JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M108652200 on October 8, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 50, 47512-47517, December 14, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/50/47512    most recent
M108652200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bünemann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hein, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bünemann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hein, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Activation and Deactivation Kinetics of alpha 2A- and alpha 2C-Adrenergic Receptor-activated G Protein-activated Inwardly Rectifying K+ Channel Currents*

Moritz Bünemann, Markus M. Bücheler, Melanie Philipp, Martin J. Lohse, and Lutz HeinDagger

From the Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Universität Würzburg, 97078 Würzburg, Germany

Received for publication, September 7, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Although G protein-coupled receptor-mediated signaling is one of the best studied biological events, little is known about the kinetics of these processes in intact cells. Experiments with neurons from alpha 2A-adrenergic receptor knockout mice suggested that the alpha 2A-receptor subtype inhibits neurotransmitter release with higher speed and at higher action potential frequencies than the alpha 2C-adrenergic receptor. Here we investigated whether these functional differences between presynaptic alpha 2-adrenergic receptor subtypes are the result of distinct signal transduction kinetics of these two receptors and their coupling to G proteins. alpha 2A- and alpha 2C-receptors were stably expressed in HEK293 cells at moderate (~2 pmol/mg) or high (17-24 pmol/mg) levels. Activation of G protein-activated inwardly rectifying K+ (GIRK) channels was similar in extent and kinetics for alpha 2A- and alpha 2C-receptors at both expression levels. However, the two receptors differed significantly in their deactivation kinetics after removal of the agonist norepinephrine. alpha 2C-Receptor-activated GIRK currents returned much more slowly to base line than did alpha 2A-stimulated currents. This observation correlated with a higher affinity of norepinephrine at the murine alpha 2C- than at the alpha 2A-receptor subtype and may explain why alpha 2C-adrenergic receptors are especially suited to control sympathetic neurotransmission at low action potential frequencies in contrast to the alpha 2A-receptor subtype.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)1 transfer a large diversity of extracellular signals into the cell interior, including light, neurotransmitters, and hormones. Although GPCRs represent some of the best studied signaling molecules, relatively little information exists about the kinetics of signal transduction by these receptors (except for rhodopsin) in intact cells. However, more detailed knowledge about the kinetic properties of GPCR signal transduction would be of particular interest to determine the physiological significance of closely related receptor subtypes, which can be activated by the same endogenous agonist but differ in their biological function.

Functional data on alpha 2-adrenergic receptor subtypes suggest that they differ in their signaling kinetics. Interestingly, several physiological differences were identified between presynaptic alpha 2A- and alpha 2C-receptor subtypes (1). In mouse atria, the alpha 2A-subtype inhibited norepinephrine release at high stimulation frequencies whereas the alpha 2C-receptor operated at lower levels of sympathetic nerve activity (1). Moreover, inhibition of norepinephrine release mediated by the alpha 2A-subtype occurred much faster than inhibition by the alpha 2C-receptor. These findings indicate that two presynaptic receptors in the inhibitory feedback loop of transmitter release may differentially regulate synaptic transmission. Several explanations may account for these functional differences. alpha 2-Adrenergic receptor subtypes have been shown to differ in their signal transduction, agonist-dependent internalization and receptor trafficking, subcellular localization, and binding to intracellular scaffolding proteins (2-11).

alpha 2-Adrenergic receptors are essential regulators of the sympathetic and central nervous system (12-15). Three subtypes of alpha 2-adrenergic receptors have been identified in different species (12). Recently, transgenic mouse models lacking individual alpha 2-receptor subtypes have been generated to define the physiological significance and therapeutic potential of these receptor subtypes (for reviews, see Refs. 16-18). alpha 2-Receptors are essential constituents of a negative feedback loop regulating presynaptic neurotransmitter release (15). Experiments with gene-targeted mice lacking individual alpha 2-adrenergic receptors have demonstrated that two alpha 2-receptor subtypes, alpha 2A and alpha 2C, serve as presynaptic regulators in the sympathetic nervous system and in the central nervous system (1, 19). Mice lacking both of these receptors had enhanced circulating norepinephrine levels and developed cardiac hypertrophy and failure (1).

