|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M111293200 on January 11, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 12, 10498-10505, March 22, 2002
P-selectin Targeting to Secretory Lysosomes of Rbl-2H3 Cells*
Jasber
Kaur and
Daniel F.
Cutler
From the MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, Cell Biology
Unit, and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
University College London, Gower Street,
London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
Received for publication, November 27, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The biogenesis of secretory lysosomes, which
combine characteristics of both lysosomes and secretory granules, is
currently of high interest. In particular, it is not clear whether
delivery of membrane proteins to the secretory lysosome requires
lysosomal, secretory granule, or some novel targeting determinants.
Heterologous expression of P-selectin has established that this
membrane protein contains targeting signals for both secretory granules
and lysosomes. P-selectin is therefore an ideal probe with which to
determine the signals required for targeting to secretory lysosomes. We have exploited subcellular fractionation and immunofluorescence microscopy to monitor targeting of transiently expressed wild-type and
mutant horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-P-selectin chimeras to secretory
lysosomes of Rbl-2H3 cells. The exposure of the HRP chimeras to
intracellular proteolysis was also determined as a third monitor of
secretory lysosome targeting. Our data show that HRP-P-selectin
accumulates in secretory lysosomes of Rbl-2H3 cells using those
cytoplasmic sequences previously found to be sufficient for targeting
to conventional lysosomes. This work highlights the similar sorting
signals used for targeting of membrane proteins to conventional
lysosomes and secretory lysosomes.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Secretory lysosomes are a distinct class of regulated secretory
organelle. Not only does this organelle serve as the final degradative
compartment of the cell, but it also stores secretory molecules that
are released in response to an extracellular trigger. This exocytic
capacity clearly marks them from conventional lysosomes. Although
conventional lysosomes can also fuse with the plasma membrane and
release their soluble contents following stimulation (1), the extent of
Ca2+-triggered secretion of lysosomal enzymes from cells
such as fibroblasts and epithelial cells tends to be only 10-20% (2).
In comparison, up to 80% of lysosomal markers are released upon a
physiological trigger from cells that possess secretory lysosomes.
Cells such as cytotoxic T lymphocytes, neutrophils, melanocytes, mast
cells, and basophils use their secretory lysosomes to store specialized components such as granzymes, melanin, histamine, and serotonin, in
addition to their usual lysosomal content (3-5).
Rbl-2H3 is a basophilic leukemia cell line that has been extensively
used in studies of regulated exocytosis. Morphological and biochemical
studies have revealed that Rbl-2H3 secretory granules possess an acidic
pH, contain mature lysosomal enzymes, and are accessible to endocytic
markers, all hallmarks of lysosomes, but they also contain secretory
markers such as serotonin. Both "lysosomal" and "granule"
markers can be released upon stimulation of the cells by aggregation of
Fc RI (6, 7). Thus the endocytic and exocytic apparatus are linked
such that the lysosome has been modified to become the regulated
secretory organelle of these cells.
Given the hybrid nature of the secretory lysosome, an interesting
question is which cytoplasmic targeting signals (in this paper we
define a targeting signal as a peptide sequence that is required for
the accumulation of a protein within an organelle) direct membrane
proteins to this organelle. The simplest possibility is that lysosomal
targeting sequences operate to direct both lysosomal and secretory
membrane proteins to the modified lysosome (3). Alternatively,
secretory granule or entirely novel targeting signals that are specific
to secretory lysosomes might be used.
When tyrosinase, the resident membrane protein of melanosomes is
heterologously expressed in HeLa and Madin-Darby canine kidney cells,
it localizes to lysosomes in a di-leucine signal-dependent manner (8, 9). In addition this di-leucine signal mediates targeting of
tyrosinase to synaptic like microvesicles
(SLMV)1 from the endocytic
pathway of PC12 cells (10). Thus tyrosinase appears to possess the
necessary sorting information for its localization to secretory
lysosomes, conventional lysosomes, and SLMV.
In contrast, it has been suggested that Fas ligand is sorted to the
secretory lysosome of cytotoxic T lymphocytes using novel signals in
its cytoplasmic tail, specific to this class of organelle, because when
heterologously expressed, Fas ligand localizes only to secretory
lysosomes (Rbl-2H3 cells) but not to conventional lysosomes (HeLa
cells) (11).
P-selectin resides in the membranes of and granules of
platelets (12-14) and also in Weibel-Palade bodies (WPB) (15, 16) and
lysosomes (17) of endothelial cells. The short, 35-amino acid
cytoplasmic tail of P-selectin is necessary for targeting to WPB, but
surprisingly, deletion of this region does not affect sorting to the
secretory lysosomal granules of platelets (18). Importantly,
heterologous expression of P-selectin has allowed for the definition of
both granule and lysosomal targeting signals, as well as those for
delivery to SLMV, in a variety of cell types (Fig.
1).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Sequences in the cytoplasmic tail of
P-selectin needed for targeting to regulated secretory organelles and
lysosomes. Shaded sequences highlight amino acids that,
when deleted or mutated, decrease targeting to the named
organelle.
|
|
It is therefore an ideal candidate to investigate the following two
questions: first, is the cytoplasmic tail of P-selectin sufficient for
delivery to secretory lysosomes of Rbl-2H3 cells, and second, if so,
then does delivery rely on granule, lysosomal, or novel targeting
signals? We have combined subcellular fractionation coupled to
transient transfection of HRP-P-selectin chimeras in Rbl-2H3 cells to
answer these questions.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials and Reagents--
Micro-BCA Protein Assay Reagent kit
was used according to the manufacturer's instructions (Pierce).
[3H]Serotonin (hydroxytryptamine binoxylate-5), specific
activity 28 Ci/mm, was purchased from PerkinElmer Life Sciences.
125I-Diferric transferrin (human), specific activity 60 Ci/mm, was purchased from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. TSA Fluorescence
Systems (cyanine 3) was purchased from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma, unless otherwise stated.
