![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 11, 9262-9267, March 15, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, October 29, 2001, and in revised form, December 21, 2001
Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 The hypoxia-inducible factor-1
(HIF-1)1 is a heterodimeric
transcription factor composed of the two subunits HIF-1 The protein chaperone complex heat shock protein 90 (HSP90)-p23
(reviewed in Refs. 22 and 23) is involved in the regulation of a
variety of bHLH transcription factors including MyoD and the bHLH-PAS
proteins Sim and AhR (24-26). HSP90 interacts with two different sites
of AhR, one in the bHLH domain and the other in the PAS B domain (26,
27). The interaction of HSP90 with the ligand binding domain of AhR is
important for maintaining the receptor in a high affinity ligand
binding and repressed conformation (28-30). Furthermore, the HSP90
chaperone complex seems to regulate the intracellular localization of
the AhR (31). As shown by in vitro pull-down assays, HSP90
can also bind HIF-1 We therefore investigated the impact of heat shock (as evidenced by
HSP90 induction and activation) in vivo and in
vitro on the regulation of cellular HIF-1 Antibodies and Chemicals--
Antibodies were purchased from the
suppliers indicated: mouse monoclonal anti-HSP90 (StressGen), mouse
anti-HIF-1 Cell Culture and Reporter Gene Assays--
The human hepatoma
cell lines HepG2 and Hep3B were obtained from American Type Culture
Collection. Cells were grown in high glucose Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal calf serum (Invitrogen) in a
humidified 5% CO2, 95% air atmosphere at 37 °C. For
hypoxic exposure, the O2 concentration in the cell culture
incubator (Heraeus) was lowered to 3%. The B1 cell line (kind gift of
J. Caro, Philadelphia, PA) is derived from Hep3B cells
stably transfected with a reporter gene construct containing the 5'-
and 3'-flanking regions of the erythropoietin gene linked to the
luciferase reporter gene (10).
Animal Experiments--
The investigations were performed in
strict accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines
(48) and approved by the local Governmental Commissions for the
Care of Animals. For heat treatment, B6C3F1 mice were placed into a
37 °C incubator for different time periods. The rectal temperature
was continuously recorded with a thermocouple. Recooling of the animals
was accomplished by exposing the animals after heat treatment to
20 °C ambient temperature. Typically, rectal temperature increased
up to 41 °C during heat treatment, reaching the maximum temperature
~2 h after exposing the mice to 37 °C. Recooling resulted in a
drop of rectal temperature back to 37 °C within 20 min.
Immunoblot Analyses--
Following stimulation, cells were
collected, washed with ice-cold PBS, and extracted with 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, 400 mM NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml
pepstatin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Protein
concentrations were determined using the Bradford method (Sigma).
Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose
membranes by semidry electroblotting (Bio-Rad). Membranes were stained
with Ponceau S to verify equal protein loading per lane. After
overnight blocking (5% nonfat milk powder in PBS), the blots were
incubated for 1-2 h with primary antibodies against HIF-1 Immunofluorescence Analyses--
For immunofluorescence
analyses, cells were fixed with freshly prepared 3.7% formaldehyde in
PBS (pH 7.4) for 10 min, washed with PBS, permeabilized with 0.5%
Triton X-100 for 5 min, and rinsed again with PBS. After blocking
nonspecific binding sites with 3% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 30 min, the cells were incubated for 1 h with the anti-HIF-1 Immunoprecipitation Analyses--
Following stimulation, cells
were collected, washed with ice-cold PBS, and extracted with 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, 400 mM NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml
pepstatin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. 1 mg of each
protein sample was incubated with 26 µg of anti-HIF-1 RNA Extraction and RNA Blot Analysis--
Total cellular RNA
preparation and RNA blot analysis was carried out as described
previously (34). Hybridization probes for glucose transporter-1,
aldolase, and Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay--
Electrophoretic
mobility shift assay was performed as described before (35).
Oligonucleotides containing an HIF-1 DNA-binding site derived from the
erythropoietin gene were gel-purified on 10% polyacrylamide gels prior
to 5'-end-labeling of the sense strand with [ Heat Induces HIF-1 Temperature-dependent HIF-1
Three major HIF-1 Heat-induced HIF-1 Heat Induces HIF-1
Finally, HIF-1 target gene expression was evaluated following exposure
to heat and/or hypoxia. In agreement with the lack of DNA-binding and
heat-induced reporter gene activity, hypoxia but not heat induced the
HIF-1 target genes glucose transporter-1 (Glut-1) and
aldolase in HepG2 cells (Fig. 5C). In the same samples, no
change in HIF-1 Heat Induction of HIF-1
Compared with heat and IVTT, hypoxia resulted in a distinct HIF-1 HSP90 Activity Is Required for HIF-1
The direct interaction of HIF-1
Of note, the HSP90 inhibitor geldanamycin was able to diminish also the
hypoxia-induced expression of HIF-1 Early work on hypoxia-inducible gene expression suspected
mechanisms comparable with those elicited by the general stress response, most prominently represented by the heat-shock response. However, with the discovery of HIF-1 it became evident that the specific hypoxic response is distinct from the heat-shock response (38). Thus, we were surprised to find heat induction of HIF-1 The treatment with the HSP90 inhibitors novobiocin or geldanamycin
prevented heat-induced as well as hypoxia-induced HIF-1 HSP90 is a highly conserved and abundant protein in the cytosol of both
eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells (22, 23). It represents the most
abundant heat shock protein under normal conditions and is up-regulated
by various stress conditions including heat. HSP90 functions as a
general molecular chaperone in vitro and in vivo,
acts in concert with many other heat shock and nonheat shock proteins,
and shows a broad substrate specificity. The chaperone complex
HSP90-p23 has impact on the regulation of a variety of bHLH
transcription factors including AhR and Sim as well as various protein
kinases such as pp60v-src, steroid hormone receptors, and
the tumor suppressor p53 (24-26, 44). Many of these proteins are
activated by binding of ligands. HSP90 is thought to stabilize these
proteins and maintain them in an activable form. Especially for
bHLH transcription factors like AhR and Sim, the release of HSP90
appears to be required for activation, since only the repressed, non-DNA-binding forms of the receptors show interaction with HSP90. Although a protein interaction of HSP90 with HIF-1 Heat induction of HIF-1 In summary, our studies imply that HSP90 plays a functional role in
HIF-1 regulation by physiologic variations of both environmental parameters, oxygen partial pressure and temperature.
We thank J. Caro for the gift of the B1
cell line, G. Fletschinger for the artwork, and J. Fandrey and W. Jelkmann for support.
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Supported by grants from the Forschungsschwerpunkt Onkologie of the
Medical University of Lübeck.
¶
Supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant GRK288.
§§
Supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant
We2672/1-1.
¶¶
Present address: Carl-Ludwig-Institute of Physiology,
University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 27, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 4, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110377200
The abbreviations used are:
HIF, hypoxia-inducible factor;
AhR, arylhydrocarbon receptor;
ARNT, AhR
nuclear translocator;
bHLH, basic-helix-loop-helix;
Glut, glucose
transporter;
HSP, heat shock protein;
IVTT, in vitro
transcribed and translated;
PAS, Per-Arnt-Sim;
pVHL, von Hippel-Lindau
protein;
MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular
signal-regulated kinase kinase;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.
Heat Induction of the Unphosphorylated Form of Hypoxia-inducible
Factor-1
Is Dependent on Heat Shock Protein-90 Activity*
§¶
,
¶,
,
**,
,
, and
§§§¶¶
Institute of Physiology and
** Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical University of
Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany and
the 
Institute of Physiology, University of
Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse. 190, Zürich CH-8057, Switzerland
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
is the
oxygen-sensitive subunit of HIF-1, a transcriptional master regulator
of oxygen homeostasis. Oxygen-dependent prolyl
hydroxylation targets HIF-1
for ubiquitinylation and proteasomal
degradation. Unexpectedly, we found that exposing mice to elevated
temperatures resulted in a strong HIF-1
induction in kidney, liver,
and spleen. To elucidate the molecular mechanisms responsible for this
effect, HepG2 hepatoma cells were exposed to different temperatures
(34-42 °C) under normoxic (20% O2) or hypoxic
(3% O2) conditions. Heat was sufficient to stabilize
mainly a phosphatase-resistant, low molecular weight form of HIF-1
(termed HIF-1
a). Heat-induced HIF-1
a
accumulated in the nucleus but neither bound to DNA nor
trans-activated reporter or target gene expression,
demonstrating the need for post-translational modifications for these
functions. The protein banding pattern of heat-induced HIF-1
in
immunoblot analyses was clearly distinct from the HIF-1
pattern
after prolyl hydroxylase inhibition (by hypoxia or iron chelation/replacement) or following proteasome inhibition, suggesting that heat stabilizes HIF-1
by a novel mechanism. Inhibition of the
ATP-dependent chaperone activity of HSP90 by novobiocin or geldanamycin prevented heat-induced as well as hypoxia-induced HIF-1
accumulation, indicating a common role of the HSP90 chaperone activity
in HIF-1
stabilization by these two environmental parameters.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and
HIF-1
, both belonging to the basic helix-loop-helix
(bHLH)-Per/arylhydrocarbon receptor (AhR)
nuclear translocator (ARNT)/Sim (PAS) protein superfamily (1). HIF-1
is identical to the previously described ARNT protein. HIF-1 is a critical regulator of the physiological adaptive response to
hypoxia, since it activates genes regulating, among other
processes, angiogenesis, erythropoiesis, and glucose metabolism.
HIF-1 has also been described to be involved in tumor angiogenesis and
ischemic diseases such as myocardial ischemia or stroke (reviewed in
Refs. 2 and 3). Whereas ARNT is constitutively expressed,
HIF-1
expression is induced in hypoxic cells with an exponential
increase in expression as cells are exposed to decreased oxygen partial pressures. As determined in HeLa cells, the highest HIF-1
protein levels are reached at 0.5% oxygen (4, 5). Recent studies have shown
that HIF-1
is modified by oxygen-dependent prolyl hydroxylation (6-9), allowing the binding of the von Hippel-Lindau protein (pVHL), which targets HIF-1
for ubiquitinylation and proteasomal degradation (10-17). Further activation of HIF-1 involves nuclear translocation, dimerization with ARNT, DNA binding, and recruitment of transcriptional co-activators. These processes are
regulated at least in part by posttranslational modifications. It has
been demonstrated that phosphorylation of HIF-1
via the Ras/Raf-MEK-p42/44 and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-PTEN-Akt-GSK3 kinase pathways eventually results in elevated expression and/or transcriptional activity of HIF-1 (18-21).
(32). This observation has been confirmed by
co-immunoprecipitation studies using an artificial enhanced green
fluorescent protein-HIF-1
fusion protein ectopically
overexpressed in heterologous COS-7 cells (33). However, because HSP90
is capable of binding many proteins, the functional significance of
these observations remained unknown. In particular, the effect of
physiological activation of HSPs by heat on HIF-1 activity has not been
reported so far.
expression, protein
modifications, and subcellular localization as well as HIF-1 DNA
binding and trans-activation activity. Our data indicate a
novel role of HSP90 in the stabilization of HIF-1
, which is not
related to proteasome function or posttranslational modification of
HIF-1
by phosphorylation.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(Novus), mouse anti-pVHL (Pharmingen), mouse
anti-HIF-1
(Transduction Laboratories), mouse anti-
-actin
(Sigma). Appropriate horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary
antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa
Cruz, CA) and Promega. PD98059 and
protein phosphatase were
supplied by Calbiochem and New England Biolabs, respectively. All other
chemicals were obtained from Sigma. Petriperm dishes were purchased
from Satorius.
, pVHL,
HSP90, or
-actin and detected with secondary horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated antibodies. Chemiluminescence detection was
performed by incubating the membranes with 100 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 8.5), 2.65 mM H2O2, 0.45 mM luminol, and 0.625 mM coumaric acid for 1 min followed by exposure to x-ray films.
(Transduction Laboratories) or the anti-HSP90 antibody diluted 1:100 in
3% bovine serum albumin in PBS, followed by a fluorescein
isothiocyanate-coupled secondary anti-mouse (Dako) antibody diluted
1:100 with 3% bovine serum albumin in PBS. After extensive washings
with PBS, the slides were mounted and analyzed by fluorescence
microscopy (Axioplan 2000; Zeiss).
(Novus)
antibodies and 100 µl of protein G/A-agarose (Oncogene) overnight.
Agarose beads were washed three times with lysis buffer containing 2 mM sodium molybdate. Immunoprecipitated proteins were
recovered by adding 0.5 M Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 0.5% SDS,
0.5% bromphenol blue, 20% glycerol. Subsequently, samples were freed
of agarose beads by filtration through Micropure 0.22 separators
(Amicon), boiled, and separated by SDS-PAGE. HIF-1
and HSP90 were
detected by immunoblot analysis as described above.
-actin were obtained by gel purification of the
inserts and random-primed labeling as described previously (34).
Radioactive signals were recorded by exposure to phosphorimaging
screens (Fuji).
-32P]ATP
(Amersham Biosciences, Inc.). Unincorporated nucleotides were removed
by gel filtration over Bio-Gel P60 columns (Bio-Rad). Labeled sense
strands were annealed to a 2-fold molar excess of unlabeled antisense
strands. DNA-protein binding reactions were carried out for 4 h at
4 °C in a total volume of 20 µl of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH
7.5), 50 mM KCl, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM
dithiothreitol, 5% glycerol, containing 5 µg of nuclear extract, 0.1 µg of sonicated calf thymus DNA (Sigma), and 2 × 104 cpm of oligonucleotide probe. Samples were run on 4%
nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels at 200 V in TBE buffer (89 mM Tris, 89 mM boric acid, 5 mM
EDTA) at 4 °C. The gels were dried, and radioactive signals were
recorded as described above.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Expression in Vivo--
Similar to other
bHLH transcription factors, HIF-1
can form a stable association with
HSP90 in vitro (33, 36). To obtain evidence as to whether
HIF-1
stabilization is functionally linked to activation of the heat
shock response in vivo, we exposed mice to an ambient
temperature of 37 °C for up to 4 h. During this treatment, the
rectal temperature increased up to 41 °C as soon as 2 h of
exposure. Three animals were recooled following 3 h of 37 °C by
exposing them back to room temperature. Subsequently, animals were
sacrificed, and HSP90 as well as HIF-1
protein expression was
determined in kidney, liver, spleen, lung, and testis (Fig. 1). In kidney and liver, a strong
induction of HIF-1
expression was observed as soon as 1 h after
exposure of the mice to an ambient temperature of 37 °C. This
induction was detectable up to 3 h after recooling of the animals,
although the rectal temperature had decreased back to normal values. In
spleen, only a slight induction of HIF-1
protein expression with
elevated core body temperature was observed, whereas in the lung no
signal could be detected. In testis, a strong constitutive HIF-1
protein expression was observed, which remained unaffected by elevated
core body temperature. Interestingly, heat-induced as well as
constitutive expression of HIF-1
protein correlated with the
expression of HSP90 in the different organs (Fig. 1), suggesting that
HSP90 induction might be functionally linked to HIF-1
stabilization.

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Heat induces HIF-1
expression in vivo. Mice were exposed to an
ambient temperature of 37 °C for different time intervals and were
then either sacrificed directly after the heat treatment or recooled by
reexposure to 20 °C. Subsequently, HIF-1
, HSP90, and
-actin
protein expression was determined in organ protein extracts. A
representative immunoblot analysis of cellular protein probed with
anti-HIF-1
, anti-HSP90, or anti-
-actin antibodies is shown.
Protein
Accumulation--
To gain insight into the molecular basis of the
heat-induced HIF-1
expression, human hepatoma HepG2 cells were
exposed for 4 h to temperatures ranging from 34 to 42 °C under
normoxic (20% O2) or hypoxic (3% O2)
conditions. HIF-1
but not pVHL or
-actin protein levels were
induced by elevated incubation temperatures under both normoxic and
hypoxic conditions (Fig. 2A).
A similar effect was found when desferrioxamine or cobalt chloride was
combined with heat (Fig. 2B). Heat-induced expression of
HIF-1
started following exposure for 2 h (data not shown). A
heat-induced increase in HIF-1
expression was also detectable in
Petriperm cell culture dishes, in which the cells were grown attached
to an oxygen-permeable silicone membrane. This prevents hypoxic effects
that potentially might occur due to increased oxygen consumption
following heat exposure (data not shown).

View larger version (49K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Heat induces HIF-1
expression in vitro. A,
induction of HIF-1
protein after exposure of HepG2 cells to
34-42 °C under normoxic (20% O2) or hypoxic (3%
O2) conditions for 4 h. A representative immunoblot
analysis of cellular protein probed with anti-HIF-1
, anti-pVHL, and
anti-
-actin antibodies is shown. B, induction of HIF-1
protein after exposure of HepG2 cells to 125 µM
desferrioxamine (DFX) or 50 µM
CoCl2 at 37 °C or 42 °C for 4 h. Representative
immunoblot analysis is shown of protein probed with
anti-HIF-1
.
bands could be resolved by Western blot analysis
(termed HIF-1
a, HIF-1
b, and
HIF-1
c) (Figs. 2 and 3). Interestingly, heat induced primarily the low molecular weight form
HIF-1
a in vitro and to some extent
HIF-1
b, whereas hypoxia or the hypoxia-mimicking agents
cobalt chloride and desferrioxamine induced primarily the higher
molecular weight species HIF-1
b and
HIF-1
c as well as intervening forms (Fig. 2,
A and B). To determine the biochemical basis of
the three HIF-1
forms, protein extracts of HepG2 cells exposed to
37 °C under hypoxic conditions or exposed to 42 °C under normoxic
conditions were treated with
-phosphatase. The HIF-1
c
band disappeared after
-phosphatase (400 units) treatment, whereas
the HIF-1
a and HIF-1
b bands were not
affected (Fig. 3A), even after increasing the amount of
-phosphatase up to 2000 units (data not shown). These results
suggest that HIF-1
c represents a phosphorylated form of
HIF-1
. A high resolution immunoblot with the organ protein extracts,
derived from mice exposed for 4 h to elevated temperatures,
together with a protein extract of hypoxic HepG2 cells, clearly
indicated that the HIF-1
a form is also induced by heat
in vivo (Fig. 3B).

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Heat induces nonphosphorylated
HIF-1
. A, HepG2 cells were
exposed to 37 °C under hypoxic conditions or 42 °C under normoxic
conditions. Cell lysates were then treated with or without 400 units of
-phosphatase. Representative immunoblot analysis is shown;
proteins were probed with anti-HIF-1
. B, organ protein
extracts of mice exposed for 4 h to an ambient temperature of
37 °C were analyzed together with a protein extract of HepG2 cells
exposed for 4 h to 3% O2 by high resolution HIF-1
immunoblotting.
a Translocates into the Nucleus
under Normoxic Conditions--
Immunofluorescence studies were
performed to analyze the subcellular localization of heat-induced
HIF-1
a. As shown in Fig. 4, nuclear accumulation of
HIF-1
a was detected following exposure of HepG2 cells to
hypoxic conditions at 37 °C as well as at 42 °C. A similar effect
could be observed following exposure of the cells to 42 °C at
normoxic conditions but not to 37 °C. In the same cell line, a
strong induction of HSP90 was observed at 42 °C in the cytoplasm as
well as in the nucleus. Because the same antibody was used for the
immunoblot and immunofluorescence studies, it has to be assumed
(although this cannot be formally proven) that all three forms of
HIF-1
(i.e. HIF-1
a-c) are recognized in
the immunofluorescence experiments as well. Strikingly, nuclear HSP90
was detected under hypoxic conditions at 37 °C. Neither these
immunofluorescence nor Western blot analyses (data not shown) provided
evidence for an increase of total HSP90 cellular protein under hypoxic
conditions, indicating that hypoxia induces nuclear translocation of
HSP90.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Subcellular localization of
HIF-1
. HepG2 cells were exposed to
37 °C or 42 °C under normoxic (20% O2) or hypoxic
(3% O2) conditions for 4 h. The cells were
prepared for immunofluorescence analysis and incubated with
anti-HIF-1
or anti-HSP90 antibodies followed by fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibodies as described under
"Experimental Procedures."
a but Not HIF-1 trans-Activation
Activity--
Next, we analyzed the functional activities of
heat-induced compared with hypoxia-induced HIF-1
. Therefore, DNA
binding and reporter gene studies were performed. Despite the increase
in protein concentration, exposing cells to 42 °C did not result in
increased DNA binding activity (Fig.
5A). Consequently, the transcriptional activity of heat-induced HIF-1 remained unchanged in B1
cells exposed to 42 °C (Fig. 5B). Since the luciferase
protein was found to be thermoinstable (data not shown and Ref. 37), reporter gene expression was determined at the mRNA level. In contrast to heat, exposing B1 cells to hypoxia resulted in a strong induction of luciferase mRNA expression, which was not further increased by heat.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Heat-induction of HIF-1
is not sufficient for induction of HIF-1
trans-activation activity. A, lack of
heat-induced HIF-1 DNA-binding. HepG2 cells were incubated at 37 and
42 °C under normoxic (20% O2) or hypoxic (3%
O2) conditions for 4 h. Nuclear protein was extracted
and incubated with 32P-labeled oligonucleotides containing
the wild type or a mutant HIF-1 binding site derived from the
erythropoietin 3' hypoxia response element. Antibodies were added to
the samples where indicated to confirm the specificity of the
supershifted (ss) protein-DNA complexes. B,
luciferase mRNA Northern blotting of B1 cells (Hep3B cells stably
transfected with the regulatory elements of the erythropoietin gene
linked to the luciferase reporter gene) exposed to 37 and 42 °C
under normoxic (20% O2) or hypoxic (3% O2)
conditions for 4 h. Shown are mean values ± S.D. of three
independent experiments. C, Northern blotting of HepG2 cells
exposed to 37 and 42 °C under normoxic (20% O2) or
hypoxic (3% O2) conditions for 4 h using
radioactively labeled cDNA probes for glucose transporter-1
(Glut-1), aldolase, HIF-1
, and
-actin mRNA.
mRNA expression was detectable, demonstrating that neither hypoxia nor heat-induced HIF-1
protein expression is
caused by increased mRNA expression.
a,b Is Not Caused by
Inhibition of Prolyl Hydroxylation or Proteasomal Activity--
There
are several possible regulatory steps during which heat might block the
HIF-1
degradation process, including prolyl hydroxylation,
ubiquitinylation, and proteasomal degradation. By high resolution
Western blotting, HIF-1
was detected as multiple bands, designated
HIF-1
a (likely to represent the native HIF-1
protein), HIF-1
b (representing a phosphatase-resistant
form), and HIF-1
c (representing the phosphorylated
form). Interestingly, the protein banding pattern of HIF-1
induced
by heat corresponded to the pattern obtained with recombinant HIF-1
in vitro transcribed and translated (IVTT) in rabbit
reticulocyte lysates (Fig. 6). Because
the HIF-1
a and HIF-1
b bands were still
present in IVTTs performed in the presence of the iron chelator
desferrioxamine (DFX; Fig. 6), an inhibitor of HIF-1
prolyl hydroxylation (6, 7), it is unlikely that HIF-1
b
is the hydroxylated form of HIF-1
. These results were confirmed by
IVTTs performed under hypoxic conditions (data not shown).

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Distinct banding patterns of
HIF-1
are induced by heat, hypoxia, and
proteasomal inhibition. HepG2 cells were exposed to the indicated
temperatures or oxygen concentrations with or without the addition of
lactacystin for 4 h. Representative immunoblot analysis is
shown of cellular protein or recombinant HIF-1
, IVTT with or
without the presence of 125 µM desferrioxamine
(DFX), probed with anti-HIF-1
antibodies.
banding pattern. Hypoxia induced the phosphatase treatment-resistant HIF-1
b and the phosphorylated HIF-1
c
species, the latter of which is not found following heat or IVTT. This
observation suggests that heat induced HIF-1
at least partially by a
pathway distinct from hypoxia. We further excluded heat-mediated
proteasome inhibition as a potential mechanism of HIF-1
stabilization, as evidenced by the distinct pattern of HIF-1
following treatment of the cells with the proteasome inhibitor
lactacystin (Fig. 6). Unlike heat, lactacystin induced a series of
additional (most probably polyubiquitinylated) HIF-1 bands with lower
electrophoretic mobilities than HIF-1
a, HIF-1
b, and HIF-1
c (Fig. 6).
Induction by Heat as Well
as by Hypoxia--
The HSP90-inhibiting drugs novobiocin and
geldanamycin were used to gain insight into a possible contribution of
HSP90 activity to the heat-induced expression of HIF-1
. Therefore,
HepG2 cells were subjected to 42 °C with or without the addition of
increasing concentrations of novobiocin or geldanamycin (Fig.
7A). It is important to note
that the doses of geldanamycin and novobiocin employed were not
cytotoxic as determined by a
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
survival assay (data not shown). At lower doses, both HSP90 inhibitors
diminished the prominent heat-induced HIF-1
a form but
led to an increase of the HIF-1
b form. Higher doses of
both HSP90 inhibitors even led to the disappearance of heat-induced HIF-1
a and HIF-1
b. The addition of the
MEK1 inhibitor PD98059 did not affect heat induction of
HIF-1
a and HIF-1
b, confirming that the
MEK-ERK kinase pathway is not involved in heat regulation of HIF-1
(Fig. 7A).

View larger version (47K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
HSP90 activity is required for both heat and
hypoxic induction of HIF-1
. A,
HepG2 cells were incubated at 37 or 42 °C under normoxic (20%
O2) or hypoxic (3% O2) conditions for 4 h
with or without the addition of the HSP90 inhibitor novobiocin and
geldanamycin (GM) or the MEK1 inhibitor PD98059.
B, HepG2 cells were incubated at 37 or 42 °C for 4 h
under normoxic conditions. Subsequently, protein extracts were
prepared, and the HIF-1
/HSP90 interaction was detected by
co-immunoprecipitation assays using anti-HIF-1
antibodies.
C, HepG2 cells were incubated at 37 °C under hypoxic (3%
O2) conditions for 4 h with or without the addition of
geldanamycin. Representative immunoblot analysis of cellular protein
probed with anti-HIF-1
and anti-
-actin antibodies.
and HSP90 was determined by
co-immunoprecipitation assays in protein extracts of HepG2 cells exposed to 37 °C compared with 42 °C. In good agreement with the hypothesis that HSP90 is mediating heat-induced stabilization of
HIF-1
, more HSP90 was found to be complexed with HIF-1
after exposure to 42 °C compared with 37 °C (Fig. 7B).
(Fig. 7C). At lower
doses, the native HIF-1
a form was more susceptible to
inhibition of HSP90 activity than the phosphorylated
HIF-1
c form. These data indicate that protein
stabilization of HIF-1
by heat as well as by hypoxia involves
ATP-dependent HSP90 activity.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
in
mice exposed to elevated temperatures. It seems unlikely that heat-induced HIF-1
expression is simply mediated by hypoxia due to
an increased oxygen consumption, since the temperature effects were
similar in standard polystyrol cell culture dishes and in Petriperm
dishes, in which the cells grow attached to oxygen-permeable silicone
membranes. As previously shown in our laboratory, this prevents hypoxic
effects caused by high cell densities or increased metabolic rates
(39). More important, the protein pattern of HIF-1
induced by heat
was clearly distinct from the pattern induced by hypoxia; while heat
induced mainly the native form of HIF-1
(HIF-1
a),
hypoxia induced a series of additional bands with lower electrophoretic
mobilities (HIF-1
b and HIF-1
c), which
were prone (HIF-1
c) or resistant (HIF-1
b)
to phosphatase treatment. Although we can not fully exclude the
possibility that secondary hypoxia plays an additional role for
heat-induced HIF-1
induction in vivo, our data indicate
that the mechanism of heat-induced HIF-1
expression in
vivo appears to be similar to the mechanism found in
vitro, since also the HIF-1
a form is induced by
heat in vivo. Thus, heat-induced protein expression is
mainly due to protein stabilization and to a lesser extent dependent on
protein modifications. In line with this notion, Jewell et
al. (5) reported that immediately after the onset of hypoxia, the
high mobility (native) form of HIF-1
became first detectable on
Western blots, whereas following prolonged exposure additional
(modified) forms with lower electrophoretic mobility became apparent.
expression.
Geldanamycin and novobiocin specifically bind to ATP-binding pockets of
HSP90, blocking the ATP-dependent maturation process of
HSP90-dependent complexes in an intermediate state by
interfering with the association of HSP90 with Hsc70 and finally the
recruitment of the co-chaperone p23 that has been reported to stabilize
the interaction between HSP90 and HSP90-regulated proteins (40, 41).
Occupancy of the ATP binding pocket by ansamycin drugs prevents
refolding of mature proteins and causes the degradation of
HSP90-regulated proteins (42, 43). Thus, the chaperone activity of
HSP90 is involved in HIF-1
stabilization, and an increase in HSP90
protein by heat might stabilize HIF-1
even under normoxic conditions.
has been
described previously (33, 36), the functional meaning of this
interaction was not clear so far. We show for the first time that the
heat-induced stabilization of HIF-1
is linked to the function of
HSP90. The correlation of HSP90 and heat-induced as well as
constitutive HIF-1
expression in the animal experiments suggests a
general role of HSP90-mediated stabilization of HIF-1
also in
vivo. In accordance with the depressing function of HSP90 for
other bHLH transcription factors, the heat-induced HIF-1
was
functionally inactive as demonstrated by DNA-binding and reporter gene
assays as well as by the lack of target gene expression. This suggests that additional posttranslational modifications of HIF-1
are required to activate these functions.
was sufficient to induce nuclear
translocation of the HIF-1
a form. Concomitantly, a
tremendous induction and nuclear accumulation of HSP90 was observed.
Thus, it is tempting to speculate that HSP90 itself inhibited the DNA
binding activity of the native HIF-1
-ARNT complex. Following hypoxic
induction, however, HIF-1
becomes activated by phosphorylation
(and/or other modifications), which might prevent the interaction with
HSP90. Accordingly, heat did not inhibit DNA-binding or reporter gene activation under hypoxic conditions. Similar data have been reported for the function of HSP90 in glucocorticoid receptor regulation. Applying heat stress to both cell cultures or whole organisms led to
considerable loss of cytosolic glucocorticoid binding capacity that
coincided with a decreased amount of the glucocorticoid receptor protein present in the cytosolic fraction and its increase in the
nuclei (45-47). Since we were able to demonstrate a slight nuclear
accumulation of HSP90 after hypoxic versus normoxic exposure at normothermic temperature, one could postulate a physiologic role of
the HSP90-HIF-1
interaction for the hypoxic activation of HIF-1. In
analogy to AhR and Sim, HSP90 could support the conformational maturation of HIF-1
and protect it from proteasomal degradation. This hypothesis is further substantiated by the study of Minet et
al. (33), who demonstrated that inhibition of the function of
HSP90 with geldanamycin impaired CoCl2-induced HIF-1
activation as determined by reporter gene assays in transiently
transfected cells. In agreement with this model, we found that the
HSP90 inhibitor geldanamycin was able to inhibit hypoxic stabilization
of HIF-1
.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
49-451-500-4152; Fax: 49-451-500-4151; E-mail:
katschinski@physio.mu-luebeck.de.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Wang, G. L.,
Jiang, B. H.,
Rue, E. A.,
and Semenza, G. L.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
5510-5514 2.
Wenger, R. H.
(2000)
J. Exp. Biol.
203,
1253-1263[Abstract]
3.
Semenza, G. L.
(2001)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
13,
167-171[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Jiang, B. H.,
Semenza, G. L.,
Bauer, C.,
and Marti, H. H.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
271,
C1172-C1180 5.
Jewell, U. R.,
Kvietikova, I.,
Scheid, A.,
Bauer, C.,
Wenger, R. H.,
and Gassmann, M.
(2001)
FASEB J.
15,
1312-1314 6.
Jaakkola, P.,
Mole, D. R.,
Tian, Y. M.,
Wilson, M. I.,
Gielbert, J.,
Gaskell, S. J.,
von Kriegsheim, A.,
Hebestreit, H. F.,
Mukherji, M.,
Schofield, C. J.,
Maxwell, P. H.,
Pugh, C. W.,
and Ratcliffe, P. J.
(2001)
Science
292,
468-472 7.
Ivan, M.,
Kondo, K.,
Yang, H.,
Kim, W.,
Valiando, J.,
Ohh, M.,
Salic, A.,
Asara, J. M.,
Lane, W. S.,
and Kaelin, W. G., Jr.
(2001)
Science
292,
464-468 8.
Epstein, A. C.,
Gleadle, J. M.,
McNeill, L. A.,
Hewitson, K. S.,
O'Rourke, J.,
Mole, D. R.,
Mukherji, M.,
Metzen, E.,
Wilson, M. I.,
Dhanda, A.,
Tian, Y. M.,
Masson, N.,
Hamilton, D. L.,
Jaakkola, P.,
Barstead, R.,
Hodgkin, J.,
Maxwell, P. H.,
Pugh, C. W.,
Schofield, C. J.,
and Ratcliffe, P. J.
(2001)
Cell
107,
43-54[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Bruick, R. K.,
and McKnight, S. L.
(2001)
Science
294,
1337-1340 10.
Salceda, S.,
and Caro, J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
22642-22647 11.
Huang, L. E., Gu, J.,
Schau, M.,
and Bunn, H. F.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
7987-7992 12.
Kallio, P. J.,
Wilson, W. J., S, O. B.,
Makino, Y.,
and Poellinger, L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
6519-6525 13.
Maxwell, P. H.,
Wiesener, M. S.,
Chang, G. W.,
Clifford, S. C.,
Vaux, E. C.,
Cockman, M. E.,
Wykoff, C. C.,
Pugh, C. W.,
Maher, E. R.,
and Ratcliffe, P. J.
(1999)
Nature
399,
271-275[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Ohh, M.,
Park, C. W.,
Ivan, M.,
Hoffman, M. A.,
Kim, T. Y.,
Huang, L. E.,
Pavletich, N.,
Chau, V.,
and Kaelin, W. G.
(2000)
Nat. Cell Biol.
2,
423-427[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Cockman, M. E.,
Masson, N.,
Mole, D. R.,
Jaakkola, P.,
Chang, G. W.,
Clifford, S. C.,
Maher, E. R.,
Pugh, C. W.,
Ratcliffe, P. J.,
and Maxwell, P. H.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
25733-25741 16.
Tanimoto, K.,
Makino, Y.,
Pereira, T.,
and Poellinger, L.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
4298-4309[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Kamura, T.,
Sato, S.,
Iwai, K.,
Czyzyk-Krzeska, M.,
Conaway, R. C.,
and Conaway, J. W.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
10430-10435 18.
Richard, D. E.,
Berra, E.,
Gothie, E.,
Roux, D.,
and Pouysségur, J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
32631-32637 19.
Zhong, H.,
Chiles, K.,
Feldser, D.,
Laughner, E.,
Hanrahan, C.,
Georgescu, M. M.,
Simons, J. W.,
and Semenza, G. L.
(2000)
Cancer Res.
60,
1541-1545 20.
Zundel, W.,
Schindler, C.,
Haas-Kogan, D.,
Koong, A.,
Kaper, F.,
Chen, E.,
Gottschalk, A. R.,
Ryan, H. E.,
Johnson, R. S.,
Jefferson, A. B.,
Stokoe, D.,
and Giaccia, A. J.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
391-396 21.
Chen, E. Y.,
Mazure, N. M.,
Cooper, J. A.,
and Giaccia, A. J.
(2001)
Cancer Res.
61,
2429-2433 22.
Buchner, J.
(1996)
FASEB J.
10,
10-19[Abstract]
23.
Pirkkala, L.,
Nykanen, P.,
and Sistonen, L.
(2001)
FASEB J.
15,
1118-1131 24.
Kallio, P. J.,
Pongratz, I.,
Gradin, K.,
McGuire, J.,
and Poellinger, L.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
5667-5672 25.
Shue, G.,
and Kohtz, D. S.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
2707-2711 26.
Whitelaw, M. L.,
Gottlicher, M.,
Gustafsson, J. A.,
and Poellinger, L.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
4169-4179[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Antonsson, C.,
Whitelaw, M. L.,
McGuire, J.,
Gustafsson, J. A.,
and Poellinger, L.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
756-765[Abstract]
28.
Carver, L. A.,
Jackiw, V.,
and Bradfield, C. A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
30109-30112 29.
Pongratz, I.,
Mason, G. G.,
and Poellinger, L.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
13728-13734 30.
Whitelaw, M. L.,
McGuire, J.,
Picard, D.,
Gustafsson, J. A.,
and Poellinger, L.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
4437-4441 31.
Kazlauskas, A.,
Sundstrom, S.,
Poellinger, L.,
and Pongratz, I.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
2594-2607 32.
Gradin, K.,
Toftgard, R.,
Poellinger, L.,
and Berghard, A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
13511-13518 33.
Minet, E.,
Mottet, D.,
Michel, G.,
Roland, I.,
Raes, M.,
Remacle, J.,
and Michiels, C.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
460,
251-256[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Rolfs, A.,
Kvietikova, I.,
Gassmann, M.,
and Wenger, R. H.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
20055-20062 35.
Chilov, D.,
Camenisch, G.,
Kvietikova, I.,
Ziegler, U.,
Gassmann, M.,
and Wenger, R. H.
(1999)
J. Cell Sci.
112,
1203-1212[Abstract]
36.
Gradin, K.,
McGuire, J.,
Wenger, R. H.,
Kvietikova, I.,
Whitelaw, M. L.,
Toftgard, R.,
Tora, L.,
Gassmann, M.,
and Poellinger, L.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
5221-5231[Abstract]
37.
Nguyen, V. T.,
Morange, M.,
and Bensaude, O.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
10487-10492 38.
Maxwell, P. H.,
Pugh, C. W.,
and Ratcliffe, P. J.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
2423-2427 39.
Metzen, E.,
Wolff, M.,
Fandrey, J.,
and Jelkmann, W.
(1995)
Respir. Physiol.
100,
101-106[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
40.
Marcu, M. G.,
Chadli, A.,
Bouhouche, I.,
Catelli, M.,
and Neckers, L. M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
37181-37186 41.
Marcu, M. G.,
Schulte, T. W.,
and Neckers, L.
(2000)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
92,
242-248 42.
Whitesell, L.,
Sutphin, P., An, W. G.,
Schulte, T.,
Blagosklonny, M. V.,
and Neckers, L.
(1997)
Oncogene
14,
2809-2816[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
43.
Loo, M. A.,
Jensen, T. J.,
Cui, L.,
Hou, Y.,
Chang, X. B.,
and Riordan, J. R.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
6879-6887[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
44.
Segnitz, B.,
and Gehring, U.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
18694-18701 45.
Anderson, R. L.,
Kraft, P. E.,
Bensaude, O.,
and Hahn, G. M.
(1991)
Exp. Cell Res.
197,
100-106[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
46.
Sanchez, E. R.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
17-20 47.
Cvoro, A.,
Dundjerski, J.,
Trajkovic, D.,
and Matic, G.
(1998)
J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.
67,
319-325[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
48.
National Institutes of Health.
(1996)
Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals
, National Institutes of Health Publication 85-23, Bethesda, MD
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Nikinmaa, L. Leveelahti, E. Dahl, E. Rissanen, K. T. Rytkonen, and A. Laurila Population origin, development and temperature of development affect the amounts of HSP70, HSP90 and the putative hypoxia-inducible factor in the tadpoles of the common frog Rana temporaria J. Exp. Biol., June 15, 2008; 211(12): 1999 - 2004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Andriopoulos, S. Hegedusch, J. Mangin, H.-D. Riedel, U. Hebling, J. Wang, K. Pantopoulos, and S. Mueller Sustained Hydrogen Peroxide Induces Iron Uptake by Transferrin Receptor-1 Independent of the Iron Regulatory Protein/Iron-responsive Element Network J. Biol. Chem., July 13, 2007; 282(28): 20301 - 20308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Fang, Q. Zhou, L.-Z. Liu, C. Xia, X. Hu, X. Shi, and B.-H. Jiang Apigenin inhibits tumor angiogenesis through decreasing HIF-1{alpha} and VEGF expression Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2007; 28(4): 858 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Fu, J. Xue, Z. Li, X. Shi, B.-H. Jiang, and J. Fang Chrysin inhibits expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1{alpha} through reducing hypoxia-inducible factor-1{alpha} stability and inhibiting its protein synthesis Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2007; 6(1): 220 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|