|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M110392200 on December 18, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 10, 8566-8571, March 8, 2002
Interaction and Cooperation of mi Transcription
Factor (MITF) and Myc-associated Zinc-finger Protein-related Factor
(MAZR) for Transcription of Mouse Mast Cell Protease 6 Gene*
Eiichi
Morii §,
Keisuke
Oboki ,
Tatsuki R.
Kataoka ,
Kazuhiko
Igarashi¶, and
Yukihiko
Kitamura
From the Department of Pathology (Room C2), Osaka
University Medical School, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan, and the ¶ Department of Biochemistry, Hiroshima University
Medical School, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
Received for publication, October 29, 2001, and in revised form, December 10, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The mi transcription factor (MITF) is
a basic-helix-loop-helix leucine zipper (bHLH-Zip) transcription factor
that is important for the normal phenotypic expression of mast cells.
Most transcription factors function in cooperation with other factors
by protein-protein interactions. To search proteins interacting with
MITF, we carried out a yeast two-hybrid screen and isolated
Myc-associated zinc-finger protein related factor (MAZR) as a
partner of MITF. When expressed with MITF in NIH/3T3 cells, MAZR was
colocalized with MITF. The association of MAZR with MITF was further
confirmed by a co-immunoprecipitation study and in vitro
binding assay. The zinc-finger domain of MAZR and the Zip domain of
MITF were essential for the interaction. MAZR was expressed in cultured
mast cells and MST mastocytoma cells containing mouse mast cell
protease (mMCP)-6 transcript abundantly. The overexpression of dominant
negative MAZR in MST mastocytoma cells reduced the amount of mMCP-6
mRNA. The simultaneous transfection of MAZR and MITF significantly
increased the promoter activity of the mMCP-6 gene, indicating
that the MAZR and MITF synergistically transactivated the mMCP-6 gene.
MAZR appeared to play important roles in the normal phenotypic
expression of mast cells in association with MITF.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The mi locus of mice encodes a member of the
basic-helix-loop-helix leucine zipper
(bHLH-Zip)1 protein family of
transcription factors (hereafter called MITF) (1, 2). The MITF encoded
by the mutant mi allele (mi-MITF) deletes one of
four consecutive arginines in the basic domain (1, 3, 4). The
mi/mi mutant mice show microphthalmia, depletion of
pigmentation in both hair and eyes, osteopetrosis, and deficient
natural killer activity (3, 5-7). In addition, the phenotypic
expression of mast cells is abnormal in mi/mi mice (8-15).
Cultured mast cells (CMCs) derived from the spleen of mi/mi
mice are deficient in the expression of various genes, such as mouse
mast cell protease (mMCP)-4 (16), mMCP-5 (17), mMCP-6 (18), mMCP-7
(19), c-kit (20), p75 nerve growth factor receptor (21),
granzyme B (22), tryptophan hydroxylase (22), integrin 4 subunit
(23) and  melanocyte-stimulating hormone receptor genes (24).
Among the genes whose expression was deficient in mi/mi
CMCs, the transactivation mechanism of the mMCP-6 gene has been studied most intensively (18, 25, 26). The expression of mMCP-6 gene was
deficient not only in mi/mi CMCs but also in CMCs derived from other mutants at the mi locus. The tg/tg
CMCs that lack MITF did not express the mMCP-6 gene (27). The
miew/miew and
mice/mice CMCs, in which
the basic domain and the Zip domain of MITF were deleted, respectively,
also did not express the mMCP-6 gene (28, 29). These findings indicated
that the normal (+) MITF was essential for the expression of the mMCP-6
gene. The +-MITF bound the three motifs in the promoter region of the
mMCP-6 gene (18). The mutation of each of these three motifs reduced
the magnitude of transactivation by +-MITF. Among them, the GACCTG
motif appeared to play the most important role since the magnitude of
reduction was greatest after the mutation of the GACCTG motif (18). We
found that the GACCTG motif was partly overlapped by the binding motif
recognized by another transcription factor, polyomavirus
enhancer-binding protein (PEBP2). PEBP2 interacted with +-MITF and
showed functional synergy in the transcription of mMCP-6 gene (26).
In the present study, we searched the factor that cooperated with
+-MITF using the yeast two-hybrid screen and found the
Myc-associated zinc-finger
protein-related factor (MAZR) as a protein that interacted with +-MITF. MAZR possesses the broad-complex-tramtrack-bric-a-brac (BTB) domain and the zinc-finger domain (30). The overexpression of
dominant negative MAZR reduced the expression of the mMCP-6 gene in
mastocytoma cells. MAZR showed functional synergy with +-MITF for
transcription of the mMCP-6 gene. MAZR appeared to play roles in the
normal phenotype expression of mast cells in association with
+-MITF.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Yeast Two-hybrid Screen--
The bait plasmid pGBKT7-MITF was
constructed by inserting a portion of MITF cDNA, which was deleted
in the N-terminal 161 residues, into pGBKT7 vector
(CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA). The yeast two-hybrid
screen was performed according to the instructions for the MATCHMAKER
two-hybrid system 3 (CLONTECH) using pGBKT7-MITF as
bait and a mouse lymphoma cell cDNA library
(CLONTECH). Approximately 2 × 108
Hf7c yeast transformants were screened for His autotrophy.