Constructs--
HRP-P-selectin is a chimera comprising the human
growth hormone signal sequence, followed by horseradish peroxidase
(HRP) and the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of P-selectin in pRK34 (18). 763HRP-P-selectin is a truncation of the
cytoplasmic tail (21), and KCPL, YGVF,
DPSPHRP-P-selectin are tetra-alanine mutations as described
(24, 25) (see Fig. 3).
Cell Culture and Transient Transfection--
Rbl-2H3 cells (kind
gift from Mark Marsh, MRC Unit, LMCB, University College London) were
grown as an adherent monolayer in DMEM (Life Technologies, Inc.),
supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 50 µg/ml
Gentamicin (Life Technologies, Inc.), at 37 °C, 5% CO2.
For transient transfection studies, ~4 × 107 cells
were electroporated (three pulses) at 125 microfarads, 250 V, infinity
ohms. For wt, YGVF, DPSPHRP-P-selectin
constructs, 10 µg of DNA was used for transfection, whereas 3 µg of
DNA was used for KCPL, 763HRP-P-selectin
constructs to obtain similar levels of expression. Cells were replated
in their usual growth medium and analyzed 3 days post-transfection.
Stimulation of Cells--
Cells were primed overnight (day 2 post-transfection) with 0.5 µg/ml anti-2,4-dinitrophenol IgE
(monoclonal, SPE-7, Sigma) and also incubated with 0.2 µCi/ml
[3H]serotonin (hydroxytryptamine binoxylate-5,
PerkinElmer Life Sciences) in growth medium prior to stimulation the
following day. Cells were rinsed twice and cultured for 1 h in
normal media. Stimulation was induced by the addition of 50 ng/ml
human serum albumin/2,4-dinitrophenol to cross-link the IgE
bound to Fc RI on the cell surface for 25 min at 37 °C. This took
place in DMEM (without serum, 10 mM HEPES, 2 mg/ml bovine
serum albumin) with no phenol red (to prevent interference of
absorbance assays for -hexosaminidase). Cells were then placed on
ice, and the stimulation medium was removed and kept for analysis.
125I-Transferrin Loading--
Three days
post-transfection, cells were serum-starved (DMEM, 10 mM
HEPES, 2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin) for 1 h and incubated with
0.6 µCi/ml 125I-transferrin for 1 h. Cells were then
rinsed three times in cold DMEM. To locate the plasma membrane, cell
surface 125I-transferrin was stripped by the following
method. Following loading with 125I-transferrin, cells were
transferred to ice, rinsed, and incubated for 15 min in 20 mM sodium acetate, pH 5, 2 mM
CaCl2, 150 mM NaCl, and 50 µM
deferoxamine mesylate. This was replaced with PBS+ (PBS, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM CaCl2)
and then further rinsed and incubated for 20 min with PBS+ and 50 µM deferoxamine mesylate.
Subcellular Fractionation--
Single sucrose gradient
subcellular fractionation was performed according to a procedure
modified from that published by Baram et al. (27). Cells
were placed on ice and rinsed twice with homogenization buffer (HB, pH
7.3, 0.25 M sucrose, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES). Samples were scraped (4 × 107)
in 1.5-ml volume of HB (plus 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride and protease inhibitor mixture). The cell suspension was
homogenized by five passages through a ball bearing homogenizer with
0.009 mm clearance (EMBL, Heidelberg, Germany). The nuclear fraction was spun down at 170 × g for 10 min at 4 °C and 800 units/ml DNase (type IV) added to the post-nuclear supernatant (PNS).
The PNS was loaded onto a preformed continuous sucrose gradient as
described (27). Gradients were collected in 25 fractions of 500 µl
from the top of the tube using an Autodensi-Flow IIC (Buchler
Instruments, Kansas City, MO) and analyzed when necessary for
[3H]serotonin, 125I-transferrin,
-hexosaminidase, and HRP activities across the gradient. Recovery of
-hexosaminidase and HRP activities on the primary gradient was
~50% of total activity (homogenate + medium) in resting cells;
however, for stimulated cells, recovery was reduced to around 40% of
total activity. For experiments that required a further secondary
gradient, fractions 14-20 were analyzed and the remainder pooled to 4 ml at 1.1 M sucrose. The pooled fractions were layered onto
a preformed continuous sucrose gradient of 1.3-2.0 M
sucrose (8 ml). This gradient was then run, fractionated, and analyzed
as with the first gradient.
Quantification--
[3H]Serotonin incorporation
was monitored by tritium radioactivity using liquid scintillation
spectrometry. 125I-Transferrin loading was monitored by
gamma counting using a Packard Cobra II auto-gamma counter.
-Hexosaminidase activity was determined using an absorbance assay in
a microplate reader as follows. 50 µl of sample was mixed with 20 µl of subcellular fractionation buffer (1 mM
NaHCO3, 1 mM EDTA, 0.01% Triton X-100). This
was then incubated with 100 µl of substrate solution consisting of 4 mg/ml
p-nitrophenyl-N-acetyl- -D-glucosaminide
in 0.1 M sodium citrate buffer, (pH 4.5, 0.2% Triton
X-100) for 30 min at 37 °C in the dark. The reaction was stopped by
the addition of 150 µl of pre-warmed (37 °C) stop buffer (0.25 M glycine, 0.2 M NaCl, 4% SDS, pH 12.5). The
samples were read at 405 nm in a Molecular Devices Thermo.max
microplate reader. HRP activities were determined from aliquots of 75 µl as described previously (28).
Immunofluorescence Microscopy of HRP Chimeras and
Serotonin--
Transfected cells on glass coverslips 1 day
post-transfection were paraformaldehyde (3%)-fixed, quenched with 50 mM NH4Cl, and rinsed with PBS. Coverslips were
then placed in cyanine 3-tyramide signal amplification (TSA) reagent
for 10 min. The reaction was stopped with 8 washes in PBS plus azide
(0.2%). Samples were permeabilized in 0.2% saponin and then
transferred to PBS plus 0.02% saponin and 0.2% gelatin for subsequent
antibody incubations. Cells were incubated with mouse monoclonal
anti-serotonin (Biogenesis, Poole, UK), followed by goat anti-mouse
fluorescein isothiocyanate (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West
Grove, PA). After staining, cells were mounted in Mowiol and analyzed
with the use of an Optiphot-2 microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) equipped
with an MRC Bio-Rad 1024 confocal laser scanning system. Images were
transferred to Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems, Mountain View, CA).
