|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M107646200 on January 9, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 12, 9870-9879, March 22, 2002
Transforming Growth Factor 1 Induces Proliferation
in Colon Carcinoma Cells by Ras-dependent,
smad-independent Down-regulation of p21cip1*
Zhongfa
Yan,
Geum-Yi
Kim,
Xiaobing
Deng, and
Eileen
Friedman
From the Pathology Department, Upstate Medical University, State
University of New York, Syracuse, New York 13210
Received for publication, August 9, 2001, and in revised form, November 6, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Transforming growth factor 1 (TGF 1) can act
as a tumor suppressor or a tumor promoter depending on the
characteristics of the malignant cell. We recently demonstrated that
colon carcinoma cells transfected with oncogenic cellular
K-rasV12, but not oncogenic cellular H-rasV12,
switched from TGF 1-insensitive to TGF 1-growth-stimulated and also
became more invasive (Yan, Z., Deng, X., and Friedman, E. (2001)
J. Biol. Chem. 276, 1555-1563). We now demonstrate
that TGF 1 growth stimulation of colon carcinoma cells is
Ras-dependent and smad-independent. In U9 colon carcinoma
cells, which are responsive to TGF 1 by growth stimulation, a
truncating mutation at Gln-311 was found in the
smad4 gene. Very little smad4 protein was detected in these cells. Loss of smad4 protein was confirmed by functional studies. In U9 cells co-transfected wild-type smad4, but
not mutant smad4, mediated response of the 3TP-lux and pSBE
promoter reporter constructs to TGF 1. Proliferation initiated by
TGF 1 in U9 cells required Ras-mediated down-regulation of p21cip1
protein. Less p21cip1 was associated with cdk2·cyclin
complexes in TGF 1-treated U9 cells, and the cdk2 complexes
had increased kinase activity. Elevation of p21cip1 levels diminished
proliferative response to TGF 1. U9 cells expressing DN-N17ras
neither proliferated in response to TGF 1 nor down-regulated the cdk
inhibitor p21cip1, and TGF 1 activation of 3TP-lux in U9 cells was
inhibited by DN-N17ras in a dose-dependent manner. TGF 1
also decreased p21cip1 levels and stimulated proliferation in SW480
cells, which express mutant K-Ras but no smad4 protein. TGF 1 did not
activate or inhibit the p21cip1 promoter construct in U9 cells even in
the presence of co-transfected smad4, or alter p21cip1 mRNA levels.
Thus the decrease in p21cip1 levels was mediated by a TGF -initiated
Ras-dependent, but smad-independent post-transcriptional mechanism.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The transforming growth factor (TGF )1 family of related
proteins is a superfamily of secreted factors that have been implicated in diverse phenomena, including growth control, cell adhesion and
motility, production of extracellular matrix components, and alteration
of cell phenotype (1, 2). TGF 1 induces its varied biological
responses through the paired heteromeric complex of type I (T RI) and
type II (T RII) transmembrane serine/threonine kinases. Upon binding
of TGF 1, T RII transphosphorylates T RI in a highly conserved GS
domain, activating T RI kinase to its downstream effectors (3).
Genetic studies in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis
elegans have identified one set of downstream effectors, whose
mammalian homologues are termed smads. There are 9 smads in
vertebrates: the receptor-regulated smads 1, 2, 3, 5, and 8 with very
similar structures, the common interacting smads 4 and 4 , and the
signal-blocking smads 6 and 7, which form a third discrete subgroup.
Upon binding TGF 1 and activation of T Rs, the smad2 or
smad3 molecules bound to T RI are phosphorylated, dissociate to form
a heteromeric complex with smad4 trimers, and translocate to the
nucleus where they modify transcription (4) following binding to a
palindromic smad binding element (SBE), GTCTAGAC (5), or related
sequences containing CAGAC (6). smad2 and smad3 are not interchangeable
because they mediate different responses to TGF 1 (7). TGF 1
activation of its receptors leads, by as yet unknown pathways, to
activation of a series of signaling pathways, in addition to the smads.
These pathways include Ras ERK (8), Rho JNK (9),
RhoA p160ROCK (10), Tak1 p38 MAPK (11, 12), protein phosphatase
2A S6 kinase (13), and possibly others.
There are at present 51 members of the TGF superfamily with three
TGF isoforms found in humans, types 1, 2 and 3, each with a
different spectrum of localization in vivo (14). Use of
isoform-specific antisera has shown that only the TGF 1 isoform is
associated with cancer development in a wide series of human neoplasias
(colon, breast, prostate, glioma, pancreatic, endometrial, gastric,
osteosarcomas, etc.) (15). Elevated expression of TGF 1, but not
TGF 2 or TGF 3, was significantly correlated with colon cancer
progression to metastases. Patients with elevated levels of TGF 1
protein in their tumor cells were 18 times more likely to experience
recurrence of their disease (16). Furthermore, when metastatic cells
were compared with their primary site colon cancer, the level of
TGF 1 protein in the primary site tumor was maintained or increased in the metastatic cells in roughly 75% of cases (17). Elevated TGF 1
levels could mediate increased tumor aggressiveness in several ways,
and autocrine TGF 1 pathways have been shown to mediate increased
invasiveness and metastasis in carcinomas (18). Another autocrine
response to TGF 1 is increased proliferation, which has been observed
in resected carcinomas in primary culture (19, 20) as well as
established cell lines such as U9 colon carcinoma cell line. The colon
carcinoma cells, which exhibited increased proliferation in response to
TGF 1, have also become more invasive in vitro and
in vivo, suggesting that the two biological responses share
at least some components of a common TGF 1-signaling system (21, 22).
For example, decreasing TGF 1 protein levels in the metastatic U9
colon cancer cell line by antisense methodology decreased both U9 cell
metastasis to the liver and subcutaneous tumor formation in a nude
mouse system, and the tumors that did arise had regained TGF 1
expression (21). TGF 1 growth stimulation has been documented in
various aggressive carcinoma cells, including a subset of colon
carcinomas (20-25), prostate carcinomas (26), and hepatocellular
carcinomas (27). We have previously reported that TGF 1 growth
stimulation in colon carcinoma cells is dependent on mutation in K-Ras
(22). In the current study we demonstrate that the TGF 1-initiated
signaling pathways, which mediate increased proliferation are
Ras-dependent and smad-independent.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
TGF 1 was purchased from R&D Systems.
Antibodies to cyclins E, D1, and A, smad2, smad4, and
rabbit antibody to cdk2 coupled to agarose were purchased from Santa
Cruz Biotechnology, whereas antibodies to p21 and p27 were from
Transduction Laboratories. The pan-Ras antibody Y13-259 and c-Ha-Ras
Ab1 (clone 235-17.1.1), a mouse monoclonal specific for H-Ras, were
purchased from Oncogene Science. Polyvinylidene difluoride transfer
paper Immobilon-P was purchased from Millipore and polyethyleneimine
cellulose F from EM Separations. All radioactive materials were
purchased from PerkinElmer Life Sciences, and ECL reagents were from
Amersham Biosciences, Inc. Lovastatin was obtained from Merck, Sharp & Dohme Research Laboratories and dissolved in ethanol (4 mg/0.1 ml),
made active by addition of 0.15 ml of 0.1 N NaOH and
heating for 2 h at 50 °C, neutralized with HCl, then brought to
a stock solution of 4 mg/ml with distilled water. All other reagents
were from Sigma Chemical Co.
Plasmids--
pcDPC4wt, pcDPC4-100T, and p6MBE-luc were
obtained from S. Kern; pSBE-luc/BV and WWP-luc from B. Vogelstein;
p3TP-lux, pCMV5/smad4-HA-(294-552), and pCMV5/DPC-(1-514) from
J. Massague; p(SBS)2/tkCAT from A. Mauviel; and pCAL2 from
R. Derynck.
Transient Transfections--
For transient transfections, cells
were plated in 12-well plates at an approximate density of 3 × 105 and cultured for 24 h. LipofectAMINE (Amersham
Biosciences, Inc.) (5 µ /well) was mixed with a total of 720 ng of DNA for 30 min in serum-free medium, then added to the cells in
serum-free medium for 16-18 h with or without 5 ng/ml TGF 1, and
luciferase activity was then determined. Transfected DNA samples were
composed of 200 ng of reporter construct, 20 ng of the pCMV-gal
-galactosidase expression plasmid and, depending on the
experiment, 500 ng of test expression plasmid or vector control DNA.
Cells were lysed, and both luciferase and -galactosidase activity
were measured using a TD-20/20 luminometer. Luciferase activity was
normalized to -galactosidase activity for differences in
transfection efficiency. Each experiment was performed in triplicate
and performed three to four times.
Cell Culture and Growth Assays--
The human colon carcinoma
cell lines used in this study were maintained in DME medium containing
7% fetal bovine serum, modified, and supplemented as described (24).
Effects on cell growth by TGF 1 were assayed by direct cell counting
using a hemacytometer or by incorporation of
[3H]thymidine after culture in serum-free ITS (2.5 µg/ml insulin, 1.7 µg/ml transferrin, 0.1 µM selenous
acid, 0.29 µM linoleic acid, 1 mg/ml fatty acid
free bovine serum albumin)-DME. The N17rasH construct developed by L. Feig (28) had been inserted into a pCNC10 expression plasmid behind a
CMV promoter by Dr. Fran Kern (University of Alabama) who provided us
with the plasmid. This plasmid also carries a neomycin resistance gene
behind a CMV promoter. U9 colon carcinoma cells were transfected with
this expression plasmid by calcium phosphate precipitation, and
putative N17ras transfectants were selected in G418. Transfectants were
isolated after transfection with the empty pCNC10 expression plasmid
and used as controls. The p21cip1 coding sequence was inserted
C-terminal to EGFP (enhanced green fluorescence protein) in the
pUC-derived pEGFP-C2 mammalian expression vector
(CLONTECH) and designated p21-EGFP-C2. Apoptosis
was measured by binding of fluorescein isothiocyanate-bound annexin V
to phosphatidylserine on the outer layer of the plasma membrane
(CLONTECH K2027-1) by fluorescence microscopy.
Immunodetection--
Following treatment as indicated and
washing with cold phosphate-buffered saline, cells were lysed in a
buffer containing 25 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 150 mM
NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 20 µg/ml leupeptin, 20 µg/ml aprotinin, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
200 µM sodium orthovanadate, and 20 mM sodium
fluoride. Lysates were pelleted in a microcentrifuge for 15 min
to remove insoluble material. Depending on the experiment, 40-100 µg
of the cell lysate was blotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes after separation on SDS-PAGE. The blots were blocked in either TBS or
TBST buffer (TBS containing 0.05% Tween 20) and 3-5% nonfat dry milk
for 2 h, incubated overnight at 4 °C with the primary antibody
(1 µg/ml Ab to cyclin E, cyclin A, H-Ras, cdc25A, p21cip1, or p15;
0.5 µg/ml for cyclin D1; 1:2500 dilution of antibody to p27), and
proteins were subsequently detected by enhanced chemiluminescence.
Northern Analysis for p21cip1--
20 µg of total RNA from
each cell line was electrophoresed in a 0.8% agarose-formaldehyde gel,
transferred to nylon membranes by downward capillary transfer, and UV
cross-linked. The membranes were hybridized to a full-length p21cip1
cDNA. Probes were labeled with 32P by random priming.
The blot was hybridized overnight at 42 °C with at least
107 cpm of the labeled probe, washed at room temperature
three times for 7 min with 1× SSC-1% SDS, then washed for 20 min at
52 °C in 0.1× SSC-0.1% SDS and autoradiographed. The blots were
stripped and rehybridized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
cdk2 Kinase Activity Assay--
Cell lysates were prepared
exactly as detailed (29). Lysates were diluted 10-fold with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, containing 110 mM NaCl, 20 mM EDTA, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 mM benzamidine, 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. 15 µl of cdk2
agarose-coupled antibody (M2) was added to 800 µg to 1 mg lysate
protein in a final volume of 500 µl of binding buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 120 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM NaF, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 mM benzamidine,
10 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, and 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and incubated overnight at 4 °C with
rocking before four times washing with binding buffer, one rinse with
kinase assay buffer, then kinase assay. The reaction buffer (875 µl)
was 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, 15 mM
MgCl2, 1 µM dithiothreitol added immediately
before use. Added to it were 3 µl of 10 mg/ml histone H1, 20 µl of
0.1 mM ATP, 2 µl of [ -32P]ATP (10 mCi/ml), and the reaction proceeded for 5 min at 30 °C.
Determination of Ras GTP/GDP+GTP Ratio--
Cells were labeled
overnight with 200 µCi of 32P-labeled orthophosphate in
serum-free, phosphate-free ITS-DME, then lysed and immunoprecipitated
with affinity-purified monoclonal antibody Y13-259, exactly as
described (30). After washing the immunoprecipitates, GTP and GDP were
eluted with 20 µl of 1 M KH2PO4,
pH 3.4, with heating for 3 min at 90 °C, then separated by thin
layer chromatography on polyethyleneimine cellulose F developed with 1 M KH2PO4, pH 3.4, followed by autoradiography.
Band Analysis--
Immunoblots were scanned using a Lacie
Silverscanner DTP and a Power Macintosh 7500, and densitometry
was performed using the IP Lab Gel program (Scanalytics).
 |
RESULTS |
TGF 1 Decreases Levels of p21cip1 When It Stimulates
Proliferation--
About half of all colon cancers exhibit Ras
mutations, with the vast majority in K-Ras, and very rarely, if ever,
in H-Ras. Recent results from our laboratory (22) have shown that colon cancer cells can respond to TGF 1 by growth if they express
transfected oncogenic K-Ras proteins, but not transfected oncogenic
H-Ras proteins or an equal abundance of transfected wild-type K-Ras proteins. In our earlier studies about 40% of resected colon cancers placed into primary culture, including most metastatic tumors, responded to TGF 1 by growth stimulation; therefore, the oncogenic K-Ras-expressing cell lines serve as models for this biological response (19, 20). The HT29 colon carcinoma sublines U9 and HP1 are not
mutated in Ras, however, and yet respond to TGF 1 by growth and
enhanced invasion and metastasis (21, 23, 31, 32). We undertook these
studies to determine their molecular basis for growth stimulation.
In our earlier study, TGF 1 down-regulated the abundance of the cdk
inhibitor p21cip1 when it stimulated cell proliferation in colon
carcinoma cells expressing transfected oncogenic K-Ras proteins (22),
but the functional significance of this reduction was not determined.
We now tested the effect of TGF 1 on p21cip1 abundance in HT29
sublines. The HT29 parental line is not clonal, so the isolated
sublines represent cells within the tumor with differing malignant
potential. These include the weakly invasive HD3 and HD4 sublines,
which respond to TGF 1 by growth inhibition through a block in
phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein, and the highly invasive
U9 and HP1 sublines, which respond to TGF 1 by increased
proliferation through increased retinoblastoma protein
phosphorylation (25). Each of the HT29 sublines displays the same
mutations in the colon cancer genes APC and p53
(31).
Two HT29 sublines, one growth-inhibited and the other growth-stimulated
by TGF 1, were treated with a range of TGF 1 concentrations. TGF 1 increased p21cip1 protein levels 9-fold when added to HD3 cells
at 4 ng/ml, a concentration that inhibits cell proliferation (Fig.
1A). In contrast, TGF 1
decreased the abundance of p21cip1 to one-third of control levels in U9
cells (Fig. 1A, loading and blotting controls shown
below the p21cip1 lanes), similar to its down-regulation of p21cip1 in HD6-K-RasV12 cells
(22). Our initial observation, that the retinoblastoma protein was more
highly phosphorylated in U9 and HP1 cells induced to proliferate by
TGF 1 (25), implied that TGF 1 increased the kinase activity of the
cdk2·cyclin complexes in these cells. This hypothesis was confirmed
when the histone kinase activity of cdk2·cyclin complexes was
determined by immunoprecipitation of cdk2. Equal amounts of cdk2 were
immunoprecipitated (Fig. 1C, lower lanes), but
TGF 1 increased the cdk2 kinase activity of U9 cells while inhibiting
the cdk2 kinase activity of HD3 cells (Fig. 1C, one of four
experiments with similar results). Analysis of the composition of such
complexes revealed that after TGF 1 treatment there was less p21
associated with cdk2 complexes in U9 cells, whereas more p21cip1
associated with cdk2 complexes in TGF 1-treated HD3 cells (Fig.
1B; 150% more lysate was used for the cdk2
immunoprecipitates from U9 cells, so the decrease in p21cip1 levels
would be more evident). Addition of a cdk2 peptide during the
immunoprecipitation blocked the association of p21cip1 with cdk2 (Fig.
1B). These cdk2·cyclin·cdk inhibitor compositions are
consistent with modulations in histone H1 kinase activity caused by
TGF 1 treatment (Fig. 1C). Thus TGF 1 stimulated the
growth of certain colon carcinoma cells by decreasing the total amount
of the cdk inhibitor p21, which in turn led to a decrease in the amount
of p21cip1 capable of associating with cdk2·cyclin complexes and an
increase in the kinase activity of the cdk2·cyclin complexes. Such an
increase in cdk2·cyclin activity by TGF 1 was the likely cause of
the increase in retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation seen in
TGF 1-treated U9 and HP1 cells in our earlier studies (25). The cell
growth induced by TGF 1 was not due to a block in apoptosis. U9 cells were treated with 5 ng/ml TGF 1 for 2 days, and the percentage of
apoptotic cells was determined by binding of annexin V. Both untreated and TGF 1-treated cultures contained 0.9% apoptotic cells (a total of 3996 cells assayed).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
TGF 1 modulation of
the abundance of the cdk inhibitor p21cip1 in two HT29 sublines:
TGF 1 growth-inhibited HD3 cells and
TGF 1 growth-stimulated U9 cells; association
of p21cip1 with cdk2·cyclin complexes, and assay of kinase
activity. A, log phase cells were treated with 0-32
ng/ml TGF 1 in serum-free ITS medium for 54 h before Western
blotting for p21cip1. Blotting controls are shown in the lower
panels. The decrease in p21cip1 levels by TGF 1 in U9 cells was
seen in each of five independent experiments. B, log phase
cells were treated with 5 ng/ml TGF 1 in serum-free ITS medium for
54 h before immunoprecipitation of cdk2 by anti-cdk2 coupled to
agarose, then analysis of cdk2 immunoprecipitates by Western blotting
for p21. 1.5-fold as much cell lysate was used for the analysis of
cdk2-bound p21cip1 in U9 cells because of the lower expression levels
of p21cip1. pep, addition of the cdk2 peptide before
immunoprecipitation. Data shown is representative of three separate
experiments. C, log phase cells were treated with 5 ng/ml
TGF 1 in serum-free ITS medium for 54 h before
immunoprecipitation of cdk2 by anti-cdk2 coupled to agarose, then the
kinase activity of the cdk2·cyclin complexes was determined by an
in vitro kinase reaction on histone H1. The kinase reaction
products were separated by SDS-PAGE, and the histone H1 band was
detected by autoradiography. The amount of cdk2 in each
immunoprecipitate was detected by Western blotting (lowest
band). Data shown are one of four experiments with similar
results.
|
|
Elevation of p21cip1 Protein Levels Blocks TGF 1 Growth
Stimulation--
A longer exposure of the Western blots from U9 cells
was needed to detect p21cip1 (Fig. 1A), suggesting that
steady-state levels of p21cip1 were lower in these cells. Both U9 and
HD3 cells exhibit autocrine regulation by TGF 1 (32), so it is
possible that their endogenous TGF 1 regulates their steady-state
p21cip1 levels. Steady-state levels of cell cycle modulators were
compared between HT29 sublines growth-stimulated by TGF 1 (U9, HP1)
and sublines growth-inhibited by TGF 1 (HD3, HD4). Western blotting demonstrated that levels of the cdk inhibitor p21cip1 were markedly lower in both growth-stimulated lines (Fig.
2A, lower panel,
protein loading controls) whereas levels of other cell cycle modulators were not substantially altered (Fig. 2B). The extent of the
difference in p21cip1 abundance between these lines varied in different
experiments (results from two experiments shown in Fig. 2, A
and B) and may reflect differential response to the insulin
and insulin-like growth factor 1 found in different batches of fetal
calf serum. However, in growth media the level of p21cip1 was always
lower in the U9 and HP1 cell lines, which were capable of growth
stimulation by TGF 1. In contrast to the differences in abundance of
p21cip1, all four lines exhibit similar steady-state levels of the cdk inhibitors p15 and p27, the tyrosine phosphatase cdc25A, which dephosphorylates cdc2 on regulatory tyrosine residues, and the cyclins
D1 and E. A small increase in the steady-state level of cyclin A was
seen in both TGF 1-stimulated cell lines (Fig. 2B), which
may simply reflect their increased growth rate.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Steady-state p21cip1 levels are lower in the
HT29 sublines, which can be growth stimulated by
TGF 1 and elevation of p21cip1 levels decreases
the proliferative response. A, Western blot for
p21cip1; the lower band of similar size was detected
by Coomassie Blue staining in the same blot previously probed for
p21cip1. B, the same cell lysates were analyzed by Western
blotting for the cdk inhibitors p21, p15, and p27, the phosphatase
cdc25A, and the cyclins D1, E, and A. C, Western blot for
p21cip1. The upper portion of the blot is shown to
demonstrate equal loading. U9 cells were cultured in serum-free ITS-DME
supplemented with 40 µg/ml insulin for 1 day or left unsupplemented
( lane), then 5 ng/ml TGF 1 was added to half of the
insulin-supplemented cultures for an additional 2 days. D,
U9 cells were cultured for 3 days in serum-free ITS-DME supplemented
with 40 µg/ml insulin or 5 ng/ml TGF 1 as indicated, then
proliferation measured by incorporation of
[3H]thymidine.
|
|
Elevated expression of p21cip1 blocked the proliferation of U9 cells.
An expression plasmid for p21cip1 driven by a CMV promoter and tagged
with EGFP was transfected into U9 cells, and G418 selection was
attempted. The U9 cells expressing exogenous p21cip were identified by
the co-expressed EGFP protein by fluorescence microscopy. However, after 4-5 days the vast majority of U9 cells with overexpressed p21cip1 detached from the substratum and then died within the next few
days, whereas the control transfectants expressing only the EGFP
protein were still viable, attached cells. We concluded that U9 colon
carcinoma cells responded to highly elevated levels of p21cip1 by
growth arrest and apoptosis as has been reported for other cell types.
Therefore, there was no inherent resistance to p21cip1 expression in U9
cells. We then tested whether a more modest elevation of endogenous
p21cip1 levels would block TGF 1-induced cell proliferation.
Increasing the level of insulin 16-fold in the serum-free ITS-DME
medium caused a 10-fold increase in p21cip1 levels after 24 h
(Fig. 2C). TGF 1 was added for an additional 2 days to
half of the cultures, leading to a 4-fold decrease in p21cip1 levels.
Parallel cultures were examined for proliferation. TGF 1 induced a
2-fold increase in proliferation in U9 cells cultured in standard
ITS-DME but only a modest 30% increase in proliferation in U9 cells
with elevated p21cip1 levels due to insulin treatment (Fig.
2D). Increasing insulin levels did not increase U9 cell proliferation (Fig. 2D, compare lanes 1 with
3), probably because the increase in p21cip1 levels was
balanced by increases in other regulatory molecules such as cyclins.
However, increasing p21cip1 levels did diminish the growth stimulation
by TGF 1.
Functional, Nonmutated TGF Receptors in TGF 1
Growth-stimulated Cells--
We next investigated the TGF 1
signaling pathways in TGF 1 growth-stimulated U9 cells and TGF 1
growth-inhibited HD3 cells. Possibly a mutation in either T RI or
T RII might explain growth stimulation by TGF 1. This hypothesized
mutation could not be in the extracellular TGF -binding domain
because TGF binding was normal (25). Functional TGF receptors had
been detected in both TGF 1 growth-inhibited cells (HD3, HD4) and
TGF 1 growth-stimulated cells (HP1, U9) by
[125I]TGF 1 binding studies (25). All of these cells
express equal levels of T RI, T RII, and T RIII mRNA and
protein, and these receptors are transported to the cell surface (33).
T RII and T RI were sequenced in three HT29 subclones:
TGF 1-resistant HD6 cells (25), TGF 1 growth-inhibited HD3 cells,
and TGF 1 growth-stimulated U9 cells, and compared with the published
sequences. DNA sequencing was performed on reverse
transcriptase-PCR-generated overlapping fragments from bp 220 through
767 of the coding region of T RII, which covers the poly(A) tracts
mutated in repair-deficient syndromes (34) and the majority of the
extracellular sequence and the transmembrane domain. No mutations were
found. Both the alk2 (bp 105-1788 encompassing all of the coding
region) and alk5 (bp 279-1570 encoding part of the extracellular
domain and the remaining portion of the coding region) forms of T RI
were sequenced. No mutations were seen in T RI in any of the three
lines. In both U9 and HD3 cells TGF receptors were functional,
because they phosphorylated smad2 following addition of TGF 1. A
time-course study demonstrated that smad2 was phosphorylated with the
same kinetics in HD3 and U9 cells, as shown by Western blotting using
phospho-specific antisera, and controlled by blotting for both
phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms (Fig.
3). We concluded that proliferative response to TGF 1 in U9 colon carcinoma cells was not caused by TGF receptor mutation.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
smad2 is phosphorylated in response to
TGF 1 with the same kinetics in
TGF 1-growth-stimulated U9 colon carcinoma
cells and TGF 1-growth-inhibited HD3
cells. Parallel cultures of HD3 and U9 HT29 colon carcinoma
sublines were treated with 5 ng/ml TGF 1 for 0, 5, 15, and 30 min,
then phospho-smad2 and total smad2 proteins were detected by Western
blots.
|
|
Mutated, Nonfunctional smad4 in TGF 1
Growth-stimulated Colon Carcinoma Cells--
We next investigated
whether TGF 1 activated the remaining elements of the smad signaling
pathway in U9 cells, resulting in transcriptional activation. Transient
transfection experiments were performed in U9 colon carcinoma cells
with transcriptional reporters, which contain TGF -responsive
elements. TGF 1 activated the p2XSBS/tkCAT construct in melanoma
cells whether their response to TGF 1 was either increased or
decreased proliferation (35). TGF 1 did not activate p2XSBS/tkCAT in
U9 cells while inducing a 3-fold activation of this reporter in Mv1Lu
cells in parallel experiments (Fig.
4A). This construct includes
SBE sequences within elements of the smad-responsive collagen type VII
promoter, and its lack of activation in U9 cells indicated that their
smad signaling pathway might be aberrant. Similar data was observed
with the pCAL2 reporter, which is composed of cyclin A promoter
elements (36) (negative data not shown). TGF 1 did activate the
p3TP-lux reporter construct about 5-fold in U9 cells, but activation by TGF 1 was increased over 200-fold when wild-type smad4 was
co-transfected (Fig. 4B). Mutant smad4 expression
plasmids encoding either the C-terminal MH2 domain of smad4 (37) or a
mutant smad4 unable to bind DNA (100T) (38) could not
substitute for smad4 in enhancing activation of 3TP-lux in
U9 cells. These smad4 mutants also did not inhibit
TGF 1-induced activation. 3TP-lux is composed of three TGF
response elements and a fragment of the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 promoter and can respond to smad-independent signaling pathways activated by TGF 1 (39), including JNK (40). These data
strongly suggested that smad4 was nonfunctional in U9 cells and that
3TP-lux was activated by TGF 1 in U9 cells in a smad-independent manner. To resolve this issue we co-transfected pSBE4-BV/luc, a
reporter containing four repeats of an 8-bp palindromic SBE, which is
known to be activated only by a smad3·smad4 complex (5) into U9 cells
together with smad4 expression plasmids. The pSBE4-BV/luc reporter was
only activated by TGF 1 when wild-type smad4, but not a dominant
negative smad4, was co-transfected (Fig. 4C).
Parallel experiments demonstrated that TGF 1 could not activate a
mutant form of this reporter construct, p6MBE, when co-transfected with neither wild-type or mutant smad4 (Fig. 4D).
Therefore, endogenous smad4 was nonfunctional in TGF 1
growth-stimulated cells.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
No TGF 1 activation
of smad-dependent signaling in
TGF 1 growth-stimulated cells. Transient
transfections of the promoter reporter constructs
(SBS)2TK-CAT (A), 3TP-lux (B), pSBE4
(C), and its mutated version p6MBE (D) into U9
and Mv1Lu cells as indicated. All transfections were controlled by
co-transfection with a -galactosidase expression construct and
addition of vector DNA to maintain identical levels of added DNA. Data
shown are representative experiments. All experiments were performed
four times with triplicate assay points. Mean ± S.E. bars are
shown if >5%.
|
|
smad4 has been found to be infrequently mutated in benign
colon tumors and noninvasive carcinomas, whereas smad4
mutations occur in over 30% of metastatic colon carcinomas (38,
41-43), so we tested the hypothesis that smad4 might be functionally
inactivated in metastatic U9 cells by mutation. The U9 cell
smad4 gene and the HD3 cell smad4 gene were
sequenced from cDNA. Both smad4 genes contained the same
mutation, which converted Gln-311 to a stop codon, which would yield a
protein of 310 amino acids, with the MH2 domain deleted. Such a mutated
smad4 protein would not be able to interact with other smads and
probably would not be able to trimerize. A smad4 deletion mutant
( 274-321), which encompasses some of the amino acids deleted
because of the Q311stop mutation, exhibited virtually no capacity to
mediate TGF 1 activation of the p3TP-lux reporter (44). However, no
shorter smad4 form was detected when lysates from U9, HD3, and a third
HT29 subline, HD6, cells were examined by Western blotting with an
NIH3T3 cell lysate as control (Fig.
5A). Thus the
C-terminal-deleted smad4Q311st form appeared to be unstable. Lysates
from a colon carcinoma cell line, SW480, which contains an oncogenic
mutated K-ras gene, also exhibited no smad4 protein, as has
been shown previously (45). smad2 served as the loading and blotting
control. Therefore, all TGF 1 signaling in U9 and HD3 cells must be
smad-independent because of the absence of smad4 protein.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Mutated smad 4 protein is not expressed in
colon carcinoma lines sensitive to
TGF 1-induced proliferation and p21cip1
down-regulation. A, smad4 and smad2 were detected in
lysates from log phase cultures by Western blotting. Lysates from
NIH3T3 cells and SW480 colon carcinoma cells served as positive and
negative controls, respectively. B, Western blotting for
smad4 in SW480 and SKCO-1 colon carcinoma cells after 2 days of
treatment with 5 ng/ml TGF 1. C, parallel blot as in
B probed for p21cip1.
|
|
We then determined whether TGF 1 would induce proliferation and
decrease p21cip1 levels in other carcinoma cells. Two colon carcinoma
cell lines were compared: SW480, which expresses no smad4 protein, and
SKCO-1, which does (Fig. 5B). Treatment with TGF 1
decreased p21cip1 levels in SW480 cells and increased proliferation a
modest 43% while affecting neither p21cip1 levels nor proliferation in
SKCO-1 cells (Fig. 5C). Induction of proliferation by
TGF 1 in SW480 cells but not in SKCO-1 cells had been shown
previously (46).
The Decrease in p21cip1 Levels Requires Activated, Mature Ras
Proteins--
Both SKCO-1 and SW480 cells express mutated
K-ras oncogenes. In the absence of smad4 protein, TGF 1
was able to down-regulate p21cip1 and stimulate proliferation in SW480
cells. In our earlier study, expression of K-Ras oncoproteins was
essential to convert the TGF 1-insensitive HD6 colon carcinoma cell
line to a line capable of growth stimulation in response to TGF 1
(22). However, one of the novel functions of the K-Ras oncoproteins
first demonstrated in this study was to mediate post-translational
maturation of T RIII, which was incomplete in HD6 cells. U9 cells, in
contrast, have functional TGF receptors capable of binding TGF 1
(25) and transmitting the signal to smad2 (Fig. 3). Perhaps oncogenic K-Ras is needed to mediate T RIII maturation, but only wild-type Ras
proteins are needed to mediate cell proliferation. Oncogenic Ras
proteins are highly activated, with about 50% of Ras proteins binding
GTP in untreated SKCO1 colon carcinoma cells, which express oncogenic
K-Ras, whereas only about 1% of the Ras proteins in untreated HD3
cells bind GTP (30). Steady-state levels of activated Ras proteins were
compared in untreated U9 and HD3 cells by measuring the Ras-bound
GTP/GDP ratio. Total Ras proteins were immunoprecipitated from
H3[32P]O4-prelabeled HD3 and U9
cells, and the Ras-bound GDP and GTP was separated by thin layer
chromatography. The percentage of Ras-bound GTP was 5.4-fold more in U9
cells than in HD3 cells (Fig.
6A). Therefore, roughly about
5% of wild-type Ras proteins were activated in untreated U9 colon
carcinoma cells and 1% in HD3 cells, similar to data we reported
earlier (30). The significance of this Ras activation in U9 cells is
unknown, but it may contribute to response to TGF 1.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Ras is activated and mature Ras is required
for p21cip1 down-regulation in TGF 1
growth-stimulated colon carcinoma cells. A, the amount
of Ras-bound GTP is greater in U9 cells than HD3 cells. Log phase cells
were prelabeled with [32P]orthophosphate, then Ras
proteins were immunoprecipitated with a pan-Ras antibody. The Ras-bound
GTP and GDP were eluted then separated by thin layer chromatography.
B, lovastatin, an inhibitor of Ras post-translational
modification, increases p21cip1 protein abundance. U9 cells were
treated with increasing concentrations of lovastatin, and p21cip1
abundance was detected by Western blotting. C, treatment of
U9 cells with 5 ng/ml TGF 1 ± 32 µg/ml lovastatin. Western
blotting is as in B.
|
|
Western blotting had demonstrated that TGF 1 down-regulated p21cip1
levels in U9 cells in a dose-dependent manner (Fig.
1A). The relationship between the presence of mature Ras
proteins and p21 abundance was examined further by treating U9 cells
with lovastatin, a compound that blocks the post-translational
modification of Ras proteins necessary for their function. Lovastatin
inhibits hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase and thus depletes cells of farnesyl pyrophosphate. It does not diminish total levels of Ras but
inhibits both Ras farnesylation and geranylgeranylation (47, 48). Both H-Ras and K-Ras4B are post-translationally farnesylated, whereas K-Ras proteins have also been shown to be
geranylgeranylated when cells are treated with a
farnesyltransferase inhibitor (reviewed in Ref. 49). Thus lovastatin is
predicted to block prenylation of both of these Ras proteins (50). The
abundance of p21cip1 was increased in a dose-dependent
manner by treatment of U9 cells with increasing concentrations of
lovastatin (Fig. 6B), suggesting that inhibition of Ras
maturation prevents Ras proteins from mediating p21cip1
down-regulation. Furthermore, lovastatin treatment prevented TGF 1
from reducing p21cip1 levels in U9 cells (Fig. 6C). Blocking the prenylation of Ras proteins by lovastatin blocked the ability of
Ras proteins to mediate the signal from TGF 1 to down-regulate p21cip1. These studies, taken together, demonstrate that a cell must
maintain a threshold level of activated, mature Ras proteins for it to
respond to TGF 1 by reduction of p21cip1 levels, which in turn leads
to enhanced cell proliferation.
Dominant Negative Ras Blocks Proliferative Response to
TGF 1--
To confirm that Ras proteins were essential for both
p21cip1 down-regulation and growth stimulation by TGF 1, a construct encoding both the H-ras gene bearing a dominant negative
S17N mutation and a neomycin resistance gene was transfected
into the U9 colon carcinoma cell line, and putative stable
transfectants were isolated in G418 by standard methods (51).
Overexpression of a dominant negative H-Ras protein inhibits the
activity of all Ras proteins. U9 cells were also transfected with the
empty pCNC10 expression plasmid, and stable transfectants were
isolated. Expression of the N17ras construct was monitored by
performing Western blots with a monoclonal antibody specific for H-Ras.
The U9-N17ras transfectant exhibited increased expression of H-Ras proteins compared with the control transfectant, U9-N17EV (empty vector) (Fig. 7A), confirming
expression of the dominant-negative H-Ras construct. A nonspecific band
in the immunoblot serves as an internal control. This construct had
earlier been shown to block the TGF 1 signaling pathways in HD3 colon
carcinoma cells that mediate the maturation of 1 integrin (51).
Therefore, the N17ras proteins were expected to be functional in U9
cells and possibly block some TGF 1 signaling pathways that require active Ras proteins.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
TGF 1 down-regulates
the cdk inhibitor p21cip1 in a ras-dependent manner.
A, Western blot of total Ras proteins in dominant-negative
N17ras transfectant of U9 cells and empty vector control transfectants
U9-N17EV. The nonspecific band in the lower panel is loading
and transfer control. B, growth assay: parallel cultures of
U9 parental cells, DN-N17ras U9 cell transfectants, and U9-N17EV empty
vector control transfectants were cultured for 2.5 days with 4 ng/ml
TGF 1 or left untreated. Cell numbers were assayed by direct cell
counting in a hemacytometer. C, Western blot showing that
2.5 days of treatment with 5 ng/ml TGF 1 decreased p21cip1 levels in
U9 cells, in empty vector control transfectants U9-N17EV, but not in
dominant-negative N17ras U9 cell transfectants. The lower
panel is a nonspecific band demonstrating loading and transfer
control. D, DN-N17ras blocks TGF 1 activation of 3TP-lux
in a dose-dependent manner. Transient co-transfection of a
series of concentrations of the DN-N17ras expression plasmid together
with the 3TP-lux promoter reporter for 24 h followed by treatment
with 5 ng/ml TGF 1 or no treatment for 24 h before assay.
|
|
Proliferative response to TGF 1 was then compared in U9-N17ras
transfectant cells, the U9-N17EV empty vector control transfectant, and
the U9 parental line. After 2 days of exposure to 4 ng/ml TGF 1 in
serum-free ITS-medium, the U9 parental cells and the U9-N17EV empty
vector control transfectant cells exhibited a 2- to 3-fold increase in
cell number (Fig. 7B). However, the U9-N17ras transfectant
cells exhibited no modulation in cell growth. Therefore, proliferative
response to TGF 1 was dependent on activated, functional Ras
proteins. In parallel Western blots, expression of DN17ras was shown to block the down-regulation of p21cip1 caused by TGF 1, whereas p21cip1 down-regulation was seen in vector controls and in the
parental line (Fig. 7C). To confirm that Ras proteins
participate in TGF 1 signaling in U9 cells, increasing concentrations
of a DN-N17ras expression plasmid were co-transfected with p3TP-lux in
U9 cells. DN-N17ras induced a dose-dependent inhibition of activation of p3TP by TGF 1 (Fig. 7D). Therefore,
inhibiting the TGF 1 to activated Ras pathway with DN-N17ras blocked
proliferative response, p21cip1 down-regulation, and activation of the
p3TP reporter in U9 colon carcinoma cells.
p21cip1 Levels Down-regulated by TGF 1 by a Post-transcriptional
Mechanism--
TGF 1 did not decrease p21cip1 abundance in U9 cells
by down-regulating transcription of p21 mRNA. The p21cip1 promoter
reporter construct WWP-luc was transfected into U9 cells and as a
control into Mv1Lu cells. TGF 1 activated the WWP-luc reporter about
2-fold in Mv1Lu cells while not activating or inhibiting basal
activation levels of this reporter in U9 cells (Fig.
8A). As an internal control,
phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate was shown to activate the p21cip1
promoter reporter in U9 cells showing that the construct was
efficiently expressed. These transient transfections studies were
confirmed by Northern analysis. A 24- or 48-h exposure to a range of
TGF 1 levels, from 2 to 16 ng/ml, was ineffective in modulating p21
mRNA levels in U9 (Fig. 8B). Therefore, TGF 1
down-regulation of p21cip1 levels in these colon carcinoma cells must
occur by a post-transcriptional mechanism.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
TGF 1 down-regulates
p21cip1 post-transcriptionally. A, TGF 1 does not
inhibit the WWP-luc p21 promoter reporter in U9 colon carcinoma cells
in the presence or absence of co-transfected smad4. WWP-luc was
transiently transfected without or with (last four bars)
co-transfection of a wild-type smad4 expression plasmid, and the
plasmids were allowed to express for 16 h. The cells were then
divided into two groups in serum-free DME, one of which was treated
with 5 ng/ml TGF 1 for an additional 24 h. Additional parallel
U9 cell cultures were not treated with TGF 1, but with 10 ng/ml
phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate diluted in 0.2% Me2SO or
the Me2SO diluent alone. All experiments were performed
four times with triplicate assay points. Luciferase values were
normalized to 100% for controls ± S.E. bars. The Mv1Lu data is
shown × 0.01 to allow data to be shown on the same scale.
B, Northern blots for p21cip1 were performed on parallel U9
cell cultures treated with 0-16 ng/ml TGF 1 for 24 and for 48 h. Blots were stripped and reprobed with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
dehydrogenase.
|
|
smad4 Is Not Sufficient to Restore Regulation of p21cip1 Expression
by TGF 1--
Transient overexpression of smad4/dpc4 has been
reported to induce p21cip1 expression in the presence or absence of
TGF 1 (52). Expression of smad4 enabled TGF 1 to activate the
3TP-lux and pSBE4 promoter reporter constructs in U9 cells (Fig. 4,
B and C). However, expression of smad4 did not
enable TGF 1 to activate the p21cip1 promoter reporter in U9 cells
(Fig. 8A, last 4 bars). Thus U9 cells may have
additional genetic alterations that limit their ability to activate
p21cip1 transcription via the smad pathway. Similar results had been
found in SW480.7 cells in which restoration of smad4 expression was not
sufficient either to rescue TGF 1-antiproliferative responses or to
allow TGF 1 induction of p21cip1 (45).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Expression of TGF 1 protein increases in various neoplasias and
is maintained or even increased in many metastatic cancers compared
with the primary site tumor (15, 17). TGF 1 is a very potent natural
growth inhibitor for epithelial cells, but the vast majority of
carcinomas either are not growth-inhibited by TGF 1 or show modest
response. Because of this diminished effect on growth, the selection
for increased levels of TGF 1 protein in tumors in vivo
has often been explained by its paracrine effects, such as the
induction of angiogenesis through production and secretion of
platelet-derived growth factor (53) and vascular endothelial growth
factor, and TGF 's immunosuppressive functions. Tumor cells themselves were thought to be insensitive to TGF , because
inactivating mutations in TGF receptors had been found in various
tumor types. TGF receptor type II is mutated in a subset of colon
cancers (about 15%), which display microsatellite instability (34). The human colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability are weakly
aggressive, with a decreased rate of metastasis, and are not likely to
be fatal. Therefore, tumors displaying microsatellite instability and
mutation in T RII and thus not responding to TGF 1 are not
representative of the aggressive tumors in which elevated TGF 1
protein levels are significantly correlated with disease progression
(15). In addition, elevated TGF 1 levels can modulate tumor
aggressiveness through autocrine mechanisms. Expression of DN-T RII
in EpH4ras-transformed mammary epithelial cells and highly metastatic
CT26 mesenchymal cells blocked invasion and metastasis, proving the
necessity for autocrine TGF signaling in these functions (18). In
addition, decreasing TGF 1 protein levels in the metastatic U9 colon
cancer cell line by antisense methodology decreased both U9 cell
metastasis to the liver and subcutaneous tumor formation in a nude
mouse system, and the tumors that did arise had regained TGF 1
expression (21). Thus in 80-85% of colon cancers and in other cancers
that have functional TGF receptors such as the cells in this report,
an aggressive cancer phenotype can result from mutations in smads and
other signaling pathways that mediate growth arrest, with retention or
even activation of other TGF signaling pathways, such as Ras.
Mutation of smad4/dpc4 occurs in over 30% of
aggressive, metastatic colon cancers, and in about 50% of pancreatic
carcinomas (41, 43). Mutations in other smad genes have also
been found, but infrequently, less than 5% (54). The smad4 Gln-311
mutation to a stop codon, which we report in U9 and HD3 colon carcinoma cells, has not been found in other tumor types to our knowledge. Other
mutations to stop codons have also been found in the MH2 domain of
smad4, however, and include 343stop, 358stop, 412stop, and 515stop,
each of which blocks the ability of dpc4/smad4 to mediate transcription
(55). The 311stop mutation is in a codon conserved in smads 1-4, near
the N terminus of the MH2 domain. Because smad4 was mutated and
functionally inactive in U9 cells and in SW480 cells that responded to
TGF 1 by proliferation, smad4 is not necessary for this response to
TGF 1. No smad4 protein was detected in another HT29 subline, HD6.
Because its derivative line, HD6-K-RasV12, was stimulated
to proliferate by TGF 1 (22), we can conclude that this proliferation
also occurred in a smad-independent manner. Mitogenic response to
TGF 1 has been seen in several types of aggressive tumor cells (56,
57) and has been reported to be caused by oncogenic Ras in human
prostate TSU-Pr1 carcinoma cells by a smad-independent pathway (26). We
believe that TGF 1's action as a mitogen is not a cell line
phenomenon; our original studies demonstrated that TGF 1 could
stimulate proliferation of primary cultured colon carcinomas, as
assayed by direct cell counting as well as
[3H]thymidine incorporation (20). TGF 1 induces
both mitogenesis and increased invasion in vivo and in
vitro in U9 colon carcinoma cells (32), so it is likely that both
TGF 1 responses are linked and may be mediated by similar pathways.
Little if any smad4 protein was detected in U9, HD3, and HD6 colon
carcinoma cells, and this may be due to rapid degradation. The L440R
mutation in the MH2 domain of smad2 results in a dramatic reduction in
steady-state levels, which is due to rapid ubiquitination and
proteolysis (58). Recently, oncogenic Ras was shown to induce ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation of smad4 (59). HD3 colon
carcinoma cells were also shown to express very little smad4 protein.
In prior studies HD3 cells exhibited growth inhibition by TGF 1 (23,
25).Thus, growth inhibition induced by TGF 1 in HD3 cells must also
be smad-independent. TGF 1 can induce several physiological
responses without smad4, including growth inhibition and the induction
of fibronectin and several collagens in smad4 knock-out
cells, either embryo fibroblasts (39) or MDA-MB 468 cells, which have a
homozygous deletion in smad4 (60, 61). smad4 is also dispensable for
induction of the endogenous PAI-I gene (39), so the 5-fold activation
of the p3TP-lux reporter construct by TGF 1 in smad4-mutant U9 cells
(Fig. 4B) is probably due to TGF 1-mediated activation of
TPA-responsive elements added to the 3TP-lux construct to enhance
responsiveness (62). Studies are currently underway to determine
whether TGF 1 can initiate colon carcinoma cell proliferation in the
presence of wild-type functional smad4.
TGF 1 has been shown to induce several signaling pathways in addition
to smads, one of them the Ras ERK pathway (63). We have shown in this
study that Ras is essential for TGF 1 signaling, which results in
proliferation by analysis of a DN-N17ras transfectant. Multiple Ras
effector pathways are known to contribute to cell cycle progression
(64). Ras contributes to cell cycle progression through the Raf-MEK-ERK
induction of cyclin D1 (65). However, there is little ERK activation in
the latter stages of G1 when cyclin D1 expression is
maximal. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity is necessary for this
induction and for entry into S phase, through activation of Akt/protein
kinase B and the Rho family GTPase Rac (64). Phosphatidylinositol
3-kinase may play a significant role in TGF 1 signaling through Ras
to mediate growth. This report documents that wild-type Ras proteins
were at least 5-fold more activated in cells responsive to TGF 1 by
growth stimulation than in cells that did not exhibit this response.
Consistent activation of wild-type Ras proteins may be due to the
elevated expression of growth factors in many aggressive tumors. U9
cells with wild-type, activated Ras proteins have been shown to express
many growth factors, including members of the EGF and fibroblast growth
factor families and to respond to these factors by proliferation (53, 66). Therefore, any or all of these growth factors may mediate activation of wild-type Ras proteins by autocrine mechanisms in U9
cells. We can conclude that colon carcinoma cells with inactive smad4
may respond to TGF 1 by proliferation if they exhibit functional TGF receptors and Ras proteins activated either by mutation
(HD6-K-RasV12 cells or SW480 cells) or wild-type Ras
proteins activated by autocrine growth factors. In our prior study (22)
K-Ras oncoproteins, but not H-Ras oncoproteins, mediated proliferative
response to TGF 1, but the relative roles of wild-type K-Ras and
H-Ras proteins have not been evaluated in this response. Oncogenic
H-RasV12 has been shown to block TGF 1-mediated
inhibition of RIE-1 (rat/intestinal epithelial) cells through
degradation of smad4 but not to induce proliferation (59), so the Ras
isoform may be critical.
Down-regulation of certain cdk inhibitors by TGF 1 has been found by
several investigators, including our group, and is likely to contribute
to autocrine growth stimulation. Autocrine TGF 1 accelerated the
growth of two hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines, constitutively
activated smad2, and suppressed the transcription of endogenous
p15ink4B and a p15ink4B promoter construct, which was blocked with
neutralizing antibody to TGF 1 (27). Lower levels of p15ink4B
mRNA were seen in lysates of human hepatocellular cancers compared
with normal hepatic tissue and were correlated with primarily nuclear
expression of smad2, possibly reflecting smad2 constitutive activation
by autocrine TGF 1 in vivo (27). The switch to a spindle
cell morphology in epidermal carcinogenesis has also been correlated
with the loss of p15ink4B (67). This is functionally similar to our
observations that, following stable transfection with an oncogenic
cellular K-RasV12 construct, colon carcinoma cells
with wild-type Ras lose cell polarity and become multilayered,
invasive, and more aggressive in vivo and down-regulate
p21cip1 and the tumor suppressor PTEN (22, 68). U9, U9H, and
HP1 colon carcinoma cells, all of which were spindle-shaped and
fibroblastoid and grew in response to TGF 1 (23, 24), exhibited low
levels of p21cip1 and down-regulated p21cip1 even further in response
to TGF 1 (this report). Thus down-regulation of cdk inhibitors may be
a common mechanism by which TGF 1 stimulates growth, with the
selection of the cdk inhibitor being cell type-specific: p21cip1 in
colon carcinomas, p15ink4B in hepatocellular carcinomas and squamous
cell carcinomas, and p57kip1 in osteoblastic cells (69).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Public Health Service Award RO1
CA75708 (to E. F.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pathology,
Upstate Medical University, 2303 Weiskotten Hall, 750 East Adams St.,
Syracuse, NY 13210. Tel.: 315-464-7138; Fax: 315-464-8419; E-mail:
friedmae@mail.upstate.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 9, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M107646200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
TGF , transforming
growth factor ;
T RI, -II, and -III, type I-III transmembrane
serine/threonine kinases;
SBE, smad binding element;
ERK, extracellular
signal-regulated kinase;
JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase;
CMV, cytomegalovirus;
DME, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
EGFP, enhanced green fluorescence protein;
Ab, antibody;
DN, dominant-negative.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
| Roberts, A., and Sporn, M. (1990) in Peptide Growth Factors
and Their Receptors (Sporn, M. B., and Roberts, A. B.,
eds) Vol. 1, Chap. 8, Springer-Verlag, New York
|
| 2.
|
Barnard, J.,
Lyons, R.,
and Moses, L.
(1990)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1032,
79-87[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Massague, J.
(1996)
Cell
85,
947-950[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Massague, J.,
Hata, A.,
and Liu, F.
(1997)
Trends Cell Biol.
7,
187-192[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Zawel, L.,
Dai, J.,
Buckhaults, P.,
Zhou, S.,
Vogelstein, B.,
and Kern, S.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
1,
611-617[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Dennler, S.,
Itaoh, S.,
Vivien, D.,
ten Dijke, P.,
Huet, S.,
and Gauthier, J.-M.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
3091-3100[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Piek, E., Ju, W. J.,
Heyer, J.,
Escalante-Alcade, D.,
Stewart, C.,
Weinstein, M.,
Deng, C.,
Kucherlapati, R.,
Bottinger, E.,
and Roberts, A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
19945-19953[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Mulder, K.,
and Morris, S.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
5029-5031[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Afti, A.,
Djelloul, S.,
Chastre, E.,
Davis, R.,
and Gespach, C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
1429-1432[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Ishizaki, T.,
Naito, M.,
Fujisawa, K.,
Maekawa, M.,
Watanabe, N.,
Saito, Y.,
and Narumiya, S.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
404,
118-124[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Yamaguchi, K.,
Shirakabe, K.,
Shibuya, H.,
Irie, K.,
Oishi, I.,
Ueno, N.,
Taniguichi, T.,
Nishida, E.,
and Matsumoto, K.
(1995)
Science
270,
2008-2011[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Shibuya, H.,
Yamaguchi, K.,
Shirakabe, K.,
Tonegawa, A.,
Gotoh, Y.,
Ueno, N.,
Irie, K.,
Nishida, E.,
and Matsumoto, K.
(1996)
Science
272,
1179-1182[Abstract]
|
| 13.
|
Petritsch, C.,
Beug, H.,
Balmain, A.,
and Oft, M.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
3093-3101[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Pelton, R.,
Saxena, B.,
Jones, M.,
Moses, H.,
and Gold, L.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
115,
1091-1105[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Gold, L.
(1999)
Crit. Rev. Oncogenesis
10,
303-360[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Friedman, E.,
Gold, L.,
Klimstra, D.,
Zeng, Z.,
Winawer, S.,
and Cohen, A.
(1995)
Cancer Epidemiol.
4,
549-554[Abstract]
|
| 17.
|
Picon, A.,
Gold, L. I.,
Wang, J.,
Cohen, A.,
and Friedman, E.
(1998)
Cancer Epidemiol.
7,
497-504[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Oft, M.,
Heider, K.-M.,
and Beug, H.
(1998)
Curr. Biol.
8,
1243-1251[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Schroy, P.,
Carnright, K.,
Winawer, S.,
and Friedman, E.
(1988)
Cancer Res.
48,
5487-5494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Schroy, P.,
Rifkin, J.,
Coffey, R.,
Winawer, S.,
and Friedman, E.
(1990)
Cancer Res.
50,
261-265[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Huang, F.,
Newman, E.,
Kerbel, R.,
and Friedman, E.
(1995)
Cell Growth Diff.
6,
1635-1642[Abstract]
|
| 22.
|
Yan, Z.,
Deng, X.,
and Friedman, E.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
1555-1563[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Hafez, M.,
Infante, D.,
Winawer, S.,
Friedman, E.,
Yan, Z.,
Hsu, S.,
Winawer, S.,
and Friedman, E.
(1990)
Cell Growth Diff.
1,
617-626[Abstract]
|
| 24.
|
Hafez, M.,
Hsu, S.,
Yan, Z.,
Winawer, S.,
and Friedman, E.
(1992)
Cell Growth Diff.
3,
753-762[Abstract]
|
| 25.
|
Yan, Z.,
Hsu, S.,
Winawer, S.,
and Friedman, E.
(1992)
Oncogene
7,
801-805[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Park, B.-J.,
Park, J. I.,
Byun, D.-S.,
Park, J.-H.,
and Chi, S.-G.
(2000)
Cancer Res.
60,
3031-3038[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Matsuzaki, K.,
Date, M.,
Furukawa, F.,
Tahashi, Y.,
Matsushita, M.,
Sakitani, K.,
Yamashiki, N.,
Seki, T.,
Saito, H.,
Nishizawa, M.,
Fujisawa, J.,
and Inoue, K.
(2000)
Cancer Res.
60,
1394-1402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Feig, L.,
and Cooper, G.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
3235-3243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Lee, H.,
Ghose-Dastidar, J.,
Winawer, S.,
and Friedman, E.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
5255-5263[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Yan, Z.,
Winawer, S.,
and Friedman, E.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
13231-13237[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Huang, F.,
Hsu, S.,
Yan, Z.,
Winawer, S.,
and Friedman, E.
(1994)
Oncogene
9,
3701-3706[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Hsu, S.,
Huang, F.,
Hafez, M.,
Winawer, S.,
and Friedman, E.
(1994)
Cell Growth Diff.
5,
267-275[Abstract]
|
| 33.
|
Deng, X.,
Bellis, S.,
Yan, Z.,
and Friedman, E.
(1999)
Cell Growth Diff.
10,
11-18[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Markowitz, S.,
Wang, J.,
Myeroff, L.,
Parsons, R.,
Sun, L.,
Lutterbaugh, J.,
Fan, R.,
Zborowska, E.,
Kinzler, K.,
Vogelstein, B.,
Brattain, M.,
and Willson, J.
(1995)
Science
268,
1336-1338[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Rodeck, U.,
Nishiyama, T.,
and Mauviel, A.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
547-550[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Feng, X.-H.,
Filvaroff, E.,
and Derynck, R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24237-24245[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Hata, A., Lo, R.,
Wotton, D.,
Lagna, G.,
and Massague, J.
(1997)
Nature
388,
82-87[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Jones, J.,
and Kern, S.
(2000)
Nucleic Acids Res.
28,
2363-2368[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Sirard, C.,
Kim, S.,
Mirtsos, C.,
Tadich, P.,
Hoodless, P.,
Itie, A.,
Maxson, R.,
Wrana, J.,
and Mak, T.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
2063-2070[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Engel, M.,
McDonnell, M.,
Law, B.,
and Moses, H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
37413-37420[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Hahn, S.,
Schutte, M.,
Hoque, A. T. M. S.,
Moskaluk, C.,
da Costa, L.,
Rozenblum, E.,
Weinstein, C.,
Fischer, A.,
Yeo, C.,
Hruban, R. H.,
and Kern, S.
(1996)
Science
271,
350-353[Abstract]
|
| 42.
|
Schutte, M.,
Hruban, R.,
Hedrick, L.,
Cho, K.,
Molnar-Nadasky, G.,
Weinstein, C.,
Bova, G.,
Isaacs, W.,
Cairns, P.,
Nawroz, H.,
Sidransky, D.,
Casero, R., Jr.,
Meltzer, P.,
Hahn, S.,
and Kern, S.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
2527-2530[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Miyaki, M.,
Iijima, T.,
Konishi, M., K, S.,
Ishii, A.,
Yasuno, M.,
Hishima, T.,
Koike, M.,
Shitara, N.,
Iwama, T.,
Utsunomiya, J.,
Kuroki, T.,
and Mori, T.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
3098-3103[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
deCaestecker, M.,
Hemmati, P.,
Larisch-Bloch, S.,
Ajmera, R.,
Roberts, A.,
and Lechleider, R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
13690-13696[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Calonge, M.,
and Massague, J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
33637-33643[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Kansra, S.,
Ewton, D.,
Wang, J.,
and Friedman, E.
(2000)
Int. J. Cancer
87,
373-378[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Hohl, R.,
and Lewis, K.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
17508-17512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Vogt, A.,
Qian, Y.,
McGuire, T.,
Hamilton, A.,
and Sebti, S.
(1996)
Oncogene
13,
1991-1999[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Sebti, S.,
and Hamilton, A.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
6584-6593[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Shields, J.,
Pruitt, K.,
McFall, A.,
Shaub, A.,
and Der, C.
(2000)
Trends Cell Biol.
10,
147-154[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Bellis, S.,
Newman, E.,
and Friedman, E.
(1999)
J. Cell. Physiol.
181,
33-44[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Hunt, K.,
Fleming, J.,
Abramian, A.,
Zhang, L.,
Evans, D.,
and Chiao, P.
(1998)
Cancer Res.
58,
5656-5661[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Hsu, S.,
Huang, F.,
and Friedman, E.
(1995)
J. Cell. Physiol.
165,
239-245[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Riggins, G.,
Kinzler, K.,
Vogelstein, B.,
and Thagalingam, S.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
2578-2580[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Dai, J.,
Turnacioglu, K.,
Schutte, M.,
Sugar, A.,
and Kern, S.
(1998)
Cancer Res.
58,
4592-4597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 56.
|
Fan, D.,
Chakrabarty, S.,
Seid, C.,
Bell, C.,
Shackert, H.,
Morikawa, K.,
and Fidler, I.
(1989)
Cancer Commun.
1,
117-125[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Coppa, A.,
Mincione, G.,
Mammarella, S.,
Ranieri, A.,
and Colletta, G.
(1995)
Cell Growth Diff.
6,
281-290[Abstract]
|
| 58.
|
Xu, J.,
and Attisano, L.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
4820-4825[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 59.
|
Saha, D.,
Datta, P.,
and Beauchamp, R.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
29531-29537[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 60.
|
Dai, J.,
Schutte, M.,
Bandal, R.,
Wilentz, R.,
Sugar, A.,
and Kern, S.
(1999)
Mol. Carcinog.
26,
37-43[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 61.
|
Hocevar, B.,
Brown, T.,
and Howe, P.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
1345-1356[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 62.
|
Wrana, J.,
Attisano, L.,
Carcamo, J.,
Zentella, A.,
Doody, J.,
Laiho, M.,
Wang, X.,
and Massague, J.
(1992)
Cell
71,
1003-1014[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 63.
|
Hartsough, M.,
and Mulder, K.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
7117-7124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 64.
|
Gille, H.,
and Downward, J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
22033-22040[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 65.
|
Filmus, J.,
Robles, A.,
Shi, W.,
Wong, M.,
Columbo, L.,
and Conti, C.
(1994)
Oncogene
9,
3627-3633[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 66.
|
Lee, H.,
Hsu, S.,
Winawer, S.,
and Friedman, E.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
8181-8187[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 67.
|
Akhurst, R.,
and Balmain, A.
(1999)
J. Pathol.
187,
82-90[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 68.
|
Yan, Z.,
Deng, X.,
Chen, M., Xu, Y.,
Abram, M.,
Sloane, B.,
and Friedman, E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27902-27907[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 69.
|
Nishimori, S.,
Tanaka, Y.,
Chiba, T.,
Fujii, M.,
Imamura, T.,
Mizayano, K.,
Ogasawara, T.,
Kawaguchi, H.,
Igarashi, T.,
Fujita, T.,
Tanaka, K.,
and Toyoshima, H.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
10700-10705[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Levy and C. S. Hill
Smad4 Dependency Defines Two Classes of Transforming Growth Factor {beta} (TGF-{beta}) Target Genes and Distinguishes TGF-{beta}-Induced Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition from Its Antiproliferative and Migratory Responses
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
September 15, 2005;
25(18):
8108 - 8125.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Suzuki, G.-i. Kusakai, Y. Shimojo, J. Chen, T. Ogura, M. Kobayashi, and H. Esumi
Involvement of Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1 Signaling in Hypoxia-induced Tolerance to Glucose Starvation
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 9, 2005;
280(36):
31557 - 31563.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Moustakas and C.-H. Heldin
Non-Smad TGF-{beta} signals
J. Cell Sci.,
August 15, 2005;
118(16):
3573 - 3584.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D.-W. Kim and A. B. Lassar
Smad-Dependent Recruitment of a Histone Deacetylase/Sin3A Complex Modulates the Bone Morphogenetic Protein-Dependent Transcriptional Repressor Activity of Nkx3.2
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
December 1, 2003;
23(23):
8704 - 8717.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Matsuyama, M. Iwadate, M. Kondo, M. Saitoh, A. Hanyu, K. Shimizu, H. Aburatani, H. K. Mishima, T. Imamura, K. Miyazono, et al.
SB-431542 and Gleevec Inhibit Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}-Induced Proliferation of Human Osteosarcoma Cells
Cancer Res.,
November 15, 2003;
63(22):
7791 - 7798.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Deng, D. Z. Ewton, B. Pawlikowski, M. Maimone, and E. Friedman
Mirk/dyrk1B Is a Rho-induced Kinase Active in Skeletal Muscle Differentiation
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 17, 2003;
278(42):
41347 - 41354.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Sowa, H. Kaji, T. Yamaguchi, T. Sugimoto, and K. Chihara
Activations of ERK1/2 and JNK by Transforming Growth Factor beta Negatively Regulate Smad3-induced Alkaline Phosphatase Activity and Mineralization in Mouse Osteoblastic Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 20, 2002;
277(39):
36024 - 36031.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G.-Y. Kim, S. E. Mercer, D. Z. Ewton, Z. Yan, K. Jin, and E. Friedman
The Stress-activated Protein Kinases p38alpha and JNK1 Stabilize p21Cip1 by Phosphorylation
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 9, 2002;
277(33):
29792 - 29802.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|