|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M111099200 on January 15, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 13, 11208-11216, March 29, 2002
Cupiennin 1, a New Family of Highly Basic Antimicrobial
Peptides in the Venom of the Spider Cupiennius salei
(Ctenidae)*
Lucia
Kuhn-Nentwig §,
Jürg
Müller ,
Johann
Schaller¶,
Alfred
Walz ,
Margitta
Dathe**, and
Wolfgang
Nentwig
From the Zoological Institute, University of
Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland, ¶ Department of
Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Bern, Freiestrasse 3, CH-3012
Bern, Switzerland, Theodor Kocher Institute, University of Bern,
Freiestrasse 1, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland, and ** Institute
of Molecular Pharmacology, Campus Berlin-Buch, Robert
Rössle-Strasse 10, D-13125 Berlin, Germany
Received for publication, November 20, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
A new family of antimicrobial peptides was
isolated from the venom of Cupiennius salei. The peptides
were purified to homogeneity, and the sequence of cupiennin 1a was
determined by Edman degradation: GFGALFKFLAKKVAKTVAKQAAKQGAKYVVNKQME-NH2. The amino acid
sequences of cupiennin 1b, c, and d were obtained by a combination of
sequence analysis and mass spectrometric measurements of comparative
tryptic peptide mapping. All peptides consist of 35 amino acid residues and are characterized by a more hydrophobic N-terminal chain region and
a C terminus composed preferentially of polar and charged residues. The
total charge of all cupiennins calculated under physiological
conditions is +8, and their C terminus, formed by a glutamic acid
residue, is amidated. Conformational studies of the peptides revealed a
high helix forming potential. Antimicrobial assays on bacteria with
cupiennin 1a, 1d, and synthesized cupiennins 1a* and 1d* showed minimal
inhibitory concentrations for bacteria in the submicromolar range.
Their lytic effect on human red blood cells was lower by a factor of 8 to 14 than the highly hemolytic melittin. Cupiennin 1a, 1b, 1d, 1a*,
and 1d* showed pronounced insecticidal activity. The immediate
biological effects and the structural properties of the isolated
cupiennins indicate a membrane-destroying mode of action on prokaryotic
as well as eukaryotic cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Antimicrobial peptides are ubiquitous in nature as a part of the
innate immune system and host defense mechanism. They are produced by
various species, both in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells (for reviews,
see Refs. 1-5). Many of these peptides act within minutes by a
cell-lytic/ionophoric, nonstereoselective mechanism against a
broad spectrum of bacteria (6), protozoa (7, 8), filamentous fungi (9,
10), tumor cells (11), and enveloped viruses (12). Additional
mechanisms to kill bacteria by acting stereospecifically on molecular
targets have been described (13-15).1
As a selective response to microbial invasion, several antimicrobial
peptides have been identified in the hemolymph (e.g. hemocytes) of insects (16), spiders (17), and scorpions (18). Only a
few antimicrobial peptides are exclusively and constitutively present
in the venom glands of insects, namely melittin (19) and crabolin (20),
and in scorpions, hadrurin (21) and scorpine (22). In 1989 the first
report on bactericidal peptides in spider venom (Lycosa
singoriensis) was published (23); later, lycotoxins were isolated
from Lycosa carolinensis (24).
Spiders are hunting predators and use paralytic venoms to immobilize
their prey. Most components in their venoms act on the nervous system
and are enzymatically active causing cell membrane disruption and
tissue necrosis. The venom of Cupiennius salei, a hunting
spider found in Central America, yielded both neurotoxically active
peptides (named CSTX-1 to CSTX-13) (25) and bactericidal peptides (26).
To differentiate between the two groups of peptides, we named the
family of antimicrobial compounds cupiennins.
Here, the purification of the cupiennin family 1 composed of four
very similar peptides, named cupiennin 1a, 1b, 1c and 1d, is reported.
Cupiennin 1a is identical with peptide 8, and cupiennin 1d is identical
with peptide 7 in Ref. 26. Sequence analysis of the highly cationic
peptides and helix projection revealed a unique structure distinctly
different from that of other potentially helical cationic peptides
isolated so far. The highly antimicrobial, hemolytic, and insecticidal
activity and the structural properties indicate a membrane-disturbing
function of the cupiennins on prokaryotic as well eukaryotic cells.
These peptides may provide a powerful tool in analyzing the structural
prerequisites of antimicrobial selectivity and general cytolytic
membrane action. In the light of the massive increase of
multi-drug-resistant bacterial infections, further structural
investigations of cupiennins may prove helpful in the development of
new antimicrobial peptide pharmaceutics.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Chemicals--
Trifluoroacetic acid (for protein
sequencing), TFE,2 and
acetonitrile (LiChrosolv® for chromatography) were purchased from Merck. Melittin (amidated) was purchased from Tocris (Anawa Trading SA,
Zürich, Switzerland) and magainin 2 (not amidated) from Sigma.
Isolation of Toxins--
C. salei (Ctenidae) spider
maintenance, venom collection by an electrical milking procedure,
separation of venom by gel filtration, cationic exchange
chromatography, and reversed-phase HPLC were performed as described
previously (25). Briefly, 450 µl of crude venom was fractionated into
nine 50-µl aliquots and diluted with 150 µl of 200 mM
ammonium acetate buffer, pH 5.5 (buffer A). The diluted venom was
separated on a Superdex 75 HR 10/30 column (Amersham Biosciences. Inc.)
in buffer A, and fractions were collected as noted on the chromatogram
(see Fig. 1A). Further separation of the pooled fractions
was achieved by cationic exchange on a Mono S HR 10/10 column (Amersham
Biosciences. Inc.) in buffer A. Elution was done with a salt gradient
(2 M NaCl in buffer A, pH 5.5) as shown in Fig.
