|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M108799200 on December 26, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 10, 7905-7912, March 8, 2002
Regulation of Constitutively Expressed and Induced Cutinase
Genes by Different Zinc Finger Transcription Factors in
Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi
(Nectria haematococca)*
Daoxin
Li,
Tatiana
Sirakova,
Linda
Rogers,
William F.
Ettinger , and
P.E.
Kolattukudy§
From the Departments of Biochemistry and Molecular and Cellular
Biochemistry and Neurobiotechnology Center, The Ohio State
University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
Received for publication, September 12, 2001, and in revised form, November 27, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Cutin monomers, generated by the low levels of
constitutively expressed cutinase, induce high levels of cutinase that
can help pathogenic fungi to penetrate into the host through the
cuticle whose major structural polymer is cutin. We cloned three highly homologous cutinase genes, cut1, cut2, and
cut3, from Fusarium solani f. pisi
(Nectria haematococca). Amino acid sequence
deduced from the nucleotide sequence of cut1 and
cut2/3 matched with that of the peptides from cutinase 1 and cutinase 2, respectively, isolated from F. solani pisi
grown on cutin as the sole carbon source. Induction of
-glucuronidase gene fused to the promoters of the cutinases
integrated into F. solani pisi genome indicates that
cut2 is constitutively expressed and induced under
starvation, whereas cut1 is highly induced by cutin
monomers. A palindrome binding protein (PBP) previously cloned binds
only to palindrome 1 of cut1 promoter but not palindrome 1 of cut2/3 which contains two base substitutions. PBP is
thought to interfere with the binding of CTF1 , the transcription
factor involved in induction, to cut1 promoter and thus
keep cut1 gene repressed until induced by cutin monomers.
Because PBP cannot bind palindrome 1 of cut2, this gene is
not repressed. CTF1 does not transactivate cut2
promoter. A new Cys6Zn2 motif-containing
transcription factor, CTF1 , that binds palindrome 2 was cloned and
sequenced. In yeast, CTF1 transactivates cut2 promoter
but not cut1 promoter unless its palindrome 1 is mutated,
unlike CTF1 which transactivates cut1. Thus, CTF1 is involved in the constitutive expression of cut2 that causes
production of low levels of cutin monomers that strongly induce
cut1 using CTF1 as the transcription factor.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Fungal infection of plants can be assisted by extracellular
cutinases that help the pathogen penetrate through the outermost cuticular barrier of the host (1, 2). Conidia of highly virulent
pathogens, which can directly penetrate through the cuticle, have low
levels of cutinase that release small amounts of cutin monomers when
the conidia contact the host surface (3). These monomers
transcriptionally activate the expression of an inducible cutinase gene
that is responsible for the production of high levels of cutinase that
assist the infection peg to gain entry into the host through the
cuticle (4). A cis element essential for the inducible
expression of cutinase gene was found to be located at 159 bp in the
promoter of this gene (5) in Fusarium solani f.
pisi (Nectria haematococca). In this region, two
overlapping palindromes were found. Palindrome 2 was found to be
necessary for the inducible cutinase gene expression (5). A protein
that binds the palindromic region, called palindrome binding protein (PBP),1 (6) and a cutinase
transcription factor 1 (CTF1 ), which selectively binds palindrome
2 and transactivates the cutinase promoter (7), have been cloned.
CTF1 , a 101-kDa protein, contains a Cys6Zn2
binuclear cluster motif, sharing homology to the
Cys6Zn2 binuclear cluster DNA-binding domains
of transcription factors from yeast and filamentous fungi. Whether the
constitutively expressed cutinase and the inducible cutinase are
encoded by the same or different genes is not known, and the nature of
the transcription factors that are involved in the constitutive
expression of cutinase is unknown. Two different but very similar
cutinases had been isolated from F. solani pisi (8, 9), and
the gene previously cloned matched the amino acid sequence of one of
these proteins (10), suggesting that another gene encodes the other.
Such a gene had not been previously cloned, although Southern analysis had indicated the presence of multiple cutinase genes in the F. solani pisi genome (11). In this paper, we describe cloning of two
highly homologous genes in addition to the one that encodes the
inducible cutinase. The newly cloned gene sequences contain a segment
that matches the amino acid sequence of a peptide from cutinase 2, isolated from the fungus. The palindrome 1 of the additional cutinase
genes contains two nucleotide differences from that of the previously
cloned inducible cutinase gene (cut1). We show that PBP is
unable to bind the palindrome 1 of the newly cloned genes. We report
cloning of a second cutinase transcription factor (CTF1 ), also
containing a Cys6Zn2 binuclear cluster motif, that binds palindrome 2. We demonstrate that in yeast CTF1
transactivates the promoter of cut2 but is not effective in
transactivating cut1 promoter, except when its palindrome 1 is mutated and thus incapable of binding PBP and/or other repressor.
Thus, CTF1 activates the constitutive expression of cut2,
and the cutin monomers generated by this enzyme together with CTF1
transcriptionally activate the cut1 gene to cause highly
induced expression of cutinase.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials and Bacterial Strains--
F. solani pisi
(isolate T-8) was grown, and genomic DNA was isolated as described
before (5). All plasmids were propagated in Escherichia coli
DH5 (Invitrogen). Chemicals were from Sigma or Amresco (Solon, OH),
and labeled nucleotides were from Amersham Biosciences. Duralon UV
membranes were from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA). Restriction and
modification enzymes and Taq DNA polymerase were from Invitrogen.
Amino Acid Sequence of Cutinase 1 and Cutinase 2--
Cutinase 1 and cutinase 2 were purified from the culture filtrates of cutin-grown
F. solani pisi (8). Samples of each cutinase were reduced,
and SH groups were derivatized with 14C-labeled
iodoacetamide (2.8 Ci/mol, PerkinElmer Life Sciences) and digested with
trypsin as described before (10). The digests were fractionated by high
pressure liquid chromatography on a Nova-PacC18 Radial-Pac
column (Waters Associates) with a linear gradient of 5-65%
acetonitrile in water containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. A major
14C-labeled peptide fraction was further fractionated with
a 0-50% linear gradient of isopropyl alcohol in water
containing 0.1% phosphoric acid, followed by high pressure liquid
chromatography using 0-50% acetonitrile in water containing 0.1%
trifluoroacetic acid. The 14C-labeled peptides were
subjected to amino acid sequencing by Edman degradation in a Beckman sequencer.
Genomic Library Construction, Screening, and Sequencing of
Cutinase Genes--
F. solani pisi genomic DNA was
partially digested with Sau3A1 and separated on a 0.6% low
melting point agarose gel. DNA fragments ranging from 9 to 20 kb were
gel-purified, ligated to the Lambda FIX II vector using the Lambda FIX
II/XhoI Partial Fill-in vector kit (Stratagene), and
packaged in vitro into particles with Gigapack II
Goldpacking extract (Stratagene) to create a library that contained
2 × 106 recombinant phages. The library was screened
by plaque hybridization under low stringency hybridization conditions
at 37 °C with standard reagents (12) and 35% formamide. Cutinase
cDNA labeled with [ -32P]dCTP with the random prime
labeling system Rediprime II (Amersham Biosciences) was used as a
probe. Membranes were washed twice at room temperature for 15 min in
2× SSPE (0.81 M NaCl, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 1 mM EDTA, pH7) containing
0.1% SDS and once at 37 °C for 15 min in 1× SSPE, 0.1% SDS, prior
to exposure to x-ray films. Positive plaques were identified by
autoradiography and recovered from agar plugs. DNA purified from
positive phage clones was digested with SstI and subjected
to Southern blot analysis using the same probe. DNA fragments
hybridizing with the probe were isolated from the agarose gel with
Geneclean III (Qbiogene, Carlsbad, CA), subcloned into pBluescript
KS vector, and sequenced by using a Sequenase 2.0 DNA
sequencing kit from United States Biochemical Corp. (Cleveland, OH) as
recommended by the supplier.
Isolation of Phage Clones for CTF1 --
The 27 discrete
clones identified in the original tertiary screen for pbp
(6) were tested with pbp gene-specific primers, and the
phage clones that yielded no PCR products were further investigated.
Phage DNA purified from these clones was double digested with
EcoRI and BamHI, EcoRI and
SalI, EcoRI and SstI, or
EcoRI and XhoI. The phage clones whose DNA
differed in restriction patterns were probed with
32P-labeled palindrome 2 fragment as described (7). Two
polypeptides from two of the phage clones, designated
ctf15 and ctf11, that bound the
concatenated palindrome 2 were designated CTF1 (7) and CTF1 ,
respectively. DNA sequence analysis of clone ctf11 that
contained coding sequence for CTF1 indicated that it did not encode
a full-length polypeptide. Additional clones for CTF1 were obtained
with DNA insert of ctf11 as probe by screening the
gt11 library (6, 7) and another gt11
library constructed similarly with
oligo(dT)2 using standard
procedures (12).
Subcloning and Sequence Analysis--
All phage clones
identified with the DNA insert of ctf11 as probe were
propagated and phage DNA was isolated as described (6). DNA inserts
were subcloned into pBluescript KS vector (Stratagene).
DNA was sequenced with a model 373A sequencer (Applied Biosystems Inc.,
Foster City, CA). The putative subcellular locations for the
polypeptide were predicted with PSORT (version 6.30 in Pedro's
Biomolecular Research Tools WWW site). Protein homology searches were
conducted with the Blast program from NCBI (13). Amino acid sequence
alignments were conducted with the SeqApp program from the Internet.
DNA Blot Analysis of ctf1 Gene--
Fungal mycelia were
propagated, harvested, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and extracted with
DNA extraction buffer, and DNA was isolated as described (5). The
fungal DNA was then digested with restriction enzymes,
EcoRI, PstI, BamHI, or
HindIII, and the fragments were separated on a
0.8% agarose gel and transferred onto a Nytran Plus membrane
(Schleicher & Schuell). The membrane was hybridized with
32P-labeled ctf1 gene fragment at 65 °C,
washed twice with 2× SSPE, 0.1% SDS at room temperature for 10 min
and twice with 0.1× SSPE, 0.1% SDS at 65 °C for 10 min, and
subjected to autoradiography.
Expression of Recombinant CTF1 Fragment and Binding to
Palindromic DNA Fragment--
The cDNA insert of
ctf11 was released by EcoRI digestion. The
fragment was isolated with a Geneclean kit (Qbiogene) and cloned into
the EcoRI site of a glutathione S-transferase
(GST) fusion vector, pGEX-4T-1 (Amersham Biosciences) to produce
pGEX-4T-1/CTF1 (6-341). To generate recombinant CTF1 protein,
pGEX-4T-1/CTF1 (6-341) was introduced into E. coli BL21
cells. Isopropyl- -D-thiogalactopyranoside was added to
the BL21 culture to induce the production of GST-CTF1 (6-341) fusion
protein. Induced cells were broken by ultrasonic treatment. The lysate
was centrifuged, and the soluble supernatant and the insoluble fraction
were examined by SDS-PAGE. Total protein from 100 ml of
isopropyl- -D-thiogalactopyranoside-induced bacterial culture of two randomly selected clones was subjected to SDS-PAGE on
12.5% gel and transferred to nitrocellulose, and the filter was
treated and tested for binding to the concatenated palindrome element
as described before (6, 14).
Test for Induction of gus Gene Fused to the Promoters of cut1,
cut2, or cut3 in F. solani pisi--
The start codon and 404-bp
promoter region of cut1, cut2, and
cut3 were amplified with Pfu polymerase,
introducing BamHI sites at the 5' and 3' ends. The amplified
DNA products were ligated into the BamHI site of plasmid
pGUS.2 (15), yielding cut1/gus, cut2/gus, and cut3/gus.
After sequencing the introduced promoter regions and the junction to
the gus gene, a hygromycin resistance gene (hyg)
fused to a constitutive promoter from Cochliobolus heterostrophus (16) was cloned into the EcoRI sites of
the constructs as the selection marker for F. solani pisi transformation.
F. solani pisi conidia (107) were inoculated
into 500 ml of mineral medium containing 2% glucose. After the culture
was shaken for 24 h at 24 °C, mycelia were harvested by
filtration through a Whatman No. 1 filter and washed twice with 0.6 M MgCl2. Protoplast preparation and
transformation were done as described (17). The transformed protoplasts
were plated on mineral medium containing 2% glucose, 1.2 M
sorbitol, and 2% agar. An overlay of 1% agar containing hygromycin B
(300 µg/ml) (Calbiochem) was added after 24 h of incubation.
Stable transformants were selected as before (17) and verified by PCR
using primers designed to amplify the hygromycin gene portion or the
gus gene:cut promoter junction portion of the
construct. The primers used are as follows: hyg forward,
5'-GAA GAA TCT CGT GCT TTC AG-3'; hyg reverse, 5'-TAC TTC
TAC ACA GCC ATC GG-3'; cut1 forward, 5'-GGG GGA TTC TCT TTC ATG TTT GCG G-3'; cut2 forward, 5'-GGG GGA TCC TCT TTC TTA
TTG GGG G-3'; cut3 forward, 5'-GGG GGA TCC TCT TTC TTA TTT
GCG G-3'; and gus reverse, 5'-GAT TTC ACG GGT TGG GGT TTC
T-3'. For each construct, two transformants were used in the
inducibility studies.
To determine the effect of cutin hydrolysate on the inducibility of
cutinase promoters, each transformant (2.5 × 106
spores) was grown in 0.8 ml of 1% glucose in mineral medium (18) in a
35-mm diameter Petri dish. At glucose depletion, as measured by glucose
oxidase assay (19), the cultures received 0.2 ml of minimal medium with
or without 80 µg of cutin hydrolysate (sonicated) and were incubated
for 72 h at 24 °C; an aliquot of the medium from each sample
was assayed for cutinase activity (9). For each sample, the total
incubation mixture was homogenized in 0.5 ml of 3× -glucuronidase
buffer (1× -glucuronidase buffer: 10 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 10 mM EDTA, 0.1% sodium lauryl
sarcosine, and 0.1% Triton X-100 in 50 mM sodium phosphate
buffer, pH 7.0 (20)), using a Mini-BeadBeater. The homogenate was
centrifuged for 15 min at 17,000 × g, and the
supernatant was assayed for -glucuronidase activity (20) and protein
(21).
DNA Binding Assay of PBP to Palindromes of cut1 and
cut2/3--
To prepare the palindrome 1 fragment, oligonucleotides aat
tCG GAT CGC GAG CCG and aat tCG GCT CGC GAT CCG were annealed. To
prepare the palindrome 2 fragment, oligonucleotides aat tCG AGC CGA GGC
TCG and aat tCG AGC CTC GGC TCG were annealed. The annealed fragments
contain palindrome 1 of 12 nucleotides and palindrome 2 of 14 nucleotides, each flanked on both ends by EcoRI sites. These
EcoRI sites served for concatenation and fill-in labeling
with [ -32P]dATP. The 37-mer containing both
overlapping palindromic elements ( 159 to 178 bp) from
cut1 was prepared as described (6). The palindromic element
of cut2 (containing both palindromes) was prepared as
described with the synthetic 37-mer,
aattCGAAATGGACGGCGAGCCGAGGCTCGACTTCAG and its complement. Binding of
recombinant PBP to these DNA fragments was tested essentially as
described (6).
In Vivo Transactivation of lacZ Gene in Yeast by
CTF1 --
Full-length ctf1 was amplified by PCR as
separate 5' end and 3' end fragments. For the 5' end amplified
fragment, BamHI was used to digest the 5' end and
NheI was used to cut the 3' end. These two BamHI-
and NheI-digested fragments were simultaneously cloned into
the BamHI sites of the GAL4 DNA-binding domain hybrid cloning vector pGBT9 (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) to
generate pGBT9/CTF1 (1-882), which contained the DNA-binding domain
of GAL4 fused in-frame to ctf1 . For comparison with
CTF1 , fragments of full-length ctf1 were first
amplified by PCR as separate 5' and 3' end fragments. These two
fragments were then joined by SOEing (splicing by overlap extension) PCR (22) and cloned in-frame into the PstI site
of pGBT9 to produce pGBT9/CTF1 (1-909). Additionally, the
EcoRI fragment of ctf15 was directly cloned
into the EcoRI site of pGBT9 to generate
pGBT9/CTF1 (1-519) that contained the DNA-binding domain of GAL4
fused in-frame to CTF1 (amino acids 1-519).
Plasmids pGBT9/CTF1 (1-519), pGBT9/CTF1 (1-909), and
pGBT9/CTF1 (1-882) were introduced into the yeast reporter strain
SFY526 (CLONTECH) to express the hybrid proteins of
GAL4 BD-CTF1 (1-519) and GAL4 BD-CTF1 . Plasmids pVA3 and pLAM5'
(CLONTECH) expressing the hybrid protein of GAL4
DNA-binding domain fused to amino acids 72-390 of murine p53 protein
or hybrid protein of GAL4 DNA-binding domain fused to amino acids
66-230 of human lamin C, respectively, and vector pGBT9 were
introduced into SFY 526 as negative controls. For positive control,
plasmid pCL1 expressing the wild-type GAL4 was also introduced into
SFY526 according to the supplier's instructions. Filter binding assays
for -galactosidase activity of lacZ gene product were
performed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
In Vivo Transactivation of cut1 and cut2 Promoter by
CTF1 --
For expression of CTF1 in yeast without the in-frame
fusion of GAL4 protein, a GAL4 DNA activation domain hybrid cloning vector, pGAD424, was modified as follows. A
HindIII-EcoRV linker containing an
EcoRI site was ligated to HindIII- and
EcoRV-digested pGAD424 to produce pYEXP(HindIII + EcoRI + EcoRV), which was then cut with
EcoRI and EcoRV. The EcoRI and
EcoRV fragment of pGAD424 was released from pGAD424 by
digestion with EcoRI and EcoRV, gel-purified, and
ligated to EcoRI and EcoRV-digested
pYEXP(HindIII + EcoRI + EcoRV). The
resulting plasmid was designated as pYEXP(L), which allows for leucine
selection and expression of genes driven by the ADH1 promoter.
To clone the full-length ctf1 in pYEXP(L),
pGBT9/CTF1 (1-882) was digested with BamHI. The
full-length ctf1 fragment was isolated and ligated to
BamHI-digested pYEXP(L) to produce pYEXP(L)/CTF1 .
