|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M110188200 on January 4, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 11, 9437-9446, March 15, 2002
Endosomal Proteolysis of Internalized Insulin at the C-terminal
Region of the B Chain by Cathepsin D*
François
Authier §,
Mourad
Métioui ,
Sylvie
Fabrega ,
Mostafa
Kouach¶, and
Gilbert
Briand¶
From the INSERM U510, Faculté de Pharmacie
Paris XI, 92296 Châtenay-Malabry, France and ¶ Laboratoire
de Spectrométrie de Masse, Faculté de Médecine,
59000 Lille, France
Received for publication, October 23, 2001, and in revised form, December 20, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The endosomal compartment of hepatic parenchymal
cells contains an acidic endopeptidase, endosomal acidic insulinase,
which hydrolyzes internalized insulin and generates the major primary end product A1-21-B1-24 insulin
resulting from a major cleavage at residues
PheB24-PheB25. This study addresses the nature
of the relevant endopeptidase activity in rat liver that is responsible
for most receptor-mediated insulin degradation in vivo. The
endosomal activity was shown to be aspartic acid protease cathepsin D
(CD), based on biochemical similarities to purified CD in 1) the rate
and site of substrate cleavage, 2) pH optimum, 3) sensitivity to
pepstatin A, and 4) binding to pepstatin A-agarose. The identity of the
protease was immunologically confirmed by removal of greater than 90%
of the insulin-degrading activity associated with an endosomal lysate using polyclonal antibodies to CD. Moreover, the elution profile of the
endosomal acidic insulinase activity on a gel-filtration TSK-GEL G3000
SWXL high performance liquid chromatography column corresponded exactly with the elution profile of the immunoreactive 45-kDa mature form of endosomal CD. Using nondenaturating
immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting procedures, other endosomal
aspartic acid proteases such as cathepsin E and -site amyloid
precursor protein-cleaving enzyme (BACE) were ruled out as candidate
enzymes for the endosomal degradation of internalized insulin.
Immunofluorescence studies showed a largely vesicular staining pattern
for internalized insulin in rat hepatocytes that colocalized partially
with CD. In vivo pepstatin A treatment was without any
observable effect on the insulin receptor content of endosomes but
augmented the phosphotyrosine content of the endosomal insulin receptor
after insulin injection. These results suggest that CD is the endosomal
acidic insulinase activity which catalyzes the rate-limiting step of
the in vivo cleavage at the
PheB24-PheB25 bond, generating the inactive
A1-21-B1-24 insulin intermediate.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Proteins entering the endocytic pathway encounter an increasingly
hydrolytic environment imposed by a progressive decrease in pH and an
increase in protease concentrations (reviewed in Ref. 1). Ultimately,
most are degraded in lysosomes to small peptides and free amino acids.
For some, degradation takes place early in the endocytic pathway. This
is the case for polypeptide hormones such as insulin (2-4), glucagon
(5), and parathyroid hormone (6) and growth factors such as the
epidermal growth factor (7) and insulin-like growth factor-I
(IGF-I)1 (8) as well as
endocytosed protein antigens for major histocompatibility class II
presentation (9) and plant toxins (10).
In liver parenchyma the endosomal degradation of internalized insulin
is thought to occur after acidification of the endosomal lumen by a
soluble enzyme termed endosomal acidic insulinase (EAI) (2, 3, 11),
although this protease has yet to be identified. EAI, which was easily
extracted by hypotonic shock from hepatic endosomes, displayed an
acidic pH optimum for insulin binding and degradation (2, 3, 11). The
events leading to the endosomal proteolysis of internalized insulin by
EAI involve initial binding of the C-terminal region of the B chain of
insulin to EAI followed by two initial proteolytic cleavages at
PheB24-PheB25 and
PheB25-TyrB26 peptide bonds (11). This is
followed by the hydrolysis of seven peptide bonds in the C terminus of
the insulin B chain and, in the central region of the insulin A and B
chains, via an ordered sequential pathway. The high IC50
value of insulin for EAI (2-4 × 10 5 M)
and the high proteolytic activity and affinity of EAI for insulin B
chain and a B22-30 insulin fragment suggest that EAI is a
nonspecific peptidase whose physiological substrates other than insulin
within the endosomal apparatus have yet to be defined (11). In support
of this, we have recently demonstrated that cathepsin B, a general
cysteine protease, down-regulates internalized epidermal growth factor and glucagon within rat liver endosomes (5, 7) and internalized IGF-I
in MCF-7 and H-59 tumor cells (8) by inducing proteolytic cleavages of
these ligands.
Previous attempts to purify and identify EAI have been made using the
radiolabeled peptide [125I-TyrA14]insulin to
measure endosomal hydrolysis of insulin by monitoring the increase in
soluble counts after precipitation of radioactive insulin with cold
trichloroacetic acid (2, 3). Based on the trichloroacetic acid
precipitation assay, endosomal proteolysis of
[125I-TyrA14]insulin was partially inhibited
by chelating agents, thiol reagents, pepstatin A, leupeptin, and
bacitracin (2). However, none of the protease inhibitors was
individually capable of completely inhibiting
[125I-TyrA14]insulin proteolysis, suggesting
the contribution of more than one protease to the processing of
radioactive insulin. Later, using an alternate approach based on
reverse-phase (RP) HPLC and mass spectrometry analysis in which
hydrolysis was measured by the generation of degradation products from
unlabeled HI, we elucidated the entire structure of nine early insulin
intermediates generated within hepatic endosomes, all of which
contained the A14 tyrosine residue in their sequence and
displayed a molecular mass higher than 3125 Da (11). Indeed, all of the
early insulin intermediates identified in this study were not
trichloroacetic acid-soluble (11). Consequently, the trichloroacetic
acid solubility of radioactive products, which greatly underestimates
actual degradation, reflects additional and/or further processing of
transient insulin intermediates and their late transformation into
short end products and/or free amino acids by endosomal proteases that
are possibly distinct from EAI.
These concerns were addressed in this study by using native HI as the
substrate and RP HPLC to improve the specificity of the degradation
assay and identify the nature of EAI. An early time point of HI
digestion was always chosen for RP HPLC analysis, when the two primary
products A1-21-B1-24 and
A1-21-B1-25 insulin were the most
abundant. These improvements in the methodology used to evaluate the
proteolytic activity have allowed us to identify the role of the
aspartic acid protease cathepsin D in the endosomal processing of insulin.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Peptides, Antibodies, Protein Determination, Enzyme Assays, and
Materials--
A chain and B chain from bovine insulin, human insulin,
and bovine cathepsin D (EC 3.4.23.5), 15 units/mg, were from Sigma. Rabbit anti-mouse cathepsin D R291 (5), sheep anti-human cathepsin D
M8147 (12, 13), rabbit anti-rat cathepsin B 7183 (5, 7, 14), and rabbit
anti-rat cathepsin L R958 (5, 15) were obtained from Dr. J. S. Mort (Shriners Hospital for Crippled Children, Montreal, Quebec) and
used to immune-deplete samples of native mature enzymes as described
previously (5, 7). Rabbit polyclonal antisera directed against N- and
C-terminal -site amyloid precursor protein-cleaving enzyme (BACE)
peptides were obtained from Dr. R. W. Doms (University of
Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA) and have been
described previously (16). Affinity-purified goat antibody raised
against human cathepsin E (sc-6508), which cross-reacts with cathepsin E of rat origin, was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Inc. Mouse monoclonal antibody 9B12 directed against the human
insulin-degrading enzyme (17) was a kind gift from Dr. R. A. Roth
(Stanford University, Stanford, CA). Polyclonal IgG against the human
insulin receptor -subunit and mouse monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine
(clone 4G10) were purchased from Upstate Biotechnology Inc. Mouse
monoclonal antibody directed against the rat early endosome antigen 1 (EEA1) was purchased from Transduction Laboratories. Horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG and goat anti-mouse IgG were
from Bio-Rad. The protein content of isolated fractions was determined
by the method of Lowry et al. (18).
N-Acetyl- -D-glucosaminidase was assayed with
p-nitrophenyl
N-acetyl- -D-glucosaminide as substrate according to Touster et al. (19). Acid phosphatase was
assayed as described by Trouet (20). Nitrocellulose membranes and the Enhanced Chemiluminescence (ECL) detection kit were from Amersham Biosciences, Inc. Protein G-Sepharose was from Amersham Biosciences, Inc. CA074, which is a highly selective irreversible cathepsin B
inhibitor, was purchased from Peptides International. Pepstatin A,
pepstatin A-agarose, EDTA, 1,10-phenanthroline, E64,
N-ethylmaleimide, p-hydroxymercuri phenylsulfonic
acid, iodoacetamide, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and
benzamidine were from Sigma. HPLC grade acetonitrile and
trifluoroacetic acid were obtained from J. T. Baker Inc. All other chemicals were obtained from commercial sources and were of
reagent grade.
Animals and Injections--
Male Sprague-Dawley rats, body
weight 180-200 g, were obtained from Charles River France (St. Aubin
Les Elbeufs, France) and were fasted for 18 h before sacrifice.
Native insulin (15 µg/100 g of body weight) in 0.4 ml of 0.15 M NaCl was injected within 5 s into the penis vein
under light anesthesia with ether. In some experiments, rats received
an intraperitoneal injection of 2 mg of pepstatin A in 0.4 ml of 12.5%
Me2SO, 0.15 M NaCl 1 h before HI injection.
Isolation of Subcellular Fractions from Rat
Liver--
Subcellular fractionation was performed using established
procedures (2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 21-23). After injection of human insulin,
animals were sacrificed, and livers were rapidly removed and minced in
isotonic ice-cold homogenization buffer as previously described (2, 3,
5, 7, 11, 21-23).
Lysosomes were prepared by isopycnic centrifugation of the light
mitochondrial fraction in a discontinuous metrizamide gradient according to the method of Wattiaux et al. (24). Lysosomes
(L2 fraction) were collected at the 1.109-1.135 g/ml metrizamide
interface (24). The endosomal fraction was isolated by discontinuous
sucrose gradient centrifugation and collected at the 0.25-1.0
M sucrose interface (2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 21-23). The soluble
extract from the endosomal fractions was isolated by freeze/thawing in 5 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, and disrupted in the same
hypotonic medium using a small Dounce homogenizer (15 strokes with Type A pestle) followed by centrifugation at 300,000 × gav for 30 min as described previously (2, 3, 5,
7, 11, 25).
Endosomal fractions isolated after the injection of HI were suspended
at 1.5 mg/ml in 62.5 mM Tris/HCl, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 2% -mercaptoethanol and heated at 100 °C for 2 min. Samples were then subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by Western blotting to determine the integrity and phosphotyrosine content of the internalized insulin receptor.
Immunoblot Analysis--
Electrophoresed samples were
transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (0.45 × 10 6
m) for 60 min at 380 mA in transfer buffer containing 25 mM
Tris base and 192 mM glycine. The membranes were blocked by
a 3-h incubation with 5% skim milk or 2% bovine serum albumin (for
phosphotyrosine immunoblots) in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, and 0.05% Tween 20. The membranes were then
incubated with primary antibody (rabbit polyclonal antisera against
either mouse cathepsin D R291 diluted 1:1500, human BACE diluted 1:1000
or rat cathepsin L R958 diluted 1:200, affinity-purified polyclonal
antibodies to insulin receptor diluted 1:1000, monoclonal
anti-phosphotyrosine diluted 1:2500) in the above buffer for 16 h
at 4 °C. After incubation, the blots were washed 3 times with 0.5%
skim milk or 0.2% bovine serum albumin (for phosphotyrosine
immunoblots) in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 300 mM
NaCl, and 0.05% Tween 20 over a period of 1 h at room
temperature. The bound immunoglobulin was detected using horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG for the polyclonal antibody
or horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG for the
monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine antibody.
In Vitro Proteolysis of Native Peptides--
Soluble endosomal
extract (ENs) ( 1 ng) was incubated for varying lengths of time at
37 °C with 5 × 10 5 M human insulin,
insulin A chain, or insulin B chain in 200 × 10 6
liters of 50 mM citrate-phosphate, pH 4, in the presence or
absence of protease inhibitors. The samples were then acidified with
acetic acid (15%) and immediately loaded onto a RP HPLC column. In
some experiments, ENs was immunodepleted of active insulin-degrading enzyme, cathepsin L, cathepsin B, or cathepsin D before the digestion step by incubating ENs (0.15 mg/ml) with antibodies coated to protein
G-Sepharose for 16 h at 4 °C in 800 × 10 6
liters of 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7. The
fractions were then centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000 × gav, and the resultant supernatants were
adjusted to pH 4 with citrate-phosphate buffer and used in the HI
degradation assay. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 15%
acetic acid and immediately assayed by RP HPLC.
Native HI, insulin A chain, and insulin B chain were also digested
in vitro with bovine cathepsin D. Insulin peptides (5 × 10 5 M) were incubated with 0.025 units/ml
cathepsin D in 0.1 M citrate-phosphate, pH 4. After 5-60
min of incubation at 37 °C, the proteolytic reaction was stopped by
adding acetic acid (15%), and the samples were immediately analyzed by
RP HPLC.
HPLC Separation of Human Insulin, Insulin A Chain, and Insulin B
Chain Peptides--
RP HPLC was performed on a Beckman Coulter System
Gold model 127 liquid chromatograph equipped with a Rheodyne sample
injector fitted with a 500-µl loop and a microBondapak C18 column
(Waters, 0.39 × 30 cm; 10 5 m particle size).
Samples were chromatographed using a mixture of 0.1% trifluoroacetic
acid in water (solvent A) and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in
acetonitrile (solvent B) with a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Elution was
carried out using two sequential linear gradients of 0-15% solvent B
(5 min) and 15-39% solvent B (32 min) followed by an isocratic
elution of 39% solvent B (13 min). Eluates were monitored on-line for
absorbance at 214 nm with a LC-166 spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter).
Binding of Endosomal Acidic Insulinase to Pepstatin
A-agarose--
ENs (0.15 mg/ml) was incubated for 15 h at 4 °C
with pepstatin A-agarose in 20 mM citrate-phosphate buffer,
pH 7. After centrifugation at 20,000 × gav
for 5 min, the resultant supernatant was tested for its ability to
degrade 10 6 M HI in 300 mM
citrate-phosphate buffer, pH 4, at 37 °C for varying amounts of
time, and samples were immediately analyzed by RP HPLC.
Characterization of Endosomal Acidic Insulinase Using
Gel-filtration HPLC--
ENs was loaded onto a TSK-GEL G3000
SWXL HPLC column (Tosoh Corp., 0.78 × 30 cm)
equilibrated at 4 °C with 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer,
pH 6. The column was washed with 30 ml of sodium phosphate buffer, pH
6, using a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Eluates were monitored on-line for
absorbance at 214 nm with an LC-166 spectrophotometer (Beckman
Coulter). Each fraction (0.5 ml) was immediately adjusted to pH 4 with
0.5 M citrate-phosphate buffer and evaluated for insulin-degrading activity by incubating with 5 × 10 5 M HI at 37 °C for 10 min. The reaction
was stopped by the addition of 15% acetic acid, and samples were
analyzed by RP HPLC or subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by Western
blotting to determine their cathepsin D content. In some experiments,
fractions eluted from the gel-filtration HPLC column that contained
insulin-degrading activity with the highest specific activity
(fraction 20; see Fig. 4A) were incubated for
15 h at 4 °C with pepstatin A-agarose in 75 mM
citrate-phosphate buffer, pH 7. After centrifugation at 20,000 × gav for 5 min, the bound proteins were subjected
to SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis.
Mass Spectrometry--
Samples were prepared and analyzed using
ion spray mass spectrometry and HPLC electron spray ionization mass
spectrometry coupling as previously described (11).
Hepatocyte Culture--
Primary hepatocytes were isolated from
male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 180-200 g. Hepatocytes were prepared
by collagenase perfusion and purified by Percoll gradient
centrifugation (26) as modified by Balavoine et al. (27).
Viability was >85% by trypan blue exclusion. Hepatocytes were
suspended in William's E medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10%
fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 1% glutamine and
plated on type-I collagen-coated glass coverslips.
Immunofluorescence--
Hepatocytes grown on glass coverslips
were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) before incubation
with serum-free William's E medium containing 2 µM human
insulin. After 20 min at 37 °C, cells were washed 3 times with PBS
and fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min. Fixed cells were
treated with 100 mM NH4Cl for 15 min, washed
with PBS, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 4 min, and
blocked by a 20-min incubation with 10% horse serum in PBS. Staining
consisted of mouse monoclonal antibody to human insulin (diluted 1:100)
(Sigma), mouse monoclonal antibody to rat EEA1 (diluted 1:200)
(Transduction Laboratories), and rabbit polyclonal antibody to mouse
cathepsin D R291 (diluted 1:100) as the primary reagents, followed by
Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse (diluted 1:100) (Molecular
Probes) and Texas Red-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (diluted 1:400)
(Jackson Immunoresearch). Laser-scanning confocal microscopy was done
with a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal (Axiovert 100 M) inverted microscope
equipped with a Zeiss X63/1.4 NA oil immersion objective lens
(plan-Apochromat). Fluorescent images were acquired with argon
(wavelength 488 nm) and helium neon (wavelength 543 nm) lasers.
Simultaneous images corresponding to Alexa Fluor 488 and Texas Red
fluorescence were obtained using the multi-tracking function of the microscope.
 |
RESULTS |
Catalytic Properties of Endosomal Acidic Insulinase--
As a
substrate, radiolabeled HI may lack many structural features of the
natural EAI substrate that might be important in directing protease
interaction and cleavage. Moreover, the trichloroacetic acid
precipitation assay gives only limited information about the enzymatic
mechanism of insulin degradation where conditions are far from the
initial reaction rate. The most appropriate substrate for assaying EAI
activity is native HI, which contains the physiological prerequisites
for protease recognition. We therefore decided to reevaluate the effect
of various protease inhibitors on the insulin-degrading activity
contained in endosomes using a highly specific RP HPLC assay (Fig.
1). A short time of digestion was always
chosen in order to follow the major primary cleavage of HI at residues
PheB24-PheB25, which generates the hexapeptide
B25-30 (Fig. 1B, middle panel,
peak 2) and the remaining N-terminal residues
B1-24 connected to the intact A chain A1-21
(A1-21-B1-24; Fig. 1B,
middle panel, peak 3) (11). Correct
endoproteolytic cleavage of HI at the
PheB24-PheB25 peptide bond was confirmed using
electron spray ionization-mass spectrometry analysis (results not
shown) (11). Native HI was then digested with ENs at pH 4 and 37 °C
for 15 min in the presence of protease inhibitors (Fig. 1A).
The protease activity was strongly inhibited (>95%) by pepstatin A,
an inhibitor of aspartic acid proteases (Fig. 1, A and
B, lower panel). No effect was observed with
metallo-, cysteine-, and serine-protease inhibitors (Fig. 1A). From these results it was concluded that the primary
cleavages of native HI were due to aspartic acid protease(s).

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Effect of protease inhibitors on endosomal
insulin-degrading activity. ENs (~1 ng) was incubated with
10 6 M native HI at 37 °C for 15 min in 50 mM citrate-phosphate buffer, pH 4, in the absence or
presence of 0.1-5 µg/ml pepstatin A (PA), 1%
Me2SO (DMSO), 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM 1,10-phenanthroline, 10 7 M
E64, 10 7 M CA074, 10 4
M N-ethylmaleimide, 10 4
M p-hydroxymercuriphenylsulfonic acid,
10 4 M iodoacetamide, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), or 1 mM
benzamidine (panel A). At the end of the incubation, the
proteolytic reaction was stopped with acetic acid (15%), and the
incubation mixtures were analyzed by RP HPLC as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The rate of HI proteolysis was
determined by following the disappearance of the peak area
corresponding to the parent peptide. The results are expressed as HI
degraded (% of control) and normalized to that seen in the absence of
added compound. The results are the mean ± S.D. of three to five
different experiments performed on endosomal fractions prepared from
separate liver fractionations. Panel B shows representative
RP HPLC profiles resulting from the incubation of HI with ENs in the
presence or absence of 0.1 µg/ml PA. All panels show absorbance
profiles at 214 nm. Intact HI had an elution time of 48 min. The
endosomal proteins alone did not give any detectable peak (results not
shown).
|
|
Identification of Aspartic Acid Proteases Associated with Hepatic
Endosomes--
Of the intracellular aspartic acid proteases
characterized to date in mammalian cells, the most obvious candidates
for our observed results are cathepsin D, cathepsin E, or BACE (28, 29). We were unable to detect cathepsin E in hepatic endosomes by
Western blot analysis (results not shown), confirming the little or no
detectable expression of the protease previously reported in rat liver
parenchyma (29). ENs was then evaluated for its content of cathepsin D
and BACE by immunoblotting with well characterized polyclonal
antibodies (Fig. 2) (5, 16). The soluble
hypotonic extract from endosomes (ENs) showed intense immunoreactivity
for the 45-kDa mature cathepsin D enzyme and the 64-kDa cathepsin D
proenzyme. By contrast, using anti-BACE antibodies directed against N-
( -BACE N) and C-terminal ( -BACE C) BACE peptides (16),
BACE immunoreactivity (68-kDa) was restricted to endosomal membranes
(ENm) with none detectable in the luminal content
(ENs), confirming that BACE is an integral membrane protein
(30).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Association of aspartyl proteases with
endosomal fractions. Hepatic endosomes were disrupted by hypotonic
shock. The lysate supernatants (ENs) from the 300,000 × gav × 60 min centrifugation and their
respective membrane pellets (endosomal membranes (ENm)) were
prepared, adjusted to the same volume, subjected to SDS-PAGE,
transferred to nitrocellulose, and immunoblotted with rabbit polyclonal
antisera against N-terminal (N) and C-terminal
(C) human BACE peptides (16) or mouse liver CD (5).
Molecular mass markers are indicated to the left of each
panel.
|
|
The possibility of lysosome contamination of our endosomal fraction has
been assessed in Fig. 3. We compared
enzyme distribution in endosomal and lysosomal fractions of two
lysosomal enzyme markers, acid phosphatase and
N-acetyl- -D-glucosaminidase (Fig.
3A). The endosomal fraction revealed no significant
enrichment of N-acetyl- -D-glucosaminidase (relative specific activity = 1.5) and acid phosphatase
(relative specific activity = 2.2) with the yield of enzymes
accounting for <0.2% that of homogenate. On the other hand, the L2
lysosomal fraction was more than 60 times enriched in lysosomal enzyme
markers (Fig. 3A). Overall, the enrichment of radiolabeled
[125I]TyrA14 human insulin in endosomal
fractions at the early time (4 min) of endocytosis (relative specific
activity = 92.4 ± 6.38) was far greater than that of any of
the enzymes assayed (results not shown; Ref. 3). As well, we used the
well characterized anti-cathepsin antibodies to assess the distribution
of precursor and mature forms of cathepsins in hepatic endosomes
(EN) and lysosomes (L2) (Fig. 3B). The
37-kDa procathepsin L and 64-kDa procathepsin D proenzymes were
exclusively identified in endosomes, whereas lysosomes showed strong
immunoreactivity only for mature cathepsin L (29- and 22-kDa species)
and cathepsin D (45- and 31-kDa species). The distinct distribution of
procathepsin L to endosomes and mature 29-kDa single-chain and 22-kDa
heavy-chain cathepsin L to lysosomes attests to the lack of
contamination of our endosomal fraction by lysosomes (Fig.
3B). These data essentially agree with previously published
studies (5, 21).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Distribution of lysosomal enzymes in
endosomal and lysosomal fractions from rat liver. Endosomal
(EN) and lysosomal (L2) fractions were isolated
from control rats. Panel A, acid phosphatase and
N-acetyl- -D-glucosaminidase activities were
determined, and results are expressed as relative specific activity,
i.e. specific activity found in the subcellular
fraction/specific activity measured in the homogenate. Recoveries (% of the constituent present in the homogenate) of lysosomal marker
enzymes in endosomal fraction were 0.17% ± 0.01 acid phosphatase and
0.113% ± 0.01 N-acetyl- -D-glucosaminidase.
The results are the mean ± S.D. of three to six separate
experiments. Panel B, endosomal (EN) and
lysosomal (L2) fractions were subjected to SDS-PAGE on a
12% acrylamide-resolving gel for the anti-CL immunoblot and 8%
acrylamide-resolving gel for the anti-CD immunoblot, transferred to
nitrocellulose, and immunoblotted with polyclonal antisera against
mouse liver CD or rat cathepsin L (CL). Each lane contained
80 µg of endosomal protein or 5 µg of lysosomal protein. Molecular
mass markers are indicated to the left of the
panels. The arrows indicate the mobility of
immunoreactive proforms and mature forms of cathepsins L and D.
|
|
Identification of Endosomal Acidic Insulinase as Cathepsin
D--
The aspartic acid proteolytic activity associated with soluble
endosomal proteins that generates the major primary cleavage PheB24-PheB25 after digestion of native HI was
further purified on a TSK-GEL G3000 HPLC column (Fig.
4). Fractions eluted from the
gel-filtration HPLC column were characterized for their insulinase
activity at pH 4 using native HI followed by RP HPLC (Fig.
4A). In addition, fractions 13-25 were assayed for their
content of cathepsin D by Western blotting using anti-cathepsin D
antibody (Fig. 4B). The peak of acidic insulinase activity
(fraction 20) coincided with elution of two cathepsin D
immunoreactive polypeptides of 45 kDa (major peptide; fractions 19-21)
and 31 kDa (minor peptide; fractions 20-21). The elution of the
inactive 64-kDa cathepsin D proenzyme (fractions 16-18) was clearly
separated from the mature active enzyme (Fig. 4B).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Characterization of endosomal acidic
insulinase activity by gel-filtration HPLC. ENs (230 µg) was
applied to a TSK-GEL G3000 HPLC column. Panel A shows the
absorbance profile at 214 nm. The eluted fractions were also tested for
their ability to degrade 5 × 10 5 M HI
at 37 °C and pH 4 and analyzed using RP HPLC. In panel B,
fractions 13-25 were evaluated for their content of cathepsin D by
immunoblotting with polyclonal anti-mouse cathepsin D antibody R291.
Molecular mass markers are indicated to the left of
panel B.
|
|
To determine whether other endosomal proteases in addition to aspartic
acid proteases may participate in the primary cleavage of the insulin B
chain at the PheB24-PheB25 peptide bond, ENs
was incubated with pepstatin A-agarose at pH 7, and the absorbed
proteins were precipitated by centrifugation (Fig.
5). Analysis of the bead supernatant
showed that depletion of pepstatin A-binding proteins prevented
proteolysis of native HI as measured at pH 4 and 15 or 30 min of
incubation (Fig. 5A). To test whether pepstatin A-agarose
bound nonspecifically to other endosomal proteins, we determined the
protein concentration of the endosomal fractions before and after the
pepstatin A-agarose precipitation step (Fig. 5B), and we
could not detect any significant change in protein concentration. To
gain more information regarding the specificity of the
insulinase-pepstatin A interaction, the HPLC fraction from the TSK-GEL
G3000 column with the highest acidic insulinase activity
(fraction 20, see Fig. 4A) was incubated with pepstatin A-agarose beads (Fig. 5C). The bead precipitate
was then subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blotting using anti-mouse cathepsin D antibody (Fig. 5C, PA-ag pellet),
revealing the presence of the two active forms of cathepsin D at 45 and
31 kDa. Hence, the EAI activity present in ENs likely corresponds to an
active form of cathepsin D.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Affinity purification of a soluble endosomal
pepstatin A-sensitive protease. Panel A, ENs was incubated
for 15 h at 4 °C with pepstatin A-agarose in 20 mM
citrate-phosphate buffer, pH 7. After centrifugation at 20,000 × gav for 5 min, the resultant supernatant was
tested for its ability to degrade 10 6 M HI in
300 mM citrate-phosphate buffer, pH 4, for 15 or 30 min of
incubation at 37 °C (PA-ag supernatant). The amount of
protein recovered in the supernatant (PA-ag supernatant) as
well as in the starting material (ENs) is presented in
panel B. Panel C, the fraction eluted from the
gel-filtration HPLC column that contained insulin-degrading activity
with the highest specific activity (fraction 20; see Fig.
4A) was incubated with pepstatin A-agarose beads using the
same procedure as described for panel A. Proteins associated
with the pellet (lane PA-ag pellet) were eluted from the
pepstatin A-agarose beads under denaturing conditions by suspending the
beads in Laemmli buffer and heating at 100 °C for 5 min. The samples
were then subjected to SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and
immunoblotted with anti-mouse cathepsin D antibody R291. The parent
soluble endosomal fraction is also shown (lane ENs).
Molecular mass markers are indicated to the left of
panel C.
|
|
As further evidence, we used well characterized polyclonal antibodies
to mature cathepsin D and its proform (5) to deplete cathepsin D from
ENs (Fig. 6). Quantitative
immunoprecipitation of cathepsin D using antibodies directed against
the mouse and human enzyme removed greater than 90% of endosomal
HI-degrading activity from ENs based on the
PheB24-PheB25 peptide bond cleavage assay at
acidic pH (Fig. 6, A and B). Immunodepletion of
ENs with antibodies to cathepsins L and B and insulin-degrading enzyme
failed to remove the insulinase activity as measured at pH 4 (Fig.
6A).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of immunodepletion of endosomal
proteases on endosomal insulin-degrading activity. Panel A,
ENs were immunodepleted of active insulin-degrading enzyme
( -IDE), cathepsin L ( -CL), cathepsin
B ( -CB), or cathepsin D ( -CD) using
monoclonal (insulin-degrading enzyme) or polyclonal antibodies
(cathepsin L, cathepsin B, and CD) coated to protein G-Sepharose. After
centrifugation, the resultant supernatants were tested for their
ability to degrade native HI at pH 4 and analyzed by RP HPLC. The
results were normalized to that seen in the absence of antibody and are
the mean ± S.D. of four experiments. Panel B, ENs were
immunodepleted of active cathepsin D using polyclonal antibodies
directed against mouse and human cathepsin D, and the resultant
supernatants were tested for their ability to degrade 5 × 10 5 M HI in 50 mM
citrate-phosphate buffer, pH 4, after 20 min incubation at 37 °C.
The proteolytic reaction was stopped with acetic acid (15%), and the
samples were analyzed by RP HPLC. All panels show absorbance
profiles at 214 nm.
|
|
Digestion of Insulin Peptides with Cathepsin D--
To determine
whether cathepsin D is capable of cleaving HI at the same primary sites
as those observed with ENs (11), HI was subjected to in
vitro digestion with bovine cathepsin D at pH 4. The digestion
products were separated by RP HPLC, and the resulting chromatogram is
shown in Fig. 7 (lower panel,
HI + CD). RP HPLC analysis revealed four proteolytic
products (peaks 1-4) with retention times identical to
those seen with ENs (upper panel, HI + ENs) (11).
Each of the major HPLC peaks for HI plus CD was analyzed using mass
spectrometry to determine the molecular masses of the peptide products.
Table I lists the peptide peaks (HPLC
pools), their retention times, theoretical and experimental molecular
masses, and structures. Peak 2 corresponded to a mixture of the
hexapeptide B25-30 (755.5 Da) and pentapeptide
B26-30 (608.2 Da). Peak 4 was a mixture of the remaining
N-terminal residues B1-24 and B1-25 connected
to the intact A-chain A1-21
(A1-21-B1-24, 5087 Da, and
A1-21-B1-25, 5216 Da). Peak 3 (5069 Da) was
the same as the A1-21-B1-24 peptide with an
internal peptide bond cleaved. The HPLC pool 1 contained the
B27-30 peptide (445.2 Da), thereby indicating the removal
of the TyrB26 residue from peptide 2a. The full-length HI
substrate (peptide 4c; 5806 Da) coeluted with products 4a and b with a
retention time of 48 min. Thus, HI was similarly cleaved by cathepsin D (Table I) and ENs (11) at the two primary sites,
PheB24-PheB25 and
PheB25-TyrB26, both located in the C terminus
of the B chain. Digestion with human cathepsin D (not shown) gave
identical results to that of bovine cathepsin D, indicating that the
cleavage specificity of this enzyme is conserved across species.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
HPLC profiles of native human insulin
digested in vitro with a soluble endosomal extract or
cathepsin D. HI (5 × 10 5 M) was
treated in vitro with ENs or 0.025 units/ml cathepsin D in
0.1 M citrate-phosphate buffer, pH 4. After 15 min
(HI + ENs) or 60 min (HI + CD) at 37 °C, the
proteolytic reaction was stopped by adding acetic acid (15%), and the
hydrolysis products were immediately analyzed by RP HPLC. The major
degradation products, pools 1-4, were collected from the elution
profile HI + CD as indicated. These pools were subjected to mass
spectrometry analyses (see Table I).
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Masses and assigned structures of the cleavage products generated from
human insulin by cathepsin D
Selected HPLC pools (see Fig. 7) generated by bovine cathepsin D were
analyzed by HPLC coupled with electron spray ionization-mass
spectrometry. Average molecular masses are used for calculations. HPLC
pools 2 and 4 are heterogeneous. HPLC pools 1 and 2 are the carboxyl
end of the B chain. HPLC pools 3, 4a, and 4b are portions of the amino
end of the B chain still connected by disulfide bonds to intact A
chain. HPLC pool 4c is intact human insulin.
|
|
We have previously shown that the insulin B chain represents a high
affinity substrate for EAI (11). Using RP HPLC analysis of digestions
performed under initial rate conditions, we have compared the rate of
hydrolysis of intact HI and the individual insulin A and B chains by
ENs or pure cathepsin D (Fig. 8). As previously reported (11), ENs degraded insulin B chain more efficiently
than for intact HI, whereas the rate of hydrolysis of insulin A chain
was lower than that of HI (Fig. 8A). Pure cathepsin D was
found to degrade insulin peptides in a manner similar to ENs
(i.e. insulin B chain > HI > insulin A-chain,
Fig. 8B). These results support the hypothesis that EAI and
endosomal cathepsin D are the same enzyme.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Proteolysis of native human
insulin, insulin A-chain, and insulin B chain by ENs or cathepsin
D. Native HI, insulin A chain and insulin B chain were incubated
in vitro with ENs (panel A) or 0.025 units/ml
cathepsin D (panel B) in 0.1 M citrate-phosphate
buffer, pH 4. After 5-120 min at 37 °C, the proteolytic reaction
was stopped by adding acetic acid (15%), and the incubation mixture
was analyzed by RP HPLC. The rate of hydrolysis of each peptide was
determined by following the disappearance of the peak area,
corresponding to the parent peptide. The results are the mean ± S.D. of three different experiments performed on endosomal fractions
prepared from separate liver fractionations.
|
|
Intracellular Colocalization of Human Insulin with Cathepsin
D--
To strengthen the physiological relevance of our observations
obtained with cell-free endosomes, we studied the cellular localization of internalized HI and cathepsin D in intact hepatocytes by confocal microscopy coupled to immunostaining (Fig.
9). Hepatocytes were incubated with
2 × 10 6 M HI for 20 min, when most of
the internalized ligand would be located in the endosomes (3), and the
subcellular localization of both HI and cathepsin D were revealed by
indirect immunofluorescence (Fig. 9A). Antibody to HI (in
green) demonstrated a highly punctate staining pattern
reminiscent of vesicular compartments. Costaining with antibody
directed against mature and precursor cathepsin D enzyme (in
red) revealed a partial colocalization (in
yellow) with the intracellular protease. HI co-localization
did not overlap completely with intracellular cathepsin D, although the
extent of signal overlap was quite significant (Fig.
9A).

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Partial colocalization of internalized
insulin and cathepsin D in hepatocytes. Hepatocytes were
treated with 2 × 10 6 M HI for 20 min,
fixed with paraformaldehyde, and permeabilized with Triton X-100 before
staining. Panel A, HI is shown in green,
cathepsin D is shown in red, and merged images on the far
right indicate the extent of colocalization (yellow).
Anti-HI antibody gave a typical endosomal vesicular pattern that
colocalized partially with intracellular cathepsin D. Scale
bar, 7.6 µm. Two cells with a typical fluorescent staining
pattern are presented. Panel B, cathepsin D is shown in
red, EEA1 is shown in green, and the merged image
on the far right indicates the extent of colocalization
(yellow). Scale bar, 8.5 µm. Fluorescent images
were captured at two emission wavelengths (488 and 543 nm).
|
|
The localization of cathepsin D in endocytic vesicles was next examined
by double-staining immunofluorescence with the early endosome marker
EEA1 (Fig. 9B). A partial immunoreactivity of cathepsin D
was observed in the early endocytic vesicles identified by the presence
of EEA1. These results confirm a minor but genuine endosomal location
for the lysosomal aspartic acid protease. Moreover, the previous
biochemical and morphological demonstrations that internalized insulin
in hepatocytes accumulated into endocytic components clearly
distinguishable from lysosomes (reviewed in Ref. 31) combined with the
biochemical (this study; Refs. 5 and 32) and morphological (this study;
Ref. 33) demonstrations of the presence of cathepsin D within hepatic
endosomes suggest that the partial colocalization of internalized
insulin and cathepsin D observed in Fig. 9A occurred most
probably within endocytic vesicles.
Effect of Pepstatin A on the Fate of Insulin Receptor within
Hepatic Endosomes in Vivo--
The level of insulin receptor
internalization and the tyrosine phosphorylation state of the
internalized insulin receptor could potentially be affected by
pepstatin A, which affects endosomal proteolysis of HI. Therefore, the
effect of pepstatin A on endosomal insulin receptor signal transduction
was next examined (Fig. 10). Animals
were administered an intraperitoneal injection of either 12.5%
Me2SO, 0.15 M NaCl or 2 mg of pepstatin A
diluted in 12.5% Me2SO, 0.15 M NaCl 1 h
before native HI administration, and animals were sacrificed 2-60 min
after HI administration. Hepatic endosomes were prepared, and the
amount of internalized insulin receptor and its phosphotyrosine content
was determined by Western blot analyses. A time-dependent
increase in insulin receptor content was observed in endosomal
fractions isolated 2-30 min after administration of a single
receptor-saturating dose of HI (15 µg/100 g of body weight) as
described previously (3) (Fig. 10, lower panel). No
difference in the time nor extent of receptor internalization was
observed after pepstatin A treatment. In contrast, a difference was
observed for tyrosine phosphorylation of the insulin receptor -subunit. Insulin administration led to a brief burst (2 min) of
tyrosine autophosphorylation of the insulin receptor, and pepstatin A
treatment could extend this time to 5 min (Fig. 10, upper
panel).

View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Effect of pepstatin A treatment on the
internalization of tyrosine-phosphorylated insulin receptor after
administration of human insulin in vivo. Rats
were injected with native HI (15 µg/100 g of body weight) having
first received an intraperitoneal injection of either 12.5%
Me2SO, 0.15 M NaCl or 2 mg of pepstatin A in
12.5% Me2SO, 0.15 M NaCl 1 h before
ligand administration. Endosomal fractions were isolated at the
indicated times and evaluated by Western blotting for their content of
insulin receptor using polyclonal antibody to the insulin receptor
-subunit (Anti-IR ) and for their immunoreactivity to
monoclonal antibody against phosphotyrosine (Anti-PY). Each
lane contained 60 µg of endosomal protein. The
arrows indicate the mobility of the -subunit of the
insulin receptor (94 kDa). Molecular mass markers are indicated to the
left of the panels.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The soluble aspartic acid protease cathepsin D has been identified
as the insulin-degrading activity responsible for the primary cleavages
of internalized insulin within hepatic endosomes. In this study, we
sought to characterize the proteolytic function of endosomal cathepsin
D toward the insulin substrate through a series of biochemical and
morphological investigations. Using similar approaches, we have
previously reported that hepatic endosomes contain the cysteine
protease cathepsin B, that processes internalized glucagon (5),
epidermal growth factor (7), and IGF-I (8). Identically, we have
recently shown that CA074-methyl ester, a cathepsin B inhibitor,
prevented endosomal processing of internalized IGF-I in MCF-7 and H-59
tumor cells (8). Consistent with our previous studies, we concluded in
this present work that the EAI activity was likely the aspartic acid
protease cathepsin D, as indicated by the following observations.
(a) The inhibitor profile and the pH optimum of the
endosomal proteolytic activity were similar to those of cathepsin D;
(b) immunodepletion of cathepsin D from ENs led to a loss of
EAI activity; (c) the EAI activity was specifically absorbed
to pepstatin A-agarose; (d) Western blot experiments
demonstrated the presence of the 45-kDa active form of cathepsin D as
well as its 64-kDa inactive precursor in the endosomal lumen;
(e) using confocal immunofluorescent microscopy, internalization of HI into rat hepatocytes led to partial
colocalization of internalized insulin with cathepsin D and cathepsin D
with the early endocytic marker EEA1; and (f) pure cathepsin
D produced a cleavage pattern for HI that was similar to that generated
using the endosomal proteolytic activity.
That the presence of active cathepsin D within hepatic endosomes was
due to lysosomal contamination of our endosomal fraction is highly
unlikely. Thus, the modest content of
N-acetyl- -D-glucosaminidase and acid
phosphatase in our endosomal fraction points to minimal contamination
by lysosomes and confirms our earlier observations (21). Moreover,
mature lysosomal cathepsin L was undetectable in our endosomal fraction
although its inactive precursor was easily identified. Finally,
immunofluorescence studies performed on rat hepatocytes revealed that
the endosomal marker protein EEA1 was present in some cathepsin
D-positive structures, suggesting a genuine endosomal localization for
the cathepsin D enzyme. These data conform well to previous biochemical
(5, 32) and morphological evidence (33) that active cathepsin D was
selectively retained within hepatic endosomes.
Although the radiolabeled peptide
[125I-TyrA14]HI can be used to assay insulin
degradation at the endosomal locus (2-4), caution should be used when
interpreting this cleavage activity as the true EAI activity (11).
First, radioactive HI might not display all the primary, secondary, and
tertiary structural elements of the natural peptide substrate (34).
Thus, the radioactive iodine on the molecule might mask the substrate
recognition site and the sites of cleavage for the endosomal
proteolytic system. Secondly, although a trichloroacetic acid
precipitation assay has been developed for the degradation analysis of
radioactive insulin (2-4, 11), the limitation of this type of assay is
that it greatly underestimates actual degradation and measures the
proteolytic activities under conditions far from the initial rate of
the reaction. In a complex system where intermediate cleavage products
can be further processed, it is difficult to obtain any meaningful
information on the enzyme of interest. The trichloroacetic acid
precipitation assay is, therefore, inherently unsuitable to screening
for a specific protease in endosomal lysates, where many other
proteases with a broad substrate specificity are likely to be present
(5, 7). Thus, we have developed an RP HPLC assay based on measurement
of the initial degradation step of native HI by endosomal lysates, with the subsequent identification of the early insulin intermediates. The
improved specificity of this method allowed for the rigorous screening
of EAI activity. However, we cannot exclude that very late cleavages of
small insulin intermediates observed within hepatic endosomes (11) may
be produced by other endosomal endo- and/or exopeptidases such as
cathepsin B (5, 7), insulin-degrading enzyme (35), or other as yet
unidentified endosomal proteolytic activities.
Despite the limitations of the trichloroacetic acid precipitation
assay, an accurate examination of the early proteolytic cleavages
generated in vivo has been possible with the use of monoiodinated insulin isomers combined with RP HPLC and radiosequencing procedures (35-38). Using this approach, endosome-associated
degradation products extracted at an early time of insulin endocytosis
displayed intact A chain and cleavages in the B chain at
B24-B25, B23-B24,
B16-B17, and B14-B15
bonds (35-38). Structural and kinetic analyses of in vivo
intermediates isolated from the intraendosomal compartment have allowed
the determination of an ordered sequence involving an initial cleavage in the B chain at 24-25, which produces des(hexapeptide)insulin (38).
This process has been supported by our in vitro study characterizing endosomal proteolysis of native HI using a soluble endosomal extract from rat liver parenchyma (11). This study showed
initial B24-B25 cleavage with the parallel
production of des(hexapeptide)-HI and the C-terminal B chain
hexapeptide (B25-30) (11). Therefore, we elected to pursue
the in vitro characterization of EAI using the most
sensitive assay for insulin degradation by following the primary
in vivo cleavage between PheB24 and
PheB25 residues.
The two primary end products of HI that are generated using cell-free
endosomes (this study; Ref. 11) and pure cathepsin D (this study)
result from proteolytic cleavages occurring at residues
PheB24-PheB25 (major pathway) and
PheB25-TyrB26 (minor pathway), two sites that
fit the specificity pattern for sites cleaved by cathepsin D (39).
Sequences readily cleaved by cathepsin D contain apolar or hydrophobic
residues situated on both sides of the cleavage site, with the Phe-Phe
bond strongly favored and, in most cases, a hydrophobic residue in
position P1 (39). Thus, the sites in HI that were cleaved
to produce the two primary end products
A1-21-B1-24 and
A1-21-B1-25 satisfy all the requirements for
a cathepsin D cleavage site. Accordingly, characterization of the
residues in positions P1 and P'1, determined
with synthetic substrates (39), explains the highly specific primary
cleavages obtained using natural and physiological substrates by
cathepsin D. Thus, cathepsin D appears to mediate the selective
cleavage of parathyroid hormone at the Phe34-Val35 peptide bond (6), human invariant
chain at the Leu174-Phe175 peptide bond (40),
the A1 protein from myelin at the Phe42-Phe43
peptide bond (41), -1,4-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase at the Leu23-Tyr24 peptide bond (42), and
-amyloid precursor protein at various hydrophobic peptide bonds such
as between the Phe93 and Phe94 residues (43).
Finally, kallistatin, a serpin that specifically inhibits human tissue
kallikrein, was recently demonstrated to be cleaved at the Phe-Phe bond
in its reactive site loop by cathepsin D (44).
Studies on the structural requirements for HI/EAI binding have also
identified a highly specific molecular interaction at the C-terminal
B22-B30 region of the insulin B chain, a region
that contains the aromatic locus
PheB24-PheB25-TyrB26 (11). Thus,
the hydrophobic
PheB24-PheB25-TyrB26 tripeptide
might also dictate HI binding to cathepsin D. Unexpectedly, binding
(11) and cleavage (8) of the insulin-related IGF-I polypeptide by EAI
activity and aspartic acid proteases were not detected upon incubation
of this growth factor with hepatic ENs and tumor cell lysates. One
explanation might be the difference in primary sequence between
positions B24-B26 (Phe-Phe-Tyr) of the insulin
B chain and the corresponding positions 23-25 (Phe-Tyr-Phe) of IGF-I,
which displays a simple inversion of the insulin Phe-Tyr sequence and
lacks the unique Phe-Phe bond (45).
The present studies indicate that internalized insulin is a
physiological substrate for the endosomal protease cathepsin D. Cathepsin D has been identified in endosomes of rabbit alveolar macrophages by biosynthetic studies and affinity chromatography purification (46), in hepatic endosomes by Western blotting (5, 32) and
immunocytochemistry (33), in multivesicular endosomes of macrophages
(47) and B-lymphoblastoid cells (48) by immunocytochemistry, and in the
late endosomal Rab7-containing compartment by flow cytometric sorting
(49). Consistent with previous studies on the subcellular distribution
and molecular species of cathepsins in liver parenchyma (5, 32) and
other studies on the biogenesis of cathepsin D (46, 49, 50), the cathepsin D species identified in endosomes consisted of both the
inactive precursor and active mature forms. These data suggest that
significant processing of lysosomal hydrolases may occur within
endosomes (46). The molecular mechanisms responsible for targeting and
retaining cathepsin D and its proform in endosomes are not clear.
Morphological and biochemical analyses, which focused on the
localization and targeting of the cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor (CI-MPR) in stable BHK cell lines and one of its
ligands, cathepsin D, have shown that a significant fraction of CI-MPR
and cathepsin D traffic from the trans-Golgi network to late
endosomes/lysosomes via early endosomes (51). Alternatively, mannose
6-phosphate receptor-independent membrane association of cathepsin D
has been reported within acidic endosomes in macrophages (46), in HepG2
cells (50), in human B-lymphocytes (52), and in NIH 3T3 mouse
fibroblasts (53).
In the present study, we provide also the first evidence for endosomal
compartmentalization of the recently identified -secretase protein
BACE in hepatocytes. By immunoblot analysis, we confirmed earlier
biochemical and immunofluorescence studies that had localized BACE to
endosomes, one of several intracellular sites where amyloid is
thought to be produced (28). The accumulation of BACE in the endosomal
system appears to be governed largely by a cytoplasmic dileucine motif
(16). Although the evidence is quite compelling that BACE is the
-secretase in Alzheimer's disease (16, 28, 30), it has not been
established whether other soluble or membrane-bound proteins, related
or not to -amyloid precursor protein, are subject to endosomal
cleavage by BACE. The previously reported transmembrane property of
BACE (30), confirmed by us in this study, provides evidence against a
role for BACE in the proteolysis of free insulin within the endosomal
lumen. However, the type-I integral membrane protein BACE may be a good
candidate protease for the endosomal degradation of membrane-associated peptides.
Our present work combined with our previous studies that provided the
first evidence for endosomal compartmentalization of cathepsin B in
hepatocytes (5, 7) is in total agreement with other studies suggesting
that 20-40% of newly synthesized lysosomal hydrolases can be detected
in early endosomes (54). Recently, cell fractionation studies performed
on stable BHK cell lines reveal cathepsin D comigration with Rab5 and
EEA1, established markers of early endosomes, as well as the
sensitivity of cathepsin D to horseradish
peroxidase/diaminobenzidine-mediated cross-linking of endosomal
proteins (51). Our immunofluorescence studies confirm that a small
amount of cathepsin D can be detected in early endocytic EEA1-positive
vesicles. In the study of Press et al. (51), the potential
significance of cathepsin D delivery to early endosomes is discussed in
light of its involvement in cellular growth control and
differentiation. Indeed, increased extracellular levels of various
cathepsins, especially cathepsins D and B, have been correlated to
metastasis and a number of human tumors (55). Thus, endosomal cathepsin
D may modulate the amount of these molecules delivered to the cell
surface versus the amount transported toward lysosomes (51).
Even cell death was recently shown to be influenced by endosomal/lysosomal cathepsin D in a study showing its involvement in
cell apoptosis induced by oxidative stress (56). Our studies provide
important clues regarding another function of endosomal cathepsin D
related to the proteolysis of internalized ligands, with the subsequent
regulation of intracellular receptor signaling and trafficking at the
endosomal locus (1, 3, 5).
Cathepsin D induces the proteolytic cleavage of several other
polypeptide hormones, proteins, and plant toxins within endocytic vesicles. Thus, we have previously reported that internalized glucagon
is partially processed within hepatic endosomes by the endopeptidase
activity of cathepsin D (5). Also, proteolysis of mannose-bovine serum
albumin and parathyroid hormone-(1-84), with the subsequent release of
the bioactive peptide parathyroid hormone-(1-34), was primarily
mediated by cathepsin D within macrophage endosomes (6). The
participation of cathepsin D in the endosomal processing, membrane
translocation, and cytotoxicity of ricin A chain has also been
demonstrated (10). Studies have also suggested the potential role of
cathepsin D in conjunction with cathepsins S and L in degrading the
invariant chain and endocytosed antigens within antigen-presenting
cells (57). Finally, some properties associated with cathepsin D favor
its putative role in the amyloidogenic processing of -amyloid
precursor protein within the endo-lysosomal compartment (43, 58).
In this study, we have shown that in vivo administration of
pepstatin A, a compound that inhibits endosomal degradation of insulin
in vitro, was without apparent effect on the level of insulin receptors present in endosomes but induced a more prolonged tyrosine autophosphorylation of the insulin receptor -subunit. The
concentration of pepstatin A required to demonstrate this same
phenomenon in vitro was in the order of 1 µg/ml and
induced a complete inhibitory effect. The modest effect of pepstatin A observed in vivo probably reflects its low degree of cell
and organelle penetrance (59, 60) and also its inability to affect the
dissociation of internalized insulin from its endosomal receptor, which
attenuates any further ligand-driven receptor re-phosphorylation (3).
Moreover, after intravenous administration in rats, pepstatin A is
rapidly cleared from the blood by the kidneys (61), confirming that it
requires very high concentrations to be effective in vivo (60). Consequently, because cells are rather impermeable to pepstatin
A, it was necessary to treat rats with high concentrations (>1 mg) in
the presence of Me2SO to obtain effective intracellular concentrations. The development of specific and potent inhibitors of CD
activity will greatly advance the elucidation of the function of the
endosomal proteolysis of internalized insulin.
Some studies point out that the defects in the metabolism of
intracellular insulin observed in non-insulin-dependent
diabetes mellitus could be localized within the endosomal apparatus and are caused mainly by a defective acidification of its interior (62,
63). Studies are under way to determine whether the pathological decrease in endosomal proteolysis of insulin observed in
non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus may also be caused
by alterations in the endosomal targeting or activity of the
pepstatin A-sensitive CD activity.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Pamela H. Cameron (McGill
University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada) for reviewing the manuscript. We
thank Dr. R. A. Roth (Stanford University, Stanford, CA), Dr.
J. S. Mort (Shriners Hospital for Crippled Children, Montreal,
Quebec, Canada), Dr. R. W. Doms (University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, PA) for kind gifts of anti-insulin-degrading enzyme,
-cathepsins, and -BACE antibodies, respectively. We thank Dr. F. Daniel
and P. Perron (U327 INSERM, Paris, France) for assistance in the
preparation of primary hepatocytes. We thank Dr. V. Nicolas (IFR 75 INSERM, Faculté de Pharmacie, Châtenay-Malabry, France) for
assistance in confocal microscopy.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: INSERM U510,
Faculté de Pharmacie Paris XI, 5 rue Jean-Baptiste Clément,
92296 Châtenay-Malabry, France. Tel.: 33.1.46835843; Fax:
33.1.46835844; E-mail: francois.authier@cep.u-psud.fr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 4, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110188200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
IGF-I, insulin-like
growth factor I;
BACE, -site amyloid precursor protein-cleaving
enzyme;
EAI, endosomal acidic insulinase;
EEA1, early endosome antigen
1;
ENs, soluble endosomal extract;
HI, human insulin;
RP HPLC, reverse-phase high pressure liquid chromatography;
CD, cathepsin D;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Authier, F.,
Posner, B. I.,
and Bergeron, J. J. M.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
389,
55-60[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Authier, F.,
Rachubinski, R. A.,
Posner, B. I.,
and Bergeron, J. J. M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
3010-3016[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Authier, F., Di,
Guglielmo, G. M.,
Danielsen, G. M.,
and Bergeron, J. J. M.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
332,
421-430
|
| 4.
|
Desbuquois, B.,
Janicot, M.,
and Dupuis, A.
(1990)
Eur. J. Biochem.
193,
501-512[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Authier, F.,
Mort, J. S.,
Bell, A. W.,
Posner, B. I.,
and Bergeron, J. J. M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
15798-15807[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Diment, S.,
Martin, K. J.,
and Stahl, P. D.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
13403-13406[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Authier, F.,
Métioui, M.,
Bell, A. W.,
and Mort, J. S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
33723-33731[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Navab, R.,
Chevet, E.,
Authier, F., Di,
Guglielmo, G. M.,
Bergeron, J. J. M.,
and Brodt, P.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
13644-13649[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Chapman, H. A.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
10,
93-102[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Blum, J. S.,
Fiani, M. L.,
and Stahl, P. D.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
22091-22095[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Authier, F.,
Danielsen, G. M.,
Kouach, M.,
Briand, G.,
and Chauvet, G.
(2001)
Endocrinology
142,
276-289[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Mort, J. S.,
Poole, A. R.,
and Decker, R. S.
(1981)
J. Histochem. Cytochem.
29,
649-657[Abstract]
|
| 13.
|
Mort, J. S.,
Recklies, A. D.,
and Poole, A. R.
(1984)
Arthritis Rheum.
27,
509-515[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Rowan, A. D.,
Mason, P.,
Mach, L.,
and Mort, J. S.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
15993-15999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Hughes, C. E.,
Caterson, B.,
White, R. J.,
Roughley, P. J.,
and Mort, J. S.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
16011-16014[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Huse, J. T.,
Pijak, D. S.,
Leslie, G. J.,
Lee, V. M. Y.,
and Doms, R. W.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
33729-33737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Shii, K.,
and Roth, R. A.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
4147-4151[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Lowry, O. H.,
Rosebrough, N. J.,
Farr, A. L.,
and Randall, R. J.
(1951)
J. Biol. Chem.
193,
265-275[Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Touster, O.,
Aronson, N. N.,
Dulaney, J. T.,
and Hendrickson, H.
(1970)
J. Cell Biol.
47,
604-618[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Trouet, A.
(1974)
Methods Enzymol.
31,
323-329[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Authier, F.,
Janicot, M.,
Lederer, F.,
and Desbuquois, B.
(1990)
Biochem. J.
272,
703-712[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Authier, F.,
and Desbuquois, B.
(1991)
Biochem. J.
280,
211-218
|
| 23.
|
Authier, F.,
Desbuquois, B.,
and De Galle, B.
(1992)
Endocrinology
131,
447-457[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Wattiaux, R.,
Wattiaux-de Coninck, S.,
Ronveaux-Dupal, M. F.,
and Dubois, F.
(1978)
J. Cell Biol.
78,
349-368[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Authier, F.,
Bergeron, J. J. M., Ou, W.-J.,
Rachubinski, R. A.,
Posner, B. I.,
and Walton, P. A.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
3859-3863[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Seglen, P. O.,
Gordon, P. B.,
and Poli, A.
(1980)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
630,
103-118[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Balavoine, S.,
Feldmann, G.,
and Lardeux, B.
(1990)
Eur. J. Biochem.
189,
617-623[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Nunan, J.,
and Small, D. H.
(2000)
FEBS Lett.
483,
6-10[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Yamamoto, K.
(1999)
in
Proteases: New Perspective
(Turk, V., ed)
, pp. 59-71, Birkhäuser Publishing Ltd, Base, Switzerland
|
| 30.
|
Haniu, M.,
Denis, P.,
Young, Y.,
Mendiaz, E. A.,
Fuller, J.,
Hui, J. O.,
Bennett, B. D.,
Kahn, S.,
Ross, S.,
Burgess, T.,
Katta, V.,
Rogers, G.,
Vassar, R.,
and Citron, M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
21099-21106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Authier, F.,
Posner, B. I.,
and Bergeron, J. J. M.
(1994)
in
Cellular Proteolytic Systems
(Ciechanover, A.
, and Schwartz, A. L., eds), Vol. 15
, pp. 89-113, Wiley-Liss, Inc., New York
|
| 32.
|
Runquist, E. A.,
and Havel, R. J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
22557-22563[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Araki, N.,
Yokota, S.,
Takashima, Y.,
and Ogawa, K.
(1995)
Exp. Cell Res.
217,
469-476[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Ryan, M. P.,
Peavy, D. E.,
Frank, B. H.,
and Duckworth, W. C.
(1984)
Endocrinology
115,
591-599[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Hamel, F. G.,
Mahoney, M. J.,
and Duckworth, W. C.
(1991)
Diabetes
40,
436-443[Abstract]
|
| 36.
|
Hamel, F. G.,
Posner, B. I.,
Bergeron, J. J. M.,
Frank, B. H.,
and Duckworth, W. C.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
6703-6708[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Clot, J. P.,
Janicot, M.,
Fouque, F.,
Desbuquois, B.,
Haumont, P. Y.,
and Lederer, F.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
72,
175-185[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Seabright, P. J.,
and Smith, G. D.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
320,
947-956
|
| 39.
|
Van Noort, J. M.,
and Van der Drift, A. C.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
14159-14164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Kageyama, T.,
Yonezawa, S.,
Ichinose, M.,
Miki, K.,
and Moriyama, A.
(1996)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
223,
549-553[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Brostoff, S. W.,
Reuter, W.,
Hichens, M.,
and Eylar, E. H.
(1974)
J. Biol. Chem.
249,
559-567[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Jaskiewicz, E.,
Zhu, G.,
Bassi, R.,
Darling, D. S.,
and Young, W. W.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
26395-26403[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Higaki, J.,
Catalano, R.,
Guzzetta, A. W.,
Quon, D.,
Navé, J. F.,
Tarnus, C.,
D'Orchymont, H.,
and Cordell, B.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
31885-31893[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Pimenta, D. C.,
Oliveira, A.,
Juliano, M. A.,
and Juliano, L.
(2001)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1544,
113-122[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Cascieri, M. A.,
Chicchi, G. G.,
Applebaum, J.,
Hayes, N. S.,
Green, B. G.,
and Bayne, M. L.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
2199-2202[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Diment, S.,
Leech, M. S.,
and Stahl, P. D.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
6901-6907[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Rodman, J. S.,
Levy, M. A.,
Diment, S.,
and Stahl, P. D.
(1990)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
48,
116-122[Abstract]
|
| 48.
|
Guagliardi, L. E.,
Koppelman, B.,
Blum, J. S.,
Mark, M. S.,
Cresswell, P.,
and Brodsky, F. M.
(1990)
Nature
343,
133-139[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Meresse, S.,
Andre, P.,
Mishal, Z.,
Barad, M.,
Brun, N.,
Desjardins, M.,
and Gorvel, J. P.
(1997)
Electrophoresis
18,
2682-2688[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Rijnboutt, S.,
Kal, A. J.,
Geuze, H. J.,
Aerts, H.,
and Strous, G. J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
23586-23592[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Press, B.,
Feng, Y.,
Hoflack, B.,
and Wandinger-Ness, A.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
140,
1075-1089[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Glickman, J. N.,
and Kornfeld, S.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
99-108[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
McIntyre, G. F.,
and Erickson, A. H.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
15438-15445[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 54.
|
Ludwig, T.,
Griffiths, G.,
and Hoflack, B.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
115,
1561-1572[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Rochefort, H.,
Garcia, M.,
Glondu, M.,
Laurent, V.,
Liaudet, E.,
Rey, J. M.,
and Roger, P.
(2000)
Clin. Chim. Acta
291,
157-170[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Kagedal, K.,
Johansson, U.,
and Öllinger, K.
(2001)
FASEB J.
15,
1592-1594[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 57.
|
Villadangos, J. A.,
Bryant, R. A.,
Deussing, J.,
Driessen, C.,
Lennon-Dumenil, A. M.,
Riese, R. J.,
Roth, W.,
Saftig, P.,
Shi, G. P.,
Chapman, H. A.,
Peters, C.,
and Ploegh, H. L.
(1999)
Immunol. Rev.
172,
109-120[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 58.
|
Grüninger-Leitch, F.,
Berndt, P.,
Langen, H.,
Nelboeck, P.,
and Döbeli, H.
(2000)
Nature Biotechnology
18,
66-70[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 59.
|
Dean, R. T.
(1979)
Biochem. J.
180,
339-345[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 60.
|
Fallon, K.,
Bausch, K.,
Noonan, J.,
Huguenel, E.,
and Tamburini, P.
(1997)
Infect. Immun.
65,
551-556[Abstract]
|
| 61.
|
Grant, D. A.,
Ford, T. F.,
and McCulloch, R. J.
(1982)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
31,
2302-2305[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 62.
|
Tong, P.,
Thomas, T.,
Berrish, T.,
Humphriss, D.,
Barriocanal, L.,
Stewart, M.,
Walker, M.,
Wilkinson, R.,
and Alberti, K. G.
(1995)
Lancet
345,
357-358[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 63.
|
Benzi, L.,
Cecchetti, P.,
Ciccarone, A. M.,
Nardone, A.,
Merola, E.,
Maggiorelli, R.,
Campi, F., Di,
Cianni, G.,
and Navalesi, R.
(1997)
Metabolism
46,
1259-1265[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
X.-L. Chen, B.-B. Xie, F. Bian, G.-Y. Zhao, H.-L. Zhao, H.-L. He, B.-C. Zhou, and Y.-Z. Zhang
Ecological Function of Myroilysin, a Novel Bacterial M12 Metalloprotease with Elastinolytic Activity and a Synergistic Role in Collagen Hydrolysis, in Biodegradation of Deep-Sea High-Molecular-Weight Organic Nitrogen
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
April 1, 2009;
75(7):
1838 - 1844.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Yang, J. Sun, T. Zhang, J. Liu, J. Zhang, M. A. Shi, F. Darakhshan, M. Guerre-Millo, K. Clement, B. D. Gelb, et al.
Deficiency and Inhibition of Cathepsin K Reduce Body Weight Gain and Increase Glucose Metabolism in Mice
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
December 1, 2008;
28(12):
2202 - 2208.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Tamura, P. Thotakura, T. S. Tanaka, M. S. H. Ko, and K. Ozato
Identification of target genes and a unique cis element regulated by IRF-8 in developing macrophages
Blood,
September 15, 2005;
106(6):
1938 - 1947.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Diederich, M. Moll, H.-D. Klenk, and A. Maisner
The Nipah Virus Fusion Protein Is Cleaved within the Endosomal Compartment
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 19, 2005;
280(33):
29899 - 29903.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Balbis, G. Baquiran, V. Dumas, and B. I. Posner
Effect of Inhibiting Vacuolar Acidification on Insulin Signaling in Hepatocytes
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 26, 2004;
279(13):
12777 - 12785.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Authier, P. H. Cameron, C. Merlen, M. Kouach, and G. Briand
Endosomal Proteolysis of Glucagon at Neutral pH Generates the Bioactive Degradation Product Miniglucagon-(19-29)
Endocrinology,
December 1, 2003;
144(12):
5353 - 5364.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Desbuquois, G. Chauvet, M. Kouach, and F. Authier
Cell Itinerary and Metabolic Fate of Proinsulin in Rat Liver: In Vivo and in Vitro Studies
Endocrinology,
December 1, 2003;
144(12):
5308 - 5321.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|