1B. Similar fractions from four chromatographies were
combined. The pooled fractions were further desalted and separated by
RP-HPLC on a nucleosil 300-5 C4 column (4.6 × 250 mm,
Macherey & Nagel) using 100% solvent A with a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min for 0-15 min followed by a first 10-min gradient of 1% solvent
B in A/min and a second 120-min gradient of 0.4% solvent B in A/min
(solvent A, 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water; solvent B, 0.1%
trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile (not shown)). After each step of
purification the fractions were tested for their antimicrobial activity
by a plate growth assay as described previously (26). Further
purification was achieved by RP-HPLC on a nucleosil 120-5 C18 column (4 × 250 mm, Macherey & Nagel)
equilibrated with 22% solvent B in solvent A and a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. Ten minutes after injection of the sample the first gradient
(22-40% solvent B) was started for 115 min followed by a second
10-min gradient (40-100% solvent B). The peptide fractions obtained
were pooled (Fig. 1C) and purified in a final RP-HPLC step
on a nucleosil 100-5 C8 HD column (4 × 250 mm,
Macherey & Nagel) with constant 36% solvent B and a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min (Fig. 1D). This step was repeated three to five times
to obtain homogeneous peptides. The purity of these peptides was
confirmed by ESI-MS and amino acid analyses.
Enzymatic Cleavages--
10 µg of cupiennin 1a were incubated
with 1 µg of chymotrypsin (sequencing grade, Roche
Diagnostics) in 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM
CaCl2, pH 7.5, for 4 h at 25 °C. Separation of the
chymotryptic peptides was achieved with RP-HPLC on a 120-5
C18 column (2 × 125 mm, Macherey & Nagel)
equilibrated with 100% solvent A. Ten minutes after injection of the
sample, a 250-min gradient of 0.2% solvent B in solvent A/min
was started. Comparative digestions of 5 µg of purified cupiennin 1a,
1a*, 1b, 1c, and 1d with 0.5 µg of trypsin (sequencing grade, Roche
Diagnostics) were carried out in 100 mM ammonium hydrogen
carbonate buffer at pH 8.0 for 4 h at 25 °C. Separation of the
tryptic peptides was obtained under isocratic conditions with RP-HPLC
on a 120-5 C18 column (2 × 125 mm, Macherey & Nagel)
equilibrated with 100% solvent A. A second run was started and after
10 min followed by a 120-min gradient of 0.23% solvent B in A/min.
Solvent A: 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water, solvent B: 0.1%
trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile (Fig. 3, A and
B). Mass analysis of the digested samples and of the
isolated peptides was performed on ESI-MS.
Amino Acid Analysis--
Samples were hydrolyzed in the gas
phase with 6 M hydrochloric acid containing 0.1% (by
volume) phenol for 24 h at 115 °C under N2 vacuum
(27). The liberated amino acids were labeled with phenylisothiocyanate
and the resulting phenylthiocarbamoyl amino acids analyzed by RP-HPLC
on a Nova Pak ODS column (3.9 × 150 mm, 4 µm; Waters) in
a Hewlett Packard liquid chromatograph 1090 with an automatic injection
system (28).
Amino Acid Sequence Analysis--
N-terminal sequence analysis
was carried out either in a Procise cLC 492 protein sequencer or in a
pulsed-liquid-phase sequencer 477A, both from Applied Biosystems. The
released amino acids were analyzed on-line by RP-HPLC according to
instructions from Applied Biosystems.
ESI-MS--
The molecular mass of isolated cupiennins and
proteolytic peptides was determined using electrospray ionization mass
spectrometry on a single-stage quadrupole instrument (VG Platform,
Micromass, Manchester, UK) calibrated with horse myoglobin in a mass
range of 600-2000 m/z. Peptides from enzymatic
cleavages represent monoisotopic masses, and native cupiennins
represent average masses.
Synthesis of Peptides--
Solid-phase peptide synthesis was
performed on a Millipore 9050 continuous flow peptide synthesizer
(Millipore Corp.) using Fmoc
(N-(9-fluorenyl)methoxycarbonyl) chemistry. Cleavage and deprotection was carried out in 88% trifluoroacetic acid, 5%
liquefied phenol, 2% triisopropylsilane, and 5% water for 1-2 h at
room temperature. The free peptide was then repeatedly precipitated with ice-cold ether and dried under vacuum. After resuspension in 10%
acetic acid, the peptides were purified by preparative RP-HPLC on a
C18 column (25 × 100 mm, 15 µm, 300Å, Delta-Pak, Waters, Millipore Corp.), which was eluted at 5 ml/min with a gradient
of 0-60% acetonitrile in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid at an increment
of 1.3%/min. Peak fractions were repurified on a semi-preparative
C18 column (10 × 250 mm, 7 µm, 300Å, Vydac,
Holland, MI). Purity and protein composition were analyzed by ESI-MS,
amino acid analysis, and N-terminal sequence analysis.
Circular Dichroism--
Stock solutions of the peptides were
prepared by dissolving the samples in 5 mM sodium phosphate
buffer at pH 7.25 containing 150 mM NaF. For CD
measurements, aliquots of the solution were diluted with buffer or
mixed with TFE to give a final concentration of 50 µM and
the desired solvent composition. Measurements were carried out on a
J-720 spectrometer in 0.1-cm cells between 195 and 260 nm at room
temperature (Jasco). Each spectrum was the average of five
scans. The base line was subtracted. The helicity ( ) of cupiennin
1a, 1a*, and 1d* was determined from the mean residue ellipticity at
222 nm ( 222), according to the equation: (%) = ( 222 + 2340) × 100%/ 30300 (29).
Antimicrobial Assays--
Bacteria (Escherichia coli
ATCC 25922; Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213;
Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, Pseudomonas
aeruginosa ATCC 27853) were cultured in Mueller-Hinton broth.
Determination of the minimal inhibitory concentration for the cationic
antimicrobial peptides was performed using a 2-fold microtiter broth
dilution assay (30). Mueller-Hinton broth was used to dilute the
bacterial inoculum, which was prepared from mid-log phase cultures to
give a final concentration of 1.7- 3.8 × 105
colony-forming units/ml in the wells. First, 100 µl of the bacteria dilution was added to the wells followed by 10 µl of the test peptides in 0.01% acetic acid, 0.2% bovine serum albumin. The peptides (0.04-100 µM), a nontreated growth control, and
a sterility control were tested in triplicate. The microtiter plates
were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The content of the first four
wells showing no visible growth of bacteria (measured as an increase of
optical density at 630 nm) were plated out on blood agar plates and
incubated at 37 °C for 18 h. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) are expressed as intervals of concentrations, [a] [b], where [a] is the highest concentration of peptide at which bacteria still grow and [b] the lowest concentration causing 100% growth inhibition (no colony forming bacteria estimated after additional plating of 91% of the tested bacteria suspension).
