Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M104782200 on October 15, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 52, 48754-48763, December 28, 2001
Differential Regulation of Two Alternatively Spliced Isoforms of
Hypoxia-inducible Factor-1
in Activated T Lymphocytes*
Dmitriy
Lukashev,
Charles
Caldwell,
Akio
Ohta,
Pearl
Chen, and
Michail
Sitkovsky
From the Laboratory of Immunology, NIAID, National Institutes of
Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Received for publication, May 24, 2001, and in revised form, August 15, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Cell adaptation to hypoxia is partially
accomplished by hypoxia-inducible transcription factor-1
(HIF-1). Here we report the hypoxia-independent
up-regulation of HIF-1
subunit in antigen receptor-activated T
cells. This is explained by a selective up-regulation of alternatively
spliced mRNA isoform I.1 that encodes the HIF-1
protein without
the first 12 N-terminal amino acids. We show that both short (I.1) and
long (I.2) HIF-1
isoforms display similar DNA binding and
transcriptional activities. Major differences were observed between
these two HIF-1
isoforms in their expression patterns with respect
to the resting and activated T lymphocytes in hypoxic and normoxic
conditions. The T cell antigen receptor (TCR)-triggered activation of
normal ex vivo T cells and differentiated T cells results
in up-regulation of expression of I.1 isoform of HIF-1
mRNA
without an effect on constitutive I.2 HIF-1
mRNA expression. The
accumulation of I.1 HIF-1
mRNA isoform in T lymphocytes is also
demonstrated during cytokine-mediated inflammation in vivo,
suggesting a physiological role of short HIF-1
isoform in activated
lymphocytes. The TCR-triggered, protein kinase C and
Ca2+/calcineurin-mediated HIF-1
I.1 mRNA induction
is protein synthesis-independent, suggesting that the HIF-1
I.1 gene
is expressed as an immediate early response gene. Therefore, these data
predict a different physiological role of short and long isoforms of
HIF-1
in resting and activated cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Immune cells are exposed to different oxygen tensions,
including hypoxia, as they develop, migrate, and function in primary, secondary, and tertiary lymphoid organs with different infrastructure, vasculature, and oxygen supply (1, 2). Hypoxic extracellular environments were demonstrated in some normal tissues (3, 4) and during
chronic inflammatory and malignant diseases (5-10). The mechanisms of
lymphocyte adaptation to hypoxia are likely to exist under such conditions.
Cell adaptation to hypoxia is partially accomplished by the
transcriptional activity of hypoxia-inducible factor-1
(HIF-1).1 HIF-1 is a basic
helix-loop-helix/Per-ARNT-Sim protein consisting of HIF-1
and
HIF-1
subunits (11, 12). The HIF-1
subunit is also known as aryl
hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT) and serves as a
heterodimerization partner for other transcription factors (13-17).
HIF-1 activates the transcription of genes required for glucose
metabolism, erythropoiesis, vascularization, and cell proliferation by
binding to cis-acting hypoxia response element (HRE)
(18-22). The HIF-1
subunit may also affect cell metabolism and
signaling by its ability to directly interact with other proteins such
as p53 (23). Multiple roles of HIF-1
as transcriptional factor and
in protein-protein interactions complicate the understanding of its
role in vivo. Possible clues are expected to be provided by
studies of regulation of HIF-1
mRNA and protein expression.
Oxygen-sensing mechanisms and the subsequent
regulation of HIF-1 expression are the subject of intensive
investigations. It was shown that HIF-1
, but not HIF-1
,
expression is significantly enhanced by hypoxia (12, 24, 25). It is
believed that the regulation of HIF-1
expression occurs mostly on
post-translational level (19). HIF-1
mRNA is constitutively
expressed in tissue culture cells independent of oxygen tensions (26,
27), but its expression is induced by hypoxia or ischemia in
vivo (28-30). Protein stability plays most important role in
control of HIF-1
expression. At high oxygen tensions, HIF-1
is
targeted for destruction by an E3 ubiquitin ligase containing the von
Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein (pVHL) (31, 32). According to a
current model, pVHL binds to the oxygen-dependent
degradation domain located in the central region of HIF-1
(33) that
results in a subsequent degradation of HIF-1
through the
ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (34, 35).
We were prompted to revisit this model by recent demonstrations of
oxygen tension-independent induction of HIF-1
by hormones (36) and
proinflammatory cytokines (37) as well as by our own studies of
HIF-1
expression in activated T
lymphocytes.2 It was also
important to investigate the possibility of differential expression of
two mouse HIF-1
mRNA isoforms, which contain two alternative
first exons named I.1 and I.2 (38, 39). The I.1 mRNA encodes a
protein, which is expected to be 12 N-terminal amino acid residues
shorter than HIF-1
I.2 mRNA-encoded protein, although no
difference in functions of these HIF-1
isoforms has yet been
reported (40). No corresponding human isoform has been found so far.
The ratios of these two mRNA isoforms in cells and patterns of
expression of HIF-1
I.1 mRNA in resting versus
activated versus differentiated cells are not known.
HIF-1
I.2 mRNA is constitutively expressed like a housekeeping
gene in all tissues in an oxygen tension-independent manner, while I.1
mRNA has a tissue-specific expression (39).
Thus, studies of expression of these two HIF-1
mRNA isoforms may
allow to us to distinguish possible separate roles of HIF-1
as a transcription factor and in protein-protein interactions provided
that the expression of short and long forms of HIF-1
is
differentially regulated. Accordingly, in this study we asked whether
HIF-1
mRNA is indeed constitutively expressed in ex
vivo naive T cells, ex vivo activated T cells,
differentiated T cells, and resting versus activated T cells
by taking advantage of the possibilities provided by quantitative
competitive RT-PCR.
We report here that TCR-triggered activation of T lymphocytes results
in up-regulation of the I.1 isoform of HIF-1
mRNA without an
effect on I.2 mRNA expression. The expression of I.1 HIF-1
mRNA follows a pattern of immediate early response genes. These observations suggest differential regulation and functions of these two
isoforms of HIF-1
proteins in resting and activated cells.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cells--
Mouse 2B4 T helper hybridoma cells and mouse
splenocytes were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Biofluids, Rockville, MD)
supplemented with 5% dialyzed fetal calf serum (heat-inactivated) and
100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 1 mM
sodium pyruvate, 1 mM HEPES, nonessential amino acids
(RP5), and 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol (complete RPMI). NIH
3T3 fibroblasts were cultured in AMEM supplemented with 10%
fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin.
