|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M107494200 on September 27, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 50, 47434-47444, December 14, 2001
Phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-Trisphosphate Directs Association
of Src Homology 2-containing Signaling Proteins with
Gelsolin*
Meenakshi A.
Chellaiah §,
Rajat S.
Biswas ,
David
Yuen ,
Ulises M.
Alvarez¶, and
Keith A.
Hruska¶
From the Department of Oral and Craniofacial
Biological Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 and ¶ Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of
Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
Received for publication, August 6, 2001, and in revised form, September 24, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Podosomes are adhesion structures in osteoclasts
and are structurally related to focal adhesions mediating cell motility
during bone resorption. Here we show that gelsolin coprecipitates some of the focal adhesion-associated proteins such as c-Src,
phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), p130Cas, focal
adhesion kinase, integrin v 3, vinculin,
talin, and paxillin. These proteins were inducibly
tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to integrin activation by
osteopontin. Previous studies have defined unique biochemical
properties of gelsolin related to phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate in osteoclast podosomes, and here we demonstrate phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate/gelsolin function in mediating organization of the podosome signaling complex. Overlay and
GST pull-down assays demonstrated strong phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate-PI3K interactions based on the Src homology 2 domains of PI3K. Furthermore, lipid extraction of lysates from activated osteoclasts eliminated interaction between gelsolin, c-Src,
PI3K, and focal adhesion kinase despite equal amounts of gelsolin in
both the lipid-extracted and unextracted experiment. The cytoplasmic
protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP)-proline-glutamic acid-serine-threonine amino acid sequences (PEST) was also found to be associated with gelsolin in osteoclast podosomes and with stimulation of v 3-regulated
phosphorylation of PTP-PEST. We conclude that gelsolin plays a key role
in recruitment of signaling proteins to the plasma membrane
through phospholipid-protein interactions and by regulation of their
phosphorylation status through its association with PTP-PEST. Because
both gelsolin deficiency and PI3K inhibition impair bone resorption, we
conclude that phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate-based protein
interactions are critical for osteoclast function.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Osteoclasts are multinucleated giant cells with bone-resorbing
activity. As osteoclasts crawl over bone surfaces, they require rapid
attachment and release from the extracellular matrix. Adhesion structures called podosomes present in highly motile cells are also
found in osteoclasts. Osteoclasts are unique because they use the speed
of podosome assembly and disassembly to generate high rates of
motility. Podosome formation stabilizes the bone matrix-cell interface
and forms an isolated compartment between the ruffled border and the
bone surface (1, 2). Consistent with their function as adhesion sites,
podosomes contain many of the same proteins found in focal adhesions,
such as F-actin, vinculin, talin, gelsolin, fimbrin, and -actinin
(3-7).
We have shown previously that osteopontin
(OPN)1 binding to integrin
v 3 in osteoclasts stimulates
gelsolin-associated PI3K. This leads to increased levels of
gelsolin-associated polyphosphoinositides, such as phosphatidylinositol
4,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns 4,5-P2), phosphatidylinositol
3,4-bisphosphate, and phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate,
uncapping of actin barbed ends, and actin filament formation (8).
Moreover, OPN stimulates gelsolin-associated c-Src, leading to
increased gelsolin-associated PI3K activity (9). Elimination of
gelsolin resulted in osteoclasts devoid of podosomes and actin rings
but still capable of organization for bone resorption. These
osteoclasts failed to respond to OPN with stimulation of motility and
bone resorption (10). Also, these observations in
vitro suggest an important role for gelsolin in osteoclast-actin
dynamics in vivo. They also demonstrate the functional role
and significance of gelsolin as well as the associated signaling
molecules during OPN-induced osteoclast cytoskeletal organization.
However, the molecular mechanisms involved in the recruitment of
signaling molecules with gelsolin have not been elucidated.
Integrin activation following matrix-integrin binding results in an
increased tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK (11, 12). Activation of FAK
has been shown to induce its association with signal-transducing
molecules such as c-Src, PI3K, paxillin, and p130Cas
(13-20). Paxillin acts as a scaffolding adaptor protein in integrin signaling by binding to several other integrin assembly proteins including vinculin, integrin 1, FAK, and c-Src (21, 22). Binding of OPN- or RGD-containing peptides to
v 3 stimulated the formation of
signal-generating complexes consisting of FAK, c-Src, and PI3K
associated with v 3 (23) and gelsolin
(10). Integrin receptor engagement to the ligand or clustering of
integrin receptors on the surface leads to the formation of focal
adhesions. Because gelsolin deficiency blocks podosome assembly and
v 3-stimulated signaling related to
motility and bone resorption (10), we hypothesized that gelsolin may be
an adaptor protein that could influence actin reorganization by
recruiting the signaling proteins in the osteoclast podosome. Moreover,
integrin-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins may modulate the
protein-protein interactions between integrin and the downstream effectors.
A universal feature of the process of signal transduction and
transmission in eucaryotic cells is the transient but specific association between protein molecules. A large body of evidence supports the view that these interactions are mediated by distinct functional modules within these proteins (24, 25). Many of the proteins
involved in signal transduction contain recapitulations of polypeptide
segments called the Src homology (SH) domains: SH1, SH2, or SH3 (26,
27). SH2-containing proteins are often downstream targets of protein
tyrosine kinases (24, 28, 29) and SH3 domains, which bind polyproline
sequences (30-32). Another new class of functional domain is
pleckstrin homology domains. Pleckstrin homology domains have been
suggested to bind to inositol phosphates (27, 33). However, gelsolin
does not contain any of the domains mentioned above but does contain
actin and phosphoinositide-binding domains (34-39). Functions of
phosphoinositide-binding domains include targeting of proteins to sites
of signal transduction and/or direct regulation of protein activity by
phosphoinositide binding (40). Recent evidence suggests that the
biochemical and physical organization of lipid molecules in the plasma
membrane can affect integrin-mediated cellular functions (41-47). The
indirect effects of lipid molecules on integrin function are manifested mainly through cytoskeletal or signaling molecules. Cytoskeleton-lipid interactions are involved in mediating the linkage of the cytoskeleton with membrane bilayer and also in defining the membrane architecture in
specific areas (such as focal adhesions). Talin, vinculin, and
-actinin are among the main integrin-associated cytoskeletal molecules that bind to or are modulated by membrane lipids
(48-51).
An important insight into the role of phosphoinositides results from
the finding that PtdIns P3 associates directly with the SH2
domain of kinase and that PtdIns P3 also disrupts the
association of PI3K with tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins by binding to
the SH2 domains of the p85 subunit (52). PtdIns P3
displayed a discriminative affinity to 17-mer peptide, corresponding to
the protein kinase C phosphorylation and calmodulin-binding domain of a
brain-specific protein (53). In addition to protein kinase C
activation, PtdIns P3 provides an alternative mechanism for
regulating protein kinase C activity in vivo by recruiting
and concentrating its target proteins at the interface to facilitate
the subsequent protein kinase C phosphorylation (54). A by-product of
these studies has been the discovery that not only do SH2 and SH3
domains mediate interactions of proteins, but they may also bind to the
lipid products of PI3K. As a result of this interaction, other
SH2-containing proteins may be recruited to the plasma membrane to
initiate downstream signaling (52, 55). From these observations, we
hypothesized that the signaling molecules are associated with gelsolin
through a unique phospholipid-based association.
This report describes the initial characterization of the signaling
proteins that are associated with gelsolin as well as the role of
PtdIns P3 in the interaction of proteins with gelsolin. We
focused on defining the interaction of PtdIns P3 with the
SH2 or SH3 domains of kinases, including c-Src, lck, and p85 (PI3K). A
unique mechanism of PtdIns P3-SH2 domain-mediated
interaction of proteins with gelsolin is described.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
The antibodies anti-gelsolin (monoclonal
antibody), talin (monoclonal antibody), vinculin (monoclonal antibody),
PI3K (polyclonal antibody), nonimmune mouse IgG, and rabbit IgG were
purchased from Sigma. Monoclonal FAK and paxillin antibodies were
obtained from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY). Polyclonal
antibodies such as anti-phosphotyrosine (PY20), anti-FAK,
anti-p130Cas, anti-c-Cbl, and anti-PYK2 were bought from
Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). Monoclonal antibodies
such as anti-PI3K and PY20 were obtained from Upstate Biotechnology
(Lake Placid, NY). Monoclonal Src antibody was purchased from Oncogene
(Uniondale, NY). PtdIns P2 and PtdIns P3
antisera were purchased from Advanced Magnetics (Cambridge, MA)
and Echelon Research Laboratories Inc. (Salt Lake City UT),
respectively. Rainbow molecular weight marker and
[32P]orthophosphate were obtained from Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech. Protein estimation reagent, molecular weight standards for
proteins, and PAGE reagents were bought from Bio-Rad (Richmond, CA).
Protein A-Sepharose, phospholipid standards, and all the other
chemicals were from Sigma.
pGEX vectors containing the cDNA sequences encoding the SH2 and SH3
domains of p85, full-length p85, and the SH2 domain of lck were kindly
provided by Dr. L. C. Cantley (Department of Cell Biology, Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA) (52); pGEX vector containing the SH2 domain
of Src was kindly provided by Dr. W. J. Muller (McMaster University,
Hamilton, Canada) (56). Polyclonal gelsolin antibody and full-length
gelsolin cDNA were provided by Dr. D. J. Kwiatkowski (Division of
Experimental Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical
School). Monoclonal v (LM142) as well as
v 3 (LM609) antibodies and anti-PTP-PEST
antibody was a gift from Dr. D. A. Cheresh (Scripps Clinic and
Research Foundation, La Jolla, CA) and Dr. M. L. Tremblay (McGill
University, Montreal, Canada), respectively. The monoclonal antibody to
leupaxin was developed by ICOS, Inc. (Bothel, WA) and provided by Dr.
Anandarup Gupta (Dental School, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD).
Preparation of Osteoclast Precursors--
Avian osteoclast
precursors were prepared as described previously (8). Mouse osteoclasts
were generated in vitro using mouse bone marrow cells. Cells
isolated from five mice were cultured in 100-mm dishes with 20 ml of
-minimum Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum
( -10). After culture for 24 h, nonadherent cells were layered
on Histopaque 1077 (Sigma) and centrifuged at 300 × g
for 15 min at room temperature. The cell layer between the Histopaque
and the media was removed and washed with -10 media at 2000 rpm for
7 min at room temperature. Cells were resuspended in -10 media and
cultured with the appropriate concentrations of macrophage
colony-stimulating factor 1 (10 ng/ml) and osteoprotegrin ligand
(55-75 ng/ml). After 3 days in culture, media were replaced with fresh
cytokines. The multinucleated osteoclasts were seen from day 4.
