![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 12, 9741-9748, March 22, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
,
,
,
, and

From the
International Centre for Genetic Engineering
and Biotechnology, Padriciano, 99, Trieste I-34012, Italy, the
§ Genome Damage and Stability Unit, University of Sussex,
Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9RR, United Kingdom, the
Istituto di Ricerche di Biologia Molecolare, P. Angeletti SpA,
Pomezia, Rome 00040, Italy, and the ** Dipartimento di
Fisica, Universita' di Milano-Bicocca, Milano 20126, Italy
Received for publication, December 14, 2001, and in revised form, January 16, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Ku heterodimer plays a central role in
non-homologous end-joining. The binding of recombinant Ku to DNA has
been investigated by dynamic light scattering, double-filter binding,
fluorescence spectroscopy, and band shift assays. The hydrodynamic
radius of Ku in solution is 5.2 nm and does not change when a 25-bp
double-strand DNA (dsDNA) fragment (D25) is added, indicating that only
one Ku molecule binds to a 25-bp fragment. The dissociation constant (kd) for the binding to D25 is 3.8 ± 0.9 nM. If both ends of the substrate are closed with hairpin
loops, Ku is still able to bind with little change in the
kd. The kd is not affected by
ATP, Mg2+, or ionic strength. However, the addition of
bovine serum albumin decreases the kd by 2-fold.
DNA substrates of 50 bp can bind two Ku molecules, whereas three
molecules are bound to a 75-bp substrate. Data analysis with the Hill
equation yields a value of the Hill coefficient (n) close
to 1, and the kd values for the binding of Ku to
both ends of these substrates are the same. Thus, we demonstrate that
there is no cooperative interaction among the Ku heterodimers binding
longer substrates.
DNA double-strand breaks
(DSBs)1 arise in cells during
physiological processes such as DNA recombination and meiosis (1, 2).
Immunological diversity is generated by V(D)J recombination that
produces DSBs during the process of rearrangement of genes encoding B
cell immunoglobulins and T cell receptors (3, 4). They are also
generated by both exogenously and endogenously generated DNA-damaging agents, including ionizing radiation and reactive oxygen species that arise as by-products of DNA metabolism. If left
unrepaired, they lead to broken chromosomes and cell death. On the
other hand, if DNA DSBs are repaired incorrectly, they may lead to
chromosome translocation and cancer. Cells have evolved two different
pathways for repairing DSBs, namely homologous recombination and
non-homologous end-joining DNA (NHEJ). NHEJ is the dominant pathway in
cells of multicellular eukaryotes, while homologous recombination
prevails in diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae (5). Mammalian
cells utilize the same reaction to repair both radiation-induced DSBs
and breaks induced during V(D)J recombination (6).
Five proteins that function in NHEJ in mammalian cells have been
identified to date, namely Ku70, Ku80 DNA-PKcs, Xrcc4, and ligase IV
(7). Three of these (Ku70, Ku80, and DNA-PKcs) constitute a complex
termed the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK). DNA-PKcs is a large protein of 469 kDa and a member of a sub-group of
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases, called phosphatidylinositol
3-kinase-related kinases (8). Ku70 and Ku83 are subunits of the
heterodimeric protein Ku and require heterodimerization for stability
and function (9). Ku has double-stranded (ds) DNA end binding activity
(10) and once bound can slide along the DNA in an energy-independent
manner (11). Recently, the crystal structure of the Ku heterodimer, both in the presence and absence of DNA, has been determined (12). The
structure shows that Ku has the shape of a ring with a large base and a
narrow "handle." When bound to DNA, the conformation of Ku does not
change, and a dsDNA duplex fits precisely inside the ring. One face of
the duplex DNA remains relatively accessible to the solvent, because it
is only partially covered by the narrow handle of the Ku
molecule. In this way, the processing enzymes may have easy access to
this side of the DNA duplex to remove damaged nucleotides and fill gaps
prior to ligation. Although the structural studies are very useful in
providing a structure of how Ku binds to DNA, they do not provide
information on the dynamics of the interaction with Ku. Here, we
exploit biophysical studies to evaluate further the information gained
from the structural studies. In addition, the structure was determined
for a Ku variant that lacked the C terminus of Ku83, a region that does
not seem to be involved in the binding of Ku to DNA but is required for the interaction with DNA-PKcs (13). Several laboratories have investigated the binding of Ku to DNA and have shown that Ku cannot bind any DNA substrate shorter than 14 bp (14). It has been also shown
that Ku binds avidly to dsDNA ends independently of the oligonucleotide
sequence and of the exact structure of the ends, whether they are
blunt, with 5' or 3' overhangs, or even with hairpin loops (15).
Binding studies performed by different groups with dsDNA fragments of
similar length and structure have yielded values of the dissociation
constants (kd) that vary from the low picomolar to
the nanomolar range (10, 16, 17). Additionally, little is known about
the cooperativity of Ku binding to DNA (18).
Under thermodynamic equilibrium conditions, we have examined the
binding of Ku to dsDNA fragments of different length and structure. The
stoichiometry of the complexes that Ku forms with the different
substrates was determined by dynamic light scattering, which reflects
the change in the value of the hydrodynamic radius of the Ku
heterodimer when DNA is added (19). In addition, the value of the
hydrodynamic radius of the molecule provides valuable information on
the shape and the hydration shell of the protein. The affinity of Ku
for DNA and the presence of cooperativity among the Ku molecules
binding longer substrates was investigated by double-filter binding, an
improved filter binding technique that has already been used to study
protein·DNA interactions (20, 21). Fluorescence studies have also
been performed to support the results obtained by double-filter
binding. Our results provide an accurate estimate of the dissociation
constant for binding that is consistent with the two methods employed.
We show that there is no cooperativity among the Ku molecules binding
to DNA substrates and that Ku binds efficiently to hairpin loops.
Together our results provide novel insights into the mechanism of Ku
binding to DNA.
Expression and Purification of Recombinant Ku--
The procedure
for the expression of Ku in baculovirus was developed by Miroslav
Chovanec in the laboratory of Dr. Penny Jeggo and is based on the same
method already applied for the expression of the Xrcc4·LigIV
complex (22). The Sf9 (Spodoptera frugiperda ovary) cells were a kind gift from the laboratory of Dr. Antonino Cattaneo (Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati,
Trieste) and they were maintained at 27 °C in SF-900 II medium
(Invitrogen) supplemented with 10 µg/ml gentamicin or stored at
The human p70 and p83 Ku cDNAs were both subcloned into the
BamHI restriction site of the pFastBac HTb vector
(Invitrogen). Two different recombinant baculoviruses expressing,
respectively, histidine-tagged Ku70 and Ku83 subunits were produced.
The amino acid sequence preceding each subunit is the following:
MSYYHHHHHHDYDIPTTQNLYFEGAMGSTM and contains 6 histidines, a
linker region, and an rTEV protease cleavage site. After rTEV cleavage,
7 residues remain bound to the N terminus of each subunit. Both the
baculoviruses were used at the same multiplicity of infection (5-10
plaque-forming units/cell) to co-infect Sf9 cells cultured in
T175 flask (~2 × 107 cells/flask). Seventy-two
hours after infection cells were scraped, harvested by centrifugation,
and resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 5 mM
To remove the N-terminal polyhistidine sequence, rKu was incubated
overnight at 4 °C with rTEV protease (Invitrogen) in buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol), and the digested sample was loaded
again of the TALON column. The fraction not retained by the resin
containing rKu was concentrated and stored in buffer (20 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 60-100 mM KCl, 5 mM
Native HeLa Ku--
The Ku heterodimer was purified from HeLa
cells, as described previously (16, 23). For the last step of
purification, a dsDNA-Sepharose affinity column was used. The column
was equilibrated in buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM
EDTA, 10% glycerol), and the elution was performed with a linear
gradient of from 0.1 to 1 M KCl (20 column volumes). The Ku
heterodimer obtained after the last step of purification was judged to
be at least 95% pure as determined by SDS 8% polyacrylamide gel
stained both with Coomassie Brilliant Blue and silver.
DNA Substrates--
All the oligonucleotides used for the
binding experiments were obtained from Sigma-Genosys or Invitrogen. The
DNA substrates used for all the experiments are listed in Table
I. The blunt-end 25-bp duplex (D25) was
made by annealing the oligonucleotide 5'-GAT CTC GCA TCA CGT GAC GAA
GAT C-3' with its complementary. Complementary oligonucleotides were
annealed in buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2) first heating
the samples at 95 °C for 5 min and then gradually cooling them until
they reach room temperature. The 50-bp (D50) and 75-bp (D75) blunt-end
DNA substrates contain the same sequence of the D25 repeated two and
three times, respectively. The 25-bp duplex DNA substrate with one
hairpin loop (H25) was made using a single oligonucleotide containing
the D25 sequence followed by eight T and the reverse complementary
sequence of the D25 (H25 = 5'-(D25) TTT TTT TTG ATC TTC GTC ACG
TGA TGC GAG ATC-3'). Also the 50-bp (H50) and 75-bp (H75) substrates
with one hairpin were prepared using a single oligonucleotide of 108 and 158 bp, respectively. The double-hairpin substrate (2H25) was
prepared using the following oligonucleotide 5'-GTG ACG AAG ATC TTT TTT
TT (D25) TTT TTT TTG ATC TCG CAT CA-3'. Self-annealing of this
oligonucleotide produced a duple hairpin substrate with a nick (2H25').
To fill the gap with the missing base and generate in this way a close
double-hairpin probe (2H25), a 5'-phosphate was added, 15.9 pmol of the
substrate were incubated with 16.7 pmol of [ Spectroscopic Studies--
Fluorescence measurements were
performed on a Cary Eclipse fluorescence spectrophotometer (Varian,
Inc.). Spectra were collected at a protein concentration of about 0.1 µM in 600 µl of buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.5, 100 mM KCl, 10 mM
Circular dichroism (CD) spectra in the far UV (200-260 nm) were
collected on a JASCO J-600 dichrograph using a cylindrical cell
with optical path of 0.1 cm. Proteins at a concentration of few
micromolar were analyzed in 20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, containing 60 mM KCl and 1 mM
MgCl2. The acquisition parameters were: bandwidth 1 nm,
time constant 4 s, speed of 5-10 nm/min, and step resolution 0.1 nm. The average of three to five CD spectra was baseline-corrected,
expressed in terms of molar ellipticity (deg·cm2·dmol Dynamic Light Scattering--
DLS measurements were performed
using a DynaPro-801 instrument (Protein Solution, Charlottesville, VA)
where the scattered light was collected at an angle of 90° through a
fiber optic and converted to an electrical signal by an avalanche photo
diode. The time-dependent autocorrelation function (ACF) of
the photon current was monitored with a 20-channel software correlator
(based on a Digital Signal Processor (DSP) unit) provided by the
manufacturer. The first sampling time was 3.86 µs. The length of the
subsequent channels increases in a quasi-logarithmic fashion.
The samples were gently injected into the cell through a series of
Whatman filters with decreasing porosity, from 0.1 to 0.02 µm. The
protein concentration was in the range of 3.5-4 µM, and the buffer used for measurements is 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM Double-filter Binding--
Double-filter binding
measurements were performed with a modified 96-well dot blot apparatus
that allows the addition of a DEAE membrane for the retention of
unbound DNA under the nitrocellulose membrane (20). The procedure for
the preparation of the membranes is the same already described (20).
Titration experiments were performed at constant DNA concentration with
varying concentration of heterodimer in the same buffer used for the
dynamic light scattering and fluorescence experiments (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM Gel Shift--
The gel shift assay was performed by incubating
the purified Ku protein (0.2-0.4 µM) with about 20 fmol
of The baculovirus expression system allows the expression and the
purification of milligram quantities of highly pure (>99% as judged
from Coomassie- and Silver-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gel) recombinant
Ku heterodimer (rKu) (Fig.
1A). An electrophoretic mobility shift assay showed that rKu binds the 25-bp blunt-end dsDNA
substrate (D25) with the same affinity of the native Ku, purified from
HeLa cells (Fig. 1B). Circular dichroism and fluorescence studies proved that the recombinant and native proteins have almost identical secondary structure (data not shown).
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
80 °C in 50% conditioned media with 7.5% Me2SO. The
addition of 10% fetal bovine serum did not show any improvement in the
yield and the quality of the final recombinant Ku protein (rKu).
-mercaptoethanol, 1% Nonidet P-40) supplemented with
protease inhibitor mixture (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Molecular
Biochemicals). 5 ml of lysis buffer were used for each flask (2 × 107 cells), and the incubation was for 10 min at 4 °C.
Recombinant Ku70/83 heterodimer was identified in cell lysate by
SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using specific monoclonal antibodies (data not shown). Then the lysate was cleared by centrifugation and incubated
with TALON metal affinity resin (CLONTECH) (1 ml of resin/5 mg of protein) for 2 h at 4 °C. The resin was washed
with lysis buffer and with buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl,
pH 8.0, 5 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 12.5 mM
imidazole) containing 500 mM KCl (three washes) and 100 mM KCl (two washes). The polyhistidine-tagged rKu was
eluted in buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 100 mM imidazole). The purity of the preparation was verified by SDS-polyacrylamide gel stained with silver.
-mercaptoethanol). N-terminal sequence analysis was performed as a
final step to verify the removal of the His-Tag. If protein needed to
be frozen at
80 °C, 40% glycerol was added to reduce loss of
dsDNA binding capability. The concentration of the rKu heterodimer was
determined by UV absorption measurements using an extinction
coefficient at 280 nm of 77,660 M
1
cm
1 simply estimated from the amino acid sequence
(ProtParam, available at www.expasy.ch). The extinction
coefficient value increases to 87,900 M
1
cm
1 if the histidine tag is still present. Approximately
0.5 mg of rKu was obtained from 5 × 107 infected
Sf9 cells. Gel shift assays showed that rKu binds a 25-mer DNA
with the same affinity of the HeLa Ku used as a control.
-32P]CTP
using 5 units of polymerase I Klenow fragment (New England BioLabs) and
ligation was done with 400 units of T4 ligase (New England BioLabs).
The efficiency of the ligation was verified comparing the 2H25 closed
substrate and the 2H25' substrate with a nick on a denaturating 7 M urea 8% polyacrylamide gel (Fig. 4B).
Description of the substrates used in the binding experiments
-mercaptoethanol) and
using a quartz cuvette with an optical path of 1 cm. The parameters used for the acquisition of the fluorescence spectra were as follows: excitation wavelength 280-282 nm, speed 300 nm/min, time constant 0.2 s, excitation and emission slits 5 nm. For titration
experiments, the substrate concentration was varied between 0.01 and
100 nM. Proper corrections were applied to take in account
the change in volume due to the addition of the substrates. The
fluorescence data were analyzed with the Langmuir equation for the
determination of the kd values like in the case of
the double-filter binding studies.
1) and analyzed with CDNN
software (version 2.1) (24).
-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM MgCl2. The DNA substrates were added in
slight excess over the protein concentration ([DNA]/[Ku] = 1.25),
and the solution was incubated for 30 min at room temperature before
collecting data. Autocorrelation functions (ACF) were measured every
10 s, containing 105 to 106 counts each.
Data analysis was performed fitting with a non-linear second order
cumulant function (25, 26),
where
(Eq. 1)
1 and
2 are the first and
second cumulants, bl is the baseline in arbitrary counts and
sn is a parameter related to the signal-to-noise ratio
(i.e. the maximum initial value of the ACF). The
hydrodynamic radius Rh of the molecule was
derived from the first cumulant
1 using the
Stokes-Einstein relation: [GRAPHIC1], where [GRAPHIC2], and where
0 is the vacuum wavelength of incident light,
ns is the solution refraction index,
is the scattering angle, KB is the Boltzmann constant,
and
is the solvent viscosity at the experimental Kelvin temperature
T. The sample polydispersity (P) was computed as
[GRAPHIC3]. Measurements were done at 20.2 ± 0.1 °C as
monitored by a built in Peltier junction. The water refractive
index at the laser wavelength of 843.4 nm and at a temperature of
20.2 °C was n = 1.3282, as interpolated from
available data (27). The values of Rh were
corrected for the relative viscosity and refraction index of the buffer
solution (20 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM KCl). The
presence of 5 mM
-mercaptoethanol was neglected.
-mercaptoethanol, ±1 mM
MgCl2, and ±3 mM ATP). Typically, 70 µl of
reaction mixture containing 0.3-1.3 nM dsDNA probe was incubated with several different concentrations of Ku. All the experiments were always done in triplicate to reduce the errors on the
determination of the binding isotherm. The two membranes were subjected
to autoradiography (Instant Imager, Packard Corp., Meriden, CT) to
quantify the radioactivity of each dot. For the analysis of the data,
we considered the dsDNA as the macromolecule (M) that can bind one or
more ligands (Ku). Isotherms were plotted as the fraction of DNA
molecules bound to Ku (Yi),
[DNAbound]/[DNAtotal], versus
the total ligand (Ku) concentration (xi). The
fraction of DNA bound (Yi) was calculated using
the following equation: Yl = Ni/(Ni + Di), where Ni and
Di are the radioactive counts retained on the
nitrocellulose and DEAE membranes, respectively. All the experimental
data were fitted in two different ways. First with the simple Langmuir
equation,
where the floating parameters are the dissociation constant
(kd) and two parameters, A and
B, that take in account for the free DNA retained
nonspecifically by the nitrocellulose membrane (A) and for
the incomplete retention of the protein·DNA complex by the
nitrocellulose (B). Then the same data were also re-analyzed
with the following Hill equation,
(Eq. 2)
where (n) is the Hill coefficient. Good fits of all
the data were obtained using both equations and the
kd values measured were basically the same in the
two cases. From the analysis of the fitted data, it was possible to
estimate the free ligand concentration at each point of the titration
curve. These free ligand concentration values were used for a second
fitting iteration, but because most of the titration points were
collected under conditions were xtot
(Eq. 3)
xfree, the values of the dissociation constants changed only 5-10%.
-32P-end-labeled dsDNA probes of various length (25, 50, and 75 bp) in 10 µl of reaction mixture containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM MgCl2, 60 mM KCl, 8 mM dithiothreitol, 4% (w/v) sucrose, 80 mg/ml bovine serum albumin. After incubation for 30 min at room
temperature, 1 µl of gel loading buffer (250 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.2% bromphenol blue, 40% glycerol) was added, and the reaction products were separated on a 5% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel run at 100 V and 4 °C in buffer containing 45 mM
Tris, 45 mM boric acid, and 1 mM EDTA. Labeled
DNA fragments were detected in the dried gel by autoradiography
(Instant Imager, Packard Corp., Meriden, CT).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (80K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Production of the recombinant Ku.
A, Coomassie Blue-stained SDS-PAGE analysis of the
baculovirus Ku heterodimer before (lane 1) and after
(lane 2) removal of the polyhistidine-tag and of the native
HeLa Ku (lane 3). Molecular mass markers are: 200,000 Da (I), 116,250 Da (II), 97,400 Da
(III), 66,200 Da (IV), 45,000 Da (V).
B, comparison of the band shift activities of recombinant
(lanes 1 and 3) and HeLa Ku (lanes 2 and 4). The experiments were done with the 25-mer dsDNA
(D25) (lanes 1 and 2) and with the 50-mer dsDNA
(D50) (lanes 3 and 4). The recombinant Ku used
for these band shift experiments contains the histidine-tag.
Stoichiometry of Ku Binding to dsDNA-- The size of the Ku molecule alone and in complex with dsDNA fragments of different length and structure was measured by Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) (Table II). The linear trend of the autocorrelation function (ACF) transformed according to the cumulant analysis (25)(Fig. 2B) and the low values of the polydispersity (Table II) demonstrates that the samples are monodispersed both in the absence and presence of dsDNA, showing that the Ku heterodimer does not aggregate under these conditions. In addition, no change in the average size and in the polydispersity of the protein preparation was observed under different temperatures ranging from 6 to 25 °C (data not shown). Fig. 2A shows the autocorrelation function measured for Ku alone, Ku bound to the 25-bp dsDNA (D25), and Ku bound to the 50-bp dsDNA (D50). The ACF of the solution containing Ku alone is indistinguishable from that of the solution containing the complex of Ku with D25, whereas the solution containing the Ku·D50 complex clearly shows an ACF with a longer decay time (Fig. 2A). The hydrodynamic radius of rKu alone is calculated to be 5.21 ± 0.04 nm (Table II). This value does not change significantly when Ku is complexed with the D25 substrate demonstrating that only one Ku molecule is bound to a blunt-end DNA substrate of 25 bp. In contrast, the hydrodynamic radius increases to 7.06 ± 0.02 nm when Ku is incubated with the D50 substrate indicating that the Ku·D50 complex contains more than one Ku molecule (Table II).
|
|
The stoichiometry of Ku binding to the dsDNA fragments has been
investigated also by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (Fig.
3). When Ku is incubated with the D25
substrate, a major lower band is detectable, while two distinct bands
are visible in the presence of the D50 probe indicating that the 50-bp
fragment can form a complex with one or two Ku molecules consistent
with the conclusion based on DLS. Fig. 3 shows that Ku is also able to
bind a 25-bp substrate where one (H25) or both ends (2H25) have been
modified with the addition of an eight-nucleotide hairpin loop. The
fainter upper bands present in the experiments done with
D25, H25, and 2H25 suggest that these substrates may also be able to
accommodate two Ku molecules. Because the crystal structure shows that
each Ku molecule covers about 20 bp and all these substrates are
shorter than 40 bp, the upper bands may represent a less
likely situation where two Ku molecules are not "fully" bound to
the substrate. Experiments done with a 75-bp duplex DNA show the
presence of a third upper band suggesting that, in this
case, three Ku molecules are bound to DNA (see below).
|
Binding Affinity of Ku for dsDNA--
The double-filter binding
technique, which has been used previously to study protein·DNA
interactions, was exploited here to measure the binding affinity of Ku
for eight different DNA probes (Table
III). This technique utilizes a DEAE
membrane beneath the nitrocellulose membrane as an additional means to
trap DNA that fails to bind to the nitrocellulose filter. This
modification increases both the accuracy and precision of the
measurements while reducing the time required for analysis. Fig.
4A shows the
-emission
images for both the nitrocellulose and DEAE membranes where the 25-bp
blunt-end dsDNA (0.8 nM) was titrated with the Ku protein.
There is an inverse relationship between the radioactivity retained by
the two filters and quantification of the radioactivity allowed the
construction of the binding curves shown in Fig. 4B. The
dissociation constant (kd) for the binding of
recombinant Ku to the blunt-end dsDNA substrate of 25-bp (D25) is
3.8 ± 0.9 nM. Surprisingly, the addition of one or
two hairpin loops to the same substrate (H25 and 2H25) has only a small
effect on the kd values (Table III) demonstrating
that Ku binds to a "closed" substrate lacking free ends (2H25). As
already shown by light scattering and band shift experiments, a dsDNA
fragment of 50 bp (D50) can bind two Ku molecules. The dissociation
constant (kd) for the binding of Ku to both sites of
D50 is 7.9 ± 0.6 nM, and the value of the Hill
coefficient (n) is close to 1 indicating the absence of
cooperativity (Table III). This kd value remains the
same within experimental error if the data are fitted with the Langmuir
equation. Thus, our experiments demonstrate that the two Ku binding
sites on the D50 probe are identical and independent (Fig.
5). The 75-bp dsDNA probe (D75) can
accommodate three molecules of Ku. Two are bound to the dsDNA ends, and
the third must, therefore, lie internally. Again, no cooperative
interaction is observed (n
1) between the molecules
of Ku binding the substrate (Fig. 5). The kd value
for the binding of Ku to the two ends of D75 is the same, within the
experimental error, measured for the binding of the heterodimer to the
D50 probe (Table III).
|
|
|
Similarly, for the two single-hairpin substrates of 50 and 75 bp (H50 and H75) that can bind two and three Ku molecules, respectively (Fig. 5), the experimental data indicate the absence of cooperativity (Table III).
The Fluorescence Studies--
The fluorescence spectrum of rKu
shows a maximum of emission at 349 nm, and the signal is primarily due
to the 6 Trp residues present in the rKu molecule. The 2 extra Phe and
8 extra Tyr residues that are present in the sequence of the
histidine-tag significantly affect the fluorescence spectrum of the rKu
molecule, shifting the emission maximum from 349 to 355 nm (Fig.
6A). The values of the
dissociation constants (kd) determined for the protein with and without the histidine-tag are very similar, suggesting that this extra N-terminal tail of 30 amino acids does not affect the
binding of Ku to DNA. The fluorescence signal is reduced or quenched by
about 10-15% when rKu is titrated with increasing amounts of dsDNA
substrates (Fig. 6B). The experimental data obtained titrating Ku with a 25-bp blunt-end dsDNA fragment (D25), can be fitted
very well with the simple 1:1 Langmuir equation (Fig. 6C)
giving a kd value of 6.6 ± 1.5 nM
that agrees with the one obtained from double-filter binding
experiments. Taken together, the fluorescence studies carried out with
D50 and D75 as well as with the other substrates used in this work give
results consistent with those obtained by filter binding (data not
shown).
|
Effects of Mg2+, ATP, BSA, and Ionic Strength on the
Binding Affinity--
A set of double-filter binding titration
experiments was collected to investigate the contribution of
Mg2+, ATP, BSA, and ionic strength on the affinity of Ku
for DNA (Fig. 7, A and
B). The values of the dissociation constants are not affected significantly by the presence of Mg2+ or ATP (Fig.
7A). However, the presence of 80 µg/ml BSA improves the
affinity of Ku for DNA by a factor of two (Fig. 7, top
panel). The values of the dissociation constant do not change when
the KCl concentration is varied from 0 to 150 mM (Fig. 7,
bottom panel) in agreement with previous salt dependence
studies carried out by other groups (28). This behavior of Ku raises
interesting questions on the mechanism of Ku binding to DNA, because it
is distinct from that observed for other DNA binding proteins where the
salt concentration dramatically affects the affinity for DNA (29,
30).
|
Analysis of the Hydrodynamic Radius of the Ku
Heterodimer--
As already mentioned, the hydrodynamic radius of rKu
alone in solution is calculated to be 5.21 ± 0.04 nm using the
classical Stokes-Einstein relation for a sphere described under
"Experimental Procedures," where the friction coefficient
f is equal to 6
R (Table II). Because the
crystal structure shows that Ku has a shape of an ellipsoid with an
axial ratio of two, the Perrin coefficient F = 1.044 (f = 6
RF) can be used to correct the
hydrodynamic radius for the ellipsoid shape (31) giving a new
hydrodynamic radius of 4.93 nm. This value is similar to the one
calculated for Ku by other laboratories but is greater than that
predicted for a molecule of similar size (153.5 kDa) (11, 14, 32). In
fact, assuming a value for the specific volume of 0.74 cm3/g (31), an anhydrous molecular volume of 190 nm3, and a theoretical hydrodynamic radius
(Rh) of 3.57 nm would be predicted for a
molecule of 153.5 kDa. Consistent with our results, the recent crystal
structure of rKu indicates that the molecule has the shape of an
ellipsoid with an overall dimension of 12 × 7 × 6 nm that
corresponds to a molecule with an anhydrous molecular volume of 264 nm3 and an average anhydrous radius of 3.78 nm (Fig.
8). Adding the 167 amino acid residues
that are missing at the C terminus of the Ku83 subunit in the crystal
structure, we estimate that the value of the radius for the entire
molecule would be 4.16 nm. A possible reason why this value is
considerably bigger than the theoretical value measured for a globular
protein of similar size (Rh = 3.57 nm) is that
the structure of Ku shows the presence of a 2-nm diameter hole in the
center of the molecule that increases the total radius (Fig. 8).
However, this value of 4.16 nm estimated from the crystal structure is
still smaller than that obtained in our DLS studies. Even adding a
typical 1- to 1.3-nm hydration shell (33) to the anhydrous radius
estimated from the crystal structure, a value 4.45-4.52 nm is
obtained. This value is 0.48-0.44 nm smaller than ours (4.93 nm)
raising the possibility that Ku may be surrounded with a hydration
shell thicker than 1.3 nm.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several studies have highlighted the key role that the Ku heterodimer plays in NHEJ and V(D)J recombination (34, 35). Recently, it has been shown that this dsDNA binding protein may be involved in other fundamental physiological processes such as DNA replication (36). Notwithstanding a plethora of knowledge about Ku, the biophysical properties of this molecule in solution and the mechanism of Ku binding to DNA still demand further investigation. Because biophysical studies often require milligram quantities of material, an efficient baculovirus expression system for the Ku heterodimer was developed. With this procedure, ~0.5 mg of rKu are obtained from 5 × 107 infected Sf9 cells. Although the histidine-tag does not seem to affect the binding of Ku to dsDNA, this 30-amino acid tail was removed from both subunits.
By DLS we have demonstrated that the rKu heterodimer, with or without the histidine-tag, does not aggregate. We have also determined the stoichiometry of the complexes that Ku forms with the different DNA probes by measuring the hydrodynamic radius of the molecule in solution. The hydrodynamic radius of rKu alone in solution is 5.21 or 4.93 nm if the correction for a ellipsoid is applied. This value is greater than the one that can be predicted for a molecule of similar size (153.5 kDa) in agreement with previous results (11, 14, 32). One explanation of this difference is the presence of a 2-nm diameter hole in the center of the molecule, which may serve to increase the radius (Fig. 8). However, the value obtained from our DLS studies is also greater than the anhydrous hydrodynamic radius that can be estimated from the crystal structure (4.16 nm). A possible explanation is that Ku may be surrounded by a thick hydration shell that increases the radius of the molecule in solution. The surface of the molecule is strongly charged, and the structure shows a disordered highly acidic N-terminal tail of 33 amino acids in the Ku70 subunit that points outside the globular domain, which is likely to be highly hydrated.
The hydrodynamic radius does not change significantly when the 25-bp duplex DNA (D25) is added to the solution containing Ku (Table II). This result indicates that only one Ku molecule is involved in the binding of a DNA probe of 25-bp in contrast to previous gel filtration studies done with DNA fragments of similar length (37) but in agreement with several studies done by other laboratories (18, 32). In contrast, a 50-bp fragment can bind two Ku molecules increasing the hydrodynamic radius from 5.31 ± 0.04 nm (D25) to 7.55 ± 0.04 nm (D50). It is worth mentioning that simply doubling the mass of a molecule with a radius of 5.21 nm would yield a new radius of 6.7 nm. The bigger value measured experimentally probably reflects the fact that the two molecules lie adjacent to one another on the 50-dp duplex DNA.
Our measurements of the dissociation constant (kd)
for the binding of the rKu heterodimer to the blunt-end DNA probe of 25 dp yielded a kd value of 3.8 ± 0.9 nM in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM
-mercaptoethanol. Surface plasmon resonance and electrophoretic mobility shift assays yielded a
kd value between 0.38 and 1.4 nM for the
binding of recombinant Ku to an 18-bp probe and a value of 0.16 nM for the binding to a 22-bp probe (18). On the other
hand, Falzon et al. (15) measured kd
values ten times lower (15-30 pM) for the binding of HeLa
Ku to a blunt-end probe of 30 bp. The affinity of Ku for DNA seems to
be independent of the oligonucleotide sequence of the DNA substrate and
of the particular structure of the DNA ends (38), but it is affected by
the length of the DNA duplex (18). Because the kd
values reported above are obtained with substrates of similar length,
the discrepancy in measured values may be due to the different
experimental conditions and techniques used for the binding studies.
Here, we show that the addition of BSA (80 µg/ml) to the reaction
buffer induces a decrease in the kd value by a
factor of two, and a similar effect of albumin in protein·DNA
interaction has been documented (39). In addition, more than one
technique should be used to determine a binding constant to prevent
errors that may be coupled with the particular method chosen for the
binding studies. In our case, double-filter binding studies were
coupled with fluorescence measurements for a comparison of the binding constants.
Because the crystal structure shows that Ku has the shape of a ring where the hole is of the right size to fit the dsDNA duplex, our results on Ku binding to a double hairpin substrate (2H25) lacking free ends is surprising. One possibility is that Ku can enter the substrate inducing a distortion of the hairpin loop. The energy cost for this process may be reflected by the lower affinity measured for this substrate (Table III). However, a clear answer to this question will be obtained from further investigation.
One of the most important conclusions form our binding studies with DNA substrates that can accommodate two (D50) or three (D75) Ku molecules is that there is no cooperative interaction among the Ku heterodimers. The kd value for the binding of Ku to both ends of D50 and D75 is around 8 nM and the Hill coefficient (n) has a value close to 1 (Table III). This result is in contrast with previous studies, where it was shown that two Ku molecules bind a 45-bp substrate in a cooperative fashion (18). A possible explanation is that the 45-bp substrate, which is 5-bp shorter than the D50 probe used here, is of insufficient length to allow two molecules to bind without interaction. In agreement with this possibility, the same authors do not observe any cooperativity using longer substrates that can bind three or four Ku molecules (18). Our results suggest that, in a in vivo situation, when a break occurs, the first Ku molecule binds to the broken end of the DNA and moves along of the dsDNA molecule without interfering either way with the binding of additional Ku molecules to the same end.
The affinity of many DNA binding proteins for oligonucleotides and the
activity of many DNA processing enzymes is controlled by ATP and
Mg2+ (40, 41). We have shown, here, that Ku binding to DNA
is not affected by the addition of ATP or Mg2+ to the
reaction mixture. Our studies have also shown that the affinity of Ku
for DNA is not altered when the concentration of KCl is changed from 0 to 150 mM in buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mM
-mercaptoethanol). This result is in agreement with previous studies that have shown that it is necessary to increase the
salt concentration up to 0.3-0.4 M to decrease the
affinity of Ku for DNA (28) but differs from the behavior of other DNA binding proteins whose affinity for DNA is largely dependent on the
salt concentration (29, 42).
The picture that emerges from our studies and from the crystallographic
data indicates that Ku binds to DNA ends with high affinity and with a
"rigid body" association process, because its conformation does not
change upon DNA binding. This binding event is hardly affected by any
cation or ATP derivative that may be present in the solution. After
binding to the DNA ends, the Ku molecules can slide along the dsDNA
chain and their presence on the DNA does not favor or impair
the binding of additional Ku molecules to the same dsDNA
break, because there is no cooperativity of binding. This picture may
become more complex if other proteins known to interact with the Ku
molecule in vivo, such as DNA-PKcs or the Xrcc4·LigIV
complex, are taken into account. For this reason, further studies will
be carried out to assess the effect of these other proteins in Ku
binding to DNA and vice versa, to obtain a better understanding
of the mechanism of NHEJ in human cells.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
|---|
We thank Dr. Penny Jeggo (Genome Damage and Stability Unit, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, United Kingdom) for providing all the necessary information for the expression of Ku in baculovirus and for comments on the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by Grant 99.00549.PF33 from Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Roma, Italy.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ Recipient of a Royal Society/NATO Post doctoral Fellowship. On leave from Cancer Research Institute, Dept. of Molecular Genetics, 83391 Bratislava, Slovak Republic.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
39-040-375-7326; Fax: 39-040-226-555; E-mail:
vindigni@icgeb.trieste.it.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 16, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111916200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: DSB, double-strand break; NHEF, non-homologous end-joining DNA; NDA-PK, DNA-dependent protein kinase; ds, double strand; rKu, recombinant Ku protein; D25, D50, D75, double-strand DNA fragments (25, 50, and 75 bp); H25, H50, H75, duplex DNA substrates with one hairpin loop (25, 50, and 75 bp); CD, circular dichroism; DLS, dynamic light scattering; ACF, autocorrelation function; BSA, bovine serum albumin.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Lieber, M. R.,
Grawunder, U., Wu, X.,
and Yaneva, M.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
7,
99-104[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Jeggo, P. A.,
Taccioli, G. E.,
and Jackson, S. P.
(1995)
Bioessays
17,
949-957[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Gellert, M.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Genet.
26,
425-446[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. |
Weaver, D. T.
(1995)
Adv. Immunol.
58,
29-85[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. |
Sargent, R. G.,
Brenneman, M. A.,
and Wilson, J. H.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
267-277[Abstract] |
| 6. |
Roth, D. B.,
Lindahl, T.,
and Gellert, M.
(1995)
Curr. Biol.
5,
496-499[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Jeggo, P. A.
(1998)
Adv. Genet.
38,
185-218[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Smith, G. C.,
and Jackson, S. P.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
916-934 |
| 9. |
Jin, S.,
and Weaver, D. T.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
6874-6885[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Blier, P. R.,
Griffith, A. J.,
Craft, J.,
and Hardin, J. A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
7594-7601 |
| 11. |
de Vries, D. J.,
and Blumberg, P. M.
(1989)
Life Sci.
44,
711-715[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Walker, J. R.,
Corpina, R. A.,
and Goldberg, J.
(2001)
Nature
412,
607-614[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Singleton, B. K.,
Torres-Arzayus, M. I.,
Rottinghaus, S. T.,
Taccioli, G. E.,
and Jeggo, P. A.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
3267-3277 |
| 14. |
Yaneva, M.,
Kowalewski, T.,
and Lieber, M. R.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
5098-5112[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Falzon, M.,
Fewell, J. W.,
and Kuff, E. L.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
10546-10552 |
| 16. |
Tuteja, N.,
Tuteja, R.,
Ochem, A.,
Taneja, P.,
Huang, N. W.,
Simoncsits, A.,
Susic, S.,
Rahman, K.,
Marusic, L.,
Chen, J.,
Zhang, J.,
Wang, S.,
Pongor, S.,
and Falaschi, A.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
4991-5001[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. |
West, R. B.,
Yaneva, M.,
and Lieber, M. R.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
5908-5920 |
| 18. |
Ma, Y.,
and Lieber, M. R.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
9638-9646[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Huffman, J. L.,
Mokashi, A.,
Bachinger, H. P.,
and Brennan, R. G.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
40537-40544 |
| 20. |
Wong, I.,
and Lohman, T. M.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
5428-5432 |
| 21. |
Ali, J. A.,
Maluf, N. K.,
and Lohman, T. M.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
293,
815-834[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. |
Riballo, E.,
Doherty, A. J.,
Dai, Y.,
Stiff, T.,
Oettinger, M. A.,
Jeggo, P. A.,
and Kysela, B.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
31124-31132 |
| 23. |
Ochem, A. E.,
Skopac, D.,
Costa, M.,
Rabilloud, T.,
Vuillard, L.,
Simoncsits, A.,
Giacca, M.,
and Falaschi, A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
29919-29926 |
| 24. |
Bohm, G.,
Muhr, R.,
and Jaenicke, R.
(1992)
Protein Eng.
5,
191-195 |
| 25. |
Koppel, D. E.
(1972)
J. Chem. Phys.
57,
4814-4820[CrossRef] |
| 26. | Arosio, D. (1995) Hemoglobin Intermolecular Interactions Effects on Dynamic Light Scattering, Ph.D. thesis, PACS 87.15 , University of Milan, Milano, Italy |
| 27. | Lide, D. R. (ed) (1996) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , Chemical Rubber Publishing, Cleveland, OH |
| 28. |
Mimori, T.,
and Hardin, J. A.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
10375-10379 |
| 29. |
Misra, V. K.,
Hecht, J. L.,
Sharp, K. A.,
Friedman, R. A.,
and Honig, B.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
238,
264-280[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. |
Sharp, K. A.,
and Honig, B.
(1995)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
5,
323-328[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | Cantor, C. R., and Schimmel, I. R. (1980) Biophysical Chemistry , W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, CA |
| 32. |
Zhao, J.,
Wang, J.,
Chen, D. J.,
Peterson, S. R.,
and Trewhella, J.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
2152-2159[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. |
Arosio, D.,
Kwansa, H. E.,
Gering, H.,
Piszczek, G.,
and Bucci, E.
(2002)
Biopolymers
63,
1-11[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. |
Jones, J. M.,
Gellert, M.,
and Yang, W.
(2001)
Structure (Camb.)
9,
881-884[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. |
Taccioli, G. E.,
Gottlieb, T. M.,
Blunt, T.,
Priestley, A.,
Demengeot, J.,
Mizuta, R.,
Lehmann, A. R.,
Alt, F. W.,
Jackson, S. P.,
and Jeggo, P. A.
(1994)
Science
265,
1442-1445 |
| 36. |
Novac, O.,
Matheos, D.,
Araujo, F. D.,
Price, G. B.,
and Zannis-Hadjopoulos, M.
(2001)
Mol. Biol. Cell
12,
3386-3401 |
| 37. |
Cary, R. B.,
Peterson, S. R.,
Wang, J.,
Bear, D. G.,
Bradbury, E. M.,
and Chen, D. J.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
4267-4272 |
| 38. |
Dynan, W. S.,
and Yoo, S.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
1551-1559 |
| 39. |
Kozmik, Z.,
Urbanek, P.,
and Paces, V.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
2198 |
| 40. |
Ellison, V.,
and Stillman, B.
(2001)
Cell
106,
655-660[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. |
Watrob, H.,
Liu, W.,
Chen, Y.,
Bartlett, S. G.,
Jen-Jacobson, L.,
and Barkley, M. D.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
683-692[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. |
Barkley, M. D.,
Lewis, P. A.,
and Sullivan, G. E.
(1981)
Biochemistry
20,
3842-3851[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. J. Andrews, J. A. Lehman, and J. J. Turchi Kinetic Analysis of the Ku-DNA Binding Activity Reveals a Redox-dependent Alteration in Protein Structure That Stimulates Dissociation of the Ku-DNA Complex J. Biol. Chem., May 12, 2006; 281(19): 13596 - 13603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Jin, J. Sepulveda, and O. R. Burrone Specific recognition of a dsDNA sequence motif by an immunoglobulin VH homodimer Protein Sci., December 1, 2004; 13(12): 3222 - 3229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Arosio, S. Costantini, Y. Kong, and A. Vindigni Fluorescence Anisotropy Studies on the Ku-DNA Interaction: ANION AND CATION EFFECTS J. Biol. Chem., October 8, 2004; 279(41): 42826 - 42835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||