The promoter of cut2 was amplified by PCR with a sense
primer (5'-GAC GAT GCG GCC GCG CGG GGA ACG TTC CAT CC-3') containing a
NotI site, an antisense primer (5'-GGC CAG AAG AGT GGT AAG
AGC-3'), and cut2 DNA as template. The PCR fragments were
cut with NotI and phosphorylated with T4 DNA kinase. This
fragment was ligated to plasmid pCAT360 (7) after digestion with
BglII, fill-in with Klenow, and digested with
NotI. This procedure yielded pCAT(cut2p), which was then cut
with NotI and SalI, and the resulting fragment was gel-purified and ligated to a similarly digested pRS413, a yeast
centromere plasmid (Ycp) that allows for histidine selection in yeast
(Stratagene; Ref. 7). The resultant plasmid was designated pYcut2p.
Plasmids pYCAT (7) containing the wild-type cut1
promoter/cat gene and pYcut2p were introduced into yeast
strain YPH499 (Stratagene; Ref. 7) to yield yeast strains
YPH499::pYCAT and YPH499::pYcut2p.
For transactivation by CTF1 , pYEXP(L)/CTF1 was introduced into
YPH499::pYCAT and
YPH499::pYcut2p as described
(Stratagene; Ref. 7). Yeast transformants were selected on leucine- and histidine-lacking minimal medium (7). Growth of yeast transformants and
CAT assays were done as described (7).
 |
RESULTS |
Multiple Cutinase Genes and Identification of Proteins Encoded by
Them--
Constitutive expression of low levels of cutinase by
F. solani pisi had been noted (3), and such an expression is
probably responsible for the low level of cutinase carried by the
conidia of the pathogenic isolates of this organism. It is possible
that the gene that encodes the constitutively expressed enzyme is
different from that which encodes the inducible one. The presence of
the multiple cutinase genes was indicated by Southern analysis of the
genome of F. solani pisi (11) and by the production of
multiple cutinases (8). However, only the highly inducible cutinase gene had been cloned (10). Therefore, we first examined a genomic DNA
library for cutinase genes. Screening of a Lambda FIX II library with
the previously cloned full-length cutinase cDNA as the probe under
low stringency revealed six clones that hybridized. DNA from these
phage clones, digested with SstI and analyzed by Southern hybridization, showed unique digestion patterns and had different size
fragments hybridizing with the cDNA probe. Subcloning and DNA
sequencing showed that two of the clones contained overlapping DNA
sequences that revealed the previously sequenced cutinase gene that we
designate cut1. Two additional cutinase genes were found in
the remaining four clones as overlapping sequences. These two newly
cloned genes are designated cut2 and cut3.
cut2 and cut3 genes and their 5'-untranslated
regions (404 bp) were sequenced. The nucleotide sequences revealed
identical size orfs of 693 bp for cut2 and cut3
showing 86 and 85.5% identity to cut1, respectively. Both
orfs are interrupted by one 49-bp intron. The position and the
nucleotide sequence of the introns in the two genes are identical.
cut1 has one 52-bp intron located at the same relative
position, but it shows only 65% sequence homology to the
cut2/3 intron. cut2 would encode a protein with a
calculated molecular mass of 23.93 Da, a pI of 7.68, and shares 93%
amino acid identity with cut1. The protein encoded by
cut3 has a calculated molecular mass of 24.02 Da, a pI of
6.82, and exhibits 92.1% amino acid identity with cutinase 1. cut2 and cut3 products, that have one amino acid
more than the cut1 product, share more identity to each
other (98.7%) than to cut1 (Fig.
1).

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Amino acid sequence of the proteins encoded
by the three cutinase genes cut1,
cut2, and cut3 from F. solani
pisi. Solid line indicates the segments of
the proteins that gave rise to the tryptic peptides whose sequence was
determined.
|
|
Amino acid sequencing of the Cys- and His-containing tryptic peptides
obtained from cutinase 1 and cutinase 2 isolated from cutin-grown
F. solani pisi showed very similar but distinctly different
amino acid sequence. Peptides isolated from cutinase 1 and cutinase 2 after reduction and carboxymethylation with 14C-labeled
iodoacetamide were sequenced. One of the labeled peptides isolated from
cutinase 2 was a 28-mer composed of amino acids 186-213 of the
cutinase, and it showed two amino acid differences (Val200
Ile201 and Ala206 Thr207),
when compared with the amino acid sequence of the corresponding peptide
isolated from cutinase 1. Cutinase 1 peptide sequence is found in the
orf of the cut1 gene, and cutinase 2 peptide sequence is
found in the orfs of both cut2 and cut3 (Fig.
1).
Comparison of Promoters of Cutinase Genes--
The 5'-flanking
region that is known to contain the promoter of cut1 (5, 17)
showed a high degree of identity with the corresponding segment of
cut2 and cut3 (Fig.
2). The promoter segments of
cut2 and cut3 were about 94% identical, whereas
they showed 80-83% identity to cut1 promoter. They
contained the G-rich element found to be essential for the high level
of the inducible cutinase gene expression and the silencer of the
cutinase promoter (5). Comparison of the palindromic sequences at 159
bp, which have been found to be essential for the inducible expression
of the cutinase gene, showed that palindrome 2 is conserved in all three cut genes. However, palindrome 1 in cut2
and cut3 contains two nucleotide substitutions (Fig. 2).

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The promoter sequences of the three cutinase
genes from F. solani pisi. The palindrome 1 and
palindrome 2 sequences are indicated.
|
|
cut2/3 Palindrome 1 Does Not Bind PBP--
We had cloned and
expressed previously a protein designated palindrome binding protein
(PBP) that binds the palindromic segment of cut1 promoter.
However, whether PBP bound to only one of the palindromes was not
known. Examination of the binding to the two palindromes individually
by gel retardation assay showed that PBP bound only to palindrome 1 and
not palindrome 2 (Fig. 3A). To
test whether the two nucleotide substitutions in the palindrome 1 of
cut2/3 affect PBP binding, we performed gel retardation
tests with the palindrome segment of cut1 or
cut2/3. Only palindrome 1 of cut1 bound to PBP
but not the palindrome 1 of cut2/3 (Fig. 3B).

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
A gel retardation showing binding of PBP
specifically to palindrome 1 (not to palindrome 2) of
cut1 (A) and specific binding of PBP
only to cut1 promoter and not to
cut2/3 promoter (B). pal,
palindrome of cut1 or cut2/3 generated as
described under "Experimental Procedures." PBP was expressed in
E. coli and purified as described before (6), and the
32P-labeled probes were prepared as described under
"Experimental Procedures."
|
|
Cloning of CTF1 --
Because the phage clones encoding PBP were
isolated using the fragment containing both palindromes, the phage
clones obtained during that screening may also contain clones that
would encode CTF1. The tertiary screening for PBP clones yielded 27 discrete clones. PCR test indicated that 10 of the phage clones
belonged to those encoding PBP (data not shown). The remaining 17 clones showed 5 distinctly different restriction patterns, and the
representative clones from each group were designated as
ctf1 8, ctf1 11, ctf1 15, ctf1 22, ctf1 26. When tested by
Southwestern hybridization (14), all these 5 types of clones showed
binding to the concatenated palindrome 2 fragment (data not shown). DNA
inserts from these phage clones were subcloned into pBS
KS to generate pCTF1-8, pCTF1-11, pCTF1-15, pCTF1-22
and pCTF1-26. Initial sequencing of these clones indicated that
pCTF1-8 was a partial clone of pCTF1-15, pCTF1-22 was a partial
clone of pCTF1-26, and pCTF1-11 was a distinct clone. The inserts in
pCTF1-15 and pCTF1-11 were completely sequenced, and the deduced
polypeptides revealed the presence of
Cys6Zn(II)2 binuclear cluster DNA-binding motifs in their N termini. The lack of in-frame stop codons for both
DNA inserts indicated that neither clone represented a complete open
reading frame. The polypeptide encoded by the DNA insert in pCTF1-15
was designated CTF1 and further studied (7). The one encoded by
pCTF1-11 was designated CTF1 (Fig.
4A). Further screening of
gt11 libraries identified three additional overlapping clones for
CTF1 (Fig. 4A). The complete sequencing of the four overlapping clones for CTF1 revealed a contiguous cDNA sequence of 4234 bp containing a complete open reading frame of 2646 bp that
would encode a putative acidic protein of 882 amino acids with a
calculated pI of 6.33 and molecular weight of 98,180 (Fig. 4B). CTF1 contains 10 potential consensus sequences for
phosphorylation by casein kinase II (23), two potential sites for
phosphorylation by the cAMP-dependent protein kinase A
(24), and four potential phosphorylation sites for protein kinase C
(Fig. 4C) (25). Two consensus sites, PPSP and PSSP, for
potential mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation (26) were
also identified. Two potential asparagine-glycosylation sites (27) are
observed. PSORT identified one likely nuclear localization signal RRRKK (28) in CTF1 , with a 98% certainty of it being a nuclear
protein. A Cys6Zn(II)2 binuclear cluster domain
is located at the N terminus from amino acid residues 51-76 of CTF1
(Fig. 5). CTF1 and CTF1 showed only
17% overall amino acid identity.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
A, schematic representation of the
clones used to obtain the complete sequence of CTF1 . B,
the amino acid sequence of CTF1 deduced from the cDNA sequence.
C, schematic representation showing the possible functional
domains in CTF1 .
|
|

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Alignment of the zinc finger region of
CTF1 and CTF1 with
zinc finger regions of transcription factors from other organisms as
described in the text. The numbers at the
right show the position of the last residue.
|
|
Binding of CTF1 to Palindrome 2 in Cutinase Promoter--
To
test the binding of CTF1 to the palindromic fragment, GST fusion
vector was used to express the amino acids 6-341 of CTF1 . This GST
fusion protein contains the DNA-binding domain of CTF1 . Protein
samples from two bacterial transformants were subjected to DNA binding
assay by Southwestern hybridization (14). Only one band was found, and
it corresponded to the fusion protein of GST-CTF1 (6-341) in the
autoradiogram, whereas no binding was observed with proteins from
bacterial host cells containing the expression vector alone (Fig.
6).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Expression of the DNA-binding domain of
CTF1 in E. coli
(left) and Southwestern blot showing binding to
palindrome 2 of cutinase promoter (right). In
both, 12.5% polyacrylamide was used. Lane 1, E. coli extract of vector control; lanes 2 and
3, two independent clones expressing 6-341 N-terminal
segment of CTF1 . Experimental details are indicated under
"Experimental Procedures."
|
|
Transactivation of Cut2 Promoter by CTF1 --
We tested whether
CTF1 could function as a transcriptional activator. Plasmid
constructs were made to express a hybrid fusion protein in which
CTF1 was fused to the DNA-binding domain (DBD) of GAL4. The
GAL4(DBD)-CTF1 hybrid protein was tested for activation of
transcription of the chromosomally integrated lacZ gene
containing the GAL4-binding element. The transactivating capabilities
were indicated by the production of active -galactosidase that
caused the formation of blue colonies on a filter containing
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl -D-galactopyranoside (X-gal)
(data not shown). Furthermore, expression of the GAL4 DNA-binding
domain alone, or the fusion of GAL4 DNA-binding domain to amino acids
72-390 of murine p53 protein, or the fusion of GAL4 DNA-binding domain
to amino acids 66-230 of human lamin C, were unable to activate the
transcription of the lacZ gene. These results demonstrated
that CTF1 could function as a transcriptional activator in
vivo in yeast.
To assess quantitatively whether CTF1 could function as a cutinase
transcriptional activator in vivo, plasmid constructs were
made to express a hybrid fusion protein in which CTF1 was fused to
the nuclear localization sequence of SV40. The CTF1 hybrid protein
was tested for activation of transcription of the cat gene
fused to the promoter of cut1 or cut2 in yeast.
The transactivation was measured by the level of CAT activity. Such an
approach has been used previously to demonstrate transactivation of
cut1 promoter in vivo (7). With this approach,
CTF1 was found to activate the native cut1 promoter only
slightly (Fig. 7). However, CTF1 activated the cut2 promoter. If the selective activation of
cut2 promoter, but not cut1 promoter, is because
of the nucleotide substitutions in palindrome 1 found in
cut2/3 promoter, the cut1 promoter with mutations
in palindrome 1 should recover the transactivation. In fact,
cut1 promoter with mutated palindrome 1 showed
transactivation by CTF1 as measured by CAT activity that was almost
as high as that observed with cut2 (Fig. 7).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Transactivation of cutinase promoters by
CTF1 in yeast. CAT gene was
under the control of cutinase promoter, and full-length CTF1 was
expressed via another plasmid under the control of SV40
promoter; CAT activity was measured as described (5). cut1,
cut1 promoter; cut2, cut2 promoter;
cut1( pal 1), cut1 promoter in which GGATCG of
palindrome 1 was replaced with ATGAGC.
|
|
Induction of the cut1, cut2, or cut3 Promoter by Starvation and
Cutin Monomers in F. solani pisi--
Because the transcripts of the
three cutinase genes are very similar, it is difficult to quantitate
their transcripts individually. Therefore, the individual
cut promoters were fused to gus gene as a
reporter and introduced into the genome of F. solani pisi. After screening several stable transformants for each promoter, two
randomly selected transformants for each promoter were used for
quantitative measurements of the degree of expression of gus under the control of the three cutinase promoters under various conditions (Fig. 8). The results showed
that cut1 and cut3 promoter did not allow high
level expression of the gus gene upon glucose depletion or
subsequently during a 3-day starvation period; cut2 promoter
was induced by starvation (Fig. 8). Cutin monomers prepared by alkaline
hydrolysis of cutin highly induced cut1 promoter and moderately induced cut3 (Fig. 8). This result confirms that
cut1 promoter is responsible for a major part of the induced
expression of cutinase activity. cut2 promoter, on the other
hand, allowed some expression of gus gene upon glucose
depletion, and moderate induction of gus gene was observed
upon starvation for a 72-h period. These results strongly suggest that
cut2 is probably responsible for the low constitutive levels
of cutinase activity.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Expression of
-glucuronidase under the control of the promoters
of cutinase genes in F. solani pisi. In each case
404-bp 5'-flanking region was fused to GUS gene and used to
transform F. solani pisi. Two transformants each were grown
in glucose until glucose depletion and were assayed for
-glucuronidase activity at glucose depletion, after 72 starvation or
after induction with cutin hydrolysate for 72 h as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Induction is expressed as the number of
fold activity found after starvation or induction when compared with
the activities at glucose depletion.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The first purification of fungal cutinase from the extracellular
fluid of cutin-grown F. solani pisi yielded two enzymes of similar size (8). Amino acid sequence of some peptides obtained from
one of these enzymes (cutinase 1) matched with that predicted from the
cDNA of the induced cutinase transcript (10). The present results
reveal the occurrence of other cutinase genes that could encode enzymes
that are similar but not identical to cutinase 1. Comparison of the
amino acid sequences that would be encoded by the three cloned genes
indicates that the two newly identified genes would encode proteins
that are nearly identical, differing only in three amino acid residues.
Among them only one, Ala14 Asp, would affect the
ionic status of the protein if this segment is retained in the mature
protein. Thus, products of cut2 and cut3 probably
would be inseparable by the protein fractionation methods used, and
therefore the purified cutinase 2 might have contained products
of both cut2 and cut3. If cut3 is not
expressed at significant levels either constitutively or under the
induction conditions used, the isolated cutinases 1 and 2 might be
products of cut1 and cut2, respectively.
cut1, although similar, does not share the same degree of
identity, suggesting that cut2 and cut3 probably
originated from a more recent gene duplication when compared with the
earlier divergence between the constitutive (cut2/3) and
inducible (cut1) cutinase genes. This conclusion is
consistent with our finding that cut2 and cut3
have exactly the same two nucleotide substitutions in the palindrome 1 in the promoter and with the finding that the size and sequence of
cut2 and cut3 intron are identical but distinctly
different from those of cut1 intron.
CTF1 shows characteristics of a transcription factor. The presence
of putative nuclear localization signals suggested that CTF1 may be
a nuclear protein. Binding to the palindromic DNA element in the
cutinase promoter by the expressed segment of CTF1 is demonstrated.
The N-terminal Cys6Zn(II)2 binuclear cluster motif found in CTF1 is probably involved in the binding to the palindrome. Such DNA-binding motifs are characteristic of other regulatory proteins such as GAL4 (29), ARGRII (30), PPR1 (31), PDR1
(32), PUT3 (33), HAP1 (34), and UGA3 (35) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae; LAC9 of Kluyveromyces lactis (36); MAL63 of
Saccharomyces carlsbergensis (37); NIT4 of Neurospora
crassa (38); NIRA (39), UAY (40), QUTA (41), and AMDR (42) of
Aspergillus nidulans; and AFLR of Aspergillus
flavus (43). However, CTF1 does not share homology to any other
regions of those factors. Functionally, GAL4 is a positive activator
that regulates the transcription of the galactose-inducible genes
gal1, gal2, gal7, gal10, and mel1 (29). PPR1 positively regulates
transcription of the genes ura1, ura3, and
ura4 involved in controlling pyrimidine levels (31). Some of
these protein factors recognize a DNA sequence with two inverted
repeats of CGG elements separated by a spacing characteristic of the
specific protein factor (44). For example, PPR1 recognizes
5'-CGG(n6)CCG with a spacer of 6 nucleotides, whereas the spacing for GAL4, PUT3, PPR1, and LEU3 is 11, 10, 6, and 4 nucleotides, respectively (45). HAP1, on the other hand,
binds a direct repeat of CGG triplet with a spacer of 6 nucleotides
(44). Interestingly, CTF1 and CTF1 bind to a palindrome with an
oppositely oriented 5'-GCC(n2)GGC (5).
The transcription factor CTF1 binds palindrome 2 of cut1
promoter that is known to be essential for cutinase induction by cutin
monomers. In vivo CTF1 , in fact, transactivates
cut1 promoter in yeast. However, another transcription
factor, CTF1 that has now been cloned as described here, does not
transactivate cut1 promoter but it transactivates
cut2 promoter. The chief difference between the promoters of
cut1 gene and cut2/3 genes in the palindromic promoter region is that there are two nucleotide substitutions in
palindrome 1. Here we show that PBP binds palindrome 1 of
cut1, whereas it does not bind palindrome 1 of
cut2/3. If palindrome 1 of cut1 is occupied by
PBP, then CTF1 may not be able to bind palindrome 2 of the promoter
because of steric hindrance and thus would not induce the transcription
of cut1 gene. On the other hand, CTF1 may bind palindrome
2 of cut2/3 because palindrome 1 of this gene cannot bind
PBP because of the nucleotide substitutions in this palindrome. The
hypothesis that PBP may function as a repressor of cut1 is
consistent with our previous finding that mutations in palindrome 1 of
cut1 promoter fused to cat reporter gene
increased the inductibility of this promoter 2-fold when assayed in
F. solani pisi transformants generated with this promoter fusion construct (5). The transactivation of cat gene
expressed under the control of cutinase gene promoters by CTF1 in
yeast is consistent with this hypothesis.
The results presented here and previously published results suggest the
following mechanism by which a Cys6Zn2
transcription factor causes constitutive expression of one cutinase
gene whose product generates an inducer from cutin in the environment,
and this inducer uses a different Cys6Zn2
transcription factor to cause induction of high levels of cutinase
(Fig. 9). (The speculative part of the
hypothesis is indicated by dotted lines and lowercase letters.) Cutinase gene promoter contains two overlapping
palindromic elements. Proteins that bind the two palindromes regulate
the transcription of cutinase genes. CTF1 and CTF1 both bind
palindrome 2. In the absence of PBP binding to palindrome 1 of
cut2, CTF1 can bind palindrome 2 and activate
cut2 gene transcription, albeit at low levels, explaining
the constitutive production of low levels of cutinase. Palindrome 1 of
cut1 binds PBP, and the bound PBP interferes with CTF1
binding to palindrome 2. We postulate that the presence of high levels
of CTF1 may allow it to overcome the interference from PBP and thus
bind palindrome 2 of cut1 and transcriptionally activate it
and thus cause production of high levels of cutinase. From the amino
acid sequence it is clear that the major induced protein is in fact
encoded by cut1. CTF1 promoter does contain an element
that binds a transcription factor that has been
cloned.3 We postulate that
cutin monomer-dependent phosphorylation that has been
detected previously (1, 16) is involved in the transcriptional activation of ctf1 gene, possibly by direct
phosphorylation of the transcription factor that binds
ctf1 promoter, although we do not have direct evidence
for this hypothesis (indicated by the dotted lines and
lowercase letters in Fig. 9). It is also possible that the
repressor (PBP) binding may be diminished by cutin
monomer-dependent phosphorylation of PBP. However, the
identity of the phosphorylated protein remains uncertain.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
A hypothetical mechanism by which a
constitutively expressed cutinase gene uses zinc finger transcription
factor CTF1 to cause production of cutin
monomers that in turn induce the expression of another cutinase gene
using another zinc finger transcription factor,
CTF1 . CRE, cutin-responsive
element in the promoter of ctf1 ; CREBP,
CRE-binding protein. The postulated cutin monomer-dependent
phosphorylation of cutin-responsive element-binding protein and the
role of this phosphorylation in CTF1 transcription do not have
direct experimental evidence and are therefore indicated by
dashed lines and lowercase lettering.
|
|
Functions of zinc finger proteins in the regulation of processes
relevant to fungal pathogenesis are not well understood. The presence
of multiple zinc finger proteins and possible roles in regulating
multiple processes complicate the picture. In the present case, two
zinc finger proteins with a relatively low degree of overall identity
(17%) regulate the expression of two different genes with a high
degree of selectivity. CTF1 disruption eliminated phytopathogenicity
of F. solani pisi without any detectable change in growth
rate in cultures, although the decreased level of cutinase resulting
from the CTF1 disruption was not adequate to explain the loss of
virulence, as supplementation with cutinase did not restore
pathogenicity.3 Thus, CTF1 may participate also
in the regulation of other genes essential for pathogenesis. Obviously,
CTF1 cannot substitute for CTF1 in this function, further
illustrating the differential functions of these zinc finger proteins.
In the field, the constitutively expressed low levels of cutinase from
fungi would release cutin monomers from cutin found in their immediate
environment, and these monomers would in turn induce the synthesis of
high levels of the enzyme. Such a mechanism could allow saprophytic
growth or growth into the host during infection, as in both cases the
fungal conidia with their low level of cutinase contact cutin,
presenting basically the same situation as far as induction is
concerned. This molecular strategy is probably used widely by microbes
to utilize insoluble polymers they find in their environment. The low
levels of polymer-degrading enzymes secreted upon depletion of readily
utilizable soluble nutrients generates soluble products (monomers or
oligomers) that in turn induce high levels of the degrading enzymes
that generate soluble nutrients from the insoluble polymer in the
medium for growth of the microbe. We present evidence that
constitutively expressed and induced cutinase genes use their own
unique transcription factors. Whether the mechanism similar to that
described here for cutinase is used for the constitutive and induced
expression of the other polymer-degrading enzymes in general is not known.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Usha Raman for technical help.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by National Science
Foundation Grant IBN-9816868.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AF417004, AF417005, and U51672.
Present address: Dept. of Biology, Gonzaga University, Spokane, WA.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Neurobiotechnology
Center, Ohio State University, 206 Rightmire Hall, 1060 Carmack Rd.,
Columbus, OH 43210. Tel.: 614-292-5682; Fax: 614-292-5379; E-mail:
kolattukudy.2@osu.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 26, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108799200
2
U. Kamper and P.E. Kolattukudy, unpublished observations.
3
D. Li and P. E. Kolattukudy, unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PBP, palindrome
binding protein;
CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase;
CTF, cutinase
transcription factor;
DBD, DNA-binding domain;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
orf, open reading frame.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Kolattukudy, P. E.,
Rogers, L. M., Li, D.,
Hwang, C. H.,
and Flaishman, M. A.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
4080-4087[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Kolattukudy, P. E.
(2001)
in
Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Bio/Technology: Biopolyesters
(Babel, W.
, and Steinbüchel, A., eds)
, pp. 1-49, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg
|
| 3.
|
Köller, W.,
Allan, C. R.,
and Kolattukudy, P. E.
(1982)
Physiol. Plant Pathol.
20,
47-60
|
| 4.
|
Woloshuk, C. P.,
and Kolattukudy, P. E.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
1704-1708[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Kämper, J. T.,
Kämper, U.,
Rogers, L. M.,
and Kolattukudy, P. E.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
9195-9204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Li, D.,
and Kolattukudy, P. E.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
11753-11756[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Li, D.,
and Kolattukudy, P. E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
12462-12467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Purdy, R. E.,
and Kolattukudy, P. E.
(1975)
Biochemistry
14,
2824-2831[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Purdy, R. E.,
and Kolattukudy, P. E.
(1975)
Biochemistry
14,
2832-2840[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Soliday, C. L.,
Flurkey, W. H.,
Okita, T. W.,
and Kolattukudy, P. E.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
3939-3943[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Woloshuk, C. P.
(1986)
Cutinase of Fusarium solani f. sp. Pisi.Ph.D. thesis
, Washington State University, Pullman, WA
|
| 12.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, pp. 2-102-2-122, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 13.
|
Altshul, S. F.,
Madden, T. L.,
Schäffer, A. A.,
Zhang, J.,
Zhang, Z.,
Miller, W.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
3389-3402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Vinson, C. R.,
LaMarco, K. L.,
Johnson, P. F.,
Landschulz, W. H.,
and McKnight, S. L.
(1988)
Genes Dev.
2,
801-806[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Mohan, R.,
Bajar, A. M.,
and Kolattukudy, P. E.
(1993)
Plant Mol. Biol.
21,
341-354[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Bajar, A.,
Podila, G. K.,
and Kolattukudy, P. E.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
8208-8212[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Soliday, C. L.,
Dickman, M. B.,
and Kolattukudy, P. E.
(1989)
J. Bacteriol.
171,
1942-1951[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Hankin, L.,
and Kolattukudy, P. E.
(1968)
J. Gen. Microbiol.
51,
457-463[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Worthington, C. C.
(ed)
(1988)
Worthington Manual
, pp. 155-158, Worthington Biochemical Corp., Freehold, NJ
|
| 20.
|
Jefferson, R. A.
(1987)
Plant Mol. Biol. Rep.
5,
387-405[CrossRef]
|
| 21.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Horton, R. M.,
Hunt, H. D., Ho, S. N.,
Pullen, J. K.,
and Pease, L. R.
(1989)
Gene (Amst.)
77,
61-68[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Kuenzel, E. A.,
Mulligan, J. A.,
Sommercon, J.,
and Krebs, E. G.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
9136-9140[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Kemp, B. E.,
and Pearson, R. B.
(1991)
Methods Enzymol.
200,
63-81
|
| 25.
|
Woodgett, J. R.,
Gould, K. L.,
and Hunter, T.
(1986)
Eur. J. Biochem.
161,
177-184[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Ray, L. B.,
and Sturgill, T. W.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
1502-1506[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Bause, E.
(1983)
Biochem. J.
209,
331-336[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Boulikas, T.
(1993)
Crit. Rev. Eukaryotic Gene Expr.
3,
193-227[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Laughon, A. S.,
and Gesteland, R. F.
(1984)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
4,
260-267[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
| Messenguy, F., Dubois, E., and Descamps, F. (1986) Eur. J. Biochem. 15777-15781
|
| 31.
|
Kammerer, B.,
Guyonvarch, A.,
and Hubert, J. C.
(1984)
J. Mol. Biol.
180,
239-250[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Balzi, E.,
Chen, W.,
Ulaszewske, S.,
and Goffeau, A.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
16871-16879[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Marczak, J. E.,
and Brandriss, M. C.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
2609-2619[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Pfeifer, K.,
Kim, K.-S.,
Kogan, S.,
and Guarente, L.
(1989)
Cell
56,
291-301[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Andre, B.
(1990)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
220,
269-276[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Wray, L. V., Jr.,
Witte, M. M.,
Dickson, R. C.,
and Riley, M. I.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
1111-1121[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Kim, J.,
and Michels, C. A.
(1988)
Curr. Genet.
14,
319-323[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Yuan, G.-F., Fu, Y.-H.,
and Marzluf, G. A.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
5735-5745[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Burger, G.,
Strauss, J.,
Scazzocchio, C.,
and Lang, B. F.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
5746-5755[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Suarez, T.,
de Queiroz, M. V.,
Oestreicher, N.,
and Scazzocchio, C.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
1453-1467[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Beri, R. K.,
Whittington, H.,
Roberts, C. F.,
and Hawkins, A. R.
(1987)
Nucleic Acids Res.
15,
7991-8001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Andrianopoulos, A.,
and Hynes, M. J.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
3194-3203[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Woloshuk, C. P.,
Foutz, K. R.,
Brewer, J. F.,
Bhatnagar, D.,
Cleveland, T. E.,
and Payne, G. A.
(1994)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
60,
2408-2414[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Marmorstein, R.,
and Harrison, S. C.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
2504-2512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Zhang, L.,
and Guarente, L.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
2110-2119[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Skamnioti and S. J. Gurr
Magnaporthe grisea Cutinase2 Mediates Appressorium Differentiation and Host Penetration and Is Required for Full Virulence
PLANT CELL,
August 1, 2007;
19(8):
2674 - 2689.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. MacPherson, M. Larochelle, and B. Turcotte
A Fungal Family of Transcriptional Regulators: the Zinc Cluster Proteins
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,
September 1, 2006;
70(3):
583 - 604.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Hynes, S. L. Murray, A. Duncan, G. S. Khew, and M. A. Davis
Regulatory Genes Controlling Fatty Acid Catabolism and Peroxisomal Functions in the Filamentous Fungus Aspergillus nidulans
Eukaryot. Cell,
May 1, 2006;
5(5):
794 - 805.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. M. Freimoser, S. Screen, S. Bagga, G. Hu, and R. J. St Leger
Expressed sequence tag (EST) analysis of two subspecies of Metarhizium anisopliae reveals a plethora of secreted proteins with potential activity in insect hosts
Microbiology,
January 1, 2003;
149(1):
239 - 247.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|