|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M111587200 on December 26, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 10, 8209-8216, March 8, 2002
Unusual Structural Organization of the Endocytic Proteins AP180
and Epsin 1*
Christoph
Kalthoff ,
Jürgen
Alves§,
Claus
Urbanke§,
Ruth
Knorr , and
Ernst J.
Ungewickell ¶
From the Department of Cell Biology, Center of
Anatomy, and the § Department of Biophysical Chemistry,
Center of Biochemistry, Hannover Medical School,
D-30125 Hannover, Germany
Received for publication, December 5, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Epsin and AP180/CALM are important endocytic
accessory proteins that are believed to be involved in the formation of
clathrin coats. Both proteins associate with phosphorylated membrane
inositol lipids through their epsin N-terminal homology domains and
with other components of the endocytic machinery through short peptide motifs in their carboxyl-terminal segments. Using hydrodynamic and
spectroscopic methods, we demonstrate that the parts of epsin 1 and
AP180 that are involved in protein-protein interactions behave as
poorly structured flexible polypeptide chains with little or no
conventional secondary structure. The predominant cytosolic forms of
both proteins are monomers. Furthermore, we show that recombinant epsin
1, like AP180, drives in vitro assembly of clathrin cages.
We conclude that the epsin N-terminal homology domain-containing proteins AP180/CALM and epsin 1 have a very similar molecular architecture that is designed for the rapid and efficient recruitment of the principal coat components clathrin and AP-2 at the sites of
coated pit assembly.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Clathrin-coated vesicles are involved in a number of membrane
transport processes, including receptor-mediated endocytosis, recycling
of synaptic vesicles, and sorting of lysosomal enzymes (1). Despite our
detailed knowledge of the structural components of the coat and the
identity of many endocytic accessory proteins, the molecular events
leading to coat formation on the plasma membrane remain elusive. Among
the factors considered to be important for coat formation are the
neuronal proteins AP180, its ubiquitously expressed homolog CALM
(clathrin assembly lymphoid
myeloid leukemia protein), and epsin 1 (2, 3). All three
proteins have a globular epsin N-terminal homology
(ENTH)1 domain in common that
is constructed from 8 to 10 -helical rods (4-6). This domain
mediates binding to the rare membrane lipid phosphatidylinositol
4,5-bisphosphate (PI-4,5-P2), which is generally regarded
as a major recruiter of components for the endocytic machinery to the
plasma membrane (7, 8). AP180 and epsin 1 interact directly with
clathrin and the - and -appendage domains of the AP-2 adaptor
complex (3, 9-14). AP180 binding to clathrin promotes assembly of
clathrin triskelia into a population of small cages with a narrow size
distribution (15, 16). In neuronal tissue of Drosophila, a
knockout of the AP180 ortholog LAP reduces the number of
clathrin-coated vesicles; moreover, their size range is much wider than
in wild-type flies (17). These studies have led to the suggestion that
AP180 and its orthologs might be involved in the control of vesicle
size and thus support the notion of playing an important role in
vesicle formation. More recently, the potential of AP180 to recruit
clathrin to lipid surfaces and to assemble it there was demonstrated
with PI-4,5-P2-containing liposomes and lipid monolayers
(7). When a combination of AP-2 and AP180 was added to the monolayer,
the clathrin lattices became deeply invaginated (7). Whereas the ENTH
domains of AP180 and epsin 1 appear to be predominantly important for
membrane binding, their carboxyl-terminal segments are designed for
protein-protein interactions. Eight tandemly arranged DPW motifs
present in epsin 1 mediate its high affinity interaction with the
-appendage domain of AP-2 (9, 12). The association of epsin 1 with
the clathrin terminal domain occurs through two clathrin box motifs in
the central and carboxyl-terminal parts of the protein (13, 14). The
second clathrin box motif is followed by three NPF repeats, which are known to interact with Eps15 homology
domains (18). AP180 contains two DPF motifs, which were shown for other
endocytic accessory proteins to mediate their interaction with AP-2 (3, 9, 10, 13, 14). In addition, there are three
FXDXF motifs present in AP180 that were recently
implicated in -appendage binding (19). The central and
carboxyl-terminal segments of AP180 lack typical clathrin box motifs;
but instead, five DLL repeats were recently implicated in its clathrin
assembly function (11). These findings raise the questions why such
multiple tandemly arranged binding motifs are needed and how endocytic
proteins utilize them. Are they structurally arranged in a way that
they are presented to only one interaction partner at a time, or could they possibly interact with more than one target domain simultaneously? Earlier biophysical studies on AP180 from bovine brain coated vesicles
suggested an unusually large Stokes radius (15). Analysis of its
circular dichroism spectrum indicated 30% -helix, 14% -turn,
and 27% -sheet (20). So far, little is known about the structure of
the carboxyl-terminal parts beyond the ENTH domains. Therefore, we have
subjected epsin 1 and AP180 as well as recombinant fragments of them to
a detailed biophysical analysis using gel filtration, analytical
ultracentrifugation, and CD spectroscopy. We conclude that the parts of
both proteins that follow their respective ENTH domains are flexible
extended polypeptide chains with no relationship to any known
conventional secondary structure. Furthermore, we show that epsin 1, like AP180, drives in vitro assembly of clathrin cages and
thus might have more functional similarities to other ENTH
domain-containing proteins such as AP180 and CALM than previously assumed.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Reagents--
Restriction enzymes and other reagents for
molecular biology were obtained from MBI Fermentas (St. Leon-Roth,
Germany) and Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Mannheim, Germany).
Calibration standards for gel permeation chromatography and sucrose
density gradient centrifugation (MW-GF-1000 kit) were from Sigma
(Deisenhofen, Germany), and lactate dehydrogenase and catalase
were from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. The epsin 1 peptide
NH2-CEERIRRGDDLRLQMA-COOH was used for custom immunization
in rabbits by Biosciences (Göttingen, Germany). Monoclonal
antibody AP180.1 (15) was used to detect AP180. Secondary horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG and goat anti-mouse IgG for
immunoblots were purchased from ICN/Cappel (Costa Mesa, CA). The blots
were developed with ECL reagent (Amersham Biosciences, Inc., Freiburg, Germany).
Expression of Recombinant Proteins--
Epsin 1 cDNA in
pBluescript was a gift from Hong Chen and Pietro De Camilli
(Yale University). The gene for the full-length protein was obtained by
cleavage with SalI and ligation into the SalI
site of the pET32c expression vector (Novagen, Madison, WI). Epsin 1 was expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) pLysS (Novagen) with a fusion tag containing thioredoxin and a His6
cluster. The epsin 1-(144-575) fragment was generated by digestion of
the epsin 1 cDNA with PauI and SalI. The
5'-end overhang of the insert was filled in using Klenow polymerase and
ligated between the SmaI and SalI sites of the
pQE32 vector (QIAGEN Inc., Hilden, Germany). The
His6-tagged fusion proteins were expressed in E. coli DH5 . The plasmid coding for His6-AP180 was
constructed from AP180 clone 36 as described previously (21, 22). A
fragment containing the ENTH domain of AP180 was generated from the
His6-AP180 plasmid by digestion with SalI,
completely removing the segments coding for the carboxyl-terminal parts
of AP180. A 647-bp StuI/HindIII fragment of AP180
clone 36 coding for the carboxyl-terminal end of AP180 was cloned
between the SmaI and HindIII sites of the pQE30 expression vector (QIAGEN Inc.), resulting in plasmid pQB4, which
expresses His6-AP180-(745-896). The remaining 2003-bp
StuI/HindIII fragment coding for the
amino-terminal and middle parts (segment 328-745) of AP180, as well as
the initial cloning vector pBluescript SK+, was again cut
with SalI and treated with Klenow fragment to fill up the
recessed 3' termini. The resulting 1250-bp fragment was isolated and
cloned into the SmaI site of vector pQE31, expressing His6-AP180-(328-745). To obtain a plasmid from which
His6-AP180-(328-896) can be expressed, AP180 clone 36 was
cut with SalI and HindIII, and the 1907-bp
fragment was isolated and cloned between the SalI and
HindIII sites of pQE31.
All fusion proteins were purified on an
Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid-agarose affinity matrix (QIAGEN
Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. If not stated
otherwise, the bacterial lysates containing the expressed heat-stable
His6-epsin 1-(144-575) and
His6-AP180-(328-896) fusion proteins were heated in a
boiling water bath for 3 min, shock-cooled in blended NaCl and ice
water for 5 min, and centrifuged for 15 min at 120,000 × g in a Beckman Ti-70 rotor to remove precipitated heat-denatured proteins. The supernatant was incubated with the affinity matrix. To remove the tag from epsin 1, the fusion protein was
digested with 8 units/ml thrombin (ICN, Aurora, OH) for 18 h.
Epsin 1 and its fragment were further purified by ion exchange chromatography on MonoQ resin. The protein was eluted at pH 8.0 with a
0-0.5 M NaCl gradient buffered with 0.025 M
Tris-HCl. Fractions (1 ml) were collected. AP180 from pig brain was
obtained as described previously (15). All proteins used in this study
were finally purified by gel filtration through a Superdex 200 HR10/30
column (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.) equilibrated with
phosphate-buffered saline (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM
KCl, 1.9 mM KH2PO4, and 8.2 mM Na2HPO4).
Preparation of Cytosol--
Fresh pig brains were obtained from
the local slaughterhouse, immediately stored on ice, and processed
within 2 h after slaughter. The brains were homogenized in 250 mM sucrose, 25 mM HEPES, 0.5 mM
dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (pH 7.3; 1 ml of buffer/g of tissue)
using a Potter S homogenizer (B. Braun Biotech International GmbH,
Melsungen, Germany) and centrifuged for 70 min at 125,000 × g in a Beckman Ti-45 rotor. The pellet was discarded, and
the supernatant was centrifuged for another 70 min as described above.
The clarified cytosol was dialyzed against 50 mM Tris and
100 mM NaCl (pH 7.5) overnight. Finally, the cytosol was
centrifuged again for 2 h. When not used immediately, the cytosol
was shock-frozen in ethanol and dry ice and stored at 80 °C.
Frozen cytosol was rapidly thawed in a water bath at 37 °C and then
clarified by ultracentrifugation.
Analytical Gel Filtration Chromatography--
Size exclusion
chromatography was performed on an Amersham Biosciences fast protein
liquid chromatography system with a Superdex 200 HR10/30 column.
Elution volumes of purified proteins were determined from the recorder
profiles. To determine the elution positions of epsin 1 and AP180 in
pig brain cytosol, 500 µl of cytosol were applied to the Superdex
column, and 500-µl fractions were collected. Each fraction was
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting using antibodies against the
proteins of interest. The elution volume of each fraction was
calculated by adding the dead volume between the photometer of the fast
protein liquid chromatography system and the fraction collector to the
volume collected up to the middle of the respective fraction. The
Western blots were analyzed densitometrically with NIH Image Version
1.62 software, and the relative signal was plotted against the
calculated elution volume. The distribution maximum of this curve
corresponds to the elution volume of the protein. The Superdex column
was calibrated with thyroglobulin (Stokes radius of 8.6 nm)
(23), apoferritin (6.6 nm), alcohol dehydrogenase (4.6 nm), bovine
serum albumin (3.6 nm), and carbonic anhydrase (2.0 nm) (24). Clathrin
cages were used to determine the void volume. Distribution coefficients (KD) were calculated from the elution volume of the
standard proteins. Plotting Stokes radii against the square roots of
the negative decadic logarithms of the distribution coefficients
resulted in a straight line (25). This linear relationship was used to translate elution volumes of epsin 1, AP180, and their derivatives into
Stokes radii.
Sucrose Density Gradient Centrifugation--
To estimate the
sedimentation coefficients of proteins in cytosol, we used sucrose
gradients (5-20%) made up in 0.5 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.0). The
gradients were cast in 5-ml thin-walled ultracentrifuge tubes (13 × 51 mm) using a gradient mixer that was connected to a peristaltic
pump. The gradients were overlaid with 200 µl of either pig brain
cytosol or a mixture of several standard proteins in 0.5 M
Tris-HCl (pH 7.0) at a concentration of 0.14 mg/ml each. We used
lysozyme (1.91 S), ovalbumin (3.55 S), bovine serum albumin (4.44 S),
lactate dehydrogenase (6.93 S), and catalase (11.20 S) as standards
(26). The gradients were centrifuged in a Beckman SW 55 Ti rotor at
40,000 rpm for 18 h and fractionated from the meniscus downwards
in 220-µl steps using a micropipette. The fractions were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE. The standard proteins were visualized with Coomassie Blue,
and the proteins of interest were visualized by Western blotting. The
linear relationship between the fraction numbers of the distribution
maxima of the standard proteins and their sedimentation coefficients
was used to determine the s values of cytosolic epsin 1 and AP180. As
an internal control, the sedimentation coefficient of G-actin was
determined to be 3.2 S, which is very close to the published value
(26).
Heat Denaturation--
The susceptibility of epsin 1, AP180, and
their fragments to irreversible denaturation was tested by heating them
in a boiling water bath for 5 min, followed by shock cooling for 5 min
in an NaCl/ice water slurry. 10 µg of the respective protein in 100 µl of phosphate-buffered saline and 1 mg/ml glutathione
S-transferase (GST) were subjected to the procedure.
Precipitated protein was pelleted by centrifugation for 10 min at
90,000 × g in a Beckman Optima TL ultracentrifuge
using a Beckman TLA45 rotor. Supernatant and pellet fractions were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and subsequent Coomassie Blue staining.
Pull-down Experiments and Clathrin Assembly--
Binding
experiments with His6-AP180-(328-896) and the immobilized
GST- -appendage domain and GST-clathrin terminal domain fusion
proteins were performed exactly as described by Scheele et
al. (27), as were the clathrin assembly experiments.
Analytical Ultracentrifugation--
Analytical
ultracentrifugation was done in a Beckman/Coulter XL-A analytical
ultracentrifuge in either eight- or four-place rotors (An-40 or An-60).
Sedimentation rate analysis was done with 12-mm path length double
sector centerpieces. Sedimentation rate constants were determined by
analysis of the boundary movement and were corrected to 20 °C and
pure water as solvent (s20,w) (28).
CD Spectroscopy--
CD spectroscopy was performed using a Jobin
Yvon Dichrograph III with a bandwidth of 2 nm, a scanning rate of 0.03 nm/s, and a time constant of 2 s. The spectra were evaluated with
CDPro software using the expanded reference set of protein spectra as described previously (29).
 |
RESULTS |
Molecular Dimensions of Epsin 1 and AP180--
In the course of
purifying recombinant epsin 1, we noted that it migrated anomalously
slow upon SDS-PAGE, gave rise to sharp but slightly distorted bands,
and eluted from gel filtration columns like a much larger protein than
predicted by its sequence. Similar observations were made previously
with the endocytic accessory protein AP180 (15, 30). To determine
whether both proteins share common structural features in addition to
the ENTH domain, we embarked on a detailed structural characterization
of epsin 1 and AP180 that also included several functional fragments of both proteins (Fig. 1). We started by
fractionating pig brain cytosol on a calibrated gel filtration column
to separate the proteins according to their hydrodynamic radii. The
square root of the negative decadic logarithm of the distribution
coefficients (KD) of macromolecules is linearly
related to their Stokes radii (25). Using this relationship, we
obtained Stokes radii of 5.3 nm for cytosolic epsin 1 and 7.5 nm for
AP180 (Fig. 2 and Table
I). These values are characteristic for
globular proteins with molecular masses of 230 and 550 kDa,
respectively; but according to sequence data, epsin 1 has a
molecular mass of only ~60 kDa and AP180 of 92 kDa. Assuming
that epsin 1 and AP180 are monomers and not associated with any other
cytosolic components, these results suggest that epsin 1 and AP180
contain segments that have an extended rod-like structure or that are
not compactly folded.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Domain structures of epsin 1, AP180, and the
expressed recombinant fragments and SDS-PAGE of the proteins used in
this study. A, schematic view with binding motifs for
AP-2 (DP(F/W) and FXDXF) and clathrin indicated.
Known protein-protein interactions, including those with the clathrin
amino-terminal domain, involve only the central and carboxyl-terminal
regions of the proteins. B, purity of the proteins used for
biophysical studies as judged by SDS-PAGE. recomb.,
recombinant.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Analytical size exclusion chromatography on
calibrated gel filtration columns. A, elution profiles
of epsin 1 ( ) and AP180 ( ) in pig brain cytosol as determined by
Western blot analysis of the collected fractions. The elution maxima of
the standard proteins are indicated by arrows together with
the values for their Stokes radii in nanometers. B and
C, plots of the Stokes radii (RS) of
standard proteins versus the square roots of the negative
decadic logarithms of their distribution coefficients
(KD). The respective values calculated from the
KD of epsin 1 (B) and AP180
(C) are indicated by arrows.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Hydrodynamic properties of epsin 1, AP180, and their fragments lacking
the ENTH domains as determined by different methods
The molecular masses given in the second column were calculated from
the compositions based on the amino acid sequences. The last two
columns show a comparison of s20,w values in
the presence and absence of the chaotropic denaturant guanidinium
chloride. The sedimentation coefficients determined by analytical
ultracentrifugation have errors of <5%. ND, not determined;
RS, Stokes radius.
|
|
To exclude the possibility that epsin 1 and AP180 form complexes with
other cytosolic components, we determined the Stokes radii of purified
recombinant epsin 1 and AP180 by analytical gel filtration. We observed
that the values for both proteins are very close to the ones determined
for their cytosolic forms (Fig. 2). Because the overall structure of
the ENTH domain is already known to be globular (4-6), we focused our
analysis on the recombinant fragments His6-epsin
1-(144-625) and His6-AP180-(328-896), which lack the ENTH
domain. Both fragments eluted from the gel filtration column only
slightly behind the positions of the respective full-length proteins
(Fig. 2, B and C). This suggests that the behavior of epsin 1 and AP180 upon gel filtration chromatography is
dominated by the structural organization of their carboxyl-terminal segments.
Sedimentation Properties of Epsin 1 and AP180--
To
determine whether the observed large Stokes radii of epsin 1 and AP180
might possibly result from self-association, we analyzed the
sedimentation properties of epsin 1 and AP180 in 5-20% sucrose
gradients. First, the sedimentation velocities of unfractionated
cytosolic epsin 1 and AP180 were examined. After ultracentrifugation,
the gradient was fractionated, and each fraction was analyzed by
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting with antibodies directed against epsin 1 and AP180. A set of standard proteins with known sedimentation
coefficients was used to construct a calibration line from which s
values of 2.4 for epsin 1 and 2.5 for AP180 were obtained (Fig.
