Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M104385200 on January 10, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 11, 9077-9087, March 15, 2002
A Differential Role for the Mitogen-activated Protein Kinases in
Lipopolysaccharide Signaling
THE MEK/ERK PATHWAY IS NOT ESSENTIAL FOR NITRIC OXIDE AND
INTERLEUKIN 1
PRODUCTION*
Jyoti J.
Watters
§¶,
Julie A.
Sommer
§
**,
Zachary A.
Pfeiffer
§**,
Usha
Prabhu
§,
Alma N.
Guerra
§, and
Paul J.
Bertics
§

From the
Department of Biomolecular Chemistry and
Program in Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, University
of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Received for publication, May 14, 2001, and in revised form, December 31, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) is a
component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria and promotes
the activation of macrophages and microglia. Although these cells are
highly LPS-responsive, they serve unique tissue-specific functions and exhibit different LPS sensitivities. Accordingly, it was of interest to
evaluate whether these biological differences reside in variations within LPS signaling pathways between these two cell types. Because the
mitogen-activated protein kinases ERK-1 and ERK-2 have been implicated
in the control of many immune responses, we tested the concept that
they are a key indicator for differences in cellular LPS sensitivity.
We observed that murine RAW 264.7 macrophages and murine BV-2
microglial cells both respond to LPS by exhibiting increased I
B
degradation, enhanced NF-
B DNA binding activity, and elevated nitric
oxide and interleukin-1
production. Although LPS potently stimulates
ERK activation in RAW 264.7 macrophages, it does not activate ERK-1/-2
in BV-2 microglia. Moreover, antagonism of the MEK/ERK pathway
potentiates LPS-stimulated nitric oxide production, suggesting that
LPS-stimulated ERK activation can exert inhibitory effects in
macrophage-like cells. These data support the idea that ERK activation
is not a required function of LPS-mediated signaling events and
illustrate that alternative/additional pathways for LPS action exist in
these cell types.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Lipopolysaccharide (endotoxin,
LPS)1 is a component of the
outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria and can potently promote the activation of macrophage and microglial cells, which are important sensors of infection by bacteria, fungi, and viruses, in both the
periphery and the central nervous system (1-3). Microglia are resident
macrophages with wide distribution in nervous tissues, and upon
activation by endotoxin or various microorganisms, these cells and
other mononuclear phagocytes produce several toxic mediators, such as
nitric oxide (NO) and free radicals, in addition to numerous cytokines,
including interleukin 1
(IL-1
) and tumor necrosis factor
(TNF
). The production of these mediators, although beneficial for
killing bacteria and further activating the immune system, can also
contribute to significant tissue damage, especially in the brain. For
example, the generation of NO by microglial cells may promote brain
damage during infection by enhancing vascular permeability and
potentially compromising the blood brain barrier (4-6). Additionally,
the activation of microglial cells may contribute to neurodegenerative
disorders as a result of their production of
-amyloid protein
(7-9), which is deposited in plaques thought to be important in the
pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Moreover, microglial cells have
also been implicated in neuronal injury such as stroke, meningitis, and
multiple sclerosis. Thus, a further understanding of microglial cell
activation and function should allow for the identification of
potential targets for therapeutic intervention in these neuronal disorders.
Multiple signaling pathways are known to be activated in macrophages
upon LPS exposure (10). Among these pathways are the mitogen-activated
protein kinases (MAPKs), which are a highly conserved family of protein
serine/threonine kinases and include the extracellular signal-regulated
kinases ERK-1 and ERK-2 (11, 12). Along with nuclear factor-
B
(NF-
B) activation, ERK activation is often used as a hallmark of
LPS-induced signal transduction in many cell types (13-19). It has
been proposed that ERK (p42/p44 MAPK) activation is involved in
LPS-induced cellular responses, such as the increased production of
TNF
, inducible nitric-oxide synthase (iNOS) and NO, and
interleukin-6 (IL-6) (20-22). Recent data suggest, however, that the
ERKs are not involved in iNOS or NO production in macrophages nor in
the activation of NF-
B DNA binding activity (23, 24), but rather
other MAPKs, specifically p38, have been postulated to be important in
the control of these end points. Therefore, given the powerful
responses of macrophages and microglia to LPS, it is important to
establish the relative contribution of the ERKs and p38 in the LPS
sensitivity of these two cell types.
Because NF-
B activity regulates the expression of several cytokine
genes including TNF
, IL-6, and IL-1
(25-31), and because LPS
modulates its activity, the status of NF-
B DNA binding activity is a
key issue when considering the mechanisms of LPS signaling in murine
macrophages and microglial cells. NF-
B is a homo- or heterodimeric
transcription factor whose function is regulated by the binding of an
inhibitory protein, I
B. Upon serine phosphorylation of the I
B
protein, it is targeted for proteasome-mediated degradation, thus
allowing the now transcriptionally active NF-
B protein complex to
translocate into the nucleus where it can bind to various regulatory elements present in gene promoter regions (32). LPS is known to
stimulate the degradation of one of the isoforms of I
B, I
B
, and accordingly, LPS promotes the activation of NF-
B DNA binding activity in numerous myelocytic cell types, including phagocytes (19).
Additionally, it has been documented that NF-
B not only plays a role
in the regulation of cytokine genes but also in the expression of other
genes important for macrophage and microglial cell function. For
example, binding sites for NF-
B are present in the promoter of the
iNOS gene, and these have been shown to be involved in iNOS gene
up-regulation (33, 34).
There are several known LPS-binding proteins present on macrophage
membranes, including CD14, CD11b/18, and Toll-like receptors (35).
Toll-like receptors are mammalian homologs of the Drosophila Toll receptor and are involved in initiating innate immune defense against bacteria and fungi (36). Because CD14 lacks a transmembrane domain and is unlikely to initiate signals on its own, it is noteworthy that the Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR-4) has emerged as a potential signaling partner for LPS/CD14 interactions (37-39). The presence of
TLR-4 alone in transfected cell systems is insufficient to confer
substantial LPS responsiveness unless another protein, MD-2, is present
(40). Thus, the Toll-like receptors are believed to be responsible for
much of the observed CD14-dependent, LPS-induced ERK
(41-43) and NF-
B (44) activation.
Although LPS is a potent activator of several cell types, such as
macrophages and microglial cells, these cells often play unique
tissue-specific roles and exhibit different sensitivities to LPS. These
types of biological differences may be inherent in variations within
LPS signaling pathways. Because ERK-1 and ERK-2 have been implicated in
the control of a wide variety of macrophage mediators, the present
studies were initiated to evaluate the hypothesis that variations in
the activation pattern of the ERKs and NF-
B can serve as indicators
for differences in LPS sensitivity between macrophage-like cells.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
LPS (Escherichia coli 0111:B4),
3'-O-(4-benzoylbenzoyl)-ATP (BzATP), anisomycin, and the
phorbol ester PMA were purchased from Sigma.