Hemolytic Assay--
The hemolytic activity of cupiennin 1a,
1a*, 1b, 1d, 1d*, magainin 2, and melittin was determined using fresh
human erythrocytes. 1 ml of citrated blood was washed four times with 6 ml of PBS buffer (50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.2) and centrifuged (900 × g)
for 6 min at room temperature. The pellet was resuspended in 3 ml and
further diluted to a concentration of 1 × 109 human
erythrocytes/ml in PBS buffer. Lyophilized peptides in various
concentrations were resolved in 200 µl of PBS buffer, and 50 µl of
human erythrocytes were added following incubation under gentle shaking
at 37 °C for 1 h. The samples were then placed on ice and
immediately centrifuged at 4 °C. The supernatant was carefully
removed, and the pellet was resuspended in 240 µl of water. Release
of hemoglobin was monitored by measuring the absorbance of supernatant
and water-treated pellet at 541 nm in a 1-cm cell (Jasco V-550).
The negative control (0% hemolysis) was 50 µl of human erythrocytes
in 200 µl of PBS buffer, and the positive control (100% hemolysis)
was 50 µl of human erythrocytes in 200 µl of water. The
concentrations of peptide at which 50% hemolysis was observed
(EC50) were derived using a sigmoidal curve fitting
software (GraphPad Prism 3.0, Graph Pad Software).
Bioassays--
Bioassays using Drosophila
melanogaster according to Escoubas et al. (31) were
performed to estimate the LD50 (24 h postinjection) of the
peptides. For each assay 20 flies were used as control (injecting 0.05 µl of insect ringer) and 20 for each of the three peptide
concentrations. LD50 stands for the lethal dose (50% of the test flies die of intoxication) and calculations were done as
described elsewhere (32).
 |
RESULTS |
Purification of Cupiennins--
450 µl of venom was separated in
a five-step protocol that included gel filtration (Fig.
1A), cationic exchange
chromatography (Fig. 1B), and successive reversed-phase-HPLC
on a nucleosil 300-5 C4 column (not shown), a nucleosil
120-5 C18 column (Fig. 1C) and a nucleosil 100-5 C8 column (Fig. 1D). The retention times of the
purified antimicrobial peptides ranged from 18.35 min for cupiennin 1d
to 20.12 min for cupiennin 1a. The retention profiles revealed no other
impurities. The purity of the peptides obtained was additionally
examined by ESI-MS, N-terminal sequence analysis, and amino acid
composition. The yield of cupiennin 1a (ESI-MS 3798.63 ± 0.51 Da,
theoretically 3798.59 Da) was 4.7 µg/µl fractionated venom. This
implies that the toxin concentration is 1.2 mM in crude
venom. Cupiennin 1b (ESI-MS 3800.25 ± 0.28 Da, theoretically 3800.57 Da) occurred in the venom at a concentration of 0.4 µg/µl. Because of very similar retention times, the last RP-HPLC purification step had to be repeated several times for cupiennin 1c (ESI-MS 3769.75 ± 0.50 Da, theoretically 3770.48 Da) and cupiennin 1d (ESI-MS 3795.13 ± 0.79 Da, theoretically 3795.55 Da). However, the procedure was accompanied by a substantial loss of peptides. The
amounts of cupiennin 1c and 1d yielded were 0.02 and 0.1 µg/µl crude venom, respectively. The purification procedure was impeded by
methionine oxidation at position 34 in cupiennin 1a, 1b, and 1d. As a
result, the sulfoxide containing cupiennins eluted directly prior to
the nonoxidated peptides (Fig. 1D, peaks are labeled with
arrows) as small peaks and were identified by ESI-MS (for cupiennin 1a: ESI-MS 3814.50 ± 0.35 Da, theoretically 3814.59 Da)
and, additionally, amino acid analyses (not shown). Amino acid and
sequence analysis of the C-terminal tryptic peptide 33-35 of
sulfoxidated cupiennin 1a (ESI-MS 421.28 Da, theoretically 421.09 Da)
thus also confirmed the presence of methionine sulfoxide at position
34. The oxidation of methionine is a well known artifact during the
repeated purification cycles on RP-HPLC.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Isolation of cupiennins from the venom of the
spider C. salei. A, crude venom was
first separated by gel filtration on a Superdex 75 column, and the
obtained antimicrobial fractions were pooled. B, further
separation of the pooled fraction was achieved by cationic exchange on
a Mono S HR column. C, using RP-HPLC on a nucleosil 120-5 C18 column, the cupiennins were isolated as a broad peak.
D, in a last purification step using RP-HPLC on a nucleosil
100-5 C8 HD column cupiennin 1a, b, c, and d (1 nmol) were
isolated as described under "Experimental Procedures." Synthesized
cupiennin 1a* (1 nmol, not amidated) differed only slightly in
retention time. The arrows show small peaks of Met-34
sulfoxidated cupiennins. Absorbance was measured in milli-absorbance
units. RT, retention time.
|
|
Sequence Analysis of Cupiennin 1a--
Sequence analysis of
cupiennin 1a ceased at position 34. To obtain the rest of the sequence,
cupiennin 1a was cleaved with chymotrypsin and the peptides generated
were separated by RP-HPLC on a nucleosil 120-5 C18 column
(not shown). The five peaks received were identified by ESI-MS, and the
C-terminal peptide (residues 29-35; ESI-MS 845.40 Da, theoretically
846.43 Da) was sequenced. It is noteworthy that glutamic acid was
identified as the C-terminal amino acid (Fig.
2A). Because of the observed
molecular mass difference of 1 Da between the theoretical and measured
mass of the chymotryptic C-terminal fragment, an amidation of glutamic
acid was supposed. Cupiennin 1a* (*, acidic C terminus) was therefore
synthesized to confirm the assumed posttranslational amidation in
cupiennin 1a. After purification, cupiennin 1a* (ESI-MS 3799.38 ± 0.39 Da, theoretically 3799.58 Da) eluted as a single sharp peak after RP-HPLC on an analytical nucleosil 120-5 C8 HD column. The
retention time differed slightly from the retention time of cupiennin
1a (Fig. 1D), also indicating the assumed chemical
modification. The correct sequence of cupiennin 1a* was further
confirmed by amino acid analysis, ESI-MS, and Edman degradation (not
shown). The determined amino acid sequence of cupiennin 1a and 1a*
agree well with the results of the amino acid composition analyses
(Table I).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Amino acid sequences of cupiennins from the
venom of the spider C. salei. A, amino
acid sequence of cupiennin 1a acquired by sequence analysis until
position Met-34 and the chymotryptic peptide 29-35. B,
overview of amino acid sequences of cupiennin 1a*, 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d, and
1d* deduced from a combination of tryptic peptide mapping and sequence
analysis of nonidentical tryptic peptides.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Amino acid analyses of natural and synthesized (*) cupiennins
The amino acid composition of cupiennin 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d from
C. salei venom purified by RP-HPLC and synthesized cupiennin
1a* and 1d*. The values in parentheses are those calculated from the
amino acid sequence. ND, not determined.
|
|
Sequence Analysis of Cupiennin 1b, 1c, and 1d--
Comparative
amino acid analysis of cupiennin 1a, 1a*, 1b, 1c, and 1d (Table
I) revealed only slight differences in the content of Ala, Ser,
Glx, Ile, Val, His, Thr, and Met. Therefore the amino acid sequence
determination of cupiennin 1b, 1c, and 1d was performed by comparative
tryptic peptide mapping. Peptide separation was carried out by RP-HPLC
(Fig. 3, A and B),
and the peptides obtained were then identified by ESI-MS. The tryptic
peptides of cupiennin 1a and 1a* are identical (Table
II) except for the C-terminal peptides,
which are amidated in the case of cupiennin 1a, as indicated by the
mass difference of 0.85 Da (ESI-MS). Cupiennin 1b differs from
cupiennin 1a: 1) in the N-terminal peptide 1-7, where Ala-4 is
exchanged with Ser; and 2) in the peptide sequence 28-32, where Val-29
and Val-30 are replaced by Ile-29 and Ala-30. However, cupiennin 1c and
1d also show the single replacement of Ser at position 4 in peptide
1-7. The sequence 28-32 of cupiennin 1c is identical to fragment
28-32 of cupiennin 1b (Val-29 and Val-30 substituted by Ile-29 and
Ala-30), but in addition Met-34 is replaced by Thr in the C-terminal
peptide 33-35. Cupiennin 1d differs in the C-terminal region from
cupiennin 1a in fragment 28-32, where Val-30 is replaced by Ala, and
in fragment 33-35, where Gln-33 is exchanged with His (Fig.
2B). The sequences of all tryptic peptides that differed
from cupiennin 1a fragments were later determined by Edman degradation
(Table II). The deduced amino acid sequences of cupiennin 1b, 1c, and
1d (Fig. 2B) are in good agreement with the results of the
amino acid analyses (Table I). For further studies a cupiennin 1d
analogue with Gln was synthesized as nonamidated C terminus
(cupiennin 1d*). The correct sequence of cupiennin 1d* was also
confirmed by amino acid analysis (Table I) and ESI-MS (ESI-MS
3794.90 ± 0.44 Da, theoretically 3795.55 Da).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Tryptic peptide mapping of cupiennins
from the venom of the spider C. salei.
A, after digestion of cupiennin 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d (5 µg)
with trypsin (0.5 µg), peptides were fractionated isocratically
(0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water) on a nucleosil 120-5 C18 column. B, in a second stage, further
separation was obtained using a linear gradient (0.23%
acetonitrile/min) as described under "Experimental Procedures." The
separated peptides (F) were identified by ESI-MS
(monoisotopic masses, Da) and compared with peptides of cupiennin 1a.
Nonidentical peptides (F*) were sequenced by Edman
degradation.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Tryptic peptide mapping of cupiennin 1a*, 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d and
identification by ESI-MS
Cupiennins were incubated with trypsin (10:1) for 4 h at 25 °C.
Tryptic peptides were isolated by RP-HPLC (Fig. 3), the molecular mass
measured by ESI-MS, and the amino acid sequence determined by Edman
degradation. The numbers in parentheses are theoretical values
(monoisotopic, Da). The replacement of the amino acids in cupiennin 1b,
1c, and 1d is mentioned in the legend for Fig. 2. *, not amidated.
|
|
General Structural Features--
Cupiennin 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d are
linear peptides consisting of 35 amino acid residues. The C terminus is
amidated, and the net positive charge is at least + 8 at neutral pH
(Fig. 2B). The theoretical isoelectric point is 11.30 for
all peptides, not taking the C-terminal amidation into account. The
N-terminal part of the sequences (Gly-Phe-Gly-Ala/Ser-Leu-Phe) is
somewhat hydrophobic, whereas polar amino acid residues predominate in
the C-terminal region. All cupiennins are characterized by six repeats
of four amino acids, which form the central part of the peptide chain, following the N-terminal hydrophobic stretch with lysine at every first
position in their central part. These six repeats are defined by the
following sequence: position 1 is always lysine; position 2 is variable
(hydrophobic, charged, or polar amino acid); position 3 is always a
hydrophobic amino acid (Leu, Val, Ala, Ile) or Gly; and in position 4 is Ala or Val (Fig. 2B). Based on the consensus scale of
hydrophobicity for the individual amino acid residues of Eisenberg (33)
the mean hydrophobicity (H) of the cupiennins was found to range
between 0.138 and 0.168. Assuming an -helical conformation,
their hydrophobic moment (µ) was determined to vary between 0.0121 and 0.0282 (Fig. 4A, Table
III). These parameters differ distinctly from H and µ values
characterizing other antimicrobial peptides such as lycotoxins (24)
isolated from spider venom, melittin (34) from bee venom, and
magainin 2 (35) found in frog skin.
However, the mean hydrophobicity as well as the hydrophobic moment of
the cupiennins are distinctly lower than the H and µ of melittin
(H = 0.086, µ = 0.2244), magainin 2 (H = 0.036, µ = 0.2861), and lycotoxin I (H = 0.083, µ = 0.0681) (Table III). The angle subtended by polar residues ( )
describing the hydrophilic helix surface is at 220° unambiguously
greater than the polar face of most other helical antimicrobial
peptides (Fig. 4A). The amphipathic motif becomes obvious in
the helix net projection. The surface of the cupiennin helix is
characterized by a right-handed ribbon of positively charged (lysine)
side groups and polar amino acids winding around the -helix
(Fig. 4B).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
-Helical wheel projection of
the cupiennin sequences and net projection of cupiennin 1a.
A, gray circles correspond to residues
with positively charged side chains. Polar amino acids are marked with
interrupted circles. denotes the angle
subtended by the hydrophilic helix face. B, net projection
of cupiennin 1a; the helix coat is cut open and projects on the plane
surface. A spiral-shaped ribbon consisting of lysine
residues (gray circles) and polar groups (interrupted
circles) connects the hydrophobic N-terminal with the more polar
C-terminal region.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Structural properties of cupiennins and other antimicrobial peptides
The net charge of the peptides was calculated under the assumption that
under physiological conditions Lys, Arg, and the N-terminal NH2
are positively charged, and Glu and the C-terminal COOH are negatively
charged. The His residues were calculated as not charged. H and µ were calculated on the basis of the Eisenberg consensus scale of
hydrophobicity (33). The percentage of helicity ( ) in sodium
phosphate buffer/TFE = 1:1 (v/v) of the peptides was determined
from the molar ellipticity at 222 nm according to Chen (29). ND, not
determined; *, not amidated.
|
|
Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy--
The CD spectra of the
peptides were recorded in sodium phosphate buffer and exhibit an
unordered peptide structure (Fig.
5a). The addition of TFE
induced pronounced spectral changes (Fig. 5, b and
c). The negative bands at 207 and 222 nm and the positive ellipticity below 200 nm are characteristic of an -helical
conformation. Therefore all peptides were found to be completely
helical in the TFE/buffer (1/1 v/v) mixture (Fig. 5). Following Lehrman
et al. (36), who suggested that TFE-induced helicity of
peptides is a measure of their helix propensity, we take the high of the investigated cupiennins as an indication of their very high capacity to assume a helical conformation (Table III).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
CD spectra of cupiennin 1a, 1a*, and
1d*. a, CD characteristics of cupiennin 1a (C = 5 × 10 5 M) in buffer (5 mM
sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium fluoride, pH 7.25) ( )
and in TFE/buffer mixtures: TFE , 30% by volume (····);
TFE, 50% by volume (- - -). b and c, CD
spectra of cupiennin 1a ( ), 1a* (····), and 1d*
(- - -) in TFE/buffer mixtures. [ ] is the mean residue
ellipticity.
|
|
Antibacterial Effects--
The cupiennins are highly active
against bacteria. Interestingly all four tested bacteria species were
susceptible to cupiennin 1a, 1a*, 1d, and 1d* in the nanomolar to
micromolar concentration range (Table
IV). No clear differences in the minimal
inhibitory concentrations were observed between the amidated natural or
C-terminal free synthesized cupiennins and E. coli
(0.31-0.63 µM; cupiennin 1a and 1a*) and E. faecalis (2.5-5.0 µM cupiennin 1a and 1a*; 1.25-2.5 µM cupiennin 1d and 1d*). The activity of
cupiennin 1a (more active) and cupiennin 1a* against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus and of cupiennin 1d and 1d*
against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus differed by
only one dilution step, whereas the bactericidal effect of cupiennin 1d
(more active) and 1d* against E. coli differed by two
dilution steps. Pronounced differences in the susceptibility of
Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria could not be found. E. faecalis exhibited the weakest susceptibility against the
cupiennins. Here, melittin was one dilution step more active. However,
in the same test system magainin 2 showed no growth inhibition of the
tested bacteria up to a concentration of 60 µM.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table IV
Antimicrobial activity of cupiennins (native and synthetic derived),
melittin, and magainin 2 against different bacteria species
|
|
Hemolytic Effects--
The half-maximal concentrations
(EC50) of the tested cupiennins to induce hemolysis were
found to range between 14.5 and 24.4 µM (Table
V). Compared with melittin
(EC50, 1.7 µM) lytic activity was reduced by
a factor of 8.5 for cupiennin 1d* and by a factor of 14.4 and 12.1 for
cupiennin 1a and cupiennin 1a*. At a concentration of 8 µM, cupiennin 1b induced 15% hemolysis and is thus about twice as active as cupiennin 1a and less effective than cupiennin 1d
(30%). Magainin 2 showed no hemolytic effect.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table V
Hemolytic and insecticidal activity of cupiennin 1a, 1a*, 1b, 1d, 1d*,
melittin, and magainin 2
Human erythrocytes were incubated with peptides for 1 h at
37 °C. Hemolysis (EC50) was determined as a percentage of
released hemoglobin by measuring the absorbance at 541 nm. Estimation
of the lethal dose (LD50), where 50% of the test flies die of
intoxication 24 h after injection, was done using bioassays on
D. melanogaster. Different amounts of peptides were
dissolved in insect ringer, and 0.05 µl was injected into the flies.
ND, not determined.
|
|
Insecticidal Effects--
We also investigated insecticidal
effects in a bioassay with D. melanogaster. Surprisingly,
cupiennin 1a, 1a*, 1b, 1d, and 1d* showed LD50
concentrations between 4.7 and 7.9 pmol/mg fly measured after 24 h
(Table V). Differences between the LD50 doses of the
synthesized cupiennins 1a* and 1d* and the natural forms were marginal.
Obviously, the neurotoxic effects are independent of C-terminal
amidation. In comparison with melittin (14.6 pmol/mg fly) the toxicity
of the cupiennins was 2.3-3.1 times higher, and compared with
magainin 2 (123.1 pmol/mg fly), it was 19.2-26.2 times higher (Table
V). Injection of peptides at sublethal doses paralyzed the flies in
most cases within the first 3 min. Dose-dependent recovery
from paralysis was observed within 1-6 h.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Cupiennins as Constitutive Components in Venom--
The venom
glands of C. salei store and secrete a highly active
hyaluronidase, neurotoxic/cytolytic peptides, and low molecular weight
substances such as histamine and taurine, which enable the spider to
paralyze its prey within a few seconds (25). In this process the single
components act synergistically. For example, hyaluronidase and
histamine accelerate the toxin transport into the tissue (spreading
factor). Similarly the toxicity of CSTX-1, the main neurotoxic peptide
in the venom of C. salei, is increased by histamine and
taurine (39). A comparable synergistic effect between various
neurotoxic peptides has also been described in Agelena
aperta venom (38). But what purpose do the cupiennins serve? We know that the concentration of cupiennin 1a (1.2 mM) in the crude venom of C. salei is in the
same range as CSTX-1 (1.4-3.3 mM) (25, 32). This is much
higher than the concentration of induced antimicrobial peptides (200 µM) found in the hemolymph of insects after injury (40).
We also know that C. salei has to use its venom very
economically (41, 42) because its complete regeneration takes more than
16 days (43). Both hints suggest that the cupiennins do not act
exclusively as antimicrobial agents (bactericidal concentration,
0.16-5 µM; [b] in Table IV) but also have an important
function as toxin synergists with additional neurotoxic
(LD50 for D. melanogaster, 84-115
µM; Table V) and cytolytic effects (hemolysis,
EC50 14.5-24.4 µM; Table V). Comparable antimicrobial lycotoxins from the venom of the spider L. carolinensis act in a neurotoxic mode of operation by dissipating
voltage gradients across insect muscle membranes and promoting
Ca2+ efflux from rat brain synaptosomes (24). It is
therefore tempting to speculate that the -helical melittin in the
venom of Apis mellifera (bactericidal concentration, 1.2-5
µM, [b] in Table IV; LD50 for D. melanogaster, 263 µM; hemolysis, EC50
1.7 µM in Table V), and the cupiennins of C. salei act in a general manner on a wide range of different cell
membranes. A common basis is their occurrence in the venom together
with hyaluronidase. Such venoms have the function of defending the host
against very different organisms or quickly paralyzing its victims.
This means that the direct neurotoxic effect of the cupiennins and the
synergism with other neurotoxic components such as CSTX-1 are the main
function of these peptides in spider
venom.3 Additionally, the
bactericidal effect of cupiennins protects the spider venom glands from
contamination with bacteria as discussed for lycotoxins (24) and for
hadrurin (21) from scorpion venoms.
Primary and Secondary Structure--
A comparison with other
-helical antimicrobial peptides in the SWISS-PROT sequence data base
(release 40.3 of November 16, 2001) and TrEMBL (release 18.3 of
November 16, 2001) revealed a fairly unique amino acid sequence for the
highly cationic peptides of the cupiennin 1 family. The sequence
identity (ALIGN, gene stream network server IGH Montpellier) (44)
between cupiennin 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d is very high (88.6-91.4%) (Fig.
2). Structural similarities with melittin were noticed in the
hydrophobic N terminus and the polar C terminus. The central part of
all cupiennins is formed by a remarkable 6-fold repeat of a
quadruplet comprising: 1) Lys, 2) variable (charged or polar or
hydrophobic), 3) hydrophobic or Gly, and 4) Ala or Val. Cupiennins were
found to share some structural similarities (a lysine motif in the
central part) with the antimicrobial toxins gaegurin 1, 2, 3, and 4 from the frog Rana rugosa (45) and with lycotoxins from the
spider L. carolinensis (24) (Fig.
6). However, gaegurin 3 shows only
34.2% identity with cupiennin 1a, 35.1% with cupiennin 1b/d, and
37.8% with cupiennin 1c. Lycotoxin I shares 31.4% identity with
cupiennin 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d, and the sequence of lycotoxin II is
28.6% identical with that of cupiennin 1a, 1b, and 1c, and 29.7%
identical with that of cupiennin 1d. Thus, the structural peculiarities
of cupiennins appear to be unique.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Sequence alignment of cupiennin 1a and 1d
compared with amino acid sequences of other antimicrobial
peptides. Lysine motifs are boxed, and identical
residues are shaded gray. Amino acid differences of
cupiennin 1a to cupiennin 1d and identities with other peptides are
shaded in dark gray. The asterisks (*) label
C-terminal amidation.
|
|
According to the secondary structure prediction method of
Garnier et al. (46), all cupiennins show a high
probability of forming an -helix. The enhanced helicity of cupiennin
1b, 1c, and 1d can be associated with the replacement of Val-29-Val-30 in cupiennin 1a by residues of higher helix propensity (Val-29 Ala-30 (cupiennin 1d); Ile-29 Ala-30 (cupiennin 1b and 1c)) (47). CD measurements in the presence of 30 and 50% structure-inducing TFE
confirm the high helix forming potential of the peptides.
Many antimicrobial and hemolytic peptides are able to form highly
amphipathic helices, and their structural motifs have been described as
effective modulators of activity (48). Thus, the magainin helix is
characterized by a polar face dominated by the cationic residues that
are spread over the whole peptide chain and a hydrophobic surface. H
and µ are moderate (Table III). In contrast to magainin, the melittin
helix is determined by the extensive hydrophobic N-terminal peptide
domain, whereas the C-terminal part of the helix cylinder is highly
cationic (48). The helical wheel projection of cupiennin 1a (Fig.
4A) did not show a distinct separation of polar and
hydrophobic surface domains. However, pronounced clustering became
obvious in the helix net projection (Fig. 4B). The surface
of the cupiennin helix is characterized by a charged spiral shaped
ribbon of at least six lysine residues and polar groups that connects
the more hydrophobic N-terminal with the polar C-terminal domain. This
spiral motif of lysine residues determining the helix surface of the
cupiennins is to our knowledge unique for antimicrobial peptides from arthropods.
Bactericidal and Hemolytic Activities--
A comparison of the MIC
values reported here with results obtained by other authors is rather
difficult, because different assay conditions (plate versus
liquid growth assay) and bacterial strains were used. For reasons of
standardization ATCC strains were used, and the MIC experiments were
performed as reported by Wu and Hancock (30). The minimal inhibitory
concentrations of the most active cationic antimicrobial peptides have
been reported to range between 0.25 and 4 µg/ml (2). The tested
cupiennins are highly active against both Gram-negative and
Gram-positive bacteria as shown by MICs ([a] in Table IV) between 0.3 µg/ml for cupiennin 1d against E. coli and up to 9.5 µg/ml for cupiennin 1a/1a* against E. faecalis. The MIC
range of cupiennins contains six dilution steps in contrast to three in
the case of melittin. This may indicate differences in the mode of
action. Studies of a variety of natural peptides and their chemically
modified analogs demonstrate that the cationic charge is essential for
recognition and accumulation on the negatively charged bacterial
membranes (2, 49, 50). With their high content of positively charged lysine residues, the cupiennins fulfill this prerequisite. To possess
antimicrobial activity, less hydrophobic peptides should have a well
developed hydrophobic domain providing the peptide with a highly
hydrophobic moment, whereas peptides with low amphipathicity may
display antimicrobial activity if they possess an appropriately high
intrinsic hydrophobicity. Interestingly, the H and µ values of
the cupiennins are rather low. Thus, either the hydrophobicity of the
N-terminal chain region (comparable with melittin) is sufficient to
induce membrane disruption, or the high activity is related to specific
structural transformations of membrane-bound peptides based on their
unique distribution of charged and hydrophobic residues.
A well developed amphipathic helix and high peptide hydrophobicity
mediate the hemolytic effect (37, 51, 52). The activity is determined
by hydrophobic interactions between the nonpolar amino acid residues
and the hydrophobic core of the lipid matrix of red blood cells (53).
The cupiennins are composed of 46-49% hydrophobic amino acids and
show high helicity in the presence of TFE, but structural motifs
favoring hydrophobic interactions such as high hydrophobicity and a
pronounced hydrophobic moment are poorly developed. H and µ values
are much lower in the cupiennins than in the highly hemolytic melittin
and even lower than in the nonhemolytic magainin 2. However, the
hydrophobicity of the N-terminal stretches of cupiennins (1.81-2.32)
and melittin (2.37) are almost identical. Thus, comparable with
melittin, insertion of the hydrophobic N-terminal helix domain into the
hydrophobic core of the neutral lipid matrix of red blood cells seems
to be responsible for the hemolytic effects of the cupiennins.
Additional ionic interactions between the negatively charged
O-glycosidic chains of glycophorin A of erythrocytes (54)
and the highly cationic lysine ribbon of the cupiennin peptides might
support membrane insertion followed by bilayer disturbance, pore
formation or lysis. The hypothesis is supported by Helmerhorst et
al. (55), who suggested that electrostatic interactions govern the
peptide-erythrocyte interaction.
In summary, the cupiennins have been found to be a class of
antimicrobial, hemolytic, and bactericidal peptides with unique structural properties. Additional studies are in progress to further elucidate the structural basis of the diversity in their biological activity. Furthermore, the peptides appear to be valuable as model compounds for the investigation of the structural background of membrane lysis and selectivity to different target membranes.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank U. Kämpfer, H. Petrenko, and
S. Luethi for their excellent technical assistance, Dr. T. Bodmer
for kindly providing the bacteria, and Dr. H. Murray and Dr. C. Boesch
for helpful discussion.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This research was supported by the Swiss National Science
Foundation (Grant 31-52238-97). These peptides have been
patent-protected.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel:+41-31-631-45-32;
Fax:+41-31-631-48-88; E-mail: lucia.kuhn@zos.unibe.ch.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 15, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111099200
1
Data for more than 500 different antimicrobial
peptides are available on-line
(bbcm1.univ.trieste.it/~tossi.htm).
3
L. Kuhn-Nentwig, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
TFE, trifluoroethanol;
RP-HPLC, reversed-phase high performance liquid
chromatography;
MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration;
ESI-MS, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry;
PBS, phosphate-buffered
saline.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Boman, H. G.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
13,
61-92[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Hancock, R. E. W.,
and Lehrer, R.
(1998)
Trends Biotechnol.
16,
82-88[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Andreu, D.,
and Rivas, L.
(1998)
Biopolymers
47,
415-433[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Dimarcq, J.-L.,
Bulet, P.,
Hetru, C.,
and Hoffmann, J.
(1998)
Biopolymers
47,
465-477[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Simmaco, M.,
Mignogna, G.,
and Barra, D.
(1998)
Biopolymers
47,
435-450[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Hancock, R. E. W.
(1997)
Lancet
349,
418-422[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Ghosh, J. K.,
Shaool, D.,
Guillaud, P.,
Cicéron, L.,
Mazier, D.,
Kustanovich, I.,
Shai, Y.,
and Mor, A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
31609-31616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Díaz-Achirica, P.,
Ubach, J.,
Guinea, A.,
Andreu, D.,
and Rivas, L.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
330,
453-460[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Cavallarin, L.,
Andreu, D.,
and Segundo, B. S.
(1998)
Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.
11,
218-227[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Nicolas, P.,
and Mor, A.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
49,
277-304[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Rozek, T.,
Wegener, K. L.,
Bowie, J. H.,
Olver, I. N.,
Carver, J. A.,
Wallace, J. C.,
and Tyler, M. J.
(2000)
Eur. J. Biochem.
267,
5330-5341[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Wachinger, M.,
Kleinschmidt, A.,
Winder, D.,
von Pechmann, N.,
Ludvigsen, A.,
Neumann, M.,
Holle, R.,
Salmons, B.,
Erfle, V.,
and Brack-Werner, R.
(1998)
J. Gen. Virol.
79,
731-740[Abstract]
|
| 13.
|
Kragol, G.,
Lovas, S.,
Varadi, G.,
Condie, B. A.,
Hoffmann, R.,
and Otvos, L., Jr.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
3016-3026[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Otvos, L. Jr., O, I.,
Rogers, M. E.,
Consolvo, P. J.,
Condie, B. A.,
Lovas, S.,
Bulet, P.,
and Blaszczyk-Thurin, M.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
14150-14159[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Park, C. B.,
Kim, H. S.,
and Kim, S. C.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
244,
253-257[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Hetru, C.,
Hoffmann, D.,
and Bulet, P.
(1998)
in
Molecular Mechanisms of Immune Responses in Insects
(Brey, P. T.
, and Hultmark, D., eds)
, pp. 40-66, Chapman and Hall, London
|
| 17.
|
Silva, P. I. Jr.,
Daffre, S.,
and Bulet, P.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
33464-33470[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Ehret-Sabatier, L.,
Loew, D.,
Goyffon, M.,
Fehlbaum, P.,
Hoffmann, J. A.,
van Dorsselaer, A.,
and Bulet, P.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
29537-29544[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Dempsey, C. E.
(1990)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1031,
143-161[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Krishnakumari, V.,
and Nagaraj, R.
(1997)
J. Pept. Res.
50,
88-93[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Torres-Larios, A.,
Gurrola, G. B.,
Zamudio, F. Z.,
and Possani, L. D.
(2000)
Eur. J. Biochem.
267,
5023-5031[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Conde, R.,
Zamudio, F. Z.,
Rodríguez, M. H.,
and Possani, L. D.
(2000)
FEBS Lett.
471,
165-168[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Xu, K., Ji, Y.,
and Qu, X.
(1989)
Acta Zool. Sin.
35,
300-305
|
| 24.
|
Yan, L.,
and Adams, M. E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
2059-2066[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Kuhn-Nentwig, L.,
Schaller, J.,
and Nentwig, W.
(1994)
Toxicon
32,
287-302[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Haeberli, S.,
Kuhn-Nentwig, L.,
Schaller, J.,
and Nentwig, W.
(2000)
Toxicon
38,
373-380[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Chang, J.-Y.,
and Knecht, R.
(1991)
Anal. Biochem.
197,
52-58[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Bindlingmeyer, B. A.,
Cohen, S. A.,
and Tarvin, T. L.
(1984)
J. Chromatogr.
336,
93-104[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Chen, Y.-H.,
Yang, J. T.,
and Martinez, H. M.
(1972)
Biochemistry
11,
4120-4131[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Wu, M.,
and Hancock, R. E. W.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
29-35[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Escoubas, P.,
Palma, M. F.,
and Nakajima, P.
(1995)
Toxicon
33,
1549-1555[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Kuhn-Nentwig, L.,
Schaller, J.,
Kämpfer, U.,
Imboden, H.,
Malli, H.,
and Nentwig, W.
(2000)
Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol.
44,
101-111[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Eisenberg, D.
(1984)
Ann. Rev. Biochem.
53,
595-623[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Dathe, M.,
and Wieprecht, T.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1462,
71-87[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Zasloff, M.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
5449-5453[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Lehrman, S. R.,
Tuls, J. L.,
and Lund, M.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
5590-5596[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Dathe, M.,
Wieprecht, T.,
Nikolenko, H.,
Handel, H.,
Maloy, W. L.,
MacDonald, D. L.,
Beyermann, M.,
and Bienert, M.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
403,
208-212[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Adams, M. E.,
Herold, E. E.,
and Venema, V. J.
(1989)
J. Comp. Physiol. A Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol.
164,
333-342[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Kuhn-Nentwig, L.,
Bücheler, A.,
Studer, A.,
and Nentwig, W.
(1998)
Naturwissenschaften
85,
136-138[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Schröder, J.-M.
(1999)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
57,
121-134[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Malli, H.,
Imboden, H.,
and Kuhn-Nentwig, L.
(1998)
Toxicon
36,
1959-1969[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Malli, H.,
Kuhn-Nentwig, L.,
Imboden, H.,
and Nentwig, W.
(1999)
J. Exp. Biol.
202,
2083-2089[Abstract]
|
| 43.
|
Boevé, J. L.,
Kuhn-Nentwig, L.,
Keller, S.,
and Nentwig, W.
(1995)
Toxicon
33,
1347-1357[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Person, W. R.,
Wood, T.,
Zhang, Z.,
and Miller, W.
(1997)
Genomics
46,
24-36[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Park, J. M.,
Jung, J.-E.,
and Lee, B. J.
(1994)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
205,
948-954[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Garnier, J.,
Gibrat, J.-F.,
and Robson, B.
(1996)
Methods Enzymol.
266,
540-553[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Chou, P. Y.,
and Fasman, G. D.
(1978)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
47,
251-276[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Dathe, M.
(2000)
in
Membrane Structure in Disease and Drug Therapy
(Zimmer, G., ed)
, pp. 1-26, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, Basel
|
| 49.
|
Vorland, L. H.,
Ulvatne, H.,
Rekdal, Ø.,
and Svendsen, J. S.
(1999)
Scand. J. Infect. Dis.
31,
467-473[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Matsuzaki, K.,
Sugishita, K.,
and Miyajima, K.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
449,
221-224[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Shin, S. Y.,
Kang, J. H.,
Lee, M. K.,
Kim, S. Y.,
Kim, Y.,
and Hahm, K.-S.
(1998)
Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int.
44,
1119-1126[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Oren, Z.,
and Shai, Y.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
1826-1835[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Oh, D.,
Shin, S. Y.,
Lee, S.,
Kang, J. H.,
Kim, S. D.,
Ryu, P. D.,
Hahm, K.-S.,
and Kim, Y.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
11855-11864[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Viitala, J.,
and Järnefelt, J.
(1985)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
12,
392-395[CrossRef]
|
| 55.
|
Helmerhorst, E. J.,
Reijnders, I. M.,
van't Hof, W.,
Veerman, E. C. I.,
and Amerongen, A. V. N.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
449,
105-110[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Kozlov, A. A. Vassilevski, A. V. Feofanov, A. Y. Surovoy, D. V. Karpunin, and E. V. Grishin
Latarcins, Antimicrobial and Cytolytic Peptides from the Venom of the Spider Lachesana tarabaevi (Zodariidae) That Exemplify Biomolecular Diversity
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 28, 2006;
281(30):
20983 - 20992.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Wullschleger, W. Nentwig, and L. Kuhn-Nentwig
Spider venom: enhancement of venom efficacy mediated by different synergistic strategies in Cupiennius salei
J. Exp. Biol.,
June 1, 2005;
208(11):
2115 - 2121.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Wullschleger, L. Kuhn-Nentwig, J. Tromp, U. Kampfer, J. Schaller, S. Schurch, and W. Nentwig
CSTX-13, a highly synergistically acting two-chain neurotoxic enhancer in the venom of the spider Cupiennius salei (Ctenidae)
PNAS,
August 3, 2004;
101(31):
11251 - 11256.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. V. Prates, M. L. Sforca, W. C. B. Regis, J. R. S. A. Leite, L. P. Silva, T. A. Pertinhez, A. L. T. Araujo, R. B. Azevedo, A. Spisni, and C. Bloch Jr.
The NMR-derived Solution Structure of a New Cationic Antimicrobial Peptide from the Skin Secretion of the Anuran Hyla punctata
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 26, 2004;
279(13):
13018 - 13026.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Corzo, E. Villegas, F. Gomez-Lagunas, L. D. Possani, O. S. Belokoneva, and T. Nakajima
Oxyopinins, Large Amphipathic Peptides Isolated from the Venom of the Wolf Spider Oxyopes kitabensis with Cytolytic Properties and Positive Insecticidal Cooperativity with Spider Neurotoxins
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 21, 2002;
277(26):
23627 - 23637.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|