![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 52, 49371-49377, December 28, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
,
¶
From the
Center for Advanced Research in
Biotechnology, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute,
Rockville, Maryland 20850 and the § National Institute of
Standards and Technology, Analytical Chemistry Division,
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Received for publication, September 5, 2001, and in revised form, October 16, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins, a
family of six conserved polypeptides found in all eukaryotes, are
essential for DNA replication. The archaeon Methanobacterium
thermoautotrophicum The minichromosome maintenance
(MCM)1 genes encode a family
of six proteins (MCM2 to -7) first identified by their essential role
in the maintenance of ARS-containing minichromosomes in
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (1, 2). MCM homologues have been
identified in all eukaryotes, and all are essential for DNA replication
(1, 3-7). The recruitment of these proteins onto replication origins during the G1 phase of the cell cycle is essential for the
formation of a prereplicative complex and initiation of DNA
synthesis (8-12). In addition to the heterohexameric structure
MCM2/3/4/5/6/7, found in vivo and in vitro,
several additional MCM complexes have been identified (13-16).
Biochemical studies in yeast and mammals have shown that a dimeric
complex of the MCM4/6/7 heterotrimer contains 3'-5' DNA helicase
activity, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding, and
DNA-dependent ATPase activities (15, 17, 18). Both MCM2 and
MCM3/5 were shown to inhibit the helicase activity of MCM4/6/7 and thus
were suggested to play regulatory roles (15, 19). Both genetic and
biochemical data suggest that the MCM4/6/7 complex is the eukaryotic
replicative helicase and that the other MCM polypeptides may play
regulatory roles (15, 16, 19).
Zinc fingers were first identified as zinc-binding domains important
for protein-DNA interactions (20, 21). They contain conserved Cys and
His residues, and to date more than 10 classes have been biochemically
characterized, and their structures have been determined (reviewed in
Refs. 22-25). Since their discovery, zinc finger domains have been
implicated in diverse functions, including ssDNA and double-stranded
DNA (dsDNA) binding, RNA binding, and protein-protein interactions
(reviewed in Refs. 24 and 26). The primary amino acid sequences of the
eukaryotic MCM2, -4, -6, and -7 proteins from all organisms contain a
putative zinc finger motif of the C4 type, either
CX2CXnCX2C
(MCM2) or
CX2CXnCX4C (MCM4, -6, and -7) (Fig. 1A) (2).
The role of the zinc finger domain in MCM2 function was suggested by
in vivo mutational analyses conducted in S. cerevisiae (27). In these studies, several substitutions were made
in the second cysteine pair. None of the mutant proteins supported cell growth, suggesting an essential function for the putative zinc-binding domain of MCM2. However, the biochemical properties of the MCM2 zinc
finger mutant were not characterized, and the roles of the zinc finger
domains in MCM4, -6, or -7 have not yet been determined. Conservation
of the domain from archaea to eukarya (Fig. 1) in a nonconserved region
of the MCM family of proteins suggests the importance of the zinc
finger domain in MCM function (2). Furthermore, mutational
analyses of zinc finger domains in several viral helicases have
shown these motifs to be important for helicase activity (28,
29).
Archaea, the third domain of life (30), are believed to replicate DNA
in a eukaryotic-like fashion (31, 32). This conclusion is based in
large part on the complete genome sequences of several members of this
domain and the biochemical properties of the replication proteins that
have been studied. Homologues of proteins involved in eukaryotic DNA
replication have been identified within archaeal genomes, whereas
bacterial DNA replication proteins have only limited sequence
similarity to the eukaryotic ones. To date, at least one MCM homologue
has been identified in all archaeal species studied (Fig.
1B) (32, 33). Biochemical studies with the single MCM
homologue from the thermophilic archaeon Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum The archaeal domain can be divided into two main kingdoms:
euryarchaeota and crenarchaeota (39). A zinc finger domain of the
C4 type has been identified in all MCM homologues from the euryarchaeota kingdom, including the Mth MCM (Fig. 1B). Only
the first Cys pair is present in the two identified MCM homologues from
the crenarchaeota kingdom (Fig. 1B). In order to elucidate the roles played by the zinc finger domain in mthMCM function, the
motif was mutated by substituting the last Cys to Ser, resulting in a
C3S domain. In this study, the expression, purification, and biochemical properties of the mutant protein are described. It is
shown that while the wild-type protein binds zinc, the mutant enzyme
does not. While zinc binding is not needed for the oligomeric structure
of the MCM complex, it is needed for efficient ssDNA binding,
stimulation of ATPase activity by DNA, and helicase activity.
Materials
Labeled and unlabeled dNTPs and rNTPs were obtained from
Amersham Biosciences, Inc., and AMP-PNP was from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. Single-stranded M13mp18, single-stranded Methods
Preparation of Substrates for Helicase and Gel Mobility Shift
Assays--
The oligonucleotide used in preparation of the helicase
substrates was a 74-mer,
5'-(dT)40CGCGCGGGGAGAGGCGGTTTGCGTATTGGGCGCC-3', referred to as M13-1T. After labeling with [ Constructing the Zinc Finger Mutant of MCM--
The MCM zinc
finger mutant was constructed in the pET-21 (Novagene) plasmid
containing the wild-type MCM gene with a His10 tag at the C
terminus of the protein. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using
the QuickChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) according to
the manufacturer's protocol, with two complementary oligonucleotide
primers Z207
(5'-GAGCCATCACTCTGCTCAGAGAGTGGTGGGAGATCCTTCAGGC-3') and
Z208 (5'-GCCTGAAGGATCTCCCACCACTCTCTGAGCAGAGTGATGGCTC-3'). The mutated residues are underlined. The resulting construct contains a
Cys to Ser substitution at residue 158 located in the second Cys pair
of the zinc finger motif (Fig. 1B). Following mutagenesis, the entire gene was sequenced to ensure that no additional mutations were created.
Expression and Purification of Recombinant Proteins--
The
wild-type and mutant MCM proteins were overexpressed and purified from
Escherichia coli cells essentially as previously described
(34) but with the following modifications. All proteins were
overexpressed using the E. coli cells RIL CondoPlas
(Stratagene) at either 37 °C (wild type and a protein with a
mutation at the Walker-A motif (Lys Glycerol Gradient Centrifugation--
A portion of the fraction
purified on Q-Sepharose (300 µg) was applied to a 5-ml 20-40%
glycerol gradient in buffer A, containing 200 or 500 mM
NaCl. After centrifugation at 45,000 rpm (190,000 × g)
for 13 h in a SW 50.1 rotor at 4 °C, fractions (300 µl) were collected from the bottom of the tube. The distribution of the mthMCM
proteins was determined following 10% SDS-PAGE and staining with
Coomassie Brilliant Blue (R-250).
Gel Filtration Separation--
A portion of the protein fraction
purified on Q-Sepharose (100 µg in 100 µl of buffer A) was applied
to a Superose-6 gel filtration column (HR10/30; Amersham Biosciences,
Inc.) equilibrated with buffer A. Fractions (250 µl) were collected
and analyzed for the presence of the mthMCM proteins by fractionation
on a 10% SDS-PAGE and staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue
(R-250).
Analytical Measurement of Zinc--
To determine the presence or
absence of zinc in the wild-type and mutant MCM proteins, a portion of
the isolated proteins was dialyzed for 5 h against buffer B. The
protein solutions were diluted with quartz-distilled water to reduce
the level of dissolved solids and slightly acidified with nitric acid
(Ultrex; J. T. Baker). Scandium was added as an internal standard at a
concentration of 10 ng/g. All samples were measured using a VG
PQ2 quadrupole ICP-MS system (VG Elemental) operated in a peak jumping
mode. Samples were introduced into the instrument using a
microconcentric nebulizer (CETAC) operated at a liquid uptake rate of
125 µl/min. Zinc measurements were made using the 66Zn
isotope with three replicate 30-s integrations at a dwell time of 10 ms. All measurements were normalized to the internal standard response.
The zinc concentrations were calculated from a response curve generated
from zinc calibration standard solutions.
ATPase Assay--
ATPase activity was measured in reaction
mixtures (15 µl) containing 25 mM Hepes-NaOH (pH 7.5), 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 100 µg/ml
BSA, 1 nmol of ATP containing 2.5 µCi of [ DNA Helicase Assay--
DNA helicase activity was measured in
reaction mixtures (15 µl) containing 25 mM Hepes-NaOH (pH
7.5), 25 mM sodium acetate, 10 mM magnesium
acetate, 5 mM ATP, 1 mM DTT, 100 µg/ml BSA, 5 fmol of 32P-labeled DNA substrate (5000-6000 cpm/fmol) and
wild-type or mutant proteins. After incubation at 60 °C for 1 h, the reaction was stopped by adding 5 µl of 5× loading buffer (100 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS, 0.1% xylene cyanol, 0.1% bromophenol
blue, and 50% glycerol), and aliquots were loaded onto a 12%
polyacrylamide gel in 1× TBE (90 mM Tris, 90 mM boric acid, 1 mM EDTA) and electrophoresed for 3 h at 200 V at 4 °C.
Gel Mobility Shift Assay--
Complexes formed between the
enzymes and ssDNA were detected by a gel mobility shift assay in
reaction mixtures (15 µl) containing 25 mM Hepes-NaOH (pH
7.5), 50 mM sodium acetate, 8 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM ATP, 1 mM DTT, 100 µg/ml BSA, 20 fmol of 32P-labeled oligonucleotide
(2000-3000 cpm/fmol), and various protein concentrations. After
incubation at 60 °C for 20 min, 5 µl of 5× loading buffer (0.1%
xylene cyanol, 0.1% bromophenol blue, 50% glycerol) were added to
stop the reaction. Aliquots of the reaction mixture were
electrophoresed for 3 h at 200 V at 4 °C through a 4%
polyacrylamide gel containing 6 mM magnesium acetate and
5% glycerol in 0.5 × TBE.
Nitrocellulose Filter Binding Assay--
A nitrocellulose filter
binding assay was carried out by incubating varying amounts of the
mthMCM wild-type or mutant proteins at 65 °C for 10 min in 25 µl
of buffer C containing 50 fmol of 5' 32P-labeled
oligonucleotide (either M13-1T or Hel-4) (5000 cpm/fmol) in the
presence or absence of 1 mM ATP. After incubation, the mixture was filtered through an alkaline-washed nitrocellulose filter
(HA 0.45 µm; Millipore) (40), which was then washed with 20 mM Hepes-NaOH (pH 7.5). The radioactivity adsorbed to the
filter was measured by liquid scintillation counting.
UV Cross-linking--
The UV-cross-linking experiments were
performed using 500 ng of the wild-type enzyme as well as the Lys The Archaeal MCM Protein Contains a Functional Zinc Finger
Domain--
A zinc finger motif of the type C4 has been
identified in all archaea of the euryarchaeota kingdom for which the
complete genome is known (Fig.
1B). To determine whether this
domain binds zinc and to examine the role of the domain in MCM
activity, one of the Cys residues in the second Cys pair was mutated to
Ser, resulting in a C3S motif. The mutant protein was
expressed and purified from E. coli cells using the protocol
previously described for the purification of the wild-type enzyme (34).
The ability of the purified wild-type and mutant enzymes to bind zinc
was determined using the ICP-MS system. While 0.6 mol of zinc were bound to 1 mol of the wild-type protein, only 0.08 mol were bound to
the mutant enzyme. These results illustrate that, as predicted from the
primary amino acid sequence, the archaeal MCM protein contains a
functional zinc-binding domain. Submolar amounts of zinc in the
wild-type proteins can be attributed to the loss of ions during the
extensive purification steps.
The Zinc Finger Motif Does Not Affect the Oligomeric Structure of
the MCM Complex--
There are many examples in which zinc finger
domains participate in protein-protein interactions (for examples, see
Refs. 24 and 25). Previous studies with the wild-type mthMCM showed that the protein forms a double hexamer in solution with a native mass
of about 1 MDa (Fig. 2) (34-36).
Therefore, the effect of the mutation in the zinc-binding domain on the
oligomeric structure of mthMCM was determined using gel filtration
(Fig. 2) and glycerol gradient sedimentation (data not shown). SDS-PAGE
of fractions obtained by the glycerol gradient and gel filtration (Fig.
2) yielded protein peaks at similar positions for the wild-type (Fig. 2A) and mutant proteins (Fig. 2B). The protein
peaks were detected at a position (fractions 36 and 37) that is
larger than thyroglobulin (660 kDa) and is similar to that previously
reported for the wild-type enzyme (34-36). Thus, these results suggest
that the zinc finger of the mthMCM protein is not needed to stabilize
protein-protein interactions within the MCM complex. The zinc finger
mutant, however, migrates at a slightly lower apparent molecular mass
during gel filtration (Fig. 2) and at a slightly larger apparent
molecular mass during glycerol gradient centrifugation (data not
shown). This may indicate a more compact structure of the mthMCM
protein in the absence of zinc.
The Zinc Finger Motif Mutant Has an Altered ssDNA Binding
Activity--
Studies performed with the mthMCM demonstrated that the
protein binds ssDNA in the presence of magnesium (34, 35). Since zinc
fingers have been shown to participate in protein-DNA interactions, the
effect of the mutation at the zinc finger domain on ssDNA binding was
determined using the gel mobility shift (Fig.
3A) and filter binding (Fig.
3B) assays. For these studies, 5'-32P-labeled
oligonucleotides were incubated with increasing amounts of wild-type
and mutant forms of the mthMCM protein in the presence or absence of
ATP. In the gel mobility shift assay (Fig. 3A), the
wild-type enzyme (lanes 2-5), as well as the
zinc finger (lanes 6-9) and Walker-A (Lys
In the presence of ATP, the wild-type protein forms two distinct
shifted bands (Fig. 3A, lanes 2-4),
suggesting two modes of interaction with DNA, whereas in the absence of
ATP (Fig. 3A, lane 5), only a slower
migrating band is observed. The zinc finger mutant, however, forms only
the slower migrating band, whether ATP is present (Fig. 3A,
lanes 6-8) or not (Fig. 3A,
lane 9). When a nonhydrolyzable analogue of ATP,
AMP-PNP, was used, only the slower migrating band could be detected
with both the wild-type and the zinc mutant (data not shown),
suggesting that ATP hydrolysis is needed to produce the faster
migrating form of the protein-DNA complex. In support of this notion,
when the wild-type protein was incubated with ssDNA in the presence of
ATP but at lower temperatures (4 and 24 °C) that cannot support the
ATPase and helicase activities of mthMCM (35, 36), only the slower
migrating band could be detected. In addition, a mthMCM protein with a
mutation at the Walker-A motif (Lys The Zinc Finger Motif Is Needed for DNA-dependent
ATPase Activity--
As shown in Fig. 3, the mthMCM zinc mutant binds
DNA in a different fashion from the wild-type enzyme. In the absence of
ATP, the zinc mutant has the lowest binding activity of all of the proteins tested. However, in the presence of ATP, the DNA binding activity of the zinc mutant improves significantly, suggesting that the
protein interactions with DNA may be stabilized by the nucleotide.
Nevertheless, DNA binding activity by the mutant is still lower than
that of the wild-type protein. This lower DNA binding activity could be
attributed either to a lower affinity for ATP, an inability to bind ATP
(as in the Lys
Previous studies showed that the ATPase activity of the wild-type
protein is stimulated in the presence of ssDNA and, to a lesser extent,
by dsDNA (34-36). Therefore, to demonstrate the importance of the zinc
finger for ssDNA binding, the stimulatory effects of ssDNA and dsDNA on
the ATPase activity of the protein were examined. As shown in Fig.
4B, the ATPase activity of the wild-type protein was
stimulated 7-fold by The Zinc Finger Domain Is Important for Helicase Activity--
The
experiments described above demonstrate that the integrity of the zinc
finger domain of MCM is important for efficient interaction with ssDNA
and for ATPase activity. Thus, it is likely that the helicase activity
of the mthMCM mutant will also be affected when the zinc binding domain
is altered. The experiment described in Fig.
5 was designed to address the role of
zinc binding on helicase activity. As previously reported (34-36), the
wild-type protein contains a 3'-5' helicase activity (lanes
3-5) that is dependent on ATP hydrolysis (compare
lanes 3-5 with lanes 6 and 11). Very limited helicase activity could be detected with
the zinc finger mutant under similar conditions (compare
lanes 7-9 with lanes
3-5). Thus, these results demonstrate that the zinc-binding domain of the archaeal MCM protein is needed for helicase activity.
In the study presented here, the roles of the zinc finger domain
in the functions of the mthMCM protein were analyzed. The data
illustrate that a mutation at the zinc finger, which drastically reduces zinc binding, weakens the interaction between the mthMCM protein and ssDNA, which, in turn, leads to impaired ATPase and helicase activities. The zinc finger mutant appears to retain a low
level of DNA binding activity. However, ATPase activity by the zinc
finger mutant is not stimulated by DNA, indicating that its interaction
with DNA is different from that of the wild-type enzyme.
There are several examples in which zinc fingers are needed for
protein-protein interactions (24, 26). However, oligomerization of the
mthMCM does not appear to require the zinc-binding motif, since a
dodecamer could be observed with the mutant protein. This is consistent
with the analysis of a truncated form of the mthMCM, which demonstrated
that the N-terminal 111 amino acids contain a region required for
multimerization (35). The zinc finger domain is located between
residues 133 and 158, which is outside of the multimerization region.
It is nevertheless possible that the zinc finger participates in
interactions with other proteins (e.g. the helicase loader).
In vitro and in vivo interactions between
archaeal MCM and Cdc6 homologues have been suggested (34, 38).
One MCM homologue has been identified in all archaea for which the
complete genome is known (32, 33). To date, Methanococcus jannaschii is the only archaeon in which multiple MCM homologues (four) have been identified (42). All MCM homologues from the euryarchaeota kingdom (one out of the four in M. jannaschii)
contain a C4 type zinc finger motif (Fig. 1B).
In the two identified MCM homologues from the crenarchaeota kingdom,
only the first Cys pair is present (Fig. 1B), and thus the
protein is not likely to bind zinc. Therefore, the MCM proteins from
the crenarchaeota may have developed a different mechanism for
interaction with ssDNA during translocation along the DNA, or
additional proteins may be needed to associate with the MCM for
helicase activity. Alternatively, it is possible that in crenarchaeota
another protein, and not the MCM, functions as the replicative
helicase. Future studies with MCMs from this kingdom should determine
their role in DNA replication.
Previous studies have shown that the mthMCM is a dodecamer in solution
(34-36). The Schizosaccharomyces pombe MCM4/6/7 complex as
well as the large T-antigen, the helicase of simian virus 40, were also
shown to form double hexamers. The difference, however, is that these
dodecamers are efficiently formed only in the presence of DNA substrate
(DNA fork structure) (43, 44). Interestingly, gel mobility shift
analyses indicated that both large T-antigen and the S. pombe MCM form two types of interactions with DNA (i.e. a faster migrating band that was shown to be a hexamer and a slower migrating band that was shown to be a double hexamer) (43, 44). These
observations are similar to the gel mobility shift assay presented here
(Fig. 3), in which the wild-type mthMCM formed a faster and a slower
migrating band in the presence of ATP. Thus, it is possible that the
faster migrating band contains only one hexamer, while the slower one
contains a double hexamer. It was suggested that double-hexamers unwind
DNA in opposite directions (one on each strand) at the
replication fork and thus initiate bidirectional DNA synthesis.
However, in the absence of ATP, at lower temperatures, or with the zinc
finger or ATP-binding mutants, only the slower migrating band was
produced, suggesting that ATP hydrolysis may be responsible for
producing a single hexamer-DNA complex, perhaps by destabilizing
the double hexameric structure during translocation.
In eukaryotes, MCM2, -4, -6, and -7 contain the consensus sequence of a
putative zinc-binding motif. Although the ability of these proteins to
bind zinc has not yet been demonstrated, they are likely to bind the
ion, since these motifs are similar to the one in the mthMCM and other
zinc finger domains. The functions of the zinc fingers may differ
between MCM2 and MCM4, -6, and -7. The MCM4/6/7 complex was shown to
interact with ssDNA and to possess helicase activity (15, 17, 18), and
thus the role of the zinc finger in the eukaryotic proteins may be
similar to its role in the archaeal enzyme by participating in the
interactions with ssDNA during helicase activity.
MCM2 was shown to form a complex with the other five MCM subunits, as
well as with the MCM4/6/7 complex, and is believed to play a regulatory
role, since the presence of MCM2 inhibits the helicase activity of the
MCM4/6/7 complex in vitro (15, 19). Furthermore, the
phosphorylation of MCM2 by Cdc7-Dbf4 kinase is required for the
initiation of DNA synthesis (45-47), presumably by relieving the
inhibition on helicase activity. It is tempting to speculate, in light
of the results presented here, that the MCM2 protein interacts tightly
with ssDNA at the origin via the zinc finger motif, which may tether
the helicase to the DNA, preventing its translocation along the duplex.
The phosphorylation of the MCM2, prior to the initiation of DNA
synthesis, releases the protein from the MCM complex and/or changes its
conformation such that it can no longer interact with DNA. On the other
hand, MCM3 does not appear to have a zinc finger domain, and MCM5 has
lost one of the cysteines needed for a functional zinc finger domain,
suggesting that the regulatory role of MCM3/5 may not entail DNA binding.
The conservation of the zinc finger motif and similar biochemical
properties between the archaeal and eukaryal MCM suggest that the
archaeal MCM may provide a simpler model for the mechanism of the
eukaryotic helicase. Studies of the interaction of the mthMCM with
other proteins such as the archaeal Cdc6/Orc1 homologues and with the
origin DNA may shed light on how the prereplicative complex is formed
and regulated during replication in archaea and eukarya.
H contains a single homologue of MCM with
biochemical properties similar to those of the eukaryotic enzyme.
The amino acid sequence of the archaeal protein contains a
putative zinc-binding domain of the
CX2CXnCX2C
(C4) type. In this study, the roles of the zinc finger
domain in MCM function were examined using recombinant wild-type and
mutant proteins expressed and purified from Escherichia
coli. The protein with a mutation in the zinc motif forms a
dodecameric complex similar to the wild-type enzyme. The mutant enzyme,
however, is impaired in DNA-dependent ATPase activity and
single-stranded DNA binding, and it does not possess helicase activity.
These results illustrate the importance of the zinc-binding domain for
archaeal MCM function and suggest a role for zinc binding in the
eukaryotic MCM complex as well, since four out of the six eukaryotic
MCM proteins contain a similar zinc-binding motif.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
H (Mth) showed that it forms a ring-shaped dodecamer with biochemical properties similar to the eukaryotic MCM4/6/7 complex, including ssDNA binding, ATPase activity stimulated by DNA, and 3' to 5' helicase activity that is dependent upon ATP
hydrolysis (see Refs. 34-36; summarized in Ref. 37). Furthermore, it
was recently demonstrated that MCM is associated with chromatin in
Pyrococcus abyssi (38).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
X174, and
double-stranded
X174 DNAs were from New England Biolabs, and
oligonucleotides were synthesized by the CARB DNA synthesis facility.
Buffer A contained 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM DTT, 0.5 mM EDTA, and
10% glycerol. Buffer B contained 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5),
300 mM NaCl, and 5% glycerol. Buffer C contained 20 mM Hepes-NaOH (pH 7.5), 10 mM
MgCl2, 2 mM DTT, and 100 µg/ml bovine serum
albumin (BSA).
-32P]ATP
and T4 polynucleotide kinase, the oligonucleotide was annealed to a
single-stranded M13mp18 in a ratio of 1:2 and purified over a 1-ml
Sephacryl HS-300-HR column (Sigma). Gel mobility shift assays were
performed with either the M13-1T oligonucleotide; a 29-mer, Z149
(5'-AAAGCGGCCGCGCAGCCAACTCAGCTTCC-3'); a 50-mer, Hel-1
(5'-GGCCAACCGATCAAGTGCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTAAAACGAGCCCGCGCG-3'), or a 110-mer, Hel-4
(5'-CGCGCGGGCTCGTTTTACAACGTCGTGACTGGGCACTTGATCGGTTGGCC(dT)60-3') labeled with [
-32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase.
Ala)) or 24 °C (zinc
finger mutant) in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium in the presence of
appropriate antibiotics. Protein expression was induced and the
proteins were purified to near homogeneity using
Ni2+-chelate, Q-Sepharose, and glycerol gradient
sedimentation. The glycerol gradient fractions were used in the
experiments described below. Before glycerol gradient purification, the
proteins were stored in buffer A at
70 °C. Protein concentrations
were determined using the Bradford method (Bio-Rad) with BSA as the standard.
-32P]ATP
(3000 Ci/mmol; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in the absence of DNA or in
the presence of 50 ng of single-stranded or double-stranded
X174 DNA
(0.15 nmol as nucleotides) and various protein concentrations. After
incubation at 60 °C for 60 min, an aliquot (1 µl) was spotted onto
a polyethyleneimine cellulose thin layer plate, and ATP and Pi were separated by chromatography in 1 M
formic acid plus 0.5 M LiCl. The extent of ATP hydrolysis
was quantitated by PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale,
CA) analysis.
Ala and zinc finger mutants essentially as previously described (41) in
a reaction mixture containing 3.3 pmol of [
-32P]ATP,
20 mM Hepes-NaOH (pH 7.5), 5 mM
MgCl2, 2 mM DTT, and 250 ng BSA. The samples
were incubated for 10 min at 65 °C followed by exposure to 2.5 J/cm2 UV irradiation in a model 2400 Stratalinker
(Stratagene) and analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie Blue
staining and autoradiography.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (49K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Mth MCM protein contains a zinc finger motif
of the type C4. A, an alignment of the zinc
finger domain region of the six members of the MCM family (MCM2-7)
from S. pombe. B, an alignment of the zinc finger
domain region from several archaeal species belonging to the
euryarchaeota and crenarchaeota kingdoms. The numbers to the
left of the sequence represent the first residue of the zinc
finger domain. Cysteine residues are shown in boldface
type.

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Zinc binding is not needed for mthMCM
oligomeric structure. The purified Q-Sepharose column fractions of
the mthMCM wild-type (A) and zinc finger mutant
(B) proteins (100 µg in 100 µl) were loaded onto a
Superose-6 gel filtration column and analyzed as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Aliquots (15 µl) of the fractions
(indicated at the top) were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE
analysis followed by Coomassie Blue staining. The peak positions of
thyroglobulin (Thy; 670 kDa), ferritin (Fer; 440 kDa), and aldolase (Ald; 150 kDa) are indicated at the
top. LO indicates the sample loaded onto the
column.
Ala, lanes 10 and 11) mutants, all
bound ssDNA. However, the two mutant proteins differ from the wild type in binding activity and pattern of interaction with ssDNA. At each
concentration studied and in the presence or absence of ATP, the
wild-type mthMCM showed a higher binding activity than the zinc finger
mutant, with close to a 3-fold difference (compare lane
2 with lane 6, lane
3 with lane 7, lane
4 with lane 8, and lane
5 with lane 9). In the absence of ATP,
the wild-type protein bound DNA about as well as the ATP-binding mutant
(compare lane 5 with lane
11). The results of the complementary nitrocellulose filter
binding assay (Fig. 3B) are similar. A surprising result in
both assays was the improvement in DNA binding by the zinc mutant in
the presence of ATP, suggesting that nucleotide binding might stabilize
the mutant protein. In the gel mobility shift assay, but not the
nitrocellulose filter-binding assay, the Lys
Ala mutant exhibited
lower DNA binding activity in the presence of ATP. This discrepancy may
be explained by the longer incubation time and harsher conditions of
the gel mobility shift assay, compared with the filter binding assay,
which measures weaker and more transient associations.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
ssDNA binding activity of the different
mthMCM proteins. A, gel mobility shift assays were
performed as described under "Experimental Procedures," using
32P-labeled M13-1T oligonucleotide in the presence
(lanes 1-4, 6-8, and 10)
or absence (lanes 5, 9, 11,
and 12) of 1 mM ATP. Lanes
2 and 6, 20 ng of enzyme; lanes
3 and 7, 60 ng of enzyme; lanes
4, 5, and 8-11, 180 ng of enzyme. The
percentage of the oligonucleotide that formed a complex with MCM is
indicated (%). B, nitrocellulose filter binding assays were
performed as described under "Experimental Procedures" using
32P-labeled Hel-4 oligonucleotide in the presence of 10, 30, 90, and 270 ng of enzyme in the presence (filled
symbols) or absence (empty symbols) of
1 mM ATP. Circles, wild-type protein;
squares, Lys
Ala (K
A) mutant; triangles,
zinc finger mutant.
Ala; lanes
10 and 11), which cannot bind ATP, exhibits the
slower but not the faster migrating band, similar to the zinc finger
mutant and the wild-type enzyme in the absence of ATP.
Ala mutant), or to aberrant ssDNA interactions.
Thus, the ability of the mutant protein to bind ATP was tested by UV
cross-linking, as was previously done with the wild-type mthMCM enzyme
(41). As shown in Fig. 4A,
both the wild-type (lane 2) and the zinc finger
mutant (lane 3) can bind ATP, unlike the Lys
Ala mutant (lane 4). Comparing the amount of
protein and labeled nucleotide in each lane (using densitometer and
phosphorimager analyses, respectively) showed that similar amounts of
ATP were cross-linked to the wild-type and zinc finger mutant enzymes.
Thus, although UV cross-linking is not a quantitative assay, these
results suggest comparable binding of ATP to both proteins.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
The mthMCM zinc finger domain is needed for
DNA-dependent ATPase activity. A, UV
cross-linking of mthMCM proteins to ATP. 500 ng of each protein (as
indicated) were cross-linked to [
-32P]ATP as described
under "Experimental Procedures." The proteins were separated on
10% SDS-PAGE and visualized by Coomassie Blue (upper
panel) and autoradiography (lower
panel). B, the ATPase activity of the wild-type
and mutant mthMCM proteins was determined using 50 and 100 ng of enzyme
in the absence or presence of single- or double-stranded
X174 DNA as
described under "Experimental Procedures." The numbers
at the bottom of the autoradiogram indicate the
amount of 32Pi released (quantitated by
PhosphorImager analysis).
X174 ssDNA (compare lanes
3 and 6 with lanes 2 and
5) and 4-fold by dsDNA (compare lanes
4 and 7 with lanes 2 and
5). The zinc finger mutant protein possesses ATPase activity
in the absence of DNA (lanes 8 and
11), albeit lower than the wild-type enzyme (compare
lane 8 with lane 2 and
lane 11 with lane 5). The
lower activity may be due to conformational changes within the mutant
protein, which affect the ATPase activity. Neither ssDNA nor dsDNA,
however, stimulated the ATPase activity of the mutant protein (compare
lanes 9 and 10 with lane
8 and lanes 12 and 13 with
lane 11). Similar results have been obtained with
different protein concentrations (data not shown). Taken together,
these results illustrate that the zinc finger domain is needed for
stable interactions between mthMCM and ssDNA.

View larger version (8K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
The zinc finger domain of mthMCM is needed
for helicase activity. Helicase activity assays were carried out
with increasing amounts of the wild-type protein (lanes
3-6), zinc finger mutant (lanes
7-10), and Walker-A motif mutant (Lys
Ala,
lanes 11 and 12) in the presence or
absence of ATP, as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Lane 1, boiled substrate; lane
2, no protein added; lanes 3 and
7, 50 ng of enzyme; lanes 4 and
8, 100 ng of enzyme; lanes 5,
6, and 9-12, 200 ng of enzyme. The percentage
displacement of the oligonucleotide from the duplex DNA substrate is
indicated (%).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Drs. Jerard Hurwitz and Joon-Kyu Lee
for helpful suggestions during the course of this work and Drs. Edward
Egelman and Lori Kelman for comments on the manuscript. We also thank D. Shechter and Dr. J. Gautier for the MCM wild type and Lys
Ala
expression vectors.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ An Invitrogen professor. To whom correspondence should be addressed: CARB/UMBI, 9600 Gudelsky Dr., Rockville, MD 20850. Tel.: 301-738-6294; Fax: 301-738-6255; E-mail: kelman@umbi.umd.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 17, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108519200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
MCM, minichromosome
maintenance;
Mth, Methanobacterium thermoautorophicum
H;
AMP-PNP, 5'-[
,
-imido]triphosphate;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
dsDNA, double-stranded DNA;
ssDNA, single-stranded
DNA;
mthMCM, Methanobacterium
thermoautotrophicum.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Maine, G. T., Sinha, P., and Tye, B. K. (1984) Genetics 106, 365-385 |
| 2. | Tye, B. K. (1999) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 649-686 |
| 3. | Madine, M. A., Khoo, C. Y., Mills, A. D., and Laskey, R. A. (1995) Nature 375, 421-424 |
| 4. | Chong, J. P., Mahbubani, H. M., Khoo, C. Y., and Blow, J. J. (1995) Nature 375, 418-421 |
| 5. | Forsburg, S. L., and Nurse, P. (1994) J. Cell Sci. 107, 2779-2788 |
| 6. | Kubota, Y., Mimura, S., Nishimoto, S., Takisawa, H., and Nojima, H. (1995) Cell 81, 601-609 |
| 7. | Labib, K., Tercero, J. A., and Diffley, J. F. (2000) Science 288, 1643-1647 |
| 8. | Tanaka, T., Knapp, D., and Nasmyth, K. (1997) Cell 90, 649-660 |
| 9. | Zou, L., and Stillman, B. (1998) Science 280, 593-596 |
| 10. | Donovan, S., Harwood, J., Drury, L. S., and Diffley, J. F. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 5611-5616 |
| 11. | Young, M. R., and Tye, B. K. (1997) Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 1587-1601 |
| 12. | Aparicio, O. M., Weinstein, D. M., and Bell, S. P. (1997) Cell 91, 59-69 |
| 13. | Ishimi, Y., Ichinose, S., Omori, A., Sato, K., and Kimura, H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 24115-24122 |
| 14. | Adachi, Y., Usukura, J., and Yanagida, M. (1997) Genes Cells 2, 467-479 |
| 15. | Lee, J. K., and Hurwitz, J. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 18871-18878 |
| 16. | Tye, B. K., and Sawyer, S. L. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 34833-34836 |
| 17. | Ishimi, Y. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24508-24513 |
| 18. | You, Z., Komamura, Y., and Ishimi, Y. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 8003-8015 |
| 19. | Ishimi, Y., Komamura, Y., You, Z., and Kimura, H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 8369-8375 |
| 20. | Hanas, J. S., Hazuda, D. J., Bogenhagen, D. F., Wu, F. Y., and Wu, C. W. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 14120-14125 |
| 21. | Miller, J., McLachlan, A. D., and Klug, A. (1985) EMBO J. 4, 1609-1614 |
| 22. | Schwabe, J. W., and Klug, A. (1994) Nat. Struct. Biol. 1, 345-349 |
| 23. | Berg, J. M., and Shi, Y. (1996) Science 271, 1081-1085 |
| 24. | Leon, O., and Roth, M. (2000) Biol. Res. 33, 21-30 |
| 25. | Raman, C. S., Martasek, P., and Marsters, B. (2000) in Structural Themes Determining Function in Nitric Oxide Synthases: The Porphyrin Handbook (Kadish, K. M. , Smith, K. M. , and Guilard, R., eds), Vol. 4 , Academic Press, Inc., New York |
| 26. | Laity, J. H., Lee, B. M., and Wright, P. E. (2001) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11, 39-46 |
| 27. | Yan, H., Gibson, S., and Tye, B. K. (1991) Genes Dev. 5, 944-957 |
| 28. | van Dinten, L. C., van Tol, H., Gorbalenya, A. E., and Snijder, E. J. (2000) J. Virol. 74, 5213-5223 |
| 29. | Biswas, N., and Weller, S. K. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 8068-8076 |
| 30. | Woese, C. R., and Fox, G. E. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 5088-5090 |
| 31. | Edgell, D. R., and Doolittle, W. F. (1997) Cell 89, 995-998 |
| 32. | Kelman, Z. (2000) Curr. Protein Peptide Sci. 1, 139-154 |
| 33. | Myllykallio, H., and Forterre, P. (2000) Trends Microbiol. 8, 537-539 |
| 34. | Kelman, Z., Lee, J. K., and Hurwitz, J. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 14783-14788 |
| 35. | Chong, J. P., Hayashi, M. K., Simon, M. N., Xu, R. M., and Stillman, B. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 1530-1535 |
| 36. | Shechter, D. F., Ying, C. Y., and Gautier, J. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 15049-15059 |
| 37. | Tye, B. K. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 2399-2401 |
| 38. | Matsunaga, F., Forterre, P., Ishino, Y., and Myllykallio, H. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 11152-11157 |
| 39. | Barns, S. M., Delwiche, C. F., Palmer, J. D., and Pace, N. R. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 9188-9193 |
| 40. | McEntee, K., Weinstock, G. M., and Lehman, I. R. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 77, 857-861 |
| 41. | Grabowski, B., and Kelman, Z. (2001) J. Bacteriol. 183, 5459-5464 |
| 42. | Bult, C. J., White, O., Olsen, G. J., Zhou, L., Fleischmann, R. D., Sutton, G. G., Blake, J. A., FitzGerald, L. M., Clayton, R. A., Gocayne, J. D., Kerlavage, A. R., Dougherty, B. A., Tomb, J. F., Adams, M. D., Reich, C. I., Overbeek, R., Kirkness, E. F., Weinstock, K. G., Merrick, J. M., Glodek, A., Scott, J. L., Geoghagen, N. S. M., and Venter, J. C. (1996) Science 273, 1058-1073 |
| 43. | Smelkova, N. V., and Borowiec, J. A. (1997) J. Virol. 71, 8766-8773 |
| 44. | Lee, J.-K., and Hurwitz, J. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 54-59 |
| 45. | Lei, M., Kawasaki, Y., Young, M. R., Kihara, M., Sugino, A., and Tye, B. K. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 3365-3374 |
| 46. | Jiang, W., McDonald, D., Hope, T. J., and Hunter, T. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 5703-5713 |
| 47. | Brown, G. W., and Kelly, T. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 22083-22090 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Liu, B. Pucci, M. Rossi, F. M. Pisani, and R. Ladenstein Structural analysis of the Sulfolobus solfataricus MCM protein N-terminal domain{dagger} Nucleic Acids Res., April 16, 2008; (2008) gkn183v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Sakakibara, R. Kasiviswanathan, E. Melamud, M. Han, F. P. Schwarz, and Z. Kelman Coupling of DNA binding and helicase activity is mediated by a conserved loop in the MCM protein Nucleic Acids Res., March 27, 2008; 36(4): 1309 - 1320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Barry, A. T. McGeoch, Z. Kelman, and S. D. Bell Archaeal MCM has separable processivity, substrate choice and helicase domains Nucleic Acids Res., February 16, 2007; 35(3): 988 - 998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kasiviswanathan, J.-H. Shin, and Z. Kelman DNA Binding by the Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus Cdc6 Protein Is Inhibited by the Minichromosome Maintenance Helicase. J. Bacteriol., June 1, 2006; 188(12): 4577 - 4580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Fletcher, J. Shen, Y. Gomez-Llorente, C. S. Martin, J. M. Carazo, and X. S. Chen Double Hexamer Disruption and Biochemical Activities of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum MCM J. Biol. Chem., December 23, 2005; 280(51): 42405 - 42410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kasiviswanathan, J.-H. Shin, and Z. Kelman Interactions between the archaeal Cdc6 and MCM proteins modulate their biochemical properties Nucleic Acids Res., September 8, 2005; 33(15): 4940 - 4950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Seybert, C. C. Posthuma, L. C. van Dinten, E. J. Snijder, A. E. Gorbalenya, and J. Ziebuhr A Complex Zinc Finger Controls the Enzymatic Activities of Nidovirus Helicases J. Virol., January 15, 2005; 79(2): 696 - 704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Pucci, M. De Felice, M. Rossi, S. Onesti, and F. M. Pisani Amino Acids of the Sulfolobus solfataricus Mini-chromosome Maintenance-like DNA Helicase Involved in DNA Binding/Remodeling J. Biol. Chem., November 19, 2004; 279(47): 49222 - 49228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Gai, D. Li, C. V. Finkielstein, R. D. Ott, P. Taneja, E. Fanning, and X. S. Chen Insights into the Oligomeric States, Conformational Changes, and Helicase Activities of SV40 Large Tumor Antigen J. Biol. Chem., September 10, 2004; 279(37): 38952 - 38959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Capaldi and J. M. Berger Biochemical characterization of Cdc6/Orc1 binding to the replication origin of the euryarchaeon Methanothermobacter thermoautotrophicus Nucleic Acids Res., September 9, 2004; 32(16): 4821 - 4832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kasiviswanathan, J.-H. Shin, E. Melamud, and Z. Kelman Biochemical Characterization of the Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus Minichromosome Maintenance (MCM) Helicase N-terminal Domains J. Biol. Chem., July 2, 2004; 279(27): 28358 - 28366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Forsburg Eukaryotic MCM Proteins: Beyond Replication Initiation Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 2004; 68(1): 109 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Shin, Y. Jiang, B. Grabowski, J. Hurwitz, and Z. Kelman Substrate Requirements for Duplex DNA Translocation by the Eukaryal and Archaeal Minichromosome Maintenance Helicases J. Biol. Chem., December 5, 2003; 278(49): 49053 - 49062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Shin, B. Grabowski, R. Kasiviswanathan, S. D. Bell, and Z. Kelman Regulation of Minichromosome Maintenance Helicase Activity by Cdc6 J. Biol. Chem., September 26, 2003; 278(39): 38059 - 38067. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. You, Y. Ishimi, H. Masai, and F. Hanaoka Roles of Mcm7 and Mcm4 Subunits in the DNA Helicase Activity of the Mouse Mcm4/6/7 Complex J. Biol. Chem., November 1, 2002; 277(45): 42471 - 42479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Carpentieri, M. De Felice, M. De Falco, M. Rossi, and F. M. Pisani Physical and Functional Interaction between the Mini-chromosome Maintenance-like DNA Helicase and the Single-stranded DNA Binding Protein from the Crenarchaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus J. Biol. Chem., March 29, 2002; 277(14): 12118 - 12127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||