![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 52, 48764-48774, December 28, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
§¶,
, and
§
From the
Banting and Best Department of Medical
Research and § Department of Biochemistry, University of
Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L6, Canada
Received for publication, August 20, 2001, and in revised form, October 12, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The phospholipid-anchored membrane glycoprotein
(gp)-80 mediates cell-cell adhesion through a homophilic
trans-interaction mechanism during
Dictyostelium development and is enriched in a Triton
X-100-insoluble floating fraction. To elucidate how gp80 adhesion complexes assemble in the plasma membrane, gp80-gp80 and
gp80-raft interactions were investigated. A low density raft-like membrane fraction was isolated using a detergent-free method. It was
enriched in sterols, the phospholipid-anchored proteins gp80, gp138,
and ponticulin, as well as DdCD36 and actin, corresponding to
components found in the Triton X-100-insoluble floating fraction. Chemical cross-linking revealed that gp80 oligomers were enriched in
the raft-like membrane fraction, implicating stable oligomer-raft interactions. However, gp80 oligomers resisted sterol sequestration and
were partially dissociated with Triton X-100, suggesting that compartmentalization in rafts was not solely responsible for their formation. The trans-dimer known to mediate adhesion was
identified, but cis-oligomerization predominated and
displayed greater accumulation during development. In fact,
oligomerization was dependent on the level of gp80 expression and
occurred among isolated gp80 extracellular domains, indicating that it
was mediated by direct gp80-gp80 interactions. Rafts existed in
gp80-null cells and such pre-existent membrane domains may provide
optimal microenvironments for gp80 cis-oligomerization and
the assembly of adhesion complexes.
Integral membrane proteins and lipids have been predicted to
typically display long-range random distributions, and maintenance of
any nonrandom distributions would require specific mechanisms (1). In
recent years, many nonrandom distributions have been discovered. For
individual proteins, long-range lateral diffusion can be restricted by
corrals established by the underlying cytoskeleton (2). The
cytoskeleton can also tether and actively redistribute transmembrane
proteins (3). Discrete membrane structures, such as cell-cell and
cell-substratum adhesion complexes, also form through interactions
between multiple membrane components (4). Modulation of the
structure and function of these complexes may influence many
cellular and developmental events.
Glycosylphosphatidylinositol
(GPI)1-anchored proteins are
unique, since they lack the direct cytoskeleton interactions that affect the distributions and complexes of their transmembrane counterparts. Nevertheless, they can be clustered into rafts by lipid
interactions (5, 6). Rafts are membrane microdomains that form from the
close packing of sterols and saturated lipids into a liquid ordered
structure. Model membranes with this structure are insoluble in cold
Triton X-100. Triton X-100-insoluble floating fractions (TIFF) have
been isolated from many different cell types and contain the lipid
components of rafts, plus GPI-anchored and other acylated proteins
(7-10). A growing number of GPI-anchored cell adhesion molecules have
been discovered in TIFF (11-14), suggesting that they are components
of membrane rafts. This potential compartmentalization could possibly
effect receptor interactions, cytoskeleton associations, and signaling
during the assembly of GPI-anchored cell adhesion molecule complexes.
We have used Dictyostelium as a model system to examine the
involvement of TIFF in cell-cell adhesion mediated by GPI-anchored receptors (14). Dictyostelium has a simple and well defined life cycle that permits the biochemical analysis of dynamic processes over developmental time (15). During the aggregation stage of development, single cells aggregate chemotactically and undergo intercellular adhesion to form stable aggregates (16). Cell-cell contacts are formed first by the Ca2+-dependent
adhesion molecule DdCAD-1 (17, 18) and distinct Mg2+-dependent adhesion sites (19).
Subsequently, two Ca2+/Mg2+-independent
adhesion molecules, gp80 and gp150/LagC, are expressed (20-22).
Gp80 is a phospholipid-anchored receptor (23, 24) which mediates
cell-cell adhesion through a trans-homophilic binding mechanism (25). Gp80 is required for strong adhesion that maintains multicellularity during development (26, 27). However, gp80 adhesion
complexes must also be dynamic structures, since cells are constantly
breaking and re-making contacts as they migrate. What mechanisms
underlie the assembly and disassembly of gp80 adhesion complexes?
Like many vertebrate GPI-anchored adhesion molecules (11-13), gp80 is
a main component of TIFF (14). Additionally, Triton X-100-insoluble
contact regions (28) were found to be a cytoskeleton-associated form of
TIFF and large domains containing TIFF proteins and lipids localize to
gp80-mediated cell-cell contacts, thus implicating a role for TIFF in
gp80-mediated adhesion. In this paper, we have extended our studies to
investigate the assembly and organization of gp80 molecules in
raft-like membrane domains as gp80-mediated cell-cell contacts form
during development. Low density plasma membrane fragments were isolated
using a detergent-free method. Their similarity to TIFF confirms the
existence of raft-like domains in the Dictyostelium plasma
membrane. Gp80 was found to oligomerize preferentially in these domains
by direct cis-interactions between their extracellular
domains. These results suggest that raft-like domains may provide
optimal microenvironments for the assembly of gp80
cis-oligomers and their subsequent incorporation into adhesion complexes.
Cell Growth and Development--
Both the wild-type axenic
strain AX2 and the csaA-null strain GT10 (26) of Dictyostelium
discoideum, were cultured with Klebsiella aerogenes
(29). For development, cells were collected, washed, and resuspended at
2 × 107 cells/ml in 17 mM sodium
phosphate buffer (pH 6.1), shaken at 180 rpm and pulsed with cAMP every
7 min at a final concentration of 2 × 10 Isolation of TIFF and Low Density Plasma Membrane
Fragments--
TIFF was isolated as previously described (14). Low
density plasma membrane fragments were isolated according to an
established protocol (30). Cell pellets were frozen, thawed,
resuspended at 1.5 × 109 cells/ml in 1 mM
ZnCl2, and homogenized using a Dounce homogenizer. Microscopic examination revealed minimal breakage of nuclei. Cell particulate was collected by centrifugation at 3,000 × g and plasma membranes were isolated using the aqueous
two-phase polymer system (31). After washing, isolated plasma membranes
were resuspended in 8.5% (w/v) sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.6), and sonicated with 12 10-s
pulses of a Sonifier cell disruptor (Branson, Danbury, CT) with a duty
cycle of 40% and an output of 4, on ice. The suspension was mixed 1:2
with 60% (w/w) sucrose in 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.6)
for a final sucrose concentration of ~45% (w/w). This mixture was
overlaid with either a continuous (30-45%, w/w) or a discontinuous
(20/38%, w/w) sucrose gradient in 20 mM sodium phosphate
buffer (pH 7.6) and centrifuged at 120,000 × g for
15-17 h at 2 °C, using the Beckman SW40 rotor. One-ml fractions
were collected from the top for further analyses.
Immunoprecipitation of Membranes--
Equivalent amounts of
isolated low density plasma membrane fragments were incubated with
antibodies as previously described (14). Samples were incubated with
0.1 mg/ml anti-gp80 IgG or 0.1 mg/ml of an irrelevant mouse IgG in TBS
plus 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin. After washing, samples
were incubated with goat anti-mouse antibodies conjugated with 10-nm
gold (Sigma) at 1:10 dilution in TBS plus 0.1% bovine serum albumin.
After washing, membrane pellets were resuspended in ~40 µl of
sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.6) and then raised to ~57% (w/w)
sucrose, overlaid with a continuous gradient of 34-45% (w/w) sucrose
and centrifuged at 120,000 × g for 15-17 h at
2 °C. One-ml fractions were collected from the top of the gradient
and proteins were collected by chloroform-methanol precipitation.
Preparation of Gp80 Extracellular Domains--
The extracellular
domains of gp80 were isolated from culture medium using a reported
method (23). Cells were developed in suspension for 10 h and then
pelleted at 3,000 × g. The supernatant was centrifuged
at 100,000 × g for 1 h at 4 °C. The resulting S-100 supernatant was adjusted to pH 7.6 and then concentrated using
the Centricon centrifugal filtration device (Millipore, Bedford, MA).
Chemical Cross-linking--
Samples were cross-linked with DSP,
DSS, or BS3 (Pierce, Rockford, IL). In a typical
experiment, samples of equal protein concentration were incubated with
0.1 mM cross-linker in 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.6) for 30 min at room temperature. Unreacted cross-linker was quenched by the addition of 1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.6) to a
final concentration of 100 mM for 10 min. Cells were
cross-linked at 2.0 × 107 cells/ml in 17 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.6) with rotation at 60 rpm.
Gel Electrophoresis--
Protein concentrations were determined
using the bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Pierce). Protein
samples were separated by SDS-PAGE (32). For immunoblot analysis, bound
antibodies were detected using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
secondary antibodies and the enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham
Bioscience, Inc., Piscataway, NJ). Immunoblots were imaged and
quantified using the Fluor-S Max multiimager system (Bio-Rad,
Mississauga, ON). Two-dimensional SDS-PAGE was performed by first
separating samples in a nonreducing 6% acrylamide slab gel.
Separation in the second dimension was carried out in a 10% slab gel.
Before the second dimension, stacking gel buffer containing 10%
Protein Identification and Lipid Analysis--
For protein
identification by mass spectrometry, silver-stained gel bands were
excised, macerated, reduced, alkylated, and then digested with trypsin
as previously described (14). MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry was performed
by the Mass Spectrometry Laboratory of the Molecular Medicine Research
Center, University of Toronto. Monoisotopic peptide masses were
submitted to the ProFound search engine (available on the world wide
web) for matches. Unless otherwise stated, search parameters were held
constant and included all Dictyostelium proteins in the NCBI
nonredundant or SWISS-PROT data bases, tolerance for peptide mass error
of 300 ppm, and no missed cut sites per peptide. For lipid analysis,
membrane samples were subjected to gas-liquid chromatography as
described previously (14).
Immunofluorescent Staining--
Cells were collected from
suspension cultures and deposited on poly-L-lysine-coated
coverslips for 10 min. Membrane samples were deposited on coated
coverslips for 30-45 min. The samples were then fixed, stained, and
mounted on slides as previously described (33). Samples were incubated
with antibodies against gp80 followed by Alexa 488-conjugated secondary
antibodies (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) at 1:300 dilution. Laser
scanning confocal microscopy was performed using a Leica DM IRBE
inverted microscope equipped with a Leica TCS SP confocal system.
Detection was maintained within the range of the gray scale to prevent
signal saturation. Capping of gp80 was carried out using the anti-gp80
mAb 80L5C4 in the absence of secondary antibody using an established
protocol (14). Cell aggregates were dispersed and deposited on
coverslips for 10 min. Subsequently, cells were incubated with the mAb
for 30 min, and then washed and incubated until 55 min after the
initial addition of the mAb. The cells were then fixed and prepared for confocal microscopy.
Isolation of Low Density Plasma Membrane Fragments Enriched in
Gp80--
The phospholipid-anchored cell adhesion molecule gp80 is
enriched in TIFF (14). To demonstrate that TIFF originated from discrete raft-like domains in the plasma membrane, a detergent-free isolation method was developed based on the one used for caveolae isolation (30). Plasma membranes were purified, sonicated, and subjected to flotation centrifugation into a continuous sucrose gradient. Without prior sonication, the plasma membrane preparation formed a single prominent band at a density of 1.19 g/ml. The band was
collected in fraction 6 (termed fraction 6 hereafter) (Fig.
1A), which contained gp80 and
most of the membrane protein. Proteins were not detected in the lower
density fractions. With prior sonication, the main band shifted to a
higher density region at 1.20 g/ml and was collected in fraction 7 (designated fraction s7 hereafter) (Fig. 1B). Additionally,
proteins of 139, 105, 82, 41, and 16 kDa floated into the lower density
fractions with maximum levels detected in fraction 4 (termed fraction
s4 hereafter). Fraction s4 had a density of 1.17 g/ml, indicating the
association of these proteins with lipid-rich domains of the plasma
membrane. Relative to total protein, gp80 was enriched by 3-5-fold in
fraction s4 over fraction s7.
The association of gp80 with these fractions was also examined by
confocal microscopy. Fixed membrane samples were stained for gp80. The
nonsonicated membranes in fraction 6 displayed a heterogeneous gp80
distribution, with gp80-rich structures of <0.5 µm in diameter
embedded in the bulk of the large membrane fragments (Fig.
1C). Fraction s4 contained an abundance of gp80-stained small membrane fragments (Fig. 1D), which might represent
the gp80-rich regions observed in fraction 6.
Protein and Lipid Components of the Low Density Plasma Membrane
Fragments--
Next, we analyzed the protein and lipid compositions of
fraction s4. Fifteen bands were excised from a silver-stained gel and
then analyzed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Eight produced relatively
strong mass spectra, and six of them were identified as the
Dictyostelium proteins gp138, gp138B, DdCD36, gp80, actin, and ponticulin (Fig. 1E). The identifications of gp80 and
actin were confirmed by immunoblot analysis. Post-source decay analysis was used to confirm the other identifications, and 18/20, 9/10, 19/21,
and 49/54 of derived peptide fragments matched (error <1 Da)
expected fragments of peptides 326-338 of gp138, 484-495 of gp138B,
635-656 of DdCD36, and 66-89 of ponticulin, respectively. All the
proteins identified here have been found in TIFF (14).
Total lipids were extracted and quantified (Table
I). Lipid-to-protein ratios were highest
for the low density plasma membranes fragments and lowest for fraction
s7, consistent with their apparent densities in the sucrose gradient.
The phospholipid and sterol contents were analyzed. Relative to
fraction 6, the sterol-to-phospholipid ratio of fraction s7 was reduced
by ~40%, whereas fraction s4 showed an increase of ~36%. A 2-fold
higher sterol-to-phospholipid ratio was observed in fraction s4
relative to fraction s7. The protein composition of fraction s4 and its
high sterol level indicated that the low density membrane fragments had
raft-like properties.
Recovery of Raft-like Membrane Fragments from gp80-null
Cells--
To investigate the role of membrane rafts in the assembly
of gp80 adhesion complexes, we first determined whether the raft-like membrane domains required gp80 for their formation. Plasma membranes were isolated from csaA-null cells where the gene encoding
gp80 was inactivated (26). Membrane samples were subjected to flotation into a continuous sucrose gradient with or without prior sonication (Fig. 2). The protein profiles of the
gradient fractions were similar to those obtained with wild-type cells
(see Fig. 1). With sonication, the bulk of the membrane moved to
fraction 7 from fraction 6 where it banded without sonication. Although
gp80 was absent, proteins corresponding to the gp138 species, DdCD36,
actin, and ponticulin floated into fractions 3 and 4 only after
sonication. Total lipids were extracted and quantified from these
membrane fractions. Similar to the samples isolated from wild-type
cells, both the lipid-to-protein and sterol-to-phospholipid ratios were highest for the low density plasma membranes fragments, intermediate for fraction 6, and lowest for fraction s7 (Table I). These results thus indicate that raft-like domains exist in the absence of gp80.
Co-fractionation of the Low Density Membrane Components with
Gp80--
Since the low density membrane fraction might contain
several types of raft-like domains, we assessed the relationship
between the major protein species in the gp80-enriched raft-like
structures using a variation of the co-immunoprecipitation approach.
The low density membrane fragments were incubated with either anti-gp80 mAb alone or mAb followed by colloidal gold-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibodies. Samples were floated into a 34-45% (w/w) sucrose gradient to separate membrane fragments that contained immune complexes of gp80
from fragments devoid of gp80. The binding of colloidal gold was
expected to shift the gp80-rich fragments to a higher density region.
Anti-gp80 antibodies alone shifted the gp138 species, DdCD36 and
ponticulin together with gp80 to a denser region of the gradient.
Incubation of membrane fragments with anti-gp80 mAb and colloidal
gold-conjugated secondary antibodies shifted these bands further in a
region between fractions 5 to 13 (Fig. 3). This wide spread probably resulted
from the formation of large immune complexes. Bands corresponding to
the gp138 species, DdCD36, gp80, and ponticulin displayed a similar
distribution pattern in all cases. Bands between 45 and 70 kDa were
detected mainly in fraction 13 and were likely due to bovine serum
albumin and protein aggregates in the antibody solutions. Neither
bovine serum albumin nor control mAb produced the density shifts. The
co-shifting of the major protein species with gp80 is consistent with
them being directly or indirectly associated with gp80 in the same membrane rafts.
Chemical Cross-linking Reveals Close Clustering of Gp80
Molecules--
To investigate interactions between gp80 and other
proteins in the rafts, membrane samples were cross-linked with the
amine-reactive chemical cross-linkers DSS (spacer length of 1.14 nm) or
DSP (spacer length of 1.2 nm), a cleavable analog of DSS. First, TIFF
was cross-linked with DSS. When protein blots were probed with
anti-gp80 mAb, gp80-positive species of ~150, ~160, and ~215 kDa
were detected (Fig. 4A). The
150- and 160-kDa species might represent two dimer conformations and
the ~215-kDa species might represent gp80 trimers. DSP produced
gp80-positive species of ~155 and ~215 kDa (Fig. 4A).
The putative dimer band was more diffuse and may represent multiple
dimer conformations. To confirm that the cross-linked species were gp80
oligomers, DSP cross-linked samples were analyzed by two-dimensional
SDS-PAGE (Fig. 4B). Silver staining revealed that putative
cross-linked gp80 dimers, trimers, and higher molecular weight
oligomers were indeed comprised of gp80 monomers. Cross-linking of gp80
with other TIFF proteins was not observed.
DSP cross-linking of the low density membrane fragments (fraction s4)
also revealed the two gp80 dimer species in addition to trimers. To
assess whether gp80 oligomerization occurred to a greater extent in
fraction s4 relative to the bulk of the membrane, fractions 6 and s7
were cross-linked. With equal amounts of protein, fractions 6 and s4
produced similar levels of the gp80 oligomers, whereas fraction s7
produced less (Fig. 4C). Quantitative analysis showed that
the ratio between the level of dimers and total gp80 was 3-fold higher
in fractions s4 and 6 than in fraction s7 (Fig. 4D),
indicating an enrichment of gp80 oligomers in the raft-like membrane
fraction. Additionally, the lack of additional cross-linked species in
the bulk plasma membrane samples suggested that the gp80 oligomers were
segregated from most membrane proteins, consistent with their
localization to raft-like domains.
Detection of Gp80 Oligomers on Live Cells--
To demonstrate the
presence of gp80 oligomers under normal physiological conditions, cell
aggregates at 10 h of development were cross-linked. DSS produced
gp80 species corresponding to the dimers and trimers (Fig.
5A). Cross-linking with
BS3 (spacer length of 1.14 nm), a membrane-impermeable DSS
analog, produced the same cross-linked species, indicating that gp80
oligomers were present on the cell surface.
The specificity of the chemical cross-linking reaction was assessed by
incubating 10-h cells with 0.01-1.0 mM DSS (Fig.
5B). Over this concentration range, the proportion of
monomeric gp80 decreased substantially, with a corresponding increase
in the level of the cross-linked species. From 0.03-1.0 mM
DSS, large gp80 complexes were observed in the stacking gel.
Quantitative analysis showed only a minor reduction in the amount of
monomeric gp80 between 0.1 and 1.0 mM DSS. The small change
in gp80 cross-linking in response to a 10-fold increase in cross-linker
concentration suggested that nonspecific cross-linking was minimal.
When cells were cross-linked with 0.1 mM DSS for 15-60
min, the proportion of total gp80 remaining as monomers was constant at
55-60% regardless of the length of the reaction time (Fig.
5C). The results suggest that the incorporation of
additional gp80 monomers into oligomers was minimal over a 60-min
period and that the gp80 oligomers present on live cells were
relatively stable.
Preferential Association of Gp80 Oligomers with Detergent-insoluble
Membranes--
An increase in the clustering of GPI-anchored proteins
can be induced by cold nonionic detergents, possibly due to the
coalescence of associated rafts (5). We investigated this effect by
extracting cells with cold 0.2% Triton X-100. Unexpectedly, extraction
of cells prior to cross-linking decreased the level of cross-linked gp80 species and increased the amount of monomers (Fig.
6A). These results indicate
that gp80-gp80 interactions were sensitive to cold Triton X-100.
To determine whether the stabilized oligomers were associated with
raft-like structures, the extracted and cross-linked sample was
separated into Triton X-100-soluble and -insoluble fractions. The
cross-linked dimers and trimers were preferentially associated with the
Triton-insoluble fraction, whereas the supernatant contained predominantly gp80 monomers (Fig. 6A). When cells were
cross-linked first and then extracted, the levels of dimers, trimers,
and species trapped in the stacking gel were ~2.3-, ~3-, and 9-fold
higher, respectively, in the Triton X-100-insoluble fraction
versus the supernatant (Fig. 6B). In contrast,
the gp80 monomers were 1.2-fold higher in the supernatant. Therefore,
gp80 oligomerization apparently enhanced its partitioning into the
raft-like domains.
Effects of Sterol Sequestration and Cleavage of the Phospholipid
Anchor on Gp80 Oligomerization--
To assess the relationship between
gp80 oligomerization and raft localization, we performed sterol
sequestration treatments that were previously shown to disperse
clusters of other GPI-anchored proteins (34). Cell aggregates were
treated with low levels of digitonin or filipin to sequester sterols
and then cross-linked with DSS. Although sterol sequestration induced
cell rounding, neither digitonin nor filipin affected gp80
cross-linking, whereas Triton X-100 partially dissociated the oligomers
(Fig. 7, A-C). Immunostaining
of these cells revealed discrete patches of gp80 at both cell-cell
contacts and noncontact surfaces, further suggesting that gp80-gp80
interactions resisted sterol sequestration.
The above observation suggested that sterol-gp80 interactions might not
be a major contributor to the stability of gp80 oligomers. To assess
whether direct interactions between extracellular domains could mediate
gp80 oligomerization in the absence of membrane association, we
analyzed gp80 molecules released from the cell surface through cleavage
of their phospholipid anchors by an endogenous phospholipase (35). Gp80
molecules released into the medium were isolated in an S-100 fraction,
which represented ~15% of the cellular gp80. After concentration,
proteins were cross-linked with either DSP or DSS. Dimer and trimer
species of gp80 were detected in both cases (Fig. 7D).
Direct interactions between the extracellular domains of gp80 were
evidently sufficient for oligomerization.
Gp80 Oligomerization Is Mediated Predominantly by
cis-Interactions--
The gp80 homophilic binding site that mediates
trans-interactions has been mapped (25) and is recognized by
the mAb 80L5C4 (20). We investigated the contribution of this site to
gp80 oligomerization by incubating 10-h cells with equivalent amounts of either gp80 Fab or control Fab, followed by cross-linking. Anti-gp80
Fab consistently reduced the upper dimer band to the background level
(Fig. 8A). However, the other
cross-linked species were unchanged, suggesting that the lower dimer
(d1) and the other oligomers were maintained by
cis-interactions, whereas the upper dimer (d2) was formed by
trans-interactions.
To assess gp80 oligomerization on single cells, cells were dissociated
with high shear forces in 10 mM EDTA. The cross-linked gp80
species persisted after the dissociation (Fig. 8B). Even with the addition of latrunculin B, the lower dimer (d1) and other oligomers remained, whereas the upper dimer (d2) was substantially reduced.
The presence of such gp80 cis-oligomers should permit gp80
capping through bivalent mAb cross-linking alone. Indeed, exposure of
live single cells to anti-gp80 mAb alone readily induced the redistribution of gp80 into caps (Fig. 8C). Gp80 displayed
an even membrane distribution on fixed and untreated single cells (Fig.
8D). Together, these results indicate that gp80 oligomers occurred predominantly in cis.
Elevated Gp80 Expression Is Accompanied by Increases in Gp80
Oligomerization--
Clustering of GPI-anchored proteins into rafts
through lipid interactions with their anchors was found to be
independent of protein expression (5, 6). However, if oligomerization
is mediated by direct interactions between the extracellular domains of
gp80, it may show a dependence on the level of gp80 expression. To
distinguish between these possibilities, we cross-linked cells with 0.1 mM DSS from 0 to 12 h of development, when gp80
expression increases from background to maximal levels (36). From 4 to 12 h, total gp80 expression increased ~10-fold. The cross-linked species also increased, whereas the level of gp80 monomers formed a
plateau from 8 to 12 h (Fig. 9,
A and B). Assuming that the difference between
total gp80 and monomeric gp80 corresponded to the amount of gp80
oligomers, the percentage of gp80 oligomers increased linearly from 20 to 55% over the 10-fold range of gp80 expression between 4 and 12 h (Fig. 9C). From 6 to 12 h, the putative trans-dimers increased by ~1.8-fold, but the putative
cis-dimers and trimers each increased by ~3-fold (Fig.
9D). Similar results were obtained after cross-linking with
1 mM DSS (data not shown). The data indicate that direct
interactions between gp80 molecules are important for gp80
oligomerization associated with cell-cell adhesion.
In this paper, we have isolated and analyzed low density plasma
membrane fragments that display characteristics of membrane rafts.
Additionally, the phospholipid-anchored cell adhesion molecule gp80 was
found to form stable oligomers that partitioned preferentially into
raft-like membranes. Our results reveal the coordination of multiple
molecular interactions as gp80 assembles into adhesion complexes during
Dictyostelium development. A model is proposed for this
process (Fig. 10).
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
8
M.
-mercaptoethanol was applied to the stacking gel for 15 min and then
removed. The lane from the first gel was excised, placed on top of the
stacking gel of the second gel, and encased in molten 1% (w/v)
agarose, 2%
-mercaptoethanol in stacking gel buffer.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (51K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Isolation and characterization of gp80-rich
low density plasma membrane fragments. Plasma membrane
preparations were floated into 30-45% (w/w) sucrose gradients and
1-ml fractions were collected from the top of the gradient.
A, nonsonicated plasma membranes. Top, relative
amounts of total membrane protein (
) and gp80 (
) in gradient
fractions. Sucrose densities were also determined for each fraction
(
). Middle, silver-stained gel profiles for the sucrose
gradient fractions. Molecular weight markers are indicated on the
left. Bottom, immunoblots depicting gp80
distribution along the sucrose gradient. B, sonicated plasma
membranes. Top, distribution of membrane protein (
) and
gp80 (
) in gradient fractions. In addition to the main peak, a low
density peak of gp80 appeared (arrow). Middle,
silver-stained gel profiles of the gradient fractions. Gp80 (82-kDa
band) and several other protein species were present in the lower
density fractions (arrowheads). Bottom,
immunoblots of gp80. Membrane fractions were deposited on coverslips,
fixed, stained for gp80, and imaged by confocal microscopy.
C, fraction 6 derived from the nonsonicated sample;
D, fraction s4 from the sonicated sample.
Bars = 5 µm. E, identification of proteins
in fraction s4 by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Proteins were separated
in a 10% gel and silver-stained. The identified proteins are
indicated. For DdCD36, the match was made to a protein termed lysosomal
integral membrane protein II that was found to have >99% sequence
identity with the partial DdCD36 sequence in the data base. Footnote
a, gp138 and gp138B are highly glycosylated and have
apparent molecular mass of 138 kDa, but the search engine
considered only their primary sequences of 83.02 and 81.62 kDa,
respectively. By using mass windows of 93.3 ± 25% and 82 kDa ± 25% for the 155- and 139-kDa bands, respectively,
significant Z scores resulted. Footnote b, for ponticulin, a
significant Z score resulted after correction for the cleaved
N-terminal signal sequence and allowance of pyrrolidone carboxylic acid
modification of the resulting N-terminal glutamine residue.
Lipid compositions of plasma membrane fractions

View larger version (64K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Isolation of raft-like membrane fragments
from csaA-null cells. Plasma membranes
preparations from 10-h csaA-null cells were floated into
30-45% (w/w) sucrose gradients. One-ml fractions were collected from
the top. Nonsonicated membranes formed a sharp band
collected in fraction 6. Sonicated membranes formed a sharp band
collected in fraction 7. Equal proportions of the fractions were
separated in a 10% gel. Silver staining revealed protein species with
molecular weights of 139,000, 105,000, 41,000, and 16,000, corresponding to the gp138 family members, DdCD36, actin, and
ponticulin, respectively, that floated into fractions 3-6
(arrowheads).

View larger version (90K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Co-immunoprecipitation of the low density
membrane components with gp80. Low density membrane fragments were
isolated after gradient centrifugation and then incubated with:
A, control mouse IgG alone; B, control mouse IgG
plus 10-nm colloidal gold-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibodies;
C, anti-gp80 mAb alone; or D, anti-gp80 mAb plus
gold-conjugated secondary antibodies. Following these incubations,
membrane pellets were resuspended and adjusted to ~57% (w/w) sucrose
in 1 ml, and then floated into 34-45% (w/w) sucrose gradients. One-ml
fractions were collected from the top and proteins were separated by
SDS-PAGE and the gels were subjected to silver staining. The 139-, 105-, 82-, and 16-kDa bands identified previously as the gp138 family
members, DdCD36, gp80, and ponticulin co-shifted with gp80
(arrowheads). The 53- and 25-kDa bands corresponding to the
heavy and light chains of anti-gp80 IgG molecules are marked with
circles.

View larger version (46K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Detection of gp80 oligomers in raft-like
membrane fractions. A, TIFF was prepared and
cross-linked with 0.1 mM DSP or DSS for 30 min, separated
in a 5% gel, blotted, and probed for gp80. Both reactions produced
putative gp80 dimer (d) and trimer (t) bands. Two
dimer species of 150 and 160 kDa were clearly resolved with DSP and
designated d1 and d2, respectively. B,
two-dimensional gel analysis of gp80 oligomers. DSP cross-linked TIFF
was separated in the first dimension by electrophoresis in a
nonreducing 6% gel, followed by second dimension electrophoresis in a
reducing 10% gel, and then silver stained. In addition to monomers
(m), dimers (d), and trimers (t),
higher molecular weight oligomers (hmw) of gp80 were
detected. C, samples of fraction 6 isolated without
sonication (6) and fractions 4 and 7 isolated with
sonication (s4 and s7) were prepared. Aliquots of
equal protein amounts were cross-linked with 0.1 mM DSS.
Species with molecular weights expected for gp80 monomers (m), dimers
(d1 and d2), and trimers (t) were
detected. D, the Western blots in C were
quantified by dividing the intensity of both cross-linked dimers
(a) by that of the noncross-linked monomers (b).
Data represent the mean values of three different experiments.

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Analyses of gp80 oligomers on live
cells. A, cells at 10 h of development were
cross-linked with 0.1 mM DSS or 0.1 mM
BS3 for 30 min at 2 × 107 cells/ml.
Samples were separated on a 5% gel, blotted, and probed for gp80.
B, dose effects of cross-linking by DSS. Cells were
cross-linked with 0.01-1 mM DSS for 30 min and probed for
gp80 oligomers. Accumulation of high molecular weight oligomers was
apparent in the stacking gel. C, time course of
cross-linking by 0.1 mM DSS. In both B and
C, the relative amounts of monomeric gp80 were quantified
and plotted below the Western blots. Values are normalized to those of
the noncross-linked samples and represent the mean of three
experiments.

View larger version (48K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Effects of cold Triton X-100 treatment on
gp80 oligomers. A, cross-linking reactions were
performed with 0.1 mM DSS at 4 °C for 30 min with or
without prior extraction with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 10 min at 4 °C.
The sample extracted with Triton X-100 was separated into a Triton
X-100-soluble supernatant (S) and a Triton X-100-insoluble
pellet (P). Equal proportions of each sample were separated
in a 5% gel, blotted, and probed for gp80. B, cells were
first cross-linked with 0.1 mM DSS at room temperature for
30 min, chilled, and then extracted with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 10 min
at 4 °C. Equal proportions of the Triton X-100 soluble
(S) and insoluble (P) fractions were probed for
gp80 oligomers.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Detection of gp80 oligomers after sterol
sequestration and cleavage of the gp80 phospholipid anchor.
A, cells were collected at 10 h of development and
treated with either Me2SO carrier, 0.001% (v/v) Triton
X-100, 0.001% (w/v) digitonin, or 0.0004% (w/v) filipin for 20 min
prior to cross-linking with 0.1 mM DSS. Proteins were
separated in a 5% gel, blotted, and probed for gp80. B,
quantification of the relative amounts of monomers after cross-linking
(n = 3). C, confocal images of treated
cells. Following the treatments described in A, cells were
deposited on coverslips, fixed, and stained for gp80.
Bars = 5 µm. D, S-100 fractions containing
gp80 extracellular domains were concentrated ~15-fold and probed for
gp80 oligomers after cross-linking with 0.1 mM DSP or DSS.
Monomer (m), dimer (d), and trimer (t)
bands are indicated.

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Effects of anti-gp80 Fab and aggregate
dissociation on gp80 oligomers. A, cells were collected
at 10 h of development and resuspended at 2 × 107 cells/ml in the presence of either 0.1 mg/ml goat
anti-mouse Fab or 0.1 mg/ml anti-gp80 Fab in 10 mM EDTA in
20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.6). Samples were
incubated on ice for 20 min and then diluted 10-fold with the same
buffer for a further incubation at room temperature for 10 min, at 60 rpm. Next, they were cross-linked with 0.5 mM DSS for 30 min at 60 rpm, separated in a 5% gel, blotted, and probed for gp80.
B, cells were collected and resuspended at 2 × 106 cells/ml in 10 mM EDTA in 20 mM
sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.6). For one sample, latrunculin B was
added to a final concentration of 5 µM. All samples were
incubated for 10 min prior to cross-linking. Low shear samples were
cross-linked with 0.1 mM DSS at 60 rpm for 15 min. For high
shear conditions, samples were vortexed for 30 s and rotated at
300 rpm, DSS was added to 0.1 mM for 15 min to cross-link
proteins. Samples were then probed for gp80 oligomers. In A
and B, arrows indicate the loss of the upper
dimer band (d2). C, gp80 caps induced by anti-gp80 mAb
alone. Cells were incubated with mAb, fixed, and stained with secondary
antibodies. D, gp80 staining of control cells which were
fixed without pretreatment with mAb. Bars = 5 µm.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Dependence of gp80 oligomerization on the
level of gp80 expression. A, cells were cross-linked
with 0.1 mM DSS during development and the protein blots
were probed for gp80. The total amount of gp80
(noncross-linked) at each time point is shown in the
lower panel. B, the total amount of gp80 (
)
and gp80 monomers remaining after cross-linking (
) were quantified.
All values are normalized to the total level of gp80 at 12 h.
C, the percent oligomerization of gp80 was compared with the
normalized value of total gp80 expressed between 4 and 12 h of
development. D, the accumulation of the upper dimer (d2,
) was compared with the lower dimer (d1,
) and trimer (t,
)
from 6 to 12 h. For each species, the values were normalized to
their respective 6-h level.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (46K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 10.
A model for the assembly of gp80 adhesion
complexes. The schematic drawing depicts the gp80-raft
(shaded box) and gp80-gp80 interactions leading to the
assembly of adhesion complexes. 1) Membrane rafts enriched
with sterols and phospholipid-anchored proteins exist prior to gp80
expression. 2) Gp80 molecules are recruited into rafts
through interactions between their phospholipid anchor and the
sterol-rich domains. 3) As the overall level of gp80
increases, the elevated concentration of gp80 molecules in rafts leads
to local cis-interactions via their extracellular domains.
4) The affinity of gp80 for rafts is increased upon
oligomerization. 5) gp80 cis-oligomers accumulate
as development proceeds. 6) The presentation of
cis-oligomers in rafts facilitates
trans-dimerization required for cell-cell adhesion. The
combination of trans- and cis-interactions
promotes the cross-linking and coalescence of the adhering rafts.
7) Cytoskeleton association with the enlarged rafts
contributes to the further expansion of the gp80 adhesion
complexes.
The existence of rafts in Dictyostelium plasma membrane is evident from the isolation of similar raft-like complexes by distinct methods. In this study, low density plasma membrane fragments, isolated with a detergent-free method, have been shown to share many properties with Dictyostelium TIFF (14). Both complexes contain high lipid contents and are especially enriched in sterols. Although they exclude most membrane protein species, they both contain gp80, gp138 family members, DdCD36, actin, and ponticulin. Gp138 and ponticulin were identified in TIFF after performing the molecular weight corrections described in the legend to Fig. 1. The main proteins in the membrane fragments are phospholipid-anchored, as such anchorage has been shown for gp80 (23, 24) and ponticulin (37) and predicted for gp138 family members (38). The enrichment of sterols and phospholipid-anchored proteins in these membranes, together with their insolubility in cold Triton X-100, suggest that they have the liquid-ordered structure characteristic of rafts (7, 8).
The raft-like domains likely play a key role in the assembly and function of the cell adhesion molecule gp80. However, raft-like fragments can be isolated from gp80-null cells, indicating that the formation of rafts is independent of gp80. During development, gp80 molecules are recruited into these membrane domains as depicted in step 2 of Fig. 10, since the other components of the rafts co-migrate with gp80 immune complexes in flotation gradients (Fig. 3).
Many GPI-anchored proteins are clustered through compartmentalization in raft microdomains alone (5, 6). The same proportion of these proteins can be chemically cross-linked regardless of protein levels. Clustering of these raft proteins was abrogated by removal of the GPI-anchor or by sterol sequestration, but clustering was elevated by detergent extraction that coalesces rafts (5). However, gp80 behaves in a distinct manner. Gp80 oligomers are resistant to sterol sequestration by digitonin or filipin, while gp80-gp80 interactions are sensitive to Triton X-100 extraction, consistent with what we have observed in in vitro binding studies (25). These results suggest that while lipid interactions may be important in the recruitment of gp80 molecules into membrane rafts, additional forces stabilize the oligomers. Analysis of soluble gp80 shed from cells during development indicates that direct gp80-gp80 interactions are sufficient for oligomerization of gp80 molecules that lack the phospholipid anchor. Moreover, the increased oligomerization observed over development was likely due to elevated gp80 expression driving direct gp80-gp80 interactions.
Our chemical cross-linking studies detected relatively stable gp80 oligomers on aggregating cells during development. Cis-interactions between gp80 molecules are probably the major force stabilizing these oligomers as depicted in step 3 of our model. Gp80 is known to mediate adhesion through trans-dimerization at a single homophilic binding site that we have mapped (25). Exposure to antibodies that block this site diminishes one of the two detected gp80 dimers, thus identifying it as the gp80 trans-dimer. The resistance of the other oligomers to both this treatment and cell dissociation indicates that they can be maintained by cis-interactions alone. These cis-oligomers also display independence from the trans-dimer during development, as they accumulate to a much greater extent. Moreover, immunoelectron microscopy detected clusters of gp80 on the surface of single cells (39). Most clusters have diameters from 30 to 70 nm, values remarkably close to sizes ascribed to vertebrate rafts (6, 40). Consistent with this observation, gp80 redistribution into caps can be induced by exposure of live single cells to mAb alone. Since capping of membrane proteins normally requires multivalent cross-linking (41), capping in response to a bivalent cross-linker implicates the prior existence of gp80 clusters.
The gp80 oligomers are partitioned preferentially within rafts. Relative to monomers, the oligomers are enriched in rafts isolated either with or without detergent. Moreover, ~55% of gp80 molecules form oligomers at a stage when 50-55% of gp80 is resistant to Triton X-100 (14). Since gp80 oligomerization was not concomitant with its recruitment into rafts, the preferential compartmentalization of oligomers within the domains may arise from a combination of secondary effects. The general ability of rafts to recruit certain molecules and exclude others (10) may facilitate direct gp80-gp80 interactions. During development, accumulation of monomeric gp80 in rafts could expedite local gp80-gp80 interactions with minimal interference from other membrane proteins. Once formed, the gp80 oligomers may be retained preferentially in the domains, since their multiple phospholipid anchors could strengthen their affinity for rafts (see step 4 in Fig. 10).
Gp80 oligomerization is likely central to the assembly of gp80 adhesion complexes, since oligomerization reaches maximal levels when gp80-mediated adhesion is at its peak (36). The cis-oligomers in rafts would be favorable precursors to the adhesion complexes. The oligomers could mediate avid trans-interactions, and the associated rafts could recruit additional components while minimizing interference from other membrane proteins (see steps 5 and 6 in Fig. 10). Adhering rafts on apposing cells may coalesce into the extended sterol-rich and cytoskeleton-associated domains found at gp80-mediated contacts (14). The large gp80-positive complexes trapped in the stacking gels after chemical cross-linking may correspond to such assemblies. Consistent with a role for gp80-gp80 interactions during such enlargement, gp80 complexes have been found to coalesce within contacts between model membranes with the addition of greater amounts of gp80 alone (42). Gp80 trans-interactions may cross-link gp80 cis-oligomers and facilitate the rapid formation of adhesion complexes at contacts, as likely occurs when gp80 is capped by mAb alone.
On cells, cross-linking of GPI-anchored proteins can produce signals, such as tyrosine phosphorylation, and recruit the cytoskeleton (8, 43-45). Similarly, the formation of large gp80 assemblies at cell-cell contacts may stabilize the associated rafts and recruit the cytoskeleton (see step 7 of Fig. 10). The cytoskeleton could attach directly to the raft component ponticulin, which is the major high affinity link between the membrane and the actin cytoskeleton (46). Sterols may promote lipid-lipid interactions potentially linking gp80 to ponticulin. Comitin (14) and the 30-kDa actin bundling protein (47) are potential components of peripheral cytoskeleton complexes. Such interactions are currently under investigation.
It is increasingly evident that raft-like membrane domains can have many forms and functions (10). Since raft-like domains can be isolated in the absence of gp80, they may also contribute to cell-cell interactions mediated by the gp138 family members during sexual fusion of Dictyostelium cells (38) or to steps in phagocytosis that may involve DdCD36 (48). Also, different types of rafts have been detected on many cell types (49, 50). In Dictyostelium, a CHAPS-insoluble floating fraction has been isolated. Similar to TIFF, this membrane fraction is sterol-rich but its main protein component is the cAMP receptor cAR1, whereas gp80 is present at background levels (51). In contrast, cAR1 is not a major component of either TIFF or the raft-like membrane fragments. Thus, gp80 and cAR1 are likely segregated into different membrane domains. This compartmentalization may enhance the coordination of cell-cell adhesion and chemotaxis during Dictyostelium aggregation.
Compartmentalization of adhesion molecules within particular domains of
the plasma membrane likely influences multiple aspects of cell
adhesion. During the initial stages of cell-cell contact formation,
restriction of different adhesion molecules to distinct domains could
optimize conditions for individual complex formation and thereby
maximize overall adhesion. The mobilization of rafts to cell-cell
contacts may exclude pre-existing adhesion molecules that are
incompatible with the lipid environment. Such segregation of adhesion
complexes may facilitate the reorganization of adhesion complexes
and modulate cell-cell adhesion during physiological and developmental
processes. For instance, domains of various receptors, including
GPI-anchored LFA-3, exchange positions during formation of the
immunological synapse (52). NCAM and cadherin have been found to
segregate into distinct patches of single contact regions (53), and
VE-cadherin and PECAM-1 exhibit distinct patterns within individual
endothelial junctions (54). Also, gp80 replaces DdCAD-1 at cell-cell
contacts during Dictyostelium aggregation (55), and
GPI-anchored NCAM-120 likely excludes cadherins from cell-cell contacts
during pancreatic development (56). Rafts may facilitate the
segregation of adhesion receptors, thus allowing signaling and
regulatory events to be differentiated among various membrane complexes.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Drs. M. Opas and R. Reithmeier for advice and discussion, and Eric Huang for expert technical assistance. We thank Dr. A. Kuksis for advice and generous access to lipid analysis facilities.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by Operating Grant MT-6140 from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ Recipient of a postgraduate scholarship from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and a University of Toronto Open Scholarship.
To whom correspondence should be addressed:
Charles H. Best Institute, University of Toronto, 112 College Street,
Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L6, Canada. Tel.: 416-978-8766; Fax:
416-978-8528; E-mail:
chi.hung.siu@utoronto.ca.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 16, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108030200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol; TIFF, Triton X-100-insoluble floating fraction; DSP, dithiobis(succinimidylpropionate); DSS, disuccinimydyl suberate; BS3, bis-(sulfosuccinimidyl)suberate; MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption and ionization time-of-flight; gp, glycoprotein; CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Singer, S. J., and Nicolson, G. L. (1972) Science 175, 720-731 |
| 2. | Edidin, M., Kuo, S. C., and Sheetz, M. P. (1991) Science 254, 1379-1382 |
| 3. | Sheetz, M. P., Turney, S., Qian, H., and Elson, E. L. (1989) Nature 340, 284-288 |
| 4. | Gumbiner, B. M. (1996) Cell 84, 345-357 |
| 5. | Friedrichson, T., and Kurzchalia, T. V. (1998) Nature 394, 802-805 |
| 6. | Varma, R., and Mayor, S. (1998) Nature 394, 798-801 |
| 7. | Simons, K., and Ikonen, E. (1997) Nature 387, 569-572 |
| 8. | Brown, D. A., and London, E. (1998) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 14, 111-136 |
| 9. | Hooper, N. M. (1999) Mol. Membr. Biol. 16, 145-156 |
| 10. | Simons, K., and Toomre, D. (2000) Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1, 31-39 |
| 11. | Olive, S., Dubois, C., Schachner, M., and Rougon, G. (1995) J. Neurochem. 65, 2307-2317 |
| 12. | Doyle, D. D., Goings, G. E., Upshaw-Early, J., Page, E., Ranscht, B., and Palfrey, H. C. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 6937-6943 |
| 13. | Funatsu, N., Miyata, S., Kumanogoh, H., Shigeta, M., Hamada, K., Endo, Y., Sokawa, Y., and Maekawa, S. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 8224-8330 |
| 14. | Harris, T. J. C., Awrey, D. E., Cox, B. J., Ravandi, A., Tsang, A., and Siu, C.-H. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 18640-18648 |
| 15. | Loomis, W. F. (1975) Dictyostelium discoideum: A Developmental System , Academic Press Inc., New York |
| 16. | Siu, C.-H., Harris, T. J. C., Wong, E. F. S., Yang, C., Sesaki, H., and Wang, J. (1997) in Dictyostelium, A Model System for Cell and Developmental Biology (Maeda, Y. , Inouye, K. , and Takeuchi, I., eds) , pp. 69-79, Universal Academy Press, Tokyo |
| 17. | Brar, S. K., and Siu, C.-H. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 24902-24909 |
| 18. | Wong, E. F., Brar, S. K., Sesaki, H., Yang, C., and Siu, C.-H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 16399-16408 |
| 19. | Fontana, D. R. (1993) Differentiation 53, 139-147 |
| 20. | Siu, C.-H., Lam, T. Y., and Choi, A. H. C. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 16030-16036 |
| 21. | Gao, E. N., Shier, P., and Siu, C.-H. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 9409-9415 |
| 22. | Wang, J., Hou, L., Awrey, D., Loomis, W. F., Firtel, R. A., and Siu, C.-H. (2000) Dev. Biol. 15, 734-745 |
| 23. | Sadeghi, H., da Silva, A. M., and Klein, C. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 5512-5515 |
| 24. | Stadler, J., Keenan, T. W., Bauer, G., and Gerisch, G. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 371-377 |
| 25. | Kamboj, R. K., Gariepy, J., and Siu, C.-H. (1989) Cell 59, 615-625 |
| 26. | Harloff, C., Gerisch, G., and Noegel, A. A. (1989) Genes Dev. 3, 2011-2019 |
| 27. | Ponte, E., Bracco, E., Faix, J., and Bozzaro, S. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 9360-9365 |
| 28. | Ingalls, H. M., Goodloe-Holland, C. M., and Luna, E. J. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 4779-4783 |
| 29. | Sussman, M. (1987) Methods Cell Biol. 28, 9-29 |
| 30. | Smart, E. J., Ying, Y.-S., Mineo, C., and Anderson, R. G. W. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 10104-10108 |
| 31. | Brunette, D. M., and Till, J. F. (1971) J. Membr. Biol. 5, 215-225 |
| 32. | Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 |
| 33. | Sesaki, H., Wong, E. F. S., and Siu, C.-H. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 138, 939-951 |
| 34. | Rothberg, K. G., Ying, Y.-S., Kamen, B. A., and Anderson, R. G. W. (1990) J. Cell Biol. 111, 2931-2938 |
| 35. | da Silva, A. M., and Klein, C. (1989) Exp. Cell Res. 185, 464-472 |
| 36. | Siu, C.-H., Lam, T. Y., and Wong, L. M. (1988) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 968, 283-290 |
| 37. | Hitt, A. L., Lu, T. H., and Luna, E. J. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 126, 1421-1431 |
| 38. | Fang, H., Higa, M., Suzuki, K., Aiba, K., Urushihara, H., and Yanagisawa, K. (1993) Dev. Biol. 156, 201-208 |
| 39. | Ochiai, H., Schwarz, H., Merkl, R., Wagle, G., and Gerisch, G. (1982) Cell Differ. 11, 1-13 |
| 40. | Pralle, A., Keller, P., Florin, E. L., Simons, K., and Horber, J. K. (2000) J. Cell Biol. 148, 997-1008 |
| 41. | Schreiner, G. F., and Unanue, E. R. (1976) Adv. Immunol. 24, 37-165 |
| 42. | Kloboucek, A., Behrisch, A., Faix, J., and Sackmann, E. (1999) Biophys. J. 77, 2311-2328 |
| 43. | Deckert, M., Ticchioni, M., and Bernard, A. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 133, 791-799 |
| 44. | Moran, M., and Miceli, M. C. (1998) Immunity 9, 787-796 |
| 45. | Harder, T., and Simons, K. (1999) Eur. J. Immunol. 29, 556-562 |
| 46. | Hitt, A. L., Hartwig, J. H., and Luna, E. J. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 126, 1433-1444 |
| 47. | Fechheimer, M., Ingalls, H. M., Furukawa, R., and Luna, E. J. (1996) J. Cell Sci. 107, 2393-2401 |
| 48. | Janssen, K. P., and Schleicher, M. (2001) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1525, 228-233 |
| 49. | Madore, N., Smith, K. L., Graham, C. H., Jen, A., Brady, K., Hall, S., and Morris, R. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 6917-6926 |
| 50. | Roper, K., Corbeil, D., and Huttner, W. B. (2000) Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 582-592 |
| 51. | Xiao, Z., and Devreotes, P. N. (1997) Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 855-869 |
| 52. | Grakoui, A., Bromley, S. K., Sumen, C., Davis, M. M., Shaw, A. S., Allen, P. M., and Dustin, M. L. (1999) Science 285, 221-227 |
| 53. | Sandig, M., Kalnins, V. I., and Siu, C.-H. (1997) Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 36, 149-163 |
| 54. | Ayalon, O., Sabanai, H., Lampugnani, M. G., Dejana, E., and Geiger, B. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 126, 247-258 |
| 55. | Sesaki, H., and Siu, C.-H. (1996) Dev. Biol. 177, 504-516 |
| 56. | Esni, F., Taljedal, I. B., Perl, A. K., Cremer, H., Christofori, G., and Semb, H. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 144, 325-337 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. C. Laughlin, G. C. McGugan, R. R. Powell, B. H. Welter, and L. A. Temesvari Involvement of Raft-Like Plasma Membrane Domains of Entamoeba histolytica in Pinocytosis and Adhesion Infect. Immun., September 1, 2004; 72(9): 5349 - 5357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Reed, C. McNamee, S. Rackstraw, J. Jenkins, and D. Moss Diglons are heterodimeric proteins composed of IgLON subunits, and Diglon-CO inhibits neurite outgrowth from cerebellar granule cells J. Cell Sci., August 1, 2004; 117(17): 3961 - 3973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|