|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M111356200 on December 13, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 11, 9112-9117, March 15, 2002
Identification of a Novel Residue within the Second Transmembrane
Domain That Confers Use-facilitated Block by Picrotoxin in Glycine 1
Receptors*
Mohammed I.
Dibas,
Eric B.
Gonzales,
Paromita
Das,
Cathy L.
Bell-Horner, and
Glenn H.
Dillon
From the Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of
North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas
76107
Received for publication, November 28, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The central nervous system convulsant
picrotoxin (PTX) inhibits GABAA and
glutamate-gated Cl channels in a use-facilitated fashion,
whereas PTX inhibition of glycine and GABAC receptors
displays little or no use-facilitated block. We have identified a
residue in the extracellular aspect of the second transmembrane domain
that converted picrotoxin inhibition of glycine 1 receptors from
non-use-facilitated to use-facilitated. In wild type 1 receptors,
PTX inhibited glycine-gated Cl current in a competitive
manner and had equivalent effects on peak and steady-state
currents, confirming a lack of use-facilitated block. Mutation of the
second transmembrane domain 15'-serine to glutamine ( 1(S15'Q)
receptors) converted the mechanism of PTX blockade from competitive to
non-competitive. However, more notable was the fact that in 1(S15'Q)
receptors, PTX had insignificant effects on peak current amplitude and
dramatically enhanced current decay kinetics. Similar results were
found in 1(S15'N) receptors. The reciprocal mutation in the 2
subunit of 1 2 GABAA receptors ( 1 2(N15'S)
receptors) decreased the magnitude of use-facilitated PTX inhibition.
Our results implicate a specific amino acid at the extracellular aspect
of the ion channel in determining use-facilitated characteristics of
picrotoxin blockade. Moreover, the data are consistent with the
suggestion that picrotoxin may interact with two domains in
ligand-gated anion channels.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Glycine receptors belong to a superfamily of ligand-gated chloride
channels that include
GABAA1 receptors,
GABAC receptors, and glutamate-gated chloride channels (1).
In native tissue, glycine receptors exist as either homomers or
 heteromers (1). They comprise five subunits (usually
three subunits and two subunits) arranged asymmetrically around
the ion pore. Each subunit is made up of a large extracellular N-terminal region, four transmembrane domains (TM), and a large cytoplasmic domain; TMII forms the channel lumen (2). Glycine receptors
are targets of therapeutics such as anesthetics as well as toxins like
the central nervous system convulsant picrotoxin (1).
Picrotoxin inhibits all known anionic ligand-gated Cl
channels (3-5). The mechanism of action and the exact location of
picrotoxin binding are still unknown (6-12). However, several studies
have indicated that TMII is the probable site for picrotoxin
action (6, 13-22) (Fig. 1). For example,
the TMII of the glycine subunit was found to be responsible for
conferring resistance to picrotoxin in heteromeric glycine
n receptors (n = 1-3) (6).
Subsequent work has defined the existence of a phenylalanine residue at
the 6' position of the TMII glycine subunit in conferring
insensitivity to picrotoxin (16). In addition, other TMII residues (2'
and 19') have also been implicated directly or indirectly in the
mechanism by which picrotoxin inhibits these channels (13, 15, 16). The
mutations at positions 2' and 19' have been shown to affect the type of
the inhibition (competitive versus non-competitive) by
picrotoxin in GABAC and glycine 1 receptors,
respectively (13, 18).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
TMII map of ligand-gated ion channels.
Glycine 1 receptors (Gly 1), which express
serine at the 15' position, display no use-facilitated block by
picrotoxin. GABAA receptors incorporating the 2 subunit
(GABA 2) and glutamate-gated chloride channels or
homomeric channels (Glu-gated ) show
use-facilitated inhibition by picrotoxin. These receptors express
asparagine and glutamine, respectively, at the 15' position, which is
the focus of this study. Residues at the 2', 6', and 19' positions are
also known to affect picrotoxin sensitivity.
|
|
The ability of some antagonists to block channel activity is enhanced
when the channel is open. This trait is generally referred to as a
use-dependent or use-facilitated block and suggests that the site of action of the antagonist may be in the channel lumen. Whereas picrotoxin block of GABAC and glycine 1
receptors displays weak or no use-facilitation (13, 21), picrotoxin
inhibition of GABAA receptors and glutamate-gated
Cl channels is strongly use-facilitated (3, 5, 11, 12). The molecular basis underlying this trait is unknown. Thus, we sought
to determine the mechanism that confers use-facilitated blockade by
picrotoxin. Because of its prominent role in picrotoxin action, we
focused on the TMII domain as the probable region that would underlie
the differing mechanisms of picrotoxin blockade. In our analysis of the
TMII domain of Cl channels of the ligand-gated ion
channel superfamily, we observed that GABAA and
glutamate-gated channels have neutral acidic polar residues (Asn and
Gln) at the 15' position; these receptors both demonstrate
use-facilitated block by picrotoxin. Glycine 1 receptors, which do
not display use-facilitated picrotoxin blockade, have a dissimilar
residue (Ser) at the 15' position.
We demonstrate here that S15'Q and S15'N mutations in the TMII of
glycine 1 receptors confer use-facilitated block by picrotoxin. In
addition, the S15'Q mutation converted the picrotoxin block from
competitive to non-competitive. This position also affects the
mechanism of the picrotoxin blockade in GABAA receptors,
because receptors expressing the reciprocal mutation (N15'S) in the
2 subunit of 1 2 GABAA receptors displayed
significantly less use-facilitated block than observed in wild type
receptors. Our data demonstrate the involvement of the 15' position in
the mechanism of picrotoxin block and suggest that PTX may be acting at
two distinct sites in ligand-gated anion channels.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Site-directed Mutagenesis and Transient Transfection--
The
wild type glycine receptor 1 cDNA was a generous gift from H. Betz.
The mutant 1 cDNAs were kindly provided by Qing Ye, N. L. Harrison, and R. A. Harris. All glycine cDNAs had been subcloned into the mammalian expression vector pCIS (23). The mutation
of the 15'-asparagine to serine in the human GABAA receptor 2 subunit was generated using QuikChangeTM (Stratagene,
La Jolla, CA) and confirmed by DNA sequencing. Untransfected TSA-201 cells, which are transformed human embryonic kidney 293 cells, were plated onto 25-mm coverslips. These cells were cultured as
described previously (24). Transient expression of all glycine and
GABAA receptors was obtained using the modified calcium
phosphate precipitation method (25). 15-20 µg of total DNA was used
in the transfection step. Cells were analyzed electrophysiologically 48-72 h after transfection.
Electrophysiology--
Whole-cell patch recordings were made at
room temperature (22-25 °C). Cells were voltage-clamped at 60 mV.
Patch pipettes of borosilicate glass (1B150F, World Precision
Instruments, Inc., Sarasota, FL) were pulled (Flaming/Brown, P-87/PC,
Sutter Instrument Co., Novato, CA) to a tip resistance of 1-2.5
megohms for whole-cell recordings. The pipette solution contained 140 mM CsCl, 10 mM EGTA, 10 mM HEPES, 4 mM Mg-ATP, pH 7.2. Coverslips containing cultured cells
were placed in a small chamber (~1.5 ml) on the stage of an inverted
light microscope (Olympus IMT-2) and superfused continuously at 5-8
ml/min with the following external solution containing 125 mM NaCl, 5.5 mM KCl, 0.8 mM
MgCl2, 3.0 mM CaCl2, 20 mM HEPES, 25 mM D-glucose, pH 7.3. Glycine/GABA-induced Cl currents from the whole-cell
configuration of the patch clamp technique were obtained using an
Axoclamp 200A amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) equipped
with a CV-4 headstage. Currents were low pass filtered at 5 kHz,
monitored on an oscilloscope and a chart recorder (Gould TA240), and
stored on a computer (pClamp 6.0, Axon Instruments) for subsequent
analysis. To monitor the possibility that access resistance changed
over time or during different experimental conditions, at the
beginning of each recording we measured and stored on our digital
oscilloscope the current response to a 5-mV voltage pulse. This stored
trace was continuously referenced throughout the recording. If a
change in access resistance was observed throughout the recording
period, the patch was aborted, and the data were not included in the analysis.
Experimental Protocol--
The agonist (glycine or GABA) with or
without PTX was prepared in the extracellular solution and then was
applied from independent reservoirs by gravity flow to cells using a
Y-shaped tube positioned within 100 µm of the cell. With this system,
the 10-90% rise time of the junction potential at the open tip
is 12-51 ms (26). Receptors were typically activated roughly with the
EC50 agonist concentration. Once a control agonist response
was determined, the effect of PTX on the response was examined. Agonist
applications were separated by at least 2-min intervals to ensure both
adequate washout from the bath and recovery of receptors from
desensitization if present.
Data Analysis--
Glycine and GABA concentration-response
profiles were generated for their respective receptors using the
following Equation 1
|
(Eq. 1)
|
where I and Imax represent the
normalized and maximal agonist-induced current at a given
concentration, X represents the agonist (glycine or GABA) in
µM, EC50 is the half-maximal effective agonist concentration, and n is the Hill coefficient. The
antagonism profile of picrotoxin was analyzed by constructing
concentration-inhibition relationships. The data were fitted to the
Equation 2
|
(Eq. 2)
|
where I is the steady-state current at a given
concentration of picrotoxin, Imax is the maximum
current induced by agonist, IC50 is the picrotoxin
concentration that is half-maximally effective, and n is the
Hill coefficient.
Materials--
Glycine, GABA, and picrotoxin were obtained
from Sigma.
 |
RESULTS |
Previous work has shown that mutations at the 15' position affect
glycine sensitivity to varying degrees (23). Thus, we first examined
the glycine concentration-response curve for the wild type, the mutant
1(S15'Q), and mutant 1(S15'N) receptors (Fig.
2). The EC50 and Hill
coefficient values for glycine in the wild type receptors were 44 ± 5.3 and 2.1 ± 0.5 µM, respectively. The
substitution of the 15'-serine by glutamine caused a roughly 2-fold
right shift in the glycine dose-response curve. The incorporation of
Asn at position 15' caused a dramatic rightward shift, roughly 15-fold,
in the concentration-response curve for glycine. The EC50
and Hill coefficient values for all receptors are summarized in Table
I.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Glycine sensitivity in wild type and mutant
glycine 1 receptors. Both mutations
induced a rightward shift in the glycine concentration-response curve.
EC50 values were 44 ± 5.3, 102 ± 7.6, and
670 ± 38 µM in wild type, 1(S15'Q), and
1(S15'N) receptors, respectively. See Table I for Hill coefficients.
All data points are from a minimum of 3-4 cells.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Agonist sensitivity and picrotoxin inhibition in wild type and mutant
glycine and GABAA receptors
Values for EC50 and picrotoxin IC50 are in
µM. PTX IC50 is the value obtained when gated by
the agonist EC50 (PTX IC50-A) or when gated by a
saturating agonist concentration (PTX IC50-B). WT, wild type;
nH, Hill coefficient; n.d., not determined.
|
|
S15'Q Mutation Confers Use-facilitated Block by Picrotoxin--
In
wild type 1 receptors, picrotoxin lacks the use-facilitated feature
that exists in GABAA and glutamate-gated Cl
channels (13). We observed a similar lack of use-facilitated block in
the present studies. As shown in Fig.
3A, picrotoxin inhibited the
peak as well as the steady-state current induced by 200 µM glycine with equal potency in the wild type receptors. Picrotoxin did not increase the rate of current decay, even at a
concentration of 3 mM. The introduction of the 15'Q
mutation had striking effects on the picrotoxin blockade of the glycine receptor. Co-application of variable concentrations of picrotoxin (1-1000 µM) with 1 mM glycine in 1(S15'Q)
receptors had little effect on the initial peak current but
subsequently induced a time-dependent current decay to
steady state (Fig. 3B). In addition, increasing the
picrotoxin concentration enhanced the exponential decay rate of the
glycine-induced current (Figs. 3B and
4). The application of increasing
picrotoxin concentration caused a concentration-dependent decrease in the time constant (t) of the current decay from
11.5 ± 1.0 s with 3 µM PTX to 0.23 ± 0.02 s with 1 mM PTX (Fig. 4B). Thus, the time constant for the decay was inversely related to the
concentration of picrotoxin. We also evaluated the effect of picrotoxin
on the current induced by glycine in 1(S15'N) receptors. The
conversion to use-facilitated block was evident in 1(S15'N) receptors as well (Fig. 3C). Thus, the incorporation of Asn
or Gln changed the mechanism by which picrotoxin inhibits glycine receptors. The 1(S15'Q) mutation had an effect on picrotoxin inhibition similar to that observed with the 1(S15'N) mutation, and
had a lesser effect on glycine sensitivity (Fig. 2). Hence, the
remaining experiments were conducted using 1(S15'Q) receptors.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Use-facilitated picrotoxin block conferred by
the S15'Q and S15'N mutations. A, an example of
response to picrotoxin in wild type 1 glycine receptors
(a) and mean concentration-response profile for picrotoxin
in the wild type receptors (b). Note that picrotoxin equally
inhibited the peak and steady-state currents. B,
a, response to picrotoxin in 1(S15'Q) receptors. Note
insignificant effects on peak current and marked enhancement of current
decay in this receptor, which are indicative of use-facilitated
blockade. b, mean concentration-response profile for the
effect of picrotoxin on initial peak and steady-state currents.
Picrotoxin of up to 1 mM had minimal effect on peak
current. C, similar use-facilitated blockade was observed in
1(S15'N) receptors (a), although the degree of
use-facilitation was not as great as that induced with the S15'Q
mutation (b). Calibration bar equals 360 pA in A,
285 pA in B, and 885 pA in C. See Table I for
IC50 and Hill coefficient values. Ligand application time
in this and all other figures is 10 s unless otherwise noted.
Glycine-gating concentrations were 200, 1, and 650 µM in
A-C, respectively.
|
|

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Rate of block in
1(S15'Q) receptors is dependent on both glycine and
picrotoxin concentrations. A, rate of
picrotoxin-induced current decay is significantly slower when the
channel is gated by 100 µM glycine (a) than
when gated by 1000 µM glycine (b), a trait
consistent with use-facilitated blockade. B, the time
constant (t) for use-facilitated block picrotoxin is
inversely proportional to picrotoxin concentration. Decaying currents
were fitted with a single exponential function. Note also the summary
data for the experiment in A, illustrating a 5-fold
enhancement in current decay kinetics by 100 µM
picrotoxin when glycine is increased from 100 to 1000 µM.
All data points are from a minimum of three cells. Calibration bar
equals 175 pA in Aa and 375 pA in Ab.
|
|
We next tested whether increasing the glycine concentration would
increase the rate of the block by picrotoxin in 1(S15'Q) receptors.
When the channel was gated by 100 µM glycine, 100 µM picrotoxin enhanced the glycine current decay rate to
a time constant (t) of 4.7 ± 0.3 s (Fig.
4A). When the 1(S15'Q) receptors were gated with a
saturating glycine concentration (1 mM), 100 µM picrotoxin caused a much greater enhancement of the
decay of the glycine-activated current to a t of 0.87 ± 0.5 s. The enhancement of current decay with an increase in
glycine concentration further demonstrates the use-facilitated nature
of picrotoxin blockade in the mutant receptor.
It might be argued that the mutation has affected the glycine
activation kinetics by enhancing glycine binding and/or the gating
transition. In this scenario, the data would not necessarily reflect a
use-facilitated block but could instead be explained via an underlying
alteration in the relative reaction rates for glycine and picrotoxin in
the wild type compared with the mutant receptors. To test this
possibility, we measured the 10-90% current rise time
(t10-90) in wild type and 1(S15'Q)
receptors. The t10-90 was not different in the
two receptors (85 ± 17 ms (n = 5) and 127 ± 16 ms (n = 7) in wild type and mutant receptors,
respectively). Thus, a change in glycine activation kinetics is not
responsible for the presence of use-facilitated block in glycine
1(S15'Q) receptors.
S15'Q Mutation Converts Picrotoxin Antagonism from Competitive to
Non-competitive--
A TMII mutation has been shown to convert the
mechanism of picrotoxin blockade in 1 glycine receptors from
competitive to non-competitive (13). The enhanced picrotoxin effect
with increased concentrations of glycine as described above is
suggestive of non-competitive inhibition. Thus, we assessed the nature
of picrotoxin inhibition in both wild type and 1S15'Q receptors. In
this report, picrotoxin inhibited the current induced by the glycine
EC50 with an IC50 of 39 ± 6.0 µM. Increasing the glycine concentration (4× the glycine
EC50) shifted the picrotoxin IC50 almost
10-fold to the right to 339 ± 40 µM (Fig.
5A), confirming the previous
report of competitive inhibition in glycine 1 receptors (13). In
1S15'Q receptors, picrotoxin inhibited the current induced by the
glycine EC50 with an IC50 of 54 ± 14 µM. However, when the channel was gated with a saturating
concentration of glycine (1 mM), the picrotoxin concentration-response curve was significantly shifted to the left to
9.3 ± 1.5 µM (Fig. 5B). Thus, the
(S15'Q) mutation converted the mechanism of picrotoxin block from
competitive to non-competitive. A summary of the effects of picrotoxin
in the different receptor configurations is presented in Table I.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
S15'Q mutation converts picrotoxin blockade
from competitive to non-competitive inhibition. A,
consistent with previous findings (13), picrotoxin inhibition of wild
type glycine 1 receptors is competitive. B, in contrast,
picrotoxin-induced blockade in 1(S15'Q) receptors was converted to
non-competitive inhibition. See Table I for summarized
information.
|
|
Picrotoxin Can Access Its Site in the S15'Q Mutant in the Absence
of Channel Opening--
The ability of picrotoxin to access its site
is poor in the absence of the agonist in GABAA and
glutamate-gated Cl channels (3, 5). However, picrotoxin
can efficiently access its site without channel opening in glycine 1
receptors (13); we confirmed this finding in the present investigation
(data not shown). We subsequently tested whether the S15'Q
mutation affected the channel state dependence of picrotoxin access.
Receptors were preincubated in 100 µM picrotoxin for 3 min. At the 3-min time point, glycine (1 mM) and picrotoxin
(100 µM) were co-applied to the cell while still
equilibrated in bath picrotoxin. As is evident from Fig.
6, pretreatment with picrotoxin abolished
the use-facilitated aspect of block (Fig. 6, n = 4). A
similar effect was found when using 10 µM picrotoxin.
Thus, whereas the S15'Q mutation clearly induced a use-facilitated
picrotoxin effect, it did not prevent picrotoxin from accessing its
site in the closed channel state.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Picrotoxin can access its site in the absence
of the glycine application in 1(S15'Q)
receptors. Following establishment of the control glycine current
(1 mM) (solid line), receptors were incubated in
100 µM picrotoxin for 3 min. Picrotoxin and glycine were
subsequently co-applied to the cells. The dotted line
represents the presence of picrotoxin in the bath solution.
Dashed line represents a 5-s co-application of picrotoxin
(100 µM) and glycine (1 mM) separated by 3-s
intervals. Similar results were obtained in four cells expressing the
S15'Q mutation as well as wild type glycine 1 receptors (data not
shown). Calibration bar equals 230 pA.
|
|
The Reciprocal 15'-TMII Mutation in 1 2 GABAA
Receptors Alters Picrotoxin Blockade--
The presence of Asn or Gln
at the 15' position of TMII in glycine 1 receptors clearly converted
the mechanism of picrotoxin blockade to use-facilitated non-competitive
inhibition. We next sought to evaluate the effects of the reciprocal
mutation (N15'S) in GABAA receptors. The wild type
GABAA receptor 1 subunit has a serine residue at the 15'
position. Co-expression of the wild type 1 subunit with the
2(N15'S) subunit yields a 1 2(N15'S) GABAA receptor
with only serine residues at this position; thus, it is equivalent to
the wild type glycine 1-homomeric receptor at the 15' position. The
N15'S mutation caused a 3-fold shift in GABA sensitivity (Table I). As
expected, picrotoxin inhibition of wild type 1 2 GABAA
receptors showed strong use-facilitated non-competitive inhibition
(Fig. 7A). In 1 2(N15'S)
receptors, blockade by picrotoxin was not completely shifted to that
observed in wild type glycine 1 receptors. However, the magnitude of
the use-facilitated block was greatly attenuated. In wild type
receptors, increasing the GABA-gating concentration from the
EC50 to 10× EC50 decreased the picrotoxin
IC50 ~8-fold. In contrast, in 1 2(N15'S) GABAA receptors, increasing the GABA-gating concentration
had no effect on picrotoxin sensitivity. The results confirm the
involvement of this residue in the mechanism of picrotoxin blockade of
both glycine and GABAA receptors.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
N15'S modifies picrotoxin inhibition of
1 2 GABAA
receptors. A, picrotoxin inhibits wild type 1 2
GABAA receptors in a non-competitive fashion. In these
receptors, increasing the GABA-gating concentration from the GABA
EC50 (1.5 µM) to 10× the GABA
EC50 elicited a dramatic leftward shift in the picrotoxin
inhibition curve. B, the mutation of the 2 subunit 15'
asparagine to serine completely abolished the GABA concentration
dependence of the ability of picrotoxin to block the channel. However,
the mutation did not fully convert the mechanism of picrotoxin blockade
to competitive inhibition. See Table I for IC50 and Hill
coefficient values under each condition.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The Mechanism of Block by Picrotoxin--
The inhibitory
mechanism of picrotoxin in ligand-gated anion channels is a
complex phenomenon. Based on the fact that the onset of picrotoxin
block is facilitated in the presence of the agonist in
GABAA and glutamate-gated Cl channels, it has
been suggested that picrotoxin acts as an open channel blocker (3, 5).
However, single channel analysis has shown that picrotoxin lacks the
flickery effect that is typical of a classical channel blocker (12). In
addition, picrotoxin inhibition is voltage-independent in these
channels (3, 12, 13). Furthermore, other reports have demonstrated
little or no use-facilitated block by picrotoxin in glycine and
GABAC receptors, respectively (13, 21). Thus, picrotoxin
might bind at an allosteric site to stabilize a closed or desensitized
state of these channels (11, 12, 27). To resolve the complexity of the
picrotoxin interaction with these channels, the existence of multiple
binding sites for picrotoxin has been suggested (7, 10). Upon analyzing the actions of picrotoxin and related compounds, Yoon et al.
(7) suggested that picrotoxin might bind to both
use-dependent and use-independent sites in
GABAA receptors (7). Regardless of whether picrotoxin
inhibition results from an interaction at one or two sites (discussed
below), a molecular basis for the use-facilitated block has not been described.
In this study, the mutation of the wild type glycine 1 TMII 15'
serine to glutamine or asparagine, which exists in glutamate-gated and
GABAA-gated Cl channels, respectively (3,
15), conferred use-facilitated block by picrotoxin. Use-facilitated
block was concluded based on the following criteria: 1) peak glycine
current was unaffected by picrotoxin, but it greatly enhanced current
decay kinetics, 2) glycine current decay rate was picrotoxin
concentration-dependent, 3) current decay rate in the
presence of picrotoxin was dependent on glycine concentration, and 4)
the magnitude of picrotoxin block was dependent on glycine
concentration. None of these traits is present in wild type glycine
1 receptors, and all are observed in GABAA and
glutamate-gated Cl channels (3, 7, 11). Thus, the
introduction of Asn or Gln at the 15' position of TMII appears to be
sufficient to confer use-facilitated block by picrotoxin. At initial
inspection, one aspect of our data appears to be inconsistent with this
conclusion. Pretreatment studies showed that picrotoxin can still
access its site in the absence of channel opening. In the strictest
sense, "use-dependence" implies that the channel must be gated for
the drug to access its site. There is a number of possibilities that could account for this somewhat unexpected finding. First, although picrotoxin is a highly oxygenated molecule, it is neutral at
physiological pH and thus could access its site through both
hydrophilic (the channel lumen) and hydrophobic (the lipid bilayer)
pathways (5, 28). Second, even in GABAA receptors,
picrotoxin can gain access to its site in the closed channel state (11,
12). However, the picrotoxin association rate is slowed ~100-fold
when the channel is closed (11). Nevertheless, the inference is that
channel opening is not an absolute requirement for picrotoxin to access its site. For this reason, we have chosen to refer to the phenomenon as
use-facilitation rather than use dependence. Third, additional residues
that are not yet identified may exist in the vicinity of the 15'
position in both GABAA and glutamate-gated Cl
channels, but not in glycine receptors, that further interfere with
picrotoxin access to its binding site in the closed state. Agonist binding in GABAA and glutamate-gated
Cl channels could induce a conformational change that
relieves the hindrance of picrotoxin binding. This suggestion is
speculative, and no structural data exist to support or refute it.
Finally, we cannot definitively rule out the possibility that during
our picrotoxin incubation experiments, some spontaneous channel
openings may have occurred that allowed picrotoxin to access its site. Indeed, in a number of experiments, we did note a modest (30-50 pA)
decrease in holding current when cells were incubated in picrotoxin. This may account for some of the reduction of glycine current amplitude
following picrotoxin incubation. It is worth noting that the
picrotoxin-site ligand -ethyl- -methyl- -butyrolactone shows a
prominent use-dependent block in GABAA
receptors and can also readily access its site in the absence of
channel opening (7). Indeed, in many respects, the block of
GABAA receptors by -ethyl- -methyl- -butyrolactone
closely resembles the block of 1(S15'Q) receptors by picrotoxin
described here. Yoon et al. (7) expressed similar thoughts
pertaining to -ethyl- -methyl- -butyrolactone access in the
absence of channel opening.
Whereas the presence of asparagine or glutamine at the 15' position
dramatically altered the mechanism of picrotoxin blockade in glycine
receptors, the reciprocal mutation in GABAA receptors only
partially altered picrotoxin pharmacology. There was a significant decrease in the ability of GABA to facilitate the block by picrotoxin in 1 2(N15'S) GABAA receptors, although
use-facilitation was not abolished. These results confirm the
importance of this residue in the mechanism of block by picrotoxin and
the cross-talk between the GABA and picrotoxin binding sites. However,
because the mode of block was not completely converted in
1 2(N15'S) GABAA receptors, the results suggest that
other as yet unidentified residues also influence use-facilitated
picrotoxin inhibition.
Location of the Picrotoxin Site(s)--
Precisely where picrotoxin
binds has not been determined conclusively. Several studies have
implicated residues in the cytoplasmic aspect of TMII as the picrotoxin
binding site (27, 29-31). Mutations introduced at both the 2' and 6'
positions of TMII confer PTX resistance (15, 16, 27). Picrotoxin can
protect a cysteine engineered into the 2' position from irreversible
modification by reactive sulfhydryl reagents (29). When cysteine is
mutated into the 6' position, picrotoxin cannot protect it from
sulfhydryl modification. Based on these studies, it has been suggested
that the picrotoxin binding site lies between the 2' and 6' positions of TMII (29, 32). However, more recent work has shown that picrotoxin
can also protect a cysteine engineered into the extracellular aspect of
TMII (17' position) from irreversible modification by chemically
reactive picrotoxin-related compounds (33). Although not definitive,
these data are consistent with earlier suggestions that picrotoxin and
related ligands may interact with multiple sites (7, 10, 34, 35). The
present data give additional credence to this possibility and indicate
that the second site of picrotoxin interaction may exist in the 15' to
17' vicinity. In the GABAA receptor 1 subunit, the 15'
residue appears to be directed away from the lumen of the channel (36).
However, a cysteine residue at this position can be modified
irreversibly by sulfhydryls, and it may form a water-filled crevice
along with residues in the TMIII domain (36). Taken together, these
studies indicate that this putative extracellular site and the more
intracellular site near the 2' position could account for the
use-dependent and use-independent picrotoxin sites
described by Yoon et al. (7). A recent preliminary report
based on kinetic analysis of picrotoxin binding and unbinding in
varying states of the GABAA receptor also supports the
existence of two sites of picrotoxin action (37). If two picrotoxin
sites do exist, they must be of comparable affinity or of significantly
different efficacy as Hill coefficients of near unity are routinely
recorded in functional assays (3, 9, 11, 13, 16, 29, but see Refs. 10
and 18).
Other interpretations of the data, however, must be considered. A
number of recent studies has demonstrated the important role of the 15'
residue in modulating the effects of other ligands including
anesthetics, alcohol, barbiturates, and diazepam (23, 38-41). The fact
that the 15' position strongly influences such a structurally and
functionally diverse class of drugs makes it difficult to argue that
this residue might form a common binding site for all of these
compounds. An alternative explanation is that it may be part of a
pivotal signal transduction point through which the effects of many of
these drugs converge (13). Indeed, conformational changes corresponding
to different functional states are greatly influenced by mutations
within TMII (13, 31, 42-43). In the present experiments, the
substitution of glutamine or asparagine for the native serine may have
influenced a state transition that altered picrotoxin inhibition of the
channel, resulting in the use-facilitated blockade. Several studies
have suggested that picrotoxin may inhibit GABAA receptors
by stabilization of a desensitized state (11, 12, 31). We observed no
evidence of this at the whole-cell level, but alterations in kinetic
transitions can only be definitively observed with single channel
recordings. It is notable that the wild type receptor showed more
desensitization than the mutant receptors. However, because the
alteration in the mechanism of picrotoxin block was independent of
glycine-gating concentration, it probably does not confound our
interpretation (13).
One final interpretation of the present experiments must be considered.
It is possible that mutations introduced at the 15' position may alter
orientation of residues that are deeper in the channel. A change
in orientation could influence the interaction of picrotoxin with these
deeper channel residues and thus the mechanism by which it blocks
channel activity. The idea of conformational change in the receptor
structure induced by amino acid substitutions at quite distant
locations is not without precedent. Jackson and colleagues (20)
have recently postulated a similar mechanism to explain the observation
that the presence of lysine, but not arginine, at the 19' position of
TMII in Drosophila GABA receptors confers cation
selectivity. Although there is no direct physical evidence to support a
conformational change deep in the channel by alterations at the 15'
position, we are aware of no evidence that eliminates this as a
possible mechanism.
In conclusion, we have identified a residue at the extracellular aspect
of TMII that confers use-facilitated (i.e.
use-dependent) block by picrotoxin. It is possible that
this 15' residue plays a role in a transduction step necessary
for the expression of the inhibitory effect of picrotoxin.
Alternatively, it may form part of a second binding site for
picrotoxin, the existence to which has been alluded previously. Further
studies should be conducted to explore the importance of this residue
for picrotoxin action in other ligand-gated ion channels as well as the
action of other convulsants that might interact with the picrotoxin site.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Heinrich Betz for providing the wild
type glycine 1 subunit cDNA, and Qing Ye, Neil Harrison, and R. Adron Harris for providing cDNA for the 1(S15'Q) and 1(S15'N) subunits.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes Health
Grant ES 07904 (to G. H. D.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology
and Neuroscience, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76107. Tel.: 817-735-2055; Fax:
817-735-2091; E-mail: gdillon@hsc.unt.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 13, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111356200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
GABA, -aminobutyric acid;
GABAA and GABAC, -aminobutyric acid, types A and C;
PTX, picrotoxin;
TM, transmembrane domain;
pA, picoAmperes.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Rajendra, S.,
Lynch, J. W.,
and Schofield, P. R.
(1997)
Pharmacol. Ther.
73,
121-146[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Langosch, D.,
Thomas, L.,
and Betz, H.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
185,
7394-7398
|
| 3.
|
Etter, A.,
Cully, D. F.,
Liu, K. K.,
Reiss, B.,
Vassilatis, D. B.,
Schaeffer, J. M.,
and Arena, J. P.
(1999)
J. Neurochem.
72,
318-326[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
ffrench-Constant, R. H.,
Mortlock, D. P.,
Shaffer, C. S.,
Macintyre, R. J.,
and Roush, R. T.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
7209-7213[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Inoue, M.,
and Akaike, N.
(1988)
Neurosci. Res.
5,
380-394[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Pribilla, 1.,
Takagi, T.,
Langosch, D.,
Bormann, J.,
and Betz, H.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
4305-4311[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Yoon, K. W.,
Covey, D. F.,
and Rothman, S. M.
(1993)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
464,
423-439[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Akaike, N.,
Hattori, K.,
Oomura, Y.,
and Carpenter, D. O.
(1985)
Experientia (Basel)
41,
70-71
|
| 9.
|
Krishek, B. J.,
Moss, S. J.,
and Smart, T. G.
(1996)
Neuropharmacology
35,
1289-1298[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Simmonds, M. A.
(1980)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
80,
347-358
|
| 11.
|
Dillon, G. H., Im, W. B.,
Carter, D. B.,
and McKinley, D. D.
(1995)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
115,
539-545[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Newland, C. F.,
and Cull-Candy, S. G.
(1992)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
447,
191-213[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Lynch, J. W.,
Rajendra, S.,
Bany, P. H.,
and Schofield, P. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
13799-13806[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Enz, R.,
and Bormann, J.
(1995)
Neuroreport
6,
1569-1572[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
ffrench-Constant, R. H.,
Rocheleau, T. A.,
Steichen, J. C.,
and Chalmers, A. E.
(1993)
Nature
363,
449-451[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Gurley, D.,
Amin, J.,
Ross, P.,
Weiss, D. S.,
and White, G.
(1995)
Receptor Channels
3,
13-20[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Reddy, G. L.,
lwamoto, T.,
Tomich, J. M.,
and Montal, M.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
14608-14615[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Wang, T.-L.,
Hackam, A. S.,
Guggino, W. S.,
and Cutting, G. R.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
11751-11755[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Wang, T. L.,
Guggino, W. B.,
and Cutting, G. R.
(1994)
J. Neurosci.
14,
6524-6531[Abstract]
|
| 20.
|
Wang, C.-T.,
Zhang, H.-G.,
Rocheleau, T. A.,
ffrench-Constant, R. H.,
and Jackson, M. B.
(1999)
Biophys. J.
77,
691-700[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Dong, C.,
and Werblin, F.
(1996)
Vision Res.
36,
3997-4005[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Cully, D. F.,
Vassilatis, D. K.,
Liu, K. K.,
Paress, P. S.,
Van der Ploeg, L. H. T.,
Schaeffer, J. S.,
and Arena, J. P.
(1994)
Nature
371,
707-711[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Ye, Q.,
Koltchine, V. V.,
Mihic, S. J.,
Mascia, M. P.,
Wick, M. J.,
Finn, S. E.,
Harrison, N. L.,
and Harris, R. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
3314-3319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Steward, L. J.,
Boess, F. G.,
Steele, J. A.,
Liu, D.,
Wong, N.,
and Martin, I. L.
(2000)
Mol. Pharmacol.
57,
1249-1255[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Chen, C.,
and Okamaya, H.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
2745-2750[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Huang, R. Q.,
and Dillon, G. H.
(1999)
J. Neurophysiol.
82,
1233-1243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Shan, Q.,
Haddrill, J. L.,
and Lynch, J. W.
(2001)
J. Neurochem.
76,
1109-1120[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Jarboe, C. H.,
Poerter, L. A.,
and Buckler, R. T.
(1968)
J. Med. Chem.
11,
729-731[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Xu, M.,
Covey, D. F.,
and Akabas, M. H.
(1995)
Biophys. J.
69,
1858-1867[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Zhang, D.,
Pan, Z. H.,
Zhang, X.,
Brideau, A. D.,
and Lipton, S.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
11756-11760[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Zhang, H. G.,
ffrench-Constant, R. H.,
and Jackson, M. B.
(1994)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
479,
65-75[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Zhorov, B.,
and Bregestovski, P.
(2000)
Biophys. J.
78,
1786-1803[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Perret, P.,
Sadra, X.,
Wolff, M., Wu, T.,
and Bushey, D.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
25350-25354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Tehrani, M. H.,
Clancey, C. J.,
and Barnes, E. M.
(1985)
J. Neurochem.
45,
1311-1314[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Trifiletti, R. R.,
Snowman, A. M.,
and Snyder, S. H.
(1984)
Mol. Pharmacol.
26,
470-476[Abstract]
|
| 36.
|
Williams, D. B.,
and Akabas, M. H.
(1999)
Biophys. J.
77,
2563-2574[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Li, T. B.,
and Pearce, R. A.
(2000)
Soc. Neurosci. Abstr.
26,
629
|
| 38.
|
Koltchine, V. V.,
Finn, S. E.,
Jenkins, A.,
Nikolaeva, N.,
Lin, A.,
and Harrison, N. L.
(1999)
Mol. Pharmacol.
56,
1087-1093[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Wafford, K. A.,
Bain, C. J.,
Quirk, K.,
McKernan, R. M.,
Wingrove, P. B.,
Whiting, P. J.,
and Kemp, J. A.
(1994)
Neuron
12,
775-782[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Walter, R. J.,
Hadley, S. H.,
Morris, K. D. W.,
and Amin, J.
(2000)
Nat. Neurosci.
3,
1274-1281[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Maskell, P. D.,
Wafford, K. A.,
and Bermudez, I.
(2001)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
132,
205-212[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Cestari, I. N.,
Min, K. T.,
Kulli, J. C.,
and Yang, J.
(2000)
J. Neurochem.
74,
827-838[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Im, W. B.,
Binder, J. A.,
Dillon, G. H.,
Pregenzer, J. F., Im, H. K.,
and Altman, R. A.
(1995)
Neurosci. Lett.
186,
203-207[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D.-S. Wang, R. Buckinx, H. Lecorronc, J.-M. Mangin, J.-M. Rigo, and P. Legendre
Mechanisms for Picrotoxinin and Picrotin Blocks of {alpha}2 Homomeric Glycine Receptors
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 1, 2007;
282(22):
16016 - 16035.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Sedelnikova, B. E. Erkkila, H. Harris, S. O. Zakharkin, and D. S. Weiss
Stoichiometry of a pore mutation that abolishes picrotoxin-mediated antagonism of the GABAA receptor
J. Physiol.,
December 1, 2006;
577(2):
569 - 577.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D.-S. Wang, J.-M. Mangin, G. Moonen, J.-M. Rigo, and P. Legendre
Mechanisms for Picrotoxin Block of {alpha}2 Homomeric Glycine Receptors
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 17, 2006;
281(7):
3841 - 3855.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Hawthorne and J. W. Lynch
A Picrotoxin-specific Conformational Change in the Glycine Receptor M2-M3 Loop
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 28, 2005;
280(43):
35836 - 35843.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Das and G. H. Dillon
Molecular Determinants of Picrotoxin Inhibition of 5-Hydroxytryptamine Type 3 Receptors
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
July 1, 2005;
314(1):
320 - 328.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Qian, Y. Pan, Y. Zhu, and P. Khalili
Picrotoxin Accelerates Relaxation of GABAC Receptors
Mol. Pharmacol.,
February 1, 2005;
67(2):
470 - 479.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. E. Schmitt, R. H. Hill, and S. Grillner
The Spinal GABAergic System Is a Strong Modulator of Burst Frequency in the Lamprey Locomotor Network
J Neurophysiol,
October 1, 2004;
92(4):
2357 - 2367.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. W. Lynch
Molecular Structure and Function of the Glycine Receptor Chloride Channel
Physiol Rev,
October 1, 2004;
84(4):
1051 - 1095.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. N Eisenman, Y. He, C. Fields, C. F Zorumski, and S. Mennerick
Activation-Dependent Properties of Pregnenolone Sulfate Inhibition of GABAA Receptor-Mediated Current
J. Physiol.,
August 1, 2003;
550(3):
679 - 691.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|