-galactosidase assay was used for isolating positive clones. The
isolated clones were sequenced in both directions with ABI 3100 Genetic
Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).
Cells--
CMCs were obtained by culturing spleen cells of +/+
mice as described previously (17). MST cells were kindly provided by Dr. J. D. Esko of University of California, San Diego (31), and
Jurkat cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma)
supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Nippon Bio Supply
Center, Tokyo, Japan). NIH/3T3 cells and 293T cells were
maintained in Dulbecco's modification of Eagle's medium (Flow
Laboratories, Irvine, UK) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum.
Plasmids--
The DNA fragment encoding the entire open reading
frame of MAZR was obtained by PCR from the reverse-transcribed
product of CMCs. The used primers were
5'-ATGGAGCGGGTCAACGACGCTTCTTGCGGT and
5'-TCACTTCCCTTCAGGCCCCATGGGCTGCTG. The amplified DNA fragment was
subcloned into pBluescript (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The amplified
fragment was also subcloned into pGEX-3X glutathione S-transferase (GST)-expressing vector (Amersham Biosciences,
Inc.) and into pEF-BOS expression vector kindly provided by Dr.
S. Nagata of Osaka University (32). Various fragments of MAZR were
amplified by PCR and subcloned into pBluescript or pEF-BOS. The
expression plasmid containing MAZR fused with green fluorescent protein
(GFP) and the expression plasmid containing MAZR fused with FLAG
epitope tag were described before (30). The expression plasmid and the pBluescript containing normal or mutant MITFs, the expression plasmid
containing Myc-tagged normal or mutant MITFs, and the GST-expressing
plasmid containing +-MITF were also described previously (19, 33, 34).
All of the PCR fragments were verified by sequencing.
Northern Blot Analysis--
Each RNA sample was prepared from
1.0 × 107 CMCs, MST cells, and Jurkat cells by the
lithium chloride-urea method (35). Northern blot analysis was performed
using the full-length MAZR (30), mMCP-6 (36), and
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (37) cDNAs labeled with
[ -32P]dCTP (PerkinElmer Life Sciences; 10 mCi/ml) by random oligonucleotide priming. After hybridization at
42 °C, blots were washed to a final stringency of 0.2 × SSC
(1 × SSC is 150 mmol/liter NaCl and 15 mmol/liter trisodium
citrate, pH 7.4) and subjected to autoradiography.
Immunocytochemistry--
The expression plasmid containing
+-MITF and the expression plasmid containing MAZR fused with GFP were
cotransfected to NIH/3T3 cells using TransFast Transfection Reagent
(Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
The cells were fixed with 100% methanol and permiated by
treatment with 0.2% Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline. The
cells were incubated with polyclonal rabbit anti-MITF antibody (Ab).
Immunoreacted cells were detected with anti-rabbit IgG Ab conjugated
with rhodamine (MBL, Nagoya, Japan). The cells expressing +-MITF were
detected with the red filter, and the cells expressing MAZR fused with GFP were detected with the green filter. The specimens were observed with a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM 510; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
Immunoprecipitation--
The Myc-tagged normal or mutant MITF
was coexpressed with FLAG-tagged MAZR in 293T cells using TransFast
Transfection Reagent (Promega). The nuclear or whole cell extract was
obtained by the method described previously (38). The nuclear or whole
cell extract was incubated with LIP buffer (10 mM HEPES,
250 mM NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and protein G-Sepharose
(Amersham Biosciences, Inc.) for 1 h with gentle rocking and
centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 3 min. The supernatants were transferred
into new tubes and incubated with protein G-Sepharose and anti-Myc
monoclonal Ab (9E10, PharMingen, San Diego, CA) or anti-FLAG Ab (Sigma)
for 1 h in LIP buffer. Immunocomplexes were washed
four times with LIP buffer, resuspended in loading buffer, boiled, and
analyzed by immunoblot with anti-Myc monoclonal Ab.
In Vitro Binding Assay--
The 35S-labeled normal
or mutant MITF protein was synthesized using the reticulocyte lysate
system (TNT system, Promega). The 35S-labeled normal or
mutant MAZR protein was also synthesized. For the binding assays, the
35S-labeled normal or mutant MITF protein was incubated for
1 h at room temperature with GST-MAZR or GST alone immobilized on glutathione-agarose beads. The 35S-labeled normal or mutant
MAZR protein was also incubated with GST-+-MITF or GST alone
immobilized on beads. The beads were washed four times. Proteins
retained on the beads were subsequently analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.
Transfection and Luciferase Assay--
The transfection to MST
cells and to Jurkat cells were performed by electroporation. The
reporter plasmid that contained the promoter region of the mMCP-6 gene
starting from nucleotide (nt) 171 or nt 151 and the reporter
plasmid with the minimal mMCP-6 promoter starting from nt 61 were
described previously (26). The reporter plasmid mutated at the
MITF-binding GACCTG motif in the mMCP-6 promoter and the reporter
plasmid possessing the tetrameric fragment between nt 171 and 151
upstream from the minimal mMCP-6 promoter were also described
previously (26). The pEF-BOS expression plasmid containing +-MITF,
mutant MITFs, MAZR, or mutant MAZRs was used as the effector plasmid.
In luciferase assays, 5 µg of a reporter, 2 µg of effector
plasmids, and 1 µg of an expression vector containing the
-galactosidase gene were cotransfected to Jurkat cells. The
expression vector containing the -galactosidase gene was used as an
internal control. When two kinds of effector plasmids were used, equal
amounts of both plasmids were transfected. In some experiments, 5 µg
of a reporter, 2 µg of the expression plasmid containing +-MITF, 2 or
4 µg of the expression plasmid containing the dominant negative form
of MAZR and 1 µg of an expression vector containing the
-galactosidase gene were cotransfected to MST cells. The cells were
harvested 48 h after the transfection and lysed with 0.1 mol/liter
potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 1% Triton X-100.
Soluble extracts were then assayed for luciferase activity with a
luminometer LB96P (Berthold GmbH, Wildbad, Germany) and for
-galactosidase activity. The luciferase activity was normalized by
the -galactosidase activity and the total protein concentration as
described previously (18). The normalized value was divided by the
value obtained without effector plasmids, and the divided value was
expressed as the relative luciferase activity.
 |
RESULTS |
We searched for proteins that were associated with +-MITF by yeast
two-hybrid screening. The full-length +-MITF was not suitable as bait,
since the full-length +-MITF fused to the Gal4 DNA binding domain was a
strong transactivator of reporter genes. We deleted the transactivation
domain and obtained the new construct, truncating the N-terminal 161 amino acids (aa) of MITF (MITF-(162-419). MITF-(162-419) contained the bHLH-Zip domain. MITF-(162-419) fused with the Gal4 DNA
binding domain was used as bait. Positive transformants were selected
for His autotrophy and -galactosidase assay. We isolated eighteen
positive cDNA clones. Four of the 18 clones encoded the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBC9, and one of the 18 clones encoded protein kinase C-interacting protein. UBC9 and protein kinase C-interacting protein were previously shown to associate with MITF (39,
40). One of the other clones was found to encode a part of cDNA of
a transcription factor, MAZR. MAZR consisted of 641 aa and contains a
BTB domain in the N terminus (aa 1-145) and seven zinc-finger domains
in the C terminus (aa 288-641) (30). By Northern blotting, the
expression of the MAZR gene was detected in CMCs and MST mastocytoma
cells, but was hardly detectable in Jurkat T cells (Fig.
1).

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Expression of the MAZR gene in CMCs, MST
mastocytoma cells, and Jurkat cells. The blot was hybridized with
the 32P-labeled cDNA probe of the MAZR gene or of the
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene. Three independent
experiments were done, and comparable results were obtained.
Representative findings are shown.
|
|
The interaction of MAZR to +-MITF was confirmed by two
experiments. First, MAZR fused with GFP was coexpressed with +-MITF in
NIH/3T3 cells, and their subcellular localization was examined. The
+-MITF and MAZR were colocalized in the nucleus of NIH/3T3 cells (Fig.
2A). Next, the
co-immunoprecipitation studies were performed. Myc-tagged +-MITF and
FLAG-tagged MAZR were coexpressed in 293T cells, and their nuclear
extract was analyzed. The immunoprecipitated product with anti-FLAG Ab
contained Myc-tagged +-MITF (Fig. 2B).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Interaction of MAZR with +-MITF.
A, colocalization of +-MITF and MAZR. Both +-MITF and MAZR
fused with GFP were simultaneously expressed in NIH/3T3 cells. The
cells were stained with anti-MITF Ab. The cells expressing +-MITF were
detected with the red filter, and the cells expressing MAZR
fused with GFP were detected with the green filter. An
overlay of these two expression patterns is also shown (indicated as
merge). B, co-immunoprecipitation of +-MITF and MAZR.
Myc-tagged +-MITF was cotransfected to 293T cells with FLAG-tagged
MAZR. The nuclear extract was subjected to immunoprecipitation
with anti-Myc or anti-FLAG Ab. Precipitates were separated by
SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with anti-Myc Ab. IP,
immunoprecipitation.
|
|
To identify the region of +-MITF that was required for the interaction
with MAZR, we carried out in vitro binding experiments. Various mutants of MITF were constructed (Fig.
3A). The mi-MITF deletes one arginine in the basic domain. MITF-(1-298) possesses the
Zip domain, but deletes the C-terminal region downstream of the Zip
domain. MITF-(1-260) deletes the Zip domain. The
35S-labeled normal or mutant MITF was subjected to
coprecipitation with GST or GST-MAZR fusion protein that was
immobilized on glutathione-agarose beads. Protein complexes were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The complex of +-MITF and GST-MAZR was detected,
but that of +-MITF and GST was not (Fig. 3B). The
mi-MITF and MITF-(1-298) bound GST-MAZR-coated beads but
not GST-coated beads (Fig. 3B). In contrast, MITF-(1-260), which lacked the Zip domain, did not bind GST-MAZR-coated beads (Fig.
3B).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Region of MITF that was required for the
interaction with MAZR. A, diagram of various mutant MITFs.
B, in vitro binding of various MITFs to MAZR.
35S-labeled +-MITF, 35S-labeled
mi-MITF, 35S-labeled MITF-(1-298), or
35S-labeled MITF-(1-260) was subjected to coprecipitation
with GST-MAZR or GST, which had been attached to beads, and the protein
complex was analyzed by SDS-PAGE. C, co-immunoprecipitation
of various MITFs and MAZR. Myc-tagged +-MITF, Myc-tagged
mi-MITF, or Myc-tagged MITF-(1-260) was cotransfected to
293T cells with FLAG-tagged MAZR. The whole cell extract was subjected
to immunoprecipitation with anti-Myc Ab or anti-FLAG Ab. Precipitates
were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with anti-Myc Ab. The
bands for MITF are indicated by arrowheads. The size of
Myc-tagged MITF-(1-260) was smaller than that of Myc-tagged
+-MITF or that of Myc-tagged mi-MITF because of
the truncation of the C-terminal region of MITF. IP,
immunoprecipitation.
|
|
The region required for the interaction with MAZR was also examined by
a co-immunoprecipitation study. Myc-tagged +-MITF, Myc-tagged
mi-MITF, and Myc-tagged MITF-(1-260) were coexpressed with
FLAG-tagged MAZR in 293T cells, and their whole cell lysate was
analyzed. The immunoprecipitated product with anti-FLAG Ab contained
Myc-tagged +-MITF or Myc-tagged mi-MITF, but did not contain
Myc-tagged MITF-(1-260) that lacked the Zip domain (Fig. 3C).
Next, the region of MAZR necessary for the interaction with MITF was
examined by in vitro binding experiments. MAZR deleting the
zinc-finger domain (MAZR-(1-288)), MAZR deleting the BTB domain (MAZR-(145-641)), and MAZR containing the zinc-finger domain alone (MAZR-(288-641)) were constructed (Fig.
4A). MAZR, MAZR-(145-641), and MAZR-(288-641) bound GST-+-MITF-coated beads but not GST-coated beads (Fig. 4B). In contrast, MAZR-(1-288) that lacked the
zinc-finger domain did not bind GST-+-MITF-coated beads (Fig.
4B).

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Region of MAZR that was required for the
interaction with +-MITF. A, diagram of various mutant
MAZRs. B, in vitro binding of various MAZRs to
+-MITF. 35S-labeled MAZR, 35S-labeled
MAZR-(1-288), 35S-labeled MAZR-(145-641), or
35S-labeled MAZR-(288-641) was subjected to
coprecipitation with GST-+-MITF or GST, which had been attached to
beads, and the protein complex was analyzed by SDS-PAGE.
|
|
Since the +-MITF strongly transactivated the mMCP-6 promoter in mast
cells (18), the effect of MAZR on the function of +-MITF was examined.
To examine whether the endogenous MAZR increased the amount of mMCP-6
mRNA, we used a dominant negative MAZR. The dominant negative MAZR
is a mutant that possesses only a part of the zinc-finger domain (aa
409-496). We overexpressed the dominant negative MAZR in MST cells
that expressed both mMCP-6 and MAZR mRNAs. After 6 days of culture,
the expression of mMCP-6 gene was examined by Northern blotting. The
overexpression of dominant negative MAZR significantly reduced the
amount of mMCP-6 mRNA (Fig.
5A). Next, we cotransfected
the dominant negative MAZR to MST cells with the reporter plasmid
containing the promoter region of the mMCP-6 gene. This reporter
plasmid possessed the GACCTG motif to which +-MITF bound. When various
amounts of dominant negative MAZR were cotransfected, the luciferase
activity of the reporter plasmid decreased in a
dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5B).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effect of dominant negative MAZR on the
expression of the mMCP-6 gene. A, reduced expression of
the mMCP-6 transcript by the overexpression of a dominant negative
MAZR. Total RNA was extracted from the original MST cells (indicated as
original), MST cells overexpressing 20 µg of empty
expression vector alone (indicated as vector), or MST cells
overexpressing 20 µg of the dominant negative MAZR cDNA
(indicated as dn-MAZR). The expression of mMCP-6 gene was
examined using Northern blotting. B, the effect of
coexpression of dominant negative MAZR cDNA on the luciferase
activity. The reporter plasmid that contained the mMCP-6 promoter
starting from nt 171 was cotransfected to MST cells with the
expression plasmid containing +-MITF cDNA (2 µg) and the
expression plasmid containing dominant negative MAZR cDNA (2 or 4 µg). The transfected DNA was always kept in equal amounts using the
backbone expression vector in each transfection assay. The values
represent the means ± S.E. of three experiments. In some cases,
the S.E. was too small to be shown by bars.
|
|
The functional synergy between +-MITF and MAZR was examined. To remove
the possible involvement of endogenous MITF and MAZR, we used Jurkat
cells that expressed neither MITF (19) nor MAZR. The expression plasmid
containing +-MITF cDNA and that containing MAZR cDNA were
cotransfected to Jurkat cells with the reporter plasmid used in Fig.
5B. The transfection of the plasmid containing +-MITF
cDNA alone and the transfection of the plasmid containing MAZR
cDNA alone did not increase the luciferase activity. In contrast, the simultaneous transfection of these plasmids increased the luciferase activity ~40-fold (Fig.
6).

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Synergy between +-MITF and MAZR. The
reporter plasmid contained the mMCP-6 promoter starting from nt 171.
The effector plasmid contained +-MITF or MAZR cDNA. The reporter
plasmid and the effector plasmid were cotransfected to Jurkat cells,
and the luciferase activity was measured. The effector plasmids were
used in various combinations as indicated in the figure. The
transfected DNA was always kept in equal amounts using the backbone
expression vector in each transfection assay. The values represent the
means ± S.E. of three experiments. In some cases, the S.E. was
too small to be shown by bars. *, p <.01 by t
test when compared with the luciferase activity obtained by the
transfection of the reporter plasmid alone.
|
|
Various mutants of MITF were cotransfected with MAZR. The synergy with
MAZR was not observed when mi-MITF or MITF-(1-260) deleting
the Zip domain was cotransfected (Fig.
7). Next, various mutants of MAZR were
cotransfected with +-MITF. MAZR-(145-641) and MAZR-(288-641) showed
the synergy with +-MITF, but MAZR-(1-288) deleting the zinc-finger
domain did not (Fig. 7).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Synergy between various mutant MITFs and
mutant MAZRs. Various mutant MITFs and MAZR were coexpressed in
Jurkat cells with the reporter plasmid containing the mMCP-6 promoter
used in Figs. 5 and 6. In separate transfections, the +-MITF and
various mutant MAZRs were coexpressed. The transfected DNA was always
kept in equal amounts using the backbone expression vector in each
transfection assay. The values represent the means ± S.E. of
three experiments. In some cases, the S.E. was too small to be shown by
bars. *, p <.01 by t test when compared with the
luciferase activity obtained by the transfection of the reporter
plasmid without effector plasmids.
|
|
Then, we examined the DNA element that was necessary for the synergy
between MAZR and +-MITF. The +-MITF bound the GACCTG motif in the
mMCP-6 promoter but not the mutated GTCCAG
motif (Fig. 8A) (18). The
mutation or deletion of the GACCTG motif abolished the synergy (Fig.
8B). The tetrameric fragments between nt 171 and 151
were cloned into the plasmid with the minimal mMCP-6 promoter starting
from nt 61. A significant synergy between +-MITF and MAZR was
observed in the reporter plasmid containing the tetrameric fragments
but not in the reporter plasmid containing the minimal mMCP-6 promoter
alone (Fig. 8C). No synergy was observed in the reporter
plasmid that contained the tetrameric fragments mutated at the GACCTG
motif (Fig. 8C).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Synergy between +-MITF and MAZR in various
reporter plasmids. A, the sequence of mMCP-6 promoter
between nt 171 and 151. The MITF-binding GACCTG motif is
boxed. The mutated GACCTG motif is also shown. B,
the reporter plasmid containing the GACCTG motif or the reporter
plasmid mutating or deleting the GACCTG motif was cotransfected with
the effector plasmids containing +-MITF and MAZR. C, the
reporter plasmid containing the tetrameric fragments between nt 171
and 151 upstream from the minimal mMCP-6 promoter was cotransfected
with the effector plasmids. The reporter plasmid with the tetrameric
fragments mutated in the GACCTG motif was also used. The values
represent the means ± S.E. of three experiments. In some cases,
the S.E. was too small to be shown by bars. *, p <.01 by
t test when compared with the luciferase activity obtained
by the transfection of the reporter plasmid without effector
plasmids.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
MAZR was isolated as a protein that interacted with +-MITF by
yeast two-hybrid screening. MAZR was first cloned as the protein interacting with Bach2, which is a transcription factor possessing both
the BTB domain and the b-Zip domain (30). MAZR transactivates the
c-myc gene in B cells and is important for the
development of B cells in association with Bach2 (30). In mast cells,
MAZR transactivated the mMCP-6 gene in cooperation with +-MITF. MAZR may show synergy with +-MITF in the transcription of other genes in
mast cells. MAZR appeared to play some roles in the normal phenotype
expression of mast cells in association with +-MITF.
The deletion of the zinc-finger domain of MAZR abolished the physical
interaction and functional synergy with +-MITF. This suggested that the
zinc-finger domain of MAZR was essential for the interaction with
+-MITF.
The Zip domain of MITF mediated the physical interaction and functional
synergy with MAZR. The Zip domain of cAMP-response element-binding
protein interacted with the zinc-finger domain of YY1 (41). The present
result may be another example of such interactions.
The MITF encoded by the mutant mice allele
deletes the Zip domain (3). The mMCP-6 gene was not expressed in mast
cells of mice/mice
genotype (28). Since the Zip domain of MITF mediated the interaction with MAZR, the loss of expression of the mMCP-6 gene might be attributable to the abolishment of synergy between MITF and MAZR in
mice/mice mast cells. The
MITF encoded by the mutant miew allele
(miew-MITF) deletes most of the portion of the
basic domain (3). The mMCP-6 gene was also not expressed in mast cells
of the miew/miew genotype
(29). Since the basic domain of MITF mediates the DNA binding (4), the
loss of expression of the mMCP-6 gene might be attributable to the
deficient DNA binding of the complex of
miew-MITF and MAZR in
miew/miew mast cells.
MAZR recognizes the G-rich motif of DNA (30). The consensus binding
sequence of MAZR is (G/C)GGGGGGGG(A/C)C (30). In the promoter
region of the mMCP-6 gene, there was a sequence GTGGTGGGGAC between nt
138 and 128, in which nine of 11 nucleotides were matched to the
MAZR-consensus sequence. However, this sequence was not essential for
the synergy between +-MITF and MAZR, since the synergy was observed in
the reporter plasmid containing the fragment between nt 171 and 151
alone upstream of the minimal mMCP-6 promoter. No G-rich motif was
found in the fragment between nt 171 and 151 or in the minimal
mMCP-6 promoter. The G-rich motif appeared dispensable for the synergy
between MAZR and +-MITF. Instead, the GACCTG motif between nt 166 and
161, to which +-MITF bound, was required for the synergy, since the
mutation at the GACCTG motif abolished it. The binding of +-MITF to the
GACCTG motif activated the mMCP-6 promoter, and binding of MAZR to
+-MITF might further enhance the promoter activity.
PEBP2 showed synergy with +-MITF for the transcription of the mMCP-6
gene (26). PEBP2 recognized the TGTGGTC motif, partly overlapped the MITF-binding GACCTG motif (the overlapped
nucleotides were underlined) (26). The +-MITF interacted with PEBP2
through the region upstream of the basic domain (33), whereas the
+-MITF interacted with MAZR through the Zip domain. The formation of the triple complex consisting of +-MITF, PEBP2, and MAZR might be possible. The triple complex might efficiently enhance the transcription of the mMCP-6 gene in mast cells.
Taken together, MAZR interacted with +-MITF and synergistically
transactivated the mMCP-6 promoter. MAZR appeared important for the
normal phenotypic expression of mast cells.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. S. Nagata of Osaka University
for pEF-BOS, Dr. Jeffrey D. Esko of University of California, San Diego
for MST cells, and C. Murakami for technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of
Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology and the Uehara Memorial Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-6-6879-3721;
Fax: 81-6-6879-3729, E-mail: morii@patho.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 18, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110392200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
bHLH-Zip, basic-helix-loop-helix leucine zipper;
MITF, mi
transcription factor;
CMC, cultured mast cells;
MST, mastocytoma cell
line;
PEBP, polyomavirus enhancer-binding protein;
MAZR, Myc-associated zinc-finger
protein-related factor;
BTB, broad-complex-tramtrack-bric-a-brac;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
GFP, green fluorescent protein;
Ab, antibody(ies);
nt, nucleotide(s);
aa, amino acid(s).
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Hodgkinson, C. A.,
Moore, K. J.,
Nakayama, A.,
Steingrimsson, E.,
Copeland, N. G.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
and Arnheiter, H.
(1993)
Cell.
74,
395-404[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Hughes, J. J.,
Lingrel, J. B.,
Krakowsky, J. M.,
and Anderson, K. P.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
20687-20690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Steingrimsson, E.,
Moore, K. J.,
Lamoreux, M. L.,
Ferre-D'Amare, A. R.,
Burley, S. K.,
Zimring, D. C.,
Skow, L. C.,
Hodgkinson, C. A.,
Arnheiter, H.,
Copeland, N. G.,
and Jenkins, N. A.
(1994)
Nat. Genet.
8,
256-263[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Hemesath, T. J.,
Streingrimsson, E.,
McGill, G.,
Hansen, M. J.,
Vaught, J.,
Hodgkinson, C. A.,
Arnhheiter, H.,
Copeland, N. G.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
and Fisher, D. E.
(1994)
Gene. Dev.
8,
2770-2780[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Silvers, W. K.
(1979)
The Coat Colors of Mice: a Model for Mammalian Gene Action and Interaction
, pp. 268-279, Springer-Verlag, Inc., New York, NY
|
| 6.
|
Green, M. C.
(1981)
Catalog of Mutant Genes and Polymorphic Loci
, pp. 158-161, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany
|
| 7.
|
Moore, K. J.
(1995)
Trends Genet.
11,
442-448[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Stevens, J.,
and Loutit, J. F.
(1982)
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci.
215,
405-409[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Stechschulte, D. J.,
Sharma, R.,
Dileepan, K. N.,
Simpson, K. M.,
Aggarwal, N.,
Clancy, J., Jr.,
and Jilka, R. L.
(1987)
J. Cell. Physiol.
132,
565-570[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Ebi, Y.,
Kasugai, T.,
Seino, Y.,
Onoue, H.,
Kanemoto, T.,
and Kitamura, Y.
(1990)
Blood
75,
1247-1251[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Ebi, Y.,
Kanakura, Y.,
Jippo-Kanemoto, T.,
Tsujimura, T.,
Furitsu, T.,
Ikeda, H.,
Adachi, S.,
Kasugai, T.,
Nomura, S.,
Kanayama, Y.,
and Kitamura, Y.
(1992)
Blood
80,
1454-1462[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Kasugai, T.,
Oguri, K.,
Jippo-Kanemoto, T.,
Morimoto, M.,
Yamatodani, A.,
Yoshida, K.,
Ebi, Y.,
Isozaki, K.,
Tei, H.,
Tsujimura, T.,
Nomura, S.,
Okayama, M.,
and Kitamura, Y.
(1993)
Am. J. Pathol.
143,
1337-1347[Abstract]
|
| 13.
|
Isozaki, K.,
Tsujimura, T.,
Nomura, S.,
Morii, E.,
Koshimizu, U.,
Nishimune, Y.,
and Kitamura, Y.
(1994)
Am. J. Pathol.
145,
827-836[Abstract]
|
| 14.
|
Jippo, T.,
Ushio, H.,
Hirota, S.,
Mizuno, H.,
Yamatodani, A.,
Nomura, S.,
Matsuda, H.,
and Kitamura, Y.
(1994)
Blood
84,
2977-2983[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Kim, D. K.,
Morii, E.,
Ogihara, H.,
Lee, Y. M.,
Jippo, T.,
Adachi, S.,
Maeyama, K.,
Kim, H. M.,
and Kitamura, Y.
(1999)
Blood
93,
4179-4186[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Jippo, T.,
Lee, Y. M.,
Katsu, Y.,
Tsujino, K.,
Morii, E.,
Kim, D. K.,
and Kitamura, Y.
(1999)
Blood
93,
1942-1950[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Morii, E.,
Jippo, T.,
Tsujimura, T.,
Hashimoto, K.,
Kim, D. K.,
Lee, Y. M.,
Ogihara, H.,
Tsujino, K.,
Kim, H. M.,
and Kitamura, Y.
(1997)
Blood
90,
3057-3066[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Morii, E.,
Tsujimura, T.,
Jippo, T.,
Hashimoto, K.,
Takebayashi, K.,
Tsujino, K.,
Nomura, S.,
Yamamoto, M.,
and Kitamura, Y.
(1996)
Blood
88,
2488-2494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Ogihara, H.,
Morii, E.,
Kim, D. K.,
Oboki, K.,
and Kitamura, Y.
(2001)
Blood
97,
645-651[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Tsujimura, T.,
Morii, E.,
Nozaki, M.,
Hashimoto, K.,
Moriyama, Y.,
Takebayashi, K.,
Kondo, T.,
Kanakura, Y.,
and Kitamura, Y.
(1996)
Blood
88,
1225-1233[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Jippo, T.,
Morii, E.,
Tsujino, K.,
Tsujimura, T.,
Lee, Y. M.,
Kim, D. K.,
Matsuda, H.,
Kim, H. M.,
and Kitamura, Y.
(1997)
Blood
90,
2601-2608[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Ito, A.,
Morii, E.,
Maeyama, K.,
Jippo, T.,
Kim, D. K.,
Lee, Y. M.,
Ogihara, H.,
Hashimoto, K.,
Kitamura, Y.,
and Nojima, H.
(1998)
Blood
91,
3210-3221[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Kim, D. K.,
Morii, E.,
Ogihara, H.,
Hashimoto, K.,
Oritani, K.,
Lee, Y. M.,
Jippo, T.,
Adachi, S.,
Kanakura, Y.,
and Kitamura, Y.
(1998)
Blood
92,
1973-1980[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Adachi, S.,
Morii, E.,
Kim, D.,
Ogihara, H.,
Jippo, T.,
Ito, A.,
Lee, Y. M.,
and Kitamura, Y.
(2000)
J. Immunol.
164,
855-860[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Morii, E.,
Takebayashi, K.,
Motohashi, H.,
Yamamoto, M.,
Nomura, S.,
and Kitamura, Y.
(1994)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
205,
1299-1304[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Ogihara, H.,
Kanno, T.,
Morii, E.,
Kim, D. K.,
Lee, Y. M.,
Sato, M.,
Kim, W. Y.,
Nomura, S.,
Ito, Y.,
and Kitamura, Y.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
4632-4639[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Ito, A.,
Morii, E.,
Kim, D. K.,
Kataoka, T. R.,
Jippo, T.,
Maeyama, K.,
Nojima, H.,
and Kitamura, Y.
(1999)
Blood
93,
1189-1196[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Morii, E.,
Ogihara, H.,
Kim, D. K.,
Ito, A.,
Oboki, K.,
Lee, Y. M.,
Jippo, T.,
Maeyama, K.,
Nomura, S.,
Lamoreux, M. L.,
and Kitamura, Y.
(2001)
Blood
97,
2038-2044[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Morii, E.,
Ogihara, H.,
Oboki, K.,
Kataoka, T. R.,
Maeyama, K.,
Fisher, D. E.,
Lamoreux, M. L.,
and Kitamura, Y.
(2001)
Blood
98,
2577-2579[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Kobayashi, A.,
Yamagiwa, H.,
Hoshino, H.,
Muto, A.,
Sato, K.,
Morita, M.,
Hayashi, N.,
Yamamoto, M.,
and Igarashi, K.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
1733-1746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Montgomery, R. I.,
Lidholt, K.,
Flay, N. W.,
Liang, J.,
Vertel, B.,
Lindahl, U,
and Esko, J. D.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
11327-11331[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Mizushima, S.,
and Nagata, S.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
5322[Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Morii, E.,
Ogihara, H.,
Kanno, T.,
Kim, D. K.,
Nomura, S.,
Ito, Y.,
and Kitamura, Y.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm.
261,
53-57[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Morii, E.,
Ogihara, H.,
Oboki, K.,
Sawa, C.,
Sakuma, T.,
Nomura, S.,
Esko, J. D.,
Handa, H.,
and Kitamura, Y.
(2001)
Blood
97,
3032-3039[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Auffray, C.,
and Rougenon, F.
(1980)
Eur. J. Biochem.
107,
303-314[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Reynolds, D. S.,
Gurley, D. S.,
Austen, K. F.,
and Serafin, W. E.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
3847-3853[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Sabath, D. E.,
Broome, H. E.,
and Prystowsky, M. B.
(1990)
Gene
91,
185-191[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Takebayashi, K.,
Chida, K.,
Tsukamoto, I.,
Morii, E.,
Munakata, H.,
Arnheiter, H.,
Kuroki, T.,
Kitamura, Y.,
and Nomura, S.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
1203-1211[Abstract]
|
| 39.
|
Xu, U.,
Gong, L.,
Haddad, M. M.,
Biscof, O.,
Campisi, J.,
Yeh, E. T. H.,
and Medrano, E. E.
(2000)
Exp. Cell Res.
255,
135-143[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Razin, E.,
Zhang, Z. C.,
Nechushtan, H.,
Frenkel, S.,
Lee, Y. N.,
Arudchandran, R.,
and Rivela, J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
34272-34276[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Zhou, Q.,
Gedrich, R. W.,
and Engel, D. A.
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
4323-4330[Abstract]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Chin, L. A. Garraway, and D. E. Fisher
Malignant melanoma: genetics and therapeutics in the genomic era.
Genes & Dev.,
August 15, 2006;
20(16):
2149 - 2182.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Funaba, T. Ikeda, M. Murakami, K. Ogawa, K. Tsuchida, H. Sugino, and M. Abe
Transcriptional Activation of Mouse Mast Cell Protease-7 by Activin and Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Is Inhibited by Microphthalmia-associated Transcription Factor
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 26, 2003;
278(52):
52032 - 52041.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Levy, A. Sonnenblick, and E. Razin
Role Played by Microphthalmia Transcription Factor Phosphorylation and Its Zip Domain in Its Transcriptional Inhibition by PIAS3
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
December 15, 2003;
23(24):
9073 - 9080.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Di, J. Li, Y. Zhang, X. He, H. Lu, D. Xu, J. Ling, K. Huo, D. Wan, Y.-Y. Li, et al.
HCC-Associated Protein HCAP1, a Variant of GEMIN4, Interacts with Zinc-Finger Proteins
J. Biochem.,
June 1, 2003;
133(6):
713 - 718.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Ito, T. Jippo, T. Wakayama, E. Morii, Y.-i. Koma, H. Onda, H. Nojima, S. Iseki, and Y. Kitamura
SgIGSF: a new mast-cell adhesion molecule used for attachment to fibroblasts and transcriptionally regulated by MITF
Blood,
April 1, 2003;
101(7):
2601 - 2608.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|