|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M109324200 on October 29, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 1, 528-534, January 4, 2002
Phosphorylation of MEK1 by cdk5/p35 Down-regulates the
Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Pathway*
Pushkar
Sharma § ,
Veeranna §§§,
Monica
Sharma ,
Niranjana D.
Amin ,
Ram K.
Sihag ,
Philip
Grant ,
Natalie
Ahn¶,
Ashok B.
Kulkarni , and
Harish C.
Pant **
From the Laboratory of Neurochemistry, NINDS,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, the
¶ Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder,
Colorado 80309, and the Functional Genomics Unit, Gene Targeting
Facility, NIDCR, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Received for publication, September 26, 2001, and in revised form, October 29, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Cyclin-dependent protein kinase 5 (cdk5), a member of the cdk family, is active mainly in postmitotic
cells and plays important roles in neuronal development and migration,
neurite outgrowth, and synaptic transmission. In this study we
investigated the relationship between cdk5 activity and regulation of
the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway. We report that cdk5
phosphorylates the MAP kinase kinase-1 (MEK1) in vivo as
well as the Ras-activated MEK1 in vitro. The
phosphorylation of MEK1 by cdk5 resulted in inhibition of MEK1
catalytic activity and the phosphorylation of extracellular
signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2. In p35 (cdk5 activator) / mice,
which lack appreciable cdk5 activity, we observed an increase in the
phosphorylation of NF-M subunit of neurofilament proteins that
correlated with an up-regulation of MEK1 and ERK1/2 activity. The
activity of a constitutively active MEK1 with threonine 286 mutated to
alanine (within a TPXK cdk5 phosphorylation motif in the
proline-rich domain) was not affected by cdk5 phosphorylation,
suggesting that Thr286 might be the cdk5/p35
phosphorylation-dependent regulatory site. These findings
support the hypothesis that cdk5 and the MAP kinase pathway cross-talk
in the regulation of neuronal functions. Moreover, these data and the
recent studies of Harada et al. (Harada, T., Morooka, T.,
Ogawa, S., and Nishida, E. (2001) Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 453-459) have prompted us to propose a model for feedback
down-regulation of the MAP kinase signal cascade by cdk5 inactivation
of MEK1.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
cdk51 is a member of the
cyclin-dependent protein kinase family (cdc2, CDC28, and
other generically cyclin-dependent CDKs). Although cdk5
binds to cyclin D, its activity is not regulated by cyclins and there
is little evidence that cdk5 is involved in the progression of the cell
cycle (for review see Ref. 1; see also Refs. 2 and 3). cdk5 is active
mainly in post-mitotic cells such as neurons (4, 5), retinal cells (6),
and muscle cells (7), where its activators p35 (or its truncated form
p25) (4, 5) and p39 (8-11) are specifically expressed. cdk5 has been
suggested to play important roles in neurite outgrowth (12, 13),
neuronal migration (14-16), dopamine signaling in the striatum (17),
exocytosis (18-21), differentiation of muscle cells (7), and
organization of acetylcholine receptors at the neuromuscular junction
(22). Although neuronal cytoskeletal proteins were initially identified
as the major target substrates (4, 23, 24), the number of cdk5
substrates has expanded considerably (see Table I in Ref. 25). These
include DARPP-32, a dopamine and cyclic AMP-regulated phosphoprotein
involved in dopamine signaling (17), NUDEL (a murine homolog of the
Aspergillus nidulans nuclear migration mutant NudE), a
protein involved in neuronal migration and axon transport (26), and
other proteins involved in cross-talk between protein kinases and
phosphatases (27). cdk5 also modulates protein kinase reactions such as
the small GTPase-Rac dependent phosphorylation of p21-activated
kinase, which results in modification of the actin cytoskeleton
(28). By virtue of phosphorylating these diverse substrates, cdk5 plays a multifunctional role in the nervous system.
It has been demonstrated that the absence of cdk5 in cdk5 / mice
results in embryonic lethality (16). Although the p35 knockout mice
survive longer (14), both cdk5 / and p35 / mice exhibit similar
defects in cortical neuronal migration and affect the development of
the nervous system (14-16). We observed that in cdk5 / mice brain
stem neurons showed ballooning and hyperphosphorylation of cytoskeletal
proteins as detected by the SMI31 antibody (see Fig. 1). Similar
observations were obtained from p35 ( / )
mice.2 The antibody
cross-reacts with phosphorylated Lys-Ser-Pro (KSP) motifs in
neurofilament proteins, tau, and MAPs (29), sites that are specifically
targeted by proline-directed kinases such as cdk5 and MAP kinases (24,
30). The data suggested that in the absence of cdk5 activity, other
proline-directed protein kinases were up-regulated. The findings that
KSP motifs in rat NF proteins (particularly, NF-M) are preferentially
phosphorylated by ERK1/2 (30) prompted us to examine the relationship
between cdk5/p35 and MAP kinase activities in vitro and
in vivo.
The MAP kinases mediate a wide range of cellular functions via a
variety of signal transduction pathways (31, 32). In one well studied
pathway, the binding of GTP to Ras protein initiates a phosphorylation
cascade through Raf-1 and MEK1/2 (MAPK kinase), which results in
stimulation of the MAP kinases, ERK1/2. Upon stimulation, ERKs are
known to phosphorylate a variety of cytosolic substrates and are also
translocated into the nucleus where they initiate the transcription of
immediate early genes (33). The Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK pathway is stimulated
by various growth factors and extracellular stimuli and plays important
roles in cell survival, differentiation, and proliferation. This
pathway interacts (cross-talks) with other signal transduction
cascades, either because of overlapping substrate specificity, shared
regulatory sites (31), and/or associations with shared scaffolding
proteins (34).
To explore the nature of interactions between cdk5 and the MAP kinase
signaling cascade, we studied the effect of cdk5 on MEK1 activity
in vitro and in vivo. In this report we provide evidence that cdk5 regulates the MAP kinase pathway in a negative manner via phosphorylation of MEK1.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
All fine chemicals were purchased from Sigma
unless indicated. [ -32P]ATP and
[32P]orthophosphate were purchased from Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech. The glutathione-Sepharose beads were a product of
Sigma Life Sciences. Roscovitine was a product of BioMol.