Single cell splenocyte suspensions were prepared from adult mouse
spleens. T cells were isolated using a mixture of anti-CD4 and anti-CD8
microbeads to positively select cells on an AutoMACS (Miltenyi Biotec,
Auburn, CA) using the manufacturer's protocol. Isolated cells were
incubated in complete RPMI 1640. Unless otherwise indicated, 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol was added into cell cultures conducted at 20% oxygen but not in the medium for cultures
conducted at 1.0% oxygen tensions. Cells to be cultured at 1.0%
oxygen were centrifuged and added to culture medium
pre-equilibrated for at least 30 min with a certified gas mixture
containing 1.0% oxygen, 5.0% CO2, and 94.0%
N2 (Roberts Oxygen Company, Rockville, MD). Cells
were incubated in a NAPCO (Winchester, VA) 7000 three-gas incubator at
1 or 20% oxygen tension as indicated in the figure legends. Th1 and
Th2 cells were obtained after cytokine-driven differentiation of naive
CD4+ T cells in vitro according to Ref. 41, and they were
kindly provided by Dr. J. Hu-Li (NIAID, National Institutes of Health).
Activation of T Cells--
The TCR-activated 2B4
cells were incubated (2 × 106 cells/ml) in 96-well
plates (Costar, Corning, NY) precoated with 10 µg/ml anti-TCR (clone
H57-597; Pharmingen, La Jolla, CA). Studies of the biochemical pathways
involved in HIF-1
mRNA regulation were performed after
incubation of cells with 15 nM phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (Calbiochem) and/or 300 nM ionomycin
(Calbiochem). Inhibitors were added as indicated: cycloheximide (Sigma)
(50 µg/ml), actinomycin D (Biomol, Plymouth Meeting, PA) (5 µg/ml), cyclosporin A (Biomol, Plymouth Meeting, PA) (1 µg/ml), and K252b (20 nM). Mouse T cells were activated by plate-bound (3 µg/ml) anti-CD3 mAb (clone 145-2C110; Pharmingen, La Jolla, CA) and 3 µg/ml anti-CD28 mAb (clone 37.51; Pharmingen) for 36 h as
described earlier (42).
Activation of T Cells in Vivo--
Female C57BL/6 mice were
injected intravenously with 20 mg/kg concanavalin A (type IV; Sigma)
dissolved in sterile phosphate-buffered saline. After 6 h, tissue
samples were taken, and spleen T cells were isolated using AutoMACS as
described above. Total RNA was isolated using the RNA STAT-60 kit
(Tel-Test, Friendswood, TX) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Measurements of cytokine levels (tumor necrosis factor-
and
interferon-
in the sera were determined using enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay kits obtained from R&D systems (Minneapolis, MN)
according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Western Blot Analysis--
Cells were centrifuged and
resuspended in 2× sample buffer (Novex) with 4% 2-mercaptoethanol
followed by 30-s ultrasonic treatment. Samples were boiled for 5 min
and loaded to 7% SDS-PAGE. An immunoblot assay was
performed as described (12) except that 1:200 diluted antibodies
(Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY) were used.
RNA Isolation and Northern Blot Analysis--
Total RNA was
extracted from 105 to 107 cells using RNA
STAT-60 kit (Tel-Test, Friendswood, TX) according to the
manufacturer's protocol. Northern blotting was performed following the
general procedure (formaldehyde gel) (43) using 1 µg of messenger RNA purified with the Oligotex mRNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA)
per lane. HIF-1
probe was synthesized using a 380-bp HIF-1
cDNA fragment. The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase probe was purchased from CLONTECH (Palo Alto, CA).
Construction of Mimic for Competitive
RT-PCR--
The EcoRI-PstI fragment of human
HIF-1
cDNA (GenBankTM number U22431), which has high
homology with mouse HIF-1
(GenBankTM number AF003695)
was subcloned into pGEM-3Zf(+) (Promega, Madison, WI) to be used for
mimic construction. For deletion of the internal region from wild type
cDNA, PCR was performed using M13 reverse primer and
SpeI containing primer GAAACTACTAGTCGGACAGCCTCACCAAAC. PCR
product was digested with PstI and SpeI and was
inserted instead of the SpeI-PstI fragment in the
HIF-1
cDNA EcoRI-PstI fragment. The
resulting HIF-1
mimic cDNA was 33 bp shorter then wild type HIF-1
cDNA (Fig. 1B). I.1 (GenBankTM
number Y09086) and I.2 (GenBankTM number Y13656) mimic
cDNA were constructed by PCR using TTTCTGGGCAAACTGTTA and
CTCTGGACTTGTCTC, respectively, and TAACCCCATGTATTTGTTC. PCR was
performed on total cDNA from activated 2B4 cells. PCR products were
digested with XbaI, resulting in the deletion of 167 bp (see Fig. 3B) and cloned into blunted XbaI site in
pGEM-3Zf(+) (Promega, Madison, WI). The above primers were also used in
competitive RT-PCR for determination of either I.1 or I.2 mRNA
concentrations in cellular extracts. VEGF mimic cDNA was made by
PCR on total mouse cDNA using primers
TTTTTTGAATTCTTGAGTTAAACGAACGTACTTGC and TTTTTTGGATCCACGAGCTCTACAGGAATACCAG. A 369-bp PCR product was digested with EcoRI, BamHI, and HinfI and
cloned into in pGEM-3Zf(+) (Promega, Madison, WI) by
EcoRI-BamHI sites. Mimic cDNA for iNOS was
created from total mouse cDNA by PCR using primers
AATAATGAATTCAACTGCAAGAGAACGGAGAAC and AATAATGGATCCGAGCTCCTCCAGAGGGTAGG.
455-bp PCR product was digested with EcoRI,
BamHI, and HinfI and cloned into in pGEM-3Zf(+)
(Promega, Madison, WI) by EcoRI-BamHI sites.
Determination of HIF-1
mRNA Expression by
Competitive RT-PCR--
RNA corresponding mimic cDNA was
synthesized with T7 RNA polymerase (Life Technologies, Inc.,
Gaithersburg, MD) according to the manufacturer's manual.
Transcription product was analyzed in 8% PAGE, and an 850-base
nondegraded RNA band was observed. Optical dichroism of RNA product was
measured at 260 nM, and 1 µg of mimic RNA was subjected
to reverse transcription in the same conditions as for endogenous RNA.
Total RNA was prepared using the RNA STAT-60 kit followed by treatment
with DNase I (Life Technologies). The first strand cDNA was
synthesized on 1 µg of total RNA using the SuperSCRIPT
preamplification system (Life Technologies) with random hexaprimers
according to the manufacturer's instructions. After RNase H treatment,
the reaction mixture was diluted to a final volume of 100 µl. The
competitive PCR was performed using PLATINUM Taq DNA
polymerase (Life Technologies) under standard conditions for 30 cycles
in a 30-µl reaction volume that included 1 µl of the diluted
cDNA and 1 µl of mimic DNA at the concentrations indicated in the
figure legends. PCR using HIF-1
-specific primers ACTGCCACCACTGATGAATCAAAAACAG and TTCCATTTTTCGCTTCCTCTGAGCATTC gave a
283-bp product from mimic cDNA and a 316-bp product from wild type
HIF-1
cDNA. Twenty microliters of PCR product was fractionated in a 2% agarose gel and examined by ethidium bromide staining. The
density of each band was determined with Stratagene Eagle Eye II
(Stratagene, Cedar Creek, TX). The densities of RT-PCR products were
normalized for differences in cDNA quantity between samples using
PCR quantitation of
-actin mRNA using a
-actin competitive
PCR set (Takara Shuzo Co., Kyoto, Japan). The use of
-actin mRNA
as an internal standard in studies of activated murine T lymphocytes
was justified in previous experiments reported by Koshiba et
al. (44). Quantitative determination of mRNA was done by
estimating the equivalent point (where the mimic/target PCR product
ratio equals 1.0) in a competitive RT-PCR experiment with serial
dilutions of mimic. To estimate the equivalent point, 10-fold serial
dilutions of mimic DNA were used in preliminary PCR experiments
followed by more precise estimations using 2-fold dilutions of mimic DNA.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift
Assay--
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay was performed as in
Gorlach et al. (40). Briefly, plasmids pmHIF-I.1, pmHIF-I.2
(kind gift of Dr. R. Wenger, Medical University in Lubeck, Germany), and pBM5/NEO/M1-1 (kind gift of Dr. O. Hankinson (UCLA) were used for
transcription in vitro of HIF-I.1, HIF-I.2, and human ARNT mRNAs, respectively, by T7 RNA polymerase (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals), which were subsequently used for translation in
vitro using rabbit reticulocyte lysate system (Promega, Madison,
WI) with or without [35S]Met (Amersham Biosciences,
Inc.). After that, 5 µl of unlabeled in vitro synthesized
ARNT and either one of the HIF-1
isoforms were incubated for 30 min
at room temperature before the addition of 104 cpm of
32P-labeled ([
-32P]ATP for 5' labeling of
oligonucleotide was purchased from Amersham Biosciences)
double-stranded oligodeoxyribonucleotide AGCTTGCCCTACGTGCTGTCTCAG, corresponding to HRE from the human erythropoietin gene enhancer, and
binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 20% glycerol, 0.1 M KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 2.5 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM Na3VO4) to a final volume of 40 µl. The same but unlabeled double-stranded oligonucleotide was used
as a competitor in 20-fold excess. After 20 min of incubation at
4 °C, the samples were resolved using 5% nondenaturating gel with
0.5× TBE.
Transient Expression Assay--
Expression vector
containing the HIF-I.2 isoform was prepared by cloning HIF-I.2 cDNA
containing 45-bp 5'-untranslated region in pCEP4 plasmid
(CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA). An expression construct of the I.1 isoform was created by deletion of 36 bp corresponding to
amino acid residues 1-12 from I.2 cDNA. Human HIF-1
expressing vector pCEP4/HIF-1
T7 was kindly provided by Dr. G. Semenza (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD), and plasmid pBM5/NEO/M1-1 containing human ARNT was a kind gift from Dr. O. Hankinson. Reporter plasmid HRE-Luc, containing three copies of iNOS promoter-derived HRE,
was kindly provided by Dr. M. Blagosklonny (NCI, National Institutes of
Health). 5 × 104 NIH 3T3 cells/well were plated in
24-well plates (Costar, Corning, NY) the day before transfection. Cells
were transfected in triplicate using LipofectAMINE PLUS reagent (Life
Technologies) in the same medium according to the
manufacturer's protocol. The following amounts of plasmids were used:
0.1 µg of HRE-Luc, 0.2-0.5 µg of one of the HIF-1
-expressing
vectors, 0.2-0.5 µg of pBM5/NEO/M1. The total amount of DNA/well was
adjusted to 1 µg with pGEM-3Zf(+) (Promega, Madison, WI). Sixteen
hours after transfection, fresh medium was added, and cells were grown
for an additional 24 h at either 1 or 20% O2.
Luciferase activity was determined using the Luciferase Assay System
(Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
 |
RESULTS |
Up-regulation of Expression of HIF-1
mRNA in
Antigen Receptor-activated T Cells--
Our studies of T cell
functions under hypoxic conditions revealed HIF-1
protein
up-regulation in TCR-triggered activated T lymphocytes under normoxic
conditions (20% O2).2 T lymphocytes are not
unique to receptor-triggered HIF-1
up-regulation. This phenomenon
has been reported in normoxic conditions in different cells after
incubations with hormones (36) or proinflammatory cytokines (37). We
undertook detailed studies of HIF-1
regulation in activated T cells,
since HIF-1
has important transcriptional activities and affects
important regulatory proteins (45). Up-regulation of HIF-1
protein
and HIF-1
mRNA in activated versus nonactivated T
cells is demonstrated by Western and Northern blot analysis of extracts
from 2B4 T helper hybridoma cells after their incubation with anti-TCR
mAb at nonhypoxic conditions at 20% oxygen (Fig. 1A). Increased amounts of
HIF-1
mRNA in activated T cells was unexpected, since HIF-1
regulation was known to be controlled on a post-translational level
(19). Further detailed mRNA expression studies by Northern blot
analysis of HIF-1
mRNA in T lymphocytes were limited by the
requirement of the large numbers of cells and inadequate quantitative
measurement of HIF-1
mRNA increase by Northern blot analysis.
This precluded analysis of small numbers of cells in different T cells
populations ex vivo and after in vitro
differentiation and prompted the development of quantitative competitive RT-PCR assay using the mimic corresponding to the 3' region
of HIF-1
mRNA (Fig. 1B). We determined that HIF-1
mRNA expression is greater than 5-fold higher in TCR-stimulated T
cells cultured at 1% O2 as compared with nonstimulated
cells, with a 15-fold increase in HIF-1
mRNA in cells activated
in normoxic conditions, at 20% O2 (Fig. 1C).
Direct measurements established that there were lower levels of
HIF-1
mRNA in ex vivo CD4+ naive T cells than in Th1
and Th2 T cells obtained after their differentiation in
vitro (data not shown). Therefore, TCR-mediated activation, but
not hypoxia, leads to HIF-1
mRNA expression up-regulation in T
cells.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Induction of HIF-1 and its mRNA
in TCR-activated cells in normoxic conditions. A, immunoblot
of protein extracts (upper panel) and Northern
blot analysis of mRNA (lower panel) from
resting and activated 2B4 cells. Cells were incubated at 20%
O2 for 24 h at 37 °C with or without plate-bound
anti-TCR mAb as described under "Experimental Procedures." The
arrows indicate the positions of molecular weight markers.
B, development of competitive quantitative RT-PCR for
HIF-1 mRNA from ex vivo mouse splenocytes. The
arrows indicate positions of target and mimic PCR products.
Equal amounts of target cDNA were amplified with different
dilutions of known amounts of mimic DNA and the ratio of mimic band
intensity to target band intensity was determined by densitometry, as
described. 10-fold serial dilutions of mimic were used to determine the
approximate equivalent point (where mimic/target ratio = 1),
followed by the more precise estimation with 2-fold serial dilutions of
mimic. The linearity of the mimic/target ratio plot was confirmed, and
the concentration of the target cDNA was estimated by determining
the concentration of mimic at the equivalent point. The positions of
the target and mimic RT-PCR products are indicated by the
arrows. C, competitive RT-PCR analysis of
HIF-1 mRNA from activated versus nonactivated T cells
at normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Spleen T cells were incubated with
plate-bound anti-CD3 mAb and anti-CD28 mAb at 1 or 20% O2
at 37 °C for 24 h. 10-fold serial dilutions of mimic were used
to determine the approximate equivalent point of mimic/target, followed
by more precise estimation with 2-fold serial dilutions of mimic.
Results in 2-fold mimic dilution are shown with M1 representing the
maximal mimic concentration. The amount of HIF-1 mRNA from
ex vivo cells assigned to one relative unit. Samples
were normalized for -actin mRNA expression. D,
competitive RT-PCR analysis of HIF-1 mRNA from 2B4 cells,
activated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate and ionomycin. Cells
were incubated at 20% O2 for 8 h at 37 °C with the
addition of the indicated compound. The amount of HIF-1 mRNA
from untreated cells is 1 relative unit. Samples were normalized
for -actin mRNA expression.
|
|
Incubation of T cells with TCR-cross-linking reagents
triggers a complex cascade of events such as inositol-triphosphate
signaling, increases in intracellular Ca2+,
Ca2+/CaM-dependent phosphatase, and calcineurin
and protein kinase C activation (46). To test whether these pathways
may be implicated in HIF-1
mRNA up-regulation, we tested the
effects of protein kinase C activators and Ca2+ ionophore.
It appears that these pathways are responsible, in part, for the
observed increases in HIF-1
mRNA expression. Protein kinase C
activator phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate and Ca2+
ionophore ionomycin were able to mimic the effects of TCR cross-linking on HIF-1
mRNA expression in T cells (Fig. 1D).
Additionally, inhibition of TCR-triggered HIF-1
mRNA
up-regulation by inhibitors of calcineurin (cyclosporin A) and protein
kinase C (K252b) supports such an interpretation (data not shown).
HIF-1
Is an Immediate Early Response Gene in Antigen
Receptor-activated T Cells--
The HIF-1
mRNA up-regulation at
nonhypoxic conditions by TCR cross-linking in T cells (Fig. 1) prompted
us to investigate the mechanisms of HIF-1
up-regulation using
competitive RT-PCR in time course studies (Fig.
2A).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
TCR-stimulated HIF-
mRNA up-regulation represents an immediate early gene
response. A, time course of activation-induced changes
in HIF- mRNA expression in 2B4 cells. Quantitative RT-PCR
measurements of HIF- mRNA levels in activated 2B4 cells are
presented. Cells were incubated for the indicated lengths of time with
plate-bound anti-TCR mAb at 20% O2 at 37 °C. At each
time point, HIF- mRNA levels were determined by quantitative
RT-PCR. The arrows indicate DNA bands for mimic and target.
2-fold mimic dilutions are shown, where M1 is the maximal mimic
concentration. The amount of HIF- mRNA from untreated cells is
assigned 1 relative unit. The amount of material in samples was
normalized for -actin mRNA expression. The effect of
cycloheximide (CHX) (B) and actinomycin D
(AmD) (C) on TCR-induced HIF-1 mRNA
expression is shown. 2B4 cells were incubated with plate-bound anti-TCR
mAb as described above for 45 min. The concentration of inhibitors is
described under "Experimental Procedures."
|
|
The expression of HIF-1
mRNA increased within 1 h of TCR cross-linking, with the fastest accumulation between 3 and
6 h and plating after 6 h of activation (Fig. 2A).
These data both confirm that HIF-1
mRNA is up-regulated upon
TCR-triggered activation and suggest that such rapid induction of
HIF-1
mRNA may indicate the involvement of HIF-1 in functions of
immediate early genes in T cell activation.
The rapid (from minutes up to 4 hours) and de novo
protein synthesis-independent increase in mRNA expression is
considered to be a hallmark of immediate early genes (47). To test
whether HIF-1
expression follows the pattern of immediate early
response genes, we measured the HIF-1
mRNA expression in
activated T cells in the presence of an inhibitor of protein synthesis,
cycloheximide. Cycloheximide did not affect up-regulation of HIF-1
mRNA in activated 2B4 cells (Fig. 2B), indicating that
increases in HIF-1
mRNA expression are accomplished by
preexisting proteins. To distinguish between HIF-1
mRNA
stabilization versus the de novo HIF-1
mRNA synthesis as the mechanisms observed in HIF-1
mRNA
up-regulation in TCR-activated T cells, we utilized actinomycin D, an
RNA polymerase inhibitor (Fig. 2C). Actinomycin D does
inhibit HIF-1
mRNA up-regulation, suggesting that transcription
of the HIF-1
gene, rather than HIF-1
mRNA stabilization, is
required for the effects of TCR cross-linking on HIF-1
mRNA
expression in activated T cells. We therefore conclude that HIF-1
is an immediate early response gene in antigen
receptor-activated T cells, since its transcription is rapidly
up-regulated upon TCR-triggered T cell activation by preexisting
cellular factors.
Differential Up-regulation of Expression of I.1 and I.2
mRNA Isoforms of Hypoxia-inducible Factor-1
in Antigen
Receptor-activated Lymphocytes in Vitro and in Vivo--
Next, we
attempted to determine whether the up-regulation of HIF-1
mRNA
in T cells is due to up-regulation of HIF-1
I.1 or I.2 mRNA or
both isoforms. It was shown that the mouse genome contains two
alternative exons for HIF-1
mRNA, I.1 and I.2 (38). While I.2
HIF-1
mRNA is expressed like a housekeeping gene, the expression
of I.1 HIF-1
mRNA has tissue specificity and can be found in
spleen and thymus (39). To test whether both or one HIF-1
mRNA
is expressed in TCR-activated T cells, we performed RT-PCR on RNA
samples from T cells and 2B4 hybridoma cells using primers specific for
I.1 and I.2 exons. The I.2 HIF-1
mRNA isoform is expressed in
both nonactivated and activated T cells in both hypoxic and nonhypoxic
conditions (Fig. 3A). In
contrast, only I.1 mRNA was up-regulated by T cell activation. The
I.1 mRNA was not observed in nonactivated peripheral T cells or T
cell hybridomas (Fig. 3A).

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Differential up-regulation of
HIF-1 I.1 mRNA upon T cell
activation. A, RT-PCR for I.1 and I.2 isoforms of
HIF-1 mRNA from mouse T cells and 2B4 hybridoma cells. Cells
were incubated with or without plate-bound anti-CD3 mAb at 1% or 20%
O2 at 37 °C for 24 h. B, design of
mimics for competitive RT-PCR for HIF-1 I.1 and I.2 mRNA
isoforms. C, quantitative RT-PCR for HIF-1 I.1 mRNA
from mouse T cells and 2B4 hybridoma cells. Cells were activated as
described above. The positions of the target and mimic RT-PCR products
are indicated by the arrows. Results obtained with 2-fold
mimic dilutions are shown, where M1 is the maximal mimic concentration.
The amount of HIF-1 mRNA from untreated cells is assigned
1 relative unit for the presentation of results. Samples were
normalized for -actin mRNA expression. D, competitive
RT-PCR for HIF-1 I.2 mRNA from T cells and 2B4 cells. Cells were
stimulated as described above. The positions of the target and mimic
RT-PCR products are indicated by the arrows. The same
concentration of mimic was used for each sample. E,
ConA-induced T cell activation. Upper panel, up-regulation
of proinflammatory cytokines after intravenous injection of
concanavalin A. C57BL/6 mice were treated with concanavalin A (20 mg/kg), and serum tumor necrosis factor- and interferon- levels
were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Tumor necrosis
factor- levels after 1.5 h and interferon- levels after
8 h were shown. Lower panel, quantitative RT-PCR for
HIF-1 I.1 mRNA from ConA-activated T cells. T lymphocytes were
in vivo stimulated by ConA as described under
"Experimental Procedures." 3-fold mimic dilutions are shown, where
M1 represents maximal mimic concentration. The amount of
HIF-1 mRNA from T cells derived from untreated mice is used as 1 relative unit. Samples were normalized for -actin mRNA
expression.
|
|
To enable simultaneous measurements of I.1 and I.2 HIF-1
mRNA
isoforms in further studies, a competitive RT-PCR for I.1 and I.2
HIF-1
mRNAs has been developed (Fig. 3B) by
constructing appropriate mimics. It is shown that the I.1 HIF-1
mRNA isoform is indeed up-regulated by T cell activation but not
hypoxia (Fig. 3C), while the I.2 exon is expressed
constitutively (Fig. 3D). Therefore, the differential
regulation of these two isoforms in T cells and the
functioning of the activation-dependent mechanism of
up-regulation of I.1 HIF-1
mRNA in T cells were established.
To further support this theory based on in
vitro experiments, we demonstrated the
activation-dependent I.1 HIF-1
mRNA expression in vivo. This was accomplished with a ConA-induced model
of inflammation in vivo, where the proinflammatory cytokine
secretion is dependent on activation of T and NKT cells (48). It is
shown that intravenous injection of ConA results in a "cytokine
storm," as illustrated by strong up-regulation of levels of
interferon-
and tumor necrosis factor-
in serum (Fig.
3E). It is also shown (Fig. 3E), that I.1
mRNA expression is increased about 20-fold at in vivo
activated spleen T cells from ConA-injected animals. Similar increases
were also found, in lymphocytes from lymph nodes and thymus (data not shown). Thus, these data provide evidence that T cell receptor stimulation up-regulates the HIF-1
I.1 mRNA isoform both
in vitro and at in vivo conditions.
Long and Short HIF-1
Isoforms Possess Similar DNA
Binding and Transcriptional Activities--
It was interesting to
continue our studies by analyzing the expression patterns and
properties of "long" and "short" HIF-1
isoforms on protein
level. There are, however, limitations in our ability to observe
differential expression of these two proteins by Western blots. Indeed,
the observed differential accumulation of I.1 HIF-1
mRNA
suggests that I.1 mRNA would be translated (40) into the HIF-1
"short" protein isoform lacking 12 amino acid residues at the N end
as compared with the long I.2 isoform that contains 836 amino acid
residues (49) (Fig. 4A). We
were unable to discern between these two protein isoforms because of the small size difference between these proteins (data not shown). This
precluded comparative studies of HIF-1
isoforms on protein levels by
immunoblotting, although important questions were addressed using
recombinant DNA techniques (Fig. 4). First, do the short HIF-1
isoform and long HIF-1
isoform have similar DNA-binding activities?
I.1 isoform has the same four amino acids upstream of the basic
helix-loop-helix domain that is involved in DNA recognition and
dimerization with ARNT (Fig. 4A), but the possibility
existed that the absence of the 12 N-terminal amino acids could affect the HIF-1 functioning as a transcriptional factor. To determine whether
short I.1 HIF-1
retains DNA binding activity similar to that
of the I.2 isoform, we studied the binding of in vitro translated HIF-1
isoforms to HRE-containing
oligodeoxyribonucleotide. Analysis of in vitro translated
HIF-1
isoforms shows that electrophoretic mobility of both isoforms
is in agreement with their estimated molecular mass (92.3 kDa for I.1
HIF-1
, 93.5 kDa for I.2 HIF-1
, and 86.6 kDa for ARNT) (Fig.
4B). Electrophoretic mobility shift assay data revealed that
both short and long HIF-1
isoforms display the ability to bind HRE
(Fig. 4C). These data confirm previous results of A. Gorlach
et al. (40), showing that the lack of 12 amino acids
adjacent to the basic helix-loop-helix domain does not abolish HIF-1
DNA binding activity. However, it has not been established yet whether
these two isoforms display the same transcriptional activity. To
compare the ability of I.1 and I.2 HIF-1
isoforms to activate the
HRE-dependent transcription, HIF-1
and ARNT expression vectors were used to cotransfect cells with luciferase plasmid containing the hypoxia-response element from the iNOS promoter. HRE-dependent luciferase expression was induced equally
well by both isoforms, and they have similar transcriptional activity compared with human HIF-1
(Fig. 4D). Therefore, both
short and long isoforms retain the ability to bind to HRE and activate
transcription of responsive HRE-containing genes. Finally, we examined
whether the up-regulation of HIF-1
in activated T cells has an
effect on the transcription of HRE-containing genes in normoxic
conditions. If HIF-1
expression is induced by T cell activation then
one may expect the transcription of its target genes to be increased. This was determined by competitive RT-PCR, measuring concentrations of
VEGF and iNOS mRNA, two genes known as target genes for HIF-1
(50-54). Analysis of RNA samples from TCR-stimulated versus
untreated Th1 cells demonstrated that transcription of VEGF and iNOS
was enhanced in activated T cells (Fig.
5, A and B).

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Functional analysis of
HIF-1 short and long isoforms.
A, structure of mouse HIF-1 isoforms. Long isoforms
consist of I.2 starting exon, whereas short isoforms contain I.1 exon.
B, synthesis of two HIF-1 isoforms in vitro.
I.1 and I.2 mRNA were used for in vitro translation
using the rabbit reticulocyte lysate system. Aliquots were used for
synthesis of 35S-labeled proteins (shown here) and
unlabeled proteins for EMSA using cold methionine. HIF-1 isoforms
were analyzed using 10% bis-Tris NuPage gel (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA)
with MES buffer, and ARNT was analyzed using 3-8% Tris acetate NuPage
gel with Tris acetate buffer. The positions of molecular weight markers
are indicated. C, DNA binding analysis of HIF-1 isoforms.
EMSA was performed using 32P-labeled HRE-derived
oligonucleotide and the same unlabeled oligonucleotide in a 20-fold
excess where indicated. D, HRE-specific transcriptional
activation mediated by HIF-1 isoforms. NIH 3T3 cells were
cotransfected with 0.1 µg of reporter plasmid, 0.2 or 0.5 µg of
HIF-1 -expressing vectors, and 0.2 or 0.5 µg of HIF-1 -expressing
vector. The cells were cultured at 20% O2 for 16 h
and then exposed to 1 or 20% O2 for 24 h.
HIF-1-dependent luciferase activity is measured. Mean
values are from triplicate experiments; bars display
S.D.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Transcription of HIF-1 target genes is
enhanced in activated T cells. A, quantitative RT-PCR
for VEGF mRNA from mouse Th1 cells. Cells were incubated with
plate-bound anti-CD3 mAb and anti-CD28 mAb at 20% O2 at
37 °C for 24 h. The positions of the target and mimic RT-PCR
products are indicated by arrows. Three-fold mimic dilution
is shown, where M1 is maximal mimic concentration. The amount of VEGF
mRNA from untreated cells is used as 1 relative unit. Samples were
normalized for -actin mRNA expression. B,
quantitative RT-PCR for iNOS mRNA from mouse Th1 cells. Cells were
activated as described above.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The main findings of this study are (i) the
oxygen-independent up-regulation of HIF-1
mRNA in antigen
receptor-activated T cells; (ii) dramatic differences in regulation of
expression of I.1 and I.2 isoforms of HIF-1
mRNA; (iii) rapid
and protein synthesis-independent up-regulation of I.1 HIF-1
mRNA, thereby identifying HIF-1
as an immediate early response
gene; and (iv) similar transcriptional activity for both long and short
HIF-1
protein isoforms, suggesting that they may be employed to
target the same set of genes but at different physiological situations.
I.1 HIF-1
mRNA is not just expressed in a
tissue-specific manner (39), but it is also expressed in a cell
activation-dependent manner. This may provide an
explanation for the increase in HIF-1
mRNA in vivo
(28-30) as cell activation during adaptation of live animals to
hypoxia rather than to local tissue hypoxia. An activation-induced HIF-1
mRNA expression described here explains the inconsistency between reports that described the hypoxia-independent HIF-1
mRNA expression in vitro (26, 27) and findings of
HIF-1
mRNA up-regulation in vivo in animals
maintained in hypoxic conditions (28-30). However, whether the
difference in regulation of HIF-1
mRNA by hypoxia in
vivo and in vitro could be explained by different mechanisms of oxygen sensing is yet to be established. The
up-regulation of short HIF-1
isoform in in vivo activated
T cells during the course of proinflammatory
cytokine-dependent fulminant hepatitis (Fig. 3E)
strongly supports the physiological significance of these observations.
The findings described above indicate the functions of HIF-1
in T
cell activities not related to hypoxia, which were not obvious from the
original definition of hypoxia-inducible factor. These observations may
reflect the previously unrecognized and important role of HIF-1
in
both immune and "nonimmune" functions of T cells. For example, it
was shown that CD3-positive T cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
express VEGF (55), thus implicating the potential role of T cells in neovascularization.
The observations presented in this work raise interesting questions as
to why T cells activation leads to selective transcription of I.1
HIF-1
mRNA. It is also important to understand why activated T
cells must employ an additional HIF-1
gene isoform, instead of
stabilization of already synthesized HIF-1
protein, as was established in nonlymphoid cells in hypoxic conditions.
Why does HIF-1
exist in two isoforms? Two main possibilities could
be considered. First, the 12-amino acid deficit in the N
terminus of the shorter HIF-1 protein may result in changes in its
interactions with, for example, cell cycle-regulating proteins such as
p53 and therefore affect cell proliferation (23, 56). This property of
short HIF-1
could be beneficial for the T cell activation process.
If this is true, then the short HIF-1
should have a different
potential than the long isoform to interact with other proteins.
Unfortunately, the functional differences between two HIF-1
isoforms
derived from I.1 and I.2 mRNAs are yet to be discovered. Further
studies should address the differences in DNA sequence specificity and
transcriptional partners between these two HIF-1
isoforms and which
process in activated T cells is regulated by short and/or long HIF-1
isoforms.
The selective up-regulation of I.1 HIF-1
isoform in activated T
cells is best explained by differences in promoter regions of these two
isoforms (Fig. 6A). The I.2
exon is located within the methylation-free CpG island (39), which is
commonly associated with the 5'-end of housekeeping genes (57), while
the promoter of exon I.1 exhibits tissue-specific features (39).
Moreover, the putative AP-1 binding site, which was shown to be an
important regulator of gene expression in lymphocytes (58) is present in the exon I.1 promoter (39).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Model of TCR-mediated up-regulation of
HIF-1 I.1 mRNA. Upper panel,
constitutive expression of the long (I.2) HIF-1 isoform. Lower
panel, T cell activation-dependent regulation of
expression of the short (I.1) HIF-1 isoform.
|
|
The alternative splicing of human HIF-1
mRNA was reported (59),
but no alternative splicing in a starting exon has been discovered yet.
It would be important to test whether human HIF-1
also consists of
two or more differently regulated mRNA isoforms. Studies based on
expression of these isoforms may shed light on mechanisms of HIF-1
action and dissociate functions of HIF-1 as transcription factor from
its direct effects on other proteins such as p53 (23).
The oxygen-independent up-regulation of HIF-1
mRNA
in antigen receptor-activated T cells (Fig. 1A) was an
unexpected observation. This finding contradicted the firmly
established mechanism that HIF-1
mRNA expression is oxygen
tension-independent, while HIF-1
protein is degraded due
pVHL-ubiquitin ligase activity (31, 32) in nonhypoxic conditions. This
contradiction could not be resolved were it not for the alternatively
spliced HIF-1
mRNA described by Wenger et al. (38).
This allowed our group to study I.1 versus I.2 HIF-1
mRNA isoform expression patterns (Fig. 3). The TCR-mediated
HIF-1
mRNA up-regulation can be determined and clarified as
activation-dependent up-regulation of the short HIF-1
mRNA (Fig. 3C). This resolves the apparent
contradiction, since the I.1 isoform behaves as was reported and
expected and HIF-1
I.2 mRNA is constitutively expressed (Fig.
3D).
Rapid protein synthesis-independent up-regulation of I.1 mRNA (Fig.
2) identifies HIF-1
as an immediate early response gene family
member (47). This suggests that HIF-1
is important very early after
activation of lymphocytes by the antigen. The ability to discriminate
between these possibilities depends on the knowledge of differences
between long and short isoforms of HIF-1
. The gel shift assay and
reporter gene transfection data (Fig. 4) suggest that both isoforms
have similar transcriptional activity. It remains to be established
whether these two isoforms have similar or different protein-protein interactions.
The oxygen tension-dependent, pVHL-ubiquitin-mediated
HIF-1
degradation mechanism would be expected to operate with both short and long HIF-1
isoforms, because both isoforms contain an
oxygen-dependent degradation domain. However, both isoforms would not appear to be equally well degraded at normoxic conditions, since the activation-induced expression of HIF-1
in T cells may be
accompanied by a simultaneous decrease in the ability of pVHL to target
the short HIF-1
for degradation. For example, it was shown that
activation of G-protein-coupled receptor (36) results in HIF-1
induction, most likely by activity of GTPase Rac1 (60). This pathway
may lead to stabilization of HIF-1
by the production of reactive
oxygen species (61). It would be interesting to test in future studies
whether the TCR-triggered biochemical pathway is able to affect the
HIF-1
-pVHL interactions. It is likely, however, that both HIF-1
isoforms are equally susceptible to oxygen-dependent
degradation domain-mediated degradation in normoxic conditions. The
ability to detect expression of HIF-1
protein under normoxic
conditions in activated T cells several hours after stimulation with
anti-TCR mAb reflects that HIF-1
is either not degraded in activated
T cells or that the rate of HIF-1
synthesis is higher than the rate
of its degradation. This balance may shift toward degradation as the
intensity of TCR-activating pathways diminishes. The observations
reported here suggest a previously unappreciated role of HIF-1
in
the regulation of lymphocyte activation and point to the need for
further studies of this factor in activated lymphocytes as a convenient
model system to understand molecular mechanisms of HIF-1
functions.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Dr. R. Wenger and Dr. M. Gassmann for the gift of plasmids and helpful advice; Dr. G. Semenza
and Dr. O. Hankinson for providing cDNAs of HIF-1
and HIF-1
;
Dr. J. Hu-Li for the generous gift of Th1 and Th2 cells; Dr. M. Blagosklonny for providing HRE-containing reporter plasmid; Dr. M. Koshiba for advice in developing RT-PCR procedures; and Dr. P. Smith
and S. Starnes for the help in experiments and in preparing the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Bldg. 10, Rm. 11N311,
Laboratory of Immunology, NIAID, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, MD 20892. Tel.: 301-496-5495; Fax: 301-480-7352; E-mail:
mvsitkov@helix.nih.gov.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 15, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M104782200
2
C. Caldwell and M. Sitkovsky, manuscript
in preparation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HIF, hypoxia-inducible factor;
VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor;
iNOS, inducible nitric-oxide synthase;
HRE, hypoxia response element;
ARNT aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, pVHL, von
Hippel-Lindau protein;
RT, reverse transcription;
TCR, T cell antigen
receptor;
ConA, concanavalin A;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid;
bis-Tris, 2-[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-2-(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diol.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Picker, L. J.,
and Siegelman, M. H.
(1999)
in
Fundamental Immunology
(Paul, W. E., ed)
, pp. 479-533, Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia
|
| 2.
|
Westermann, J.,
and Bode, U.
(1999)
Immunol. Today
20,
302-306
|
| 3.
|
Loeffler, D. A.,
Keng, P. C.,
Baggs, R. B.,
and Lord, E. M.
(1990)
Int. J. Cancer
45,
462-467
|
| 4.
|
Dewhirst, M. W.
(1998)
Semin. Radiat. Oncol.
8,
143-150
|
| 5.
|
Jelkmann, W.
(1998)
J. Interferon Cytokine Res.
18,
555-557
|
| 6.
|
Van Belle, H.,
Goossens, F.,
and Wynants, J.
(1987)
Am. J. Pathol.
252,
H886-H893
|
| 7.
|
Matherne, G. P.,
Headrick, J. P.,
Coleman, S. D.,
and Berne, R. M.
(1990)
Pediatr. Res.
28,
348-353
|
| 8.
|
Vaupel, P. W.,
Frinak, S.,
and Bicher, H. I.
(1981)
Cancer Res.
41,
2008-2013
|
| 9.
|
Vaupel, P.,
Kalinowski, F.,
and Okunieff, P.
(1989)
Cancer Res.
49,
6449-6465
|
| 10.
|
Hoskin, D. W.,
Reynolds, T.,
and Blay, J.
(1994)
Int. J. Cancer
59,
854-855
|
| 11.
|
Wang, G. L.,
and Semenza, G. L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
1230-1237
|
| 12.
|
Wang, G. L.,
Jiang, B. H.,
Rue, E. A.,
and Semenza, G. L.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
5510-5514
|
| 13.
|
Rowlands, J. C.,
and Gustafsson, J. A.
(1997)
Crit. Rev. Toxicol.
27,
109-134
|
| 14.
|
Sogawa, K.,
and Fujii-Kuriyama, Y.
(1997)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
122,
1075-1079
|
| 15.
|
Ema, M.,
Morita, M.,
Ikawa, S.,
Tanaka, M.,
Matsuda, Y.,
Gotoh, O.,
Saijoh, Y.,
Fujii, H.,
Hamada, H.,
Kikuchi, Y.,
and Fujii-Kuriyama, Y.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
5865-5875
|
| 16.
|
Whitmore, D.,
Sassone-Corsi, P.,
and Foulkes, N. S.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
8,
635-641
|
| 17.
|
Zheng, B.,
Larkin, D. W.,
Albrecht, U.,
Sun, Z. S.,
Sage, M.,
Eichele, G.,
Lee, C. C.,
and Bradley, A.
(1999)
Nature
400,
169-173
|
| 18.
|
Semenza, G. L.,
Agani, F.,
Booth, G.,
Forsythe, J.,
Iyer, N. V.,
Jiang, B.-H.,
Leung, S.,
Roe, R.,
Wiener, C.,
and Yu, A.
(1997)
Kidney Int.
51,
553-555
|
| 19.
|
Wenger, R. H.,
and Gassmann, M.
(1997)
Biol. Chem.
378,
609-616
|
| 20.
|
Semenza, G. L.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
1983-1991
|
| 21.
|
Semenza, G. L.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Gene Dev.
8,
588-594
|
| 22.
|
Iyer, N. V.,
Kotch, L. E.,
Agani, F.,
Leung, S. W.,
Laughner, E.,
Wenger, R. H.,
Gassmann, M.,
Gearhart, J. D.,
Lawler, A. M., Yu, A. Y.,
and Semenza, G. L.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
149-162
|
| 23.
|
An, W. G.,
Kanekal, M.,
Simon, M. C.,
Maltepe, E.,
Blagosklonny, M. V.,
and Neckers, L. M.
(1998)
Nature
392,
405-408
|
| 24.
|
Huang, L. E.,
Arany, Z.,
Livingston, D. M.,
and Bunn, H. F.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
32253-32259
|
| 25.
|
Jiang, B.-H.,
Semenza, G. L.,
Bauer, C.,
and Marti, H. H.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
271,
C1172-C1180
|
| 26.
|
Wenger, R. H.,
Kvietikova, I.,
Rolfs, A.,
Gassmann, M.,
and Marti, H. H.
(1997)
Kidney Int.
51,
560-563
|
| 27.
|
Wenger, R. H.,
Rolfs, A.,
Marti, H. H.,
Guenet, J.-L.,
and Gassmann, M.
(1996)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
223,
54-59
|
| 28.
|
Bergeron, M., Yu, A. Y.,
Solway, K. E.,
Semenza, G. L.,
and Sharp, F. R.
(1999)
Eur. J. Neurosci.
11,
4159-4170
|
| 29.
|
Wiener, C. M.,
Booth, G.,
and Semenza, G. L.
(1996)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
225,
485-488
|
| 30.
|
Yu, A. Y.,
Frid, M. G.,
Shimoda, L. A.,
Wiener, C. M.,
Stenmark, K.,
and Semenza, G. L.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
275,
L818-L826
|
| 31.
|
Cockman, M. E.,
Masson, N.,
Mole, D. R.,
Jaakola, P.,
Chang, G. W.,
Clifford, S. C.,
Maher, E. R.,
Pugh, C. W.,
Ratcliffe, P. J.,
and Maxwell, P. H.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
25733-25741
|
| 32.
|
Ohh, M.,
Park, C. W.,
Ivan, M.,
Hoffman, M. A.,
Kim, T. Y.,
Huang, L. E.,
Pavletich, N.,
Chau, V.,
and Kaelin, W. G.
(2000)
Nat. Cell Biol.
2,
423-427
|
| 33.
|
Srinivas, V.,
Zhang, L. P.,
Zhu, X. H.,
and Caro, J.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
260,
557-561
|
| 34.
|
Salceda, S.,
and Caro, J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
22642-22647
|
| 35.
|
Huang, L. E.,
Gu, J.,
Schau, M.,
and Bunn, H. F.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
7987-7992
|
| 36.
|
Richard, D. E.,
Berra, E.,
and Pouyssegur, J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
26765-26771
|
| 37.
|
Thornton, R. D.,
Lane, P.,
Borghaei, R. C.,
Pease, E. A.,
Caro, J.,
and Mochan, E.
(2000)
Biochem. J.
350,
307-312
|
| 38.
|
Wenger, R. H.,
Rolfs, A.,
Kvietikova, P.,
Spielmann, P.,
Zimmermann, D. R.,
and Gassmann, M.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
246,
155-165
|
| 39.
|
Wenger, R. H.,
Rolfs, A.,
Spielmann, P.,
Zimmermann, D. R.,
and Gassmann, M.
(1998)
Blood
91,
3471-3480
|
| 40.
|
Gorlach, A.,
Camenisch, G.,
Kvietikova, I.,
Vogt, L.,
Wenger, R. H.,
and Gassmann, M.
(2000)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1493,
125-134
|
| 41.
|
Hu-Li, J.,
Huang, H.,
Ryan, J.,
and Paul, W. E.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
3189-3194
|
| 42.
|
Apasov, S.,
and Sitkovsky, M.
(1999)
Int. Immunol.
11,
179-189
|
| 43.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 44.
|
Koshiba, M.,
Apasov, S.,
Sverdlov, V.,
Chen, P.,
Erb, L.,
Turner, J. T.,
Weisman, G. A.,
and Sitkovsky, M. V.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
831-836
|
| 45.
|
Semenza, G. L.
(2000)
Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol.
35,
71-103
|
| 46.
|
Crabtree, G. R.,
and Clipstone, N. A.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
63,
1045-1083
|
| 47.
|
Kelly, K.,
and Siebenlist, U.
(1995)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
7,
327-332
|
| 48.
|
Tiegs, G.
(1997)
Acta Gastro-enterol. Belg.
60,
176-179
|
| 49.
|
Luo, G.,
Gu, Y. Z.,
Jain, S.,
Chan, W. K.,
Carr, K. M.,
Hogenesch, J. B.,
and Bradfield, C. A.
(1997)
Gene Expr.
6,
287-299
|
| 50.
|
Forsythe, J. A.,
Jiang, B.-H.,
Iyer, N. V.,
Agani, F.,
Leung, S. W.,
Koos, R. D.,
and Semenza, G. L.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
4604-4613
|
| 51.
|
Levy, A. P.,
Levy, N. S.,
Wegner, S.,
and Goldberg, M. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
13333-13340
|
| 52.
|
Liu, Y.,
Cox, S. R.,
Morita, T.,
and Kourembanas, S.
(1995)
Circ. Res.
77,
638-643
|
| 53.
|
Melillo, G.,
Musso, T.,
Sica, A.,
Taylor, L. S.,
Cox, G. W.,
and Varesio, L.
(1995)
J. Exp. Med.
182,
1683-1693
|
| 54.
|
Palmer, L. A.,
Semenza, G. L.,
Stoler, M. H.,
and Johns, R. A.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
274,
L212-L219
|
| 55.
|
Freeman, M. R.,
Schneck, F. X.,
Gagnon, M. L.,
Corless, C.,
Soker, S.,
Niknejad, K.,
Peoples, G. E.,
and Klagsbrun, M.
(1995)
Cancer Res.
55,
4140-4145
|
| 56.
|
Carmeliet, P.,
Dor, Y.,
Herbert, J. M.,
Fukumura, D.,
Brusselmans, K.,
Dewerchin, M.,
Neeman, M.,
Bono, F.,
Abramovitch, R.,
Maxwell, P.,
Koch, C. J.,
Ratcliffe, P.,
Moons, L.,
Jain, R. K.,
Collen, D.,
and Keshert, E.
(1998)
Nature
394,
485-490
|
| 57.
|
Cross, S. H.,
and Bird, A. P.
(1995)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
5,
309-314
|
| 58.
|
Foletta, V. C.,
Segal, D. H.,
and Cohen, D. R.
(1998)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
63,
139-152
|
| 59.
|
Gothie, E.,
Richard, D. E.,
Berra, E.,
Pages, G.,
and Pouyssegur, J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
6922-6927
|
| 60.
|
Hirota, K.,
and Semenza, G. L.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
21166-21172
|
| 61.
|
Richard, D. E.,
Vouret-Craviari, V.,
and Pouyssegur, J.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
1556-1562
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Red