![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 11, 9505-9511, March 15, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
¶
From the Departments of
Molecular Oncology and
§ Protein Engineering, Genentech, Inc.,
South San Francisco, California 94080
Received for publication, October 2, 2001, and in revised form, November 27, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Receptor-interacting protein (RIP), a Ser/Thr
kinase component of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-1
signaling complex, mediates activation of the nuclear factor Tumor necrosis factor receptor-1
(TNFR1)1 is a potent
activator of nuclear factor The NF- RIP belongs to a family of related kinases that includes RIP2 (also
known as CARDIAK/RICK) and RIP3 (13). The kinases share significant
homology in their amino-terminal kinase domains, but possess distinct C
termini. RIP has a DD at its C terminus, whereas RIP2 has a related
homotypic interaction domain called CARD (14-17). The CARD mediates
the interaction of RIP2 with CARD-containing caspase-1 (15, 18). Unlike
RIP and RIP2, RIP3 has no DD or CARD motif at its C terminus (19-22),
nor does it resemble any other protein in the data base. Previously, we
reported that RIP3 physically associates with RIP to inhibit RIP- and
TNFR1-induced NF- Expression Vectors, Mutagenesis, and Antibodies--
All
eukaryotic expression vectors were constructed in pCMV2-FLAG
(N-terminal FLAG tag), pcDNA3.1/Myc-His (C-terminal Myc tag), or
pGST (N-terminal GST tag) using standard PCR techniques employing custom-designed primers containing appropriate restriction sites. Alanine cluster mutations were done using the QuikChangeTM
site-directed mutagenesis kit from Stratagene. The presence of the
introduced mutation and the fidelity of PCR replication were confirmed
by sequence analysis. The pGEX-2T-1 vector (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.)
was used for expression of GST-tagged RIP3 and RIP truncations in
Escherichia coli. Mouse anti-RIP3 monoclonal antibody was
raised against a His-tagged C-terminal 218-amino acid segment of RIP3,
which was then expressed in BL21(DE3) pLysS cells. Anti-RIP3 polyclonal
antibody was raised against a synthetic peptide composed of the last
C-terminal 20 amino acids of RIP3.
Cell Cultures, Transfections, and Luciferase
Assays--
HEK293E, human U937, and Jurkat cells were cultured as
previously described (6, 8). Constructs expressing deletions and
mutations of RIP and RIP3 were transiently transfected into HEK293E
cells using FuGENE reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Jurkat cells were electroporated at 270 V and 960 microfarads in a 4-mm
gap cuvette using 15 µg of a mixture of DNAs containing a 3:1 ratio
of RIP or RIP3 plasmid versus the SV40 Western Blot Analysis and Immunoprecipitation--
Transfected
cells were lysed in lysis buffer containing 1× Tris-buffered saline,
1% Nonidet P-40, 1× protease inhibitor mixture (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals), and 1 mM dithiothreitol. For
Western analysis, lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to
Immobilon P membrane (Millipore), and immunoblotted. For
immunoprecipitation, 107 cells were lysed in lysis buffer
and precleared with nonspecific antibody and protein G-agarose (Sigma).
Lysates were then incubated with the indicated antibodies, and immune
complexes were precipitated with protein G-agarose. Following extensive
washing, beads were boiled in sample buffer, and the released material
was subjected to Western blot analysis. For endogenous association and
recruitment experiments, human U937 cells were used. A monoclonal
antibody to TNFR1 (Genentech, Inc.) was used to immunoprecipitate the
TNFR1 complex, which was analyzed directly or subjected to an in
vitro kinase assay. The TNFR1 complex was dissociated in
Tris-buffered saline containing 1% SDS, which was then diluted 10-fold
with lysis buffer before it was subjected to a second round of immunoprecipitation.
Immunofluorescence Microscopy--
RIP3 was cloned into the
pEGFP-C1 vector (CLONTECH), transfected into COS-7
cells, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized in 0.25%
Triton X-100, and stained with anti-RIP monoclonal antibody. Bound anti-RIP antibody (Pharmingen) was detected using a
Cy5-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories,
Inc.). RIP3 was visualized by green fluorescence. Cells were examined and photographed by confocal microscopy (Leica SP).
