![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 7, 4539-4542, February 16, 2001
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
, and
From the Chromatin and Gene Expression Group, Department of
Anatomy, University of Birmingham Medical School, Birmingham B15 2TT,
United Kingdom and the
School of Biochemistry and
Genetics, The Medical School, University of
Newcastle, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom
Received for publication, November 20, 2000, and in revised form, December 22, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DNA topoisomerase II (topo II) is a
ubiquitous nuclear enzyme that is involved in DNA replication,
transcription, chromosome segregation, and apoptosis. Here we show by
immunoprecipitation, pull down with glutathione
S-transferase fusion proteins, and yeast two-hybrid
analysis that both topo II For completion of cell division, the DNA of replicated chromosomes
must be disentangled to allow the segregation of sister chromatids. In
humans, this is achieved by the unique decatenation activity of DNA
topoisomerase II (topo1 II).
Topo II is essential for normal and neoplastic cellular proliferation,
and several common anti-cancer drugs exert their cytotoxic effects
through this enzyme (1, 2).
Topoisomerase II activity in mammalian cells has been attributed to at
least two isoforms. Topo II HDAC1, and the closely related HDAC2, are both components of two
separate multiprotein complexes. The NuRD/Mi-2 repression complex
contains both nucleosome remodeling and histone deacetylase activities
(12), whereas the Sin3 complex contains only the latter (9). Both
complexes contain the Rb-associated proteins RbAp46 and RbAp48 and
associate with various, sometimes DNA-binding, transcriptional
repressor and corepressor proteins (11). The Xenopus NuRD
complex (which contains homologues of mammalian HDAC1, RbAp48, and the
methyl-CpG-binding protein MBD3) copurifies with DNA topoisomerase II
(13), raising the possibility that mammalian topo II isoforms and HDAC1
may interact in a multiprotein complex.
Here we show that HDAC1 and DNA topoisomerase II isoforms physically
interact both in vivo and in vitro. We also show
that the HDAC inhibitor, TSA, suppresses apoptosis induced by the topo II poison etoposide, but not by the topo I inhibitor camptothecin. Our
results raise the interesting possibility that chromatin remodeling by
a topo II-HDAC-containing complex is involved in topo II-catalyzed DNA
rearrangements and/or generation of etoposide-induced DNA strand breaks
in vivo.
Cells, Reagents, and Materials--
The human cell lines HL-60
(promyelocytic leukemia; p53 null) and HeLa were grown in RPMI 1640 medium containing 8% fetal calf serum. Regions of HDAC1 cDNA were
subcloned into the pGEX3T-4 family of vectors (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) and verified by sequencing. GST fusion proteins were
purified essentially as described previously (6). Recombinant human DNA
topoisomerase II Immunoprecipitations, in Vitro Binding Assays, and Western Blot
Analysis--
HeLa whole cell extract was prepared by lysing cells in
incubation buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM
NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 10% (v/v)
glycerol) containing 1.0% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 0.5% (w/v) sodium
deoxycholate, 0.1% (w/v) SDS, protease inhibitors (0.1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and "Complete
MiniTM" tablets, Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and
50 units of DNase I (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) per 108
cells. The lysate was incubated in ice for 10 min, and the clarified supernatant was used in standard immunoprecipitations as described previously (6, 17). To confirm specificity, cognate blocking peptide
(10 µg) was incubated with the antibody for 30 min before the
addition of extract. Preimmune serum and irrelevant antisera were used
as controls. GST pull down experiments used equivalent amounts of GST
fusion proteins prebound to glutathione-Sepharose beads (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) as described previously (6). Interactions
with recombinant topo II Yeast Two-hybrid Assays--
Yeast strains CG-1945 from a
Matchmaker Two-Hybrid System II kit
(CLONTECH) were transformed with appropriate binary
combinations of constructs containing the GAL4 DNA-binding domain and
the GAL4 activation domain, as recommended by the manufacturers.
HIS3 reporter gene expression was assayed on plates
(6), in the presence of 25 mM 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole
to suppress background growth (18).
Enzyme Assays--
Histone deacetylase activity was assayed as
described previously (17). DNA strand-passage assays were
performed on kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) as described previously
(6).
Detection of Apoptosis--
HL-60 cells were grown until in
mid-log phase, then treated with 100 nM (30 ng/ml) TSA for
0.5 h before additional treatments with either 100 µM (59 µg/ml) etoposide or 5.8 µM (2 µg/ml) camptothecin for 1.5 h. Control samples were treated with
the dilution vehicles (0.1% Me2SO and 0.1%
ethanol). All cells were observed in situ with
phase-contrast microscopy to count cells with an apoptotic morphology,
after staining with 10 µM Hoechst 33342 with the addition of 0.1 µM propidium iodide to visualize necrotic cells.
Cells were also labeled with either FITC-annexin V conjugate
(PharMingen) or with the FAM-VAD-FMK reagent provided in the
CaspaTagTM fluorescein caspase activity kit (Intergen).
Labeled cells were detected by indirect fluorescence microscopy (all
cells) or by FACS analysis on a Coulter Epics flow cytometer.
Interaction of HDAC1 and DNA Topoisomerase II--
HeLa whole cell
extract was immunoprecipitated with affinity-purified antibody against
mammalian HDAC1 and precipitated material tested for the presence of
topo II
We performed in vitro pull down experiments of endogenous
protein with GST fusion proteins. Full-length mammalian HDAC1, tagged with a GST moiety, but not GST itself, bound endogenous topo II
GST fusion proteins containing the
C-terminal domain of HDAC1 interact with recombinant topo II
A yeast two-hybrid system (18) was used to test for direct in
vivo interaction between topo II and HDAC1. Inserts were
constructed to express the topo II
To explore the biological significance of the topo II-HDAC1
interaction, we tested the ability of full-length recombinant HDAC1 to
modulate the functional properties of recombinant topo II Suppression of Etoposide-mediated Apoptosis by the HDAC
Inhibitor Trichostatin A--
We tested the effect of the HDAC
inhibitor trichostatin A (20) on apoptosis induced by the
chemotherapeutic agent etoposide (VP-16). Etoposide causes
topoisomerase II-mediated DNA damage by increasing the steady-state
concentration of covalent DNA cleavage complexes (1, 2, 4). Cells
treated with etoposide acquire an apoptotic morphology, notably the
condensation of chromatin at the nuclear periphery and blebbing of the
plasma membrane (2, 21). HL-60 cells displayed apoptotic chromatin
condensation after only 1.5-h treatment with either 100 µM etoposide or 5.8 µM camptothecin, an
inhibitor of topo I (Fig. 6A).
Plasma membrane changes during early apoptosis include the exposure of
phosphatidylserine to the external cellular environment (22). This
change was measured by binding of FITC-conjungated annexin V and
counting of labeled cells by fluorescence microscopy (Fig.
6B). Activation of cysteine aspartyl proteases (caspases)
(21) during the apoptosis of HL-60 cells was assayed with a fluorescent
substrate and FACS analysis of viable cells (Fig. 6C).
Chromatin condensation, membrane changes, and caspase activation all
demonstrated that prior treatment with 100 nM TSA
suppresses the apoptotic effect of etoposide (Fig. 6, A-C).
In contrast, TSA did not affect apoptosis induced by the topo I
inhibitor camptothecin (Fig. 6, A-C). Note that topo I does
not associate with detectable amounts of deacetylase activity (Fig.
1B). An identical anti-apoptotic effect of TSA treatment was
also observed for the human lung adenocarcinoma cell line H1299 and
HeLa cells (data not shown).
The results presented show that the histone deacetylase HDAC1 is
physically associated with each of the two isoforms of human topoisomerase II, topo II In experiments to assess the biological significance of the topo
II-HDAC interaction, we analyzed the effect of the deacetylase inhibitor TSA on processes known to require topo II activity. The most
striking effect so far has been on the ability of the topo II poison
etoposide to drive cells into apoptosis. We show that treatment
with TSA prior to the addition of etoposide suppresses apoptosis in a
variety of cell lines. The effect is seen even with HL60 cells, in
which apoptosis is detectable within less than 1 h, a finding that
minimizes the probability that inhibition of apoptosis is due to
pleiotropic effects of TSA, such as its ability to alter cell cycle
progression. The inhibitory effect of TSA was detected in several
p53-null cell lines, so the interaction between HDAC1 and p53 (7)
cannot be responsible. Microscopically detectable chromatin remodeling
is a diagnostic characteristic of cells in the later stages of
apoptosis, and recent reports indicate that both topo II and histone
acetylation play a role in this process (24). However, our results
indicate that this is not the stage at which TSA exerts the inhibitory
effect reported here. We have shown that TSA inhibition is detectable
even when using an assay that measures one of the earliest changes of
apoptosis, namely the alteration in membrane phospholipids detected by
binding of annexin V (22). These findings argue that TSA is acting at a
relatively early stage in apoptosis, prior to the onset of major changes in nuclear ultrastructure. It remains possible that TSA also
effects more subtle chromatin changes, possibly those determining expression of genes required for progression through apoptosis (25).
These effects are not mutually exclusive. Indeed, recent results
indicate that both topo II and changes in acetylation act at various
stages in the pathways by which cells progress through apoptosis (24,
26-28).
In attempting to explain the effect of TSA on etoposide-induced
apoptosis, it is important to note that etoposide is a topo II poison
that blocks the enzyme after DNA cleavage but prior to strand passage
(4). Covalent topoisomerase-DNA cleavage complexes accumulate in the
presence of such poisons. DNA replication, transcription, or helicase
activity all disrupt these complexes, releasing the DNA double-strand
breaks that can precipitate apoptosis (1, 4). Reducing either the
accumulation of topo II-DNA complexes, or their breakdown, will both
reduce DNA damage and hence apoptosis. A possible explanation for the
results presented here is that HDAC-dependent chromatin
remodeling is necessary for the initiation of topo II-catalyzed DNA
rearrangement or for dissociation of topo II-DNA complexes, or both. If
this were the case, then HDAC inhibitors such as TSA would be expected
to prevent the appearance of DNA damage in the presence of topo II
poisons, and consequent progression into apoptosis, exactly as we have found. Crucially, TSA has no effect on apoptosis induced by the topo I
inhibitor camptothecin. We show here that topo I is not associated with
HDAC1. Further support for these ideas comes from the recent results of
Tsai et al. (23), who show that topo II is associated not
only with HDAC1/2, but also with MTA2, a protein that is part of the
NuRD chromatin remodeling complex. The NuRD complex contains both
HDAC1/2 and Mi-2, a protein with ATPase/helicase activity (12).
We and others (23) find that HDAC1 can inhibit the catalytic activity
of topo II in vitro. This is an important confirmation of
the ability of topo II and HDAC1 to interact, but is not, at first
sight, consistent with the proposition outlined above that HDAC
activity facilitates topo II catalysis, or its consequences. This can
be resolved by noting that the GST-HDAC1 construct used to inhibit topo
II in vitro is catalytically inactive, presumably because it lacks essential protein partners such as RbAp46/48 (8, 11).
It would be wrong to assume that catalytically active HDAC1,
in the context of a multiprotein complex that includes both HDAC and
chromatin remodeling activities (23), is also inhibitory. It might even
be the case that, in vivo, topo II activity is inhibited
only by association with HDAC rendered catalytically inactive by
inhibitors such as TSA. Such an effect would complement the suppression
of topo II activity brought about by inhibition of chromatin remodeling.
and -
physically interact with the
histone deacetylase HDAC1. The in vitro DNA decatenation activity of recombinant topo II
and -
is inhibited by association with catalytically inactive, recombinant HDAC1. We
provide evidence for the in vivo significance of the topo
II-HDAC1 association, showing that inhibition of HDAC activity with
trichostatin A suppresses apoptosis induced by the topo II poison
etoposide, but not by the topoisomerase I inhibitor camptothecin. We
suggest that chromatin remodeling by an HDAC-containing complex
facilitates both topo II-catalyzed DNA rearrangement and
etoposide-induced DNA damage in vivo.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(p170) associates with chromosomes
during prophase and throughout mitosis and is thought to be a major
component of the nuclear scaffold (3, 4). It has a peak of expression
during G2/M of the cell cycle (5). In contrast, the closely
related topo II
(p180) isoform is thought to have a more general
role in DNA metabolism, with expression levels that remain relatively
constant during cell and growth cycles (5). Both isoforms interact with
the C-terminal region of the tumor suppressor protein, p53 (6). p53 is
a component of a multiprotein complex that contains the histone
deacetylase HDAC1 and the corepressor Sin3a (7-11).
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and -
were made in a yeast system and purified
as described previously (14). Characterization and use of rabbit
polyclonal antibodies against topo II
(18511
) and topo II
(18513
) are described elsewhere (15). A polyclonal rabbit antibody
against mammalian HDAC1 was raised against a synthetic peptide
corresponding to amino acid residues 467-482 and affinity-purified as
described previously (16). Antibody against topo I was obtained
commercially (TopoGen, number 2012).
were performed in incubation buffer
containing 0.1% (v/v) Nonidet P-40.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
by Western blotting (Fig. 1A). Anti-HDAC1 brought down
easily detectable amounts of topo II
. There was no detectable
immunoprecipitation of topo II
with preimmune serum, and
immunoprecipitation was completely abolished by inclusion in the
incubation mix of the peptide used to raise the anti-HDAC1 antibody
(Fig. 1A). The anti-HDAC1 antibody did not immunoprecipitate
detectable levels of topo II
(data not shown), and antibody to topo
II
brought down only a comparatively small amount of the
isoform
(Fig. 1A). However, antisera against both topo II
and
topo II
immunoprecipitate 6-9% of total deacetylase activity from
HeLa whole cell extract (Fig. 1B). The activity is fully
inhibited by TSA. Negative control immunoprecipitations with preimmune
serum, an irrelevant antibody (anti-CDK7), or an antibody against DNA
topoisomerase I (topo I) did not bring down activity above that of the
no-antibody control.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Evidence for the physical association of topo
II
and HDAC1 proteins. A,
Immunoprecipitation of endogenous topo II
(molecular mass,
170 kDa), with the indicated antibodies (10 µg of total IgG), from
100 µg of HeLa whole cell extract (WCE). B,
immunoprecipitation of deacetylase activity by antisera against topo
II
and topo II
(18511
and 18513
) from HeLa WCE. Deacetylase
activity is inhibited by TSA (10 ng/ml). Activity immunoprecipitated is
expressed as a percentage of total input deacetylase activity, less a
background of nonenzymatic release of [3H]acetate of
1.94%. Percentages are averages of three separate experiments, with
bars representing S.D.
in
whole cell extract (Fig. 2A).
In the converse experiment, a GST fusion protein containing the
C-terminal domain (CTD) of topo II
was able to pull down endogenous
HDAC1 (Fig. 2B). The fusion protein of the CTD of topo II
was also able to pull down small amounts of HDAC1 (Fig. 2B).
Fusion proteins of the CTD of topo II
and topo II
were able to
pull down between 9 and 11% of deacetylase activity (Fig.
2C), comparable with the amounts brought down by immunoprecipitation (Fig. 1B). Whereas GST-topo II
pulls
down less HDAC1, as detected on Western blots, than comparable amounts of GST-topo II
(Fig. 2B), the two different fusion
proteins bring down similar amounts of deacetylase activity (Fig.
2C). A possible explanation for this quantitative
discrepancy is that other deacetylases, in addition to HDAC1, are
preferentially associated with topo II
.

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Pull down experiments of endogenous topo II
and HDAC1. A, pull down of endogenous topo II
by 5 µg of immobilized (bound) GST-HDAC1, but not by
immobilized GST. Topo II
is also depleted from the supernatant
(unbound) by GST-HDAC1. B, pull down of
endogenous HDAC1 (molecular mass, 62 kDa) by immobilized
GST-topo II
and topo II
, containing the CTD of each isoform.
C, pull down of deacetylase activity with immobilized
GST-topo II
CTD and topo II
CTD. Bars represent ranges
of two experiments.
(Fig.
3). This domain has previously been shown to contain the LXCXE motif
(residues 414-418), that appears to mediate interactions with the
retinoblastoma protein pRb (19). In contrast, an N-terminal HDAC1
fusion protein, containing the catalytic site, showed minimal
interaction with recombinant topo II
(Fig. 3).

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
In vitro interaction of
recombinant topo II
and HDAC1. Regions of
HDAC1 cDNA were subcloned and expressed as GST fusion proteins.
Immobilized fusion proteins (5 µg) were tested for interaction with 1 µg of recombinant topo II
.
and topo II
C-terminal domains
(6) and the HDAC1 region 220-482 (Fig. 3). Expression of the
integrated, GAL4-dependent HIS3 reporter gene
was used to detect interactions between "bait" and "prey"
proteins in vivo. Topo II
CTD or topo II
CTD as bait,
together with HDAC1 as prey, allowed growth of large colonies (over 2 mm diameter) on His-selective medium. All three proteins were
ineffective when expressed individually (Fig. 4).

View larger version (71K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Yeast two-hybrid assay showing that the CTDs
of topo II
and topo II
can interact with HDAC1 CTD (amino acids 220-482) in
vivo. Expression of the reporter gene HIS3
in yeast stain CG-1945 (CLONTECH) was determined by
two parallel series of spot assays on selective medium plates lacking
tryptophan, leucine, and histidine (
Trp,
Leu,
His), but in the presence of 25 mM
3-amino-1,2,4-triazole to suppress background growth (6, 18). Colony
size was compared with that on plates lacking tryptophan and leucine
(
Trp
Leu) as control. Strong growth in
His medium
occurs only in cells in which the bait and prey proteins physically
interact.
and -
.
Both of these enzymes can decatenate kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) to
minicircle monomers, a process that requires a double-stranded break in
the kDNA to allow strand passage. The addition of increasing amounts of
HDAC1 to the reaction decreases the decatenation of kDNA by topo II
and -
(Fig. 5). Addition of GST alone
did not affect decatenation by either topo II
and -
.

View larger version (55K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Functional association of topo II and histone
deacetylase. Decatentation of 1.4 µg of kinetoplast DNA
concatemer (concat.) to monomers of minicircle DNA by
recombinant topo II
(0.60 pmol) and topo II
(0.22 pmol) is
inhibited by increasing amounts of GST-HDAC1 (1.4-13.9 pmol), but not
by GST alone (4.2-13.9 pmol).

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
TSA suppresses apoptosis induced by topo
II-mediated DNA damage, but not by topo I inhibition, in HL-60
cells. A, cells were treated as indicated (see
"Materials and Methods" for details). Nuclear changes were
visualized by indirect fluorescence microscopy after staining with
Hoechst 33342 with the addition of propidium iodide (PI) to
visualize necrotic cells. The nuclear morphology of cells were scored
for apoptotic cells (PI
; clear bars) and
necrotic cells (PI+; gray bars) and expressed as
percentages of total cells in the field of view. Values are averages of
two separate experiments. B, plasma membrane changes were
detected by the binding of annexin V conjugated to FITC, after
treatment with TSA, etoposide, or camptothecin as indicated (see
"Materials and Methods"). Staining was visualized by indirect
fluorescence microscopy and expressed as percentages of total cells.
Bars represent S.D. values for three separate experiments.
C, broad-spectrum caspase activity was detected by labeling
live cells with the FAM-VAD-FMK fluorescein-conjugated caspase
substrate (see "Materials and Methods") after treatment with
inhibitors, as indicated. Labeled cells were detected by FACS analysis,
and activity is expressed as the percentage of the viable cell
subpopulation that stains positive for the substrate. Values are
averages of two separate experiments.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and topo II
. The association occurs in vivo, being detectable by coimmunoprecipitation from
human cell extracts and by yeast two-hybrid assay. It also occurs
in vitro. GST-coupled recombinant topo II
and topo II
pull down significant amounts of HDAC activity from cell extracts,
while recombinant HDAC1 inhibits the in vitro decatenation
activity of recombinant topo II
. Since completion of the work
reported here, Tsai et al. (23) have reported essentially
the same findings for the two very similar deacetylases HDAC1 and
HDAC2. Interestingly, whereas Tsai et al. (23) find evidence
for an interaction between topo II
and various regions of HDAC2,
including N-terminal residues 1-57, we find that only the C-terminal
region of HDAC1 (residues 220-482) interacts with topo II in
vitro. These two deacetylases seem to differ in their mode of
interaction with topo II.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. G. Anderson for help with the FACS analysis, Dr. J. Shuttleworth for the gift of anti-CDK7 antibody and GST-cdc2 fusion protein construct, Darren A. White and Jayne S. Lavender for technical support.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Wellcome Trust grants (to B. M. T. and C. A. A.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-121-414-6824; Fax: 44-121-4146815; E-mail: b.m.turner@bham.ac.uk.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 2, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C000824200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: topo, topoisomerase; TSA, trichostatin A; GST, glutathione S-transferase; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorter; CTD, C-terminal domain; Rb, retinoblastoma; HDAC, histone deacetylase.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Froelich-Ammon, S. J., and Osheroff, N. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 21429-21432 |
| 2. | Kaufmann, S. H., and Earnshaw, W. C. (2000) Exp. Cell Res. 256, 42-49 |
| 3. | Wang, J. C. (1996) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65, 635-692 |
| 4. | Burden, D. A., and Osheroff, N. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1400, 139-154 |
| 5. | Austin, C. A., and Marsh, K. L. (1998) Bioessays 20, 215-226 |
| 6. | Cowell, I. G., Okorokov, A. L., Cutts, S. A., Padget, K., Bell, M., Milner, J., and Austin, C. A. (2000) Exp. Cell Res. 255, 86-94 |
| 7. | Murphy, M., Ahn, J., Walker, K. K., Hoffman, W. H., Evans, R. M., Levine, A. J., and George, D. L. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 2490-2501 |
| 8. | Taunton, J., Hassig, C. A., and Schreiber, S. L. (1996) Science 272, 408-411 |
| 9. | Struhl, K. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 599-606 |
| 10. | Johnson, C. A., and Turner, B. M. (1999) Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 179-188 |
| 11. | Ng, H. H., and Bird, A. (2000) Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 121-126 |
| 12. | Zhang, Y., LeRoy, G., Seelig, H.-P., Lane, W. S., and Reinberg, D. (1998) Cell 95, 279-289 |
| 13. | Wade, P. A., Gegonne, A., Jones, P. L., Ballestar, E., Aubry, F., and Wolffe, A. P. (1999) Nat. Genet. 23, 62-66 |
| 14. | Austin, C. A., Marsh, K. L., Wasserman, R. A., Willmore, E., Sayer, P. J., Wang, J. C., and Fisher, L. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 15739-15746 |
| 15. | Cowell, I. G., Willmore, E., Chalton, D., Marsh, K. L., Jazrawi, E., Fisher, L. M., and Austin, C. A. (1998) Exp. Cell Res. 243, 232-240 |
| 16. | White, D. A., Belyaev, N. D., and Turner, B. M. (1999) Methods Companion Methods Enzymol. 10, 417-424 |
| 17. | Nan, X., Ng, H.-H., Johnson, C. A., Laherty, C. D., Turner, B. M., Eisenman, R. N., and Bird, A. (1998) Nature 393, 386-389 |
| 18. | Bartel, P. L., and Fields, S. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 254, 241-263 |
| 19. | Brehm, A., Miska, E. A., McCance, D. J., Reid, J. L., Bannister, A. J., and Kouzarides, T. (1998) Nature 391, 597-601 |
| 20. | Yoshida, M., Horinouchi, S., and Beppu, T. (1995) Bioessays 17, 423-430 |
| 21. | Earnshaw, W. C., Martins, L. M., and Kaufmann, S. H. (1999) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69, 383-424 |
| 22. | Vermes, I., Haanen, C., Steffens-Nakken, H., and Reutelingsperger, C. (1995) J. Immunol. Methods 184, 39-51 |
| 23. | Tsai, S. C., Valkov, N., Yang, W. M., Gump, J., Sullivan, D., and Seto, E. (2000) Nat. Genet. 26, 349-353 |
| 24. | Durrieu, F., Samejima, K., Fortune, J. M., Kandels-Lewis, S., Osheroff, N., and Earnshaw, W. C. (2000) Curr. Biol. 10, 923-926 |
| 25. | Green, D. R. (2000) Cell 102, 1-4 |
| 26. | Allera, C., Lazzarini, G., Patrone, E., Alberti, I., Barboro, P., Sanna, P., Melchiori, A., Parodi, S., and Balbi, C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 10817-10822 |
| 27. | Ikura, T., Ogryzko, V. V., Grigoriev, M., Groisman, R., Wang, J., Horikoshi, M., Scully, R., Qin, J., and Nakatani, Y. (2000) Cell 102, 463-473 |
| 28. | Kratzmeier, M., Albig, W., Hanecke, K., and Doenecke, D. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 30478-30486 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. McNamara, H. Wang, N. Hanna, and W. H. Miller Jr. Topoisomerase II{beta} Negatively Modulates Retinoic Acid Receptor {alpha} Function: a Novel Mechanism of Retinoic Acid Resistance Mol. Cell. Biol., March 15, 2008; 28(6): 2066 - 2077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Wyles, Z. Wu, S. E.L. Mirski, and S. P.C. Cole Nuclear interactions of topoisomerase II {alpha} and {beta} with phospholipid scramblase 1 Nucleic Acids Res., June 12, 2007; (2007) gkm434v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Martins and S. A. Krawetz Decondensing the protamine domain for transcription PNAS, May 15, 2007; 104(20): 8340 - 8345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. R. Dawe, U. M. Smith, A. R. Cullinane, D. Gerrelli, P. Cox, J. L. Badano, S. Blair-Reid, N. Sriram, N. Katsanis, T. Attie-Bitach, et al. The Meckel-Gruber Syndrome proteins MKS1 and meckelin interact and are required for primary cilium formation Hum. Mol. Genet., January 15, 2007; 16(2): 173 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. L. Lyu, C.-P. Lin, A. M. Azarova, L. Cai, J. C. Wang, and L. F. Liu Role of Topoisomerase II{beta} in the Expression of Developmentally Regulated Genes Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2006; 26(21): 7929 - 7941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Sanchez-Gonzalez, H. Yang, C. Bueso-Ramos, K. Hoshino, A. Quintas-Cardama, V. M. Richon, and G. Garcia-Manero Antileukemia activity of the combination of an anthracycline with a histone deacetylase inhibitor Blood, August 15, 2006; 108(4): 1174 - 1182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Boix-Chornet, M. F. Fraga, A. Villar-Garea, R. Caballero, J. Espada, A. Nunez, J. Casado, C. Largo, J. I. Casal, J. C. Cigudosa, et al. Release of Hypoacetylated and Trimethylated Histone H4 Is an Epigenetic Marker of Early Apoptosis J. Biol. Chem., May 12, 2006; 281(19): 13540 - 13547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Marchion, E. Bicaku, J. G. Turner, A. I. Daud, D. M. Sullivan, and P. N. Munster Synergistic Interaction between Histone Deacetylase and Topoisomerase II Inhibitors Is Mediated through Topoisomerase II{beta} Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2005; 11(23): 8467 - 8475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Bevins and S. G. Zimmer It's About Time: Scheduling Alters Effect of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors on Camptothecin-Treated Cells Cancer Res., August 1, 2005; 65(15): 6957 - 6966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Jiao, H.-M. Lin, J. Timmons, A. K. Nagaich, S.-W. Ng, T. Misteli, and S. G. Rane E2F-Dependent Repression of Topoisomerase II Regulates Heterochromatin Formation and Apoptosis in Cells with Melanoma-Prone Mutation Cancer Res., May 15, 2005; 65(10): 4067 - 4077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zhang, Y. Ozawa, H. Lee, Y.-D. Wen, T.-H. Tan, B. E. Wadzinski, and E. Seto Histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) activity is regulated by interaction with protein serine/threonine phosphatase 4 Genes & Dev., April 1, 2005; 19(7): 827 - 839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Sugo, N. Niimi, Y. Aratani, K. Takiguchi-Hayashi, and H. Koyama p53 Deficiency Rescues Neuronal Apoptosis but Not Differentiation in DNA Polymerase {beta}-Deficient Mice Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2004; 24(21): 9470 - 9477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Sumer, R. Saffery, N. Wong, J. M. Craig, and K. H. A. Choo Effects of Scaffold/Matrix Alteration on Centromeric Function and Gene Expression J. Biol. Chem., September 3, 2004; 279(36): 37631 - 37639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Agostinho, J. Rino, J. Braga, F. Ferreira, S. Steffensen, and J. Ferreira Human Topoisomerase II{alpha}: Targeting to Subchromosomal Sites of Activity during Interphase and Mitosis Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2004; 15(5): 2388 - 2400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Khobta, C. Carlo-Stella, and G. Capranico Specific Histone Patterns and Acetylase/Deacetylase Activity at the Breakpoint-Cluster Region of the Human MLL Gene Cancer Res., April 15, 2004; 64(8): 2656 - 2662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Kim, M. Blake, J. H. Baek, G. Kohlhagen, Y. Pommier, and F. Carrier Inhibition of Histone Deacetylase Increases Cytotoxicity to Anticancer Drugs Targeting DNA Cancer Res., November 1, 2003; 63(21): 7291 - 7300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. L. Lyu and J. C. Wang Aberrant lamination in the cerebral cortex of mouse embryos lacking DNA topoisomerase II{beta} PNAS, June 10, 2003; 100(12): 7123 - 7128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. THIAGALINGAM, K.-H. CHENG, H. J. LEE, N. MINEVA, A. THIAGALINGAM, and J. F. PONTE Histone Deacetylases: Unique Players in Shaping the Epigenetic Histone Code Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., March 1, 2003; 983(1): 84 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Collins, A. Weber, and D. Levens Transcriptional Consequences of Topoisomerase Inhibition Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2001; 21(24): 8437 - 8451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. U. Kurz, S. E. Wilson, K. B. Leader, B. P. Sampey, W. P. Allan, J. C. Yalowich, and D. J. Kroll The Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Sodium Butyrate Induces DNA Topoisomerase II{alpha} Expression and Confers Hypersensitivity to Etoposide in Human Leukemic Cell Lines Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2001; 1(2): 121 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||