|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M108019200 on October 8, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 51, 48371-48375, December 21, 2001
Poxvirus Infection Rapidly Activates Tyrosine Kinase Signal
Transduction*
Jennefer
Masters §,
Anna A.
Hinek §,
Shahab
Uddin¶,
Leonidas C.
Platanias¶,
Wei
Zeng ,
Grant
McFadden **, and
Eleanor N.
Fish  §§
From the  Division of Cell and Molecular
Biology, Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network,
Canadian Blood Services Building, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M1, Canada, the
Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto,
Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada, the ¶ Section of
Hematology-Oncology, University of Illinois and West Side Veterans
Affairs Hospital, Chicago, Illinois 60607, The John P. Robarts
Research Institute and Department of Microbiology and Immunology,
University of Western Ontario,
London, Ontario 46G 2V4, Canada
Received for publication, August 20, 2001, and in revised form, October 5, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Viruses have evolved a number of strategies to
gain entry and replicate in host target cells that, for human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the poxvirus, myxoma virus, involve
appropriating chemokine receptors. In this report we demonstrate that
activation of multiple intracellular tyrosine
phosphorylation events rapidly ensues following virus
adsorption to NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5 cells and affects the ultimate level of
myxoma virus replication. UV-inactivated myxoma virus induces the rapid
phosphorylation of CCR5 on tyrosine residues, the association of CCR5
with Jaks and p56lck, and their phosphorylation-activation
within minutes of virus adsorption. Additionally, we provide evidence
for myxoma virus-inducible signal transducers and activators of
transcription (Stat) and insulin receptor substrate (IRS) activation.
In contrast to CCR5 activation effected by HIV Env protein, these
myxoma virus-inducible phosphorylation events are not sensitive to
pertussis toxin treatment. Moreover, in cells that are non-permissive
for myxoma virus infection, we provide evidence that myxoma virus fails
to invoke this tyrosine phosphorylation cascade. Consistent with the
observation that infection of CCR5-expressing cells is blocked by
herbimycin A and the Jak 2 inhibitor, tyrophostin AG490, we infer that
viral infectivity may be dependent on non-G-protein-coupled signal
transduction pathways triggered by the infecting myxoma virus particle.
This provides a novel post-binding mechanism by which viruses can
co-opt a cellular receptor to permit productive virus infection.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Poxviruses are DNA viruses that replicate autonomously in the
cytoplasm of infected cells. They have been the subject of intensive study, based largely on their severe pathogenesis in humans and a
variety of domestic animals (1). Until its global irradication, smallpox, caused by an orthopoxvirus, was one of the most serious diseases of mankind. Myxoma virus, a member of the
Leporipoxvirus genus, is the causative agent of myxomatosis,
a lethal disease of the European rabbit (2). Myxomatosis is
characterized by extensive fulminating lesions and severe immune
dysfunction accompanied by supervening Gram-negative bacterial
infections of the respiratory tract (3).
Recently, evidence was provided that myxoma virus may utilize chemokine
receptors to initiate infection (4). Viruses have evolved a number of
strategies to gain entry and replicate in host target cells that, for
HIV1 and myxoma virus,
includes appropriating chemokine receptors (4-6). Chemokines and their
receptors are critical for the clearance of infectious pathogens.
Specifically, chemokines are implicated in directing lymphocyte
trafficking to sites of infection and in activating the effector
functions of these immune cells to eliminate infectious pathogens (7).
Thus, viral subversion of chemokine receptors is an effective way to
modulate chemokine-receptor-mediated interactions that would invoke an
immune response against the invading virus. Indeed, herpesviruses and
poxviruses subvert a host immune response by encoding several candidate
chemokine receptor homologues and chemokine mimetics, capable of
precluding chemokines from activating their cognate cell surface
receptors (8, 9). However, for HIV-1, there is accumulating evidence to
suggest that interference with the signaling capacity of CCR5 can
compromise its role as an HIV-1 entry coreceptor (10). Indeed,
activation of CCR5 by Env protein of HIV leads to the selective
stimulation of distinct signaling pathways that are advantageous to
establish a "friendly" cellular environment for the virus (10-13).
Accordingly, we undertook studies to examine whether myxoma virus
infection of cells requires activation of the signaling capacity of
CCR5. Our data suggest that myxoma virus entry into cells does not
require the signaling capacity of CCR5 to be intact, yet initiation of infection is dependent on non-G-protein-coupled tyrosine
phosphorylation events initiated by the virus binding to the cell surface.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cells, Viruses, and Reagents--
Murine fibroblast NIH
3T3.CD4.CCR5 and NIH 3T3.CD4.neo cells were obtained from D. Littman
(New York University) and were maintained in DMEM (Life Technologies,
Inc.), supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 100 units/ml
penicillin, and 100 mg/ml streptomycin. vMyxlac is a myxoma virus
(strain Lausanne) derivative containing a -galactosidase marker
cassette driven by a late viral promoter in an intergenic location (4).
109 plaque-forming units/ml of vMyxlac was UV inactivated
using the Stratagene StratLinker for 20-30 min, as indicated. The
StratLinker delivers a dose of 1.2 × 105
µJ/cm2.
4-Amino-5-(4-methylphenyl)7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo(3,4-d)pyrimidine (PP1) was purchased from Biomol and tyrophostin B42 (AG490) from Calbiochem.
Analysis of Human CCR5 and CD4 Expression by Flow
Cytometry--
Cell surface expression of CCR5 and CD4 was quantified
by flow cytometry using the monoclonal antibodies 2D7 (PharMingen) and
SIM.4 (National Institutes of Health AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program), respectively. Cells were gated based on forward and
side scatter. CCR5 and CD4 expression was determined using an
anti-mouse biotin conjugated secondary antibody detected with Cy5
conjugated streptavidin fluorescent tertiary reagent. Staining was
according to the manufacturer's protocol, and flow cytometric data
were acquired using FACScan (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry) as
described previously (14). CELLQuest software was used to analyze data.
Cell Lysis and Immunoblotting--
Approximately 107
cells were either exposed to 108 live virus particles, or
the equivalent of 108 infectious units of UV-inactivated
virus particles, or medium alone, for the indicated times. Cells were
washed twice with cold phosphate-buffered saline and lysed as described
previously (16). Immunoprecipitations and immunoblotting using enhanced
chemiluminescence were performed as described previously (16).
-Galactosidase Colorimetric Assay--
Cells in individual
wells of a 96-well microtiter plate were either left untreated, or
treated with varying doses of PP1 or AG490, then exposed to vMyxlac at
a m.o.i. of 10. After 16 h cells were lysed using a buffer
composed of 10% Nonidet P-40 and 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5. Following one freeze-thaw cycle, an aliquot of the lysate was
transferred to a well in another 96-well microtiter plate, containing
100 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM
KCl, 1 mM MgSO4, and 50 mM
-mercaptoethanol. The mixture was incubated for 5 min at 37 °C.
To measure -galactosidase activity, 4 mg/ml of substrate o-nitrophenyl- -D-galactopyranoside was added
in 100 mM NaH2PO4, pH 7.5. The
breakdown of
o-nitrophenyl- -D-galactopyranoside by -galactosidase results in a yellow color reaction. After 1 h the reaction was terminated by the addition of 1 M
Na2CO3. Absorbance was measured
spectrophotometrically at 420 nm using a THERMOmax microplate reader.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
To determine whether infection by myxoma virus mediates CCR5
activation, thereby rendering a cell permissive for viral replication, we undertook studies to examine CCR5 mediated signal transduction in
two distinct cell lines that are differentially sensitive to viral
infection. NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5 cells, that stably express human CD4 and
human CCR5 (Fig. 1A), are
fully permissive for viral replication (Fig. 1B). For these
studies, viral gene expression was monitored using a recombinant myxoma
virus that expresses -galactosidase under the control of a late
viral promoter that drives a lacZ transgene reporter
(4). By contrast, NIH 3T3.CD4.neo cells that express low levels of
human CD4 and no CCR5 (Fig. 1A) do not support myxoma virus
replication, as revealed in Fig. 1B. When both cell types
are infected at an m.o.i. of 0.01 plaque-forming units/cell, then cells
are harvested at 1 and 16 h post-infection for virus titration on
permissive BGMK cells, we observe that the NIH 3T3.CD4.neo cells are
completely non-permissive for infection (data not shown). By contrast,
over this same time period we observe a log increase in plaque-forming
units/106 BGMK cells (~500-5000) from the permissive NIH
3T3.CD4.CCR5 cells (data not shown).

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
NIH 3T3.CD4.neo and NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5 are
differentially permissive for myxoma virus infection. A,
cell surface expression of human CCR5 and human CD4 were determined by
flow cytometric analysis. Incubation with medium alone or
2o and 3o reagents resulted in the negative
cytogram, represented as the filled profiles. Positive
cytograms for CCR5 (gray) and CD4 (black) are
represented as open profiles. B, susceptibility to myxoma
virus infection was determined for both NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5 and NIH
3T3.CD4.neo cells. Cells were either mock-infected or infected at a
m.o.i. of 1 with vMyxlac for 1 h. After 16 h, infected
monolayers were fixed and stained for LacZ expression.
|
|
Since myxoma virus infection of NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5 cells can be inhibited
by herbimycin A (4), at the outset we examined whether adsorption of
myxoma virus induces CCR5 phosphorylation. For these studies we
employed UV-inactivated myxoma virus, in which the structural integrity
of the viral particles is retained, yet UV-induced damage to the viral
genome irreversibly prevents viral replication (17). UV-inactivated
myxoma virus particles can bind and enter into susceptible cells and
are uncoated, with similar kinetics to the infective virus, but virus
gene expression is severely compromised (data not shown). When lysates
from myxoma virus exposed NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5 cells were
immunoprecipitated with antibodies against phosphotyrosine or CCR5 and
immunoblotted to detect either CCR5 or phosphotyrosine, we observed
that even 1-5-min exposure to UV-inactivated myxoma virus induces
rapid phosphorylation of CCR5 on tyrosine residues (Fig.
2, A and B).
Moreover, in NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5 cells exposed to myxoma virus particles,
we invariably observed the co-immunoprecipitation of a 56-kDa
tyrosine-phosphorylated protein with CCR5 (Fig. 2C).
Immunoblot analysis identified this protein as the Src kinase,
p56lck (Fig. 2D). Our data would suggest that
p56lck associates with CCR5 in a tyrosine
phosphorylation-dependent manner. Notably, we observe
inducible phosphorylation of p56lck whether live or
UV-inactivated myxoma virus is used (Fig. 2E).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Myxoma virus adsorption induces CCR5 tyrosine
phosphorylation in NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5 cells. NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5 cells
were either treated with medium alone ( ) or exposed (+) to an
equivalent of an m.o.i. of 10 with UV-inactivated (20 min) myxoma virus
particles, for the times indicated. Cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated (IP) with either an anti-phosphotyrosine
antibody (pY20) (A) or anti-CCR5 antibody (B,
C, D), and immunoprecipitated proteins were
resolved by SDS-PAGE, then sequentially immunoblotted (WB)
as shown, for CCR5 (A), phosphotyrosine (B,
C), and p56lck (D). E, NIH
3T3.CD4.CCR5 cells were either left untreated or exposed to live (m.o.i
of 10) or an equivalent m.o.i of UV-inactivated (30 min) vMyxlac for 5 min. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-phosphotyrosine
antibody 4G10, and 80 µg of immunoprecipitated proteins were resolved
by SDS-PAGE, then immunoblotted for p56lck.
|
|
In subsequent experiments we examined the extent of myxoma
virus-inducible protein tyrosine phosphorylation in whole cell lysates
from the permissive NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5 and non-permissive NIH 3T3.CD4.neo
cells. Immunoprecipitation of tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins followed
by Western blot analysis revealed that a number of proteins
consistently become tyrosine-phosphorylated following 1-5-min exposure
of NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5 cultures to UV-inactivated myxoma virus (Fig.
3A), yet the non-susceptible
NIH 3T3.CD4.neo cells do not show any evidence of virus-inducible
tyrosine phosphorylation of cellular proteins (Fig. 3B).
Additionally, BGMK cells become resistant to myxoma virus infection
following herbimycin A
treatment.2

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Myxoma virus-induced tyrosine
phosphorylation of cellular proteins is cell-specific. NIH
3T3.CD4.CCR5 (A) and NIH 3T3.CD4.neo (B) cells
were either treated with medium alone ( ) or exposed (+) to an
equivalent of an m.o.i. of 10 with UV-inactivated myxoma virus, for the
times indicated. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP)
with anti-phosphotyrosine (pY20) antibody, and immunoprecipitated
proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE, then immunoblotted (WB)
with 4G10 anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. The NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5 membrane
was stripped and re-probed for Jak1 (C) and Jak2
(D) with the respective antibodies. E, NIH
3T3.CD4.CCR5 cells were either left untreated or exposed to live (m.o.i
of 10) or an equivalent m.o.i of UV-inactivated (30 min) vMyxlac for 5 min. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-phosphotyrosine
antibody 4G10, and 80 µg of immunoprecipitated proteins were resolved
by SDS-PAGE, then immunoblotted with pY20 anti-phosphotyrosine
antibody. Stripping and reprobing the immunoblot confirmed the band
indicated corresponded to Jak2.
|
|
Chemokine-mediated activation of chemokine receptors leads to the rapid
phosphorylation of receptor-associated Jaks (18, 19). PAGE analysis
revealed myxoma virus-inducible phosphorylation of proteins that were
candidate Jaks. Stripping and reprobing these antiphosphotyrosine
immunoblots with antibodies to Jaks confirmed the identity of
tyrosine-phosphorylated Jak1 and Jak2 (Fig. 3, C and
D). Moreover, identical results were obtained whether live
or UV-inactivated myxoma virus was used (Fig. 3E). We did not observe myxoma virus-inducible Jak3 phosphorylation (not shown). Since p56lck associated with CCR5 in a
phosphorylation-dependent manner (Fig. 2, C and
D), we infer that p56lck may be a substrate for the
activated Jaks (20-22). Alternatively, myxoma virus-CCR5 interactions
may lead to cross-talk between cell surface receptors that are
constitutively associated with CCR5, such as CD4 (23), which results in
the subsequent phosphorylation of CCR5 by other tyrosine kinases, like
p56lck. Certainly, the NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5 cells also stably
express ectopic human CD4 (Fig. 1A), and an earlier report
described the dissociation of p56lck from CD4 that accompanies
myxoma virus infection of T lymphocytes (24). As with HIV, myxoma virus
may interact with both CD4 and CCR5, and the phosphorylation-activation
of p56lck that we observe may be a direct consequence of myxoma
virus interaction with CD4. It is possible that neither of these
scenarios is mutually exclusive, since the kinetics of Jak and
p56lck phosphorylation in the NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5 cells would
suggest that both tyrosine kinases are rapidly phosphorylated within
the first few minutes of virus adsorption.
In a recent study, evidence was provided for the reciprocal
desensitization of CCR5 and CD4 by their respective ligands (25). Moreover, HIV-1 gp120 association with CD4 results in p56lck
phosphorylation and CX chemokine receptor CXCR4 down-regulation (26).
Although the pathophysiological relevance of CXCR4 down-regulation is
unclear, this negative regulatory role for CD4 and p56lck may
be associated with inhibition of ligand-CXCR4-inducible events that
would lead to viral clearance and/or limiting the number of viral
particles that may subsequently infect a single cell. Accordingly, we
examined the effect of inhibition of p56lck on myxoma virus
replication in NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5 cells. The pharmacological inhibitor
PP1 was used that exhibits a half-maximal inhibitory concentration
(IC50) on p56lck activation at 5 nM
(27). The results in Fig. 4 reveal a
dose-dependent PP1-mediated increase in myxoma virus
replication, suggestive of a negative regulatory role for
p56lck in myxoma virus infection.

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
PP1 treatment of NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5 cells
results in increased myxoma virus replication. NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5
cells were either left untreated or treated with varying doses of PP1
for 15 min prior to myxoma virus adsorption. Cells were infected at an
m.o.i. of 10, then LacZ activity measured 16 h post-infection,
using the -galactosidase colorimetric assay described under
"Experimenatl Procedures." Results are representative of five
different experiments in which lysates were assayed in
quadruplicate.
|
|
In other cytokine receptor systems, the activation of Jaks results in
the engagement of multiple distinct proteins to transduce signals and
alter gene expression. Accordingly, we examined whether two of the best
characterized downstream targets of Jak activation, the signal
transducers and activators of transcription (Stat) proteins
(28) and the insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-proteins (29), were
phosphorylated in NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5 cells exposed to myxoma virus. In an
earlier published report, we provided evidence for RANTES-CCR-mediated
phosphorylation-activation of the Stat proteins Stat1 and Stat3 (30).
The results in Fig. 5, A and B, indicate that exposure of NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5 cells to
UV-inactivated myxoma virus leads to the rapid phosphorylation of Stat1
and Stat3 by 1 min, consistent with the rapid kinetics of
phosphorylation-activation that we have observed with the cognate
ligand, RANTES. The IRS family of proteins includes IRS-1 and IRS-2,
which contain multiple tyrosine phosphorylation sites in protein
binding motifs for the SH2 domains of the p85 subunit of
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, the adapter protein Grb-2, SHP-2
phosphatase, and other signaling elements (31). These proteins play a
central signaling role for various cytokine receptors by their ability
to link these receptors to diverse downstream signaling pathways. We
observed that myxoma virus consistently induces
dose-dependent increases in the tyrosine phosphorylation of
IRS-1 and IRS-2, albeit relatively weakly (Fig. 5,
C-E).

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Myxoma virus induces Stat and IRS tyrosine
phosphorylation. NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5 cells were either treated with
medium alone ( ) or exposed (+) to an equivalent of an m.o.i. of 10 with UV-inactivated myxoma virus, for the times indicated. Cell lysates
were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-Stat1 (A)
or anti-Stat3 (B) antibodies. These immunocomplexed proteins
were resolved by SDS-PAGE, then immunoblotted (WB) with 4G10
anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. The blots were stripped and re-probed
with Stat1 and Stat3 antibodies, respectively. C and
D, cell lysates treated as above were immunoprecipitated
with anti-IRS1 (C) or anti-IRS-2 (D) antibodies,
resolved by SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with 4G10 anti-phosphotyrosine
antibody. The blot was stripped and re-probed for IRS-1 and IRS-2,
using anti-IRS-1 and anti-IRS-2 antibodies. E, NIH
3T3.CD4.CCR5 cells were either left untreated or exposed to increasing
doses of live vMyxlac for 5 min. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated
with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody 4G10, and 80 µg of
immunoprecipitated proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE, then
immunoblotted with pY20 anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. Stripping and
reprobing the immunoblot confirmed the band indicated corresponded to
IRS-1.
|
|
Our results clearly show that coincident with initiation of a fully
productive myxoma virus infection in NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5 cells, there is
activation of a signal transduction cascade. Unlike HIV-1 (10),
interference with tyrosine kinase signaling, but not G-protein-coupled
receptor signaling, appears to compromise the ability of myxoma virus
to infect cells. Interference with the G-protein-coupled signaling
capacity of CCR5 using pertussis toxin can compromise the ability of
HIV to infect cells, at both entry and post-entry stages (32).
Interestingly, for myxoma virus, this activation is not
G-protein-coupled, but is dependent on tyrosine phosphorylation events.
These data do not rule out the possibility of
signal-dependent entry of myxoma virus into cells, mediated
by non-tyrosine kinase pathways. Indeed, the intracellular mature
infectious form of vaccinia virus, IMV, enters cells by a process that
involves protein kinase C phosphorylation, the small GTPase rac1, in
addition to tyrosine phosphorylation (33). In preliminary studies, we
have evidence that the non-permissive NIH 3T3.CD4.neo cells, as well as
a rat basophilic cell line ectopically expressing human CCR5, RBL-5,
that is also non-permissive for myxoma virus infection, permit viral
particle entry, yet target the virus for lysosomal degradation (data
not shown). Notably, myxoma virus fails to induce either CCR5
phosphorylation or other tyrosine phosphorylation events in the RBL-5
cells (data not shown). The implications from our study are that
adsorption by myxoma virus, in a ligand-like fashion, activates a rapid
tyrosine kinase signal transduction that, at the very least, allows for
downstream events required for the completion of the fully productive
virus replication cycle.
In a final series of experiments, we examined the influence of Jak2
activation in mediating viral replication. Specifically, when NIH
3T3.CD4.CCR5 cells were treated with tyrophostin AG490, a
dose-dependent inhibition of myxoma virus replication was
noted (Fig. 6A). AG490
exhibits an IC50 on Jak2 activation at 10 µM. Treatment with 10 µM AG490 reduced myxoma virus-induced
Jak2 phosphorylation by 36% (Fig. 6B). Thus, inhibition of
Jak kinase activity blocks myxoma virus replication, indicative of a
critical role for this kinase in virus infection.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Tyrophostin AG490 inhibits myxoma virus
replication in NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5 cells. A, NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5
cells were either left untreated or treated with varying doses of AG490
for 16 h prior to myxoma virus adsorption. Cells were infecetd at
an m.o.i. of 10, then LacZ measured using the -galactosidase
colorimetric assay described under "Experimental Procedures,"
16 h post-infection. Results are representative of four
experiments in which lysates were assayed in quadruplicate.
B, NIH 3T3.CD4.CCR5 cells were either left untreated or
treated with 25 µM of AG490 for 16 h, then exposed
to UV-inactivated myxoma virus for 5 min. Lysates from 107
cells were immunoprecipitated with 4G10 anti-phosphotyrosine antibody,
then 80 µg of immunocomplexed proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and
immunoblotted with anti-phosphotyrosine (pY20) antibody. The membrane
was stripped and re-probed with anti-Jak2 Ab.
|
|
Myxoma virus-dependent recruitment of p56lck to
CCR5 and its concommitant phosphorylation is reminiscent of an earlier
observation of Src family kinase phosphorylation of a vaccinia viral
protein, A36R, required for viral spread (34). An alternative role for myxoma virus-inducible tyrosine phosphorylation of p56lck may
be associated with either CCR5 or CD4 down-regulation. As described
above, in other studies there is evidence that HIV-1 gp120 binding to
CD4 on T cells leads to tyrosine phosphorylation of p56lck and
the subsequent down-regulation of cell surface CXCR4 (26). The
observation that PP1 treatment leads to enhanced viral replication is
supportive of a negative regulatory role for p56lck in myxoma
virus infection. This contrasts with the requirement for Jak2
activation for myxoma virus replication. Apparently, this kinase
activity is obligatory for a productive virus infection. The engagement
of Stat and IRS proteins by myxoma virus suggests that the virus may
regulate host cell gene expression to create the appropriate cellular
environment for the later events in viral replication. In any event,
the utilization of cellular tyrosine-kinase signaling pathways
initiated by virus adsorption represents a novel strategy by which
viruses subvert cell surface receptors to mediate host cell tropism.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health
Research Grants MOP-42564 (to E. N. F.) and MOP-37993
(to G. M.), by National Institutes of Health Grants CA73381 and
CA77816, and by a Merit Review grant form the Department of Veterans
Affairs (to L. C. P.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
These authors contributed equally to this work.
**
Senior Scientist of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
§§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Cell & Molecular Biology, University Health Network, Toronto General Research
Inst., Canadian Blood Services Bldg., 67 College St., Rm. 424, Toronto,
Ontario M5G 2M1, Canada. Tel.: 416-340-5380; Fax: 416-340-3453; E-mail:
en.fish@utoronto.ca.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 8, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108019200
2
J. Masters, A. A. Hinek, G. McFadden, and
E. N. Fish, unpublished observation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HIV, human
immunodeficiency virus;
m.o.i, multiplicity of infection;
PP1, 4-amino-5-(4-methylphenyl)7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo(3,4-d)pyrimidine;
IRS, insulin receptor substrate;
Stat, signal transducers and
activators of transcription;
RANTES, regulated on activation normal T
cell expressed and secreted.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Fenner, F.
(2000)
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
24,
123-133[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Nash, P.,
Barret, J.,
Cao, J. X.,
Hota-Mitchell, S.,
Lalani, A. S.,
Everett, H.,
Xu, X. M.,
Robichaud, J.,
Hnatiuk, S.,
Ainslie, C.,
Seet, B. T.,
and McFadden, G.
(1999)
Immunol. Rev.
168,
103-120[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
McFadden, G. M.
(1994)
in
Encyclpedia of Virology
(Webster, R.
, and Granoff, A., eds)
, pp. 1153-1160, Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA
|
| 4.
|
Lalani, A. S.,
Masters, J.,
Zeng, W.,
Barrett, J.,
Pannu, R.,
Everett, H.,
Arendt, C. W.,
and McFadden, G.
(1999)
Science
286,
1968-1971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Fauci, A.
(1996)
Nature
384,
529-534[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Berger, E. A.,
Murphy, P. M.,
and Farber, J. M.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
17,
657-700[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Rossi, D.,
and Zlotnik, A.
(2000)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
18,
217-242[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Pease, J. E.,
and Murphy, P. M.
(1998)
Semin. Immunol.
10,
169-178[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Lalani, A. S.,
Barrett, J. W.,
and McFadden, G.
(2000)
Immunol. Today
21,
100-106[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Wang, J. M.,
and Oppenheim, J. J.
(1999)
J. Exp. Med.
190,
591-595[Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Liu, Q.-H.,
Williams, D. A.,
McManus, C.,
Baribaud, F.,
Doms, R. W.,
Schols, D.,
De Clercq, E.,
Kotlikoff, M. I.,
Collman, R. G.,
and Freedman, B. D.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
4832-4837[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Cicala, C.,
Arthos, J.,
Ruiz, M.,
Vaccarezza, M.,
Rubbert, A.,
Riva, A.,
Wildt, K.,
Cohen, O.,
and Fauci, A. S.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
163,
420-426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Davis, C. B.,
Dikic, I.,
Unutmaz, D.,
Hill, C. M.,
Arthos, J.,
Siani, M. A.,
Thompson, D. A.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Littman, D. R.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
186,
1793-1798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Ghislain, J.,
Lingwood, C. A.,
and Fish, E. N.
(1994)
J. Immunol.
153,
3655-3663[Abstract]
|
| 15.
| Deleted in proof
|
| 16.
|
Ahmad, S.,
Alsayed, Y.,
Druker, B. J.,
and Platanias, L. C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
29991-29994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Ramsey-Ewing, A.,
and Moss, B.
(1998)
Virol.
242,
138-149
|
| 18.
|
Opermann, M.,
Mack, M.,
Proudfoot, A. E. I.,
and Olbrich, H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
8875-8885[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Wong, M.,
Uddin, S.,
Majchrzak, B.,
Huynh, T.,
Proudfoot, A. E. I.,
Platanias, L. C.,
and Fish, E. N.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
11427-11431[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Uddin, S.,
Sher, D. A.,
Alsayed, Y.,
Pons, S.,
Colamonici, O. R.,
Fish, E. N.,
White, M. F.,
and Platanias, L. C.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
235,
83-87[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Uddin, S.,
Grumbach, I. M.,
Yi, T.,
Colamonici, O. R.,
and Platanias, L. C.
(1998)
Br. J. Haematol.
101,
446-449[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Reddy, E. P.,
Korapati, A.,
Chaturvedi, P.,
and Rane, S.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
2532-2547[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Xiao, X.,
Wu, L.,
Stantchev, T. S.,
Feng, Y. R.,
Ugolini, S.,
Chen, H.,
Shen, Z.,
Riley, J. L.,
Broder, C. C.,
Sattentau, Q. J.,
and Dimitrov, D. S.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sc. U. S. A.
96,
7496-7501[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Barry, M.,
Lee, S. F.,
Boshkov, L.,
and McFadden, G.
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
5243-5251[Abstract]
|
| 25.
|
Mashikian, M. V.,
Ryan, T. C.,
Seman, A.,
Brazer, W.,
Center, D. M.,
and Cruikshank, W. W.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
163,
3123-3130[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Su, S. B.,
Gong, W.,
Grimm, M.,
Utsunomiya, I.,
Sargeant, R.,
Oppenheim, J. J.,
and Wang, J. M.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
162,
7128-7132[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Hanke, J. H.,
Gardner, J. P.,
Dow, R. L.,
Changelian, P. S.,
Brisette, W. H.,
Weringer, E. J.,
Pollok, B. A.,
and Connelly, P. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
695-701[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Schindler, C.
(1999)
Exp. Cell Res.
253,
7-14[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
White, M. F.
(1998)
Recent Prog. Horm. Res.
53,
119-138
|
| 30.
|
Wong, M.,
and Fish, E. N.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
309-314[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Ogawa, W.,
Matozaki, T.,
and Kasuga, M.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
182,
13-22[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Alfano, M.,
Schmidtmayerova, H.,
Amella, C.-A.,
Pushkarsky, T.,
and Bukinsky, M.
(1999)
J. Exp. Med.
190,
597-606[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Locker, J. K.,
Kuehn, A.,
Schleich, S.,
Rutter, G.,
Hohenberg, H.,
Wepf, R.,
and Griffiths, G.
(2000)
Mol. Biol. Cell
11,
2497-2511[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Frischknecht, F.,
Moreau, V.,
Rottger, S.,
Gonfioni, S.,
Reckmann, I.,
Superti-Furga, G.,
and Way, M.
(1999)
Nature
401,
926-929[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Rahbar, T. T. Murooka, and E. N. Fish
Role for CCR5 in Dissemination of Vaccinia Virus In Vivo
J. Virol.,
March 1, 2009;
83(5):
2226 - 2236.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Ahmed, R. Dabelic, L. W. Waiboci, L. D. Jager, L. L. Heron, and H. M. Johnson
SOCS-1 Mimetics Protect Mice against Lethal Poxvirus Infection: Identification of a Novel Endogenous Antiviral System
J. Virol.,
February 1, 2009;
83(3):
1402 - 1415.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Crotti, M. Lusic, R. Lupo, P. M. J. Lievens, E. Liboi, G. D. Chiara, M. Tinelli, A. Lazzarin, B. K. Patterson, M. Giacca, et al.
Naturally occurring C-terminally truncated STAT5 is a negative regulator of HIV-1 expression
Blood,
June 15, 2007;
109(12):
5380 - 5389.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Zhang, Q. Zhang, A. Tengholm, and A. Sjoholm
Involvement of JAK2 and Src kinase tyrosine phosphorylation in human growth hormone-stimulated increases in cytosolic free Ca2+ and insulin secretion
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
September 1, 2006;
291(3):
C466 - C475.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Rahbar, T. T. Murooka, A. A. Hinek, C. L. Galligan, A. Sassano, C. Yu, K. Srivastava, L. C. Platanias, and E. N. Fish
Vaccinia Virus Activation of CCR5 Invokes Tyrosine Phosphorylation Signaling Events That Support Virus Replication
J. Virol.,
July 15, 2006;
80(14):
7245 - 7259.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Munter, M. Way, and F. Frischknecht
Signaling During Pathogen Infection
Sci. Signal.,
May 16, 2006;
2006(335):
re5 - re5.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Law, G. C. Carter, K. L. Roberts, M. Hollinshead, and G. L. Smith
From the Cover: Ligand-induced and nonfusogenic dissolution of a viral membrane
PNAS,
April 11, 2006;
103(15):
5989 - 5994.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Chahroudi, R. Chavan, N. Koyzr, E. K. Waller, G. Silvestri, and M. B. Feinberg
Vaccinia Virus Tropism for Primary Hematolymphoid Cells Is Determined by Restricted Expression of a Unique Virus Receptor
J. Virol.,
August 15, 2005;
79(16):
10397 - 10407.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Moriguchi, B. D. Hissong, M. Gadina, K. Yamaoka, H. L. Tiffany, P. M. Murphy, F. Candotti, and J. J. O'Shea
CXCL12 Signaling Is Independent of Jak2 and Jak3
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 29, 2005;
280(17):
17408 - 17414.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. Brierley and E. N. Fish
Functional Relevance of the Conserved DNA-binding Domain of STAT2
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 1, 2005;
280(13):
13029 - 13036.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Magnani, E. Balestra, A. Fraternale, S. Aquaro, M. Paiardini, B. Cervasi, A. Casabianca, E. Garaci, and C.-F. Perno
Drug-loaded red blood cell-mediated clearance of HIV-1 macrophage reservoir by selective inhibition of STAT1 expression
J. Leukoc. Biol.,
November 1, 2003;
74(5):
764 - 771.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. B. Johnston, J. W. Barrett, W. Chang, C.-S. Chung, W. Zeng, J. Masters, M. Mann, F. Wang, J. Cao, and G. McFadden
Role of the Serine-Threonine Kinase PAK-1 in Myxoma Virus Replication
J. Virol.,
May 15, 2003;
77(10):
5877 - 5888.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. L. Smith, A. Vanderplasschen, and M. Law
The formation and function of extracellular enveloped vaccinia virus
J. Gen. Virol.,
December 1, 2002;
83(12):
2915 - 2931.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Portella, S. Scala, D. Vitagliano, G. Vecchio, and A. Fusco
ONYX-015, an E1B Gene-Defective Adenovirus, Induces Cell Death in Human Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma Cell Lines
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
June 1, 2002;
87(6):
2525 - 2531.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|