|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M111880200 on January 8, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 12, 10379-10386, March 22, 2002
Long Term Regulation of Aquaporin-2 Expression in
Vasopressin-responsive Renal Collecting Duct Principal Cells*
Udo
Hasler ,
David
Mordasini ,
Marcelle
Bens§,
Matthieu
Bianchi ,
Françoise
Cluzeaud§,
Martine
Rousselot ,
Alain
Vandewalle§¶,
Eric
Féraille , and
Pierre-Yves
Martin
From the Division of Nephrology, Fondation pour
Recherches Médicales, 64 Avenue de la Roseraie, CH-1211,
Genève 4, Switzerland and § INSERM U478,
Faculté de Médecine Xavier Bichat, Institut
Fédératif de Recherche 02, BP416, F-75870
Paris Cedex 18, France
Received for publication, December 13, 2001, and in revised form, January 7, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Fine regulation of water reabsorption by the
antidiuretic hormone [8-arginine]vasopressin (AVP) occurs in
principal cells of the collecting duct and is largely dependent on
regulation of the aquaporin-2 (AQP2) water channel. AVP-inducible long
term AQP2 expression was investigated in immortalized mouse cortical collecting duct principal cells. Combined RNase protection assay, Western blot, and immunofluorescence analyses revealed that
physiological concentrations of AVP added to the basal side, but not to
the apical side, of cells grown on filters induced both AQP2 mRNA and apical protein expression. The stimulatory effect of AVP on AQP2
expression followed a V2
receptor-dependent pathway because [deamino-8-D-arginine]vasopressin (dDAVP), a specific
V2 receptor agonist, produced the same effect as AVP,
whereas the V2 antagonist SR121463B antagonized action of
both AVP and dDAVP. Moreover, forskolin and cyclic 8-bromo-AMP fully
reproduced the effects of AVP on AQP2 expression. Analysis of protein
degradation pathways showed that inhibition of proteasomal activity
prevented synthesis of AVP-inducible AQP2 mRNA and protein. Once
synthesized, AQP2 protein was quickly degraded, a process that involves
both the proteasomal and lysosomal pathways. This is the first study
that delineates induction and degradation mechanisms of AQP2
endogenously expressed by a renal collecting duct principal cell line.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Kidneys are the major determinant of body water and electrolyte
composition. Water reabsorption across the membranes of renal epithelial cells occurs through a complex process. Approximately 70 and
15% of the glomerular filtrate is reabsorbed in the proximal tubule
and thin descending limb of Henle's loop, respectively. In contrast,
the ascending limb of Henle's loop and the distal convoluted tubule
are impermeable to water. These segments empty into the collecting duct
(CD),1 the chief site where
tight regulation of water reabsorption occurs. In this segment, and in
the connecting tubule of some species as well (1, 2), the excretion of
electrolyte-free water is adjusted by principal cells under the control
of the antidiuretic hormone [8-arginine]vasopressin (AVP)
(3).
Water movement across renal epithelial cells is facilitated
by the presence of water channels of the aquaporin (AQP) protein family. Aquaporins exhibit a conserved homotetrameric organization, and
the expression of different members of the aquaporin family is
tissue-specific. AQP1 accounts for the transcellular selective water
permeability of the proximal tubule and thin descending limb of
Henle's loop (4, 5) and is constitutively expressed in the apical and
basolateral membrane domains of both of these segments (6). Three
aquaporins (AQP2, AQP3, and AQP4) are expressed in collecting duct
principal cells where AVP regulates water reabsorption across the
principal cell epithelium. AQP2 is located in subapical intracellular
vesicles and in the apical plasma membrane (7, 8), whereas AQP3 and
AQP4 are both located in the basolateral membrane (9, 10). Of all
aquaporins, AQP2 is the principal target of AVP. Acute increases in
plasma AVP concentration leads to translocation of AQP2 from
intracellular storage vesicles to the apical plasma membrane and
results in increased CD water permeability (11). Sustained increases in
plasma AVP levels raise expression levels of both AQP2 and AQP3
allowing maximal water permeability across renal CD (12). AVP exerts
its effect by binding to V2 receptors located in the
basolateral membrane of CD principal cells and inner medullary
collecting duct cells, resulting in activation of the
Gs /adenylyl cyclase system (13), increased intracellular
cAMP concentration, and cAMP-dependent protein kinase activation. Mutations in either AQP2 or the V2 receptor are
responsible for reduced expression levels of AQP2 of inherited forms of
nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (14, 15).
Several studies have documented the long term control of AQP2
expression by AVP (16, 17, 20, 34). Prolonged infusion with AVP has
been shown to increase the water permeability of renal CD in
AVP-deficient Brattleboro rats, an effect that correlates well with
increased levels of AQP2 mRNA and protein (16). Similarly, normal
rats infused with AVP develop hyponatremia and exhibit increased AQP2
expression levels (17). AQP2 expression can also be increased under
particular circumstances such as cardiac failure (18, 19), liver
cirrhosis (20), and pregnancy (21) where a hyponatremic state is
associated with non-osmotic AVP release. These findings together with
the identification of cAMP-responsive elements in the 5'-flanking
region of the AQP2 gene (22) suggest that AVP
increases the transcription rate of the AQP2 gene.
Cultured kidney epithelial cells transfected with AQP2 cDNA have
proven to be a valuable tool for the study of short term action of AVP
on AQP2 expression (23, 24). However, they cannot be used for long term
regulation studies that require intact cis- and trans-acting DNA
domains. Attempts to characterize long term AQP2 expression in primary
cultures of kidney epithelial cells have been hampered by the rapid
down-regulation of endogenously expressed AQP2 (25), possibly because
of the presence of negatively acting cis-elements present in the
AQP2 gene (26). We have established previously a novel
immortalized clonal collecting duct cell line, mpkCCDcl4,
which was derived from microdissected cortical collecting ducts of an
SVPK/Tag transgenic mouse (27). These mpkCCDcl4 cells
exhibit many major functional properties of CD principal cells
including electrogenic Na+ transport stimulated by
aldosterone and AVP (27, 28). The high differentiation state of these
cells, which develop into tight epithelium, has been exploited for
analysis of regulated Na+ transport mediated by the apical
amiloride-sensitive Na+ channel (27, 29, 30) and
basolateral Na+-K+-ATPase (31, 32) and has
allowed identification of a panel of genes that are stimulated or
repressed by aldosterone and vasopressin (33).
In this study, we show that mpkCCDcl4 cells grown on
permeable filters maintain AVP-inducible AQP2 expression and can be
used as a cellular model to analyze the mechanisms that govern the long
term effect of AVP on AQP2 expression. These cells produce large
amounts of both AQP2 mRNA and protein in response to physiological concentrations of AVP. Synthesis of AQP2 mRNA was found to be dependent on the proteolytic activity of the proteasome. In addition, newly synthesized AQP2 protein was found to have a short half-life, and
both proteasomal and lysosomal proteolytic pathways were found to
participate in its degradation.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture--
Mouse mpkCCDC14 cells grown in
modified DM medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's F-12,
1:1 v/v; 60 nM sodium selenate; 5 µg/ml transferrin; 2 mM glutamine; 50 nM dexamethasone; 1 nM triiodothyronine; 10 ng/ml epidermal growth factor; 5 µg/ml insulin; 20 mM D-glucose; 2% fetal
calf serum; and 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4) (27) were used. All
experiments were performed on confluent cells seeded on permeable
filters (Transwell®,0.4-µm pore size, 1-cm2 growth area,
Corning Costar, Cambridge, MA). Cells were grown in DM medium until
confluent (day 6 after seeding) and then in DM containing no epidermal
growth factor, hormones, or fetal calf serum for an additional 24 h before use. The medium was changed every 2 days, and all experiments
were performed between the 20th and 35th passages.
