![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 11, 8827-8834, March 15, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
,
, and
§¶
From the
Renal Division, Washington University School
of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 and the § Department
of Physiology and Cell Biology, College of Medicine and Public Health,
The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
Received for publication, December 14, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The proton-translocating vacuolar ATPase
(V-ATPase) acidifies the endocytic network of eukaryotic cells.
Although all eukaryotic cell types require low to moderate levels of
V-ATPase, some proton-secreting cells express amplified levels for use
in specialized membrane domains. To characterize genetic elements
required for this heightened expression, we studied transcription and
stability of mRNA encoding the V-ATPase c subunit in a low
expressing fibroblast cell line (NIH 3T3) and a high expressing
macrophage cell line (RAW 264.7). Isolation of the promoter and mapping
of the transcriptional start site indicated that the c subunit promoter
is TATA-less and initiates transcription at a single site. Promoter
activity was regulated through the same transcription factor binding
sites in both cell types, which showed no discernible difference in
rates of c subunit transcription. In contrast, c subunit transcripts
showed markedly greater stability in RAW cells than in 3T3 cells, as
did other constitutively expressed V-ATPase subunit transcripts. Only
the B and `a' subunits, which are expressed in multiple isoforms, were not regulated solely by mRNA stability. These results suggest that overall expression levels of the V-ATPase are set primarily by
regulation of mRNA stability and that transcriptional mechanisms determine subunit composition in varying cell types.
The proton-translocating vacuolar ATPase
(V-ATPase)1 utilizes energy
of ATP hydrolysis to transport protons across cellular membranes. In
eukaryotic cells, the action of V-ATPase is required for acidification
of the endocytic network, and thus is crucial for protein processing,
degradation, and trafficking. Two functionally and structurally
distinct domains compose this enzyme (1). The V1, or
catalytic domain, contains the site of ATP hydrolysis and includes
eight distinct polypeptide subunits. The V0, or
membrane-spanning domain, is composed of up to five distinct
polypeptides and forms the pore through which protons traverse the
membrane. The most abundant proteins of the V0 domain are
highly hydrophobic proteolipids that form hexameric rings within cell
membranes (2). Although all eukaryotic cells require the V-ATPase for
normal cellular function, some specialized, proton-secreting cells such
as macrophages, osteoclasts, and renal tubule cells, express the enzyme
at high levels on their plasma membranes and specialized intracellular compartments. Osteoclasts and renal intercalated cells shuttle V-ATPases between intracellular stores and the plasma membrane in
response to extracellular stimuli (3, 4), whereas macrophages require
high levels of V-ATPase for acidification of phagocytic vacuoles (5)
and regulation of intracellular pH (6, 7). In addition, these cells and
others that utilize V-ATPases for specialized purposes often express
tissue-restricted isoforms of a few V-ATPase subunits. The B subunit, a
component of the V1 domain, is expressed as two isoforms,
designated B1 and B2 (8, 9). Although B2 is widely expressed, B1 is
restricted to a few tissues, including kidney-intercalated cells (10)
and cells of the inner ear (11). In addition, the `a' subunit
of the V0 domain is expressed as three isoforms, designated
a1-a3 (12, 13), and a more recently discovered human form, referred to
here as a4 (14). Biochemical (15-17) and genetic data (11, 14, 18)
indicate that both the B and a subunit isoforms are involved in
intracellular targeting of V-ATPases and most likely are critical for
transport to specialized membrane domains. Mutations in the B1, a3, and
a4 isoforms cause human disease states, including malignant
osteopetrosis (18-20) and renal tubular acidosis (11, 14).
Side-by-side comparisons of V-ATPase protein and mRNA for low and
high expressing tissues show that subunit protein levels generally
correlate with subunit mRNA levels, indicating that overall enzyme
amounts are controlled by steady-state mRNA expression (10, 21). In
addition, V-ATPase subunit mRNAs appear to be tandemly regulated.
In previous studies, we found that the stoichiometry of V-ATPase
mRNAs in bone marrow cultures reflected the stoichiometry of
V-ATPase subunits in intact enzyme complexes (22). mRNA transcripts for subunits that are present in multiple copies in an intact V-ATPase were expressed at higher levels than mRNA transcripts for those subunits present in single copies. Furthermore, subunit levels appear to change in tandem during cellular processes that increase V-ATPase levels, such as cell differentiation (22, 23). These
results suggest that expression of V-ATPase subunits is tightly
controlled and that there may exist a universal mechanism that
regulates expression levels of all subunits in a coordinated manner.
Based on these data, we began to examine mRNA transcription and
stability for one V-ATPase subunit in an effort to define the control
mechanisms that mediate overall expression levels. We chose the
proteolipid c subunit, because it is ubiquitously expressed, and the
corresponding mRNA transcript is highly abundant (22, 24),
facilitating analysis of its expression. We isolated the murine c
subunit promoter and assayed transcription factor binding and promoter
activity in two mouse cell lines, NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, and RAW 264.7 macrophages. Although macrophages express 6- to 8-fold more V-ATPase
than fibroblasts, we found no difference in relative promoter activity
or in the transcription factors used by each cell line. However, the c
subunit mRNAs exhibited a greatly enhanced stability in RAW 264.7 cells, accounting for the differences in cellular expression levels.
All other subunits tested showed similarly enhanced mRNA
half-lives, with the exception of the B2 subunit. In addition, the a
subunits appear to be regulated at least in part by transcriptional
control. These data suggest that transcriptional control may determine
the subunit content of the V-ATPase, whereas regulation of mRNA
stability determines its overall expression levels.
Isolation of the c Subunit Promoter--
A DNA fragment of 116 bp, comprising a portion of the first exon of the human c subunit gene,
was used to screen a pre-arrayed mouse genomic BAC library (Incyte
Genomics, Palo Alto, CA). BAC clones that gave a positive signal in the
initial screen were digested with multiple restriction enzymes and
reprobed with the same 116-bp DNA fragment. Positive bands were cloned
into the plasmid pBluescript KS+ (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA)
for further experiments. Putative promoter regions were characterized
by sequencing the first exon and surrounding regions, using the ABI
Prism dRhodamine Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit (PE Biosystems, Foster
City, CA). Sequencing reactions were analyzed by the Protein and
Nucleic Acid Chemistry Laboratory at the Washington University School
of Medicine.
Primer Extension Analysis--
An antisense oligonucleotide
primer of the sequence 5'-GAAAAACGAAGAATATTCGG-3', corresponding to c
subunit base pairs 23-42 (relative to the translational start), was
synthesized and end-labeled with [ Luciferase Reporter Constructs and Transfections--
Promoter
fragments were subcloned into the firefly luciferase-encoding vector
pGL3-basic (Promega, Madison, WI). All fragments of clone L5 contained
the entire 5'-untranslated region (up to bp +158) and were truncated at
upstream sequences. Deletions were performed by PCR and confirmed by
DNA sequence analysis.
NIH 3T3, RAW 264.7, and LLC-PK1 cells were obtained from
the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and were grown in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Invitrogen, Rockville, MD)
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and penicillin/streptomycin at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. IC-21 cells also were
obtained from the American Types Culture Collection but were grown in
RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 10 mM
Hepes, and penicillin/streptomycin. Transfection was performed using
the SuperFect reagent (Qiagen Inc.). Cells in 60-mm dishes at 50% confluence were transfected with ~1 µg of DNA. Promoter fragments in pGL3 were co-transfected at a ratio of 5:1 with the plasmid pRL-CMV
(Promega, Madison, WI) as an internal standard for transfection efficiency. The total concentration of plasmid added to the
transfection mixture was kept constant in all experiments. Luciferase
activity was quantified using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay system (Promega) and a Zylux FB12 tube luminometer, according to the manufacturers' recommendations.
Gel Mobility Shifts and Supershifts--
Nuclear extracts from
NIH 3T3 and RAW 264.7 cells were isolated as described (26).
Double-stranded oligonucleotide probes were 32P-labeled
using T4 polynucleotide kinase and purified over a G-50 NICK Spin
column (Amersham Biosciences, Inc., Piscataway, NJ). Six micrograms of
nuclear extract either alone or premixed for 10 min with 100×
competitor oligonucleotide were added to 50,000 cpm of probe, and
incubated 20 min at room temperature prior to gel electrophoresis. For
supershifts, extracts were mixed with 50,000 cpm of probe for 30 min at
4 °C, then 4 µg of purified antibody was added and incubated for
an additional 30 min at 4 °C. Antibodies against the Sp1 and AP-2
families of transcription factors were obtained from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Reactions were run in precast 1× TBE
minigels containing 5% acrylamide (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).
Nuclear Run-off Analysis--
Preparation of NIH 3T3 and RAW
264.7 nuclei and radiolabeling of nascent transcripts were performed as
described (27). Radiolabeled RNA was isolated using RNAzol (Tel-Test,
Inc., Friendswood, TX) followed by ethanol precipitation in the
presence of ammonium acetate to remove unincorporated nucleotides.
Radiolabeled RNA samples from 3T3 and RAW cell nuclei were adjusted to
equal counts/min and were added to nitrocellulose membranes to which 5 µg of linearized, denatured plasmid had been applied using a slotted
filtration manifold (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Hybridization and washing
of the membrane strips were performed as previously described (27).
Actinomycin D Treatment and Northern Blotting--
NIH 3T3 or
RAW 264.7 cells were treated over time with 5 µg/ml actinomycin D
(Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). Total RNA was prepared using
RNAzol (Tel-Test Inc.), following the manufacturer's instructions.
Five micrograms of each RNA sample was separated in a formaldehyde gel
system as previously described (23), and the RNA was transferred to
GeneScreen Plus membrane (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Boston, MA). The
blots were probed with 32P-labeled cDNA fragments of
various murine V-ATPase subunits generated by reverse transcription-PCR
from murine marrow cultures, as previously described (22), as well as
32P-labeled probes for murine Immunoblots and Immunocytochemistry--
Polyclonal antiserum
generated against a C-terminal peptide of the a1 subunit was a kind
gift of Dr. Xiao-Song Xie (University of Texas-Southwestern Medical
Center, Dallas, TX). Antiserum derived against the V-ATPase a3 subunit
was generously provided by Dr. Jan Mattsson (AstraZeneca Corp.,
Sweden). Polyclonal antiserum against the B2 subunit was described
previously (28). For immunoblots, equivalent amounts of whole cell
lysates from NIH 3T3 and RAW 264.7 cells were run in 10% SDS-PAGE gels
(Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) under standard conditions. Proteins were
transferred to Hybond-P membranes (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.) and
probed with antisera at the following dilutions: a1, 1:5000; a3,
1:1250; B2, 1:1000. Primary antibodies were detected using horseradish
peroxidase-coupled secondary antibodies (Southern Biotechnology,
Birmingham, AL) and chemiluminescence detection reagents (Pierce,
Rockford, IL). Results were visualized using a Chemi-Doc image analysis
system (Bio-Rad).
For immunostaining, IC-21 cells were plated on glass coverslips and,
after an overnight incubation, were fixed and permeabilized in a
solution containing 2% formaldehyde, 0.2% Triton X-100, and 0.5%
deoxycholate in a physiological salt solution. Free aldehydes were
quenched using 10 mM sodium borohydride, and the cells were preblocked in a solution of 0.8% bovine serum albumin, 0.1% gelatin, and 10 µg/ml goat IgG in phosphate-buffered saline. Primary
antibodies were then added in a solution of 0.08% bovine serum
albumin, 0.01% gelatin, and 1 µg/ml goat IgG in phosphate-buffered
saline. Following a 2-h incubation, cells were washed and incubated
with Alexa 568-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies
(Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for 1 h. After further washing, the
coverslips were mounted on slides in a mixture of 9 parts glycerol/1
part phosphate-buffered saline plus an anti-fading reagent.
Cells were visualized using a Nikon Eclipse E800 microscope and
SPOT image analysis software (Diagnostic Instruments, Sterling
Heights, MI).
Isolation and Sequencing of the c Subunit Exon I and 5'-Flanking
Regions--
Five positive clones from a murine BAC library were
identified using a 116-bp DNA fragment from the first exon of the human c subunit gene. Following digestion of these clones with multiple restriction enzymes and Southern blotting, subclones were generated for
further study. Three were identified that contained the putative first
exon and promoter region of the c subunit gene. These subclones included pL5, an 8-kb BamHI fragment; pD6, a 9-kb
BamHI fragment; and pP10R, a 9-kb EcoRI fragment.
DNA sequencing analysis revealed that pL5 contained the first exon of
the c gene, with a consensus intron boundary at the same position as
that found in the human gene (29). In contrast, pD6 encoded the entire
c subunit coding region without introns, and its upstream sequence
contained a long stretch of sequence corresponding to retroviral long
terminal repeats. These results indicate that clone pD6 represents a
pseudogene resulting from an event of retroviral reverse transcription
and integration. Clone pP10R also encoded the c subunit without
introns; however, the putative promoter region of pP10R was unlike that of pD6, indicating that it may represent a second pseudogene.
To examine this possibility that pL5 might represent a true c subunit
gene fragment, we isolated regions of the three clones upstream of
their coding sequences, fused them to a firefly luciferase reporter,
and assayed their relative activities as promoters. As shown in Table
I, the upstream fragment of pP10R showed
no activity higher than the vector alone (pGL3-basic). Although pD6 elicited some activity, pL5 was by far the strongest promoter, with
activity comparable to the CMV promoter. These data, coupled with the
sequence information above, strongly suggested that clone pL5 contained
the true c subunit promoter elements.
Fig. 1A illustrates a
restriction map of the 8-kb L5 clone, whereas Fig. 1B shows
the nucleotide sequence of ~1.1 kb beginning in the 5'-flanking
region and ending at the base immediately upstream of the coding
region.2 Nucleotides are
numbered relative to the site of transcription initiation, which were
determined as discussed below.
Transcription of the c Subunit mRNA Initiates at a Single Site
via an Initiator (Inr) Element--
To pinpoint the transcriptional
start site(s) of the c subunit, the 5'-end of the native c subunit
transcript was mapped by primer extension analysis. A strong band was
produced (Fig. 2, arrow) that
indicated transcriptional initiation 158 bases upstream of the
translation start site, in the sequence 5'-CCATCTT-3', where the adenosine residue represents the start of transcription. A
second experiment with a primer ~100 bp upstream of the one used in
Fig. 2 gave the same results (data not shown). This start sequence
corresponds well, although not perfectly, to the loose consensus
sequence for an initiator (Inr) box,
5'-Py2AN(T/A)Py2-3', where Py = pyrimidine (30). No corresponding TATA box was evident 25-30 bp
upstream of the transcription initiation site (see Fig. 1B).
Although most abundantly expressed genes contain TATA boxes, Inr
elements can serve as functional analogs in directing transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II (31).
A GC Box Is Necessary for Full Expression in 3T3 Fibroblasts and
RAW Macrophages--
To determine the promoter elements required for
expression of the c subunit, portions of the L5 clone upstream of the
coding region were subcloned in the firefly luciferase expression
vector pGL3-basic. All constructs included the entire 5'-untranslated region and were truncated at various points upstream (see Fig. 3A). Fig. 3 shows the
activities of these promoter fragments in 3T3 (Fig. 3B,
left panel) and RAW 264.7 (right panel) cells.
The overall pattern of expression in the two cell types was highly similar; fragments
As shown in Fig. 3B, the activity of the c subunit promoter,
relative to the CMV-driven internal standard, was higher in 3T3 cells
than in RAW 264.7; however, these data cannot be taken as measurements
of absolute activity, because the strength of the CMV promoter varies
among cell types. To more accurately measure the relative
transcriptional activity of the c subunit promoter in fibroblasts and
macrophages, we performed nuclear run-off analysis. Nuclei were
prepared from both cell types, and transcription was permitted to
proceed in the presence of [32P]UTP. Equal numbers of
radiolabeled RNA were added to membrane strips containing cDNA
probes for either the c subunit, or the cloning vector pBluescript II
KS (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) as a negative control. As shown in Fig.
3C, radiolabeled c subunit mRNAs were detected at equal
levels in both 3T3 and RAW cells, indicating that c subunit
transcription in these cells represents equivalent fractions of overall
transcription. Although interpretation of this experiment requires the
assumption that the overall levels of RNA synthesis do not differ
dramatically between the two cell types, this result further suggests
that activity of the c subunit promoter is similar in both fibroblasts
and macrophages.
To determine the identity of factors that bind to the GC box, we
performed gel mobility shift assays using nuclear extracts from both
3T3 and RAW 264.7 cells. Fig.
4A shows extracts probed with
oligonucleotides encompassing the wild-type c subunit GC box
(5'-CCCGTGGGGGCGGGGACAGATC-3'). Three bands, designated
A-C, were shifted when extracts from either cell type were used
(lanes 2 and 6). Preincubating the nuclear
extracts with unlabeled competitor oligonucleotides corresponding to
the c subunit GC box (lanes 3 and 7) prior to the
addition of probe resulted in loss of all three bands. Similar results
were obtained when extracts were preincubated with a GC box containing
different flanking sequences (5'-ATTCGATCGGGGCGGGGCGAG-3',
obtained from Promega). In contrast, addition of unlabeled competitor
oligonucleotides corresponding to a mutated c subunit GC box
(5'-CCCGTGGGaataaGGACAGATC-3') did not abolish the bands in
question. These data indicate that the proteins responsible for the
mobility shift are likely to be related to the Sp1 family of
transcription factors.
To positively identify the proteins bound to the c subunit GC box, we
performed supershift analysis on nuclear extracts from both 3T3 and RAW
264.7 cells (Fig. 4B). Antibodies against transcription factors Sp1 and Sp3 were included in standard mobility shift reactions, as were antibodies against two members of a different class of transcription factors that also recognize GC-rich sequences, AP-2 The c Subunit mRNA Shows Greater Stability in RAW 264.7 Cells
Than in NIH 3T3 Cells--
As shown by the above experiments, RAW
264.7 and NIH 3T3 cells utilize the same promoter elements and
transcription factors to initiate transcription of the c subunit
mRNA. Furthermore, nuclear run-off analysis showed that levels of
transcription were similar in both cell types. This was somewhat
surprising, given the difference in steady-state levels of c subunit
mRNA between RAW and 3T3 cells. We surmised that this disparity
might be accounted for by different rates of mRNA decay. A role for
stability in control of V-ATPase mRNA levels was further suggested
by the finding that V-ATPase mRNAs typically contain long (up to
>1 kb), highly conserved 3'-untranslated
regions,3 which are often
mediators of transcript stability (34).
To investigate this possibility, cells were treated with actinomycin D,
an inhibitor of RNA polymerase II, and mRNA levels were examined by
Northern analysis. In both cell types, the c subunit mRNA was found
to be relatively long-lived, with little to no degradation after 4 h of treatment. However, although the c subunit transcript was
decreased by ~75% in 3T3 cells after 24 h of actinomycin D, no
change was seen in RAW cells after the same length of time (Fig.
5A). To ensure the activity of
actinomycin D in RAW cells, we reprobed the blot with a cDNA
corresponding to mouse
To determine whether other V-ATPase subunits showed enhanced stability
in RAW 264.7 cells, we performed similar experiments using probes
against various V-ATPase subunit mRNAs. Fig. 5B shows total RNA from actinomycin D-treated cells that was
hybridized to cDNA probes corresponding to subunits E and F, which
are components of all murine V-ATPases, and to three subunit
isoforms, B2, a1, and a3. Like the c subunit mRNA, the E, F, and a1
mRNAs showed enhanced stability in RAW 264.7 cells. Subunit a3,
which is expressed primarily in cells of the monocyte-macrophage
lineage, was not detectable in NIH 3T3 cells under these conditions;
nevertheless, the a3 mRNA was highly stable in RAW 264.7 cells. In
contrast, the mRNA encoding B2 did not show enhanced stability in
the macrophage line, even though steady-state levels were higher in RAW
cells than in 3T3 cells. From two independent experiments, the average half-life for the B2 subunit mRNA in 3T3 cells was calculated as
13.9 h, and in RAW 264.7 cells, 14.3 h. Because the
differences in steady-state levels of B2 mRNA cannot be accounted
for by message stability, this subunit must be transcribed at a greater
rate in the macrophage line. These data are consistent with our
previous observation that B2 subunit is regulated by transcriptional
mechanisms during macrophage differentiation (23).
Although stability of the a1 mRNA is higher in RAW 264.7 cells than
in NIH 3T3 cells, both cell types express similar levels of this
mRNA (note the "0" time points for a1 in Fig. 5B),
indicating that transcriptional controls also may play a role in its
expression. Furthermore, the highly tissue-restricted nature of the a3
subunit (12, 13) suggests that specific mediators (such as
transcription factors) may be responsible for its expression in
macrophages, although our stability data cannot directly address this
matter. (We were unable to detect a2 mRNA in macrophage
preparations, and a4 is specific to only a few distinct cell types
(14).) It is noteworthy that the a1 mRNA (uniquely, out of the
V-ATPase mRNAs tested) was not expressed at higher levels in the
macrophage cell line than in the fibroblasts. This suggests that
increased levels of V-ATPase in macrophages over fibroblasts is
accounted for by a3-containing complexes, which may play a specialized
role in macrophages, as they do in a related cell type, the osteoclast (18-20). To explore this hypothesis further, we performed immunoblots of a1 and a3 on NIH 3T3 and RAW 264.7 lysates to determine whether protein levels of these subunits mirrored their corresponding mRNA
levels. As shown in Fig. 6A,
both a3 and B2 proteins were increased in RAW cells over 3T3 cells, as
expected from their respective Northern analysis. The a1 subunit
protein levels also appeared to be determined by mRNA levels in the
two cell types, because immunoblot analysis showed roughly equivalent
expression in both cells.
Because macrophages and fibroblasts appear to express similar amounts
of a1-containing V-ATPases, we surmised that this form of the enzyme
may represent a constitutive "housekeeping" form, and that
a3-containing complexes might represent a V-ATPase specialized for
macrophage-specific functions. We next performed immunostaining of
macrophages with antibodies derived against a1 and a3 to determine whether V-ATPases containing these isoforms may reside in different intracellular compartments. RAW 264.7 cells in culture are round and
somewhat indistinct in morphology, so these studies were performed on
another murine macrophage cell line, IC-21, which exhibits a morphology
closer to that of primary macrophages. Fig. 6B shows two
typical IC-21 cells stained for a1 (top panels) and two
stained for a3 (bottom panels). We previously had noted that
staining of macrophages for another V-ATPase subunit, B2, resulted in a tubulovesicular pattern, as well as prominent staining at the leading
edge (28). In this study, the a1 and a3 isoforms each appear to compose
a subset of the B2 staining. First, a1 staining was most apparent as a
punctate, vesicular pattern that was fairly evenly distributed
throughout the cytoplasm, and was prominent at the leading edge of
motile macrophages (arrows). In contrast, a3 staining was
heavy near the nucleus, radiating throughout the cytoplasm in tubular
structures (arrows), and was present at the edge of the
cells only in a fine, punctate pattern. Although it is not the purpose
of this study to define the respective roles of these isoforms in
macrophages, these data, coupled with the expression data, suggest that
a3-containing complexes account for the bulk of V-ATPases over that
required for housekeeping functions in macrophages, and that these
complexes may play a specialized role in these cells.
Although all eukaryotic cells require low to moderate levels of
V-ATPase to acidify their endocytic networks, specialized, proton-secreting cells such as kidney tubule epithelia, macrophages, and osteoclasts express levels of the enzyme that are greater by an
order of magnitude or more. For these cells, amplified levels of the
enzyme are required to create a pool that is available for expression
at the plasma membrane and other membranous compartments (such as
phagosomes) while still maintaining the housekeeping function in the
endocytic network. In this study, we compared the promoter activity and
mRNA stability of a ubiquitous V-ATPase subunit in both a high
expressing and low expressing cell type. This study marks the first
comprehensive effort to define the genetic elements required for
cell-specific expression levels of the V-ATPase.
Because the V-ATPase is composed of 13 distinct polypeptides in a
highly ordered structure that may differ from one tissue to the next,
it would seem advantageous to a cell to tightly regulate V-ATPase
subunit synthesis to conserve resources. As the cDNAs for V-ATPase
subunits have become available, screening of various tissues by Western
and Northern blotting showed that mRNA levels reflect those of the
translated protein, indicating that subunit levels are controlled at
least in part at the level of mRNA expression. Our previous studies
suggested further that V-ATPase mRNAs are expressed in the same
stoichiometry as V-ATPase subunits (22) and that increases in V-ATPase
expression are mediated by coordinated up-regulation of all subunit
mRNAs (22, 23). These results underscored the role of mRNA
control mechanisms in regulating V-ATPase expression levels and
suggested the existence of a universal mechanism that could regulate
all subunits in tandem. Our current findings indicate that control of
mRNA stability may provide this mechanism. With the exception of
the B2 subunit (and possibly a3), all V-ATPase transcripts exhibited
increased stability in macrophages, compared with fibroblasts. In
addition to the findings presented here using our macrophage model
system, we also tested the stability of several V-ATPase subunit
mRNAs in a kidney proximal tubule cell line that expresses high
levels of the enzyme. We found that the mRNAs similarly showed
enhanced stability in the kidney cells (data not shown); thus, this may
be a universal mechanism for regulation of the V-ATPase in
proton-secreting cells.
Extremely long-lived mRNAs often are associated with differentiated
cells that require an accumulation of protein species specific to their
function. For example, globin mRNAs accumulate to 95% of the total
cellular mRNAs in erythrocytes as a consequence of their extreme
stability (t1/2 > 24 h (38)). Similarly,
V-ATPase transcripts can represent a large proportion of cellular
mRNAs in proton-secreting cells. Random sequencing of an osteoclast
cDNA library showed the V-ATPase c subunit to be one of the two
most abundant mRNA species in the cell (24).
The V-ATPase promoters characterized so far share the property of
initiating transcription from TATA-less promoters. These promoters are
often associated with "housekeeping" genes; that is, those encoding
products that are essential to eukaryotic cell survival. Although the
V-ATPase fits this definition, there is a great degree of promoter
variability among the subunits studied. The c subunit gene contains the
simplest arrangement of promoter elements, with an Inr box and a
Sp1-binding site about 30 bp upstream. In contrast, promoters of the B2
and B1 isoforms are arranged in a more complicated organization. The B2
gene contains a TATA-less promoter that is characterized by a high G+C
content and lacks an Inr sequence (23), an arrangement often found in
genes regulated by the cell cycle (39). Moreover, the activator
elements of the B2 promoter (overlapping Sp1 and AP-2 sites) reside
downstream of the site for transcription initiation (23, 40). The B1 gene, also lacking a TATA box, contains consensus Inr sequences and is
marked by long GA/CT sequences proximal to the potential start
sites.4
Expression of the B2 isoform in macrophages is unusual among V-ATPase
subunits examined in this and previous studies perhaps because of its
association with the cytoskeleton and potential role in intracellular
trafficking (15, 16, 23). Here, we showed that, unlike other subunits
tested, B2 mRNA did not show enhanced stability in macrophages over
fibroblasts. This result is consistent with previous work in which we
examined the regulation of several V-ATPase subunits during
monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation (23). During this process,
overall V-ATPase content increased about 4-fold. However, nuclear
run-off analysis showed that transcriptional controls mediated this
increase only for B2, but not other subunits, which were regulated by
post-transcriptional mechanisms. Thus, in macrophages, B2 appears to be
primarily under transcriptional control.
Although mRNA stability may be mediated by sequences throughout the
transcript, it is most often mediated by portions of the 3'-untranslated region (3'-UTR). Although many eukaryotic genes possess
3'-UTRs of less than 100 bp, V-ATPase subunit genes (with a few
exceptions) contain extremely long 3'-UTRs of up to more than 1 kb. In
addition, these regions tend to be more highly conserved than the
3'-UTRs of many eukaryotic genes, with regions of over 85% identity
between human and rodent sequences.3 Thus, V-ATPase 3'-UTRs
are likely candidates to mediate the extreme stability of mRNAs in
macrophages and other cell types. Additionally, in osteoclasts, a cell
type that targets V-ATPase to an apical ruffled membrane, V-ATPase
mRNAs were shown to be targeted toward this membrane domain during
the cell's active, polarized state (41). Targeting of mRNAs in
such a manner universally has been attributed to sequences in 3'-UTRs
that contain signals for localization mediated by cytoskeletal
components (42), and such interactions may modulate mRNA half-life.
Therefore, the 3'-UTRs of V-ATPase mRNAs may contain a wealth of
genetic information that mediates expression of this functionally
diverse enzyme.
Macrophages express greater levels of all subunit mRNAs and
proteins tested in this study, with the exception of the a1 subunit. Levels of a1 in macrophages were equivalent to those found in fibroblasts, which appear to utilize the V-ATPase only for
constitutive, housekeeping functions. These results suggest that the
additional V-ATPases of macrophages contain the a3 subunit and may be
utilized for a function specific to macrophage physiology. A close
relative of macrophages, the osteoclast, appears to use a3-containing
V-ATPases to shuttle between intracellular stores and the plasma
membrane, as required for regulated proton extrusion and resorption of
bone (18-20). The differences in distribution between a1 and a3 (as shown in Fig. 6B) strongly suggest differential functions
for these two forms in macrophages, most likely relating to their roles
in immunity and proton secretion. Further experiments on this subject
should provide significant insights into specialized membrane domains
of the macrophage.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]ATP using T4
polynucleotide kinase. Total RNA was purified from mouse kidney using
the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA). Primer extension
reactions were performed as described previously (25), and the products
were analyzed in a conventional 6% polyacrylamide gel containing 1×
TBE (0.09 M Tris borate, 2 mM EDTA, pH 8.3) with a DNA sequencing ladder as the molecular weight standard.
-actin and murine 18 S
rRNA (both from Ambion, Austin, TX). Final washing conditions for
all probes were 0.2× SSC, 1% SDS, at 65 °C. Hybridized probe
was quantified using phosphorimaging and ImageQuaNT software (Molecular
Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Relative activities of putative c subunit promoter fragments

View larger version (46K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Restriction map and sequence of the c subunit
promoter. A, a restriction map of the L5 subclone is
shown with the position of the first exon. B, the sequence
of the c subunit 5'-untranslated region (underlined) and 1.1 kb of the 5'-flanking region are shown. The GC box centered at
34
(see below) is boxed.
![]()
View larger version (9K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Mapping the 5'-end of the c subunit
mRNA. Total cellular mouse kidney RNA was allowed to anneal to
an oligonucleotide primer corresponding to a sequence within the first
exon of the c subunit, and the primer was extended with reverse
transcriptase. A single strong band of 200 bp was produced. Band sizes
were determined by running an unrelated dideoxynucleotide termination
sequencing reaction as a size marker adjacent to the primer extension
reaction (not shown).
571 to +158,
145 to +158, and
88 to +158 produced the highest activity. The longest fragment tested,
1.7 kb to
+158, was only half as active, suggesting potential negative regulatory
elements in the region from
1.7 to
571 kb. However, deletion of
regions downstream of
88 produced the most dramatic change in
promoter activity levels. As expected, removal of the transcriptional
start site (fragment +3 to +158) caused a complete ablation of promoter
activity. More significantly, deletion of sequences between
88 and
31 produced greater than 90% loss in promoter activity in both cell
types. Inspection of this region for promoter element consensus
sequences resulted in identification of a single GC box (GGGGCGGGG)
centered at
34 (Fig. 1B). An identical sequence was found
in the human gene centered at
36, further suggesting a role for this
region in regulation of the c subunit gene (32). Because GC/GT boxes,
the cognate binding sequences for the Sp1 family of transcription
factors, are often critical components of TATA-less promoters (31), we
mutated this site to GGaataaGG and determined activity of the resulting
fragment. As illustrated in Fig. 3, construct
88 to +158/mutGC showed
activity similar to the construct in which the majority of the GC box
was deleted (
31 to +158), indicating that this site is a primary element required for basal expression of the c subunit in both 3T3 and
RAW 264.7 cells.

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Transcriptional activity of the c subunit
promoter. A, the deletion constructs used in this
experiment are schematized, with the positions of the GC box and the
transcriptional start site noted. B, left panel,
the relative activities of the promoter constructs transfected into NIH
3T3 cells are shown. Activities were normalized against activity of
plasmid pRL-CMV (Promega), which utilizes the cytomegalovirus
enhancer/promoter region. B, right panel,
activities of the same promoter constructs are shown in RAW 264.7 cells, also normalized against activity of pRL-CMV. For transfections,
n
4; the mean ± S.E. are shown. C,
nuclei were isolated from 3T3 and RAW cells, and transcription was
permitted to proceed in the presence of [32P]UTP. RNA was
isolated from these nuclei and equal cpm were hybridized to cDNA
probes for the V-ATPase c subunit and the cloning vector pBluescript
pKS (bottom). Both 3T3 and RAW cells showed equivalent
levels of c subunit transcription.

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Gel mobility shift analysis of critical
transcription factors in c subunit promoter activity.
A, nuclear extracts (in equal amounts) from NIH 3T3 and RAW
264.7 cells were mixed with a 32P-labeled double-stranded
oligonucleotide corresponding to the c promoter GC box (see text for
details). Three bands, designated A, B, and
C, were produced by mixing nuclear extracts from either 3T3
or RAW cells with the probe (lanes 2 and 6).
Competition with unlabeled oligonucleotides corresponding to either the
c subunit GC box (lanes 3 and 7), or a consensus
GC box of different sequence (lanes 4 and 8)
resulted in a loss of the three bands. A mutated GC box, however, did
not compete with the labeled probe for binding (lanes 5 and
9). The unbound oligonucleotide probe was run off the bottom
of the gel in an effort to achieve good separation of bands
A and B. No other bands were visible in the gel.
B, equal amounts of nuclear extracts from 3T3 and RAW cells
were mixed with the same oligonucleotide probe as in Fig.
4A, but reactions were done either in the absence
(lanes 1 and 6) or presence (lanes
2-5, 7-10) of supershift-grade antibodies. Addition
of an antibody against Sp1 (lanes 2 and 7)
shifted band A, whereas addition of antibody against Sp3
(lanes 3 and 8) shifted bands B and
C. Antibodies against two forms of transcription factor
AP-2, which also recognizes a GC-rich consensus, did not affect the
banding pattern.
and AP-2
. Fig. 4B shows that addition of an antibody
against Sp1 created a supershifted band, as well as a diminution in the intensity of band with the lowest mobility (A), indicating
that the identity of the protein bound in band A is Sp1.
Similarly, an antibody against Sp3 created a supershifted band and
resulted in decreased intensity of bands B and C.
Sp3 is represented by multiple bands due to alternate translational
initiation within its coding region (33). In contrast, antibodies
against AP-2 family members did not produce supershifted bands.
-actin mRNA, which possesses a half-life
that varies from 6 to 26 h, depending on the cell type and growth
condition (35, 36). We found a diminution of this mRNA species
within 24 h after actinomycin treatment in both 3T3 and RAW cells,
indicating that the unchanged expression levels for the c subunit in
RAW cells were not due to inactivity of the actinomycin D. Reprobing the blot with a cDNA corresponding to the murine 18 S rRNA
controlled for equivalent RNA loading in the gel (lower
panel). In two separate experiments, the average half-life of the
c subunit mRNA in NIH 3T3 cells was 14 h. We were unable to
empirically determine this figure in RAW 264.7 macrophages, because
longer treatments with actinomycin D resulted in cell death. However,
because we determined that the c mRNA transcription rates in the
two cell types are equal and that, at steady-state, RAW cells express
6- to 8-fold more of the transcript than 3T3 cells, their half-lives
must also differ by 6- to 8-fold (37). Therefore, the half-life of the mRNA in RAW cells can be estimated at between 3.5 and 4.5 days, values similar to those of other highly stable mRNAs such as
-globin (38).

View larger version (55K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Stability of V-ATPase subunit transcripts in
fibroblasts and macrophages. A, NIH 3T3 fibroblasts and
RAW 264.7 macrophages were treated with actinomycin D for the
designated periods of time, and cellular RNA was isolated and prepared
for Northern analysis. The RNA blot was probed first with a cDNA
corresponding to the V-ATPase c subunit, then stripped and reprobed
with cDNAs corresponding to murine
-actin and the 18 S rRNA.
B, RNA blots such as that shown in A were probed
with cDNAs corresponding to various subunits of the V-ATPase. Note
the enhanced mRNA stability in RAW cells for all subunits except
B2.

View larger version (80K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Expression of a1 and a3 subunits in
macrophages. A, equivalent amounts of whole cell
extracts from NIH 3T3 or RAW 264.7 cells were run in SDS-PAGE,
transferred to membrane, and probed with antisera derived against the
a1, a3, or B2 subunits. B, the murine macrophage cell line
IC-21 was plated on glass coverslips and immunostained with antibodies
against the a1 (top panels) or a3 (bottom panels)
subunits. Arrows indicate heavy staining of a1 at the
leading edge of the cells, and staining of a3 in tubular patterns that
radiate from the nucleus (see text). Bars = 10 µm.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Drs. Jan Mattsson and Xiao-Song Xie for their kind gifts of antibodies, Dr. Stephen Gluck for contributions made to early portions of this work, and Dr. Jill Rafael for the use of microscopy facilities.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AF366932.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Physiology and Cell Biology, The Ohio State University, 302 Hamilton Hall, 1645 Neil Ave., Columbus, OH 43210. Tel.: 614-688-3585; Fax: 614-292-4888; E-mail: lee.2076@osu.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 10, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111959200
2 GenBankTM accession number AF366932.
3 B. S. Lee, personal observation.
4 R. D. Nelson, personal communication.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: V-ATPase, vacuolar proton-translocating ATPase; CMV, cytomegalovirus; Inr, initiator element; UTR, untranslated region.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Forgac, M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
12951-12954 |
| 2. |
Powell, B.,
Graham, L. A.,
and Stevens, T. H.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
23654-23660 |
| 3. |
Blair, H. C.,
Teitelbaum, S. L.,
Ghiselli, R.,
and Gluck, S.
(1989)
Science
245,
855-857 |
| 4. | Bastani, B., Purcell, H., Hemken, P., Trigg, D., and Gluck, S. (1991) J. Clin. Invest. 88, 126-136 |
| 5. | Gabig, T. G., and Babior, B. M. (1981) Annu. Rev. Med. 32, 313-326[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Swallow, C. J., Grinstein, S., Sudsbury, R. A., and Rotstein, O. D. (1990) Surgery 108, 363-368[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Swallow, C. J., Grinstein, S., Sudsbury, R. A., and Rotstein, O. D. (1991) Clin. Invest. Med. 14, 367-378[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Südhof, T. C.,
Fried, V. A.,
Stone, D. K.,
Johnston, P. A.,
and Xie, X. S.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
6067-6071 |
| 9. |
Bernasconi, P.,
Rausch, T.,
Struve, I.,
Morgan, L.,
and Taiz, L.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
17428-17431 |
| 10. |
Nelson, R. D.,
Guo, X.-L.,
Masood, K.,
Brown, D.,
Kalkbrenner, M.,
and Gluck, S.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
3541-3545 |
| 11. | Karet, F. E., Finberg, K. E., Nelson, R. D., Nayir, A., Mocan, H., Sanjad, S. A., Rodriguez-Soriano, J., Santos, F., Cremers, C. W. R. J., Di, Pietro, A., Hoffbrand, B. I., Winiarski, J., Bakkaloglu, A., Ozen, S., Dunsunsel, R., Goodyer, P., Hulton, S. A., Wu, D. K., Skvorak, A. B., Morton, D. D., Cunningham, M. J., Jha, V., and Lifton, R. P. (1999) Nat. Genet. 21, 84-90[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Toyomura, T.,
Oka, T.,
Yamaguchi, C.,
Wada, Y.,
and Futai, M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
8760-8765 |
| 13. |
Nishi, T.,
and Forgac, M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
6824-6830 |
| 14. | Smith, A. N., Skaug, J., Choate, K. A., Nayir, A., Bakkaloglu, A., Ozen, S., Hulton, S. A., Sanjad, S. A., Al-, Sabban, E. A., Lifton, R. P., Scherer, S. W., and Karet, F. E. (2000) Nat. Genet. 26, 71-75[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Lee, B. S.,
Gluck, S. L.,
and Holliday, L. S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
29164-29171 |
| 16. |
Holliday, L. S., Lu, M.,
Lee, B. S.,
Nelson, R. D.,
Solivan, S.,
Zhang, L.,
and Gluck, S. L.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
32331-32337 |
| 17. |
Breton, S.,
Wiederhold, T.,
Marshansky, V.,
Nsumu, N. N.,
Ramesh, V.,
and Brown, D.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
18219-18224 |
| 18. | Frattini, A., Orchard, P. J., Sobacchi, C., Giliani, S., Abinun, M., Mattsson, J. P., Keeling, D. J., Andersson, A.-K., Wallbrandt, P., Zecca, L., Notarangelo, L. D., Vezzoni, P., and Villa, A. (2000) Nat. Genet. 25, 343-346[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. | Li, Y.-P., Chen, W., Liang, Y., Li, E., and Stashenko, P. (1999) Nat. Genet. 23, 447-451[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Scimeca, J.-C., Franchi, A., Trojani, C., Parrinello, H., Grosgeorge, J., Robert, C., Jaillon, O., Poirier, C., Gaudray, P., and Carle, G. F. (2000) Bone 26, 207-213[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Hirsch, S.,
Strauss, A.,
Masood, K.,
Lee, S.,
Sukhatme, V.,
and Gluck, S.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
3004-3008 |
| 22. | Lee, B. S., Holliday, L. S., Krits, I., and Gluck, S. L. (1999) J. Bone Miner. Res. 14, 2127-2136[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. |
Lee, B. S.,
Underhill, D. M.,
Crane, M. K.,
and Gluck, S. L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
7320-7329 |
| 24. | Sakai, D., Tong, H. S., and Minkin, C. (1995) Bone 17, 111-119[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (eds) (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 26. | Lee, K. A., Bindereif, A., and Green, M. R. (1988) Gene Anal. Tech. 5, 22-31[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Greenberg, M. E., and Bender, T. P. (1997) in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Ausubel, F. M. , Brent, R. , Kingston, R. E. , Moore, D. D. , Seidman, J. G. , Smith, J. A. , and Struhl, D., eds) , pp. 4.10.11-14.10.11, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY |
| 28. |
Lee, B. S.,
Holliday, L. S.,
Ojikutu, B.,
Krits, I.,
and Gluck, S. L.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
270,
C382-C388 |
| 29. | Hasebe, M., Hanada, H., Moriyama, Y., Maeda, M., and Futai, M. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 183, 856-863[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. |
Javahery, R.,
Khachi, A., Lo, K.,
Zenzie-Gregory, B.,
and Smale, S. T.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
116-127 |
| 31. | Smale, S. T. (1997) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1351, 73-88[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Gillespie, G. A.,
Somlo, S.,
Germino, G. G.,
Weinstat-Saslow, D.,
and Reeders, S. T.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
4289-4293 |
| 33. |
Kennett, S. B.,
Udvadia, A. J.,
and Horowitz, J. M.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
3110-3117 |
| 34. | Decker, C. J., and Parker, R. (1995) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7, 386-392[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. | Krowczynska, A., Yenofsky, R., and Brawerman, G. (1985) J. Mol. Biol. 181, 231-239[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. | Khalili, K., and Weinmann, R. (1984) J. Mol. Biol. 180, 1007-1021[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. |
Ross, J.
(1995)
Microbiol. Rev.
59,
423-450 |
| 38. | Weiss, I. M., and Liebhaber, S. A. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 2457-2465[Abstract] |
| 39. |
Körner, K.,
Wolfraim, L. A.,
Lucibello, F. C.,
and Müller, R.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
4933-4939 |
| 40. |
Lee, B. S.,
Krits, I.,
Crane-Zelkovic, M. K.,
and Gluck, S. L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
174-181 |
| 41. | Laitala-Leinonen, T., Howell, M. L., Dean, G. E., and Väänänen, H. K. (1996) Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 129-142[Abstract] |
| 42. |
Jansen, R. P.
(1999)
FASEB J.
13,
455-466 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Jeyaraj, D. Dakhlallah, S. R. Hill, and B. S. Lee HuR Stabilizes Vacuolar H+-translocating ATPase mRNA during Cellular Energy Depletion J. Biol. Chem., November 11, 2005; 280(45): 37957 - 37964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Jouret, C. Auzanneau, H. Debaix, G.-H. S. Wada, C. Pretto, E. Marbaix, F. E. Karet, P. J. Courtoy, and O. Devuyst Ubiquitous and Kidney-Specific Subunits of Vacuolar H+-ATPase Are Differentially Expressed during Nephrogenesis J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2005; 16(11): 3235 - 3246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Y. Sautin, M. Lu, A. Gaugler, L. Zhang, and S. L. Gluck Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Mediated Effects of Glucose on Vacuolar H+-ATPase Assembly, Translocation, and Acidification of Intracellular Compartments in Renal Epithelial Cells Mol. Cell. Biol., January 15, 2005; 25(2): 575 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Torigoe, H. Izumi, H. Ishiguchi, H. Uramoto, T. Murakami, T. Ise, Y. Yoshida, M. Tanabe, M. Nomoto, H. Itoh, et al. Enhanced Expression of the Human Vacuolar H+-ATPase c subunit Gene (ATP6L) in Response to Anticancer Agents J. Biol. Chem., September 20, 2002; 277(39): 36534 - 36543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||