Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M108861200 on October 26, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 1, 609-617, January 4, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/1/609    most recent
M108861200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hao, M.
Right arrow Articles by Maxfield, F. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hao, M.
Right arrow Articles by Maxfield, F. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Vesicular and Non-vesicular Sterol Transport in Living Cells

THE ENDOCYTIC RECYCLING COMPARTMENT IS A MAJOR STEROL STORAGE ORGANELLE*

Mingming HaoDagger §, Sharron X. LinDagger , Ola J. KarylowskiDagger , Daniel WüstnerDagger , Timothy E. McGrawDagger , and Frederick R. MaxfieldDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Biochemistry, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York 10021 and the § Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853

Received for publication, September 13, 2001, and in revised form, October 26, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We examined the intracellular transport of sterol in living cells using a naturally fluorescent cholesterol analog, dehydroergosterol (DHE), which has been shown to mimic many of the properties of cholesterol. By using DHE loaded on methyl-beta -cyclodextrin, we followed this cholesterol analog in pulse-chase studies. At steady state, DHE co-localizes extensively with transferrin (Tf), a marker for the endocytic recycling compartment (ERC), and redistributes with Tf in cells with altered ERC morphology. Expression of a dominant-negative mutation of an ERC-associated protein, mRme-1 (G429R), results in the slowing of both DHE and Tf receptor return to the cell surface. [3H]Cholesterol is found in the same fraction as 125I-Tf on sucrose density gradients, and this fraction can be specifically shifted to a higher density based on the presence of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated Tf in the same organelle. Whereas vesicular transport of Tf and efflux of DHE from the ERC are entirely blocked in energy-depleted cells, delivery of DHE to the ERC from the plasma membrane is only slightly affected. Biochemical studies performed using [3H]cholesterol show that the energy dependence of cholesterol transport to and from the ERC is similar to DHE transport. We propose that a large portion of intracellular cholesterol is localized in the ERC, and this pool might be important in maintaining cellular cholesterol homeostasis.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

As an essential constituent of biological membranes, cholesterol plays various roles in the functions of membranes and membrane-regulated processes in mammalian cells. Cholesterol is a major component of lipid rafts, which are postulated to play an important role in cellular functions such as signaling, adhesion, motility, and membrane traffic (1-5).

Cholesterol is distributed unevenly among various intracellular membranes. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER)1 and mitochondrial membranes contain very little cholesterol (6). By using various methods in different cell types, the plasma membrane has been estimated to contain 50-90% of cellular cholesterol. Estimating the precise cholesterol content in the plasma membrane has been a source of controversy because of limitations of assay techniques (7, 8). One popular technique for determining plasma membrane cholesterol is measuring susceptibility to cholesterol oxidase treatment (9-11). However, this method may overestimate plasma membrane cholesterol to the extent that intracellular cholesterol becomes oxidized (10). Another widely used technique is subcellular fractionation followed by lipid composition analysis. By using a well characterized method based on magnetic affinity chromatography to purify membranes, the plasma membrane was estimated to contain half of the total cellular cholesterol in CHO cells (12).

The balance between plasma membrane and internal cholesterol could be affected, in part, by the relative rates of endocytosis versus secretion and recycling (13). Although the overall lipid composition in early endosomes may be similar to that of the plasma membrane (14), there is experimental evidence that various lipids are sorted differentially at multiple steps in the endocytic pathways (15-17). This sorting would lead to different lipid compositions in the various endocytic organelles. Analysis of recycling endosomes from rat livers by gas-liquid chromatography indicates that these endosomes are enriched in cholesterol (18).

Due to the importance of cholesterol in cell function, it is crucial that the intracellular transport of cholesterol is tightly regulated. Cholesterol is synthesized in the ER and subsequently transported to the plasma membrane in an ATP-dependent process that is independent of the secretory pathway (19-22). Cells also obtain cholesterol by receptor-mediated endocytosis of low density lipoproteins (23). Once delivered to late endosomes or lysosomes, the cholesteryl esters in low density lipoprotein are hydrolyzed, and free cholesterol is rapidly cycled back to the plasma membrane (24, 25). Excess cholesterol is esterified by acyl CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase. Cholesterol cycles constitutively between the cell interior and the plasma membrane (26). Cholesterol movement from the plasma membrane to the ER is inhibited by disruption of the cytoskeleton and acidic compartments (27) but not by ATP depletion (28).

The endocytic recycling pathway has been well characterized in CHO cells (29-31). After internalization via clathrin-coated pits, transferrin (Tf) bound to Tf receptor, and other recycling molecules are rapidly delivered to the sorting endosomes. They are then recycled directly to the plasma membrane (32) or transported to the endocytic recycling compartment (ERC) and subsequently recycled backed to the plasma membrane. The recycling pathway, along with other mechanisms, ensures that the plasma membrane maintains its lipid and protein composition.

Although significant advances have been made in studying cholesterol distribution and trafficking in cells, most methods used are indirect, which can lead to different interpretations (reviewed in Ref. 7). Fluorescent cholesterol analogs offer a unique opportunity for direct imaging of sterol trafficking in living cells. Unlike many synthetic cholesterol analogs tagged with bulky fluorophores that do not mimic the behavior of cholesterol, dehydroergosterol (DHE) is a naturally occurring sterol whose chemical structure closely resembles that of cholesterol. It differs from cholesterol only in having three additional double bonds and an extra methyl group (33). Many studies have shown that DHE is a good cholesterol analog (33-47), in terms of its ability to faithfully mimic the function and behavior of cholesterol in model and biological membranes. A major obstacle in DHE imaging lies in the fact that DHE absorbs and emits in the UV region of the spectrum. A microscope having optical components with high UV throughput and a camera with a high quantum efficiency in the UV region enables us to perform microscopic imaging of this cholesterol analog (34).

Loading DHE onto methyl-beta -cyclodextrin (Mbeta CD) and thus creating a soluble DHE-Mbeta CD complex makes it possible to deliver DHE to the plasma membrane with an efficiency high enough to carry out short pulse-chase experiments. In this study, we perform microscopic imaging of DHE, in combination with biochemical studies using [3H]cholesterol, to examine the intracellular distribution and trafficking of cholesterol in CHO cells. Because we can directly visualize DHE, we are able to identify the ERC as a major intracellular compartment for sterol and subsequently characterize the transport pathways between the plasma membrane and the ERC. All of our major results obtained with DHE are also confirmed by biochemical studies using [3H]cholesterol.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- N-(4,4-Difluoro-5,7-dimethyl-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene-3-pentanoyl)sphingosine (BODIPY FL C5-ceramide) and the Alexa labeling kits were purchased from Molecular Probes Inc. (Eugene, OR). Human Tf, DHE, and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) were from Sigma. Iron-loaded Tf was passed through a Sephacryl S-300 gel filtration system (29). 125I-Tf was prepared as described previously (29). Alexa 546 or 633 was conjugated to iron-loaded Tf following the manufacturer's instructions. HRP was conjugated to iron-loaded Tf as described previously (4). [1,2-3H]Cholesterol (48 Ci/mmol) was purchased from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. All tissue culture supplies were from Invitrogen. All other chemicals were from Sigma.

The media used are as follows: Medium 1 (150 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, and 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4); M1glucose (Medium 1 containing 2 g/liter glucose); acid wash (Medium 1 containing 25.5 mM citric acid, 24.5 mM sodium citrate, 100 mM deferoxamine, 280 mM sucrose, pH 5.2); chase medium (Medium1 containing 5 mM cholesterol-loaded Mbeta CD, 5 mM Mbeta CD, 50 µM deferoxamine, 100 µg/ml unlabeled iron-loaded Tf); energy poisons (15 µM NaN3 and 15 µM 2-deoxyglucose); energy depletion (ED) medium (Medium 1 containing the energy poisons).

Cells-- TRVb-1 is a modified CHO cell line that lacks endogenous Tf receptor and expresses the human Tf receptor (48). Cells were grown at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator and in bicarbonate-buffered Ham's F-12 medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum, 200 µg/ml geneticin as a selection for the transfected Tf receptors, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 2 g/liter glucose. Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged mouse Rme-1 (mRme-1) dominant-negative mutant (G429R) construct was transiently transfected into TRVb-1 cells using the LipofectAMINE reagent system (Invitrogen) as described previously (49). Cells for microscopy were plated 2 days before the experiments in 35-mm plastic tissue culture dishes with a 7-mm hole in the bottom covered by poly-D-lysine-coated coverslips (50).

