 |
INTRODUCTION |
Thyroid hormone receptor
(TR)1 is a member of the
nuclear hormone receptor superfamily that acts as
ligand-dependent transcription factor to control cell
proliferation, differentiation, and homeostasis (1). Two distinct
genes, TR
and TR
, give rise to four
hormone-binding TR isoforms (
1,
1,
2, and
3) by alternative
splicing (1, 2). The tissue specificity and differential expression of
TR isoforms indicate that they play distinct functional roles in vivo (3, 4). This is demonstrated by the finding that
TR
-knockout mice show very different phenotypes from
TR
1-deficient mice. TR regulates transcription by binding to thyroid
hormone response element (TRE) as a homodimer or heterodimer in the
promoter region of target genes. The transcriptional activity of TR
relies on the types of TRE as well as on T3. In the presence of T3, TR
functions as a transcriptional activator that binds to positive TREs
and as a repressor that binds to negative TREs.
Modulation of gene expression by TR involves the coordination of a
network of co-regulatory proteins, including co-activators and
co-repressors. Binding of ligand to TR induces a conformational change that promotes dissociation of the co-repressors and recruitment of the co-activators, leading to gene activation. Unlike other nuclear
hormone receptors, TR and retinoic acid receptors are able to bind to
their target genes in the absence of ligands and actively repress
transcription (5-8). The repression is mediated by a silencing domain
in the carboxyl terminus (5, 9-11) that also harbors several other
functions, including hormone binding, dimerization, and
hormone-dependent activation. Although the mechanisms by
which TR repress basal transcription are not fully understood, studies
suggest that TR interacts with various regulatory proteins to exert its
repression functions. Interaction with components of basal
transcription machinery, including TATA binding protein and
TFIIB, and disruption of the pre-initiation complex formation were
shown to be involved in gene silencing by TR (8, 12-14). However,
mutations in the hinge region of TR that completely abolished ligand-independent repression did not interfere with the interaction of
TFIIB (15), suggesting that interaction with transcription factors is
not solely responsible for gene repression by TR. Investigations of
active repression by unliganded TR and retinoic acid receptor have led
to the identification of several co-repressors, N-CoR (15), SMRT
(16-18), and Alien (19), by a yeast two-hybrid screen. The repressive
activity of N-CoR and SMRT is manifested through their interaction with
Sin3 that associates with histone deacetylase (HDAC) to form a
co-repressor complex. Recently, isolation and characterization of
HDAC3, HDAC5, and HDAC7 showed that SMRT and N-CoR-mediated repression
is also promoted by HDAC in a Sin3A-independent fashion (20-23).
Deacetylation of histones is thought to condense chromatin that then
becomes less accessible to transcription factor, leading to gene repression.
To explore the mechanism of repression by TR, we searched for
co-regulatory protein in human colon carcinoma RKO cells by yeast
two-hybrid screen using intact TR
1 as bait. In this study, we report
the identification and characterization of a novel co-repressor for TR
that interacts with TR in a hormone-insensitive manner. This gene,
designated as P3, encodes an isoform of human
mitochondria branched-chain aminotransferase (BCATm) that catalyzes the
first step in degradation of branched chain amino acids (24, 25). We
provide evidence that P3 cDNA is derived from BCATm by alternative splicing in human cell lines. Importantly, we show that P3 was localized not only to the mitochondria but also that a significant fraction of P3 was localized in the nucleus.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plasmids--
The following plasmids have been described
previously: pCLC51, pCLC61, and pCDMTR
2, which express human TR
1,
TR
1, and rat TR
2, respectively (20, 27); pTK-Pal-Luc, which
contains two TRE-Pal-binding sites and a luciferase gene under the
control of thymidine kinase promoter; pCEP4F contains the CMV early
promoter and an ATG followed by the FLAG epitope (20); pCJ3, pJL8,
pJL5, and pCJ4, which contain full-length and truncated TR
1 cDNA
downstream of the phage T7 promoter (27).
The pCMV-P3 plasmid, carrying both the T7 and cytomegalovirus
promoters, was constructed as follows. First, a double-stranded oligonucleotide
(5'-CCATGGCTCGAGGATCCGAATTCCAGATCTATGCTAGCCCTAGG-3'), containing multiple cloning sites and an ATG signal (underlined), was ligated to the pExpress-shutter vector at NcoI and
BamHI sites. Subsequently, pExp-P3 was constructed by
releasing the P3 cDNA from pGAD10-P3 and subcloning it into the
pExpress-shutter vector digested with EcoRI. The P3 fragment
(HindIII-NheI) was cut out from the pExp-P3
vector and ligated to the HindIII-NheI site of the pCMV-TR
1 to produce the pCMV-P3.
To construct pGST-P3, P3 cDNA was isolated and cloned into the
EcoRI site of the pGEX-6P-1 vector (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech), in-frame with the glutathione S-transferase (GST)
polypeptide. pCEP4F-P3 was generated by isolating the P3 cDNA with
SalI digestion and subcloning it into the XhoI
site of the pCEP4F vector to produce an in-frame fusion protein with
FLAG tagged at the amino terminus. All constructions were verified by
restriction enzyme digestions and DNA sequencing.
Yeast Two-hybrid Assay--
The human colon carcinoma RKO
cDNA library in pGAD 10 vector (CLONTECH
Laboratories, Inc.) was constructed according to the manufacturer's
protocol (28). The full-length TR
1 was inserted into the
NdeI and EcoRI site of pAS2-1 vector to generate
Gal4DNA-BD-TR
1 as the bait. Both plasmids were transformed into
yeast Y190 strain and selected on histidine(
), leucine(
), and
tryptophan(
) medium. After 4 days, colonies were picked and confirmed
by
-galactosidase assay. The cDNA from positive clones were
isolated and subjected to sequencing.
Cell Culture and Transient Transfection--
Monkey kidney CV1
cells and human colon carcinoma RKO cells were maintained in DMEM
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 µg/ml
penicillin, 0.25 µg/ml streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine at 37 °C in 5% CO2. To prepare
thyroid hormone-depleted FBS (Td-FBS), 500 ml of FBS was incubated with
20 mg/ml activated charcoal and 50 mg/ml anion exchange resin (AGX-8,
Bio-Rad) for 24 h followed by centrifugation and ultrafiltration.
3 × 105 cells were seeded into a 6-well plate 1 day
before transfection in DMEM with 10% Td-FBS. Cells were transfected
with 1 µg of pTK-Pal-Luc, 0.25 µg of TR, and P3-expressing vector
using FuGENE 6 transfection reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Empty vectors were used to supplement equal amounts of DNA in each
transfection. After overnight incubation, cells were replaced with
fresh DMEM with 10% Td-FBS and induced by 100 nM T3. After 24 h, cells were lysed with reporter lysis buffer (Promega) and assayed for luciferase activity and total protein. All experiments were
performed in duplicates and repeated 3-5 times. The results shown are
the means ± S.E.
Northern Blot Analyses--
Total RNA was isolated from cell
lines by RNA miniprep kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's
protocol. Ten µg of RNA was analyzed in 1% agarose gel containing
2.2 M formaldehyde. A Northern blot containing RNA from
normal human tissues was purchased from CLONTECH
Laboratories. The
-32P-labeled probes were prepared by
random prime kit (Stratagene).
RT-PCR Analysis--
RNA was isolated from tissue culture cells
by TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.). The first-stranded
cDNA synthesis was catalyzed by SuperScript II Reverse
Transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc.) using 5 µg of total RNA and
poly(dT) as a primer. The target cDNA was amplified with a
pair of primers: BCAT-5' primer, 5'-ACGCCCCCGCTGAATGGTGTTATC, and
BCAT-3' primer, 5'-GTGCTGGCGTGACGAGATGCTACG. PCR was performed as
follows for 35 cycles: denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s,
annealing at 60 °C
66 °C for 30 s, and amplification at
74 °C for 30 s. The amplified products were analyzed in 3%
agarose gel in TAE buffer (Tris acetate, 1 mM EDTA, pH
8.3)
GST Pull-down and Co-immunoprecipitation Assay--
Expression
of GST, GST-TR
1 was induced by 1 mM
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside in BL21 cells. The
expressed proteins were purified and immobilized by
glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) according
to the manufacturer's protocol. In vitro translated
proteins were synthesized by TNT-coupled reticulocyte lysate system
(Promega), and the translation efficiency was verified by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiography. For binding
assay, beads were incubated with in vitro translated [35S]methionine-labeled proteins (intact TR
1 and its
truncated proteins lacking domain A/B, A/B +C, or A/B + C + D) (27)
using TNT Kit (Promega, Madison, WI) in 500 µl of buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 0.1% Lubrol, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 0.05% BSA, 5% glycerol, and protease inhibitors) at 4 °C overnight with constant rotation. Subsequently, beads were washed 4 times in 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 2.5% sucrose, 2.5 mM
EDTA, 250 mM NaCl, and 1% Lubrol. The bound proteins
were eluted out by boiling the beads in SDS sample buffer and
analyzed on SDS-polyacrylamide gels. The proteins were detected by autoradiography.
The physical interaction of P3 with domain E of TR
1 was further
evaluated by co-immunoprecipitation assay. In vitro
translated [35S]methionine-labeled domain E (T7
expression plasmid, pCJ4) prepared similarly as described above (10 µl lysates) and P3 (10 µl lysates) were incubated in 100 µl of
buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 0.1% Lubrol, 2 mM dithiothreitol,
0.05% BSA, 5% glycerol, and protease inhibitors) at 20 °C for
2 h. Monoclonal anti-TR antibody (mAbC4; 2 µg; 29) or an
irrelevant antibody (MOPC; 2 µg; Sigma) was added and incubated for
an additional 2 h at 4 °C. The mixture was further incubated
with 20 µl of protein G-agarose beads (Roche Molecular Biochemicals)
for 1 h at 4 °C. The beads were spun down and washed 4 times
with buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 2.5%
sucrose, 2.5 mM EDTA, 250 mM NaCl, and 1%
Lubrol. The bound proteins were eluted out by boiling the beads in SDS
sample buffer and analyzed on SDS-polyacrylamide gels. The proteins
were detected by autoradiography.
Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis--
Cells were
washed in phosphate-buffered saline and lysed in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% Nonidet P-40) containing a complete protease
inhibitor mixture (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Cell lysate was
clarified by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C. For
immunoprecipitation, 300 µg of cell extract was incubated with mAbC4
(29) or anti-FLAG M2 antibodies (Sigma) for 2 h at 4 °C and
followed by incubation with protein G-agarose beads (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) overnight. Beads were washed 5 times in lysis buffer and
boiled in 2× Laemmli sample buffer. The immunoprecipitates were
separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to
Immobilon membranes (Millipore). The bolt was probed with mouse
anti-FLAG M2 antibody, mAbC4, or a rabbit polyclonal antibody against
sheep BCATm provided by Susan Hutson (from Bowman Gray School of
Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC) (30). After washing, the reactive proteins
were detected by ECL reagent (Pierce).
Electrophoresis Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)--
A
double-stranded oligonucleotide containing the F2-TRE-binding
sequence was prepared by annealing two synthetic complementary oligomers (5'-AAGGGATCCTTATTGACCCCAGCTGAGGTCAAGTTACG-3' and
5'-AGGAGGATCGTAACTTGACCTCAGCTGGGGTCAATAA-3'). The oligonucleotide
was labeled by Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I in the presence of
[
-32P]dCTP. About 0.2 ng of probe (3-5 × 104 cpm) was incubated with in vitro translated
proteins, 0.15 µg of single-stranded DNA, and 1 µg of nonspecific
competitor poly(dI-dC) in 10 µl of binding buffer (10 mM
HEPES, pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 4% Ficoll). Full-length P3 and TR
1 were prepared by in vitro transcription/translation kit
(wheat germ TNT, Promega). Reactions were carried out at room
temperature for 30 min, and complexes were resolved on 6%
non-denaturing polyacrylamide in 0.5× TBE (45 mM Tris-HCl,
45 mM boric acid, 0.5 mM EDTA). After electrophoresis, the gel was vacuum-dried and subjected to autoradiography.
To establish the specificity of the effect of P3 on the binding of
TR
1 to TRE, we also carried out EMSA similarly as described above
except in the presence of bovine serum albumin (0.1-1 µg) or the
in vitro translated steroid hormone co-activator-1 (1 and 4 µl) (31) as controls. EMSA were also carried out similarly using
purified Gal repressor (GalR) and a 32P-labeled 140-bp DNA
containing its target binding sequence, OI (32), in the
presence or absence of P3.
Immunofluorescence and Confocal Localization--
CV-1 cells
were seeded in Nunc chamber slides (Fisher, catalog number 2565401)
with a density of 2.5 × 104 cells/well. After
culturing the cells for 24 h, cells were transfected with FLAG-P3
expression plasmid (pCEPF-P3; 1 µg/well) using Fugene6 (1 µg/50
µl of Opti-MEM) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After 5 h, an equal volume of T3 (100 nM) containing
medium was added to the cell cultures. After culturing the cells for
16 h, cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and fixed
with 3.7% formaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature followed by
permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100. After washing with
phosphate-buffered saline (three times), cells were treated with the
anti-FLAG M2 monoclonal antibody (Sigma) at a dilution of 1:20,000 in
5% BSA. Detection was carried out with fluorescein
isothiocyanate-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (20 µg/ml in 5% BSA;
Jackson Laboratories). All immunofluorescence localization experiments
were performed using Nunc chamber slides. Mitochondria were visualized
using the Mitochondrion-selective Probe Mitotracker Red CMXRos
(Molecular Probes) and visualized using the rhodamine channel. Cells
were examined using an Ultraview Confocal microscope on a Zeiss TV200 microscope (krypton-argon laser).
 |
RESULTS |
Characterization of Human P3--
To search for TR-interacting
proteins, a yeast two-hybrid system was used with the intact TR
1 as
bait. The screening led to the isolation of several positive clones
from the human RKO cDNA library. DNA sequence analysis of one clone
showed an open reading frame of 1143 bp encoding for a protein of 381 amino acids. We referred this cDNA clone as P3 (Fig.
1). While searching the NCBI data base
for sequence homology, we discovered that P3 is highly
homologous to members of the BCATm family. Among these members, the human BCATm cDNA encodes a mature protein of
366 amino acids that is preceded by a mitochondrial targeting
sequence of 27 amino acids (Fig. 1B). DNA sequence alignment
of the P3 and human BCATm (GenBankTM accession number
U68418) shows that they share 97% identity except for a 36-bp gap
(corresponding to nucleotides 1030-1065 of BCATm) located near the
carboxyl terminus of the P3 (Fig. 1A). This suggests that P3
and BCATm may originate from the same gene.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Comparison of P3 with human BCATm.
A, comparison of DNA sequences of P3 and human BCATm. P3 DNA
sequence is aligned with human BCATm (GenBankTM
accession number U68418) using GCG program. Only the carboxyl-terminal
sequences are shown. Identical sequences are aligned and
dots represents gaps in P3. The asterisk denotes
the deduced stop codon for translation. Primers used in RT-PCR analysis
are underlined. The potential 5' and 3' splice sites in
human BCATm are indicated in bold letters. B,
schematic representation of the human BCATm, P3, and FLAG-P3 proteins.
The numbers show the position of the indicated amino acids.
The arrow indicates the predicted cleavage site of the
mitochondrial targeting sequence (shown as the black box).
The predicated splicing junctions are shown as the gray
box. A FLAG tag shown as the striped box was added to
the amino terminus of the P3 to produce the FLAG-P3.
|
|
Analysis of the flanking sequence of the gap region revealed the
consensus sequence of the 5' and 3' splice sites (5'-GT and AG-3') for
RNA processing. To explore further the possibility that the P3 mRNA
resulted from alternative splicing of the human BCATm mRNA, we
isolated total mRNA from RKO cells and synthesized the first
stranded cDNA by reverse transcription. To enrich the target genes,
PCR was performed using primers complementary to the flanking sequences
of the gap region. Reactions were carried out at different annealing
temperatures to ensure specific gene amplification. Two specific bands
corresponding to the predicted sizes for the P3 (345 bp) and the BCATm
(381 bp) were detected in all PCRs (Fig.
2A). Evidently, the BCATm
mRNA is the dominant form in RKO cells, ~10 times more abundant
than the spliced P3 mRNA. To determine whether the splicing event
occurs in other human cell lines, total mRNA isolated from human
HeLa, Saco-2, MCF7, and 293 cell lines was analyzed accordingly.
Similarly, BCATm mRNA was the major form, and detectable P3
mRNA was observed in these cell lines under the conditions stated
(data not shown), suggesting that the splicing event is not unique in
RKO cells.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Differential expression of P3 and BCATm in
human tissues and cell lines. A, detection of the P3
and BCATm mRNA by RT-PCR. Total RKO RNA was synthesized into
cDNA by reverse transcription and amplified as described under
"Experimental Procedures." PCRs were performed at different
annealing temperatures as indicated at the top. Sizes of DNA
1-kilobase pair (kb) markers are shown on the
left. B, Northern blot analysis of BCATm/P3 in
human tissues and cell lines. Ten µg of total RNA samples from
selected human tissues and cell lines were separated on formaldehyde
gel and hybridized with the 32P-labeled P3 probe. The size
markers are indicated on the right. C, detection
of endogenous BCATm/P3 and transfected P3 proteins. Lysates from
untransfected human cell lines (lanes 1-5) and CV1 cells
transfected with FLAG-P3 expression vector or empty vector (lanes
6 and 7, respectively) were analyzed by Western
blotting using rabbit anti-BCATm. The loading amount for each cell line
is 30 µg except 15 µg for RKO cells.
|
|
To explore the expression of BCATm/P3 mRNA in tissues and cultured
cells, Northern blot analysis was performed using intact P3 cDNA as
a probe. Whereas the P3 and BCATm mRNAs are produced by alternative
splicing, they only differ 36 bp in size. As expected, only one major
mRNA transcript of about 1.7 kilobase pairs was detected in all
normal human tissues and cell lines. The BCATm/P3 was expressed at
higher levels in human heart, placenta, skeletal muscle, and pancreas,
whereas lower levels were observed in brain, lung, liver, and kidney
(Fig. 2B). A significantly higher level of BCATm/P3 was
detected in human RKO cells than in rat growth hormone-producing cell
(GC) and monkey CV1 cell lines. The low signal in GC and CV cells did
not result from lack of sequence homology because the human BCATm
shares more than 80% identity in DNA sequence with other cloned
mammalian BCATm (33).
Because the human BCATm is highly homologous to sheep BCATm, a rabbit
antiserum against mature sheep BCATm protein was used to detect the
expression of BCATm and P3 (33). The anti-BCATm antibody detected a
42-kDa band corresponding to the predicted size for endogenous BCATm in
several human cell lines, including HeLa, 293, MCF7, RKO, Saos-2 cells,
and monkey CV1 cells (Fig. 2C, band a,
lanes 1-3 and 5-7). Consistent with the results
of RT-PCR and Northern blotting, BCATm and P3 were expressed more abundantly in RKO cells than in other cell lines.
To demonstrate that the cloned P3 cDNA encoding a protein is
antigenically related to BCATm, the P3 cDNA was cloned into the pCEP-F expression vector, which encodes a amino-terminal FLAG-tagged P3
fusion protein and transfected into CV1 cells. Surprisingly, two bands
were detected by anti-BCATm antibody. The lower band co-migrated with
the endogenous BCATm/P3 (band a, lanes 6 and 7)
and the upper band migrates approximately at the size of 45 kDa
(band b, lane 6). When the bolt was re-probed with
anti-FLAG, only the upper band was detected (data not shown),
suggesting that the FLAG-P3 expressed an isoform of BCATm that was not
proteolytically processed in CV1 cells (Fig. 1B). The
failure of cleavage most likely results from interference of the FLAG
peptide fused upstream of the mitochondrial targeting sequence (Fig.
1B). Taken together, these data confirm that P3 encodes an
isoform of human BCATm and is derived from the BCATm gene by
alternative splicing.
Binding of P3 to TR
1 in Vitro--
P3 was identified as a
TR
1-interacting protein by the yeast two-hybrid screening. To
confirm the physical interaction between P3 and TR in vitro,
we used bacterially expressed GST-TR
1 and in vitro
35S-labeled P3 in the binding assay. In agreement with
the yeast two-hybrid result, P3 bound strongly to GST-TR
1 (Fig.
3A, lanes 3 and 4)
but not to GST alone (Fig. 3A, lanes 1 and 2),
indicating that the association was specific. Interestingly, addition
of 1 µM T3 ligand did not disrupt the interaction between
GST-TR
1 and P3 (lane 3 versus 4).
TR
1 consists of several functional domains: the amino-terminal
domain (A/B), a highly conserved DNA-binding domain (C), and
a hormone-binding domain (D and E) (see
also Fig. 3D of Ref. 1). To identify the domain that is
required for interaction with P3, we used in vitro
translated TR
1-truncated proteins (27) in a reciprocal GST pull-down
assay. All TR
1-truncated proteins were efficiently translated
in vitro, and equal amounts these proteins were used in the
binding assays. Full-length TR
1 and all truncated TR
1 bound to
GST-P3 (Fig. 3B, lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8) but not to
GST alone (Fig. 3B, lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7). These results indicate that the hormone-binding domain E is the critical binding region (see also Fig. 3D). To further support that
domain E was responsible for the binding of TR
1 to P3,
co-immunoprecipitation assay was also carried out by using anti-TR
antibody, mAbC4 (29). Fig. 3C shows that in the presence of
both P3 and domain E (see also Fig. 3D), P3 was associated
with the immunoprecipitated domain E. Lane 4 is a control to
indicate that an irrelevant monoclonal antibody, MOPC, did not
precipitate any proteins. These results provide additional support to
show that domain E of TR
1 is the binding site for P3.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Interaction of P3 with
TR 1 in vitro and in
vivo. A, pull-down assay of P3 by
GST-TR 1. GST or GST-TR 1 was incubated with in vitro
translated 35S-labeled P3 in the presence or absence of 1 µM T3. B, mapping of the P3 interaction domain
of TR 1. GST or GST-P3 was incubated with 35S-labeled
TR 1 mutants. The GST-pull-down assay was carried out as described in
A. The lanes are marked. C, the binding of P3 to
domain E as shown by co-immunoprecipitation assay. Ten µl each of
35S-labeled domain E and P3 were prepared by in
vitro translation and co-immunoprecipitated by using anti-TR mAbC4
as described under "Experimental Procedures." Lane 4 is
a control to indicate that an irrelevant monoclonal antibody, MOPC,
did not precipitate any proteins. D, schematic
representation of TR 1-truncated proteins. The amino-terminal domain
(A/B), DNA binding domain (C), hinge region (D),
and hormone binding domain (E) of TR 1 are indicated. The
designations for the T7 expression vectors for the intact TR 1 and
its truncated proteins are also indicated. E, in
vivo association of P3 with unliganded TR 1. CV1 cells were
transfected with the indicated expression vectors of TR 1 and FLAG-P3
in the absence of T3. Lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG
antibody before being immunoblotted for TR. Ten percent of the input
was used to detect the expression level of TR 1 and P3 as shown in
direct Western. F, association of endogenous
BCATm/P3 with transfected TR 1. Lysates from TR 1-transfected CV1
cells were immunoprecipitated with either control IgG or anti-TR
antiserum. Samples were immunoblotted with anti-BCATm antibody.
|
|
We next determined whether P3 could associate with TR
1 in intact
cells. Thus, CV1 cells were transfected with plasmids encoding TR
1
and FLAG-P3 in the absence of T3. TR
1 co-precipitated with FLAG-P3
using an antibody against the FLAG epitope (Fig. 3E, lane 3). To monitor the expression of TR
1 and FLAG-P3, lysates from the transfected cells were analyzed by direct Western blotting (Fig.
3E, lanes 4-6). We estimated ~2% of the expressed
TR-forming complex with FLAG-P3 in CV1 cells. Similar association of
FLAG-P3 with TR
1 in CV1 cells was observed in the presence of T3
(data now shown). The T3-independent association of P3 with TR
1
detected in cells is consistent with the results found by GST pull-down assay in vitro.
Finally, we examined interaction of endogenous BCAT/P3 with transfected
TR
1. Endogenous BCAT/P3 was precipitated with anti-TR antibody in
cells transfected with TR
1 but not with empty vector (Fig. 3F,
lane 1 versus 2). No BCATm/P3 was precipitated with normal mouse IgG in cells transfected with TR
1 (Fig. 3F, lane 3). Together, these results demonstrate that TR
1 interacts with P3, through the hormone-binding domain, in a ligand-insensitive manner.
P3 Localizes to the Nucleus and Mitochondria of Transfected
Cells--
The intracellular localization of P3 was examined by
immunofluorescence after transfecting CV1 cells with FLAG-P3 expression plasmid. As indicated by the arrows (Mi) in Fig.
4A, P3 was localized to the
mitochondria. Importantly, P3 was also found to localize in the nucleus
(indicated by arrows, Nu). To confirm further the localization of P3 in the mitochondria, we carried out similar immunofluorescence experiments except that living cells were first treated with Mitotracker (a mitochondrion-selective red marker) before
immunostaining with anti-FLAG for FLAG-P3. Fig. 4B shows the
merged image (indicated by yellow), indicating substantial coincidence of confocal labeling by the Mitotracker (D,
viewed using red rhodamine channel) and anti-FLAG P3 (C,
viewed using green fluorescein channel).

View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Expression and immunofluorescent
localization of FLAG-P3 in the nucleus and mitochondria. CV1 cells
were transfected with expression plasmid for FLAG-P3 in the absence of
T3. Cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde and permeabilized with
0.1% Triton X-100. Immunofluorescence images were obtained as
described under "Experimental Procedures." A, using
confocal microscopy, P3 was localized to both nuclei
(arrows, Nu) and to extended cytoplasmic
structures morphologically resembling mitochondria (arrows,
Mi). B, co-localization of P3 with mitochondria using
MitoTracker Red CM-H3Xros. Living cells were incubated with MitoTracker
for 10 min according to the manufacturer's instructions and fixed.
Localization of FLAG-P3 was carried out as described under
"Experimental Procedures." This image represents the merge of the
rhodamine (red) and fluorescein (green) channels
showing substantial co-localization in the confocal microscope as
represented by yellow. C, localization of P3
using anti-FLAG (fluorescein; green). D,
localization of mitochondria using the MitoTracker (Rhodamine channel;
red). The bars at the lower left in
A-D are 10µm.
|
|
P3 Enhances the Silencing Mediated by TR
1 and Functions as a
Transcriptional Repressor--
To study the ability of P3 to influence
the silencing activity of TR
1, CV1 cells were transiently
transfected with a luciferase reporter containing 2 copies of inverted
repeat TRE (TRE-pal) together with the TR
1 and the FLAG-P3
expression vectors in the absence of T3. As expected, unliganded TR
1
behaved as a repressor of the TRE-mediated transcription (Fig.
5A, bars 1 versus
2). FLAG-P3 itself repressed the TRE-luciferase activity by
3-fold (Fig. 5A, bar 3). When FLAG-P3 was co-expressed with
TR, the repression was synergistically enhanced (15-fold, bar
4 versus 2 and 3). These data
show P3 as a transcriptional co-repressor that augments the silencing
mediated by TR
1.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
P3 harbors intrinsic repression
activity. A, P3 enhancing the silencing effect of
unliganded TR 1. Luciferase reporter together with TR 1 expression
plasmid, FLAG-P3, or empty vector was transfected into CV1 cells. Fold
repression was calculated as relative to cells co-transfected with
empty vectors. B, repression of P3 on TRE-mediated
transcription. CV1 cells were transfected with pTK-Pal-Luc reporter (1 µg) and the FLAG-tagged P3 expression vector (0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 µg). Fold repression was calculated relative to cells transfected
with reporter construct. Data are means ± S.D. (n = 3).
|
|
The repression effect shown in Fig. 5A raises the question
whether P3 itself harbors intrinsic silencing activity. CV1 cells were
transiently transfected with FLAG-P3 expression plasmid along with the
TRE-luciferase construct. Expression of FLAG-P3 repressed basal
transcription from the TRE-luciferase reporter in a
dose-dependent fashion (Fig. 5B), indicating
that P3 harbors intrinsic silencing activity.
P3 Represses TR Transactivational Activity--
To determine
whether P3 represses the ligand-dependent transactivation
activity of TR, FLAG-P3 was co-transfected with TR
1 and
TRE-luciferase reporter into CV1 cells. The luciferase activity was
activated by TR
1 in the presence of T3. However, the activation of
luciferase activity by TR
1 was greatly reduced by increasing the
expression plasmids of FLAG-P3 (Fig.
6A). To see whether TR
1 expression was affected by the presence of FLAG-P3, cell lysates from
each transfection were subjected to Western blot analysis. The
expression level of TR
1 was not affected by the co-expression of P3
(data not shown), ruling out the possibility that the reduced activation of luciferase reporter is a consequence of lower expression of TR.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Repression of TR 1
transcriptional activity by P3. A, P3 represses
T3-dependent activation by TR 1. CV1 cells were
transfected with pTK-Pal-Luc, TR 1 expression plasmid, and increasing
amounts of FLAG-P3. After transfection, cells were induced by 100 nM T3 for 24 h before harvesting. The relative
reporter activity in the absence of T3 was set as 1. The reporter
plasmid pTK-Pal-Luc (1 µg) together with pCMV-P3 (0.2 or 0.4 µg)
and TR 1 (0.2 µg) expression vectors were transiently transfected
into CV1 (B) and RKO (C) cells. The fold
activation is calculated relative to that of reporter activity in the
absence of T3, which was set to 1. Data represent means ± S.D.
(n = 3).
|
|
To ask whether the P3-mediated repression depends on the backbone of
expression vector, we generated a second P3 expression vector by
cloning the P3 cDNA into the pcDNA3.1 vector. As shown in Fig.
6B, TR
1 alone repressed the basal transcription of
TRE-luciferase in the absence of T3 and activated luciferase activity
in the presence of T3. Co-transfection of pCMV-P3 further enhanced the gene silencing by the unliganded TR. In the presence of T3, P3 significantly repressed the transactivation activity of TR
1 in CV1
cells. Comparable but less significant repression was seen in RKO cells
(Fig. 6C). The lower repression effect of P3 on TR activity
could be attributed to the high expression of endogenous BCATm/P3 in
RKO cells (Fig. 2C), suggesting the extent of repression is
cell type-dependent. Similarly, P3 also repressed TR
transcriptional activity on reporters containing Lys-TRE (an inverted
TRE) in CV1 cells (data not shown).
Previously, we mapped the hormone binding domain and DNA binding domain
of TR
1 as the critical interaction regions with P3. Sequence
comparison shows that TR isoforms share high homology in their DNA
binding and ligand binding domains. However, very little or no
sequence similarity exists in the amino-terminal activation domain
among the TR isoforms. We therefore determined whether P3 represses the
transcriptional activity of other TR isoforms. As shown in Fig.
7, the repression effect of P3 was in the
order TR
2 > TR
1 > TR
1, indicating that the extent
of the repression by P3 is TR isoform-dependent.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Repression of transcriptional activity of TR
isoforms by P3. CV1 cells were transfected with pTK-Pal-Luc
reporter (1 µg), TR expression vector (0.2 µg), and pCMV-P3 (0.4 µg) or empty vector. As indicated, cells were treated with 100 nM T3 for 24 h. The fold activation is calculated
relative to that of reporter alone without adding T3, which was set to
1. Data represent means ± S.D. (n = 3).
|
|
P3 Inhibits the Binding of TR
1 to TRE--
To understand the
mechanisms by which P3 repressed the T3-dependent
transactivation, we first analyzed the TR-TRE complexes in response to
P3 using EMSA. TR
1 and P3 proteins were generated in
vitro by a rabbit reticulate lysate transcription/translation kit,
and the amounts of the translated proteins were determined by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. As shown in Fig.
8A, binding of TR
1
homodimer to 32P-labeled TRE probe was enhanced as an
increasing amount of TR
1 was added to the reactions (lanes
2 and 3). However, TR
1 binding was greatly reduced
when increasing amounts of P3 were present (lanes 6-9).
Unlike TR
1, P3 did not show any direct binding to TRE (lanes
4 and 5), indicating that inhibition of TR
1 binding to TRE by P3 is not resulting from a direct competition for the same
DNA-binding site.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Binding of TR 1 to
TRE is specifically inhibited by P3. A, inhibition of
TR 1 homodimer binding to TRE by P3. The 32P-labeled TRE
was incubated with in vitro translated TR 1 (lanes
2 and 3), P3 (lanes 4 and 5), or
TR 1 in the presence of increasing concentrations of P3 (lanes
6-9; 1-4 µl, respectively), and subjected to EMSA as described
under "Experimental Procedures." An equal amount of unprogrammed
lysates was used as control shown in lanes 1 and
10. The same amount of TR 1 (1 µl) of translated lysates
was used in lane 2 and lanes 6-9. TR 1
homodimer complex is indicated by arrows. B, the binding
TR 1 to TRE is inhibited by P3 but not by BSA or SRC-1. Binding of
the in vitro translated TR 1 (1 µl) to
32P-labeled TRE without (lane 1) or with
in vitro translated P3 (lysates 1 and 4 µl in lanes
3 and 4, respectively). Binding of the in
vitro translated TR 1 (1 µl) to 32P-labeled TRE
was in the presence of BSA (0.1, 0.5, and 1 µg in lanes
5-7, respectively) or in the presence of in vitro
translated SRC-1 (lysates 1 and 4 µl in lanes 8 and
9, respectively). Lane 10, no binding of SRC-1 (4 µl) to 32P-labeled TRE. C, P3 does
not affect the binding of GalR to its target DNA element. Binding of
purified GalR (10 nM) to 32P-labeled 140-bp DNA
fragment carrying its binding sequence OI (1 nM; lane 2); no binding of P3 (4 µl) to
OI (lane 3); P3 (4 µl) had no effect on the
binding of GalR to OI (lane 4). Lane
1 shows the control in which only lysates and DNA probe were
present. Only nonspecific (NS) band was detected as marked.
D, reduction of TR 1/RXR heterodimer binding to TRE by
P3. Assay was performed as described in A. Increasing
amounts of RXR were incubated with in vitro translated
TR 1 (lanes 2 and 3) or P3 (lanes 4 and 5); the inhibition of TR 1-RXR complex formation by
increasing concentrations of P3 (1, 2, and 4 µl for lanes
6-8, respectively). An equal amount of TR 1 was used in the
binding reactions where indicated. Arrows mark the TR 1
homodimer, monomer, and heterodimer complexes.
|
|
To establish the specificity of the inhibitory effect of P3 on the
binding of TR
1 binding to TRE, we carried out similar EMSA in the
presence of increasing concentrations of BSA or the steroid hormone
co-activator-1 (SRC-1; Fig. 8B). As shown lanes 5-7 in Fig. 8B, the presence of increasing amounts of
BSA had no effect on the binding of TR
1 binding to TRE, whereas the
increasing amounts of P3 decreased the binding of TRE to TR
1
(lanes 2-4 of Fig. 8B). As an additional
control, we also carried out EMSA in the presence of increasing amounts
of SRC-1 in the absence of T3 (lanes 8 and 9 of
Fig. 8B), and no effect on the binding of TR
1 to TRE
(lanes 8 and 9 versus lanes
2-4). Lane 10 of Fig. 8B shows that SRC1
itself did not bind to TRE.
To demonstrate further the specificity of the inhibitory effect of P3
on the binding of TR
1 to TRE, we used a well characterized DNA-binding protein, the Gal repressor (GalR; see Ref. 32). Lane
2 of Fig. 8C shows that the purified GalR bound to its
target DNA element, OI (32), whereas P3 did not bind to the
GalR-binding element OI (lane 3 of Fig.
8C). Lane 4 shows that same amount of P3 that
inhibited the binding of TR
1 to TRE (see lane 9 of Fig.
8A and lane 4 of Fig. 8B) did not
affect the binding of GalR to OI. Lane 1 was a
control to indicate that only a nonspecific band was detected when the
DNA probe was incubated with the unprogrammed lysates. These data
provide additional control to indicate that P3 did not affect the
binding of other DNA-binding proteins to its target DNA element.
Heterodimerization of TR and RXR
has been shown to modulate TR
transactivation activity. To assess whether P3 affected TR
1/RXR
binding to the Lys-TRE sequence, bacterially expressed RXR
was incubated with TR
1 in the binding reactions (Fig. 8D).
Heterodimer of TR
1 and RXR increased as more RXR
was added
(lanes 2 and 3 of Fig. 8D). Incubation
of P3 and RXR
did not result in any binding to the TRE probe
(lanes 4 and 5 of Fig. 8D). As shown in lanes 6 and 7 (Fig. 8D), binding of
TR
1/RXR
heterodimers to Lys-TRE was decreased by P3 in a
concentration-dependent manner. Taken together, these data
suggest that the suppression action of P3 on TR transcriptional
activity is, at least in part, due to inhibition of TR
1 binding to
TRE by P3.
Role of HDAC in P3 Repression--
To investigate whether the
P3-mediated repression of TR
1 involves HDAC, we transfected CV1
cells with TRE-luciferase reporter with TR
1 alone or TR
1 and
FLAG-P3 and treated cells with T3 and 100 nM trichostatin A
(TSA), a specific inhibitor of HDAC. In the absence of TSA,
co-transfection of P3 resulted in a 7-fold reduction of
T3-dependent activation by TR
1. P3-mediated repression of TR
1 activation was significantly relieved by TSA treatment (Fig.
9A). We asked whether the
silencing activity of P3 also involves HDAC activity. As shown in Fig.
9B, P3-mediated repression of TRE-luciferase activity was
dramatically reversed by TSA. These results suggest that the repressor
activity of P3 may also be mediated by HDAC activity.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Reversal of P3 repression by histone
deacetylase inhibitor TSA. A, pTK-Pal-Luc and TR alone
or together with FLAG-P3 expression vector was transfected into CV1
cells. After transfection, cells with 100 nM T3 and
in the presence or absence of 100 nM TSA for 24 h.
Relative activation was determined relative to cells transfected with
TR in the absence of T3. B, CV1 cells were transfected
pTK-Pal-Luc and FLAG-P3 or empty vector. Luciferase activity was
measured in the absence or presence of 100 nM TSA.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The redundancy of regulatory function is commonly observed in the
biological systems. We therefore used a yeast two-hybrid screen to
search for additional co-regulators for TR
1 in human RKO cells. Here
we identified a novel co-repressor for TR, designated as P3. Unlike
SMRT, N-CoR, and Alien which only associate with TR in the absence of
ligand (15), P3 physically interacts with TR in a T3-independent
manner. P3 enhances TR-mediated silencing and represses
T3-dependent transcriptional activity of TR. Taken together, our data show that P3 represents a member of a new class of
co-repressor.
We identified P3 as a shorter isoform of the human BCATm. The human
BCATm genes have been isolated and mapped to chromosome 19 (33), but
the genomic organization is not yet explored. In this study, DNA
sequence analysis shows the P3 is identical to the BCATm except for a
36-bp deletion at the carboxyl-terminal region. We hypothesized that P3
may have originated from the human BCATm gene. This is confirmed by the
identification of RNA spliced sites at the junction of the gap region
(Fig. 1A). This was further confirmed by RT-PCR analysis
that yielded two fragments corresponding to the predicated sizes for
BCATm and P3 cDNA (Fig. 2A). In support of our findings,
it was reported that three different isoforms of BCATm were detected in
rat tissues by Western blot analysis (25).
In mammals, there are two BCAT isoenzymes encoded by two different
genes, a BCATm and a BCAT cytosolic (BCATc) form, to catalyze the first
step in the catabolism of branched chain amino acids, leucine,
isoleucine, and valine, to
-keto acids (24, 25, 34). BCATm is the
dominant isoenzyme and is expressed in all tissues. In contrast, BCATc
is highly expressed during embryogenesis but is limited to only a few
adult tissues.
Multiple functions have been ascribed to BCATm. It has been shown to
catalyze the transamination reaction as well as to transport branched-chain
-keto amino acids (35). The finding that BCATc is
highly expressed in proliferating cells but not in arrested cells,
whereas BCATm is expressed constitutively through the cell cycle (36,
37) implicates that BCATm may act as a housekeeping gene. Recently,
yeast BCATm that shares 49% homology to its human homolog was shown to
regulate cell growth and transition of G1 to S phase in the
cell cycle (38, 39). Yeast cells deleted of BCATm show a faster growth
rate and a shorter G1 phase. In contrast, cells depleted of
BCATc do not show any growth phenotype. This suggests that BCATm may be
involved in maintaining normal cell growth. It is not clear how BCATm
regulates the cell cycle progression.
In this study, we discovered that P3, a shorter isoform of BCATm, can
act as a co-repressor for TR-mediated transcription. This repressor
function is supported by the findings that P3 not only localized to the
mitochondria, but also localized to the nucleus to affect the function
of TRs. However, the mechanism by which P3 mediates repression is still
unclear. We observed that P3 reduced the binding of TR
1 homodimer
and heterodimer to TRE in gel shift assay. The decreased binding
activities are not likely mediated by a direct competition of P3 for
TRE binding because P3 fails to bind to TRE. It is possible that the
association with P3 induced a conformation change of TR
1 in that it
lost the binding ability to TRE. This mode of action is not without precedent. Previously, we also found that the tumor suppressor, p53,
physically interacts with TR
1 and inhibits the binding of TR
1 to
TREs (26). Interestingly, we further discovered that P3 itself harbors
an intrinsic repression activity. Our results show that the silencing
activity of P3 is reversed by TSA, an HDAC inhibitor. This suggests
that P3 may recruit complexes containing HDAC to repress basal
transcription. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that P3
could interact with basal transcription factors and interfere with the
assembly of pre-initiation complex. Meanwhile, we have shown that TSA
treatment reversed the repressive effect of P3 on TR transcription
activation in the presence of ligand. This may be explained by the
finding that the interaction of TR with P3, which has recruited HDAC
complexes, was not disrupted by the binding of ligand. It is possible
that the P3-HDAC complexes interfere with the binding of co-activators
to TR and thus prevent further activation. These data provide a link
between P3-mediated repression and HDAC activity. Taken together, our
results suggest that P3 acts as a repressor for TR-mediated
transcription, most likely via multiple mechanisms. The elucidation of
these mechanisms awaits future studies.