Triton X-114 Assay--
The partitioning of membrane-associated
HRP and soluble (clipped) HRP (28) was established using the Triton
X-114 assay (29) with the addition of a protease inhibitor mixture upon cell lysis. Transfected and mock-transfected cells were separated into
upper and lower phases, and HRP assays were carried out in triplicate.
To normalize for differential cell number between samples, the protein
concentration (Micro BCA Protein Assay Reagent kit, Pierce) of each
phase was determined. For transfected and mock-transfected cells, the
HRP activity in each phase (upper or lower) was calculated per µg of
total protein (upper plus lower). Levels of HRP activity/µg of
protein in the two phases of mock-transfected cells was used to
subtract background levels of endogenous peroxidase activity away from
transfected cells. The extent of proteolysis of HRP from its P-selectin
membrane-bound anchor was established by calculating the percentage of
soluble (clipped) HRP in the upper phase to the total of both phases.
 |
RESULTS |
To determine which targeting signals are required by
HRP-P-selectin for accumulation within Rbl-2H3 secretory lysosomes, we combined transient expression with subcellular fractionation, a
strategy that has proved highly successful in previous analyses of
targeting (21-25, 28). Because morphological co-localization of
Rbl-2H3 endogenous markers such as the granule membrane protein 5G10
(30), serotonin, lgp120, and -hexosaminidase has been reported
within a single population of organelles (6, 7, 31), we expected to
find a single peak containing these markers by fractionation.
We have chosen two markers for the secretory lysosome, the lysosomal
enzyme -hexosaminidase and the secretory monoamine serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine), to reflect the twin characteristics of the
organelle. We assayed for endogenous activity of -hexosaminidase and
labeled cells with [3H]serotonin. We first established
that the uptake of [3H]serotonin was specific by using
reserpine, which blocks the vesicular uptake of catecholamines and
serotonin (data not shown).
Enrichment for the Secretory Lysosome--
Fig.
2A shows the subcellular
distribution of the secretory lysosome marker -hexosaminidase across
a single sucrose gradient following centrifugation of the PNS from
resting and cells stimulated by cross-linking the IgE receptor
(Fc RI) for 25 min. The lysosomal enzyme -hexosaminidase
distributes as a single peak of activity, highlighted in gray
(fractions 14-20), and activity falls from this peak by 45% upon
stimulation. This fractionation scheme was adapted from the work of
Baram et al. (27), who enriched for secretory lysosomes from
Rbl cells using this single sucrose gradient. We have observed the
secretory marker [3H]serotonin to always co-distribute
with -hexosaminidase across the gradient in resting cells and to
respond to stimulation in the same way as -hexosaminidase in all
experiments carried out to date. [3H]Serotonin, however,
was not monitored at this early stage to retain material for subsequent
analysis.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Co-distribution of secretory lysosome markers
and wt HRP-P-selectin in resting and stimulated cells. Enrichment
for the secretory lysosome of Rbl cells. Cells transfected with 10 µg
of wt HRP-P-selectin cDNA, pre-loaded with
[3H]serotonin and primed with IgE, were stimulated with
50 ng/ml human serum albumin/2,4-dinitrophenol for 25 min at
37 °C. Resting and stimulated cells were homogenized, and the PNS
was separated on a pre-formed 0.45-2.0 M sucrose
equilibrium gradient with a 70% sucrose cushion. A,
fractions were assayed by absorbance at 405 nm for -hexosaminidase
activity. Data are plotted as -hexosaminidase activity per fraction
as a percentage of total activity (homogenate + medium) for resting
( ) and stimulated cells ( ). B, HRP-P-selectin
localizes to the secretory lysosome. The same fractions as above were
also assayed for HRP activity, and data represent HRP activity per
fraction as a percentage of total HRP activity. A time course of
stimulation is presented, ( ) resting cells, and cells stimulated for
5 ( ), 10 ( ), and 25 min ( ). C and D,
highlighted areas (fractions 14-20) of A and
B were pooled and further resolved on secondary pre-formed
1.3-2.0 M sucrose equilibrium gradients and fractionated
as before. Fractions in C were assayed for the secretory
lysosome markers -hexosaminidase ( , resting, and , stimulated
for 25 min) and [3H]serotonin ( , resting, and ,
stimulated for 25 min), expressed as a percentage of total (homogenate + medium). D represents HRP activity as a percentage of
total activity in resting cells ( ), and cells stimulated for 5 ( ), 10 ( ), and 25 min ( ). E, -hexosaminidase
(filled boxes) and [3H]serotonin (open
boxes) secretion. Media samples were assayed for the secretory
lysosomal markers, and data are presented as the percentage of total
(homogenate + medium) activity in the medium in resting cells and cells
stimulated for 25 min. The data points are means ± S.E.
A-E, represent the average of three independent
experiments.
|
|
HRP-P-Selectin Localizes to the Secretory Lysosome--
These same
resting and stimulated cells had been transiently transfected 3 days
prior with wt HRP-P-selectin (21) to determine whether the cytoplasmic
domain of P-selectin has the necessary sorting information required to
direct it to the secretory lysosome of these cells. Fig. 2B
shows that wt HRP-P-selectin peaks in the same fractions (15-19) that
contain the marker -hexosaminidase in resting cells and that this
compartment also responds to stimulation of the cells caused by
aggregation of the Fc RI for 25 min. Thus HRP-P-selectin is targeted
to the functionally active secretory lysosome. A more detailed
stimulation profile was carried out by inducing exocytosis for 5 and 10 min to ascertain whether a significant proportion of HRP-P-selectin
would shift out of the secretory lysosome peak into other organellar
fractions, such as the plasma membrane, upon degranulation of the
cells. HRP activity does appear as a shoulder to the main secretory
lysosome peak from fractions 9-14, within which the HRP activity
increases sequentially as we increase the stimulation period. However,
the secretory lysosome peak remains the main peak of HRP activity.
Following 5 min of stimulation, 29% HRP activity is lost from the
secretory lysosome fractions (14-20); 10 min of stimulation results in
a 35% fall, and after 25 min of stimulation there is a 38% fall in
HRP activity from the secretory lysosome. This sequential loss of
activity from the peak of the secretory lysosome upon stimulation coincides with the sequential increase in activity in fractions 9-14.
Following the full 25-min stimulation period, we only observe a 38%
fall in HRP activity within the secretory lysosome, whereas the extent
of release of -hexosaminidase following the same period was
45%.
Further Resolution of the Secretory Lysosome Fractions--
To
investigate the residual HRP activity within the secretory lysosome
peak, we pooled fractions 14-20 (highlighted) and layered them onto a
more shallow secondary sucrose gradient (1.3-2.0 M). Fig.
2C shows the distribution of -hexosaminidase and
[3H]serotonin from the pooled fractions of Fig.
2A. The profile of the two markers in resting cells reveals
two peaks, the lighter one distributing between fractions 9 and 10 and
the denser one between fractions 17 and 20, both of which are
responsive when the cells are induced to exocytose for 25 min. Hence
both peaks are secretory lysosomes. The traces for resting and
stimulated [3H]serotonin show a significant number of
counts in the load of the gradient (fractions 1-5) which probably
reflect leakage of this tracer molecule from vesicular structures. This
is also observed when [3H]serotonin is monitored on the
primary gradient (data not shown).
Fig. 2D shows that the resting peaks of HRP-P-selectin
activity co-distribute with those for the secretory lysosome markers (2C) and that they also both respond to stimulation for 25 min, HRP activity falling from the secretory lysosome peaks and
redistributing to a new lighter peak at fraction 8. This peak is not
observed upon stimulation for the secretory lysosome markers
-hexosaminidase and [3H]serotonin (Fig.
2C). The clear fall in activity from both peaks of the
secretory lysosome markers upon stimulation (2C) is not as
obvious as the fall in HRP activity, because of the overlap of the peak
at fraction 8 with the lighter one of the two secretory lysosome peaks
(9, 10). The shift of activity to fraction 8 is consecutive over time,
HRP activity peaking at fraction 10 for resting and 5 min of
stimulation, fraction 9 following 10 min and then to fraction 8 after
25 min of stimulation. This secondary gradient reveals that a large
proportion of the residual HRP activity retained in the secretory
lysosome peak following 25 min of stimulation in Fig. 2B has
moved to a separate compartment from the markers -hexosaminidase and
[3H]serotonin.
Release of Secretory Lysosome Markers--
In parallel, we
quantified release of -hexosaminidase and
[3H]serotonin into the bathing medium. Fig. 2E
shows that only 3.5% of both -hexosaminidase and
[3H]serotonin is constitutively secreted from resting
cells, whereas 47% is released upon 25 min of stimulation. This 47%
release is in good agreement with the 45% fall in -hexosaminidase
activity from the subcellular profile of the secretory lysosome in Fig. 2A.
Effects of Mutations in the Cytoplasmic Tail of HRP-P-Selectin on
Secretory Lysosomal Targeting--
We compared the targeting of wt
HRP-P-selectin to secretory lysosomes with that of tetra-alanine mutant
chimeras of the cytoplasmic sequences KCPL, YGVF, and DPSP and of the
deletion mutant 763HRP-P-selectin, which lacks all three
motifs (Fig. 3). These three motifs have
been implicated in lysosomal, secretory granule, and SLMV targeting
(Fig. 1). Rbl cells were transiently transfected with wt,
KCPL, YGVF, DPSP, 763HRP-P-selectin
and cultured for 3 days. Fractionation was then carried out, and
the subcellular profile across the primary sucrose gradient for each
chimera is shown in Fig. 4A.
The secretory lysosome fractions are highlighted in gray
(14-20). The majority of wt, YGVF,
DPSPHRP-P-selectin activity is found in the secretory
lysosome peak, all three having very similar profiles. However, much
lower levels of HRP activity within the secretory lysosome peak are
found with the mutants KCPL and 763HRP-P-selectin, which
coincide with a significant accumulation of HRP activity elsewhere on
the gradient. The profiles for 763HRP-P-selectin and
KCPLHRP-P-selectin differ in that there is a significant
shoulder to the major peak for 763HRP-P-selectin such that
it covers fractions 6-15, whereas the peak for
KCPLHRP-P-selectin is sharper (fractions 10-15). Mutating
the sequence KCPL, which is implicated in lysosomal targeting (Fig. 1),
to tetra-alanine has a similar effect on targeting to the secretory lysosome as the complete removal of the last 27 residues of the cytoplasmic domain.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Schematic illustration of the cytoplasmic
domain of HRP-P-selectin chimeras. The name of each chimera is
listed, showing the sequences to the top left that have been
deleted or replaced by alanine (underlined and in
bold). N-terminal to the transmembrane (TM)
region is the human growth hormone signal sequence followed by
HRP.
|
|

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Diagrammatic distribution of HRP-P-selectin
chimeras across primary and secondary sucrose gradients. Cells
were transfected with 10 µg of cDNA for wt HRP-P-selectin,
DPSPHRP-P-selectin, YGVFHRP-P-selectin, and 3 µg of cDNA for KCPLHRP-P-selectin and
763HRP-P-selectin. Cells were homogenized and the PNS run
on gradients and analyzed as before. A, individual traces
across the primary sucrose gradient for wt HRP-P-selectin ( ),
YGVFHRP-P-selectin ( ),
DPSPHRP-P-selectin ( ),
KCPLHRP-P-selectin ( ), and
763HRP-P-selectin ( ) are shown as percentage of total
HRP activity across the gradient. Results are expressed as an average
of three experiments and are all plotted on the same scale axis.
B, in parallel, fractions were assayed for
-hexosaminidase ( ) and [3H]serotonin ( ) or
125I-transferrin (37 °C loading , 37 °C load
followed by cell surface strip ), all presented as percentage total
across the gradient, on the same axis. Highlighted areas of
A and B represent pooled fractions 14-20 that
were further resolved on secondary gradients in C and
D. All traces are presented as in A and
B.
|
|
Identification of Peaks--
Because expression of
KCPLHRP-P-selectin in H.Ep.2 cells results in localization
in transferrin-positive compartments (24), and
763HRP-P-selectin localization at the plasma membrane (24,
25), we analyzed the distribution of 125I-transferrin
across our sucrose gradients in addition to analyzing the secretory
lysosome markers. Fig. 4B illustrates the distribution of
125I-transferrin following loading of transfected cells for
1 h and internal stores of 125I-transferrin after
stripping transferrin bound at the plasma membrane. Internal
transferrin peaks at fraction 12, whereas plasma membrane-bound
transferrin peaks at fractions 5-6. 125I-Transferrin bound
at the cell surface at 4 °C reveals this same peak (data not shown).
A substantial proportion of HRP activity for the mutants KCPL,
763HRP-P-selectin co-distributes with the internal endosomal
load of 125I-transferrin (fraction 12). The shoulder of HRP
activity for 763HRP-P-selectin (fractions 6-15)
co-distributes in part with the plasma membrane and mainly with
endosomes. All the HRP chimeras in Fig. 4A show a peak of
activity at fraction 4 that does not co-distribute with any marker we
have assayed and may represent the newly synthesized material within
the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi. It is important to note that the
redistribution of wt HRP-P-selectin upon stimulation of the cells from
the secretory lysosome to the shoulder of activity between fractions 10 and 13 (see Fig. 2B) coincides with the peak of internal
125I-transferrin-positive compartments.
Secondary Gradient of the Secretory Lysosome Fractions--
To
investigate the targeting of each mutant to the two peaks of the
secretory lysosome identified on secondary gradients, we pooled
fractions 14-20 and ran them on a 1.3-2.0 M sucrose gradient as in Fig. 2, D and E. It is clear from
Fig. 4C, that YGVF,
DPSPHRP-P-selectin show a similar distribution as the wt
chimera, localizing to the two peaks that also contain
-hexosaminidase and [3H]serotonin. Hence there is no
differential targeting of the mutant chimeras between the two peaks.
The HRP activity that appeared to be within the secretory lysosome peak
for KCPL, 763HRP-P-selectin in Fig.
4B is now seen to partially co-distribute with the
125I-transferrin positive peak (fraction 8) rather than
with the secretory lysosome markers (Fig. 4D). However, the
peaks for KCPL, 763HRP-P-selectin are broader than that of
125I-transferrin, also showing a partial overlap with the
lighter of the two peaks containing -hexosaminidase and
[3H]serotonin.
Immunofluorescence Microscopy of HRP Chimeras and
Serotonin--
To confirm the subcellular localization of the HRP
chimeras, we visualized HRP using Tyramide Signal Amplification (TSA), which uses HRP activity to catalyze the deposition of cyanine 3-tyramide immediately adjacent to the immobilized HRP-P-selectin chimeras. We also stained the cells with an antibody to the secretory lysosome marker serotonin, and Fig. 5
shows the fluorescence pattern of HRP and serotonin in cells
transfected with wt, KCPL and 763HRP-P-selectin. The great
majority of wt HRP-P-selectin is found to co-localize with
serotonin-positive structures, as highlighted by the magnification of
one of the processes of the cell. A few structures stain only for
serotonin and not HRP, and these most likely reflect secretory
lysosomes made before the transient expression of wt HRP-P-selectin.
Also present are a small number of HRP-positive structures that appear
devoid of serotonin, which may represent the biosynthetic traffic of
HRP-P-selectin en route to the secretory lysosome. In contrast,
KCPLHRP-P-selectin localizes to very distinct structures
from serotonin, being especially enriched at the processes of the
cells. The localization of 763HRP-P-selectin is more
diffuse, mainly at the plasma membrane, but it is also found within
internal structures that do not co-localize with serotonin. Staining
patterns for YGVF, DPSPHRP-P-selectin are
similar to the wild-type protein (data not shown).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Immunofluorescence microscopy of
HRP-P-selectin chimeras and endogenous serotonin. Transfected Rbl
cells grown on coverslips were fixed, incubated with TSA reagent for 10 min, and subsequently permeabilized and stained for serotonin (see
"Materials and Methods"). Wt, KCPLHRP-P-selectin and
763HRP-P-selectin were visualized by cyanine 3-tyramide
(red channel) and endogenous serotonin in the green
channel. The insert in the wt panel contains a 2-fold
magnification of the boxed area. Bar represents
50 µm.
|
|
Intracellular Proteolysis (Triton X-114 Assay)--
Once
HRP-P-selectin is delivered to and accumulates within protease-rich
environments, the chimera becomes subject to proteolytic attack such
that soluble HRP is released from the P-selectin membrane anchor. We
made use of this phenomenon, determining the amount of soluble HRP
compared with that which remains membrane-bound, as an independent
measure of targeting to the secretory lysosome (22, 24, 25,
28). Partitioning of HRP activity between two phases of Triton X-114
reveals the extent of proteolysis for each of the HRP chimeras (Fig.
6), with 48.6% (±0.8) of wt
HRP-P-selectin HRP in its soluble form and 24.2% (±3.1) proteolysis
for 763HRP-P-selectin. KCPLHRP-P-selectin
has a very similar value to that of the
763 HRP-P-selectin (27.4%, ±3.4), but the extent of
proteolysis of YGVF and DPSPHRP-P-selectin was even higher
than wt levels (73.4 ± 3.8 and 63.6 ± 0.9%, respectively).
Thus, in the case of YGVF and DPSPHRP-P-selectin, more HRP
is in its soluble, clipped form than its membrane-bound form.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Proteolysis of HRP-P-selectin chimeras in Rbl
cells. HRP activities in the upper and lower phases of Triton
X-114 were determined for wt, KCPL, YGVF,
DPSP, 763HRP-P-selectin and mock-transfected cells. The
protein concentration as a total of the two phases was also established
to normalize the data for cell number. The values for mock-transfected
cells were used to subtract background levels of peroxidase activity
from the HRP chimeric mutants. Percentage proteolysis is defined as the
fraction of HRP activity in the upper aqueous phase of the partition.
Results are means of four independent experiments ± S.E.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this work we have used a combination of transient transfection
of HRP-P-selectin plus subcellular fractionation to analyze targeting
to secretory lysosomes. We have discovered that in Rbl-2H3 cells,
HRP-P-selectin accumulation in secretory lysosomes is dependent on the
cytoplasmic tail of P-selectin and, in particular, on the sequence
KCPL, elsewhere used for accumulation within conventional lysosomes
(19, 21, 22).
There are multiple pathways for targeting of membrane proteins to
lysosomes (31), and it is thought that certain components of this
ubiquitous lysosomal targeting machinery are subtly rearranged or
enhanced, leading to distinct tissue-specific secretory lysosomes. Trafficking of membrane proteins to the secretory lysosome would thus
be dependent on one type of lysosomal sorting pathway, resulting in the
differential sorting of proteins to the secretory lysosome, via the
enhanced pathway, over conventional lysosomes. Cells that only possess
secretory lysosomes would continue to use this enhanced lysosomal
sorting pathway. This is exemplified in human genetic disorders and
mouse models of diseases such as Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome and
Griscelli syndromes, whereby components of ubiquitous cellular
machinery are mutated such that the biogenesis of, sorting to, and
secretion from certain secretory lysosomes is dramatically abrogated
(32-38). Conventional lysosomes are affected to a lesser degree
indicating that there are many redundant pathways for sorting to lysosomes.
DCG (YGVF) or SLMV (a combination of the sequences KCPL, YGVF, and
DPSP) targeting sequences do not abrogate targeting of HRP-P-selectin
to secretory lysosomes of Rbl-2H3 cells (Fig. 4, A and
C). Only when all three sequences are removed from the tail of P-selectin (763HRP-P-selectin) or the lysosomal
targeting signal KCPL is replaced with tetra-alanine is targeting
compromised. This supports the relationship between trafficking to
conventional lysosomes and secretory lysosomes.
The 763HRP-P-selectin chimera is not able to internalize
efficiently in H.Ep.2 and PC12 cells and has provided a base line of non-signal-mediated internalization and traffic through to the lysosome
(22, 25). It has been found in H.Ep.2 and PC12 cells that the
majority of 763HRP-P-selectin is localized to the
plasma membrane and that KCPLHRP-P-selectin accumulates in
early endosomes. In Rbl-2H3 cells, however, the majority of
763HRP-P-selectin co-distributes with internal stores
of 125I-transferrin with a shoulder of activity that
partially overlaps with the plasma membrane (Fig. 4, A and
B). This is confirmed by immunofluorescence microscopy of
763HRP-P-selectin and serotonin (Fig. 5) that shows
internal vesicular structures as well as labeling the plasma membrane.
This contrasting localization of 763HRP-P-selectin between
PC12 cells, H.Ep.2 cells, and the Rbl-2H3 cells in this study may
reflect a highly active endocytic pathway within Rbl cells. The high
ratio of internal to cell surface 125I-transferrin shown in
Fig. 4B, indicated by the cell surface strip, would be
consistent with this. However, a full analysis of the endocytic pathway
within Rbl-2H3 cells is beyond the scope of this paper.
The proteolysis data of Fig. 6 reflect the reduced exposure
of KCPLHRP-P-selectin and 763HRP-P-selectin to
proteolytic cleavage within late endosomal and lysosomal compartments
in comparison with the wt chimera. This is in accordance with the
subcellular targeting profiles of Fig. 4, A and
B, further confirming that mutation of the sequence KCPL results in reducing accumulation within secretory lysosomes to base-line levels.
It has been shown that in addition to the lysosomal targeting signal
KCPL, negative targeting or lysosomal avoidance signals (YGVF and DPSP)
also operate in the accumulation of HRP-P-selectin to lysosomes of
H.Ep.2 and PC12 cells (22, 25). Mutation of these avoidance
motifs leads to an increase above wild-type in accumulation of
HRP-P-selectin within the conventional lysosome. Our data (Fig. 6) also
reveal an increase above wt levels (49%) of proteolysis for
YGVFHRP-P-selectin (73%) and
DPSPHRP-P-selectin (64%), as is the case for targeting to
conventional lysosomes in H.Ep.2 and PC12 cells. This further
reinforces the similarity of the targeting behavior of HRP-P-selectin
to lysosomes and secretory lysosomes.
Upon stimulation of cells transfected with wt HRP-P-selectin, the HRP
activity shifts out of the secretory lysosome peak and into a shoulder
of activity from fractions 9 to 14 (Fig. 2B). This shoulder
co-distributes with 125I-transferrin-rich compartments.
P-selectin reaching the plasma membrane has been shown to internalize
(39) and subsequently pass through endosomal compartments (22, 23, 26,
40), yet our time course of stimulation (Fig. 2B) does not
reveal a simple bulk transfer of HRP activity to the plasma membrane.
This might reflect an asynchronous fusion of secretory lysosomes with the plasma membrane, especially if compound exocytosis, common to mast
cells and other hematopoietic cells is taking place (41). Further
resolution of the residual HRP activity within the secretory lysosome
peak in Fig. 2C shows that there is a substantial fall in
HRP activity within the secretory lysosome peaks upon stimulation than
was originally apparent from the primary gradient (2B).
The single sucrose gradient procedure used in this work to monitor
HRP-P-selectin targeting to secretory lysosomes was adapted from Baram
et al. (27) who found two populations of -hexosaminidase, the secretory lysosome pool and a less dense conventional lysosome pool. However, this conventional lysosomal pool was identified by the
co-distribution of -hexosaminidase with pro-cathepsin D (53 kDa),
which is a form usually associated with the Golgi in Rbl-2H3 cells (6,
42). In our hands, -hexosaminidase and the secretory marker
serotonin have always co-distributed across the first gradient within a
single dense peak, which when further analyzed on secondary gradient
reveals two peaks (Fig. 2C) with similar profiles for the
two markers. When we stimulate our cells, there is a 45% fall in the
peak for -hexosaminidase on the primary gradient (Fig.
2A) and a fall in both peaks for -hexosaminidase and
[3H]serotonin on the secondary gradient. Because both
peaks respond to stimulation, and both contain our markers, they must
be secretory lysosomes. The most likely explanation is that these peaks
represent immature and mature secretory lysosomes, with increasing
density reflecting maturation. However, in the absence of a thorough
analysis of the make-up of the peaks, this remains speculation.
Certainly, for the purposes of this work, we see no differential
targeting of our HRP chimeras between the two peaks (Fig.
4C) and so we conclude that they are closely related
secretory lysosomes. The residual -hexosaminidase activity and
[3H]serotonin within the secretory lysosome may represent
a complete (100%) degranulation of a proportion of the cell
population, a 47% release from the entire population of the cells, or
a situation somewhere between these two extremes.
In contrast to our findings with P-selectin (this work) and the
behavior of tyrosinase (8, 9, 10, 43), the targeting of Fas ligand to
secretory lysosomes seems to use a novel sorting pathway, specific to
these organelles (11). Fas ligand targeting is dependent on a
proline-rich domain, contrasting with more conventional short
contiguous sequences, as used by P-selectin and tyrosinase, suggesting
a different sorting mechanism for targeting of Fas ligand to secretory lysosomes.
The discovery that the cytoplasmic tail of P-selectin is not required
for targeting to granules of platelets (18) is in contrast to our
finding that it is sufficient for accumulation in secretory lysosomes
of Rbl-2H3 cells. It is not clear whether the proposed variations in
biogenesis and trafficking between different secretory lysosomes is
sufficient to explain this discrepancy. Further examination of the
targeting of P-selectin to the secretory lysosomes within platelets,
the granule (44) and granule (45-47), and to lysosomes (17),
and WPB (15, 16) of endothelial cells may reveal key differences in
their biogenesis. By identifying the sorting and targeting machinery
used by P-selectin to reach these organelles, we could subdivide
secretory lysosomes into further classes, mapping out which lysosomal
sorting pathways are enhanced for which secretory lysosome.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank members of the laboratory for helpful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by a Medical Research Council
program grant (to D. F. C.) and a Medical Research Council Ph.D.
studentship (to J. K.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
44-020-7679-7808; Fax: 44-020-7679-7805; E-mail:
d.cutler@ucl.ac.uk.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 11, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111293200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
SLMV, synaptic like
microvesicles;
WPB, Weibel-Palade bodies;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium;
HRP, horseradish peroxidase;
PBS, phosphate-buffered
saline;
PNS, post-nuclear supernatant;
wt, wild type;
TSA, tyramide
signal amplification.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Andrews, N.
(2000)
Trends Cell Biol.
10,
316-321[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Rodriguez, A.,
Webster, P.,
Ortego, J.,
and Andrews, N.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
137,
93-104[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Dell'Angelica, E. C.,
Mullins, C.,
Caplan, S.,
and Bonifacino, J. S.
(2000)
FASEB J.
14,
1265-1278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Stinchcombe, J. C.,
and Griffiths, G. M.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
147,
1-5[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Griffiths, G. M.
(1996)
Trends Cell Biol.
6,
329-332[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Dragonetti, A.,
Baldassarre, M.,
Castino, R.,
Demoz, M.,
Luini, A.,
Buccione, R.,
and Isidoro, C.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
3289-3298[Abstract]
|
| 7.
|
Xu, K.,
Williams, R. M.,
Holowka, D.,
and Baird, B.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
2385-2396[Abstract]
|
| 8.
|
Calvo, P. A.,
Frank, D. W.,
Bieler, B. M.,
Berson, J. F.,
and Marks, M. S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
12780-12789[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Simmen, T.,
Schmidt, A.,
Hunziker, W.,
and Beermann, F.
(1999)
J. Cell Sci.
112,
45-53[Abstract]
|
| 10.
|
Blagoveshchenskaya, A. D.,
Hewitt, E. W.,
and Cutler, D. F.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
3979-3990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Bossi, G.,
and Griffiths, G. M.
(1999)
Nat. Med.
5,
90-96[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Berman, C. L.,
Yeo, E. L.,
Wencel-Drake, J. D.,
Furie, B. C.,
Ginsberg, M. H.,
and Furie, B.
(1986)
J. Clin. Invest.
78,
130-137[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Stenberg, P. E.,
McEver, R. P.,
Shuman, M. A.,
Jacques, Y. V.,
and Bainton, D. F.
(1985)
J. Cell Biol.
101,
880-886[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Israels, S. J.,
Gerrard, Y. V.,
Jacques, Y. V.,
McNicol, A.,
Cham, B.,
Nishibori, M.,
and Bainton, D. F.
(1992)
Blood
80,
143-152[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Bonfanti, R.,
Furie, B. C.,
Furie, B.,
and Wagner, D. D.
(1989)
Blood
73,
1109-1112[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
McEver, R. P.,
Beckstead, J. H.,
Moore, K. L.,
Marshall-Carlson, L.,
and Bainton, D. F.
(1989)
J. Clin. Invest.
84,
92-99[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Arribas, M.,
and Cutler, D. F.
(2000)
Traffic
1,
783-793[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Hartwell, D. W.,
Mayadas, T. N.,
Berger, G.,
Frenette, P. S.,
Rayburn, H.,
Hynes, R. O.,
and Wagner, D. D.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
143,
1129-1141[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Disdier, M.,
Morrisey, J. H.,
Fugate, R. D.,
Bainton, D. F.,
and McEver, R. P.
(1992)
Mol. Biol. Cell
3,
309-321[Abstract]
|
| 20.
|
Modderman, P. W.,
Beuling, E. A.,
Govers, L. A. T.,
Calafat, J.,
Janssen, H.,
Von Dem Borne, A. E.,
and Sonnenberg, A.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
336,
153-161
|
| 21.
|
Norcott, J. P.,
Solari, R.,
and Cutler, D. F.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
134,
1229-1240[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Blagoveshchenskaya, A. D.,
Hewitt, E. W.,
and Cutler, D. F.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
1419-1433[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Blagoveshchenskaya, A. D.,
and Cutler, D. F.
(2000)
Mol. Biol. Cell
11,
1801-1814[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Blagoveshchenskaya, A. D.,
Norcott, J. P.,
and Cutler, D. F.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
2729-2737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Blagoveshchenskaya, A. D.,
Hewitt, E. W.,
and Cutler, D. F.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
27896-27903[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Green, S. A.,
Setiadi, H.,
McEver, R. P.,
and Kelly, R. B.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
124,
435-448[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Baram, D.,
Adachi, R.,
Medalia, O.,
Tuvim, M.,
Dickey, B. F.,
Mekori, Y. A.,
and Sagi-Eisenberg, R.
(1999)
J. Exp. Med.
189,
1649-1657[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Blagoveshchenskaya, A. D.,
and Cutler, D. F.
(2000)
Methods Enzymol.
327,
45-60[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Masterton, W. J.,
and Magee, A. I.
(1992)
in
Protein Targeting, A Practical Approach
(Magee, A. I.
, and Wileman, T., eds)
, p. 242, Oxford University Press, New York
|
| 30.
|
Bonifacino, J. S.,
Yuan, L.,
and Sandoval, I. V.
(1989)
J. Cell Sci.
92,
701-712[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Dell'Angelica, E. C.,
and Payne, G. S.
(2001)
Cell
106,
395-398[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Detter, J. C.,
Zhang, Q.,
Mules, E. H.,
Novak, E. K.,
Mishra, V. S., Li, W.,
McMurtrie, E. B.,
Tchernev, V. T.,
Wallace, M. R.,
Seabra, M. C.,
Swank, R. T.,
and Kingsmore, S. F.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
4144-4149[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Hume, A. N.,
Collinson, L. M.,
Rapak, A.,
Gomes, A. Q.,
Hopkins, C. R.,
and Seabra, M. C.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
152,
795-808[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Kantheti, P.,
Qiao, X.,
Diaz, M. E.,
Peden, A. A.,
Meyer, G. E.,
Carskadon, S. L.,
Kapfhamer, D.,
Sufalko, D.,
Robinson, M. S.,
Noebels, J. L.,
and Burmeister, M.
(1998)
Neuron
21,
111-122[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Pastural, E.,
Barrat, F. J.,
Dufourcq-Lagelouse, R.,
Certain, S.,
Sanal, O.,
Jabado, N.,
Seger, R.,
Griscelli, C.,
Fischer, A.,
and de Saint Basile, G.
(1997)
Nat. Genet.
16,
289-292[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Stinchcombe, J. C.,
Barral, D. C.,
Mules, E. H.,
Booth, S.,
Hume, A. N.,
Machesky, L. M.,
Seabra, M. C.,
and Griffiths, G. M.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
152,
825-833[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Wilson, S. M.,
Yip, R.,
Swing, D. A.,
O'Sullivan, N.,
Zhang, Y.,
Novak, E. K.,
Swank, R. T.,
Russell, L. B.,
Copeland, N. G.,
and Jenkins, N. A.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
7933-7938[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Marks, M. S.,
and Seabra, M. C.
(2001)
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.
2,
738-748[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Setiadi, H.,
Disdier, M.,
Green, S. A.,
Canfield, W. M.,
and McEver, R. P.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
26818-26826[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Straley, K. S.,
Daugherty, B. L.,
Aeder, S. E.,
Hockenson, A. L.,
Kim, K.,
and Green, S. A.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
1683-1694[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Guo, Z.,
Turner, C.,
and Castle, D.
(1998)
Cell
94,
537-548[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Baldassarre, M.,
Dragonetti, A.,
Marra, P.,
Luini, A.,
Isidoro, C.,
and Buccione, R.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
741-748[Abstract]
|
| 43.
|
Vijayasaradhi, S., Xu, Y.,
Bouchard, B.,
and Houghton, A. N.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
130,
807-820[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Heijnen, H. F. G.,
Debili, N.,
Vainchenker, W.,
Breton-Gorius, J.,
Geuze, H. J.,
and Sixma, J. J.
(1998)
Blood
91,
2313-2325[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Youssefian, T.,
and Cramer, E. M.
(2000)
Blood
95,
4004-4007[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Israels, S. J.,
McMillan, E. M.,
Robertson, C.,
Singhroy, S.,
and McNicol, A.
(1996)
Thromb. Haemostasis
75,
623-629[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Nishibori, M.,
Cham, B.,
McNicol, A.,
Shalev, A.,
Jain, N.,
and Gerrard, J. M.
(1993)
J. Clin. Invest.
91,
1775-1782[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Michaux, L. J. Hewlett, S. L. Messenger, A. C. Goodeve, I. R. Peake, M. E. Daly, and D. F. Cutler
Analysis of intracellular storage and regulated secretion of 3 von Willebrand disease-causing variants of von Willebrand factor
Blood,
October 1, 2003;
102(7):
2452 - 2458.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Gao, H. Rosen, E. Johnsson, J. Calafat, H. Tapper, and I. Olsson
Sorting of soluble TNF-receptor for granule storage in hematopoietic cells as a principle for targeting of selected proteins to inflamed sites
Blood,
July 15, 2003;
102(2):
682 - 688.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|