Protein Extraction--
Strips of rat kidney cortex were excised
and frozen in liquid nitrogen, ground to powder, and homogenized in 500 µl of ice-cold lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl; 2 mM EGTA; 2 mM EDTA; 30 mM NaF; 30 mM Na4O7P2; 2 mM Na3VO4; 1 mM
4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulfonyl fluoride; 10 µg/ml leupeptin; 4 µg/ml aprotinin; 1% Triton X-100; pH 7.4). After incubation in the
absence or presence of AVP and/or drugs, confluent cultured
mpkCCDC14 cells grown on filters or flasks were rinsed
twice with phosphate-buffered saline and then homogenized in 150 µl
of ice-cold lysis buffer (see above). Protein concentrations were
measured by the BCA protein assay (Pierce).
Western Blot Analysis--
Equal amounts of protein samples were
separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride
membranes (Immobilon-P, Millipore, Bedford, MA). Membranes were blocked
by incubation with Tris-buffered saline (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl) containing 0.2% (v/v) Nonidet P-40 and 5% (w/v)
nonfat dry milk for 30 min at room temperature. Membranes were probed
overnight at 4 °C with a polyclonal rabbit anti-rat AQP2 antibody
(1:20,000) (18) and then with secondary horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:20,000) (Transduction
Laboratories, Lexington, KY) for 1 h at room temperature. The
membranes were washed three times with Tris-buffered saline containing
0.2% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, and the antigen-antibody complexes were
detected by the Super Signal Substrate method (Pierce).
Identified protein bands were quantified using a video densitometer
and ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
Immunofluorescence Studies--
Confluent mpkCCDC14
cells grown on filters were incubated in a serum- and hormone-deprived
medium supplemented or not with 10 8 M AVP for
24 h. Cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at
room temperature, permeabilized with 0.25% tergitol (Nonidet P-40) for
10 min, and then rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline. Filters were
detached from the holders and incubated with the rabbit polyclonal
anti-rat AQP2 antibody (dilution 1:50) for 1 h at room
temperature. After three rinses with phosphate-buffered saline,
specimens were incubated with a CY3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG
antibody (dilution 1:100) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories Inc.,
West Grove, PA) for 30 min at room temperature. Nuclei were counterstained with Sytox (dilution 1:500) (Molecular Probes, Eugene,
OR). Specimen examined by confocal laser scanning microscopy (Leica,
Wetzlar, Germany) were viewed in the x-y and x-z planes, and the images
were photographed.
RNase Protection Assay--
Mouse genomic DNA was extracted from
mpkCCDC14 cells using the DNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen,
Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. A mouse
AQP2 cDNA (NCBI accession number NM_009699) fragment coding
for the 81-279-nucleotide sequence was PCR-amplified using sense and
antisense primers containing EcoRI and XbaI
restriction sites, respectively, and cloned into pCIneo (Promega,
Madison, WI). Computer-assisted alignment sequence analyses confirmed
the specificity of the cDNA fragment used. The sequence of the
PCR-amplified fragment was checked by sequencing. The plasmid was then
linearized with NheI restriction enzyme, and 1 µg was used
to produce antisense AQP2 transcripts (riboprobes) using T3 RNA
polymerase in the presence of 50 µCi of [ -32P]UTP
(Amersham Biosciences). A linearized pTRI RNA 18 S plasmid (Ambion,
Austin, TX) was used to produce an 18 S rRNA antisense probe, used as
an internal standard, which was transcribed with T7 RNA polymerase in
the presence of 5 µCi of [ -32P]UTP to avoid signal
saturation due to the greater abundance of 18 S rRNA as compared with
AQP2 rRNA. Total RNA was extracted from cultured cells using the RNeasy
Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's
instructions. Four µg of riboprobe and 21 µg of yeast tRNA
were used for hybridization with 2 × 105 cpm AQP2
probe and 5 × 104 cpm 18 S rRNA probe. Yeast tRNA
(25 µg) was used as a negative control. Hybridization was performed
for 60 min at 70 °C followed by RNase A/T1 mixture digestion
(Ambion, Austin, TX) for 30 min at 37 °C. The reaction was
terminated by the addition of SDS and proteinase K. RNA duplexes were
extracted with phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol and precipitated with
ammonium acetate/ethanol. Samples were then denatured in gel loading
buffer at 95 °C for 5 min, run together with non-digested riboprobes
on a 6% polyacrylamide sequencing gel, and autoradiographed.
Identified fragments were quantified using a video densitometer and
ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
 |
RESULTS |
Endogenous AQP2 Expression of Untreated and AVP-treated Mouse
Collecting Duct Principal Cells--
The expression of AQP2 mRNA
was analyzed by RNase protection assay (RPA) in confluent
mpkCCDC14 cells. Cells grown on filters were incubated
9 h without or with 10 9 M AVP and in the
absence or presence of 2·10 6 M actinomycin
D. All agents were added to the basal medium. Protected fragments of
expected size for the 18 S rRNA probe were visible in each tested
condition at similar intensities (Fig.
1A, bottom panel) confirming
that equal amounts of RNA were loaded to each lane. In untreated cells,
a signal corresponding to protected fragments of the AQP2 mRNA
probe could be detected but only after very long exposure times,
indicating very low basal AQP2 mRNA expression levels (Fig.
1A, lane 1, top panel). The presence of AQP2 mRNA in
untreated cells was nevertheless confirmed by reverse transcription-PCR
analyses using specific primers for AQP2 (data not shown). Importantly,
cells incubated 9 h in the presence of 10 9
M AVP exhibited dramatically increased expression levels of
AQP2 mRNA (Fig. 1A, lane 2, top panel).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Vasopressin stimulates the expression of AQP2
mRNA and protein in mouse mpkCCDC14 cells.
Confluent mpkCCDC14 cells grown on filters were incubated
in the absence (lanes 1 and 3) or presence
(lanes 2 and 4) of 10 9
M AVP and/or 2·10 6 M
actinomycin D (lanes 3 and 4) added to the basal
medium for 9 h at 37 °C prior to RNA and protein extraction as
described under "Experimental Procedures." A, RPA was
performed with riboprobes for AQP2 mRNA (top panel) and
for 18 S rRNA (bottom panel) on 4 µg of total RNA.
B, total protein extracts from rat renal cortex (rat, 50 µg) and mpkCCDC14 cells (40 µg) obtained from the same
batch of cells used for RPA analysis were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE,
and AQP2 was detected by Western blot using a polyclonal anti-AQP2
antibody. Fully glycosylated (fg), core-glycosylated
(cg), and non-glycosylated (ng) AQP2 protein
bands were revealed in rat renal cortex and in AVP-treated
mpkCCDC14 cells. Occasionally, a 34- and a 48-kDa band were
observed in mpkCCDC14 protein extracts of both AVP-treated
and untreated cells. These additional bands, which were not detected in
rat kidney protein extract and whose intensity was not altered by the
absence or presence of AVP, most likely represent nonspecific signals.
One of two similar experiments is shown.
|
|
Western blot analysis of rat kidney protein extract using a polyclonal
anti-AQP2 antibody produced a narrow 28-kDa band and a more diffuse
band of about 35 kDa that represented the non-glycosylated and
glycosylated forms of AQP2, respectively (21) (Fig. 1B). An
additional faint band of about 31 kDa that was endoglycosidase H-sensitive (data not shown) was also apparent and corresponds to
core-glycosylated AQP2. As illustrated in Fig. 1, Western blot analysis
of protein extracts obtained from the same batch of
mpkCCDC14 cells used for RPA analysis revealed a
coordinated expression between AQP2 mRNA and protein. Indeed,
either no or, at best, only very faint bands of AQP2 protein were
detected in protein extracts of unstimulated cells (Fig. 1B, lane
1) indicating low basal expression levels of AQP2 protein. In
sharp contrast, a strong AQP2 protein signal was observed when the
basal medium was provided 9 h with 10 9 M
AVP (Fig. 1B, lane 2). Furthermore, like AQP2 mRNA, the
amount of AQP2 protein was greatly reduced when cells were
simultaneously incubated 9 h with both 10 9
M AVP and 2·10 6 M actinomycin D
(Fig. 1, A and B, lane 4). These results indicate that in mpkCCDC14 cells, AVP stimulates constitutive AQP2
protein expression that is dependent on AQP2 gene transcription.
As analyzed by Western blotting, AVP added to the basal medium of
mpkCCDC14 cells stimulated AQP2 expression in a
dose-dependent manner (Fig.
2, A and B). An
increase in AQP2 protein expression was clearly detected in the
presence of 10 10 M AVP, and AQP2 protein
expression sharply increased when greater concentrations of AVP were
added to the cell medium. Half-maximal and maximal induction were
achieved at 10 10 and 10 9 M AVP,
respectively. AVP-induced AQP2 expression was also found to be
time-dependent (Fig. 2, C and D).
AQP2 protein was first detected 3 h after addition of
10 9 M AVP to the basal medium and gradually
increased thereafter. For incubation times exceeding 24 h, the
amount of AQP2 protein continued to increase, and by 72 h AQP2
protein expression was 2-fold greater than that observed after 24 h of AVP treatment (data not shown).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Vasopressin induces a concentration- and
time-dependent increase of AQP2 expression in
mpkCCDC14 cells. A, confluent
mpkCCDC14 cells grown on filters were incubated 24 h
at 37 °C in the absence or presence of various concentrations of AVP
added to the basal medium. Total protein extracts (40 µg) were
separated by 10% SDS-PAGE, and AQP2 was detected by Western blot using
a polyclonal anti-AQP2 antibody. A representative immunoblot is shown.
B, densitometric quantification of AQP2 protein, expressed
as the ratio of optical density values measured for each experimental
condition and the optical density measured at 10 9
M AVP (at which point the maximal effect was reached).
Values are means ± S.E. from four independent experiments as
represented in A. C, mpkCCDC14 cells
were incubated in the presence of 10 9 M AVP
for various times at 37 °C, and AQP2 protein was analyzed as
described above (A). A representative immunoblot is shown.
D, densitometric quantification of AQP2 protein expressed as
the ratio of optical density values measured for each experimental
condition and the optical density measured at 24 h AVP treatment.
Values are means ± S.E. from four independent experiments as
represented in C.
|
|
In agreement with Western blot results (Fig. 1B),
immunofluorescence analysis of untreated confluent
mpkCCDC14 cells grown on filters revealed almost no
fluorescent signal (Fig. 3A, panel A), whereas cells incubated 24 h with 10 8
M AVP added to the basal medium exhibited intense AQP2
immunostaining (Fig. 3A, panel B). Confocal laser scanning
microscopy analysis of x-z planes revealed that most AQP2
immunostaining was detected at the apical pole of AVP-treated cells,
whereas the basolateral pole remained unstained (Fig. 3A, panel
D).

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
The AVP-induced apical expression of
AQP2 protein is mediated by basolateral V2 receptors in
mpkCCDC14 cells. A, confluent
mpkCCDC14 cells grown on filters were incubated 24 h
at 37 °C without ( AVP) or with (+AVP)
10 8 M AVP and processed for indirect
immunofluorescence using a polyclonal anti-AQP2 antibody (in
red) and nuclear staining using Sytox (in green)
as described under "Experimental Procedures." Upper
panels, untreated cells viewed in the x-y plane exhibited a faint
cytoplasmic AQP2 staining ( AVP, panel A),
whereas most cells treated with AVP (+AVP, panel B)
exhibited a more diffuse cytoplasmic and, in some cases, a punctated
apical membrane staining. Lower panels, images viewed in the
x-z plane revealed very little AQP2 staining in untreated cells
( AVP, panel C), whereas intense AQP2 staining
was observed in the apical pole of AVP-treated cells (+AVP,
panel D). ap, apical; ba, basal.
B-D, Western blotting was performed using a polyclonal
anti-AQP2 antibody on protein extracts (40 µg) from
mpkCCDC14 cells incubated in the absence or presence of AVP
and/or drugs. B, no specific AQP2 signal was detected when
cultured mpkCCDC14 cells were incubated 24 h at
37 °C in the absence of AVP (lane 1) or when
10 9 M AVP was added to the apical medium of
cells grown on filters (lane 2) or on a solid plastic
support (lane 4). In contrast, bands specific for AQP2
protein were detected when cells were incubated 24 h with
10 9 M AVP added to the basal medium of cells
grown on filters (lane 3). One of three similar experiments
is shown. C, mpkCCDC14 cells were incubated
24 h at 37 °C either without hormones and drugs (lane
1) or with 10 9 M AVP alone (lane
2), 10 9 M dDAVP alone (lane
4), or in the presence of both 10 9 M AVP
and 10 8 M SR121463B (lane 3),
10 9 M dDAVP and 10 8
M SR121463B (lane 5), or 10 8
M SR121463B alone (lane 6). One of three
experiments is shown. D, mpkCCDC14 cells were
incubated 24 h at 37 °C either without hormones and drugs
(lane 1) or with 5·10 6 M
forskolin (lane 2), 10 3 M
8-bromo-cyclic AMP (8Br-cAMP) (lane 3), or
10 9 M AVP (lane 4). One of three
similar experiments is shown.
|
|
The observations made by confocal laser scanning microscopy suggest
that the predominant apical localization of the AQP2 protein is
conserved in mpkCCDC14 cells. We next determined whether
these cells also retain a polarized expression of AVP receptors.
Although a strong AQP2 protein signal was detected by Western blotting when 10 9 M AVP was applied for 24 h to
the basal medium (Fig. 3B, lane 3), no specific bands
corresponding to AQP2 were detected when cells were grown in the
absence of AVP (lane 1), when AVP was added to the apical
medium for 24 h (lane 2), or when cells were grown to
confluency on a solid plastic support in the presence of
10 9 M AVP for the same period (lane
4). These results indicate that AVP receptors are predominantly
located in the basolateral membrane of mpkCCDC14 cells.
In kidney collecting duct cells, AVP controls water permeability and
AQP2 expression levels by binding to V2 receptors (34), which causes an increase in cellular cAMP content (35). We next determined whether AVP-induced AQP2 expression observed in
mpkCCDC14 cells relies on AVP binding to basolateral
V2 receptors. The strong AQP2 signal induced by incubating
cells 9 h with 10 9 M basal AVP was
attenuated in the presence of 10 8 M SR121463B
(a generous gift of Dr. C. Serradeil-Le Gal, Sanofi Research, Toulouse,
France), a non-peptidic, competitive, and specific V2
receptor antagonist (36) (Fig. 3C, lanes 2 and
3). On the other hand, basal addition of 10 9
M [1-desamino-8-D-arginine]vasopressin
(dDAVP), a preferential V2 receptor agonist, increased AQP2
cellular content as efficiently as 10 9 M AVP
(Fig. 3C, lane 4). Similar to AVP-induced AQP2 expression, AQP2 expression induced by dDAVP was attenuated by simultaneous basal
addition of SR121463B (lane 5). To establish further the involvement of V2 receptors in AVP-induced AQP2 expression,
we assessed whether cAMP was able to mimic the AVP- or
dDAVP-dependent increase of cellular AQP2 protein content
by incubating cells 24 h with 5·10 6 M
forskolin or with 10 3 8-bromo-cyclic AMP (Fig.
3D). Compared with AVP alone, both of these compounds
induced a similar rise in AQP2 protein levels (compare lane
4 to lanes 2 and 3), indicating that the
action of AVP in mpkCCDC14 cells is mediated by cAMP. These
results demonstrate, as observed in vivo, that AQP2 protein
expression induced by AVP or dDAVP occurs via the occupancy of
functional V2 receptors located in the basolateral
membranes of mpkCCDC14 cells.