3, A and B; and
Table I). Considering the molecular masses of both proteins, these s
values are unusually low and suggestive of a very high frictional
coefficient. By entering the value for the Stokes radius and that for
the s value into the Svedberg equation, it is possible to estimate the
molecular mass of a macromolecule. We did this for cytosolic AP180 and
epsin 1 and arrived at molecular masses of 90 and 60 kDa, respectively. These values suggest that both proteins exist in cytosol mainly as
monomers.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Sucrose gradient centrifugation of pig brain
cytosol. After centrifugation of pig brain cytosol through a
5-20% sucrose gradient, 23 fractions were collected and analyzed by
Western blotting. A, distribution of epsin 1 ( ) and AP180
( ) in the gradient. Distribution maxima of standard proteins are
indicated by arrows; their sedimentation coefficients are
given in Svedberg units. B, plot of the sedimentation
coefficients of the standard proteins versus the fraction
numbers of their distribution maxima. The peak positions of epsin 1 and
AP180 are indicated by arrows.
|
|
We next used sedimentation-diffusion equilibrium ultracentrifugation to
directly determine the molecular masses of highly purified recombinant
epsin 1, AP180, and their fragments lacking the ENTH domains. The data
indicate that all examined proteins are predominantly monomers (data
not shown). We also analyzed the sedimentation properties of
His6-epsin 1-(144-625) and
His6-AP180-(328-896) in strong chaotropic protein
denaturants (3-6 M guanidinium chloride) and
observed only very small changes in their frictional coefficients upon
denaturation (Table I). The observed hydrodynamic size is consistent
with either an extended rod with a thickness of 1.5-2.0 nm and a
length of some 50 nm or, alternatively, a poorly folded polypeptide
chain. Taken together, our data obtained from quantitative gel
filtration chromatography and ultracentrifugation strongly suggest that
the carboxyl-terminal parts of epsin 1 and AP180 are rather extended,
with the consequence that they behave like very large proteins on gel
filtration columns and like molecular parachutes during ultracentrifugation.
CD Spectroscopy Reveals Unstructured Polypeptide
Chains--
Whereas hydrodynamic methods are suitable for determining
the molecular dimensions of macromolecules, they do not, however, tell
us whether the molecule is an extended structure such as a rod
(e.g. a coiled coil) or an unstructured random coil. To distinguish between these two possibilities, recombinant epsin 1, AP180, and several of their recombinantly expressed fragments were
analyzed by CD spectroscopy. The spectra of epsin 1 and AP180 are very
similar. Both show typical characteristics of a moderate -helical
content, but are obviously dominated by the signature of random coils.
Evaluation of the raw data with CDPro software indicated an -helical
content of 21% for epsin 1 and of 22% for AP180 (Table
II). In the spectra of the fragments
lacking the ENTH domains (His6-epsin 1-(144-575) and
His6-AP180-(328-896)), the -helical characteristics
were almost completely lost, whereas the content of random structures
increased from 56 to 66% for the epsin 1 fragment and from 55 to 84%
for the AP180 fragment (Fig. 4,
A and B). In contrast, in the
His6-AP180-(1-329) fragment, which includes the ENTH
domain, the -helical content reached 42%, accounting approximately
for the total -helical content of intact AP180. We also divided the
carboxyl-terminal AP180 segment into two fragments and obtained their
CD spectra. The first fragment extended from Val328
to Gly745, and the second from Gly745 to
Leu896. As expected, the spectra of both fragments revealed
little secondary structure; but more important, the sum of the molar
ellipticities in the spectra of the three recombinant AP180 fragments
(His6-AP180-(1-329), -(328-745), and -(745-896)) was
identical to that in the spectrum of recombinant full-length AP180 and
similar to that in the spectrum of AP180 isolated from pig brain (Fig.
4D). This observation ruled out the possibility that the
lack of secondary structure was an artifact caused by expressing only
short fragments that cannot fold properly due to the disruption of
intramolecular interactions. The small discrepancies in the
-structure content between recombinant and pig brain AP180 are most
likely explained by contaminating proteins present in the AP180
preparation.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Secondary structure contents of recombinant epsin 1, pig brain AP180,
recombinant AP180, and recombinantly expressed fragments of both
proteins
CD spectra were evaluated with CDPro software as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Notably, the ENTH domains of both
proteins account for almost all the -helical content of epsin 1 and
AP180, whereas the carboxyl-terminal parts have an extremely high
content of random structures. CCV, clathrin-coated vesicles.
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Secondary structures of epsin 1 and
AP180. A and B, comparison of the CD spectra
of full-length AP180 and epsin 1 and their fragments, respectively. The
spectra of AP180 are characteristic for proteins with modest
-helical content. In contrast, the spectrum of the ENTH domain of
AP180 is dominated by its -helical content, whereas the spectra of
the recombinant carboxyl-terminal portions from both proteins do not
match the signatures of known conventional secondary structures.
C, comparison of the spectra of recombinant
His6-AP180 and AP180 isolated from pig brain
clathrin-coated vesicles (CCV). Both spectra are almost
identical, suggesting that the unusual CD spectrum is a characteristic
not only of the recombinant protein. D, comparison of
averaged spectra of full-length AP180 and the sum of the spectra of its
recombinant fragments. Both spectra are almost identical, so the
observed loss of secondary structure when measuring the
carboxyl-terminal parts is not due to disruption of intramolecular
interactions. deg, degrees.
|
|
Taken together, these results show that besides their respective
ENTH domains, epsin 1 and AP180 contain no conventional secondary structure, but are overall unstructured, randomly coiled, and therefore
hydrodynamically large polypeptide chains. However, we cannot entirely
rule out the possibility that short segments of the polypeptide chains
engage in intramolecular interactions, but they seem to lack overall
secondary structure and hence also tertiary structure.
Epsin 1 and AP180 without the ENTH Domains Are
Heat-stable--
The irreversible denaturation of most
proteins upon heating is due to the disruption of native secondary and
tertiary structures and concomitant transient exposure of hydrophobic
segments. These lead to coagulation of the denatured protein either
during heating or upon rapid cooling when the polypeptide chain follows
a wrong refolding pathway and becomes trapped in non-native
conformations. Therefore, we assumed that where there is no structure,
the fragments that lack the ENTH domains ought to remain soluble upon
heating in a boiling water bath. To test this hypothesis, we
heat-denatured both the amino-terminally truncated fragments of epsin 1 and AP180 and the recombinant full-length proteins, shock-cooled them,
and then pelleted any coagulated protein by centrifugation. SDS-PAGE analysis of the supernatant and pellet fractions indeed demonstrated that His6-epsin 1-(144-625) and
His6-AP180-(328-896) were both heat-stable, whereas the
full-length proteins and GST added as a carrier and internal standard
did almost quantitatively precipitate (Fig.
5A). We next tested whether
boiling of the recombinant AP180 fragment
His6-AP180-(328-896) would compromise its functions. AP180-(328-896) is known to bind the clathrin amino-terminal domain, to associate with the -appendage domain of the AP-2 adaptor complex, and to induce assembly of clathrin triskelia (11, 31). Binding of the
boiled protein fragments to clathrin and the adaptor was assessed by
pull-down experiments using the immobilized recombinant -appendage
domain and the clathrin amino-terminal domain as baits. No significant
differences between the untreated and heat-treated His6-AP180-(328-896) fragments were observed (Fig.
5B). Similarly, heating did not affect the ability of the
fragment to induce clathrin assembly (Fig. 5C).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Carboxyl-terminal segments of epsin 1 and
AP180 are heat-stable. A, recombinant epsin 1 and AP180
as well as their fragments lacking the ENTH domains were boiled in the
presence of GST and shock-cooled. Denatured precipitated proteins were
pelleted by centrifugation. Whereas the full-length proteins were
almost completely in the pellet (p), the heat-stable
carboxyl-terminal fragments remained in the supernatant (s).
B, pull-down experiments were carried out with the
immobilized GST- -appendage domain (GST- app.) of the
AP-2 adaptor (1.8 µmol) and the GST-amino-terminal domain
(GST-TD) of the clathrin heavy chain (HC) (1.1 µmol). Immobilized GST beads (1.8 µmol) served as a control. The
beads were incubated with untreated or boiled 6x-His-AP180-(328-896)
in buffer G (25 mM Hepes, 125 mM potassium
acetate, 5 mM magnesium acetate, pH 7.1) for 30 min.
The concentration of the recombinant fragment was 0.73 µM. The beads were washed and recovered by low speed
centrifugation and then analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. Equal
amounts of supernatant and pellet fractions were loaded onto the gel.
C, assembly experiments were carried out with heat-treated
6x-His-AP180-(328-896). Clathrin (1.4 × 10 10 mol)
was incubated on ice in buffer G for 1 h in a final volume of 100 µl with 1.5 × 10 10 mol of either untreated or
boiled 6x-His-AP180-(328-896). Assembled clathrin was separated from
free triskelia by ultracentrifugation. Aliquots of the supernatant and
resuspended pellets were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Proteins were stained
with Coomassie Blue. Note that boiling did not significantly affect the
assembly-promoting activity of 6x-His-AP180-(328-896). LC,
light chain.
|
|
Epsin Promotes Clathrin Assembly--
Given that epsin 1 and AP180
not only share homology in the ENTH domain, but have an overall similar
structural organization, we wondered whether they might have more in
common than so far assumed. The best characterized functional feature
of AP180 is its ability to promote the assembly of clathrin cages from
free triskelia under physiological conditions in vitro.
Therefore, we also tested epsin 1 for possible clathrin assembly
activity and found that it is indeed capable of supporting clathrin
association with cages (Fig. 6). In fact,
it is at least as efficient as His6-AP180-(328-896). Assuming that, in epsin 1, this activity is also located in the carboxyl-terminal part of the protein, we tested fragment
His6-epsin 1-(144-575). As expected, this epsin 1 fragment
also possessed assembly activity, although it was somewhat lower
compared with that of the full-length protein. Electron micrographs
showed that the cages were slightly larger and less homogeneous
than those assembled by AP180 or His6-AP180-(328-896)
(Fig. 6).

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Epsin 1 promotes clathrin assembly. Free
clathrin triskelia were incubated with recombinant full-length epsin 1, a recombinantly expressed fragment of epsin 1 lacking the ENTH domain,
and 6x-His-AP180-(328-896) as a positive control. As a negative
control, clathrin was incubated without any additions. A,
Coomassie Blue staining/SDS-PAGE of the supernatants (s) and
pellets (p) after ultracentrifugation of the reaction
mixtures showed that full-length epsin 1 very efficiently assembled
clathrin. His6-epsin 1-(144-575) also assembled clathrin,
albeit less efficiently than the full-length protein. B-D,
shown are electron micrographs of negatively stained clathrin cages
assembled by epsin 1 (B) and its fragment (C).
The cages appear slightly larger and less homogeneous than those formed
by AP180 (D).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Clathrin triskelia and the AP-2 adaptor complex are the principal
components of the endocytic machinery. They are supported by accessory
proteins that function as structural or regulatory factors at various
stages in the biogenesis of plasma membrane-derived clathrin-coated
vesicles. Here, we have focused on the accessory proteins AP180 and
epsin 1. Both proteins bind to PI-4,5-P2-containing membranes through their respective ENTH domains and to clathrin and
AP-2 through short peptide motifs in their carboxyl-terminal segments.
Besides the ENTH domain and DP(F/W) peptide motifs, epsin 1 and AP180
share little sequence homology. However, we have shown here that both
proteins are monomers with long poorly structured carboxyl-terminal
segments that behave like flexible polymers. This manifests itself in
unusually large hydrodynamic radii, correspondingly low sedimentation
coefficients, and resistance to irreversible heat denaturation. In
epsin 1, the peptide motifs involved in binding the clathrin
amino-terminal domain are the type II clathrin box motif
257LMDLADV and the type I motif 480LVDLD (14).
It has been suggested that the two chemically distinct motifs recognize
different surfaces on the clathrin amino-terminal domain (14). Assuming
a fully extended polypeptide chain, the motifs could be as far as 155 nm apart, which corresponds roughly to the circumference of a small
clathrin-coated vesicle. The average or effective distance between the
clathrin box motifs will probably be considerable shorter than 155 nm, but certainly very much longer than required for an
interaction between different surfaces on the same globular clathrin
amino-terminal domain, which has a diameter of only ~5 nm (32). This
suggests that epsin 1 is designed to engage simultaneously two clathrin
amino-terminal domains rather than one. Our observation that epsin 1 can function as an assembly protein supports this conjecture. In
between the two clathrin-binding motifs, there are eight copies of the
tripeptide DPW, which was shown previously to bind the -appendage
domain of the AP-2 adaptor (12). Their maximal spacing averages 10 ± 2 nm, and they could therefore associate simultaneously with several
AP-2 complexes.
AP180 is the most effective clathrin assembly protein (33),
and it also associates with the -appendage domain of the AP-2 adaptor (34, 35). Its flexible carboxyl-terminal segment
Val328-Leu896 contains no typical clathrin box
motif, but does have five DLL repeats that have been related to the
assembly function of AP180 (11). In addition, AP180 contains two DPF
peptide motifs, which were shown to be involved in AP-2 binding in
amphiphysin, auxilin-1 and -2, and Eps15. Moreover, AP180
contains three FXDXF motifs that were recently
demonstrated to mediate binding of the accessory protein HIP1 to AP-2
(19). One of them (640FGDAF) occurs within
AP180-(623-680), which binds AP-2 and competes with intact AP180 for
AP-2 binding (31).
Several lines of evidences suggest that the interactions between short
peptide motifs and their usually stably folded binding partners are of
low affinity. For example, despite the apparent high affinity of AP180
for clathrin cages, it proved initially difficult to directly identify
the clathrin amino-terminal domain as its contact surface on the heavy
chain (36). Only after using recombinantly expressed GST-clathrin
amino-terminal domain fusion proteins immobilized at high density on
glutathione-Sepharose beads was it possible to prove an interaction
between AP180 and the amino-terminal domain (11). This suggests that
multimerization of binding sites is required for stable interactions.
These might occur either by immobilizing monovalent binding partners on
beads or membranes or by their polymerization into supramolecular
structures such as a clathrin cage. Accordingly, in most endocytic
accessory proteins, short peptide motifs occur in multiple copies. The
cooperativity of the interactions provides not only stability, but also
specificity. In this scenario, specificity is not born out of a tight
key and lock-type fit, but results from many loosely fitting contacts between the interaction partners. Flexibility of the residual structure
allows for a random search for additional binding partners without a
biased orientation. Recruitment of additional proteins to the ones
already present would transform fleeting assemblies into stable
structures. This process would be akin to a condensation reaction that
consists of a nucleation phase followed by an elongation phase, which,
when applied to a clathrin-coated pit, would correspond to the growth
of the clathrin lattice. However, the resulting structure could be
described as dynamically stable. Upon interfering with individual weak
interactions, e.g. by protein phosphorylation at or near the
interaction sites or by offering alternative binding partners, the
lattice could undergo rapid local and eventually global changes. Thus,
by combining multiple weak interactions in a cooperative manner, a
dynamic macromolecular structure can be constructed that can also
rapidly be remodeled.
Which role do epsin 1 and AP180 play in coat assembly on the plasma
membrane? There is already ample evidence that clathrin coat formation
on the plasma membrane is linked to lipid metabolism. Current models
suggest that locally high concentrations of
PI-4,5-P2 might attract epsin 1, AP180, and AP-2 to select
plasma membrane domains (8). With their long flexible polypeptide
chains, AP180 and epsin 1 might be more suited to ensnare soluble and
membrane-bound coat components than other more structured lipid-binding
proteins such as HIP1/HIP1R and the amphiphysins. The affinity
of AP-2 for epsin 1 and AP180 might then lead to AP-2 binding and
thereby stabilization of a membrane subdomain. Subsequent recruitment of multivalent clathrin triskelia and their polymerization into a lattice will not only fortify the coat, but also extend the coated
area (Fig. 7). The efficient cooperation
between AP-2 and AP180 in the recruitment of clathrin triskelia to
lipid monolayers was recently demonstrated in vitro (7).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Schematic illustrating early events in the
assembly of the endocytic machinery at the plasma membrane.
Clathrin coat formation is probably initiated by locally
high concentrations of the lipid PI-4,5-P2 that might
attract epsin 1, AP180/CALM (depicted in yellow and
red), and AP-2 (shown in blue) to select plasma
membrane domains (8). The long and flexible segments of AP180 and epsin
1 may be primarily designed to concentrate adaptors and
clathrin from the cytosol to this domain. The cooperativity of
the interactions of clathrin triskelia with membrane-bound components
and with each other provides the driving force for rapid coat formation
(see "Discussion" for details).
|
|
Why then are two distinct proteins (epsin 1 and AP180) with
similar functions needed? First, our pull-down experiments using the
immobilized -appendage domain and the clathrin amino-terminal domain
as baits suggested that epsin 1 binds with somewhat higher affinity to
the -appendage domain compared with AP180 (data not shown), whereas
AP180 proved to be slightly more promiscuous with respect to lipid
binding (6, 7). Moreover, both proteins support assembly of clathrin,
but only AP180 is also capable of precisely controlling the size of the
resulting coat (15, 16). Also, epsin 1 contains the peptide motif NPF,
which binds to Eps15 homology domains like that of the accessory
protein Eps15, whereas AP180 lacks this capacity, as does its
non-neuronal homolog CALM (37). Taken together, this suggests a
division of labor between epsin 1 and AP180 in recruiting additional
coat components.
Almost all of the known endocytic accessory proteins interact with the
clathrin amino-terminal domain and with the -appendage domain of
AP-2. Immunofluorescence studies of fixed cells suggest their
collective presence in each of the clathrin-positive fluorescent dots.
Because these proteins cannot possibly all be present in stoichiometric
amounts at the same time, it is likely that they might act not only at
different places in a growing lattice, but possibly also sequentially,
as would be expected for a vectorial process. Determining the order of
the protein-protein interactions that keep the endocytic machine
running will constitute a major challenge for the future.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We than H. Ungewickell and C. Lemke for
expert technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the German Research Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Cell
Biology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30125
Hannover, Germany. Tel.: 49-511-532-6744; Fax:
49-511-532-3903; E-mail: ungewickell.ernst@mh-hannover.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 26, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111587200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ENTH, epsin
N-terminal homology;
PI-4, 5-P2, phosphatidylinositol
4,5-bisphosphate;
GST, glutathione S-transferase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Kirchhausen, T.
(2000)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
69,
699-727[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
McMahon, H. T.
(1999)
Curr. Biol.
9,
R332-R335[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Chen, H.,
Fre, S.,
Slepnev, V. I.,
Capua, M. R.,
Takei, K.,
Butler, M. H., Di,
Fiore, P. P.,
and De Camilli, P.
(1998)
Nature
394,
793-797[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Mao, Y.,
Chen, J.,
Maynard, J. A.,
Zhang, B.,
and Quiocho, F. A.
(2001)
Cell
104,
433-440[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Hyman, J.,
Chen, H., Di,
Fiore, P. P., De,
Camilli, P.,
and Brunger, A. T.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
149,
537-546[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Itoh, T.,
Koshiba, S.,
Kigawa, T.,
Kikuchi, A.,
Yokoyama, S.,
and Takenawa, T.
(2001)
Science
291,
1047-1051[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Ford, M. G.,
Pearse, B. M.,
Higgins, M. K.,
Vallis, Y.,
Owen, D. J.,
Gibson, A.,
Hopkins, C. R.,
Evans, P. R.,
and McMahon, H. T.
(2001)
Science
291,
1051-1055[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Takei, K.,
and Haucke, V.
(2001)
Trends Cell Biol.
11,
385-391[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Owen, D. J.,
Vallis, Y.,
Noble, M. E.,
Hunter, J. B.,
Dafforn, T. R.,
Evans, P. R.,
and McMahon, H. T.
(1999)
Cell
97,
805-815[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Owen, D. J.,
Vallis, Y.,
Pearse, B. M.,
McMahon, H. T.,
and Evans, P. R.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
4216-4227[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Morgan, J. R.,
Prasad, K.,
Hao, W.,
Augustine, G. J.,
and Lafer, E. M.
(2000)
J. Neurosci.
20,
8667-8676[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Rosenthal, J. A.,
Chen, H.,
Slepnev, V. I.,
Pellegrini, L.,
Salcini, A. E., Di,
Fiore, P. P.,
and De Camilli, P.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
33959-33965[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Drake, M. T.,
Downs, M. A.,
and Traub, L. M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
6479-6489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Drake, M. T.,
and Traub, L. M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
28700-28709[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Ahle, S.,
and Ungewickell, E.
(1986)
EMBO J.
5,
3143-3149[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Ye, W.,
and Lafer, E. M.
(1995)
J. Neurosci. Res.
41,
15-26[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Zhang, B.,
Koh, Y. H.,
Beckstead, R. B.,
Budnik, V.,
Ganetzky, B.,
and Bellen, H. J.
(1998)
Neuron
21,
1465-1475[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Salcini, A. E.,
Confalonieri, S.,
Doria, M.,
Santolini, E.,
Tassi, E.,
Minenkova, O.,
Cesareni, G.,
Pelicci, P. G.,
and Di Fiore, P. P.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
2239-2249[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Mishra, S. K.,
Agostinelli, N. R.,
Brett, T. J.,
Mizukami, I.,
Ross, T. S.,
and Traub, L. M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
46230-46236[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Prasad, K.,
and Lippoldt, R. E.
(1988)
Biochemistry
27,
6098-6104[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Morris, S. A.,
Schroder, S.,
Plessmann, U.,
Weber, K.,
and Ungewickell, E.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
667-675[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Norris, F. A.,
Ungewickell, E.,
and Majerus, P. W.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
214-217[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Le Maire, M.,
Aggerbeck, L. P.,
Monteilhet, C.,
Andersen, J. P.,
and Moller, J. V.
(1986)
Anal. Biochem.
154,
525-535[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Potschka, M.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
162,
47-64[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Laurent, T. C.,
and Killander, J.
(1964)
J. Chromatogr.
14,
331-339[CrossRef]
|
| 26.
|
Sober, H. A.
(1970)
CRC Handbook of Biochemistry: Selected Data for Molecular Biology
, 2nd Ed.
, pp. C-10-C-25, Chemical Rubber Co., Cleveland, OH
|
| 27.
|
Scheele, U.,
Kalthoff, C.,
and Ungewickell, E.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
36131-36138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Laue, T. M.,
Shah, B. D.,
Ridgeway, T. M.,
and Pelletier, S. L.
(1992)
in
Computer-aided Interpretation of Analytical Sedimentation Data for Proteins
(Harding, S. E.
, Rowe, A. J.
, and Horton, J. C., eds)
, pp. 90-125, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, United Kingdom
|
| 29.
|
Sreerama, N.,
and Woody, R. W.
(2000)
Anal. Biochem.
287,
252-260[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Murphy, J. E.,
Pleasure, I. T.,
Puszkin, S.,
Prasad, K.,
and Keen, J. H.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
4401-4408[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Hao, W.,
Luo, Z.,
Zheng, L.,
Prasad, K.,
and Lafer, E. M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
22785-22794[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
ter Haar, E.,
Musacchio, A.,
Harrison, S. C.,
and Kirchhausen, T.
(1998)
Cell
95,
563-573[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Lindner, R.,
and Ungewickell, E.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
16567-16573[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Kohtz, D. S.,
and Puszkin, S.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
7418-7425[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Wang, L. H.,
Sudhof, T. C.,
and Anderson, R. G.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
10079-10083[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Murphy, J. E.,
and Keen, J. H.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
10850-10855[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Tebar, F.,
Bohlander, S. K.,
and Sorkin, A.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
2687-2702[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Thieman, S. K. Mishra, K. Ling, B. Doray, R. A. Anderson, and L. M. Traub
Clathrin Regulates the Association of PIPKI{gamma}661 with the AP-2 Adaptor {beta}2 Appendage
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 15, 2009;
284(20):
13924 - 13939.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Keyel, J. R. Thieman, R. Roth, E. Erkan, E. T. Everett, S. C. Watkins, J. E. Heuser, and L. M. Traub
The AP-2 Adaptor {beta}2 Appendage Scaffolds Alternate Cargo Endocytosis
Mol. Biol. Cell,
December 1, 2008;
19(12):
5309 - 5326.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Brady, Y. Wen, and T. J. O'Halloran
The ENTH and C-terminal domains of Dictyostelium epsin cooperate to regulate the dynamic interaction with clathrin-coated pits
J. Cell Sci.,
October 15, 2008;
121(20):
3433 - 3444.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Maldonado-Baez, M. R. Dores, E. M. Perkins, T. G. Drivas, L. Hicke, and B. Wendland
Interaction between Epsin/Yap180 Adaptors and the Scaffolds Ede1/Pan1 Is Required for Endocytosis
Mol. Biol. Cell,
July 1, 2008;
19(7):
2936 - 2948.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-H. Huang, Z. Qi, F. Wu, L. Kotula, S. Jiang, and Y.-H. Chen
Interaction of HIV-1 gp41 Core with NPF Motif in Epsin: IMPLICATION IN ENDOCYTOSIS OF HIV
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 30, 2008;
283(22):
14994 - 15002.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. K. Mishra, A. Jha, A. L. Steinhauser, V. A. Kokoza, C. H. Washabaugh, A. S. Raikhel, W. A. Foster, and L. M. Traub
Internalization of LDL-receptor superfamily yolk-protein receptors during mosquito oogenesis involves transcriptional regulation of PTB-domain adaptors
J. Cell Sci.,
April 15, 2008;
121(8):
1264 - 1274.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. E. Olesen, M. G. J. Ford, E. M. Schmid, Y. Vallis, M. M. Babu, P. H. Li, I. G. Mills, H. T. McMahon, and G. J. K. Praefcke
Solitary and Repetitive Binding Motifs for the AP2 Complex {alpha}-Appendage in Amphiphysin and Other Accessory Proteins
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 22, 2008;
283(8):
5099 - 5109.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Poupon, M. Girard, V. Legendre-Guillemin, S. Thomas, L. Bourbonniere, J. Philie, N. A. Bright, and P. S. McPherson
Clathrin light chains function in mannose phosphate receptor trafficking via regulation of actin assembly
PNAS,
January 8, 2008;
105(1):
168 - 173.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. D. Allaire, B. Ritter, S. Thomas, J. L. Burman, A. Yu. Denisov, V. Legendre-Guillemin, S. Q. Harper, B. L. Davidson, K. Gehring, and P. S. McPherson
Connecdenn, A Novel DENN Domain-Containing Protein of Neuronal Clathrin-Coated Vesicles Functioning in Synaptic Vesicle Endocytosis
J. Neurosci.,
December 20, 2006;
26(51):
13202 - 13212.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Costaguta, M. C. Duncan, G. E. Fernandez, G. H. Huang, and G. S. Payne
Distinct Roles for TGN/Endosome Epsin-like Adaptors Ent3p and Ent5p
Mol. Biol. Cell,
September 1, 2006;
17(9):
3907 - 3920.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Hinrichsen, A. Meyerholz, S. Groos, and E. J. Ungewickell
Bending a membrane: How clathrin affects budding
PNAS,
June 6, 2006;
103(23):
8715 - 8720.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Legendre-Guillemin, M. Metzler, J.-F. Lemaire, J. Philie, L. Gan, M. R. Hayden, and P. S. McPherson
Huntingtin Interacting Protein 1 (HIP1) Regulates Clathrin Assembly through Direct Binding to the Regulatory Region of the Clathrin Light Chain
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 18, 2005;
280(7):
6101 - 6108.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. G. Roth
Phosphoinositides in Constitutive Membrane Traffic
Physiol Rev,
July 1, 2004;
84(3):
699 - 730.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Barth and S. E. H. Holstein
Identification and functional characterization of Arabidopsis AP180, a binding partner of plant {alpha}C-adaptin
J. Cell Sci.,
April 15, 2004;
117(10):
2051 - 2062.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Jha, N. R. Agostinelli, S. K. Mishra, P. A. Keyel, M. J. Hawryluk, and L. M. Traub
A Novel AP-2 Adaptor Interaction Motif Initially Identified in the Long-splice Isoform of Synaptojanin 1, SJ170
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 16, 2004;
279(3):
2281 - 2290.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Legendre-Guillemin, S. Wasiak, N. K. Hussain, A. Angers, and P. S. McPherson
ENTH/ANTH proteins and clathrin-mediated membrane budding
J. Cell Sci.,
January 1, 2004;
117(1):
9 - 18.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. K. Soutar, R. P. Naoumova, and L. M. Traub
Genetics, Clinical Phenotype, and Molecular Cell Biology of Autosomal Recessive Hypercholesterolemia
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
November 1, 2003;
23(11):
1963 - 1970.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Morgan, K. Prasad, S. Jin, G. J. Augustine, and E. M. Lafer
Eps15 Homology Domain-NPF Motif Interactions Regulate Clathrin Coat Assembly during Synaptic Vesicle Recycling
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 29, 2003;
278(35):
33583 - 33592.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Klebig, M. D. Wall, M. D. Potter, E. L. Rowe, D. A. Carpenter, and E. M. Rinchik
Mutations in the clathrin-assembly gene Picalm are responsible for the hematopoietic and iron metabolism abnormalities in fit1 mice
PNAS,
July 8, 2003;
100(14):
8360 - 8365.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Scheele, J. Alves, R. Frank, M. Duwel, C. Kalthoff, and E. Ungewickell
Molecular and Functional Characterization of Clathrin- and AP-2-binding Determinants within a Disordered Domain of Auxilin
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 3, 2003;
278(28):
25357 - 25368.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. C. Aguilar, H. A. Watson, and B. Wendland
The Yeast Epsin Ent1 Is Recruited to Membranes through Multiple Independent Interactions
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 14, 2003;
278(12):
10737 - 10743.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Hirst, A. Motley, K. Harasaki, S. Y. Peak Chew, and M. S. Robinson
EpsinR: an ENTH Domain-containing Protein that Interacts with AP-1
Mol. Biol. Cell,
February 1, 2003;
14(2):
625 - 641.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. G. Mills, G. J.K. Praefcke, Y. Vallis, B. J. Peter, L. E. Olesen, J. L. Gallop, P. J. G. Butler, P. R. Evans, and H. T. McMahon
EpsinR: an AP1/clathrin interacting protein involved in vesicle trafficking
J. Cell Biol.,
January 21, 2003;
160(2):
213 - 222.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. K. Mishra, S. C. Watkins, and L. M. Traub
The autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia (ARH) protein interfaces directly with the clathrin-coat machinery
PNAS,
December 10, 2002;
99(25):
16099 - 16104.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Kalthoff, S. Groos, R. Kohl, S. Mahrhold, and E. J. Ungewickell
Clint: A Novel Clathrin-binding ENTH-Domain Protein at the Golgi
Mol. Biol. Cell,
November 1, 2002;
13(11):
4060 - 4073.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Wasiak, V. Legendre-Guillemin, R. Puertollano, F. Blondeau, M. Girard, E. de Heuvel, D. Boismenu, A. W. Bell, J. S. Bonifacino, and P. S. McPherson
Enthoprotin: a novel clathrin-associated protein identified through subcellular proteomics
J. Cell Biol.,
September 3, 2002;
158(5):
855 - 862.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|