We therefore sought a simple experimental model to investigate potential differences in the speed of alpha 2A- and alpha 2C-receptor-mediated signaling and the role of receptor levels for signaling kinetics. We have determined the properties of these receptor subtypes to inhibit N-type Ca2+ channels or activate G protein-activated inwardly rectifying K+ (GIRK) channels in a heterologous expression system in human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells. We found that, at similar levels of expression, alpha 2A- and alpha 2C-receptors did not differ in their activation kinetics, but the deactivation after receptor stimulation by norepinephrine was significantly slower for alpha 2C- than for alpha 2A-receptors. This finding is consistent with a higher affinity of norepinephrine for alpha 2C- than for alpha 2A-receptors. Different deactivation kinetics may account for part of the functional differences between presynaptic alpha 2-adrenergic receptor subtypes to enhance the power of synaptic regulation and plasticity.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

alpha 2-Receptor-expressing Cell Lines and Transfection Procedure-- HEK293 cells were stably transfected with the murine alpha 2A- and alpha 2C-adrenergic receptors using a pcDNA3 vector (2). After selection with 200 µg/ml G418 (Life Technologies, Inc.), stable cell clones were screened by radioligand binding and homogeneity of receptor expression was controlled by immunofluorescence (2). alpha 2A-AR-or alpha 2C-AR-expressing cell lines were transiently transfected with a bicistronic expression vector encoding for GIRK1 and GIRK4 (kindly provided by Dr. L.Y. Jan, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA) as well as with pi H3 plasmids encoding the CD8 receptors (0.15 µg/5-cm dish; kindly provided by Dr. G Yellen, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA) using the Effectene transfection kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). For GIRK deactivation studies, either rat RGS4 (in pcDNA3.1) or empty pcDNA3 vector (0.5 µg/5-cm dish) was added to the transfection reaction. 18-24 h after transfection, cells were replated onto poly-L-lysine-coated cell culture dishes and were used for experiments 40-50 h after transfection. Successfully transfected cells were detected by binding Dynabeads coated with anti-CD8 antibodies (Dynal ASA, Oslo, Norway) to the cells (20). For measurement of N-type Ca2+ channels, G1A1 cells (Ref. 21; cells provided by Dr. R. J. Miller with permission from SIBIA Neuroscience, La Jolla, CA) were transiently transfected with pCDNA3-alpha 2A or pcDNA3-alpha 2C (1 µg/5-cm dish) and pi H3-CD8 (0.15 µg/5-cm dish) using Effectene.

Immunofluorescence Staining-- Immunofluorescence detection of alpha 2-adrenergic receptor was performed as described previously (2) using alpha 2A- and alpha 2C-adrenergic receptor subtype-specific antibodies (2, 22) and secondary anti-mouse Alexa (Molecular Probes, Leiden, Netherlands) and anti-mouse Cy2 antibodies (Dianova, Hamburg, Germany).

Radioligand Binding-- Expression levels of alpha 2-adrenergic receptors were determined after lysis of cells with hypotonic buffer (5 mM Tris, 2 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) as described (23). [3H]RX 821002 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Freiburg, Germany) was used as radioligand, and nonspecific binding was determined by addition of 1 µM atipamezole (Orion Corp., Turku, Finland). For competition assays, 4 nM [3H]RX 821002 was used with equal amounts of alpha 2A- and alpha 2C-receptors (150 fmol) (24).

Electrophysiology-- Inward currents through GIRK channels were measured by whole cell patch recording similar to that described previously (25). Briefly, whole cell membrane currents were measured at -90 mV holding potential and agonist-induced currents were activated by fast superfusion of the cells using a solenoid valve operated superfusion system (26). Solution exchange occurred within less than 150 ms. Voltage ramps (from 120 mV to +60 mV in 500 ms, every 10 s) were used to determine current-voltage relationships. Barium currents through N-type Ca2+ channels were measured as described (27). Depolarization-evoked Ba2+ currents were measured every 10 s using 25-ms test pulses of +10 mV (holding potential was -90 mV). All measurements were performed at room temperature.

Patch pipettes were fabricated from borosilicate glass capillaries (GF-150-10, Harvard Apparatus, Edenbridge, United Kingdom) using a horizontal puller (P-95, Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA). The DC resistance of the filled pipettes ranged from 2 to 5 megohms. Membrane currents were recorded using either an EPC 9 patch clamp amplifier (HEKA, Lambrecht, Germany) or an Axopatch 200 (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA). Signals were analog-filtered using a low pass Bessel filter (1-3-kHz corner frequency). Data were digitally stored using computers equipped with the appropriate hardware/software package (ISO2 by MFK, Frankfurt/Main, Germany; or PULSE by HEKA, Lambrecht, Germany) for voltage control, data acquisition, and data evaluation.

For the measurement of GIRK currents, an extracellular solution of the following composition was used: 120 mM NaCl, 20 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES-NaOH (pH 7.3). The internal (pipette) solution contained: 100 mM potassium aspartate, 40 mM KCl, 5 mM MgATP, 10 mM HEPES-KOH, 5 mM NaCl, 2 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.01 mM GTP (pH 7.3). For measurement of barium currents through N-type Ca2+ channels, the extracellular solution contained: 105 mM NaCl, 25 mM CsCl, 10 mM BaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES-NaOH (pH 7.3). The intracellular solution contained 130 mM CsCl, 5 mM EGTA, 5 mM HEPES-CsOH, 5 mM MgATP, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.01 mM GTP (pH 7.3). NaCl, KCl and MgCl2 were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany); potassium aspartate, CaCl2, BaCl2, CsCl, ATP, GTP, EGTA, norepinephrine, and phenylephrine were from Sigma (Deisenhofen, Germany); and HEPES was from Biomol (Hamburg, Germany).

Statistics-- Results shown display means ± S.E. for n = 5-10 experiments if not stated otherwise, and statistically significant differences were determined by applying the Student's t test for two independent data sets (*, p <=  0.05; **, p <=  0.01).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Ca2+ Channel Inhibition and GIRK Activation by alpha 2-Adrenergic Receptors-- The ability of alpha 2-adrenergic receptor subtypes alpha 2A and alpha 2C to activate GIRK currents or to inhibit N-type Ca2+ currents was initially tested in HEK293 cells transiently expressing either one of the receptor subtypes and GIRK channels or in HEK cells stably expressing N-type Ca2+ channels composed of alpha 1B-, beta 1B-, and alpha 2delta -channel subunits (G1A1 cells; Ref. 21). Activation of both adrenergic receptors, alpha 2A and alpha 2C, led to inhibition of N-type Ca2+ currents (Fig. 1) and to activation of GIRK channels (Fig. 1). The time course of the phenylephrine-induced inhibition of Ba2+ currents through N-type Ca2+ channels was similar for the two alpha 2-receptor subtypes (data not shown). In addition, the time course of the activation of GIRK currents was indistinguishable from the time course of the phenylephrine-induced inhibition of N-type Ca2+ channels (Fig. 1). However, independent from the effector system, the time courses of alpha 2-adrenergic responses were quite variable in this transient expression system, possibly because of cell to cell variability of the expression levels of the receptors. Therefore, we chose to investigate the signaling of both receptor subtypes in stable HEK293 cell lines expressing defined amounts of receptor. From a total of 48 cell lines with ~0.1-50 pmol of receptor/mg of membrane protein, four cell lines were chosen for further experiments (Fig. 2). An intermediate level (2 pmol of receptor/mg of membrane protein) and a high level (17-24 pmol of receptor/mg of membrane protein) of receptor expression were used for all experiments. Lower expression levels of alpha 2-receptors resulted in less reproducible Ca2+ channel inhibition or GIRK channel activation, respectively (data not shown). As previous studies had indicated that alpha 2A- and alpha 2C-receptors may differ in their plasma membrane targeting (2, 11), all cell clones used for this study were screened by immunofluorescence staining and only clones with plasma membrane localization of alpha 2-receptors were included for further study (Fig. 2, c and d). As the GIRK channel activation kinetics by alpha 2-receptors had been found to be similar to the kinetics of alpha 2-receptor-mediated inhibition of N-type Ca2+ channels, and as measurement of GIRK current activation allowed for a higher temporal resolution of the alpha 2-response, we focused on these channels for detailed kinetic analysis of alpha 2-receptor signaling.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Comparison of alpha 2C-receptor-induced responses on N-type Ca2+ currents and GIRK currents. HEK293 cells or HEK G1A1 cells stably expressing alpha 1B, beta 1B, and alpha 2delta subunits of N-type Ca2+ channels were transiently transfected with alpha 2C-adrenergic receptors and GIRK1 and GIRK4 channel subunits (only HEK293 cells) and were subjected to whole cell patch experiments. The time course of the inhibition of N-type Ca2+ channels (black squares) as well as the activation of GIRK currents (representative current trace) by the alpha -agonist phenylephrine were determined. Ba2+ currents through N-type Ca2+ channels were elicited every 10 s by a depolarizing voltage pulse from -90 mV to +10 mV for 25 ms. Application of the agonist 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 s prior to a voltage pulse allowed us to follow the time course of the current inhibition. For comparison both alpha 2C-receptor-mediated responses were normalized to the maximal response.


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Expression of alpha 2A- and alpha 2C-adrenergic receptors in HEK293 cells. Cells were stably transfected with murine alpha 2A- or alpha 2C-receptors, and clones with similar expression levels (a and b) and cell surface expression of receptors (c and d) were selected for this study. a and b, saturation binding experiments for [3H]RX821002 to alpha 2A- and alpha 2C-receptors. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 1 µM atipamezole. c and d, subcellular distribution of alpha 2-adrenergic receptors was detected by immunofluorescence staining in permeabilized HEK293 cells stably expressing high levels of alpha 2A- or alpha 2C-receptors. Bars, 10 µm.

alpha 2-Receptor-mediated Activation of GIRK Currents-- Activation of alpha 2-receptors by norepinephrine led to a concentration-dependent increase in steady-state GIRK currents (Fig. 3). In cells expressing similar levels of receptors, the concentration-response curves were indistinguishable for the alpha 2A- and the alpha 2C-receptor. For both receptor subtypes, the potency for norepinephrine was closely correlated with the density of receptor expression. A 10-fold increase in receptor expression led to a similar increase in the potency of norepinephrine to activate steady-state GIRK currents. To test whether the kinetics of alpha 2-receptor activation differed between the two alpha 2-receptor subtypes, the time course of GIRK current activation by norepinephrine was determined (Fig. 4). With increasing concentrations of norepinephrine (10 nM to 10 µM), the time for half-maximal GIRK activation decreased progressively. At 2 pmol/mg of alpha 2-receptor expression, the half-times for GIRK activation were similar for alpha 2A- and alpha 2C-receptors at all three norepinephrine concentrations tested. Only at high receptor levels and at 10 µM norepinephrine, concentrations 104 times the EC50, the activation of GIRK currents was significantly faster when activated via alpha 2A-receptors (218 ± 13 ms) as compared with alpha 2C-receptors (503 ± 29 ms, p < 0.05) (Fig. 4).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Concentration-response curves of norepinephrine-induced GIRK current activation by alpha 2A- and alpha 2C-adrenergic receptors in HEK293 cells. The amplitudes of norepinephrine-induced GIRK currents (steady-state currents) were measured in cell clones expressing high (alpha 2A, 24 pmol/mg; alpha 2C, 17 pmol/mg) or intermediate (alpha 2A and alpha 2C, 2 pmol/mg) levels of alpha 2-adrenergic receptors. At similar levels of expression, concentration-response curves were essentially identical for both alpha 2-receptor subtypes. However, for both receptor subtypes, norepinephrine concentration-response curves were shifted to the left in cells expressing high amounts of alpha 2-receptors compared with 10-fold lower receptor levels. Data shown represent means ± S.E. for 7-10 experiments performed in two to three different transfections.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Activation kinetics of GIRK currents induced by norepinephrine. The activation of inward GIRK currents in response to fast superfusion with norepinephrine (using different concentrations) was recorded. Representative current recordings (left side, normalized to maximal responses) and summarized data for the time of half-maximal activation (right) are shown for cell lines expressing indicated levels of alpha 2A- or alpha 2C-receptors. Data shown represent means ± S.E. of 5-10 different cells derived from two to three different transfections.

The activation kinetics of norepinephrine-induced GIRK currents were not only dependent on the agonist concentration, but also correlated with the receptor expression level independent of the receptor subtype, e.g. the half-time for GIRK current activation by 10 nM norepinephrine decreased from 5.3 ± 1.1 s to 2.1 ± 0.3 s when alpha 2A-receptor expression was increased from 2 pmol/mg to 17 pmol/mg (similar results were obtained for the alpha 2C-receptor, Fig. 4). Thus, with the possible exception of maximal stimulation of high levels of alpha 2-receptors, no subtype-specific differences could be identified for activation kinetics or steady-state GIRK currents. However, both parameters were greatly dependent on the level of receptor expression for the two alpha 2-receptor subtypes.

Deactivation Kinetics of GIRK Currents-- To search for subtype-specific differences in off-rates of alpha 2-receptor-activated GIRK transients, the time course of deactivation of GIRK currents was monitored after rapid removal of norepinephrine (Fig. 5). For both alpha 2-receptors, GIRK currents completely returned to base-line values within 60 s. However, a significant difference remained between the deactivation time courses of the two receptor subtypes; alpha 2A-stimulated GIRK currents deactivated 2-3.5 times faster than alpha 2C-stimulated GIRK currents (Fig. 5, b and c). This difference was the same at high receptor levels (Fig. 5, a and b) and at moderate levels (Fig. 5c). For both receptor subtypes, the half-time for deactivation was similar at moderate and at high levels of receptor expression.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Deactivation kinetics of alpha 2-adrenergic receptor-activated GIRK currents after removal of norepinephrine. GIRK currents were first activated via alpha 2A- or alpha 2C-receptors by superfusing the cells with norepinephrine until reaching a steady state, and the time course of GIRK current deactivation was then measured in response to rapid washout of norepinephrine (a, representative recordings). The times until reaching half-maximal deactivation were summarized (b) and were expressed as means ± S.E. (n = 5-8). c, norepinephrine displaced the alpha 2-receptor antagonist, [3H]RX821002, at lower concentrations from alpha 2C- than from alpha 2A-receptors (Ki for alpha 2A, 5.0 µM; for alpha 2C, 0.8 µM).

To test whether different receptor affinities for norepinephrine are responsible for the observed deactivation kinetics, competition binding experiments were performed with HEK cells expressing alpha 2A- and alpha 2C-receptors. The Ki values for norepinephrine were higher at the alpha 2A-receptor (5.03 µM) than at the alpha 2C-subtype (0.77 µM), indicating that, indeed, norepinephrine has a higher affinity for the alpha 2C-receptor than for the alpha 2A-receptor (Fig. 5d).

The higher affinity of norepinephrine for the alpha 2C-receptor compared with the alpha 2A-receptor suggested a slower time constant for the unbinding of the agonist from the alpha 2C-receptor. We hypothesized this phenomenon to be responsible for the slower deactivation kinetics of the alpha 2C-receptor-mediated responses. To rule out that the slower deactivation of the alpha 2C-adrenergic receptor was caused by a post-receptor mechanism, the regulator of G protein-signaling protein, RGS4, was transiently overexpressed in these cells (Fig. 6). RGS4 has been shown to accelerate deactivation of G proteins 100-1000-fold (28) and to substantially accelerate GIRK current deactivation after agonist removal (29, 30). If indeed the slower deactivation of alpha 2C-receptors were the result of decreased G protein inactivation, RGS4 overexpression should lead to enhanced turn-off rates of the G protein. However, addition of RGS4 did not affect the deactivation of alpha 2-receptor-activated GIRK currents (Fig. 6). Interestingly, phenylephrine, an alpha -adrenergic receptor agonist with very low affinity, showed significantly faster deactivation of GIRK currents than norepinephrine, when used at equally potent concentrations (Fig. 6). These findings indicate that the agonist affinity rather than intrinsic receptor-G protein interaction determined the turning off rates of the alpha 2-receptor evoked responses.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Receptor rather than G protein deactivation limits deactivation kinetics of alpha 2C-adrenergic receptor-activated GIRK currents after removal of norepinephrine. GIRK currents in cells expressing alpha 2C-adrenergic receptor at 2 pmol/mg protein were activated with either 10 nM norepinephrine or 1 µM phenylephrine, and deactivation kinetics were determined (see representative current recording in a and summarized data shown in b; n = 7-8). In addition, the effect of coexpression of RGS4 on the deactivation kinetics of currents activated by 10 nM norepinephrine was analyzed (n = 4).


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Our study represents the first in which activation and deactivation of Gi protein signaling in intact cells were determined in dependence of defined amounts of receptor expression. No subtype-dependent differences were found in steady-state GIRK currents and their activation kinetics between alpha 2A- and alpha 2C-receptors expressed at moderate or at high levels in HEK293 cells. However, for both receptor subtypes, a 10-fold increase in receptor expression was correlated with a 2.5-3-fold acceleration of the GIRK current activation for both receptor subtypes.

Most interestingly, alpha 2A- and alpha 2C-adrenergic receptors differed significantly in their deactivation kinetics. This finding may explain part of the functional differences between the two alpha 2-receptor subtypes, which have been identified in mouse sympathetic neurons in vitro (1). At high stimulation frequencies of isolated mouse atria, norepinephrine release was primarily controlled by the alpha 2A-receptor subtype, whereas at lower frequencies the alpha 2C-receptor was the principle regulator of transmitter release (1).

Deactivation of norepinephrine-activated GIRK currents was significantly faster for the alpha 2A- than for the alpha 2C-receptor. This finding is consistent with the higher affinity (and thus slower dissociation kinetics) of norepinephrine for the alpha 2C-subtype than for the alpha 2A-receptor subtype (31). Deactivation of the alpha 2C-receptor-induced GIRK currents occurred with faster kinetics, when the low affinity agonist phenylephrine was used instead of the endogenous agonist, norepinephrine. In addition, enhancing the rate of G protein inactivation by overexpressing RGS4 in these cells did not alter GIRK deactivation. Taken together, these results indicate that agonist dissociation rather than receptor-G protein interaction or a post-receptor effect was responsible for the slower turn-off rate of the norepinephrine-activated alpha 2C-receptor.

The finding of similar activation kinetics is in contrast to in vitro observations in intact sympathetic neurons where endogenous alpha 2A-receptors can inhibit presynaptic transmitter release significantly faster than alpha 2C-receptors (1). Several possibilities remain to explain this discrepancy between the HEK293 cell data of this study and the situation in intact neurons. Expression levels may differ between alpha 2-receptor subtypes. Indeed, in the central nervous system, ~90% of alpha 2-adrenergic receptors belong to the alpha 2A-subtype, whereas only 10% are alpha 2C-receptors (32). The alpha 2B-receptor is restricted to very few brain nuclei and thus does not contribute significantly to total brain alpha 2-receptor binding. However, these data are based on radioligand binding experiments in membrane homogenates, and no data are available on receptor densities in presynaptic membranes.

Selective targeting of alpha 2-receptor subtypes to specific membrane domains has been shown in a number of different cell types (2, 9, 11). Whereas alpha 2A-receptors were always targeted to the plasma membrane, alpha 2C-receptors were found in addition in an intracellular membrane compartment (22). Specific targeting of alpha 2A- and alpha 2C-receptors to distinct plasma membrane domains in intact neurons may account for differences in signaling kinetics because of their distance from the neurotransmitter release site or because of specific interaction with distinct intracellular messenger systems. Different modulatory pathways have been implicated in presynaptic inhibition of neurotransmission by G protein-coupled receptors (33), which also differ in their signaling kinetics. In sympathetic neurons norepinephrine, via Go, slowed the kinetics of Ca2+ current activation and a second, sustained reduction in Ca2+ current, via the inhibitory G protein, Gi, was also observed (5). Thus further studies are required to test whether indeed alpha 2A- and alpha 2C-receptors in intact neurons in vivo differ in their subcellular localization and/or intracellular signaling pathways. These studies demonstrate that subtype-specific differences in receptor signaling kinetics may be important avenues for future study to further understand the functional significance of GPCR subtype diversity.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are indebted to Kerstin Hadamek for assistance with immunofluorescence screening of stable HEK cell clones. We thank M. Marlene Hosey and R. ten Eick (Northwestern University, Chicago, IL) for fruitful discussions and for providing equipment and laboratory space.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grant SFB487 and a Leibniz award from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, by the Fond der Chemischen Industrie, and by a grant from the Boehringer Ingelheim Foundation (to M. M. B.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Inst. für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Universität Würzburg, Versbacher Str. 9, 97078 Würzburg, Germany. Tel.: 49-931-201-5401; Fax: 49-931-201-3539; E-mail: hein@toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 8, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108652200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; alpha 2-AR, alpha 2-adrenergic receptor; GIRK, G protein-activated inwardly rectifying K+ channel; HEK, human embryonic kidney.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Hein, L., Altman, J. D., and Kobilka, B. K. (1999) Nature 402, 181-184[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Daunt, D. A., Hurt, C., Hein, L., Kallio, J., Feng, F., and Kobilka, B. K. (1997) Mol. Pharmacol. 51, 711-720[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Delmas, P., Abogadie, F. C., Milligan, G., Buckley, N. J., and Brown, D. A. (1999) J. Physiol. 518, 23-36[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Diverse-Pierluissi, M., Inglese, J., Stoffel, R. H., Lefkowitz, R. J., and Dunlap, K. (1996) Neuron 16, 579-585[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Diversé-Pierluissi, M., Goldsmith, P. K., and Dunlap, K. (1995) Neuron 14, 191-200[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Eason, M. G., Kurose, H., Holt, B. D., Raymond, J. R., and Liggett, S. B. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 15795-15801[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Eason, M. G., and Liggett, S. B. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 25473-25479[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Eason, M. G., and Liggett, S. B. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 24753-24760[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Olli-Lahdesmaki, T., Kallio, J., and Scheinin, M. (1999) J. Neurosci. 19, 9281-9288[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Surprenant, A., Horstman, D. A., Akbarali, H., and Limbird, L. E. (1992) Science 257, 977-980[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. von Zastrow, M., Link, R., Daunt, D., Barsh, G., and Kobilka, B. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 763-766[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Bylund, D. B., Eikenberg, D. C., Hieble, J. P., Langer, S. Z., Lefkowitz, R. J., Minneman, K. P., Molinoff, P. B., Ruffolo, R. R., and Trendelenburg, U. (1994) Pharmacol. Rev. 46, 121-136[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Langer, S. Z. (1974) Biochem. Pharmacol. 23, 1793-1800[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Starke, K., Endo, T., and Taube, H. D. (1975) Nature 254, 440-441[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Starke, K., Göthert, M., and Kilbinger, H. (1989) Physiol. Rev. 69, 864-989[Free Full Text]
16. Docherty, J. R. (1998) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 361, 1-15[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. MacDonald, E., Kobilka, B. K., and Scheinin, M. (1997) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 18, 211-219[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Hein, L. (2001) Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 142, 162-185
19. Trendelenburg, A. U., Klebroff, W., Hein, L., and Starke, K. (2001) Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 364, 117-130[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Jurman, M. E., Boland, L. M., Liu, Y., and Yellen, G. (1994) BioTechniques 17, 876-881[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Shekter, L. R., Taussig, R., Gillard, S. E., and Miller, R. J. (1997) Mol. Pharmacol. 52, 282-291[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Hurt, C. M., Feng, F. Y., and Kobilka, B. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 35424-35431[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Ceresa, B. P., and Limbird, L. E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 29557-29564[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Pihlavisto, M., Sjoholm, B., Scheinin, M., and Wurster, S. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1448, 135-146[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Bünemann, M., Meyer, T., Pott, L., and Hosey, M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 12537-12545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Bünemann, M., Liliom, K., Brandts, B. K., Pott, L., Tseng, J. L., Desiderio, D. M., Sun, G., Miller, D., and Tigyi, G. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 5527-5534[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Bünemann, M., and Hosey, M. M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 31186-31190[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Berman, D. M., Wilkie, T. M., and Gilman, A. G. (1996) Cell 86, 445-452[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Doupnik, C. A., Davidson, N., Lester, H. A., and Kofuji, P. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 10461-10466[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Saitoh, O., Kubo, Y., Miyatani, Y., Asano, T., and Nakata, H. (1997) Nature 390, 525-529[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Chruscinski, A. J., Link, R. E., Daunt, D. A., Barsh, G. S., and Kobilka, B. K. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 186, 1280-1287[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. MacMillan, L. B., Hein, L., Smith, M. S., Piascik, M. T., and Limbird, L. E. (1996) Science 273, 801-803[Abstract]
33. Hille, B. (1994) Trends Neurol. Sci. 17, 531-535[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X.-B. Zhou, I. Wulfsen, S. Lutz, E. Utku, U. Sausbier, P. Ruth, T. Wieland, and M. Korth
M2 Muscarinic Receptors Induce Airway Smooth Muscle Activation via a Dual, G{beta}{gamma}-mediated Inhibition of Large Conductance Ca2+-activated K+ Channel Activity
J. Biol. Chem., July 25, 2008; 283(30): 21036 - 21044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
V. O. Nikolaev, C. Boettcher, C. Dees, M. Bunemann, M. J. Lohse, and M. H. Zenk
Live Cell Monitoring of {micro}-Opioid Receptor-mediated G-protein Activation Reveals Strong Biological Activity of Close Morphine Biosynthetic Precursors
J. Biol. Chem., September 14, 2007; 282(37): 27126 - 27132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. K. Best, R. J. Siarey, and Z. Galdzicki
Ts65Dn, a Mouse Model of Down Syndrome, Exhibits Increased GABAB-Induced Potassium Current
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 892 - 900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Hein, F. Rochais, C. Hoffmann, S. Dorsch, V. O. Nikolaev, S. Engelhardt, C. H. Berlot, M. J. Lohse, and M. Bunemann
GS Activation Is Time-limiting in Initiating Receptor-mediated Signaling
J. Biol. Chem., November 3, 2006; 281(44): 33345 - 33351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Ohana, O. Barchad, I. Parnas, and H. Parnas
The Metabotropic Glutamate G-protein-coupled Receptors mGluR3 and mGluR1a Are Voltage-sensitive
J. Biol. Chem., August 25, 2006; 281(34): 24204 - 24215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
V. Regitz-Zagrosek, B. Hocher, M. Bettmann, M. Brede, K. Hadamek, C. Gerstner, H. B. Lehmkuhl, R. Hetzer, and L. Hein
{alpha}2C-Adrenoceptor polymorphism is associated with improved event-free survival in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy
Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2006; 27(4): 454 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Bunemann, M. Frank, and M. J. Lohse
From The Cover: Gi protein activation in intact cells involves subunit rearrangement rather than dissociation
PNAS, December 23, 2003; 100(26): 16077 - 16082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. J. Olave and D. J. Maxwell
Neurokinin-1 Projection Cells in the Rat Dorsal Horn Receive Synaptic Contacts from Axons That Possess {alpha}2C-Adrenergic Receptors
J. Neurosci., July 30, 2003; 23(17): 6837 - 6846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Benians, J. L. Leaney, and A. Tinker
Agonist unbinding from receptor dictates the nature of deactivation kinetics of G protein-gated K+ channels
PNAS, May 13, 2003; 100(10): 6239 - 6244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. G. Hommers, M. J. Lohse, and M. Bunemann
Regulation of the Inward Rectifying Properties of G-protein-activated Inwardly Rectifying K+ (GIRK) Channels by Gbeta gamma Subunits
J. Biol. Chem., January 3, 2003; 278(2): 1037 - 1043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
M. Philipp, M. Brede, and L. Hein
Physiological significance of alpha 2-adrenergic receptor subtype diversity: one receptor is not enough
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2002; 283(2): R287 - R295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/50/47512    most recent