Cell Culture--
Murine RAW 264.7 macrophage cells were grown
to ~80% confluency and routinely passaged in RPMI 1640 medium
containing 5% cosmic calf serum (Mediatech, Herndon, VA) and 100 units/ml penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen). BV-2 microglial cells
were a kind gift from Dr. Gary Weisman (University of
Missouri-Columbia) and were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum and 100 units/ml
penicillin/streptomycin. RAW 264.7 and BV-2 cells were cultured in
100-mm Falcon plates (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). CHO-K1
stable cell lines expressing vector (CHO-K1/Neo) or human CD14
(CHO-K1/CD14) were generously provided to us by Dr. Douglas Golenbock
(Boston University School of Medicine) (45) and were grown as described
for RAW 264.7 cells. Prior to each experiment, cells were plated
overnight in Falcon 24-well plates (RAW cells at 8.5 × 104 cells/well and BV-2 cells at 7 × 104
cells/well). The following day, cells were treated with LPS at the
concentrations indicated in the figures or with the phorbol ester PMA
(100 nM) or BzATP (250 µM) as positive
controls. BzATP is a ligand for the purinergic receptor
P2X7 and has been shown previously to powerfully stimulate
the activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinases ERK-1 and ERK-2
in murine RAW 264.7 macrophages (46, 47). Human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK 293) cells were grown to 80% confluency and routinely passaged in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum
(Mediatech) and 100 units/ml penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen) and
were used as a negative control cell line for TLR-4 expression
(43).
Immunoblotting for MAPKs, I
B
, and TLR-4--
Whole cell
lysates were prepared by lysing CHO-K1, CHO-CD14, BV-2, and RAW 264.7 cells, plated as indicated above, in SDS-PAGE sample buffer without
bromphenol blue (20 mM Tris, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM Na3VO4, 2 mM
dithiothreitol, 2% SDS, 20% glycerol). Protein content was determined
using the Micro-BCA Protein Assay (Pierce). Equal amounts of protein
(~25 µg) were loaded per lane and separated by 10% SDS-PAGE as
described by Laemmli (48). Proteins in the gels were transferred to
Immobilon polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore Corp.,
Bedford, MA), and the membranes were subsequently blocked in 5%
non-fat milk/TBST (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20). Anti-active ERK antibodies (Promega, Madison, WI) that recognize the dually tyrosine- and threonine-phosphorylated, and thus enzymatically active forms of ERK-1
and ERK-2, were used at a dilution of 1:5000. Anti-I
B
antibodies
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) were diluted 1:1000 in 5%
milk/TBST and used to measure I
B
degradation following treatment
with LPS. For detection of p38 and JNK activation, membranes were
blocked in 1% IgG and protease-free BSA (Jackson ImmunoResearch, Bar
Harbor, ME). Anti-active p38 antibodies were used at a final dilution
of 1:4000 in 0.1% BSA/TBST, and anti-active JNK antibodies were
employed at a final concentration of 1:5000 in 0.1% BSA/TBST. Cell
lysates (100 µg of protein) were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and
transferred to PVDF membranes for immunoblotting using anti-TLR-4 antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at a final dilution of 1:1000 in
5% milk/TBST. The immunoreactive bands were visualized using secondary
antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) and Lumi-Glo chemiluminescent detection methods (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD). To confirm equal
protein loading, membranes were stripped at 70 °C for 30 min with a
buffer consisting of 62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.7, 2% SDS, and
100 mM dithiothreitol. The immunoblots were re-blocked in 5% milk/TBST followed by incubation with antibodies that react with
both active and inactive forms of ERK-1 and ERK-2 proteins (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology). Bands were visualized using chemiluminescence. The data
shown are representative of at least three separate experiments.
Measurement of iNOS, NO, and IL-1
Production--
Murine BV-2
and RAW 264.7 cells were cultured in 24-well plates as described above.
Cells were treated for 20 h with LPS at the concentrations
indicated in the figures. For NO determination, the medium was removed;
the cells were washed, and whole cell lysates were prepared as
described above. The concentration of NO in the medium was determined
using the Greiss reagent as described previously (49). For experiments
investigating the involvement of MAPK signaling pathways, the MEK1/MEK2
inhibitor UO126 (10 µM, Promega) or the p38 MAPK
antagonist SB 202190 (10 µM, Calbiochem) were used to
pretreat RAW 264.7 or BV-2 cells for 15 min prior to incubation with
LPS. In some experiments, additional pulses of UO 126 were also given
at several hour intervals following LPS stimulation, as indicated in
the figure legends. To confirm the activity of these inhibitors, BV-2
cells were pretreated with 10 µM UO126 or 10 µM SB 202190 followed by stimulation with either 1 µM PMA (a potent activator of ERK-1 and
2) or with 10 µg/ml anisomycin (a potent activator of p38). Additionally, to
ascertain the time period that UO126 is capable of inhibiting ERK
activation in culture, RAW 264.7 cells were treated for 2, 4, 6, or
18 h with 10 µM UO126 followed by stimulation with
100 nM PMA for 5 min, and ERK-1/ERK-2 and/or p38 activation
was measured as described above. To assess NO levels, the breakdown
product nitrite was measured in the medium as detailed above. The
Student's t test was used to evaluate the statistical
differences between various treatment groups, with the level of
significance being set at not more than p < 0.02. The
levels of iNOS were measured by immunoblotting, as outlined above.
Equal amounts of protein (~25 µg) were loaded and separated in each
lane of a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The separated proteins were
transferred to a PVDF membrane, and the membrane was blocked in 5%
milk/TBST. Anti-iNOS antibodies (1:2000) (Transduction Laboratories,
Lexington, KY) were used to measure iNOS protein up-regulation
following treatment with LPS. Equal protein loading was confirmed by
stripping and re-probing blots with anti-ERK antibodies. For IL-1
level determinations, cells were treated for 3-18 h with either 10 or
1000 ng/ml LPS, and then Quantikine-M ELISA assays (R & D Systems,
Minneapolis, MN) were performed according to the manufacturer's
protocol. This assay system measures both the processed and immature
forms of IL-1
.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays--
Nuclear extracts were
prepared from RAW 264.7 macrophages and BV-2 microglial cells grown in
100-mm Falcon plates, and gel mobility assays were performed as
described previously (50). In these experiments, the cells were treated
with 1 µg/ml LPS for 30, 60, or 90 min and lysed, and 10 µg of
nuclear protein extract was incubated with 32P-labeled
double-stranded oligonucleotide probe encoding two consensus NF-
B
DNA-binding sites. The DNA-protein complexes were separated using
non-denaturing PAGE techniques, and the gels were dried and apposed to film.
CD14 Flow Cytometric Analysis--
Murine RAW 264.7 macrophages
and BV-2 microglial cells were removed from 100-mm Falcon plates using
a non-enzymatic cell dissociation solution (Sigma catalog number
C-1544). Cells (~5 × 105) were washed and
resuspended in PBS containing 1% BSA. Rat anti-mouse CD14 (PharMingen
International, San Diego, CA) or isotype control antibodies (Caltag
Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) were added to the cells at a final
concentration of 1 µg/tube and incubated for 1 h at 4 °C.
After washing with PBS, 1% BSA, the cells were again incubated for 30 min at 4 °C with 1 µg/tube of anti-rat IgG phycoerythrin-labeled
secondary antibodies (Caltag Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Cells were
washed and resuspended in PBS, 1% BSA. Propidium iodide (~10
µg/tube) was added to differentiate live from dead cells. FACS
analysis was performed in a Becton-Dickinson FACScan Flow Cytometer
gating 10,000 live events.
Reverse Transcription (RT)-PCR--
Murine RAW 264.7 macrophages
and BV-2 microglia were grown in 100-mm plates as detailed above. Cells
were lysed in 1 ml of Tri- Reagent (Sigma), and total RNA was harvested
as described by the manufacturer's protocol, followed by DNase I
treatment for 60 min and heat inactivation at 95 °C for 10 min. Five
µg of total RNA were used as templates for the RT-PCR using random hexamers and Superscript Reverse Transcriptase II (Invitrogen). Reactions were performed according to the manufacturer's protocol except that the reverse transcriptase enzyme was omitted in one sample
for control purposes. Following reverse transcription, 1/10 of the
total RT reaction was utilized for PCR of MD-2 mRNA using the
following murine primers: 5' TCT GCA ACT CCT CCG ATG CAA TTA TTT CCT AC
and 5' TGT ATT CAC AGT CTC TCC TTT CAG AGC TCT GC. The expected size of
the amplified fragment is 274 bp. As a control,
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH, expected amplimer size
982 bp) was also amplified using the following human primer sequences:
5' TGA AGG TCG GAG TCA ACG GAT TTG GT and 5' CAT GTG GGC CAT GAG GTC
CAC CAC.
 |
RESULTS |
Effect of LPS on iNOS, NO, and IL-1
Production in BV-2
Microglial and RAW 264.7 Macrophage Cells--
The murine macrophage
cell line RAW 264.7 recapitulates the behavior of peripheral macrophage
cells, whereas BV-2 cells retain the characteristics of activated
microglial cells. These cells have similar antigen profiles, phagocytic
capacities, and anti-microbial activities and respond to LPS in terms
of NO production (51-53). Although the production of cytokines and
mediators by macrophages and microglia are known to be critical for
their function (53-55), it is unclear how these cells compare with
regard to LPS responsiveness. Treatment of both RAW 264.7 macrophages
and BV-2 microglial cells for 16-20 h with increasing concentrations
of LPS (10-1000 ng/ml) results in increased iNOS protein levels (Fig.
1A) and subsequent NO
production (Fig. 1B). However, as illustrated in Fig.
1B, on a per cell basis, BV-2 microglial cells respond more
robustly to LPS than do RAW 264.7 macrophages in terms of NO
production. This effect is most notable at the lower concentrations of
LPS (10 and 100 ng/ml) where BV-2 cells produce more NO over the course of the assay than do RAW 264.7 cells.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Effect of LPS on iNOS expression and NO
generation by murine RAW 264.7 macrophages and BV-2 microglial cells.
A, RAW 264.7 (~8.5 × 104 cells/well) and
BV-2 cells (~7 × 104 cells/well) were treated with
10-1000 ng/ml LPS for 16 h. Whole cell lysates were prepared, and
proteins (~25 µg) were separated by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were
transferred to PVDF membrane and probed with an anti-iNOS antibody, and
the bands were visualized using chemiluminescence. B, NO
levels in the medium from the cells in A were determined
using the Griess reagent as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The data are expressed as the mean (pmol of nitrite per
5000 cells) ± S.E. of triplicate samples. Analogous results were
obtained in three separate experiments.
|
|
Interestingly, a different pattern of LPS responsiveness is also
observed with regard to the release of the cytokine IL-1
by RAW
264.7 macrophages and BV-2 microglial cells (Fig.
2). In these studies, ELISAs were used to
measure immunoreactive IL-1
species released into the tissue culture
medium from both cell lines. This method allows for the detection of
both the immature (pro-IL-1
) as well as the mature (cleaved IL-1
)
forms of the cytokine. When RAW 264.7 and BV-2 cells are treated with
LPS (10 and 1000 ng/ml) for 3-18 h, a large increase in immunoreactive IL-1
is observed in the tissue culture medium at 18 h (Fig.
2A). However, in addition to the differential LPS
sensitivities of these two cell types, i.e. BV-2 microglia
generate more immunodetectable IL-1
in the tissue culture medium on
a per cell basis following treatment with 1000 ng/ml LPS for 18 h,
we also detected a substantial difference in the kinetics of IL-1
appearance. In contrast to RAW 264.7 macrophages, IL-1
levels in the
medium were detectable in the BV-2 microglial cell cultures within
3 h of treatment, while after 9 h of LPS (1000 ng/ml)
exposure, the medium from both cell types contained approximately equal
levels of IL-1
(Fig. 2A). Although the present ELISAs
cannot discriminate between processed and immature forms of IL-1
,
more IL-1
is detected in the medium of RAW 264.7 cells over time in
response to 10 ng/ml LPS than is found with BV-2 microglial cells. In
fact, the amount of immunoreactive IL-1
produced by BV-2 microglial
cells in response to 10 ng/ml LPS appears unchanged over an 18-h
period. Because this observation is different from what has been
reported regarding IL-1
production by macrophages and macrophage
cell lines (56-62), we evaluated the kinetics of IL-1
accumulation
in the tissue culture medium in BV-2 microglial cells in response to 10 and 1000 ng/ml LPS (Fig. 2B). Again, as illustrated in Fig.
2, A and B, similar levels of detectable IL-1
were found in the medium from BV-2 cells following treatment with 10 ng/ml LPS for 6-18 h.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Influence of LPS on IL-1
release by murine RAW 264.7 macrophages and BV-2 microglial
cells. A, total (processed and immature) immunodetectable
IL-1 levels, as determined by ELISA, were measured in the culture
medium of both RAW 264.7 and BV-2 cells treated with 10 or 1000 ng/ml
LPS as indicated in the figure for 3-18 h. B, total IL-1
levels, as determined by ELISA, were measured in the culture medium of
BV-2 cells treated with 10 or 1000 ng/ml LPS as indicated in the figure
for 3-18 h. The data are expressed as the mean (femtograms of IL-1
per 5000 cells) ± S.E. of triplicate or quadruplicate samples.
