|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M104484200 on October 10, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 52, 48988-48996, December 28, 2001
DNA Array Studies Demonstrate Convergent Regulation of Virulence
Factors by Cph1, Cph2, and Efg1 in Candida albicans*
Shelley
Lane §,
Charlie
Birse ¶,
Song
Zhou ,
Robert
Matson**, and
Haoping
Liu 
From the Department of Biological Chemistry,
University of California, Irvine, California 92697-1700 and
** Beckman Coulter, Inc., Advanced Technology Center,
Fullerton, California 92834-3100
Received for publication, May 17, 2001, and in revised form, September 18, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Candida albicans, normally a human
commensal, can cause fatal systemic infections under certain
circumstances. Its unique ability to switch from yeast to hyphal growth
in response to various environmental signals is inherent to its
pathogenicity. Filamentation is regulated by multiple pathways
including a Cph1-mediated mitogen-activated protein kinase
pathway, an Efg1-mediated cAMP/PKA pathway, and a
Cph2 pathway. To gain a general picture of how these various signaling
pathways regulate differential gene expression during filamentation, we
have constructed a partial C. albicans DNA array of 7,000 genes and used it to study the gene expression profiles using various
mutants and growth conditions. By combining this novel technology with
a new liquid medium in which cph1/cph1 is defective in
filamentation, previously identified differentially expressed genes
(ECE1, HWP1, HYR1,
RBT1, SAPs5-6, and RBT4) are found
to be regulated by all three pathways. In addition, two novel genes,
DDR48 and YPL184, have been found to be
differentially regulated during hyphal development and by all three
pathways. This suggests that distinct filamentation signaling pathways
converge to regulate a common set of differentially expressed genes. As one of the mechanisms for the observed convergence, we find that the
transcription of a key regulator, TEC1, is regulated by
Efg1 and Cph2. Importantly, most of the genes regulated by multiple filamentation pathways encode known virulence factors. Perhaps, C. albicans utilizes converging pathways to regulate its
vital virulence factors to ensure its survival and pathogenicity in various host environments.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Candida albicans is a common human commensal often
associated with superficial colonization of the mucous epithelium.
However, the incidence of fatal C. albicans infections, as
well as drug-resistant strains, have increased dramatically in recent
years in patients undergoing chemotherapy, transplantation, and in
particular, in immunocompromised patients suffering from AIDS (1).
C. albicans exhibits the ability to grow in a variety of
reversible morphological forms (yeast, pseudohyphal, and hyphal) in
response to various environmental signals (2). The ability of C. albicans to switch its mode of growth has been shown to be
required for the pathogenicity of this fungus (3-5). Clearly a better
understanding of the differentiation pathways which permit C. albicans to switch between the different morphological forms will
reveal more about C. albicans pathogenesis.
Multiple signaling pathways have been found to regulate filamentation.
Cph1, a transcription factor homologous to Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Ste12, plays a role in hyphal development on certain solid media in C. albicans (6). As in S. cerevisiae, Cph1 in C. albicans is regulated by a
mitogen-activated protein
(MAP)1 kinase cascade that
includes Cst20, Hst7, and Cek1 (7-9). Mutants with homozygous
deletions of the genes encoding these proteins all display a
medium-specific defect in hyphal development on certain solid media.
Efg1, a basic helix-loop-helix protein similar to Phd1 of S. cerevisiae and StuA of Aspergillus nidulans, plays a
major role in regulating hyphal development in C. albicans
(3, 10). efg1/efg1 null mutant
strains fail to produce hyphae under many conditions, including the
presence of serum, which is one of the strongest inducers of hyphal
formation (3, 10). Efg1 acts downstream of the
cAMP/protein kinase A (PKA) signaling pathway (11, 12).
The Efg1-mediated cAMP pathway is thought to be distinct from the
Cph1-mediated MAP kinase pathway, because the cph1/cph1
efg1/efg1 double mutant has a greater
defect in hyphal development and virulence than either single mutant
(3). Cph1 and Efg1 are the first identified regulators of hyphal
development. Recently, a new member of the TEA/ATTS
family of transcription factors, Tec1, has been shown to regulate
hyphal development and virulence in C. albicans (13). More
recently, Cph2, a basic helix loop helix protein of the Myc subfamily,
is found to regulate hyphal development in a medium-specific manner
(34). Its activity is mediated, in part, through regulating
TEC1 transcriptional induction. Condition-specific hyphal
regulators such as Czf1 and Rim101/Prr2 have also
been identified in C. albicans (14, 15). Czf1, a potential
transcription factor with a zinc finger motif, regulates filamentous
growth in response to embedded conditions. Rim101, a transcription
factor with a zinc-finger domain similar to PacC of A. nidulans and Rim101 of S. cerevisiae, is involved in a
pH-responsive pathway (15-18). Rim101-activated hyphal development requires Efg1 (15). C. albicans also has negative regulators of hyphal development. Tup1, a global transcriptional co-repressor, is
required to maintain the organism in yeast form, as the disruption of
TUP1 causes the organism to filament under conditions that normally induce it to grow as yeast (19). Tup1-mediated repression of
hyphal development is mediated though Rfg1 (20, 21) and Nrg1 (22), but
not Cph1 or Efg1 (23).
Several differentially expressed genes have been identified by
screening C. albicans libraries with cDNA probes derived
from yeast or hyphal cultures (24, 25). These include ECE1, HWP1, HYR1, ALS3, RBT1, RBT4, and ALS8
(24-29). Many of them encode either cell wall or secreted proteins and
some have been shown to be important virulence factors for systemic
infection. HWP1 encodes a
glycosylphosphatidylinositol-modified cell wall protein that can
serve as a target for mammalian transglutaminases to form covalent
attachments between C. albicans and host epithelial cells (30). Rbt1 and Rbt4, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-modified cell wall
protein and a secreted protein similar to plant pathogenesis-related protein (PRY-1), are also necessary for the full virulence of C. albicans in a systemic mouse model. Als3 and Als8 belong to a
family of cell wall agglutinin-like proteins, some of which are
involved in adhesion to host cells (28). In addition, three members of
the secreted aspartyl proteinase genes, SAPs 4-6, are differentially transcribed when hyphal development is induced with
serum or media containing polypeptides as the sole nitrogen source
(31). They have been shown to promote virulence in host systemic and
mucosal candidal infections (32). The expression of ECE1,
HWP1, HYR1, RBT1, and RBT4
have been shown to require Efg1 (23, 29, 33), Cph2 (34), and
potentially Tec1, but not Cph1 (23, 33). Tup1-Nfg1 and Tup1-Nrg1 also
regulate the repression and full induction of these genes (20-22). In
addition, the expression of SAPs 4-6 also require Efg1
(35), Cph2 (34), and Tec1 (13). Therefore, filamentation signaling
pathways not only regulate hyphal morphogenesis but also the
expression of virulence genes.
While several differentially expressed genes have been identified by
screening libraries by differential hybridization, this type of
approach is limited to comparing a single growth condition or strain
per experimental set. The recently established DNA array technology, on
the other hand, allows a more efficient analysis of gemone-wide gene
expression in multiple growth conditions and strains. Here, we report
the construction of a partial C. albicans DNA array and its
application in studying differential gene expression during the
yeast-to-hyphal transition in wild type and mutants of different
signaling pathways. Our studies have identified two novel,
differentially expressed genes. It also indicates that multiple
filamentation signaling pathways converge to regulate the expression of
a common set of differentially expressed genes. Potential mechanisms of
convergence are discussed. As many of the target genes have been shown
to be required for C. albicans virulence, these studies are
vital to understanding much about the components and mechanism of
fungal pathogenesis.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Media and C. albicans Manipulation--
S. cerevisiae
media were used for routine culturing of C. albicans, except
that uridine, instead of uracil, was used for growing Ura
C. albicans strains. Several hyphal inducing media were
used: Lee's medium (36) with 1% mannitol as the carbon source, YPD + 10% serum, SS (synthetic succinate) medium (0.0425% YNB without amino
acids and ammonium sulfate (Difco), 0.125% ammonium sulfate, 2%
succinic acid, pH 6.5), and SSA (SS with amino acids) medium. A
modified lithium acetate method was used for C. albicans
transformation (34). Strains HLY3223 were obtained by transforming an
ura strain of HLC52 with the PCK1p-TEC1
plasmid BP2-TEC1 (34). The strain HLY3134 was obtained by
transforming an ura strain of JKC19 with the
PCK1p-CPH1 plasmid BP1-CPH1 (34). The C. albicans strains used in this study are listed in Table I.
Generation of a Partial C. albicans Array--
We used the
Primer 3 program (Whitehead Institute for Biochemical Research) to
design PCR primers based on sequence information from the
Candida Genome Data base at the Stanford Genome Center. The
primers were designed to generate DNA fragments 200-400 base pairs in length with the following settings in Primer 3:
mispriming library (human), product size range (200), CG clamp
(2), optimum primer size (22), minimum primer size (18), maximum primer size (27), optimum Tm (65), minimum
Tm (62), maximum Tm (68), maximum
complementarity (4), maximum 3' complementarity (2), and maximum poly-X
(3). The primer information was collated in a Candida Primer
Pairs Data base using the Filemaker Pro software program and sequence
information exported directly to the Stanford PAN Facility for the
synthesis of primers in a 96-well format (20 nmol scale).
1 µg of C. albicans SC5314 genomic DNA was used for each
100-µl PCR reaction with 2.5 units of Biolase (ISC) in 96-well PCR plates (Greiner). The PCR conditions were as follows: 94.5 °C for 3 min, 8 cycles of 94.6 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 30 s,
72 °C for 30 s, 30 cycles of 94.5 °C for 30 s, 52 °C
for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s. An aliquot of each PCR reaction
was run on a Visigel Separation Matrix (Stratagene) to determine the
yield of the PCR reaction and to confirm that the product was of the
expected size. Approximately 70% of the PCR reactions (from a total of
1,000 primer pairs) were successful on the first attempted
amplification. As the C. albicans genome is estimated to
contain 7,000 open reading frames (ORFs), the PCR products represent
roughly 10% of these ORFs. Without additional purification, 20 µl of
each PCR product was transferred to 384-well plates and directly
gridded onto a positively charged nylon membrane in triplicate (Fig.
1), using a BioMek 2000 robotic gridding machine. The gridding of each
filter was repeated for a total of three to five overprints, and the membranes were subsequently fixed by UV cross-linking.
In addition to the randomly selected ORFs, several controls were also
included on the membrane. The previously reported differentially expressed genes, such as ECE1, HWP1, and HYR1,
were included to serve as positive controls. As shown in Fig. 1, many
of these are shown to be up-regulated in hyphal versus yeast
form, a positive indication of the success of the array. C. albicans genomic DNA was also spotted at multiple locations
throughout each filter to control for the evenness of hybridization
across the filter. Furthermore, pBluescript DNA was included to control
for nonspecific hybridization. Finally, a series of PCR products that
spanned TDH3 and TEF1 (two relatively long,
highly expressed C. albicans genes) from the 5' to 3' end
were included to control for transcriptase processivity.
Two sets of array filters were constructed during the course of this
study. Differences in the intensity of hybridization for some genes
were observed between filters A and B. This was likely due to a
difference in the concentration of the PCR reactions used for gridding.
Some PCR products were re-made for filter set A and the PCR reactions
of several positive controls were diluted in the set A.
Array Hybridization--
The array filters were pretreated,
prehybridized, hybridized, and washed using the protocol for the Yeast
Index GENEFILTERS Microarrays (Research Genetics). They were probed
with 33P-labeled cDNA reverse transcribed with
oligo(dT) from 1 µg of total RNA extracted using a hot acidic phenol
method (Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, 13.12) from different
C. albicans morphological forms. The arrays were scanned
with a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics) (Fig. 1).
Each filter could be stripped in boiling 0.5% SDS (Research Genetics)
and re-probed up to 7 times without a significant loss of signal. As
shown in Table II, filter A1 was
hybridized, sequentially, with wild type,
cph1/cph1,
cph2/cph2, and
efg1/efg1 strains that were
grown in YPD at 25 °C. Similarly, filter A2 was probed in succession
with the above four strains grown in Lee's medium at 25 °C.
Likewise, filter A3 was probed with cells from YPD + Ser at 37 °C,
and filter A4 with cells in Lee's medium at 37 °C. Additional hybridizations were performed on filters A2 and A4 with the
cph1/cph1 and
cph1/cph1+PCK1p-CPH1
strains grown in SS medium at 25 and 37 °C, respectively. Filters B5
and B6 were sequentially hybridized with the wild type strain in yeast,
hyphal, and the cph1/cph1 efg1/efg1 strain in hyphal growth media (Table
II). The same filter was used for each set of compared experiments to
avoid any variations among filters.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Array experiments
Experiments used for clustering analysis are listed. Two sets of
filters were gridded, A and B, of which each of the filters is
numbered. The subsequent value indicates the hybridization number for
the filter.
|
|
Array Data Analysis--
The images from the PhosphorImager for
each array experiment were analyzed for initial data quantification
using ArrayVision software (Imaging Research, Inc.). The background
subtracted intensity of each spot on the array was calculated by taking
the average intensity of the area surrounding each group of 9 spots and
subtracting it from the intensity value of each spot within the group.
The data were subsequently exported to Excel where the values for each
of the three spots corresponding to a particular gene were averaged and
divided by the sum of the values for every gene spotted on the array
(not including controls) to get an average % intensity value for each
gene. Lowly expressed genes, with an average % intensity value less
than or close to that of pBluescript in all hybridizations, were
eliminated from further data analysis. Many of the controls were also
removed (Genomic DNA, TDH3, TEF1, rDNA, pBluescript). The ratio value using the average % intensity values for
each gene from a pair of hybridizations was calculated. As a further
measure, we visually checked the array images to eliminate false
positives caused by a flaw on the array filters. The remaining gene
ratio values from 16 pairs of comparisons were used for the clustering
analysis (using software available at rana.stanford.edu). The results
were viewed using the TreeView program. Several genes were clustered
with the positive controls of differentially regulated genes, but were
found to be false positives by Northern analyses (data not shown).
These false positive genes usually appeared in only one batch of the
arrays (either A or B), and were all in close proximity to the highly
expressed control genes in a 384-well plate, and were removed from the
final data set. The remaining 637 genes were used in the clustering
analysis (Fig. 2).
Northern Analysis--
Methods for RNA isolation and Northern
blot hybridization were as described (Current Protocols in Molecular
Biology, 13.12). A ClaI-SalI ACT1
fragment from the plasmid p1595/3 (37) was used as
the probe for ACT1 for Northern blots. PCR products of ECE1, HWP1, HYR1,
SAPs4-6, ALS3, RBT4,
EBP1, WH11, ECE99, TEC1, DDR48, and YPL184 were used for probing Northern
blots. The oligos used for PCR are listed in Table
III. The sizes of the mRNAs on the
Northern blots were compared with the expected lengths based on
information from the Stanford C. albicans Genome Data
base.
Promoter Sequence Analysis--
1-Kilobase upstream sequences
were used for computational search of conserved binding sequences as
described (34).
 |
RESULTS |
Cph1, Cph2, and Efg1 Regulate the Same Set of Differentially
Expressed Genes--
A cph1/cph1
efg1/efg1 double mutant is avirulent
in a mouse systemic infection model, whereas the single mutants,
cph1/cph1 and
efg1/efg1 are virulent
(3). Two models can explain how Cph1 and Efg1 can exhibit this synergy
in regulating virulence genes. One is a divergence model, which
proposes that the two pathways have their own downstream genes. In the
divergence model, Cph1 and Efg1 are predicted to regulate different
virulence genes. Another is a convergence model, which proposes that a
common set of virulence genes are regulated coordinately by both Cph1
and Efg1 pathways. Therefore, the deletion of one pathway is not
sufficient to block the expression of virulence genes in
vivo. It is also possible that the above two models coexist. In
this case, these pathways regulate the transcription of an overlapping
set of genes, while each pathway can also activate its pathway-specific targets.
To develop an overall picture of how genes are regulated during hyphal
development, we used the partial C. albicans DNA array to
study differences in gene expression between wild type and the
signaling mutants cph1/cph1,
cph2/cph2, and
efg1/efg1. To determine
the effect of each pathway on gene expression, single mutants were
used. Each strain was grown in Lee's or YPD medium at 25 °C for
yeast, and Lee's or YPD + serum medium at 37 °C for hyphae. Lee's
and YPD + serum medium were used because they are the two most
effective liquid media for hyphal induction. cDNA probes from four
strains grown under the same condition were used to probe the same
array, sequentially (Table II, top). The data from each mutant were
compared with those of the wild type from the same filter (Fig. 2). We
also compared the gene expression profiles during the dimorphic
transition in wild type, and between wild type and the
cph1/cph1 efg1/efg1
strains, grown in the above two hyphal inducing conditions, by
hybridizing two additional arrays (Table II, bottom). Data from all
these array experiments were compiled into an Excel table. Individual
observations were rejected in some cases, if the signal intensity was
the same as or below the mean intensity of the pBluescript negative
controls. The intensity ratios were then calculated from each pair of
hybridizations, log-transformed, organized by hierarchical
clustering (using software available at rana.stanford.edu), and
displayed with the TreeView program (38) (Fig. 2).
An overview of the array results is presented in Fig. 2. How our data
were grouped by the clustering program correlated somewhat to the
morphological differences between cells in each pair of comparisons.
Columns 1-3 and 6-8 are comparisons of wild type with
cph1/cph1,
cph2/cph2, and
efg1/efg1 in Lee's or
YPD + serum medium at 25 °C, respectively. All cells in these six
comparisons were in yeast form. However, columns 4 and 5 are
comparisons between wild type and
cph1/cph1 or
cph2/cph2 strains in YPD + serum at 37 °C, in which the mutants formed hyphal filaments
indistinguishable from those of wild type. Interestingly, they were
grouped among comparisons between yeast-form cells by the program. This
indicates that Cph1 and Cph2 do not play any roles in gene
transcription under this condition, which is consistent with their lack
of a morphological defect. Columns 9 through 16 are comparisons of wild
type with single or double mutants under hyphal growth conditions, or a
comparison of wild type cells in hyphal versus yeast growth conditions. Except column 10 where
cph1/cph1 cells formed filaments, all
other columns are comparison of gene expression between hyphal and
yeast cells. It is intriguing that the comparison between wild type and
cph1/cph1 was grouped among comparisons of
hyphal versus yeast, rather than grouped with columns 4 and
5. Overall, the expression profiles for most genes did not show
dramatic changes during filamentation under the two hyphal inducing
conditions. Only three small clusters of genes showed significant
changes in expression level.
The first cluster represents genes whose expression was highly induced
in filamentous cells (Fig. 2B, a, columns 9-16).
They were induced in both types of hyphal inducing media. Their
induction was blocked in mutants that did not form hyphae such as
efg1/efg1 mutants in
both YPD + serum and Lee's media and
cph2/cph2 mutants in Lee's medium. This
group of genes includes all known differentially expressed genes seeded
on the array (ECE1, HWP1, and HYR1). In addition,
two new genes, YJL79 and ECE99, clustered
together with the known genes. Recently, YJL79 and
ECE99 have been shown to be RBT4 and
RBT1, respectively (25). The expression patterns of these
genes were further confirmed by Northern analysis (Fig. 3), and are
consistent with the published results (23).
The second group includes SAP5 and SAP6. Although
they were also highly induced under both hyphal inducing conditions,
and the induction required Efg1 and Cph2 (Fig. 2B, panel b,
and Fig. 3), they were not on the same branch of the dendrogram
generated during the data clustering. This may be due to the fact that
their expression was repressed by Cph2 in YPD + serum at 37 °C.
The third cluster includes two genes, WH11 and
HSP12 (a small heat shock protein) (Fig. 2B, panel
c). WH11 is a white-specific gene identified previously
by using a strain capable of white-opaque switching (39). It encodes a
protein with 48% identity to Hsp12, and therefore, is likely to have a
function that is similar to Hsp12. Both genes were expressed only in
Lee's medium at 25 °C, and the expression requires Efg1. This is
consistent with the finding that Efg1 was involved in the regulation of
phase switching in C. albicans (40). Interestingly, Cph1 and
Cph2 showed some repressive effects on their expression in Lee's
medium at 37 °C (Fig. 3).
Although EBP1 (originally isolated as an estrogen-binding
protein (41)) also clustered with hypha-specific genes in the array
experiments, further analysis of its expression by Northern blotting
showed that it was induced only in YPD + serum at 37 °C, and its
induction was dependent on Efg1 (Fig. 3). We suspect that the signal
intensity of the EBP1 spots on our array was falsely elevated due to the proximity of the sample to that of the neighboring gene tag for HWP1 on the 384-well plate used for
constructing the array (Fig. 1).

View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
A partial C. albicans array
illustrating differential gene expression in yeast and hyphal
forms. A nylon membrane is spotted with 1,000 PCR reactions of
roughly 1000 C. albicans genes in triplicates. About 70% of
the PCR reactions contained gene tags of the expected sizes, which
represent about 10% of the total C. albicans genome
(~7000 ORFs). The filter array was hybridized, sequentially, with
33P-labeled cDNA probes which were reverse transcribed
from the total RNA of wild type (SC5314) cells grown into Lee's medium
at 25 °C (yeast form, top panel) and 37 °C (hyphal
form, bottom panel) for 6 h. The filter was scanned
with a PhosphorImager after each hybridization, and the images are
shown. Genes showing an obvious increase in the level of expression in
hyphal versus yeast form are marked.
|
|
Although the comparisons of wild type to the
cph1/cph1 mutant in Lee's medium at
37 °C (Fig. 2B,
column 10) clustered together with other comparisons of
hyphal versus yeast cells, no obvious reduction in the level
of differentially expressed genes was observed in the
cph1/cph1 strains under both inducing
conditions by Northern blotting (Fig. 3),
which is consistent with its lack of a defect in hyphal development in
these liquid media. One explanation for this lack of a phenotype could
be that Cph1 was not activated under the in vitro hyphal
inducing conditions examined. However, this pathway is active under
certain in vivo conditions in mice, as the
cph1/cph1 efg1/efg1
mutant is much less virulent than the efg1/efg1 mutant in a
systemic infection model (3). To address this possibility, we searched
for liquid media in which cph1/cph1 mutant
strains exhibited a defect in filamentation. In particular, SS medium
allowed the hyphal development of wild type cells, while it did not
induce filamentation in the cph1/cph1
mutant cells in liquid medium (Fig.
4A). The carbon source in the
media was found to significantly affect the phenotypic outcome of the
cph1/cph1 mutants. Glucose or mannitol did
not result in any differences in filamentation between wild type and
cph1/cph1 strains, but succinate produced
a visible difference. The addition of amino acids to SS medium
increased filamentation in both wild type and cph1/cph1 strains. In addition to testing
different media, we also created C. albicans strains with an
activated Cph1 pathway. This was achieved by overexpressing
CPH1 from the PCK1 promoter (34). The
CPH1 transcript was detectable by Northern blotting only in
strains carrying PCK1p-CPH1, not in wild type (data not shown). CPH1 overexpression led to pseudohyphal growth
(filamentation) under conditions that favor yeast growth (34). The
mechanism for Cph1 activation by overexpression is likely to be
analogous to Ste12 regulation in S. cerevisiae (42, 43).
During pseudohyphal growth activation of the filamentation MAP kinase
pathway, Kss1 releases the inhibition of Dig1 and -2 on Ste12. A
similar effect can be obtained by overproducing the Ste12 protein, or
Ste12 domains that interact with the Dig1 and Dig2 proteins (44,
45).

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Cluster analysis reveals groups of highly
regulated genes during hyphal development. 637 genes (see
"Materials and Methods") on the partial C. albicans
array were clustered based on their expression patterns in 16 comparisons that followed the yeast-to-hyphal transition in wild type
and mutants of three filamentation signaling pathways, as indicated in
panel B. Columns 1-3 are comparisons of gene expression
between wild type (SC5314) and
cph1/cph1 (JKC19),
cph2/cph2 (HLY1921), or
efg1/efg1 (HLC52) strains grown
in Lee's medium at 25 °C, obtained from sequential hybridizations
on filter A2 (Table II). Similarly, columns 4, 5, and 12 are
comparisons of the same strains grown in YPD + serum at 37 °C
(Filter A3). Likewise, columns 6-8 are comparisons of the strains
grown in YPD at 25 °C (Filter A1), and columns 9-11 are comparisons
of the same strains grown in Lee's medium at 37 °C (Filter A2),
respectively. Columns 13 and 14 are comparisons of wild type (SC5314)
with the cph1/cph1
efg1/efg1 (HLC52) mutant grown in YPD + serum
(column 13) and Lee's medium at 37 °C (column 14) in the same
conditions, respectively. Columns 15 and 16 are comparisons of wild
type (SC5314) grown in YPD + serum at 37 °C versus YPD at
25 °C, and Lee's medium at 37 °C versus at 25 °C.
Each column of colored boxes represents the variation in
transcript level of every gene in a given pair of RNA samples on the
array, and each row represents the variation in transcript
abundance for each gene. The variations in transcript abundance are
depicted by means of a color scale, in which shades of red
represent increases and shades of green represent decreases
in transcript level (a color scale is indicated). A black
color indicates an undetectable change in transcript level. Based
on the dendrogram constructed during the clustering program (not
shown), three different clusters of genes, as indicated in panel
A, were found to be co-regulated by multiple mutants. The patterns
of gene expression in the 16 pairs of compared experiments are shown in
panel B, a-c. a, hypha-specific
cluster. Gene expression was highly induced in hyphal versus
yeast form, and in wild type versus mutant strains in YPD + serum and Lee's medium at 37 °C. Genes encoding virulence factors
are marked with an asterisk. b, SAP
cluster. Genes in this cluster were not only up-regulated in hyphal
versus yeast form, and in wild type versus mutant
strains, but also were repressed by Cph2 in YPD + serum at 37 °C.
SAP4 also showed a similar pattern of gene expression as
SAPs 5,6, although it was not clustered into the same group
as SAP 5,6. c, WH11 cluster. Genes in
this cluster were repressed in Lee's medium, and their transcription
required Efg1. Differential gene expression was also observed with
ALS genes, as indicated in panel A. However, our
PCR tags do not distinguish between different ALS genes. By
Northern analysis, the differential expression of CTR1 was
found to be regulated in response to extracellular copper
concentrations (data not shown), but not by filamentation pathways.
Growth media are indicated as YPD (Y), YPD + serum
(S), and Lee's medium (L).
|
|

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Northern analysis shows that Cph2 and Efg1
regulate a common set of differentially regulated genes. Wild type
(SC5314), cph2/cph2 (HLY1921),
cph1/cph1 (JKC19), and
efg1/efg1 (HLC52) strains
were inoculated into YPD (Y), YPD + serum (S), and Lee's
(L) media at 25 °C for yeast growth, or at 37 °C for
hyphal induction. Cells were grown for 3 h in all conditions
except for Lee's medium, where they were grown for 6 h. Strains,
growth conditions, and gene probes are indicated. SAP6
expression patterns in these strains are similar to those of
YJL79, HWP1, ECE1, and HYR1, or
SAP5, respectively (data not shown).
|
|

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Cph1 regulates the same set of differentially
regulated genes. A, the
cph1/cph1 strain displays a
medium-specific defect in filamentation.
cph1/cph1 (JKC19), wild type (SC5314), and
cph1/cph1 + CPH1 (HLY3134)
strains were inoculated into SS medium at 25 °C for yeast growth and
37 °C for hyphal induction. Cells were grown for 6 h and
photographed. B, Northern analysis of the cultures from
panel A. Strains and probes are indicated. C,
Northern analysis of DDR48 and YPL184 in
cph2/cph2 and
efg1/efg1. The same RNA
blot from Fig. 3 was probed with DDR48 and
YPL184. Of the two transcripts that hybridized to the
YPL184 probe, the expression of the smaller transcript is
differentially regulated.
|
|
The partial C. albicans array was then used to compare the
gene expression profiles of the cph1/cph1
mutant strain with a cph1/cph1 strain
carrying the CPH1 overexpression construct, both grown in SS
medium. Analysis of the array data indicated that most of the changes
in gene expression were limited to the same set of differentially
expressed genes identified by clustering analysis in Fig. 2. Northern
blotting of their expression in cph1/cph1, wild type, and CPH1 overexpression strains is shown in Fig.
4B. All of the genes had reduced expression in the
cph1/cph1 mutant versus wild
type. Therefore, Cph1 regulates the expression of the same set of genes
as Cph2 and Efg1. The extent of the transcriptional activation with
CPH1 overexpression varied between the different genes. For
example, CPH1 overproduction activated the expression of
YJL79 dramatically at 25 °C, but did not affect the
expression of ECE1 or HYR1 (Fig. 4B).
This may be a reflection of whether Cph1 has direct binding sites
upstream of the hypha-specific genes, as conserved Ste12 binding motifs
are found upstream of HWP1, YJL79, and
SAP5, but not upstream of HYR1 and
ECE1 by DNA sequence analysis (Table
IV).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table IV
Computational search of potential Cph1-, Efg1-, and Tec1-binding sites
Ste12 and AbaA consensus sequences and E-box sequence were used to
search for potential Cph1-, Tec1-, and Efg1-binding sites in the 1-kb
upstream sequences of hypha-specific genes. The sequences and positions
of putative binding sites found from the search are shown. The expected
random occurrence of a motif in this set of hypha-specific genes is
calculated by multiplying the frequency of its occurrence in 1-kb
upstream sequences of 1000 randomly chosen genes by the number of
hypha-specific genes.
|
|
Two novel genes, DDR48 and YPL184, were
identified as being regulated by Cph1 from the array experiments by
comparing the cph1/cph1 strain with the
strain carrying a CPH1 overexpression construct (Fig. 4C).
DDR48 of S. cerevisiae encodes a stress protein of unknown function. The YPL184 protein product is similar
to Nrd1 (negative regulator of differentiation-conjugation) of S. pombe. The expression level of YPL184 is much lower
than that of previously identified differentially regulated genes, and
would not have been identified with the traditional method of screening cDNA libraries. Interestingly, as with other differentially
expressed genes, DDR48 and YPL184 were also
regulated by Efg1 and Cph2 (Fig. 4C).
From array studies and Northern analyses, we have found that Cph1,
Cph2, and Efg1 regulate the expression of a common set of
differentially expressed genes, including YJL79, HYR1, ECE1, HWP1, ECE99. SAPs5,6, WH11, HSP12, DDR48, and YPL184.
The expression patterns of most of them are associated with hyphal
morphogenesis, rather than with growth conditions (therefore, defined
hypha-specific genes). The expression of some of them, however, did not
show a strict correlation with cell morphogenesis. For example,
ECE99 was expressed in Lee's medium at 25 °C. Similarly,
DDR48 also showed some expression under the same condition.
Interestingly, ECE99 expression was derepressed in
cph1/cph1 mutants. It is
possible that a combination of repression and activation from different pathways can lead to a medium- dependent pattern of
expression. The expression of WH11 and HSP12 can
be viewed as two such examples to an extreme (Fig. 3). They were best
expressed in Lee's medium at room temperature, and Cph1 and Cph2 were
inhibitory to their expression in Lee's medium at 37 °C. In
addition to genes affected by all pathways, we also identified a
pathway-specific gene, EBP1, which was induced in the YPD + serum medium in an Efg1-dependent manner (Fig. 3). From the
partial DNA array, we did not find genes regulated solely by Cph1 or
Cph2. If we extend the scale of the DNA array to include all C. albicans ORFs, or if we include genes with less dramatic changes
in gene expression from our partial array, we may identify genes
specifically regulated by Cph1 or Cph2. Certainly, we also expect to
identify more genes regulated by multiple pathways or by Efg1 alone.
However, even if Cph1 or Cph2 pathway-specific genes are identified,
the fact that multiple signaling pathways regulate the expression of a
common set of differentially expressed genes still stands. Therefore,
our data favors the convergence model. At the same time,
pathway-specific transcriptional regulation may also exist, depending
on growth conditions.
TEC1 Expression Is Regulated by Efg1 and Cph2--
Previously, we
have shown that Cph2 directly regulates the induction of
TEC1 transcription in Lee's medium and that the function of
Cph2 in filamentation is mediated, in part, through Tec1 (34). However,
TEC1 expression is not abolished in the
cph2/cph2 mutant, suggesting additional
regulation of TEC1. Therefore, TEC1 transcription represents a potential convergence point for regulating the expression of differentially expressed genes.
The fact that AbaA expression is under the direct control of StuA in
A. nidulans (36), and that
AbaA/Tec1-binding sites are found in the upstream
regions of all known hypha-specific and serum-induced genes (Table IV),
led us to investigate the possibility that Efg1 may regulate
TEC1 transcription. We examined TEC1 expression
in efg1/efg1 mutants by
Northern analysis. As shown in Fig.
5A, the TEC1
transcript level was diminished in the
efg1/efg1 mutant under
all growth conditions examined. In contrast, the
cph1/cph1 mutant did not affect
TEC1 expression in SS medium (data not shown). This,
together with the fact that EFG1 expression was unchanged in
tec1/tec1 mutant strains (13), suggests that Efg1 regulates TEC1 transcription.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Efg1 regulates TEC1
expression. A, Northern analysis of
TEC1 expression in wild type and
efg1/efg1 strains. The
RNA blot from Fig. 3 was probed with TEC1. B,
TEC1 overexpression partially suppresses the defect of
efg1/efg1 in hyphal
development. Wild type + TEC1 (HLY3214) and
efg1/efg1 + TEC1
(HLY3223) strains were grown on solid SSA medium for 20 h at
30 °C and photographed.
|
|
Ectopic expression of TEC1 only partially suppressed the
defect of efg1/efg1 in
filamentation. Ectopic expression of TEC1 in wild type,
cph1/cph1, and
cph2/cph2 cells formed long hyphal cells
with limited lateral branches, but in
efg1/efg1, cells generated pseudohyphal
cells with many lateral branches like a tree (Fig. 5B).
Therefore, not all of the Efg1 function in hyphal regulation is
mediated through Tec1, consistent with the fact that
efg1/efg1 strains have a much
more severe defect in hyphal development than tec1/tec1 strains (13). In
addition to regulating the TEC1 expression level, Efg1 may
regulate the transcription of differentially expressed genes directly,
as Efg1 has been shown to bind to two E-box sequences upstream of
ALS8 (29).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Convergent Regulation of Differentially Expressed Genes by Multiple
Filamentation Pathways--
Our data support a model in which
different hyphal signaling pathways can respond to each specific medium
or growth condition, and they converge to regulate a common set of
differentially expressed genes (Fig. 6).
Each pathway may also activate the transcription of pathway-specific
genes, and their expression is likely medium-dependent. This model is in agreement with the "network control" model from Braun and Johnson (23), where they proposed that, rather than using a
central processor, which integrates signals from different pathways to
regulate all differentially expressed genes, C. albicans uses a network of connections between regulatory pathways and downstream genes. But unlike the network control model, which stresses the differences in genes regulated by each pathway and suggests that distinct types of filaments and genes are induced in
response to different inducing conditions, our model emphasizes convergent regulation by multiple signaling pathways.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Multiple pathways converge at different
points to regulate differentially expressed genes.
Arrows represent transcriptional regulation.
|
|
The discovery of a liquid medium in which the
cph1/cph1 mutant displays a defect in
hyphal formation is a key to establishing the convergence model.
Several previous reports have failed to identify the effects of
cph1/cph1 mutants on the transcription of
the differentially regulated genes in other hyphal inducing media (23,
33), and therefore, have concluded that Cph1 regulates genes that are
different from those regulated by Efg1. By using an appropriate medium
for the cph1/cph1 and CPH1
overexpression strains, we have shown that Cph1 regulates the same
differentially regulated genes that are under the control of Efg1.
Potential Mechanisms for the Observed Convergence in
Transcriptional Regulation by Multiple Signaling Pathways--
We show
TEC1 expression is regulated by Efg1 and Cph2. Thus, the
regulation of TEC1 transcription provides one example of how
C. albicans cells can integrate two different upstream
signals into a single downstream output. Another logical convergence
point is at the promoters of the regulated genes, analogous to the
convergent regulation of FLO11 transcription by the MAP
kinase pathway and cAMP pathway in S. cerevisiae (46). In
addition, synergistic activation by cooperative interaction between
hyphal regulators of different pathways at the promoters of
hypha-specific genes may happen during filamentation since many of the
hypha-specific genes are induced over 100-fold during filamentation.
Cooperative transcriptional regulation has been reported between Ste12
and Tec1 in regulating filamentation responsive elements in S. cerevisiae (47), as well as between Max and TEF-1, a mammalian
member of the TEA/ATTS transcription family, in
activating MCAT1 elements of muscle-specific genes (48). By homology,
Cph1 and Tec1, or Cph2 and Tec1 may also act cooperatively to regulate
hypha-specific genes in C. albicans. Combinatorial control
not only allows cells to integrate signals from two pathways, but can
also increase the specificity of the target genes. This may explain why
the DNA binding sequences for many of the hyphal regulators are not highly overrepresented in the promoters of hypha-specific genes. As
shown in Table IV, the frequencies of E-box sequences, which have been
shown to be recognized by Efg1 (29), are similar between upstream
regions of hypha-specific genes and 1000 randomly chosen genes. Another
potential level of convergence is through complicated pathway
cross-talk. The fact that more genes regulated by multiple pathways
have been identified than pathway-specific genes implies the existence
of cross-talk between different pathways.
Convergent Regulation of Virulence Genes by Multiple Filamentation
Signaling Pathways: An in Vitro Model for Candidal Virulence in
Vivo--
The virulence factors examined so far are all regulated by
multiple filamentation signaling pathways. We have discovered that Efg1, Cph2, and Cph1 all regulate the expression of SAP5 and
SAP6, which may be important for the organism to invade and
damage the oral epithelium, and are present at sites of oropharyngeal
candidiasis in humans (49). The filamentation signaling pathways
examined so far all regulate the expression of HWP1, whose
product is important for the adherence of C. albicans cells
to oral epithelial cells (30). All pathways that were analyzed also
affected the transcription of YJL79 and ECE99
(also known as RBT4 and RBT1), which are
important for the virulence of C. albicans in two animal
models examined (25). Interestingly, other Tup1-repressed genes are not
regulated by Efg1 and Cph1, and they are not required for virulence
either. Therefore, many genes that are regulated by multiple
filamentation signaling pathways are likely to encode important
virulence factors. This pattern of transcriptional regulation may have
important implications for how C. albicans cells can thrive
in the varied microenvironments of the host. They may have implemented
a convergent regulatory system to ensure that the genes whose products
enable the organism to invade and injure host cells in specific
microenvironments of the host during specific phases of infection are
expressed at appropriate levels. In bacterial pathogens, such as
Salmonella and Listeria, the expression of many
key virulence factors is known to be tightly regulated (50-52), and
they are only expressed in certain host cells under specific
conditions. It is possible that C. albicans controls the
expression of its most important virulence factors with multiple
signaling pathways to ensure its survival in a variety of host environments.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Kay Jing for assistance in picking
oligo sequencess for PCR reactions, Wes Hatfield for providing the
ArrayVision software, Suzanne Sandmeyer and Tony Long for helpful
discussions, Scott Filler for comments, and the C. albicans
Genome Sequencing project at Stanford for sequence information.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by Burroughs Wellcome,
University of California Universitywide AIDS Research Program Grant R00-1-058, and National Institutes of Health Grant GM55155.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Predoctoral fellow of a National Institutes of Health
Carcinogenesis Training grant.
¶
Current address: Human Genome Sciences, 9410 Key West Ave.,
Rockville, MD 20850-3338.
Predoctoral fellow of a training grant from the University of
California Systemwide Biotechnology Research and Education program.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
949-824-1137; Fax: 949-824-2688; E-mail: h4liu@uci.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 10, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M104484200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
SS, synthetic succinate;
PCR, polymerase
chain reaction;
ORF, open reading frame.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Powderly, W. G.,
Mayer, K. H.,
and Perfect, J. R.
(1999)
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
15,
1405-1412
|
| 2.
|
Brown, A. J.,
and Gow, N. A.
(1999)
Trends Microbiol.
7,
333-338
|
| 3.
|
Lo, H. J.,
Kohler, J. R.,
DiDomenico, B.,
Loebenberg, D.,
Cacciapuoti, A.,
and Fink, G. R.
(1997)
Cell
90,
939-949
|
| 4.
|
Leberer, E.,
Ziegelbauer, K.,
Schmidt, A.,
Harcus, D.,
Dignard, D.,
Ash, J.,
Johnson, L.,
and Thomas, D. Y.
(1997)
Curr. Biol.
7,
539-546
|
| 5.
|
Gale, C. A.,
Bendel, C. A.,
McClellan, M.,
Hauser, M.,
Becker, J. M.,
Berman, J.,
and Hostetter, M. K.
(1998)
Science
279,
1355-1358
|
| 6.
|
Liu, H.,
Kohler, J.,
and Fink, G. R.
(1994)
Science
266,
1723-1726
|
| 7.
|
Kohler, J. R.,
and Fink, G. R.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13223-13228
|
| 8.
|
Leberer, E.,
Harcus, D.,
Broadbent, I. D.,
Clark, K. L.,
Dignard, D.,
Ziegelbauer, K.,
Schmidt, A.,
Gow, N. A.,
Brown, A. J.,
and Thomas, D. Y.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13217-13222
|
| 9.
|
Csank, C.,
Schroppel, K.,
Leberer, E.,
Harcus, D.,
Mohamed, O.,
Meloche, S.,
Thomas, D. Y.,
and Whiteway, M.
(1998)
Infect. Immun.
66,
2713-2721
|
| 10.
|
Stoldt, V. R.,
Sonneborn, A.,
Leuker, C. E.,
and Ernst, J. F.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
1982-1991
|
| 11.
|
Sonneborn, A.,
Bockmuhl, D. P.,
Gerads, M.,
Kurpanek, K.,
Sanglard, D.,
and Ernst, J. F.
(2000)
Mol. Microbiol.
35,
386-396
|
| 12.
|
Bockmuhl, D. P.,
and Ernst, J. F.
(2001)
Genetics
157,
1523-1530
|
| 13.
|
Schweizer, A.,
Rupp, S.,
Taylor, B. N.,
Rollinghoff, M.,
and Schroppel, K.
(2000)
Mol. Microbiol.
38,
435-445
|
| 14.
|
Brown, D. H., Jr.,
Giusani, A. D.,
Chen, X.,
and Kumamoto, C. A.
(1999)
Mol. Microbiol.
34,
651-662
|
| 15.
|
El Barkani, A.,
Kurzai, O.,
Fonzi, W. A.,
Ramon, A.,
Porta, A.,
Frosch, M.,
and Muhlschlegel, F. A.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
4635-4647
|
| 16.
|
Wilson, R. B.,
Davis, D.,
and Mitchell, A. P.
(1999)
J. Bacteriol.
181,
1868-1874
|
| 17.
|
Ramon, A. M.,
Porta, A.,
and Fonzi, W. A.
(1999)
J. Bacteriol.
181,
7524-7530
|
| 18.
|
Davis, D.,
Wilson, R. B.,
and Mitchell, A. P.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
971-978
|
| 19.
|
Braun, B. R.,
and Johnson, A. D.
(1997)
Science
277,
105-109
|
| 20.
|
Kadosh, D.,
and Johnson, A. D.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
2496-2505
|
| 21.
|
Khalaf, R. A.,
and Zitomer, R. S.
(2001)
Genetics
157,
1503-1512
|
| 22.
|
Murad, A. M. A.,
Leng, P.,
Straffon, M.,
Wishart, J.,
Macaskill, S.,
MacCallum, D.,
Schnell, N.,
Talibi, D.,
Marechal, D.,
Tekaia, F.,
d'Enfert, C.,
Gaillardin, C.,
Odds, F. C.,
and Brown, A. J. P.
(2001)
EMBO J.
20,
4742-4752
|
| 23.
|
Braun, B. R.,
and Johnson, A. D.
(2000)
Genetics
155,
57-67
|
| 24.
|
Birse, C. E.,
Irwin, M. Y.,
Fonzi, W. A.,
and Sypherd, P. S.
(1993)
Infect. Immun.
61,
3648-3655
|
| 25.
|
Braun, B. R.,
Head, W. S.,
Wang, M. X.,
and Johnson, A. D.
(2000)
Genetics
156,
31-44
|
| 26.
|
Staab, J. F.,
and Sundstrom, P.
(1998)
Yeast
14,
681-686
|
| 27.
|
Bailey, D. A.,
Feldmann, P. J.,
Bovey, M.,
Gow, N. A.,
and Brown, A. J.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
5353-5360
|
| 28.
|
Hoyer, L. L.,
Payne, T. L.,
Bell, M.,
Myers, A. M.,
and Scherer, S.
(1998)
Curr. Genet.
33,
451-459
|
| 29.
|
Leng, P.,
Lee, P. R.,
Wu, H.,
and Brown, A. J.
(2001)
J. Bacteriol.
183,
4090-4093
|
| 30.
|
Staab, J. F.,
Bradway, S. D.,
Fidel, P. L.,
and Sundstrom, P.
(1999)
Science
283,
1535-1538
|
| 31.
|
Hube, B.,
Monod, M.,
Schofield, D. A.,
Brown, A. J.,
and Gow, N. A.
(1994)
Mol. Microbiol.
14,
87-99
|
| 32.
|
Schaller, M.,
Korting, H. C.,
Schafer, W.,
Bastert, J.,
Chen, W.,
and Hube, B.
(1999)
Mol. Microbiol.
34,
169-180
|
| 33.
|
Sharkey, L. L.,
McNemar, M. D.,
Saporito-Irwin, S. M.,
Sypherd, P. S.,
and Fonzi, W. A.
(1999)
J. Bacteriol.
181,
5273-5279
|
| 34.
|
Lane, S.,
Zhou, S.,
Pan, T.,
Dai, Q.,
and Liu, H.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
6418-6428
|
| 35.
|
Schroppel, K.,
Sprosser, K.,
Whiteway, M.,
Thomas, D. Y.,
Rollinghoff, M.,
and Csank, C.
(2000)
Infect. Immun.
68,
7159-7161
|
| 36.
|
Miller, K. Y.,
Wu, J.,
and Miller, B. L.
(1992)
Genes Dev.
6,
1770-1782
|
| 37.
|
Delbruck, S.,
and Ernst, J. F.
(1993)
Mol. Microbiol.
10,
859-866
|
| 38.
|
Eisen, M. B.,
Spellman, P. T.,
Brown, P. O.,
and Botstein, D.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
14863-14868
|
| 39.
|
Srikantha, T.,
Morrow, B.,
Schroppel, K.,
and Soll, D. R.
(1995)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
246,
342-352
|
| 40.
|
Sonneborn, A.,
Tebarth, B.,
and Ernst, J. F.
(1999)
Infect. Immun.
67,
4655-4660
|
| 41.
|
Buckman, J.,
and Miller, S. M.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
14326-14336
|
| 42.
|
Cook, J. G.,
Bardwell, L.,
and Thorner, J.
(1997)
Nature
390,
85-88
|
| 43.
|
Madhani, H. D.,
Styles, C. A.,
and Fink, G. R.
(1997)
Cell
91,
673-684
|
| 44.
|
Pi, H.,
Chien, C. T.,
and Fields, S.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
6410-6418
|
| 45.
|
Olson, K. A.,
Nelson, C.,
Tai, G.,
Hung, W.,
Yong, C.,
Astell, C.,
and Sadowski, I.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
4199-4209
|
| 46.
|
Rupp, S.,
Summers, E.,
Lo, H. J.,
Madhani, H.,
and Fink, G.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
1257-1269
|
| 47.
|
Madhani, H. D.,
and Fink, G. R.
(1997)
Science
275,
1314-1317
|
| 48.
|
Gupta, M. P.,
Amin, C. S.,
Gupta, M.,
Hay, N.,
and Zak, R.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
3924-3936
|
| 49.
|
Naglik, J. R.,
Newport, G.,
White, T. C.,
Fernandes-Naglik, L. L.,
Greenspan, J. S.,
Greenspan, D.,
Sweet, S. P.,
Challacombe, S. J.,
and Agabian, N.
(1999)
Infect. Immun.
67,
2482-2490
|
| 50.
|
Marcus, S. L.,
Brumell, J. H.,
Pfeifer, C. G.,
and Finlay, B. B.
(2000)
Microbes. Infect.
2,
145-156
|
| 51.
|
Pfeifer, C. G.,
Marcus, S. L.,
Steele-Mortimer, O.,
Knodler, L. A.,
and Finlay, B. B.
(1999)
Infect. Immun.
67,
5690-5698
|
| 52.
|
Bubert, A.,
Sokolovic, Z.,
Chun, S. K.,
Papatheodorou, L.,
Simm, A.,
and Goebel, W.
(1999)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
261,
323-336
|
| 53.
|
Fonzi, W. A.,
and Irwin, M. Y.
(1993)
Genetics
134,
717-728
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Stichternoth and J. F. Ernst
Hypoxic Adaptation by Efg1 Regulates Biofilm Formation by Candida albicans
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
June 1, 2009;
75(11):
3663 - 3672.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Trunk, P. Gendron, A. Nantel, S. Lemieux, T. Roemer, and M. Raymond
Depletion of the Cullin Cdc53p Induces Morphogenetic Changes in Candida albicans
Eukaryot. Cell,
May 1, 2009;
8(5):
756 - 767.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Hao, C. J. Clancy, S. Cheng, S. B. Raman, K. A. Iczkowski, and M. H. Nguyen
Candida albicans RFX2 Encodes a DNA Binding Protein Involved in DNA Damage Responses, Morphogenesis, and Virulence
Eukaryot. Cell,
April 1, 2009;
8(4):
627 - 639.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. L. Chaffin
Candida albicans Cell Wall Proteins
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,
September 1, 2008;
72(3):
495 - 544.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-S. Bahn, M. Molenda, J. F. Staab, C. A. Lyman, L. J. Gordon, and P. Sundstrom
Genome-Wide Transcriptional Profiling of the Cyclic AMP-Dependent Signaling Pathway during Morphogenic Transitions of Candida albicans
Eukaryot. Cell,
December 1, 2007;
6(12):
2376 - 2390.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Wolyniak and P. Sundstrom
Role of Actin Cytoskeletal Dynamics in Activation of the Cyclic AMP Pathway and HWP1 Gene Expression in Candida albicans
Eukaryot. Cell,
October 1, 2007;
6(10):
1824 - 1840.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Zhao, R. Mehrabi, and J.-R. Xu
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathways and Fungal Pathogenesis
Eukaryot. Cell,
October 1, 2007;
6(10):
1701 - 1714.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. D. Vinces and C. A. Kumamoto
The morphogenetic regulator Czf1p is a DNA-binding protein that regulates white opaque switching in Candida albicans
Microbiology,
September 1, 2007;
153(9):
2877 - 2884.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Wang and P. J. Szaniszlo
WdStuAp, an APSES Transcription Factor, Is a Regulator of Yeast-Hyphal Transitions in Wangiella (Exophiala) dermatitidis
Eukaryot. Cell,
September 1, 2007;
6(9):
1595 - 1605.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Biswas, P. Van Dijck, and A. Datta
Environmental Sensing and Signal Transduction Pathways Regulating Morphopathogenic Determinants of Candida albicans
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,
June 1, 2007;
71(2):
348 - 376.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. E. Jackson, B. M. Mitchell, and K. R. Wilhelmus
Corneal Virulence of Candida albicans Strains Deficient in Tup1-Regulated Genes
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
June 1, 2007;
48(6):
2535 - 2539.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Argimon, J. A. Wishart, R. Leng, S. Macaskill, A. Mavor, T. Alexandris, S. Nicholls, A. W. Knight, B. Enjalbert, R. Walmsley, et al.
Developmental Regulation of an Adhesin Gene during Cellular Morphogenesis in the Fungal Pathogen Candida albicans
Eukaryot. Cell,
April 1, 2007;
6(4):
682 - 692.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q.-M. Shi, Y.-M. Wang, X.-D. Zheng, R. Teck Ho Lee, and Y. Wang
Critical Role of DNA Checkpoints in Mediating Genotoxic-Stress-induced Filamentous Growth in Candida albicans
Mol. Biol. Cell,
March 1, 2007;
18(3):
815 - 826.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Wang, S. Lane, Z. Tian, A. Sharon, I. Hazan, and H. Liu
Temporal and Spatial Control of HGC1 Expression Results in Hgc1 Localization to the Apical Cells of Hyphae in Candida albicans
Eukaryot. Cell,
February 1, 2007;
6(2):
253 - 261.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Zhao, J. C. Panepinto, J. R. Fortwendel, L. Fox, B. G. Oliver, D. S. Askew, and J. C. Rhodes
Deletion of the Regulatory Subunit of Protein Kinase A in Aspergillus fumigatus Alters Morphology, Sensitivity to Oxidative Damage, and Virulence.
Infect. Immun.,
August 1, 2006;
74(8):
4865 - 4874.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Cao, S. Lane, P. P. Raniga, Y. Lu, Z. Zhou, K. Ramon, J. Chen, and H. Liu
The Flo8 Transcription Factor Is Essential for Hyphal Development and Virulence in Candida albicans
Mol. Biol. Cell,
January 1, 2006;
17(1):
295 - 307.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Sohn, M. Roehm, C. Urban, N. Saunders, D. Rothenstein, F. Lottspeich, K. Schroppel, H. Brunner, and S. Rupp
Identification and Characterization of Cor33p, a Novel Protein Implicated in Tolerance towards Oxidative Stress in Candida albicans
Eukaryot. Cell,
December 1, 2005;
4(12):
2160 - 2169.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Cheng, C. J. Clancy, M. A. Checkley, Z. Zhang, K. L. Wozniak, K. R. Seshan, H. Y. Jia, P. Fidel Jr, G. Cole, and M. H. Nguyen
The Role of Candida albicans NOT5 in Virulence Depends upon Diverse Host Factors In Vivo
Infect. Immun.,
November 1, 2005;
73(11):
7190 - 7197.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Zhao, K. J. Daniels, S. R. Lockhart, K. M. Yeater, L. L. Hoyer, and D. R. Soll
Unique Aspects of Gene Expression during Candida albicans Mating and Possible G1 Dependency
Eukaryot. Cell,
July 1, 2005;
4(7):
1175 - 1190.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Bassilana, J. Hopkins, and R. A. Arkowitz
Regulation of the Cdc42/Cdc24 GTPase Module during Candida albicans Hyphal Growth
Eukaryot. Cell,
March 1, 2005;
4(3):
588 - 603.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Noble and A. D. Johnson
Strains and Strategies for Large-Scale Gene Deletion Studies of the Diploid Human Fungal Pathogen Candida albicans
Eukaryot. Cell,
February 1, 2005;
4(2):
298 - 309.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Forche, G. May, and P. T. Magee
Demonstration of Loss of Heterozygosity by Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Microarray Analysis and Alterations in Strain Morphology in Candida albicans Strains during Infection
Eukaryot. Cell,
January 1, 2005;
4(1):
156 - 165.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. B. Herrero, P. Magnelli, M. K. Mansour, S. M. Levitz, H. Bussey, and C. Abeijon
KRE5 Gene Null Mutant Strains of Candida albicans Are Avirulent and Have Altered Cell Wall Composition and Hypha Formation Properties
Eukaryot. Cell,
December 1, 2004;
3(6):
1423 - 1432.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Doedt, S. Krishnamurthy, D. P. Bockmuhl, B. Tebarth, C. Stempel, C. L. Russell, A. J.P. Brown, and J. F. Ernst
APSES Proteins Regulate Morphogenesis and Metabolism in Candida albicans
Mol. Biol. Cell,
July 1, 2004;
15(7):
3167 - 3180.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. L. vandenBerg, A. S. Ibrahim, J. E. Edwards Jr., K. A. Toenjes, and D. I. Johnson
Cdc42p GTPase Regulates the Budded-to-Hyphal-Form Transition and Expression of Hypha-Specific Transcripts in Candida albicans
Eukaryot. Cell,
June 1, 2004;
3(3):
724 - 734.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Lotz, K. Sohn, H. Brunner, F. A. Muhlschlegel, and S. Rupp
RBR1, a Novel pH-Regulated Cell Wall Gene of Candida albicans, Is Repressed by RIM101 and Activated by NRG1
Eukaryot. Cell,
June 1, 2004;
3(3):
776 - 784.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Staib, A. Binder, M. Kretschmar, T. Nichterlein, K. Schroppel, and J. Morschhauser
Tec1p-Independent Activation of a Hypha-Associated Candida albicans Virulence Gene during Infection
Infect. Immun.,
April 1, 2004;
72(4):
2386 - 2389.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. E. Krueger, A. K. Ghosh, B. P. Krom, and R. L. Cihlar
Deletion of the NOT4 gene impairs hyphal development and pathogenicity in Candida albicans
Microbiology,
January 1, 2004;
150(1):
229 - 240.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. F. Staab, Y.-S. Bahn, and P. Sundstrom
Integrative, multifunctional plasmids for hypha-specific or constitutive expression of green fluorescent protein in Candida albicans
Microbiology,
October 1, 2003;
149(10):
2977 - 2986.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Naglik, S. J. Challacombe, and B. Hube
Candida albicans Secreted Aspartyl Proteinases in Virulence and Pathogenesis
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,
September 1, 2003;
67(3):
400 - 428.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. C. Korting, B. Hube, S. Oberbauer, E. Januschke, G. Hamm, A. Albrecht, C. Borelli, and M. Schaller
Reduced expression of the hyphal-independent Candida albicans proteinase genes SAP1 and SAP3 in the efg1 mutant is associated with attenuated virulence during infection of oral epithelium
J. Med. Microbiol.,
August 1, 2003;
52(8):
623 - 632.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. T. Magee, C. Gale, J. Berman, and D. Davis
Molecular Genetic and Genomic Approaches to the Study of Medically Important Fungi
Infect. Immun.,
May 1, 2003;
71(5):
2299 - 2309.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Bachewich, D. Y. Thomas, and M. Whiteway
Depletion of a Polo-like Kinase in Candida albicans Activates Cyclase-dependent Hyphal-like Growth
Mol. Biol. Cell,
May 1, 2003;
14(5):
2163 - 2180.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Newport, A. Kuo, A. Flattery, C. Gill, J. J. Blake, M. B. Kurtz, G. K. Abruzzo, and N. Agabian
Inactivation of Kex2p Diminishes the Virulence of Candida albicans
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 10, 2003;
278(3):
1713 - 1720.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. K. Mukherjee, J. Chandra, D. M. Kuhn, and M. A. Ghannoum
Differential expression of Candida albicans phospholipase B (PLB1) under various environmental and physiological conditions
Microbiology,
January 1, 2003;
149(1):
261 - 267.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. S. Bensen, S. G. Filler, and J. Berman
A Forkhead Transcription Factor Is Important for True Hyphal as well as Yeast Morphogenesis in Candida albicans
Eukaryot. Cell,
October 1, 2002;
1(5):
787 - 798.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Nantel, D. Dignard, C. Bachewich, D. Harcus, A. Marcil, A.-P. Bouin, C. W. Sensen, H. Hogues, M. van het Hoog, P. Gordon, et al.
Transcription Profiling of Candida albicans Cells Undergoing the Yeast-to-Hyphal Transition
Mol. Biol. Cell,
October 1, 2002;
13(10):
3452 - 3465.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|