Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M106307200 on December 26, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 12, 9763-9771, March 22, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/12/9763    most recent
M106307200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zahner, G.
Right arrow Articles by Stahl, R. A. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zahner, G.
Right arrow Articles by Stahl, R. A. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Cyclooxygenase-2 Overexpression Inhibits Platelet-derived Growth Factor-induced Mesangial Cell Proliferation through Induction of the Tumor Suppressor Gene p53 and the Cyclin-dependent Kinase Inhibitors p21waf-1/cip-1 and p27kip-1*

Gunther ZahnerDagger §, Gunter WolfDagger , Murwan AyoubDagger , Rüdiger ReinkingDagger , Ulf PanzerDagger , Stuart J. Shankland, and Rolf A. K. StahlDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Osteology, University of Hamburg, 20246 Hamburg, Germany and the  Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98104

Received for publication, July 6, 2001, and in revised form, December 19, 2001

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is an inducible enzyme and serves as a source of paracrine prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) formation in many tissues. In glomerular immune injury COX-2 formation is up-regulated in association with increased mesangial cell growth. To examine whether COX-2 exerts growth modulating effects on glomerular cells, we established two separate COX-2-overexpressing mesangial cell lines (COX-2+) and assessed their proliferative response to the potent mesangial cell growth-promoting factor, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). PDGF increased proliferation in mock-transfected cells. In contrast, PDGF did not induce proliferation in COX-2+ cells. Our results also showed that the tumor suppressor protein p53 and the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p21cip-1 and p27kip-1 were up-regulated in COX-2+ cells de novo as well as under PDGF-stimulated conditions. To study whether COX-2 products are required for these effects, COX-2+ cells were treated with indomethacin (1 µg/ml) or NS-398 (3 µM). Unexpectedly, both COX inhibitors had no significant effect on cell proliferation, not on the protein levels of p53, p21cip-1, or p27kip-1. To evaluate the role of p21cip-1 and p27kip-1, COX-2 was overexpressed in mesangial cells derived from p21cip-1 (p21-/- COX-2+) and p27kip-1 (p27-/- COX-2+) null mice. In contrast to the wild type COX-2+ cells, p21-/- COX-2+ and p27-/- COX-2+ cells proliferated in response to PDGF. These data suggest that COX-2 inhibits mesangial cell proliferation by a novel mechanism that is independent of prostaglandin synthesis, but involves p53, p21cip-1, and p27kip-1.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The rate-limiting enzymes in the formation of prostaglandins are the cyclooxygenases (1). Two cyclooxygenase isoforms, called cyclooxygenase 1 (COX-1)1 and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), are currently known. The COX-1 iosenzyme is constitutively expressed in many tissues and is assumed to be responsible for the physiological functions of prostaglandins (PG) such as maintenance of the integrity of gastric mucosa and regulation of renal blood flow (2). In contrast, COX-2 is an immediate early response gene that is undetectable in most mammalian tissues, but is rapidly induced by proinflammatory cytokines, growth factors, and tumor promotors such as interleukin 1beta (3), PDGF (4), and phorbol myristate acetate (5, 6). The subcellular localization of COX-1 and COX-2 is similar. Both isoenzymes are present in the endoplasmic reticulum as well as the outer and inner membranes of the nuclear envelope (7).

Classical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as indomethacin or aspirin inhibit both cyclooxygenases (8, 9). More recently, a new class of COX-2 specific inhibitors, such as NS-398 or SC-58635, has been characterized, which target cyclooxygenases more specifically and therefore may have specific treatment implications (10).

COX-2 gene expression is increased in proliferative diseases such as cancer and rheumatoid arthritis (11, 12). Moreover, COX-2 stimulates the proliferation of cancer cells in colorectal and gastric cancer via prostanoids (11, 13), an effect that can be prevented by selectively inhibiting COX-2 (14). In contrast, PGE2 and prostacyclin exert anti-proliferative effects on rat mesangial cells (MC) (15, 16), suggesting an involvement of prostanoids in the complex growth regulation of resident glomerular cells. Many forms of glomerulonephritis are characterized by MC proliferation, and therefore understanding the mechanisms regulating this is critical in determining treatment strategies.

Proliferation is governed at the level of the cell cycle by specific cell cycle regulatory proteins. Proliferation requires that cyclins activate target cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK). In contrast, the CDK inhibitors p21cip-1 and p27kip-1 limit proliferation by inhibiting cyclin-CDK complexes. Studies have shown a role for specific CDK inhibitors in renal and non-renal diseases. To further delineate the role of the COX-2 isoform in governing specific cell cycle proteins, we stably overexpressed COX-2 in mesangial cells derived from wild type rats and p21cip-1 null (-/-) mice or p27kip-1 null (-/-) mice. Our studies demonstrated that COX-2 overexpression inhibits PDGF-induced proliferation of wild type MC. Moreover, COX-2 overexpression increases the expression of the tumor suppressor p53 and the CDK inhibitors p21cip-1 and p27kip-1 in a prostaglandin-independent manner. COX-2 overexpression also increased p53 in p21-/- and p27-/- MCs. These data suggest that COX-2 inhibits the growth of MC by a novel mechanism, independent of prostaglandin synthesis, but involves p53 as well as the concerted action of p21cip-1 and p27kip-1.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

COX-2 Expression Plasmid, Cell Culture, and Stable Transfection-- An EcoRI/KpnI full-length PCR construct of rat COX-2 (17) was cloned into the mammalian expression vector pcDNA3.1-Zeo (Invitrogen). This plasmid was sequenced to confirm the identity and orientation of rat COX-2. Wild type rat MC cultures were established from glomeruli isolated from kidneys of male Sprague-Dawley rats (80-100 g of body weight) by differential sieving as previously described (16). For transfection, 2 × 105 rat MC between passage 15-18 or mouse MC from p21-/- (18) or p27-/- (19) mice were seeded in RPMI 1640 media containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS; Invitrogen), 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin and 0.66 units/ml bovine insulin (Invitrogen). A mixture of 5 µg of plasmid and 20 µg/ml Lipofectin (Invitrogen) in RPMI 1640 without penicillin and streptomycin and FCS were added to the 70-80% confluent MCs for 6 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Cells were maintained in normal 10% FCS RPMI 1640 growth media for 48 h before selection was started by adding 200 µg/ml zeocin (Invitrogen) for 2 weeks. Single cell clones of stable transfected MCs were established through limiting dilution and were cultured in 10% FCS RPMI 1640 supplemented with 100 µg/ml zeocin at 37 °C in 5% CO2.

FACS Analysis-- To characterize the transfected cell lines as mesangial cells, the cell surface antigen Thy1.1 was detected. Rat MCs were trypsinized, washed in 1× PBS, and incubated for half an hour with a 1:100 dilution of FITC-labeled mouse-anti rat Thy 1.1 (BD Biosciences). For detection of intracellular desmin, rat MCs were trypsinized and washed with 1× PBS. The cells were then resuspended in 0.25 ml cytofix/cytoperm solution (BD Biosciences) for 20 min at 4 °C. Cells were then washed twice in 1× wash/cytoperm solution (BD Biosciences) before a 1:50 dilution of mouse-anti human desmin in 1× wash/cytoperm solution containing 5% bovine serum albumin was added for half an hour at 4 °C. After washing, cells were incubated in a 1:100 dilution of FITC-labeled goat-anti mouse IgG (BD Bioscience) for 30 min at 4 °C in the dark. FACS analysis was performed with FACS-Calibur (BD Bioscience). Data were analyzed with the FACScomp software.

Western Blot Analysis-- Cells were washed with 1× PBS and lysed in 1× cell lysis buffer (150 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 6.6% SDS). Equal amounts of protein were treated with 0.25 volume reducing buffer (50% mercaptoethanol, 50% glycerol) as well as 0.20 volume gel loading buffer (42.5% glycerol, 0.05% bromphenol blue), and samples were boiled for 10 min. The solution was loaded onto a 12% polyacrylamide SDS gel and electrophoresed at a constant current of 20 mA for 4 h. A molecular mass marker (10.0-250 kDa, Amersham Biosciences, Inc.), was run in parallel. After completion of electrophoresis, proteins were electroblotted semidry (blottingbuffer:25 mM Tris, 200 mM glycine, 20% methanol) for 1 h at 1 mA/cm2 onto a PVDF membrane (Hybond ECL, Amersham Biosciences, Inc.). The membrane was blocked in 5% nonfat dry milk in washing buffer (1× PBS, 0.1% Tween 20) for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated for another hour with the primary antibody in the same buffer. The following primary antibodies were used: anti-human COX-2, anti-human CDK-2, and p27kip-1 were obtained from Transduction Laboratories; anti-human p53 and p21cip-1 were purchased from PharMingen. All primary antibodies were used in a dilution of 1:1000. After rinsing the membrane in washing buffer for 2× 10 min, an anti-mouse-IgG antibody conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (Southern Biotechnology) was added at a concentration of 1:2500 for 1 h at room temperature. Detection of the alkaline phosphatase activity was performed with CDP-Star (Tropix) in an assay buffer (10 mM Tris HCl, pH 9.6, 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM MgCl2) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Chemiluminescence detection of the Blots as well as densitometric evaluation were performed with the FluorS imager system (Bio-Rad).

PGE2-ELISA and Cell Proliferation Assay-- The extracellular PGE2 content was measured by a PGE2 ELISA obtained from Cayman Chemicals according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Cells (5 × 103 cells/well) were plated on 96-well plates (Nunc) and maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FCS overnight. In one set of experiments, the media was changed to serum-free media for 48 h. DNA synthesis was measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation. In the control group 2 µCi/ml [3H]thymidine (90 Ci/mmol; Amersham Biosciences, Inc.) was added to the serum-free media for 4 and 24 h. [3H]thymidine incorporation of the appropriate control group was compared with cells that were additionally treated with 50 ng/ml PDGF for 4 and 24 h.

In a second set of experiments, cells were grown in serum-free media in which 3 µM NS-398 (Alexis Biochemicals) or 1 µg/ml indomethacin (Sigma) was added for 48 h. 2 µCi/ml [3H]thymidine was added for 4 and 24 h in serum-free medium in the presence of either 3 µM NS-398 or 1 µg/ml indomethacin. The media of the control cells was changed to serum-free media for 48 h, and subsequently 2 µCi/ml [3H]thymidine was added for 4 and 24 h.

At the end of the incubation period, cells were washed twice with 1× PBS and were then trypsinized. The cell suspensions were subsequently harvested onto a filterpaper (Whatman) using an automated cell harvester (Dynatech) before [3H]thymidine incorporation was measured in a beta -scintillation counter (Packard).

Non-radioactive Northern Blot Analysis-- Cells were washed twice with sterile 1× PBS and then directly solubilized in 5 ml of buffer containing 4 M guanidine isothiocyanate, 25 mM sodium citrate (pH 7.0), 0.5% sodium lauroyl-sarcosinate, and 0.7% beta -mercaptoethanol. RNA was extracted by repetitive phenol-chloroform extraction and precipitated with ice-cold isopropanol (20). The quantity and purity of the preparations were assessed by measurement of absorption at 260 and 280 nm. To separate total RNA, 20 µg was denatured in formamide-formaldehyde and loaded onto a 1.2% agarose gel containing 2.2 M formaldehyde. RNA was vacuum blotted to a nylon membrane (Hybond-N, Amersham Biosciences, Inc.) and UV-cross-linked. Prehybridization was performed at 50 °C for 1 h in specific non-radioactive hybridization buffer (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). A digoxigenin-labeled p21cip-1 cDNA fragment was added and hybridized overnight at 50 °C. The membranes were washed once in 250 mM sodium-phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, and 1% SDS for 15 min at 65 °C and subsequently twice in 100 mM sodium-phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, 1% SDS 15 min at 65 °C. Detection of the digoxigenated hybrids were performed with a chemiluminescence based northern hybridization detection kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) according to the manufacturers protocol. X-ray films (Hyperfilm ECL; Amersham Biosciences, Inc.) were exposed 0.5-2 h at room temperature without intensifying screen. Membranes were stripped for 1 h in 5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.5% sodium pyrophosphate, 5× Denhardt's (100× denhardt's:2% Ficoll 400, 2% polyvinylpyrrolidone, 2% bovine serum albumin), and 0.2 mM EDTA at 65 °C and rehybridized with a digoxigenin-labeled 2.0-kb human cDNA probe of 18 S rRNA to account for small RNA loading and transfer variabilities. Exposed films were scanned with a FluorS-imager system (Bio-Rad). The intensities of the hybridization signals were normalized to 18 S rRNA.

Statistical Analysis-- All values are presented as means ± standard deviation (S.D.). All experiments were repeated a minimum of three times. Statistical significance between individual groups were tested using the nonparametric unpaired Mann-Whitney U test. A p value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Characterization of the COX-2 Overexpressing MC Lines-- It is important to compare the nature of the genetically engineered cells with original rat MCs. Fig. 1, A-C shows the morphology of hematoxylin-stained rat MCs (A), mock-transfected control rat MC (B), and rat COX-2+ cells (C). The shape of all cell lines tested were similar, but COX-2+ cells (C) were smaller in size compared with mock-transfected control cells (B) and original rat MCs (A). Thy1.1 expression was measured by FACS analysis to confirm the mesangial cell origin of each cell line. Fig. 1, D-F depict Thy1.1 expression of rat MC (D), mock transfected control rat MC (E), and COX-2+ rat MC (F). All three cell lines expressed Thy1.1. Interestingly, COX-2+ cells had an approximate 10-fold increase in Thy1.1 compared with untreated MC and mock-transfected cells. Because we only utilized the Thy1.1 expression to characterize the cells, we did not further evaluate this phenomenon. Furthermore, Fig. 1, G-I demonstrates that all cell lines examined expressed significant amounts of desmin.


View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Characterization of the cell lines. COX-2 transfected and mock-transfected cell lines were compared with original rat mesangial cells. A-C, lightmicroscopy of hematoxylin-stained cells to assess cell morphology. Magnification, ×1000. D-F, FACS analysis of FITC-labeled anti-Thy1.1-treated cells. G-I, intracellular FACS analysis against the cytoskeleton filament desmin. The right peaks represent the FITC-fluorescence intensity of the appropriate isotype control.

We selected two independent isolated clones of wild type COX-2+ rat MC lines, called COX-2+ #1 and COX-2+ #2. Fig. 2A shows that compared with mock-transfected control cells, COX-2 levels were increased 5-fold in stably transfected COX-2+ #1 and #2 cells. Furthermore, the production of PGE2 (21) was also significantly elevated in both COX-2+ cell lines (1.76 ± 0.09-fold for COX-2+ #1 and 2.91 ± 0.28-fold for COX-2+ #2) compared with control cells (Fig. 2B).


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Characterization of COX-2 overexpression. A, COX-2-specific immunoblot analysis of COX-2+ #1 and #2 MCs. COX-2 expression of COX-2+ #1 and #2 cell lines were stimulated 5-fold when compared with mock-transfected control cells. B, PGE2 formation of COX-2+ #1 and #2 MCs was measured by a PGE2 ELISA system obtained from Cayman Chemicals in cell culture supernatants. COX-2+ #1 and #2 cell lines increased their PGE2 formation 1.76 ± 0.09-fold and 2.91 ± 0.28-fold. Both COX-2+ cell lines were normalized to the mock-transfected control cell line.

Proliferation after PDGF Stimulation-- Studies have shown that PGE2 is anti-proliferative for MC (15, 16), whereas PDGF is proliferative (4). PDGF significantly increased DNA synthesis in mock-transfected control cells at 4 h (2.86 ± 0.46-fold) and 24 h (2.05 ± 0.07-fold) compared with mock-transfected control cells not exposed to PDGF.

To determine the role of COX-2 overexpression on basal levels of growth, proliferation was compared in COX-2+ overexpressing and mock-transfected cells when grown in serum-free media. COX-2+ #1 and #2 cell lines had a significantly reduced proliferative capacity at 4 h (0.45 ± 0.06 versus 0.65 ± 0.1) and 24 h (0.31 ± 0.08 versus 0.53 ± 0.08) compared with mock transfected control cells. To test the hypothesis that COX-2 overexpression limits PDGF-induced proliferation, DNA synthesis was also measured at 4 and 24 h after exposure to PDGF, and the results are shown in Fig. 3, A and B. PDGF did not increase proliferation in COX-2+ #1 (0.63 ± 0.12) and COX-2+ #2 (0.68 ± 0.14) cells at 4 h. Although there was a mild increase in [3H]thymidine incorporation in both COX-2+ cell lines (0.53 ± 0.06 for COX-2+ #1; 0.68 ± 0.02 for COX-2+ #2) in response to PDGF stimulation at 24 h, [3H]thymidine incorporation was significantly reduced compared with PDGF stimulation of mock-transfected controls.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Proliferation after PDGF induction. All MC lines were incubated for 48 h in serum-free cell culture media and treated with 2 µCi/ml [3H]thymidine or with 2 µCi/ml [3H]thymidine plus 50 ng/ml recombinant rat PDGF-BB for 4 h (A) and 24 h (B). The [3H]thymidine incorporation of mock-transfected control cells were 4363 ± 320 cpm/well (4 h) and 9040 ± 634 cpm/well (24 h). PDGF significantly stimulates proliferation of control cells 2.86 ± 0.46-fold (4 h) and 2.05 ± 0.07-fold (24 h). Proliferation in untreated COX-2+ cell lines was significantly reduced to 0.45 ± 0.06 and 0.65 ± 0.1 (4 h) and 0.31 ± 0.08 and 0.53 ± 0.08 (24 h), respectively. PDGF-stimulated COX-2+ #1 and #2 cell lines did not significantly proliferate at 4 h (0.63 ± 0.12 and 0.68 ± 0.14) and increased proliferation slightly after 24 h of PDGF stimulation (0.53 ± 0.06 and 0.68 ± 0.02). All cell lines were normalized to untreated mock-transfected control cell line. *, p < 0.05 versus untreated control cells. #, p < 0.05 versus PDGF-treated control cells. C, cell number evaluation after 24 h of PDGF treatment. The cell number of mock-transfected control cells is increased (1.74 ± 0.04-fold), whereas both COX-2+ cell lines hardly changed their cell number (1.1 ± 0.12 and 1.14 ± 0.08), respectively, when compared with the appropriate non-stimulated cell line. #, p < 0.05 versus PDGF-treated control cells.

Cell proliferation was also assessed by cell count in serum-starved COX-2+ #1 and #2 cells, and mock-transfected control cells in the presence or absence of PDGF stimulation. As shown in Fig. 3C, cell number in PDGF-stimulated control cells was increased to 1.74 ± 0.04-fold. In contrast, there was no statistically significant increase in cell number in both COX-2+ cell lines (1.1 ± 0.12 and 1.14 ± 0.08) compared with control cells.

Cox-2 Overexpression Increases the Expression of p53, p21cip-1, and p27kip-1 but Does Not Influence CDK-2 Protein Expression-- Because [3H] thymidine is incorporated in DNA during the S-phase of the cell cycle, earlier events in the G1-phase of the cell cycle might be responsible for the anti-proliferative effects of COX-2 in MC. We next elucidated if the changes in proliferation induced by COX-2 were due to specific cell cycle regulatory proteins. Fig. 4A shows a representative immunoblot for p53 and p21cip-1. Under serum-free conditions, protein expression for p53 was significantly increased in COX-2+ #1 cells (1.97 ± 0.43-fold) and COX-2+ #2 cells (2.37 ± 0.18-fold) compared with control cells. The addition of 50 ng/ml PDGF for 1 h augmented the increase in p53 protein expression in COX-2+ #1 (2.23 ± 0.85-fold) and COX-2+ #2 (2.88 ± 0.74-fold) cell lines compared with PDGF-stimulated control cells. The maximal effect on p53 protein expression was detected when COX-2+ #1 and #2 cells were stimulated with PDGF for 4 h (3.08 ± 0.41 and 8.24 ± 2.4-fold) compared with PDGF-treated control cells.



View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   A, COX-2 overexpression stimulates p53, p21cip-1. Western analysis of the tumor suppressor p53 and the CDK inhibitor p21cip-1 are shown. Four h of PDGF exposure maximally stimulates p53 protein expression in both COX-2+ cell lines (3.08 ± 0.41-fold and 8.24 ± 2.41-fold). Protein expression of p21cip-1 is also strongly enhanced in untreated and PDGF-treated COX-2+ #1 and #2 cells and varies between 3.6 ± 0.95-fold and 4.61 ± 0.71-fold. Both COX-2+ cell lines were compared with the appropriately treated mock-transfected control cell line. B, expression of p21cip-1 was stimulated on mRNA levels. The mRNA expression of p21cip-1 was stimulated under serum-free conditions in COX-2+ cells. PDGF stimulation for 1 and 4 h significantly reduced p21cip-1 mRNA expression in control cells, whereas the appropriate mRNA expression of COX-2+ cells were only slightly affected. C, COX-2 overexpression stimulates p27kip-1. Western analysis of the CDK inhibitor p27kip-1. Four h of PDGF stimulation maximally reduced p27kip-1 protein expression in control cells. In both COX-2+ cell lines, p27kip-1 protein stability does not significantly change following PDGF stimulation. Thus, p27kip-1 protein levels were increased in both COX-2+ cell lines when compared with the corresponding mock-transfected control cell line. D, COX-2 overexpression does not influence protein expression of CDK-2. Western analysis of CDK-2 is shown. CDK-2 protein expression in mock-transfected control cells and in both COX-2+ cell lines was not influenced under basal conditions and by 4 h of PDGF stimulation.

Our results also showed that the protein expression for p21cip-1 was markedly increased in serum-free conditions in COX-2+ #1 (3.97 ± 1.52-fold) and #2 cell line (4.19 ± 1.43-fold) compared with untreated control cells. Compared with control cells, p21cip-1 levels remained significantly elevated following PDGF stimulation in COX-2+ #1 cells at 1 h (2.79 ± 0.71-fold) and 4 h (4.21 ± 2.1-fold) and in COX-2+ #2 cells at 1 h (4.61 ± 0.71-fold) and 4 h (3.6 ± 0.95-fold).

Since p53 transactivates transcription of the p21cip-1 gene, p21cip-1 mRNA expression was measured (Fig. 4B). Under serum-free conditions the p21cip-1 mRNA expression was increased in COX-2 #1 and #2 cells. The addition of PDGF for 1 and 4 h markedly decreased the mRNA expression of p21cip-1 in mock-transfected control cells. In contrast, p21cip-1 mRNA levels were only mildly affected in COX-2 #1 and #2 cells. Thus, compared with control cells, the p21cip-1 mRNA content of both COX-2+ cell lines were markedly increased after 1 h of PDGF stimulation (3.37 ± 0.74-fold, for #1 and 4.19 ± 0.42-fold, for #2) and 4 h of PDGF stimulation (2.19 ± 0.39-fold, for #1 and 2.65 ± 0.35-fold, for #2).

G1 growth arrest is also influenced by the CDK inhibitor p27kip-1, which is p53-independent. Fig. 4C shows that PDGF significantly reduced p27kip-1 protein expression in control cells. In contrast, PDGF stimulation was associated with increased p27kip-1 protein content in COX-2+ #1 and #2 cell lines (2.83 ± 0.97 and 2.2 ± 0.28-fold after 4 h of PDGF).

CyclinE/CDK-2 complexes are essential mediators of the cell cycle progression and are pivotal in G1/S-phase transition (22). Fig. 4D shows that CDK-2 levels did not change in both COX-2+ cell lines compared with mock-transfected control cell line. This result contrasts to the increased protein expression of the tumor suppressor p53 and the CDK inhibitors p21cip-1 and p27kip-1 under serum-free conditions and in the presence of PDGF.

Inhibition of COX-2 Does Not Influence Proliferation-- To test whether prostaglandins were responsible for the growth inhibitory effects and the levels of p53, p21cip-1, and p27kip-1, prostaglandin formation was inhibited either with indomethacin (1 µg/ml), a nonspecific cyclooxygenase inhibitor, and with NS-398 (3 µM), a COX-2-specific cyclooxygenase inhibitor for 48 h. As demonstrated in Fig. 5, neither indomethacin nor NS-398 prevented cell cycle arrest due to the enhanced COX-2 expression. Moreover, neither indomethacin nor NS398 significantly reduced p53, p21cip-1 and p27kip-1 protein expression in COX-2+ #1 and #2 cell lines (Table I).


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Effect of indomethacin and NS 398 on [3H]thymidine incorporation. COX-2+ #1 and #2 cell lines were incubated for 48 h in serum-free media in the presence of 1 µg/ml indomethacin or 3 µM NS398. 2 µCi/ml [3H]thymidine was added to the media in the last 4 or 24 h. Neither indomethacin nor NS-398 significantly influenced proliferation of both COX-2+ cell lines when normalized to the appropriate COX-2+ cell line without any COX inhibitor. Control [3H]thymidine incorporation of COX-2+ #1 cells was 2086 ± 186 cpm/well for 4 h and 2655 ± 263 cpm/well for 24 h. Control COX-2+ #2 cells incorporated 1919 ± 126 cpm/well for 4 h and 2434 ± 243 cpm/well for 24 h [3H]thymidine.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Protein expression of p53, p21cip-1, and p27kip-1 in the presence of COX inhibitors
Summary of the COX inhibitor effects on the protein expression of p53 and the two CDK inhibitors with or without PDGF in COX-2+ cells. Indomethacin and the specific COX-2 inhibitor NS-398 diminished protein expression of all proteins studied in both COX-2+ cell lines when compared to the corresponding cell line without any COX inhibitor. The protein expression of COX inhibitor treated COX-2+ cells, however, remained significantly increased (p < 0.05 versus controls). All data were normalized to mock-transfected control cells after 4h of PDGF treatment and without COX inhibitors or to mock-transfected control cells without any PDGF and without any COX-inhibitors respectively.

COX-2 Overexpression in p21-/- and p27-/- MCs Restores PDGF-induced Proliferation-- To examine the role for p21cip-1 and p27kip-1 in COX-2-induced growth inhibition in MCs, p21 (18) and p27 (19) null (-/-) MCs were stably transfected with COX-2, and the results are shown in Fig. 6. There was an increase in p53 levels in p21-/- and p27-/- MCs. When grown in serum-free media, p27kip-1 protein expression increased in p21-/- cells, and p21cip-1 increased in p27-/- cells.


View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Characterization of the p21cip-1 and p27kip-1 knockout COX-2+ cell lines. To characterize both knockout COX-2+ cell lines, Western blot analysis of COX-2, p53, p21cip-1, and p27kip-1 were performed. Both knockout cell lines expressed significantly higher amounts of COX-2 and p53. In addition, the p21-/- COX-2+ produced more p27kip-1, whereas p27-/- COX-2+ produced higher levels of p21cip-1. All experiments were performed under serum-free conditions and compared with the appropriate mock-transfected knockout control cell lines.

Fig. 7A compares [3H]thymidine incorporation in mock-transfected p21-/- MC with p21-/- MC overexpressing COX-2+ (named p21-/- COX-2+) and mock transfected p27-/- MC with p27-/- MC overexpressing COX-2 (named p27-/- COX-2+). COX-2 overexpression significantly decreased DNA synthesis in p21-/- cells at 4 h (0.12 ± 0.005) and 24 h (0.27 ± 0.04). COX-2 overexpression also reduced [3H]thymidine incorporation in p27-/- cells at 4 h (0.16 ± 0.03) and 24 h (0.34 ± 0.04).


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Proliferation of the p21cip-1 and p27kip-1 knockout cell lines. All cell lines were incubated for 48 h in serum-free media. 2 µCi/ml [3H]thymidine was added to the media in the last 4 or 24 h. A, both knockout COX-2+ cell lines significantly reduced their proliferation after 4 and 24 h incubation with [3H] thymidine when normalized to the corresponding mock-transfected knockout control cell line. The [3H]thymidine incorporation of mock-transfected p27-/- cells was 7721 ± 344 cpm/well (4 h) and 19436 ± 1633 cpm/well (24 h), and for mock-transfected p21-/- cells 4281 ± 243 cpm/well (4 h) and 12112 ± 1345 cpm/well (24 h). B, PDGF stimulation significantly increased growth of mock-transfected wild type cells. Proliferation of the COX-2+ #1 cell line was significantly decreased (*). In contrast, PDGF stimulation at 4 and 24 h significantly increased proliferation of p27-/- COX-2+ and p21-/- COX-2+ cell lines (#). The data were normalized to the appropriate nonstimulated cell line. *, p < 0.05 versus PDGF-stimulated wild type control cells. #, p < 0.05 versus PDGF-stimulated wild type COX-2+ #1 cell line. The [3H]thymidine incorporation of the different cell lines under control conditions were as follows: mock-transfected wild type cells: 3564 ± 324 (4 h) and 9384 ± 558 (24 h); wild type COX-2+ #1 cells, 1996 ± 156 (4 h) and 2743 ± 265 (24 h); p27-/- COX-2+ cells, 8463 ± 518 (4 h) and 20,327 ± 1360 (24); p21-/- COX-2+ cells, 4897 ± 476 (4 h) and 12,487 ± 948 (24 h).

Finally, proliferation (assessed by [3H]thymidine incorporation) in PDGF-stimulated (4 and 24 h) wild type control, wild type COX-2+ #1, p27-/- COX-2+, and p21-/- COX-2+ cell lines were compared with the corresponding nonstimulated cell line (Fig. 7B). PDGF-induced DNA synthesis in wild type control cells (3 ± 0.52-fold at 4 h and 2.05 ± 0.07-fold at 24 h). This effect was less pronounced in wild type COX-2+ #1 cells (1.28 ± 0.15-fold at 4 h and 1.4 ± 0.23-fold at 24 h). In contrast to wild type COX-2+ #1 cells, PDGF-stimulated DNA synthesis in p27-/- COX-2+ cells (2.66 ± 0.32-fold at 4 h and 2.02 ± 0.11-fold at 24 h) and in p21-/- COX-2+ cells (2.28 ± 0.25-fold at 4 h and 2.23 ± 0.07-fold at 24 h).

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In specific renal diseases such as glomerulonephritis, the formation of the cyclooxygenase product PGE2 is enhanced (23-26). This prostaglandin exerts anti-proliferative effects on MC (15, 16) and could therefore counteract the growth-promoting events following glomerular injury.

To further characterize the role of COX-2 on mesangial cell growth, cell lines were generated that stably overexpress COX-2. Two independently isolated single clones overexpressing COX-2, named COX-2+ #1 and #2, were used in all the studies described. Both cell lines expressed large amounts of COX-2 protein and synthesize more PGE2 than control cells. COX-2 overexpression did not alter cell morphology nor expression for the cytoskeletal filament desmin (15). The COX-2+ cell line expressed about 10-fold more cell surface Thy1.1 than untransfected and mock-transfected MCs. Because the Thy1.1 expression served to identify our modified cells as true MCs we did not further examine this observation.

The growth factor, PDGF-BB is a potent MC mitogen (4), and has also been shown to play a critical role in the pathogenesis of glomerulonephritis (27, 28). Cell growth in wild type COX-2+ cells was significantly inhibited compared with mock-transfected wild type control cells. Our results show that COX-2 effects likely appear before the S-phase of the cell cycle, since [3H]thymidine incorporation into newly synthesized DNA was reduced. Events during the G1-phase may explain these differences. For example, the tumor suppressor p53 is able to inhibit cell growth by transactivation of the CDK inhibitor p21cip-1 gene transcription, which acts exclusively in the G1-phase of the cell cycle and can induce apoptosis in the G1-phase. Both mechanisms could account for the reduced [3H]thymidine incorporation. This mechanism may be operative because the reintroduction of p53 in p53-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts inhibits COX-2 gene expression (29). Thus, a regulation loop between p53 and COX-2 might exist. In our independently isolated COX-2+ cell lines such a mechanism may be operative since p53 protein expression was enhanced and further increased after the PDGF-BB exposure.

We next sought to clarify the effect of p21cip-1. In COX-2+ #1 and #2 cell lines, the mRNA and protein expression of p21cip-1 were also up-regulated, suggesting that p53-mediated up-regulation of p21cip-1 may be involved in the anti-proliferative effect in G1-phase. Apoptosis due to high p53 levels did not play a role, because we could cultivate single cell clones that stably overexpress COX-2 as well as p53 and both CDK inhibitors. This was not unexpected, since p21cip-1 protects against p53-mediated apoptosis (30). Moreover, COX-2 is a survival factor by suppressing caspase-3 activity (31) or inhibiting NO- and superoxide-mediated apoptosis (32). Thus, COX-2 might exclusively influence the growth suppressing properties of p53 in our cell system.

The cip/kip CDK inhibitor p27kip-1 is also expressed in mesangial cells (33-36). In contrast to p21cip-1, differences in the p27kip-1 expression between COX-2+ #1 and #2 and control cell lines were only detectable after 4 h of PDGF treatment, suggesting a different regulation of p21cip-1 and p27kip-1. These results imply that multiple events cooperate in the anti-proliferative effect of COX-2.

In contrast, CDK-2 protein expression remained unaffected following COX-2 overexpression. Thus, it seems that COX-2 influences cell cycle indirectly through CDK inhibitors of the cip/kip family rather than directly through influencing protein expression of CDK-2.

To confirm the potential interrelation between p21cip-1 and p27kip-1 in the blockade of PDGF-induced proliferation of COX-2, p21cip-1 (18), or p27kip-1 (19) null MCs, which overexpress COX-2 were established. Exposure of both COX-2+ knockout cell lines to PDGF resulted in a significant induction of proliferation. This suggests that both CDK inhibitors have to be expressed together to inhibit PDGF-induced proliferation. Moreover, the behavior of the COX-2+ CDK inhibitor knockout cell lines strongly argues against an artificial effect due to the overexpression of the COX-2 protein.

Since prostaglandins are known to reduce MC proliferation (15, 16) it was expected that COX products are responsible for the anti-proliferative effect seen in this study. To examine the role of cyclooxygenase cells were either treated with indomethacin or NS-398 (9, 10). Our results showed that when [3H]thymidine incorporation was measured in the presence of the cyclooxygenase inhibitors the proliferation of both independently isolated COX-2+ cells unexpectedly remained unaltered compared with untreated COX-2+ #1 and #2 cells. On the other hand, the protein expression of p53, p21cip-1 and p27kip-1, was partially reduced in the presence of the cyclooxygenase inhibitors in both COX-2+ cell lines; however, it remained significantly increased compared with control cells. Interestingly, Trifan et al. (37) transiently overexpressed a COX-2-GFP chimeric protein in NIH 3T3 and COS-7 cells and showed cell cycle arrest, independent of cyclooxygenase inhibition. Moreover, COX-2 mutants devoid of cyclooxygenase activity exhibit the same effect as wild type COX-2.

These results of Trifan et al. and now by our group suggest that COX-2 exerts its anti-proliferative effect independently of cyclooxygenase activity. Furthermore, because p53, p21cip-1, and p27kip-1 were partially attenuated by cyclooxygenase inhibitors, other factors such as the retinoblastoma protein and their related factors and/or the INK4 family of CDK inhibitors, might contribute to this complex COX-2 mediated inhibition of proliferation. Therefore the concerted action of multiple factors are necessary to induce the COX-2-dependent cell cycle arrest obviously partially independent of cyclooxygenase products. Finally, these data suggest the contribution of a novel COX-2 mechanism that does not require the formation of prostaglandins.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Regine Schröder who performed the cell counting assays and the Werner Otto Stiftung, which found us the FACS.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Univ. of Hamburg, Dept. of Medicine, Div. of Nephrology and Osteology, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany. Tel.: 49-40-42803-3936; Fax: 49-40-42803-9036; E-mail: zahner@uke.uni-hamburg.de.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 26, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M106307200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: COX, cyclooxygenase; PG, prostaglandin; PGE2, prostaglandin E2; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; COX-2+, cyclooxygenase overexpressing cell line; MC, mesangial cells; CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase; FCS, fetal calf serum; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorter; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Herschman, H. R. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1299, 125-140[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Smith, W. L., Garvito, R. M., and DeWitt, D. L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 33157-33160[Free Full Text]
3. Rzymkiewiecz, D., Leingang, K., Baird, N., and Morrison, A. R. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. 266, F39-F45[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Abboud, H. E. (1992) Kidney Int. 41, 581-583[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Hla, T., and Neilson, K. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 7384-7388[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Rzymkiewiecz, D., DuMaine, J., and Morrison, A. R. (1995) Kidney Int. 47, 1354-1363[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Spencer, A. G., Woods, J. W., Arakawa, T., Singer, L. L., and Smith, W. L. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 9886-9893[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Smith, W. L., and DeWitt, D. L. (1996) in Advances in Immunology (Dixon, F. J., ed), Vol. 62 , pp. 167-215, Academic Press, Orlando, FL
9. Laneuville, O., Breuer, D. K., DeWitt, D. L., Hla, T., Funk, C. D., and Smith, W. L. (1994) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 271, 927-934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Hla, T., Ristimaki, A., Appleby, S., and Barriocanal, J. G. (1993) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 696, 197-204[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Warner, T. D., Guiliano, F., Vojnovic, I., Bukasa, A., Mitchell, J. A., and Vane, J. R. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 7563-7568[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Dubois, R. N., Abramson, S. B., Crofford, L., Gupta, R. A., Simon, L. S., Nan De Putte, L. B., and Lipsly, P. E. (1998) FASEB J. 12, 1063-1073[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Hla, T., Bishop-Bailey, D., Liu, C. H., Schaefer, H., and Trifan, O. C. (1999) Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 31, 551-557[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Kawamori, T., Rao, C. V., Seibert, K., and Reddy, B. S. (1998) Cancer Res. 58, 409-412[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Mene, P., Abboud, H. E., and Dunn, M. J. (1990) Kidney Int. 38, 232-239[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Stahl, R. A. K., Thaiss, F., Haberstroh, U., Kahf, S., Shaw, A., and Schoeppe, W. (1990) Am. J. Physiol. 259, F419-F424[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Kennedy, B. P., Chan, C. C., Culp, S. A., and Cromlish, W. A. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 197, 494-500[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Kim, Y. G., Alpers, C. E., Brugarolas, J., Johnson, R. J., Couser, W. G., and Shankland, S. J. (1999) Kidney Int. 55, 2349-2361[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Hiromura, K., Pippin, J. W., Fero, M. L., Roberts, J. M., and Shankland, S. J. (1999) J. Clin. Invest. 103, 597-604[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Chirgwin, J. M., Przbyla, A. E., MacDonald, R. J., and Rutter, W. J. (1979) Biochemistry 18, 5294-5299[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Brock, T. G., McNish, R. W., and Petrers-Golden, M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 11660-11666[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Nigg, E. A. (1995) Bioessays 17, 471-480[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Lianos, E. A., Andres, G. A., and Dunn, M. J. (1983) J. Clin. Invest. 72, 1439-1448[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Stahl, R. A. K., Adler, S., Baker, P. J., Chen, Y. P., Protzl, P. M., and Couser, W. G. (1987) Kidney Int. 31, 1126-1131[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Stork, J. E., and Dunn, M. J. (1985) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 233, 672-678[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Stahl, R. A. K., Kudelka, S., Paravicini, M., and Schollmeyer, P. (1986) Nephron. 42, 252-257[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Okuda, S., Languino, L. R., Ruoslahti, E., and Border, W. A. (1990) J. Clin. Invest. 86, 453-462[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Border, W. A., Okuda, S., Languino, L. R., and Ruoslahti, E. (1990) Kidney Int. 37, 689-695[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Subbaramaiah, K., Altorki, N., Chung, W. J., Mestre, J. R., Sampa, A., and Dannenberg, A. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 10911-10915[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Gorospe, M., Cirielli, C., Wang, X., Seth, P., Capogrossi, M. C., and Holbrook, N. J. (1997) Oncogene 14, 929-935[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. McGinty, A., Chang, Y. W., Sorokin, A., Bokemeyer, D., and Dunn, M. J. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 12095-12101[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Chang, Y. W., Jakobi, R., McGinty, A., Foschi, M., Dunn, M. J., and Sorokin, A. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 8571-8579[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Shankland, S. J., Pippin, J., Flanagan, M., Coats, S. R., Nangaku, M., Gordon, K. L., Roberts, J. M., Couser, W. G., and Johnson, R. J. (1997) Kidney Int. 51, 1088-1099[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Wolf, G., Schroeder, R., Thaiss, F., Ziyadeh, F. N., Helmchen, U., and Stahl, R. A. K. (1998) Kidney Int. 53, 869-879[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Wolf, G., Schroeder, R., Ziyadeh, F. N., Thaiss, F., Zahner, G., and Stahl, R. A. K. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 273, F348-F356[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Wolf, G., and Stahl, R. A. K. (1996) Kidney Int. 50, 2112-2119[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Trifan, O. C., Smith, R. M., Thompson, B. D., and Hla, T. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 34141-34147[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
U. Panzer, G. Zahner, U. Wienberg, O. M. Steinmetz, A. Peters, J.-E. Turner, H.-J. Paust, G. Wolf, R. A. K. Stahl, and A. Schneider
15-Deoxy-{Delta}12,14-prostaglandin J2 inhibits INF-{gamma}-induced JAK/STAT1 signalling pathway activation and IP-10/CXCL10 expression in mesangial cells
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 3776 - 3785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
H. Hasegawa, Y. Yamada, K. Komiyama, M. Hayashi, M. Ishibashi, T. Sunazuka, T. Izuhara, K. Sugahara, K. Tsuruda, M. Masuda, et al.
A novel natural compound, a cycloanthranilylproline derivative (Fuligocandin B), sensitizes leukemia cells to apoptosis induced by tumor necrosis factor related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) through 15-deoxy-{Delta}12, 14 prostaglandin J2 production
Blood, September 1, 2007; 110(5): 1664 - 1674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
H.-Y. Tang, A. Shih, H. J. Cao, F. B. Davis, P. J. Davis, and H.-Y. Lin
Resveratrol-induced cyclooxygenase-2 facilitates p53-dependent apoptosis in human breast cancer cells.
Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2006; 5(8): 2034 - 2042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Z. Xu, S. Choudhary, O. Voznesensky, M. Mehrotra, M. Woodard, M. Hansen, H. Herschman, and C. Pilbeam
Overexpression of Cox-2 in Human Osteosarcoma Cells Decreases Proliferation and Increases Apoptosis.
Cancer Res., July 1, 2006; 66(13): 6657 - 6664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
U. Hopfer, H. Hopfer, K. Jablonski, R. A. K. Stahl, and G. Wolf
The Novel WD-repeat Protein Morg1 Acts as a Molecular Scaffold for Hypoxia-inducible Factor Prolyl Hydroxylase 3 (PHD3)
J. Biol. Chem., March 31, 2006; 281(13): 8645 - 8655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. L. Gauthier, C. R. Pickering, C. J. Miller, C. A. Fordyce, K. L. Chew, H. K. Berman, and T. D. Tlsty
p38 Regulates Cyclooxygenase-2 in Human Mammary Epithelial Cells and Is Activated in Premalignant Tissue
Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 65(5): 1792 - 1799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
A Baldi, D Santini, F Vasaturo, M Santini, G Vicidomini, M P. Di Marino, V Esposito, A M Groeger, G Liuzzi, B Vincenzi, et al.
Prognostic significance of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and expression of cell cycle inhibitors p21 and p27 in human pleural malignant mesothelioma
Thorax, May 1, 2004; 59(5): 428 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/12/9763    most recent
M106307200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zahner, G.
Right arrow Articles by Stahl, R. A. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zahner, G.
Right arrow Articles by Stahl, R. A. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement