|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M105345200 on December 21, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 10, 8449-8456, March 8, 2002
Identification and Localization of T-type Voltage-operated
Calcium Channel Subunits in Human Male Germ Cells
EXPRESSION OF MULTIPLE ISOFORMS*
Suchitra
Jagannathan ,
Emma L.
Punt §,
Yuchun
Gu ¶,
Christophe
Arnoult ,
Denny
Sakkas** ,
Christopher L. R.
Barratt**, and
Stephen J.
Publicover
From the School of Biosciences, University of
Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom, CNRS,
Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique/Grenoble DBMS-CIS, 17 Rue des Martyrs, Grenoble, 38054 France, and the
** Reproductive Biology and Genetics Research Group, Assisted
Conception Unit, Birmingham Women's Hospital,
Birmingham B15 2TG, United Kingdom
Received for publication, June 11, 2001, and in revised form, December 20, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Low voltage activated, voltage-operated
Ca2+ channels are expressed in rodent male germ cells
and are believed to be pivotal in induction of the acrosome reaction in
mouse spermatozoa. However, in humans, very little is known about
expression of voltage-operated Ca2+ channels in male germ
cells or their function. We have used reverse transcription-polymerase
chain reaction, in situ hybridization, and patch clamp
recording to investigate the expression of low voltage activated
voltage-operated Ca2+ channels in human male germ cells. We
report that full-length transcripts for both 1G and
1H low voltage activated channel subunits are expressed
in human testis. Multiple isoforms of 1G are present in
the testis and at least two isoforms of 1H, including a
splice variant not previously described in the human. Transcripts for
all the isoforms of both 1G and 1H were
detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction on
mRNA isolated from human spermatogenic cells. In situ
hybridization for 1G and 1H localized
transcripts both in germ cells and in other cell types in the testis.
Within the seminiferous tubules, 1H was detected primarily in germ cells. Using the whole cell patch clamp technique, we
detected T-type voltage-operated Ca2+ channel currents in
isolated human male germ cells, although the current amplitude and
frequency of occurrence were low in comparison to the occurrence of
T-currents in murine male germ cells. We conclude that low
voltage activated voltage-operated Ca2+ channels are
expressed in cells of the human male germ line.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The AR1 of spermatozoa
is crucial for fertilization. In humans, male factor infertility is
highly correlated with failure of AR and/or the events that activate AR
(1-4). It is believed that the primary activator of AR in mammals is
binding of the spermatozoon to the ZP (5), although AR can also
be induced by progesterone (6-8). In both instances, activation of
exocytosis requires a multiphasic entry of Ca2+ through
plasma membrane ion channels (9-12).
Stimulation of mouse spermatozoa with purified ZP3 induces a brief (200 ms) [Ca2+]i transient, which is
blocked by antagonists of VOCCs (13). This transient activates a
separate sustained [Ca2+]i influx,
probably through store-operated channels incorporating Trp2, which
leads to AR (12-14). Application of the patch clamp technique to the
study of ion channels in mature spermatozoa has proved to be very
difficult and has so far been limited to cell-attached recordings and
use of artificial bilayers (Ref. 15, and see "Discussion").
Unfortunately, this approach has (so far) provided little information
on expression of VOCCs. However, the whole cell clamp technique has
been applied successfully to mouse spermatogenic cells (16-18). These
cells express a LVA, transient VOCC current with voltage dependence and
kinetics very similar to those of expressed, recombinant
1G and 1H LVA channels (19-21). No high voltage activated (HVA)-VOCC current was observed. The pharmacological sensitivity of the spermatogenic cell LVA current resembles that of
ZP-induced [Ca2+]i signal in
spermatozoa, suggesting that influx through this channel is the primary
response to ZP binding (17, 22). Intriguingly, it has been shown
recently that the LVA currents of mouse late spermatids are partially
blocked by -conotoxin GVIA (23). The effects of -conotoxin GVIA
on the ZP-induced [Ca2+]i signal
and AR have not yet been investigated.
Immunostaining and RT-PCR of rodent testicular tissue and germ cells
have demonstrated the presence of both transcripts and proteins for
HVA-VOCC 1 subunits ( 1A,
1B, 1C, 1E; Refs. 23-30) and subunits (29). Expression of recombinant 1E
subunits can result in T-like currents (31). However, male germ cells of 1E knockout mice possess normal T-currents,
indicating that 1E channels do not mediate the currents
seen in these cells (32). Espinosa et al. (28) used RT-PCR
to investigate expression of LVA channel transcripts in mouse germ
cells. Appropriate products were generated using primers directed
against the -COOH termini of 1H and 1G.
However, Jacob et al. (33), using primer pairs against
various regions of 1G, could obtain products only with primers encoding domain IV and the -COOH terminus in rat testis mRNA. Antibodies for LVA channels are not available.
Very little is known about the expression and roles of VOCCs in human
male germ cells. The effects of VOCC antagonists on progesterone-induced [Ca2+]i
signaling in spermatozoa have been studied extensively, but findings
have been both variable and contradictory (34-40). Preliminary data
suggest that human ZP induces a pimozide-sensitive [Ca2+]i signal in human
spermatozoa (41, 42). NGPs, which have been proposed to act in a
similar manner to human ZP, induce elevation of
[Ca2+]i and AR in human
spermatozoa (37, 43, 44). NGP-induced AR is blocked by VOCC antagonists
(44, 45) and mibefradil, a semi-specific blocker of T-type channels,
blocks NGP-induced [Ca2+]i
signaling and AR with similar potency (37, 46). Using molecular and
immunohistochemical techniques, Benoff and colleagues (27) have
provided evidence for the presence of a number of isoforms of the HVA
1C subunit in human testis and spermatozoa. However,
only preliminary data are available on expression of LVA channels. Son
et al. (46) obtained a 489-bp RT-PCR fragment of
1H with human testicular mRNA. Transcripts for
1G were not detected in human testicular mRNA (46)
or mRNA isolated from human spermatozoa (33).
To understand the processes that underlie AR in human spermatozoa, and
to assess the accuracy of the mouse model of AR, it is vital that the
nature of the Ca2+ channels involved is elucidated. As a
vital, first step, we have undertaken the detection, sequencing, and
localization of T-channel subunit transcripts from the human testis and
have applied the patch clamp technique to immature human germ cells.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
PCR
PCR forward and reverse primers were designed to sequences of
1G from the human brain (GenBankTM accession no.
AF029229) and 1H from the human heart (GenBankTM
accession no. AF051946). PCR products were amplified on human, adult,
normal testis cDNA (Invitrogen, Groningen, Netherlands; Origene
Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD) using in-house primer pairs (Table
I) and the Expand High Fidelity PCR System containing thermostable
Taq DNA polymerase and a proofreading enzyme (Roche
Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). A human brain cDNA library
provided by the Medical Research Council, Human Genome Mapping
Project Resource Center, United Kingdom, was used as positive control.
Touchdown PCR was carried out on a Primus 25 legal thermocycling PCR
system (MWG Biotech Ltd., Ebersberg, Germany). The cycling
conditions were 94 °C for 3 min 30 s, followed by six cycles of
94 °C, 30 s; 64 °C, 30 s; 72 °C, 3 min; with a
touchdown temperature change of 0.5 °C/cycle. A further 40 cycles
were carried out at 94 °C, 30 s; 61 °C, 30 s; 72 °C,
3 min, followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The
annealing temperatures for different primer pairs were altered in the
range of 64 to 58 °C depending upon the Tm
(melting temperature) of the primer pairs in use. Corresponding changes in touchdown temperatures were made. The annealing temperature of the
second set of PCR cycling conditions was kept 3 °C below the
annealing temperature of the first set of cycling conditions.
The PCR products were run on agarose gels and purified using a
QIAquickTM Spin gel extraction kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) and
either sequenced directly (MWG Biotech. Ltd.) or cloned into a
pGEM®-T Easy cloning vector (Promega).
Isolation of Germ Cells
Human Cells--
Cells were obtained by two methods.
For RT-PCR and for the first series of electrophysiological recordings,
testicular tissue was removed from patients who were attending for
treatment at the Assisted Conception Unit, Birmingham Women's
Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom (Human Fertilization and
Embryology Authority Center 0119). Mature, motile spermatozoa were
found in all biopsies used for cell isolation. Sufficient testicular
tissue was initially isolated for the treatment of patients by
intracytoplasmic sperm injection, whereas the remainder was used to
isolate cells undergoing spermatogenesis. Ethical approval was obtained
from the local ethics committee (0374 and 0420). A total of six
biopsies were used for isolation of cells, three of which had been
frozen in sperm freezing medium (MediCult Ltd., Copenhagen, Denmark)
after selection of cells for intracytoplasmic sperm injection and
subsequently thawed for isolation of germ cells and patching. The
extracted testicular tissue was placed in a Petri dish containing
in vitro fertilization medium (Scandinavian IVF, Gothenburg,
Sweden) and the seminiferous tubules teased out using needles.
Following this, the tissue was then passed through a series of smaller
gauge needles starting at 26 through to 18. Once the cells were
sufficiently dissociated, a 50-µl droplet of the cell suspension was
placed in a Petri dish along with two 50-µl droplets of clean medium.
The droplets were covered with oil (OvOil, Scandinavian IVF). The Petri
dish was then placed on a Nikon Microscope under 200× magnification,
and individual cells were removed from the cell suspension using a
Narashige micromanipulator. Micropipettes with a 10-15-µm inner
diameter were used to individually select germ cells (spermatocytes and spermatids). The classification of germ cells was the same as that
previously published by Johnson and colleagues (47). Once an individual
germ cell was selected, it was placed in a clean medium droplet. This
procedure was repeated until sufficient germ cells were isolated. The
droplet was then aspirated using a pipette, and the contents were
either placed in an Eppendorf tube for RT-PCR (see above) or incubated
overnight in a Petri dish for attachment to gelatin-coated slides prior
to electrophysiological recording (see below). For RT-PCR, a total of
75 cells from the six biopsies were pooled before extraction of
mRNA. For patch clamping, cells from five of the biopsies were used.
For the second series of electrophysiological recordings, seminiferous
tubules were isolated from the testes of a patient undergoing an
orchidectomy (ethical authorization number DGS 2001/0211) and incubated
at 37 °C for 30 min in 3 ml of solution containing (mM):
NaCl (150), KCl (5), CaCl2 (2), MgCl2 (1),
NaH2PO4 (1), NaHCO3 (12),
D-glucose (11), pH 7.3, and collagenase type IA (1 mg/ml;
Sigma). Tubules were rinsed twice in collagenase-free medium and cut
into 2-mm sections. Spermatogenic cells were obtained by manual
trituration and attached to culture dishes coated with Cell-Tak
(Collaborative Biomedical Products, Bedford, MA). The cells obtained
were primarily pachytene spermatocytes and round spermatids.
Mouse Cells--
Testes were dissected in phosphate-buffered
saline and transferred to a Petri dish containing Earle's balanced
salts medium (Sigma) containing 1% (w/v) trypsin (Invitrogen)
in RNase-free water. Seminiferous tubules were teased out using a
sterile needle and the sample incubated at 37 °C for 2 h with
intermittent shaking. The aqueous medium was then pipetted out from the
Petri dish, and mineral oil (Sigma) was overlaid. Germ cell isolation,
including overnight incubation for attachment, was then carried out as
described above for isolation of cells from biopsies taken for
intracytoplasmic sperm injection (method 1 above). For patch clamp,
untrypsinized tissue was used to isolate germ cells. After isolation,
cells were allowed to attach to gelatinized slides before recording (see below).
RT-PCR on Germ Cells
For both human and mouse preparations, total RNA was isolated
from 75-100 germ cells using the StrataPrep® Total RNA
Microprep kit (Stratagene) as per the manufacturer's protocol (48).
The expected yield of RNA was 50-100 ng. RNA was eluted in a total
volume of 60 µl of elution buffer. 30 µl was used for reverse
transcription. The RT reaction was carried out in a total volume of 60 µl in presence of 5 mM MgCl2, 0.8 mM dNTP, 1.5 units of recombinant RNasin® (1 unit/µl), 1× RT buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.0 at
25 °C), 50 mM KCl, 0.1% (v/v) Triton®
X-100), 1.5 µg of random hexamers (0.5 µg/µl), and 48 units of avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase enzyme (15 units/µl) (Promega). The reaction mix was incubated for 10 min at room
temperature, followed by 60 min at 42 °C. The sample was placed in a
boiling water bath for 5 min and on ice for 5 min to inactivate the
enzyme. The RT mix was stored at 70 °C for further use or used
immediately in PCR.
PCR reaction was carried out using 5 µl of the RT mix from RNA
isolated from human or mouse germ cells, 1× RT buffer, 0.64 µM primer pairs (A1G9F-A1G10R specific to
1G and HHS1-HHAS1 specific to 1H,
respectively), and nuclease-free water to make up the total reaction
volume to 25 µl.
Touchdown PCR, similar to that described under "PCR," was carried
out in the presence of Taq DNA polymerase enzyme (Promega). Primers internal to the region amplified were used to confirm the PCR
products obtained. Control PCR reactions employed (i) human or mouse
actin primers (Origene) to amplify 614 and 575 bp, respectively,
and (ii) primer pairs matching the human T200 leukocyte common antigen
precursor gene sequence (GenBankTM accession no. AH007396; see Table
I). PCR was carried out using RT mix from
germ cell RNA and testis cDNA (Invitrogen) as template.
Amplification conditions were hot start at 94 °C for 3 min 30 s, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C, 30 s; 64 °C, 30 s;
72 °C, 1 min. The PCR product obtained using cDNA as template
was sequenced to confirm its identity.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Sense and antisense primers used in the amplification of transcripts
for 1G and 1H subunits and the leukocyte common
antigen precursor
|
|
In Situ Hybridization
A digoxigenin (DIG) labeling and detection kit (Roche; Ref. 49)
was used to make DNA probes with PCR-amplified products. The products
used were a 395-bp product from the COOH-terminal end of
1G (PCR product no. 15; Fig. 1) and a 373-bp product
from the I-II linker region of 1H (PCR product no. 5;
Fig. 1). The PCR product was cloned into pGEM®-T Easy
vector and DIG label incorporated into the cloned DNA template by PCR
carried out for 25 cycles at 94 °C, 1 min 45 s; 55 °C, 1 min
30 s; 72 °C, 2 min. The annealing temperature was 59 °C for
1H. 0.4 µl of Expand High Fidelity PCR enzyme (1 unit/µl; Roche) was used in a 50-µl reaction containing 5 µl each
of 10× DIG DNA labeling mix, 10× HF buffer, 1.6 pmol of primer, and
0.1 µg of plasmid DNA. DIG labeled DNA was run on a 1.5% (w/v)
agarose gel. Labeled probe, migrating at a higher molecular weight than unlabeled cDNA, was eluted from the gel using QIAquick spin gel extraction kit. In situ hybridization was carried out on
adult human testis sections (Novagen; Peterborough Hospital Tissue
Bank, United Kingdom). Probe mixture and hybridization conditions were as described in the Roche manual with some modifications. Sections were
de-waxed (Histoclear) for 10 min, rehydrated, and digested with 0.1 µg/ml proteinase K (Sigma) for 5 min at 37 °C. Sections were
hybridized overnight at 42 °C and sequentially washed twice for 15 min at 20 °C with 5× SSC and once for 10 min at 42 °C with 1×
SSC. Probe hybrids were localized using 1:500 dilution of alkaline phosphatase anti-DIG antibody (Fab fragments; Roche). Alkaline phosphatase activity was finally stained with freshly prepared solutions of 45 µl of nitro blue tetrazolium chloride (3 mg/ml) and
35 µl of 5-bromo-4 chloro-3 indolyl phosphate (3 mg/ml) in 1 ml of
detection solution (0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 0.05 M MgCl2, 0.1 M NaCl; Ref. 50). The
reaction was stopped with 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.1, and 1 mM EDTA. Sections were mounted using DABCO (Sigma), an
aqueous mounting medium and observed under bright-field illumination (Zeiss Axioskop 2). Control hybridization and localization reactions were carried out using non-DIG-labeled probe, using unconjugated DIG
(blind probe), without the anti-DIG antibody and without use of nitro
blue tetrazolium chloride and 5-bromo-4 chloro-3 indolyl phosphate.
Positive reactions were also carried out on other tissues to confirm
localization of hybridization.
The distributions of 1G and 1H
transcripts within seminiferous tubules, were compared by counting
stained cells. For each of the two probes, 20 tubule profiles derived
from two different samples were examined. The numbers of stained
spermatogenic cells and Sertoli cells were counted, and the
distributions of staining (spermatogenic:Sertoli) for the two
transcripts were compared using a chi-square contingency table.
Electrophysiology
Two series of electrophysiological recordings were made. For the
first series, cells were isolated from human testicular biopsies taken
for intracytoplasmic sperm injection and from mouse testes (see above).
After incubation overnight for cell attachment (see above),
extracellular saline was exchanged for recording one containing 108 mM BaCl2 and 10 mM HEPES, pH
corrected to 7.6 with NaOH (maximum Na+ content ~3
mM; Ref. 51). Under these conditions, T current amplitudes
are typically increased by ~70% and the voltage sensitivities of
current activation and inactivation are shifted by ~+30 mV (52-54).
Patch electrodes were pulled from filamented 1.5-mm glass capillaries
(Clark Electromedical GC150TF) and fire-polished. Electrodes were
back-filled with saline containing 150 mM CsCl, 5 mM EGTA, 10 mM D-glucose, 10 mM HEPES. pH was corrected to 7.3 with CsOH. Pipette
resistance was 3-7 M . All recordings were made using the whole cell
variant of the patch clamp technique. Seals of up to 10 G were
achieved prior to breakthrough. Resulting whole cell input resistances
in cells considered suitable for recording were in the order of 1-2
G . Recordings were commenced within 1-2 min of breakthrough, using
a Warner PC501A amplifier with filter set at 2 kHz. Signals were passed
to an IBM-compatible PC, via a CED 1401 data acquisition interface.
Acquisition and analysis of signals was carried out using WCP version
2.1 (Strathclyde Electrophysiology Software). Cells were held at 60
mV, and families of currents were generated by applying a series of
400-ms voltage steps, starting with a step to 40 mV and incrementing
by 10 mV up to +60 mV (11 steps in all). Depolarizing steps were
interspersed with hyperpolarizing steps, which were used for leak
subtraction using a P/4 protocol. Recordings were carried out at room
temperature (20-21 °C). Statistical comparison of the frequency of
occurrence of LVA currents in human and mouse cells was carried out
using a chi-square contingency table.
The second series of recordings were obtained from cells isolated from
a patient undergoing orchidectomy (see above). Cells were separated by
trituration and identified visually before patching. After attachment,
the extracellular saline was exchanged for recording saline containing
(mM): NaCl (100), KCl (5), CaCl2 (10), MgCl2 (1), TEA-Cl (26), sodium lactate (6), HEPES (10), 3.3 D-glucose, pH 7.4 (adjusted with 1 N NaOH).
Pipettes were pulled from Corning no. 7052 glass (Gardner Glass Co.,
CA) and fire-polished. The pipette solution consisted of the following components (mM): cesium glutamate (130),
D-glucose (5), HEPES (10), MgCl2 (2.5),
Mg2ATP (4), EGTA-Cs (10), pH 7.2 (adjusted with 1 N CsOH). Pipette resistance was 5-7 M . Whole cell
currents were recorded with an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Axon
Instruments, Union City, CA) during depolarizing steps from a holding
potential of 90 mV to test potentials between 60 mV and +30 mV
(10-mV increments) and analyzed using Biopatch (BioLogic, France). All traces were corrected for leak and capacitance currents, and filtered at 2 kHz. All recordings were made at room temperature
(~25 °C).
 |
RESULTS |
PCR on Testis cDNA--
Initial attempts to amplify
full-length 1G and 1H transcripts, or to
obtain full-length sequence from two or three amplification products,
proved unsuccessful. However, using primers designed to generate
products of 250-1000 bp, we were able to generate a series of PCR
products. Using this strategy we obtained the complete sequence from
human testicular cDNA for both 1G and 1H (Fig. 1). During this
procedure it became apparent that, for certain regions, more than one
transcript was represented in the testicular cDNA. With
1G primers, we routinely detected variation in the
III-IV linker region. Using the nomenclature of Monteil et
al. (55), the isoforms detected were 1G-a,
1G-b, and 1G-bc, which encode three
different, intracellular III-IV loops. Primers HGS11 and HGAS11
( 1G PCR product 10; Fig. 1, top
panel), which span the relevant region, generated two bands
of ~220 and 240 bp (Fig. 2). Sequencing
confirmed that the smaller (222 bp) product was 1G-b.
These primers will generate a product of 244 bp from 1G-a template and a product of 240 bp from
1G-bc, which would not be expected to separate clearly
on the gel used. However, the sequence of the larger (240 bp) product,
determined on two occasions from different PCR reactions, was
unambiguously that of 1G-bc. To investigate directly the
presence of transcripts for 1G-a, we used the specific
primer HGBAS1 in combination with HGS11 ( 1G PCR product
11; Fig. 1, top panel). Reactions with these
primers generated a band of 144 bp, which was confirmed, by sequencing,
to be the appropriate portion of 1G-a (Fig. 2). In
accord with the findings of Monteil et al. (55), the two 1G-b isoforms were always observed together. We did not
detect any of the 1G-e isoforms, which include an
insertion in the II-III linker region of the molecule, or the d or f
isoforms, which include insertions in the COOH-terminal region. With
the 1H primer pair HHS15-HHAS19 ( 1H PCR
product 12; Fig. 1, lower panel), we obtained two
products of ~300 and 280 bp using human testicular cDNA. The sequence of the larger product corresponded to the human cardiac form
previously described by Perez-Reyes and colleagues
( 1H-a; see Ref. 56). The smaller product gave a 282 bp
sequence, which was an 1H isoform with a deletion in the
III-IV linker region ( 1H-b; Fig.
3, upper panel). The presence
of both isoforms was confirmed by use of an internal primer HHAS22
( 1H PCR product 13; Fig. 1, lower
panel), which again generated the expected product and a
truncated product (Fig. 3). Comparison of the cDNA sequence with
the human genomic sequence confirmed that this deletion was because of
alternative splicing of the gene, omitting cassette exon 26 (GenBankTM
accession no. AF051946; Fig. 3, lower panel). This
isoform of 1H was recently detected in rat brain (21), but this is the first report of such a deletion in the human
(GenBankTM accession no. AJ420779). Using both primer pairs, we could detect only the longer ( 1H-a) isoform in positive
control reactions using a human brain cDNA library (Fig. 3).

View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Position and overlap of the PCR products used
to obtain full sequence of 1G
(top panel) and
1H (lower
panel) from human testis cDNA. Linear
representations are drawn to scale, boxes showing putative
transmembrane -helical regions. Product numbering relates
to column 1 of Table I, where the primers used are tabulated.
|
|

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
PCR of
1G from human testis cDNA, using
primers in the III-IV linker region. Lane 1, 100-bp DNA
ladder; lane 2, PCR products generated from human testicular
cDNA using primers HGS11-HGAS11. Two products of 222 and 240 bp
were shown by sequencing to correspond to the 1G-b and
1G-bc isoforms. Lane 3, PCR product generated
from human testicular cDNA using primers HGS11-HGBAS1
( 1G-a-specific primer pair). The product (144 bp) was
shown by sequencing to be the appropriate portion of
1G-a. Lane 4, no template control. Gel used
was 3% (w/v) agarose. Gray scales in this and subsequent gel images
have been inverted to improve clarity.
|
|

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
PCR of
1H from human testis cDNA, using
primers in the III-IV linker region. Upper
panel, 4% (w/v) agarose gel showing results of PCR
reactions using primer pairs HHS15-HHAS19 (lanes 1-3) and
HHS15-HHAS22 (lanes 5-7). Lanes 1 and
5 show PCR products generated from human brain cDNA,
lanes 2 and 6 show PCR products generated from
human testicular cDNA, lanes 3 and 7 show PCR
products generated from a human 1H-a clone, and
lane 4 is a 100-bp DNA ladder. Both primer pairs generated
two products from testicular cDNA. Sequence analysis showed that
this was because of the presence in the testis of a deleted isoform
( 1H-b) in which exon 26, encoding six amino acids
(STFPSP) is spliced out (lower panel).
|
|
Negative control reactions (no template) were carried out for every
primer pair, and all failed to generate a product. To assess any
effects of genomic DNA contamination, a series of reactions were
carried out, for 1G and 1H, employing
primers against an intronic region in the II-III linker region, paired
with primers against sequences within domains II and III. These
reactions generated the predicted products with genomic DNA, but failed
to generate any product with testicular cDNA. PCR was also carried
out with primers in the untranslated region and the COOH terminus,
spanning an intronic sequence. With genomic DNA, larger products were
obtained for both for 1G and 1H than with
testicular cDNA. The size of the products from genomic DNA
corresponded to amplification of a product including the intronic region.
cDNA samples from four different biopsies (each from a different
donor) were used for these studies. Each sample gave positive results
with all the primer pairs with which it was used (each primer pair was
used on two to four different samples) except for one, which gave no
product for any primer pairs directed against the region from the
II-III linker to the 3' end of 1H. Positive controls,
run in parallel, gave the expected product, raising the possibility
that this individual (reported as fertile) expressed a truncated
1H transcript.
In Situ Hybridization--
To identify the cell types responsible
for the LVA-VOCC subunit transcripts detected by RT-PCR, in
situ hybridization was carried out with sections from human
testicular biopsies. Although described as "normal," there were few
if any late germ cells in these sections and no spermatozoa were
visible (Fig. 4). However, "spherical" cells resembling spermatogonia and primary
spermatocytes were clearly discernible, as were larger elongated cells,
which we tentatively identified as Sertoli cells. Despite the
relatively low abundance of germ cells, purple-brown staining in these
cells was detected using both the 1G and
1H probes (Fig. 4, a-d). Transcripts for
both LVA subunits were also detected in the Sertoli-like cells and in
extratubular cells of the testis. Within the tubules, 1H
transcripts were present primarily in the germ cells, with few of the
elongated, Sertoli-like cells stained, but 1G
transcripts were distributed equally between the Sertoli-like cells and
germ cells (Fig. 4; p < 0.001). Control sections,
using a "blind" probe mixture, did not show any staining (Fig.
4d). Human heart tissue used as a positive control showed
staining of vascular tissue for both 1G and
1H, but no staining of myocytes (LVA-VOCCs are expressed
in cardiac myocytes only during hypertrophy; Refs. 57 and 58). No
staining was observed in other portions of the reproductive tract, such
as ductus deferens.

View larger version (161K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Localization of transcripts by in
situ hybridization. a shows localization of
1G, b and c show localization of
1H, and d shows a tubule profile from
a control reaction in which unconjugated DIG (blind probe) was used.
Black arrows in a and b
show purple-brown staining of germ cells. White
arrows in a and b show staining of
larger, Sertoli-like cells. c shows a section of a tubule
stained for 1H in which a number of germ cells are
stained. Scale bar equals 25 µm.
|
|
RT-PCR on Germ Cells--
As an alternative method for
confirmation of the presence of LVA-VOCC transcripts in spermatogenic
cells, RT-PCR was carried out on mRNA extracted from isolated human
male germ cells. Cells were individually selected from biopsy material
as described above. After preparation of germ cell cDNA, PCR was
carried out using primer pairs for 1G and
1H, both of which had previously been shown to generate
a product when used with testicular cDNA. Products of appropriate
size were detected in both cases (Fig. 5)
and their identity confirmed by use of internal primers. To investigate the presence of 1G isoforms in cDNA isolated from
germ cells, we used the primer pairs HGS11 and HGAS11 (product 10). Two
bands were detected as in testicular cDNA, but there was
insufficient product for sequencing. Use of HGS11 with HGBAS1 (product
11) confirmed the presence of 1G-a. We conclude that
germ cell cDNA contained 1G-a, 1G-b,
and probably a1G-bc (see above). For 1H the
primer pair HHS15-HHAS19 (product 12), as with testicular cDNA,
generated two products of ~300 and 280 bp. Use of internal primers
confirmed the identity of 1H-a and 1H-b
(data not shown). Negative control reactions (no template) failed to
generate products. Control reactions using intronic primers, as
described above, confirmed that products were not a result of genomic
DNA contamination.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
PCR of human male germ cell cDNA.
Left panel, T-channel primers: Lane 1 shows results of PCR reaction using primer pairs HHS1 and HHAS1
( 1H), lane 3 shows results of PCR reaction
using primers A1G9F-A1G10R ( 1G), lane 2 is a
100-bp DNA ladder, and lane 4 shows product generated from
the 1H-a clone using HHS1-HHAS1. Right
panel, controls. Lanes 1 and 4 show
products generated using gene-specific primers SLEUKO1 and ASLEUKO1 for
the T200 leukocyte common antigen precursor gene. Product was obtained
from testis cDNA (lane 1) but not from cDNA derived
from germ cells (lane 4). Lanes 2 and
5 show that primers directed against actin generated a
product both from testis and germ cell cDNA. Lane 6 is a
no template control. Sequence analysis confirmed the identity of all
products. Both gels were 2% (w/v) agarose.
|
|
To confirm that the human germ cell cDNA had not been contaminated
by accidental inclusion of lymphocytes in the isolated cells, primers
were designed to match the leukocyte common antigen precursor T 200, a
lymphocyte marker sequence. PCR with these primers failed to generate a
product with human male germ cell cDNA, but produced a product of
the appropriate size with human testicular cDNA (Fig. 5).
Sequencing of the product confirmed identity.
PCR was also carried out, using 1G- and
1H-specific primer pairs ( 1G product 6, 1H product 5; Fig. 1), on mouse testis cDNA
(Origene) and cDNA generated from mouse germ cells. As with the
human, products of appropriate size were obtained from both sources of
cDNA using both sets of primers. Identity of the products was
confirmed by use of internal primers (data not shown). Negative control
reactions (no template) failed to generate products. Control reactions
using intronic primers, as described above, confirmed that products
were not a result of genomic DNA contamination.
Electrophysiology--
Rodent male germ cells, held under whole
cell clamp, express a LVA VOCC current with kinetics similar to those
seen upon expression of recombinant 1G and
1H VOCC subunits. Because our PCR and in situ
studies showed the presence of both 1G and
1H VOCC subunits in human male germ cells, we used the
patch clamp technique to investigate VOCC currents in these cells. The
first series of recordings (on cells isolated from biopsies taken for
intracytoplasmic sperm injection) were carried out in high
Ba2+ saline to maximize the amplitude of any VOCC currents.
Recordings were attempted from over 70 cells, but only 50 of these
maintained good seals after breakthrough (input resistance 1-2 G ).
35 of these cells were from previously frozen biopsies and 15 from
fresh tissue. In six cells we recorded voltage-activated outward
currents (Fig. 6a). Two of
these currents were seen in cells from previously frozen biopsies, but
these were much smaller than those recorded in freshly prepared cells.
In one of the fresh cells, a very small "possible" LVA inward
current (approximately 15 pA) was present. The current activated at
approximately 30 to 20 mV (typical for a T current in this saline),
but, at potentials positive to 10 mV, it was occluded by a
considerably larger outward current (Fig. 6a). In contrast,
when mouse male germ cells were isolated and prepared for recording in
a similar manner, LVA currents were clearly present in at least 6 of
the 20 cells examined (p < 0.0005). In the high
Ba2+ saline used for these recordings, peak current
occurred at ~+10 mV, as reported previously for LVA currents recorded
under these conditions (51-54, 59).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
LVA currents in germ cells.
a, currents recorded from intracytoplasmic sperm injection
biopsies (first series of recordings). Upper
panel shows a "typical" family of traces obtained from a
human germ cell isolated from a previously frozen biopsy taken for
intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The cell (bathed in 108 mM BaCl2) was held at 60 mV and stepped to
40, 30, 20, 10, 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 mV
(center panel). Lower panel
shows records obtained from a freshly prepared (not previously frozen)
cell, which was subjected to a similar stimulus protocol but in which
an outward current was induced by depolarizing voltage steps. In this
cell a very small transient inward current (arrow) was
detectable in leak-subtracted traces obtained with steps up to 10 mV
(inset). b, detection of LVA currents in human
male germ cells freshly isolated from an orchidectomy. Upper
panel shows currents, from a round spermatid, activated by
stepping from 90 mV to 50, 30, 10, and 10 mV. Lower
panel shows the current voltage relationship for this
current. Similar currents were observed in a second round
spermatid.
|
|
In a second series of recordings on cells isolated from human testis
(tissue removed during an orchidectomy), seven pachytene spermatocytes
and round spermatids were tested (seal resistance >1G ). In two of
these cells (both identified as round spermatids), small
voltage-activated inward currents (maximum amplitude approximately 8
pA) were detected (Fig. 6b). The currents activated at 50 to 40 mV, peak amplitude occurring at 10 mV. Inactivation was rapid
with a time constant of ~15 ms. These characteristics are consistent
with those of currents generated by 1G or
1H T-type channels.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Despite the fact that T-type VOCCs are believed to play a critical
role in ZP-induced AR in rodent spermatozoa (9, 17), almost nothing is
known of the expression or function of these channels in
[Ca2+]i signaling in human male
germ cells. We report here, for the first time, the presence in human
testis of full-length transcripts for both 1H and
1G subunits. The unavailability of specific antibodies
for the LVA 1 subunit family is a significant problem in
determining the tissue distribution of these channels. Therefore, to
confirm the expression of LVA subunit transcripts in male germ cells,
two alternative approaches were employed.
(i) RT-PCR, using RNA isolated from male germ cells, detected the
presence of transcripts for both 1G and
1H. The cells were individually selected, by
micromanipulation, by an experienced embryologist (D. S.),
according to strict criteria (47). Although contamination of the germ
cell sample cannot be completely discounted, we consider this to be
most unlikely. PCR reactions designed to detect markers of potential
contaminating cells did not generate products.
(ii) Use of in situ hybridization revealed the presence of
transcripts for both 1G and 1H in germ
cells, as well as in other cells of the seminiferous tubules and
interstitium. The relative distribution of in situ staining
suggests that 1H transcripts are present primarily in
germ cells with little staining in the elongated Sertoli-like cells,
but that 1G is expressed at least as strongly in other
cell types as in germ cells. The sections contained few "late" germ
cells and therefore may have under-represented the number of cells
expressing the transcripts. However, even under these conditions, the
presence of transcripts in germ cells was clear. On the basis of these
two complementary findings, we conclude that both 1H and
1G are expressed in human male germ cells and are
therefore potentially involved in Ca2+ signaling during
spermatogenesis or in the mature gamete (see below).
LVA Channel Types and Isoforms in Human Testis--
RT-PCR of
human testicular and germ cell cDNA and male germ cell cDNA
revealed the presence not only of transcripts for 1G and
1H subunits, but also of multiple isoforms of both
subunits. Because expressed recombinant LVA channels have shown
considerable differences in properties, both between different subunits
and between subunit isoforms (19, 21, 60), this diversity potentially provides considerable variation in T-channel properties between testicular cell types or stages of differentiation. The shorter variant
of the two 1H isoforms that we detected in the testis ( 1H-b; which has a deletion in the III-IV linker) has
not been reported previously in human tissues but has recently been
detected in rat brain (21), where it is widely distributed. In
contrast, reactions with human brain cDNA generated a robust
product for 1H-a, but 1H-b could not be
detected (Fig. 3). The rat 1H-b isoform appears to
function over more positive voltage ranges, for both activation and
inactivation, than human 1H-a (19, 21), although it
remains to be seen whether this reflects splice variation or other
(species) differences in the molecules. The range of 1G
splice variants detected in the testis includes 1G-b, which, of the five variants expressed in HEK-293 cells by Chemin et al. (60), had the most positive voltage range for
steady-state inactivation. 1G-b and 1G-a
(primarily neuronal (55) but also present in human testis and germ
cells) have steady-state inactivation ranges differing by >10 mV.
Clearly, it is important that the distribution of these diverse
T-channel subunits between cell types and stages of differentiation is
elucidated, because a change from 1G to
1H or even from 1G-a to
1G-b during germ cell differentiation could have
profound effects on cell function.
Functional Expression of LVA Subunits in Human Male Germ
Cells--
To examine the functional characteristics of the LVA VOCC
subunits that we detected by RT-PCR, we applied the whole cell patch clamp to human male germ cells. In our first series of recordings, we
used cells obtained from biopsies taken for intracytoplasmic sperm
injection. Of the 50 records considered to be reliable (see results),
only one "possible" LVA current was observed (Fig. 6a). In contrast, when mouse germ cells were prepared similarly, we observed
T-type currents in 6 of 20 cells. Peak current occurred at ~10 mV
(Fig. 6). LVA currents in rat osteoblasts (primarily 1G;
Ref. 54)2 and rat marrow
stromal cells (primarily 1H),2 recorded
under identical conditions, gave maximal currents at 0-10 and 10-20
mV, respectively (52, 54). In a second series of experiments, using
freshly prepared cells obtained from an orchidectomy, we observed
T-currents in two of seven cells (both identified as round spermatids;
Fig. 6b). Apart from the use of different biopsies, the
difference in success rate between the two series of experiments may
reflect other factors. First, we consider that use of previously frozen
material may be inappropriate because, as well as our failure to find
any T currents in such cells, the robust outward currents seen in the
fresh cells used in the first series of experiments (Fig.
6a) were small or absent in frozen-thawed cells. Second, it
may be important to record currents immediately after isolation rather
than after overnight incubation. Although T-currents were observed in
mouse cells prepared in this way, their frequency of occurrence (~1
in 6) was low compared with that seen in cells used on the day of
isolation.3
All of the currents that we did observe were very small (10-15 pA)
compared with the currents of rodent cells reported here and in
previous studies (16-18). We conclude that human male germ cells
express T currents but that, in immature cells, their amplitude and
possibly their frequency of occurrence is low. Furthermore, the
currents were observed in late germ cells (spermatids). We consider it
likely that, in the human, functional expression of these channels
occurs at a late stage of germ cell differentiation and/or during
epididymal maturation, the channels being functionally significant
primarily in the mature cell (see below). Preliminary patch clamp
recordings from pachytene spermatocytes of cat, sheep, rabbit, and
guinea pig failed to reveal the presence of any VOCC currents,3 suggesting that rodent cells may be unusual in
their expression of significant T currents at an immature stage.
Functional expression of HVA VOCCs in human and possibly rodent male
germ cells may be similarly restricted to mature spermatozoa.
Transcripts for various HVA channels have been detected in rodent and
human male germ cells (24-28), the encoded proteins can be detected in
spermatogenic cells and mature spermatozoa (23, 27, 29, 30), and there is evidence for function of such channels in mature cells (23, 61).
However, only LVA currents are detected in patch clamped spermatogenic cells.
The relationship of the channels described here to those detected using
other techniques is difficult to assess. Although the use of whole cell
patch clamp to characterize expression of ion channels in mature
spermatozoa has so far proved impossible, Ca2+ channels
have been detected by cell-attached recording and by inclusion of sperm
membrane proteins in artificial bilayers. Darszon and colleagues (62),
using patch clamp, detected a Ca2+-permeable but poorly
selective cation channel in mouse spermatozoa. Using insertion of sperm
proteins into artificial lipid membranes, the same group have observed
a high conductance Ca2+ channel in sea urchin and mouse
spermatozoa that resembles the ryanodine receptor (63). Tiwari-Woodruff
and Cox (64), also using artificial bilayers, observed a
Ca2+ channel from porcine spermatozoa, which displayed
sensitivity to dihydropyridine drugs, but showed no voltage dependence.
Similar studies with human sperm proteins have resulted in detection of various channels, including a Ca2+-selective channel that
showed voltage sensitivity (65, 66), but the conductance of this
channel was considerably higher than that of native or recombinant T
channels. There has been only one report of patching of human
spermatozoa, in which Weyand et al. (67) described a cyclic
nucleotide gated Ca2+ channel. It appears that currents
corresponding to the transcripts described here are yet to be detected
in mature cells.
LVA VOCCs and AR--
It has been known for some time that the
influx of Ca2+ (and consequent AR) that occurs upon binding
of mammalian spermatozoa to the ZP requires opening of VOCCs (9, 68).
More recently it has been proposed that ZP-induced
Ca2+-influx in mouse spermatozoa is mediated by LVA
channels (9, 17). Not only are LVA currents the only detectable VOCCs
in mouse spermatogenic cells, these currents display sensitivities to
organic and inorganic antagonists that closely resemble those of the
ZP-induced [Ca2+]i signal in
mature spermatozoa (17, 18).
Because of the difficulty of working on human tissues, almost nothing
is known about the participation of VOCCs in ZP-induced [Ca2+]i signaling in human
spermatozoa. Furthermore, there are known to be significant differences
between the mouse and human in sperm-ZP interaction (69). The data
reported here confirm that both 1H and 1G
transcripts are present in human male germ cells and that functional
channels are formed, consistent with participation of either or both of
these channels in ZP-induced Ca2+ influx. Interestingly,
the pharmacology of NGP-induced AR in human spermatozoa resembles that
of 1H (46), a finding that complements the apparent
preferential expression of 1H in germ cells (see above).
However, in comparison to the mouse, the involvement of LVA currents in
the AR of human spermatozoa is far from established. Comparison of the
pharmacology of the 1H isoforms reported here with the
pharmacology of ZP-activated
[Ca2+]i signaling in human
spermatozoa should allow significant progress in determining whether
these subunits contribute significantly to ZP-induced
Ca2+-influx and AR in the human. A similar study on mouse
male germ cell LVA VOCC subunits may be necessary to establish firmly
the identity of the currents detected in immature germ cells.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Professor G. W. Zamponi and Dr.
J. Hamid (Neuroscience Research Group, Department of Pharmacology and
Therapeutics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada) for advice and
for assistance with primers, Professor E. Perez-Reyes (Department of
Pharmacology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville,
VA) for providing cloned human 1H-a, and Sylvie
Rousseau for providing samples from tissue removed during orchidectomy.
We also thank David Hughes and Richard Sharpe for advice on primers and
leukocyte markers.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by a National Health Service
Locally Organized Research Scheme project grant.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AJ420779.
§
Recipient of a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research
Council studentship.
¶
Present address: Medical Research Council Clinical Sciences
Center, Division of Medicine, Hammersmith Campus, Imperial College School of Medicine, London W12 ONN, United Kingdom

Present address: Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8063.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 21, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M105345200
2
Y. Gu, T. Snow, S. Jagannathan, and S. J. Publicover, unpublished data.
3
C. Arnoult, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
AR, acrosome
reaction;
ZP, zona pellucida;
ZP3, zona pellucida glycoprotein 3;
VOCC, voltage-operated calcium channel;
LVA, low voltage activated;
HVA, high
voltage activated;
RT, reverse transcription;
NGP, neoglycoprotein;
DIG, digoxigenin;
, ohm(s).
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Krausz, C.,
Bonaccorsi, L.,
Luconi, M.,
Fuzzi, B.,
Criscuoli, L.,
Pellegrini, S.,
Forti, G.,
and Baldi, E.
(1995)
Hum. Reprod.
10,
120-124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Baldi, E.,
Luconi, M.,
Bonaccorsi, L.,
Maggi, M.,
Francavilla, S.,
Gabriele, A.,
Properzi, G.,
and Forti, G.
(1999)
Steroids
64,
143-148[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Liu, D. Y.,
and Baker, H. W. G.
(2000)
Hum. Reprod.
15,
702-708[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Esterhuizen, A. D.,
Franken, D. R.,
Lourens, J. G.,
and van Rooyen, L. H.
(2001)
Hum. Reprod.
16,
138-144[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Wassarman, P. M.
(1999)
Cell
96,
175-183[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Baldi, E.,
Luconi, M.,
Bonaccorsi, L.,
and Forti, G.
(1998)
Frontiers Biosci.
3,
d1051-d1059
|
| 7.
|
Bronson, R. A.,
Peresleni, T.,
and Golightly, M.
(1999)
Mol. Hum. Reprod.
5,
507-512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Calogero, A. E.,
Burrello, N.,
Barone, N.,
Palermo, I.,
Grasso, U.,
and D'Agata, R.
(2000)
Hum. Reprod.
15,
28-45
|
| 9.
|
Florman, H. M.,
Arnoult, C.,
Kazam, I. G., Li, C.,
and O'Toole, C. M. B.
(1998)
Biol. Reprod.
59,
12-16[Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Shirakawa, H.,
and Miyazaki, S.
(1999)
Dev. Biol.
208,
70-78[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Kirkman-Brown, K. C.,
Bray, C.,
Stewart, P. M.,
Barratt, C. L. R.,
and Publicover, S. J.
(2000)
Dev. Biol.
222,
326-335[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
O'Toole, C. M. B.,
Arnoult, C.,
Darszon, A.,
Steinhardt, R. A.,
and Florman, H. M.
(2000)
Mol. Biol. Cell
11,
1571-1584[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Arnoult, C.,
Kazam, I. G.,
Visconti, P. E.,
Kopf, G. S.,
and Florman, H. M.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
6757-6762[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Jungnickel, M. K.,
Marrero, H.,
Birnbaumer, L.,
Lemos, J. R.,
and Florman, H. M.
(2001)
Nat. Cell Biol.
3,
499-502[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Darszon, A.,
Labarca, P.,
Nishigaki, T.,
and Espinosa, F.
(1999)
Physiol. Rev.
79,
481-510[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Hagiwara, S.,
and Kawa, K.
(1984)
J. Physiol.
356,
135-149[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Arnoult, C.,
Cardullo, R. A.,
Lemos, J. R.,
and Florman, H. M.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13004-13009[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Santi, C. M.,
Darszon, A.,
and Hernandez, A.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
40,
C1583-C1593
|
| 19.
|
Klöckner, U.,
Lee, J.-H.,
Cribbs, L. L.,
Daud, A.,
Hescheler, J.,
Pereverzev, A.,
Perez-Reyes, E.,
and Schneider, T.
(1999)
Eur. J. Neurosci.
11,
4171-4178[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Lacinová, L.,
Klugbauer, N.,
and Hofman, F.
(2000)
Gen. Physiol. Biophys.
19,
121-136[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
McRory, J. E.,
Santi, C. M.,
Hamming, K. S. C.,
Mezeyova, J.,
Sutton, K. G.,
Ballie, D. L.,
Stea, A.,
and Snutch, T. P.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
3999-4011[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Arnoult, C.,
Villaz, M.,
and Florman, H. M.
(1998)
Mol. Pharmacol.
53,
1104-1111[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Wennemuth, G.,
Westenbroek, R. E., Xu, T.,
Hille, B.,
and Babcock, D. F.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
21210-21217[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Liévano, A.,
Santi, C. M.,
Serrano, C. J.,
Treviño, C. L.,
Bellvé, A. R.,
Hernandez-Cruz, A.,
and Darszon, A.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
388,
150-154[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Goodwin, L. O.,
Leeds, N. B.,
Hurley, I. R.,
Mandel, F. S.,
Pergolizzi, R. G.,
and Benoff, S.
(1997)
Mol. Hum. Reprod.
3,
255-268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Goodwin, L. O.,
Leeds, N. B.,
Hurley, I.,
Cooper, G. W.,
Pergolizzi, R. G.,
and Benoff, S.
(1998)
Mol. Hum. Reprod.
4,
215-226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Benoff, S.
(1998)
Frontiers Biosci.
3,
d1220-d1240
|
| 28.
|
Espinosa, F.,
López-González, I.,
Serrano, C. J.,
Gasque, G.,
de la Vega-Beltran, J. L.,
Trevino, C. L.,
and Darszon, A.
(1999)
Dev. Genet.
25,
103-114[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Serrano, C. J.,
Trevino, C. L.,
Felix, R.,
and Darszon, A.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
462,
171-176[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Westenbroek, R. E.,
and Babcock, D. F.
(1999)
Dev. Biol.
207,
457-469[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Soong, T. W.,
Stea, A.,
Hodson, C. D.,
Dubel, S. T.,
Vincent, S. R.,
and Snutch, T. P.
(1993)
Science
260,
1133-1136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Sakata, Y.,
Saegusa, H.,
Zong, S.,
Osanai, M.,
Murakoshi, T.,
Shimizu, Y.,
Noda, T.,
Aso, T.,
and Tanabe, T.
(2001)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
288,
1032-1036[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
| Jacob, A., and Benoff, S. (2000) J. Androl. 56, March/April Suppl., 48
|
| 34.
|
Blackmore, P. F.,
Beebe, S. J.,
Danforth, D. R.,
and Alexander, N.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
1376-1380[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Foresta, C.,
Rossato, M.,
and di Virgilio, F.
(1993)
Biochem. J.
294,
279-283
|
| 36.
|
Aitken, R. J.,
Buckingham, D. W.,
and Irvine, D. S.
(1996)
Endocrinology
137,
3999-4009[Abstract]
|
| 37.
|
Blackmore, P. F.,
and Eisoldt, S.
(1999)
Mol. Hum. Reprod.
5,
498-506[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Garcia, M. A.,
and Meizel, S.
(1999)
Biol. Reprod.
60,
102-109[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Publicover, S. J.,
and Barratt, C. L. R.
(1999)
Hum. Reprod.
14,
873-879[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Morales, P.,
Pizarro, E.,
Kong, M.,
Kerr, B.,
Ceric, F.,
and Vigil, P.
(2000)
Biol. Reprod.
63,
635-642[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Patrat, C.,
Serres, C.,
and Jouannet, P.
(2000)
Biol. Cell
92,
255-266[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
| Patrat, C., Serres, C., and Jouannet, P. (2000) Proceeding of the
Society for the Study of Reproduction 33rd Annual Meeting,
July 15-18, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI,
Abstr. 258
|
| 43.
|
Brandelli, A.,
Miranda, P. V.,
Anon-Vazquez, M. G.,
Martin-Briggiler, C. I.,
Sanjurjo, C.,
Gonzalez-Echeverria, F.,
Blaquier, J. A.,
and Tezon, J. G.
(1995)
Hum. Reprod.
10,
1751-1756[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Brandelli, A.,
Miranda, P. V.,
and Tezon, J. G.
(1996)
J. Androl.
17,
522-529[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Loeser, C. R.,
Lynch, C., II,
and Tulsiani, D. R. P.
(1999)
Biol. Reprod.
61,
629-634[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Son, W.-Y.,
Lee, J.-H.,
Lee, J.-H.,
and Han, C.-T.
(2000)
Mol. Hum. Reprod.
6,
893-897[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Johnson, L.,
Neaves, W. B.,
Barnard, J. J.,
Keillor, G. E.,
Brown, S. W.,
and Yanagimachi, R.
(1999)
Biol. Reprod.
61,
927-934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Steuerwald, N.,
Cohen, J.,
Herera, R. J.,
and Brenner, C. A.
(1999)
Mol. Hum. Reprod.
5,
1034-1039[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Meehan, T.,
Schlatt, S.,
O'Bryan, M. K., De,
Kretser, D. M.,
and Loveland, K. L.
(2000)
Dev. Biol.
220,
225-237[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Fragale, A.,
Aguanno, S.,
Kemp, M.,
Reeves, M.,
Price, K.,
Beattie, R.,
Craig, P.,
Volsen, S.,
Sher, E.,
and D'Agostino, A.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
162,
25-33[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Chesnoy-Marchais, D.,
and Fritsch, J.
(1988)
J. Physiol.
398,
291-311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Publicover, S. J.,
Thomas, G. P.,
and El Haj, A. J.
(1994)
Calcif. Tiss. Int.
54,
125-132[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Publicover, S. J.,
Preston, M. R.,
and El Haj, A. J.
(1995)
J. Physiol.
489,
649-661[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 54.
|
Gu, Y.,
Preston, M. R., El,
Haj, A. J.,
Hamid, J.,
Zamponi, G. W.,
Howl, J.,
and Publicover, S. J.
(1999)
Pflugers Arch.
438,
553-560[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Monteil, A.,
Chemin, J.,
Bourinet, E.,
Mennessier, G.,
Lory, P.,
and Nargeot, J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
6090-6100[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 56.
|
Cribbs, L. L.,
Lee, J.-H.,
Yang, J.,
Satin, J.,
Zhang, Y.,
Daud, A.,
Barclay, J.,
Williamson, M. P.,
Fox, M.,
Rees, M.,
and Perez-Reyes, E.
(1998)
Circ. Res.
83,
103-109[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 57.
|
Clozel, J. P.,
Ertel, E. A.,
and Ertel, S. I.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
111,
429-437[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
Martinez, M. L.,
Heredia, M. P.,
and Delgado, C.
(1999)
J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.
31,
1617-1625[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 59.
|
Preston, M. R., El,
Haj, A. J.,
and Publicover, S. J.
(1996)
Bone
19,
101-106[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 60.
|
Chemin, J.,
Monteil, A.,
Bourinet, E.,
Nargeot, J.,
and Lory, P.
(2001)
Biophys. J.
80,
1238-1250[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 61.
| Kirkman-Brown, K. C., Barratt, C. L. R., and Publicover,
S. J. (2000) J. Androl. 91, March/April
Suppl., 57
|
| 62.
|
Espinosa, F,.,
de la Vega-Beltran, J. L.,
Lopez-Gonzalez, I.,
Delgado, R.,
Labarca, P.,
and Darszon, A.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
426,
47-51[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 63.
|
Beltran, C.,
Darszon, A.,
Labarca, P.,
and Lievano, A.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
338,
23-26[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 64.
|
Tiwari Woodruff, S. K.,
and Cox, T. C.
(1995)
Am. J. Physiol.
268,
C1284-C1294[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 65.
|
Chan, H. C.,
Zhou, W. O.,
Wang, W. P.,
Shi, Y. L.,
and Wong, P. Y. D.
(1997)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1323,
117-129[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 66.
|
Ma, X.-H.,
and Shi, Y.-L.
(1999)
Acta Physiol. Sinica
51,
571-579
|
| 67.
|
Weyand, I.,
Godde, M.,
Frings, S.,
Welner, J.,
Muller, F.,
Altenhofen, W.,
Hatt, H.,
and Kaupp, U. B.
(1994)
Nature
368,
859-863[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 68.
|
Florman, H. M.
(1994)
Dev. Biol.
165,
152-164[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 69.
|
Hughes, D. C.,
and Barratt, C. L.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1447,
303-306[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. C.N. Chiu, B. S.T. Wong, M.-K. Chung, K. K.W. Lam, R. T.K. Pang, K.-F. Lee, S.B. Sumitro, S.K. Gupta, and W. S.B. Yeung
Effects of Native Human Zona Pellucida Glycoproteins 3 and 4 on Acrosome Reaction and Zona Pellucida Binding of Human Spermatozoa
Biol Reprod,
November 1, 2008;
79(5):
869 - 877.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Tao, M. E. Hildebrand, P. Liao, M. C. Liang, G. Tan, S. Li, T. P. Snutch, and T. W. Soong
Activation of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Receptor 1 Selectively Inhibits CaV3.2 T-Type Calcium Channels
Mol. Pharmacol.,
June 1, 2008;
73(6):
1596 - 1609.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Torres-Flores, N. L. Garcia-Sanchez, and M. T. Gonzalez-Martinez
Intracellular Sodium Increase Induced by External Calcium Removal in Human Sperm
J Androl,
January 1, 2008;
29(1):
63 - 69.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-G. Li, X.-F. Ding, A.-H. Liao, X.-B. Kong, and C.-L. Xiong
Expression of CatSper family transcripts in the mouse testis during post-natal development and human ejaculated spermatozoa: relationship to sperm motility
Mol. Hum. Reprod.,
May 1, 2007;
13(5):
299 - 306.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Zhong, J. R. Liu, J. W. Kyle, D. A. Hanck, and W. S. Agnew
A profile of alternative RNA splicing and transcript variation of CACNA1H, a human T-channel gene candidate for idiopathic generalized epilepsies
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
May 1, 2006;
15(9):
1497 - 1512.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Jimenez-Gonzalez, F. Michelangeli, C.V. Harper, C.L.R. Barratt, and S.J. Publicover
Calcium signalling in human spermatozoa: a specialized 'toolkit' of channels, transporters and stores
Hum. Reprod. Update,
May 1, 2006;
12(3):
253 - 267.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Vitko, Y. Chen, J. M. Arias, Y. Shen, X.-R. Wu, and E. Perez-Reyes
Functional Characterization and Neuronal Modeling of the Effects of Childhood Absence Epilepsy Variants of CACNA1H, a T-Type Calcium Channel
J. Neurosci.,
May 11, 2005;
25(19):
4844 - 4855.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Felix
Molecular physiology and pathology of Ca2+-conducting channels in the plasma membrane of mammalian sperm
Reproduction,
March 1, 2005;
129(3):
251 - 262.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Agoston, L. Kunz, A. Krieger, and A. Mayerhofer
Two Types of Calcium Channels in Human Ovarian Endocrine Cells: Involvement in Steroidogenesis
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
September 1, 2004;
89(9):
4503 - 4512.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Perez-Reyes
Molecular Physiology of Low-Voltage-Activated T-type Calcium Channels
Physiol Rev,
January 1, 2003;
83(1):
117 - 161.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. De Blas, M. Michaut, C. L. Trevino, C. N. Tomes, R. Yunes, A. Darszon, and L. S. Mayorga
The Intraacrosomal Calcium Pool Plays a Direct Role in Acrosomal Exocytosis
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 13, 2002;
277(51):
49326 - 49331.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|