Loading DHE on Mbeta CD-- DHE-Mbeta CD complexes were prepared similarly to a procedure described previously (51), replacing cholesterol with DHE. In brief, DHE in ethanol was dried under argon and subsequently dissolved in Mbeta CD in Medium 1, making the initial ratio of Mbeta CD to DHE 8:1 (mol:mol). The resulting suspension was vortexed and sonicated until it clarified. It was then incubated in a rocking water bath overnight at 37 °C and centrifuged to remove insoluble DHE aggregates. Final concentration of DHE used for labeling cells was 0.5 to 1 mM.

Fluorescence Microscopy-- Fluorescence microscopy and digital image acquisition were carried out using a Leica DMIRB microscope (Leica Mikroscopie und Systeme GmbH, Germany) equipped with a Princeton Instruments (Princeton, NJ) cooled CCD camera driven by Image 1/MetaMorph Imaging System software (Universal Imaging Corp.). All images were acquired using a high magnification oil immersion objective (63×, 1.4 NA). To optimize the throughput of the microscope in the UV region of the spectrum, a lamp housing from Leica with a collecting lens that had high transmittance characteristics in the UV region was used. DHE was imaged using a filter cube obtained from Chroma Technology Corp. (Brattleboro, VT) (335-nm (20-nm bandpass) excitation filter, 365-nm longpass dichromatic filter, and 405-nm (40-nm bandpass) emission filter). The detection of UV fluorescence of DHE was made possible by the use of a camera with a back-thinned, UV-sensitive CCD chip (Princeton Instruments Frame Transfer MicroMAX camera with a 512 × 512 back-thinned EEV chip; model 512BFT). This camera has ~70% quantum efficiency at 400 nm. BODIPY FL C5-ceramide and Alexa 488-phalloidin were imaged using a standard fluorescein filter cube (470-nm (20-nm bandpass) excitation filter, 510-nm longpass dichromatic filter, and 537-nm (23-nm bandpass) emission filter), Alexa 546-Tf using a standard rhodamine filter cube (535-nm (50-nm bandpass) excitation filter, 565-nm longpass dichromatic filter, and 610-nm (75-nm bandpass) emission filter), and Alexa 633-Tf using a standard Cy5 filter cube (623-nm (31-nm bandpass) excitation filter, 655-nm longpass dichromatic filter, and 700-nm (35-nm bandpass) emission filter).

Fluorescence crossover was measured using single-labeled samples of each probe, and images were corrected for background (32) and crossover (15).

Quantification of Intracellular Distribution of DHE and [3H]Cholesterol-- The following method was used to estimate the fraction of DHE that was in the ERC. The images were first background-corrected using extracellular intensity values (32). The cell outlines were traced out manually using the phase contrast images. The ERC was also manually outlined for each cell using the Tf-labeled images. Fluorescence power from the outlined ERC region (I<UP><SUB>ERC</SUB><SUP>′</SUP></UP>) and the entire cell (Icell), as well as the areas of the two regions (SERC and Scell, respectively), were measured. To calculate the fluorescence intensity in the plasma membrane (IPM) while taking into consideration the fluorescence contributed by the regions of the plasma membrane that were directly above and below the ERC, Equation 1 was used,


I<SUB><UP>PM</UP></SUB>=<FR><NU>I<SUB><UP>cell</UP></SUB>−I′<SUB><UP>ERC</UP></SUB></NU><DE>1−S<SUB><UP>ERC</UP></SUB>/S<SUB><UP>cell</UP></SUB></DE></FR> (Eq. 1)
This was based on the assumption that the number of DHE molecules present in a certain region of the plasma membrane was proportional to its surface area on the plasma membrane in the wide-field micrographs. DHE fluorescence that was present in the ERC (IERC) was obtained by Equation 2,
I<SUB><UP>ERC</UP></SUB>=<FR><NU>I′<SUB><UP>ERC</UP></SUB>−I<SUB><UP>cell</UP></SUB> · S<SUB><UP>ERC</UP></SUB>/S<SUB><UP>cell</UP></SUB></NU><DE>1−S<SUB><UP>ERC</UP></SUB>/S<SUB><UP>cell</UP></SUB></DE></FR> (Eq. 2)
The ratio of DHE that was present in the ERC versus the plasma membrane is shown in Equation 3,
<FR><NU>I<SUB><UP>ERC</UP></SUB></NU><DE>I<SUB><UP>PM</UP></SUB></DE></FR>=<FR><NU>I′<SUB><UP>ERC</UP></SUB>−I<SUB><UP>cell</UP></SUB> · S<SUB><UP>ERC</UP></SUB>/S<SUB><UP>cell</UP></SUB></NU><DE>I<SUB><UP>cell</UP></SUB>−I<SUB><UP>ERC</UP></SUB></DE></FR> (Eq. 3)
This measurement was repeated for ~30 cells from experiments done on 2 different days.

To quantify the fraction of [3H]cholesterol that was in the ERC versus on the plasma membrane from the density gradients, a ratio was taken of the areas under the lighter peak (the plasma membrane fractions) and the heavier peak (the intracellular fractions). This measurement was repeated for seven experiments from 3 different days.

Subcellular Fractionation of Cells Containing 125I-Tf and [3H]Cholesterol-- Cells were grown to confluency in 150 × 25-mm tissue culture dishes. Control cells were incubated with M1glucose containing 1.2 µg/ml 125I-Tf, 24 µg/ml HRP-Tf, and 1 µCi/ml [3H]cholesterol for 1 h at 37 °C. [3H]Cholesterol was dissolved in ethanol to give a final ethanol concentration in the labeling medium less than 0.1%, v/v. To deplete energy, cells were first incubated with 125I-Tf and HRP-Tf for 1 h at 37 °C, incubated with ED medium for 30 min, and then with ED medium containing [3H]cholesterol for 1 h at 37 °C. For experiments designed to test the efficiency of energy depletion, cells were first incubated with ED medium for 30 min and then with ED medium containing 125I-Tf for 1 h at 37 °C. After labeling with radioactive probes, cells were chilled on ice, and surface-bound 125I-Tf and HRP-Tf were removed by acid wash on ice. 0.4 mg/ml 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB), 50 mM ascorbic acid, and 0.025% H2O2 were added to half of the dishes (referred to as "density-shifted"), and only DAB and ascorbic acid were added to the other half (52, 53). The dishes were incubated in the dark for 1 h on ice. Cells were harvested by incubation with EDTA on ice for 15 min. After removing EDTA, the cells were resuspended in 250 mM sucrose and 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4. The cells were then lysed through a ball-bearing cell breaker and centrifuged to remove the nuclei, and the postnuclear supernatant was layered onto a 10-45% continuous sucrose gradient (54). The gradients were subjected to centrifugation at 137,000 × g for 16 h at 4 °C in a swinging bucket rotor (Sorvall, Newton, CT). The fractionated gradient and resuspended pellet were taken for radioactivity measurement. For experiments designed to identify the plasma membrane fraction, cells were chilled on ice and incubated with 125I-Tf for 1 h on ice. The cells were then lysed and fractionated as described above.

[3H]Cholesterol Efflux-- Cells were grown to confluency in 150 × 25-mm tissue culture dishes. Cells were incubated in M1glucose containing [3H]cholesterol (control) or ED medium containing [3H]cholesterol (energy-depleted) for 1 h at 37 °C. They were then washed several times with Medium 1. Radioactivity from the last wash was measured to make sure that no [3H]cholesterol remained in the bathing medium. 6 ml of chase medium (M1glucose with 10 mM Mbeta CD for control cells and ED medium with 10 mM Mbeta CD for energy depleted cells) was added. This was defined as chase time 0. At each time point, 600 µl of chase medium was taken from the cell dish, and 600 µl of fresh pre-warmed chase medium was added back to the dish. At the end of the 60-min chase, remaining chase medium was removed, and cells were harvested by incubation with EDTA on ice.

[3H]Cholesterol from the chase medium aliquots, remaining chase medium, EDTA wash, and harvested cells was counted by liquid scintillation. To obtain the kinetic curves, the following calculations were made: (a) total [3H]cholesterol = cell-associated [3H]cholesterol + [3H]cholesterol remaining in chase medium + [3H]cholesterol in chase aliquots; (b) fraction of [3H]cholesterol in the chase medium at each time point, f = (10 × ([3H]cholesterol in chase aliquot)) + [3H]cholesterol removed in previous chase aliquots)/total [3H]cholesterol; (c) fraction of [3H]cholesterol that was cell-associated, l = 1 - f. The fraction of [3H]cholesterol that was cell-associated at each chase time point, l, was fit to a double exponential decay l = a·e-bt + c·e-dt + e by SigmaPlot Scientific Graphing Software.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

DHE Is Distributed between the Plasma Membrane and the ERC at Steady State-- Cells were labeled with DHE-loaded Mbeta CD for 1 min and chased for various times (Fig. 1). DHE was incorporated in the plasma membrane during a 1-min pulse, and it was seen most clearly in the regions where two cells abut (Fig. 1A). Accumulation in the juxta-nuclear region was seen within 5 min of chase (Fig. 1B). We did not observe significant amounts of DHE leaving cells in the absence of an acceptor, and this was confirmed by quantification of images taken after different chase times (data not shown). By chasing DHE-labeled cells in serum-free medium without a sterol acceptor for different periods, we found that DHE reached a stable distribution after 30-60 min that remained virtually unchanged during chase periods up to 18 h (Fig. 1, C-E). 35 ± 12% of total cellular DHE was estimated to be in the ERC from these wide field micrographs (see "Experimental Procedures").


View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   DHE distribution in pulse-chase experiments. TRVb-1 cells were pulsed with DHE-loaded Mbeta CD for 1 min at 37 °C and chased for 0 min (A), 5 min (B), and 30 min (C) in M1glucose, or for 2 (D) and 18 h (E) at 37 °C in Ham's F-12 medium similar to the growth medium but with 5% lipoprotein-deficient serum in place of fetal bovine serum. F, cells were incubated with DHE-loaded Mbeta CD for 10 min on ice, chased in M1glucose for 3 h on ice, and fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde for 30 min on ice. All washes were done with ice-cold M1glucose. For all panels cells were then imaged at room temperature. Bar, 10 µm.

To see if reducing temperature has any effect on the delivery of DHE from the plasma membrane to the ERC, we incubated the cells with DHE-loaded Mbeta CD for 10 min on ice, chased for 3 h on ice, and fixed the cells for 30 min on ice. Fig. 1F shows that although the plasma membrane staining was not as bright as the cells labeled for 1 min at 37 °C (Fig. 1A), DHE was nevertheless incorporated into the plasma membrane at 0 °C. However, DHE delivery to the ERC was completely blocked. The flip-flop of DHE from the outer leaflet of the bilayer to the inner leaflet, as well as the desorption from the inner leaflet on to protein carriers, might be affected by lowering the temperature.

It was shown previously (34) that at steady state DHE is localized to a juxta-nuclear dot that overlaps with Tf, a marker for the ERC, and TGN-38, a marker for the trans-Golgi network (TGN). Both DHE and filipin showed a similar ERC/TGN distribution at steady state in CHO cells (34). Due to their close proximity in CHO cells, the ERC and the TGN often appeared to be extensively co-localized in wide field micrographs. However, there were cells in which the ERC was clearly distinguishable from the TGN. When the cells were triple-labeled with BODIPY FL C5-ceramide, a vital stain for the TGN (Fig. 2A), DHE (Fig. 2B), and Alexa 633-Tf (Fig. 2C), DHE was found to be much more closely associated with the ERC than with the TGN. In fact, many cells, such as the ones shown in Fig. 2, displayed the DHE-containing compartment right next to or encircled by the TGN, with only partial overlap. This is more clearly demonstrated in the lower panels of Fig. 2. In Fig. 2D, DHE is pseudo-colored green and BODIPY FL C5-ceramide is red; in Fig. 2E, DHE is green and Tf is red; and in Fig. 2F, DHE is green, Tf is red, and BODIPY FL C5-ceramide is blue. A clear separation of the red and the green colors is seen in Fig. 2D, and the two colors are extensively, but not completely, co-localized to form yellow in Fig. 2E.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   DHE distribution at steady state in CHO cells. TRVb-1 cells were first pulsed with DHE-loaded Mbeta CD for 1 min, chased in the presence of 5 µg/ml Alexa 633-Tf for 1 h, and chased further in M1glucose with excess unlabeled iron-loaded Tf for 15 min. Finally, cells were pulsed with 1 µM BODIPY FL C5-ceramide for 2 min and chased for 5 min. All the pulse-chase treatments were done at 37 °C. Chasing DHE for different times, from 1 to 5 h, gave very similar distribution (images not shown). A-C show BODIPY FL C5-ceramide, DHE, and Alexa 633-Tf staining, respectively. D-F show pseudocolored images intended to demonstrate the extent of co-localization among the three markers. D, DHE is pseudo-colored green and ceramide red; E, DHE is green and Tf is red; and F, DHE is green; Tf is red; and ceramide is blue. Bar, 10 µm.

To demonstrate further that DHE is associated with the ERC, we show that DHE co-redistributed with ERC markers when the ERC morphology was altered (Fig. 3). The ERC dispersed into large aggregates near the cell periphery when cells were treated with the microtubule depolymerization drug, nocodazole. With this treatment, DHE was no longer seen in a tight juxta-nuclear dot, but rather, it co-localized with Tf (Fig. 3A) in the dispersed ERC aggregates (Fig. 3B). The arrows in Fig. 3, A and B, indicate examples of co-distribution of the two molecules.


View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   DHE distribution in nocodazole-treated cells and in cells expressing mRme-1 (G429R). In the top panels, TRVb-1 cells were labeled with DHE for 1 min and chased in the presence of 2 µg/ml Alexa 546-Tf for 1 h at 37 °C. They were then chased for 20 min in the presence of 10 µg/ml nocodazole and imaged in the presence of nocodazole. A and B show Tf and DHE staining, respectively. Arrows indicate some of the places where the two molecules co-localized. In the lower panels, TRVb-1 cells transiently transfected with GFP mRme-1 (G429R) were pulsed with DHE for 1 min and chased for 1 h at 37 °C. C and D show GFP mRme-1 (G429R) and DHE staining, respectively. Bar, 10 µm.

Rme-1/EHD1 is an EH domain protein that is associated with the ERC in CHO cells (49). Expression of a dominant-negative mutant of mRme-1 (G429R) alters the ERC morphology so that it wraps partly around the nucleus, and the retention of Tf in the ERC is prolonged (49). We examined the distribution of DHE in cells that were transiently transfected with mRme-1 (G429R). The extended ERC morphology was demonstrated with GFP-mRme-1 (G429R) in a transfected cell as compared with neighboring untransfected cells (Fig. 3C), and the corresponding DHE staining (Fig. 3D) co-localized very well with the GFP.

Energy-independent Uptake of DHE to the ERC-- Although DHE was delivered from the plasma membrane to the ERC within minutes, we could not detect DHE in endosomal intermediates, such as sorting endosomes, on the route to the ERC. To test further whether DHE was delivered to the ERC from the plasma membrane via a different pathway as Tf, we examined DHE transport in energy-depleted cells. As shown in Fig. 4, A and B, Tf and DHE were concentrated in the ERC after 30 min of internalization in control cells. If the cells were treated with energy poisons prior to labeling, Tf internalization was entirely blocked as expected (28). Tf remained exclusively on the plasma membrane (Fig. 4, C and D) and was removed completely by a mild acid wash (Fig. 4F). DHE uptake to the ERC, on the other hand, was only slightly affected (Fig. 4, E and G) by energy depletion.