The results shown are representative of experiments performed in at
least three separate trials. This ELISA detection method does not
differentiate between the pro- (immature) and cleaved (mature) forms of
IL-1 released into the culture medium.
|
|
Expression of CD14, TLR-4, and MD-2 on RAW 264.7 and BV-2
Cells--
Although LPS potently stimulates both RAW 264.7 macrophages
and BV-2 microglial cells to produce cytokines and NO, BV-2 cells exhibit an altered pattern of LPS responsiveness, especially at lower
LPS concentrations and earlier time points. To determine whether the
differential sensitivity of BV-2 cells to LPS is dependent upon the
expression of the known LPS-binding protein CD14, we evaluated the
expression levels of CD14 by flow cytometry. Both RAW 264.7 cells (Fig.
3A) and BV-2 cells (Fig.
3B) exhibited a comparable level of cell surface CD14
expression. Next, the expression of another LPS receptor, TLR-4, and
its associated signaling partner MD-2 were evaluated using
immunoblotting and RT-PCR analysis, respectively. As illustrated in
Fig. 3C, TLR-4 protein expression does not appear to be
measurably different between the two cell types. Because of the lack of
availability of antibodies to evaluate MD-2 protein levels, RT-PCR was
performed in both RAW 264.7 and BV-2 cells (Fig. 3D).
Although this assay is not quantitative, both cell types exhibited
similar levels of amplified MD-2 transcripts. These data suggest that
the differential sensitivity to LPS by both RAW 264.7 and BV-2 cells is
not due to substantial differences in the expression of the LPS-binding
proteins CD14, TLR-4, or MD-2.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Expression of CD14, TLR-4, and MD-2 in RAW
264.7 and BV-2 cells. Murine RAW 264.7 and BV-2 cells (5 × 105 cells/sample) were utilized for flow cytometry analysis
using anti-CD14 and isotype control antibodies followed by
phycoerythrin-labeled secondary antibody conjugation for FACS
measurement. Ten thousand gated events were measured using both RAW
264.7 cells (A) and in BV-2 cells (B). The peaks
for both the isotype control antibody and the CD14 antibody have been
superimposed on the same graph. The data shown are representative of
four separate experiments. C, whole cell lysates from HEK
293, RAW 264.7, and BV-2 cells were prepared, and proteins (~100
µg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE for immunoblot analysis using
anti-TLR-4 antibodies. D, RT-PCR was performed on 5 µg of
total RNA from RAW 264.7 and BV-2 cells using murine MD-2 primers to
amplify a PCR product of 274 bp. PCR with GAPDH primers was utilized as
an internal control for the quality of the reverse transcriptase
reaction (expected amplimer size 982 bp). Additionally, a reverse
transcription reaction was also performed without the addition of
reverse transcriptase, followed by PCR with GAPDH primers. No bands
were detected in this reaction (data not shown).
|
|
Effect of LPS on I
B
Degradation and NF-
B DNA Binding
Activity--
The degradation of I
B proteins is involved in the
activation and nuclear translocation of NF-
B protein complexes.
I
B proteins maintain the transcription factor NF-
B in the cytosol
until they are dissociated primarily because of their serine
phosphorylation and subsequent ubiquitination targeting them for
proteasome degradation (32). LPS is known to induce the degradation of
I
B
in macrophages (63), thereby facilitating NF-
B DNA binding
activity. The stimulation of NF-
B DNA binding activity by LPS is
believed to be part of the mechanism employed by endotoxin to stimulate
NO and IL-1
production in immune cells. The data in Fig.
4A indicate that LPS, at
concentrations of 100 and 1000 ng/ml, induces the degradation of
I
B
in BV-2 microglial cells within 15 min of treatment. Fig. 4B illustrates a comparable effect in RAW 264.7 macrophages,
where 100 and 1000 ng/ml LPS stimulate the degradation of I
B
.
Similarly, NF-
B DNA binding activity in the two cell types is
apparent within 60 min of LPS treatment (Fig. 4C).
Interestingly, RAW 264.7 macrophages display a higher level of basal
NF-
B DNA binding activity than is observed in BV-2 cells.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of LPS on
I B degradation and
NF- B DNA binding activity in murine RAW 264.7 macrophages and BV-2 microglial cells. A, murine BV-2.
B, RAW 264.7 cells were treated with 10, 100, or 1000 ng/ml
LPS for 5, 10, or 15 min. Whole cell lysates were prepared and proteins
(~25 µg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE for immunoblot analysis.
Membranes were probed with an antibody to I B and visualized using
chemiluminescence to evaluate degradation of I B . C,
NF- B DNA binding activity was evaluated using nuclear extracts
prepared from both BV-2 cells and RAW 264.7 cells treated with 1 µg/ml LPS for 60 min. Nuclear protein extracts (10 µg) were
incubated with 32P-labeled double-stranded oligonucleotides
encoding a consensus NF- B-binding site. The DNA-protein complexes
were separated by non-denaturing PAGE techniques, and the gels were
dried and apposed to film. The data shown are representative of
experiments that have been performed on at least three separate
occasions.
|
|
Effect of LPS on the Mitogen-activated Protein Kinases ERK-1,
ERK-2, p38, JNK-1, and JNK-2--
Because the levels of NO produced on
a per cell basis by BV-2 cells treated with LPS were greater than those
produced by RAW cells, and given that differences in CD14 expression
were likely not the basis for this observation, we further investigated
LPS-induced signaling pathways in BV-2 cells. Surprisingly, LPS did not
detectably stimulate ERK-1 and ERK-2 in BV-2 cells (Fig.
5A) regardless of the
concentration used, whereas a dose-dependent effect was
observed in RAW 264.7 cells (Fig. 5B). To confirm that
receptor-mediated activation of ERK-1 and ERK-2 was intact in BV-2
cells, BzATP (250 µM), an agonist of the purinergic
receptor P2X7, was used as a positive control for ERK
activation in both cell types and was found to greatly induce ERK-1 and
ERK-2 activation. These blots were stripped and re-probed with an
antibody that cross-reacts with ERK-1 and ERK-2 and confirmed that
equal protein loading was obtained (data not shown). In summary, ERK
activation was observed in both RAW 264.7 and BV-2 cells following
stimulation with BzATP, indicating that BV-2 cells have the capacity to
exhibit ERK activation in response to agents other than LPS.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Dose response of LPS effects on ERK-1 and
ERK-2 activation in murine RAW 264.7 macrophages and BV-2 microglial
cells. Murine BV-2 microglia (A) and murine RAW 264.7 macrophages (B) were treated with 10, 100, or 1000 ng/ml LPS
for 5, 10, or 15 min. Cells were also stimulated with BzATP (250 µM), a well known activator of MAPKs and a ligand for the
purinergic receptor P2X7, for 5 min. Whole cell lysates
were prepared, and proteins (~25 µg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE for
immunoblot analysis. ERK-1 and ERK-2 activation was assessed using a
phospho-specific anti-active MAPK antibody that recognizes the dually
tyrosine- and threonine-phosphorylated and enzymatically active forms
of ERK-1 and ERK-2. Equal protein loading was confirmed by re-probing
these blots with an anti-ERK-1 antibody that recognizes total ERK-1 and
ERK-2 protein (data not shown). In the indicated cases, the cells were
also stimulated with BzATP (250 µM), a well known
activator of MAPKs and a ligand for the purinergic receptor
P2X7, for 5 min. ERK-1 and ERK-2 activation was assessed
using the phospho-specific anti-active MAPK antibody. Equal protein
loading was confirmed by re-probing these blots with an anti-ERK-1
antibody that recognizes total ERK-1 and ERK-2 protein (data not
shown). The data shown are representative of experiments that have been
performed as least three separate times.