Lysate Preparation and Western Analysis--
After 4 or 5 days
in culture, cells were washed three times with ice-cold PBS, and
lysates were made from avian or mouse osteoclasts. Protein contents
were measured using the Bio-Rad protein assay reagent kit. Equal
amounts of lysate proteins were immunoprecipitated with antibodies or
nonimmune serum as mentioned under "Results." Immunoprecipitations
and Western analysis were carried out as described previously (8, 9).
Immunoprecipitations were also performed in lipid-extracted and
unextracted lysates. Lipid extraction was performed in about 10 mg of
avian osteoclast lysate protein. An equal volume of chloroform:methanol
(4:1) mixture was added to osteoclast lysate, and the aqueous layer
containing the proteins was separated. The organic layer containing
chloroform was extracted once more with lysis buffer and pooled.
Lipid-extracted and unextracted lysates were dialyzed against 4-5
liters of PBS with two to three changes for 24 h at 4 °C.
Protein content was measured by using the Bio-Rad protein assay kit.
There was about 25-30% loss in protein content during lipid extraction.
Immunostaining--
Osteoclasts cultured on whale dentine slices
or glass coverslips were immunostained with different antibodies as
shown (Figs. 2-4) (57, 58). Briefly, cells were fixed with 3%
paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.4, 150 mM NaCl, and 1 mM CaCl2
containing 0.1% Triton X-100 for 1 min. The cells were washed and
incubated with primary antibodies (1:100 dilution) for 2 h,
washed, and then counterstained with Cy2-or Cy3-conjugated anti-mouse
or anti-rabbit IgG for 2 h. The cells were washed and mounted on a
slide in a mounting solution (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame,
CA). The cells were viewed on a Zeiss LSM 410 confocal laser-scanning
microscope (Thornwood, NY), and images were recorded as described
previously (10).
Purification of Lipids for Binding Studies--
Avian osteoclast
precursor cells, after 4 days in culture, were kept in serum-free
(PO[stack][low]4[high] [/stack]) media for 2 h. The cells
were labeled as described previously (8, 59) with carrier-free
[32P]orthophosphate for 2 h at 37 °C. After
labeling, they were washed twice with serum-free media and incubated
with OPN (25 µg/ml) for 15 min at 37 °C. Lipids were extracted
from 32P-labeled and unlabeled lysates as described
previously (8) and dried under N2. The dried lipids were
reconstituted in 500 µl of chloroform:methanol (1:1) and spotted on
silica gel TLC plates pretreated with 1.2% potassium oxalate in
methanol and water (2:3). The plates were developed as described
previously (8), and bands were visualized by autoradiography. The
PtdIns P3, PtdIns P2, PtdIns P, and
PtdIns spots were scraped and extracted as described previously
with a minor modification (23). The 32P-labeled
phospholipid spots present in the cellulose slurry were incubated
overnight with 1 N HCL. The next day, the cellulose slurry
was extracted as described previously (23) and counted (PtdIns
P3 = 1 × 106 cpm, PtdInsP2 = 2 × 106 cpm; PtdIns P = 3.5 × 106 cpm, and PtdIns = 1 × 107 cpm).
The incorporation into PtdIns P3 is 50% of the
incorporation into PtdIns P2 or 33% of the incorporation
into PtdIns P. The purity of the isolated phosphoinositides was
analyzed by TLC and high pressure liquid chromatography. For the
unlabeled PtdIns P3, labeled PtdIns P3 was used
as marker. After purification, a known amount of PtdIns P2
(Sigma) was used to quantitate the unlabeled PtdIns P3 by
exposing the TLC to iodine vapor.
Lipid Binding Assay--
GST fusions proteins coupled to
Sepharose beads were allowed to bind to 100 µM
phosphatidyl serine vesicle containing the following
32P-labeled phosphoinositide: 12,000 dpm of PtdIns
4,5-P2 and 6000 dpm of PtdIns P3. The binding
was performed in 10 mM Hepes (pH 7.0), 1 mM
EDTA buffer containing 0.02% Nonidet P-40. Binding was carried out
essentially as described previously (52). Binding of each phospholipid
to the indicated proteins was analyzed. After binding, Sepharose beads
were washed with buffer containing 0.5% Nonidet P-40, and the bound
lipids were extracted with chloroform:methanol mixture and analyzed by
TLC (8).
Overlay Assay Using Lipid-spotted Membrane--
To spot the
purified phosphoinositides onto a nitrocellulose membrane, lipid
solutions containing PtdIns P3 (purified), PtdIns P2, and PtdIns P (Sigma) were used. About 2 pmol of
purified PtdIns P3 and 3-5 pmol of PtdIns P2
or PtdIns P (Sigma) phospholipids in 1-2 µl of a
chloroform:methanol:water (1:2:0.8; by volume) mixture were spotted and
dried. The blots were blocked overnight at 4 °C with 5% bovine
serum albumin in PBS and 0.1% Tween 20 (PBS-T). The membrane was
washed three times with PBS-T and incubated overnight at 4 °C with
the indicated proteins (Fig. 9B) at a concentration of 10 µg/ml in PBS-T containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin and 12 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. The blots were washed and
immunoblotted with anti-GST monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology Inc.) in 1:1000 dilutions as described previously
(8).
GST Fusion Proteins--
pGEX vectors containing cDNA
sequences encoding the SH2 and SH3 domains of p85, full-length p85, and
the SH2 domain of c-Src and lck were expressed in Escherichia
coli as GST fusion proteins and purified as described previously
(52).
Overlay Assay Using GST Fusion Protein-containing
Membrane--
To analyze the binding of lipid-associated gelsolin to
the indicated GST fusion proteins (Fig. 7), 3-5 µg of GST fusion
proteins were subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE and blotted onto
nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5% milk in
PBS-0.5% Tween 20 for 3 h and subsequently incubated overnight
with lipid-extracted or unextracted avian osteoclast lysates (about
3-5 mg of protein) in PBS-T. 2-Mercaptoethanol and bovine serum
albumin were added to a final concentration of 12 mM and
0.1%, respectively. The blot was washed twice in PBS-T for 30 min each
time and immunoblotted with anti-gelsolin antibody (1:1000 dilution) as
described previously (8). Lysates (unextracted and extracted) were made
from two different osteoclast preparations, and binding was performed
in duplicate filters for each lysate preparation.
GST Pull-down Assay--
5 µg of GST fusion proteins
noncovalently coupled to Sepharose beads were incubated with 500 µg
of lipid-extracted and unextracted lysates for 2 h at 4 °C.
After binding, the Sepharose beads were washed four to five times with
lysis buffer and washed three times with cold PBS. Bound proteins were
boiled with SDS-PAGE sample buffer (60) and subjected to 7.5%
SDS-PAGE. The proteins were transferred onto a polyvinylidene
difluoride membrane and immunoblotted with anti-gelsolin antibody as
described previously (8).
Data Analysis--
All comparisons were made as a percentage of
the control, which refers to vehicle-treated cells. The other treatment
groups in each experiment were normalized to each control value. Data presented are the mean ± S.E. of experiments done at different times normalized to intraexperimental control values. For statistical comparisons, analysis of variance was used with the Bonferroni corrections (Instat for IBM, version 2.0; Graphpad Software).
 |
RESULTS |
Immunofluorescent Staining of Various Proteins in
Osteoclasts--
Osteoclasts plated on a glass coverslip demonstrate
multiple actin-containing dot-like structures in the area corresponding to the clear zone of osteoclasts (3-5, 10, 61-63), whereas the resorbing osteoclasts demonstrated a band of F-actin-containing podosomes (61, 64). We have shown that OPN binding to the v 3 integrin of osteoclast podosomes
stimulated cytoskeletal reorganization and bone resorption by
activating a heteromultimeric signaling complex that includes gelsolin,
FAK, c-Src, and PI3K (8, 9). The activity of these enzymes was focused
in a signaling complex associated with gelsolin (8, 9). To further
investigate whether gelsolin interacts with the signaling molecules
associated with integrin v 3 of osteoclast
podosome (23) and focal adhesion proteins, osteoclasts from chicken
cultured on bone slices were immunostained with various antibodies and
anti-gelsolin as shown in Fig. 1.
Colocalization of gelsolin with v 3 (Fig.
1A) and actin (Fig. 1I) is shown. Actin
distribution is seen at the periphery as a ring-like structure at the
resorbing area. The formation of actin ring is a prerequisite for the
initiation of bone resorption. Osteoclasts stained for gelsolin/actin
(Fig. 1I) and actin/ v 3 (Fig.
1J) demonstrate actin ring at the resorbing area. Punctate staining of actin and v 3 is seen
throughout the cell, showing their colocalization (Fig. 1J).
Also, at the resorbing area, colocalization of
v 3 (Fig. 1A), FAK (Fig.
1B), PI3K (Fig. 1D), paxillin (Fig. 1E), c-Src (Fig. 1G), and talin (Fig.
1K) with gelsolin is seen. Punctate staining is shown at the
basolateral membrane of the resorbing osteoclast stained for gelsolin
and v 3 (Fig. 1A). Colocalization of FAK, PI3K, c-Src, and paxillin with gelsolin is also
seen at the periphery of the cell. Very little or no colocalization of
C-Cbl (data not shown), leupaxin (Fig. 1F), and PYK2 (Fig. 1C) with gelsolin is observable.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Immunofluorescence localization with
antibodies against the indicated proteins and gelsolin in osteoclasts
plated on bone. Colocalization of the proteins is seen in
yellow. Arrows in the figures point to the
position of the pits underneath the osteoclast. Green
staining represents gelsolin distribution, except in F,
where red staining represents gelsolin distribution.
Bar, 25 µm.
|
|
Association of Gelsolin with
v 3-associated Proteins--
Because
immunostaining of osteoclasts showed colocalization of gelsolin with
various proteins, we further confirmed the association of these
proteins with gelsolin by immunoprecipitation and Western analyses
(Fig. 2, A and B).
Avian osteoclast lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-gelsolin
antibody and analyzed by Western blot with various antibodies as shown
in Fig. 2. In Fig. 2A, Src (lane 1), PI3K
(lane 3), FAK (lane 7), vinculin
(lane 11), v, (lane 16) and
paxillin (lane 22) are detected in gelsolin
immunoprecipitates. Consistent with the immunostaining data (Fig. 1),
c-Cbl (data not shown), leupaxin (lane 6), and PYK2
(lane 19) are not detected in the analysis.