Plasmids and Expressed Proteins--
A constitutively active
mutant (CA-MEK1) (engineered by deleting residues 32-51 from the N
terminus of MEK1 and by mutating its Ser218 and
Ser222 to Glu and Asp, respectively (35)) or a T286A mutant
was used for cell transfection (as HA tag) as well as for bacterial
protein expression (His6 and/or GST-tagged) purposes. The
mutant (T286A) was created in a plasmid encoding CA-MEK1 using a
Quick Change site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). CA-MEK1(K97M)
was engineered by mutating Lys97 to Met in the CA-MEK1
plasmid. This was used as a template for making T286A(K97M) by mutating
Thr286 to Ala. CA-MEK1 and its variant proteins (T286A,
CA-MEK1(K97M), and T286A(K97M)) were bacterially expressed with
His6 tag (35), and cdk5 and p35 were expressed as GST
fusion proteins as described previously (4). cdk5 and cdk5 dominant
negative (DN) constructs for cell transfections were in pcDNA3.1His
vector and were expressed as His6 tag proteins (gift from
Dr. Li-Huei Tsai, Harvard Medical School). The CMV-p35 plasmid was a
gift from Dr. Li Tsai (Harvard Medical School). Raf-activated MEK1 (GST
fused at the N terminus and His6 fused at the C terminus)
was purchased from Upstate Biotech Industries.
Cell Culture, Transfection, Metabolic Labeling, and
Immunoblotting--
Cortices from 18-day-old rat embryos were
dissected, and the cortical neuronal cell cultures were grown on
polylysine-treated 6-well cell culture dishes. The cells were grown in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal
bovine serum for 7-8 days before drug treatment.
PC12 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
containing 12.5% fetal horse serum and 2.5% fetal bovine serum, and
NIH 3T3 cells were cultured in 10% fetal bovine serum as described earlier (33). The cells were serum-starved by culturing in medium containing 1% fetal bovine serum for 16 h prior to both
transfection and roscovitine inhibition experiments.
cDNA encoding HA-tagged CA-MEK1 or its variant, T286A,
His6-tagged cdk5, or its kinase defective mutant cdk5(DN)
and CMV-p35 (4) were transfected in NIH 3T3 or PC12 cells using
LipofectAMINE PLUS (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's
instructions. Briefly, 2 µg of each plasmid DNA was used in 35-mm
collagen-coated dishes to perform transfections for 60 h. In some
experiments cells were treated with NGF (50 ng/ml) 12 h after
transfection for every 24 h. Subsequently, the cells were lysed
and used for immunoblotting after normalizing the protein using
anti-phospho-ERK1/2 or anti-ERK1/2 antibodies (New England Biolabs).
The phosphorylated form of ERK1/2 is indicated as pp-ERK1/2 in the
figures, whereas ERK1/2 indicates total amount of ERK1/2. For in
vivo labeling experiments, the cells were incubated in
phosphate-deficient Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium 2 h prior
to incubation in [32P]orthophosphoric acid (0.2 mCi/ml)
for 3 h. The cell lysates were prepared in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% Nonidet P-40,
50 µM -glycerophosphate, 50 µM sodium fluoride, 0.1 µM sodium vanadate, and protease inhibitor
mixture (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). An enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Biosciences, Inc. or Pierce) method was used for
immunoblotting following manufacturer's protocol in all experiments.
Anti-HA antibody (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) was used to
immunoprecipitate CA-MEK1 or T286A as described earlier (30).
Kinase Assay and Metabolic Labeling--
cdk5 kinase assays were
performed in a total volume of 50 µl by incubating a preformed
complex of bacterially expressed GST-cdk5 and GST-p25, a truncated form
of p35 (4, 5) and 1 µg of either Raf-phosphorylated or
unphosphorylated GST-MEK1-His6 (N terminus tagged with GST
and C terminus tagged with His6) (Upstate Biotech
Industries) or bacterially expressed CA-MEK1 or its variants, in a
buffer containing 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 1 mM
EDTA, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 µM sodium
fluoride, 10 µM -glycerophosphate, 1 µM
sodium vanadate, protease inhibitor mixture (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals), 100 µM [ -32P]ATP for
60-90 min at 30 °C. The reaction was stopped by boiling the samples
in Laemmli's sample buffer. The phosphate incorporation was detected
by autoradiography of the protein gels. A similar procedure was used
for assessing ERK2 activity using myelin basic protein or a synthetic
KSPXK peptide derived from NF-H (VKSPAKEKAKSPEK) (30) as the
substrate. The reaction mixture was spotted on phospho-cellulose paper
(Whatman), and the phosphate incorporation was measured by
scintillation counting as described previously.
To examine the effect of cdk5/p25 phosphorylation on MEK1 activity,
similar kinase assays were performed using unlabeled ATP (1 mM). GST-Sepharose was used to concentrate MEK1 because it was GST-fused, and then the fusion protein-coupled Sepharose beads were
used to phosphorylate 1 µg of bacterially expressed GST-ERK2 as
described above for the cdk5 assays. The reaction mixture was immunoblotted using anti-phospho-ERK1/2 antibody (New England Biolabs)
to assess the MEK1 activity. When radiolabeled
[ -32P]ATP was used, the phosphate incorporation was
observed by autoradiography of the protein gels or scintillation
counting as described above.
Analysis of NF Proteins, cdk5, and MEK1 Activity in p35 /
Mice--
The p35 / mice were created as described earlier (14,
36). Lysates were prepared from the cerebral cortex and cerebellar tissues of 3-4-week-old p35 / mice as described above for PC12 cells. Cytoskeletal extracts containing NF proteins were prepared according to previously published procedures (30). The protein levels
were normalized, and cdk5 and MEK1 were immunoprecipitated by using
anti-cdk5 (C-8, Santa Cruz) and anti-MEK1/2 (New England Biolabs)
antibodies, respectively. Bacterially expressed GST-ERK2 was used as
the substrate for MEK1 assays, whereas VKSPAKEKAKSPEK, a synthetic
KSPXK peptide derived from the sequence of neurofilament-H, was used for cdk5/p35 assays as described previously (30). The lysates
were immunoblotted using phospho-ERK1/2 or ERK1/2 antibodies.
 |
RESULTS |
Neurofilament Protein Hyperphosphorylation and MAP Kinase
Activities in p35 / Mice--
It has been observed that
neurofilament and microtubule-associated proteins are
hyperphosphorylated in neurons of cdk5 / mice (16). Because cdk5
activity is dependent on p35, we examined whether p35 / mice would
show hyperphosphorylation of neurofilament proteins. Unlike cdk5 /
mice, the p35 / mice are viable after birth, and therefore, the
phosphorylation levels of neurofilament proteins were easily followed
by SMI31 antibody. Fig. 1A
shows the ballooning and accumulation of hyperphosphorylated
anti-SMI31 epitope immunoreactive proteins in the brain stem neurons of
cdk5 / mice. To further verify this observation, the cytoskeletal protein fraction from the cortex and cerebella of 3-4-week-old p35
/ and +/+ wild type mice were analyzed by immunoblotting with
SMI-31 antibody, which specifically recognizes phosphorylated KSP sites
on neurofilament and microtubule-associated proteins. As shown in Fig.
1B, the immunoreactivity of NF-M to SMI31 in the cortex of
p35 / mice was severalfold higher than in the wild type mice.
However, in contrast to the observations in the cortex, the NF-M from
the control and p35 / mice cerebella showed fewer significant
differences in immunoreactivity to SMI-31. However, the intensity of
immunoreactivity of NF-H to SMI-31 in wild type and knockout mice was
very similar. It should be noted that the rodent NF-M is a preferred
substrate for ERK1/2 phosphorylation as compared with cdk5 (30),
therefore suggesting that in p35 / mice the absence of cdk5
activity might have up-regulated ERK1/2. It has been reported earlier
that the brain extracts from p35 / mice exhibited insignificant
levels of cdk5 activity (14). It is possible that the cerebellum might
contain higher levels of p39, a cdk5 activator present in both wild
type and mutant mice that could possibly compensate for the absence of
p35 (10, 11). These data suggested that cdk5 activity in +/+ mouse
cortex might inhibit the activity of other proline-directed kinases
like ERK1/2 that are known to preferentially phosphorylate NF-M.

View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
A, immunohistochemical staining of
18-day-old embryonic brain stem sections from cdk5 / and cdk5 +/+
mice with SMI31 antibody. Note the intense immunostaining of
hyperphosphorylated cytoskeletal proteins in large brain stem neurons
of cdk5 / mice (arrows). These neurons in cdk5 +/+ mice
were not immunostained (arrowheads). B,
immunoblot analysis of phosphorylated cytoskeletal protein preparations
from 4-week-old p35 / and wild type mice brains using
phosphoepitope-specific SMI-31 antibody. The SMI-31
immunoreactivity of NF-M, particularly from the cortex and cerebella in
p35 / mice, was severalfold higher than in p35 +/+ mice.
|
|
Because MEK1 is a key regulator in the MAP kinase pathway, we
immunoprecipitated MEK1 from the cerebral cortex of p35 / and +/+
mice to examine whether these two preparations had a differential effect on ERK2 phosphorylation and activity. The animals used for these
studies were 3-4 weeks old because MEK1 is expressed at significant
levels mainly in the adult brain (37). The MEK1 activity as measured by
ERK1/2 phosphorylation was 60-75% higher in the brain extract from
the p35 / mice as compared with that observed in p35 +/+ mice (Fig.
2, B and C). This
increase in MEK1 activity correlated with the observed decrease in cdk5
activity in p35 / mice (Fig. 2A). The levels of total
MEK1 were the same in p35 / and +/+ mice as measured by
immunoblotting (data not shown). Interestingly, not only did the level
of ERK1/2 phosphorylation increase in the p35 / mice (Fig.
2B), but the amount of phosphorylated ERK1/2 also increased,
although the amount of total ERK1/2 remained unchanged (Fig.
2D). These data prompted the idea that in vivo cdk5/p35 and MEK1 cross-talk might result in regulation of the MAP
kinase pathway.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
p35 / mice showed elevated levels of
phospho-ERK2 and enhanced MEK1 activity. A, the p35
/ mice showed basal levels of cdk5 activity. cdk5 was
immunoprecipitated from the cerebral cortex of age-matched (3-4 weeks)
p35 +/+ and p35 / mice, and the kinase activity was determined by
using a cdk5-specific peptide substrate (31). B, MEK1
activity in p35 / mice was increased over the wild type. MEK1 was
immunoprecipitated from cortex extracts of 3-4-week-old p35 / or
+/+ mice by using MEK1-specific antibody, and the MEK1
immunoprecipitates were then used to phosphorylate bacterially
expressed ERK2. The autoradiogram shows the increased phosphorylation
of ERK2 in p35 / mice. C, MEK1 activity was quantitated
from three separate ERK2 phosphorylation experiments described for
B. D, the blots from 3-4-week-old p35 / and
+/+ mice were immunostained with anti-phospho-ERK1/2
(pp-ERK1/2) or anti-ERK1/2. Results representative of four
different experiments are shown here. p35 / mice showed elevated
levels of phospho-ERK2, but the levels of total ERK1/2 were not
affected.
|
|
cdk5 Phosphorylates and Inhibits Activated MEK1--
To further
explore the relationship between cdk5 and MEK1, we compared the
in vitro phosphorylation of bacterially expressed MEK1
(inactive), Raf-phosphorylated MEK1 (active), and constitutively active
MEK1 (CA-MEK1) by cdk5/p25. Although inactive (unphosphorylated) MEK1
was not phosphorylated by cdk5/p25 (Fig.
3A, lane 5),
Raf-phosphorylated MEK1 (Fig. 3A, lane 2) and
CA-MEK1 (not shown here) were good substrates of cdk5/p25. These data
suggested that the Raf-activated MEK1 served as a substrate for
cdk5/p25.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
A, cdk5/p25 phosphorylated Raf-activated
MEK1 in vitro. Autoradiogram showing bacterially expressed
GST-MEK1-His6, previously phosphorylated by Raf, that was
incubated alone (lane 1) or with cdk5/p25 (lane
2) for 60 min and then subjected to SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.
The right panel (lanes 4 and 5) shows
a similar experiment done with unphosphorylated (inactive) MEK1 and
cdk5/p25. Note the high level of MEK1 phosphorylation in lane
2. The data presented are representative of four experiments.
B, the phosphorylation of active MEK1 by cdk5/p25 resulted
in inhibition of its ability to phosphorylate ERK2. Left
panel, Raf-phosphorylated MEK1 was incubated in vitro
with (lanes 1) or without cdk5/p25 (lanes 3) for
2 h in the presence of unlabeled ATP. Lane 2 is the
control without MEK1. The modified MEK1 was used to phosphorylate equal
amounts of GST-ERK2. The level of phospho-ERK 2 was reduced after cdk5
phosphorylation of MEK1 as shown in the Western blot using phospho-ERK2
antibody (lane 1 compared with lane 3).
Right panel, ERK 2 phosphorylation by active MEK1 was
performed by incubating it with cdk5/p25 and [ -32P]ATP
in the assay mix for 1 h, and the phosphate incorporation was
detected by autoradiography of protein gels. Note that a similar
decrease in MEK1 activity by cdk5-mediated phosphorylation was observed
(compare lanes 1 and 2). C, activation
of ERK2 by CA-MEK1 is suppressed by cdk5/p25 phosphorylation.
Upper panel, in vitro kinase assays for ERK2
activity were performed using a synthetic peptide derived from NF-H as
the substrate (31) using 0.3 µg of CA-MEK1 and 1 µg of ERK2 in the
presence or absence of cdk5/p35 as indicated. Lower panel,
ERK2 was phosphorylated by MEK1 in the presence or absence of cdk5/p25
for 1 h, and the [32P]phosphate incorporation was
measured from the autoradiograms. The data are representative of three
separate experiments.
|
|
The effect of cdk5/p25-mediated phosphorylation on MEK1 catalytic
activity was then tested using expressed ERK2 as its substrate. In
experiments described here the Raf-modified MEK1 with or without cdk5/p35 phosphorylation was used to phosphorylate ERK2. Immunoblot analyses using a phospho-ERK1/2-specific antibody that detects the
phosphorylation at the regulatory T and Y residues in the activation
loop of ERK2 showed a significant decrease in MEK1 activity (Fig.
3B, left panel, lanes 1 and
3). Similarly, when the phosphorylation of ERK2 was followed
by 32P incorporation, cdk5/p35-mediated phosphorylation of
Raf-1, phosphorylated MEK1 showed a decreased phosphorylation of ERK2
(Fig. 3B, right panel, lane 1 versus lane
2). A quantitative measurement of [32P]phosphate
incorporation into ERK2 suggested a 75% decrease in MEK1 activity as a
result of cdk5/p25 phosphorylation (Fig. 3C, lower
panel). Similarly, in another experiment, when an NF-M peptide containing the KSP motif KAKSPVPKSPVEEVKP, a preferred substrate for
ERK (30), was incubated in an assay mixture containing ERK2 and CA-MEK1
with and without cdk5/p25, the phosphorylation of the peptide was
reduced by ~40% in the presence of cdk5/p25 (Fig. 3C,
upper panel). These experiments supported the idea that the activation of ERK2 by CA-MEK1 is inhibited by cdk5/p35-mediated phosphorylation of CA-MEK1.
cdk5 Inhibits the MAP Kinase Pathway in PC12 Cells and Cortical
Neurons--
NGF stimulates the Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK (MAP kinase) pathway
in PC12 cells, which results in neuronal differentiation (33). Also, cdk5 is active in PC12 cells because p35 is endogenously expressed in
these cells (38). To examine the effect of cdk5 on the MAP kinase
pathway, PC12 cells were treated with roscovitine, a specific cdk5
inhibitor shown to inhibit endogenous cdk5 activity in cultured cells
(17, 39). Subsequent treatment of these cells for 25 min with NGF
stimulated the MAP kinase pathway as indicated by enhanced
phosphorylation of ERK1/2 (Fig.
4A, lane 2).
Interestingly, when the cells were stimulated with NGF in the presence
of roscovitine, the increase in ERK phosphorylation was about 3-fold
higher (Fig. 4A, lane 3). The effect of cdk5 on
the kinetics of MAP kinase activation was also tested (Fig.
4B). PC12 cells were treated with NGF for different times in
the presence or absence of roscovitine. In the absence of roscovitine,
NGF stimulated the MEK1-dependent MAP kinase pathway in a
manner reported by several groups. The MEK activity (as judged by
phosphorylated ERK1/2 levels) was near maximal at 20 min after NGF
treatment. In the presence of roscovitine, however, there was a slight
increase in phospho-ERK1/2 levels after 15 min of NGF treatment
followed by a significant increase in phosphorylation of ERK1/2 between
15 and 25 min, further suggesting that inhibition of cdk5 activity
enhances the activation of the MAP kinase pathway. Interestingly, the
maximal effect of roscovitine was observed when the MAP kinase pathway
or MEK1 was substantially activated and is consistent with the data
presented in Fig. 3A. A similar increase in ERK1/2
phosphorylation was also observed when rat cortical neurons were
treated with 50 µM roscovitine, (Fig. 4C,
lane 2), suggesting that cdk5 inhibits the MAP kinase pathway in primary neuron cultures.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
cdk5/p35-mediated phosphorylation of MEK1
inhibits the stimulation of the MAP kinase pathway. A,
PC12 cells were incubated with dimethyl sulfoxide (lane 2)
or 50 µM roscovitine (lane 3) for 30 min prior
to 25 min of stimulation with NGF. Cell lysates were prepared in 2%
SDS and immunoblotted with phospho-ERK1/2 antibodies, and the
densitometric quantitation is expressed in optical density units
(ODU). A significant increase in phospho-ERK1/2 level was
observed upon roscovitine treatment in the absence of any change in
non-phospho-ERK 1/2. B, PC12 cells were treated with
roscovitine or only with dimethyl sulfoxide for 30 min prior to
stimulation of the cells with NGF for indicated times. The activation
of the MAP kinase pathway or MEK activity was estimated by quantitation
of the phospho-ERK1/2 bands from the immunoblots. Activation in the
presence of roscovitine was most evident after 15 min of NGF treatment.
This experiment was repeated two times. C, cortical neurons
from 18-day-old embryonic rats were treated with dimethyl sulfoxide
alone (lane 1) or with roscovitine (50 µM) for
20 min. Immunoblotting was performed on cell extracts using
phospho-ERK1/2 antibody. A significant increase in phospho-ERK1/2 level
was observed upon roscovitine treatment. D, PC12 cells were
transfected with plasmids encoding HA-CA-MEK1, CMV-p35,
His6-cdk5, and His6-cdk5(DN), a kinase
defective mutant as indicated by the labels. Immunoblots of cell
lysates with anti-HA antibody showed no decrease in transfected CA-MEK1
(lane 1). The expression level, however, of phospho-ERK 1/2
was significantly lower in the presence of cdk5/p35 (lane 2)
than in either the control (lane 1) or in the presence of
DNcdk5 (lane 3). For the experiments in the right
panel His6-cdk5 and CMV-p35 followed treatment with
NGF (50 ng/ml) every 24 h starting 12 h after transfection.
The cell lysates were prepared after 60 h and immunoblotted with
anti-phospho-ERK1/2 or anti-ERK1/2 antibodies. The data in A
and C are representative of three independent experiments,
and the densitometric quantitation is expressed in optical density
units (ODU). DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.
|
|
To investigate whether this cdk5-mediated down-regulation of the MAP
kinase pathway was also due to inhibition of MEK1 in cultured cells,
cdk5 and p35 plasmids were co-transfected with CA-MEK1 in PC12 cells in
the absence of NGF treatment (Fig. 4D, left
panel). CA-MEK1 transfection caused ERK1/2 phosphorylation of the
activation loop (Fig. 4D, lane 1). Overexpression
of cdk5/p35 along with CA-MEK1 resulted in a 4-fold decrease in
phosphorylation of ERK1/2 (Fig. 4D, lane 2).
Overexpression of a mutant of cdk5 (cdk5DN) with only 10% of cdk5
activity (5, 28), together with p35, did not produce a similar
reduction in phosphorylation of ERK1/2 (Fig. 4D, lane
3). This suggested that the down-regulation of the MAP kinase
pathway was due to cdk5 catalytic activity.
The long term NGF-mediated activation of endogenous MEK1 and ERK1/2 was
also inhibited by cdk5/p35 overexpression in the PC12 cells (Fig.
4D, right panel). Although the cell lysates were
analyzed at 60 h, long after the early induction of high levels of
endogenous ERK and MEK1 by NGF, the inhibition by cdk5/p35 was evident.
Thr286 of MEK1 Is a Putative cdk5 Target Site--
To
determine whether cdk5/p25 phosphorylates MEK1 at a threonine residue,
cdk5/p25-phosphorylated MEK1 was immunoblotted with a
phosphothreonine-specific antibody. As shown in Fig.
5A (lane 1), cdk5
phosphorylated threonine residues on MEK1. Significantly, the cdk5
consensus motifs are absent in MEK2, and MEK2 was not phosphorylated by
cdk5/p25 (data not shown).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Thr286 of MEK1 is a putative site
for cdk5/p35 phosphorylation. A, MEK1 is phosphorylated
at a threonine residue. Raf-activated MEK1 was phosphorylated by
cdk5/p25 (lane 1) in vitro as described for Fig.
1A. The reaction mixture was immunoblotted using a
phosphothreonine antibody. Lane 2 and 3 represent
controls with Raf-phosphorylated MEK1 alone and cdk5/p25 alone,
respectively. B, schematic diagram showing the domain
structure of MEK1. The regulatory sites in the activation loop as well
as the putative cdk5 consensus sites in the PRD are indicated in
bold type. C, NIH 3T3 cells were co-transfected
with plasmids encoding HA-CA-MEK1 or its variant (HA-CA-T286A) along
with plasmids encoding for cdk5 and p35. The cell lysates were prepared
60 h after transfection, and immunoblotting was performed using
anti-phospho-ERK2 antibody.
|
|
Only two threonine residues (Thr286 and Thr292)
are localized within the cdk5 consensus motifs (TPXK) on
MEK1. The sites of Raf phosphorylation (Ser218 and
Ser222) in the activation loop and a proline-rich domain
(PRD) at its C-terminal region, which contains the two threonine
residues located within the cdk5 consensus motifs, are shown in Fig.
5B. It has been reported that although ERK2 phosphorylated
Thr292 of MEK1, this phosphorylation did not inhibit MEK1
activity (40). However, a related cyclin-dependent kinase,
p34cdc2, found in mitotically active cells, phosphorylated MEK1 at
these two threonine sites and inactivated its enzymatic activity (41).
Therefore, it was reasonable to assume that phosphorylation of
Thr286 and/or Thr292 by neuronal-specific
cdk5/p35 could also inhibit MEK1 activity.
To ascertain which threonine residue in MEK1 is the putative site for
cdk5/p35 phosphorylation, NIH3T3 cells were co-transfected with
plasmids encoding HA-CA-MEK1 or HA-CA-MEK1 (Thr 286A) together with
cdk5/p35 (Fig. 5C). A significant decrease in MEK1 activity (as judged by reduced phospho-ERK levels) resulted upon co-transfection of CA-MEK1 with cdk5 and p35 (Fig. 5C, lane 1 compared with lane 2). On the other hand, co-transfection of
CA-MEK1 (T286A) with cdk5/p35 did not show any significant change in
phospho-ERK levels compared with the control (Fig. 5C,
lane 3), suggesting that Thr286 in MEK1 is a
site of cdk5/p35 phosphorylation that inhibits MEK1 activity. The
levels of total ERK1/2 were not affected in these experiments (data not
shown). These data do not preclude the possibility that
Thr292 was also phosphorylated by cdk5/p35. The fact,
however, that phosphorylation of Ser292 alone by ERK had no
effect on MEK1 (40) implies that phosphorylation of Thr286
is necessary and may be sufficient to inhibit MEK1 activity.
 |
DISCUSSION |
MEK1 occupies a central position in the network of interactive
signaling cascades in all cells. Its target specificity, extent of
activation, and localization in cells are controlled by complex formation with other kinases and non-kinase scaffolding proteins (34,
42). Signal cascades may be regulated positively or negatively by a
variety of factors including cross-talk interactions between components
of specific signaling pathways (43, 44). For example, the Rho family of
G-proteins may cooperate with Raf-1 to activate the Erk pathway (45).
Our results, on the other hand, show that a neuronal-specific cdk5/p35
complex phosphorylated MEK1 in vitro and in vivo,
which resulted in a reduction of MEK1 activity. The cdk5/p35-mediated
decrease in MEK1 activity down-regulated the MAP kinase pathway
in vivo. The data also suggest that for cdk5 to
down-regulate MEK1, the latter must be in an activated state, phosphorylated at Ser218 and Ser222 in the
T-loop by Raf. It implies that cdk5 regulation occurs only after the
MAP kinase cascade has been stimulated by cellular signals that
interact with diverse surface receptors (31, 46). Furthermore,
phosphorylation of the Thr 286 residue in the PRD of MEK1 inhibited
MEK1 and ERK activity, suggesting it as the putative site of cdk5/p35
phosphorylation. This has led us to propose that a conformational
change induced by the Raf activation of MEK1 may be required for
phosphorylation of Thr286 by cdk5. It is possible that the
conformational change in MEK1 caused by cdk5 phosphorylation of Thr 286 is also unfavorable for MEK1 interaction with ERK1/2, thereby
inhibiting the phosphorylation and activation of the latter. This, in
turn, would switch off the MAP kinase signaling cascade in stimulated cells.
A related cyclin-activated kinase, p34cdc2, active during the cell
division cycle, also inactivates MEK1 by phosphorylation in
vivo and in vitro at sites Thr286 and
Thr292 in the PRD (41). It was suggested that this
phosphorylation might act as a feedback regulator to shut down the cell
cycle. It appears, therefore, that the PRD may be a critical domain for the regulation of MEK1 catalytic activity in both proliferating and
terminally differentiated cells such as neurons.
The PRD of MEK1 seems to be principally involved in modulating the
efficient activation of ERK1/2 in the MAP kinase cascade (47). On the
one hand, deletion of the PRD domain residues (265) has no effect
on MEK1 binding to Raf or its activity in vitro (47). On the
other hand, a similar PRD deletion in MEK1 (residues 270-307) blocked
MEK1-Raf binding and decreased MEK1 activity in response to growth
factors (48). The contradictory results could be attributed to a
difference in the residues, i.e. residues between 301 and
307 may be essential for PRD activity.
Formation of the Raf-MEK1 complex seems to be essential for downstream
signaling, and complex formation is modulated by phosphorylation of
sites in the PRD domain. For example, phosphorylation of
Ser298 by p21-activated kinase 1 enhances activation of
MEK1 by promoting MEK1-Raf binding (45). This is consistent with the
observation that mutation of sites Ser298 and
Thr292 to Ala inhibited MEK-Raf binding. Evidently,
conformational changes induced by the additional negativity of the
phosphate groups favor Raf binding and MEK1 activation. Our results
suggest that phosphorylation of Thr286 by neuronal-specific
cdk5/p35 inhibits MEK activity. It may do so by virtue of a
conformational change in MEK1 that may affect binding of the activated
Raf-MEK1 complex to other proteins essential for downstream activation
of ERK1/2. Apparently, different conformational changes may be induced
upon phosphorylation of different residues in the PRD domain.
Our model of cdk5/p35 down-regulation of the MAP kinase signaling
cascade is shown in Fig. 6 on left
side of the diagram. The cdk5 cross-talk inhibition of the cascade
is targeted at Raf-activated MEK1, an event occurring shortly after
receptor activation. We suggest that transient increases in activated
MEK1 are modulated by cdk5 phosphorylation of MEK1 in the Raf-MEK1
complex. Because cdk5 activity depends, in part, on its regulator, p35,
the extent of cdk5 inhibition is limited by the availability of p35.
This model is consistent with recent data showing the activation of cdk5/p35 by ERK in NGF-stimulated PC12 cells (50) (NGF to ERK1/2 in
Fig. 6). It has been well established that NGF stimulates the MAP
kinase cascade with the peak of ERK and MEK1 activity attained rapidly,
within 10-20 min (see Fig. 1C) (50). They have also shown
that ERK activation induces a transcription factor, EGR-1, that
initiates p35 transcription and activation of cdk5 within 1-2 h (Fig.
1) (50). What is most striking is that the increasing cdk5/p35 activity
correlates directly with the subsequent decline in ERK and MEK1
activation as if cdk5/p35 is acting as a feedback regulator or switch
to shut down the signaling cascade by phosphorylating and inactivating
the Raf-MEK1 complex. It is significant that the data in Fig.
1B (50) showing an early decrease in activated MEK1
preceding the decline in ERK activation are consistent with our
model.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
A model of cdk5/p35 feedback regulation of
the MAP kinase cascade in PC12 cells based on our data and the data
reported in Ref. 50 on the transcription of p35 in PC12 cells by
NGF-induced ERK activation of the transcription factor Egr1. The
cdk5/p35 feedback inhibitory loop is shown on the left side
of the figure in bolder arrows, targeted at activated MEK-1.
Inhibition is limited by the availability of cdk5/p35, which is in turn
dependent on levels of p35. As seen in Fig. 1B (50), within
5-10 min, NGF induces a rapid activation of the ERK 1/2 pathway, which
induces the active transcription factor EGR-1 followed by transcription
and up-regulation of p35. This persists for about an hour until
phospho-ERK 1/2 and phospho-MEK1 begin to decline. The timing of this
decline (1-3 h) coincides with increased expression of p35 and cdk5
activity. We suggest that cdk5/p35 phosphorylation and inhibition of
MEK1 activity is a feedback switch responsible for down-regulating the
MAP kinase cascade.
|
|
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are thankful to Drs. R. W. Albers and
H. Gainer for critical discussions and suggestions with the manuscript.
DNA sequencing support by Jim Neagle (NINDS DNA sequencing facility at
the National Institutes of Health) is appreciated. We would also like
to thank Drs. T. Oshima and T. Tanaka for providing
p35( / ) mice when they were at NIDCR, NIH, Bethesda, MD.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
These authors contributed equally to this work.

Present address: National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India.
§§
Present address: Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric
Research, Orangeburg, NY 10962.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Laboratory of
Neurochemistry, Bldg. 36, Rm. 4D-04, NINDS, National Institutes of
Health, Bethesda, MD 20892. Tel.: 301-402-2124; Fax:
301-496-1339; E-mail: panth@ninds.nih.gov.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 29, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M109324200
2
I. Vincent, personal communication.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
cdk5, cyclin-dependent protein kinase 5;
MAP, mitogen-activated
protein;
MEK1, MAP kinase kinase 1;
CA-MEK1, constitutively active
MEK1;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
PRD, proline-rich domain;
HA, hemagglutinin;
DN, dominant negative;
NGF, nerve growth factor.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Morgan, D. O.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
13,
261-291[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Guidato, S.,
McLoughlin, D. M.,
Grierson, A. J.,
and Miller, C. C.
(1998)
J. Neurochem.
70,
335-340[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Xiong, Y.,
Zhang, H.,
and Beach, D.
(1992)
Cell
71,
505-514[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Lew, J.,
Huang, Q. Q., Qi, Z.,
Winkfein, R. J.,
Aebersold, R.,
Hunt, T.,
and Wang, J. H.
(1994)
Nature
371,
423-426[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Tsai, L. H.,
Delalle, I.,
Caviness, V. S., Jr.,
Chae, T.,
and Harlow, E.
(1994)
Nature
371,
419-423[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Hirooka, K.,
Tomizawa, K.,
Matsui, H.,
Tokuda, M.,
Itano, T.,
Hasegawa, E.,
Wang, J. H.,
and Hatase, O.
(1996)
J. Neurochem.
67,
2478-2483[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Philpott, A.,
Porro, E. B.,
Kirschner, M. W.,
and Tsai, L. H.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
1409-1421[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Honjyo, Y.,
Kawamoto, Y.,
Nakamura, S.,
Nakano, S.,
and Akiguchi, I.
(1999)
Neuroreport
10,
3375-3379[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Humbert, S.,
Dhavan, R.,
and Tsai, L.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
975-983[Abstract]
|
| 10.
|
Wu, D. C., Yu, Y. P.,
Lee, N. T., Yu, A. C.,
Wang, J. H.,
and Han, Y. F.
(2000)
Neurochem. Res.
25,
923-929[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Zheng, M.,
Leung, C. L.,
and Liem, R. K.
(1998)
J. Neurobiol.
35,
141-159[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Nikolic, M.,
Dudek, H.,
Kwon, Y. T.,
Ramos, Y. F.,
and Tsai, L. H.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
816-825[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Sharma, M.,
Sharma, P.,
and Pant, H. C.
(1999)
J. Neurochem.
73,
79-86[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Chae, T.,
Kwon, Y. T.,
Bronson, R.,
Dikkes, P., Li, E.,
and Tsai, L. H.
(1997)
Neuron
18,
29-42[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Ohshima, T.,
Gilmore, E. C.,
Longenecker, G.,
Jacobowitz, D. M.,
Brady, R. O.,
Herrup, K.,
and Kulkarni, A. B.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
6017-6026[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Ohshima, T.,
Ward, J. M.,
Huh, C. G.,
Longenecker, G.,
Veeranna,
Pant, H. C.,
Brady, R. O.,
Martin, L. J.,
and Kulkarni, A. B.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
11173-11178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Bibb, J. A.,
Snyder, G. L.,
Nishi, A.,
Yan, Z.,
Meijer, L.,
Fienberg, A. A.,
Tsai, L. H.,
Kwon, Y. T.,
Girault, J. A.,
Czernik, A. J.,
Huganir, R. L.,
Hemmings, H. C., Jr.,
Nairn, A. C.,
and Greengard, P.
(1999)
Nature
402,
669-671[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Fletcher, A. I.,
Shuang, R.,
Giovannucci, D. R.,
Zhang, L.,
Bittner, M. A.,
and Stuenkel, E. L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
4027-4035[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Matsubara, M.,
Kusubata, M.,
Ishiguro, K.,
Uchida, T.,
Titani, K.,
and Taniguchi, H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
21108-21113[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Rosales, J. L.,
Nodwell, M. J.,
Johnston, R. N.,
and Lee, K. Y.
(2000)
J. Cell. Biochem.
78,
151-159[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Shuang, R.,
Zhang, L.,
Fletcher, A.,
Groblewski, G. E.,
Pevsner, J.,
and Stuenkel, E. L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
4957-4966[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Fu, A. K., Fu, W. Y.,
Cheung, J.,
Tsim, K. W., Ip, F. C.,
Wang, J. H.,
and Ip, N. Y.
(2001)
Nat. Neurosci.
4,
374-381[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Paudel, H. K.,
Lew, J.,
Ali, Z.,
and Wang, J. H.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
23512-23518[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Shetty, K. T.,
Link, W. T.,
and Pant, H. C.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
6844-6848[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Grant, P.,
Sharma, P.,
and Pant, H. C.
(2001)
Eur. J. Biochem.
268,
1534-1546[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Sasaki, S.,
Shionoya, A.,
Ishida, M.,
Gambello, M. J.,
Yingling, J.,
Wynshaw-Boris, A.,
and Hirotsune, S.
(2000)
Neuron
28,
681-696[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Bibb, J. A.,
Nishi, A.,
O'Callaghan, J. P.,
Ule, J.,
Lan, M.,
Snyder, G. L.,
Horiuchi, A.,
Saito, T.,
Hisanaga, S.,
Czernik, A. J.,
Nairn, A. C.,
and Greengard, P.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
14490-14497[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Nikolic, M.,
Chou, M. M., Lu, W.,
Mayer, B. J.,
and Tsai, L. H.
(1998)
Nature
395,
194-198[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Sternberger, L. A.,
and Sternberger, N. H.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
6126-6130[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Veeranna,
Amin, N. D.,
Ahn, N. G.,
Jaffe, H.,
Winters, C. A.,
Grant, P.,
and Pant, H. C.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
4008-4021[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Pearson, G.,
Robinson, F.,
Beers Gibson, T., Xu, B.,
Karandikar, M.,
Berman, K.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(2001)
Endocr. Rev.
22,
153-183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Schaeffer, H. J.,
and Weber, M. J.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
2435-2444[Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Cowley, S.,
Paterson, H.,
Kemp, P.,
and Marshall, C. J.
(1994)
Cell
77,
841-852[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Whitmarsh, A. J.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1998)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
23,
481-485[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Mansour, S. J.,
Matten, W. T.,
Hermann, A. S.,
Candia, J. M.,
Rong, S.,
Fukasawa, K.,
Vande Woude, G. F.,
and Ahn, N. G.
(1994)
Science
265,
966-970[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Ohshima, T.,
Ogawa, M.,
Veeranna,
Hirasawa, M.,
Longenecker, G.,
Ishiguro, K.,
Pant, H. C.,
Brady, R. O.,
Kulkarni, A. B.,
and Mikoshiba, K.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
2764-2769[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Alessandrini, A.,
Brott, B. K.,
and Erikson, R. L.
(1997)
Cell Growth Differ.
8,
505-511[Abstract]
|
| 38.
|
Yan, G. Z.,
and Ziff, E. B.
(1995)
J. Neurosci.
15,
6200-6212[Abstract]
|
| 39.
|
Patrick, G. N.,
Zukerberg, L.,
Nikolic, M.,
de la Monte, S.,
Dikkes, P.,
and Tsai, L. H.
(1999)
Nature
402,
615-622[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Gardner, A. M.,
Vaillancourt, R. R.,
Lange-Carter, C. A.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1994)
Mol. Biol. Cell
5,
193-201[Abstract]
|
| 41.
|
Rossomando, A. J.,
Dent, P.,
Sturgill, T. W.,
and Marshak, D. R.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
1594-1602[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Hunter, T.
(2000)
Cell
100,
113-127[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Hucho, F.,
and Buchner, K.
(1997)
Naturwissenschaften
84,
281-290[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Xia, Z.,
Dickens, M.,
Raingeaud, J.,
Davis, R. J.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(1995)
Science
270,
1326-1331[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Frost, J. A.,
Steen, H.,
Shapiro, P.,
Lewis, T.,
Ahn, N.,
Shaw, P. E.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
6426-6438[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Widmann, C.,
Gibson, S.,
Jarpe, M. B.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1999)
Physiol. Rev.
79,
143-180[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Dang, A.,
Frost, J. A.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
19909-19913[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Catling, A. D.,
Schaeffer, H. J.,
Reuter, C. W.,
Reddy, G. R.,
and Weber, M. J.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
5214-5225[Abstract]
|
| 49.
| Deleted in proof
|
| 50.
|
Harada, T.,
Morooka, T.,
Ogawa, S.,
and Nishida, E.
(2001)
Nat. Cell Biol.
3,
453-459[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Nadeau, S. Guillemette, L.-F. Belanger, O. Jacob, S. Roy, and J. Charron
Map2k1 and Map2k2 genes contribute to the normal development of syncytiotrophoblasts during placentation
Development,
April 15, 2009;
136(8):
1363 - 1374.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Martinez-Cardus, E. Martinez-Balibrea, E. Bandres, R. Malumbres, A. Gines, J. L. Manzano, M. Taron, J. Garcia-Foncillas, and A. Abad
Pharmacogenomic approach for the identification of novel determinants of acquired resistance to oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
January 1, 2009;
8(1):
194 - 202.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Y. Zhang, X. Zhang, X. Chen, D. Thomas, K. Hormi-Carver, F. Elder, S. J. Spechler, and R. F. Souza
Differences in activity and phosphorylation of MAPK enzymes in esophageal squamous cells of GERD patients with and without Barrett's esophagus
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
September 1, 2008;
295(3):
G470 - G478.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Hlavanda, E. Klement, E. Kokai, J. Kovacs, O. Vincze, N. Tokesi, F. Orosz, K. F. Medzihradszky, V. Dombradi, and J. Ovadi
Phosphorylation Blocks the Activity of Tubulin Polymerization-promoting Protein (TPPP): IDENTIFICATION OF SITES TARGETED BY DIFFERENT KINASES
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 5, 2007;
282(40):
29531 - 29539.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Nguyen, A. Nishi, J. W. Kansy, J. Fernandez, K. Hayashi, F. Gillardon, H. C. Hemmings Jr., A. C. Nairn, and J. A. Bibb
Regulation of Protein Phosphatase Inhibitor-1 by Cyclin-dependent Kinase 5
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 1, 2007;
282(22):
16511 - 16520.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-L. Zheng, B.-S. Li, J. Kanungo, S. Kesavapany, N. Amin, P. Grant, and H. C. Pant
Cdk5 Modulation of Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Signaling Regulates Neuronal Survival
Mol. Biol. Cell,
February 1, 2007;
18(2):
404 - 413.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Huynh, K. C. Soo, P. K.H. Chow, and E. Tran
Targeted inhibition of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase pathway with AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
January 1, 2007;
6(1):
138 - 146.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Plattner, M. Angelo, and K. P. Giese
The Roles of Cyclin-dependent Kinase 5 and Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 in Tau Hyperphosphorylation
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 1, 2006;
281(35):
25457 - 25465.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Hallows, R. E. Iosif, R. D. Biasell, and I. Vincent
p35/p25 is not essential for tau and cytoskeletal pathology or neuronal loss in Niemann-Pick type C disease.
J. Neurosci.,
March 8, 2006;
26(10):
2738 - 2744.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. K. Pareek, J. Keller, S. Kesavapany, H. C. Pant, M. J. Iadarola, R. O. Brady, and A. B. Kulkarni
Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 activity regulates pain signaling
PNAS,
January 17, 2006;
103(3):
791 - 796.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Tarrega, P. Rios, R. Cejudo-Marin, C. Blanco-Aparicio, L. van den Berk, J. Schepens, W. Hendriks, L. Tabernero, and R. Pulido
ERK2 Shows a Restrictive and Locally Selective Mechanism of Recognition by Its Tyrosine Phosphatase Inactivators Not Shared by Its Activator MEK1
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 11, 2005;
280(45):
37885 - 37894.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. H. Song, C. X. Wang, D. K. Song, P. Wang, A. Shuaib, and C. Hao
Interferon {gamma} Induces Neurite Outgrowth by Up-regulation of p35 Neuron-specific Cyclin-dependent Kinase 5 Activator via Activation of ERK1/2 Pathway
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 1, 2005;
280(13):
12896 - 12901.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Takahashi, T. Ohshima, A. Cho, T. Sreenath, M. J. Iadarola, H. C. Pant, Y. Kim, A. C. Nairn, R. O. Brady, P. Greengard, et al.
Increased activity of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 leads to attenuation of cocaine-mediated dopamine signaling
PNAS,
February 1, 2005;
102(5):
1737 - 1742.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. K.-H. Chan, A. Dickerson, D. Ortiz, A. F. Pimenta, C. M. Moran, J. Motil, S. J. Snyder, K. Malik, H. C. Pant, and T. B. Shea
Mitogen-activated protein kinase regulates neurofilament axonal transport
J. Cell Sci.,
September 15, 2004;
117(20):
4629 - 4642.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Chen, Q. Wang, X. Wang, and G. P. Studzinski
Up-Regulation of Egr1 by 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 Contributes to Increased Expression of p35 Activator of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 5 and Consequent Onset of the Terminal Phase of HL60 Cell Differentiation
Cancer Res.,
August 1, 2004;
64(15):
5425 - 5433.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kesavapany, N. Amin, Y.-L. Zheng, R. Nijhara, H. Jaffe, R. Sihag, J. S. Gutkind, S. Takahashi, A. Kulkarni, P. Grant, et al.
p35/Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 5 Phosphorylation of Ras Guanine Nucleotide Releasing Factor 2 (RasGRF2) Mediates Rac-Dependent Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 Activity, Altering RasGRF2 and Microtubule-Associated Protein 1b Distribution in Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
May 5, 2004;
24(18):
4421 - 4431.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. K. Y. Fu, W.-Y. Fu, A. K. Y. Ng, W. W. Y. Chien, Y.-P. Ng, J. H. Wang, and N. Y. Ip
Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 phosphorylates signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 and regulates its transcriptional activity
PNAS,
April 27, 2004;
101(17):
6728 - 6733.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Hallows, K. Chen, R. A. DePinho, and I. Vincent
Decreased Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 5 (cdk5) Activity Is Accompanied by Redistribution of cdk5 and Cytoskeletal Proteins and Increased Cytoskeletal Protein Phosphorylation in p35 Null Mice
J. Neurosci.,
November 19, 2003;
23(33):
10633 - 10644.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kesavapany, K.-F. Lau, S. Ackerley, S. J. Banner, S. J. A. Shemilt, J. D. Cooper, P. N. Leigh, C. E. Shaw, D. M. McLoughlin, and C. C. J. Miller
Identification of a Novel, Membrane-Associated Neuronal Kinase, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 5/p35-Regulated Kinase
J. Neurosci.,
June 15, 2003;
23(12):
4975 - 4983.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|