JBC Oz Biosciences

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M104385200 on January 10, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 11, 9077-9087, March 15, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/11/9077    most recent
M104385200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watters, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bertics, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watters, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bertics, P. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A Differential Role for the Mitogen-activated Protein Kinases in Lipopolysaccharide Signaling

THE MEK/ERK PATHWAY IS NOT ESSENTIAL FOR NITRIC OXIDE AND INTERLEUKIN 1beta PRODUCTION*

Jyoti J. WattersDagger §, Julie A. SommerDagger §||**, Zachary A. PfeifferDagger §**, Usha PrabhuDagger §, Alma N. GuerraDagger §, and Paul J. BerticsDagger §||DaggerDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Biomolecular Chemistry and || Program in Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Received for publication, May 14, 2001, and in revised form, December 31, 2001

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) is a component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria and promotes the activation of macrophages and microglia. Although these cells are highly LPS-responsive, they serve unique tissue-specific functions and exhibit different LPS sensitivities. Accordingly, it was of interest to evaluate whether these biological differences reside in variations within LPS signaling pathways between these two cell types. Because the mitogen-activated protein kinases ERK-1 and ERK-2 have been implicated in the control of many immune responses, we tested the concept that they are a key indicator for differences in cellular LPS sensitivity. We observed that murine RAW 264.7 macrophages and murine BV-2 microglial cells both respond to LPS by exhibiting increased Ikappa Balpha degradation, enhanced NF-kappa B DNA binding activity, and elevated nitric oxide and interleukin-1beta production. Although LPS potently stimulates ERK activation in RAW 264.7 macrophages, it does not activate ERK-1/-2 in BV-2 microglia. Moreover, antagonism of the MEK/ERK pathway potentiates LPS-stimulated nitric oxide production, suggesting that LPS-stimulated ERK activation can exert inhibitory effects in macrophage-like cells. These data support the idea that ERK activation is not a required function of LPS-mediated signaling events and illustrate that alternative/additional pathways for LPS action exist in these cell types.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Lipopolysaccharide (endotoxin, LPS)1 is a component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria and can potently promote the activation of macrophage and microglial cells, which are important sensors of infection by bacteria, fungi, and viruses, in both the periphery and the central nervous system (1-3). Microglia are resident macrophages with wide distribution in nervous tissues, and upon activation by endotoxin or various microorganisms, these cells and other mononuclear phagocytes produce several toxic mediators, such as nitric oxide (NO) and free radicals, in addition to numerous cytokines, including interleukin 1beta (IL-1beta ) and tumor necrosis factor alpha  (TNFalpha ). The production of these mediators, although beneficial for killing bacteria and further activating the immune system, can also contribute to significant tissue damage, especially in the brain. For example, the generation of NO by microglial cells may promote brain damage during infection by enhancing vascular permeability and potentially compromising the blood brain barrier (4-6). Additionally, the activation of microglial cells may contribute to neurodegenerative disorders as a result of their production of beta -amyloid protein (7-9), which is deposited in plaques thought to be important in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Moreover, microglial cells have also been implicated in neuronal injury such as stroke, meningitis, and multiple sclerosis. Thus, a further understanding of microglial cell activation and function should allow for the identification of potential targets for therapeutic intervention in these neuronal disorders.

Multiple signaling pathways are known to be activated in macrophages upon LPS exposure (10). Among these pathways are the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), which are a highly conserved family of protein serine/threonine kinases and include the extracellular signal-regulated kinases ERK-1 and ERK-2 (11, 12). Along with nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) activation, ERK activation is often used as a hallmark of LPS-induced signal transduction in many cell types (13-19). It has been proposed that ERK (p42/p44 MAPK) activation is involved in LPS-induced cellular responses, such as the increased production of TNFalpha , inducible nitric-oxide synthase (iNOS) and NO, and interleukin-6 (IL-6) (20-22). Recent data suggest, however, that the ERKs are not involved in iNOS or NO production in macrophages nor in the activation of NF-kappa B DNA binding activity (23, 24), but rather other MAPKs, specifically p38, have been postulated to be important in the control of these end points. Therefore, given the powerful responses of macrophages and microglia to LPS, it is important to establish the relative contribution of the ERKs and p38 in the LPS sensitivity of these two cell types.

Because NF-kappa B activity regulates the expression of several cytokine genes including TNFalpha , IL-6, and IL-1beta (25-31), and because LPS modulates its activity, the status of NF-kappa B DNA binding activity is a key issue when considering the mechanisms of LPS signaling in murine macrophages and microglial cells. NF-kappa B is a homo- or heterodimeric transcription factor whose function is regulated by the binding of an inhibitory protein, Ikappa B. Upon serine phosphorylation of the Ikappa B protein, it is targeted for proteasome-mediated degradation, thus allowing the now transcriptionally active NF-kappa B protein complex to translocate into the nucleus where it can bind to various regulatory elements present in gene promoter regions (32). LPS is known to stimulate the degradation of one of the isoforms of Ikappa B, Ikappa Balpha , and accordingly, LPS promotes the activation of NF-kappa B DNA binding activity in numerous myelocytic cell types, including phagocytes (19). Additionally, it has been documented that NF-kappa B not only plays a role in the regulation of cytokine genes but also in the expression of other genes important for macrophage and microglial cell function. For example, binding sites for NF-kappa B are present in the promoter of the iNOS gene, and these have been shown to be involved in iNOS gene up-regulation (33, 34).

There are several known LPS-binding proteins present on macrophage membranes, including CD14, CD11b/18, and Toll-like receptors (35). Toll-like receptors are mammalian homologs of the Drosophila Toll receptor and are involved in initiating innate immune defense against bacteria and fungi (36). Because CD14 lacks a transmembrane domain and is unlikely to initiate signals on its own, it is noteworthy that the Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR-4) has emerged as a potential signaling partner for LPS/CD14 interactions (37-39). The presence of TLR-4 alone in transfected cell systems is insufficient to confer substantial LPS responsiveness unless another protein, MD-2, is present (40). Thus, the Toll-like receptors are believed to be responsible for much of the observed CD14-dependent, LPS-induced ERK (41-43) and NF-kappa B (44) activation.

Although LPS is a potent activator of several cell types, such as macrophages and microglial cells, these cells often play unique tissue-specific roles and exhibit different sensitivities to LPS. These types of biological differences may be inherent in variations within LPS signaling pathways. Because ERK-1 and ERK-2 have been implicated in the control of a wide variety of macrophage mediators, the present studies were initiated to evaluate the hypothesis that variations in the activation pattern of the ERKs and NF-kappa B can serve as indicators for differences in LPS sensitivity between macrophage-like cells.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- LPS (Escherichia coli 0111:B4), 3'-O-(4-benzoylbenzoyl)-ATP (BzATP), anisomycin, and the phorbol ester PMA were purchased from Sigma.

Cell Culture-- Murine RAW 264.7 macrophage cells were grown to ~80% confluency and routinely passaged in RPMI 1640 medium containing 5% cosmic calf serum (Mediatech, Herndon, VA) and 100 units/ml penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen). BV-2 microglial cells were a kind gift from Dr. Gary Weisman (University of Missouri-Columbia) and were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum and 100 units/ml penicillin/streptomycin. RAW 264.7 and BV-2 cells were cultured in 100-mm Falcon plates (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). CHO-K1 stable cell lines expressing vector (CHO-K1/Neo) or human CD14 (CHO-K1/CD14) were generously provided to us by Dr. Douglas Golenbock (Boston University School of Medicine) (45) and were grown as described for RAW 264.7 cells. Prior to each experiment, cells were plated overnight in Falcon 24-well plates (RAW cells at 8.5 × 104 cells/well and BV-2 cells at 7 × 104 cells/well). The following day, cells were treated with LPS at the concentrations indicated in the figures or with the phorbol ester PMA (100 nM) or BzATP (250 µM) as positive controls. BzATP is a ligand for the purinergic receptor P2X7 and has been shown previously to powerfully stimulate the activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinases ERK-1 and ERK-2 in murine RAW 264.7 macrophages (46, 47). Human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK 293) cells were grown to 80% confluency and routinely passaged in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Mediatech) and 100 units/ml penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen) and were used as a negative control cell line for TLR-4 expression (43).

Immunoblotting for MAPKs, Ikappa Balpha , and TLR-4-- Whole cell lysates were prepared by lysing CHO-K1, CHO-CD14, BV-2, and RAW 264.7 cells, plated as indicated above, in SDS-PAGE sample buffer without bromphenol blue (20 mM Tris, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM Na3VO4, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 2% SDS, 20% glycerol). Protein content was determined using the Micro-BCA Protein Assay (Pierce). Equal amounts of protein (~25 µg) were loaded per lane and separated by 10% SDS-PAGE as described by Laemmli (48). Proteins in the gels were transferred to Immobilon polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA), and the membranes were subsequently blocked in 5% non-fat milk/TBST (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20). Anti-active ERK antibodies (Promega, Madison, WI) that recognize the dually tyrosine- and threonine-phosphorylated, and thus enzymatically active forms of ERK-1 and ERK-2, were used at a dilution of 1:5000. Anti-Ikappa Balpha antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) were diluted 1:1000 in 5% milk/TBST and used to measure Ikappa Balpha degradation following treatment with LPS. For detection of p38 and JNK activation, membranes were blocked in 1% IgG and protease-free BSA (Jackson ImmunoResearch, Bar Harbor, ME). Anti-active p38 antibodies were used at a final dilution of 1:4000 in 0.1% BSA/TBST, and anti-active JNK antibodies were employed at a final concentration of 1:5000 in 0.1% BSA/TBST. Cell lysates (100 µg of protein) were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes for immunoblotting using anti-TLR-4 antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at a final dilution of 1:1000 in 5% milk/TBST. The immunoreactive bands were visualized using secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and Lumi-Glo chemiluminescent detection methods (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD). To confirm equal protein loading, membranes were stripped at 70 °C for 30 min with a buffer consisting of 62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.7, 2% SDS, and 100 mM dithiothreitol. The immunoblots were re-blocked in 5% milk/TBST followed by incubation with antibodies that react with both active and inactive forms of ERK-1 and ERK-2 proteins (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Bands were visualized using chemiluminescence. The data shown are representative of at least three separate experiments.

Measurement of iNOS, NO, and IL-1beta Production-- Murine BV-2 and RAW 264.7 cells were cultured in 24-well plates as described above. Cells were treated for 20 h with LPS at the concentrations indicated in the figures. For NO determination, the medium was removed; the cells were washed, and whole cell lysates were prepared as described above. The concentration of NO in the medium was determined using the Greiss reagent as described previously (49). For experiments investigating the involvement of MAPK signaling pathways, the MEK1/MEK2 inhibitor UO126 (10 µM, Promega) or the p38 MAPK antagonist SB 202190 (10 µM, Calbiochem) were used to pretreat RAW 264.7 or BV-2 cells for 15 min prior to incubation with LPS. In some experiments, additional pulses of UO 126 were also given at several hour intervals following LPS stimulation, as indicated in the figure legends. To confirm the activity of these inhibitors, BV-2 cells were pretreated with 10 µM UO126 or 10 µM SB 202190 followed by stimulation with either 1 µM PMA (a potent activator of ERK-1 and -2) or with 10 µg/ml anisomycin (a potent activator of p38). Additionally, to ascertain the time period that UO126 is capable of inhibiting ERK activation in culture, RAW 264.7 cells were treated for 2, 4, 6, or 18 h with 10 µM UO126 followed by stimulation with 100 nM PMA for 5 min, and ERK-1/ERK-2 and/or p38 activation was measured as described above. To assess NO levels, the breakdown product nitrite was measured in the medium as detailed above. The Student's t test was used to evaluate the statistical differences between various treatment groups, with the level of significance being set at not more than p < 0.02. The levels of iNOS were measured by immunoblotting, as outlined above. Equal amounts of protein (~25 µg) were loaded and separated in each lane of a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The separated proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane, and the membrane was blocked in 5% milk/TBST. Anti-iNOS antibodies (1:2000) (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY) were used to measure iNOS protein up-regulation following treatment with LPS. Equal protein loading was confirmed by stripping and re-probing blots with anti-ERK antibodies. For IL-1beta level determinations, cells were treated for 3-18 h with either 10 or 1000 ng/ml LPS, and then Quantikine-M ELISA assays (R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) were performed according to the manufacturer's protocol. This assay system measures both the processed and immature forms of IL-1beta .

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays-- Nuclear extracts were prepared from RAW 264.7 macrophages and BV-2 microglial cells grown in 100-mm Falcon plates, and gel mobility assays were performed as described previously (50). In these experiments, the cells were treated with 1 µg/ml LPS for 30, 60, or 90 min and lysed, and 10 µg of nuclear protein extract was incubated with 32P-labeled double-stranded oligonucleotide probe encoding two consensus NF-kappa B DNA-binding sites. The DNA-protein complexes were separated using non-denaturing PAGE techniques, and the gels were dried and apposed to film.

CD14 Flow Cytometric Analysis-- Murine RAW 264.7 macrophages and BV-2 microglial cells were removed from 100-mm Falcon plates using a non-enzymatic cell dissociation solution (Sigma catalog number C-1544). Cells (~5 × 105) were washed and resuspended in PBS containing 1% BSA. Rat anti-mouse CD14 (PharMingen International, San Diego, CA) or isotype control antibodies (Caltag Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) were added to the cells at a final concentration of 1 µg/tube and incubated for 1 h at 4 °C. After washing with PBS, 1% BSA, the cells were again incubated for 30 min at 4 °C with 1 µg/tube of anti-rat IgG phycoerythrin-labeled secondary antibodies (Caltag Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Cells were washed and resuspended in PBS, 1% BSA. Propidium iodide (~10 µg/tube) was added to differentiate live from dead cells. FACS analysis was performed in a Becton-Dickinson FACScan Flow Cytometer gating 10,000 live events.

Reverse Transcription (RT)-PCR-- Murine RAW 264.7 macrophages and BV-2 microglia were grown in 100-mm plates as detailed above. Cells were lysed in 1 ml of Tri- Reagent (Sigma), and total RNA was harvested as described by the manufacturer's protocol, followed by DNase I treatment for 60 min and heat inactivation at 95 °C for 10 min. Five µg of total RNA were used as templates for the RT-PCR using random hexamers and Superscript Reverse Transcriptase II (Invitrogen). Reactions were performed according to the manufacturer's protocol except that the reverse transcriptase enzyme was omitted in one sample for control purposes. Following reverse transcription, 1/10 of the total RT reaction was utilized for PCR of MD-2 mRNA using the following murine primers: 5' TCT GCA ACT CCT CCG ATG CAA TTA TTT CCT AC and 5' TGT ATT CAC AGT CTC TCC TTT CAG AGC TCT GC. The expected size of the amplified fragment is 274 bp. As a control, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH, expected amplimer size 982 bp) was also amplified using the following human primer sequences: 5' TGA AGG TCG GAG TCA ACG GAT TTG GT and 5' CAT GTG GGC CAT GAG GTC CAC CAC.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Effect of LPS on iNOS, NO, and IL-1beta Production in BV-2 Microglial and RAW 264.7 Macrophage Cells-- The murine macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 recapitulates the behavior of peripheral macrophage cells, whereas BV-2 cells retain the characteristics of activated microglial cells. These cells have similar antigen profiles, phagocytic capacities, and anti-microbial activities and respond to LPS in terms of NO production (51-53). Although the production of cytokines and mediators by macrophages and microglia are known to be critical for their function (53-55), it is unclear how these cells compare with regard to LPS responsiveness. Treatment of both RAW 264.7 macrophages and BV-2 microglial cells for 16-20 h with increasing concentrations of LPS (10-1000 ng/ml) results in increased iNOS protein levels (Fig. 1A) and subsequent NO production (Fig. 1B). However, as illustrated in Fig. 1B, on a per cell basis, BV-2 microglial cells respond more robustly to LPS than do RAW 264.7 macrophages in terms of NO production. This effect is most notable at the lower concentrations of LPS (10 and 100 ng/ml) where BV-2 cells produce more NO over the course of the assay than do RAW 264.7 cells.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Effect of LPS on iNOS expression and NO generation by murine RAW 264.7 macrophages and BV-2 microglial cells. A, RAW 264.7 (~8.5 × 104 cells/well) and BV-2 cells (~7 × 104 cells/well) were treated with 10-1000 ng/ml LPS for 16 h. Whole cell lysates were prepared, and proteins (~25 µg) were separated by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were transferred to PVDF membrane and probed with an anti-iNOS antibody, and the bands were visualized using chemiluminescence. B, NO levels in the medium from the cells in A were determined using the Griess reagent as described under "Experimental Procedures." The data are expressed as the mean (pmol of nitrite per 5000 cells) ± S.E. of triplicate samples. Analogous results were obtained in three separate experiments.

Interestingly, a different pattern of LPS responsiveness is also observed with regard to the release of the cytokine IL-1beta by RAW 264.7 macrophages and BV-2 microglial cells (Fig. 2). In these studies, ELISAs were used to measure immunoreactive IL-1beta species released into the tissue culture medium from both cell lines. This method allows for the detection of both the immature (pro-IL-1beta ) as well as the mature (cleaved IL-1beta ) forms of the cytokine. When RAW 264.7 and BV-2 cells are treated with LPS (10 and 1000 ng/ml) for 3-18 h, a large increase in immunoreactive IL-1beta is observed in the tissue culture medium at 18 h (Fig. 2A). However, in addition to the differential LPS sensitivities of these two cell types, i.e. BV-2 microglia generate more immunodetectable IL-1beta in the tissue culture medium on a per cell basis following treatment with 1000 ng/ml LPS for 18 h, we also detected a substantial difference in the kinetics of IL-1beta appearance. In contrast to RAW 264.7 macrophages, IL-1beta levels in the medium were detectable in the BV-2 microglial cell cultures within 3 h of treatment, while after 9 h of LPS (1000 ng/ml) exposure, the medium from both cell types contained approximately equal levels of IL-1beta (Fig. 2A). Although the present ELISAs cannot discriminate between processed and immature forms of IL-1beta , more IL-1beta is detected in the medium of RAW 264.7 cells over time in response to 10 ng/ml LPS than is found with BV-2 microglial cells. In fact, the amount of immunoreactive IL-1beta produced by BV-2 microglial cells in response to 10 ng/ml LPS appears unchanged over an 18-h period. Because this observation is different from what has been reported regarding IL-1beta production by macrophages and macrophage cell lines (56-62), we evaluated the kinetics of IL-1beta accumulation in the tissue culture medium in BV-2 microglial cells in response to 10 and 1000 ng/ml LPS (Fig. 2B). Again, as illustrated in Fig. 2, A and B, similar levels of detectable IL-1beta were found in the medium from BV-2 cells following treatment with 10 ng/ml LPS for 6-18 h.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Influence of LPS on IL-1beta release by murine RAW 264.7 macrophages and BV-2 microglial cells. A, total (processed and immature) immunodetectable IL-1beta levels, as determined by ELISA, were measured in the culture medium of both RAW 264.7 and BV-2 cells treated with 10 or 1000 ng/ml LPS as indicated in the figure for 3-18 h. B, total IL-1beta levels, as determined by ELISA, were measured in the culture medium of BV-2 cells treated with 10 or 1000 ng/ml LPS as indicated in the figure for 3-18 h. The data are expressed as the mean (femtograms of IL-1beta per 5000 cells) ± S.E. of triplicate or quadruplicate samples. The results shown are representative of experiments performed in at least three separate trials. This ELISA detection method does not differentiate between the pro- (immature) and cleaved (mature) forms of IL-1beta released into the culture medium.

Expression of CD14, TLR-4, and MD-2 on RAW 264.7 and BV-2 Cells-- Although LPS potently stimulates both RAW 264.7 macrophages and BV-2 microglial cells to produce cytokines and NO, BV-2 cells exhibit an altered pattern of LPS responsiveness, especially at lower LPS concentrations and earlier time points. To determine whether the differential sensitivity of BV-2 cells to LPS is dependent upon the expression of the known LPS-binding protein CD14, we evaluated the expression levels of CD14 by flow cytometry. Both RAW 264.7 cells (Fig. 3A) and BV-2 cells (Fig. 3B) exhibited a comparable level of cell surface CD14 expression. Next, the expression of another LPS receptor, TLR-4, and its associated signaling partner MD-2 were evaluated using immunoblotting and RT-PCR analysis, respectively. As illustrated in Fig. 3C, TLR-4 protein expression does not appear to be measurably different between the two cell types. Because of the lack of availability of antibodies to evaluate MD-2 protein levels, RT-PCR was performed in both RAW 264.7 and BV-2 cells (Fig. 3D). Although this assay is not quantitative, both cell types exhibited similar levels of amplified MD-2 transcripts. These data suggest that the differential sensitivity to LPS by both RAW 264.7 and BV-2 cells is not due to substantial differences in the expression of the LPS-binding proteins CD14, TLR-4, or MD-2.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Expression of CD14, TLR-4, and MD-2 in RAW 264.7 and BV-2 cells. Murine RAW 264.7 and BV-2 cells (5 × 105 cells/sample) were utilized for flow cytometry analysis using anti-CD14 and isotype control antibodies followed by phycoerythrin-labeled secondary antibody conjugation for FACS measurement. Ten thousand gated events were measured using both RAW 264.7 cells (A) and in BV-2 cells (B). The peaks for both the isotype control antibody and the CD14 antibody have been superimposed on the same graph. The data shown are representative of four separate experiments. C, whole cell lysates from HEK 293, RAW 264.7, and BV-2 cells were prepared, and proteins (~100 µg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE for immunoblot analysis using anti-TLR-4 antibodies. D, RT-PCR was performed on 5 µg of total RNA from RAW 264.7 and BV-2 cells using murine MD-2 primers to amplify a PCR product of 274 bp. PCR with GAPDH primers was utilized as an internal control for the quality of the reverse transcriptase reaction (expected amplimer size 982 bp). Additionally, a reverse transcription reaction was also performed without the addition of reverse transcriptase, followed by PCR with GAPDH primers. No bands were detected in this reaction (data not shown).

Effect of LPS on Ikappa Balpha Degradation and NF-kappa B DNA Binding Activity-- The degradation of Ikappa B proteins is involved in the activation and nuclear translocation of NF-kappa B protein complexes. Ikappa B proteins maintain the transcription factor NF-kappa B in the cytosol until they are dissociated primarily because of their serine phosphorylation and subsequent ubiquitination targeting them for proteasome degradation (32). LPS is known to induce the degradation of Ikappa Balpha in macrophages (63), thereby facilitating NF-kappa B DNA binding activity. The stimulation of NF-kappa B DNA binding activity by LPS is believed to be part of the mechanism employed by endotoxin to stimulate NO and IL-1beta production in immune cells. The data in Fig. 4A indicate that LPS, at concentrations of 100 and 1000 ng/ml, induces the degradation of Ikappa Balpha in BV-2 microglial cells within 15 min of treatment. Fig. 4B illustrates a comparable effect in RAW 264.7 macrophages, where 100 and 1000 ng/ml LPS stimulate the degradation of Ikappa Balpha . Similarly, NF-kappa B DNA binding activity in the two cell types is apparent within 60 min of LPS treatment (Fig. 4C). Interestingly, RAW 264.7 macrophages display a higher level of basal NF-kappa B DNA binding activity than is observed in BV-2 cells.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effect of LPS on Ikappa Balpha degradation and NF-kappa B DNA binding activity in murine RAW 264.7 macrophages and BV-2 microglial cells. A, murine BV-2. B, RAW 264.7 cells were treated with 10, 100, or 1000 ng/ml LPS for 5, 10, or 15 min. Whole cell lysates were prepared and proteins (~25 µg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE for immunoblot analysis. Membranes were probed with an antibody to Ikappa Balpha and visualized using chemiluminescence to evaluate degradation of Ikappa Balpha . C, NF-kappa B DNA binding activity was evaluated using nuclear extracts prepared from both BV-2 cells and RAW 264.7 cells treated with 1 µg/ml LPS for 60 min. Nuclear protein extracts (10 µg) were incubated with 32P-labeled double-stranded oligonucleotides encoding a consensus NF-kappa B-binding site. The DNA-protein complexes were separated by non-denaturing PAGE techniques, and the gels were dried and apposed to film. The data shown are representative of experiments that have been performed on at least three separate occasions.

Effect of LPS on the Mitogen-activated Protein Kinases ERK-1, ERK-2, p38, JNK-1, and JNK-2-- Because the levels of NO produced on a per cell basis by BV-2 cells treated with LPS were greater than those produced by RAW cells, and given that differences in CD14 expression were likely not the basis for this observation, we further investigated LPS-induced signaling pathways in BV-2 cells. Surprisingly, LPS did not detectably stimulate ERK-1 and ERK-2 in BV-2 cells (Fig. 5A) regardless of the concentration used, whereas a dose-dependent effect was observed in RAW 264.7 cells (Fig. 5B). To confirm that receptor-mediated activation of ERK-1 and ERK-2 was intact in BV-2 cells, BzATP (250 µM), an agonist of the purinergic receptor P2X7, was used as a positive control for ERK activation in both cell types and was found to greatly induce ERK-1 and ERK-2 activation. These blots were stripped and re-probed with an antibody that cross-reacts with ERK-1 and ERK-2 and confirmed that equal protein loading was obtained (data not shown). In summary, ERK activation was observed in both RAW 264.7 and BV-2 cells following stimulation with BzATP, indicating that BV-2 cells have the capacity to exhibit ERK activation in response to agents other than LPS.


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Dose response of LPS effects on ERK-1 and ERK-2 activation in murine RAW 264.7 macrophages and BV-2 microglial cells. Murine BV-2 microglia (A) and murine RAW 264.7 macrophages (B) were treated with 10, 100, or 1000 ng/ml LPS for 5, 10, or 15 min. Cells were also stimulated with BzATP (250 µM), a well known activator of MAPKs and a ligand for the purinergic receptor P2X7, for 5 min. Whole cell lysates were prepared, and proteins (~25 µg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE for immunoblot analysis. ERK-1 and ERK-2 activation was assessed using a phospho-specific anti-active MAPK antibody that recognizes the dually tyrosine- and threonine-phosphorylated and enzymatically active forms of ERK-1 and ERK-2. Equal protein loading was confirmed by re-probing these blots with an anti-ERK-1 antibody that recognizes total ERK-1 and ERK-2 protein (data not shown). In the indicated cases, the cells were also stimulated with BzATP (250 µM), a well known activator of MAPKs and a ligand for the purinergic receptor P2X7, for 5 min. ERK-1 and ERK-2 activation was assessed using the phospho-specific anti-active MAPK antibody. Equal protein loading was confirmed by re-probing these blots with an anti-ERK-1 antibody that recognizes total ERK-1 and ERK-2 protein (data not shown). The data shown are representative of experiments that have been performed as least three separate times.

To confirm further that LPS fails to stimulate ERK activation in BV-2 cells, an extended treatment with both LPS and the phorbol ester PMA was performed over a period ranging from 5 min to 4 h. As shown in Fig. 6A (upper panel), RAW 264.7 cells exhibited a strong ERK activation following stimulation with both 100 nM PMA and 1 µg/ml LPS, although the kinetics of activation by these stimuli are different. PMA maximally promotes ERK-1 and ERK-2 activation within 5 min of treatment, and active ERK levels remain elevated above control levels even after 4 h. In contrast, LPS does not measurably stimulate ERK activation until ~15 min following treatment, whereupon it remains elevated above that observed in vehicle-treated cells until 60-120 min later, after which time active ERK levels return to basal levels. The lower panel shows the same blot stripped and re-probed with an antibody that cross-reacts with ERK-1 and, to a lesser degree, ERK-2 to confirm equal protein loading.


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Extended time course of ERK activation following LPS and phorbol ester treatment of murine RAW 264.7 macrophages and BV-2 microglial cells. A, murine RAW 264.7 macrophages were treated with 1 µg/ml LPS or 100 nM PMA for 5-240 min as indicated in the figure. Whole cell lysates were prepared, and proteins (~25 µg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE for immunoblot analysis. ERK-1 and ERK-2 activation was assessed using a phospho-specific anti-active MAPK antibody (upper panel). To confirm equal protein loading, the lower panel shows the same blot stripped and re-probed with an antibody that cross-reacts with ERK-1 and, to a lesser degree, ERK-2. B, murine BV-2 microglia were treated with 1 µg/ml LPS or 100 nM PMA for 5-240 min as indicated in the figure. Whole cell lysates were prepared, and proteins (~25 µg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE for immunoblot analysis. ERK-1 and ERK-2 activation was assessed using a phospho-specific anti-active MAPK antibody (upper panel). To confirm equal protein loading, the lower panel shows the same blot stripped and re-probed with an antibody that cross-reacts with ERK-1 and, to a lesser degree, ERK-2. The data shown are representative of experiments that have been performed on at least three separate occasions.

Interestingly, the kinetics of PMA-stimulated ERK-1 and ERK-2 activation in BV-2 cells is different from that observed in RAW 264.7 macrophage cells (Fig. 6B, upper panel). In BV-2 cells it is primarily ERK-2 activity that is stimulated upon PMA (100 nM) treatment, although some ERK-1 activation is observed. Active ERK-2 levels are increased upon PMA treatment of BV-2 cells within 5 min, and these remain elevated for 30 min. After this time they begin to decrease until after 4 h of treatment, whereupon active ERK levels return to approximately those observed in vehicle-treated cells. Again, as shown in Fig. 6B, LPS (1 µg/ml) does not detectably stimulate ERK activation within a 4-h period, indicating that LPS has different signaling effects in RAW 264.7 macrophages versus BV-2 microglial cells. The lower panel shows the same blot stripped and re-probed with an antibody that cross-reacts with ERK-1 and to a lesser degree, ERK-2, to confirm equal protein loading.

Because LPS does not promote the activation of ERK-1 and ERK-2 in BV-2 cells, it was of interest to evaluate its effects on the activation of other MAPKs in BV-2 cells. As illustrated in Fig. 7, within 15 min of treatment, LPS can promote p38 (Fig. 7A) and JNK (Fig. 7B) activation in BV-2 cells. It is noteworthy that the activation of p38, but not the ERKs, has recently been implicated in LPS-stimulated NO production (24). This observation is in contrast to previous studies suggesting that both ERK and p38 activation are involved in NO and TNFalpha production (20, 22).


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Time course and dose response of LPS on the activation of p38 and JNK MAPKs in murine BV-2 cells. A, murine BV-2 microglia were treated with 10, 100, or 1000 ng/ml LPS for 5, 10, or 15 min. Whole cell lysates were prepared, and proteins (~25 µg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE for immunoblot analysis. Activation of p38 was assessed using a phospho-specific anti-active p38 antibody that recognizes the dually tyrosine- and threonine-phosphorylated and enzymatically active form of p38. Equal protein loading was confirmed by re-probing these blots with an anti-ERK-1 antibody that recognizes total ERK-1 and ERK-2 protein (data not shown). B, murine BV-2 microglia were treated with 10, 100, or 1000 ng/ml LPS for 5, 10, or 15 min. Whole cell lysates were prepared, and proteins (~25 µg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE for immunoblot analysis. Activation of JNK-1 and JNK-2 was assessed using a phospho-specific anti-active JNK antibody that recognizes the dually tyrosine- and threonine-phosphorylated and enzymatically active forms of JNK-1 and JNK-2. Equal protein loading was confirmed by re-probing these blots with an anti-ERK-1 antibody that recognizes total ERK-1 and ERK-2 protein (data not shown).

Recapitulation of the BV-2 Cell Phenotype in Transfected CHO-K1 Cells-- To determine whether the lack of LPS-stimulated ERK activation is a phenotype specific to BV-2 microglial cells, we tested the ability of CHO-K1 cells to respond to LPS with regard to this end point. CHO-K1 cells are known to express the LPS receptor TLR-4 (64-66). This receptor has been reported to be essential for LPS-stimulated NF-kappa B DNA binding activity and many of the cell signaling events initiated upon LPS treatment, such as activation of ERK-1 and ERK-2 (41, 42, 44). CHO-K1/Neo and CHO-KI/CD14 cells were found to express TLR-4 protein and MD-2 mRNA (data not shown). As illustrated in Fig. 8A, LPS promotes Ikappa Balpha degradation in RAW 264.7 cells and in CHO-K1 cells transfected with a CD14 expression vector (CHO-K1/CD14) but not in cells transfected with empty vector alone (CHO-K1/NEO). In contrast, ERK activation was not observed in either CD14-expressing CHO-K1 cells or in the parental vector-expressing cells at either concentration of LPS (1 or 10 µg/ml), but LPS-stimulated ERK activation was observed in RAW 264.7 cells (Fig. 8B). PMA, a phorbol ester, achieves ERK activation by receptor-independent mechanisms and was observed to stimulate the activation of ERK-1 and ERK-2 in all the three cell lines, whereas LPS was without effect in the CHO-K1/NEO- and CHO-K1/CD14-expressing cells (Fig. 8, B and C). Together, these data suggest that ERK activation is not a necessary part of LPS-mediated signal transduction because in both BV-2 cells and in CHO-K1 cells LPS can elicit the degradation of Ikappa Balpha as well as the production of IL-1beta and NO in the absence of ERK activation. Additionally, these data suggest that LPS stimulation of CD14/TLR-4 receptors in CHO-K1 cells does not lead to ERK activation.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Effect of LPS treatment on ERK activation and Ikappa Balpha degradation in CD14 expressing CHO-K1 cells. A, RAW 264.7, CHO-K1/Neo, and CHO-K1/CD14 cells were treated with 1 µg/ml LPS for 30 min. Whole cell lysates were prepared, and proteins (~25 µg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE for immunoblot analysis. Membranes were probed with an antibody to Ikappa Balpha and visualized using chemiluminescence to evaluate degradation of Ikappa Balpha . B, RAW 264.7, CHO-K1/Neo, and CHO-K1/CD14 cells were treated with 1 or 10 µg/ml LPS or 1 µM PMA for 15 min as indicated in the figure. Whole cell lysates were prepared, and proteins (~25 µg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE for immunoblot analysis. Activation of ERK-1 and ERK-2 proteins was assessed using a phospho-specific anti-active MAPK antibody. Equal protein loading was confirmed by re-probing these blots with an anti-ERK-1 antibody that recognizes total ERK-1 and ERK-2 protein (data not shown). C, graphical representation of optical densities obtained from the measurement of active ERK-1 and ERK-2 immunoreactive bands (n = 6 separate experiments) in RAW 264.7 macrophages and CHO-K1/NEO and CHO-K1/CD14 cells treated with either vehicle or 1 µg/ml LPS for 15 min. The data were obtained using the program NIH Image and are expressed in arbitrary units, as the mean ± S.E.

MAPK Involvement in LPS-stimulated NO Production in BV-2 Cells-- Because LPS was observed to activate p38 MAPKs in BV-2 cells, but not ERK-1 or ERK-2, it was of interest to evaluate the involvement of these pathways in LPS-stimulated mediator production by these cells. Thus, we tested the role of both the MEK/ERK pathway and the p38 pathway in NO production in BV-2 cells using the pharmacologic inhibitors UO126 (MEK1/2 inhibitor, 10 µM) and SB 202190 (p38 inhibitor, 10 µM). As illustrated in Fig. 9A, in BV-2 cells, LPS stimulation of NO production is unaffected by the MEK inhibitor UO126, whereas NO production is profoundly diminished in the presence of the p38 inhibitor SB 202190. Interestingly, in RAW 264.7 cells, addition of UO126 does not diminish the production of NO, but rather it potentiates the effect of LPS (p < 0.02) (Fig. 9, B and C), whereas inhibition of p38 by SB 202190 significantly reduced (p < 0.02) the amount of NO produced by RAW 264.7 cells following LPS stimulation (Fig. 9B). As shown in Fig. 9C, subsequent treatment of RAW 264.7 cells with additional pulses of UO126 (4 and/or 8 h) after the initial 15-min pretreatment (Fig. 9C, UO 15') does not alter the ability of LPS to promote NO production (p < 0.01), further supporting the idea that ERK activation is not required for LPS induction of NO production. As controls for the ability of these inhibitors to block ERK and p38 activation, BV-2 cells were pretreated with the inhibitors for 15 min prior to stimulation with either 1 µM PMA or 10 µg/ml anisomycin. The upper panel of Fig. 9D demonstrates that UO126 blocks PMA-stimulated ERK-1 and ERK-2 activation, and the lower panel shows blockade of p38 activation stimulated by anisomycin using SB202190. Furthermore, to ascertain the length of time that UO126 will inhibit ERK activation following treatment of RAW 264.7 macrophages in cell culture, Fig. 9E demonstrates that 2, 4, 6, and 18 h after addition of UO126 to cell culture PMA is unable to elicit a detectable increase in ERK activation, suggesting that the inhibitor is functional in cell culture even after 18 h of addition. These data also imply that any autocrine factor that might be released by macrophages following LPS treatment that in turn might stimulate ERK activation in BV-2 cells after the 4-h period tested in Fig. 6B would also be inhibited. These data support the idea that MEKs 1 and 2 and/or ERKs-1 and -2 are not necessary for LPS-stimulated NO production in BV-2 microglial cells, whereas p38 MAPK activation is associated with this LPS action. This conclusion is further supported by the observations that LPS does not detectably stimulate ERK-1 and ERK-2 activation in BV-2 microglial cells, although it very potently promotes p38 activation.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Effect of LPS treatment on nitric oxide production in BV-2 and RAW 264.7 macrophages in the presence of MEK and p38 inhibitors. A, BV-2 cells were treated with 100 or 1000 ng/ml LPS for 16 h in the presence or absence of SB 202190 or UO126 administered 15 min prior to stimulation with LPS. NO levels in the medium were determined using the Griess reagent as described under "Experimental Procedures." The data are expressed as the mean ± S.E. of triplicate samples. B, RAW 264.7 cells were treated with 100 ng/ml LPS for 16 h in the presence or absence of SB 202190 or UO126 administered 15 min prior to stimulation with LPS. NO levels in the medium were determined using the Griess reagent as described under "Experimental Procedures." The data are expressed as the mean ± S.E. of triplicate samples. *, p < 0.02 with respect to LPS stimulation alone. C, RAW 264.7 cells were treated with 100 ng/ml LPS for 16 h in the presence or absence of UO126 administered 15 min prior to stimulation with LPS and/or 4 or 8 h after LPS treatment, as indicated in the figure. NO levels in the medium were determined using the Griess reagent as described under "Experimental Procedures." The data are expressed as the mean ± S.E. of triplicate samples. *, p < 0.01 with respect to LPS + UO126 treatments at all time points. D, BV-2 cells were pretreated with the MEK inhibitor UO126 (10 µM), the p38 inhibitor SB 202190 (10 µM), or Me2SO (DMSO) (vehicle) for 15 min prior to stimulation with either PMA (1 µM) or anisomycin (10 µg/ml) for 15 min. Whole cell lysates were prepared, and proteins (~25 µg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE for immunoblot analysis. Activation of p38 and ERK-1/ERK-2 proteins was assessed using phospho-specific anti-active antibodies. Equal protein loading was confirmed by re-probing these blots with an anti-ERK-1 antibody that recognizes total ERK-1 and ERK-2 protein (data not shown). The data are representative of three separate experiments. E, RAW 264.7 macrophages were pretreated with the MEK inhibitor UO126 (10 µM) or Me2SO (DMSO) (vehicle) for 15 min or 2, 4, 6, or 18 h prior to stimulation with PMA (100 nM), as indicated in the figure. Activation of ERK-1/ERK-2 proteins was assessed using phospho-specific anti-active antibodies. Equal protein loading was confirmed by re-probing these blots with an anti-ERK-1 antibody that recognizes total ERK-1 and ERK-2 protein (lower panel). The data are representative of three separate experiments.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The data in the present study support the concept that ERK activation is not a necessary component of LPS-stimulated signaling events in the microglial cell line BV-2. Conversely, LPS-induced p38 activation does appear to be important both in this cell line and in RAW 264.7 macrophages because an inhibitor of p38 (SB 202190) greatly reduces LPS-stimulated NO production. Although BV-2 cells exhibit an LPS-induced production of critical cytokines and mediators, such as IL-1beta and NO, as well as LPS-stimulated Ikappa Balpha degradation, NF-kappa B DNA binding activity, and p38 and JNK activation, there is no detectable ERK activation even up to 4 h of treatment with LPS concentrations as high as 1 µg/ml. In addition, a similar response can be recapitulated in CHO-K1 cells expressing the LPS-binding protein CD14. In CHO-K1 cells expressing CD14, LPS can stimulate Ikappa Balpha protein degradation but not the activation of the MAPKs ERK-1 and ERK-2. Taken together, these data strongly support the idea that LPS does not initiate identical signaling mechanisms in these LPS-responsive cells.

The magnitude to which BV-2 microglial cells respond to LPS is different with respect to certain end points when compared with RAW 264.7 macrophages. For example, BV-2 cells produce more NO on a per cell basis in response to a 16-20-h exposure to LPS than do RAW 264.7 cells. In addition, although these ELISAs cannot differentiate between the processed and immature forms of IL-1beta , the present studies reveal that BV-2 microglia and RAW 264.7 cells display dissimilar LPS-stimulated profiles with respect to the amount of total IL-1beta released into the medium. RAW 264.7 macrophages do not release immunodetectable levels of IL-1beta into the medium until ~9 h after LPS treatment, whereas the medium from BV-2 cells contains detectable levels of IL-1beta species within 3 h of LPS treatment. Interestingly, in BV-2 microglia, the profile of IL-1beta appearance in the medium is considerably different at low versus high LPS concentrations. At 10 ng/ml LPS, although IL-1beta levels are detectable, there is no observable increase in the amount of this cytokine released over time. In contrast, at high concentrations of LPS (1000 ng/ml), there is enhanced IL-1beta release from BV-2 cells over time, which surpasses the amounts of IL-1beta species detected in the medium from RAW 264.7 macrophages after 18 h of LPS treatment.

The above results suggest a complex responsiveness of the signaling systems activated upon LPS treatment of BV-2 microglia and support the idea that there may be multiple receptors involved in LPS-stimulated IL-1beta production in microglia. Alternatively, stimulation of a single receptor, exhibiting a threshold effect, may result in the activation of two different signaling pathways depending upon the concentration of ligand (LPS). Another possible explanation for these observations involves the rate of caspase-1-dependent processing and mature IL-1beta release. For example, there may be a difference in the release of IL-1beta due to variations in the rates at which caspase-1 cleaves the immature form of IL-1beta or because there are discrepancies in the rates at which the mature IL-1beta is released from each cell type. Additionally, the rates at which both cell lines initiate transcription/translation may also vary, thus providing another level at which incongruities in the synthesis and processing of IL-1beta may exist. With regard to NO production, because there appears to be little difference in the amount of LPS-stimulated iNOS produced by each cell type, it is possible that other factors such as the availability of reaction substrates or cofactors or post-translational modifications of the iNOS enzyme are involved in these effects.

It is interesting to note that CHO-K1 cells have been reported to express the LPS receptor TLR-4 (64). Additionally, Toll-like receptors, specifically TLR-2 and TLR-4, have been associated with the activation of MAPKs and NF-kappa B DNA binding activity induced upon LPS stimulation (41, 42, 44). Due to the observed lack of LPS-stimulated ERK activation in both BV-2 microglia and in CHO-K1 cells expressing CD14, it is possible that the expression of either Toll-like receptors or their co-receptors, such as MD-2, may be involved in explaining these effects. However, the present studies suggest that alternative pathways are linked to LPS-induced ERK activation because both TLR-4 and MD-2 appear to be expressed in BV-2 and CHO-K1 cells, yet LPS is unable to stimulate ERK-1 and ERK-2 activation. In this regard, TLR-4 expression in HEK 293/CD14-expressing cells confers upon these cells the ability of LPS to induce Ikappa Balpha degradation and NF-kappa B activation (43). In these studies, Yang et al. (43) also showed that the MAPKs (ERKs 1 and 2, p38, and JNKs 1 and 2) are absent in LPS-stimulated HEK 293/CD14 cells that express TLR-4. Upon expression of MD-2 in these cells, NF-kappa B activation was augmented and conferred to LPS the ability to stimulate all the MAPK members listed above. MD-2 is a protein that appears to be required for TLR-4 function. It is secreted from macrophages (40) and is believed to be important in mediating LPS-induced signaling events (67, 68). The results presented by Yang et al. (43) suggest that MD-2 can contribute to the LPS-induced activation of the MAPKs in a heterologous system. Nonetheless, our data using both BV-2 microglial cells and CHO-K1 cells illustrate that although MD-2 may be involved in the LPS-induced activation of p38 and JNKs 1 and 2, another factor/protein is also likely to be involved in ERK activation following LPS treatment.

In this regard, one receptor system that may play an important role in LPS-stimulated ERK activation is the purinergic receptor P2X7. The P2X7 receptor is an ATP-gated cation channel, and previous work from our laboratory (46) has demonstrated that this nucleotide receptor is involved in certain LPS-stimulated end points in RAW 264.7 macrophages, such as NF-kappa B and ERK activation as well as iNOS up-regulation and NO production. Interestingly, the LPS-binding protein CD14 may act to potentiate P2X7 receptor signaling with respect to NF-kappa B, p38, and JNK activation, but not ERK activation.2 Although the expression levels of the P2X7 receptor appear to be comparable in both cell lines (data not shown), it is conceivable that the expression of other proteins that may play an adaptive role between P2X7 and CD14, or that are involved in transducing the signals from the P2X7/CD14-containing protein complex are different or absent in BV-2 cells.

Another explanation for the negligible effect of LPS on ERK activation in BV-2 and CHO-K1/CD14-expressing cells may be that they lack a critical signaling component involved in regulating the ERK cascade. However, because PMA, LPS, and BzATP most likely utilize overlapping signaling mechanisms to stimulate the ERKs, it is probable that the signaling molecules required for ERK activation are present in BV-2 cells, given that PMA and BzATP retained the capacity to activate the ERKs. However, it is also possible that the activation of ERK-1 and ERK-2 is mediated in macrophage-like cells, such as RAW 264.7 cells, by an autocrine factor/receptor that is missing in BV-2 and CHO-K1/CD14-expressing cells. Due to the delayed onset of ERK activation in RAW 264.7 cells stimulated with LPS (10-15 min), compared with that of PMA or BzATP (<= 5 min), it is possible that a factor(s) is released upon LPS stimulation of macrophages that, in turn, results in ERK activation in RAW 264.7 cells. This factor may not be produced or secreted by BV-2 cells. Alternatively, both BV-2 and CHO-K1/CD14 cells may lack the ability to respond to this factor, perhaps because they do not express the receptor for this factor.

An additional consideration in the present investigations is the concept that a critical ratio of CD14 or MD-2 to Toll-like receptor may need to exist in order for LPS to elicit ERK activation. It is also conceivable that Toll-like receptors may not confer all forms of LPS responsiveness to all cell types (66, 69). Several lines of evidence supporting this idea already exist in the literature (46, 47, 70, 71) and suggest that select LPS responses may be mediated, or at least controlled, through the modulation of the P2X7 receptor. The existence of other LPS-sensitive signaling systems within immune cells does not preclude a role for the Toll-like receptors, but may in fact expand the repertoire of proteins capable of responding to the presence of Gram-negative bacterial infection.

Taken together, these results suggest that ERK activation is not required for the LPS-stimulated generation of NO, IL-1beta , and NF-kappa B DNA binding activity. Additionally, they suggest that activation of ERK-1 and ERK-2 is not an essential part of LPS-induced signaling events in cells that are highly responsive to LPS, namely BV-2 microglial cells. Furthermore, the expression levels of CD14, TLR-4, and MD-2 in BV-2 microglia in comparison to RAW 264.7 macrophages indicate that increased LPS responsiveness is not directly proportional to the amount of LPS binding/signaling proteins that are expressed. Therefore, we propose a model wherein the activation of ERK-1 and ERK-2, initiated upon LPS exposure of RAW 264.7 cells, serves as a feedback control loop for LPS responsiveness. For example, in RAW 264.7 cells, LPS substantially increases ERK activation (Fig. 5B and 6A), and the amount of NO produced is less than that of BV-2 cells (Fig. 1B). This model predicts that BV-2 cells, a cell line in which LPS does not detectably stimulate ERK-1 and ERK-2 activity, would be more sensitive to LPS with regard to certain end points, and we have observed that MEK inhibitors potentiate the ability of LPS to promote NO production in RAW 264.7 cells (Fig. 9C). These data are consistent with the idea that ERK activation may in fact be inhibitory to the production of selected mediators such as NO. It is interesting to note that the MEK inhibitor UO126 does not appear to promote increases in iNOS protein (data not shown), suggesting that the role of the Ras/MEK/ERK pathway may be manifested at the level of substrate availability rather than at iNOS expression.

The receptors that are involved in LPS stimulation of microglial and macrophage cells are not completely understood, although the Toll-like receptors, especially TLR-4, are currently believed to be responsible for many LPS-induced signaling events. ERK activation has long been an event attributed to the LPS stimulation of numerous cell types (13-17, 72, 73). Although the present observations focus on RAW 264.7 and BV-2 cell lines and may not reflect the behavior of all macrophage and microglia cell types, the data presented here nonetheless reveal that ERK activation is not a required component of LPS action. In fact, LPS retains the capacity to potently stimulate cytokine and mediator production in BV-2 microglial cells in a manner that is at least as sensitive as that observed in the highly LPS-responsive RAW 264.7 macrophages (which is a cell type wherein LPS exposure promotes ERK-1 and ERK-2 activation). In addition, because both cell types express Toll-like receptors and MD-2, but have differential LPS signaling responses, it is conceivable that additional receptors/proteins are required for mediating/modulating LPS actions.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Gary Weisman and Douglas Golenbock for generosity in supplying the cell lines used in these studies. We thank Gregory Weipz and Arturo Guadarrama for their technical help and support. We also thank Richard Proctor and Loren Denlinger for insightful discussions about the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Supported by National Institutes of Health Grants CA47881/GM53271/HL56396/AI34891 and the Draper Fund (University-Industry Research Fund).

Supported by National Research Service Award F32 CA81733.

** Supported by National Institutes of Health Biotechnology Training Program T32-GM08349.

Dagger Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biomole- cular Chemistry, 1300 University Ave., University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706. Tel.: 608-262-8667; Fax: 608-263-5253; E-mail: pbertics@facstaff.wisc.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 10, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M104385200

2 J. A. Sommer, J. J. Watters, and P. J. Bertics, submitted for publication.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; NF-kappa B, nuclear factor-kappa B; Ikappa B, inhibitory subunit of kappa B; TLR-4, Toll-like receptor 4; BzATP, 3'-O-(4-benzoylbenzoyl)-ATP; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; BSA, bovine serum albumin; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase; PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorter; iNOS, inducible nitric-oxide synthase; IL, interleukin; TNFalpha , tumor necrosis factor alpha ; HEK 293, human embryonic kidney 293; RT, reverse transcription.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Hauser, C. J. (1996) New Horizons 4, 235-251[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Gordon, S. (1998) Res. Immunol. 149, 685-688[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Zielasek, J., and Hartung, H. P. (1996) Adv. Neuroimmunol. 6, 191-222[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Calingasan, N. Y., Park, L. C., Calo, L. L., Trifiletti, R. R., Gandy, S. E., and Gibson, G. E. (1998) Am. J. Pathol. 153, 599-610[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Licinio, J., and Wong, M. L. (1997) J. Clin. Invest. 100, 2941-2947[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Sternberg, E. M. (1997) J. Clin. Invest. 100, 2641-2647[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Monning, U., Sandbrink, R., Banati, R. B., Masters, C. L., and Beyreuther, K. (1994) FEBS Lett. 342, 267-272[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Kopec, K. K., and Carroll, R. T. (1998) J. Neurochem. 71, 2123-2131[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Bitting, L., Naidu, A., Cordell, B., and Murphy, G. M., Jr. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 16084-16089[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Denlinger, L. C., Fisette, P. L., Garis, K. A., Daugherty, S. K., Bertics, P. J., and Proctor, R. A. (1996) in Novel Therapeutic Strategies in the Treatment of Sepsis (Morrison, D. C. , and Ryan, J. L., eds) , pp. 227-252, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York
11. Garrington, T. P., and Johnson, G. L. (1999) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 211-218[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Lewis, T. S., Shapiro, P. S., and Ahn