Role of Proteasomal and Lysosomal Proteolytic Pathways in the
Control of AQP2 Expression in Mouse Collecting Duct Principal
Cells--
Integral membrane proteins are mostly degraded through the
lysosomal proteolytic pathway, but recent experimental evidence indicates that a subset of these proteins can also be degraded by the
proteasome (37). The results presented so far strongly suggest that AVP
increases synthesis of the AQP2 protein by increasing AQP2 mRNA
levels. The expression levels of cellular proteins, however, depend on
protein synthesis and degradation rates. We therefore investigated the
degradation pathways of AQP2 protein and their role in the control of
AQP2 expression levels. The respective contribution of the proteasome
and the lysosome in AQP2 degradation in mpkCCDC14 cells was
analyzed by treating cells with specific inhibitors for each
degradation pathway. Proteasomal activity was inhibited by adding
10 6 M lactacystin or 10 6
M MG132, two potent and specific inhibitors of the
proteasomal pathway, to the cell medium. To analyze the contribution of
the lysosome in AQP2 degradation, we used either 2·10 6
M leupeptin, an inhibitor of cysteine proteases, or either
10 7 M chloroquine or 10 2
M methylamine, two weak bases that increase lysosomal pH
and thereby inhibit the proteolytic activity of lysosomal enzymes. We
first checked that these drugs had no cytotoxic effects by measuring
the transepithelial electrical resistance of confluent mpkCCDC14 cells grown on filters (data not shown). None of
the proteasomal or lysosomal inhibitors increased AQP2 expression when
applied to the cell medium for 9-24 h in the absence of AVP, as
revealed by Western blot analysis (data not shown). These results indicate that the very low AQP2 expression levels of cells grown in the
absence of AVP are not due to an immediate degradation of
constitutively synthesized AQP2 protein.
The effects produced by the presence of proteasomal inhibitors on AQP2
expression led to contrasting results. Indeed, when cells were
simultaneously incubated 9 h with both 10 6
M lactacystin and 10 9 M AVP, the
AVP-induced expression of AQP2 protein was almost completely abolished
(Fig. 4A, compare lanes
2 and 3). Identical results were obtained with MG132,
another structurally unrelated proteasome inhibitor (data not shown).
To determine whether inhibition of proteasomal activity decreased
AVP-induced AQP2 expression through a transcriptional or a
translational mechanism, we measured the effect of lactacystin on AQP2
mRNA expression. Results from RPA analysis performed on the same
batch of cells used for Western blot analysis clearly show that AQP2
mRNA expression induced by AVP was nearly abolished by lactacystin
(Fig. 4B, compare lanes 2 and 3).
Taken together, these results reveal that the increased levels of AQP2
mRNA expression in response to AVP require the functional integrity
of the proteasome.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Lactacystin abolishes AVP-induced AQP2
expression. Confluent mpkCCDC14 cells grown on filters
were incubated 9 h at 37 °C in the absence (lanes 1 and 4) or presence (lanes 2 and 3) of
10 9 M AVP and either without (lanes
1 and 2) or with (lanes 3 and 4)
10 6 M lactacystin prior to RNA and protein
extraction. A, Western blotting was performed on protein
extracts (40 µg) using a polyclonal anti-AQP2 antibody. B,
RPA was performed with riboprobes for AQP2 mRNA (top
panel) and for 18 S rRNA (bottom panel) on 4 µg of
total RNA extracted from the same batch of cells used for Western blot
analysis. One of two (for RPA) or four (for Western blot) similar
experiments is shown.
|
|
We investigated the role of the proteasome in AQP2 degradation by first
incubating mpkCCDC14 cells 24 h with 10 9
M AVP alone and then for an additional 9 h in the
presence of 10 9 M AVP added to the cell
medium without or with 10 6 M lactacystin.
Results from Western blots performed under these experimental
conditions showed that lactacystin considerably increased the amount of
total AQP2 protein as compared with cells treated with AVP alone (Fig.
5, compare lanes 1 and
2, and see Fig. 5B). We further examined the
effect of lactacystin on AQP2 degradation by first incubating cells
24 h with 10 9 M AVP alone and then for
an additional 9 h in the absence of AVP (AVP chase) and in the
absence or presence of 10 6 M lactacystin.
Under these conditions, the presence of lactacystin significantly
increased cellular AQP2 protein content as compared with AVP-pretreated
cells incubated in the absence of both AVP and lactacystin (Fig.
5A, compare lanes 3 and 4, and see
Fig. 5B). The present results show that the high levels of
AQP2 protein expression observed after 24 h of AVP incubation were
greatly reduced 9 h after AVP was removed from the cell medium,
suggesting that AQP2 protein is quickly degraded in the absence of AVP.
The observation that lactacystin reduced AQP2 degradation to a similar extent both in the absence and presence of AVP suggests that AQP2 degradation occurs regardless of the absence or presence of AVP and
that this process is at least partially mediated by proteasomal activity.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Inhibition of proteasomal activity by
lactacystin increases AQP2 protein expression in mpkCCDC14
cells pretreated with AVP. Confluent mpkCCDC14 cells
grown on filters were first incubated 24 h at 37 °C with
10 9 M AVP and then for an additional 9 h
with (Pulse, lanes 1 and 2) or without
(Chase, lanes 3 and 4) 10 9
M AVP and in the absence or presence of 10 6
M lactacystin. A, AQP2 expression was detected
by Western blot as described in the legend of Fig. 1. A representative
immunoblot is shown. B, densitometric quantification of AQP2
protein expressed as the ratio of optical density values measured for
each experimental condition and the optical density measured after 24 + 9 h of AVP treatment. Values are means ± S.E. from four
independent experiments as represented in A.
|
|
Integral membrane proteins are typically degraded by lysosomal
proteases. We examined lysosomal AQP2 degradation in
mpkCCDC14 cells by incubating cells 9 h with
10 9 M AVP in the absence or presence of a
lysosomal inhibitor. In contrast to results obtained with proteasome
inhibitors (Fig. 4), Western blot analysis revealed that leupeptin,
chloroquine, and methylamine all increased AQP2 protein content as
compared with untreated cells (Fig. 6,
A and B). Furthermore, as observed with
lactacystin, each lysosomal inhibitor increased AQP2 protein expression
levels of 24-h AVP-pretreated cells when added to the cell medium
together with 10 9 M AVP for an additional
9 h (9-h AVP, Fig. 6C and see Fig.
6D). The effect of lysosomal inhibitors on AQP2 degradation
was further examined by first incubating cells 24 h with
10 9 M AVP alone and then for an additional
9 h in the absence of AVP (AVP chase) and in the absence or
presence of a lysosomal inhibitor. Under these conditions, each
lysosomal inhibitor significantly increased cellular AQP2 protein
content as compared with AVP-pretreated cells incubated in the absence
of both AVP and a lysosomal inhibitor (9-h chase, Fig.
6C and see Fig. 6D). These findings strongly suggest that inhibition of lysosomal activity reduces the rate of AQP2
degradation both in the absence and presence of AVP. The observation
that AQP2 expression levels are already increased 9 h after
initial AVP stimulation by the presence of lysoosmotropic agents
suggests that AQP2 degradation occurs soon after its synthesis.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Inhibition of lysosomal proteolytic activity
increases AQP2 expression in mpkCCDC14 cells.
A, prior to Western blot analysis, confluent
mpkCCDC14 cells grown on filters were incubated 9 h at
37 °C in the presence of 10 9 M AVP alone
or together with 2·10 6 M leupeptin,
10 7 M chloroquine, or 10 2
M methylamine. A representative immunoblot is shown.
B, densitometric quantification of AQP2 protein expressed as
the ratio of optical density values measured for each experimental
condition and the optical density measured after 9 h of AVP
treatment. Values are means ± S.E. of three independent
experiments as represented in A. C,
mpkCCDC14 cells were first incubated 24 h with
10 9 M AVP and then for an additional 9 h
with (9 h AVP) or without (9 h chase)
10 9 M AVP and in the absence or presence of
2·10 6 M leupeptin, 10 7
M chloroquine, or 10 2 M
methylamine. AQP2 expression was detected by Western blot as described
in the legend of Fig. 1. A representative immunoblot is shown.
D, densitometric quantification of AQP2 protein expressed as
the ratio of optical density values measured for each experimental
condition and the optical density measured after 24 h + 9 h
of AVP treatment. Values are means ± S.E. from three independent
experiments as represented in C.
|
|
The results of the present study suggest that newly synthesized AQP2
protein is quickly degraded in mpkCCDC14 cells. AQP2 protein degradation was further analyzed by first pretreating cells
24 h with 10 9 M AVP in order to induce
large expression levels of AQP2 mRNA and protein and then by
incubating cells for an additional 24 h in the absence of AVP. RPA
and Western blot analysis revealed that AQP2 mRNA and protein
expression levels both returned to near base-line levels 24 h
after AVP deprivation (Fig. 7,
A and B, lanes 2 and 3).
