![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 50, 47512-47517, December 14, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2A- and
2C-Adrenergic Receptor-activated
G Protein-activated Inwardly Rectifying K+ Channel
Currents*
From the Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Universität Würzburg, 97078 Würzburg, Germany
Received for publication, September 7, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although G protein-coupled receptor-mediated
signaling is one of the best studied biological events, little is known
about the kinetics of these processes in intact cells. Experiments with neurons from G protein-coupled receptors
(GPCRs)1 transfer a large
diversity of extracellular signals into the cell interior, including light, neurotransmitters, and hormones. Although GPCRs represent some
of the best studied signaling molecules, relatively little information
exists about the kinetics of signal transduction by these receptors
(except for rhodopsin) in intact cells. However, more detailed
knowledge about the kinetic properties of GPCR signal transduction
would be of particular interest to determine the physiological
significance of closely related receptor subtypes, which can be
activated by the same endogenous agonist but differ in their
biological function.
Functional data on We therefore sought a simple experimental model to investigate
potential differences in the speed of Immunofluorescence Staining--
Immunofluorescence detection of
Radioligand Binding--
Expression levels of
Electrophysiology--
Inward currents through GIRK channels
were measured by whole cell patch recording similar to that described
previously (25). Briefly, whole cell membrane currents were measured at
Patch pipettes were fabricated from borosilicate glass capillaries
(GF-150-10, Harvard Apparatus, Edenbridge, United Kingdom) using a
horizontal puller (P-95, Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA). The DC
resistance of the filled pipettes ranged from 2 to 5 megohms. Membrane
currents were recorded using either an EPC 9 patch clamp amplifier
(HEKA, Lambrecht, Germany) or an Axopatch 200 (Axon Instruments, Union
City, CA). Signals were analog-filtered using a low pass Bessel filter
(1-3-kHz corner frequency). Data were digitally stored using computers
equipped with the appropriate hardware/software package (ISO2 by MFK,
Frankfurt/Main, Germany; or PULSE by HEKA, Lambrecht, Germany) for
voltage control, data acquisition, and data evaluation.
For the measurement of GIRK currents, an extracellular solution of the
following composition was used: 120 mM NaCl, 20 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES-NaOH (pH
7.3). The internal (pipette) solution contained: 100 mM
potassium aspartate, 40 mM KCl, 5 mM MgATP, 10 mM HEPES-KOH, 5 mM NaCl, 2 mM EGTA,
2 mM MgCl2, 0.01 mM GTP (pH 7.3).
For measurement of barium currents through N-type Ca2+
channels, the extracellular solution contained: 105 mM
NaCl, 25 mM CsCl, 10 mM BaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES-NaOH (pH
7.3). The intracellular solution contained 130 mM CsCl, 5 mM EGTA, 5 mM HEPES-CsOH, 5 mM
MgATP, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.01 mM GTP (pH
7.3). NaCl, KCl and MgCl2 were purchased from Merck
(Darmstadt, Germany); potassium aspartate, CaCl2,
BaCl2, CsCl, ATP, GTP, EGTA, norepinephrine, and
phenylephrine were from Sigma (Deisenhofen, Germany); and HEPES was
from Biomol (Hamburg, Germany).
Statistics--
Results shown display means ± S.E. for
n = 5-10 experiments if not stated otherwise, and
statistically significant differences were determined by applying the
Student's t test for two independent data sets (*,
p Ca2+ Channel Inhibition and GIRK Activation by
The activation kinetics of norepinephrine-induced GIRK currents were
not only dependent on the agonist concentration, but also correlated
with the receptor expression level independent of the receptor subtype,
e.g. the half-time for GIRK current activation by 10 nM norepinephrine decreased from 5.3 ± 1.1 s to
2.1 ± 0.3 s when Deactivation Kinetics of GIRK Currents--
To search for
subtype-specific differences in off-rates of
To test whether different receptor affinities for norepinephrine are
responsible for the observed deactivation kinetics, competition binding
experiments were performed with HEK cells expressing
The higher affinity of norepinephrine for the
Our study represents the first in which activation and
deactivation of Gi protein signaling in intact cells were
determined in dependence of defined amounts of receptor expression. No
subtype-dependent differences were found in steady-state
GIRK currents and their activation kinetics between Most interestingly, Deactivation of norepinephrine-activated GIRK currents was
significantly faster for the The finding of similar activation kinetics is in contrast to in
vitro observations in intact sympathetic neurons where endogenous Selective targeting of
2A-adrenergic receptor knockout mice
suggested that the
2A-receptor subtype inhibits
neurotransmitter release with higher speed and at higher action
potential frequencies than the
2C-adrenergic receptor.