In Vitro Kinase Assay--
Immunoprecipitated endogenous TNFR1
complex and various RIP and RIP3 proteins obtained from transfected
293E cells were subjected to an in vitro kinase assay as
described previously (8).
Secondary Structure Prediction--
Secondary structure
predictions for the minimal binding segments of RIP and RIP3 were
performed using the programs DSC (23) and PHD (24). Threading
calculations were performed using the program ProFit (ProCeryon
Biosciences, Inc.).
Defining the RIP Homotypic Interaction Motif
(RHIM)--
Analysis of the C terminus of RIP3 revealed a stretch
of 16 amino acids that was highly homologous to a region in the
intermediate domain of RIP: 8 of 16 contiguous residues were identical,
and 14 of 16 were conserved. To elucidate the functional significance of this region, we generated a series of C-terminal RIP truncations. Cotransfection studies revealed that 20 amino acids encompassing the
core 16 residues were required for binding of RIP to RIP3 (Fig.
1A). Only truncated forms of
RIP that contained this conserved region bound RIP3 (Fig.
1A, lanes 1 and 5-7). Similar
truncation analysis of RIP3 revealed that an equivalent stretch of 24 residues containing the 16 core residues was required for association
with RIP (Fig. 1B, lanes 1, 3, and
4). To further characterize this novel homotypic interaction
motif, we generated alanine cluster substitutions within the conserved
and flanking regions. Alanine substitutions within the core 16 residues
significantly disrupted the association between RIP and RIP3, whereas
alanine substitutions outside the core region did not (Fig.
1C). Therefore, this stretch of 16 residues forms the
essential core of a novel homotypic interaction motif, the RHIM.
Mapping the Minimal Region in RIP and RIP3 Sufficient for Their
Association--
To elucidate the minimal region of RIP3 that is
sufficient for homotypic binding, a series of GST-RIP3 fusion proteins
were tested for their ability to bind to RIP. GST-RIP3-(411-474)
retained the ability to bind RIP, indicating that this stretch of 64 amino acids is sufficient to confer RIP binding (Fig.
2B). Similar experiments were
conducted using GST-RIP fusion proteins. GST-RIP-(501-588) bound RIP3,
whereas a more truncated version, GST-RIP-(501-551), bound
RIP3 only weakly (Fig. 2C). To address the
question of whether these two minimal binding segments can bind each
other, FLAG-RIP3-(411-474) was coexpressed with GST-RIP-(501-588) or,
as a negative control, GST-E10 (25). Only GST-RIP-(501-588) bound
FLAG-RIP3-(411-474), consistent with the notion that the two RHIMs in
RIP and RIP3 bind each other (Fig. 2D). To confirm a direct
association between the two RHIMs, GST-RIP3-(388-518) and
GST-RIP-(496-583) were coexpressed in E. coli and
were found to copurify on glutathione-Sepharose as a soluble complex.
RIP3 was then cleaved from GST by thrombin and separated on a sizing
column. RIP and RIP3, both containing the core RHIM, coeluted during
gel filtration, indicating that these fragments of RIP and RIP3 can
interact directly (Fig. 2E). These results also indicate
that residues outside the core regions are required for mutual
interaction of the RHIMs.
Interestingly, secondary structure predictions using two different
methods suggested that the minimal binding fragments of RIP and RIP3
are predominantly coil-like. However, the RHIMs were predicted to have
RIP3 Is Recruited to the TNFR1 Signaling Complex--
Confocal
microscopy was used to ascertain the cellular localization of RIP and
RIP3. Ectopically expressed green fluorescent protein-tagged RIP3
colocalized with endogenous RIP in punctate structures (Fig.
3A), distinct from labeled
mitochondria (data not shown). To detect association of endogenous RIP
and RIP3 within the TNFR1 signaling complex, a monoclonal antibody
against RIP3 was generated. Previous studies have shown that RIP is
recruited to the TNFR1 signaling complex upon TNF treatment (8).
Additionally, we have reported that upon overexpression, RIP3 can be
recruited to the TNFR1 complex by RIP (22). To determine whether
endogenous RIP3 is recruited to the TNFR1 complex in a
TNF-dependent manner, TNFR1 was immunoprecipitated from
U937 cells with or without prior exposure to TNF. Endogenous RIP
complexed with TNFR1 in a TNF-dependent manner (Fig.
3B), but endogenous RIP3 could not be detected by immunoblotting due to poor reactivity of the anti-RIP3 antibody. Because RIP3 is a kinase, in vitro kinase reactions offered
a more sensitive method of detection. Following immunoprecipitation with anti-TNFR1 antibody, the TNFR1 signaling complex was subjected to
an in vitro kinase reaction, and the complex was disrupted and subjected to a second round of immunoprecipitation using antibody against RIP or RIP3. Using this protocol, we could detect recruitment of both RIP and RIP3 to the TNFR1 complex after TNF treatment (Fig.
3C). Many other proteins in the TNFR1 complex were also phosphorylated (Fig. 3C, lane 4), some of which
likely represent components of the TNFR1 signalosome (26).
RIP3 Phosphorylates RIP--
Because RIP3 binds RIP, we determined
whether RIP and RIP3 could phosphorylate each other. An in
vitro kinase assay showed RIP3 to be the stronger
autophosphorylating kinase. Furthermore, RIP3 could phosphorylate RIP,
but the converse was not observed (data not shown). To address whether
the phosphorylation of RIP by RIP3 was specific, kinase-dead
RIP(K45A) and the indicated RIP3 constructs were expressed in
HEK293E cells, immunoprecipitated, and subjected to an in
vitro kinase assay. The use of catalytically inert RIP(K45A) in
this assay eliminated interference from autophosphorylation. RIP(K45A)
was phosphorylated in the presence of wild-type RIP3, but not in the
presence of a kinase-dead RIP3 mutant (Fig. 3E, lanes
2 and 3). Importantly, mutation of the RIP3 RHIM
abrogated RIP phosphorylation by RIP3 (Fig. 3E, compare
lanes 4 and 5), indicating that RIP
phosphorylation by RIP3 is dependent on the formation of a RIP·RIP3 complex.
RIP3 Inhibits TNF-induced NF-
B
(NF-
B) pathway. RIP2 and RIP3 are related kinases that share
extensive sequence homology with the kinase domain of RIP. Unlike RIP,
which has a C-terminal death domain, and RIP2, which has a C-terminal
caspase activation and recruitment domain, RIP3 possesses a unique C
terminus. RIP3 binds RIP through this unique C-terminal segment to
inhibit RIP- and TNF receptor-1-mediated NF-
B activation. We have
identified a unique homotypic interaction motif at the C terminus of
both RIP and RIP3 that is required for their association. Sixty-four amino acids within RIP3 and 88 residues within RIP are sufficient for
interaction of the two proteins. This interaction is a prerequisite for
RIP3-mediated phosphorylation of RIP and subsequent attenuation of
TNF-induced NF-
B activation.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B (NF-
B), a transcription complex
that drives the synthesis of a number of pro-inflammatory gene products (1, 2). The intracellular segment of TNFR1 responsible for NF-
B
activation has been mapped to a discrete 70-amino acid homotypic interaction domain termed the "death domain" (DD). The DD is one of
four recognized homotypic interaction motifs that form the "molecular
glue" holding together components of the apoptotic machinery. The DD,
caspase activation and recruitment domain (CARD), death effector
domain, and PYRIN motifs are variants of a common death fold composed
of six
-helical bundles with Greek key topology (3-5). Upon
ligation of TNFR1, a multicomponent signaling complex is assembled
through a series of homotypic interactions (1). The DD-containing
adapter molecule TRADD (TNF
receptor-associated death
domain protein) is recruited to TNFR1, followed by the
DD-containing Ser/Thr kinase RIP. RIP-deficient cells from knockout
mice and a human mutant Jurkat cell line fail to activate NF-
B in
response to TNF, indicating that RIP is required for TNFR1-induced
NF-
B activation (6, 7). Indeed, overexpression of RIP in cell lines
increases NF-
B activation (6, 8). RIP kinase autophosphorylates itself at Ser/Thr residues, although the precise residues that are
phosphorylated have not been identified. Surprisingly, the kinase
domain is not required for activation of NF-
B. The crucial NF-
B-activating domain resides between the kinase and death domains and is termed the intermediate domain (6, 8). However, the RIP kinase
domain is reported to be essential for caspase-independent cell death
triggered by FasL (9).
B pathway is strictly regulated, as persistent activation is
associated with chronic inflammatory syndromes and the development of
certain malignancies such as mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue
lymphoma (10). Factors that limit NF-
B activation are only beginning
to be understood. One such factor is the TNF-inducible zinc finger
protein A20 (11). Mice lacking A20 display constitutive NF-
B
activation in lymphoid organs, leading to fatal systemic inflammation
(12).
B activation (22). Here, we report the
identification of a new homotypic interaction motif required for the
association of RIP3 with RIP. Furthermore, we found that the kinase
activity of RIP3 is important for inhibition of NF-
B activation.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B-luc reporter. CrmA was included in all transfections at a 1:1 molar ratio to suppress cell death caused by RIP and RIP3. Luciferase assays were
performed using the dual-luciferase assay system (Promega).
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Defining the RHIM required for RIP-RIP3
association. A: left, schematic
representation of the different Myc-tagged RIP truncations. The
red boxes represent the conserved core segment within RHIM.
Right, coexpression of FLAG-tagged RIP3 with different
Myc-tagged RIP truncations in HEK293E cells. Following transfection,
cells were lysed, immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-FLAG M2
beads, and immunoblotted with anti-Myc antibody (Ab). 10%
of the input cell lysate was analyzed by immunoblotting as indicated in
the lower two panels. The expression of RIP3 appeared as a
doublet, which is likely due to autophosphorylation of RIP3.
B: left, schematic representation of the
different FLAG-tagged RIP3 truncations. The red boxes
indicate the conserved core of RHIM in RIP3. Right,
coexpression of FLAG-tagged RIP3 truncations with wild-type Myc-RIP in
HEK293E cells. Samples were analyzed as described for A. C: left, schematic representation of alanine
cluster mutations in RIP3 (upper) and RIP
(lower). Right, immunoprecipitation of alanine
cluster mutant versions of RIP3 (upper two panels) and RIP
(lower two panels), followed by immunoblotting to detect
binding to cotransfected wild-type (WT) RIP or RIP3.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Mapping of the minimal binding region within
RIP and RIP3. A, schematic representation of the
different GST-RIP3 and GST-RIP constructs and corresponding binding
activities with cotransfected partners. B, coexpression of
Myc-RIP and the indicated GST-RIP3 truncations, followed by
immunoprecipitation (IP) with
GST-glutathione-Sepharose and immunoblotting with anti-Myc
monoclonal antibody. C, coexpression of FLAG-RIP3 and the
indicated GST-RIP truncations, followed by immunoprecipitation with GST
beads and immunoblotting with anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody.
D, coexpression of FLAG-RIP3-(411-474)
(f-RIP3(411-474)) with either GST-RIP-(501-588) or control
GST-E10, followed by immunoprecipitation with GST beads and
immunoblotting with anti-GST and anti-FLAG antibodies. Input cell
lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting as indicated in the left
two panels. E, recombinant RIP and RIP3 coelute as a
complex upon gel filtration chromatography. GST-RIP3-(388-518) and
GST-RIP-(496-583) were coexpressed in E. coli, bound to
glutathione-Sepharose, eluted with reduced glutathione, cleaved with
thrombin, and resolved by size-exclusion chromatography. Column
fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue
staining.
-hairpin structures with turns centered around NSTG (residues
534-537) of RIP and NCSG (residues 454-457) of RIP3. These
predictions were supported by "threading" analysis (data not shown).

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
RIP3 is recruited to the TNFR1 complex, and
RIP3 phosphorylates RIP. A, cellular
localization of RIP3. COS-7 cells were transfected with green
fluorescent protein (GFP)- and FLAG-tagged RIP3 and
visualized by confocal microscopy (upper right panel). The
same cells were co-stained for endogenous RIP using anti-RIP monoclonal
antibody (Pharmingen). RIP staining (red) was revealed by a
Cy3-conjugated secondary antibody (Molecular Probes, Inc.) (upper
left panel). The lower panel shows merged images.
B, recruitment of RIP to the TNFR1 complex in a
TNF-dependent manner. U937 cells were treated with TNF (100 ng/ml) for 15 min (lanes 3 and 4) or left
untreated (lanes 1 and 2). Cell lysates from
108 cells were immunoprecipitated (IP) with
anti-TNFR1 monoclonal antibody (lanes 2 and 4) or
with mouse control IgG (lanes 1 and 3).
Coprecipitating RIP was detected by immunoblot analysis. C,
RIP3 recruitment to the TNFR1 signaling complex. The TNFR1 signaling
complex was immunoprecipitated from 109 U937 cells and
subjected to an in vitro kinase assay using
[
-32P]ATP. The TNFR1 complex was then dissociated with 1% SDS, diluted 10-fold, and re-immunoprecipitated
with monoclonal antibody against RIP or RIP3 or with control IgG
(lanes 5-7). Following separation by SDS-PAGE,
immunoprecipitated proteins were visualized by autoradiography.
D, schematic representation of the various RIP3 constructs
and kinase-dead RIP(K45A) (K-A). E,
RIP(K45A) was coexpressed with the indicated RIP3 expression
constructs, and immunoprecipitated RIP and RIP3 were subjected to an
in vitro kinase assay using [
-32P]ATP and
visualized by autoradiography (upper panel). Equivalent
amounts of protein were present in the kinase assays as evidenced by
immunoblotting (lower panel). Abs, antibodies;
WT, wild-type; Mut, mutant; Con,
alanine cluster control.
B Activation through RIP
Phosphorylation--
We have previously shown that RIP3 attenuates
RIP- and TNFR1-mediated NF-
B activation (22). To determine whether
the kinase and homotypic interaction motifs of RIP3 are required to
attenuate RIP-mediated NF-
B activation, HEK293E cells expressing
TNFR1 and RIP, but not RIP3 (data not shown), were transfected with wild-type and mutant RIP3, and NF-
B activation was assessed
following TNF treatment. Cells expressing wild-type RIP3 showed
markedly reduced NF-
B activity upon TNF treatment. Mutant RIP3
containing a disrupted RHIM did not inhibit NF-
B activation (Fig.
4B), indicating that the
ability of RIP3 to inhibit TNF-induced NF-
B activation is dependent
on its homotypic interaction with RIP. To confirm this finding, we used
a RIP-deficient Jurkat cell line in which TNF-induced NF-
B activity
is rescued by RIP (6). Wild-type and mutant RIPs with a disrupted RHIM
were able to stimulate NF-
B activation equally well in these cells.
However, although the ability of wild-type RIP to stimulate NF-
B
activation was attenuated by RIP3, NF-
B activation by a RIP mutant
with a disrupted RHIM was not inhibited by RIP3. Disruption of the RHIM
in RIP3 also prevented inhibition of RIP-mediated NF-
B activation
(Fig. 4C). Therefore, an intact RHIM in both molecules is
required for RIP3 to inhibit RIP-mediated NF-
B activation. Like the
RIP3 RHIM mutant, a kinase-dead RIP3 mutant did not inhibit NF-
B
activation by RIP (Fig. 4D). This result suggests that
phosphorylation of RIP by RIP3 inhibits its ability to activate
NF-
B. The kinetics of attenuation of TNF-induced NF-
B activation
by RIP3 were analyzed over a 24-h period (Fig. 4E).
In the presence of transfected wild-type RIP3, NF-
B activation in
response to TNF was rapidly extinguished; however, RHIM-deficient
mutant RIP3 did not influence NF-
B activation (Fig. 4E).
We propose that when cells are exposed to TNF, RIP is recruited to the
TNFR1 signaling complex to activate NF-
B. Subsequent recruitment of
RIP3 through a RHIM-mediated interaction leads to phosphorylation of
RIP by RIP3, and this inhibits the ability of RIP to further engage the
NF-
B pathway. Such a desensitization mechanism would limit
persistent activation of the NF-
B pathway.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
The kinase domain and RHIM of RIP3 are
required to inhibit TNF-induced NF-
B
activation. A, schematic representation of the various
RIP3 and RIP constructs. B, RIP3 inhibits TNF-induced
NF-
B activation. The indicated RIP3 expression constructs together
with a NF-
B luciferase reporter plasmid were transfected into
HEK293E cells. Following transfection, cells were exposed to TNF (20 ng/ml) for 8 h. Cell lysates were prepared, and a luciferase assay
was carried out using the Promega dual-luciferase assay kit.
C, RIP3 functions through RIP to inhibit NF-
B activity.
RIP-deficient Jurkat cells were transfected with control vector
(Vec), wild-type (WT) RIP, or mutant
(Mut) RIP (alanine cluster disruption of RHIM) in the
presence of vector, wild-type RIP3, or mutant RIP3 (disrupted RHIM).
Luciferase activity was measured to assess NF-
B activation.
D, RIP3 kinase activity is required for inhibition of
NF-
B activation. Native Jurkat cells were transfected with the
indicated RIP3 constructs, and a luciferase assay was performed as
described for B. E, RIP3 rapidly inhibits NF-
B
activation. The indicated RIP3 expression constructs together with a
NF-
B luciferase reporter plasmid were transfected into HEK293E
cells. 24 h after transfection, cells were exposed to TNF (20 ng/ml) for the indicated time periods. Cell lysates were prepared, and
a luciferase assay was performed as described for B. All
graphs are averages of at least three independent experiments.
K-A, K45A; Con, alanine cluster control.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Theresa Shek and Jin Kim for antibody production; Wenlu Li and Gilbert-Andre Keller for microscopy; and the Genentech sequencing core, Andreas Strasser, and members of the Dixit laboratory for discussion, advice, and reagents.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular Oncology, Genentech, Inc., M/S40, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080. Tel.: 650-225-1312; Fax: 650-225-6127; E-mail: dixit@gene.com.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 4, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M109488200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
TNFR1, tumor
necrosis factor receptor-1;
TNF, tumor necrosis factor;
NF-
B, nuclear factor
B;
DD, death domain;
CARD, caspase activation and
recruitment domain;
RIP, receptor-interacting protein;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
RHIM, RIP homotypic interaction motif.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Ashkenazi, A.,
and Dixit, V. M.
(1998)
Science
281,
1305-1308 |
| 2. | Baeuerle, P. A. (1998) Cell 95, 729-731[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Weber, C. H., and Vincenz, C. (2001) Trends Biochem. Sci. 26, 475-481[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. |
Fairbrother, W. J.,
Gordon, N. C.,
Humke, E. W.,
O'Rourke, K. M.,
Starovasnik, M. A.,
Yin, J.,
and Dixit, V. M.
(2001)
Protein Sci.
10,
1911-1918 |
| 5. | Martinon, F., Hofmann, K., and Tschopp, J. (2001) Curr. Biol. 11, R118-R120[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Ting, A. T., Pimentel-Muinos, F. X., and Seed, B. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 6189-6196[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Kelliher, M. A., Grimm, S., Ishida, Y., Kuo, F., Stanger, B. Z., and Leder, P. (1998) Immunity 8, 297-303[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Hsu, H., Huang, J., Shu, H. B., Baichwal, V., and Goeddel, D. V. (1996) Immunity 4, 387-396[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Holler, N., Zaru, R., Micheau, O., Thome, M., Attinger, A., Valitutti, S., Bodmer, J. L., Schneider, P., Seed, B., and Tschopp, J. (2000) Nat. Immunol. 1, 489-495[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Rayet, B., and Gelinas, C. (1999) Oncogene 18, 6938-6947[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. |
Opipari, A. W., Jr.,
Boguski, M. S.,
and Dixit, V. M.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
14705-14708 |
| 12. |
Lee, E. G.,
Boone, D. L.,
Chai, S.,
Libby, S. L.,
Chien, M.,
Lodolce, J. P.,
and Ma, A.
(2000)
Science
289,
2350-2354 |
| 13. | Dixit, V. M. (1999) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 64, 359-362[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. | Stanger, B. Z., Leder, P., Lee, T. H., Kim, E., and Seed, B. (1995) Cell 81, 513-523[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Thome, M., Hofmann, K., Burns, K., Martinon, F., Bodmer, J. L., Mattmann, C., and Tschopp, J. (1998) Curr. Biol. 8, 885-888[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
McCarthy, J. V., Ni, J.,
and Dixit, V. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
16968-16975 |
| 17. |
Navas, T. A.,
Baldwin, D. T.,
and Stewart, T. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
33684-33690 |
| 18. | Humke, E. W., Shriver, S. K., Starovasnik, M. A., Fairbrother, W. J., and Dixit, V. M. (2000) Cell 103, 99-111[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. | Kasof, G. M., Prosser, J. C., Liu, D., Lorenzi, M. V., and Gomes, B. C. (2000) FEBS Lett. 473, 285-291[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Pazdernik, N. J.,
Donner, D. B.,
Goebl, M. G.,
and Harrington, M. A.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
6500-6508 |
| 21. | Yu, P. W., Huang, B. C., Shen, M., Quast, J., Chan, E., Xu, X., Nolan, G. P., Payan, D. G., and Luo, Y. (1999) Curr. Biol. 9, 539-542[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. |
Sun, X.,
Lee, J.,
Navas, T.,
Baldwin, D. T.,
Stewart, T. A.,
and Dixit, V. M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
16871-16875 |
| 23. | King, R. D., and Sternberg, M. J. (1996) Protein Sci. 5, 2298-2310[Abstract] |
| 24. | Rost, B., and Sander, C. (1994) Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 19, 55-72[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Yan, M.,
Lee, J.,
Schilbach, S.,
Goddard, A.,
and Dixit, V.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
10287-10292 |
| 26. | Zhang, S. Q., Kovalenko, A., Cantarella, G., and Wallach, D. (2000) Immunity 12, 301-311[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. W. Upton, W. J. Kaiser, and E. S. Mocarski Cytomegalovirus M45 Cell Death Suppression Requires Receptor-interacting Protein (RIP) Homotypic Interaction Motif (RHIM)-dependent Interaction with RIP1 J. Biol. Chem., June 20, 2008; 283(25): 16966 - 16970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Meurette, A. Rebillard, L. Huc, G. Le Moigne, D. Merino, O. Micheau, D. Lagadic-Gossmann, and M.-T. Dimanche-Boitrel TRAIL Induces Receptor-Interacting Protein 1-Dependent and Caspase-Dependent Necrosis-Like Cell Death under Acidic Extracellular Conditions Cancer Res., January 1, 2007; 67(1): 218 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Kaiser and M. K. Offermann Apoptosis Induced by the Toll-Like Receptor Adaptor TRIF Is Dependent on Its Receptor Interacting Protein Homotypic Interaction Motif J. Immunol., April 15, 2005; 174(8): 4942 - 4952. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yang, J. Ma, Y. Chen, and M. Wu Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling of Receptor-interacting Protein 3 (RIP3): IDENTIFICATION OF NOVEL NUCLEAR EXPORT AND IMPORT SIGNALS IN RIP3 J. Biol. Chem., September 10, 2004; 279(37): 38820 - 38829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Newton, X. Sun, and V. M. Dixit Kinase RIP3 Is Dispensable for Normal NF-{kappa}Bs, Signaling by the B-Cell and T-Cell Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1, and Toll-Like Receptors 2 and 4 Mol. Cell. Biol., February 15, 2004; 24(4): 1464 - 1469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Cariappa, L. Chen, K. Haider, M. Tang, E. Nebelitskiy, S. T. Moran, and S. Pillai A Catalytically Inactive Form of Protein Kinase C-Associated Kinase/Receptor Interacting Protein 4, a Protein Kinase C{beta}-Associated Kinase That Mediates NF-{kappa}B Activation, Interferes with Early B Cell Development J. Immunol., August 15, 2003; 171(4): 1875 - 1880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Harper, M. Hughes, M. MacFarlane, and G. M. Cohen Fas-associated Death Domain Protein and Caspase-8 Are Not Recruited to the Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 1 Signaling Complex during Tumor Necrosis Factor-induced Apoptosis J. Biol. Chem., July 3, 2003; 278(28): 25534 - 25541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Moran, K. Haider, Y. Ow, P. Milton, L. Chen, and S. Pillai Protein Kinase C-associated Kinase Can Activate NF{kappa}B in Both a Kinase-dependent and a Kinase-independent Manner J. Biol. Chem., June 6, 2003; 278(24): 21526 - 21533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |