|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M109508200 on December 19, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 10, 8202-8208, March 8, 2002
Isolation and Characterization of XKaiso, a Transcriptional
Repressor That Associates with the Catenin Xp120ctn in
Xenopus laevis*
Si Wan
Kim ,
Xiang
Fang ,
Hong
Ji ,
Alicia F.
Paulson ,
Juliet M.
Daniel§,
Malgorzata
Ciesiolka¶,
Frans
van
Roy¶, and
Pierre D.
McCrea **
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology, Program in Genes and Development, The University of
Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, the
§ Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton,
Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada, and the ¶ Department of Molecular
Biology, VIB-University of Gent, Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
Received for publication, October 2, 2001, and in revised form, December 6, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The Armadillo family of catenin proteins function
in multiple capacities including cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion
and nuclear signaling. The newest catenin, p120ctn,
differs from the classical catenins and binds to the membrane-proximal domain of cadherins. Recently, a novel transcription factor Kaiso was
found to interact with p120ctn, suggesting that p120ctn
also possesses a nuclear function. We isolated the Xenopus
homolog of Kaiso, XKaiso, from a Xenopus stage 17 cDNA
library. XKaiso contains an amino-terminal BTB/POZ domain and three
carboxyl-terminal zinc fingers. The XKaiso transcript was present
maternally and expressed throughout early embryonic development.
XKaiso's spatial expression was defined via in situ
hybridization and was found localized to the brain, eye, ear, branchial
arches, and spinal cord. Co-immunoprecipitation of Xenopus
p120ctn and XKaiso demonstrated their mutual association,
whereas related experiments employing differentially epitope-tagged
XKaiso constructs suggest that XKaiso additionally self-associates.
Finally, reporter assays employing a chimera of XKaiso fused to the
GAL4 DNA binding domain indicate that XKaiso is a transcriptional
repressor. These data suggest that XKaiso functions throughout
development and that its repressor functions may be most apparent in
the context of neural tissues. The significance of the
XKaiso-p120ctn interaction has yet to be determined, but it may
include transducing information from cadherin-mediated cell-cell
contacts to transcriptional processes within the nucleus.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Intercellular adherens junctions composed of cadherin-catenin
complexes have roles not only in embryonic development but also in
maintaining adult tissue integrity and differentiated cellular identity
(1-3). The Armadillo family of catenins are a group of proteins
characterized by the presence of 10-13 Armadillo repeats, which bind
to cadherin intracellular domains (4-7). In the case of the classical
catenins -catenin and plakoglobin, they also bind to the cortical
actin cytoskeleton via proteins including -catenin and -actinin
(8, 9). In addition to the modulation of cadherin-mediated cell-cell
contacts at the plasma membrane (10, 11), the catenins have nuclear
functions. Best characterized is -catenin, which, in the context of
the Wnt signaling pathway (12-14), translocates from the cytosol into
the nucleus to selectively regulate gene transcription in conjunction
with members of the LEF/TCF (for lymphoid
enhancer factor/T cell
factor)1 family
of transcription factors (15-18).
Another member of the Armadillo protein family is the catenin
p120ctn, a substrate of Src kinase and receptor-tyrosine
kinases (19-22) and protein-tyrosine phosphatases (23, 24).
Accumulating evidence indicates that p120ctn regulates both
cadherin-mediated cell adhesion (25-31) and the activity of small
G-proteins controlling actin filament-dependent cell
adhesion and motility (32-34). p120ctn is also present in the
nucleus, a localization believed to be influenced by the extent of its
nuclear export and by cadherin expression levels (35, 36). Recently, a
nuclear transcription factor interacting with p120ctn was
isolated through yeast two-hybrid screening of a mouse cDNA library
(37). This protein, named Kaiso, was found to be a BTB/POZ (for
Broad-Complex, Tramtrack, and Bric
à brac/poxviruses and zinc finger)
protein (38-40) containing a BTB/POZ protein-protein interaction
domain at the amino terminus and three Cys-2-His-2 type DNA-binding
zinc fingers at the carboxyl terminus. Immunofluorescence analysis of
Kaiso showed it localized to the nucleus (37). More recently, Kaiso was
shown to specifically bind nonmethylated DNA sequences and to bind
other distinct DNA sequences in a methylation-dependent manner
in mammalian cells (41).2 This
work also indicated that Kaiso's binding to DNA targets occurs via its
zinc finger domain and suggested the further association of
co-repressors such as the histone deacetylase complex and/or components
of methyl-CpG binding complexes in effecting transcriptional repression
and/or gene silencing. While Kaiso interacts with p120ctn,
Kaiso does not bind the related Armadillo domain-containing protein
-catenin (37), indicating that Kaiso in complex with p120ctn
has a nuclear function distinct from that of LEF/TCF when associated with -catenin upon Wnt signaling, a view further supported by exogenous expression studies of p120ctn carried out in
developing Xenopus embryos (26, 30).
The BTB/POZ proteins are generally divided into two groups,
actin-binding proteins and DNA-binding proteins (39). Nuclear BTB/POZ
members have been characterized in mammalian cells and invertebrates
such as Drosophila. Some mammalian BTB/POZ proteins have
been found to be oncogenic. For example, the BCL6 gene is rearranged in human non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (43, 44), and the
promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger (PLZF) protein is fused to the
retinoic acid receptor in translocations associated with acute
promyelocytic leukemia (45). Drosophila BTB/POZ proteins have been found in turn to be important in development. For example, Tramtrack is a repressor of pair-rule segmentation genes such as
ftz, eve, runt, and odd
(46) and is required for cell fate determination in the
Drosophila eye (47). Another BTB/POZ protein, Broad-Complex,
is involved in Drosophila metamorphosis (48, 49). A
Xenopus BTB/POZ zinc finger protein, Champignon, has been
recently isolated and shown to interfere with gastrulation movements
when exogenously expressed during embryonic development (50).
To better understand the nuclear function of p120ctn
during development, we isolated the Xenopus homolog of
Kaiso, XKaiso, from a neurula stage Xenopus cDNA library
(51). XKaiso was found to be highly homologous with Kaiso especially
within the BTB/POZ and zinc finger domains. The temporal and spatial
expression pattern of the XKaiso transcript was determined via
RT-PCR analysis and in situ hybridization, respectively,
revealing localized expression in neuronal tissues. XKaiso specifically
associated with Xenopus p120ctn
(Xp120ctn),3 whereas
co-immunoprecipitation experiments employing differentially epitope-tagged XKaiso constructs additionally suggested the existence of XKaiso homodimers and/or higher order oligomers. XKaiso behaved as a
transcriptional repressor when assayed in the context of a chimeric
fusion with the GAL4 DNA binding domain (GAL4BD), a characteristic
shared with other members of the BTB/POZ zinc finger family. This study
represents the first characterization of XKaiso, a direct binding
partner of Xp120ctn, in a developmental context. Experiments
are under way to determine the function of XKaiso and the
XKaiso-Xp120ctn complex.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
cDNA Cloning--
We employed standard
hybridization screening methods to obtain the full-length XKaiso
cDNA from a Xenopus stage 17 embryo cDNA library
constructed in the gt10 vector (51). The random primed probe (Random
Primers DNA Labeling System; Invitrogen) was generated by PCR
amplification (50 °C and 25 cycles) using the Xenopus
library as template and a mouse Kaiso primer set
(5'-GCTACAGACATTCAGTAC-3', 5'-TTGTTCTGAGGAGGAGTA-3'), corresponding to
coding regions within the BTB/POZ and zinc finger domains, respectively
(37). The hybridization was carried out at 50 °C for 12-16 h
according to published procedures (52). The membranes were then washed
3-5 times in 2× SSC (20× SSC: 17.5% NaCl, 8.8% sodium citrate, pH 7.0) and 0.1% SDS at room temperature for a total of 20 min and washed
once in 2× SSC, 0.1% SDS at 50 °C for 15 min. Positive clones were
further identified by PCR (55 °C and 30 cycles) with gt10-specific primers using the Expand High Fidelity PCR System (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Clones were sequenced at the
institutional core sequencing facility, and a full-length cDNA was
generated from the cDNA library by PCR (55 °C and 30 cycles)
with the Xenopus Kaiso-specific primers that were designed
based on the above known coding sequence. The product was then
gel-purified using a GeneClean kit (Bio 101) and sequenced. The XKaiso
sequence is available from GenBankTM under accession number
AF420316.
Embryos--
Xenopus eggs were obtained and
fertilized using standard methods (53). Embryos were dejellied by
treating with 2% cysteine HCl (pH 8.0) for 5 min before the first
cleavage stage and were rinsed and incubated in 0.1× MMR (10× MMR:
100 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1 mM
MgSO4, 2 mM CaCl2, 5 mM
HEPES, pH 7.4). Embryo stages were determined by observation under a
standard binocular dissecting microscope (model SMZ-U; Nikon) based on
the normal table of Xenopus laevis development
(54).
Microinjection--
mRNA or plasmid DNA constructs were
microinjected into the animal hemisphere of two blastomeres in 2-4
cell stage embryos incubated in 5% Ficoll, 0.3× MMR (pH 7.4). The
Ficoll solution was replaced with 0.1× MMR (pH 7.4) 1 h after the
injection. Embryos were injected using borosilicate glass capillary
tubes (0.75 mm in diameter; Sutter) drawn out using a P-30 pulling
instrument (Sutter) and bevelled by a K. T. Brown Type Micropipette
beveller (Sutter). The total volume of DNA or RNA injected ranged from 20 to 40 nl (total doses from 250 to 500 pg) as manipulated by the NA-1
oil-driven microinjector (Sutter).
cDNA Constructs--
XKaiso was differentially tagged
on its amino terminus with three hemagglutinin (HA) or six
myc epitopes. A XKaiso full-length cDNA was amplified by
PCR using the following primers: for HA tag,
5'-GCTCTAGAAATGGAGACAAAAAAGCTG-3' and 5'-GCTCTAGACTAGTACGATTCTGGTAT-3'; for myc tag, 5'-GCTCTAGAATGGAGACAAAAAAGCTG and
5'-GCTCTAGACTAGTACGATTCTGGTAT-3'. The resulting products were cloned in
frame within the vectors pCS2+3HA or pCS2+MT (55, 56) to generate
XKaiso/pCS2 + 3HA or XKaiso/pCS2+MT, respectively. A XKaiso construct
with carboxyl-terminal triplet HA epitopes (XKaiso/pCS2+C-3HA) was
generated by PCR (using primers 5'-AAGGCCTATGGAGACAAAAAAGCTG-3' and
5'-AAGGCCTGTACGATTCTGGTATTAC-3') and subcloned in frame into pCS2+C-3HA
at the StuI site. A XKaiso frameshifted construct (XKaisoFS)
was engineered by SacI restriction digestion of the XKaiso
cDNA coding sequence at base pair 131, T4 DNA polymerase (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) removal of the 3'-overhangs, and T4 DNA ligase
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals) blunt end religation of the preexisting
insert within the pCS2+3HA vector.
A cDNA encoding a carboxyl-terminal fragment of a
Xenopus p120ctn-like protein was cloned by screening
a yeast two-hybrid library of X. laevis oocytes using a
membrane-proximal cytoplasmic domain of Xenopus N-cadherin
as a bait.3 This p120ctn-like cDNA was
completed by 5'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends (GenBankTM accession number AF150744) and turned out to be
a true Xenopus ortholog of human p120ctn isoform
1A D (57, 58), showing highest homology in the central Armadillo
domain. Because it is the longer of two Xenopus isoforms isolated, it was designated Xp120ctniso1. A derivative
construct having six carboxyl-terminal myc epitopes
(Xp120iso1/pCS2+C-MT) was generated by PCR (using primers 5'-GAATTCGATGGATGAGCCAGAG-3' and 5'-GAATTCACACGCTGATCTTC-3') and subcloned in frame into pCS2+C-MT at the EcoRI site. A
Xenopus ARVCF (for Armadillo gene deleted in
velocardiofacial syndrome) isoform
1B (Xarvcf1B) (59) construct having three amino-terminal HA epitopes
(Xarvcf1B/pCS2+3HA) was generated by PCR (using primers 5'-GCTCTAGAATGATGCAGGAACC-3' and 5'-GCTCTAGACCCAAAAAGGGTCACTGC-3') and
subcloned in frame into pCS2+3HA at the XbaI site.
To generate a template construct for labeling of in
situ hybridization probe of XKaiso, XKaiso full-length cDNA
was amplified by PCR using the following primers:
5'-CCATCGATATGGAGACAAAAAAGCTGA-3' and
5'-CCGCTCGAGCGTACGATTCTGGTATTACAAAC-3'. The resulting products were cloned into the TA cloning vector pCRII (Invitrogen) to generate XKaiso/pCRII.
To generate fusion constructs with the GAL4BD, XKaiso,
Xp120ctniso1, and Xenopus ARVCF isoform 1A
(Xarvcf1A) (59) were cloned into the plasmid pGBT9
(CLONTECH) at the SmaI,
EcoRI, and EcoRI sites, respectively. The
following oligonucleotides were used for PCR: for XKaiso,
5'-TCCCCCGGGGATGGAGACAAAAAAGCTG-3' and
5'-TCCCCCGGGCTAGTACGATTCTGGTATTAC-3'; for Xp120ctniso1,
5'-GGAATTCATGGATGAGCCAGAGTCT-3' and 5'-GGAATTCTTAGACACGCTGATCTTCAG-3'; for Xarvcf1A, 5'-GGAATTCATGCCTGCCGAACTCCAA-3' and
5'-GGAATTCTTAGACCCAGGAGTCAAC-3'. The GAL4BD-fused XKaiso,
Xp120ctniso1, and Xarvcf1A were then PCR-amplified and
subcloned into pCS2+ (55, 56) to generate GAL4XKaiso/pCS2+,
GAL4Xp120iso1/pCS2+, and GAL4Xarvcf1A/pCS2+, respectively. The PCR
primers used were as follows: for GAL4BDXKaiso,
5'-AAGGCCTATGAAGCTACTGTCTTCT-3' and 5'-AAGGCCTCCCGGGCTAGTACGATT-3'; for
GAL4BDXp120ctniso1, 5'-AAGGCCTATGAAGCTACTGTCTTCT-3' and
5'-AAGGCCTGAATTCTTAGACACGCTG-3'; for GAL4BDXarvcf1A,
5'-AAGGCCTATGAAGCTACTGTCTTCT-3' and
5'-AAGGCCTGAATTCTTAGACCCAGGA-3'.
PCR was conducted using the Expand High Fidelity PCR system (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals), and the insert sequence of each construct was
verified by sequencing at the institutional core sequencing facility.
In Vitro Transcription--
All DNA constructs were transcribed
in vitro into capped mRNA using the SP6 mMessage
mMachine kit according to the manufacturer's protocol (Ambion).
Unincorporated nucleotides were removed by filtration through Quick
Spin Columns, Sephadex G-50 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The
concentration and integrity of the mRNA were determined by
measuring the optical density (OD260/280) and mobility on
standard RNA formaldehyde agarose gels (52).
Immnunoprecipitation and Western Blotting--
Embryos were
coinjected with 500 pg each of mRNA of epitope-tagged XKaiso and
Xp120ctn, XKaiso, and Xarvcf1B or with differentially tagged
XKaisos. The injected embryos were harvested at stage 9, and whole
embryo lysates were prepared by pipetting with a prechilled TX buffer (10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM
EDTA, 2 mM EGTA, 0.5% Triton X-100, pH 7.4) supplemented
with protease inhibitors (1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 4 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin A, 2 µg/ml
leupeptin, 10 µg/ml antipain, 50 µg/ml benzamidine, 10 µg/ml
soybean trypsin inhibitor, 100 µg/ml iodoacetamide, and 40 µg/ml
1-chloro-3-tosylamido-7-amino-2-heptanone). Yolk proteins and cellular
debris were cleared from lysates by centrifugation at 14,000 × g, 4 °C for 15 min. The lysates was incubated with
anti-HA (12CA5) or anti-myc (9E10) monoclonal antibodies at
1:1,000 dilution by rotation at 4 °C for at least 1 h. Protein A- and G-Sepharose 4B beads (Sigma) were then added and incubated for
an additional 1 h. The resulting immunocomplexes were precipitated at 14,000 × g, 4 °C for 10 s. The precipitates
were washed in prechilled TX buffer and resuspended in an SDS sample
buffer (125 mM Tris, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 2%
-mercaptoethanol, 1% bromphenol blue, pH 6.8). The resuspension was
boiled for 5 min in the presence of 20 mM dithiothreitol.
The samples were then electrophoresed on 8% polyacrylamide gels and
transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The blots were probed with
anti-HA (1:4,000 dilution) or anti-myc antibodies
(1:4,000 dilution), followed by a second incubation with goat
anti-mouse antibodies (1:3,000 dilution) conjugated to horseradish
peroxidase (Bio-Rad). The signal was detected with enhanced
chemiluminescence (Amersham Biosciences).
RT-PCR Analysis--
Total RNA was isolated from frog
eggs and embryos using Trizol (Life Technologies, Inc.) according to
the manufacturer's protocol. To detect transcripts by PCR,
cDNA was generated from 1 µg of total RNA using Moloney murine
leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals),
employing random hexamers (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The RT-PCR
assays were semiquantitative. The linear range for each primer set was
determined by removing 5-µl aliquots from the PCR tube at five-cycle
intervals and comparing band intensities of the products resolved on
agarose gels. The PCR conditions and primers used were as
follows: for XKaiso transcripts, 50 °C, 30 cycles,
5'-ATCTCCATCGAAACCTGGC-3', 5'-TTTTCCCAGGAATGGACG-3'; for ornithine
decarboxylase, 55 °C, 25 cycles, 5'-GGAGCTGCAAGTTGGAGA-3', 5'-CTCAGTTGCCAGTGTGGTC-3'.
Whole-mount in Situ Hybridization--
Digoxigenin-labeled RNA
probes were prepared using the DIG RNA labeling kit (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals). XKaiso/pCRII was digested with NotI (sense
linearization) or SpeI (antisense linearization) and then
treated with SP6 and T7 polymerase to produce the sense and antisense
probes, respectively. Eggs and embryos of different stages were
collected from albino frogs and processed using the published protocol
(53).
Luciferase Assay--
Embryos were coinjected with 250 pg of
mRNA of different GAL4 fusion constructs and 250 pg of luciferase
reporter plasmid, p17X4TKlucSV40pA (a generous gift from Drs. Zafar
Nawaz and Ming Tsai, Baylor College of Medicine), containing a minimal
thymidine kinase promoter under the control of four GAL4 binding sites. The injected embryos at the early gastrula stage (stages 10 and 11)
were harvested into three separate groups of five for each assay. The
collected embryos were lysed and assayed for luciferase activity using
the Luciferase Assay System according to the manufacturer's protocol
(Promega). Uninjected embryo lysates were used to measure base-line
activity. All experiments were repeated a minimum of three times.
 |
RESULTS |
XKaiso cDNA Isolation--
To isolate the Xenopus
homolog of Kaiso, XKaiso, a screen was undertaken of a
Xenopus stage 17 embryo cDNA library using the mouse
Kaiso coding region to design primers for generating the hybridization
probe (described under "Experimental Procedures"). A full-length
cDNA was isolated that showed overall 53% identity and 66% amino
acid similarity compared with murine Kaiso (Fig. 1). XKaiso contains an amino-terminal
BTB/POZ domain, generally involved in protein-protein interactions, and
a carboxyl-terminal zinc finger domain containing three Cys-2-His-2
zinc fingers, shown in murine Kaiso1 and other family
members to bind DNA (39). The BTB/POZ and zinc finger domains of XKaiso
show 87 and 90% amino acid identity, respectively, to mouse Kaiso,
suggesting that we have isolated the Xenopus ortholog.

View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
XKaiso sequence. The deduced amino acid
sequence of XKaiso is aligned with that of mouse Kaiso. Sequences in
shaded and boldface type represent the presence
of identical amino acid residues, and boxed
sequences indicate the presence of identical and/or similar
residues. The BTB/POZ domain residues (amino acids 12-117) are
indicated by a filled line above the
sequence, while the residues of three Cys-2-His-2 zinc
fingers are indicated by gray lines
above the sequence. The XKaiso sequence is
available from GenBankTM under accession number
AF420316.
|
|
Temporal Expression of XKaiso--
To determine the temporal
expression patterns of XKaiso, semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis was
performed on total RNAs isolated from Xenopus eggs and
embryos of different developmental stages. As shown in Fig.
2, the XKaiso transcript was present
maternally and expressed throughout early embryonic development. The
XKaiso transcript was not detectable via Northern blotting using 20 µg of total RNA of varying Xenopus embryonic stages and a
32P-labeled random primed probe (data not shown). The low
expression levels of XKaiso were further suggested by our inability to
detect the XKaiso protein using an anti-XKaiso polyclonal antibody that effectively resolved exogenously expressed XKaiso. In all events, XKaiso's RT-PCR temporal expression and whole-mount in situ
patterns (Figs. 2 and 3) indicate that
XKaiso mRNA is continually present from the egg to early tadpole
stages of embryonic development.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
RT-PCR analysis of XKaiso expression at the
indicated embryonic stages. Top panel,
semiquantitative RT-PCR evaluation of total XKaiso mRNA transcript
expression at the indicated developmental stages. Bottom
panel, control RT-PCR of ornithine decarboxylase that was
used as a reaction and loading control. The XKaiso transcript is
present throughout development.
|
|

View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Whole-mount in situ
hybridization analysis of XKaiso expression in early
Xenopus development. Spatial expression pattern
of XKaiso was evaluated via whole mount in situ
hybridization using a dioxigenin-labeled antisense (A-K)
and sense (B', D', K') XKaiso
full-length RNA probe. Developmental stages: egg (A),
cleavage (B) (stage 3); blastula (C) (stage 8);
gastrula (D) (stage 11); neurula (E) (stage 17)
(dorsal); neurula (F) (stage 17) (ventral); neurula
(G) (stage 17) (anterior); neurula (H)
(stage 17) (posterior); early tailbud (I) (stage 23)
(dorsal); early tailbud (J) (stage 23) (lateral); tailbud
(K) (stage 28); cleavage (B') (stage 3); gastrula
(D') (stage 11); tailbud (K') (stage 28). The
XKaiso transcript is principally present in neural cell precursors and
neural tissues.
|
|
Spatial Expression of XKaiso--
The spatial expression pattern
of XKaiso was examined by whole-mount in situ hybridization
of Xenopus embryos using a dioxigenin-labeled antisense
XKaiso full-length RNA probe (Fig. 3). In situ hybridization of sectioned embryos further confirmed the expression pattern (data not
shown), while a series of negative control embryos hybridized and
processed in parallel with the complimentary sense XKaiso RNA probe did
not show any significant signal (Fig. 3 (B', D', and K') and data not shown). XKaiso was revealed to be
expressed in the animal hemisphere of eggs (Fig. 3A) and
cleavage stage embryos (stage 3, Fig. 3B). At blastula
(stage 8, Fig. 3C) and gastrula stages (stage 11, Fig.
3D), XKaiso was expressed in the ectodermal region. At
neurula stages, the anterior (stage 17, Fig. 3G) and dorsal
regions (stage 17, Fig. 3E) displayed localized XKaiso
signals. Most prominently, tailbud stage embryos showed a distinctive
expression pattern in the brain, eye, ear, branchial arches, and spinal
cord (stage 28, Fig. 3K), indicating that the XKaiso
transcript was principally present within neuronal cell derivatives.
Interaction of XKaiso and Xp120ctn--
Mouse Kaiso
was first identified as a direct binding partner of p120ctn
following a yeast two-hybrid screen and subsequent
co-immunoprecipitation analysis (37). To determine if XKaiso is
likewise capable of associating with Xp120ctn,
co-immunoprecipitation experiments were performed after expressing differentially epitope-tagged XKaiso and Xp120ctn constructs in
Xenopus embryos. As shown in Fig.
4A, Xp120ctniso1
tagged on its carboxyl terminus with myc epitopes
co-immunoprecipitated with XKaiso tagged on its carboxyl terminus with
HA epitopes (lane 3). Similar levels of the
immunocomplex were precipitated in experiments using differentially
amino-terminal tagged forms of Xp120ctniso1 and XKaiso or
Xp120ctn isoform 2 and XKaiso (data not shown). Another member
of the p120ctn subfamily of Armadillo proteins (7, 60), ARVCF,
was recently identified in Xenopus (59). To determine the
specificity of the interaction of XKaiso with p120ctn, we
assessed if Xarvcf1B could be co-immunoprecipitated with XKaiso (Fig.
4B). Xarvcf1B was not able to co-immunoprecipitate with
XKaiso (lane 3), lending further support to
XKaiso's specific association with Xp120ctn and to XKaiso
being the Xenopus ortholog of mouse Kaiso.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Specific interaction of XKaiso with
Xp120ctn. A, embryos were coinjected with
mRNA coding for XKaiso tagged on the carboxyl terminus with HA
epitopes (XKaisoHA) and Xp120ctniso1 tagged on the carboxyl
terminus with myc epitopes (Xp120myc). Following
immunoprecipitation of Xp120myc or XKaisoHA, the
coimmunoprecipitation of Xp120myc was detected from
Xenopus whole embryo lysates blotted with
anti-myc monoclonal antibody. B, embryos were
coinjected with mRNA coding for XKaiso tagged with myc
epitopes (XKaisomyc) and Xarvcf1B tagged with HA epitopes
(XarvcfHA) and were immunoblotted for XarvcfHA following
immunoprecipitation of XKaisomyc or XarvcfHA.
Xp120myc robustly coimmunoprecipitated with XKaisoHA in
contrast to XarvcfHA.
|
|
Homomeric Interaction of XKaiso--
Previously identified BTB/POZ
proteins, such as the ZID (for zinc finger with
interaction domain) protein (38), PLZF,
Tramtrack, and Bric à brac (61), have been found to homodimerize
via their respective BTB/POZ domains (38, 62). In addition, murine
Kaiso has been shown to homodimerize (37). The BTB/POZ domains also mediate heteromeric interactions, for example, Tramtrack and PLZF interact with Drosophila GAGA factor (63, 64) and BCL6 (38, 65), respectively. To determine whether XKaiso might homoassociate, we
tested whether differentially epitope-tagged XKaiso constructs could be
co-immunoprecipitated following the microinjection of their respective
mRNAs in Xenopus embryos. As shown in Fig.
5, HA-tagged XKaiso co-immunoprecipitated
with myc-tagged XKaiso (lane 1),
suggesting that XKaiso homo-oligomerizes, probably as a homodimer in
keeping with other BTB/POZ family members.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Homomeric interaction of XKaiso. Embryos
were coinjected with mRNA coding for differentially tagged XKaiso
constructs (XKaisomyc and XKaisoHA). Following
immunoprecipitation of XKaisomyc or XKaisoHA, the
coimmunoprecipitation of XKaisoHA was detected from Xenopus
whole embryo lysates blotted with anti-HA monoclonal antibody,
indicating the existence of XKaiso homodimers or higher order
oligomers.
|
|
Transcriptional Repressor Activity of XKaiso--
A majority of
BTB/POZ zinc finger proteins act as transcriptional repressors
(66-72), interacting with transcriptional corepressors such as the
silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor, the
nuclear receptor corepressor, and histone deacetylase (73-75). To
assess the transregulatory activity of XKaiso, full-length XKaiso was
fused to the GAL4 DNA binding domain (XKaiso-GAL4BD chimera), and its
mRNA was co-injected into early Xenopus embryos with a
GAL4-responsive luciferase reporter plasmid. As shown in Fig.
6, XKaiso-GAL4BD repressed the
reporter's basal transcriptional activity by 10-20-fold compared with
the expression of GAL4BD alone. Full-length Xp120ctn-GAL4BD or
Xarvcf1A-GAL4BD had significantly lesser effects on the reporter's
luciferase activity. The reporter activity observed upon the
co-expression of full-length Xp120ctn and XKaiso-GAL4BD was
similar to that obtained upon expressing XKaiso-GAL4BD alone, and
likewise, the co-expression of full-length XKaiso and
Xp120ctn-GAL4BD resulted in reporter activities equivalent to
those observed following the isolated expression of
Xp120ctn-GAL4BD (data not shown). Frameshifted XKaiso
(XKaisoFS; see "Experimental Procedures"), and nucleus-localized
-galactosidase (nbgal), were tested as respective mRNA and
protein injection controls (55, 56). While neither control grossly
altered the reporter's basal activity relative to XKaiso-GAL4BD, the
reduction observed was consistent and might reflect the nonspecific
titration of protein co-factors directly or indirectly employed in
basal reporter transcription. As a positive control of the system (76,
77), a VP16-GAL4BD fusion construct was expressed, resulting in
5-7-fold reporter activation. These data suggest that in keeping with
a number of other BTB/POZ zinc finger proteins (66-72), XKaiso
functions as a transcriptional repressor, a view further supported by
recent work in mammalian cell lines (41).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Repressive activity of XKaiso on the
transcriptional reporter. A GAL4 responsive reporter plasmid,
p17X4TKlucSV40pA, was coinjected with mRNA coding for chimeric
fusions of GAL4BD with XKaiso, Xp120ctniso1, or Xarvcf1A
(XKaiso-, Xp120-, or Xarvcf-GAL4BD), and luciferase reporter activities
were measured. The VP16-GAL4BD fusion (VP16-GAL4BD) mRNA was
coinjected with the reporter as an activation control. Frameshifted
XKaiso mutant (XKaisoFS; see "Experimental Procedures") or
nucleus-localized -galactosidase (nbgal) mRNA were respectively
coinjected as mRNA or protein expression controls. Exogenous
expression of XKaiso consistently generated 10-20-fold repressions of
the luciferase reporter, while significantly lesser effects arose from
expression of Xp120ctn or Xarvcf.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We report here the isolation and initial characterization of
Xenopus Kaiso, XKaiso, from a hybridization screen of a
Xenopus stage 17 embryo cDNA library. We show that
XKaiso contains an amino-terminal BTB/POZ domain and a
carboxyl-terminal zinc finger domain with an overall identity of 53%
to its mouse ortholog (37). The XKaiso transcript was present
maternally and expressed throughout early embryonic development.
XKaiso's spatial expression was defined via in situ
hybridization, which revealed early expression in the embryonic
ectoderm and later localized expression in the brain, eye, ear,
branchial arches, and spinal cord. Co-immunoprecipitation of
Xp120ctn and XKaiso demonstrated their specific mutual
association, while related experiments employing differentially
epitope-tagged constructs of XKaiso suggest that it homooligomerizes,
consistent with the homodimerization reported for other BTB/POZ zinc
finger family members (37, 38, 62). Luciferase reporter assays
employing a chimeric GAL4BD fusion of XKaiso indicate that XKaiso is a
transcriptional repressor.
The spatial expression pattern of the Drosophila BTB/POZ
zinc finger proteins, Tramtrack, Bric à brac, and Broad-Complex, have been reported in developing embryos (42, 78, 79). Whole-mount in situ hybridization of Xenopus embryos revealed
that XKaiso is expressed in the ectodermal region of blastula and
gastrula stage embryos and at the anterior and dorsal regions of
neurula stage embryos, patterns reflecting the positions of neural
precursor cells. In tailbud stage embryos, a distinctive expression
pattern was observed in the brain, eye, ear, branchial arches, and
spinal cord, indicating that the XKaiso transcript is indeed most
highly expressed within neuronal cell derivatives, perhaps reflecting greater functionality within these tissues.
Yeast two-hybrid analysis and co-immunoprecipitation showed that mouse
Kaiso interacts with mouse p120ctn (37). Regions including and
adjoining Kaiso's zinc finger domain associate with p120ctn,
which in turn binds Kaiso via its central Armadillo domain (37). It is
likely that corresponding regions of XKaiso and Xp120ctn are
responsible for their association in Xenopus embryos. In keeping with this, the Armadillo domain shows the highest homology between Xenopus and human p120ctn
proteins.3 Another Xenopus member of the
p120ctn subfamily, Xarvcf1B, did not interact with XKaiso,
indicating that the interaction of XKaiso and Xp120ctn is specific.
Other BTB/POZ zinc finger proteins such as mouse Kaiso, PLZF, and
Tramtrack are known to form homodimers (37, 38, 62). Differentially
tagged XKaiso constructs were found to co-immunoprecipitate with each
other indicating that XKaiso is likewise likely to dimerize. In
addition to homomeric interactions, some BTB/POZ zinc finger members
engage in heteromeric interactions with other BTB/POZ zinc finger
proteins, in particular BCL6 with PLZF (38, 65) and Tramtrack with GAGA
factor (63, 64). BCL6 and PLZF have also been shown to interact with
transcriptional repressors such as histone deacetylase, silencing
mediator of retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor, and nuclear receptor
corepressor (73-75). Subsequently, the identification of XKaiso
binding partners in addition to Xp120ctn will permit us to
understand better the function of XKaiso at the molecular level.
While the gene targets or nuclear roles of XKaiso are unknown, we
determined that a chimera of XKaiso, XKaiso-GAL4BD, repressed basal
transcription from a GAL4 luciferase reporter. This result is further
supported by recent reports that Kaiso acts as a transcriptional repressor in mammalian cells upon binding
methylation-dependent (CpG) DNA sequences as well as having
the capacity to associate with specific and distinct nonmethylated DNA
consensus motifs (41).2 This work further indicated that
Kaiso's binding to DNA targets occurs via its zinc finger domain and
that its association with components of methyl-CpG binding complexes
and/or likely association with additional co-repressors such as the
histone deacetylase complex assists in promoting transcriptional gene
silencing and/or repression.
Ultimately, it will be important to resolve the developmental signaling
pathways governing the expression and activity of XKaiso, which in turn
are likely to be linked to those influencing Xp120ctn.
p120ctn is found in the cytoplasm and nucleus but is most
prominently localized to the plasma membrane in cells expressing
cadherins (31, 36). Because p120ctn binds cadherin membrane
proximal domains and probably modulates their function (25-31) and
that of small G-proteins (32-34), it is conjectured that XKaiso's
nuclear functions are indirectly or directly linked to adhesive events
taking place at the plasma membrane and/or actin-associated events
contributing to cell motility. If this proves correct, XKaiso will
represent a nuclear partner of Xp120ctn facilitating the
transcriptional integration of adhesion and motility information.
Because -catenin bears homology to p120ctn (both contain
central Armadillo repeats) and -catenin is capable of relieving
LEF/TCF-mediated repression of Wnt pathway gene targets, we were
curious to test if Xp120ctn might analogously relieve XKaiso
mediated repression. While no such relief of repression was observed
upon co-expressing Xp120ctn with XKaiso (and conversely no
additional repression was apparent), the GAL4 fusion system we employed
is artificial in nature, leaving open the possibility that
Xp120ctn modulates XKaiso's transcriptional functions in an
in vivo context. The physiological roles of XKaiso and
Xp120ctn will be more easily addressed following the
identification of XKaiso's consensus binding site(s) and endogenous
gene targets.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Werner Montross, Dr.
Agnes Chan, Byong Su Kim, Dr. Kwang Won Seo, and Charles Chung
for providing technical advice, to Dr. Zafar Nawaz and Dr. Ming
Tsai for providing needed reagents, and to Travis Vaught and Jon P. Lyons for reading the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health RO1 Grant GM 52112, a Pharmacia/Monsanto Research Award, a
Kleberg Foundation Award, and Cancer Center Support Grant Funds CCSG-CA
16672 (to P. D. M.) and by the Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders and Fortis Verzekeringen (Belgium) (to F. V. R.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AF420316.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry
and Molecular Biology, Box 117, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson
Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030. Tel.:
713-792-8979; Fax: 713-791-9478; E-mail:
pmccrea@odin.mdacc.tmc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 19, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M109508200
3
M. Ciesiolka, A. Vanlandschoot, K. Staes, K. Vlemìnckx, and F. van Roy, manuscript in preparation.
2
J. M. Daniel, C. M. Spring, H. C. Crawford, A. B. Reynolds, and A. Baig, submitted for publication.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
LEF/TCF, lymphoid enhancer
factor/T cell factor;
PLZF, promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger;
Xp120ctniso1, Xenopus p120ctn isoform 1;
GAL4BD, GAL4 DNA binding
domain;
HA, hemagglutinin;
ARVCF, Armadillo gene deleted in
velocardiofacial syndrome;
Xarvcf1A or 1B, Xenopus ARVCF
isoform 1A or 1B;
RT, reverse transcription.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Takeichi, M.
(1991)
Science
251,
1451-1455[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Gumbiner, B. M.
(1996)
Cell
84,
345-357[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Vleminckx, K.,
and Kemler, R.
(1999)
Bioessays
21,
211-220[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
McCrea, P. D.,
Turck, C. W.,
and Gumbiner, B.
(1991)
Science
254,
1359-1361[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Peifer, M.,
McCrea, P. D.,
Green, K. J.,
Wieschaus, E.,
and Gumbiner, B. M.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
118,
681-691[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Aberle, H.,
Schwartz, H.,
and Kemler, R.
(1996)
J. Cell. Biochem.
61,
514-523[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Hatzfeld, M.
(1999)
Int. Rev. Cytol.
186,
179-224[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Rimm, D. L.,
Koslov, E. R.,
Kebriaei, P.,
Cianci, C. D.,
and Morrow, J. S.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
8813-8817[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Nieset, J. E.,
Redfield, A. R.,
Jin, F.,
Knudsen, K. A.,
Johnson, K. R.,
and Wheelock, M. J.
(1997)
J. Cell Sci.
110,
1013-1022[Abstract]
|
| 10.
|
Provost, E.,
and Rimm, D. L.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
11,
567-572[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Gumbiner, B. M.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
148,
399-404[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Gumbiner, B. M.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
8,
430-435[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Willert, K.,
and Nusse, R.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
8,
95-102[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Polakis, P.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
1837-1851[Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Behrens, J.,
von Kries, J. P.,
Kuhl, M.,
Bruhn, L.,
Wedlich, D.,
Grosschedl, R.,
and Birchmeier, W.
(1996)
Nature
382,
638-642[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Molenaar, M.,
van de Wetering, M.,
Oosterwegel, M.,
Peterson-Maduro, J.,
Godsave, S.,
Korinek, V.,
Roose, J.,
Destree, O.,
and Clevers, H.
(1996)
Cell
86,
391-399[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Eastman, Q.,
and Grosschedl, R.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
11,
233-240[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Korswagen, H. C.,
and Clevers, H. C.
(1999)
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
64,
141-147[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Downing, J. R.,
and Reynolds, A. B.
(1991)
Oncogene
6,
607-613[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Reynolds, A. B.,
Herbert, L.,
Cleveland, J. L.,
Berg, S. T.,
and Gaut, J. R.
(1992)
Oncogene
7,
2439-2445[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Reynolds, A. B.,
Daniel, J.,
McCrea, P. D.,
Wheelock, M. J., Wu, J.,
and Zhang, Z.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
8333-8342[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Mariner, D. J.,
Anastasiadis, P.,
Keilhack, H.,
Bohmer, F. D.,
Wang, J.,
and Reynolds, A. B.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
28006-28013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Keilhack, H.,
Hellman, U.,
van Hengel, J.,
van Roy, F.,
Godovac-Zimmermann, J.,
and Bohmer, F. D.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
26376-26384[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Zondag, G. C.,
Reynolds, A. B.,
and Moolenaar, W. H.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
11264-11269[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Reynolds, A. B.,
Daniel, J. M., Mo, Y. Y., Wu, J.,
and Zhang, Z.
(1996)
Exp. Cell Res.
225,
328-337[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Geis, K.,
Aberle, H.,
Kuhl, M.,
Kemler, R.,
and Wedlich, D.
(1998)
Dev. Genes Evol.
207,
471-481[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Yap, A. S.,
Niessen, C. M.,
and Gumbiner, B. M.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
141,
779-789[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Aono, S.,
Nakagawa, S.,
Reynolds, A. B.,
and Takeichi, M.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
551-562[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Ohkubo, T.,
and Ozawa, M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
21409-21415[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Paulson, A. F.,
Fang, X., Ji, H.,
Reynolds, A. B.,
and McCrea, P. D.
(1999)
Dev. Biol.
207,
350-363[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Thoreson, M. A.,
Anastasiadis, P. Z.,
Daniel, J. M.,
Ireton, R. C.,
Wheelock, M. J.,
Johnson, K. R.,
Hummingbird, D. K.,
and Reynolds, A. B.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
148,
189-202[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Anastasiadis, P. Z.,
Moon, S. Y.,
Thoreson, M. A.,
Mariner, D. J.,
Crawford, H. C.,
Zheng, Y.,
and Reynolds, A. B.
(2000)
Nat. Cell Biol.
2,
637-644[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Noren, N. K.,
Liu, B. P.,
Burridge, K.,
and Kreft, B.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
150,
567-580[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Grosheva, I.,
Shtutman, M.,
Elbaum, M.,
and Bershadsky, A. D.
(2001)
J. Cell Sci.
114,
695-707[Abstract]
|
| 35.
|
Daniel, J. M.,
and Reynolds, A. B.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
4819-4824[Abstract]
|
| 36.
|
van Hengel, J.,
Vanhoenacker, P.,
Staes, K.,
and van Roy, F.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
7980-7985[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Daniel, J. M.,
and Reynolds, A. B.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
3614-3623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Bardwell, V. J.,
and Treisman, R.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
1664-1677[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Albagli, O.,
Dhordain, P.,
Deweindt, C.,
Lecocq, G.,
and Leprince, D.
(1995)
Cell Growth Differ.
6,
1193-1198[Abstract]
|
| 40.
|
Collins, T.,
Stone, J. R.,
and Williams, A. J.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
3609-3615[Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Prokhortchouk, A.,
Hendrich, B.,
Jorgensen, H.,
Ruzov, A.,
Wilm, M.,
Georgiev, G.,
Bird, A.,
and Prokhortchouk, E.
(2001)
Genes Dev.
15,
1613-1618[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Brennan, C. A., Li, T. R.,
Bender, M.,
Hsiung, F.,
and Moses, K.
(2001)
Development
128,
1-11[Abstract]
|
| 43.
|
Kerckaert, J. P.,
Deweindt, C.,
Tilly, H.,
Quief, S.,
Lecocq, G.,
and Bastard, C.
(1993)
Nat. Genet.
5,
66-70[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Ye, B. H.,
Lista, F., Lo,
Coco, F.,
Knowles, D. M.,
Offit, K.,
Chaganti, R. S.,
and Dalla-Favera, R.
(1993)
Science
262,
747-750[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Chen, Z.,
Guidez, F.,
Rousselot, P.,
Agadir, A.,
Chen, S. J.,
Wang, Z. Y.,
Degos, L.,
Zelent, A.,
Waxman, S.,
and Chomienne, C.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
1178-1182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Brown, J. L.,
and Wu, C.
(1993)
Development
117,
45-58[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Xiong, W. C.,
and Montell, C.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
1085-1096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Emery, I. F.,
Bedian, V.,
and Guild, G. M.
(1994)
Development
120,
3275-3287[Abstract]
|
| 49.
|
von Kalm, L.,
Crossgrove, K.,
Von Seggern, D.,
Guild, G. M.,
and Beckendorf, S. K.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
3505-3516[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Goto, T.,
Hasegawa, K.,
Kinoshita, T.,
and Kubota, H. Y.
(2001)
Dev. Dyn.
221,
14-25[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Kintner, C. R.,
and Melton, D. A.
(1987)
Development
99,
311-325[Abstract]
|
| 52.
|
Ausubel, F. M.
(1994)
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology
, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
|
| 53.
|
Sive, H. L.,
Grainger, R. M.,
and Harland, R. M.
(2000)
Early development of Xenopus laevis: A Laboratory Manual
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor
|
| 54.
|
Nieuwkoop, P. D.,
and Faber, J.
(1956)
Normal Table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin): A Systematical and Chronological Survey of the Development from the Fertilized Egg till the End of Metamorphosis
, North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam
|
| 55.
|
Rupp, R. A.,
Snider, L.,
and Weintraub, H.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
1311-1323[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 56.
|
Turner, D. L.,
and Weintraub, H.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
1434-1447[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 57.
|
Keirsebilck, A.,
Bonne, S.,
Staes, K.,
van Hengel, J.,
Nollet, F.,
Reynolds, A.,
and van Roy, F.
(1998)
Genomics
50,
129-146[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 58.
|
Aho, S.,
Rothenberger, K.,
and Uitto, J.
(1999)
J. Cell. Biochem.
73,
390-399[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 59.
|
Paulson, A. F.,
Mooney, E.,
Fang, X., Ji, H.,
and McCrea, P. D.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
30124-30131[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 60.
|
Anastasiadis, P. Z.,
and Reynolds, A. B.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
1319-1334[Abstract]
|
| 61.
|
Zollman, S.,
Godt, D.,
Prive, G. G.,
Couderc, J. L.,
and Laski, F. A.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
10717-10721[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 62.
|
Chen, W.,
Zollman, S.,
Couderc, J. L.,
and Laski, F. A.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
3424-3429[Abstract]
|
| 63.
|
Soeller, W. C., Oh, C. E.,
and Kornberg, T. B.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
7961-7970[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 64.
|
Farkas, G.,
Gausz, J.,
Galloni, M.,
Reuter, G.,
Gyurkovics, H.,
and Karch, F.
(1994)
Nature
371,
806-808[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 65.
|
Dhordain, P.,
Albagli, O.,
Honore, N.,
Guidez, F.,
Lantoine, D.,
Schmid, M.,
The, H. D.,
Zelent, A.,
and Koken, M. H.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
6240-6250[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 66.
|
Deweindt, C.,
Albagli, O.,
Bernardin, F.,
Dhordain, P.,
Quief, S.,
Lantoine, D.,
Kerckaert, J. P.,
and Leprince, D.
(1995)
Cell Growth Differ
6,
1495-1503[Abstract]
|
| 67.
|
Chang, C. C., Ye, B. H.,
Chaganti, R. S.,
and Dalla-Favera, R.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
6947-6952[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 68.
|
Kaplan, J.,
and Calame, K.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
1108-1116[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 69.
|
Hoatlin, M. E.,
Zhi, Y.,
Ball, H.,
Silvey, K.,
Melnick, A.,
Stone, S.,
Arai, S.,
Hawe, N.,
Owen, G.,
Zelent, A.,
and Licht, J. D.
(1999)
Blood
94,
3737-3747[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 70.
|
Kukita, A.,
Kukita, T.,
Ouchida, M.,
Maeda, H.,
Yatsuki, H.,
and Kohashi, O.
(1999)
Blood
94,
1987-1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 71.
|
Li, X.,
Peng, H.,
Schultz, D. C.,
Lopez-Guisa, J. M.,
Rauscher, F. J., 3rd,
and Marmorstein, R.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
5275-5282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 72.
|
Fedele, M.,
Benvenuto, G.,
Pero, R.,
Majello, B.,
Battista, S.,
Lembo, F.,
Vollono, E.,
Day, P. M.,
Santoro, M.,
Lania, L.,
Bruni, C. B.,
Fusco, A.,
and Chiariotti, L.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
7894-7901[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 73.
|
Dhordain, P.,
Albagli, O.,
Lin, R. J.,
Ansieau, S.,
Quief, S.,
Leutz, A.,
Kerckaert, J. P.,
Evans, R. M.,
and Leprince, D.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
10762-10767[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 74.
|
Huynh, K. D.,
and Bardwell, V. J.
(1998)
Oncogene
17,
2473-2484[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 75.
|
Wong, C. W.,
and Privalsky, M. L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
27695-27702[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 76.
|
Xu, L.,
Schaffner, W.,
and Rungger, D.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
2775[Free Full Text]
|
| 77.
|
Almouzni, G.,
and Wolffe, A. P.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
1752-1765[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 78.
|
Harrison, S. D.,
and Travers, A. A.
(1990)
EMBO J.
9,
207-216[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 79.
|
Godt, D.,
Couderc, J. L.,
Cramton, S. E.,
and Laski, F. A.
(1993)
Development
119,
799-812[Abstract]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Pan, S. Nekkalapudi, L. E. Kelly, and H. M. El-Hodiri
The Rx-like Homeobox Gene (Rx-L) Is Necessary for Normal Photoreceptor Development.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
October 1, 2006;
47(10):
4245 - 4253.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Kiefer, F. Chatail-Hermitte, P. Ravassard, E. Bayard, I. Brunet, and J. Mallet
ZENON, a Novel POZ Kruppel-Like DNA Binding Protein Associated with Differentiation and/or Survival of Late Postmitotic Neurons
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
March 1, 2005;
25(5):
1713 - 1729.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Ruzov, D. S. Dunican, A. Prokhortchouk, S. Pennings, I. Stancheva, E. Prokhortchouk, and R. R. Meehan
Kaiso is a genome-wide repressor of transcription that is essential for amphibian development
Development,
December 15, 2004;
131(24):
6185 - 6194.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. F. Kelly, A. A. Otchere, M. Graham, and J. M. Daniel
Nuclear import of the BTB/POZ transcriptional regulator Kaiso
J. Cell Sci.,
December 1, 2004;
117(25):
6143 - 6152.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Rodova, K. F. Kelly, M. VanSaun, J. M. Daniel, and M. J. Werle
Regulation of the Rapsyn Promoter by Kaiso and {delta}-Catenin
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
August 15, 2004;
24(16):
7188 - 7196.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Fang, H. Ji, S.-W. Kim, J.-I. Park, T. G. Vaught, P. Z. Anastasiadis, M. Ciesiolka, and P. D. McCrea
Vertebrate development requires ARVCF and p120 catenins and their interplay with RhoA and Rac
J. Cell Biol.,
April 12, 2004;
165(1):
87 - 98.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. K. Sengupta, E. M. Smith, K. Kim, M. J. Murnane, and B. D. Smith
DNA Hypermethylation Near the Transcription Start Site of Collagen {alpha}2(I) Gene Occurs in Both Cancer Cell Lines and Primary Colorectal Cancers
Cancer Res.,
April 15, 2003;
63(8):
1789 - 1797.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Daniel, C. M. Spring, H. C. Crawford, A. B. Reynolds, and A. Baig
The p120ctn-binding partner Kaiso is a bi-modal DNA-binding protein that recognizes both a sequence-specific consensus and methylated CpG dinucleotides
Nucleic Acids Res.,
July 1, 2002;
30(13):
2911 - 2919.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|