|
|
To confirm further that LPS fails to stimulate ERK activation in BV-2
cells, an extended treatment with both LPS and the phorbol ester PMA
was performed over a period ranging from 5 min to 4 h. As shown in
Fig. 6A (upper
panel), RAW 264.7 cells exhibited a strong ERK activation
following stimulation with both 100 nM PMA and 1 µg/ml
LPS, although the kinetics of activation by these stimuli are
different. PMA maximally promotes ERK-1 and ERK-2 activation within 5 min of treatment, and active ERK levels remain elevated above control
levels even after 4 h. In contrast, LPS does not measurably
stimulate ERK activation until ~15 min following treatment, whereupon
it remains elevated above that observed in vehicle-treated cells until
60-120 min later, after which time active ERK levels return to basal
levels. The lower panel shows the same blot stripped and
re-probed with an antibody that cross-reacts with ERK-1 and, to a
lesser degree, ERK-2 to confirm equal protein loading.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Extended time course of ERK activation
following LPS and phorbol ester treatment of murine RAW 264.7 macrophages and BV-2 microglial cells. A, murine RAW 264.7 macrophages were treated with 1 µg/ml LPS or 100 nM PMA
for 5-240 min as indicated in the figure. Whole cell lysates were
prepared, and proteins (~25 µg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE for
immunoblot analysis. ERK-1 and ERK-2 activation was assessed using a
phospho-specific anti-active MAPK antibody (upper panel). To
confirm equal protein loading, the lower panel shows the
same blot stripped and re-probed with an antibody that cross-reacts
with ERK-1 and, to a lesser degree, ERK-2. B, murine BV-2
microglia were treated with 1 µg/ml LPS or 100 nM PMA for
5-240 min as indicated in the figure. Whole cell lysates were
prepared, and proteins (~25 µg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE for
immunoblot analysis. ERK-1 and ERK-2 activation was assessed using a
phospho-specific anti-active MAPK antibody (upper panel). To
confirm equal protein loading, the lower panel shows the
same blot stripped and re-probed with an antibody that cross-reacts
with ERK-1 and, to a lesser degree, ERK-2. The data shown are
representative of experiments that have been performed on at least
three separate occasions.
|
|
Interestingly, the kinetics of PMA-stimulated ERK-1 and ERK-2
activation in BV-2 cells is different from that observed in RAW 264.7 macrophage cells (Fig. 6B, upper panel). In BV-2
cells it is primarily ERK-2 activity that is stimulated upon PMA (100 nM) treatment, although some ERK-1 activation is observed.
Active ERK-2 levels are increased upon PMA treatment of BV-2 cells
within 5 min, and these remain elevated for 30 min. After this time
they begin to decrease until after 4 h of treatment, whereupon
active ERK levels return to approximately those observed in
vehicle-treated cells. Again, as shown in Fig. 6B, LPS (1 µg/ml) does not detectably stimulate ERK activation within a 4-h
period, indicating that LPS has different signaling effects in RAW
264.7 macrophages versus BV-2 microglial cells. The
lower panel shows the same blot stripped and re-probed with
an antibody that cross-reacts with ERK-1 and to a lesser degree, ERK-2,
to confirm equal protein loading.
Because LPS does not promote the activation of ERK-1 and ERK-2 in BV-2
cells, it was of interest to evaluate its effects on the activation of
other MAPKs in BV-2 cells. As illustrated in Fig.
7, within 15 min of treatment, LPS can
promote p38 (Fig. 7A) and JNK (Fig. 7B)
activation in BV-2 cells. It is noteworthy that the activation of p38,
but not the ERKs, has recently been implicated in LPS-stimulated NO
production (24). This observation is in contrast to previous studies
suggesting that both ERK and p38 activation are involved in NO and
TNF
production (20, 22).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Time course and dose response of LPS on the
activation of p38 and JNK MAPKs in murine BV-2 cells. A,
murine BV-2 microglia were treated with 10, 100, or 1000 ng/ml LPS for
5, 10, or 15 min. Whole cell lysates were prepared, and proteins (~25
µg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE for immunoblot analysis. Activation of
p38 was assessed using a phospho-specific anti-active p38 antibody that
recognizes the dually tyrosine- and threonine-phosphorylated and
enzymatically active form of p38. Equal protein loading was confirmed
by re-probing these blots with an anti-ERK-1 antibody that recognizes
total ERK-1 and ERK-2 protein (data not shown). B, murine
BV-2 microglia were treated with 10, 100, or 1000 ng/ml LPS for 5, 10, or 15 min. Whole cell lysates were prepared, and proteins (~25 µg)
were resolved by SDS-PAGE for immunoblot analysis. Activation of JNK-1
and JNK-2 was assessed using a phospho-specific anti-active JNK
antibody that recognizes the dually tyrosine- and
threonine-phosphorylated and enzymatically active forms of JNK-1 and
JNK-2. Equal protein loading was confirmed by re-probing these blots
with an anti-ERK-1 antibody that recognizes total ERK-1 and ERK-2
protein (data not shown).
|
|
Recapitulation of the BV-2 Cell Phenotype in Transfected CHO-K1
Cells--
To determine whether the lack of LPS-stimulated ERK
activation is a phenotype specific to BV-2 microglial cells, we tested the ability of CHO-K1 cells to respond to LPS with regard to this end
point. CHO-K1 cells are known to express the LPS receptor TLR-4
(64-66). This receptor has been reported to be essential for
LPS-stimulated NF-
B DNA binding activity and many of the cell
signaling events initiated upon LPS treatment, such as activation of
ERK-1 and ERK-2 (41, 42, 44). CHO-K1/Neo and CHO-KI/CD14 cells were
found to express TLR-4 protein and MD-2 mRNA (data not shown). As
illustrated in Fig. 8A, LPS
promotes I
B
degradation in RAW 264.7 cells and in CHO-K1 cells
transfected with a CD14 expression vector (CHO-K1/CD14) but not in
cells transfected with empty vector alone (CHO-K1/NEO). In contrast,
ERK activation was not observed in either CD14-expressing CHO-K1 cells
or in the parental vector-expressing cells at either concentration of
LPS (1 or 10 µg/ml), but LPS-stimulated ERK activation was observed in RAW 264.7 cells (Fig. 8B). PMA, a phorbol ester, achieves
ERK activation by receptor-independent mechanisms and was observed to
stimulate the activation of ERK-1 and ERK-2 in all the three cell
lines, whereas LPS was without effect in the CHO-K1/NEO- and
CHO-K1/CD14-expressing cells (Fig. 8, B and C).
Together, these data suggest that ERK activation is not a necessary
part of LPS-mediated signal transduction because in both BV-2 cells and
in CHO-K1 cells LPS can elicit the degradation of I
B
as well as
the production of IL-1
and NO in the absence of ERK activation. Additionally, these data suggest that LPS stimulation of CD14/TLR-4 receptors in CHO-K1 cells does not lead to ERK activation.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effect of LPS treatment on ERK activation and
I B degradation in CD14 expressing CHO-K1 cells. A, RAW
264.7, CHO-K1/Neo, and CHO-K1/CD14 cells were treated with 1 µg/ml
LPS for 30 min. Whole cell lysates were prepared, and proteins (~25
µg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE for immunoblot analysis. Membranes were
probed with an antibody to I B and visualized using
chemiluminescence to evaluate degradation of I B . B,
RAW 264.7, CHO-K1/Neo, and CHO-K1/CD14 cells were treated with 1 or 10 µg/ml LPS or 1 µM PMA for 15 min as indicated in the
figure. Whole cell lysates were prepared, and proteins (~25 µg)
were resolved by SDS-PAGE for immunoblot analysis. Activation of ERK-1
and ERK-2 proteins was assessed using a phospho-specific anti-active
MAPK antibody. Equal protein loading was confirmed by re-probing these
blots with an anti-ERK-1 antibody that recognizes total ERK-1 and ERK-2
protein (data not shown). C, graphical representation of
optical densities obtained from the measurement of active ERK-1 and
ERK-2 immunoreactive bands (n = 6 separate experiments)
in RAW 264.7 macrophages and CHO-K1/NEO and CHO-K1/CD14 cells treated
with either vehicle or 1 µg/ml LPS for 15 min. The data were obtained
using the program NIH Image and are expressed in arbitrary units, as
the mean ± S.E.
|
|
MAPK Involvement in LPS-stimulated NO Production in BV-2
Cells--
Because LPS was observed to activate p38 MAPKs in BV-2
cells, but not ERK-1 or ERK-2, it was of interest to evaluate the
involvement of these pathways in LPS-stimulated mediator production by
these cells. Thus, we tested the role of both the MEK/ERK pathway and the p38 pathway in NO production in BV-2 cells using the pharmacologic inhibitors UO126 (MEK1/2 inhibitor, 10 µM) and SB 202190 (p38 inhibitor, 10 µM). As illustrated in Fig.
9A, in BV-2 cells, LPS stimulation of NO production is unaffected by the MEK inhibitor UO126,
whereas NO production is profoundly diminished in the presence of the
p38 inhibitor SB 202190. Interestingly, in RAW 264.7 cells, addition of
UO126 does not diminish the production of NO, but rather it potentiates
the effect of LPS (p < 0.02) (Fig. 9, B and
C), whereas inhibition of p38 by SB 202190 significantly
reduced (p < 0.02) the amount of NO produced by RAW
264.7 cells following LPS stimulation (Fig. 9B). As shown in
Fig. 9C, subsequent treatment of RAW 264.7 cells with
additional pulses of UO126 (4 and/or 8 h) after the initial 15-min
pretreatment (Fig. 9C, UO 15') does not alter the
ability of LPS to promote NO production (p < 0.01), further supporting the idea that ERK activation is not required for LPS
induction of NO production. As controls for the ability of these
inhibitors to block ERK and p38 activation, BV-2 cells were pretreated
with the inhibitors for 15 min prior to stimulation with either 1 µM PMA or 10 µg/ml anisomycin. The upper
panel of Fig. 9D demonstrates that UO126 blocks
PMA-stimulated ERK-1 and ERK-2 activation, and the lower
panel shows blockade of p38 activation stimulated by anisomycin
using SB202190. Furthermore, to ascertain the length of time that UO126
will inhibit ERK activation following treatment of RAW 264.7 macrophages in cell culture, Fig. 9E demonstrates that 2, 4, 6, and 18 h after addition of UO126 to cell culture PMA is unable
to elicit a detectable increase in ERK activation, suggesting that the
inhibitor is functional in cell culture even after 18 h of
addition. These data also imply that any autocrine factor that might be
released by macrophages following LPS treatment that in turn might
stimulate ERK activation in BV-2 cells after the 4-h period tested in
Fig. 6B would also be inhibited. These data support the idea
that MEKs 1 and 2 and/or ERKs-1 and
2 are not necessary for
LPS-stimulated NO production in BV-2 microglial cells, whereas p38 MAPK
activation is associated with this LPS action. This conclusion is
further supported by the observations that LPS does not detectably
stimulate ERK-1 and ERK-2 activation in BV-2 microglial cells, although
it very potently promotes p38 activation.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Effect of LPS treatment on nitric oxide
production in BV-2 and RAW 264.7 macrophages in the presence of MEK and
p38 inhibitors. A, BV-2 cells were treated with 100 or 1000 ng/ml LPS for 16 h in the presence or absence of SB 202190 or
UO126 administered 15 min prior to stimulation with LPS. NO levels in
the medium were determined using the Griess reagent as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The data are expressed as the mean ± S.E. of triplicate samples. B, RAW 264.7 cells were
treated with 100 ng/ml LPS for 16 h in the presence or absence of
SB 202190 or UO126 administered 15 min prior to stimulation with LPS.
NO levels in the medium were determined using the Griess reagent as
described under "Experimental Procedures." The data are expressed
as the mean ± S.E. of triplicate samples. *, p < 0.02 with respect to LPS stimulation alone. C, RAW 264.7 cells were treated with 100 ng/ml LPS for 16 h in the presence or
absence of UO126 administered 15 min prior to stimulation with LPS
and/or 4 or 8 h after LPS treatment, as indicated in the figure.
NO levels in the medium were determined using the Griess reagent as
described under "Experimental Procedures." The data are expressed
as the mean ± S.E. of triplicate samples. *, p < 0.01 with respect to LPS + UO126 treatments at all time points.
D, BV-2 cells were pretreated with the MEK inhibitor
UO126 (10 µM), the p38 inhibitor SB 202190 (10 µM), or Me2SO (DMSO) (vehicle) for
15 min prior to stimulation with either PMA (1 µM) or
anisomycin (10 µg/ml) for 15 min. Whole cell lysates were prepared,
and proteins (~25 µg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE for immunoblot
analysis. Activation of p38 and ERK-1/ERK-2 proteins was assessed using
phospho-specific anti-active antibodies. Equal protein loading was
confirmed by re-probing these blots with an anti-ERK-1 antibody that
recognizes total ERK-1 and ERK-2 protein (data not shown). The data are
representative of three separate experiments. E, RAW 264.7 macrophages were pretreated with the MEK inhibitor UO126 (10 µM) or Me2SO (DMSO) (vehicle) for
15 min or 2, 4, 6, or 18 h prior to stimulation with PMA (100 nM), as indicated in the figure. Activation of ERK-1/ERK-2
proteins was assessed using phospho-specific anti-active antibodies.
Equal protein loading was confirmed by re-probing these blots with an
anti-ERK-1 antibody that recognizes total ERK-1 and ERK-2 protein
(lower panel). The data are representative of three separate
experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The data in the present study support the concept that ERK
activation is not a necessary component of LPS-stimulated signaling events in the microglial cell line BV-2. Conversely, LPS-induced p38
activation does appear to be important both in this cell line and in
RAW 264.7 macrophages because an inhibitor of p38 (SB 202190) greatly
reduces LPS-stimulated NO production. Although BV-2 cells exhibit an
LPS-induced production of critical cytokines and mediators, such as
IL-1
and NO, as well as LPS-stimulated I
B
degradation, NF-
B
DNA binding activity, and p38 and JNK activation, there is no
detectable ERK activation even up to 4 h of treatment with LPS
concentrations as high as 1 µg/ml. In addition, a similar response
can be recapitulated in CHO-K1 cells expressing the LPS-binding protein
CD14. In CHO-K1 cells expressing CD14, LPS can stimulate I
B
protein degradation but not the activation of the MAPKs ERK-1 and
ERK-2. Taken together, these data strongly support the idea that LPS
does not initiate identical signaling mechanisms in these LPS-responsive cells.
The magnitude to which BV-2 microglial cells respond to LPS is
different with respect to certain end points when compared with RAW
264.7 macrophages. For example, BV-2 cells produce more NO on a per
cell basis in response to a 16-20-h exposure to LPS than do RAW 264.7 cells. In addition, although these ELISAs cannot differentiate between
the processed and immature forms of IL-1
, the present studies reveal
that BV-2 microglia and RAW 264.7 cells display dissimilar
LPS-stimulated profiles with respect to the amount of total IL-1
released into the medium. RAW 264.7 macrophages do not release
immunodetectable levels of IL-1
into the medium until ~9 h after
LPS treatment, whereas the medium from BV-2 cells contains detectable
levels of IL-1
species within 3 h of LPS treatment.
Interestingly, in BV-2 microglia, the profile of IL-1
appearance in
the medium is considerably different at low versus high LPS
concentrations. At 10 ng/ml LPS, although IL-1
levels are
detectable, there is no observable increase in the amount of this
cytokine released over time. In contrast, at high concentrations of LPS
(1000 ng/ml), there is enhanced IL-1
release from BV-2 cells over
time, which surpasses the amounts of IL-1
species detected in the
medium from RAW 264.7 macrophages after 18 h of LPS treatment.
The above results suggest a complex responsiveness of the signaling
systems activated upon LPS treatment of BV-2 microglia and support the
idea that there may be multiple receptors involved in LPS-stimulated
IL-1
production in microglia. Alternatively, stimulation of a single
receptor, exhibiting a threshold effect, may result in the activation
of two different signaling pathways depending upon the concentration of
ligand (LPS). Another possible explanation for these observations
involves the rate of caspase-1-dependent processing and
mature IL-1
release. For example, there may be a difference in the
release of IL-1
due to variations in the rates at which caspase-1
cleaves the immature form of IL-1
or because there are discrepancies
in the rates at which the mature IL-1
is released from each cell
type. Additionally, the rates at which both cell lines initiate
transcription/translation may also vary, thus providing another level
at which incongruities in the synthesis and processing of IL-1
may
exist. With regard to NO production, because there appears to be little
difference in the amount of LPS-stimulated iNOS produced by each cell
type, it is possible that other factors such as the availability of reaction substrates or cofactors or post-translational modifications of
the iNOS enzyme are involved in these effects.
It is interesting to note that CHO-K1 cells have been reported to
express the LPS receptor TLR-4 (64). Additionally, Toll-like receptors,
specifically TLR-2 and TLR-4, have been associated with the activation
of MAPKs and NF-
B DNA binding activity induced upon LPS stimulation
(41, 42, 44). Due to the observed lack of LPS-stimulated ERK activation
in both BV-2 microglia and in CHO-K1 cells expressing CD14, it is
possible that the expression of either Toll-like receptors or their
co-receptors, such as MD-2, may be involved in explaining these
effects. However, the present studies suggest that alternative pathways
are linked to LPS-induced ERK activation because both TLR-4 and MD-2
appear to be expressed in BV-2 and CHO-K1 cells, yet LPS is unable to
stimulate ERK-1 and ERK-2 activation. In this regard, TLR-4 expression
in HEK 293/CD14-expressing cells confers upon these cells the ability of LPS to induce I
B
degradation and NF-
B activation (43). In
these studies, Yang et al. (43) also showed that the MAPKs (ERKs 1 and 2, p38, and JNKs 1 and 2) are absent in LPS-stimulated HEK
293/CD14 cells that express TLR-4. Upon expression of MD-2 in these
cells, NF-
B activation was augmented and conferred to LPS the
ability to stimulate all the MAPK members listed above. MD-2 is a
protein that appears to be required for TLR-4 function. It is secreted
from macrophages (40) and is believed to be important in mediating
LPS-induced signaling events (67, 68). The results presented by Yang
et al. (43) suggest that MD-2 can contribute to the
LPS-induced activation of the MAPKs in a heterologous system. Nonetheless, our data using both BV-2 microglial cells and CHO-K1 cells
illustrate that although MD-2 may be involved in the LPS-induced activation of p38 and JNKs 1 and 2, another factor/protein is also
likely to be involved in ERK activation following LPS treatment.
In this regard, one receptor system that may play an important role in
LPS-stimulated ERK activation is the purinergic receptor P2X7. The P2X7 receptor is an ATP-gated cation
channel, and previous work from our laboratory (46) has demonstrated
that this nucleotide receptor is involved in certain LPS-stimulated end
points in RAW 264.7 macrophages, such as NF-
B and ERK activation as
well as iNOS up-regulation and NO production. Interestingly, the
LPS-binding protein CD14 may act to potentiate P2X7
receptor signaling with respect to NF-
B, p38, and JNK activation,
but not ERK activation.2
Although the expression levels of the P2X7 receptor appear
to be comparable in both cell lines (data not shown), it is conceivable that the expression of other proteins that may play an adaptive role
between P2X7 and CD14, or that are involved in transducing the signals from the P2X7/CD14-containing protein complex
are different or absent in BV-2 cells.
Another explanation for the negligible effect of LPS on ERK activation
in BV-2 and CHO-K1/CD14-expressing cells may be that they lack a
critical signaling component involved in regulating the ERK cascade.
However, because PMA, LPS, and BzATP most likely utilize overlapping
signaling mechanisms to stimulate the ERKs, it is probable that the
signaling molecules required for ERK activation are present in BV-2
cells, given that PMA and BzATP retained the capacity to activate the
ERKs. However, it is also possible that the activation of ERK-1 and
ERK-2 is mediated in macrophage-like cells, such as RAW 264.7 cells, by
an autocrine factor/receptor that is missing in BV-2 and
CHO-K1/CD14-expressing cells. Due to the delayed onset of ERK
activation in RAW 264.7 cells stimulated with LPS (10-15 min),
compared with that of PMA or BzATP (
5 min), it is possible that a
factor(s) is released upon LPS stimulation of macrophages that, in
turn, results in ERK activation in RAW 264.7 cells. This factor may not
be produced or secreted by BV-2 cells. Alternatively, both BV-2 and
CHO-K1/CD14 cells may lack the ability to respond to this factor,
perhaps because they do not express the receptor for this factor.
An additional consideration in the present investigations is the
concept that a critical ratio of CD14 or MD-2 to Toll-like receptor may
need to exist in order for LPS to elicit ERK activation. It is also
conceivable that Toll-like receptors may not confer all forms of LPS
responsiveness to all cell types (66, 69). Several lines of evidence
supporting this idea already exist in the literature (46, 47, 70, 71)
and suggest that select LPS responses may be mediated, or at least
controlled, through the modulation of the P2X7 receptor.
The existence of other LPS-sensitive signaling systems within immune
cells does not preclude a role for the Toll-like receptors, but may in
fact expand the repertoire of proteins capable of responding to the
presence of Gram-negative bacterial infection.
Taken together, these results suggest that ERK activation is not
required for the LPS-stimulated generation of NO, IL-1
, and NF-
B
DNA binding activity. Additionally, they suggest that activation of
ERK-1 and ERK-2 is not an essential part of LPS-induced signaling
events in cells that are highly responsive to LPS, namely BV-2
microglial cells. Furthermore, the expression levels of CD14, TLR-4,
and MD-2 in BV-2 microglia in comparison to RAW 264.7 macrophages indicate that increased LPS responsiveness is not directly proportional to the amount of LPS binding/signaling proteins that are expressed. Therefore, we propose a model wherein the activation of ERK-1 and
ERK-2, initiated upon LPS exposure of RAW 264.7 cells, serves as a
feedback control loop for LPS responsiveness. For example, in RAW 264.7 cells, LPS substantially increases ERK activation (Fig. 5B
and 6A), and the amount of NO produced is less than that of
BV-2 cells (Fig. 1B). This model predicts that BV-2 cells, a
cell line in which LPS does not detectably stimulate ERK-1 and ERK-2
activity, would be more sensitive to LPS with regard to certain end
points, and we have observed that MEK inhibitors potentiate the ability
of LPS to promote NO production in RAW 264.7 cells (Fig.
9C). These data are consistent with the idea that ERK
activation may in fact be inhibitory to the production of selected
mediators such as NO. It is interesting to note that the MEK inhibitor
UO126 does not appear to promote increases in iNOS protein (data not shown), suggesting that the role of the Ras/MEK/ERK pathway may be
manifested at the level of substrate availability rather than at iNOS expression.
The receptors that are involved in LPS stimulation of microglial and
macrophage cells are not completely understood, although the Toll-like
receptors, especially TLR-4, are currently believed to be responsible
for many LPS-induced signaling events. ERK activation has long been an
event attributed to the LPS stimulation of numerous cell types (13-17,
72, 73). Although the present observations focus on RAW 264.7 and BV-2
cell lines and may not reflect the behavior of all macrophage and
microglia cell types, the data presented here nonetheless reveal that
ERK activation is not a required component of LPS action. In fact, LPS
retains the capacity to potently stimulate cytokine and mediator
production in BV-2 microglial cells in a manner that is at least as
sensitive as that observed in the highly LPS-responsive RAW 264.7 macrophages (which is a cell type wherein LPS exposure promotes ERK-1
and ERK-2 activation). In addition, because both cell types express Toll-like receptors and MD-2, but have differential LPS signaling responses, it is conceivable that additional receptors/proteins are
required for mediating/modulating LPS actions.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Gary Weisman and Douglas Golenbock
for generosity in supplying the cell lines used in these studies. We
thank Gregory Weipz and Arturo Guadarrama for their technical
help and support. We also thank Richard Proctor and Loren Denlinger for
insightful discussions about the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Supported by National Institutes of Health Grants
CA47881/GM53271/HL56396/AI34891 and the Draper Fund
(University-Industry Research Fund).
¶
Supported by National Research Service Award F32 CA81733.
**
Supported by National Institutes of Health Biotechnology Training
Program T32-GM08349.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Biomole- cular Chemistry, 1300 University Ave., University of
Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706. Tel.: 608-262-8667; Fax:
608-263-5253; E-mail: pbertics@facstaff.wisc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 10, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M104385200
2
J. A. Sommer, J. J. Watters, and
P. J. Bertics, submitted for publication.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
LPS, lipopolysaccharide;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
NF-
B, nuclear factor-
B;
I
B, inhibitory subunit of
B;
TLR-4, Toll-like receptor 4;
BzATP, 3'-O-(4-benzoylbenzoyl)-ATP;
PMA, phorbol 12-myristate
13-acetate;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase;
PVDF, polyvinylidene
difluoride;
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay;
GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase;
FACS, fluorescence-activated
cell sorter;
iNOS, inducible nitric-oxide synthase;
IL, interleukin;
TNF
, tumor necrosis factor
;
HEK 293, human embryonic kidney 293;
RT, reverse transcription.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Hauser, C. J.
(1996)
New Horizons
4,
235-251[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Gordon, S.
(1998)
Res. Immunol.
149,
685-688[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Zielasek, J.,
and Hartung, H. P.
(1996)
Adv. Neuroimmunol.
6,
191-222[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Calingasan, N. Y.,
Park, L. C.,
Calo, L. L.,
Trifiletti, R. R.,
Gandy, S. E.,
and Gibson, G. E.
(1998)
Am. J. Pathol.
153,
599-610[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Licinio, J.,
and Wong, M. L.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
100,
2941-2947[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Sternberg, E. M.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
100,
2641-2647[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Monning, U.,
Sandbrink, R.,
Banati, R. B.,
Masters, C. L.,
and Beyreuther, K.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
342,
267-272[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Kopec, K. K.,
and Carroll, R. T.
(1998)
J. Neurochem.
71,
2123-2131[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Bitting, L.,
Naidu, A.,
Cordell, B.,
and Murphy, G. M., Jr.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
16084-16089[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Denlinger, L. C.,
Fisette, P. L.,
Garis, K. A.,
Daugherty, S. K.,
Bertics, P. J.,
and Proctor, R. A.
(1996)
in
Novel Therapeutic Strategies in the Treatment of Sepsis
(Morrison, D. C.
, and Ryan, J. L., eds)
, pp. 227-252, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York
|
| 11.
|
Garrington, T. P.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
11,
211-218[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Lewis, T. S.,
Shapiro, P. S.,
and Ahn |