View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Uptake of DHE from the plasma membrane to the ERC is energy-independent. The control cells (A and B) were first incubated with M1glucose for 30 min and labeled with DHE-loaded Mbeta CD for 1 min at 37 °C. They were then chased in M1glucose containing 5 µg/ml Alexa 546-Tf for 30 min at 37 °C and imaged in M1glucose. For energy-depleted cells (C-G), M1glucose was replaced by ED medium for all the steps described above. To remove surface-bound Tf, cells were washed twice with the acid wash and several times with Medium 1 (F and G). A, C, D, and F, Tf; B, E, and G, DHE. C and D show the bottom surface and middle focal planes of the same cell, respectively. H shows quantification of the extent of DHE delivery to the ERC in control and energy-depleted cells. To deplete energy, cells were incubated with ED medium for 30 min at 37 °C. Cells were labeled with DHE-loaded Mbeta CD for 1 min and chased in M1glucose (control cells) or ED medium (energy-depleted cells) for different times (10, 20, and 30 min) at 37 °C. To quantify, the images were first background corrected. Both the ERC and the entire cell were then manually outlined. A ratio of fluorescence intensity in the ERC to that in the entire cell was obtained for every cell. Each bar in H was derived from an average of 100 cells. Bar, 10 µm.

We quantified the extent of DHE delivery to the ERC in control and energy-depleted cells (Fig. 4H). After internalization for different times, the fraction of DHE found in the ERC (relative to the rest of the cell) in energy-depleted cells was about 70% that in control cells. Because DHE was initially inserted into the plasma membrane from the cyclodextrin carrier, this indicated that there was significant transport of DHE to the ERC by energy-independent mechanisms.

To quantify the effects of energy depletion on transport rates, we measured the kinetics of DHE delivery to the ERC in control and energy-depleted cells using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (Fig. 5). DHE fluorescence does not spontaneously recover after photobleaching, as tested by photobleaching an entire cell (data not shown). Cells were labeled to steady state with DHE before fluorescence recovery after photobleaching was performed. After photobleaching the ERC, DHE returned to the ERC with a recovery half-time of 2.5 ± 0.6 and 2.6 ± 0.8 min in control and energy-depleted cells, respectively. The fluorescence intensity ratio in the ERC to that in the entire cell recovered to a substantial extent after 10 min. The fact that the two rates were similar indicates that the energy-independent uptake pathway is the predominant route by which DHE is transported to the ERC in CHO cells.


View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Rate of DHE uptake from the plasma membrane to the ERC measured by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP). Cells were labeled with DHE-loaded Mbeta CD for 1 min and chased with 2 µg/ml Alexa 546-Tf for 1 h at 37 °C in either M1glucose (for control cells) or ED medium (for energy-depleted cells). Energy-depleted cells were kept in ED medium throughout the entire experiment. The Tf staining (not shown) was used to find the cell of interest and place its ERC in the middle of the field. An image of the field was taken before photobleaching (Pre-bleaching). The aperture was then closed all the way, and an area in the middle of the field illuminated by the closed aperture was photobleached. Images were then taken at 0, 2, 5, 7.5, and 10 min after photobleaching to monitor the fluorescence recovery in the ERC. After background correction, a ratio of fluorescence intensities in a photobleached region to the entire cell was calculated for each time point. This ratio was then divided by the corresponding ratio obtained from the pre-bleaching image and presented as percent recovered. Each data point, derived from an average of 10 experiments, is fit to the equation y = y0 + a(1 - e-kt), where k is the rate constant. The recovery half-times for control and energy-depleted cells are 2.5 ± 0.6 and 2.6 ± 0.8 min, respectively.

Energy-dependent Efflux of DHE from the ERC-- To examine the efflux of DHE from the ERC to the plasma membrane, cells were first labeled with DHE for 1 min and chased in the presence of Tf for 1 h (Fig. 6, A and E). Both probes effluxed completely from cells after 1 h in normal chase medium that contained 5 mM cholesterol-loaded Mbeta CD and 5 mM Mbeta CD to promote exchange of DHE for cholesterol at the plasma membrane (Fig. 6, B and F). However, adding energy poisons to the chase medium prevented efflux of Tf and DHE from the ERC (Fig. 6, C and G). To show that the block in efflux was due specifically to energy depletion, we washed off the energy poisons and added glucose back to the cells chased in energy poisons (similar to ones in Fig. 6, C and G). The cells were then chased in normal chase medium for 1 h, and the probes were once again chased out almost completely (Fig. 6, D and H).


View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Efflux of DHE to the plasma membrane from the ERC is energy-dependent. Cells were labeled with DHE-loaded Mbeta CD for 1 min and chased in the presence of 2 µg/ml Alexa 546-Tf for 1 h at 37 °C (A and E). They were then chased in the chase medium containing either glucose (B and F) or energy poisons (C and G) for 1 h at 37 °C. To replete energy, energy-depleted cells were washed with Medium1 and chased in the chase medium plus glucose for 1 h (D and H). A-D, DHE; E-H, Alexa 546-Tf. Bar, 10 µm.

Retention of Tf and DHE in the ERC of mRme-1 (G429R) Expressing Cells-- Expression of a mutant form of mRme-1, mRme-1 (G429R), leads to the retention of Tf in the ERC of CHO cells (49). To examine its effects on DHE recycling, cells transfected with GFP-mRme-1 (G429R) were first pulsed with DHE for 1 min and chased in the presence of Tf for 1 h. As shown in Fig. 7, A-D, the ERC in both transfected (indicated by GFP in B) and untransfected cells was equally brightly labeled with Tf and DHE. Cells were then chased for 1 h in chase medium, resulting in a complete chase-out in the untransfected cells. However, both Tf and DHE were retained in the transfected cells (Fig. 7, E-H). Because mRme-1 (G429R) is predominantly associated with the ERC in CHO cells, DHE retention again confirms its localization in the ERC. This experiment shows that the mutant mRme-1 protein affects sterol recycling as well as Tf recycling, suggesting that both are using similar mechanisms to return to the cell surface.


View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Expression of mRme-1 (G429R) results in the slowing of both DHE and Tf receptor recycling. TRVb-1 cells were transiently transfected with GFP mRme-1 (G429R). A-D, cells were pulsed with DHE for 1 min and chased in the presence of 2 µg/ml Alexa 546-Tf for 1 h at 37 °C. These cells were then chased for 1 h at 37 °C in the chase medium (E-H). DHE and Tf were retained in cells expressing mRme-1 (G429R). A and E, phase contrast; B and F, GFP mRme-1 (G429R); C and G, Alexa 546-Tf; D and H, DHE. Bar, 10 µm.

Specific Labeling of the ERC by DHE in Fixed and Permeabilized Cells-- To see whether a diffusible protein carrier is needed for DHE delivery to the ERC from the plasma membrane, we examined DHE transport in fixed and permeabilized cells. When fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde for 2 min at 37 °C, all the cells were fixed (judged by a block in Tf internalization, Fig. 8A), and most cells were permeabilized (judged by phalloidin staining, Fig. 8C). Alexa 488-phalloidin has a molecular weight of 1320, similar to that of DHE-loaded Mbeta CD. Significant juxta-nuclear accumulation of DHE was seen in permeabilized cells (Fig. 8B), whereas only dim staining was observed for non-permeabilized cells (upper right in Fig. 8, B and C). To test whether the juxta-nuclear accumulation of DHE in fixed cells was in the ERC, cells were first labeled with Tf, fixed, and labeled with DHE. DHE co-localized very well with Tf (Fig. 8, D and E) in these permeabilized cells (phalloidin staining, Fig. 8F), indicating that DHE was delivered to the ERC in fixed and permeabilized cells.


View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   DHE is delivered to the ERC specifically in fixed and permeabilized cells. In the top panels, cells were first labeled with 30 µg/ml Alexa 546-Tf for 10 s, fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde for 2 min at 37 °C, labeled with DHE for 1 min, and incubated with Alexa 488-phalloidin for 15 min. Under this condition, all the cells were fixed (judged by a block in Tf internalization, A) and some cells were permeabilized (judged by phalloidin staining, C). In the bottom panels, cells were first incubated with Alexa 546-Tf for 30 min to label the ERC, then fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde, and labeled with DHE and Alexa 488-phalloidin. Under this condition, all the cells were fixed and permeabilized. A and D, Alexa 546-Tf; B and E, DHE; C and F, Alexa 488-phalloidin. Bar, 10 µm.

Internalization of [3H]Cholesterol to the ERC in Control and Energy-depleted Cells-- To make sure that the results we obtained with DHE hold true for cholesterol, we confirmed key DHE results with [3H]cholesterol and subcellular fractionation. Cells were incubated with 125I-Tf, HRP-Tf, and [3H]cholesterol for 1 h at 37 °C. Fig. 9 shows profiles of 125I-Tf and [3H]cholesterol from density gradients of postnuclear supernatants. Fraction 1 corresponds to the top of the gradient (10% sucrose). Both 125I-Tf and [3H]cholesterol were seen in two peaks. The lighter peak (fractions 3-7) contained the plasma membrane (Fig. 9F), broken endosomes, and free 125I-Tf released from broken endosomes.2 The heavier peak (fractions 12-20) contained vesicular organelles, including ERC, TGN, and Golgi.2 To separate the ERC from other intracellular organelles of similar density, we took advantage of a density shifting reaction that occurs specifically in HRP-containing compartments. Cells were incubated with HRP-Tf, 125I-Tf, and [3H]cholesterol, allowing HRP-Tf and 125I-Tf to concentrate in the ERC. HRP-Tf and 125I-Tf were then removed from the plasma membrane by acid wash. When ascorbic acid, DAB, and H2O2 were added, a dense product was generated in the compartments containing HRP-Tf. Under the labeling conditions, most intracellular HRP-Tf would be in the ERC. The accumulation of polymerized DAB inside the ERC induces a large increase in its density, whereas organelles in the same fraction that lack HRP-Tf are essentially unaffected (52). Unable to cross the plasma membrane, ascorbic acid prevents the reaction from taking place at the plasma membrane (53). Comparing Fig. 9, A and B, we see that the denser peak in A shifted to the pellet in B, carrying both 125I-Tf and [3H]cholesterol as a consequence of the density shifting reaction. Fig. 9, A and B, together show unambiguously that there is a significant accumulation of [3H]cholesterol in the Tf-containing ERC. Quantification showed that 38 ± 7% of total cellular [3H]cholesterol was in the ERC.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Fractionation of control and energy-depleted cells containing 125I-Tf and [3H]cholesterol. See "Experimental Procedures" for details. For control cells (A and B), cells were incubated with 125I-Tf, HRP-Tf, and [3H]cholesterol for 1 h. To deplete energy (C and D), cells were incubated with 125I-Tf and HRP-Tf and then with the energy poisons, followed by incubation with [3H]cholesterol in the presence of energy poisons for 1 h. DAB, H2O2, and ascorbic acid were added to B and D. Radioactivity was counted for each fraction from the gradient and plotted as percent of total counts. E, cells were first treated with ED medium for 30 min and then incubated with 125I-Tf for 1 h. Surface-bound 125I-Tf was removed by acid wash. The amount of 125I-Tf present in each fraction (in absolute counts) was plotted together with that from control cells. F, cells were chilled on ice and incubated with 125I-Tf on ice for 1 h. Fraction 1 is the top of the gradient (10% sucrose).

We next performed the fractionation experiments in cells that had been treated with energy poisons. Cells were first incubated with 125I-Tf and HRP-Tf for 1 h at 37 °C, incubated with ED medium for 30 min, and then with ED medium containing [3H]cholesterol for 1 h at 37 °C. Fig. 9C shows that [3H]cholesterol was found in the same peaks as the 125I-Tf-containing compartments on the density gradient. Fig. 9D shows that this peak could be shifted upon HRP-Tf-catalyzed DAB polymerization, showing that [3H]cholesterol was delivered to the ERC in energy-depleted cells.

To test that the energy depletion protocol had blocked membrane internalization, 125I-Tf was added to cells after energy depletion, and the amount of cell-associated 125I-Tf was compared with that in control cells. After acid stripping of the surface-bound Tf, the 125I-Tf counts in energy-depleted cells was measured to be less than 7% of that in the control cells (Fig. 9E), indicating Tf internalization was severely blocked as a result of energy depletion. We used surface labeling of Tf to identify the position of plasma membrane on our sucrose gradients. When cells were incubated with Tf on ice, Tf remained exclusively on the plasma membrane. Surface-bound 125I-Tf was found in fractions 3-7, corresponding to the plasma membrane peak (Fig. 9F).

Efflux of [3H]Cholesterol to the Plasma Membrane in Control and Energy-depleted Cells-- We monitored the efflux of [3H]cholesterol to the plasma membrane where it is effectively removed by Mbeta CD as the acceptor. Our efflux data showed two kinetic populations, each comprising about half of the total (Fig. 10). The fast population, present in both control and energy-depleted cells, gave a half-time of 11 ± 9 and 15 ± 11 s for control and energy-depleted cells, respectively. This rate presumably represented release from the plasma membrane to the acceptor. The slower population, with a half-time of 24 ± 5 min, was not seen in energy-depleted cells, consistent with our observation that DHE efflux to the plasma membrane was energy-dependent. Two pools of cholesterol exhibiting different efflux kinetics have also been demonstrated previously (55, 56). It is not apparent why a depletion of cellular ATP had no effect on cholesterol efflux in one previous report (56).


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Efflux of [3H]cholesterol is energy-dependent. Cells were incubated with [3H]cholesterol for 1 h and continued for 30 min in the absence (control cells) or the presence (energy-depleted cells) of energy poisons. 10 mM Mbeta CD in Medium 1 containing either glucose (control cells) or energy poisons (energy depleted cells) was used as the chase medium. An aliquot of the chase medium was removed at each time point, and fresh chase medium of the same volume was added back. At the end of the chase, cells were harvested to determine cell-associated [3H]cholesterol. The fraction of cell-associated [3H]cholesterol at each time point was fit to a double exponential decay y = a·e-bt + c·e-dt + e. Both control and energy-depleted cells have a fast efflux population with a half-time of 11-15 s. Control cells also have a slower efflux population with a half-time of 24 min.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Previous measurements have estimated that 50-90% of cellular cholesterol is contained in the plasma membrane, and the TGN has been identified as one cholesterol-rich organelle (57, 58). We show here that a large pool of cholesterol is stored intracellularly in the ERC. In microscopy studies, DHE is seen to co-localize extensively with a large part of the ERC that is concentrated in the juxta-nuclear region, and to a much lesser extent with the TGN (Fig. 2). More convincing evidence comes from the fact that when the morphology or function of the ERC is altered, DHE is affected very similarly to other ERC markers. When the ERC morphology is changed by nocodazole treatment (Fig. 3, A and B) or by expressing a mutant protein mRme-1 (G429R) (Fig. 3, C and D), DHE is found to co-redistribute with the ERC markers, indicating a close association of DHE with the ERC.

Results from our microscopy experiments using DHE as well as our biochemical studies using [3H]cholesterol provide strong evidence for the association of cholesterol with the ERC in CHO cells. However, because of a low signal to noise ratio in DHE imaging and limitations in fractionation experiments, we are technically unable to detect low amounts of cholesterol in other intracellular compartments.

Transport of DHE to the plasma membrane from the ERC is energy-dependent (Fig. 6), and like Tf recycling it is slowed by expression of mRme-1 (G429R) (Fig. 7). This suggests that sterol return to the cell surface follows a conventional, tubulo-vesicular membrane recycling pathway. In contrast, an energy-independent pathway accounts for most of the DHE transport from the plasma membrane to the ERC (Figs. 4 and 5). We confirmed that our DHE results hold true for cholesterol using [3H]cholesterol in biochemical studies. In addition to being present in the plasma membrane, [3H]cholesterol is found in the same intracellular compartment as Tf (Fig. 9, A and B). [3H]Cholesterol uptake to the ERC is energy-independent (Fig. 9, C and D), and [3H]cholesterol efflux to the plasma membrane is energy-dependent (Fig. 10).

Additional information on the delivery of DHE to the ERC is gained by looking at DHE transport in fixed and permeabilized cells. When DHE-loaded Mbeta CD is added to permeabilized cells (indicated by phalloidin staining), all the internal membranes are essentially exposed to the reagent. Under this condition, DHE, now carried by the soluble Mbeta CD, is again incorporated selectively into the ERC (Fig. 8, D and E), suggesting that the ERC membrane has special properties that facilitate incorporation of DHE. Comparing the fate of DHE in permeabilized and non-permeabilized fixed cells shows that there is little intracellular accumulation of DHE in the non-permeabilized cells (i.e. cells with no phalloidin staining) (Fig. 8, B and C). Because the only difference between the two types of cells is accessibility of DHE-loaded Mbeta CD to the internal membranes, we conclude that the ERC in permeabilized cells is labeled mostly by DHE carried on Mbeta CD. This suggests that it is the ERC membrane that determines the preferential incorporation of DHE, rather than a special signal on cholesterol/DHE carrier(s) that targets the DHE transport. We do not know the basis for preferential incorporation of sterols into the ERC. One possibility is that these membranes have a high concentration of sphingomyelin which would help to accommodate cholesterol in the bilayer.

Intracellular cholesterol trafficking could occur by at least three potential mechanisms as follows: spontaneous diffusion, protein carrier-mediated diffusion, or vesicular transport. The fact that uptake of DHE to the ERC is energy-independent suggests that this pathway is non-vesicular in nature. In intact cells, a carrier protein could facilitate cholesterol transport by increasing the rate of cholesterol desorption from the bilayer and/or stabilizing the cholesterol after it leaves the bilayer. One candidate is a 13.2-kDa protein named sterol carrier protein 2 (SCP-2), which has the ability to promote sterol transfer between membranes (59-64). Although SCP-2 has been shown to bind cholesterol and DHE (58), its lack of specificity for cholesterol and predominant localization in peroxisomes (reviewed in Refs. 65 and 66)) would prevent it from being a highly efficient carrier for cholesterol trafficking between the plasma membrane and the ERC. As an alternate to a specific carrier, cholesterol transport to the ERC could be facilitated by many soluble cytoplasmic proteins with hydrophobic binding pockets that provide a platform that shields cholesterol from the aqueous cytoplasm. Such carriers would lack specificity in targeting, but our results in the fixed and permeabilized cells indicate that specific targeting by a soluble carrier is unnecessary because Mbeta CD can deliver DHE to the ERC. The low level of DHE labeling of internal membranes in cells that are fixed but not permeabilized (Fig. 8, A-C) is consistent with the need for a diffusible carrier to transport sterol between membranes.

The Golgi complex has been proposed to play a role in the relocation of cholesterol from lysosomes to other cellular membranes (57, 67). Uptake of low density lipoprotein increased Golgi cholesterol concentration, with the greatest increase occurring in the TGN (68). Given their similar densities on a sucrose gradient and close proximity in the perinuclear region, the TGN and the ERC are not always readily distinguishable and clearly separated in CHO cells. We speculate that what was previously interpreted as cholesterol accumulated in the Golgi might also include the ERC. Indeed, recycling endosomes isolated from rat livers have been proposed to be involved in the cell surface delivery of lipoprotein-derived cholesterol (18).

It has been shown that cholesterol moves bi-directionally between the plasma membrane and intracellular compartments, including the ER (26) and lysosomes (69). Because the ERC is in continuous communication and constant exchange with the plasma membrane via the endocytic recycling pathway (70), it could provide an intracellular cholesterol pool that is reflective of the cholesterol content in the plasma membrane. Because of its juxtaposition to the ER where cholesterol-sensing proteins (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (71, 72), acyl-coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase (73-75), and sterol-responsive element-binding protein cleavage-activating protein (76)) responsible for regulating cholesterol homeostasis are located, the ERC would be an ideal organelle through which these proteins could sense cholesterol changes in the plasma membrane.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We are grateful to Dr. Sushmita Mukherjee for useful discussions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK27083 (to F. R. M.) and DK57689 (to T. E. M.) and a grant from the Ara Parseghian Medical Research Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 1300 York Ave., New York, NY 10021. Tel.: 212-746-6405; Fax: 212-746-8875; E-mail: frmaxfie@med.cornell.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 26, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108861200

2 O. J. Karylowski and T. E. McGraw, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: ER, endoplasmic reticulum; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; BODIPY FL C5-ceramide, N-(4,4-difluoro-5,7-dimethyl-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene-3-pentanoyl)sphingosine; DAB, 3,3'-diaminobenzidine; DHE, dehydroergosterol (Delta 5,7,9(11)22-ergostatetraen-3beta -ol); ERC, endocytic recycling compartment; GFP, green fluorescent protein; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; Tf, transferrin; TGN, trans-Golgi network.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Simons, K., and Ikonen, E. (1997) Nature 387, 569-572
2. Brown, D. A., and London, E. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 17221-17224
3. Puri, V., Watanabe, R., Dominguez, M., Sun, X., Wheatley, C. L., Marks, D. L., and Pagano, R. E. (1999) Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 386-388
4. Mayor, S., Sabharanjak, S., and Maxfield, F. R. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4626-4638
5. Mukherjee, S., and Maxfield, F. R. (2000) Traffic 1, 203-211
6. Lange, Y. (1991) J. Lipid Res. 32, 329-339
7. Liscum, L., and Munn, N. J. (1999) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1438, 19-37
8. Blanchette-Mackie, E. J. (2000) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1486, 171-183
9. Lange, Y. (1992) J. Lipid Res. 33, 315-321
10. Underwood, K. W., Jacobs, N. L., Howley, A., and Liscum, L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 4266-4274
11. Slotte, J. P., Hedstrom, G., Rannstrom, S., and Ekman, S. (1989) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 985, 90-96
12. Warnock, D. E., Roberts, C., Lutz, M. S., Blackburn, W. A., Young, W. W., and Baenziger, J. U. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 10145-10153
13. Allan, D., and Kallen, K. J. (1993) Prog. Lipid Res. 32, 195-219
14. Evans, W. H., and Hardison, W. G. (1985) Biochem. J. 232, 33-36
15. Mukherjee, S., Soe, T. T., and Maxfield, F. R. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 144, 1271-1284
16. Kobayashi, T., Gu, F., and Gruenberg, J. (1998) Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 517-526
17. Kok, J. W., Babia, T., and Hoekstra, D. (1991) J. Cell Biol. 114, 231-239
18. Hornick, C. A., Hui, D. Y., and De Lamatre, J. G. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 273, C1075-C1081
19. Heino, S., Lusa, S., Somerharju, P., Ehnholm, C., Olkkonen, V. M., and Ikonen, E. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 8375-8380
20. De Grella, R. F., and Simoni, R. D. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 14256-14262
21. Urbani, L., and Simoni, R. D. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 1919-1923
22. Kaplan, M. R., and Simoni, R. D. (1985) J. Cell Biol. 101, 446-453
23. Brown, M. S., and Goldstein, J. L. (1986) Science 232, 34-47
24. Brasaemle, D. L., and Attie, A. D. (1990) J. Lipid Res. 31, 103-112
25. Johnson, W. J., Chacko, G. K., Phillips, M. C., and Rothblat, G. H. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 5546-5553
26. Lange, Y., Strebel, F., and Steck, T. L. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 13838-13843
27. Lange, Y., and Steck, T. L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 29371-29374
28. Skiba, P. J., Zha, X., Maxfield, F. R., Schissel, S. L., and Tabas, I. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 13392-13400
29. Yamashiro, D. J., Tycko, B., Fluss, S. R., and Maxfield, F. R. (1984) Cell 37, 789-800
30. Yamashiro, D. J., and Maxfield, F. R. (1987) J. Cell Biol. 105, 2713-2721
31. Mayor, S., Presley, J. F., and Maxfield, F. R. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 121, 1257-1269
32. Hao, M., and Maxfield, F. R. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 15279-15286
33. Schroeder, F. (1984) Prog. Lipid Res. 23, 97-113
34. Mukherjee, S., Zha, X., Tabas, I., and Maxfield, F. R. (1998) Biophys. J. 75, 1915-1925
35. Schroeder, F., Frolov, A. A., Murphy, E. J., Atshaves, B. P., Jefferson, J. R., Pu, L., Wood, W. G., Foxworth, W. B., and Kier, A. B. (1996) Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 213, 150-177
36. Schroeder, F., Nemecz, G., Wood, W. G., Joiner, C., Morrot, G., Ayraut-Jarrier, M., and Devaux, P. F. (1991) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1066, 183-192
37. Smutzer, G., Crawford, B. F., and Yeagle, P. L. (1986) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 862, 361-371
38. Schroeder, F., Barenholz, Y., Gratton, E., and Thompson, T. E. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 2441-2448
39. Wood, W. G., Schroeder, F., Avdulov, N. A., Chochina, S. V., and Igbavboa, U. (1999) Lipids 34, 225-234
40. Frolov, A., Woodford, J. K., Murphy, E. J., Billheimer, J. T., and Schroeder, F. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 16075-16083
41. Frolov, A., Woodford, J. K., Murphy, E. J., Billheimer, J. T., and Schroeder, F. (1996) J. Lipid Res. 37, 1862-1874
42. Schroeder, F., Goh, E. H., and Heimberg, M. (1979) FEBS Lett. 97, 233-236
43. Schroeder, F., Goh, E. H., and Heimberg, M. (1979) J. Biol. Chem. 254, 2456-2463
44. Smith, R. J., and Green, C. (1974) Biochem. J. 137, 413-415
45. Bergeron, R. J., and Scott, J. (1982) J. Lipid Res. 23, 391-404
46. Schroeder, F., Woodford, J. K., Kavecansky, J., Wood, W. G., and Joiner, C. (1995) Mol. Membr. Biol. 12, 113-119
47. Schoer, J. K., Gallegos, A. M., McIntosh, A. L., Starodub, O., Kier, A. B., Billheimer, J. T., and Schroeder, F. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 7662-7677
48. McGraw, T. E., Greenfield, L., and Maxfield, F. R. (1987) J. Cell Biol. 105, 207-214
49. Lin, S. X., Grant, B., Hirsh, D., and Maxfield, F. R. (2001) Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 567-572
50. Salzman, N. H., and Maxfield, F. R. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 109, 2097-2104
51. Sheets, E. D., Holowka, D., and Baird, B. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 145, 877-887
52. Courtoy, P. J., Quintart, J., and Baudhuin, P. (1984) J. Cell Biol. 98, 870-876
53. Stoorvogel, W., Oorschot, V., and Geuze, H. J. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 132, 21-33
54. Futter, C. E., and Hopkins, C. R. (1989) J. Cell Sci. 94, 685-694
55. Yancey, P. G., Rodrigueza, W. V., Kilsdonk, E. P., Stoudt, G. W., Johnson, W. J., Phillips, M. C., and Rothblat, G. H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 16026-16034
56. Haynes, M. P., Phillips, M. C., and Rothblat, G. H. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 4508-4517
57. Liscum, L., and Dahl, N. K. (1992) J. Lipid Res. 33, 1239-1254
58. Colles, S. M., Woodford, J. K., Moncecchi, D., Myers-Payne, S. C., McLean, L. R., Billheimer, J. T., and Schroeder, F. (1995) Lipids 30, 795-803
59. Woodford, J. K., Hapala, I., Jefferson, J. R., Knittel, J. J., Kavecansky, J., Powell, D., Scallen, T. J., and Schroeder, F. (1994) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1189, 52-60
60. Woodford, J. K., Colles, S. M., Myers-Payne, S., Billheimer, J. T., and Schroeder, F. (1995) Chem. Phys. Lipids 76, 73-84
61. van Amerongen, A., Demel, R. A., Westerman, J., and Wirtz, K. W. (1989) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1004, 36-43
62. Chanderbhan, R., Noland, B. J., Scallen, T. J., and Vahouny, G. V. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 8928-8934
63. Gadella, T. W., Bastiaens, P. I., Visser, A. J., and Wirtz, K. W. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 5555-5564
64. Hapala, I., Kavecansky, J., Butko, P., Scallen, T. J., Joiner, C. H., and Schroeder, F. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 7682-7690
65. Seedorf, U., Ellinghaus, P., and Roch Nofer, J. (2000) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1486, 45-54
66. Atshaves, B. P., Petrescu, A. D., Starodub, O., Roths, J. B., Kier, A. B., and Schroeder, F. (1999) J. Lipid Res. 40, 610-622
67. Neufeld, E. B., Cooney, A. M., Pitha, J., Dawidowicz, E. A., Dwyer, N. K., Pentchev, P. G., and Blanchette-Mackie, E. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 21604-21613
68. Coxey, R. A., Pentchev, P. G., Campbell, G., and Blanchette-Mackie, E. J. (1993) J. Lipid Res. 34, 1165-1176
69. Lange, Y., Ye, J., and Steck, T. L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 18915-18922
70. Mukherjee, S., Ghosh, R. N., and Maxfield, F. R. (1997) Physiol. Rev. 77, 759-803
71. Roitelman, J., Olender, E. H., Bar-Nun, S., Dunn, W. A., and Simoni, R. D. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 117, 959-973
72. Kumagai, H., Chun, K. T., and Simoni, R. D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 19107-19113
73. Chang, C. C., Chen, J., Thomas, M. A., Cheng, D., Del Priore, V. A., Newton, R. S., Pape, M. E., and Chang, T. Y. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 29532-29540
74. Khelef, N., Soe, T. T., Quehenberger, O., Beatini, N., Tabas, I., and Maxfield, F. R. (2000) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 20, 1769-1776
75. Khelef, N., Buton, X., Beatini, N., Wang, H., Meiner, V., Chang, T. Y., Farese, R. V., Maxfield, F. R., and Tabas, I. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 11218-11224
76. Sakai, J., Nohturfft, A., Cheng, D., Ho, Y. K., Brown, M. S., and Goldstein, J. L. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 20213-20221


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
M. Mondal, B. Mesmin, S. Mukherjee, and F. R. Maxfield
Sterols Are Mainly in the Cytoplasmic Leaflet of the Plasma Membrane and the Endocytic Recycling Compartment in CHO Cells
Mol. Biol. Cell, January 1, 2009; 20(2): 581 - 588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Chevallier, Z. Chamoun, G. Jiang, G. Prestwich, N. Sakai, S. Matile, R. G. Parton, and J. Gruenberg
Lysobisphosphatidic Acid Controls Endosomal Cholesterol Levels
J. Biol. Chem., October 10, 2008; 283(41): 27871 - 27880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
N. H. Petersen, N. J. Faergeman, L. Yu, and D. Wustner
Kinetic imaging of NPC1L1 and sterol trafficking between plasma membrane and recycling endosomes in hepatoma cells
J. Lipid Res., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 2023 - 2037.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Yamauchi, P. C. Reid, J. B. Sperry, K. Furukawa, M. Takeya, C. C. Y. Chang, and T.-Y. Chang
Plasma Membrane Rafts Complete Cholesterol Synthesis by Participating in Retrograde Movement of Precursor Sterols
J. Biol. Chem., November 30, 2007; 282(48): 34994 - 35004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
M. Hao, W. S. Head, S. C. Gunawardana, A. H. Hasty, and D. W. Piston
Direct Effect of Cholesterol on Insulin Secretion: A Novel Mechanism for Pancreatic {beta}-Cell Dysfunction
Diabetes, September 1, 2007; 56(9): 2328 - 2338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
M. Takahashi, M. Murate, M. Fukuda, S. B. Sato, A. Ohta, and T. Kobayashi
Cholesterol Controls Lipid Endocytosis through Rab11
Mol. Biol. Cell, July 1, 2007; 18(7): 2667 - 2677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
J. Leyt, N. Melamed-Book, J.-P. Vaerman, S. Cohen, A. M. Weiss, and B. Aroeti
Cholesterol-sensitive Modulation of Transcytosis
Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 2007; 18(6): 2057 - 2071.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
M. D. Linder, R.-L. Uronen, M. Holtta-Vuori, P. van der Sluijs, J. Peranen, and E. Ikonen
Rab8-dependent Recycling Promotes Endosomal Cholesterol Removal in Normal and Sphingolipidosis Cells
Mol. Biol. Cell, January 1, 2007; 18(1): 47 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
D. Wustner
Plasma Membrane Sterol Distribution Resembles the Surface Topography of Living Cells
Mol. Biol. Cell, January 1, 2007; 18(1): 211 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Sugii, S. Lin, N. Ohgami, M. Ohashi, C. C. Y. Chang, and T.-Y. Chang
Roles of Endogenously Synthesized Sterols in the Endocytic Pathway
J. Biol. Chem., August 11, 2006; 281(32): 23191 - 23206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
D. Rodriguez-Agudo, S. Ren, P. B. Hylemon, R. Montanez, K. Redford, R. Natarajan, M. A. Medina, G. Gil, and W. M. Pandak
Localization of StarD5 cholesterol binding protein
J. Lipid Res., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 1168 - 1175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
N. A. Braun, P. J. Mohler, K. H. Weisgraber, A. H. Hasty, M. F. Linton, P. G. Yancey, Y. R. Su, S. Fazio, and L. L. Swift
Intracellular trafficking of recycling apolipoprotein E in Chinese hamster ovary cells
J. Lipid Res., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 1176 - 1186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Yu, S. Bharadwaj, J. M. Brown, Y. Ma, W. Du, M. A. Davis, P. Michaely, P. Liu, M. C. Willingham, and L. L. Rudel
Cholesterol-regulated Translocation of NPC1L1 to the Cell Surface Facilitates Free Cholesterol Uptake
J. Biol. Chem., March 10, 2006; 281(10): 6616 - 6624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
N. H. Pipalia, A. Huang, H. Ralph, M. Rujoi, and F. R. Maxfield
Automated microscopy screening for compounds that partially revert cholesterol accumulation in Niemann-Pick C cells
J. Lipid Res., February 1, 2006; 47(2): 284 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
N. M. Urs, K. T. Jones, P. D. Salo, J. E. Severin, J. Trejo, and H. Radhakrishna
A requirement for membrane cholesterol in the {beta}-arrestin- and clathrin-dependent endocytosis of LPA1 lysophosphatidic acid receptors
J. Cell Sci., November 15, 2005; 118(22): 5291 - 5304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
M. A. Churchward, T. Rogasevskaia, J. Hofgen, J. Bau, and J. R. Coorssen
Cholesterol facilitates the native mechanism of Ca2+-triggered membrane fusion
J. Cell Sci., October 15, 2005; 118(20): 4833 - 4848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
R. S. Kiss, J. Maric, and Y. L. Marcel
Lipid efflux in human and mouse macrophagic cells: evidence for differential regulation of phospholipid and cholesterol efflux
J. Lipid Res., September 1, 2005; 46(9): 1877 - 1887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
M. Holtta-Vuori, F. Alpy, K. Tanhuanpaa, E. Jokitalo, A.-L. Mutka, and E. Ikonen
MLN64 Is Involved in Actin-mediated Dynamics of Late Endocytic Organelles
Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2005; 16(8): 3873 - 3886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
E. S. Ward, C. Martinez, C. Vaccaro, J. Zhou, Q. Tang, and R. J. Ober
From Sorting Endosomes to Exocytosis: Association of Rab4 and Rab11 GTPases with the Fc Receptor, FcRn, during Recycling
Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 2005; 16(4): 2028 - 2038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J BiochemHome page
R. Ishitsuka, S. B. Sato, and T. Kobayashi
Imaging Lipid Rafts
J. Biochem., March 1, 2005; 137(3): 249 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
D. S. Ory
Nuclear Receptor Signaling in the Control of Cholesterol Homeostasis: Have the Orphans Found a Home?
Circ. Res., October 1, 2004; 95(7): 660 - 670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
G. Vassiliou and R. McPherson
Role of cholesteryl ester transfer protein in selective uptake of high density lipoprotein cholesteryl esters by adipocytes
J. Lipid Res., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1683 - 1693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
G. Vassiliou and R. McPherson
A Novel Efflux-Recapture Process Underlies the Mechanism of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesteryl Ester-Selective Uptake Mediated by the Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2004; 24(9): 1669 - 1675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
N. Naslavsky, R. Weigert, and J. G. Donaldson
Characterization of a Nonclathrin Endocytic Pathway: Membrane Cargo and Lipid Requirements
Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2004; 15(8): 3542 - 3552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
D. Rhainds, P. Bourgeois, G. Bourret, K. Huard, L. Falstrault, and L. Brissette
Localization and regulation of SR-BI in membrane rafts of HepG2 cells
J. Cell Sci., July 1, 2004; 117(15): 3095 - 3105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
R. E. Soccio and J. L. Breslow
Intracellular Cholesterol Transport
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 2004; 24(7): 1150 - 1160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Wang, D. Lan, W. Chen, F. Matsuura, and A. R. Tall
ATP-binding cassette transporters G1 and G4 mediate cellular cholesterol efflux to high-density lipoproteins
PNAS, June 29, 2004; 101(26): 9774 - 9779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
O. W. Lindwasser and M. D. Resh
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Contains a Dileucine-Like Motif That Regulates Association with Multivesicular Bodies
J. Virol., June 1, 2004; 78(11): 6013 - 6023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. B. Sato, K. Ishii, A. Makino, K. Iwabuchi, A. Yamaji-Hasegawa, Y. Senoh, I. Nagaoka, H. Sakuraba, and T. Kobayashi
Distribution and Transport of Cholesterol-rich Membrane Domains Monitored by a Membrane-impermeant Fluorescent Polyethylene Glycol-derivatized Cholesterol
J. Biol. Chem., May 28, 2004; 279(22): 23790 - 23796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
N. Naslavsky, M. Boehm, P. S. Backlund Jr., and S. Caplan
Rabenosyn-5 and EHD1 Interact and Sequentially Regulate Protein Recycling to the Plasma Membrane
Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2004; 15(5): 2410 - 2422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Hao, S. Mukherjee, Y. Sun, and F. R. Maxfield
Effects of Cholesterol Depletion and Increased Lipid Unsaturation on the Properties of Endocytic Membranes
J. Biol. Chem., April 2, 2004; 279(14): 14171 - 14178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
D. Wustner, M. Mondal, A. Huang, and F. R. Maxfield
Different transport routes for high density lipoprotein and its associated free sterol in polarized hepatic cells
J. Lipid Res., March 1, 2004; 45(3): 427 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
I. Coppens and K. A. Joiner
Host but Not Parasite Cholesterol Controls Toxoplasma Cell Entry by Modulating Organelle Discharge
Mol. Biol. Cell, September 1, 2003; 14(9): 3804 - 3820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
P. L. TUMA and A. L. HUBBARD
Transcytosis: Crossing Cellular Barriers
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2003; 83(3): 871 - 932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
S. Sugii, P. C. Reid, N. Ohgami, Y. Shimada, R. A. Maue, H. Ninomiya, Y. Ohno-Iwashita, and T.-Y. Chang
Biotinylated {theta}-toxin derivative as a probe to examine intracellular cholesterol-rich domains in normal and Niemann-Pick type C1 cells
J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2003; 44(5): 1033 - 1041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. M. Wojtanik and L. Liscum
The Transport of Low Density Lipoprotein-derived Cholesterol to the Plasma Membrane Is Defective in NPC1 Cells
J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2003; 278(17): 14850 - 14856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
V. Wachtler, S. Rajagopalan, and M. K. Balasubramanian
Sterol-rich plasma membrane domains in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe
J. Cell Sci., March 1, 2003; 116(5): 867 - 874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Wustner, A. Herrmann, M. Hao, and F. R. Maxfield
Rapid Nonvesicular Transport of Sterol between the Plasma Membrane Domains of Polarized Hepatic Cells
J. Biol. Chem., August 9, 2002; 277(33): 30325 - 30336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. E. Soccio, R. M. Adams, M. J. Romanowski, E. Sehayek, S. K. Burley, and J. L. Breslow
The cholesterol-regulated StarD4 gene encodes a StAR-related lipid transfer protein with two closely related homologues, StarD5 and StarD6
PNAS, May 14, 2002; 99(10): 6943 - 6948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/1/609    most recent
M108861200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hao, M.
Right arrow Articles by Maxfield, F. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hao, M.
Right arrow Articles by Maxfield, F. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement