|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M110904200 on December 28, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 12, 9772-9779, March 22, 2002
Trafficking and Cell Surface Stability of the Epithelial
Na+ Channel Expressed in Epithelial Madin-Darby Canine
Kidney Cells*
David
Hanwell ,
Toru
Ishikawa§,
Reza
Saleki, and
Daniela
Rotin¶
From the Hospital for Sick Children and the Department of
Biochemistry, University of Toronto,
Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada
Received for publication, November 14, 2001, and in revised form, December 7, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The apically located epithelial
Na+ channel (  -ENaC) plays a key role
in the regulation of salt and fluid transport in the kidney and other
epithelia, yet its mode of trafficking to the plasma membrane and its
cell surface stability in mammalian cells are poorly understood.
Because the expression of ENaC in native tissues/cells is very low, we
generated epithelial Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells
stably expressing   -ENaC, where each subunit is tagged
differentially at the intracellular C terminus and the -subunit is
also Myc-tagged at the ectodomain
( HA Myc,T7 FLAG). ENaC expression in these cells was verified by immunoblotting with
antibodies to the tags, and patch clamp analysis has confirmed that the
tagged channel is functional. Moreover, using electron microscopy, we
demonstrated apical, but not basal, membrane localization of ENaC in
these cells. The glycosylation pattern of the intracellular pool of
ENaC revealed peptide N-glycosidase F and
endoglycosidase H sensitivity. Surprisingly, the cell surface pool of
ENaC, analyzed by surface biotinylation, was also core glycosylated and
lacked detectable endoglycosidase H-resistant channels. Extraction of the channel from cells in Triton X-100 demonstrated that both intracellular and cell surface pools of ENaC are largely soluble. Moreover, floatation assays to analyze the presence of ENaC in lipid
rafts showed that both intracellular and cell surface pools of this
channel are not associated with rafts. We have shown previously that
the total cellular pool of ENaC is turned over rapidly
(t1/2 ~ 1-2 h). Using cycloheximide
treatment and surface biotinylation we now demonstrate that the cell
surface pool of ENaC has a similarly short half-life
(t1/2 ~1 h), unlike the long half-life
reported recently for the Xenopus A6 cells. Collectively,
these results help elucidate key aspects of ENaC trafficking and
turnover rates in mammalian kidney epithelial cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The amiloride-sensitive epithelial Na+ channel
(ENaC)1 is an apically
located channel expressed primarily in salt-transporting epithelia of
the kidney (distal nephron), distal colon, lung, ducts of exocrine
glands, and other organs (for review, see Ref. 1). Its critical role in
regulating salt and fluid transport is underscored by the findings that
inactivating mutations in ENaC cause the salt-wasting nephropathy
pseudohypoaldosteronism type I, and gain-of-function mutations cause
Liddle syndrome, a hereditary form of hypertension (for review, see
Ref. 2). Liddle syndrome is caused by mutations in one of the PY motifs (PPPxY) of ENaC, leading to increased channel numbers and
opening at the plasma membrane (3); the increase in channel numbers is
believed to be caused by impaired binding to and suppression by the
ubiquitin ligase Nedd4 (4-9) and by impaired endocytosis of the
channel (10).
ENaC consists of three subunits,   (11, 12), arranged in a
stoichiometry of 2 :1 :1 (13, 14; for another view, see Ref.
15). Each ENaC subunit is comprised of two transmembrane domains, a
large ectodomain flanking them and containing numerous N-linked glycosylation sites, and short intracellular N and
C termini (16-18). The N termini of - and -ENaC contain
conserved Lys residues that serve as ubiquitin acceptor sites (19), and the C termini of all three subunits contain the above mentioned PY
motifs (4, 5, 20). Although all three ENaC chains are glycosylated in
cells, the role of this glycosylation is not clear, and indeed mutation
of all N-linked glycosylation sites in -ENaC does not
seem to affect channel function (16, 18).
In native tissues, ENaC is a rare protein with very low expression
levels (21, 22), permitting electrophysiological and limited
immunofluoresence analyses to be performed but precluding biochemical
studies on such low abundance proteins. Thus, several groups have
investigated aspects of ENaC trafficking and protein stability in cell
lines and heterologous expression systems, primarily in
Xenopus oocytes, Xenopus A6 cells, and mammalian
fibroblasts transiently expressing the ENaC subunits (23-26; for
review, see Ref. 27). ENaC trafficking in mammalian kidney (polarized)
epithelial cells stably expressing   -ENaC has not been
reported, hence this was the focus of our studies.
The ENaC chains appear to assemble together early on in the
endoplasmic reticulum (28), but details of the route of trafficking to
the cell surface are lacking. A major obstacle in following ENaC
maturation biochemically has been the lack of an apparent endoglycosidase H (Endo H)-resistant pool, which typically marks mature
transmembrane proteins that have acquired complex glycosylation at the
medial Golgi compartment. This is unlike the ENaC relative Phe-Met-Arg-Phe-amide-activated Na channel (FaNaC), in which an Endo H-resistant pool is easily detectable during its maturation process (29). Thus, an important issue to be resolved is whether ENaC
does not acquire complex glycosylation, or whether it does so but the
Endo H-resistant pool is below our detection limits. In addition, it
has been suggested that in COS cells, the mature ENaC is stripped of
its core glycosylation and becomes insoluble in non-ionic detergents
upon arrival at the plasma membrane (23, 24).
Our previous work (19) has demonstrated that the total cellular pool of
ENaC expressed heterologously in mammalian MDCK or NIH-3T3 cells has a
short half-life (t1/2 ~1-2 h), as also shown
for A6 cells, which express ENaC endogenously (25, 30). In
Xenopus oocytes expressing ectopic ENaC, which are grown at a much lower temperature, this half-life is ~10 h (31). Despite the
relatively short half-life of the intracellular pool of ENaC in
cultured cells, it has been recently suggested that the half-life of
the surface pool of ENaC in A6 cells is quite long (>24 h for or
, and ~6 h for the subunit) (25, 26). This contrasts previous
work which suggested, based on functional studies in Xenopus
oocytes after brefeldin A treatment, that the active cell surface pool
of ENaC is short lived (10, 19), although this was not tested
biochemically. The stability of ENaC at the cell surface of mammalian
epithelial cells, most relevant for ENaC function, has not been investigated.
In this study, we describe the generation of kidney epithelial MDCK
cells stably expressing epitope-tagged   -ENaC under an
inducible promoter. Each subunit was tagged with a different tag at the
intracellular C terminus, and an additional tag was added to the
extracellular domain of -ENaC. These cells express functional ENaC
at the apical membrane. Using this cell line, we show here that the
cell surface, mature ENaC is Endo H-sensitive (similar to intracellular
ENaC), suggesting that the channel does not acquire complex
glycosylation during trafficking to the cell surface. We also show that
ENaC is not associated with lipid rafts, and its intracellular and cell
surface pools are primarily detergent soluble. Moreover, we demonstrate
that unlike A6 cells, the cell surface ENaC has a very short half-life,
about 1 h. These studies are important for our understanding of
the regulation of channel numbers at the plasma membrane, which play a
key role in regulating ENaC function under physiological and
pathophysiological conditions, such as Liddle syndrome.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Generation of Stable MDCK Cell Lines Expressing Tagged
ENaC--
MDCK clones expressing rat ENaC chains bearing different
epitope tags (see Fig. 1A) were generated from high
resistance MDCK cells as follows. For -ENaC, a triple HA tag
(YPYDVPDY) was introduced intracellularly just upstream of the stop
codon, and the cDNA was subcloned into pLKneo, which possesses a
dexamethasone-inducible promoter and neomycin resistance gene (32).
After selection in G418, the stably expressing -ENaC-MDCK cells were
used as a template for the introduction of FLAG-tagged -ENaC.
FLAG- -ENaC was generated by introducing an intracellular FLAG tag
(DYKDDDDK) upstream of the stop codon and subcloning into pCEP4
(Invitrogen), which possesses a hygromycin resistance gene. After
selection in hygromycin (in the presence of G418), the
HA FLAG-ENaC-MDCK cells were used to
introduce a double-tagged -ENaC into them. For -ENaC, a Myc tag
(AEEQKLISEEDL) was inserted in the ectodomain (between amino acids 138 and 139, in a position previously described to have little effect on
channel activity (3)), and an intracellular T7 (MASMTGGQQMG) tag was
added just upstream of the stop codon. The tagged -ENaC was
subcloned into pBabe-puro, which expresses the puromycin resistance
gene, and the cDNA was introduced into the above cells. Puromycin
selection (in the presence of G418 and hygromycin) yielded the
HA Myc,T7 FLAG-ENaC-MDCK
cells (see Fig. 1A). The   FLAG-ENaC-MDCK
cells have been described previously (19). MDCK cells were maintained
in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10%, fetal bovine
serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin at
37 °C in 5% CO2-containing humidified air. The
HA Myc,T7 FLAG-ENaC-MDCK
cells were maintained in the above medium supplemented with 300 µg/ml
G418, 5 µg/ml puromycin, 100 µg/ml hygromycin, and 10 µM amiloride.
To verify protein expression, confluent monolayers grown on 10-cm
plates were induced overnight (with 2 mM sodium butyrate, 1 µM dexamethasone, and 10 µM amiloride),
washed, and lysed in lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM HEPES, 1% Triton X-100 (w/v), 10% glycerol (w/v), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1.0 mM EGTA plus protease
inhibitors (10 µg/ml leupeptin and aprotinin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin A,
1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride)). Lysates were cleared
by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C;
a 250-µg aliquot (for - or -ENaC) was boiled in sample buffer,
and proteins separated on an 8% SDS-PAGE. Because the expression of
the FLAG was very low, a larger amount of protein (6 mg)
was used, and proteins were concentrated by methanol/chloroform
precipitation (33) prior to separation on a 7% Tricine SDS-PAGE. For
comparison, 600 µg of protein from the
  FLAG-ENaC-expressing cells was also run on the
same gel. After SDS-PAGE separation, proteins were immunoblotted with
antibodies to the tags (from Sigma (anti-FLAG), BAbCO (anti-HA),
Novagen (anti-T7), PharMingen (anti-Myc)) and detected by
chemiluminescence (ECL from Amersham Biosciences, Inc. or SuperSignal
from Pierce).
In all experiments, MDCK cells were grown either on permeable filters
(2.4-cm diameter, 0.4-µm pore size, Costar) or in 3.25-cm wells or
10-cm plates (plastic, Falcon) to confluence, and assays were performed
4 days later to ensure complete polarization and formation of domes (on
plates) in the monolayers of cells. Several assays were performed using
both systems, with similar results (see "Results").
Electrophysiology--
Whole cell current recordings were made
from
HA Myc,T7 FLAG-ENaC-expressing
MDCK cells grown on cover glass using the standard whole cell
configuration of the patch clamp technique as reported previously (34).
An Axopatch 1D patch clamp amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City,
CA) was used to measure whole cell currents. The amplifier was driven
by PCLAMP 6 software to allow the delivery of voltage step protocols
with concomitant digitization of the whole cell current. The patch
clamp pipettes, which were pulled from glass capillaries (LG 16, Dagan,
Minneapolis) using a vertical puller (model PP-830, Narishige, Tokyo),
had resistances of ~2-3 megohms when filled with a standard
cesium-glutamate-rich solution described below. The reference was an
Ag/AgCl electrode, which was connected to the bath via an agar bridge
filled with a standard NaCl-rich bathing solution.
Current-voltage (I-V) relations were studied using voltage ramps. The
command voltage was varied from 124 mV to +16 mV over a duration of
800 ms every 30 s. 10 µM amiloride-sensitive
currents were estimated by subtraction of currents measured under
identical conditions except for the addition of 10 µM amiloride.
The pipette solution contained (in mM) 100 or 120 cesium-glutamate, 10 CsCl, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 0 or 10 Na2-ATP, and 10 EGTA. The pH of the solution was adjusted
with CsOH to 7.4. The cells were initially immersed in a bath solution
(pH 7.4) containing (in mM) 140 NaCl, 4.3 KCl,
1MgCl2, and 10 HEPES. Before the establishment of whole
cell configuration, the bath solution was changed to the one containing
(in mM) 145 lithium-glutamate, 1 MgCl2, and 19 HEPES. The pH of the solution was adjusted with LiOH.
All experiments were performed at room temperature (~20 °C). Bath
solution changes were accomplished by gravity feed from reservoirs. The
results are reported as the means ± S.E. of several experiments
(n), and n refers to the number of cells patched
in the different plate.
Cell Surface Biotinylation--
Confluent monolayers grown on
either a permeable filter or a solid support were induced overnight and
then kept on ice throughout the experiment. Cells were washed three
times with ice-cold PBS-CM (PBS with 1 mM MgCl2
and 0.1 mM CaCl2) and incubated 15 min with 1.0 mg/ml EZ-linkTM Sulfo-NHS-S-S-biotin (Pierce) in cold
biotinylation buffer (10 mM triethanolamine, 2 mM CaCl2, 150 mM NaCl, pH 9.0) with
gentle agitation. Cells were washed once with quenching buffer (192 mM glycine, 25 mM Tris in PBS-CM) and incubated
for 10 min with quenching buffer with light agitation. Cells were then
rinsed twice with PBS-CM, scraped in cold PBS, and pelleted at 2,000 rpm at 4 °C. They were lysed in lysis buffer and incubated on ice 30 min before centrifugation (10 min at 14,000 × g,
4 °C). Supernatants were transferred to new tubes and after the
addition of 50 µl of 50% slurry of streptavidin-agarose beads
(Sigma), were rotated for 2 h at 4 °C. Beads were pelleted by
brief centrifugation and aliquots of the supernatant were taken to
represent the unbound, intracellular pool. Beads were then washed three
times with HNTG (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM
NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.1% Trtion X-100). Biotinylated proteins were
eluted by boiling in sample buffer supplemented with 5%
-mercaptoethanol, and proteins were separated on 8% SDS-PAGE and
immunoblotted as above. In some experiments, cells were surface biotinylated by treating with prechilled 10 mM sodium
periodate on ice for 30 min in the dark. Cells were then incubated with 1.0 mg/ml EZ-linkTM biotin-LC-hydrazide (Pierce) in
prechilled 100 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, on ice with
slight agitation for 30 min.
For all experiments analyzing cell surface expression using the
Sulfo-NHS-S-S-biotin for surface biotinylation, to ensure the absence
of leakage of biotin into the cell (which could label the large
intracellular pool of ENaC thus skewing the results), an internal
control was used for each plate/well of cells by measuring surface
biotinylation of an intracellular protein (e.g. actin, annexin II, enolase). Only plates/wells showing no labeling of intracellular proteins (i.e. no leakage of biotin) were
included in our data analysis.
Treatment with Glycosidases--
Cells were grown on plates and
induced overnight prior to experiments. Plates were surface
biotinylated and lysed, and biotinylated proteins were precipitated and
eluted as described above. Aliquots of supernatant from the
streptavidin-agarose bead incubations, representing the intracellular
pool of proteins, were boiled in sample buffer. Samples were then
either left untreated or were treated with 100 mU Endo H or 15 mU
peptide N-glycosidase F (PNGaseF), according to the
manufacturer's instructions (New England Biolabs). Proteins
were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose for immunoblotting.
Cell Surface Stability--
Cells were grown on plates or
filters and induced overnight. The following day, the indicated
plates/filters were incubated with fresh induction medium supplemented
with 20 µg/ml cycloheximide (ICN) for 1-6 h at 37 °C. We used one
10-cm plate or six filters (pooled) for each time point. At each time
point, the appropriate plates/filters were placed on ice, surface
biotinylated, and lysed in lysis buffer as described above. Lysates for
each time point were quantitated using the Bio-Rad assay, and total
protein was normalized before addition of streptavidin-agarose beads.
Lysates were then rotated for 2 h at 4 °C. After a brief
centrifugation to pellet the beads, aliquots were taken to represent
the unbound, intracellular pool. Beads were washed three times with
HNTG, and proteins were eluted by boiling in sample buffer containing
5% -mercaptoethanol. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE,
transferred to nitrocellulose, and immunoblotted with antibodies to the
tags followed by chemiluminescence detection. Band quantitation was then performed using FluorchemTM equipment and software (Alpha Innotech
Corp., San Leandro, CA). Bands were quantified using spot densitometry,
where only density values within the linear range were used.
ENaC Distribution in Non-ionic Detergent--
Polarized
HA Myc,T7 FLAG-ENaC-expressing
MDCK cells grown on filters or plates were induced overnight and placed
on ice. Cells were rinsed three times with PBS-CM, surface
biotinylated, and quenched as described above, then scraped in PBS.
Cells were pelleted and lysed in lysis buffer for 30 min on ice.
Samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 14,000 rpm, and pellets
(detergent-insoluble fraction) were resuspended in a volume of lysis
buffer equal to the supernatants (detergent-soluble fractions). Re-
suspended pellets were sonicated three times for 15 s each on
ice to solubilize the insoluble fraction (35). Samples were then
centrifuged for 10 min at 14,000 rpm, and the supernatants
(representing the insoluble fraction) were collected. For ENaC at the
cell surface, biotinylated proteins were precipitated with 50 µl of
50% streptavidin-agarose bead slurry by rotating for 2 h at
4 °C. After brief centrifugation, aliquots of supernatants were
taken to represent the intracellular pool and were boiled in sample
buffer. Beads were washed, and biotinylated proteins were eluted from
the detergent-soluble and -insoluble fractions as de- scribed
above. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to
nitrocellulose for immunoblotting and quantitation of
chemiluminescence, as described above.
Isolation of Triton X-100-insoluble Membrane Rafts (Floatation
Assays)--
Confluent monolayers grown on permeable filters or solid
support (six multiwell plates) were washed three times with PBS, scraped in PBS, and pelleted at 2,000 rpm, 4 °C. Cells were lysed in
200 µl of TN (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM
NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 µg/ml leupeptin and
aprotinin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin A, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10% sucrose, and 1% Triton X-100) on ice and incubated for
30 min on ice. For some experiments, cells were surface biotinylated as
described above prior to lysis in TN. Samples were mixed with 0.4 ml of
cold OptiprepTM, transferred into SW60 centrifuge tubes,
and overlaid with 0.6 ml of each 35, 30, 25, 20, and 0% Optiprep in
TN, as described by Oliferenko et al. (36). The gradients
were centrifuged at 35,000 rpm in an SW60 rotor for 12 h at
4 °C. Fractions were collected from the top to the bottom of the
centrifuge tubes, and proteins were methanol/chloroform precipitated.
After resuspension of the pellets in equal volumes of 5% SDS, sample
buffer was added, and the fractions were boiled. Proteins were
separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting. Antibodies to
annexin II and caveolin were from Santa Cruz and for the tranferrin
receptor (TfnR) from Zymed Laboratories Inc. Proteins
in the top two fractions (20 and 25%) are considered to be
raft-associated (36). For experiments in which cells were first surface
biotinylated, 50 µl of 50% streptavidin-agarose bead slurry was
added to each sample after resuspension of the pellets and rotated for
2 h at room temperature. After brief centrifugation, supernatants
were used as described above, and beads were washed three times with
HNTG. Biotinylated proteins were eluted by boiling in sample buffer
supplemented with 5% -mercaptoethanol.
Immunoelectron Microscopy--
Confluent, filter-grown
HA Myc,T7 FLAG-ENaC-expressing
MDCK cells were induced overnight and rinsed three times with cold PBS-CM. Immunogold surface labeling was performed by incubating monolayers on ice for 3 h with monoclonal anti-Myc antibodies in
PBS-CM (1:10, PharMingen) in both the apical and basal compartments (4 °C). Cells were washed three times (5 min each) with cold PBS-CM and incubated with goat anti-mouse 15 nm gold in PBS-CM (1:12, British Biolabs) at 4 °C for 1 h on ice. Cells were rinsed
three times (5 min each) with ice-cold PBS and incubated in
Karnovsky's fixative (2.5% glutaraldehyde, 3.2% paraformaldehyde in
0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.2) for 2 h at room
temperature. Samples were rinsed three times with PBS and incubated
with 1% OsO4 for 15 min in the dark. Following PBS washes,
filters were incubated with 2% uranyl acetate for 15 min in the dark.
Samples were then washed x3 with distilled water and dehydrated using
ethanol incubations in 50, 70, 95, and 100% ethanol (2 times 5 min
each). Filters were infiltrated with Epon resin:ethanol (1:1 then 3:1,
30 min each) followed by 100% Epon overnight, 4 °C. Fresh Epon was
applied to filters and incubated at room temperature for 5 h. Epon
was again replaced and polymerized for 48 h at 65 °C. Blocks
containing filter were sectioned (90-nm thick- ness) and placed on
slotted grids. Sections were viewed using a Hitachi H600 transmission electron microscope.
 |
RESULTS |
Characterization of Epitope-tagged   -ENaC Stably Expressed
in MDCK Cells--
The expression of the ENaC protein in native kidney
epithelia is very low, thus precluding biochemical analyses of the
channel in these tissues. To analyze ENaC function in cultured kidney epithelial cells, we utilized high resistance MDCK cells, which form
polarized monolayers and which are well characterized with respect to
cellular trafficking (37). In addition, our unpublished work has
identified traces of -ENaC in the parental MDCK cells, not
sufficient to confer channel activity (34), but suggesting that such
MDCK cells could provide a suitable host for heterologous ENaC. We thus
epitope tagged each rat ENaC chain with a different tag at the C
terminus just upstream of the stop codon. We also introduced a Myc tag
at the ectodomain of -ENaC (Fig.
1A), in the same position
shown previously not to affect channel activity when containing a short
epitope tag (3). To protect cells from excessive Na+
loading, the -subunit was expressed under the control of a
dexamethasone-inducible promoter, and the other two subunits were
expressed constitutively (see "Experimental Procedures"). The
tagged ENaC subunits were then stably transfected into the parental
MDCK cells, and protein expression of the quadruple tagged ENaC was
verified after induction with dexamethasone (in the presence of
amiloride). As seen in Fig. 1B, antibodies against the tags
recognized the expected size of each ENaC subunit.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
A, schematic representation of the
tagged HA Myc,T7 FLAG-ENaC
constructs. B, protein expression of all three tagged
subunits in the stably transfected MDCK cell line. Protein expression
of -ENaC is very low, and hence ~24-fold more protein was loaded
on the gel in the right panel. Expression of -ENaC in the
  FLAG-ENaC-MDCK cell line is shown for comparison
(loaded at 1:10 of the amount of the
HA Myc,T7 FLAG-ENaC cells).
The asterisk represents a cross-reacting band recognized by
the anti-HA antibodies. T = T7.
|
|
To verify that the tagged ENaC is localized properly to the apical
membrane, we grew the
HA Myc,T7 FLAG-ENaC-expressing
MDCK cells on permeable filters and used immunogold labeling with
anti-Myc antibodies to stain the apical or basal surface of
unpermeabilized cells. Fig. 2A
shows that the tagged ENaC is indeed localized to the apical membrane
of polarized MDCK cells. Basolateral labeling was not detected, nor was
labeling seen in the apical surface of the parental untransfected MDCK
cells (Fig. 2A). Interestingly, although the tagged ENaC
chains are overexpressed in these cells, the density of ENaC channels
actually expressed at the apical cell surface appears very low
(probably <1% of total ENaC pool, based on our crude estimate).

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Characterization of
HA Myc,T7 FLAG-ENaC
stably expressed in MDCK cells. A, immunogold EM
analysis of
HA Myc,T7 FLAG-ENaC
distribution in polarized MDCK cells grown on filters. Cells were
immunostained with anti-Myc antibodies to detect -ENaC followed by
immunogold staining, without permeabilization. The arrows
depict labeled ENaC at the apical surface (top panel). No
labeling was seen at the basolateral surface (middle panel)
or apical membrane of untransfected polarized MDCK cells (bottom
panel). Magnification, ~×50,000. B, the
HA Myc,T7 FLAG-ENaC-MDCK
cells express functional ENaC, analyzed by electrophysiology.
Panel a, example of the whole cell recordings from
MDCK cells expressing
HA Myc,T7 FLAG-ENaC before
and after the addition of 10 µM amiloride to the bath
solution. Ramp command voltages were applied from 124 mV to +16 mV
every 30 s. The holding potential was 44 mV. Panel
b, current-voltage (I-V) relation for the
amiloride-sensitive whole cell currents. Each point represents the
mean ± S.E. of four experiments
|
|
The parental MDCK cells do not possess detectable ENaC activity (34).
To determine whether the
HA Myc,T7 FLAG-ENaC-expressing MDCK cells express a functional channel at the plasma membrane, we
measured the amiloride-sensitive whole cell currents in these cells. We
first measured the whole cell current-voltage (I-V) relation when the
bath contained the standard lithium-glutamate-rich solution, and then
replaced the bath with a similar solution containing 10 µM amiloride (Fig. 2B). By subtracting the
whole cell records observed before the addition of the inhibitor from
those observed after its addition, we obtained the I-V relation for the
component of the amiloride-sensitive whole cell currents (Fig.
2B). The amiloride-sensitive whole cell currents at 124
and 4 mV were 1.22 ± 0.16 nA (n = 4) and
0.28 ± 0.09 nA (n = 4), respectively. A
reversal potential of the amiloride-sensitive currents deviated far
from 0 mV, suggesting that Li+ permeability of the
amiloride-sensitive channel was much greater than Cs+,
although the relative permeability of Li+ to
Cs+ could not be determined experimentally. These results
demonstrate the presence of functional ENaC channel at the plasma
membrane of
HA Myc,T7 FLAG-ENaC-expressing
MDCK cells.
Glycosylation of ENaC--
It has been reported previously
that cellular pool of ENaC the expressed heterologously in
Xenopus oocytes is core glycosylated with no detectable Endo
H-resistant pool that usually marks mature, complex-glycosylated
transmembrane proteins (16, 18, 31). This could have two
possible explanations: either the mature, surface-expressed pool of
ENaC is so small that an Endo H-resistant fraction is below the
detection limits when total cellular ENaC is analyzed or ENaC travels
to the cell surface without the acquisition of complex glycosylation.
To sort out between these possibilities, we performed surface
biotinylation experiments on our
HA Myc, T7 FLAG-ENaC-expressing MDCK cells to test whether the cell surface, mature pool of ENaC is
complex-glycosylated. For most of our biochemical studies, we used the
-subunit (in the context of
HA Myc,T7 FLAG-ENaC) to
represent the channel because it is twice as abundant as each of the
other subunits (13), and it is also triple tagged (Fig. 1A),
rendering its detection easier.
Because our work and that of others (for review, see Ref. 27) has shown
that the pool of ENaC at the cell surface is very small relative to the
total cellular pool, we had to ensure that none of the biotin enters
the cells (and thus labels intracellular ENaC) during surface
biotinylation. Thus, for each treatment, we analyzed both surface
biotinylation of ENaC and biotinylation of an abundant intracellular
protein such as actin, annexin II, or enolase, used as a marker for
biotin entry into the cell. Fig. 3A shows the validity of the
assays, demonstrating surface biotinylation of -ENaC but not of
actin, despite high intracellular expression of both proteins. Such
cell surface biotinylation reflecting cell surface expression of ENaC
was seen both when the ENaC-expressing MDCK cells were grown (and
became polarized) on plates (solid support) or on permeable filters.
Using this cell surface biotinylation approach, we then analyzed the
susceptibility of the cell surface, mature ENaC to PNGaseF and Endo H. As seen in Fig. 3B the surface pool of -ENaC was PNGaseF-
and Endo H-sensitive, similar to the intracellular pool. We were not
able to detect cell surface biotinylated pool of -ENaC (Fig.
3C) even though this subunit is expressed at the apical
surface (Fig. 2A). The intracellular pool of -ENaC was
sensitive to both PNGaseF and Endo H (Fig. 3C), as expected. Cell surface expression of -ENaC in the
HA Myc,T7 FLAG-ENaC-expressing cells was too low to allow quantitative biochemical studies. However, we were able to perform cell surface biotinylation of -ENaC in the
  FLAG-ENaC cells (Fig. 3D,
boxed), which demonstrated lack of Endo H-resistant cell
surface or intracellular pools of -ENaC, similar to -ENaC. Our
confocal immunofluorescence analysis of the steady-state pool of ENaC
revealed extensive colocalization with the Golgi marker
galactosyltransferase (green fluorescent protein-tagged),
suggesting, as expected, that ENaC transits through the Golgi en route
to the plasma membrane (data not shown). Thus, these results
demonstrate that ENaC does not acquire complex sugar modifications
during its traffic from the endoplasmic reticulum through the Golgi to
the plasma membrane.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Glycosylation pattern of cell surface and
intracellular
HA Myc,T7 FLAG-ENaC.
A, validity of the surface biotinylation approach, showing
surface expression (biotinylation) of -ENaC but not of the
intracellular protein actin. B, PNGaseF and Endo H
sensitivity of the cell surface and intracellular pools of -ENaC.
The intracellular protein annexin II was used here as a control for
surface biotinylation. C, PNGaseF and Endo H sensitivity of
intracellular -ENaC. Cell surface -ENaC was below our detection
limits using cell surface biotinylation approach, although this
subunit is expressed at the apical membrane (see Fig. 2). D,
PNGaseF and Endo H sensitivity of the cell surface and intracellular
pools of -ENaC expressed in the context of
  FLAG-ENaC-MDCK cells (boxed).
|
|
Detergent Solubility and Lack of Raft Association of
ENaC--
ENaC has been proposed previously to become insoluble in
non-ionic detergent (such as Triton X-100) during its maturation (23,
24). To analyze whether the mature, cell surface pool of ENaC is
detergent-soluble/insoluble, we compared solubility of surface
biotinylated and intracellular pools of ENaC. Fig. 4 (top panel) depicts
solubility of ENaC in increasing concentrations of Triton X-100 and
shows that with concentrations as low as 0.2%, the majority of the
cellular and all of the surface pool of ENaC was soluble. At 0.5 and
1% Triton X-100, virtually all of the intracellular and cell surface
pools of the channel were found in the soluble fraction. This was
unlike annexin II, which is associated with rafts (see below) and was
used here as a control that is known to possess a substantial insoluble
fraction (Fig. 4, bottom panel).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Detergent solubility of intracellular and
cell surface ENaC. -ENaC solubility in increasing
concentrations of Triton X-100 was determined by analyzing both the
cell surface and intracellular pools of -ENaC (upper
panel). Annexin II, an intracellular protein also known to be
associated with lipid rafts, was used as a control for surface
biotinylation and for detergent insolubility (lower panel).
Both cell surface and intracellular pools of -ENaC are largely
soluble.
|
|
To investigate further the detergent solubility of ENaC, we tested its
possible association with lipid rafts. This was particularly important
because the ENaC-interacting protein Nedd4 is associated with lipid
rafts, and this association helps recruit Nedd4 to the apical plasma
membrane in MDCK cells (38). We thus performed floatation assays (36,
38, 39) to test for the presence of ENaC in the light fractions
(20-25%) of an Optiprep gradient that was overlaid on top of
detergent (1% Triton X-100, 4 °C)-extracted ENaC followed by
ultracentrifugation. As controls, we used caveolin and annexin II, two
proteins well established to become raft-associated (40, 41), and TfnR,
which is not associated with rafts (42). As seen in Fig.
5A, both caveolin and annexin
II were present in lipid rafts (in the 20 and 25% fractions), as
expected, and the association of annexin II with the rafts, which is
calcium-dependent, was disrupted by the addition of the
chelator EGTA. As also expected, the TfnR was not associated with
rafts. As evident from Fig. 5A (bottom panel),
the total cellular pool of ENaC did not float in the light (raft)
fractions, and its distribution matched that of the TfnR and not of
caveolin or annexin II. The same results were obtained when the
ENaC-expressing MDCK cells were grown on permeable filters (Fig.
5B). Moreover, Fig. 5B (second from
bottom panel) demonstrates that the biotinylated,
cell surface pool of ENaC is also not associated with lipid rafts.
Therefore, these results suggest that ENaC does not associate with
rafts during its intracellular trafficking or at the plasma membrane.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Lack of association of ENaC with lipid
rafts. Floatation (raft) assays were performed on postconfluent
HA Myc,T7 FLAG-ENaC-MDCK
cells grown on solid plates (A) or permeable filters
(B). The raft-associated proteins caveolin and annexin II
were used as positive controls, and the TfnR as well as annexin II
treated with EGTA (which disrupts its raft association) were used as
negative controls for raft association. Intracellular (A and
B) and cell surface (B) ENaC, immunoblotted for
-ENaC, were not associated with lipid rafts. The top two layers (20 and 25% Optiprep) represent lipid rafts.
|
|
Half-life of ENaC at the Cell Surface--
Our previous work (19)
and that of others (25, 30) has demonstrated a relatively short
half-life of the total (largely intracellular) pool of ENaC (~1-2 h)
in cultured cells. The stability of ENaC at the cell surface where it
functions, however, is a more important parameter. To determine the
half-life of ENaC at the plasma membrane, we surface biotinylated ENaC
after cycloheximide treatment (for 0-6 h), which blocks protein
synthesis and thus prevents the synthesis and arrival of new channels
to the plasma membrane. We opted not to use brefeldin A because of
earlier reports questioning its effectiveness in disrupting the Golgi
apparatus in MDCK and other kidney cells and demonstrating its
inhibitory effect on transcytosis instead (43, 44). Fig.
6 demonstrates that the cell surface pool
of -ENaC (in the context of
HA Myc,T7 FLAG-ENaC) is
short lived, with half-life of 1.04 ± 0.19 (n = 5). As expected, the intracellular pool is also turned over relatively
quickly (t1/2 = 1.7 ± 0.16 (n = 5)), as also shown for the other two ENaC subunits
(Fig. 6A) and as documented previously (19). There was no
difference in the half-life of ENaC when cells were grown to
postconfluence on either solid support or permeable filters (t1/2 for cell surface -ENaC grown on
filters = 0.9 h) (Fig. 6, A and B). A
similar short half-life of cell surface and intracellular -ENaC
(analyzed in the   FLAG-ENaC cells) was also
observed (Fig. 6C, boxed).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Half-life of cell surface and
intracellular pools of
HA Myc,T7 FLAG-ENaC.
Postconfluent MDCK cells expressing
HA Myc,T7 FLAG-ENaC grown on
plates (A) or permeable filter support (B) were
treated with cycloheximide (CHX) for the indicated times.
The half-lives of the cell surface biotinylated pool and intracellular
pool were then determined as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Only the half-lives of intracellular - and -ENaC
pools expressed in these cells are depicted in A and
B because their cell surface pool was too small for
biochemical analyses using either surface biotinylation or labeling
with anti-Myc antibodies to detect -ENaC. C,
boxed area, shows the t1/2 of
-ENaC expressed in the context of   FLAG-ENaC
cells. Half-life values: for cell surface -ENaC, 1.04 ± 0.19 h (mean ± S.E., n = 5) on plates
and ~0.9 h on filters (n = 2); for intracellular
-ENaC, 1.66 ± 0.16 h (mean ± S.E.,
n = 5) on plates and ~1.3 h (n = 2)
on filters; for intracellular -ENaC, 0.94 h on plates and
1.03 h on filters; for -ENaC, 0.75 h at the cell surface
(n = 2) and ~2.5 h intracellularly (n = 4). For all experiments, cells from a 10-cm plate or six filters
(pooled) were used for each time point. The faint upper band
in A (top panel) and the lower bands
(asterisk) in A (middle panel) or
B (middle panel) represent cross-contaminating
bands recognized by the anti-HA antibodies (see also Fig.
1B).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The regulation of ENaC trafficking and cell surface stability is
of fundamental importance to its function. Studying the factors that
control these parameters has been difficult, however, because biochemical analyses are hard to perform on such a low abundance protein in native tissues. Thus, several groups have used surrogate systems, including Xenopus A6 cells, which express
x-ENaC endogenously, and Xenopus oocytes or
mammalian fibroblasts ectopically (usually transiently) expressing ENaC
to study ENaC trafficking and stability. In this report, we describe
the generation of a MDCK cell line stably expressing epitope-tagged
ENaC, which allowed us to perform biochemical analyses and study
trafficking of ENaC in these polarized kidney epithelial cells.
Although ENaC contains multiple Asn-linked glycosylation sites (18),
which are utilized in cells, the role of glycosylation of this channel
is obscure. Moreover, our present work indicates that the glycosylation
pattern commonly seen in transmembrane proteins, i.e. the
acquisition of complex glycosylation during protein maturation, is not
seen in ENaC. This was demonstrated by analyzing the glycosylation
pattern of the cell surface, mature pool of ENaC (Fig. 3), which we
found is still core-glycosylated and Endo H-sensitive. Other groups
have described the lack of a detectable Endo H-resistant pool of total
cellular ENaC (e.g. 17, 23, 31), but because ENaC efficiency
of maturation is so low it was not possible to conclude whether this
reflects the complete absence of such a pool or its presence in amounts
below detection limits. Thus, our approach of studying the cell surface
pool of ENaC (mature by definition) helps resolve this issue. Although uncommon, there have been reports on transmembrane proteins trafficking to the plasma membrane without acquiring complex sugar modifications. Examples include the anion exchanger AE1 (45), the Torpedo
acetylcholine receptor (46), and the Shaker potassium channel (47),
although in the latter two, a lack of complex glycosylation was seen
upon expression in Xenopus oocytes (which still resulted in
the presence of functional channels at the cell surface). Our results
showing retention of core glycosylation of the mature ENaC are not in agreement with those of Prince and Welsh (23, 24) who proposed that
ENaC is stripped of its carbohydrates before arriving at the plasma
membrane. We do not know the reason for the difference, although their
study focused mainly on individual subunits expressed in nonpolarized
(COS-7 or 293) cells, which renders comparison with our work difficult.
What is clear from several studies, at least in cells heterologously
expressing ENaC (e.g. (31)) is that ENaC maturation is very
inefficient, with only a fraction of synthesized channels making it to
the cell surface. Indeed, our crude estimate suggests that less than
1% of total -ENaC expressed in our
HA Myc,T7 FLAG-ENaC-MDCK
cells is present at the cell surface under steady-state conditions.
Our results show that both intracellular and cell surface pools of ENaC
are largely soluble in the non-ionic detergent Triton X-100. This
differs from recent reports (23, 24), which suggested that the mature
ENaC is insoluble, although the cause of such proposed insolubility was
not identified. In accord with our observation of solubility of ENaC we
found, using floatation assays, that ENaC is not associated with rafts
after extraction in 1% Triton X-100 in the cold. We cannot preclude
the possibility, however, that insolubility in other non-ionic
detergents would allow sequestration of the channel in some rafts.
Lipid rafts are cholesterol- and sphingolipid-containing microdomains
in membranes that play an important role in trafficking, sequestration,
or exclusion of proteins and in signal transduction (48). We have
demonstrated previously that Nedd4, a binding partner of ENaC, employs
apical rafts to localize to the apical membrane of polarized MDCK
cells; it does so by associating, via its C2 domain, with annexin
XIIIb, an apical raft-enriched protein (38, 49). Our present work thus
suggests that the interaction between ENaC and Nedd4 likely occurs
late, at the plasma membrane, and that Nedd4 is not involved in
mediating trafficking of ENaC to the apical membrane. What does control
apical plasma membrane localization of ENaC is not known. Our earlier
work had suggested that the interaction of -ENaC C terminus with
-spectrin helps stabilize ENaC at the apical membrane of polarized
alveolar epithelial cells (50). However, such an interaction is clearly
not necessary for membrane targeting because removal of the C termini
of all ENaC chains does not interfere with plasma membrane localization
of the channel. Recent reports have implicated the SNARE protein
syntaxin 1A in regulating ENaC transport to the cell surface (51, 52),
but the regulation of this process is not known.
The stability of ENaC at the cell surface has critical implications for
its regulation, and indeed Liddle syndrome mutations in the PY motifs
of - or -ENaC are associated with increased channel retention at
the plasma membrane (6-8, 10). The cell surface stability of ENaC is
regulated by several factors, including ubiquitination (19) and the
ubiquitin ligase Nedd4 (4, 6-8). Thus, investigating the cell surface
stability of the channel in polarized epithelial cells is very
important. Our results presented here suggest that the cell surface
pool of ENaC is turned over rapidly, with a half-life of ~1 h. This
value is in agreement with functional data in Xenopus
oocytes, demonstrating that functional channels disappear rapidly from
the plasma membrane after brefeldin A treatment, which blocks
anterograde transport of transmembrane proteins from the Golgi
apparatus (10, 19), although channel numbers were not analyzed
directly. In contrast to our observations of a short half-life of the
cell surface pool of ENaC, recent reports in A6 cells suggested that
endogenous x-ENaC is very stable at the plasma membrane
(t1/2 > 24 h, but 6 h for
x-ENaC) (25, 26). Although A6 cells grow at a lower
temperature (27 °C) than mammalian MDCK cells (37 °C), this
proposed half-life is still quite long relative to what we observe in
MDCK cells (Fig. 6) or in Xenopus oocytes (19), which grow
at 18 °C. It was assessed by using antibodies raised against
x-ENaC (26) to immunoprecipitate surface-biotinylated x-ENaC
from A6 cells. The antibody to x-ENaC recognizes three
bands: at 75 (the expected size), 150, and 180 kDa. The 180 kDa band
was proposed to be a dimer of the mature, glycosylated
x-ENaC, and its half-life at the cell surface was shown
to be ~30 h (26). This long half-life (relative to the ~1 h
reported here) thus suggests that the mode of regulation of the channel
in A6 cells may be different from that seen in mammalian epithelial
cells, although the nature of such putative differences in regulation
is unknown.
In summary, our work described here provides important new insights
into the mode of trafficking and cell surface stability of ENaC
expressed in mammalian kidney epithelial cells.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by the Canadian Cystic
Fibrosis Foundation, the Canadian Institute of Health Research, and by
the International Human Frontier Science Program.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported by a University of Toronto open studentship.
§
Present address: Dept. of Biomedical Sciences, Graduate School of
Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818, Japan.
¶
Supported by a Canadian Institute of Health Research
investigator award. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Program in Cell Biology, the Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave.,
Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada. Tel.: 416-813-5098; Fax: 416-813-5771; E mail: drotin{at}sickkids.ca.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 28, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110904200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ENaC, epithelial
Na+ channel;
Endo H, endoglycosidase H;
PNGaseF, peptide
N-glycosidase F;
MDCK cells, Madin-Darby canine kidney
cells;
HA, hemagglutinin;
Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
TfnR, transferrin receptor.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Garty, H.,
and Palmer, L. G.
(1997)
Physiol. Rev.
77,
359-396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Lifton, R. P.,
Gharavi, A. G.,
and Geller, D. S.
(2001)
Cell
104,
545-556[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Firsov, D.,
Schild, L.,
Gautschi, I.,
Merillat, A. M.,
Schneeberger, E.,
and Rossier, B. C.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
15370-15375
|
| 4.
|
Staub, O.,
Dho, S.,
Henry, P.,
Correa, J.,
Ishikawa, T.,
McGlade, J.,
and Rotin, D.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
2371-2380[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Schild, L., Lu, Y.,
Gautschi, I.,
Schneeberger, E.,
Lifton, R. P.,
and Rossier, B. C.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
2381-2387[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Goulet, C. C.,
Volk, K. A.,
Adams, C. M.,
Prince, L. S.,
Stokes, J. B.,
and Snyder, P. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
30012-30017[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Abriel, H.,
Loffing, J.,
Rebhun, J. F.,
Pratt, J. H.,
Schild, L.,
Horisberger, J. D.,
Rotin, D.,
and Staub, O.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
103,
667-673[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Kamynina, E.,
Debonneville, C.,
Bens, M.,
Vandewalle, A.,
and Staub, O.
(2001)
FASEB J.
15,
204-214[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Kanelis, V.,
Rotin, D.,
and Forman-Kay, J. D.
(2001)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
8,
407-412[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Shimkets, R. A.,
Lifton, R. P.,
and Canessa, C. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
25537-25541[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Canessa, C. M.,
Horisberger, J. D.,
and Rossier, B. C.
(1993)
Nature
361,
467-470[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Canessa, C. M.,
Schild, L.,
Buell, G.,
Thorens, B.,
Gautschi, I.,
Horisberger, J. D.,
and Rossier, B. C.
(1994)
Nature
367,
463-467[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Firsov, D.,
Gautschi, I.,
Merillat, A. M.,
Rossier, B. C.,
and Schild, L.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
344-352[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Kosari, F.,
Sheng, S., Li, J.,
Mak, D. O.,
Foskett, J. K.,
and Kleyman, T. R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
13469-13474[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Snyder, P. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
681-684[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Snyder, P. M.,
McDonald, F. J.,
Stokes, J. B.,
and Welsh, M. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
24379-24383[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Renard, S.,
Lingueglia, E.,
Voilley, N.,
Lazdunski, M.,
and Barbry, P.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
12981-12986[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Canessa, C. M.,
Merillat, A. M.,
and Rossier, B. C.
(1994)
Am. J. Physiol.
267,
C1682-C1690
|
| 19.
|
Staub, O.,
Gautschi, I.,
Ishikawa, T.,
Breitschopf, K.,
Ciechanover, A.,
Schild, L.,
and Rotin, D.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
6325-6336[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Snyder, P. M.,
Price, M. P.,
McDonald, F. J.,
Adams, C. M.,
Volk, K. A.,
Zeiher, B. G.,
Stokes, J. B.,
and Welsh, M. J.
(1995)
Cell
83,
969-978[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Loffing, J.,
Pietri, L.,
Aregger, F.,
Bloch-Faure, M.,
Ziegler, U.,
Meneton, P.,
Rossier, B. C.,
and Kaissling, B.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
279,
F252-F258
|
| 22.
|
Masilamani, S.,
Kim, G. H.,
Mitchell, C.,
Wade, J. B.,
and Knepper, M. A.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
104,
R19-R23[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Prince, L. S.,
and Welsh, M. J.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
336,
705-710
|
| 24.
|
Prince, L. S.,
and Welsh, M. J.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
276,
C1346-C1351
|
| 25.
|
Weisz, O. A.,
Wang, J. M.,
Edinger, R. S.,
and Johnson, J. P.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
39886-39893[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Kleyman, T. R.,
Zuckerman, J. B.,
Middleton, P.,
McNulty, K. A., Hu, B., Su, X., An, B.,
Eaton, D. C.,
and Smith, P. R.
(2001)
Am. J. Physiol.
281,
F213-F221
|
| 27.
|
Rotin, D.,
Kanelis, V.,
and Schild, L.
(2001)
Am. J. Physiol.
281,
F391-F399
|
| 28.
|
Adams, C. M.,
Snyder, P. M.,
and Welsh, M. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27295-27300[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Coscoy, S.,
Lingueglia, E.,
Lazdunski, M.,
and Barbry, P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
8317-8322[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
May, A.,
Puoti, A.,
Gaeggeler, H. P.,
Horisberger, J. D.,
and Rossier, B. C.
(1997)
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.
8,
1813-1822[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
Valentijn, J. A.,
Fyfe, G. K.,
and Canessa, C. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
30344-30351[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Hirt, R. P.,
Poulain-Godefroy, O.,
Billotte, J.,
Kraehenbuhl, J. P.,
and Fasel, N.
(1992)
Gene (Amst.)
111,
199-206
|
| 33.
|
Wessel, D.,
and Flugge, U. I.
(1984)
Anal. Biochem.
138,
141-143[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Ishikawa, T.,
Marunaka, Y.,
and Rotin, D.
(1998)
J. Gen. Physiol.
111,
825-846[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Adair-Kirk, T. L.,
Cox, K. H.,
and Cox, J. V.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
147,
1237-1248[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Oliferenko, S.,
Paiha, K.,
Harder, T.,
Gerke, V.,
Schwarzler, C.,
Schwarz, H.,
Beug, H.,
Gunthert, U.,
and Huber, L. A.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
146,
843-854[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Bacallao, R.,
Antony, C.,
Dotti, C.,
Karsenti, E.,
Stelzer, E. H.,
and Simons, K.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
109,
2817-2832[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Plant, P. J.,
Lafont, F.,
Lecat, S.,
Verkade, P.,
Simons, K.,
and Rotin, D.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
149,
1473-1484[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Lafont, F.,
Lecat, S.,
Verkade, P.,
and Simons, K.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
142,
1413-1427[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Parton, R. G.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8,
542-548[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Harder, T.,
and Gerke, V.
(1994)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1223,
375-382
|
| 42.
|
Kundu, A.,
Avalos, R. T.,
Sanderson, C. M.,
and Nayak, D. P.
(1996)
J. Virol.
70,
6508-6515[Abstract]
|
| 43.
|
Hunziker, W.,
Whitney, J. A.,
and Mellman, I.
(1991)
Cell
67,
617-627[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Ktistakis, N. T.,
Roth, M. G.,
and Bloom, G. S.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
113,
1009-1023[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Ghosh, S.,
Cox, K. H.,
and Cox, J. V.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
455-469[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Buller, A. L.,
and White, M. M.
(1990)
J. Membr. Biol.
115,
179-189[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Santacruz-Toloza, L.,
Huang, Y.,
John, S. A.,
and Papazian, D. M.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
5607-5613[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Simons, K.,
and Ikonen, E.
(1997)
Nature
387,
569-572[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Plant, P. J.,
Yeger, H.,
Staub, O.,
Howard, P.,
and Rotin, D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
32329-32336[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Rotin, D.,
Bar-Sagi, D.,
O'Brodovich, H.,
Merilainen, J.,
Lehto, V. P.,
Canessa, C. M.,
Rossier, B. C.,
and Downey, G. P.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
4440-4450[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Qi, J.,
Peters, K. W.,
Liu, C.,
Wang, J. M.,
Edinger, R. S.,
Johnson, J. P.,
Watkins, S. C.,
and Frizzell, R. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
30345-30348[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Saxena, S.,
Quick, M. W.,
Tousson, A., Oh, Y.,
and Warnock, D. G.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
20812-20817[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C.G. van Ginneken
MinK: a double-hearted partner in cardiac repolarization
Cardiovasc Res,
June 1, 2009;
82(3):
390 - 391.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-W. Su, S.-W. Wang, F. K. Ghishan, P. R. Kiela, and M.-J. Tang
Cell confluency-induced Stat3 activation regulates NHE3 expression by recruiting Sp1 and Sp3 to the proximal NHE3 promoter region during epithelial dome formation
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
January 1, 2009;
296(1):
C13 - C24.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. B. Butterworth, R. S. Edinger, R. A. Frizzell, and J. P. Johnson
Regulation of the epithelial sodium channel by membrane trafficking
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
January 1, 2009;
296(1):
F10 - F24.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Yu, M. N. Helms, Q. Yue, and D. C. Eaton
Single-channel analysis of functional epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) stability at the apical membrane of A6 distal kidney cells
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
November 1, 2008;
295(5):
F1519 - F1527.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Obeid
ERP57 Membrane Translocation Dictates the Immunogenicity of Tumor Cell Death by Controlling the Membrane Translocation of Calreticulin
J. Immunol.,
August 15, 2008;
181(4):
2533 - 2543.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Kabra, K. K. Knight, R. Zhou, and P. M. Snyder
Nedd4-2 Induces Endocytosis and Degradation of Proteolytically Cleaved Epithelial Na+ Channels
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 7, 2008;
283(10):
6033 - 6039.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Annaba, Z. Sarwar, P. Kumar, S. Saksena, J. R. Turner, P. K. Dudeja, R. K. Gill, and W. A. Alrefai
Modulation of ileal bile acid transporter (ASBT) activity by depletion of plasma membrane cholesterol: association with lipid rafts
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
February 1, 2008;
294(2):
G489 - G497.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. G. Hill, M. B. Butterworth, H. Wang, R. S. Edinger, J. Lebowitz, K. W. Peters, R. A. Frizzell, and J. P. Johnson
The Epithelial Sodium Channel (ENaC) Traffics to Apical Membrane in Lipid Rafts in Mouse Cortical Collecting Duct Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 28, 2007;
282(52):
37402 - 37411.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. B. Butterworth, R. S. Edinger, H. Ovaa, D. Burg, J. P. Johnson, and R. A. Frizzell
The Deubiquitinating Enzyme UCH-L3 Regulates the Apical Membrane Recycling of the Epithelial Sodium Channel
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 28, 2007;
282(52):
37885 - 37893.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Adebamiro, Y. Cheng, U. S. Rao, H. Danahay, and R. J. Bridges
A Segment of {gamma} ENaC Mediates Elastase Activation of Na+ Transport
J. Gen. Physiol.,
November 26, 2007;
130(6):
611 - 629.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Pruliere-Escabasse, C. Planes, E. Escudier, P. Fanen, A. Coste, and C. Clerici
Modulation of Epithelial Sodium Channel Trafficking and Function by Sodium 4-Phenylbutyrate in Human Nasal Epithelial Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 23, 2007;
282(47):
34048 - 34057.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. M. Mueller, O. B. Kashlan, J. B. Bruns, A. B. Maarouf, M. Aridor, T. R. Kleyman, and R. P. Hughey
Epithelial Sodium Channel Exit from the Endoplasmic Reticulum Is Regulated by a Signal within the Carboxyl Cytoplasmic Domain of the {alpha} Subunit
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 16, 2007;
282(46):
33475 - 33483.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Tiwari, L. Nordquist, V. K. M. Halagappa, and C. A. Ecelbarger
Trafficking of ENaC subunits in response to acute insulin in mouse kidney
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
July 1, 2007;
293(1):
F178 - F185.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Grasberger, X. De Deken, F. Miot, J. Pohlenz, and S. Refetoff
Missense Mutations of Dual Oxidase 2 (DUOX2) Implicated in Congenital Hypothyroidism Have Impaired Trafficking in Cells Reconstituted with DUOX2 Maturation Factor
Mol. Endocrinol.,
June 1, 2007;
21(6):
1408 - 1421.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-W. Su, H.-H. Yeh, S.-W. Wang, M.-R. Shen, T.-L. Chen, P. R. Kiela, F. K. Ghishan, and M.-J. Tang
Cell Confluence-induced Activation of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription-3 (Stat3) Triggers Epithelial Dome Formation via Augmentation of Sodium Hydrogen Exchanger-3 (NHE3) Expression
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 30, 2007;
282(13):
9883 - 9894.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Hinzpeter, J. Fritsch, F. Borot, S. Trudel, D.-L. Vieu, F. Brouillard, M. Baudouin-Legros, J. Clain, A. Edelman, and M. Ollero
Membrane Cholesterol Content Modulates ClC-2 Gating and Sensitivity to Oxidative Stress
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 26, 2007;
282(4):
2423 - 2432.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. D. Espiritu, A. A. Bernardo, and J. A. L. Arruda
Role of NH2 and COOH termini in targeting, stability, and activity of sodium bicarbonate cotransporter 1
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
September 1, 2006;
291(3):
F588 - F596.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Staub and F. Verrey
Impact of Nedd4 Proteins and Serum and Glucocorticoid-Induced Kinases on Epithelial Na+ Transport in the Distal Nephron
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
November 1, 2005;
16(11):
3167 - 3174.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Adebamiro, Y. Cheng, J. P. Johnson, and R. J. Bridges
Endogenous Protease Activation of ENaC: Effect of Serine Protease Inhibition on ENaC Single Channel Properties
J. Gen. Physiol.,
September 26, 2005;
126(4):
339 - 352.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. A. Itani, J. B. Stokes, and C. P. Thomas
Nedd4-2 isoforms differentially associate with ENaC and regulate its activity
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
August 1, 2005;
289(2):
F334 - F346.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Kuliawat, J. Ramos-Castaneda, Y. Liu, and P. Arvan
Intracellular Trafficking of Thyroid Peroxidase to the Cell Surface
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 29, 2005;
280(30):
27713 - 27718.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Malik, Q. Yue, G. Yue, X. J. Chen, S. R. Price, W. E. Mitch, and D. C. Eaton
Role of Nedd4-2 and polyubiquitination in epithelial sodium channel degradation in untransfected renal A6 cells expressing endogenous ENaC subunits
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
July 1, 2005;
289(1):
F107 - F116.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Caldwell, R. C. Boucher, and M. J. Stutts
Neutrophil elastase activates near-silent epithelial Na+ channels and increases airway epithelial Na+ transport
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
May 1, 2005;
288(5):
L813 - L819.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Y. Sautin, M. Lu, A. Gaugler, L. Zhang, and S. L. Gluck
Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Mediated Effects of Glucose on Vacuolar H+-ATPase Assembly, Translocation, and Acidification of Intracellular Compartments in Renal Epithelial Cells
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
January 15, 2005;
25(2):
575 - 589.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. B. Butterworth, R. S. Edinger, J. P. Johnson, and R. A. Frizzell
Acute ENaC Stimulation by cAMP in a Kidney Cell Line is Mediated by Exocytic Insertion from a Recycling Channel Pool
J. Gen. Physiol.,
December 28, 2004;
125(1):
81 - 101.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. Sedensky, J. M. Siefker, J. Y. Koh, D. M. Miller III, and P. G. Morgan
A stomatin and a degenerin interact in lipid rafts of the nervous system of Caenorhabditis elegans
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
August 1, 2004;
287(2):
C468 - C474.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Mohan, J. R. Bruns, K. M. Weixel, R. S. Edinger, J. B. Bruns, T. R. Kleyman, J. P. Johnson, and O. A. Weisz
Differential Current Decay Profiles of Epithelial Sodium Channel Subunit Combinations in Polarized Renal Epithelial Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 30, 2004;
279(31):
32071 - 32078.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Dagenais, R. Frechette, Y. Yamagata, T. Yamagata, J.-F. Carmel, M.-E. Clermont, E. Brochiero, C. Masse, and Y. Berthiaume
Downregulation of ENaC activity and expression by TNF-{alpha} in alveolar epithelial cells
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
February 1, 2004;
286(2):
L301 - L311.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. A. Weisz and J. P. Johnson
Noncoordinate regulation of ENaC: paradigm lost?
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
November 1, 2003;
285(5):
F833 - F842.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Ishikawa, C. Jiang, M. J. Stutts, Y. Marunaka, and D. Rotin
Regulation of the Epithelial Na+ Channel by Cytosolic ATP
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 3, 2003;
278(40):
38276 - 38286.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. B. Bruns, B. Hu, Y. J. Ahn, S. Sheng, R. P. Hughey, and T. R. Kleyman
Multiple epithelial Na+ channel domains participate in subunit assembly
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
October 1, 2003;
285(4):
F600 - F609.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. P. Hughey, G. M. Mueller, J. B. Bruns, C. L. Kinlough, P. A. Poland, K. L. Harkleroad, M. D. Carattino, and T. R. Kleyman
Maturation of the Epithelial Na+ Channel Involves Proteolytic Processing of the {alpha}- and {gamma}-Subunits
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 26, 2003;
278(39):
37073 - 37082.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Auberson, N. Hoffmann-Pochon, A. Vandewalle, S. Kellenberger, and L. Schild
Epithelial Na+ channel mutants causing Liddle's syndrome retain ability to respond to aldosterone and vasopressin
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
September 1, 2003;
285(3):
F459 - F471.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. E. Booth and J. D. Stockand
Targeted degradation of ENaC in response to PKC activation of the ERK1/2 cascade
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
May 1, 2003;
284(5):
F938 - F947.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. W. Leung, R. G. Contreras, C. Flores-Maldonado, M. Cereijido, and E. Rodriguez-Boulan
Inhibitors of glycosphingolipid biosynthesis reduce transepithelial electrical resistance in MDCK I and FRT cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
April 1, 2003;
284(4):
C1021 - C1030.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. G. Shlyonsky, F. Mies, and S. Sariban-Sohraby
Epithelial sodium channel activity in detergent-resistant membrane microdomains
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
January 1, 2003;
284(1):
F182 - F188.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Planes, M. Blot-Chabaud, M. A. Matthay, S. Couette, T. Uchida, and C. Clerici
Hypoxia and beta 2-Agonists Regulate Cell Surface Expression of the Epithelial Sodium Channel in Native Alveolar Epithelial Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 27, 2002;
277(49):
47318 - 47324.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Jin, T. M. Weiger, and I. B. Levitan
Reciprocal Modulation between the alpha and beta 4 Subunits of hSlo Calcium-dependent Potassium Channels
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 8, 2002;
277(46):
43724 - 43729.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Guipponi, G. Vuagniaux, M. Wattenhofer, K. Shibuya, M. Vazquez, L. Dougherty, N. Scamuffa, E. Guida, M. Okui, C. Rossier, et al.
The transmembrane serine protease (TMPRSS3) mutated in deafness DFNB8/10 activates the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) in vitro
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
November 1, 2002;
11(23):
2829 - 2836.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. G. Hill, B. An, and J. P. Johnson
Endogenously Expressed Epithelial Sodium Channel Is Present in Lipid Rafts in A6 Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 6, 2002;
277(37):
33541 - 33544.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Kamynina and O. Staub
Concerted action of ENaC, Nedd4-2, and Sgk1 in transepithelial Na+ transport
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
September 1, 2002;
283(3):
F377 - F387.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. C. Rossier
Hormonal Regulation of the Epithelial Sodium Channel ENaC: N or Po?
J. Gen. Physiol.,
June 24, 2002;
120(1):
67 - 70.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. de la Rosa, H. Li, and C. M. Canessa
Effects of Aldosterone on Biosynthesis, Traffic, and Functional Expression of Epithelial Sodium Channels in A6 Cells
J. Gen. Physiol.,
April 15, 2002;
119(5):
427 - 442.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. de la Rosa, H. Li, and C. M. Canessa
Effects of Aldosterone on Biosynthesis, Traffic, and Functional Expression of Epithelial Sodium Channels in A6 Cells
J. Gen. Physiol.,
April 15, 2002;
119(5):
427 - 442.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|