|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M112427200 on January 2, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 11, 9468-9473, March 15, 2002
Overexpression of an ADP-ribosylation Factor-Guanine Nucleotide
Exchange Factor, BIG2, Uncouples Brefeldin A-induced Adaptor Protein-1
Coat Dissociation and Membrane Tubulation*
Chisa
Shinotsuka,
Yusaku
Yoshida,
Kazumasa
Kawamoto,
Hiroyuki
Takatsu , and
Kazuhisa
Nakayama§
From the Institute of Biological Sciences and Gene Research Center,
University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennohdai, Tsukuba Science City,
Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan
Received for publication, December 28, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
BIG2 is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor
(GEF) for the ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF) family of small GTPases,
which regulate membrane association of COPI and adaptor protein (AP)-1
coat protein complexes. A fungal metabolite, brefeldin A (BFA),
inhibits ARF-GEFs and leads to redistribution of coat proteins from
membranes to the cytoplasm and membrane tubulation of the Golgi complex
and the trans-Golgi network (TGN). To investigate the
function of BIG2, we examined the effects of BIG2-overexpression on the
BFA-induced redistribution of ARF, coat proteins, and organelle
markers. The BIG2 overexpression blocked BFA-induced redistribution
from membranes of ARF1 and the AP-1 complex but not that of the COPI
complex. These observations indicate that BIG2 is implicated in
membrane association of AP-1, but not that of COPI, through activating ARF. Furthermore, not only BIG2 but also ARF1 and AP-1 were found as
queues of spherical swellings along the BFA-induced membrane tubules
emanating from the TGN. These observations indicate that BFA-induced
AP-1 dissociation from TGN membranes and tubulation of TGN membranes
are not coupled events and suggest that a BFA target other than
ARF-GEFs exists in the cell.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Membrane traffic between intracellular organelles in eukaryotic
cells is mediated primarily by small vesicles that bud from a donor
compartment and fuse with a target compartment to deliver cargo
molecules. The budding of carrier vesicles is triggered by membrane
binding of the ADP-ribosylation factor
(ARF)1 and Sar1 families of
small GTPases (reviewed in Refs. 1-3). ARFs are found in all
eukaryotes and have been shown to function in a variety of
membrane-trafficking events. In mammals, the ARF family members are
divided into three classes based on sequence similarity, Class I
(ARF1-ARF3), Class II (ARF4 and ARF5), and Class III (ARF6) (reviewed
in Refs. 1 and 4). The Class I ARFs, especially ARF1, have been most
extensively studied and shown to regulate the assembly of coat protein
complexes onto vesicle-budding sites including the COPI complex on the
Golgi complex, the AP-1 clathrin adaptor complex on the
trans-Golgi network (TGN), and the AP-3 complex on endosomes
(5, 6). The only Class III member, ARF6, functions in endosome-plasma membrane recycling system and in the remodeling of actin cytoskeleton (7). Little is known concerning the roles of the Class II ARFs.
Similar to other GTP-binding proteins, ARF cycles between a GDP-bound
inactive state and a GTP-bound active state. GDP-bound ARF is primarily
cytosolic although weakly associated with membranes, whereas the active
GTP-bound form binds tightly to membranes in which it encounters
effectors. For instance, ARF1-GTP promotes the formation of COPI-coated
and clathrin/AP-1-coated vesicles at the pre-Golgi intermediates and at
the TGN, respectively, by inducing an assembly of the coat complexes
onto membranes and possibly by activating lipid mediators (8, 9, reviewed in Refs. 1, 4, and 10). Furthermore, brefeldin A (BFA), which
blocks guanine nucleotide exchange on ARF, inhibits the assembly of the COPI and AP-1 complexes onto membranes and induce the formation of
membrane tubules from the Golgi complex and the TGN that subsequently fuse with the endoplasmic reticulum and with endosomes,
respectively (11-14, reviewed in Refs. 6, 15, and 16). Therefore, it has been suggested that the BFA-induced dissociation of coat proteins from membranes is a prerequisite for membrane tubulation (15, 17).
However, accumulating evidence shows that membrane tubules are also
formed under physiological conditions, indicating that membrane-bound
compartments communicate with each other by tubules as well as vesicles
(for example, see Refs. 18-25).
The nucleotide exchange on ARF is catalyzed by guanine nucleotide
exchange factors (GEFs). All ARF-GEFs identified so far possess a Sec7
domain of ~200 amino acids that is a minimum unit for the catalysis
(reviewed in Refs. 26 and 27). Members of the Sec7 family of ARF-GEFs
can be subdivided into two major classes on the basis of sequence
similarity and functional differences (26, 27). The ARF-GEFs of high
molecular mass (>100 kDa) include Saccharomyces
cerevisiae Sec7p, Gea1p, and Gea2p, Arabidopsis GNOM/EMB30, and mammalian GBF1, BIG1, and BIG2. All but one, GBF1, have
been reported to be sensitive to BFA (28-32). All mammalian ARF-GEFs
of high molecular weight are localized in the Golgi region and are
believed to be involved in membrane trafficking (29, 30, 33). The
second subfamily of smaller ARF-GEFs (45-50 kDa) include mammalian
ARNO, cytohesin-1, GRP1/ARNO3, cytohesin-4, and EFA6. In
contrast to the high molecular weight group, all low molecular weight
ARF-GEFs are insensitive to BFA and are believed to be involved in
endosomal recycling and cytoskeletal reorganization through activating
ARF6 primarily (reviewed in Refs. 26 and 27).
In this study, we examined the role of one of the high molecular weight
ARF-GEFs, BIG2. When cells overexpressing BIG2 were treated with BFA,
the dissociation from membranes of the AP-1 complex but not that of the
COPI complex was blocked, suggesting that BIG2 is implicated in the
formation of clathrin/AP-1-coated vesicles through activating ARFs but
not that of COPI-coated vesicles. However, in the BIG2-overexpressing
cells, the BFA treatment still induced the formation of membrane
tubules with which not only BIG2 itself but also ARF, AP-1, and mannose
6-phosphate receptor (MPR) were associated. These observations indicate
that BFA-induced coat dissociation is not necessarily a prerequisite
for membrane tubulation and that another target of BFA, which
inherently blocks membrane tubulation, is present in the cell.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
cDNA Cloning--
A BLAST search was performed against a
human expressed sequence tag (EST) data base using the yeast Sec7p
sequence as a query and identified an EST (GenBankTM
accession number AA121376) that coded for a part of a protein showing significant homology to the Sec7 domain sequence of Sec7p. A
part of the EST sequence was amplified from a human liver cDNA library (Invitrogen) by polymerase chain reaction and used to screen a human hepatoma HepG2 cDNA library (34). Ten positive clones were identified by screening of ~1.8 × 106
clones, and the longest clone (clone 7) was subjected to further analysis. The cDNA insert of clone 7 was ~3.0-kb long and covered a part of human BIG2 polypeptide (amino acid residues 103-1362). Subsequent screening of the same HepG2 library with the clone 7 insert
identified several positive clones, and two of them (clones 22 and 67)
covered the missing BIG2 region (amino acids 1-208 and 881-1719,
respectively). However, the most C-terminal region of BIG2 did not
appear to be covered by the cloned cDNAs. Another BLAST search
against the human EST data base using the most 3' part of the clone 67 insert identified an EST (GenBankTM accession number
AA594443) that appeared to cover the missing region, and the
corresponding cDNA fragment (7C-AA) covering amino acids 1710-1785
was amplified from the human liver cDNA library. The amino acid
sequence deduced from the composite cDNA sequence was confirmed to
be identical to the reported human BIG2 sequence (32).
Plasmid Construction--
To construct expression vectors for
epitope-tagged BIG2, an oligonucleotide for an epitope sequence for
hemagglutinin (HA) or for Myc was first introduced between the
HindIII and BamHI sites of the pcDNA4/HisMax
or pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen), respectively. The entire coding
sequence for BIG2 was then ligated downstream of the epitope sequence
of the resulting pcDNA4-HAN or pcDNA3-MycN vector. The
construction of expression vectors for C-terminally HA-tagged ARF1 was
described previously (35). An expression vector for the GGA homology
(GGAH) domain of Golgi-localizing -adaptin ear homology
domain ARF-binding protein 1 (GGA1) fused to glutathione
S-transferase (GST) was constructed by subcloning of a
cDNA fragment covering the GGAH domain (amino acids 141-326) of
human GGA1 (36) into the pGEX4T-2 vector (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.).
Antibodies--
Monoclonal mouse antibody (2G11) to
cation-independent MPR (37) was kindly provided by Dr. Suzanne
Pfeffer (Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA) or purchased from Affinity
Bioreagents. Monoclonal mouse antibodies to -adaptin (100.3),
mannosidase II (Man II) (53FC3), Lamp-1 (H4A3), and EEA1 (clone 14) and
polyclonal rabbit anti- -COP antibodies were purchased from Sigma,
BAbCo, PharMingen, Transduction Laboratories, and Affinity Bioreagents,
respectively. Monoclonal rat anti-HA (3F10) and monoclonal mouse
anti-Myc (9E10) antibodies were from Roche Diagnostics and Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc., respectively. Alexa488-conjugated antibodies and
Cy3- and peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were from Molecular Probes and Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, respectively.
DNA Transfection and Microinjection and Immunofluorescence
Microscopy--
For the expression of HA-tagged BIG2, HeLa cells or
Clone 9 rat hepatocytes were transfected with its expression vector
using a FuGENE 6 transfection reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and incubated for 6 h in the presence of 20 mM sodium
butyrate. For the coexpression of HA-tagged ARF1 and Myc-tagged BIG2,
their expression vectors were microinjected into the nuclei of HeLa cells using Eppendorf Micromanipulator 5171 and Transjector 5246, and
the cells were incubated for 3 h. Staining of the cells was performed by essentially the same procedures as described previously (38, 39). The transfected or microinjected cells were fixed with 4%
paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline and permeabilized with
0.1% Triton X-100 or fixed and permeabilized with cold methanol. The
cells were then incubated with the indicated combinations of primary
antibodies followed by a combination of Alexa488-conjugated and
Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies and observed using a confocal microscope (TCS-SP2, Leica).
ARF Pull-down Assay--
The activation levels of ARF1 in cells
were estimated by a recently developed pull-down assay using GGA (40).
Human embryonic kidney 293 cells grown on a 10-cm dish were transfected
with an expression vector for either wild type or mutant ARF1-HA alone or in combination with that for HA-tagged BIG2 using the FuGENE 6 reagent and incubated for 18 h in normal medium and then for 6 h in medium containing 20 mM sodium butyrate. The
cells were then lysed in 0.65 ml of cell lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM
MgCl2, 0.1% SDS, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton
X-100, 10% glycerol) containing a CompleteTM protease
inhibitor mixture (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The lysates were
precleared by incubation with GST prebound to glutathione-Sepharose 4B
beads (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.) for 30 min at 4 °C and
centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C in a microcentrifuge.
The supernatants (0.5 ml) were then incubated with the fusion protein
of GST and the GGA1 GGAH domain prebound to glutathione-Sepharose 4B
beads for 30 min at 4 °C and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min at
4 °C in a microcentrifuge. The pellets were washed three times with cell lysis buffer and boiled in SDS-PAGE sample buffer. The samples were electrophoresed on a 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel for detection of
ARF or 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel for detection of BIG2 and electroblotted onto an Immobilon-P membrane (Millipore). The blot was
incubated sequentially with monoclonal rat anti-HA antibody (3F10) and
peroxidase-conjugated anti-rat IgG and detected using a Renaissance
Chemiluminescence Reagent Plus (PerkinElmer Life Sciences).
 |
RESULTS |
Subcellular Localization of BIG2--
Human BIG2 has recently been
cloned and found to be associated with the Golgi region (32, 33). In
these studies, however, neither its precise intracellular localization
nor its physiological role has been determined. Because we have
independently cloned human BIG2 cDNAs (see "Materials and
Methods"), we set out to address these issues. To this end, we first
attempted to raise antibodies to BIG2, but they did not work well in
immunofluorescence studies. Therefore, we transiently transfected
epitope-tagged (HA- or Myc-tagged) BIG2 into cells and examined its
subcellular localization. When expressed at moderate levels in HeLa
cells and in Clone 9 rat hepatocytes, HA-BIG2 was localized in the
perinuclear region (Fig. 1,
A-F). Similar perinuclear localization was observed for
Myc-tagged BIG2 (see Fig. 3C'). The staining for BIG2
overlapped with that for -COP (a COPI subunit, Fig. 1A),
Man II (a medial Golgi membrane protein, Fig. 1B),
-adaptin (a subunit of the AP-1 complex, Fig. 1C), or MPR
(a protein recycling between the TGN and late endosomes, Fig.
1D). In contrast, BIG2 was not significantly colocalized
with Lamp-1 (a marker for late endosomes and lysosomes, Fig.
1E) or EEA1 (an early endosomal protein, Fig.
1F). These observations are compatible with the data
presented by Yamaji et al. (33) that BIG2 is localized
primarily in the Golgi region.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Immunofluorescence localization of BIG2.
Clone 9 cells (A and B) or HeLa cells
(C-F) transfected with the expression vector for HA-tagged
BIG2 were double-stained with antibodies to the HA epitope and to
-COP (A), Man II (B), -adaptin
(C), MPR (D), lamp-1 (E), or EEA1
(F) as described under "Materials and Methods."
|
|
Activation of ARF by BIG2 in Cells--
A previous study
showed that BIG2 catalyzes guanine nucleotide exchange on ARF in
vitro (32, 33). However, the study did not address whether it is
also functional in vivo. To address this issue, we made use
of a recently developed pull-down assay (40) for active GTP-bound ARF
using GST fused to the GGAH domain of GGA, which interacts
directly with ARF in a GTP-dependent manner (41, 42). The
specificity of this assay was tested using lysates from cells
transfected with wild type or mutants of C-terminally HA-tagged ARF1.
As shown in Fig. 2, top panel,
the binding efficiency to GST-GGAH of GTP-bound mutant of ARF1,
ARF1(Q71L) (lane 3), was extremely high as compared with
those of wild type ARF1 (lane 4) and its nucleotide-free
mutant, ARF1(N126I) (lane 2). Although two bands for ARF1-HA
were detected in each lane, we speculate that the upper band may
represent myristoylated full-length ARF1, and the lower band may be its
degradation product or its non-myristoylated form. We then examined the
activation of ARF by BIG2 in cells using this assay. As shown in Fig.
2, top panel, the binding of ARF1 from cells cotransfected
with ARF1-HA and HA-BIG2 (lane 5) to GST-GGAH was increased
2-3-fold as compared with that from cells transfected with ARF1-HA
alone (lane 4). The data indicate that BIG2 does activate
ARF1 in cells. Although the -fold activation of ARF1 by BIG2 appears to
be low, this may reflect the difference between them in the subcellular
localization; namely, BIG2 is associated mainly with the TGN (see
below), whereas ARF1 is associated not only with the TGN but with other
compartments as well.

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Estimation of active ARF in cells by affinity
precipitation using GST-GGAH domain. Top panel, lysate
from human embryonic kidney 293 cells transfected with HA-tagged wild
type ARF1 (lane 4), ARF1(Q71L) (lane 3), or
ARF1(N126I) (lane 2) alone or from those cotransfected with
wild type ARF1-HA and HA-BIG2 (lane 5) or control cell
lysate (lane 1) was subjected to pull-down assay using
GST-GGAH as described under "Materials and Methods."
Middle and bottom panels show the results of
Western blot analyses of total cell lysates using anti-HA antibody to
confirm the expression of ARF1-HA and HA-BIG2, respectively.
|
|
Overexpressed BIG2 Blocks ARF1 Redistribution but Not Membrane
Tubulation Induced by BFA--
BFA inhibits ARF-GEFs and thereby
inhibits the recruitment of ARF onto Golgi membranes. Therefore, it is
possible that the overexpression of an ARF-GEF may block the
BFA-induced redistribution of ARF from membranes to the cytoplasm. To
address this possibility, we examined the effect of BIG2 overexpression
on the localization and BFA-induced redistribution of ARF. To this end,
HeLa cells were microinjected with the expression vector for
C-terminally HA-tagged ARF1 alone or in combination with that for
Myc-tagged BIG2. The microinjected cells were left untreated or treated
with BFA for 15 min and processed for immunofluorescence analysis. As
reported previously (35), when expressed alone, ARF1 was localized in
the perinuclear Golgi region (Fig.
3A). The treatment of the
cells with BFA resulted in the redistribution of ARF1 into the
cytoplasm (Fig. 3B) as reported previously (44, 45). The perinuclear localization of ARF1 was superimposed on that of BIG2 and
was not apparently affected by the coexpression of BIG2 (Fig. 3,
C-C"). When the BIG2-coexpressing cells were treated with
BFA, we met with an unexpected phenomenon. Namely, in the BFA-treated cells, BIG2 was present on membrane tubules emanating from the perinuclear region (Fig. 3D'). Furthermore, to our surprise,
some fraction of ARF1 was present along the BIG2-positive tubules, although most of the fraction appeared to dissociate into the cytoplasm
(Fig. 3, D-D"). The labeling for BIG2 and ARF1 often looked
like queues of spherical swellings along the same tubular processes.
These observations make it possible for BIG2 to be involved in the
activation of ARF in vivo. Furthermore, these findings suggest that the BFA-induced membrane tubulation is not necessarily coupled with inactivation of ARF.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of BIG2-coexpression on the
BFA-induced redistribution of ARF1. HeLa cells microinjected with
an expression vector for HA-tagged ARF1 alone (A and
B) or in combination with that for Myc-tagged BIG2
(C and D) were left untreated (A and
C) or treated with 5 µg/ml BFA for 15 min (B
and D) and processed for staining with anti-HA antibody
(A and B) or double-staining with anti-HA
(C and D) and anti-myc (C' and
D') antibodies as described under "Materials and
Methods." Merged images are shown in C" and
D".
|
|
Overexpression of BIG2 Blocks BFA-induced Redistribution of AP-1
but Not That of COPI--
Because BFA inhibits membrane association of
coat protein complexes such as COPI and AP-1 through inhibiting
ARF-GEFs, thereby blocking membrane recruitment of ARFs, it was
reasonably speculated that the overexpression of ARF-GEF may also block
the BFA-induced redistribution of the coat proteins. To see for which
coat recruitment BIG2 is responsible, the localization of -adaptin
or -COP was examined when BIG2-transfected cells were treated with
BFA. As shown in Fig. 4,
A-A", when BIG2-transfected cells were treated with BFA for
15 min, the labeling for -adaptin was also observed along the
BIG2-positive tubules, whereas in non-transfected cells seen in the
same field marked by asterisks, -adaptin was redistributed into the
cytoplasm. Again, the labeling for BIG2 and -adaptin often looked
similar to queues of spherical swellings along the same tubular
processes. The membrane tubules were still observed by a much longer
incubation period (up to 2 h) in the presence of BFA (data not
shown), suggesting that the tubular processes did not fuse with any
compartment other than the compartment from which the tubules
originated. By contrast, -COP was redistributed into the cytoplasm
by treatment with BFA for only 1 min even in the BIG2-transfected cells
and was not observed along the BIG2-positive tubules (Fig.
5, A-A").

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of BIG2-overexpression on BFA-induced
redistribution of -adaptin and MPR. HeLa
cells transfected with the expression vector for HA-tagged BIG2 were
treated with 5 µg/ml BFA for 15 min and processed for double-staining
with antibodies to the HA epitope (A and B) and
to either -adaptin (A') or MPR (B') as
described under "Materials and Methods." Merged images are shown in
A" and B". Asterisks indicate
non-transfected cells.
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effect of BIG2-overexpression on BFA-induced
redistribution of -COP and Man II. Clone
9 cells transfected with the expression vector for HA-tagged BIG2 were
treated with 5 µg/ml BFA for 1 min (A and B) or
15 min (C and D) and processed for
double-staining with antibodies to the HA epitope (A-D) and
to either -COP (A' and C') or Man II
(B' and D') as described under "Materials and
Methods." Merged images are shown in A"-D".
Asterisks indicate non-transfected cells.
|
|
To more clearly show that -adaptin remained associated with
membranes in cells overexpressing BIG2 when treated with BFA, we
exploited the fact that BFA-induced membrane tubules extend along
microtubules, and the treatment of cells with nocodazole, a
microtubule-disrupting drug, results in complete inhibition of the
tubule formation (12, 13, 18). As shown in Fig.
6, the treatment of the BIG2-transfected
cells with nocodazole for 2 h caused not only the labeling for
BIG2 (Fig. 6, A and C) but also the labeling for
-adaptin (Fig. 6A') and -COP (Fig. 6C') to
fragment and disperse throughout the cytoplasm. When the
nocodazole-treated cells were then treated with BFA for 15 min in the
continued presence of nocodazole, -adaptin remained associated with
the fragmented BIG2-positive structures while being redistributed into
the cytoplasm in non-transfected cells seen in the same field (Fig. 6,
B and B'). In contrast, -COP was
redistributed from membranes of the fragmented Golgi into the cytoplasm
even in the BIG2-overexpressing cells (Fig. 6, D and
D'). These observations indicate that BIG2 is involved in
the membrane recruitment of the AP-1 complex but not that of the COPI
complex.

View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of BIG2-overexpression on BFA-induced
coat dissociation in nocodazole-treated cells. HeLa cells
transfected with the expression vector for HA-tagged BIG2 were treated
with 5 µg/ml nocodazole (Nz) for 2 h (A
and C) and then with 5 µg/ml BFA for 15 min in the
continuous presence of nocodazole (B and D) and
processed for double-staining with antibodies to the HA epitope
(A-D) and to either -adaptin (A' and
B') or -COP (C' and D') as
described under "Materials and Methods." Asterisks
indicate non-transfected cells.
|
|
The above results suggest that BIG2 functions primarily on TGN
membranes. To corroborate this finding, cells overexpressing HA-BIG2
were treated with BFA for 15 min and double stained for HA and MPR. MPR
is present in the TGN and late endosomes and appears in TGN-derived
tubules after short periods of BFA treatment (13, 43). As shown in Fig.
4, B-B", the labeling for MPR was observed along the
BIG2-positive membrane tubules induced by the BFA treatment. Again, the
MPR labeling often looked like a queue of spherical swellings. In
contrast, punctate labeling for Lamp-1, a late endosome/lysosome marker, in untreated cells (see Fig. 1E) was not apparently
affected by the BFA treatment nor observed along the BFA-induced
tubules containing BIG2 (data not shown). Thus, the BIG2-positive
tubules appear to be derived from the TGN.
We then examined whether BIG2 overexpression also affects the
disorganization of the Golgi complex induced by BFA. It has been known
that by a relatively short term incubation period (<1 min) of cells
with BFA, COPI is dissociated from Golgi membranes, but the Golgi
complex itself is apparently intact, whereas a longer incubation period
results in the formation of Golgi tubules, which in turn fuse with the
endoplasmic reticulum (11). As shown in Fig. 5, A-A" and
B-B", irrespective of BIG2 transfection, the treatment of
cells with BFA for 1 min led to the redistribution of -COP but not
Man II, a medial Golgi marker. This finding indicates that the -COP
redistribution observed in BIG2-overexpressing cells did not result
from the Golgi disorganization. When cells were treated with BFA for 15 min, the Man II labeling was a cytoplasmic pattern reminiscent of the
endoplasmic reticulum even in the BIG2-transfected cells (Fig. 5,
D-D"), indicating that BIG2 is unable to affect the
BFA-induced Golgi disorganization.
These observations all together indicate that (i) BIG2 functions
primarily on TGN membranes, (ii) through activating ARF, BIG2 is
responsible for the recruitment of the AP-1 complex, but not that of
the COPI complex, onto membranes, and (iii) the dissociation of coat
proteins from membranes is not necessarily a prerequisite for membrane
tubulation induced by BFA.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Guanine nucleotide exchange on ARFs catalyzed by their GEFs,
especially high molecular weight ARF-GEFs, results in their membrane association that triggers subsequent membrane recruitment of coat protein complexes such as the COPI complex with cis-Golgi
membranes and that of the AP-1 adaptor complex with TGN membranes.
Thus, ARF-GEFs are key regulators for the formation of coated carrier vesicles (26, 27). BFA is known to inhibit high molecular weight
ARF-GEFs and thereby inhibit membrane association of ARF itself and
that of coat protein complexes (6, 15, 16). Furthermore, this drug
induces tubulation of Golgi and TGN membranes, which has been proposed
to follow the coat dissociation (15, 17). Previous studies (32, 33)
have shown that BIG2 localizes mainly in the Golgi region but have not
addressed which coat recruitment or which transport step BIG2 regulates
through activating ARF.
In this study, we addressed these questions by comparing changes in
response to BFA between normal and BIG2-overexpressing cells. Because
the guanine nucleotide exchange activity of BIG2 on ARFs is inhibited
by BFA, it was anticipated that the BIG2 overexpression was able to
antagonize some aspects of the effects of BFA. When overexpressed in
cells, BIG2 blocked BFA-induced dissociation of ARF and the AP-1
complex from membranes. By contrast, the BIG2 overexpression was unable
to antagonize BFA-induced COPI redistribution. The data indicate that
BIG2 is involved in the recruitment of the AP-1 complex with the TGN
membranes through activating ARF but not in the recruitment of COPI
with cis-Golgi membranes.
In the course of the experiments, we unexpectedly found that the BIG2
overexpression did not inhibit the BFA-induced membrane tubulation and
that ARF and AP-1 were associated with the BIG2-containing membrane
tubules. The tubules appear to be derived from the TGN but not from the
Golgi complex, because MPR but not Man II was also found on the
BIG2-positive tubules. The tubular processes lasted up to at least
2 h in the presence of BFA and did not appear to fuse with any
compartment other than the TGN. In normal cells, BFA induces tubules
from the TGN, which then fuse with endosomal compartments (12, 13).
Given that prior uncoating is generally required for membrane fusion,
it is probable that the continuous presence of the AP-1 coat led to the
stable BFA-induced tubules observed in the BIG2-overexpressing cells by
inhibiting membrane fusion. These observations also indicate that the
dissociation of coat proteins from membranes is not necessarily a
prerequisite for membrane tubulation and that a BFA target other than
ARF-GEFs may exist in the cell and regulate membrane
tubulation/fission. Such a candidate target is BFA-ADP-ribosylated
substrate (BARS), which is ADP-ribosylated in a
BFA-dependent manner in vitro and in
vivo (46, 47). When added to permeabilized cells, BARS strongly
inhibits BFA-induced Golgi tubular disassembly, whereas pre-ADP-ribosylated BARS does not. By contrast, BARS has no
effect on BFA-induced coat dissociation. Recently, Weigert et
al. (48) have reported that BARS is directly or indirectly
implicated in the acylation of lysophosphatidic acid to generate
phosphatidic acid and regulates fission of Golgi membrane tubules.
Because lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferase activity has been
reported to be also required for another membrane fission event (49, reviewed in Ref. 50), it is likely that BFA induces membrane tubules by
inhibiting membrane fission by inhibiting the function of BARS or a
related protein. However, we cannot exclude a possibility that
inhibition of another BFA-sensitive ARF-GEF such as BIG1 may lead to
the tubule formation. Future studies will be required to solve this problem.
Another striking observation in this study is that the labeling for
BIG2, AP-1, ARF, and MPR often looked like queues of spherical swellings along the BFA-induced tubular processes. Supporting our
observation is the most recent report of Huang et al. (51). They have observed a dynamic movement of the µ1 AP-1 subunit tagged with yellow fluorescent protein in living cells by time-lapse imaging
and found that the µ1-positive structures move as queues of spherical
swellings along the tubules, and vesicles are frequently formed at the
tips of the tubular extensions. Thus, the images of the AP-1-positive
swellings along the BFA-induced tubules we observed may correspond to
frozen images at some time point of the dynamically moving swellings
along the tubules formed under physiological conditions. In this
context, an observation in the BARS study (48) described earlier is
also noteworthy. A feature of intermediates of Golgi tubule fission
induced by BARS is a number of sites in which the tubule diameter is
greatly reduced, in other words, queues of boluses or swellings are
found in the tubule fission intermediates. Although the study (48) did
not determine whether the swollen regions are coated or whether the constricted sites along the tubules represent bona fide
fission sites, it is tempting to speculate that the swollen regions in the intermediates correspond to those observed when BIG2-overexpressing cells were treated with BFA.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Dr. Suzanne Pfeffer for providing
anti-MPR antibody.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by grants from the Ministry
of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, the
Japan Society for Promotion of Science, and the University of
Tsukuba Research Projects.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Recipient of a fellowship from the Japan Society for Promotion of
Science for Japanese Junior Scientist.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
81-298-53-7725; Fax: 81-298-53-7723; E-mail:
kazunaka@sakura.cc.tsukuba.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 2, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M112427200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ARF, ADP-ribosylation factor;
BFA, brefeldin A;
BARS, brefeldin
A-ADP-ribosylated substrate;
EST, expressed sequence tag;
GEF, guanine nucleotide exchange factor;
GGA, Golgi-localizing,
-adaptin ear homology domain ARF-binding protein;
GGAH, GGA
homology;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
HA, hemagglutinin;
Man II, mannosidase II;
MPR, mannose 6-phosphate receptor;
TGN, trans-Golgi network.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Moss, J.,
and Vaughan, M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
12327-12330[Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Schmid, S. L.,
and Damke, H.
(1995)
FASEB J.
9,
1445-1453[Abstract]
|
| 3.
|
Springer, S.,
Spang, A.,
and Schekman, R.
(1999)
Cell
97,
145-148[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Chavrier, P.,
and Goud, B.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
11,
466-475[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Hirst, J.,
and Robinson, M. S.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1404,
173-193[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Lippincott-Schwartz, J.,
Cole, N. B.,
and Donaldson, J. G.
(1998)
Histochem. Cell Biol.
109,
449-462[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Al-Awar, O.,
Radhakrishna, H.,
Powell, N. N.,
and Donaldson, J. G.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
5998-6007[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Stamnes, M. A.,
and Rothman, J. E.
(1993)
Cell
73,
999-1005[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Traub, L. M.,
Ostrom, J. A.,
and Kornfeld, S.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
561-573[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Roth, M. G.
(1999)
Trends Cell Biol.
9,
174-179[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Donaldson, J. G.,
Lippincott-Schwartz, J.,
Bloom, G. S.,
Kreis, T. E.,
and Klausner, R. D.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
111,
2295-2306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Lippincott-Schwartz, J.,
Yuan, L.,
Tipper, C.,
Amherdt, M.,
Orci, L.,
and Klausner, R. D.
(1991)
Cell
67,
601-616[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Wood, S. A.,
Park, J. E.,
and Brown, W. J.
(1991)
Cell
67,
591-600[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Robinson, M. S.,
and Kreis, T. E.
(1992)
Cell
69,
129-138[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Klausner, R. D.,
Donaldson, J. G.,
and Lippincott-Schwartz, J.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
116,
1071-1080[Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Jackson, C. L.
(2000)
Subcell. Biochem.
34,
233-272[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Scheel, J.,
Pepperkok, R.,
Lowe, M.,
Griffiths, G.,
and Kreis, T. E.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
137,
319-333[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Cooper, M. S.,
Cornell-Bell, A. H.,
Chernjavsky, A.,
Dani, J. W.,
and Smith, S. J.
(1990)
Cell
61,
135-145[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Cluett, E. B.,
Wood, S. A.,
Banta, M.,
and Brown, W. J.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
120,
15-24[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Sciaky, N.,
Presley, J.,
Smith, C.,
Zaal, K. J. M.,
Cole, N.,
Moreira, J. E.,
Terasaki, M.,
Siggia, E.,
and Lippincott-Schwartz, J.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
139,
1137-1155[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Klumperman, J.,
Schweizer, A.,
Clausen, H.,
Tang, B. L.,
Hong, W.,
Oorschot, V., V.,
and Hauri, H.-P.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
3411-3425[Abstract]
|
| 22.
|
Nakata, T.,
Terada, S.,
and Hirokawa, N.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
140,
659-674[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Shima, D. T.,
Scales, S. J.,
Kreis, T. E.,
and Pepperkok, R.
(1999)
Curr. Biol.
9,
821-824[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Blum, R.,
Stephens, D. J.,
and Schulz, I.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
3151-3159[Abstract]
|
| 25.
|
Polishchuk, R. S.,
Polishchuk, E. V.,
Marra, P.,
Alberti, S.,
Buccione, R.,
Luini, A.,
and Mironov, A. A.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
148,
45-58[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Donaldson, J. G.,
and Jackson, C. L.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
12,
475-482[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Jackson, C. L.,
and Casanova, J. E.
(2000)
Trends Cell Biol.
10,
60-67[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Peyroche, A.,
Paris, S.,
and Jackson, C. L.
(1996)
Nature
384,
479-481[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Morinaga, N.,
Moss, J.,
and Vaughan, M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
12926-12931[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Claude, A.,
Zhao, B.-P.,
Kuziemsky, C. E.,
Dahan, S.,
Berger, S. J.,
Yan, J.-P.,
Armold, A. D.,
Sullivan, E. M.,
and Melançon, P.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
146,
71-84[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Mansour, S. J.,
Skaug, J.,
Zhao, X.-H.,
Giordano, J.,
Scherer, S. W.,
and Melançon, P.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
7968-7973[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Togawa, A.,
Morinaga, N.,
Ogasawara, M.,
Moss, J.,
and Vaughan, M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
12308-12315[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Yamaji, R.,
Adamik, R.,
Takeda, K.,
Togawa, A.,
Pacheco-Rodriguez, G.,
Ferrans, V. J.,
Moss, J.,
and Vaughan, M.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
2567-2572[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Hosaka, M.,
Murakami, K.,
and Nakayama, K.
(1994)
Biomed. Res.
15,
383-390
|
| 35.
|
Hosaka, M.,
Toda, K.,
Takatsu, H.,
Torii, S.,
Murakami, K.,
and Nakayama, K.
(1996)
J. Biochem.
120,
813-819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Takatsu, H.,
Yoshino, K.,
and Nakayama, K.
(2000)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
271,
719-725[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Dintzis, S. M.,
and Pfeffer, S. R.
(1990)
EMBO J.
9,
77-84[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Torii, S.,
Banno, T.,
Watanabe, T.,
Ikehara, Y.,
Murakami, K.,
and Nakayama, K.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
11574-11580[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Takatsu, H.,
Sakurai, M.,
Shin, H.-W.,
Murakami, K.,
and Nakayama, K.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
24693-24700[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Santy, L. C.,
and Casanova, J. E.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
154,
599-610[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Boman, A. L.,
Zhang, C.-J.,
Zhu, X.,
and Kahn, R. A.
(2000)
Mol. Biol. Cell
11,
1241-1255[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Dell'Angelica, E. C.,
Puertollano, R.,
Mullins, C.,
Aguilar, R. C.,
Vargas, J. D.,
Hartnell, L. M.,
and Bonifacino, J. S.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
149,
81-93[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Wood, S. A.,
and Brown, W. J.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
119,
273-285[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Teal, S. B.,
Hsu, V. W.,
Peters, P. J.,
Klausner, R. D.,
and Donaldson, J. G.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
3135-3138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Zhang, C.-J.,
Rosenwald, A. G.,
Willingham, M. C.,
Skuntz, S.,
Clark, J.,
and Kahn, R. A.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
124,
289-300[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Mironov, A.,
Colanzi, A.,
Silletta, M. G.,
Fiucci, G.,
Flati, S.,
Fusella, A.,
Polishchuk, R.,
Mironov, A., Jr., Di,
Tullio, G.,
Weigert, R.,
Malhotra, V.,
Corda, D., De,
Matteis, M. A.,
and Luini, A.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
139,
1109-1118[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Spanfò, S.,
Silletta, M. G.,
Colanzi, A.,
Alberti, S.,
Fiucci, G.,
Valente, C.,
Fusella, A.,
Salmona, M.,
Mironov, A.,
Luini, A.,
and Corda, D.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
17705-17710[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Weigert, R.,
Silletta, M. G.,
Spanfò, S.,
Turacchio, G.,
Cericola, C.,
Colanzi, A.,
Senatore, S.,
Mancini, R.,
Polishchuk, E. V.,
Salmona, M.,
Facchiano, F.,
Burger, K. N. J.,
Mironov, A.,
Luini, A.,
and Corda, D.
(1999)
Nature
402,
429-433[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Schmidt, A.,
Wolde, M.,
Thiele, C.,
Fest, W.,
Kratzin, H.,
Podtelejnikov, A. V.,
Witke, W.,
Huttner, W. B.,
and Söling, H.-D.
(1999)
Nature
401,
133-141[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Scales, S. J.,
and Scheller, R. H.
(1999)
Nature
401,
123-124[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Huang, F.,
Nesterov, A.,
Carter, R. E.,
and Sorkin, A.
(2001)
Traffic
2,
345-357[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. I. Sesma, C. R. Esther Jr., S. M. Kreda, L. Jones, W. O'Neal, S. Nishihara, R. A. Nicholas, and E. R. Lazarowski
Endoplasmic Reticulum/Golgi Nucleotide Sugar Transporters Contribute to the Cellular Release of UDP-sugar Signaling Molecules
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 1, 2009;
284(18):
12572 - 12583.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Puxeddu, M. Uhart, C.-C. Li, F. Ahmad, G. Pacheco-Rodriguez, V. C. Manganiello, J. Moss, and M. Vaughan
Interaction of phosphodiesterase 3A with brefeldin A-inhibited guanine nucleotide-exchange proteins BIG1 and BIG2 and effect on ARF1 activity
PNAS,
April 14, 2009;
106(15):
6158 - 6163.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Pan, J. Yu, L. Zhang, A. Carpenter, H. Zhu, L. Li, D. Ma, and J. Yuan
A Novel Small Molecule Regulator of Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Activity of the ADP-ribosylation Factor and Golgi Membrane Trafficking
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 7, 2008;
283(45):
31087 - 31096.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Ishizaki, H.-W. Shin, H. Mitsuhashi, and K. Nakayama
Redundant Roles of BIG2 and BIG1, Guanine-Nucleotide Exchange Factors for ADP-Ribosylation Factors in Membrane Traffic between the trans-Golgi Network and Endosomes
Mol. Biol. Cell,
June 1, 2008;
19(6):
2650 - 2660.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Bereczky, H. Bardos, I. Komaromi, C. Kiss, G. Haramura, E. Ajzner, R. Adany, and L. Muszbek
Factor XDebrecen: Gly204Arg mutation in factor X causes the synthesis of a non-secretable protein and severe factor X deficiency
Haematologica,
February 1, 2008;
93(2):
299 - 302.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Manolea, A. Claude, J. Chun, J. Rosas, and P. Melancon
Distinct Functions for Arf Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors at the Golgi Complex: GBF1 and BIGs Are Required for Assembly and Maintenance of the Golgi Stack and trans-Golgi Network, Respectively
Mol. Biol. Cell,
February 1, 2008;
19(2):
523 - 535.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Islam, X. Shen, T. Hiroi, J. Moss, M. Vaughan, and S. J. Levine
The Brefeldin A-inhibited Guanine Nucleotide-exchange Protein, BIG2, Regulates the Constitutive Release of TNFR1 Exosome-like Vesicles
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 30, 2007;
282(13):
9591 - 9599.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. A. Belov, N. Altan-Bonnet, G. Kovtunovych, C. L. Jackson, J. Lippincott-Schwartz, and E. Ehrenfeld
Hijacking Components of the Cellular Secretory Pathway for Replication of Poliovirus RNA
J. Virol.,
January 15, 2007;
81(2):
558 - 567.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Ishizaki, H.-W. Shin, S. M. M. Iguchi-Ariga, H. Ariga, and K. Nakayama
AMY-1 (associate of Myc-1) localization to the trans-Golgi network through interacting with BIG2, a guanine-nucleotide exchange factor for ADP-ribosylation factors.
Genes Cells,
August 1, 2006;
11(8):
949 - 959.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Shen, K.-F. Xu, Q. Fan, G. Pacheco-Rodriguez, J. Moss, and M. Vaughan
Association of brefeldin A-inhibited guanine nucleotide-exchange protein 2 (BIG2) with recycling endosomes during transferrin uptake
PNAS,
February 21, 2006;
103(8):
2635 - 2640.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. K. Gillingham, J. R. C. Whyte, B. Panic, and S. Munro
Mon2, a Relative of Large Arf Exchange Factors, Recruits Dop1 to the Golgi Apparatus
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 27, 2006;
281(4):
2273 - 2280.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. M. Meyer, P. Crottet, B. Maco, E. Degtyar, D. Cassel, and M. Spiess
Oligomerization and Dissociation of AP-1 Adaptors Are Regulated by Cargo Signals and by ArfGAP1-induced GTP Hydrolysis
Mol. Biol. Cell,
October 1, 2005;
16(10):
4745 - 4754.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Hodges, J. S. Redelius, W. Wu, and C. Hoog
Accelerated Discovery of Novel Protein Function in Cultured Human Cells
Mol. Cell. Proteomics,
September 1, 2005;
4(9):
1319 - 1327.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Honda, O. S. Al-Awar, J. C. Hay, and J. G. Donaldson
Targeting of Arf-1 to the early Golgi by membrin, an ER-Golgi SNARE
J. Cell Biol.,
March 28, 2005;
168(7):
1039 - 1051.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T.-K. Niu, A. C. Pfeifer, J. Lippincott-Schwartz, and C. L. Jackson
Dynamics of GBF1, a Brefeldin A-Sensitive Arf1 Exchange Factor at the Golgi
Mol. Biol. Cell,
March 1, 2005;
16(3):
1213 - 1222.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-F. Xu, X. Shen, H. Li, G. Pacheco-Rodriguez, J. Moss, and M. Vaughan
Interaction of BIG2, a brefeldin A-inhibited guanine nucleotide-exchange protein, with exocyst protein Exo70
PNAS,
February 22, 2005;
102(8):
2784 - 2789.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-W. Shin and K. Nakayama
Guanine Nucleotide-Exchange Factors for Arf GTPases: Their Diverse Functions in Membrane Traffic
J. Biochem.,
December 1, 2004;
136(6):
761 - 767.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-W. Shin, N. Morinaga, M. Noda, and K. Nakayama
BIG2, A Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor for ADP-Ribosylation Factors: Its Localization to Recycling Endosomes and Implication in the Endosome Integrity
Mol. Biol. Cell,
December 1, 2004;
15(12):
5283 - 5294.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Cox, R. J Mason-Gamer, C. L. Jackson, and N. Segev
Phylogenetic Analysis of Sec7-Domain-containing Arf Nucleotide Exchangers
Mol. Biol. Cell,
April 1, 2004;
15(4):
1487 - 1505.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Drecktrah, K. Chambers, E. L. Racoosin, E. B. Cluett, A. Gucwa, B. Jackson, and W. J. Brown
Inhibition of a Golgi Complex Lysophospholipid Acyltransferase Induces Membrane Tubule Formation and Retrograde Trafficking
Mol. Biol. Cell,
August 1, 2003;
14(8):
3459 - 3469.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Chen, E. V. Balyakina, M. Lawrence, B. W. Christman, and B. Meyrick
Cyclooxygenase is regulated by ET-1 and MAPKs in peripheral lung microvascular smooth muscle cells
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
April 1, 2003;
284(4):
L614 - L621.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. I. Padilla, M.-j. Chang, G. Pacheco-Rodriguez, R. Adamik, J. Moss, and M. Vaughan
Interaction of FK506-binding protein 13 with brefeldin A-inhibited guanine nucleotide-exchange protein 1 (BIG1): Effects of FK506
PNAS,
March 4, 2003;
100(5):
2322 - 2327.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Li, R. Adamik, G. Pacheco-Rodriguez, J. Moss, and M. Vaughan
Protein kinase A-anchoring (AKAP) domains in brefeldin A-inhibited guanine nucleotide-exchange protein 2 (BIG2)
PNAS,
February 18, 2003;
100(4):
1627 - 1632.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Crottet, D. M. Meyer, J. Rohrer, and M. Spiess
ARF1{middle dot}GTP, Tyrosine-based Signals, and Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Bisphosphate Constitute a Minimal Machinery to Recruit the AP-1 Clathrin Adaptor to Membranes
Mol. Biol. Cell,
October 1, 2002;
13(10):
3672 - 3682.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|