Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M111696200 on January 15, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 13, 11077-11083, March 29, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/13/11077    most recent
M111696200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mansky, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ostrowski, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mansky, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ostrowski, M. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Microphthalmia Transcription Factor Is a Target of the p38 MAPK Pathway in Response to Receptor Activator of NF-kappa B Ligand Signaling*

Kim C. ManskyDagger §, Uma SankarDagger , Jiahuai Han, and Michael C. OstrowskiDagger ||

From the Dagger  Department of Molecular Genetics and the Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210 and the  Department of Immunology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037

Received for publication, December 7, 2001

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand (RANKL) activates signaling pathways that regulate osteoclast differentiation, function, and survival. The microphthalmia transcription factor (MITF) is required for terminal differentiation of osteoclasts. To determine whether MITF could be a target of RANKL signaling, a phosphospecific MITF antibody directed against conserved residue Ser307, a potential mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) site, was produced. Using this antibody, we could demonstrate that MITF was rapidly and persistently phosphorylated upon stimulation of primary osteoclasts with RANKL and that phosphorylation of Ser307 correlated with expression of the target gene tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase. MITF phosphorylation at Ser307 also correlated with persistent activation of p38 MAPK, and p38 MAPK could utilize MITF Ser307 as a substrate in vitro. The phosphorylation of MITF and activation of target gene expression in osteoclasts were blocked by p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580. In transient transfections, a constitutively active Rac1 or MKK6 gene could collaborate with MITF to activate the tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase gene promoter dependent on Ser307. Dominant negative p38 alpha  and beta  could inhibit the collaboration between upstream signaling components and MITF in the transient assays. These results indicate that MITF is a target for the RANKL signaling pathway in osteoclasts and that phosphorylation of MITF leads to an increase in osteoclast-specific gene expression.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The osteoclast plays an important role in bone resorption in vertebrates during development and throughout life (1). This resorption is counterbalanced by new bone formation from osteoblasts. This process of coupling the actions of the bone-producing cells, the osteoblasts, and the bone-resorbing cells, the osteoclasts, is termed "bone remodeling," a process necessary for maintaining a constant bone mass throughout the lifetime of vertebrate organisms. Disruption of this process in humans results in diseases of bone, including osteoporosis and hypercalcemia of malignancy (2, 3).

Osteoclasts differentiate from cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage to become multinuclear, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)1-positive cells capable of resorbing bone (4). Osteoclast differentiation is influenced by hormones and local factors produced by the osteoblasts and stromal cells (4). One local factor expressed by osteoblasts is receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand (RANKL) (5-10). RANKL is a member of the tumor necrosis factor superfamily that is important for maturation of T- and B-cells as well as osteoclasts (7). Mice containing a targeted deletion in either the RANK receptor or RANKL lack differentiated osteoclasts and develop severe osteopetrosis (7-9).

RANKL/RANK signal through tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factors to activate multiple signaling pathways thought to be important for osteoclast differentiation and function, including NF-kappa B, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, Src kinase, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathways (11, 12). Recently, it has been shown that inhibition of the p38 signaling pathway in bone marrow-derived osteoclast precursor cells by treatment with the drug SB203580 inhibited the formation of multinuclear, functional osteoclasts that expressed TRAP in response to RANKL treatment (13). In contrast, the drug PD98059, a specific inhibitor of the MAPK p42/44 pathway, had no effect on the differentiation of bone marrow cells. These results indicate that the p38 MAPK signaling pathway is involved in RANKL-induced differentiation of bone marrow-derived precursor cells (13).

The microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) is a basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper protein (14, 15) closely related to the transcription factors TFE3, TFEB, and TFEC (16-18). MITF regulates osteoclast target genes like TRAP, cathepsin K, and E-cadherin by binding to a 7-base pair conserved sequence TCANGTG found in the promoter regions of these genes (19-21). In situ hybridization experiments confirmed that MITF is expressed in osteoclasts beginning at the earliest stages of endochondral ossification of long bones (19). A mutant allele of the MITF gene, mi, encodes a protein product lacking one of four arginines in the basic region of the MITF protein critical for binding to target genes (14, 22). Osteoclast-like precursor cells derived from mice homozygous for the mi mutation are incapable of fusing to form multinuclear cells, lack a ruffled border, express low levels of TRAP and cathepsin K, and cannot efficiently resorb bone (19, 21, 23, 24). Based on the similarity of the phenotype of the bone marrow-derived precursor cells blocked for p38 MAPK activity and the mi/mi osteoclasts-like cells, we hypothesized that MITF may be a target of the p38 MAPK in osteoclasts.

In this study, we investigate whether MITF is a potential target of the p38 MAPK in osteoclasts. We show that MITF was persistently phosphorylated on a conserved serine 307 in primary osteoclast-like cells in response to RANKL signaling and that phosphorylation of serine 307 correlated with expression of the target gene, TRAP. Further, p38 MAPK could phosphorylate serine 307 in vitro, and phosphorylation of MITF at serine 307 increased the ability of the factor to stimulate the TRAP promoter activity in transient transfection assays. We conclude that MITF may be a direct target of a RANKL/p38 signaling pathway that is necessary for osteoclast differentiation and function.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Culture and Analysis of OCLs-- Hematopoietic precursors were obtained from the bone marrow of wild type mice. OCLs were grown in the presence of 50 ng/ml colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) for 3 days. CSF-1 was lowered to 5 ng/ml, and then RANKL was added at 100 ng/ml for the indicated times.

SB203580 (Calbiochem) was used at the indicated concentration, 10 µM, and was applied to the cells 30 min before stimulation with RANKL.

DNA Constructs and Transfections-- For all experiments presented here, the melanocyte form of the MITF cDNA was used (14, 25). The MITF phosphorylation mutant, termed S307A/P308A, was made by replacing conserved serine and proline with alanine residues. The point mutant was verified by sequencing. The full-length form or point mutants were cloned into a vector providing the influenza hemagglutinin tag (HA) (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Wild type TRAP promoter and the TRAP promoter containing the E box mutation were previously described (19).

Bacterial expression constructs of His-tagged MKK6b(E) and p38alpha (26), dominant negative expression plasmids for p38 alpha , beta , gamma , and delta  isoforms (27), and MKK6(E) expression plasmid were all previously described (28).

DNA transfections of RAW 264 cells have been previously described (19).

Construction of Cell Lines-- RAW 264.7 cells were transfected with Superfect (Qiagen) following the manufacturer's directions with either the plasmid expressing HA-tagged S73AMITF or HA-tagged S73A/S307A/P308AMITF, and cells were selected using 100 µg/ml Geneticin (Invitrogen). Individual clones were picked and screened for expression of HA-MITF.

Preparation of Recombinant Proteins-- Recombinant p38 isoforms and MKK6(E) were prepared by a previously described method (27). MITF corresponding to amino acids 297-377 (nucleotides 1018-1263) was cloned into pGEX2t (Pharmacia) and was purified to 95% purity by glutathione Sepharose affinity chromatography. Versions of the protein with either serine or alanine at amino acid position 307 were produced and purified.

RANKL Bacterial Expression and Purification-- RANKL corresponding to amino acids 158-316 (nucleotides 472-978) was placed into vector pET 32b (Novagene), purified by native lysis to 95% purity by nickel-Sepharose (Qiagen) affinity chromatography and eluted in imidazole. The concentration of soluble RANKL was optimized for induction of p38 phosphorylation and formation of TRAP-positive osteoclasts with each preparation.

Immunological Reagents and Analysis-- The peptide PSTGLSpSPDLVN (where pS represents phosphoserine), corresponding to amino acids 301-312 of MITF was synthesized (QCB/BIOSOURCE, Hopkinton, MA). The position of the phosphate at amino acid 307 was confirmed by NMR. The phosphopeptide was used to immunize two New Zealand White rabbits. Collected serum was pooled and passed over a column to which the nonphosphopeptide was coupled, and material that did not bind to this column was collected and passed over a phosphopeptide affinity column. Bound material was eluted from this second column with glycine buffer, dialyzed against phosphate-buffered saline, and stored at -70 °C. Polyclonal phosphorylation-independent MITF antibody has been described previously (20). p38 alpha - and beta -specific antibodies were previously described (26). Antibodies that recognized p38 MAPK were obtained from New England Biolabs Cell Signaling.

Western blotting was performed with nitrocellulose membranes and the ECL detection system (Kirkegaard and Perry Laboratories). For Western blots using the antibodies that recognize total or phosphorylated p38, the manufacturer's protocol was followed. For the phosphospecific MITF antibody, the blot was blocked in TBS (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl), 0.1% Tween 20, 5% powdered milk for 2 h at room temperature. The blot was washed three times in TBS, 0.1% Tween 20. The phosphospecific MITF antibody was added to fresh blocking buffer and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. The blot was washed three times in TBS, 0.1% Tween 20. The secondary antibody was incubated in TBS, 0.1% Tween 20 for 1 h at room temperature. The blot was washed three times in TBS, 0.1% Tween 20 and developed.

For [35S]methionine labeling experiments, cells were starved in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium lacking methionine. 90 µCi of [35S]methionine (ICN) was added to the cells, and the cells were labeled for 3 h. Cells were lysed in RIPA (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 125 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% deoxycholate) that included 10 µg/ml antipain, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 mM sodium vanadate. Cells were incubated in RIPA at 4 °C for 20 min and then centrifuged at 25,000 rpm for 20 min. Protein G beads (Amersham Biosciences) were added to the lysate, and the antibody (HA from Babco) was added. The immunoprecipitates were incubated overnight at 4 °C. The immunoprecipitates were washed three times in RIPA and run on an 8% SDS-PAGE.

Kinase Assay-- Full activation of recombinant p38 alpha  in vitro was achieved by incubation with recombinant MKK6(E) at a 5:1 molar ratio at 37 °C for 15 min in the presence of ATP as previously described (27). In vitro kinase assays were carried out at 37 °C for 15 min, using 0.2 µg of recombinant kinase, 5 µg of GST-MITF, 250 µM ATP, and 12 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP in 20 µl of kinase reaction buffer. Reactions were terminated by the addition of SDS sample buffer. Reaction products were resolved on a 10% SDS-PAGE. Phosphorylated proteins were visualized by autoradiography.

p38 MAPK activities were measured in an immune complex kinase assay. RAW264.7 cells were stimulated with RANKL at 100 ng/ml for 15 min. Cells were lysed in RIPA. Cells were incubated in RIPA at 4 °C for 20 min and then centrifuged at 25,000 rpm for 20 min. The immunoprecipitates were incubated with anti-p38 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) overnight at 4 °C. The immunoprecipitates were collected and washed three times in RIPA and two times with kinase buffer (20 mM Mops, pH 7.5, 25 mM beta -glycerol phosphate, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM sodium vanadate). Immunoprecipitates of anti-p38 were mixed with 0.5 µg of GST-MITF, 150 µM ATP, and 12 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP in 50 µl of kinase buffer. The reactions were further incubated at 30 °C for 30 min. Reactions were terminated by the addition of SDS sample buffer. Reaction products were resolved on a 10% SDS-PAGE. Phosphorylated proteins were visualized by autoradiography.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Production and Characterization of Antibodies Specific for MITF Phosphoserine 307-- Osteoclasts that are grown in the presence of CSF-1 and RANK ligand but have been blocked for the activation of the p38 MAPK by the specific inhibitor SB203580 remain mononuclear and stain weakly for the osteoclast marker TRAP (13), a similar phenotype to the osteoclasts that are cultured from the mice homozygous for the mi mutation (23, 24). This led us to test the hypothesis that MITF might be a target of the p38 MAPK pathway during osteoclast differentiation. We analyzed the amino acid sequence of MITF and discovered a potential p38 phosphorylation site at serine 307 that is conserved among different species including human, mouse, and chicken (Fig. 1A). However, the serine at amino acid position 307 is not conserved among the other related transcription factors, TFEC, TFE3, and TFEB (29).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Generation of phosphospecific MITF antibody. A, alignment of potential p38 MAPK phosphorylation sites in MITF. The sequence displayed is from amino acid 299 to 320. The conserved residues important for p38 MAPK phosphorylation are indicated in large boldface letters. B, phosphospecific MITF antibody recognizes only recombinant phosphorylated MITF. GST-MITF (amino acids 297-377) was incubated with nonradioactive ATP in the presence (lanes 1 and 3) or the absence (lanes 2 and 4) of His-tagged p38alpha . The top panel is Western blot using phosphospecific MITF antibody. Lanes 1 and 2, wild type GST-MITF; lanes 3 and 4, S307A/P308A GST-MITF. Bottom panel, blot in the top panel reprobed with an antibody recognizing GST. C, phosphospecific MITF antibody recognizes HA-MITF stably expressed in RAW 264.7 cells upon stimulation with RANKL. Immunoprecipitates with HA antibody were run on an 8% SDS-PAGE. The top panel is a Western blot probing with the phosphospecific MITF antibody. The left half of the panel contains HA immunoprecipitates from cells that stably express HA-MITF containing a replacement of the serine 307 and proline 308 to alanines, whereas the right half of the panel contains HA immunoprecipitates from cells expressing HA-MITF with no change at serine 307 and proline 308. The bottom panel is the blot in the top panel reprobed with an antibody that recognizes the HA tag.

To begin to investigate if MITF was phosphorylated at serine 307 in osteoclasts, an antibody that was specific for the phosphorylated serine at residue 307 was developed (see "Experimental Procedures"). For this purpose, the peptide PSTGLSpSPDLVN (corresponding to amino acids 301-312 of MITF) was synthesized and used to produce polyclonal rabbit serum. Following affinity purification, the specificity of the antibody for detecting phosphoserine 307 MITF in Western blotting experiments was tested with recombinant GST-MITF corresponding to amino acids 297-377. For these experiments, the GST-MITF region was incubated in vitro with activated p38 alpha  and ATP (Fig. 1B). These experiments showed that only GST-MITF that had been incubated with the p38 preparation was recognized by the antibody (Fig. 1B, lane 1 versus lane 2). Recombinant protein containing alanine substituted for serine at amino acid position 307 was not recognized by the phosphospecific antibody in either the presence or absence of activated p38 MAPK. (Fig. 1B, compare lanes 3 and 4 with lane 1). When the blot in Fig. 1B was stripped and reprobed with an antibody specific for the GST moiety, we were able to detect the recombinant protein in all four lanes (Fig. 1B, bottom panel).

To further characterize the phospho-Ser307-specific antibody, RAW 264.7 cell lines that stably expressed either HA-tagged MITF or S307A/P308A HA-tagged MITF were created. The cells were stimulated with RANKL for various times, and cell extracts were prepared and immunoprecipitated with the antibody recognizing the HA epitope. The phosphorylation status of MITF Ser307 was determined using the phosphospecific MITF antibody (Fig. 1C, top panel). This analysis demonstrated that Ser307 was phosphorylated following 15, 30, or 60 min with RANKL stimulation but that the antibody did not react with the S307A/P308A MITF protein. The bottom panel of Fig. 1C represents the blot in the top panel reprobed with an antibody that recognizes the HA tag to show approximately equal loading of the HA-containing immunoprecipitates.

MITF Is Rapidly and Persistently Phosphorylated in Osteoclasts after RANKL Stimulation-- The anti-phospho-MITF antibody was used to determine the phosphorylation status of endogenous MITF in primary osteoclast precursors after stimulation by RANKL. Bone marrow-derived osteoclast precursors were obtained from wild type mice and cultured in the presence of CSF-1 for 3 days. At this time, RANKL was added to the bone marrow cell cultures, and nuclear extracts were prepared and analyzed by Western blotting (Fig. 2). Using the anti-phospho-Ser307 antibody, MITF phosphorylation could be detected following 30 min of RANKL stimulation and persisted following 24 h of continuous RANKL treatment (Fig. 2A, upper panel). When the same blot was reprobed with a nondiscriminating MITF antibody, approximately equal levels of MITF protein are seen in all lanes (Fig. 2A, lower panel). MITF appeared as a doublet with electrophoretic mobility of around 55 and 57 kDa in these experiments, and both bands are detected by the anti-phospho-Ser307 antibody (Fig. 2A). Previous work in melanocytes has also indicated that MITF is resolved as a doublet in extracts prepared from this cell type and that the upper band is due to c-Kit-mediated phosphorylation of conserved serine residue 73 (30). Ser73 is also phosphorylated in osteoclasts in response to CSF-1, accounting for the doublet band pattern in this cell line as well (31). As shown below (see Fig. 5) mutation of Ser73 to alanine results in a loss of the slower migrating band (see Fig. 5).


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   RANKL stimulates phosphorylation of MITF at serine 307. A, phosphospecific MITF antibody that recognizes phosphorylated MITF after RANKL stimulation of osteoclasts. The top panel is a Western blot of nuclear extracts from osteoclasts run on an 8% SDS-PAGE and probed using phosphospecific MITF antibody. The numbers above the lanes indicate the hours after RANKL stimulation that the extracts were collected. The bottom panel is the same blot in the top panel reprobed with an antibody that recognizes all forms of MITF. B, real time quantitative RT-PCR (Taqman assay) was performed using RNA from bone marrow cultures treated for the same time with RANKL as indicated in A. Both TRAP and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase RNA were quantitated. All values in the chart are expressed as the ratio of TRAP to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase expression and then further normalized to the CSF-1-only control. C, p38 MAPK is phosphorylated in response to RANKL stimulation in osteoclasts. The top panel is a Western blot of whole cell extracts from osteoclasts, run on a 10% SDS-PAGE and probed using phosphospecific p38 antibody. The numbers above the lanes indicate the hours after RANKL stimulation that the extracts were collected. The bottom panel is the same blot in the top panel reprobed with an antibody that recognizes all forms of p38 MAPK.

Real time PCR was used to measure expression of the MITF target gene TRAP (19) following RANKL stimulation of osteoclasts (Fig. 2B). These experiments demonstrated that TRAP expression was increased ~7-fold following 30 min of RANKL treatment and remained elevated 7-fold, following 24 h of RANKL treatment, in good agreement with the observed increase in MITF Ser307 phosphorylation.

As previously reported in RAW 264.7 cells (13), we were able to detect the phosphorylated, activated form of p38 MAPK in primary osteoclasts following stimulation with RANKL (Fig. 2C). The phosphorylation of p38 MAPK, like the phosphorylation of MITF, was persistent, since we were able to detect phosphorylated p38 MAPK even 24 h after stimulation with RANKL (Fig. 2C, top panel). This blot was stripped and reprobed with an antibody that recognizes all forms of p38 to ensure that there was approximately equal loading of protein in all lanes (Fig. 2C, bottom panel). This second antibody detected the same 42-kDa protein in all samples, even the sample that received only CSF-1.

The effects of the specific p38 MAPK inhibitor, SB203580, on MITF Ser307 phosphorylation and TRAP gene expression were examined (Fig. 2, A and B). This analysis demonstrated that MITF Ser307 phosphorylation in response to RANKL could be inhibited by SB203580 pretreatment of osteoclasts (Fig. 2A, lane 3). Additionally, TRAP gene induction by RANKL could be reduced from 7- to 3-fold by SB203580 pretreatment (Fig. 2B).

p38 Can Phosphorylate MITF in Vitro-- To provide additional evidence linking MITF phosphorylation to p38 MAPK, in vitro kinase reactions were performed. Two types of assays were used. First, p38 MAPK immunoprecipitated from RAW264.7 was used in immune kinase reactions with GST-MITF substrate (Fig. 3A). The immune kinase experiments demonstrated that the p38 immunoprecipitate prepared from RANKL-treated cells phosphorylated the GST-MITF protein, whereas one prepared from unstimulated cells did not (Fig. 3A, compare lane 1 and lane 3). Additionally, an MITF protein containing S307A/P308A mutations was a poor substrate in the assay, whether p38 was immunoprecipitated from RANKL-treated or -untreated cells (Fig. 3A, lanes 2 and 4).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   p38 can phosphorylate MITF in vitro. A, top panel, RAW 264.7 cell extracts stimulated (lanes 1 and 2) with RANKL for 15 min or unstimulated (lanes 3 and 4). p38 was immunoprecipitated and incubated with GST-MITF (amino acids 297-377) and [gamma -32P]ATP. Lanes 1 and 3, wild type GST-MITF; lanes 2 and 4, S307A/P308A GST-MITF. The bottom panel shows a p38 Western blot. B, recombinant p38 alpha  can phosphorylate GST-MITF (amino acids 297-377). Recombinant GST-MITF was incubated with [gamma -32P]ATP and purified, activated His-tagged p38 alpha  for 15 min and run on a 10% SDS-PAGE. In the top panels, lanes 1, 3, and 5 contain activated p38 alpha , and lanes 2, 4, and 6 have no activated p38 alpha . Lanes 1 and 2 contain wild type GST-MITF as the substrate, lanes 3 and 4 contain S307A/P308A GST-MITF as the substrate, and lanes 5 and 6 contain GST as a substrate. The bottom panel shows a GST Western blot.

In the second assay, the ability of recombinant p38alpha to phosphorylate GST-MITF was tested. Recombinant p38alpha , activated in vitro by constitutively active MKK6 (28), could phosphorylate wild type GST-MITF (Fig. 3B, lane 1). The level of phosphorylation of the Ser307 protein was ~5-fold higher than phosphorylation of S307A-mutated MITF protein (Fig. 3B, compare lanes 1 and 3). The phosphorylation of GST-MITF depended on the addition of both MKK6 and p38alpha (Fig. 2C, lanes 2 and 4), and GST alone was not phosphorylated by either kinase (Fig. 2C, lanes 5 and 6). In similar experiments, the p38 beta  isoform could also phosphorylate GST-MITF, but the p38 gamma  isoform could not (data not shown).

c-Jun N-terminal kinase MAP kinase could not phosphorylate GST-MITF substrates in vitro in either type of assay, under conditions where a GST-Jun substrate could be phosphorylated (data not shown).

Dominant Active Forms of Rac1 and MKK6 Can Collaborate with MITF to Superactivate the TRAP Promoter in Transient Assays-- Rac1 and has been previously shown to be able to activate the p38 MAPK cascade (28). Further, MKK6 has been previously shown to be a MAPK kinase that is a specific activator of p38 MAPKs (28, 32). To provide additional evidence documenting MITF as a downstream target of the RANKL/p38 MAPK signaling pathway, we tested whether MITF's ability to transactivate the TRAP promoter fused to a firefly luciferase reporter gene was stimulated by Rac1(15L) or MKK6(E), constitutive active forms of these molecules. Experiments were performed in the macrophage/osteoclast cell line RAW 264.7 (Fig. 4).


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Constitutively active Rac1 and MKK6 collaborate with MITF to superactivate the TRAP promoter. Activity of TRAP-luciferase promoters in RAW 264.7 cells is shown. The activity of MITF alone and MITF and Rac1(15L) or MKK6(E) were compared on a wild type TRAP promoter and a TRAP promoter containing a mutation in the E box. In each experiment, 2.5 µg of TRAP promoter (wild type or E box-mutated) was co-transfected with 0.5 µg of MITF expression vector (or empty expression vector for basal activity) or with 0.4 µg of Rac1 or MKK6 expression vector alone or together as indicated. Activity is expressed as relative luciferase activity. The average of three independent experiments performed in duplicate is shown, and error bars indicate S.D.

In these experiments, co-transfection of the TRAP reporter with MITF expression vector resulted in approximately a 10-fold increase in promoter activity compared with control basal activity in agreement with our previously published results (19) (Fig. 4). When either Rac1(15L) or MMK6(E) expression vectors were co-transfected with the TRAP reporter, there was an ~4-5-fold increase in TRAP promoter activity compared with basal activity (Fig. 4). When the combination of Rac1(15L) and MITF expression vectors was co-transfected with the TRAP promoter, there was a more than 100-fold increase in promoter activity relative to the control (Fig. 4, compare bar 1 with bar 5), an effect that was more than additive of the effects seen with MITF or Rac1(15L) expression vectors alone. When a TRAP reporter that contains point mutations in the E box-related MITF-binding site identified in our previous studies (19) was tested in combination with MITF and Rac1(15L), activation was abolished (Fig. 4, compare bar 5 with bar 6).

Co-transfection of MITF and MKK6(E) with either TRAP reporter produced similar results, a 100-fold activation of wild type reporter and no activation of the MITF-binding site mutation (Fig. 4, compare bar 5 with bar 6 and compare bar 7 with bar 8, respectively). These experiments indicate that MITF collaborates with the Rac/MKK6 signaling pathway to stimulate TRAP promoter activity dependent on the cis-acting MITF-binding site present in the TRAP promoter.

Serine 307 and Proline 308 Are Necessary for MITF Collaboration with Rac1 and MKK6-- As discussed above, serine 307 is phosphorylated in vivo in response to RANKL signaling and is a substrate for p38 MAPK in vitro. To test the role of this phosphorylation site in MITF collaboration with either Rac1(15L) or MKK6(E), the HA-MITF protein containing S307A/P308A (see Fig. 1) was studied in the transient transfection assays in RAW264.7 cells (Fig. 5A). When co-transfected with the TRAP reporter, the MITF S307A/P308A expression vector was able to transactivate the TRAP promoter to similar levels as observed with the wild type MITF gene (Fig. 5A). In contrast, MITF S307A/P308A co-transfected with constitutively active Rac1 or MKK6 could not activate the TRAP promoter to the same levels as wild type MITF (Fig. 5A). Mutation of other potential serine phosphorylation sites (e.g. an S73A point mutation in the previously characterized Erk phosphorylation site (30, 31)) had no affect on stimulation of MITF activity by either Rac1(15L) or MKK6(E) (data not shown).


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   MITF Ser307 is necessary for collaboration with Rac1 or MKK6. A, activity of point mutants measured in transient transfection assays in RAW 264.7 cells. TRAP luciferase reporter construct (2.5 µg) was co-transfected with 0.5 µg of expression vector for either wild type MITF, MITF containing the indicated point mutant, or 0.4 µg of Rac1 15L or MKK6(E) alone or together. Activity is expressed as relative luciferase activity. The averages of three independent experiments performed in duplicate are shown, and the error bars indicate S.D. B, MITF proteins were expressed transiently in COS cells. Immunoprecipitation of 35S-labeled cell extracts with an HA-specific antibody is shown. Lane 1, HA vector; lane 2, HA-tagged wild type MITF; lane 3, HA-tagged MITF S307A/P308A; lane 4, HA-tagged MITF S73A/P74A (the Erk1 site) (30, 31). The immunoprecipitates were run on an 8% SDS-PAGE. The arrows indicate the positions of the wild type or mutated MITF protein. The specific MITF bands present with lower electrophoretic mobility probably represent the protein phosphorylated at serine 73 (see "Results" for details) (30, 31).

To determine whether the alanine substitutions affected protein stability, we examined expression of HA-tagged MITF proteins following transfection of COS cells (Fig. 5B). In these experiments, both MITF wild type and S307A/P308A forms were again resolved as doublets. However, MITF with the S73A substitution ran as a single, faster migrating band, consistent with the previous finding that phosphorylation of this site by the Erk MAPK pathway results in the band with lower electrophoretic mobility (30, 31). No significant difference in the levels of the wild type MITF or MITF S307A/P308A proteins could be detected in this assay (Fig. 5B). Taken with the data above showing that S307A/P308A MITF can be stably expressed to the same extent as wild type protein in RAW264.7 cells (Fig. 1C, bottom panel), these results indicate that MITF protein stability is not grossly affected by these point mutations.

p38 alpha  and beta  Dominant Negative Can Inhibit Rac1/MITF Activation-- There are four p38 isoforms (alpha , beta , gamma , and delta ), encoded by separate genes (26, 33-35). We were interested in determining which isoform(s) of p38 was involved in osteoclastogenesis. Since SB203580 has been shown to inhibit only p38 alpha  and beta  isoforms at low doses used in the experiments presented above (36), it was likely that one or both of these isoforms were involved in osteoclast differentiation. Western analysis was performed with p38 antibodies specific for the p38 alpha  or beta  isoforms (26). The p38 alpha  isoform was detected in both RAW 264.7 and OCL whole cell extracts (Fig. 6A, lanes 1 and 2). However, we were unable to detect expression of p38 beta  in either RAW 264.7 or OCLs, although the antibody did recognize recombinant p38 beta  protein included on the blot as a positive control (Fig. 6A, compare lanes 5, 6, and 7, respectively).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   p38 dominant negatives inhibit Rac1 superactivation of MITF. A, Western blot using p38 alpha  and beta -specific antibodies. Lanes 1 and 5, RAW whole cell extracts; lanes 2 and 6, OCL whole cell extracts; lanes 3 and 7, recombinant His-tagged p38 beta ; lanes 4 and 8, recombinant His-tagged p38 alpha . The arrows indicate the positions of recombinant or p38 MAPK found in the whole cell extracts. The extracts were run on a 10% SDS-PAGE. The left top blot was probed with p38 alpha -specific antibody; the right top blot was probed with p38 beta -specific antibody; and the left and right bottom blots were probed with p38 antibody that recognizes all isoforms of p38. B, activity of MITF co-transfected with p38 dominant negatives measured in transient transfections in RAW 264.7 cells. TRAP luciferase reporter construct (2.5 µg) was co-transfected with 0.5 µg of MITF expression vector, 0.4 µg of Rac1 15L (also contains empty p38 expression vector) or MITF, Rac1 15L, and 1 µg of p38 dominant negatives (alpha  and beta  in left panel, gamma  and delta  in right panel, respectively). Activity is expressed as relative luciferase activity. The average of three independent experiments performed in duplicate is shown, and the error bars indicate S.D.

To test if dominant negative versions of the four isoforms of p38 (27) could inhibit Rac1 activation of MITF, transient transfections were performed with RAW 264.7 cells (Fig. 6B). As shown above, co-transfection of MITF and Rac1 (15L) expression vectors with the TRAP reporter resulted in 100-fold activation of the TRAP promoter relative to the control (Fig. 6B, compare bar 1 with bar 4). When dominant negative expression vectors for p38 gamma  and delta  were co-transfected with MITF and Rac1 expression vectors, we detected no significant decrease in luciferase activity compared with when MITF and Rac1 expression vectors were co-transfected together (Fig. 6B, right panel). However, when expression vectors for the isoforms p38 alpha  and beta  were co-transfected with MITF and Rac1 expression vectors, the luciferase activity of the TRAP promoter was similar to levels seen when only MITF or Rac1 was co-transfected with the TRAP-luciferase reporter (Fig. 6B, left panel, compare bar 4 with either bar 5 or bar 6, respectively). Although our analysis indicated the p38 beta  isoform was not expressed in primary osteoclast-like cells, the fact that the dominant-negative version of the gene could still interfere with Rac1 activation of MITF is not surprising, given the high level of similarity between the p38 alpha  and beta  isoforms.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this study, we present evidence indicating that MITF is a direct target of a RANKL/p38 signaling pathway and that activation of MITF by this pathway is necessary for efficient expression of TRAP. MITF is thus defined as a nuclear target for RANKL signaling that, along with p38 MAPK activity, is persistently, and not transiently, activated by RANKL. Studies on other signaling pathways activated by RANKL, specifically the Ikappa B/NF-kappa B and c-Jun N-terminal kinase/c-Jun pathways, have not addressed the issue of persistence but have only studied activation within 30 min of RANKL treatment (10, 37, 38). RANKL can stimulate transient, acute inflammatory responses as well as promoting osteoclast differentiation (7). Thus, defining whether signaling pathways are activated in a transient or persistent manner is probably critical for understanding how RANKL promotes inflammatory responses as opposed to differentiation.

The p38 kinases constitute a distinct MAPK subfamily that plays a role in adaption, homeostasis, and stress responses (39). In addition, the p38 pathway has been implicated in the induction of myoblast differentiation (40, 41). There are interesting parallels between the role of p38 in muscle differentiation and in osteoclast differentiation. The myogenic MEF transcription factors are targets of p38 signaling (27, 42). Additionally, the p38 MAPK pathway is persistently activated and maintained during the whole process of myotube formation (41). As is the case for the p42/p44 MAPK kinase in neuronal cell differentiation (43), persistent activation of signaling appears necessary for the ability of the p38 MAPK pathway to promote cell differentiation in myoblasts and osteoclast precursors. In muscle differentiation, the identity of the factor that triggers p38 activation is unknown (41), unlike osteoclast differentiation, where RANKL is the factor that stimulates differentiation. The RANKL/p38 MAPK/MITF pathway provides a paradigm to define how persistent activation of signaling occurs.

MITF regulates distinct sets of target genes in different cell types, and a major question is what mechanisms allow for cell type-specific actions of MITF. The results presented here suggest that cell type-specific signaling events may contribute to the ability of MITF to selectively alter the expression of target genes in one cell type versus another. For example, the expression of RANK in osteoclast precursors distinguishes this cell type from melanocytes and thus allows for cell type-specific phosphorylation and activation of MITF. Importantly, the conserved Ser307 residue is not conserved among the related family members TFE3, TFEC, and TFEB (29). This is distinct from the conserved Ser73 residue, a target for the Raf/p42/p44 MAPK pathway (30, 31), a site conserved among the entire family (29). Thus, MITF may be regulated by the p42/p44 MAPK pathway in all cell types in which it is expressed, but phosphorylation of serine 307 may represent one mechanism of regulating MITF activity that is unique to osteoclasts.

How does phosphorylation at Ser307 modulate MITF activity in osteoclasts? Recent results suggest that two probable mechanisms should be considered. First, our laboratory has recently demonstrated that MITF and the Ets family member PU.1 interact uniquely in osteoclasts to regulate target genes and to promote osteoclast differentiation (44). One hypothesis is that phosphorylation of MITF by the p38 MAPK pathway increases the affinity of the interaction between MITF and PU.1 and thus increases the ability of this pair of transcription factors to stimulate osteoclast differentiation. A second hypothesis is that phosphorylation of MITF lowers its affinity for a co-repressor. For example, in muscle differentiation, calcium/calmodulin signaling leads to a dissolution of a complex between MEF2 proteins and histone deacetylases and allows MEF2 to interact with the helix-loop-helix factor MyoD to trigger muscle differentiation (45). The two hypotheses are not mutually exclusive. It could be that phosphorylation of MITF on serine 307 leads to a lower affinity for a co-repressor and subsequent high affinity interaction with PU.1. Further analysis will be required to determine whether these hypotheses can account for the ability of p38 MAPK to activate MITF.

The work presented here indicates that osteoclast-specific signaling events may contribute to the ability of MITF to regulate osteoclast gene expression and differentiation. These results suggest a unique set of molecular targets that might allow modulation of osteoclast differentiation and activity in bone disorders caused by the uncoupling of osteoblast and osteoclast action (e.g. osteoporosis).

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We acknowledge the role of the Keck Genetic facility in maintaining the mouse colony used in this work and Lori Nelsen for expert technical assistance.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by NIAMS, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Grant AR-44719 (to M. C. O.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Supported by NIH National Research Service Award F32-AR08568.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular Genetics, Ohio State University, 496 W. 12th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210. Tel.: 614-688-3824; Fax: 614-688-8727; E-mail: ostrowski.4@osu.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 15, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111696200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; RANK, receptor activator of NF-kappa B; RANKL, RANK ligand; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MITF, microphthalmia transcription factor; CSF, colony-stimulating factor; HA, hemagglutinin; RIPA, radioimmune precipitation assay; Mops, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid; GST, glutathione S-transferase; OCL, osteoclast.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Teitelbaum, S. L. (2000) Science 289, 1504-1508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Raisz, L. G. (1992) Disorders of Bone and Mineral Metabolism , pp. 287-311, Raven Press, New York
3. Mundy, G. R., Raisz, L. G., Cooper, R. A., Schecter, G. P., and Salmon, S. E. (1974) N. Engl. J. Med. 291, 1041-1046[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Roodman, G. D. (1999) Exp. Hematol. 27, 1229-1241[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Dougall, W. C., Glaccum, M., Charrier, K., Rohrbach, K., Brasel, K., DeSmedt, T., Daro, E., Smith, J., Tometsko, M. E., Maliszewski, C. R., Armstrong, A., Shen, V., Bain, S., Cosman, D., Anderson, D., Morrissey, P. J., Peschon, J. J., and Schuh, J. (1998) Genes Dev. 13, 2412-2424[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Hsu, H., Lacey, D. L., Dunstan, C. R., Solovyev, I., Colombero, A., Timms, E., Tan, H.-L, Elliot, G., Kelley, M. J., Sarosi, I., Wang, L., Xia, X.-Z., Elliot, R., Chiu, L., Black, T., Scully, S., Caparelli, C., Morony, S., Shimamoto, G., Bass, M. B., and Boyle, W. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 3540-3545
7. Lacey, D. L., Timms, E., Tan, H.-L, Kelley, M. J., Dunstan, C. R., Burgess, T., Elliot, R., Colombero, A., Elliot, G., Scully, S., Hsu, H., Sullivan, J., Hawkins, N., Davy, E., Capparelli, C., Eli, A., Qian, Y.-X., Kaufman, S., Sarosi, I., Shalhoub, V., Senaldi, G., Guo, J., Delaney, J., and Boyle, W. J (1998) Cell 93, 165-176[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Kong, Y. Y., Yoshida, H., Sarosi, I., Tan, H.-L., Timms, E., Capparelli, C., Morony, S., Oliveira, S. A., Van, G. I., Khoo, W., Wakeham, A., Dunstan, C. R., Lacey, D. L, Mak, T. W., Boyle, W. J., and Penninger, J. M. (1999) Nature 397, 315-323[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Li, J., Sarosi, I., Yan, X-Q., Morony, S., Capparelli, C., Tan, H.-L., McCabe, S., Elliot, R., Scully, S., Van, G., Kaufman, S., Juan, S.-C., Sun, Y., Tarpley, J., Martin, L., Christensen, K., McCabe, J., Kostenuik, P., Hsu, H., Fletcher, F., Dunstan, C. R., Lacey, D. L., and Boyle, W. J. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.  97, 1566-1571[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Yasuda, H., Shima, N., Nakagawa, N., Yamaguchi, K., Kinosaki, M., Mochizuki, S.-I., Tomoyasu, A., Yano, K., Goto, M., Murakami, A., Tsuda, E., Morinaga, T., Higashio, K., Udagawa, N, Takahashi, N., and Suda, T. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 3597-3602[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Wong, B. R., Besser, D., Kim, N., Arron, J., Vologodskaia, M., Hanafusa, H., and Choi, Y. (1999) Mol. Cell 4, 1041-1049[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Wong, B. R., Josien, R., Lee, S. Y., Yologodskaia, M., Steinman, R. M., and Choi, Y. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 28355-28359[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Matsumoto, M., Sudo, T., Osada, H., and Tsujimoto, M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 31155-31161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Hodgkinson, C. A., Moore, K. J., Nakayama, A., Steingrimsson, E., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A., and Arnheiter, H. (1993) Cell 74, 395-404[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Hughes, M. J., Lingrel, J. B., Krakowsky, J. M., and Anderson, K. P. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 20687-20690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Beckman, H., Su, L. K., and Kadesch, T. (1990) Genes Dev. 4, 167-179[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Carr, C. S., and Sharp, P. A. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 4384-4388[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Zhao, G.-Q., Zhao, Q., Zhou, X., Mattei, M.-G., and De Crombrugghe, B. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 4505-4512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Luchin, A., Purdom, G., Murphy, K., Clark, M.-Y., Angel, N., Cassady, A. I., Hume, D. A., and Ostrowski, M. C. (2000) J. Bone Miner. Res. 15, 451-460[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Mansky, K. C., Marfatia, K., Purdom, G., Luchin, A., Hume, D. A., and Ostrowski, M. C. (2002) J. Leukocyte Biol. 71, 295-303[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Motyckova, G., Weilbaecher, K. N., Horstmann, M. A., Rieman, D. J., Fisher, D. Z., and Fisher, D. E. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 5798-5803[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Hemesath, T. J., Steingrimsson, E., McGill, G., Hansen, M. J., Vaught, J., Hodgkinson, C. A., Arnheiter, H., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A., and Fisher, D. E. (1994) Genes Dev. 8, 2770-2780[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Thesingh, C. W., and Scherft, J. P. (1985) Bone 6, 43-52[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Holtrop, M. E., Cox, K. A., Elion, G., Simmons, H. A., and Raisz, L. G. (1981) Metab. Bone Dis. Relat. Res. 3, 123-129[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Steingrimsson, E., Moore, K. J., Lamoreux, M. L., Rerre-D'Amare, A. R., Burley, S. K., Zimring, D. C. S., Skow, L. C., Hodgkinson, C. A., Arnheiter, H., Copeland, N. G., and Jenkins, N. A. (1994) Nat. Genet. 8, 256-263[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Jiang, Y., Gram, H., Zhao, M., New, L., Gu, J., Feng, L., Padova, F. D., Ulevitch, R. J., and Han, J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 30122-30128[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Zhao, M., New, L., Kravchenko, V. V., Kato, Y., Gram, H., Padova, F. D., Olson, E. N., Ulevitch, R. J., and Han, J. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 21-30[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Han, J., Lee, J.-D., Jiang, Y., Li, Z., Feng, L., and Ulevitch, R. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2886-2891[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Rehli, M., Elzen, N. D., Cassady, A. I., Ostrowski, M. C., and Hume, D. A. (1999) Genomics 56, 111-120[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Hemesath, T. J., Price, E. R., Takemoto, C., Badalian, T., and Fisher, D. E. (1998) Nature 391, 298-301[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Weilbaecher, K. N., Motyckova, G., Huber, W. E., Takemoto, C. M., Hemesath, T. J., Xu, Y., Hershey, C. L., Dowland, N. R., Wells, A. G., and Fisher, D. E. (2001) Mol. Cell 8, 749-758[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Raingeaud, J., Whitmarsh, A. J., Barrett, T., Derijard, B., and Davis, R. J. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 1247-1255[Abstract]
33. Han, J., Lee, J. D., Bibbs, L., and Ulevitch, R. J. (1994) Science 265, 808-811[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Han, J., Lee, J.-D., Jiang, Y., Li, Z., Feng, L., and Ulevitch, R. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 17920-17926[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Li, Z., Jiang, Y., Ulevitch, R. J., and Han, J. (1996) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 228, 334-340[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Kumar, S., M. S., J., Adams, J. L., and Lee, J. C. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 263, 825-831[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Galibert, L., Tometsko, M. E., Anderson, D., Cosman, D., and Dougall, W. C. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 34120-34127[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Hsu, H., Lacey, D. L., Dunstan, C. R., Solovyev, I., Colombero, A., Timms, E., Tan, H.-L., Elliott, G., Kelley, M. J., Sarosi, I., Wang, L., Xia, X.-Z., Elliot, R., Chiu, L., Black, T., Scully, S., Capparelli, C., Morony, S., Shimamoto, G., Bass, M. B., and Boyle, W. J. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 7829-7834[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Obata, T., Brown, G. E., and Yaffe, M. B. (2000) Crit. Care Med. 28, N67-N77[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Zetser, A., Gredinger, E., and Bengal, E. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 5193-5200[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Wu, Z., Woodring, P. J., Bhakta, K. S., Tamura, K., Wen, F., Feramisco, J. R., Karin, M., Wang, J. Y. J., and Puri, P. L. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 3951-3964[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Yang, S.-H., Galanis, A., and Sharrocks, A. D. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 4028-4038[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Qui, M. S., and Green, S. H. (1992) Neuron 9, 705-717[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Luchin, A., Suchting, S., Merson, T., Rosol, T. J., Hume, D. A., Cassady, A. I., and Ostrowski, M. C. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 36703-36710[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. McKinsey, T., Zhang, C.-L., Lu, J., and Olson, E. N. (2000) Nature 408, 106-111[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Liu, S. Wang, P. Zhang, N. Said-Al-Naief, S. M. Michalek, and X. Feng
Molecular Mechanism of the Bifunctional Role of Lipopolysaccharide in Osteoclastogenesis
J. Biol. Chem., May 1, 2009; 284(18): 12512 - 12523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
R. Hu, S. M. Sharma, A. Bronisz, R. Srinivasan, U. Sankar, and M. C. Ostrowski
Eos, MITF, and PU.1 Recruit Corepressors to Osteoclast-Specific Genes in Committed Myeloid Progenitors
Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 2007; 27(11): 4018 - 4027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. M. Sharma, A. Bronisz, R. Hu, K. Patel, K. C. Mansky, S. Sif, and M. C. Ostrowski
MITF and PU.1 Recruit p38 MAPK and NFATc1 to Target Genes during Osteoclast Differentiation
J. Biol. Chem., May 25, 2007; 282(21): 15921 - 15929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. Kim, J. Lee, J. H. Kim, H. M. Jin, B. Zhou, S. Y. Lee, and N. Kim
Protein Inhibitor of Activated STAT 3 Modulates Osteoclastogenesis by Down-Regulation of NFATc1 and Osteoclast-Associated Receptor
J. Immunol., May 1, 2007; 178(9): 5588 - 5594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
K. Kim, J. H. Kim, J. Lee, H. M. Jin, H. Kook, K. K. Kim, S. Y. Lee, and N. Kim
MafB negatively regulates RANKL-mediated osteoclast differentiation
Blood, April 15, 2007; 109(8): 3253 - 3259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. A. Meadows, S. M. Sharma, G. J. Faulkner, M. C. Ostrowski, D. A. Hume, and A. I. Cassady
The Expression of Clcn7 and Ostm1 in Osteoclasts Is Coregulated by Microphthalmia Transcription Factor
J. Biol. Chem., January 19, 2007; 282(3): 1891 - 1904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
A. Bronisz, S. M. Sharma, R. Hu, J. Godlewski, G. Tzivion, K. C. Mansky, and M. C. Ostrowski
Microphthalmia-associated Transcription Factor Interactions with 14-3-3 Modulate Differentiation of Committed Myeloid Precursors
Mol. Biol. Cell, September 1, 2006; 17(9): 3897 - 3906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
L. Chin, L. A. Garraway, and D. E. Fisher
Malignant melanoma: genetics and therapeutics in the genomic era.
Genes & Dev., August 15, 2006; 20(16): 2149 - 2182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I. L. de la Serna, Y. Ohkawa, C. Higashi, C. Dutta, J. Osias, N. Kommajosyula, T. Tachibana, and A. N. Imbalzano
The Microphthalmia-associated Transcription Factor Requires SWI/SNF Enzymes to Activate Melanocyte-specific Genes
J. Biol. Chem., July 21, 2006; 281(29): 20233 - 20241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
G. Mbalaviele, G. Anderson, A. Jones, P. De Ciechi, S. Settle, S. Mnich, M. Thiede, Y. Abu-Amer, J. Portanova, and J. Monahan
Inhibition of p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Prevents Inflammatory Bone Destruction
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2006; 317(3): 1044 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. Lee, K. Kim, J. H. Kim, H. M. Jin, H. K. Choi, S.-H. Lee, H. Kook, K. K. Kim, Y. Yokota, S. Y. Lee, et al.
Id helix-loop-helix proteins negatively regulate TRANCE-mediated osteoclast differentiation
Blood, April 1, 2006; 107(7): 2686 - 2693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Xu, S. Wang, W. Liu, J. Liu, and X. Feng
A Novel Receptor Activator of NF-{kappa}B (RANK) Cytoplasmic Motif Plays an Essential Role in Osteoclastogenesis by Committing Macrophages to the Osteoclast Lineage
J. Biol. Chem., February 24, 2006; 281(8): 4678 - 4690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. Goding and F. L. Meyskens Jr.
Microphthalmic-Associated Transcription Factor Integrates Melanocyte Biology and Melanoma Progression
Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2006; 12(4): 1069 - 1073.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. M. Molina, S. Grewal, and L. Bardwell
Characterization of an ERK-binding Domain in Microphthalmia-associated Transcription Factor and Differential Inhibition of ERK2-mediated Substrate Phosphorylation
J. Biol. Chem., December 23, 2005; 280(51): 42051 - 42060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Kim, J. H. Kim, J. Lee, H.-M. Jin, S.-H. Lee, D. E. Fisher, H. Kook, K. K. Kim, Y. Choi, and N. Kim
Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cells c1 Induces Osteoclast-associated Receptor Gene Expression during Tumor Necrosis Factor-related Activation-induced Cytokine-mediated Osteoclastogenesis
J. Biol. Chem., October 21, 2005; 280(42): 35209 - 35216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. J. Miller, C. Levy, I. J. Davis, E. Razin, and D. E. Fisher
Sumoylation of MITF and Its Related Family Members TFE3 and TFEB
J. Biol. Chem., January 7, 2005; 280(1): 146 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. Liu, D. Xu, H. Yang, H. Xu, Z. Shi, X. Cao, S. Takeshita, J. Liu, M. Teale, and X. Feng
Functional Identification of Three Receptor Activator of NF-{kappa}B Cytoplasmic Motifs Mediating Osteoclast Differentiation and Function
J. Biol. Chem., December 24, 2004; 279(52): 54759 - 54769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Corre, A. Primot, E. Sviderskaya, D. C. Bennett, S. Vaulont, C. R. Goding, and M.-D. Galibert
UV-induced Expression of Key Component of the Tanning Process, the POMC and MC1R Genes, Is Dependent on the p-38-activated Upstream Stimulating Factor-1 (USF-1)
J. Biol. Chem., December 3, 2004; 279(49): 51226 - 51233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Matsumoto, M. Kogawa, S. Wada, H. Takayanagi, M. Tsujimoto, S. Katayama, K. Hisatake, and Y. Nogi
Essential Role of p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase in Cathepsin K Gene Expression during Osteoclastogenesis through Association of NFATc1 and PU.1
J. Biol. Chem., October 29, 2004; 279(44): 45969 - 45979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. So, J. Rho, D. Jeong, R. Park, D. E. Fisher, M. C. Ostrowski, Y. Choi, and N. Kim
Microphthalmia Transcription Factor and PU.1 Synergistically Induce the Leukocyte Receptor Osteoclast-associated Receptor Gene Expression
J. Biol. Chem., June 20, 2003; 278(26): 24209 - 24216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Liu, Z. Shi, A. Silveira, J. Liu, M. Sawadogo, H. Yang, and X. Feng
Involvement of Upstream Stimulatory Factors 1 and 2 in RANKL-induced Transcription of Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase Gene during Osteoclast Differentiation
J. Biol. Chem., May 30, 2003; 278(23): 20603 - 20611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P.-W. Tsai, S.-G. Shiah, M.-T. Lin, C.-W. Wu, and M.-L. Kuo
Up-regulation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C in Breast Cancer Cells by Heregulin-beta 1. A CRITICAL ROLE OF p38/NUCLEAR FACTOR-kappa B SIGNALING PATHWAY
J. Biol. Chem., February 14, 2003; 278(8): 5750 - 5759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/13/11077    most recent
M111696200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mansky, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ostrowski, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mansky, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ostrowski, M. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement