|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M105192200 on October 11, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 52, 49053-49060, December 28, 2001
MDR1 P-glycoprotein Reduces Influx of Substrates
without Affecting Membrane Potential*
Gary D.
Luker §,
Thomas P.
Flagg¶,
Qun
Sha¶ ,
Kathryn E.
Luker §,
Christina M.
Pica §,
Colin G.
Nichols¶, and
David
Piwnica-Worms §**
From the Molecular Imaging Center, Mallinckrodt
Institute of Radiology, and the Departments of § Molecular
Biology and Pharmacology and ¶ Cell Biology and Physiology,
Washington University School of Medicine,
St. Louis, Missouri 63110
Received for publication, June 6, 2001, and in revised form, August 27, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
MDR1
(multidrug resistance)
P-glycoprotein (Pgp; ABCB1) decreases intracellular concentrations of
structurally diverse drugs. Although Pgp is generally thought to be an
efflux transporter, the mechanism of action remains elusive. To
determine whether Pgp confers drug resistance through changes in
transmembrane potential (Em) or ion conductance, we
studied electrical currents and drug transport in Pgp-negative MCF-7
cells and MCF-7/MDR1 stable transfectants that were
established and maintained without chemotherapeutic drugs. Although
Em and total membrane conductance did not differ
between MCF-7 and MCF-7/MDR1 cells, Pgp reduced
unidirectional influx and steady-state cellular content of
Tc-Sestamibi, a substrate for MDR1 Pgp, without
affecting unidirectional efflux of substrate from cells. Depolarization
of membrane potentials with various concentrations of extracellular
K+ in the presence of valinomycin did not inhibit the
ability of Pgp to reduce intracellular concentration of Tc-Sestamibi,
strongly suggesting that the drug transport activity of
MDR1 Pgp is independent of changes in
Em or total ion conductance. Tetraphenyl borate, a
lipophilic anion, enhanced unidirectional influx of Tc-Sestamibi to a
greater extent in MCF-7/MDR1 cells than in control cells,
suggesting that Pgp may, directly or indirectly, increase the positive
dipole potential within the plasma membrane bilayer. Overall, these
data demonstrate that changes in Em or macroscopic
conductance are not coupled with function of Pgp in multidrug
resistance. The dominant effect of MDR1 Pgp in this system
is reduction of drug influx, possibly through an increase in
intramembranous dipole potential.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
MDR1 P-glycoprotein
(Pgp),1 a member of the
ATP-binding cassette family of membrane transporters, decreases
intracellular concentrations of structurally diverse compounds, many of
which are hydrophobic and cationic. Conventionally, Pgp is thought to
function as an efflux transporter, although it is unclear whether any
experiment has demonstrated unequivocally that Pgp mediates transport
of a substrate across a membrane bilayer against its electrochemical gradient.
Several models have been proposed to account for the apparent function
and remarkable variety of compounds that are recognized by this
protein. Pgp may be an efflux transporter that recognizes substrates
within the lipid bilayer ("hydrophobic vacuum cleaner") (1). Pgp
has been hypothesized to be a pump with multiple binding sites for
different drugs (2), a translocase for lipids (3), or a modifier of
vesicular trafficking (4). Another model suggests that MDR1
Pgp indirectly alters partitioning of substrates within cells through
effects on transmembrane potential (Em), intracellular pH, and/or surface potentials and does not directly transport drugs (5). These disparate hypotheses may result from
comparisons of data from transfected cells that have not been exposed
to chemotherapeutic agents with cell lines in which expression of
MDR1 is induced or maintained through exposure to drugs in
the MDR phenotype. Pathways of resistance other than Pgp may exist in
drug-selected cell lines, potentially confounding identification of
properties attributable solely to MDR1. In addition, many
studies have used "Pgp-negative" control cells that later were
shown to express low levels of endogenous Pgp, further complicating interpretations regarding function of the protein itself.
We investigated MDR1 Pgp transport activity
using MCF-7 breast adenocarcinoma cells, which do not express
MDR1 (6), and MCF-7/MDR1 cells in which we
established and maintained overexpression of MDR1 using a
bicistronic vector in the absence of MDR drugs. Effects of Pgp on
Em were measured directly by whole-cell patch
clamping, and transport activity of the protein was studied with
Tc-Sestamibi, an organotechnetium cationic substrate for Pgp (7, 8). In
the absence of MDR1 Pgp, Tc-Sestamibi accumulates within the
mitochondrial matrix of living cells in response to negative
mitochondrial inner membrane potentials ( ) and
Em while showing negligible nonspecific binding to
lipids and proteins (9-11). Tc-Sestamibi has no titratable proton,
making accumulation within cells independent of intracellular pH (8,
12). Using this system, we determined the effects of MDR1
Pgp on substrate content under steady-state and unidirectional influx
or efflux conditions. As proposed over 25 years ago (13), we found that the dominant effect of Pgp is to establish a permeability barrier, limiting unidirectional influx of Tc-Sestamibi without affecting Em.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials and Buffers--
Stock solutions of GF120918 (a
substituted isoquinolinylacridone carboxamide; gift of Glaxo Welcome)
(14), LY335979 (a difluorocyclopropyldibenzosuberane; gift of Lilly)
(15), tetraphenyl borate (TPB), and valinomycin were prepared in
Me2SO. 99mTc-Sestamibi
(99mTc-labeled hexakis(2-methoxyisobutylisonitrile),
Cardiolite, DuPont Medical Products Division, Billerica, MA) was
prepared as described (12). [3H]Daunomycin (1.9 Ci/mmol)
was obtained from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. G418 was from Life
Technologies, Inc. Trace metal-grade nitric acid was from Fisher. All
other reagents were from Sigma.
The control solution for transport experiments was a modified Earle's
balanced salt solution (MEBSS) containing 145 mM
Na+, 5.4 mM K+, 1.2 mM
Ca2+, 0.8 mM Mg2+, 152 mM Cl , 0.8 mM
H2PO , 0.8 mM
SO , 5.6 mM dextrose, 4.0 mM HEPES, and 1% calf serum, pH 7.4 (12). Calf serum was
omitted for all electrophysiology experiments. A solution of 142 mM K+ and 20 mM Cl
was prepared by equimolar replacement of potassium methanesulfonate for
NaCl (16).
Cell Culture, MDR1 Plasmid, and Transfection--
MCF-7 cells
were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Life
Technologies, Inc.), 10% fetal bovine serum, and 0.1% penicillin/streptomycin in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C.
pGEM3Zf( )Xba-MDR1.1 was purchased from American Type
Culture Collection and sequenced to confirm wild-type identity.
MDR1 was excised with XbaI and subcloned into
pBluescript SK (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The cDNA for
MDR1 was then removed with NotI and
BamHI and ligated into the corresponding sites of pIRESneo
(CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA). Cells were transfected
with MDR1 or vector using FuGene 6 (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals). Clones of transfected cells were isolated and maintained
in medium containing 1 mg/ml G418. Drug-sensitive (Pgp-negative) KB 3-1 and MDR (Pgp-positive) KB 8-5 human epidermoid carcinoma cells were
grown and maintained as described (17).
Western Blots--
Pgp was detected in enriched membrane
fractions of cells with monoclonal antibody C219 (Signet Laboratories,
Inc., Dedham, MA) as described previously by our laboratory
(17).
Immunofluorescence Microscopy--
Cells were processed for
immunofluorescence microscopy with monoclonal antibody C219 as
described for detection of Pgp in KB 8-5 and Chinese hamster ovary
cells (18).
Cytotoxicity Assay--
72-h cytotoxicity assays with daunomycin
and paclitaxel were performed using sulforhodamine B (19). Data are
expressed as percent growth relative to cells treated with vehicle only.
Electrophysiology--
Whole-cell current-clamp or voltage-clamp
experiments were carried out at room temperature using an Axopatch 200B
amplifier (20). Micropipettes were pulled from thin-walled glass (WPI Inc., New Haven, CT) on a horizontal puller (Sutter Instrument Co.,
Novato, CA). Two different solutions were used in pipettes: KINT solution 1 contained 140 mM KCl, 10 mM K-HEPES, and 1 mM K-EGTA, pH 7.35 with KOH;
and KINT solution 2 contained 140 mM KCl, 10 mM Na-HEPES, 1 mM K-EGTA, and 2 mM
MgATP, pH 7.35 with KOH (10 8 to 10 9
M free Ca2+). The bath solution was serum-free
MEBSS without or with drugs as indicated. pClamp Version 6.0 software
and a DigiData 1200 converter were used to generate command pulses and
collect data. Data were filtered at 5 kHz. Off-line analysis was
performed using ClampFit and Microsoft Excel programs. Current-voltage
relationships were generated from steady-state currents at 300 ms. Data
are presented as means ± S.E.
Cellular Accumulation of 99mTc-Sestamibi or
[3H]Daunomycin--
Transport function and modulation of
MDR1 Pgp under steady-state conditions were assayed with
99mTc-Sestamibi (12). Transport assays with
99mTc-Sestamibi were performed within 3 days of all
electrophysiology experiments to confirm functional expression of Pgp
in MCF-7/MDR1 cells. To determine unidirectional influx of
99mTc-Sestamibi or [3H]daunomycin during
short periods of incubation ( 90 s), the protocol was modified as
follows. 1) The concentrations of 99mTc-Sestamibi and
[3H]daunomycin were 40 µCi/ml (5-10 pmol/mCi) and 0.2 µCi/ml (1.9 Ci/mmol), respectively; and 2) coverslips with cells were
washed four times with ice-cold MEBSS. Cell-associated tracer is
expressed as fmol/mg of cell protein/nMo, where
cell content of Tc-Sestamibi or daunomycin (fmol) was normalized to mg
of cell protein and extracellular concentration of tracer
(nMo).
For efflux experiments, cells were first incubated for 30 min at
37 °C in MEBSS containing 10 µCi/ml 99mTc-Sestamibi to
reach steady-state accumulation of radiotracer (12). Coverslips were
blotted briefly ( 5 s) to remove excess buffer, transferred to
isotope-free MEBSS (37 °C) for various times, and then washed with
ice-cold MEBSS. To measure steady-state content of
99mTc-Sestamibi prior to efflux, incubation in isotope-free
buffer was omitted. Accumulation of Tc-Sestamibi was quantified as
described above and is expressed as a percentage of steady-state values for each cell line.
Intracellular Water Space--
Volumes of intracellular water
space were determined with
3-O-[3H]methyl-D-glucose and
phloretin (21). Data are expressed as µl of intracellular water
space/mg of cell protein.
Intracellular K+ Concentration--
Cells were
plated as described above for accumulation of
99mTc-Sestamibi. Coverslips without cells were incubated in
the same medium for use as controls, and values for these blank
coverslips were subtracted from data for samples with cells. Cells were
washed with phosphate-buffered saline prepared without potassium and extracted with 1% nitric acid for 30 min. Samples were microwaved to
prepare for analysis, and each sample run included a 1% nitric acid
solvent blank and an external standard. K+ content was
determined by an inductively coupled plasma atomic emission
spectrometer (IRIS Advantage Duo-View system, Thermo Jarrell Ash,
Franklin, MA) using a method that scanned each sample three times
and provided a data value with 1 level of
confidence.2 Data for µg of
K+ were normalized to mg of cell protein, and intracellular
K+ concentration ([K+]i) in each cell
line was calculated by dividing K+ content by intracellular
water space.
 |
RESULTS |
Characterization of MCF-7/MDR1 Cells--
Because cell lines
derived from stepwise selection with MDR drugs may have multiple
mechanisms of drug resistance (22), we stably transfected MCF-7 cells
with MDR1 and established clonal cell lines that express Pgp
without use of MDR drugs. Pgp was detected specifically by Western
blotting in several different clones that expressed the protein at
levels comparable to or greater than KB 8-5 cells (Fig.
1A), a cell line derived from
selection in colchicine (23). A clone (termed 3-4) with higher amounts of Pgp than in KB 8-5 cells was selected for further characterization. In the remainder of report, this clonal cell line is referred to as
MCF-7/MDR1 cells. Pgp localized predominantly to the plasma membrane in MCF-7/MDR1 cells, as determined by
immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig. 1B). No immunodetectable
Pgp was present in control MCF-7 cells, as determined by Western
blotting or immunofluorescence (Fig. 1A and data not shown).
Function of transfected MDR1 Pgp initially was characterized
with Tc-Sestamibi. Compared with parental cells, steady-state
accumulation of Tc-Sestamibi after 30 min of incubation was almost
70-fold less in MCF-7/MDR1 cells (55 ± 11 versus 0.8 ± 0.1 fmol/mg of cell
protein/nMo, respectively). Radiotracer content in
MDR1 transfectants increased to control values when cells
were incubated with a saturating dose of LY335979 (1 µM)
(Fig. 1C), a specific inhibitor of MDR1 Pgp (15).
LY335979 did not enhance accumulation of Tc-Sestamibi in MCF-7 cells,
providing further evidence that this cell line does not express
MDR1 Pgp (6, 24). Previously, our laboratory has shown that
KB 8-5 cells accumulate ~50-fold less Tc-Sestamibi than Pgp-negative parental KB 3-1 cells (17). Thus, these functional data are consistent
with differences in relative expression of Pgp in MCF-7/MDR1 and KB 8-5 cells. Furthermore, to verify that transfected
MDR1 conferred multidrug resistance to MCF-7/MDR1
cells, we performed 72-h cytotoxicity assays with doxorubicin and
paclitaxel, two validated substrates for Pgp (15, 25). Compared with
control cells, MCF-7/MDR1 cells were also ~100-fold
more resistant to doxorubicin and at least 50-fold more
resistant to paclitaxel, as determined by 72-h cytotoxicity assays
(Fig. 1, D and E). Overall, these data
demonstrate that functional MDR1 Pgp was expressed and
localized correctly, conferring MDR to transfected MCF-7 cells. As
determined by differences in accumulation of Tc-Sestamibi between MCF-7/MDR1 and control cells, function of Pgp was stable
over at least 7 months of continuous culture (data not shown).
Therefore, these matched cell lines provided an appropriate system for
biophysical analysis of MDR1 Pgp without the confounding
effects of prior exposure to MDR drugs.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Expression and function of MDR1
Pgp in MCF-7 cells. A, total membrane
proteins (20 µg) of MCF-7 and clonal cell lines transfected with
MDR1 Pgp were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and immunoblotted for Pgp with monoclonal antibody
C219. Lane 1, MCF-7 cells; lane 2, clone 3-4;
lane 3, KB 8-5 cells; lane 4, clone 2-2;
lane 5, clone 3-5. Based on molecular size markers, the
arrow indicates 170 kDa. B, shown are the results
from immunofluorescence microscopy of MCF-7/MDR1 cells
(colony 3-4 in A) with monoclonal antibody C219 and
secondary antibody labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate.
C, Tc-Sestamibi content in MCF-7 (closed bars)
and MCF-7/MDR1 (open bar) cells was determined
after 30 min of incubation in MEBSS without or with LY335979 (1 µM) as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Data are representative of two independent experiments, with
n = 4 for each condition. Error bars denote
S.E. in this and subsequent figures. mg P, mg of cell
protein. D and E, MCF-7 ( ) and
MCF-7/MDR1 ( ) cells were incubated with increasing
concentrations of doxorubicin (D) or paclitaxel
(E) and harvested after 72 h for determinations of cell
survival as described under "Experimental Procedures." Data are
percent control for n = 3 at each concentration.
|
|
Effects of MDR1 Pgp on Resting Em and Macroscopic
Conductance--
Previous studies suggest that MDR1 Pgp
(26) and other ATP-binding cassette transporters (27) reduce
Em in cells. To determine directly whether
MDR1 Pgp alone affects resting Em, we
compared the electrical properties of the cell lines by conventional whole-cell patch clamping. Using KINT solution 1 (no ATP)
in the pipette and MEBSS in the bath solution, Em
did not differ between cell lines, measuring 36.4 ± 6.0 and
32.9 ± 3.7 mV (n = 7 and 9; p > 0.25) in control and MCF-7/MDR1 cells, respectively (Fig.
2A). Because
ATP-dependent K+ channels have been shown to
influence Em of MCF-7 cells (28), we also determined
Em using a pipette solution (KINT
solution 2) that contained ATP. Em of MCF-7 and MCF-7/MDR1 cells were 42.8 ± 6.6 and 47.6 ± 3.3 mV (n = 3; p > 0.48),
respectively, using KINT solution 2 . For both cell lines, Em was more negative as measured with
KINT solution 2, although differences were significant only
for MCF-7/MDR1 cells (p < 0.01). However,
Em did not differ between control cells and Pgp
transfectants under either experimental condition. In MEBSS, an
~2-log difference in Em would be required to
account for the almost 70-fold reduction of Tc-Sestamibi in the
Pgp-expressing line (Fig. 1), assuming a constant  in both cell
lines. We also did not detect differences in macroscopic currents
between MCF-7/MDR1 and control cells as measured with a
pipette solution of either KINT solution 1 or 2 (Fig. 2,
B and C; and data not shown). Measurements of
Em and macroscopic currents were stable for at least
2 min, implying that the patch clamp did not disrupt membrane integrity
and allow leakage of ions or macromolecules from cells. In addition, no
difference in Em was measured between Pgp-negative
KB 3-1 cells and Pgp-positive KB 8-5 cells (data not shown), for which
colchicine (an MDR drug) was used in the latter to select and maintain
expression of MDR1 Pgp.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
MDR1 Pgp does not alter
Em or macroscopic conductance.
A, mean resting Em in MCF-7 and
MCF-7/MDR1 cells as measured by whole-cell patch clamping
using KINT solution 1 (open bars) or
KINT solution 2 (hatched bars) in the pipette as
described under "Experimental Procedures" and MEBSS as the bath
solution. B, representative families of macroscopic currents
in MCF-7 and MCF-7/MDR1 cells elicited by voltage-clamp
steps from 80 to +80 mV in 20-mV increments. The pipette contained
KINT solution 1. The solid line to the left of
each trace denotes zero current level. C, composite
current-voltage plots of MCF-7 ( , ) and MCF-7/MDR1
( , ) cells with KINT solution 1 ( , ) and
KINT solution 2 ( , ). ATP is present in
KINT solution 2.
|
|
If MDR1 Pgp were to confer MDR through alterations in
Em, specific inhibitors of Pgp should hyperpolarize
Em only in cells that express Pgp. To test this
possibility, whole-cell patch clamping was performed with saturating
doses of either LY335979 (1 µM) or GF120918 (300 nM), another potent inhibitor of MDR1 Pgp (14).
Although these inhibitors blocked drug transport by MDR1 Pgp
within seconds after addition to cells (see below), neither Em nor macroscopic conductance was affected in
either cell line during 2 min of monitoring (data not shown). Overall, the data directly demonstrate that expression of functional
MDR1 Pgp without selection in MDR drugs does not alter basal
Em or membrane conductance.
MDR1 Pgp Affects Accumulation of Tc-Sestamibi Even in the Presence
of Depolarized Membrane Potentials--
To investigate further the
relationship of Pgp to  and Em, we sought to
quantify accumulation of Tc-Sestamibi under conditions in which
membrane potentials were altered by variation of the extracellular
K+ concentration in the presence of valinomycin. Because
expression of a truncated form of MDR1 Pgp in yeast has been
reported to alter [K+]i under selected conditions
(29), we determined [K+]i in both parental and
MCF-7/MDR1 cells. [K+]i was not
affected by expression of MDR1 Pgp: water spaces were
3.3 ± 0.2 and 3.3 ± 0.4 µl/mg of protein
(n = 12), and calculated [K+]i
values were 140 ± 7 and 144 ± 12 mM
(n = 4) for parental and MCF-7/MDR1 cells, respectively.
We performed transport assays with the K+ ionophore
valinomycin added to standard buffer (5.4 mM extracellular
K+) (Fig. 3A).
Because intramitochondrial and cytosolic K+ concentrations
are approximately equal (30), these conditions were predicted to
depolarize  toward zero and to hyperpolarize Em toward the K+ reversal potential. In
MCF-7 cells, radiotracer content decreased from 43.2 ± 4.0 to
2.3 ± 0.6 fmol/mg of cell protein/nMo in the
absence and presence of valinomycin (1 µg/ml), respectively, consistent with depolarization of  as the dominant determinant for reduction of the accumulation of hydrophobic cationic compounds in
these cells (9, 12, 31). Steady-state accumulation of Tc-Sestamibi in
MCF-7/MDR1 cells was 0.8 ± 0.1 fmol/mg of cell protein/nMo and could not be detected above
background when valinomycin was added to 5.4 mM
K+ buffer (threshold of detection of 0.1 fmol/mg of cell
protein/nMo). Addition of GF120918 (300 nM) or LY335979 (1 µM) increased net accumulation of Tc-Sestamibi in MCF-7/MDR1 cells to values
observed in parental cells, whereas control cells were unaffected (Fig. 3A). These results indicate that MDR1 Pgp does
not reduce cell content of Tc-Sestamibi by decreasing steady-state
 .

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Pgp transports Tc-Sestamibi under conditions
that depolarize Em and
 . Tc-Sestamibi content in MCF-7
(closed bars) and MCF-7/MDR1 (open
bars) cells was determined after 30 min in MEBSS containing
valinomycin (1 µg/ml) and either 5.4 mM K+
and 152 mM Cl (A) or 142 mM K+ and 20 mM Cl
(B). Assays were performed without or with saturating
concentrations of GF120918 (300 nM) or LY335979 (1 µM). Data are representative of two independent
experiments, with n = 3 for each condition. mg
P, mg of cell protein.
|
|
To depolarize both Em and  to 0 mV, we
equilibrated [K+]i and extracellular
K+ concentration by incubating cells in 142 mM
K+ and 20 mM Cl buffer containing
valinomycin (1 µg/ml). Cl was reduced to prevent high
KCl buffer-induced increases in cell volume mediated by
K+/Cl cotransporters expressed in mammalian
cells (32). Under isoelectric conditions, steady-state content of
Tc-Sestamibi in MCF-7 cells was reduced to 0.92 ± 0.07 fmol/mg of
cell protein/nMo, which is 2.5-fold less than that
observed in buffer containing 5.4 mM K+ (Fig.
3B). By comparison, accumulation of Tc-Sestamibi in
MCF-7/MDR1 cells was reduced to background levels. Thus,
MDR1 Pgp either transported tracer out of the cells against
a significant concentration gradient to levels well below those
expected for passive distribution into intracellular water space
(calculated as 3.3 fmol/mg of cell protein/nMo) or
produced a diffusion barrier that prevented equilibration of an
inwardly directed concentration gradient for the tracer. When Pgp was
inhibited with GF120918 (300 nM) or LY335979 (1 µM), accumulation of Tc-Sestamibi in
MCF-7/MDR1 cells increased to that observed in MCF-7 cells.
Thus, although these data demonstrate that net content of Tc-Sestamibi
was reduced in fully depolarized cells, MDR1 Pgp lowered
cell content of radiotracer to an amount less than that produced by
reductions in membrane potentials alone.
Effects of MDR1 Pgp on Unidirectional Influx and Efflux of
Substrate--
Steady-state reduction in cell content of Tc-Sestamibi
produced by Pgp could be due to alterations in influx (permeability) and/or efflux (active transport). To determine the relative
contribution of each component, we first quantified cell-associated
Tc-Sestamibi over the initial 90 s of exposure to radiotracer.
Uptake of Tc-Sestamibi in control cells was linear throughout this
period and did not reach steady state until 30 min, indicating that
these early time points represent unidirectional influx of radiotracer
(Fig. 4A). In
MCF-7/MDR1 cells, accumulation of radiotracer reached a
plateau of 1.0 ± 0.04 fmol/mg of cell
protein/nMo at 60 s, a level maintained
throughout 120 min of incubation. At the earliest time point (10 s),
content of Tc-Sestamibi in MCF-7/MDR1 cells was ~7-fold
less than in control cells. Furthermore, the effects of MDR1
Pgp were completely reversed within 10 s by GF120918 (300 nM) or LY335979 (1 µM) (Fig. 4, B
and C), providing additional evidence that MDR1
Pgp markedly reduces influx of Tc-Sestamibi. To determine whether Pgp
also limits unidirectional influx of a different substrate, we measured
net content of daunomycin at time points between 10 and 90 s in
these cells. Similar to Tc-Sestamibi, cell content of daunomycin in
MCF-7/MDR1 cells was less than in control cells at all time
points, although differences did not become statistically significant
until 30 s of influx (Fig. 4D). However, unlike
Tc-Sestamibi, cell-associated daunomycin in the MDR1
transfectants did not reach a plateau during the initial 90 s of
incubation, which may be due to partitioning of anthracyclines into
lipid bilayers (33).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
MDR1 Pgp limits unidirectional
influx of substrates in MCF-7 ( ) and MCF-7/MDR1
( ) cells. A, cells were incubated with
Tc-Sestamibi in MEBSS for various times between 10 and 90 s as
described under "Experimental Procedures." The inset
shows accumulation of Tc-Sestamibi throughout 120 min of incubation
with radiotracer in MEBSS. B and C, the effects
of GF120918 (300 nM; B) and LY335979 (1 µM; C) on cell content of radiotracer were
also determined during unidirectional influx at times between 10 and
90 s in MCF-7 ( ) and MCF-7/MDR1 ( ) cells.
D, MCF-7 ( ) and MCF-7/MDR1 ( ) cells were
incubated with 0.2 µCi/ml [3H]daunomycin, and
cell-associated radiotracer was determined at time points between 10 and 90 s as described under "Experimental Procedures." Data
are representative of three (A) or two (B and
C) independent experiments, with n = 3 at
each point. Data for D are from a single experiment, with
n = 4 for each point. mg P, mg of cell
protein.
|
|
To determine whether MDR1 Pgp also affects unidirectional
efflux of Tc-Sestamibi, cells were incubated with Tc-Sestamibi for 30 min to reach steady-state levels of radiotracer and then transferred to
isotope-free buffer (zero trans-conditions). During the initial 30 s of efflux, cell-associated Tc-Sestamibi was not affected by Pgp, as
evidenced by an ~30% decrease in radiotracer in both cell lines
(Fig. 5A). Furthermore,
LY335979 (1 µM) did not alter the 30-s unidirectional
efflux of Tc-Sestamibi in either control or MCF-7/MDR1
cells. Steady-state content of Tc-Sestamibi after 30 s of efflux
in the absence and presence of LY335979 was 73.1 and 70.4% in control
MCF-7 cells, respectively, and 69.3 and 71.2% in MCF-7/MDR1
transfectants, respectively. Comparable results were observed when
parental cells were loaded with 40-fold less radiotracer than
MCF-7/MDR1 cells to achieve similar amounts of cell-associated Tc-Sestamibi at the start of efflux (data not shown).
When incubations in isotope-free buffer were extended to longer periods
of time, significant differences between cell lines were not detected
until 5 min and were maintained over the ensuing 30 min (Fig.
5B). Control cells retained 67.1 ± 8.4 and 26.2 ± 4.7% of the initial content of Tc-Sestamibi after 5 and 30 min of
efflux, respectively, compared with 22.2 ± 2.4 and 7.9 ± 2.2% in MCF-7/MDR1 cells, respectively. During these longer incubations, LY335979 (1 µM) increased cell content of
Tc-Sestamibi in MCF-7/MDR1 cells to levels observed in
parental cells (Fig. 5B). However, these extended incubation
times yielded data reflecting the combined effects of efflux and
contaminating influx (re-entry) of substrate into cells and no longer
isolated unidirectional efflux kinetics. Overall, these studies
demonstrate that MDR1 Pgp has no significant effect on
initial efflux of Tc-Sestamibi from MCF-7/MDR1 cells.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Pgp does not affect initial efflux of
Tc-Sestamibi. A, MCF-7 ( ) and MCF-7/MDR1
( ) cells were loaded to steady-state content of radiotracer for 30 min and then transferred to isotope-free MEBSS. Content of Tc-Sestamibi
was determined at 1-s intervals from 3 to 30 s. Data are mean
values of two samples, each from independent experiments. B,
efflux experiments were continued for 30 min in MEBSS only (MCF-7 ( )
and MCF-7/MDR1 ( ) cells) or in buffer containing 1 µM LY335979 (MCF-7/MDR1 cells ( )). Data are
mean values from three experiments, with n = 9 samples
for each data point.
|
|
Although MDR1 Pgp did not affect the resting
Em of cells as measured by whole-cell patch
clamping, we considered that Pgp could directly or indirectly alter the
dipole potential within the plasma membrane, producing a more positive
intramembranous potential and limiting influx of cationic substrates
like Tc-Sestamibi. Accordingly, TPB, a lipophilic anion that imposes a
negative dipole potential within lipid bilayers (34), should reduce the
effective intramembranous potential and preferentially enhance
accumulation of Tc-Sestamibi in MCF-7/MDR1 cells.
Previously, we showed that TPB enhances accumulation of Tc-Sestamibi in
cultured cells, although the effects of MDR1 Pgp were not
determined (12). In the presence of TPB, Tc-Sestamibi content after
30 s of influx increased in both cell lines in a
concentration-dependent manner (Fig.
6A). However, the -fold change
in accumulation of radiotracer with TPB was significantly higher in
Pgp-expressing cells. Influx of Tc-Sestamibi increased by 50- and
360-fold in control and MCF-7/MDR1 cells, respectively, when
30 µM TPB was added to the buffer (Fig. 6B).
At concentrations >30 µM TPB, accumulation of
radiotracer decreased in both cell lines, likely due to toxicity (data
not shown). When Pgp was inhibited with LY335979 (1 µM),
influx of Tc-Sestamibi in the presence of TPB did not differ between
MCF-7/MDR1 and parental cells, further indicating that
functional MDR1 Pgp mediated the differential effects of TPB
on accumulation of radiotracer.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
TPB preferentially enhances influx of
Tc-Sestamibi in MCF-7/MDR1 cells. A,
influx of Tc-Sestamibi in MCF-7 ( , ) and MCF-7/MDR1
( , ) cells after 30 s in buffer containing TPB without ( ,
) or with ( , ) LY335979 (1 µM). Note the
logarithmic scales. B, -fold increase in cell
content of Tc-Sestamibi in the presence of 30 µM TPB
relative to buffer with no TPB, without (closed bars) or
with (open bars) 1 µM LY335979. Data are
representative of three independent experiments, with n = 3 for each data point. mg P, mg of cell protein.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have critically examined potential mechanisms of substrate
transport by MDR1 Pgp using stringent reagents and tools to determine the effects mediated solely by Pgp. Our results demonstrate that MDR1 Pgp can confer MDR without affecting resting
Em or macroscopic conductance of the plasma membrane
in cells not previously exposed to MDR drugs. Conversely, under
conditions that depolarized Em and  ,
MDR1 Pgp reduced net cell content of Tc-Sestamibi to levels
below those produced by external manipulation of membrane potentials
alone, showing that transport of Tc-Sestamibi by Pgp is not dependent
on changes in transmembrane potential. Furthermore, specific inhibitors
of MDR1 Pgp blocked transport activity without altering
Em or macroscopic conductance of Pgp-positive or
Pgp-negative cells.
MDR1 Pgp has been associated with a variety of perturbations
in ion conductance. For example, enhanced Na+ currents were
measured in cell lines selected for expression of Pgp through drug
exposure (35, 36), but changes in Na+ conductance were not
coupled to drug transport (36). Despite changes in Na+
currents, Em did not differ between drug-sensitive
and drug-selected MDR cells, although the effects of MDR1
potentially could have been masked by the effects of selection in
chemotherapeutic drugs. Prior studies with LR73 cells reported that the
resting Em of 46 mV in these cells was reduced by
~20 mV in cells transfected with MDR1; these measurements
were made fluorometrically with K+/valinomycin null point
titration (37, 38). In the present study, Em in
control MCF-7 cells was 43 mV, as determined by whole-cell patch
clamping with ATP in the pipette solution (KINT solution
2), and was not significantly different in MDR1 transfectants. These data argue strongly against a hypothesis that Pgp
depolarizes only cells that are above a threshold value for
Em. Furthermore, the magnitude of depolarization attributed to MDR1 Pgp in previous studies cannot account
for the large differences in accumulation of Tc-Sestamibi between control and MCF-7/MDR1 cells.
Ion channel activities have been associated with expression of
MDR1 Pgp in response to various stimuli. Pgp has been
reported to mediate ATP- and Na+-dependent
Cl /H+ antiport in response to rapid changes
in extracellular ion gradients, thus alkalinizing cells and
contributing to MDR (39). MDR1 Pgp has also been reported to
function as, or regulate, a swelling-activated Cl channel
(40). Our study did not investigate ion conductances stimulated by
changes in ion gradients or channel activity during hyposmotic stress,
but our data indicate that these conditions are not necessary to
activate drug transport. Although our data do not exclude possible
channel activity associated with MDR1 Pgp under selected
conditions, the results show that Pgp does not change steady-state
currents in MCF-7 cells and imply that such alterations are not
essential for drug resistance.
The present data show that MDR1 Pgp reduces intracellular
content of Tc-Sestamibi by limiting influx without affecting
unidirectional efflux. Most studies of MDR1 Pgp have
reported that the transporter both reduces influx and enhances efflux
of substrates, although exceptions have been described in which Pgp
affects only influx (41) or efflux (42) of compounds. As indicated by
data from our efflux protocol, substrate content in non-polarized
MCF-7/MDR1 cells was reduced only at time points beyond the
experimental conditions of unidirectional efflux. Differences between
our data and previous studies could be due to prior determinations at
time points beyond the period of unidirectional efflux, the presence of
multiple mechanisms of MDR in drug-selected cells, use of substrates with varying amounts of partitioning into membranes or trapping in
subcellular compartments, or disparities between the effects of Pgp in
non-polarized versus polarized cells. Nevertheless, our
system shows that transfection of MDR1 functionally
establishes a permeability barrier to influx of Tc-Sestamibi. The
"membrane vacuum cleaner" model for Pgp in effect predicts the same
behavior (43). However, our previously published data show an identical in-to-out content ratio for Tc-Sestamibi in Pgp-expressing cells when
assayed over a 7-log range of extracellular tracer concentration (pM to 10 µM) both in the absence and
presence of the MDR modulator quinidine (12). The lack of sigmoidal
activation with no evidence of saturable behavior at high substrate
concentrations is attributed best to a process dominated by diffusion
rather than enzyme kinetics (39). As a whole, these data favor a model
whereby Pgp establishes a permeability barrier to influx of substrates.
The mechanism through which Pgp establishes a permeability barrier
remains to be identified. TPB preferentially enhanced influx of
Tc-Sestamibi in MCF-7/MDR1 cells, suggesting that Pgp may
act by increasing the net positive dipole potential within the plasma membrane. The dipole potential is manifest between the hydrophobic interior of a bilayer and water molecules immediately adjacent to lipid
head groups (44). In bilayers of phosphatidylcholine, the dipole
potential within the membrane is calculated to be approximately +280 mV
(45), which impedes diffusion of hydrophobic cationic compounds such as
Tc-Sestamibi. If MDR1 Pgp increased the intramembranous dipole potential to more positive values, influx of Tc-Sestamibi or
other positively charged hydrophobic compounds would be retarded. TPB,
a hydrophobic anion, is predicted to associate with phospholipid membranes near the polar head groups, thereby reducing intramembranous dipole potentials and enhancing the kinetics of cation translocation (46). Ion pairing effects on membrane solubility of substrates also may
contribute to the effects of TPB.
MDR1 Pgp potentially could affect intramembranous dipole
potentials by altering the distribution of lipids, such as
sphingomyelin (47) and glucosylceramide (48), between inner and outer
leaflets of the plasma membrane. Pgp localizes to low density membrane domains (18, 49), in which the magnitude of the dipole potential is
increased due to enrichment with cholesterol (50). Interestingly, although TPB behaves as a modulator of Pgp, tetraphenylphosphonium, a
hydrophobic cation that is the counterpart of TPB, is a substrate for
the transporter (51). Verapamil, a classic inhibitor of MDR1
Pgp, has also been shown to decrease the intramembranous dipole
potential in lipid vesicles (52), which would directly enhance influx
kinetics of hydrophobic cations like Tc-Sestamibi. Consistent with this
model, the effects of TPB on dipole potential would be expected to
affect the kinetics of transmembrane permeation, but not the final
steady state (46). Accordingly, the maximal effects of TPB on cell
content of Tc-Sestamibi were identical between Pgp-expressing and
Pgp-non-expressing cells. Another mechanism related to this model is
that altering the dipole potential indirectly inhibits Pgp transport by
changing lipid-protein interactions on the intramembranous surface of
the transporter. Previous work has shown that function of
MDR1 Pgp is affected significantly by changes at the
lipid-protein interface (53, 54).
In summary, we have shown that MDR1 Pgp significantly
decreased influx of an organotechnetium cationic substrate without
affecting resting Em. However, Pgp did not alter
unidirectional efflux of Tc-Sestamibi. These data suggest that the
dominant function of MDR1 Pgp in non-polarized cells is to
produce a permeability barrier for Tc-Sestamibi, perhaps by altering
the dipole potential within plasma membranes. These results provide
features that should be incorporated into any comprehensive model of
the mechanism of action for this transporter.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Rachel Lindvall for mass
spectrometry determinations and Julie Dahlheimer for technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This study was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant HL03683 and Department of Energy Grant ER61885.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address: Dept. of Medicine, University of Maryland
Medical System, Baltimore, MD 21201.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Molecular Imaging
Center, Mallinckrodt Inst. of Radiology, Washington University School
of Medicine, P. O. Box 8225, 510 S. Kingshighway Blvd., St. Louis, MO
63110. Tel.: 314-362-9359; Fax: 314-362-0152; E-mail: piwnica-wormsd@mir.wustl.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 11, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105192200
2
Additional details of the microwave protocol for
sample preparation are available upon request.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
Pgp, P-glycoprotein;
MDR, multidrug resistance;
TPB, tetraphenyl borate;
MEBSS, modified
Earle's balanced salt solution;
[K+]i, intracellular K+ concentration.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Stein, W.
(1997)
Physiol. Rev.
77,
545-590
|
| 2.
|
Shapiro, A.,
Fox, K.,
Lam, P.,
and Ling, V.
(1999)
Eur. J. Biochem.
259,
841-850
|
| 3.
|
van Helvoort, A.,
Smith, A. J.,
Sprong, H.,
Fritzsche, I.,
Schinkel, A. H.,
Borst, P.,
and van Meer, G.
(1996)
Cell
87,
507-517
|
| 4.
|
Kim, H.,
Barroso, M.,
Samanta, R.,
Greenberger, L.,
and Sztul, E.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
273,
C687-C702
|
| 5.
|
Roepe, P.
(2000)
Curr. Pharm. Des.
6,
241-260
|
| 6.
|
Ogretmen, B.,
and Safa, A.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
2189-2199
|
| 7.
|
Piwnica-Worms, D.,
Chiu, M.,
Budding, M.,
Kronauge, J.,
Kramer, R.,
and Croop, J.
(1993)
Cancer Res.
53,
977-984
|
| 8.
|
Sharma, V.,
and Piwnica-Worms, D.
(1999)
Chem. Rev.
99,
2545-2560
|
| 9.
|
Piwnica-Worms, D.,
Kronauge, J.,
and Chiu, M.
(1990)
Circulation
82,
1826-1838
|
| 10.
|
Chernoff, D. M.,
Strichartz, G. R.,
and Piwnica-Worms, D.
(1993)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1147,
262-266
|
| 11.
|
Piwnica-Worms, D.,
Kronuage, J. F.,
LeFurgey, A.,
Backus, M.,
Hockett, D.,
Ingram, P.,
Lieberman, M.,
Holman, B. L.,
Jones, A. G.,
and Davison, A.
(1994)
Magn. Reson. Imaging
12,
641-652
|
| 12.
|
Piwnica-Worms, D.,
Rao, V.,
Kronauge, J.,
and Croop, J.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
12210-12220
|
| 13.
|
Ling, V.,
and Thompson, L. H.
(1974)
J. Cell. Physiol.
83,
103-111
|
| 14.
|
Hyafil, F.,
Vergely, C.,
Du Vignaud, P.,
and Grand-Perret, T.
(1993)
Cancer Res.
53,
4595-4602
|
| 15.
|
Dantzig, A.,
Shepard, R.,
Cao, J.,
Law, K.,
Ehlhardt, W.,
Baughman, T.,
Bumol, T.,
and Starling, J.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
4171-4179
|
| 16.
|
Piwnica-Worms, D.,
Jacob, R.,
Horres, C. R.,
and Lieberman, M.
(1983)
J. Gen. Physiol.
81,
731-748
|
| 17.
|
Luker, G.,
Rao, V.,
Crankshaw, C.,
Dahlheimer, J.,
and Piwnica-Worms, D.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
14218-14227
|
| 18.
|
Luker, G.,
Pica, C.,
Kumar, A.,
Covey, D.,
and Piwnica-Worms, D.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
7651-7661
|
| 19.
|
Sharma, V.,
Crankshaw, C.,
and Piwnica-Worms, D.
(1996)
J. Med. Chem.
39,
3483-3490
|
| 20.
|
Lederer, W.,
and Nichols, C.
(1989)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
419,
193-211
|
| 21.
|
Kletzien, R.,
Pariza, M.,
Becker, J.,
and van Potter, R.
(1975)
Anal. Biochem.
68,
537-544
|
| 22.
|
Jongsma, A.,
Riethorst, A.,
Lankelma, J.,
Dekker, H.,
and Westerhoff, H. V.
(2000)
Eur. J. Biochem.
267,
5369-5377
|
| 23.
|
Akiyama, S. I.,
Fojo, A.,
Hanover, J. A.,
Pastan, I.,
and Gottesman, M. M.
(1985)
Somatic Cell Mol. Genet.
11,
117-126
|
| 24.
|
Fairchild, C.,
Moscow, J.,
O'Brien, E.,
and Cowan, K.
(1990)
Mol. Pharmacol.
37,
801-809
|
| 25.
|
Sikic, B.,
Fisher, G.,
Lum, B.,
Halsey, J.,
Beketic-Oreskovic, L.,
and Chen, G.
(1997)
Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.
40, (suppl.),
S13-S19
|
| 26.
|
Wadkins, R.,
and Roepe, P.
(1997)
Int. Rev. Cytol.
171,
121-165
|
| 27.
|
Wei, L.,
Stutts, M.,
Hoffman, M.,
and Roepe, P.
(1995)
Biophys. J.
69,
883-895
|
| 28.
|
Woodfork, K.,
Wonderlin, W.,
Peterson, V.,
and Stroble, J.
(1995)
J. Cell. Physiol.
162,
163-171
|
| 29.
|
Fritz, F.,
Howard, E.,
Hoffman, M.,
and Roepe, P.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
4214-4226
|
| 30.
|
Backus, M.,
Piwnica-Worms, D.,
Hockett, D.,
Kronauge, J.,
Lieberman, M.,
Ingram, P.,
and LeFurgey, A.
(1993)
Am. J. Physiol.
265,
C178-C187
|
| 31.
|
Davis, S.,
Weiss, M.,
Wong, J.,
Lampidis, T.,
and Chen, L.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
13844-13850
|
| 32.
|
Russell, J.
(2000)
Physiol. Rev.
80,
211-276
|
| 33.
|
Gallois, L.,
Fiallo, M.,
Laigle, A.,
Priebe, W.,
and Garnier-Suillerot, A.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
241,
879-887
|
| 34.
|
Cornelius, F.
(1995)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1235,
183-196
|
| 35.
|
Yamashita, N.,
Hamada, H.,
Tsuruo, T.,
and Ogata, E.
(1987)
Cancer Res.
47,
3736-3741
|
| 36.
|
Gerard, V.,
Rouzaire-Dubois, B.,
Dilda, P.,
and Dubois, J.-M.
(1998)
J. Exp. Biol.
201,
21-31
|
| 37.
|
Robinson, L.,
and Roepe, P.
(1996)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
52,
1081-1095
|
| 38.
|
Hoffman, M.,
Wei, L.,
and Roepe, P.
(1996)
J. Gen. Physiol.
108,
295-313
|
| 39.
|
Hoffman, M.,
and Roepe, P.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
11153-11168
|
| 40.
|
Idriss, H.,
Hannun, Y.,
Boulpaep, E.,
and Basavappa, S.
(2000)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
524,
629-636
|
| 41.
|
Bornmann, W.,
and Roepe, P.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
12665-12675
|
| 42.
|
Frezard, F.,
and Garnier, S. A.
(1991)
Eur. J. Biochem.
196,
483-491
|
| 43.
|
Ambudkar, S.,
Dey, S.,
Hrycyna, C.,
Ramachandra, M.,
Pastan, I.,
and Gottesman, M.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
31,
361-398
|
| 44.
|
Brockman, H.
(1994)
Chem. Phys. Lipids
73,
57-79
|
| 45.
|
Franklin, J.,
and Cafiso, D.
(1993)
Biophys. J.
65,
289-299
|
| 46.
|
Flewelling, R.,
and Hubbell, W.
(1986)
Biophys. J.
49,
541-552
|
| 47.
|
Bezombes, C.,
Maestre, N.,
Laurent, G.,
Levade, T.,
Bettaieb, A.,
and Jaffrezou, J.
(1998)
FASEB J.
12,
101-109
|
| 48.
|
Lala, P.,
Ito, S.,
and Lingwood, C.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
6246-6251
|
| 49.
|
Lavie, Y.,
Fiucci, G.,
and Liscovitch, M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32380-32383
|
| 50.
|
Asawakarn, T.,
Cladera, J.,
and O'Shea, P.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
38457-38463
|
| 51.
|
Ruetz, S.,
and Gros, P.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
12277-12284
|
| 52.
|
Pohl, E.,
Krylov, A.,
Block, M.,
and Pohl, P.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1373,
170-178
|
| 53.
|
Callaghan, R.,
Berridge, G.,
Ferry, D.,
and Higgins, C.
(1997)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1328,
109-124
|
| 54.
|
Romsicki, Y.,
and Sharom, F.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
6887-6896
|
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. A. Dubikovskaya, S. H. Thorne, T. H. Pillow, C. H. Contag, and P. A. Wender
Overcoming multidrug resistance of small-molecule therapeutics through conjugation with releasable octaarginine transporters
PNAS,
August 26, 2008;
105(34):
12128 - 12133.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Sharma, J. L. Prior, M. G. Belinsky, G. D. Kruh, and D. Piwnica-Worms
Characterization of a 67Ga/68Ga Radiopharmaceutical for SPECT and PET of MDR1 P-Glycoprotein Transport Activity In Vivo: Validation in Multidrug-Resistant Tumors and at the Blood-Brain Barrier
J. Nucl. Med.,
February 1, 2005;
46(2):
354 - 364.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|