Here we investigated whether these functional differences between
presynaptic
2-adrenergic receptor subtypes are the
result of distinct signal transduction kinetics of these two receptors
and their coupling to G proteins.
2A- and
2C-receptors were stably expressed in HEK293 cells at
moderate (~2 pmol/mg) or high (17-24 pmol/mg) levels. Activation of
G protein-activated inwardly rectifying K+ (GIRK) channels
was similar in extent and kinetics for
2A- and
2C-receptors at both expression levels. However, the two
receptors differed significantly in their deactivation kinetics after
removal of the agonist norepinephrine.
2C-Receptor-activated GIRK currents returned much more
slowly to base line than did
2A-stimulated currents.
This observation correlated with a higher affinity of norepinephrine at
the murine
2C- than at the
2A-receptor
subtype and may explain why
2C-adrenergic receptors are
especially suited to control sympathetic neurotransmission at low
action potential frequencies in contrast to the
2A-receptor subtype.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2-adrenergic receptor subtypes
suggest that they differ in their signaling kinetics. Interestingly,
several physiological differences were identified between presynaptic
2A- and
2C-receptor subtypes (1). In
mouse atria, the
2A-subtype inhibited norepinephrine
release at high stimulation frequencies whereas the
2C-receptor operated at lower levels of sympathetic nerve activity (1). Moreover, inhibition of norepinephrine release
mediated by the
2A-subtype occurred much faster than inhibition by the
2C-receptor. These findings indicate
that two presynaptic receptors in the inhibitory feedback loop of
transmitter release may differentially regulate synaptic transmission.
Several explanations may account for these functional differences.
2-Adrenergic receptor subtypes have been shown to differ
in their signal transduction, agonist-dependent
internalization and receptor trafficking, subcellular localization, and
binding to intracellular scaffolding proteins (2-11).
2-Adrenergic receptors are essential regulators of the
sympathetic and central nervous system (12-15). Three subtypes of
2-adrenergic receptors have been identified in different
species (12). Recently, transgenic mouse models lacking individual
2-receptor subtypes have been generated to define the
physiological significance and therapeutic potential of these receptor
subtypes (for reviews, see Refs. 16-18).
2-Receptors
are essential constituents of a negative feedback loop regulating
presynaptic neurotransmitter release (15). Experiments with
gene-targeted mice lacking individual
2-adrenergic
receptors have demonstrated that two
2-receptor subtypes,
2A and
2C, serve as presynaptic
regulators in the sympathetic nervous system and in the central nervous
system (1, 19). Mice lacking both of these receptors had enhanced
circulating norepinephrine levels and developed cardiac hypertrophy and
failure (1).
2A- and
2C-receptor-mediated signaling and the role of receptor
levels for signaling kinetics. We have determined the properties of
these receptor subtypes to inhibit N-type Ca2+ channels or
activate G protein-activated inwardly rectifying K+ (GIRK)
channels in a heterologous expression system in human embryonic kidney
(HEK293) cells. We found that, at similar levels of expression,
2A- and
2C-receptors did not differ in
their activation kinetics, but the deactivation after receptor
stimulation by norepinephrine was significantly slower for
2C- than for
2A-receptors. This finding
is consistent with a higher affinity of norepinephrine for
2C- than for
2A-receptors. Different
deactivation kinetics may account for part of the functional
differences between presynaptic
2-adrenergic receptor
subtypes to enhance the power of synaptic regulation and plasticity.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2-Receptor-expressing Cell Lines and Transfection
Procedure--
HEK293 cells were stably transfected with the murine
2A- and
2C-adrenergic receptors using a
pcDNA3 vector (2). After selection with 200 µg/ml G418 (Life
Technologies, Inc.), stable cell clones were screened by radioligand
binding and homogeneity of receptor expression was controlled by
immunofluorescence (2).
2A-AR-or
2C-AR-expressing cell lines were transiently transfected with a bicistronic expression vector encoding for GIRK1 and GIRK4 (kindly provided by Dr. L.Y. Jan, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA) as well as with
H3 plasmids encoding the CD8 receptors (0.15 µg/5-cm dish; kindly provided by Dr. G Yellen, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA) using the
Effectene transfection kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). For GIRK
deactivation studies, either rat RGS4 (in pcDNA3.1) or empty pcDNA3 vector (0.5 µg/5-cm dish) was added to the transfection reaction. 18-24 h after transfection, cells were replated onto poly-L-lysine-coated cell culture dishes and were used for
experiments 40-50 h after transfection. Successfully transfected cells
were detected by binding Dynabeads coated with anti-CD8 antibodies (Dynal ASA, Oslo, Norway) to the cells (20). For measurement of N-type
Ca2+ channels, G1A1 cells (Ref. 21; cells provided by Dr.
R. J. Miller with permission from SIBIA Neuroscience, La Jolla,
CA) were transiently transfected with pCDNA3-
2A or
pcDNA3-
2C (1 µg/5-cm dish) and
H3-CD8 (0.15 µg/5-cm dish) using Effectene.
2-adrenergic receptor was performed as described
previously (2) using
2A- and
2C-adrenergic receptor subtype-specific antibodies (2,
22) and secondary anti-mouse Alexa (Molecular Probes, Leiden,
Netherlands) and anti-mouse Cy2 antibodies (Dianova, Hamburg, Germany).
2-adrenergic receptors were determined after lysis of
cells with hypotonic buffer (5 mM Tris, 2 mM
EDTA, pH 7.4) as described (23). [3H]RX 821002 (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech, Freiburg, Germany) was used as radioligand, and
nonspecific binding was determined by addition of 1 µM
atipamezole (Orion Corp., Turku, Finland). For competition assays, 4 nM [3H]RX 821002 was used with equal amounts
of
2A- and
2C-receptors (150 fmol) (24).
90 mV holding potential and agonist-induced currents were activated by fast superfusion of the cells using a solenoid valve operated superfusion system (26). Solution exchange occurred within less than
150 ms. Voltage ramps (from 120 mV to +60 mV in 500 ms, every 10 s) were used to determine current-voltage relationships. Barium currents through N-type Ca2+ channels were measured as
described (27). Depolarization-evoked Ba2+ currents were
measured every 10 s using 25-ms test pulses of +10 mV (holding
potential was
90 mV). All measurements were performed at room temperature.
0.05; **, p
0.01).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2-Adrenergic Receptors--
The ability of
2-adrenergic receptor subtypes
2A and
2C to activate GIRK currents or to inhibit N-type
Ca2+ currents was initially tested in HEK293 cells
transiently expressing either one of the receptor subtypes and GIRK
channels or in HEK cells stably expressing N-type Ca2+
channels composed of
1B-,
1B-, and
2
-channel subunits (G1A1 cells; Ref. 21). Activation
of both adrenergic receptors,
2A and
2C,
led to inhibition of N-type Ca2+ currents (Fig.
1) and to activation of GIRK channels
(Fig. 1). The time course of the phenylephrine-induced inhibition of
Ba2+ currents through N-type Ca2+ channels was
similar for the two
2-receptor subtypes (data not shown). In addition, the time course of the activation of GIRK currents
was indistinguishable from the time course of the phenylephrine-induced inhibition of N-type Ca2+ channels (Fig. 1). However,
independent from the effector system, the time courses of
2-adrenergic responses were quite variable in this
transient expression system, possibly because of cell to cell
variability of the expression levels of the receptors. Therefore, we
chose to investigate the signaling of both receptor subtypes in stable
HEK293 cell lines expressing defined amounts of receptor. From a total
of 48 cell lines with ~0.1-50 pmol of receptor/mg of membrane
protein, four cell lines were chosen for further experiments (Fig.
2). An intermediate level (2 pmol of receptor/mg of membrane protein) and a high level (17-24 pmol of
receptor/mg of membrane protein) of receptor expression were used for
all experiments. Lower expression levels of
2-receptors resulted in less reproducible Ca2+ channel inhibition or
GIRK channel activation, respectively (data not shown). As previous
studies had indicated that
2A- and
2C-receptors may differ in their plasma membrane
targeting (2, 11), all cell clones used for this study were screened by
immunofluorescence staining and only clones with plasma membrane
localization of
2-receptors were included for further
study (Fig. 2, c and d). As the GIRK channel
activation kinetics by
2-receptors had been found to be
similar to the kinetics of
2-receptor-mediated
inhibition of N-type Ca2+ channels, and as measurement of
GIRK current activation allowed for a higher temporal resolution of the
2-response, we focused on these channels for detailed
kinetic analysis of
2-receptor signaling.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Comparison of
2C-receptor-induced responses on N-type
Ca2+ currents and GIRK currents. HEK293 cells or HEK
G1A1 cells stably expressing
1B,
1B, and
2
subunits of N-type Ca2+ channels were
transiently transfected with
2C-adrenergic receptors and
GIRK1 and GIRK4 channel subunits (only HEK293 cells) and were subjected
to whole cell patch experiments. The time course of the inhibition of
N-type Ca2+ channels (black squares)
as well as the activation of GIRK currents (representative current
trace) by the
-agonist phenylephrine were determined.
Ba2+ currents through N-type Ca2+ channels were
elicited every 10 s by a depolarizing voltage pulse from
90 mV
to +10 mV for 25 ms. Application of the agonist 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and
10 s prior to a voltage pulse allowed us to follow the time course
of the current inhibition. For comparison both
2C-receptor-mediated responses were normalized to the
maximal response.

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Expression of
2A- and
2C-adrenergic receptors in HEK293
cells. Cells were stably transfected with murine
2A- or
2C-receptors, and clones
with similar expression levels (a and b) and cell
surface expression of receptors (c and d) were
selected for this study. a and b, saturation
binding experiments for [3H]RX821002 to
2A- and
2C-receptors. Nonspecific binding
was determined in the presence of 1 µM atipamezole.
c and d, subcellular distribution of
2-adrenergic receptors was detected by
immunofluorescence staining in permeabilized HEK293 cells stably
expressing high levels of
2A- or
2C-receptors. Bars, 10 µm.
2-Receptor-mediated Activation of GIRK
Currents--
Activation of
2-receptors by
norepinephrine led to a concentration-dependent increase in
steady-state GIRK currents (Fig. 3). In
cells expressing similar levels of receptors, the
concentration-response curves were indistinguishable for the
2A- and the
2C-receptor. For both
receptor subtypes, the potency for norepinephrine was closely
correlated with the density of receptor expression. A 10-fold increase
in receptor expression led to a similar increase in the potency of
norepinephrine to activate steady-state GIRK currents. To test whether
the kinetics of
2-receptor activation differed between
the two
2-receptor subtypes, the time course of GIRK
current activation by norepinephrine was determined (Fig. 4). With increasing concentrations of
norepinephrine (10 nM to 10 µM), the time for
half-maximal GIRK activation decreased progressively. At 2 pmol/mg of
2-receptor expression, the half-times for GIRK activation were similar for
2A- and
2C-receptors at all three norepinephrine concentrations
tested. Only at high receptor levels and at 10 µM
norepinephrine, concentrations 104 times the
EC50, the activation of GIRK currents was significantly faster when activated via
2A-receptors (218 ± 13 ms) as compared with
2C-receptors (503 ± 29 ms,
p < 0.05) (Fig. 4).

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Concentration-response curves of
norepinephrine-induced GIRK current activation by
2A- and
2C-adrenergic receptors in HEK293
cells. The amplitudes of norepinephrine-induced GIRK currents
(steady-state currents) were measured in cell clones expressing high
(
2A, 24 pmol/mg;
2C, 17 pmol/mg) or
intermediate (
2A and
2C, 2 pmol/mg)
levels of
2-adrenergic receptors. At similar levels of
expression, concentration-response curves were essentially identical
for both
2-receptor subtypes. However, for both receptor
subtypes, norepinephrine concentration-response curves were shifted to
the left in cells expressing high amounts of
2-receptors
compared with 10-fold lower receptor levels. Data shown represent
means ± S.E. for 7-10 experiments performed in two to three
different transfections.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Activation kinetics of GIRK currents induced
by norepinephrine. The activation of inward GIRK currents in
response to fast superfusion with norepinephrine (using different
concentrations) was recorded. Representative current recordings
(left side, normalized to maximal responses) and
summarized data for the time of half-maximal activation
(right) are shown for cell lines expressing indicated levels
of
2A- or
2C-receptors. Data shown
represent means ± S.E. of 5-10 different cells derived from two
to three different transfections.
2A-receptor expression was
increased from 2 pmol/mg to 17 pmol/mg (similar results were obtained
for the
2C-receptor, Fig. 4). Thus, with the possible
exception of maximal stimulation of high levels of
2-receptors, no subtype-specific differences could be
identified for activation kinetics or steady-state GIRK currents.
However, both parameters were greatly dependent on the level of
receptor expression for the two
2-receptor subtypes.
2-receptor-activated GIRK transients, the time course of
deactivation of GIRK currents was monitored after rapid removal of
norepinephrine (Fig. 5). For both
2-receptors, GIRK currents completely returned to
base-line values within 60 s. However, a significant difference remained between the deactivation time courses of the two receptor subtypes;
2A-stimulated GIRK currents deactivated 2-3.5
times faster than
2C-stimulated GIRK currents (Fig. 5,
b and c). This difference was the same at high
receptor levels (Fig. 5, a and b) and at moderate
levels (Fig. 5c). For both receptor subtypes, the half-time
for deactivation was similar at moderate and at high levels of receptor
expression.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Deactivation kinetics of
2-adrenergic receptor-activated GIRK
currents after removal of norepinephrine. GIRK currents were first
activated via
2A- or
2C-receptors by
superfusing the cells with norepinephrine until reaching a steady
state, and the time course of GIRK current deactivation was then
measured in response to rapid washout of norepinephrine (a,
representative recordings). The times until reaching half-maximal
deactivation were summarized (b) and were expressed as
means ± S.E. (n = 5-8). c,
norepinephrine displaced the
2-receptor antagonist,
[3H]RX821002, at lower concentrations from
2C- than from
2A-receptors
(Ki for
2A, 5.0 µM; for
2C, 0.8 µM).
2A- and
2C-receptors. The Ki values for
norepinephrine were higher at the
2A-receptor (5.03 µM) than at the
2C-subtype (0.77 µM), indicating that, indeed, norepinephrine has a higher
affinity for the
2C-receptor than for the
2A-receptor (Fig. 5d).
2C-receptor compared with the
2A-receptor
suggested a slower time constant for the unbinding of the agonist from
the
2C-receptor. We hypothesized this phenomenon to be
responsible for the slower deactivation kinetics of the
2C-receptor-mediated responses. To rule out that the
slower deactivation of the
2C-adrenergic receptor was
caused by a post-receptor mechanism, the regulator of G
protein-signaling protein, RGS4, was transiently overexpressed in these
cells (Fig. 6). RGS4 has been shown to
accelerate deactivation of G proteins 100-1000-fold (28) and to
substantially accelerate GIRK current deactivation after agonist
removal (29, 30). If indeed the slower deactivation of
2C-receptors were the result of decreased G protein
inactivation, RGS4 overexpression should lead to enhanced turn-off
rates of the G protein. However, addition of RGS4 did not affect the
deactivation of
2-receptor-activated GIRK currents (Fig.
6). Interestingly, phenylephrine, an
-adrenergic receptor agonist
with very low affinity, showed significantly faster deactivation of
GIRK currents than norepinephrine, when used at equally potent concentrations (Fig. 6). These findings indicate that the agonist affinity rather than intrinsic receptor-G protein interaction determined the turning off rates of the
2-receptor
evoked responses.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Receptor rather than G protein deactivation
limits deactivation kinetics of
2C-adrenergic receptor-activated GIRK
currents after removal of norepinephrine. GIRK currents in cells
expressing
2C-adrenergic receptor at 2 pmol/mg protein
were activated with either 10 nM norepinephrine or 1 µM phenylephrine, and deactivation kinetics were
determined (see representative current recording in a and
summarized data shown in b; n = 7-8). In
addition, the effect of coexpression of RGS4 on the deactivation
kinetics of currents activated by 10 nM norepinephrine was
analyzed (n = 4).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2A-
and
2C-receptors expressed at moderate or at high levels
in HEK293 cells. However, for both receptor subtypes, a 10-fold
increase in receptor expression was correlated with a 2.5-3-fold
acceleration of the GIRK current activation for both receptor subtypes.
2A- and
2C-adrenergic
receptors differed significantly in their deactivation kinetics. This
finding may explain part of the functional differences between the two
2-receptor subtypes, which have been identified in mouse
sympathetic neurons in vitro (1). At high stimulation
frequencies of isolated mouse atria, norepinephrine release was
primarily controlled by the
2A-receptor subtype, whereas
at lower frequencies the
2C-receptor was the principle
regulator of transmitter release (1).
2A- than for the
2C-receptor. This finding is consistent with the higher
affinity (and thus slower dissociation kinetics) of norepinephrine for
the
2C-subtype than for the
2A-receptor
subtype (31). Deactivation of the
2C-receptor-induced GIRK currents occurred with faster kinetics, when the low affinity agonist phenylephrine was used instead of the endogenous agonist, norepinephrine. In addition, enhancing the rate of G protein
inactivation by overexpressing RGS4 in these cells did not alter GIRK
deactivation. Taken together, these results indicate that agonist
dissociation rather than receptor-G protein interaction or a
post-receptor effect was responsible for the slower turn-off rate of
the norepinephrine-activated
2C-receptor.
2A-receptors can inhibit presynaptic transmitter release
significantly faster than
2C-receptors (1). Several
possibilities remain to explain this discrepancy between the HEK293
cell data of this study and the situation in intact neurons. Expression
levels may differ between
2-receptor subtypes. Indeed,
in the central nervous system, ~90% of
2-adrenergic
receptors belong to the
2A-subtype, whereas only 10%
are
2C-receptors (32). The
2B-receptor is restricted to very few brain nuclei and thus does not contribute significantly to total brain
2-receptor binding.
However, these data are based on radioligand binding experiments in
membrane homogenates, and no data are available on receptor densities
in presynaptic membranes.
2-receptor subtypes to specific
membrane domains has been shown in a number of different cell types (2,
9, 11). Whereas
2A-receptors were always targeted to the
plasma membrane,
2C-receptors were found in addition in an intracellular membrane compartment (22). Specific targeting of
2A- and
2C-receptors to distinct plasma
membrane domains in intact neurons may account for differences in
signaling kinetics because of their distance from the neurotransmitter
release site or because of specific interaction with distinct
intracellular messenger systems. Different modulatory pathways have
been implicated in presynaptic inhibition of neurotransmission by G
protein-coupled receptors (33), which also differ in their signaling
kinetics. In sympathetic neurons norepinephrine, via Go,
slowed the kinetics of Ca2+ current activation and a
second, sustained reduction in Ca2+ current, via the
inhibitory G protein, Gi, was also observed (5). Thus
further studies are required to test whether indeed
2A-
and
2C-receptors in intact neurons in vivo
differ in their subcellular localization and/or intracellular signaling
pathways. These studies demonstrate that subtype-specific differences
in receptor signaling kinetics may be important avenues for future study to further understand the functional significance of GPCR subtype diversity.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We are indebted to Kerstin Hadamek for assistance with immunofluorescence screening of stable HEK cell clones. We thank M. Marlene Hosey and R. ten Eick (Northwestern University, Chicago, IL) for fruitful discussions and for providing equipment and laboratory space.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Grant SFB487 and a Leibniz award from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, by the Fond der Chemischen Industrie, and by a grant from the Boehringer Ingelheim Foundation (to M. M. B.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Inst. für
Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Universität Würzburg,
Versbacher Str. 9, 97078 Würzburg, Germany. Tel.:
49-931-201-5401; Fax: 49-931-201-3539; E-mail:
hein@toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 8, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108652200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
GPCR, G
protein-coupled receptor;
2-AR,
2-adrenergic receptor;
GIRK, G protein-activated
inwardly rectifying K+ channel;
HEK, human embryonic
kidney.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Hein, L., Altman, J. D., and Kobilka, B. K. (1999) Nature 402, 181-184[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Daunt, D. A.,
Hurt, C.,
Hein, L.,
Kallio, J.,
Feng, F.,
and Kobilka, B. K.
(1997)
Mol. Pharmacol.
51,
711-720 |
| 3. |
Delmas, P.,
Abogadie, F. C.,
Milligan, G.,
Buckley, N. J.,
and Brown, D. A.
(1999)
J. Physiol.
518,
23-36 |
| 4. | Diverse-Pierluissi, M., Inglese, J., Stoffel, R. H., Lefkowitz, R. J., and Dunlap, K. (1996) Neuron 16, 579-585[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Diversé-Pierluissi, M., Goldsmith, P. K., and Dunlap, K. (1995) Neuron 14, 191-200[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Eason, M. G.,
Kurose, H.,
Holt, B. D.,
Raymond, J. R.,
and Liggett, S. B.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
15795-15801 |
| 7. |
Eason, M. G.,
and Liggett, S. B.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
25473-25479 |
| 8. |
Eason, M. G.,
and Liggett, S. B.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24753-24760 |
| 9. |
Olli-Lahdesmaki, T.,
Kallio, J.,
and Scheinin, M.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
9281-9288 |
| 10. |
Surprenant, A.,
Horstman, D. A.,
Akbarali, H.,
and Limbird, L. E.
(1992)
Science
257,
977-980 |
| 11. |
von Zastrow, M.,
Link, R.,
Daunt, D.,
Barsh, G.,
and Kobilka, B.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
763-766 |
| 12. | Bylund, D. B., Eikenberg, D. C., Hieble, J. P., Langer, S. Z., Lefkowitz, R. J., Minneman, K. P., Molinoff, P. B., Ruffolo, R. R., and Trendelenburg, U. (1994) Pharmacol. Rev. 46, 121-136[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Langer, S. Z. (1974) Biochem. Pharmacol. 23, 1793-1800[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. | Starke, K., Endo, T., and Taube, H. D. (1975) Nature 254, 440-441[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Starke, K.,
Göthert, M.,
and Kilbinger, H.
(1989)
Physiol. Rev.
69,
864-989 |
| 16. | Docherty, J. R. (1998) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 361, 1-15[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | MacDonald, E., Kobilka, B. K., and Scheinin, M. (1997) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 18, 211-219[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Hein, L. (2001) Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 142, 162-185 |
| 19. | Trendelenburg, A. U., Klebroff, W., Hein, L., and Starke, K. (2001) Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 364, 117-130[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Jurman, M. E., Boland, L. M., Liu, Y., and Yellen, G. (1994) BioTechniques 17, 876-881[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Shekter, L. R.,
Taussig, R.,
Gillard, S. E.,
and Miller, R. J.
(1997)
Mol. Pharmacol.
52,
282-291 |
| 22. |
Hurt, C. M.,
Feng, F. Y.,
and Kobilka, B.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
35424-35431 |
| 23. |
Ceresa, B. P.,
and Limbird, L. E.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
29557-29564 |
| 24. | Pihlavisto, M., Sjoholm, B., Scheinin, M., and Wurster, S. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1448, 135-146[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Bünemann, M.,
Meyer, T.,
Pott, L.,
and Hosey, M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
12537-12545 |
| 26. | Bünemann, M., Liliom, K., Brandts, B. K., Pott, L., Tseng, J. L., Desiderio, D. M., Sun, G., Miller, D., and Tigyi, G. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 5527-5534[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. |
Bünemann, M.,
and Hosey, M. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
31186-31190 |
| 28. | Berman, D. M., Wilkie, T. M., and Gilman, A. G. (1996) Cell 86, 445-452[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. |
Doupnik, C. A.,
Davidson, N.,
Lester, H. A.,
and Kofuji, P.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
10461-10466 |
| 30. | Saitoh, O., Kubo, Y., Miyatani, Y., Asano, T., and Nakata, H. (1997) Nature 390, 525-529[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | Chruscinski, A. J., Link, R. E., Daunt, D. A., Barsh, G. S., and Kobilka, B. K. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 186, 1280-1287[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | MacMillan, L. B., Hein, L., Smith, M. S., Piascik, M. T., and Limbird, L. E. (1996) Science 273, 801-803[Abstract] |
| 33. | Hille, B. (1994) Trends Neurol. Sci. 17, 531-535[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X.-B. Zhou, I. Wulfsen, S. Lutz, E. Utku, U. Sausbier, P. Ruth, T. Wieland, and M. Korth M2 Muscarinic Receptors Induce Airway Smooth Muscle Activation via a Dual, G{beta}{gamma}-mediated Inhibition of Large Conductance Ca2+-activated K+ Channel Activity J. Biol. Chem., July 25, 2008; 283(30): 21036 - 21044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. O. Nikolaev, C. Boettcher, C. Dees, M. Bunemann, M. J. Lohse, and M. H. Zenk Live Cell Monitoring of {micro}-Opioid Receptor-mediated G-protein Activation Reveals Strong Biological Activity of Close Morphine Biosynthetic Precursors J. Biol. Chem., September 14, 2007; 282(37): 27126 - 27132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. K. Best, R. J. Siarey, and Z. Galdzicki Ts65Dn, a Mouse Model of Down Syndrome, Exhibits Increased GABAB-Induced Potassium Current J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 892 - 900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Hein, F. Rochais, C. Hoffmann, S. Dorsch, V. O. Nikolaev, S. Engelhardt, C. H. Berlot, M. J. Lohse, and M. Bunemann GS Activation Is Time-limiting in Initiating Receptor-mediated Signaling J. Biol. Chem., November 3, 2006; 281(44): 33345 - 33351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ohana, O. Barchad, I. Parnas, and H. Parnas The Metabotropic Glutamate G-protein-coupled Receptors mGluR3 and mGluR1a Are Voltage-sensitive J. Biol. Chem., August 25, 2006; 281(34): 24204 - 24215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Regitz-Zagrosek, B. Hocher, M. Bettmann, M. Brede, K. Hadamek, C. Gerstner, H. B. Lehmkuhl, R. Hetzer, and L. Hein {alpha}2C-Adrenoceptor polymorphism is associated with improved event-free survival in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2006; 27(4): 454 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bunemann, M. Frank, and M. J. Lohse From The Cover: Gi protein activation in intact cells involves subunit rearrangement rather than dissociation PNAS, December 23, 2003; 100(26): 16077 - 16082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Olave and D. J. Maxwell Neurokinin-1 Projection Cells in the Rat Dorsal Horn Receive Synaptic Contacts from Axons That Possess {alpha}2C-Adrenergic Receptors J. Neurosci., July 30, 2003; 23(17): 6837 - 6846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Benians, J. L. Leaney, and A. Tinker Agonist unbinding from receptor dictates the nature of deactivation kinetics of G protein-gated K+ channels PNAS, May 13, 2003; 100(10): 6239 - 6244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. G. Hommers, M. J. Lohse, and M. Bunemann Regulation of the Inward Rectifying Properties of G-protein-activated Inwardly Rectifying K+ (GIRK) Channels by Gbeta gamma Subunits J. Biol. Chem., January 3, 2003; 278(2): 1037 - 1043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Philipp, M. Brede, and L. Hein Physiological significance of alpha 2-adrenergic receptor subtype diversity: one receptor is not enough Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2002; 283(2): R287 - R295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||