Coimmunoprecipitation of PYK2 is seen in the PI3K immunoprecipitates
(lane 18) but not in gelsolin immunoprecipitates (lane
19). Western analyses with anti-PY20 antibody have demonstrated association of tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins with 125-, 85-, 60-, and 42-44 kDa proteins (lane 13).
p130Cas has been shown to associate with FAK, paxillin, and
vinculin (22, 65). Therefore, anti-gelsolin immunoprecipitates made from lysates of osteoclasts treated with PBS or OPN were analyzed by
Western blot with a p130Cas antibody. Whereas the level of
gelsolin remained the same (Fig. 2B, lanes 4 and
5), OPN stimulated association of p130Cas with
gelsolin (lane 2) as compared with vehicle-treated controls (lane 1).

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Western analysis of focal adhesion components
associated with gelsolin. A, gelsolin was
immunoprecipitated from equal amounts of proteins from OPN-treated
lysates and analyzed by Western blot with antibodies against the
indicated proteins. Proteins that are coprecipitated with gelsolin are
indicated to the left of the blot. Immunoprecipitations with
antibodies against leupaxin (lane 5), FAK (lane
8), vinculin (lane 11), phosphotyrosine (lane
14), v (lane 15), and PYK2 (lane
20) are used as markers or control. IgG heavy chain
(IgGHC) is indicated to the left of the blot. IgG
heavy chain is not seen in the immunoblotting of membranes with
polyclonal antibodies anti-PI3K (lane 4) or anti-PYK2
(lane 19). B, equal amounts of lysate proteins
(200 µg) made from PBS-treated (lanes 1 and 4)
or OPN-treated (lanes 2, 3, 5, and 6) osteoclasts
were immunoprecipitated with monoclonal gelsolin antibody (lanes
1, 2, 4, and 5) or with nonimmune serum (NI;
lanes 3 and 6). The immunoprecipitated protein
was divided into two equal aliquots, which were subjected to SDS-PAGE
and immunoblotted with either rabbit polyclonal p130Cas
(lanes 1-3) or monoclonal gelsolin (lanes 4-6)
antibody. The arrows point to the p130Cas
(left) and gelsolin (right) proteins.
|
|
To further analyze whether the ability of gelsolin to associate with
focal adhesion molecules is altered after OPN treatment, immunoprecipitates made with various antibodies as mentioned in Fig.
3A from lysates of osteoclasts
treated with PBS or OPN were analyzed by Western blot with an
anti-gelsolin antibody. Western analysis of immunoprecipitates made
with anti-PI3K (lanes 1 and 2), PY20 (lanes
5 and 6), anti- v (lanes 11 and 12), anti-FAK (lanes 13 and 14),
and anti-PtdIns 4,5-P2 (lanes 15 and
16) have demonstrated coimmunoprecipitation of gelsolin. The
increase in the levels of gelsolin indicates an increase in association
of those proteins with gelsolin in OPN-treated cells. The increase in
the levels of gelsolin in the PY20 immunoprecipitates also indicates
that gelsolin-associated signaling molecules are phosphorylated more
upon OPN stimulation (10). Therefore, anti-phosphotyrosine coprecipitates more gelsolin in OPN-treated cells. To confirm the
observation of the effect of OPN on the association of signaling proteins with gelsolin and to define the interaction in more detail, osteoclasts cultured on glass coverslips were treated with PBS or OPN
and immunostained with various antibodies and gelsolin. We have
previously demonstrated that when osteoclasts were treated with OPN,
the entire cell subsurface was occupied with podosomes within 15 min.
Immunostaining of osteoclasts with anti-gelsolin antibody and rhodamine
phalloidin for actin showed that gelsolin was colocalized with actin in
podosomes and along the inner edge of actin ring-like structures (10).
Here we show that PI3K (red) and gelsolin (green)
staining (Fig. 3B) is seen in the multiple rows of podosomes
localized in the area corresponding to the clear zone in osteoclasts at
the periphery in vehicle-treated cells (Fig. 3B, PBS).
Osteopontin treatment caused immunofluorescent staining of gelsolin and
PI3K in podosomes on the entire subsurface of the cell (Fig. 3B,
OP) similar to the gelsolin/actin staining shown previously
(10).

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
The effect of osteopontin stimulation on the
association of proteins with gelsolin. A, lysates made
from PBS ( )- or OPN (+)-treated osteoclasts were immunoprecipitated
with the antibodies indicated below each lane, subjected to
8% SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with a monoclonal gelsolin antibody.
The arrow points to the position of gelsolin
(left). Although antibodies to leupaxin, FAK, and PtdIns
P2 are monoclonal, the affinity to IgG heavy chain varies
when lysates are immunoblotted with gelsolin monoclonal antibody.
Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting with gelsolin antibody were used
as control (lanes 7 and 8). The results shown are
representative of four independent experiments. B, effect of
OPN on PI3K distribution in osteoclasts isolated from mice. Osteoclasts
plated on glass coverslips were fixed and immunostained with
anti-gelsolin (green) or PI3K antibodies after treatment
with PBS or OPN. Cells were viewed by confocal microscopy.
Colocalization of the proteins is seen in yellow.
Bar, 25 µm.
|
|
Protein tyrosine phosphatases PTEN and PTP-PEST have been shown
to modulate tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins associated with FAK
and FAK functions (66-71). Therefore, we sought to determine whether
PTEN or PTP-PEST associates with gelsolin. Anti-gelsolin immunoprecipitates were analyzed for the association with PTEN by Western analysis. We failed to show PTEN association with
gelsolin.2 We then examined
gelsolin association with PTP-PEST by Western blot (Fig.
4A) and immunostaining (Fig.
4B) analyses. In Fig. 4A, lysates made from
vehicle- and OPN-treated osteoclasts were immunoprecipitated with
antibodies to PTP-PEST (lanes 3 and 4) or
gelsolin (lanes 1 and 2) and analyzed by Western
blot with anti-phosphoserine antibody (lanes 1-4). OPN
stimulates the tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins associated with
v 3 (23) and gelsolin (10) (Fig. 3,
lanes 3 and 4). In Fig. 4A, we
demonstrate an increase in serine phosphorylation of PTP-PEST
(lanes 2 and 4) in OPN-treated osteoclasts as
compared with vehicle-treated cells (lanes 1 and
3). Lanes 5 and 6 demonstrate the
levels of PTP-PEST immunoprecipitated. Western analysis of gelsolin
immunoprecipitates demonstrates the levels of PTP-PEST
coimmunoprecipitated with gelsolin (lanes 7 and
8). These results demonstrate that PTP-PEST is
coprecipitated with gelsolin and that its phosphorylation on phosphoserine residue is increased upon OPN treatment (lane
2). Immunostaining analysis of osteoclasts plated on glass
coverslips demonstrates colocalization of gelsolin (green)
and PTP-PEST (red) in the podosome and membrane of
osteoclast (Fig. 4B).

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Analysis of PTP-PEST association with
gelsolin. A, equal amounts of lysate proteins (200 µg) made from PBS-treated (lanes 1, 3, 5, and
7) or OPN-treated osteoclasts (lanes 2, 4, 6, and
8) were immunoprecipitated with an antibody to gelsolin
(lanes 1, 2, 7, and 8) or PTP-PEST (lanes
3-6). The immunoprecipitated protein was divided into two equal
aliquots, which were subjected to SDS-PAGE. One half of the
anti-gelsolin (lanes 1 and 2) and anti-PTP-PEST
(lanes 3 and 4) immunoprecipitates was
immunoblotted with a polyclonal phosphoserine antibody (lanes
1-4), and the other half of the immunoprecipitates was
immunoblotted with a polyclonal PTP-PEST antibody (lanes
5-8). The arrows point to the position of PTP-PEST.
Treatments are as indicated below the figure. The results
represent one of three experiments performed from three separate
osteoclast preparations. B, immunolocalization of gelsolin
and PTP-PEST in osteoclasts isolated from mice. Osteoclasts plated on
glass coverslips were fixed and immunostained with anti-gelsolin
(green) or PTP-PEST (red) antibodies. Cells were
viewed by confocal microscopy. Colocalization of the proteins is seen
in yellow. The arrow indicates the areas shown at
higher magnification (right). Left bar, 25 µm;
right bar, 10 µm.
|
|
Role of Lipids in Interaction of Proteins--
Our results
demonstrate that gelsolin is associated with c-Src, PI3K, FAK,
p130Cas, paxillin, talin, and vinculin. The association of
these signaling molecules with gelsolin is increased upon OPN
stimulation in both avian and mouse osteoclasts (Fig. 3) (8-10). The
question of how these proteins interact with gelsolin remains. The
primary structure of gelsolin reveals actin and phosphoinositide
binding sites (34, 36, 39). We tested the possibility that
phosphoinositides associated with gelsolin may mediate the interaction
of SH2 domain-containing proteins (52). We used equal amount of
proteins from lipid-extracted (Fig. 5,
lanes 6-9) and unextracted lysates for immunoprecipitation with various antibodies. Immunoprecipitation of lipid-extracted lysates
with anti-PtdIns 4,5-P2 (lane 8), anti-PI3K
(lane 7), and anti-Src (lane 9) fails to show
association of gelsolin. There was no change in the levels of gelsolin
in lipid-extracted (lane 6) or unextracted (lane
2) lysates. The absence of gelsolin in the anti-PtdIns
P2 antibody immunoprecipitate (lane 8) indicates complete extraction of phosphoinositides associated with gelsolin. These results indicate that the interaction of proteins with gelsolin is mediated through phospholipids associated with gelsolin.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Analysis of the role of phospholipids in
interactions of proteins with gelsolin. Equal amounts of lysate
proteins (200 µg) made from OPN-treated osteoclasts were
immunoprecipitated with the indicated antibodies before (lanes
1-5) and after lipid extraction (lanes 6-9). The
immunoprecipitates were immunoblotted with a monoclonal gelsolin
antibody. Gelsolin, IgG heavy chain (IgGHC), and IgG light
chain (IgGLC) are marked by arrows. The results
represent one of three experiments performed from three separate
osteoclast preparations.
|
|
Role of Phosphoinositides in Protein Interactions--
The binding
of phosphoinositides with SH2 domains of proteins was further defined
by using in vitro binding of labeled phosphoinositides with GST fusion proteins containing SH2 and SH3 domains of PI3K or
c-Src (52). GST fusion proteins of SH2 and SH3 domains of PI3K, c-Src,
and lck (Fig. 7C) and 32P-labeled phospholipids
were purified as described under "Experimental Procedures."
500-1000 cpm of PtdIns P3 and 1000-2000 cpm of PtdIns P2, phosphatidylinositol 3,4-bisphosphate, PtdIns 3P, and
PtdIns were used for binding studies. We used less PtdIns
P3 because of the relatively low endogenous level of this
lipid and the low yield during the extraction procedure. The lipids
were dried, resuspended in 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.0, 1 mM EDTA (HE buffer), sonicated, and allowed to bind to the
indicated GST fusion proteins coupled to GST-Sepharose for 1.5 h
at room temperature in a solution of 0.02% Nonidet P-40-HE buffer
containing 100 mM NaCl (HNE-Nonidet P-40 buffer) (52). The
Sepharose beads were then washed with 1 ml of HNE-Nonidet P-40 buffer,
and the lipids that remained associated with the beads were extracted
with chloroform:methanol and resolved by TLC (Fig.
6). As shown in Fig. 6A,
PtdIns P3 binds to GST-gelsolin (lane 1), SH2
domains of p85 (lanes 3 and 4), and full-length
p85 (lane 7) proteins with greater affinity than it does to
srcSH2 domain protein (lane 5). LckSH2 (lane 6)
or p85SH3 (lane 8) domain proteins do not show any binding
of PtdIns P3. Phospholipid spots were scraped from the TLC
plates, and radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation
counting. The amount of radioactivity from PtdIns P3 ( )
and PtdIns P2 ( ) bound to GST fusion proteins is shown
(Fig. 6B). Radioactivity bound to GST protein was used as
control. Data from three experiments are shown, and values are
expressed as a percentage of the control. The specificity of PtdIns
P3 binding to the p85 NH2 or COOH SH2 domains
(***, p < 0001) is greater than that to the
c-Src SH2 domain (*, p < 01). PtdIns P2
binding was seen with Gst fusion proteins of full length p85 and
gelsolin. No such binding was observed with other Gst fusion proteins
such as NH2, COOH terminal SH2 domains,
SH3 domain of p85, or SH2 domains of src, and
lck. Basal level binding of PtdIns P2 with p85 SH3, p85,
c-Src, and lck SH2 domains was observed. A very low level binding of
other phosphoinositides (PtdIns P or PtdIns) with GST fusion proteins
was observed.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Analysis of binding of purified
32P-labeled PtdIns P2 and PtdIns P3
with GST fusion proteins. 32P-labeled PtdIns
P2 and PtdIns P3 were allowed to bind to the
indicated GST fusion proteins immobilized to Sepharose beads as
described under "Experimental Procedures" (52). The bound
phosphoinositides were extracted from the GST fusion proteins and
analyzed by TLC. The arrow to the left of the
panel indicates the migration of the PtdIns P3. The
experiment is representative of one of three experiments. B,
phospholipid spots were scraped from the TLC plates, and radioactivity
was determined by liquid scintillation counting. The binding is
expressed as a percentage of control. Data shown are the mean +S.E.
from three different experiments. ***, p < 0001;
**, p < 001; *, p < 01 (compared with GST control). p85NHSH2, PI3K NH2
SH2 domain; p85CSH2, PI3K COOH SH2 domain.
|
|
Overlay Assay--
The lipid-protein interaction was further
confirmed by an overlay assay in which a blot of GST fusion proteins
was probed with lysates made from OPN-treated osteoclasts for 24-48 h
at 4 °C. The bound protein was then detected with anti-gelsolin
antibody (Fig. 7). Binding of gelsolin
with GST-p85 (full length) (lane 1), GST-p85N-SH2 domain
(lane 2), and GST-p85C-SH2 (lane 3) is shown in
Fig. 7A. Weak binding to the GST-Src SH2 domain (lane 5) was seen, and no detectable binding was observed with GST alone (lane 7), SH3 domain of p85 (lane 6), and
SH2 domain of lck (lane 5). In addition to the
above-mentioned observations, the role of phosphoinositides in the
protein interaction was further verified by doing the overlay assay
with lipid-extracted lysates from OPN-treated osteoclasts (Fig.
7B). Lysates were incubated with immobilized GST/p85 SH2
domains to nitrocellulose membrane. Binding of gelsolin from the
unextracted osteoclast lysates (lanes 1 and 2) to
GST-p85N-SH2 (lane 2) and GST-p85C-SH2 domains (lane
1) is seen, whereas lipid-extracted lysates failed to show
interaction of gelsolin with fusion proteins, although gelsolin was
still present in the lipid-extracted lysates (Fig. 6A,
lane 6). Coomassie Blue-stained gel containing GST fusion proteins is shown in Fig. 7C. Equal amounts of proteins were
used for the overlay and GST pull-down assays after quantitating the protein concentration by scanning the gel and by protein estimation using the Bio-Rad kit.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Demonstration of binding of lipids associated
with gelsolin in osteoclast lysates to the SH2 domains of PI3K by
overlay assay. A, GST fusion proteins indicated
below the lanes were immobilized to a nitrocellulose
membrane and incubated with osteoclast lysates as described under
"Experimental Procedures." B, the indicated GST fusion
proteins immobilized to a membrane were incubated with unextracted
(lanes 1 and 2) or lipid-extracted (lanes
3-5) osteoclast lysates. C, SDS-PAGE and Coomassie
Blue staining of the purified GST fusion proteins. D, GST
pull-down assay. GST fusion proteins coupled to Sepharose beads were
allowed to bind to lipid-extracted or unextracted (lanes
1-4) lysates. After binding, the beads were washed, and the
eluted proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE. The potential role of
lipids in the binding of gelsolin with GST fusion proteins is analyzed
by immunoblotting the membranes with anti-gelsolin antibody (A,
B, and D). Binding of gelsolin from the lipid-extracted
lysate to GST fusion proteins was not seen (B, lanes 3-5,
and D). Lysates (unextracted and extracted) were made from
two different osteoclast preparations, and binding was done in
duplicate filters for each lysate preparation. These results are
representative of four separate binding experiments.
|
|
GST Pull-down Assay--
In addition to the above-mentioned
experiments, lipid-extracted and unextracted lysates were incubated
with the indicated immobilized GST fusion proteins coupled to Sepharose
beads as shown in Fig. 7B for 2 h or overnight at
4 °C. The Sepharose beads were washed, and binding of gelsolin to
the GST fusion protein was assessed by immunoblotting with
anti-gelsolin antibody. As shown in Fig. 7D, binding of
gelsolin from unextracted lysates (as such) with GST-p85 (full length)
(lane 1), GST-p85COOH-SH2 domain (lane 2), and
GST-p85NH-SH2 domain (lane 3) is seen. Very low-level
binding was seen with GST-Src SH2 domain (lane 4). No detectable binding of gelsolin to GST-p85, GST-p85COOH-SH2 domain, or
GST-p85NH-SH2 domain was seen from the lipid-extracted osteoclast lysates. Also, no binding was seen with the lckSH2 or p85SH3 domain from unextracted or lipid-extracted lysates. Our results indicate that
the NH2 and COOH SH2 domains of p85 have more affinity to PtdIns P3 than the c-Src SH2 domain.
Analysis of Binding of Proteins to PtdIns P3--
To investigate
whether anti-PtdIns P3 could coprecipitate the proteins
associated with gelsolin as shown in Fig. 2A, lysates made
from OPN-treated osteoclasts were immunoprecipitated with anti-PtdIns
P3 and analyzed by Western blot with the indicated antibodies (Fig. 8). Coprecipitation of
PI3K (lane 1), c-Src (lane 3),
p130Cas (lane 4), and gelsolin (lane
5) was seen. Western analysis with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody
demonstrates coprecipitation of a number of tyrosine-phosphorylated
cellular proteins, such as p130Cas, p125Fak,
p90-100 (an unknown protein), p85PI3K,
p68paxillin, and p60c-src. Lane 8 shows a shorter exposure of the blot shown in lane 7. Lanes 2 and 6 are immunoprecipitations with
nonimmune serum.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Analysis of proteins that are coprecipitated
by anti-PtdIns P3. Lysates from OPN-treated
osteoclasts were immunoprecipitated with anti-PtdIns P3 and
analyzed by Western blot with the antibodies indicated below
each lane. Arrows to the left of each blot mark
proteins that are coprecipitated with anti-PtdIns P3.
Lanes 2 and 6 are immunoprecipitation with
nonimmune serum. Gsn, gelsolin protein. Lane 8 is
a short exposure of the blot shown in lane 7.
|
|
The ability of proteins to bind to PtdIns P3 was further
assessed by an overlay assay (Fig. 9).
For this assay, PtdIns P3 (spot 1 in Fig. 9), PtdIns
P2 (spot 2), and PtdIns P (spot 3) were spotted on a
nitrocellulose filter as described previously (72, 73). Immunoblotting
with anti-PtdIns P2 and anti-PtdIns P3
recognizes PtdIns P2 and PtdIns P3 spots,
respectively (Fig. 9A). To do the overlay assay, the blot
was probed with GST fusion proteins as indicated in Fig. 9B
after blocking as described under "Experimental Procedures." Strong
binding of p85 SH2 fusion proteins to PtdIns P3 is shown.
Low-level binding of PtdIns P3 is shown with c-Src and lck
SH2 domains. Similarly, low-level binding of Src and p85 SH2 domains to
PtdIns P2 was observed.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Analysis of phospholipid binding properties
of different GST fusion proteins. The ability of binding of fusion
proteins with lipids was analyzed by lipid-protein overlay assay.
Lipids were spotted and overlaid with protein as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The numbers at the
top represent the following phosphoinositides:
1, PtdIns P2; 2, PtdIns
P3; and 3, PtdIns 3P. A, spotted
lipids were immunoblotted (IB) with the antibodies indicated
to the left of the blot. B, proteins used
for the overlay assay are indicated to the left of the blot.
After binding overnight, the blots were immunoblotted with an anti-GST
antibody to detect the interaction of proteins with the lipids
immobilized to the membrane. The results are representative of three
separate experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Gelsolin, an actin-binding protein, controls the length of actin
filaments in vitro and controls cell shape and motility
in vivo by a variety of mechanisms (74). Gelsolin severs
assembled actin filaments, caps the fast-growing plus end, and promotes the growth of actin filament by creating nucleation sites (75-77). Binding of gelsolin to phosphoinositides causes the release of gelsolin
from the filament end, providing a site for rapid monomer addition
(77-79). Thus far, we have demonstrated the following sequence of
events to explain how OPN/ v 3-mediated
signaling stimulates actin filament formation and actin reorganization
in osteoclasts: 1) OPN binding to integrin
v 3 in osteoclasts stimulates gelsolin-associated phosphoinositides, uncaps barbed end
actin, and results in actin filament formation (8), supporting the concept described by Stossel (75) and others (76, 79).
Phosphoinositides phosphorylated at 3-hydroxyl position by PI3K
associated with gelsolin also participate in actin filament
reorganization and podosome formation (8). 2) Elimination of c-Src by
antisense oligodeoxynucleotides to c-Src prevents
OPN/ v 3 activation of gelsolin-associated
PI3K (9). 3) PI3K activity is also disrupted by the treatment of cells
with C3 transferase, whereas gelsolin-associated c-Src activity is not
affected by the same treatment. These results demonstrate that OPN
stimulation of c-Src and rho are upstream of PI3K (80). 4) Osteoclasts
isolated from Gsn / mice lack podosomes and fail to respond to OPN
with a change in F-actin (10). The other actin capping or bundling
proteins cannot substitute gelsolin function in podosome assembly. Our
analyses demonstrate the functional role and significance of gelsolin
and the associated signaling molecules during OPN-induced osteoclast
cytoskeleton organization.
Involvement of signaling molecules in the regulation of cytoskeletal
organization in osteoclast function has been widely studied. Targeted
disruption of c-Src in mice leads to only one major phenotype: severe
osteopetrosis caused by an intrinsic defect in osteoclasts. Although
osteoclasts are present in src / mice in normal or increased numbers, they fail to form ruffled borders and consequently do not
resorb bone (81). As mentioned earlier, normal osteoclasts adhered to
plastic through podosomes, which are represented by dot-like
aggregations of actin, clustering in a ring around the periphery of the
cells. Osteoclasts from src / mice have a markedly different
distribution of actin, with no peripheral podosome arrangement (82).
PYK2 and p130Cas were reported to be the key effectors in
v 3 integrin-mediated signaling pathways,
and their activation requires c-Src in osteoclasts (83, 84). Inhibition
of PI3K activity, ruffled border formation, and bone resorption by
wortmannin has been reported in osteoclasts by several studies
(85-87). Involvement of rho p21 protein in osteoclastic bone
resorption has also been demonstrated by using the C3 exoenzyme (88).
These observations demonstrate that signaling molecules such as c-Src,
PI3K, PYK2, p130Cas, and rho A are essential for osteoclast function.
Our present observations have demonstrated the interaction of focal
adhesion-associated proteins such as FAK, PI3K, c-Src, p130Cas, paxillin, vinculin, and talin with gelsolin (Figs.
1 and 2). Gelsolin coprecipitates the signaling molecules with
different affinity. Although osteoclast gelsolin appears to be central
to the localization of tyrosine kinases involved in regulation of the
actin cytoskeleton, the exact mechanism of interaction of proteins with
gelsolin in the podosome of osteoclast is unknown. Focal adhesions
contain many structural proteins such as talin, tensin, and
-actinin, as well as tyrosine kinases such as FAK, c-Src, and Csk,
that are activated upon extracellular matrix binding. Multimeric
protein complexes are then formed, which contain many different adapter
proteins, including p130Cas, Shc, Grb2, Crk, and Nck. These
interactions confer an important role to focal adhesions in signal
transduction pathways (89, 90). Paxillin has been demonstrated to
interact with FAK and vinculin as well as with numerous SH2-containing
proteins (91-93). Paxillin binds to many proteins involved in
effecting changes in the organization of actin cytoskeleton. Its
primary function is as a molecular adapter or scaffold protein that
provides multiple docking sites at the plasma membrane for an array of
signaling and structural proteins (22). The FAK functions in regulating tyrosine phosphorylation of several proteins, including paxillin, p130Cas, talin, and tensin (94). FAK is also an
integrin-linked tyrosine kinase that associates with Src family kinases
and paxillin, and it is thought to regulate focal adhesion assembly and
integrin-mediated signaling (19).
We have also shown here that gelsolin is associated with PTP-PEST
and that OPN induced a transient phosphorylation of PTP-PEST on serine.
PTP-PEST has been shown to play a role in cytoskeleton reorganization
by promoting the turnover of focal adhesion required for cell migration
(70). Also, a remarkable degree of selectivity for p130Cas
as a substrate both in vitro and in intact cells (68, 96) has been displayed by PTP-PEST. Phosphorylation of PTP-PEST at two
major sites (Ser-29 and -439) has been documented in
12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-treated HeLa cells, and
the increase in phosphorylation lowers PTP-PEST affinity for
substrates, thereby lowering the phosphatase activity (97). We have
previously shown that OPN modulates tyrosine phosphorylation of
signaling proteins such as FAK, PI3K, and c-Src associated with
v 3 (23) and gelsolin (10). We presume
that the increase in serine phosphorylation of PTP-PEST may decrease
its affinity to the other signaling proteins associated with
v 3 or gelsolin and therefore lead to an
increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins. Although there is
biochemical evidence suggesting that two focal adhesion proteins, FAK
and p130Cas, are substrates for the other tyrosine
phosphatase PTEN (MMAC1) (66), we have failed to detect PTEN in this
complex. Based on our observations, we speculate that PTP-PEST may be
the potential regulator of tyrosine phosphorylation status of other
signaling proteins in the podosomes of osteoclasts.
Although proline-rich tyrosine kinase (PYK2), and leupaxin share
similar structural organization with FAK and paxillin, respectively (98-100), they are not found to be colocalized or coprecipitated with
gelsolin (Figs. 1 and 2). Western analysis of the gelsolin immunoprecipitates with phosphotyrosine antibody demonstrates 42-44-kDa proteins (Fig. 2A, lane 13), which are
closer to the molecular mass of leupaxin. Therefore, we tested
for the presence of leupaxin in gelsolin immunoprecipitates, and we
failed to detect leupaxin association with gelsolin. PYK2 has been
reported to interact with p130Cas and paxillin in a manner
similar to that of FAK. Although FAK and PYK2 are structurally similar,
each has the capacity to mediate distinctly different signaling
responses (101, 102). FAK activity has been shown to be necessary for
focal adhesion turnover (103), and targeting of active c-Src to focal
contacts has been shown to promote the turnover of these structures
during cell motility (104). FAK appears to be one of the important
integration sites of various intracellular signals, including those via
integrin receptors providing docking sites for signaling proteins
containing SH3 or SH2 domains such as c-Src, PI3K, and
p130Cas (16, 105-107). Recently, it has been shown in
c-Src / osteoclasts that macrophage colony-stimulating factor causes
recruitment of 3 integrin and phospholipase C and
induces stable association of 3 integrin with
phospholipase C , PI3K, and PYK2 (108).
Treatment of osteoclasts with antisense oligodeoxynucleotides to
c-Src reduced bone resorption as well as
OPN/ v 3 activation of gelsolin-associated
PI3K. We observed only a basal level association of PI3K with gelsolin.
However, OPN-induced translocation of PI3K from the Triton-insoluble to
the Triton-soluble fraction was not seen in antisense
oligodeoxynucleotides to Src-pretreated cells (9). The signaling
mechanism in response to various factors is not unique. Selective
interactions of proteins are required to mediate the regulatory
mechanisms and signaling cascades mediated by integrin
v 3 within the osteoclast in response to
different factors. Although PTEN,2 leupaxin (100), PYK2
(83), and c-Cbl (110, 111) are not found in gelsolin
immunoprecipitates, these proteins have been demonstrated in osteoclast
function in v 3-mediated signaling mechanisms.
Experiments to understand the mechanism involved in the association of
signaling molecules with gelsolin were subsequently pursued. Rameh
et al. (52) have demonstrated that the amount of PI3K
associated with the tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins inversely correlates with the amount of PI3K lipid products present in the cell.
Phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate was shown to disrupt the
association of PI3K with tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins by binding to
the SH2 domain of the p85 subunit of PI3K (52). Because SH2 domains of
signaling proteins have been shown to interact with phosphoinositides,
we attempted to study the biological role of phosphoinositides in the
interaction of proteins with gelsolin. The role of lipids in the
interaction of proteins was evident from the experiments done with
lipid-extracted and unextracted lysates. Overlay and GST pull-down
assays confirm the specific interaction of phosphoinositides with the
SH2 domains of c-Src and PI3K. More specifically, the interaction of
PI3K (p85) SH2 domains with the PI3K lipid product PtdIns
P3 was evident from the overlay assay. We have shown here
that the interaction of SH2-containing proteins with gelsolin in the
podosome of osteoclast is mediated through phosphoinositide-protein
interactions. PI3K SH2 domain binding with PtdIns P3 is
more than the binding of c-Src SH2. SH2 domains of
PI3K and c-Src also bind to PtdIns P2, albeit more weakly
than their binding to PtdIns P3. This raises the
possibility that the initial phospholipid-SH2 domain-mediated interaction of gelsolin with PI3K and the subsequent protein-protein interactions among focal adhesion proteins lead to architectures of
complexes formed at the podosomes of osteoclast. This complex may be
involved in connecting integrin to actin because colocalization and
coprecipitation of integrin v 3 are seen
with gelsolin. Overall, these analyses demonstrate that
phosphoinositides, through their binding to the modular domains of
kinase(s), mediate the targeting of signaling molecules to podosomes of
osteoclasts. These observations lead us to propose the model shown in
Fig. 10 describing signaling complex
formation in osteoclast in response to integrin activation.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Model of gelsolin and the associated
signaling complex. Liganding of integrin
v 3 with osteopontin stimulates
association of signaling molecules with
v 3 in the podosomes of osteoclasts. One
of the actin-capping proteins that was coprecipitated with
v 3 is gelsolin. OPN stimulated
association of PtdIns 4,5-P2 and PtdIns P3 with
gelsolin. Lipid binding studies with GST fusion proteins demonstrated
binding of PtdIns P2 with gelsolin and PI3K.
Gelsolin-associated PtdIns 4,5-P2 is the substrate for
PI3K, and recognition of this phosphoinositide by PI3K leads to its
translocation from actin to gelsolin in the Triton-soluble fraction.
Activation of lipid second messenger pathway triggered by integrin has
been shown to modulate the interaction of cytoskeletal proteins. Talin,
vinculin, and -actinin are among the main integrin-associated
cytoskeletal molecules that bind to or are modulated by
phosphoinositides (48-51).
OPN/ v 3-mediated signaling is mediated
through the recruitment of focal adhesion proteins, such as FAK,
p130Cas, talin, vinculin, paxillin, c-Src, and PI3K, at the
cytoplasmic domains of the integrins. Gelsolin is one of the proteins
in the integrin-associated complex in podosomes of osteoclast. Also,
our observations demonstrate here that gelsolin interaction with the
signaling protein(s) is initially mediated through the novel
phosphoinositide-protein interaction. The association of PTP-PEST in
this complex and regulation of its phosphorylation status by OPN may
help to regulate the phosphorylation and recruitment of the other
signaling proteins with integin in osteoclasts.
|
|
The association of SH2-containing proteins with phosphotyrosine target
molecules is phosphorylation-dependent. This interaction occurs in a sequence-specific manner (24, 28). Several SH2-containing proteins are recruited to the receptor complex in response to stimulation. Among the proteins that bind to the platelet-derived growth factor receptor are c-Src, PI3K, Nck, GAP, Syp, and
phospholipase C (24). A number of signaling proteins were identified
to associate with gelsolin. Antibody to PtdIns P3
coprecipitates several signaling proteins, most of which contain SH2
domain- and SH3 domain-containing proteins. Songyang et al.
(112, 113) introduced the use of phosphotyrosine-containing peptides
and chromatographically identified peptide families that bind to
particular SH2 domains. Tyrosine phosphorylation of paxillin on a
YXXP motif results in the formation of a high-affinity
binding site for the SH2-SH3-containing linker proteins (114, 115). Synthetic phosphopeptide has been shown to inhibit SH2 binding to
phosphoinositides (52) or receptor binding (116).
A variety of chemical, physical, and biological approaches to the
intracellular delivery of peptides into living cells have been
investigated (reviewed in Ref. 117). Hall et al. (109) introduced phospholipase C -SH2 domain-binding phosphopeptides into
cells, which were able to inhibit inositol phosphate accumulation and
neurite outgrowth stimulated by fibroblast growth factor. Similarly,
Rojas et al. (95) inhibited epidermal growth factor-induced Ras activation with signal sequence-based internalization of a Grb2
binding site phosphopeptide at Tyr-1068 of the epidermal growth factor
receptor. In our competition assays, we observed that phosphotyrosine
peptide YMPM (which binds specifically to p85 SH2 domains)
competed with phosphoinositide binding. We did not observe any
competition with the unphosphorylated YMPM peptide or peptide specific
to Src SH2 domains
(pYEEI).3
After binding of osteoclasts through v 3
to proteins such as OPN, podosomes are assembled in a band at the
periphery (Fig. 1, I and J) in an area referred
to as the clear zone. Cellular organization for bone resorption is
associated with a transition of the osteoclast expressing the band of
podosomes to one expressing dense actin ring. When osteoclasts are
stimulated to move by, possibly through secretion of the autocrine OPN,
the actin filaments of the podosomes and actin rings are severed.
Uncapping of barbed end actin by phosphoinsoitides promotes new actin
filament formation. Changes in the cytoskeletal organization lead to
the development of cellular processes as the cell migrates. Osteoclasts
isolated from gelsolin-deficient mice lack the adhesion structures
called podosomes. Integrin v 3-associated
signaling molecules, other actin-capping/binding proteins, albeit
compromised adhesion but motility and bone resorption only to a lesser
extent in osteoclasts from gelsolin-null mice. Osteoclast podosome
assembly/disassembly is crucial for migration, and the formation of
podosome stabilizes the bone matrix-cell interface and forms an
isolated compartment between the ruffled border and the bone surface.
Because osteoclasts from gelsolin-null mice are devoid of podosomes and
failed to respond to OPN with a change in F-actin or functions of
osteoclast, we conclude that remodeling of the cytoskeleton and
assembly/disassembly of podosomes are dependent on gelsolin and the
associated signaling molecules. We have shown here that PI3K is present
in the podosomes of osteoclasts and colocalized with gelsolin. The
product of PI3K, PtdIns P3, is crucial for the protein
interactions at the podosome area. OPN/ v 3
mediated increased phosphorylation of signaling, and cytoskeletal
proteins regulate the ability of these proteins to physically interact
with each other through specific domains (Fig. 10), thereby modulating
the cytoskeleton and assembly/disassembly of podosomes, the critical
processes for osteoclast functions. Studies using specific
phosphotyrosine peptide strongly suggest that phosphoinositides recruit
SH2-containing proteins and that the binding requires pTyr-pocket.
Additional experiments on the delivery of phosphopeptides specific for
SH2 domains of various proteins into osteoclasts will unravel the
question of which specific protein directly interacts with gelsolin to
bring about podosome turnover.
The findings of novel PtdIns P3-based mechanisms of protein
complex formation around the actin-capping/severing protein gelsolin are relatively unique to the osteoclasts and cells expressing podosomes. Podosomes are unique cell adhesion structures associated with high rates of motility and rapid rates of assembly/disassembly. The findings of PtdIns P3-based scaffolding and enzymatic
regulation of tyrosine phosphorylation reported herein provide
molecular insights into the specific nature of podosome operation.
Cells expressing focal adhesions are characterized by lower rates of motility due to different and slower mechanisms of structural assembly/disassembly. Furthermore, the osteoclast appears to be uniquely dependent on gelsolin as the actin-severing and podosome actin-capping protein (10).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. David Cheresh (Scripps Clinic
and Research Foundation, La Jolla, CA) for valuable discussions, Dr.
John Freeman (Department of Orthopedics, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St.
Louis, MO) for assistance with the confocal microscopy, Dr. Arasu
Chellaiah for proofreading the manuscript, and Suzanne Swanson for
technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants AR46292 (to M. A. C.), AR41677 (to K. A. H.), DK09976 (to K. A. H.) and by a grant (DRIF) from the University of Maryland Dental
School, Baltimore, MD.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Oral and
Craniofacial Biological Sciences, University of Maryland, 666 W. Baltimore St., Baltimore, MD 21201-1586. Tel.: 410-706-2083; Fax:
410-706-0193; E-mail: mac001@dental.umaryland.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 27, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M107494200
2
Soga, N., Chellaiah, M. and Hruska, K. A.,
unpublished observations.
3
M. A. Chellaiah and K. A. Hruska, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
OPN, osteopontin;
FAK, focal adhesion kinase;
SH, Src homology;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
PtdIns 4, 5-P2,
phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate;
PTP, protein tyrosine
phosphatase;
PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase;
PtdIns P2, phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate;
PtdIns P, phosphatidylinositol phosphate;
PEST, proline glutamic
acid-serine-threonine amino acid sequences;
RGD, Arg-Gly-Asp cell
adhesion sequences. PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Teti, A.,
Blair, H. C.,
Schlesinger, P.,
Grano, M.,
Zambonin-Zallone, A.,
Kahn, A. J.,
Teitelbaum, S. L.,
and Hruska, K. A.
(1989)
J. Clin. Invest.
84,
773-780
|
| 2.
|
Baron, R.,
Ravesloot, J. H.,
Neff, L.,
Chakraborty, M.,
Chatterjee, D.,
Lomri, A.,
and Horne, W.
(1993)
in
Cellular & Molecular Biology of Bone
(Noda, M., ed)
, pp. 445-495, Academic Press, Inc., NY
|
| 3.
|
Turksen, K.,
Kanehisa, J.,
Opas, M.,
Heersche, J. N.,
and Aubin, J. E.
(1988)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
3,
389-400[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Marchisio, P. C.,
Cirillo, D.,
Teti, A.,
Zambonin Zallone, A.,
and Tarone, G.
(1987)
Exp. Cell Res.
169,
202-214[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Lakkakorpi, P. T.,
and Vaananen, H. K.
(1991)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
6,
817-826[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Warchafsky, B.,
Aubin, J. E.,
and Heersche, J. N. M.
(1985)
Bone (NY)
6,
179-185[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Zambonin-Zallone, A.,
Teti, A.,
Primavera, M. V.,
Naldini, L.,
and Marchisio, P. C.
(1983)
J. Anat.
137,
57-70
|
| 8.
|
Chellaiah, M.,
and Hruska, K. A.
(1996)
Mol. Biol. Cell
7,
743-753[Abstract]
|
| 9.
|
Chellaiah, M.,
Fitzgerald, C.,
Alvarez, U.,
and Hruska, K.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
11908-11916[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Chellaiah, M.,
Kizer, N.,
Silva, M.,
Alvarez, U.,
Kwiatkowski, D.,
and Hruska, K. A.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
148,
665-678[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Richardson, A.,
and Parsons, T.
(1996)
Nature
380,
538-540[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Clark, E. A.,
and Brugge, J. S.
(1995)
Science
268,
233-239[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Xing, Z.,
Chen, H. C.,
Noelen, J. K.,
Taylor, S. J.,
Shaloway, D.,
and Guan, J. L.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
5,
413-421
|
| 14.
|
Hordijk, P. L.,
Verlaan, I.,
van Corven, E. J.,
and Moolenaar, W. H.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
645-651[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Sakai, R.,
Iwamatsu, A.,
Hirano, N.,
Ogawa, S.,
Tanaka, T.,
Mano, H.,
Yazaki, Y.,
and Hirai, H.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
3748-3756[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Nakamoto, T.,
Sakai, R.,
Honda, H.,
Ogawa, S.,
Ueno, H.,
Suzuki, T.,
Aizawa, S.,
Yazaki, Y.,
and Hirai, H.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
3884-3897[Abstract]
|
| 17.
|
Honda, H.,
Nakamoto, T.,
Sakai, R.,
and Hirai, H.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
262,
25-30[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Schaller, M. D.,
Hildebrand, J. D.,
Shannon, J. D.,
Fox, J. W.,
Vines, R. R.,
and Parsons, J. T.
(1994)
Mol. Biol. Cell
14,
1680-1688
|
| 19.
|
Schaller, M. D.,
and Parsons, J. T.
(1994)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
6,
705-710[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Lipfert, L.,
Haimovich, B.,
Schaller, M. D.,
Cobb, B. S.,
Parsons, J. T.,
and Brugge, J. S.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
119,
905-912[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Clark, E. A.,
and Brugge, J. S.
(1995)
Science
268,
233-238
|
| 22.
|
Turner, C. E.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
4139-4140[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Hruska, K. A.,
Rolnick, F.,
Huskey, M.,
Alvarez, U.,
and Cheresh, D.
(1995)
Endocrinology
136,
2984-2992[Abstract]
|
| 24.
|
Pawson, T.
(1995)
Nature
373,
573-580[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Pawson, T.,
and Gish, G. D.
(1992)
Cell
71,
359-362[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Kuriyan, J.,
and Cowburn, D.
(1993)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
3,
828-837[CrossRef]
|
| 27.
|
Gibson, T. J.,
Hyvonen, M.,
Musacchio, A.,
and Saraste, M.
(1994)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
19,
349-353[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Cantley, L. C.,
Auger, K. R.,
Carpenter, C.,
Duckworth, B.,
Graziani, A.,
Kapeller, R.,
and Soltoff, S.
(1991)
Cell
64,
281-302[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Pawson, T.,
and Nash, P.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
1027-1047[Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Koch, C. A.,
Anderson, D.,
Moran, M. F.,
Ellis, C.,
and Pawson, T.
(1991)
Science
252,
668-674[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Cohen, G. B.,
Ren, R.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1995)
Cell
80,
237-248[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Ren, R.,
Mayer, B. J.,
Cicchetti, P.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1993)
Science
259,
1157-1161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Ho, S. N.,
Hunt, H. D.,
Horton, R. M.,
Pullen, J. K.,
and Pease, L. R.
(1989)
Gene (Amst.)
7,
51-59
|
| 34.
|
Kiwatkowski, D. J.,
Janmey, P. A.,
and Yin, H. L.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
108,
1717-1726[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Yu, F.-X.,
Sun, H.-Q.,
Janmey, P. A.,
and Yin, H. L.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
14616-14621[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Janmey, P. A.,
Stossel, T. P.,
and Allen, P. G.
(1998)
Chem. Biol.
5,
R81-R85[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Sun, H. Q.,
Yamamoto, M.,
Mejillano, M.,
and Yin, H. L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
33179-33182[Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
McLaughlin, P.,
Gooch, J.,
Mannherz, H.-G.,
and Weeds, A.
(1993)
Nature
364,
685-692[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Weeds, A.,
and Maciver, S.
(1993)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
5,
63-69[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Downward, J.
(1998)
Science
279,
673-674[Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Pande, G.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
12,
569-574[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
De Deyne, P. G.,
O'Neill, A.,
Resneck, W. G.,
Dmytrenko, G. M.,
Pumplin, D. W.,
and Bloch, R. J.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
2729-2740[Abstract]
|
| 43.
|
Oliferenko, S.,
Paiha, K.,
Harder, T.,
Gerke, V.,
Schwarzler, C.,
Schwarz, H.,
Beug, H.,
Gunthert, U.,
and Huber, L. A.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
146,
843-854[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Green, J. M.,
Zhelesnyak, A.,
Chung, J.,
Lindberg, F. P.,
Sarfati, M.,
Frazier, W. A.,
and Brown, E. J.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
146,
673-682[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Ilangumaran, S.,
Arni, S.,
Echten-Deckert, G.,
Borisch, B.,
and Hoessli, D. C.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
891-905[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Isenberg, G.,
and Niggli, V.
(1998)
Int. Rev. Cytol.
178,
73-125[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Gopalakrishna, P.,
Chaubey, S. K.,
Manogaran, P. S.,
and Pande, G.
(2000)
J. Cell. Biochem.
77,
517-528[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Fukami, K.,
Furuhashi, K.,
Inagaki, M.,
Endo, T.,
Hatano, S.,
and Takenawa, T.
(1992)
Nature
359,
150-152[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Gilmore, A. P.,
and Burridge, K.
(1996)
Nature
381,
531-535[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Heraud, J. M.,
Racaud-Sultan, C.,
Gironcel, D.,
Albiges-Rizo, C.,
Giacomini, T.,
Roques, S.,
Martel, V.,
Breton-Douillon, M.,
Perret, B.,
and Chap, H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
17817-17823[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Greenwood, J. A.,
Theibert, A. B.,
Prestwich, G. D.,
and Murphy-Ullrich, J. E.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
150,
627-642[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Rameh, L. E.,
Chen, C.-S.,
and Cantley, L. C.
(1995)
Cell
83,
821-830[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Baudier, J.,
Deloulme, J. C.,
Van Dorsselaer, A.,
Black, D.,
and Matthes, H. W.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
229-237[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 54.
|
Lu, P.-J.,
and Chen, C.-S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
466-472[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Lemmon, M. A.,
Falasca, M.,
Ferguson, K. M.,
and Schlessinger, J.
(1997)
Trends Cell Biol.
7,
237-242
|
| 56.
|
Muthuswamy, S. K.,
and Muller, W. J.
(1995)
Oncogene
11,
271-279[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Wu, H.,
Kanner, S. B.,
Reynolds, A. B.,
Vines, R. R.,
and Parson, J. T.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
5113-5124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
Chellaiah, M.,
Fitzgerald, C.,
Filardo, E. J.,
Cheresh, D. A.,
and Hruska, K. A.
(1996)
Endocrinology
137,
2432-2440[Abstract]
|
| 59.
|
Meenakshi, T.,
Ross, F. P.,
Martin, J.,
and Teitelbaum, S. L.
(1993)
J. Cell. Biochem.
53,
1-11[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 60.
|
Lammelli, V. P.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 61.
|
Teti, A.,
Marchisio, P. C.,
and Zambonin-Zallone, A.
(1991)
Am. J. Physiol.
261,
C1-C7[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 62.
|
Zambonin-Zallone, A.,
Teti, A.,
Carano, A.,
and Marchisio, P. C.
(1988)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
3,
517-523[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 63.
|
Marchisio, P. C.,
Naldini, L.,
Cirillo, D.,
Primavera, M. V.,
Teti, A.,
and Zambonin-Zallone, A.
(1984)
J. Cell Biol.
99,
1696-1705[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 64.
|
Kanehisa, J.,
Yamanaka, T.,
Doi, S.,
Turksen, K.,
Heersche, J. N. M.,
Aubin, J. E.,
and Takeuchi, H.
(1990)
Bone (NY)
11,
287-293[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 65.
|
Cary, L. A.,
Han, D. C.,
Polte, T. R.,
Hanks, S. K.,
and Guan, J.-L.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
140,
211-221[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 66.
|
Tamura, M.,
Gu, J.,
Matsumoto, K.,
Aota, S.,
Parsons, R.,
and Yamada, K. M.
(1998)
Science
280,
1614-1617[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 67.
|
Tamura, M.,
Gu, J.,
Tran, H.,
and Yamada, K. M.
(1999)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
91,
1820-1828[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 68.
|
Garton, A. J.,
and Tonks, N. K.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
3811-3818[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 69.
|
Cote, J. F.,
Turner, C. E.,
and Tremblay, M. L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
20550-20560[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 70.
|
Angers-Loustau, A.,
Côté, J.-F.,
Charest, A.,
Dowbenko, D.,
Spencer, S.,
Lasky, L. A.,
and Tremblay, M. L.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
144,
1019-1031[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 71.
|
Shen, Y.,
Schneider, G.,
Cloutier, J. F.,
Veillette, A.,
and Schaller, M. D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
6474-6481[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 72.
|
Dowler, S.,
Currie, R. A.,
Downes, C. P.,
and Alessi, D. R.
(1999)
Biochem. J.
342,
7-12
|
| 73.
|
Deak, M.,
Casamayor, A.,
Currie, R. A.,
Downes, C. P.,
and Alessi, D. R.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
451,
220-226[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 74.
|
Cunningham, C. C.,
Stossel, T. P.,
and Kwiatkowiski, D. J.
(1991)
Science
251,
1233-1236[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 75.
|
Stossel, T. P.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
18261-18264[Free Full Text]
|
| 76.
|
Yin, H. L.
(1987)
Bioessays
7,
176-179[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 77.
|
Janmey, P. A.,
and Stossel, T. P.
(1987)
Nature
325,
362-364[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 78.
|
Janmey, P. A.,
Iida, K.,
Yin, H. L.,
and Stossel, T. P.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
12228-12236[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 79.
|
Kwiatkowski, D. J.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
11,
103-108[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 80.
|
Chellaiah, M.,
Soga, N.,
Swanson, S.,
McAllister, S.,
Alvarez, U.,
Wang, D.,
Dowdy, S. F.,
and Hruska, K. A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
11993-12002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 81.
|
Boyce, B. F.,
Yoneda, T.,
Lowe, C.,
Soriano, P.,
and Mundy, G. R.
(1992)
J. Clin. Invest.
90,
1622-1627
|
| 82.
|
Schwartzberg, P. L.,
Xing, L.,
Hoffmann, O.,
Lowell, C. A.,
Garrett, L.,
Boyce, B. F.,
and Varmus, H. E.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
2835-2844[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 83.
|
Duong, L. T.,
Lakkakorpi, P. T.,
Nakamura, I.,
Machwate, M.,
Nagy, R. M.,
and Rodan, G. A.
(1998)
J. Clin. Invest.
102,
881-892[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 84.
|
Lakkakorpi, P. T.,
Nakamura, I.,
Nagy, R. M.,
Parsons, J. T.,
Rodan, G. A.,
and Duong, L. T.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
4900-4907[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 85.
|
Lakkakorpi, P. T.,
Wesolowski, G.,
Limolo, L.,
Rodan, G. A.,
and Rodan, S. B.
(1997)
Exp. Cell Res.
237,
296-306[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 86.
|
Nakamura, I.,
Takahashi, N.,
Sasaki, T.,
Tanaka, S.,
Udagawa, N.,
Murakami, H.,
Kimura, K.,
Kubuyama, Y.,
Kurokawa, T.,
Suda, T.,
and Fukui, Y.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
361,
79-84[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 87.
|
Nakamura, I.,
Sasaki, T.,
Tanaka, S.,
Takahashi, N.,
Jimi, E.,
Kurokawa, T.,
Kita, Y.,
Ihara, S.,
Suda, T.,
and Fukui, Y.
(1997)
J. Cell. Physiol.
172,
230-239[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 88.
|
Zhang, D.,
Udagawa, N.,
Nakamura, I.,
Murakami, H.,
Saito, S.,
Yamasaki, K.,
Shibasaki, Y.,
Morij, N.,
Narumiya, S.,
Takahashi, N.,
and Suda, T.
(1995)
J. Cell Sci.
108,
2285-2292[Abstract]
|
| 89.
|
Hanks, S. K.,
and Polte, T. R.
(1997)
Bioessays
19,
137-145[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 90.
|
Sclaepfer, D. D.,
and Hunter, T.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
5623-5633[Abstract]
|
| 91.
|
Turner, C. E.,
and Miller, J. T.
(1994)
J. Cell Sci.
107,
1583-1591[Abstract]
|
| 92.
|
Hildebrand, J. D.,
Schaller, M. D.,
and Parsons, J. T.
(1995)
Mol. Biol. Cell
6,
637-647[Abstract]
|
| 93.
|
Burridge, K.,
Fath, K.,
Kelly, T.,
Nuckolls, G.,
and Turner, C.
(1988)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
4,
487-525[CrossRef]
|
| 94.
|
Schneider, G. B.,
Gilmore, A. P.,
Lohse, D. L.,
Romer, L. H.,
and Burridge, K.
(1998)
Cell Adhesion Communication
5,
207-219[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 95.
|
Rojas, M.,
Yao, S.,
and Lin, Y. Z.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
27456-27461[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 96.
|
Garton, A. J.,
Flint, A. J.,
and Tonks, N. K.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
6408-6418[Abstract]
|
| 97.
|
Garton, A. J.,
and Tonks, N. K.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
3763-3771[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 98.
|
Ueda, H.,
Abbi, S.,
Zheng, C.,
and Guan, J. L.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
149,
423-430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 99.
|
Lipsky, B. P.,
Beals, C. R.,
and Staunton, D. E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
11709-11713[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 100.
|
Gupta, A.,
Wang, D.,
Lipsky, B.,
Chan, D.,
Staunton, D.,
and Hruska, K. A.
(1999)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
14,
S182
|
| 101.
|
Xiong, W.-C.,
Macklem, M.,
and Parsons, J. T.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
1981-1991[Abstract]
|
| 102.
|
Schaller, M. D.,
and Sasaki, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
25319-25325[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 103.
|
Ren, X. D.,
Kiosses, W. B.,
Sieg, D. J.,
Otey, C. A.,
Schlaepfer, D. D.,
and Schwartz, M. A.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
3673-3678[Abstract]
|
| 104.
|
Klingbeil, C. K.,
Hauck, C. R.,
Hsia, D. A.,
Jones, K. C.,
Reider, S. R.,
and Schlaepfer, D. D.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
152,
97-110[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 105.
|
Nakamoto, T.,
Sakai, R.,
Ozawa, K.,
Yazaki, Y.,
and Hirai, H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
8959-8965[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 106.
|
Chen, H. C.,
Appeddu, P. A.,
Isoda, H.,
and Guan, J. L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
26329-26334[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 107.
|
Schaller, M. D.,
Hildebrand, J. D.,
and Parsons, J. T.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
3489-3505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 108.
|
Nakamura, I.,
Lipfert, L.,
Rodan, G. A.,
and Duong, L. T.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
152,
361-374[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 109.
|
Hall, H.,
Williams, E. J.,
Moore, S. E.,
Walsh, F. S.,
Prochiantz, A.,
and Doherty, P.
(1996)
Curr. Biol.
6,
580-587[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 110.
|
Levy, J. B.,
DiDomenico, E.,
Neff, L.,
Dikie, I.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Baron, R.
(1997)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
12,
S109
|
| 111.
|
Sanjay, A.,
Houghton, A.,
Neff, L.,
DiDomenico, E.,
Bardelay, C.,
Antoine, E.,
Levy, J.,
Gailit, J.,
Bowtell, D.,
Horne, W. C.,
and Baron, R.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
152,
181-195[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 112.
|
Songyang, Z.,
Shoelson, S. E.,
Chaudhuri, M.,
Gish, G.,
Pawson, T.,
Haser, W. G.,
King, F.,
Roberts, T.,
Ratnofsky, S.,
Lechleider, R. J.,
Neel, B. G.,
Birge, R. B.,
Fajardo, J. E.,
Chou, M. M.,
Hanafusa, H.,
Schaffhausen, B.,
and Cantley, L. C.
(1993)
Cell
72,
767-778[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 113.
|
Songyang, Z.,
Shoelson, S. E.,
McGlade, J.,
Olivier, P.,
Pawson, T.,
Bustelo, X. R.,
Barbacid, M.,
Sabe, H.,
Hanafusa, H.,
Yi, T.,
et al..
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
2777-2785[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 114.
|
Birge, R. B.,
Fajardo, J. E.,
Reichman, C.,
Shoelson, S. E.,
Songyang, Z.,
Cantley, L. C.,
and Hanafusa, H.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
4648-4656[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 115.
|
Salgia, R.,
Uemura, N.,
Okuda, K.,
Li, J. L.,
Pisick, E.,
Sattler, M.,
de Jong, R.,
Druker, B.,
Heisterkamp, N.,
Chen, L. B.,
et al..
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
29145-29150[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 116.
|
Escobedo, J. A.,
Kaplan, D. R.,
Kavanaugh, W. M.,
Turck, C. W.,
and Williams, L. T.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
1125-1132[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 117.
|
Hawiger, J.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
9,
189-194[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. H. Li, Y. Shi, Y. Chen, M. Sun, S. Sader, Y. Maekawa, S. Arab, F. Dawood, M. Chen, G. De Couto, et al.
Gelsolin Regulates Cardiac Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction Through DNase I-Mediated Apoptosis
Circ. Res.,
April 10, 2009;
104(7):
896 - 904.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Chellaiah, D. Kuppuswamy, L. Lasky, and S. Linder
Phosphorylation of a Wiscott-Aldrich Syndrome Protein-associated Signal Complex Is Critical in Osteoclast Bone Resorption
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 30, 2007;
282(13):
10104 - 10116.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Halle, Y.-C. Liu, S. Hardy, J.-F. Theberge, C. Blanchetot, A. Bourdeau, T.-C. Meng, and M. L. Tremblay
Caspase-3 Regulates Catalytic Activity and Scaffolding Functions of the Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase PEST, a Novel Modulator of the Apoptotic Response
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
February 1, 2007;
27(3):
1172 - 1190.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Yogo, M. Mizutamari, K. Mishima, H. Takenouchi, N. Ishida-Kitagawa, T. Sasaki, and T. Takeya
Src Homology 2 (SH2)-Containing 5'-Inositol Phosphatase Localizes to Podosomes, and the SH2 Domain Is Implicated in the Attenuation of Bone Resorption in Osteoclasts
Endocrinology,
July 1, 2006;
147(7):
3307 - 3317.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Varon, F. Tatin, V. Moreau, E. Van Obberghen-Schilling, S. Fernandez-Sauze, E. Reuzeau, I. Kramer, and E. Genot
Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Induces Rosettes of Podosomes in Primary Aortic Endothelial Cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
May 1, 2006;
26(9):
3582 - 3594.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. P. Hall, F. R. Westwood, and P. F. Wadsworth
Review of the Effects of Anti-Angiogenic Compounds on the Epiphyseal Growth Plate
Toxicol Pathol,
February 1, 2006;
34(2):
131 - 147.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Chellaiah
Regulation of Actin Ring Formation by Rho GTPases in Osteoclasts
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 23, 2005;
280(38):
32930 - 32943.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Linder and P. Kopp
Podosomes at a glance
J. Cell Sci.,
May 15, 2005;
118(10):
2079 - 2082.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. S. Moreno, S. Ramachandran, D. G. Ashby, N. Laycock, C. A. Plattner, W. Chen, W. C. Hahn, and D. C. Pallas
Signaling and Transcriptional Changes Critical for Transformation of Human Cells by Simian Virus 40 Small Tumor Antigen or Protein Phosphatase 2A B56{gamma} Knockdown
Cancer Res.,
October 1, 2004;
64(19):
6978 - 6988.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. K.Y. Siu and C. Y. Cheng
Extracellular Matrix: Recent Advances on Its Role in Junction Dynamics in the Seminiferous Epithelium During Spermatogenesis
Biol Reprod,
August 1, 2004;
71(2):
375 - 391.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Calle, G. E. Jones, C. Jagger, K. Fuller, M. P. Blundell, J. Chow, T. Chambers, and A. J. Thrasher
WASp deficiency in mice results in failure to form osteoclast sealing zones and defects in bone resorption
Blood,
May 1, 2004;
103(9):
3552 - 3561.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-H. Chen, M. R. Bubb, E. G. Yarmola, J. Zuo, J. Jiang, B. S. Lee, M. Lu, S. L. Gluck, I. R. Hurst, and L. S. Holliday
Vacuolar H+-ATPase Binding to Microfilaments: REGULATION IN RESPONSE TO PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3-KINASE ACTIVITY AND DETAILED CHARACTERIZATION OF THE ACTIN-BINDING SITE IN SUBUNIT B
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 27, 2004;
279(9):
7988 - 7998.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. D. Arora, M. Glogauer, A. Kapus, D. J. Kwiatkowski, and C. A. McCulloch
Gelsolin Mediates Collagen Phagocytosis through a Rac-dependent Step
Mol. Biol. Cell,
February 1, 2004;
15(2):
588 - 599.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Kaverina, T. E. B. Stradal, and M. Gimona
Podosome formation in cultured A7r5 vascular smooth muscle cells requires Arp2/3-dependent de-novo actin polymerization at discrete microdomains
J. Cell Sci.,
December 15, 2003;
116(24):
4915 - 4924.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Chellaiah, R. S. Biswas, S. R. Rittling, D. T. Denhardt, and K. A. Hruska
Rho-dependent Rho Kinase Activation Increases CD44 Surface Expression and Bone Resorption in Osteoclasts
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 1, 2003;
278(31):
29086 - 29097.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Khadeer, Z. Tang, H. S. Tenenhouse, M. V. Eiden, H. Murer, N. Hernando, E. J. Weinman, M. A. Chellaiah, and A. Gupta
Na+-dependent phosphate transporters in the murine osteoclast: cellular distribution and protein interactions
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
June 1, 2003;
284(6):
C1633 - C1644.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. M. Becker, A. A. Kazi, R. Wadgaonkar, D. B. Pearse, D. Kwiatkowski, and J. G. N. Garcia
Pulmonary Vascular Permeability and Ischemic Injury in Gelsolin-Deficient Mice
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.,
April 1, 2003;
28(4):
478 - 484.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. D. Niswender, B. Gallis, J. E. Blevins, M. A. Corson, M. W. Schwartz, and D. G. Baskin
Immunocytochemical Detection of Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase Activation by Insulin and Leptin
J. Histochem. Cytochem.,
March 1, 2003;
51(3):
275 - 283.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Sugatani, U. Alvarez, and K. A. Hruska
PTEN Regulates RANKL- and Osteopontin-stimulated Signal Transduction during Osteoclast Differentiation and Cell Motility
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 7, 2003;
278(7):
5001 - 5008.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Chellaiah, N. Kizer, R. Biswas, U. Alvarez, J. Strauss-Schoenberger, L. Rifas, S. R. Rittling, D. T. Denhardt, and K. A. Hruska
Osteopontin Deficiency Produces Osteoclast Dysfunction Due to Reduced CD44 Surface Expression
Mol. Biol. Cell,
January 1, 2003;
14(1):
173 - 189.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|