Time-dependent AQP2 degradation (Fig. 7, C and
D) was next analyzed on protein extracts of cells stimulated 24 h with 10 9 M AVP and then subjected
to various lengths of time in the absence of AVP (chase period).
Western blot analysis revealed that 1 h after AVP removal, AQP2
protein expression was found to be about 50% greater than that
observed in cells stimulated 24 h with AVP. This rather unexpected
increase in AQP2 expression was maintained for the next 2 h. At
later chase times, cellular AQP2 protein content gradually decreased
and attained near base-line levels 24 h after AVP removal.
Extrapolation of the AQP2 degradation curve suggests that the half-life
of total AQP2 protein, obtained after 24 h of AVP incubation, is
~6 h in mpkCCDC14 cells.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Degradation of AQP2 mRNA and protein in
mpkCCDC14 cells. Confluent mpkCCDC14 cells
grown on filters were first incubated 24 h at 37 °C with
10 9 M AVP in order to induce large expression
levels of AQP2 mRNA and protein and were then incubated for
additional lengths of time (1-24 h) without AVP (chase period) prior
to RPA and Western blot analysis. A, RPA was performed with
riboprobes for AQP2 mRNA (top panel) and for 18 S rRNA
(bottom panel) on 4 µg of total RNA extracted from
unstimulated cells (lane 1), 24 h AVP pre-stimulated
cells (lane 2), or from AVP pre-stimulated cells subjected
to an additional 24 h chase period without AVP (lane
3). One of two similar experiments is shown. B, Western
blotting was performed as described in the legend of Fig. 1 on proteins
extracted from the same batch of cells used for RPA analysis. One of
two similar experiments is shown. C, Western blotting was
performed as described in the legend of Fig. 1 on proteins extracted
from cells previously incubated 24 h with 10 9
M AVP (0) or from AVP-pretreated cells subjected to various
chase periods (1-24 h). D, densitometric quantification of
AQP2 protein expressed as the ratio of optical density values measured
for each experimental condition and the optical density measured after
24 h of AVP treatment. Values are means ± S.E. from four
independent experiments as represented in C.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The immortalized mpkCCDcl4 cells used in this study
represent, to our knowledge, the first mammalian model of cortical
collecting duct cells that maintain high endogenous AQP2 expression
levels induced by AVP administered at physiological concentrations. We have taken advantage of this remarkable property by investigating long
term AVP-induced AQP2 expression, and several novel aspects have been
revealed. Our results indicate that AVP-inducible long term AQP2
expression relies on a cAMP-dependent increase of AQP2 mRNA which itself depends on proteasomal activity. Our results further indicate that the proteasomal and lysosomal pathways both participate in AQP2 protein degradation occurring soon after its synthesis.
A large amount of work has been done to unravel the mechanisms involved
in AVP-induced targeting of AQP2 from intracellular vesicles to the
plasma membrane (3). The long term influence of AVP on AQP2 expression,
however, remains largely unexplored because of the absence of an
authentic cell line expressing significant amounts of endogenous AQP2
protein. The mpkCCDcl4 cell line (27) produces sufficient
amounts of endogenous AQP2 protein to allow its detection by Western
blot. Although very small amounts of AQP2 protein were occasionally
observed in untreated cells, exogenous AVP treatment administrated at
physiological concentrations (i.e. at 10 10
M) greatly increased AQP2 expression levels. This effect
was observed in a hormone- and serum-free medium indicating that AVP is
necessary and sufficient to induce significant AQP2 expression in
mpkCCDcl4 cells. AVP-induced AQP2 expression was only
observed when AVP was administered to the basal medium of cells grown
on porous filters. In contrast, the addition of AVP to the apical medium of cells grown on filters or to cells grown on a solid support
did not increase AQP2 expression levels. These results indicate that
mpkCCDcl4 cells grown on filters retain a polarized basolateral expression of AVP V2 receptors characteristic
of native principal cells of the collecting duct (38). Several pieces of evidence indicate that the AVP response in mpkCCDcl4
cells is mediated by V2 receptors. First, dDAVP, a
preferential V2 receptor agonist, induced AQP2 expression
at the same magnitude as AVP. Second, SR121463B, a specific
V2 receptor antagonist (36), decreased both AVP- and
dDAVP-induced expression of AQP2. Finally, forskolin, a direct
activator of adenyl cyclase, and 8-bromo-cyclic AMP, a cell-permeant
analog of cAMP, fully reproduced the effect of AVP indicating that cAMP
generation induces AQP2 expression via V2 receptor
activation, as demonstrated previously (25) in primary cultures of rat
inner medullary collecting duct cells. Together with transepithelial
Na+ transport responsiveness to mineralocorticoids (27, 32)
and AVP (28, 31) mediated by the amiloride-sensitive Na+
channel (ENaC) and Na+-K+-ATPase, the
demonstration that these cells also exhibit AVP-induced AQP2 expression
indicates that mpkCCDcl4 cells retain most of the
fundamental properties of principal cells of the collecting duct (8,
39, 40). The mpkCCDcl4 cell line therefore provides a
unique tool to study the regulation of AQP2 expression by AVP.
RPA and Western blot analyses revealed that AVP increased both AQP2
mRNA and protein levels in mpkCCDcl4 cells. This
finding is in agreement with previous observations (17, 20, 34) that
showed that infusion of dDAVP to either normal or AVP-deficient Brattleboro rats increases both AQP2 mRNA and protein expression levels in renal cortex and medulla. The increase in AQP2 protein levels
in response to AVP most likely results from increased AQP2 gene transcription and protein synthesis because actinomycin D prevented both AQP2 mRNA and protein accumulation. Moreover, both AQP2 mRNA and protein expression levels were greatly reduced
24 h after removing AVP from the cell medium providing further
evidence of coordinated expression levels between AQP2 mRNA and
protein. The finding that AVP induces AQP2 protein expression by
increasing AQP2 mRNA levels via the secondary messenger cAMP is
supported by the previous identification of several regulatory motifs
in the AQP2 gene that promote AQP2 expression. Regulatory
motifs conferring cAMP inducibility have been identified by luciferase reporter assay in the 5'-flanking region of the AQP2 gene
(22). Moreover, in transfected LLC-PK1 cells, cAMP was found to induce c-Fos expression and phosphorylation of the cAMP-responsive
element-binding protein that bound to cAMP-response element and AP1
sites present in a fragment of the AQP2 promoter (41).
However, notwithstanding these findings and those of the present work,
an AVP-induced increase of AQP2 mRNA stability may also contribute
to increased AQP2 protein expression.
In the present study, AQP2 expression induced by AVP was impaired when
cells were simultaneously incubated with AVP and a proteasomal
inhibitor. The possibility that proteasomal inhibitors hinder the
protein translation machinery in mpkCCDcl4 cells can be
reasonably discarded because increased AQP2 expression levels were
observed in AVP-pretreated cells subsequently treated with proteasome
inhibitors. Rather, because the presence of a proteasome inhibitor not
only reduced AVP-induced AQP2 protein expression but also AQP2 mRNA
expression, it appears likely that inhibition of proteasomal activity
alters the regulation of AQP2 gene transcription. On the
other hand, we cannot exclude the possibility that proteasomal inhibitors decrease AQP2 mRNA stability when added to the cell medium together with AVP. Tight control of signal transduction often
involves rapid degradation of transcription factors mediated by the
ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Examples of such transcription factors
include the tumor suppressor proteins p53, c-Jun, and E2f-1 (42). The
I B family of inhibitory molecules represents a good example of
negatively regulated transcription factors. I Bs bind to B nuclear
factors (NF- B) and are degraded by the proteasome pathway in
response to extracellular stimuli such as cytokines and stress allowing
translocation of NF- B into the nucleus (43). In the case of AQP2, a
negatively acting transcription factor may bind to one or several of
the negatively acting cis-elements proposed to repress AQP2
gene transcription in IMCD cells (26). The results of the present study
may therefore be explained by the AVP-induced degradation, via the
proteasome, of one or several transcription factors that negatively act
on AQP2 expression, either by impeding the translocation of a
functionally active element into the nucleus or by binding directly to
the AQP2 gene. In either case, the presence of a proteasome
inhibitor would block their degradation and consequently repress AQP2
expression. Further work is needed to identify the regulatory factors
that govern AQP2 gene transcription in response to AVP.
Cells degrade proteins through two major systems, the lysosome and the
proteasome. Lysosomes are involved in the degradation of extracellular
and cytosolic molecules as well as transmembrane transporters and
receptors (44), whereas the proteasome degrades cytosolic, nuclear, and
membrane proteins (42) and eliminates misfolded proteins and
misassembled oligomeric protein complexes at the level of the
endoplasmic reticulum (45). Both degradation systems are used in renal
epithelial cells as illustrated by the lysosomal degradation of the
co-transporter NaPi-2, expressed in the apical
membrane of proximal tubule cells (46), and by ubiquitin-proteasomal
degradation of ENaC (47, 48), expressed in the apical membrane of
collecting duct principal cells (40, 49). The results of the present
study show that both pathways participate in the degradation of AQP2
protein in mpkCCDcl4 cells. Indeed, the presence of either
proteasomal or lysosomal inhibitors added to the medium of cells
previously stimulated with AVP further increased AQP2 protein
expression levels. It is possible that part of the AQP2 fraction
protected from proteasomal degradation consists of a misfolded or
aggregated AQP2 population residing in the endoplasmic reticulum.
Nevertheless, the observation that fully glycosylated AQP2 is also
protected from degradation by the presence of proteasomal inhibitors
suggests that much of the proteasomal degradation of mature AQP2
complexes occurs outside of the endoplasmic reticulum. The similar
increase in AQP2 expression in the presence of proteasome or lysosome
inhibitors suggests that both degradation pathways participate equally
in AQP2 degradation. Inhibition of either pathway has been observed to
impede degradation of several mammalian cell membrane proteins
including the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (50) and the Met
tyrosine kinase receptor (51). AQP2 degradation in
mpkCCDcl4 cells may be mediated by both pathways
independently of each other or acting sequentially, as suggested for
the degradation of connexin-43 in embryonic rat heart BWEM cells (52).
Alternatively, the degradation of a protein other than AQP2 by one
degradation pathway might be required for efficient AQP2 degradation by
the other pathway.
The present study clearly shows that AQP2 is quickly degraded in
mpkCCDcl4 cells. This is supported by the observation that, after 9 h, AQP2 expression doubled in the presence of a lysosomal inhibitor added to the cell medium together with AVP. Moreover, AVP-chase experiments indicate that AQP2 half-life is ~6 h. The amount of AQP2 that accumulated in the presence of various degradation inhibitors was similar in the presence and absence of AVP, suggesting that AVP influences neither the degradation rate of AQP2 nor the respective contribution of the proteasome and lysosome degradation pathways.
In the light of these results, the role of AVP in long term AQP2
expression may be limited to the induction of AQP2 synthesis through
the degradation, via the proteasome pathway, of negatively acting
transcription factor(s). The newly synthesized AQP2 protein would then
be subject to rapid degradation via the lysosomal and proteasomal
degradation pathways. A short half-life, i.e. <4 h, mediated by the proteasome pathway was also found for AQP1 expressed in
BALB/c fibroblasts (53). The results of the present study suggest that,
along with AVP-regulated cell surface expression of AQP2, rapid
degradation of AQP2 mediated by the lysosome and proteasome pathways
contribute to controlled AQP2 expression.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Dr. Alain Doucet for critical reading
of this manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by the Swiss National
Science Foundation Grant 31-56504.99 (to P.-Y. M.), by a grant from the Fondation Carlos et Elsie de Reuter (to P.-Y. M. and E. F.), by a
grant from the Department of Medicine of Geneva University Hospital (to P.-Y. M.), and by INSERM.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: INSERM U478,
Faculté de Médecine Xavier Bichat, BP416, F-75870 Paris
Cedex 18, France. Tel.: 33-1-44-85-63-21; Fax: 33-1-42-29-16-44;
E-mail: vandewal@bichat.inserm.fr.
Both authors contributed equally to this work.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 8, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111880200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
CD, collecting duct;
AQP, aquaporin;
AVP, [8-arginine]vasopressin;
dDAVP, [1-deamino,8-D-arginine]vasopressin;
mpkCCDcl4, mouse cortical collecting duct principal cell
line;
RPA, RNase protection assay.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Kishore, B. K.,
Mandon, B.,
Oza, N. B.,
DiGiovanni, S. R.,
Coleman, R. A.,
Ostrowski, N. L.,
Wade, J. B.,
and Knepper, M. A.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
97,
2763-2771[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Loffing, J.,
Loffing-Cueni, D.,
Macher, A.,
Hebert, S. C.,
Olson, B.,
Knepper, M. A.,
Rossier, B. C.,
and Kaissling, B.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
278,
F530-F539
|
| 3.
|
Knepper, M. A.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
272,
F1-F12[Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Schnermann, J.,
Chou, C.-L., Ma, T.,
Traynor, T.,
Knepper, M. A.,
and Verkman, A. S.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
9660-9664[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Chou, C.-L.,
Knepper, M. A.,
van Hoek, A. N.,
Brown, D.,
Yang, B., Ma, T.,
and Verkman, A. S.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
103,
491-496[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Maunsbach, A. B.,
Marples, D.,
Chin, E.,
Ning, G.,
Bondy, C.,
Agree, P.,
and Nielsen, S.
(1997)
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.
8,
1-14[Abstract]
|
| 7.
|
Fushimi, K.,
Uchida, S.,
Hara, Y.,
Hirata, Y.,
Marumo, F.,
and Sasaki, S.
(1993)
Nature
361,
549-552[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Nielsen, S.,
DiGiovanni, S. R.,
Christensen, E. I.,
Knepper, M. A.,
and Harris, H. W.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
11663-11667[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Ishibashi, K.,
Sasaki, S.,
Fushimi, K.,
Uchida, S.,
Kuwahara, M.,
Saito, H.,
Furukawa, T.,
Nakajima, K.,
Yamaguchi, Y.,
Gojobori, T.,
and Marumo, F.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
6269-6273[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Terris, J.,
Ecelbarger, C. A.,
Marples, D.,
Knepper, M. A.,
and Nielsen, S.
(1995)
Am. J. Physiol.
269,
F775-F785[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Nielsen, S.,
Chou, C.-L.,
Marples, D.,
Christensen, E. I.,
Kishore, B. K.,
and Knepper, M. A.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
1013-1017[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Terris, J.,
Ecelbarger, C. A.,
Nielsen, S.,
and Knepper, M. A.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
271,
F414-F422[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Chabardes, D.,
Firsov, D.,
Aarab, L.,
Clabecq, A.,
Bellanger, A. C.,
Siaume-Perez, S.,
and Elalouf, J. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19264-19271[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Fujiwara, T. M.,
Morgan, K.,
and Bichet, D. G.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Med.
46,
331-343[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Deen, P. M.,
Croes, H.,
van Aubel, R. A.,
Ginsel, L. A.,
and van Os, C. H.
(1995)
J. Clin. Invest.
95,
2291-2296[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
DiGiovanni, S. R.,
Nielsen, S.,
Christensen, E. I.,
and Knepper, M. A.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
8984-8988[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Saito, T.,
Higashiyama, M.,
Nagasaka, S.,
Sasaki, S.,
Saito, T.,
and Ishikawa, S.-E.
(2001)
Kidney Int.
60,
1266-1276[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Xu, D. L.,
Martin, P.-Y.,
Ohara, M., St.,
John, J.,
Pattison, T.,
Meng, X.,
Morris, K.,
Kim, J. K.,
and Schrier, R. W.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
99,
1500-1505[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Nielsen, S.,
Terris, J.,
Andersen, D.,
Ecelbarger, C.,
Frøklaer, J.,
Jonassen, T.,
Marples, D.,
Knepper, M. A.,
and Petersen, J. S.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
5450-5455[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Fujita, N.,
Ishikawa, S.-E.,
Sasaki, S.,
Fujisawa, G.,
Fushimi, K.,
Marumo, F.,
and Saito, T.
(1995)
Am. J. Physiol.
269,
F926-F931[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Ohara, M.,
Martin, P.-Y., Xu, D.-L., St.,
John, J.,
Pattison, T. A.,
Kim, J. K.,
and Schrier, R. W.
(1998)
J. Clin. Invest.
101,
1076-1083[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Hozawa, S.,
Holtzman, E. J.,
and Ausiello, D. A.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
270,
C1695-C1702[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Valenti, G.,
Frigeri, A.,
Ronco, P. M.,
D'Ettorre, C.,
and Svelto, M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24365-24370[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Katsura, T.,
Ausiello, D. A.,
and Brown, D.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
270,
F548-F553[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Maric, K.,
Oksche, A.,
and Rosenthal, W.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
275,
F796-F801[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Furuno, M.,
Uchida, S.,
Marumo, F.,
and Sasaki, S.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
271,
F854-F860[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Bens, M.,
Vallet, V.,
Cluzeaud, F.,
Pascual-Letallec, L.,
Kahn, A.,
Rafestin-Oblin, M. E.,
Rossier, B. C.,
and Vandewalle, A.
(1999)
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.
10,
923-934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Vandewalle, A.,
Bens, M.,
and Duong Van Huyen, J.-P.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens.
8,
581-587[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Vuagniaux, G.,
Vallet, V.,
Fowler-Jaeger, N.,
Pfister, C.,
Bens, M.,
Farman, N.,
Courtois-Coutry, N.,
Vandewalle, A.,
Rossier, B. C.,
and Hummler, E.
(2000)
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.
11,
828-834[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Kamynina, E.,
Debonneville, C.,
Bens, M.,
Vandewalle, A.,
and Staub, O.
(2001)
FASEB J.
15,
204-214[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Gonin, S.,
Deschênes, G.,
Roger, F.,
Bens, M.,
Martin, P.-Y.,
Carpentier, J.-L.,
Vandewalle, A.,
Doucet, A.,
and Féraille, E.
(2001)
Mol. Biol. Cell
13,
255-264
|
| 32.
|
Summa, V.,
Mordasini, D.,
Roger, F.,
Bens, M.,
Martin, P.-Y.,
Vandewalle, A.,
Verrey, F.,
and Féraille, E.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
47087-47093[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Robert-Nicoud, M.,
Flahaut, M.,
Elalouf, J.-M.,
Nicod, M.,
Salinas, M.,
Bens, M.,
Doucet, A.,
Wincker, P.,
Artiguenave, F.,
Horisberger, J.-D.,
Vandewalle, A.,
Rossier, B. C.,
and Firsov, D.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
2712-2716[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Promeneur, D.,
Kwon, T.-H.,
Frøkiær, J.,
Knepper, M. A.,
and Nielsen, S.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
279,
F370-F382
|
| 35.
|
Imbert, M.,
Chabardes, D.,
Montegut, M.,
Clique, A.,
and Morel, F.
(1975)
Pfluegers Arch.
357,
173-186[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Serradeil-Le Gal, C.,
Lacour, C.,
Valette, G.,
Garcia, G.,
Foulon, L.,
Galindo, G.,
Bankir, L.,
Pouzet, B.,
Guillon, G.,
Barberis, C.,
Chicot, D.,
Jard, S.,
Vilain, P.,
Garcia, C.,
Marty, E.,
Raufaste, D.,
Brossard, G.,
Nisato, D.,
Maffrand, J.-P.,
and Le Fur, G.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
98,
2729-2738[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Hicke, L.
(1999)
Trends Cell Biol.
9,
107-112[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Nonoguchi, H.,
Owada, A.,
Kobayashi, N.,
Takayama, M.,
Terada, Y.,
Koike, J.,
Ujiie, K.,
Marumo, F.,
Sakai, T.,
and Tomita, K.
(1995)
J. Clin. Invest.
96,
1768-1778[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Ecelbarger, C. A.,
Kim, G.-H.,
Terris, J.,
Masilamani, S.,
Mitchell, C.,
Reyes, I.,
Verbalis, J. G.,
and Knepper, M. A.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
279,
F46-F53
|
| 40.
|
Loffing, J.,
Zecevic, M.,
Féraille, E.,
Kaissling, B.,
Asher, C.,
Rossier, B. C.,
Firestone, G. L.,
Pearce, D.,
and Verrey, F.
(2001)
Am. J. Physiol.
280,
F675-F682
|
| 41.
|
Yasui, M.,
Zelenin, S. M.,
Celsi, G.,
and Aperia, A.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
272,
F443-F450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Hershko, A.,
and Ciechanover, A.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67,
425-479[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Karin, M.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
6867-6874[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Mullins, C.,
and Bonifacio, J. S.
(2001)
Bioessays
23,
333-343[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Ellgaard, L.,
Molinari, M.,
and Helenius, A.
(1999)
Science
286,
1882-1888[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Pfister, M. F.,
Ruf, I.,
Stange, G.,
Ziegler, U.,
Lederer, E.,
Biber, J.,
and Murer, H.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
1909-1914[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Staub, O.,
Gautschi, I.,
Ishikawa, T.,
Breitschopf, K.,
Ciechanover, A.,
Schild, L.,
and Rotin, D.
(1997)
EMBO
16,
6325-6336[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Malik, B.,
Schlanger, L., Al-,
Khalili, O.,
Bao, H.-F.,
Yue, G.,
Price, S. R.,
Mitch, W. E.,
and Eaton, D. C.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
12903-12910[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Hager, H.,
Kwon, T.-H.,
Vinnikova, A. K.,
Masilamani, S.,
Brooks, H. L.,
Frøkiaer, J.,
Knepper, M. A.,
and Nielsen, S.
(2001)
Am. J. Physiol.
280,
F1093-F1106
|
| 50.
|
Mori, S.,
Tanaka, K.,
Omura, S.,
and Saito, Y.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
29447-29452[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Jeffers, M.,
Taylor, G. A.,
Weidner, K. M.,
Omura, S.,
and Vande Woude, G. F.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
799-808[Abstract]
|
| 52.
|
Laing, J. G.,
Tadros, P. N.,
Westphale, E. M.,
and Beyer, E. C.
(1997)
Exp. Cell. Res.
236,
482-492[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Leitch, V.,
Agre, P.,
and King, L. S.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
2894-2898[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Hasler, V. Leroy, P.-Y. Martin, and E. Feraille
Aquaporin-2 abundance in the renal collecting duct: new insights from cultured cell models
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
July 1, 2009;
297(1):
F10 - F18.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. S. P. Wildman, M. Boone, C. M. Peppiatt-Wildman, A. Contreras-Sanz, B. F. King, D. G. Shirley, P. M. T. Deen, and R. J. Unwin
Nucleotides Downregulate Aquaporin 2 via Activation of Apical P2 Receptors
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
July 1, 2009;
20(7):
1480 - 1490.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. W.M. van Balkom, M. Boone, G. Hendriks, E.-J. Kamsteeg, J. H. Robben, H. C. Stronks, A. van der Voorde, F. van Herp, P. van der Sluijs, and P. M.T. Deen
LIP5 Interacts with Aquaporin 2 and Facilitates Its Lysosomal Degradation
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
May 1, 2009;
20(5):
990 - 1001.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Hasler
Controlled aquaporin-2 expression in the hypertonic environment
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
April 1, 2009;
296(4):
C641 - C653.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. R. Soria, S. A. Gradilone, M. C. Larocca, and R. A. Marinelli
Glucagon induces the gene expression of aquaporin-8 but not that of aquaporin-9 water channels in the rat hepatocyte
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
April 1, 2009;
296(4):
R1274 - R1281.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-J. Yu, R. L. Miller, P. Uawithya, M. M. Rinschen, S. Khositseth, D. W. W. Braucht, C.-L. Chou, T. Pisitkun, R. D. Nelson, and M. A. Knepper
Systems-level analysis of cell-specific AQP2 gene expression in renal collecting duct
PNAS,
February 17, 2009;
106(7):
2441 - 2446.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Leroy, S. De Seigneux, V. Agassiz, U. Hasler, M.-E. Rafestin-Oblin, M. Vinciguerra, P.-Y. Martin, and E. Feraille
Aldosterone Activates NF-{kappa}B in the Collecting Duct
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
January 1, 2009;
20(1):
131 - 144.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Nunes, U. Hasler, M. McKee, H. A. J. Lu, R. Bouley, and D. Brown
A fluorimetry-based ssYFP secretion assay to monitor vasopressin-induced exocytosis in LLC-PK1 cells expressing aquaporin-2
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
December 1, 2008;
295(6):
C1476 - C1487.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Hasler, V. Leroy, U. S. Jeon, R. Bouley, M. Dimitrov, J. A. Kim, D. Brown, H. M. Kwon, P.-Y. Martin, and E. Feraille
NF-{kappa}B Modulates Aquaporin-2 Transcription in Renal Collecting Duct Principal Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 17, 2008;
283(42):
28095 - 28105.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Boulkroun, D. Ruffieux-Daidie, J.-J. Vitagliano, O. Poirot, R.-P. Charles, D. Lagnaz, D. Firsov, S. Kellenberger, and O. Staub
Vasopressin-inducible ubiquitin-specific protease 10 increases ENaC cell surface expression by deubiquitylating and stabilizing sorting nexin 3
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
October 1, 2008;
295(4):
F889 - F900.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Combet, S. Gouraud, R. Gobin, V. Berthonaud, G. Geelen, B. Corman, and J.-M. Verbavatz
Aquaporin-2 downregulation in kidney medulla of aging rats is posttranscriptional and is abolished by water deprivation
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
June 1, 2008;
294(6):
F1408 - F1414.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. L. Lehmann, F. I. Carreras, L. R. Soria, S. A. Gradilone, and R. A. Marinelli
LPS induces the TNF-{alpha}-mediated downregulation of rat liver aquaporin-8: role in sepsis-associated cholestasis
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
February 1, 2008;
294(2):
G567 - G575.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Bustamante, U. Hasler, V. Leroy, S. de Seigneux, M. Dimitrov, D. Mordasini, M. Rousselot, P.-Y. Martin, and E. Feraille
Calcium-sensing Receptor Attenuates AVP-induced Aquaporin-2 Expression via a Calmodulin-dependent Mechanism
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
January 1, 2008;
19(1):
109 - 116.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. I. Carreras, G. L. Lehmann, D. Ferri, M. F. Tioni, G. Calamita, and R. A. Marinelli
Defective hepatocyte aquaporin-8 expression and reduced canalicular membrane water permeability in estrogen-induced cholestasis
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
March 1, 2007;
292(3):
G905 - G912.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. H. Robben, N. V. A. M. Knoers, and P. M. T. Deen
Cell biological aspects of the vasopressin type-2 receptor and aquaporin 2 water channel in nephrogenic diabetes insipidus.
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
August 1, 2006;
291(2):
F257 - F270.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Hasler, U. S. Jeon, J. A. Kim, D. Mordasini, H. M. Kwon, E. Feraille, and P.-Y. Martin
Tonicity-Responsive Enhancer Binding Protein Is an Essential Regulator of Aquaporin-2 Expression in Renal Collecting Duct Principal Cells
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
June 1, 2006;
17(6):
1521 - 1531.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. G. Bichet
Lithium, Cyclic AMP Signaling, A-Kinase Anchoring Proteins, and Aquaporin-2
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
April 1, 2006;
17(4):
920 - 922.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Li, S. Shaw, E.-J. Kamsteeg, A. Vandewalle, and P. M.T. Deen
Development of Lithium-Induced Nephrogenic Diabetes Insipidus Is Dissociated from Adenylyl Cyclase Activity
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
April 1, 2006;
17(4):
1063 - 1072.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Hasler, S. Nielsen, E. Feraille, and P.-Y. Martin
Posttranscriptional control of aquaporin-2 abundance by vasopressin in renal collecting duct principal cells
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
January 1, 2006;
290(1):
F177 - F187.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Mordasini, M. Bustamante, M. Rousselot, P.-Y. Martin, U. Hasler, and E. Feraille
Stimulation of Na+ transport by AVP is independent of PKA phosphorylation of the Na-K-ATPase in collecting duct principal cells
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
November 1, 2005;
289(5):
F1031 - F1039.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Vinciguerra, U. Hasler, D. Mordasini, M. Roussel, M. Capovilla, E. Ogier-Denis, A. Vandewalle, P.-Y. Martin, and E. Feraille
Cytokines and Sodium Induce Protein Kinase A-Dependent Cell-Surface Na,K-ATPase Recruitment via Dissociation of NF-{kappa}B/I{kappa}B/Protein Kinase A Catalytic Subunit Complex in Collecting Duct Principal Cells
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
September 1, 2005;
16(9):
2576 - 2585.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Hasler, M. Vinciguerra, A. Vandewalle, P.-Y. Martin, and E. Feraille
Dual Effects of Hypertonicity on Aquaporin-2 Expression in Cultured Renal Collecting Duct Principal Cells
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
June 1, 2005;
16(6):
1571 - 1582.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Bustamante, U. Hasler, O. Kotova, A. V. Chibalin, D. Mordasini, M. Rousselot, A. Vandewalle, P.-Y. Martin, and E. Feraille
Insulin potentiates AVP-induced AQP2 expression in cultured renal collecting duct principal cells
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
February 1, 2005;
288(2):
F334 - F344.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Sonalker, S. P. Tofovic, and E. K. Jackson
Increased Expression of the Sodium Transporter BSC-1 in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
December 1, 2004;
311(3):
1052 - 1061.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Vinciguerra, S. Arnaudeau, D. Mordasini, M. Rousselot, M. Bens, A. Vandewalle, P.-Y. Martin, U. Hasler, and E. Feraille
Extracellular Hypotonicity Increases Na,K-ATPase Cell Surface Expression via Enhanced Na+ Influx in Cultured Renal Collecting Duct Cells
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
October 1, 2004;
15(10):
2537 - 2547.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Hadrup, J. S. Petersen, J. Praetorius, E. Meier, M. Graebe, L. Brond, D. Staahltoft, S. Nielsen, S. Christensen, D. R. Kapusta, et al.
Opioid receptor-like 1 stimulation in the collecting duct induces aquaresis through vasopressin-independent aquaporin-2 downregulation
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
July 1, 2004;
287(1):
F160 - F168.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Arima, N. Yamamoto, K. Sobue, F. Umenishi, T. Tada, H. Katsuya, and K. Asai
Hyperosmolar Mannitol Stimulates Expression of Aquaporins 4 and 9 through a p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase-dependent Pathway in Rat Astrocytes
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 7, 2003;
278(45):
44525 - 44534.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Hirano, C. Zuber, J. Roth, and M. Ziak
The Proteasome Is Involved in the Degradation of Different Aquaporin-2 Mutants Causing Nephrogenic Diabetes Insipidus
Am. J. Pathol.,
July 1, 2003;
163(1):
111 - 120.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Vinciguerra, G. Deschenes, U. Hasler, D. Mordasini, M. Rousselot, A. Doucet, A. Vandewalle, P.-Y. Martin, and E. Feraille
Intracellular Na+ Controls Cell Surface Expression of Na,K-ATPase via a cAMP-independent PKA Pathway in Mammalian Kidney Collecting Duct Cells
Mol. Biol. Cell,
July 1, 2003;
14(7):
2677 - 2688.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-E. Rafestin-Oblin, J. Fagart, A. Souque, C. Seguin, M. Bens, and A. Vandewalle
11beta -Hydroxyprogesterone Acts as a Mineralocorticoid Agonist in Stimulating Na+ Absorption in Mammalian Principal Cortical Collecting Duct Cells
Mol. Pharmacol.,
December 1, 2002;
62(6):
1306 - 1313.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|