriched fractions, followed by incubation at 37 °C for various periods of time. Drops of the endosome suspension were placed on Formvar- and carbon-coated EM grids for 15 min at room temperature, and grids were negatively stained with 2.0% phosphotungstic acid, pH 7.2, and viewed by electron microscopy (52). In an alternate method, drops of the endosome suspension were placed on Formvar- and carbon-coated EM grids for 5 min at room temperature, and glutaraldehyde (from 25% stock solution) was added directly to the drops (to a final concentration of 0.1%) and allowed to fix the organelles for 5 min. The fixed organelles were then stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid as described above.

Endosome tubulation was quantified by determining the percentage of gold-loaded organelles that displayed at least one membranous tubule or that were completely tubular. For each experimental condition, at least 150 endosomes were counted from triplicate samples. A tubule was defined as a membranous extension, 50-70 nm in diameter and at least twice as long, that was continuous with the lipid bilayer of the endosome. For practical reasons, however, this assay can only provide a semiquantitative estimation of the tubulation activity. Ideally, we would like to determine the number of tubules/endosome. Unfortunately, determining this number slowed analyses of the experiments to unacceptable levels. Therefore, an endosome with one tubule was equal to an endosome with multiple tubules. From our qualitative observations, however, we noticed a clear positive correlation between the number of endosomes with tubules and the number of tubules/endosome.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

PLA2 Antagonists Inhibit Tf-TfR Recycling at Multiple Steps-- Based on our previous studies, which revealed that PLA2 antagonists were potent inhibitors of BFA-stimulated, tubule-mediated retrograde trafficking from the Golgi complex (43), we asked here if these same antagonists affected putative tubule-mediated trafficking steps in the endocytic recycling pathway. To investigate this question, the intracellular trafficking of TfR and its ligand, Tf, were followed using various pulse-chase experiments and biochemical and morphological assays. We found that incubation of cells with the irreversible inhibitor of Ca2+-independent PLA2 enzymes, BEL, had little effect on a brief pulse (10 min) of 125I-Tf uptake (Fig. 1A). However, when cells were first pretreated with BEL for 45 min at 37 °C and then assayed for the presence of 125I-Tf binding sites, we found a significant decrease on BEL-treated cells (Fig. 1A). These results suggest that although BEL does not prevent uptake from the cell surface, it does prevent recycling of TfR from internal compartments. To directly test this idea, cells were incubated with 125I-Tf for 45 min to allow its internalization and delivery to endosomal compartments, washed free of uninternalized ligand, and then chased in 125I-Tf-free medium in the presence or absence of BEL for various periods of time. The results showed that the addition of 10 µM BEL substantially inhibited the recycling of 125I-Tf to the extracellular medium (Fig. 1B). Using a fixed chase time point (60 min), we found that increasing concentrations of BEL produced a linear and saturable inhibition of 125I-Tf recycling with an IC50 of ~4 µM (data not shown).


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   The PLA2 antagonist, BEL, inhibits Tf-TfR recycling but not endocytosis. A, measurements of the effects of BEL on 125I-Tf uptake from the cell surface (two left bars) and on the presence of TfR on the cell surface (two right bars). To measure the direct effect of BEL on endocytosis from the cell surface, cells were pretreated in the cold with (+) or without (-) 10 µM BEL and then shifted to 37 °C in the presence of 125I-Tf for 10 min (still in the presence or absence of BEL as appropriate). BEL had no appreciable effect on 125I-Tf uptake. To measure the long term effect of BEL on the presence of TfRs on the cell surface, cells were incubated with (+) or without (-) BEL for 45 min at 37 °C, and then cell surface TfRs were detected by binding saturating amounts of 125I-Tf in the cold for 2 h. Under these conditions, BEL caused a significant decrease in 125I-Tf binding to the cell surface. B, BEL inhibits the recycling of 125I-Tf from intracellular compartments. Cells were incubated with 125I-Tf for 45 min at 37 °C to allow uptake and delivery to endosomal compartments and then chased in ligand-free medium in the presence or absence of 10 µM BEL for various periods of time. At the time points indicated, medium samples and cell extracts were collected, and the amounts of 125I-Tf were determined in each. % Total Recycled represents the amount of 125I-Tf found in the medium sample divided by the total (medium plus cell extract) × 100. BEL significantly inhibited the appearance of 125I-Tf in the medium. Results in both A and B represent the average of two experiments with triplicate determinations for each.

To determine where in the recycling pathway Tf trafficking was inhibited, cells were pulse-labeled with FITC-Tf for 45 min and then chased (in medium without FITC-Tf) in the presence or absence of various PLA2 inhibitors. Cells were then prepared for immunofluorescence labeling of the TfR. In control cells with no chase, Tf and the TfR were found to almost entirely colocalize in numerous punctate vesicles located throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 2, A and B). When cells were pulse-labeled and chased in medium without antagonists for 60 min, FITC-Tf staining was significantly reduced, consistent with its recycling and loss into the extracellular medium (Fig. 2, C and D). However, quite different results were obtained when BEL was included in the chase medium. In the presence of 10 µM BEL, FITC-Tf was not lost from cells but was instead found to colocalize with TfRs in punctate vesicles located throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 2, E and F), a pattern similar to that of untreated cells. Interestingly, in 1 µM BEL, both FITC-Tf and TfR were found to colocalize in a more compact, juxtanuclear staining pattern (Fig. 2, G and H). Similar dose-dependent results were obtained with a structurally different PLA2 inhibitors, ONO-RS-082, N-(p-amylcinnamoyl)anthranilic acid, and aristolochic acid (data not shown). These results confirm the biochemical studies above showing that PLA2 antagonists inhibit Tf-TfR recycling and further suggest that BEL produced a concentration-dependent block in recycling at two different steps.


View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   PLA2 antagonists display a dose-dependent inhibition of the intracellular recycling of FITC-Tf and TfR at two discrete steps. In all experiments, HeLa cells were pulse-labeled with FITC-Tf for 45 min to label all endocytic compartments (left panels), subjected to various chase protocols in the presence or absence of the PLA2 inhibitor, BEL, and then processed for immunofluorescence to localize TfRs (right panels). A and B, cells pulse-labeled for 45 min. C and D, cells pulse-labeled and then chased in Tf-free medium for 60 min. E and F, cells pulse-labeled and chased in the presence of 10 µM BEL for 60 min. G and H, cells pulse-labeled and chased in the presence of 1 µM BEL for 60 min.

Previous studies have established that following endocytosis, Tf-TfR complexes move sequentially through peripherally located early sorting endosomes, then to a centrally located tubular recycling endocytic compartment, and finally back to the cell surface for release into the medium (for a review see Ref. 2). Thus, our above results suggest that 10 µM BEL may block trafficking of Tf-TfR out of peripheral early endosomes and that 1 µM BEL allows transport to, but not out of, centrally located recycling endosomes. To examine this issue further, we took advantage of the fact that ONO-RS-082 is a reversible inhibitor of Ca2+-independent PLA2 enzymes (53) and displayed the same concentration-dependent inhibition of Tf recycling as BEL (data not shown). As with BEL, when cells were pulse-labeled with FITC-Tf and then chased in medium without FITC-Tf but with high (10 µM) concentrations of ONO-RS-082, FITC-Tf remained located along with TfRs in vesicles throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 3, A and B). When similarly treated cells were then washed free of ONO-RS-082 and incubated for an additional 15 min, both FITC-Tf and TfR moved to the centrally located endocytic compartment (Fig. 3, C and D). This central compartment was indeed the recycling compartment, because incubation in ONO-RS-082-free medium for an additional 45 min (60 min total) resulted in a significant loss of FITC-Tf from the cells (Fig. 3, E and F). Finally, the TfRs that recycled to the cell surface following recovery from ONO-RS-082 were competent to re-endocytose another round of FITC-Tf added to the medium (Fig. 3, G and H).


View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   PLA2 antagonists inhibit sequential steps in the recycling of FITC-Tf and TfR through early (sorting) and late (recycling) endocytic compartments. In all experiments, HeLa cells were incubated with FITC-Tf for 45 min at 37 °C to label all endocytic compartments (left panels), subjected to various chase protocols in the presence or absence of the reversible PLA2 inhibitor, ONO-RS-082 (ONO), and then processed for immunofluorescence to localize TfRs (right panels). A and B, cells pulse-labeled and chased in the presence of 10 µM ONO-RS-082 for 60 min. C and D, cells treated as in A and then washed and incubated in ONO-free medium for 15 min. E and F, cells treated as in A and then washed and incubated in ONO-free medium for 60 min. G and H, cells treated as in A, washed and incubated in ONO-free medium for 60 min, and then pulse-labeled with FITC-Tf for 45 min.

Although our results are consistent with a concentration-dependent block at two stages of the Tf/TfR recycling pathway, the PLA2 antagonists might also be causing a mistargeting of receptor-ligand complexes to or from other compartments. For example, the compact juxtanuclear compartment in which FITC-Tf and TfRs accumulate in cells treated with 1 µM ONO-RS-082, might instead be elements of the TGN, given the close association between central recycling endosomes and the TGN (2). To investigate this further, cells were incubated with FTIC-Tf for 45 min in the presence of 1 µM ONO-RS-082 and then chased in ligand-free medium for an additional 30 min in the presence of ONO-RS-082. Cells were fixed; processed for immunofluorescence to localize beta 1,4-galactosyltransferase, an enzyme found in both trans-Golgi cisternae and the TGN of HeLa cells (54, 55); and then visualized by confocal microscopy. The results from both individual and merged images show that FITC-Tf and galactosyltransferase labeled separate compartments (Fig. 4).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   FITC-Tf endocytosed in the presence of 1 µM ONO-RS-082 accumulates in a compartment that is distinct from the TGN. HeLa cells were incubated with FITC-Tf for 45 min in the presence of 1 µM ONO-RS-082 and then chased in ligand-free medium for an additional 30 min in the presence of ONO-RS-082. Cells were then fixed, processed for immunofluorescence to localize beta 1,4-galactosyltransferase (using rhodamine-labeled secondary antibodies), and visualized by confocal microscopy. A, merged image of FITC-Tf (green) and galactosyltransferase (red); B, single image of FITC-Tf; C, single image of galactosyltransferase.

Another possible explanation for the accumulation of FITC-Tf and TfR within the central juxtanuclear compartment (when treated with 1 µM BEL or ONO-RS-082) is that peripheral sorting endosomes redistribute to the center of the cell, rather than receptor-ligand complexes exiting the peripheral sorting endosomes. To distinguish between these possibilities, cells were pulse-labeled with Rhod-Tf for 60 min, chased in ligand-free medium for 15 min, and then incubated with a second pulse-chase of FITC-Tf (as for Rhod-Tf), all in the presence of 1 µM ONO-RS-082. The results showed that there was significant overlap in staining of the two endocytic markers within vesicles of the central compartment (Fig. 5). Because FITC-Tf was ultimately delivered to Rhod-Tf-containing endosomes, we conclude that 1 µM ONO-RS-082 did not affect the function or distribution of early sorting endosomes, through which FITC-Tf must have entered and exited on its way to the central sorting endosomes.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   The centrally located endosomes that accumulate Tf in the presence of 1 µM ONO-RS-082 are capable of receiving another round of endocytic cargo. HeLa cells were pulse-labeled with Rhod-Tf for 60 min, rinsed in ice-cold MEM (without Rhod-Tf), and incubated in MEM containing 1 µM ONO-RS-082 for 5 min on ice. Cells were then incubated in ligand-free medium with 1 µM ONO-RS-082 for 15 min at 37 °C and then with a second pulse-chase of FITC-Tf for 60 min followed by a 15-min chase in ligand-free medium, all in the presence of 1 µM ONO-RS-082. The colocalization of both Rhod-Tf (A) and FITC-Tf (B) within centrally located vesicles of a single cell is indicated by the arrows.

One possible mechanism by which PLA2 antagonists might alter the trafficking of Tf-TfR is by changing the pH of acidified endosomal compartments. However, we found no difference in the ability of control or treated (10 µM ONO-RS-082 for 30 min at 37 °C) cells to take up the pH-sensitive dye acridine orange into endosomal and lysosomal compartment (data not shown).

PLA2 Antagonists Inhibit BFA-stimulated Endosome Tubule Formation-- Trafficking from the central recycling compartment has been proposed to involve the formation of thin membrane tubules, whose presence is enhanced by BFA. Because we have previously shown that BFA-induced Golgi tubulation was inhibited by PLA2 antagonists, we asked if BFA-stimulated tubulation of endosomes was similarly affected. Cells were first incubated with FITC-Tf for 45 min to label all endocytic compartments and then treated with BFA in the presence or absence of BEL. In both untreated cells and cells treated with BEL alone (10 µM for 20 min), FITC-Tf and TfR were primarily located in punctate vesicles throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 6, A-D). Treatment of cells with BFA alone for 15 min resulted in the extensive formation of membrane tubules that were labeled with both FITC-Tf and TfR (Fig. 6, E and F). However, pretreatment of cells for just 5 min with BEL (10 µM) before a 15-min incubation in BFA significantly inhibited endosome tubule formation (Fig. 6, G and H). This inhibition was confirmed at the EM level in cells that had been incubated with soluble HRP to identify endosomes. In control cells, HRP-labeled endosomes were generally spherical, ~200-400 nm in diameter (Fig. 7A). Incubation of cells with BFA for 10 min resulted in the formation of numerous tubular endosomes, ~50-70 nm in diameter and up to several µm in length (Fig. 7B). Pretreatment of cells with ONO-RS-082 for 5 min inhibited this BFA-stimulated tubulation (Fig. 7C).


View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   PLA2 antagonists inhibit BFA-stimulated endosome tubulation. In all experiments, HeLa cells were incubated with FITC-Tf for 45 min at 37 °C for label endocytic compartments (left panels), subsequently incubated in the presence or absence of BFA and/or BEL, and processed for immunofluorescence of TfRs (right panels). A and B, control cells; C and D, cells subsequently treated with BEL alone (10 µM) for 20 min; E and F, cells subsequently treated with BFA (10 µg/ml) for 15 min; G and H, cells subsequently treated with BEL (10 µM) and BFA (10 µg/ml) for 15 min.


View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Electron microscopic observations of PLA2 inhibitor effect on BFA-stimulated endosome tubulation. Clone 9 cells were incubated with soluble HRP for 45 min at 37 °C to label endosomes, washed, and then incubated in control medium for 15 min (A), BFA (10 µg/ml) for 10 min at 37 °C (B), or ONO-RS-082 (25 µM) for 5 min followed by BFA plus ONO-RS-082 for 10 min (C). Cells were then fixed and processed for DAB cytochemistry and electron microscopy. In control cells (A), HRP-labeled endosomes (endo with short arrows) are primarily spherical, 200-300-nm diameter organelles. Treatment with BFA (B) results in the formation of numerous tubular endosomes, 50-70 nm in diameter and up to several µm in length (endo with long arrows). Treatment with ONO-RS-082 (C) inhibited the formation of BFA-induced endosomal tubules. n, nucleus; bars, 1 µm.

A broad spectrum of PLA2 antagonists were tested for their ability to inhibit BFA-stimulated tubulation in cells whose endosomes were labeled by prior uptake with FITC-Tf and subsequently by immunofluorescence localization of the TfR. We found that all PLA2 antagonists tested were highly active inhibitors of BFA-stimulated tubulation, with IC50 values in the low micromolar range (Table I).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
PLA2 antagonists inhibit BFA-stimulated endosome tubulation in vivo
IC50, the concentration at which 50% of cells were inhibited from exhibiting BFA-induced tubulation of TfR-positive endosomes. The indicated numbers were obtained from visual inspection of dose-response curves for each inhibitor. ACA, N-(p-amylcinnamoyl)anthranilic acid.

To more directly examine the ability of low concentrations of PLA2 antagonists to inhibit tubulation of the recycling compartment, cells were incubated with FITC-Tf in the continuous presence of 1 µM ONO-RS-082 for 45 min. In these cells, FITC-Tf was primarily located in the central recycling compartment (Fig. 2, G and H). Similarly treated cells were then either kept in 1 µM ONO-RS-082 or washed free of the antagonist, BFA was immediately added, and the cells were further incubated for various periods of time (Fig. 8). In cells washed free of ONO-RS-082, BFA stimulated tubule formation within 5 min until, by 15 min, ~57% of the cells exhibited tubules emanating from the central recycling compartment. In contrast, cells kept in 1 µM ONO-RS-082 did not exhibit BFA-stimulated tubulation.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Low concentrations of PLA2 antagonists inhibit tubulation of membrane in the central recycling compartment. HeLa cells were incubated with FITC-Tf in the continuous presence of 1 µM ONO-RS-082 for 45 min at 37 °C and then 1) rapidly washed free of the antagonist and subsequently incubated in BFA (5 µg/ml) for various periods of time at 37 °C or 2) incubated in BFA in the continuous presence of 1 µM ONO-RS-082 for various periods of time at 37 °C. Cells were then fixed and viewed by fluorescence microscopy. % Tubulation represents the percentage of total cells with tubules emanating from the central recycling compartment (mean plus 1 S.D. from four independent samples).

Formation of Endosome Tubules in Vitro-- To complement these in vivo studies, we have developed a cell-free system that reconstitutes tubule formation from isolated endosomes. Endosomes were unambiguously identified in subcellular fractions by first incubating cultured clone 9 hepatocytes with Au12-BSA gold particles for 15 min at 37 °C, to allow fluid phase particle uptake into early and late endosomes prior to cell homogenization (39). Cells were then homogenized, an endosome-enriched fraction was obtained, and endosomes containing Au12-BSA were visualized by EM-negative staining (arrowheads in Fig. 9).


View larger version (182K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Morphological observations of endosome tubules in vivo and in vitro. A-C, rat clone 9 hepatocytes were incubated with HRP (15 min at 37 °C) and processed for DAB cytochemistry and thin section EM. HRP-labeled endosomes display membrane tubules, 50-60 nm in diameter and varying lengths. D-H, endosomes isolated from clone 9 cells that had been allowed to endocytose Au12-BSA particles were prepared and visualized by electron microscopy negative staining. Endosomes were identified by the presence of endocytosed Au12-BSA particles (arrowheads in all panels). Due to the sparse surface density of endosomes on the electron microscopy grids, representative endosomes from various experimental conditions are shown. Endosomes incubated in the presence of bovine brain cytosol alone (D) or BSA plus ATP and GTP (E) were primarily vesicular or vacuolar with few tubular extensions. Incubation of endosomes with bovine brain cytosol plus ATP, however, resulted in the formation of multiple, short tubules (F) or few long tubules (G and H). In F, an endosome with tubules of varying lengths is shown (arrows), and all have the same morphology; as tubules protrude from the vacuolar membrane, they taper into a narrow shaft, 50-70 nm in diameter, and terminate in a bulbous end. The tubules maintain this morphology after reaching lengths of >0.5 µm, which is similar to that of tubules seen in vivo (A-C). Standard incubation conditions were 30 min at 37 °C. Bars, 0.25 µm.

Endosomes incubated with an organelle-free extract of bovine brain cytosol (BBC) alone (Fig. 9D), or BSA plus ATP (0.1 mM) (Fig. 9E), at 37 °C for 30 min were primarily round vesicles and vacuoles, 0.25-1.5 µm in diameter (average of 0.45 µm; 50 random measurements), and they rarely exhibited tubular extensions. In contrast, incubation with BBC (1.5 mg/ml) and ATP (0.1 mM) induced the dramatic formation of extensive membrane tubules (Fig. 9, F-H). These tubules were generally uniform in diameter (average of 53 nm; 32 random measurements), reached lengths up to 3.4 µm (average of 0.61 µm; 54 tubules measured), and the lipid bilayers of the tubules were continuous with the bilayers of the main body of the endosomes. Endosomes exhibited one or multiple tubules (Fig. 9, F and H), which were morphologically similar to those seen extending from endosomes in vivo (Fig. 9, A-C) (in the latter case, endosomes that had been labeled by endocytic uptake of soluble HRP). Also, endosomes fixed with glutaraldehyde after incubation but before negative staining also exhibited a strict dependence on cytosol for tubulation (data not shown).

Quantitation of these results showed that incubation with BBC or ATP (0.1 mM) alone had little effect but that incubation with both resulted in a 5-10-fold increase in the percentage of endosomes with at least one tubule (Fig. 10A). In these experiments, ~50-75% of the endosomes were induced to form at least one tubule. Heating cytosol to 100 °C for 30 min before assaying greatly reduced the level of tubulation activity (Fig. 10A), and incubation with BBC and GTP or GTPgamma S (0.1 mM) did not support tubulation (data not shown). Also, because the tubulation mixture contained EDTA (0.5 mM), and the addition of excess Ca2+ had no effect on tubulation (data not shown), we conclude that Ca2+ is not required for this activity. A time course of tubulation using the complete mixture of BBC (1.5 mg/ml) and ATP (0.1 mM) at 37 °C showed that tubulation was fairly rapid, with a t = 4 min (Fig. 10B). In addition, a cytosol concentration curve determined that tubulation was a saturable process at ~1.5 mg/ml, with half-maximal activity at 0.15 mg/ml (Fig. 10C).


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Quantitation of in vitro endosome tubule formation. A, isolated endosomes, loaded by prior uptake with Au12-BSA, were incubated under various conditions as indicated for 30 min at 37 °C and then visualized by electron microscopy negative staining. The concentrations of the various reagents present in the incubations were as follows: 1.5 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA), 1.5 mg/ml bovine brain cytosol (BBC), 0.1 mM ATP. Heated refers to BBC that was heated to 100 °C for 30 min before assaying. B, time course of endosome tubulation in vitro. Endosomes were incubated in the presence of bovine brain cytosol (1.5 mg/ml) and ATP (0.1 mM) for various times at 37 °C. Endosome tubulation was fairly rapid, with t = 4 min under these conditions. C, cytosol concentration dependence of endosome tubulation in vitro. Endosomes were incubated with varying concentrations of bovine brain cytosol in the presence of ATP (0.1 mM) for 30 min at 37 °C. D, characterization of tubulation activity in bovine brain cytosol. Isolated endosomes were incubated under various conditions as indicated, in the presence of ATP (0.1 mM) for 30 min at 37 °C. Crude refers to the organelle free extract resulting after bovine brains were homogenized and centrifuged at high speed. BBC, our standard cytosol preparation of material present after precipitation with 60% ammonium sulfate followed by extensive dialysis in dialysis buffer. The concentrations of various reagents present in the incubations were as follows: 1.5 mg/ml crude cytosol or BBC, 0.1 mM ATP, 10 µg/ml BFA, 1 mM N-ethylmaleimide (NEM). The percentage of tubulation on the y axis is the percentage of gold-loaded endosomes with tubular extensions (determined as described under "Experimental Procedures"). Error bars, 1 S.D. determined from at least three independent experiments.

The tubulation activity could be followed through the steps used to prepare the BBC fraction from crude cytosol and characterized following various treatments (Fig. 10D). The tubulation activity in BBC was found to be insensitive to a number of agents including N-ethylmaleimide, N-ethylmaleimide in the presence of dithiothreitol, or nocodazole, a compound the depolymerizes microtubules (data not shown). Also, treating endosomes with BFA (10 µg/ml) alone or with BBC seemed to have little effect on the tubulation activity. Finally, this tubulation activity appeared not be a general perturbant of membrane structure because the active BBC preparation used in these experiments had no effect on isolated lysosomes.2

To investigate the origin of the membrane that forms tubules, we determined the average diameter of the main bodies of randomly selected nontubulated (50 selected) and tubulated (25 selected) endosomes. These measurements revealed that tubulated endosomes have, on average, a smaller diameter across their vacuolar body (0.31 µm) than their nontubulated counterparts (0.45 µm). The decrease in body diameter is consistent with the idea that the membrane for tubules originates from the main body of the endosomes. In tubulated endosomes, Au12-BSA particles were most commonly found in the tubular extensions (Fig. 9, F-H), suggesting some weak interaction with the membrane. However, with regard to tubulation, this interaction is irrelevant, since endosome tubules formed without any gold particles being present within the lumen of the tubule (Fig. 9F).

PLA2 Antagonists Inhibit in Vitro Endosome Tubulation-- Cytosol-dependent endosome tubulation was also examined for sensitivity to PLA2 antagonists and to see if it was active on endosomes from another source. For these experiments, endosomes were prepared from RAW 264.7 macrophages, and BBC was incubated with a PLA2 antagonist before the addition to isolated endosomes. The results showed that the structurally distinct compounds BEL and ONO-RS-082 significantly inhibited cytosol-dependent endosome tubulation in vitro even at 1 µM (Fig. 11), concentrations similar to those that inhibited endosome tubulation and receptor recycling in vivo. In other studies, we have found that this BBC preparation contains both BEL- and ONO-RS-082-sensitive and -insensitive PLA2 activities (43, 44). As with the Golgi complex (45), we found that a nonspecific PLA2, snake venom PLA2, did not increase endosome tubulation above background levels. Quantitatively similar inhibition by PLA2 antagonists was obtained using endosomes from clone 9 hepatocytes (data not shown).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11.   PLA2 antagonists inhibit endosome tubulation in vitro. The effects of various PLA2 antagonists were examined in the standard in vitro tubulation assay using endosomes from RAW 264.7 macrophages. ONO, ONO-RS-082; svPLA2, snake venom PLA2. The concentrations of antagonists (in µM) are shown next to each antagonist. Results are expressed as the percentage of control (the level achieved with BBC alone) and represent the mean plus 1 S.D. from four samples.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

This paper provides evidence for the role of a cytoplasmic Ca2+-independent PLA2 in the recycling of Tf-TfR from endosomal compartments to the cell surface and the formation of endosome tubules both in vivo and in vitro. These results are similar to those of recent studies that demonstrated a nearly identical sensitivity of Golgi membrane tubulation and retrograde trafficking to PLA2 antagonists (43, 45, 46). The fact that a broad spectrum of PLA2 antagonists were found to inhibit trafficking events, suspected or known to involve membrane tubules, from both endosomes and the Golgi complex, suggests that a cytoplasmic PLA2 activity plays a general role in tubule formation from organellar membranes.

We found that higher concentrations of PLA2 antagonists (~10 µM) inhibited trafficking from peripheral sorting endosomes to central recycling endosomes, and lower concentrations (1 µM) inhibited trafficking from central recycling endosomes to the cell surface. At either concentration, it appeared that transport out of an endocytic compartment rather than fusion with a target was the inhibited step. Although not shown directly, several lines of evidence support this idea. First, uptake and trafficking of endocytic tracers in the presence of low or high concentrations of BEL did not appear to result in the accumulation of small transport vesicles or tubules. Second, at the concentrations of inhibitors used here or in previous studies on trafficking through the Golgi complex, no acute effect on any known coated vesicle-mediated transport step was found, including endocytosis from the cell surface and anterograde trafficking through the secretory pathway (43). Third, BFA-stimulated tubulation of Tf-TfR-enriched endosomes was also potently inhibited within the same concentration range for all PLA2 antagonists examined. And, fourth, cytosol-dependent endosome tubulation in the cell-free system was also potently inhibited by the same PLA2 antagonists.

The conclusion that PLA2 antagonists inhibit the tubule-mediated exit of Tf-TfRs from both early sorting and late recycling endosomes is also consistent with our current understanding of the Tf-TfR recycling pathway (1, 2). For example, morphological studies have shown that after endocytosis from the cell surface, Tf-TfR complexes enter an early sorting endosome compartment located in the periphery of the cell. The complexes segregate into tubular extensions and are then packaged into vesicles and/or tubules that relocate to the central recycling compartment (9, 17, 56). Based on various pulse-chase experiments, Maxfield and colleagues (17, 18, 57) have suggested that sorting within this compartment occurs by iterative fractionation, yielding multiple rounds of tubule and vesicle formation and fusion. By mechanisms that are not fully understood, these tubulo-vesicular membranes, enriched in Tf-TfR, form an extensively interconnected tubular recycling compartment (58-62), from which Tf-TfRs recycle back to the plasma membrane. Interestingly, BFA, which enhances endosome tubule formation (36, 37, 39, 40), has been reported to increase the number of various receptors, including TfRs, on the cell surface (39, 42, 63), perhaps as a consequence of stimulating tubule-mediated recycling. Thus, the observation that PLA2 antagonists inhibit Tf-TfR trafficking from sorting and recycling endosomes is consistent with the idea that membrane tubules play an important role in mediating these steps.

A role for PLA2 in endosome-to-endosome fusion has also been suggested based on a similar pharmacological approach (64). However, the concentration of PLA2 antagonists required to inhibit endosome fusion either in vivo or in vitro was ~10-50-fold higher than that for inhibition of Tf-TfR recycling or endosome tubulation. Thus, at the concentrations used here, membrane fusion would not have been severely affected, a conclusion that is supported by finding that delivery of Tf to endosomal vesicles/vacuoles was not inhibited. These studies do, however, raise the interesting possibility that PLA2-dependent tubulation could be linked to a PLA2-dependent fusion event.

The cell-free system that reconstitutes endosome tubulation in vitro is an important adjunct to in vivo tubulation assays. The endosome tubules produced in vitro were uniform in diameter, 50-70 nm, matching their in vivo counterparts (3, 4, 6-8, 12, 18, 65, 66), and they often possessed flared or bulbous tips (see Fig. 7), which were also observed on endosome tubules in vivo (11). Interestingly, the requirements for endosome tubulation in vitro were nearly identical to those for Golgi membrane tubulation (51, 52), including 1) dependence on a heat-labile, nondialyzable protein factor found in cytosol preparations; 2) the lack of requirement for Ca2+; and 3) sensitivity to the same spectrum of PLA2 inhibitors (44).

Although our in vivo and in vitro results suggest that cytoplasmic PLA2 activity functions as a general tubulation factor, this activity was not found to induce tubulation of lysosomes, despite the well documented ability of lysosomes to become tubular in certain cells (67). However, tubular lysosomes are larger in diameter than endosome or Golgi tubules and may rely solely on microtubules for their formation (68, 69). Thus, tubulation by a cytoplasmic PLA2 may involve specific interactions with a subset of organelles on the cytoplasmic sides of their membranes.

In addition to PLA2-mediated mechanisms, intracellular membrane tubules could also form in other ways. For example, several recent studies have shown that the clathrin-coated vesicle-associated GTPase, dynamin, can be induced to assemble onto membranes and form tubules under conditions where the GTPase activity is inhibited (70-73). It is important to note, however, that the tubules in our cytosol-dependent, PLA2 inhibitor-sensitive in vitro assay were not affected by either GTP or GTPgamma S and did not appear to be coated by spirals of dynamin polymers. Therefore, the two mechanisms appear to be quite different.

Taken together, these results suggest that a cytoplasmic PLA2 activity is required for tubulation and membrane trafficking from multiple organelles, including endosome tubule formation and Tf-TfR recycling. One caveat is that we cannot definitively rule out that a phospholipase A1, lysophospholipase, or other lipase activity is responsible, because some of the tested antagonists have been shown to inhibit these activities as well (74, 75). However, our conclusion is strengthened by finding that structurally unrelated compounds (BEL, ONO-RS-082, quinacrine, etc.) all have in common the ability to inhibit PLA2 activity. BEL is particularly interesting, because it displays ~1000-fold more specificity for a cytoplasmic Ca2+-independent versus Ca2+-dependent PLA2 (74, 75), and because our in vitro tubulation activity does not require Ca2+, a Ca2+-independent PLA2 may be the relevant enzyme. A variety of Ca2+-independent, cytoplasmic PLA2 forms, with no definitive known function, have been characterized to varying degrees (76-79), and others are likely to be discovered. One of the most striking findings is that in tubulation, both endosomes and Golgi membranes display virtually identical sensitivities to PLA2 antagonists. Thus, these results suggest similar mechanisms of tubule formation on these organelles and a novel role for a cytoplasmic Ca2+-independent PLA2 in tubule-mediated intracellular trafficking.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Esther Racoosin for critically reviewing the manuscript and Dr. Ed Cluett for many helpful and important suggestions early in this work. We also thank Dr. Ian Trowbridge for generously supplying anti-TfR antibodies used early in this work.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM 60373 (to W. J. B.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 607-255-2444; Fax: 607-255-2428; E-mail: wjb5@cornell.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 3, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108508200

2 A. van Vante and W. J. Brown, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: Tf, transferrin; TfR, transferrin receptor; BBC, bovine brain cytosol; BSA, bovine serum albumin; Au12-BSA, 12-nm colloidal gold particles conjugated with BSA; BEL, bromoenol lactone (or (E)-6-(bromomethylene)tetrahydro-3-(1-naphthalenyl)-2H-pyran-2-one); ONO-RS-082, 2-(p-amylcinnamoyl)amino-4-cholorbenzoic acid; PLA2, phospholipase A2; FITC-Tf, fluorescein-labeled transferrin; Rhod-Tf, rhodamine-labeled transferrin; TGN, trans-Golgi network; BFA, brefeldin A; MEM, modified Eagle's medium; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; AMP-PNP, adenosine 5'-(beta ,gamma -imino)triphosphate; GTPgamma S, guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Mellman, I. (1996) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 12, 575-625[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Mukherjee, S., Ghosh, R. N., and Maxfield, F. R. (1997) Physiol. Rev. 77, 759-803[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Geuze, H. J., Slot, J. W., Strous, G. J. A. M., Lodish, H., and Schwartz, A. L. (1983) Cell 32, 277-287[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Bretscher, M. S., and Thomson, J. N. (1985) Eur. J. Cell Biol. 37, 78-80[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Wall, D. A., and Hubbard, A. L. (1985) J. Cell Biol. 101, 2104-2112[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Marsh, M., Griffiths, G., Dean, G. E., Mellman, I., and Helenius, A. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 2899-2903[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Geuze, H. J., Slot, J. W., and Schwartz, A. L. (1987) J. Cell Biol. 104, 1715-1723[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Stoorvogel, W., Geuze, H. J., and Strous, G. J. (1987) J. Cell Biol. 104, 1261-1268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Griffiths, G., Back, R., and Marsh, M. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 109, 2703-2720[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Hopkins, C. R., Gibson, A., Shipman, M., and Miller, K. (1990) Nature 346, 335-339[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Tooze, J., and Hollinshead, M. (1991) J. Cell Biol. 115, 635-653[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Klumperman, J., Hille, A., Veenendaal, T., Oorschot, V., Stoorvogel, W., Vonfigura, K., and Geuze, H. J. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 121, 997-1010[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Apodaca, G., Enrich, C., and Mostov, K. E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 19005-19013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Odorizzi, G., Pearse, A., Domingo, D., Trowbridge, I. S., and Hopkins, C. R. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 135, 139-152[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Futter, C. E., Gibson, A., Allchin, E. H., Maxwell, S., Ruddock, L. J., Odorizzi, G., Domingo, D., Trowbridge, I. S., and Hopkins, C. R. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 141, 611-623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Gibson, A., Futter, C. E., Maxwell, S., Allchin, E. H., Shipman, M., Kraehenbuhl, J. P., Domingo, D., Odorizzi, G., Trowbridge, I. S., and Hopkins, C. R. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 143, 81-94[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Dunn, K. W., McGraw, T. E., and Maxfield, F. R. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 109, 3303-3314[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Mayor, S., Presley, J. F., and Maxfield, F. R. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 121, 1257-1269[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Rome, L. (1985) Trends Biochem. Sci. 10, 151
20. Linderman, J. J., and Lauffenburger, D. A. (1988) J. Theor. Biol. 132, 203-245[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Faundez, V., Horng, J. T., and Kelly, R. B. (1998) Cell 93, 423-432[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Seaman, M. N., McCaffery, J. M., and Emr, S. D. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 142, 665-681[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Whitney, J. A., Gomez, M., Sheff, D., Kreis, T. E., and Mellman, I. (1995) Cell 83, 703-713[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Aniento, F., Gu, F., Parton, R. G., and Gruenberg, J. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 133, 29-41[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Stoorvogel, W., Oorschot, V., and Geuze, H. J. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 132, 21-33[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Takei, K., Mundigl, O., Daniell, L., and De Camilli, P. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 133, 1237-1250[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Traub, L. M., Bannykh, S. I., Rodel, J. E., Aridor, M., Balch, W. E., and Kornfeld, S. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 135, 1801-1814[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Daro, E., Sheff, D., Gomez, M., Kreis, T., and Mellman, I. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 139, 1747-1759[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Zhang, C. J., Rosenwald, A. G., Willingham, M. C., Skuntz, S., Clark, J., and Kahn, R. A. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 124, 289-300[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. D'Souza-Schorey, C., Li, G., Colombo, M. I., and Stahl, P. D. (1995) Science 267, 1175-1178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Peters, P. J., Hsu, V. W., Ooi, C. E., Finazzi, D., Teal, S. B., Oorschot, V., Donaldson, J. G., and Klausner, R. D. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 128, 1003-1017[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Radhakrishna, H., and Donaldson, J. G. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 139, 49-61[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. D'Souza-Schorey, C., van Donselaar, E., Hsu, V. W., Yang, C., Stahl, P. D., and Peters, P. J. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 140, 603-616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Gaynor, E. C., Chen, C. Y., Emr, S. D., and Graham, T. R. (1998) Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 653-670[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Klausner, R. D., Donaldson, J. G., and Lippincott-Schwartz, J. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 116, 1071-1080[Free Full Text]
36. Hunziker, W., Whitney, J. A., and Mellman, I. (1991) Cell 67, 617-627[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Lippincott-Schwartz, J., Yuan, L., Tipper, C., Amherdt, M., Orci, L., and Klausner, R. D. (1991) Cell 67, 601-616[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Lippincott-Schwartz, J., Donaldson, J. G., Schweizer, A., Berger, E. G., Hauri, H. P., Yuan, L. C., and Klausner, R. D. (1990) Cell 60, 821-836[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Wood, S. A., Park, J. E., and Brown, W. J. (1991) Cell 67, 591-600[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Tooze, J., and Hollinshead, M. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 118, 813-830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Wood, S. A., and Brown, W. J. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 119, 273-285[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Damke, H., Klumperman, J., von Figura, K., and Braulke, T. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 24829-24833[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. de Figueiredo, P., Drecktrah, D., Katzenellenbogen, J. A., Strang, M., and Brown, W. J. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 8642-8647[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. de Figueiredo, P., Polizotto, R. S., Drecktrah, D., and Brown, W. J. (1999) Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 1763-1782[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Polizotto, R. S., de Figueiredo, P., and Brown, W. J. (1999) J. Cell. Biochem. 74, 670-683[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. de Figueiredo, P., Drecktrah, D., Polizotto, R. S., Cole, N. B., Lippincott-Schwartz, J., and Brown, W. J. (2000) Traffic 1, 504-511[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. de Figueiredo, P., and Brown, W. J. (1995) Mol. Biol. Cell 6, 871-887[Abstract]
48. McGraw, T. E., and Subtil, A. (1999) in Current Protocols in Cell Biology (Bonifacino, J. S. , Dasso, M. , Harford, J. B. , Lippincott-Schwartz, J. , and Yamada, K. M., eds), Vol. 1 , pp. 15.13.11-15.13.23, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
49. Handley, D. A. (1989) in Colloidal Gold: Principles, Methods, and Applications (Hayat, M. A., ed) , pp. 13-32, Academic Press, Inc., New York
50. Balch, W. E., and Rothman, J. E. (1985) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 240, 413-425[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Banta, M., Polizotto, R. S., Wood, S. A., de Figueiredo, P., and Brown, W. J. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 13359-13366[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Cluett, E. B., Wood, S. A., Banta, M., and Brown, W. J. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 120, 15-24[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Banga, H. S., Simons, E. R., Brass, L. F., and Rittenhouse, S. E. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 9197-9201[Abstract/Free Full Text]
54. Roth, J., Taatjes, D. J., Lucocq, J. M., Weinstein, J., and Paulson, J. C. (1985) Cell 43, 287-295[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. Nilsson, T., Pypaert, M., Hoe, M. H., Slusarewicz, P., Berger, E. G., and Warren, G. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 120, 5-13[Abstract/Free Full Text]
56. Yamashiro, D. J., Tycko, B., Fluss, S. R., and Maxfield, F. R. (1984) Cell 37, 789-800[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Gruenberg, J., and Maxfield, F. R. (1995) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7, 552-563[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
58. Hopkins, C. R. (1983) Cell 35, 321-330[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
59. Hopkins, C. R., and Trowbridge, I. S. (1983) J. Cell Biol. 97, 508-521[Abstract/Free Full Text]
60. Killisch, I., Steinlein, P., Romisch, K., Hollinshead, R., Beug, H., and Griffiths, G. (1992) J. Cell Sci. 103, 211-232[Abstract/Free Full Text]
61. Hopkins, C. R., Gibson, A., Shipman, M., Strickland, D. K., and Trowbridge, I. S. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 125, 1265-1274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
62. Marsh, E. W., Leopold, P. L., Jones, N. L., and Maxfield, F. R. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 129, 1509-1522[Abstract/Free Full Text]
63. Wan, J., Taub, M. E., Shah, D., and Shen, W. C. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 13446-13450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
64. Mayorga, L. S., Colombo, M. I., Lennartz, M., Brown, E. J., Rahman, K. H., Weiss, R., Lennon, P. J., and Stahl, P. D. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 10255-10259[Abstract/Free Full Text]
65. Willingham, M. C., Hanover, J. A., Dickson, R. B., and Pastan, I. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 175-179[Abstract/Free Full Text]
66. Geuze, H. J., Stoorvogel, W., Strous, G. J., Slot, J. W., Bleekemolen, J. E., and Mellman, I. (1988) J. Cell Biol. 107, 2491-2501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
67. Swanson, J., Bushnell, A., and Silverstein, S. C. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 1921-1925[Abstract/Free Full Text]
68. Hollenbeck, P. J., and Swanson, J. A. (1990) Nature 346, 864-866[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
69. Swanson, J. A., Locke, A., Ansel, P., and Hollenbeck, P. J. (1992) J. Cell Sci. 103, 201-209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
70. Hinshaw, J. E., and Schmid, S. L. (1995) Nature 374, 190-192[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
71. Takei, K., McPherson, P. S., Schmid, S. L., and De Camilli, P. (1995) Nature 374, 186-190[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
72. Sweitzer, S. M., and Hinshaw, J. E. (1998) Cell 93, 1021-1029[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
73. Takei, K., Haucke, V., Slepnev, V., Farsad, K., Salazar, M., Chen, H., and De Camilli, P. (1998) Cell 94, 131-141[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
74. Mukherjee, A. B., Miele, L., and Pattabiraman, N. (1994) Biochem. Pharmacol. 48, 1-10[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
75. Gelb, M. H., Jain, M. K., and Berg, O. G. (1994) FASEB J. 8, 916-924[Abstract]
76. Balboa, M. A., Balsinde, J., Jones, S. S., and Dennis, E. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 8576-8580[Abstract/Free Full Text]
77. Dennis, E. A. (1997) Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 1-2[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
78. Tang, J., Kriz, R. W., Wolfman, N., Shaffer, M., Seehra, J., and Jones, S. S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 8567-8575[Abstract/Free Full Text]
79. Underwood, K. W., Song, C., Kriz, R. W., Chang, X. J., Knopf, J. L., and Lin, L. L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 21926-21932[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Gubern, J. Casas, M. Barcelo-Torns, D. Barneda, X. de la Rosa, R. Masgrau, F. Picatoste, J. Balsinde, M. A. Balboa, and E. Claro
Group IVA Phospholipase A2 Is Necessary for the Biogenesis of Lipid Droplets
J. Biol. Chem., October 10, 2008; 283(41): 27369 - 27382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Ghosh, R. Loper, M. H. Gelb, and C. C. Leslie
Identification of the Expressed Form of Human Cytosolic Phospholipase A2beta (cPLA2beta): cPLA2beta3 IS A NOVEL VARIANT LOCALIZED TO MITOCHONDRIA AND EARLY ENDOSOMES
J. Biol. Chem., June 16, 2006; 281(24): 16615 - 16624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
K. Chambers, B. Judson, and W. J. Brown
A unique lysophospholipid acyltransferase (LPAT) antagonist, CI-976, affects secretory and endocytic membrane trafficking pathways
J. Cell Sci., July 15, 2005; 118(14): 3061 - 3071.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Shohdy, J. A. Efe, S. D. Emr, and H. A. Shuman
Pathogen effector protein screening in yeast identifies Legionella factors that interfere with membrane trafficking
PNAS, March 29, 2005; 102(13): 4866 - 4871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
T. A. Lagace and N. D. Ridgway
The Rate-limiting Enzyme in Phosphatidylcholine Synthesis Regulates Proliferation of the Nucleoplasmic Reticulum
Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2005; 16(3): 1120 - 1130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
A. Llado, F. Tebar, M. Calvo, J. Moreto, A. Sorkin, and C. Enrich
Protein KinaseC{delta}-Calmodulin Crosstalk Regulates Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Exit from Early Endosomes
Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2004; 15(11): 4877 - 4891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Bate, S. Reid, and A. Williams
Phospholipase A2 Inhibitors or Platelet-activating Factor Antagonists Prevent Prion Replication
J. Biol. Chem., August 27, 2004; 279(35): 36405 - 36411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
K. Hueffer, L. M. Palermo, and C. R. Parrish
Parvovirus Infection of Cells by Using Variants of the Feline Transferrin Receptor Altering Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis, Membrane Domain Localization, and Capsid-Binding Domains
J. Virol., June 1, 2004; 78(11): 5601 - 5611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
D. Chan, M. Strang, B. Judson, and W. J. Brown
Inhibition of Membrane Tubule Formation and Trafficking by Isotetrandrine, an Antagonist of G-protein-regulated Phospholipase A2 Enzymes
Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 2004; 15(4): 1871 - 1880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. D. Carattino, W. G. Hill, and T. R. Kleyman
Arachidonic Acid Regulates Surface Expression of Epithelial Sodium Channels
J. Biol. Chem., September 19, 2003; 278(38): 36202 - 36213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
D. Drecktrah, K. Chambers, E. L. Racoosin, E. B. Cluett, A. Gucwa, B. Jackson, and W. J. Brown
Inhibition of a Golgi Complex Lysophospholipid Acyltransferase Induces Membrane Tubule Formation and Retrograde Trafficking
Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2003; 14(8): 3459 - 3469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/50/47361    most recent
M108508200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Figueiredo, P.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Figueiredo, P.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, W. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement