JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M111679200 on January 15, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 13, 11292-11296, March 29, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/13/11292    most recent
M111679200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahfoud, R.
Right arrow Articles by Fantini, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mahfoud, R.
Right arrow Articles by Fantini, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Identification of a Common Sphingolipid-binding Domain in Alzheimer, Prion, and HIV-1 Proteins*

Radhia Mahfoud, Nicolas Garmy, Marc Maresca, Nouara Yahi, Antoine Puigserver, and Jacques FantiniDagger

From the Institut Méditerranéen de Recherche en Nutrition, Unité Mixte de Recherche-Institut National de la recherche Agronomique 1111, Faculté des Sciences St-Jérôme, 13397 Marseille Cedex 20, France

Received for publication, December 7, 2001, and in revised form, January 14, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The V3 loop of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 surface envelope glycoprotein gp120 is a sphingolipid-binding domain mediating the attachment of HIV-1 to plasma membrane microdomains (rafts). Sphingolipid-induced conformational changes in gp120 are required for HIV-1 fusion. Galactosylceramide and sphingomyelin have been detected in highly purified preparations of prion rods, suggesting that the prion protein (PrP) may interact with selected sphingolipids. Moreover, a major conformational transition of the Alzheimer beta -amyloid peptide has been observed upon interaction with sphingolipid-containing membranes. Structure similarity searches with the combinatorial extension method revealed the presence of a V3-like domain in the human prion protein PrP and in the Alzheimer beta -amyloid peptide. In each case, synthetic peptides derived from the predicted V3-like domain were found to interact with monomolecular films of galactosylceramide and sphingomyelin at the air-water interface. The V3-like domain of PrP is a disulfide-linked loop (Cys179-Cys214) that includes the E200K mutation site associated with familial Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. This mutation abrogated sphingomyelin recognition. The identification of a common sphingolipid-binding motif in gp120, PrP, and beta -amyloid peptide underscores the role of lipid rafts in the pathogenesis of HIV-1, Alzheimer, and prion diseases and may provide new therapeutic strategies.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

One of the hallmarks of prion diseases is the cerebral accumulation of an abnormal form of prion protein (PrP),1 the so-called PrPsc, which is derived from the normal cell surface glycoprotein, PrPc (1). The conformational change associated with the PrPc right-arrow PrPsc transition (chiefly an alpha -helix right-arrow beta -sheet transformation) occurs in membrane microdomains enriched in sphingolipids and cholesterol (i.e. lipid rafts) (2, 3). Correspondingly, infectious prion rods were found to contain the two sphingolipids galactosylceramide (GalCer) and sphingomyelin, suggesting that both lipids may interact with normal and/or pathogenic prion proteins (4). Interestingly, the HIV-1 surface envelope glycoprotein gp120 also interacts with GalCer (5, 6), as well as with a few other sphingolipids found in membrane rafts, i.e. the ceramide trihexoside Gb3, the monosialoganglioside GM3, and sphingomyelin (6-10). Raft glycosphingolipids mediate lateral assemblies of the HIV-1 fusion complex and stimulate the conformational changes in HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins required for initiating the fusion process (9, 11-13). Moreover, a major conformational transition of the Alzheimer beta -amyloid peptide is observed upon binding of the 1-40 beta -amyloid peptide to ganglioside GM1-containing membranes (14). Taken together, these data suggest that conformational changes in prion, Alzheimer, and HIV-1 proteins may occur in lipid rafts under the control of specific sphingolipids.

The binding of HIV-1 to GalCer is mediated by the third variable (V3) loop of gp120, as demonstrated by various immunological, biochemical and biophysical approaches (15-17). Since GalCer is bound by both HIV-1 gp120 and prion proteins, we looked for a potential V3-like glycolipid-binding domain in human PrP. As a matter of fact, the search for molecules interacting with PrPc is a major issue in the transmissible encephalopathies field. The presence of a similar motif in the Alzheimer beta -amyloid peptide was also investigated. Structure similarity searches were carried out using the combinatorial extension (CE) method (18). A putative GalCer-binding motif was identified in the human PrP protein on the basis of its structural homology with the V3 loop. A similar motif was also found in Alzheimer beta -amyloid peptide. The interaction of sphingolipids with the V3-like domain of human PrP and Alzheimer beta -amyloid peptide was analyzed using the Langmuir film balance technology.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- The chemicals used in this study, including GalCer, sphingomyelin, and the beta -amyloid synthetic peptide (fragment 1-40) of the higher purity available were purchased from Sigma. The synthetic peptides P1 (KQHTVTTTTKGENFTETDVKMMER) and P2 (KQHTVTTTTKGENFTKTDVKMMER) respectively derived from the human PrP protein and the E200K mutant were purchased from Euro Sequence Gene service (Evry, France). The peptides were purified by high performance liquid chromatography (purity >95%) and characterized by electrospray mass spectrometry (experimental Mr of 2812.4 and 2810.8 for peptides P1 and P2, with a theoretical Mr of 2811.4 and 2810.4, respectively).

Structure Analysis-- Structure similarity searches were performed using the two chains calculation routine of the CE program (Ref. 18 and cl.sdsc.edu/ce.html). CE aligns two polypeptide chains using characteristics of their local geometry as defined by vectors between carbon alpha  positions. Molecular structures were visualized using the SWISS-PDB viewer (Ref. 19 and expasy.ch/spdbv/). PDB identification numbers were 1CE4 (HIV-1 gp120 V3 loop peptide), 1QLX (human PrP), and 1BJB (human Alzheimer peptide).

Surface Pressure Measurements-- The surface pressure was measured with a fully automated microtensiometer (µTROUGH SX, Kibron Inc.). The apparatus allowed the recording of pressure-area compression isotherms and the kinetics of interaction of a ligand with the monomolecular film using a set of specially designed Teflon troughs. All experiments were carried out in a controlled atmosphere at 20 °C ± 1 °C. Monomolecular films of the indicated lipids were spread on pure water subphases (volume of 800 µl) from hexane:chloroform:ethanol (11:5:4, v/v/v) as described previously (6). After spreading of the film, 5 min was allowed for solvent evaporation. To measure the interaction of the peptide with lipid monolayers, various concentrations of the ligand were injected in the subphase with a 10-µl Hamilton syringe, and pressure increases produced were recorded until reaching the equilibrium (maximal surface pressure increase Delta pi max usually obtained after 100-200 min of interaction). The data were analyzed with the Filmware 2.3 program (Kibron Inc.). The accuracy of the system under our experimental conditions was ± 0.25 mN m-1 for surface pressure.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

A V3-like Domain in PrP and Alzheimer beta -Amyloid Peptide-- Structure similarity searches revealed the presence of a HIV-1 gp120 V3-like motif in the human prion protein PrP and in the Alzheimer beta -amyloid peptide (Fig. 1a). The V3-like domain of PrP consists of a helix-turn-helix motif formed by 33 of the 36 amino acid residues of a disulfide-linked loop (Cys179-Cys214). This loop includes the alpha 2 and alpha 3 helix of PrPc (Fig. 1a). In the V3 loop of HIV-1 gp120, the motif is a hairpin structure with only one alpha -helix corresponding to alpha 3 in PrP. This is also the case for the Alzheimer beta -amyloid peptide. The V3-like motif of PrP and Alzheimer proteins has the same size as the V3 loop so that they can be easily superimposed (Fig. 1b). Moreover, the motif contains His, Tyr, and/or Phe residues that mediate binding to individual sugar rings of complex carbohydrates (20-22). In particular, an aromatic residue essential for GalCer recognition (16) is found at the same position and has a similar orientation in both loops, namely Tyr21 in the V3 loop, and Phe198 in human PrP (Fig. 1b). In the same way, residues Tyr10 of the Alzheimer beta -amyloid peptide and Phe20 of the gp120 V3 loop could be partially superimposed. These observations suggest that the structural alignments are highly significant, in agreement with the alignment parameters (including root mean square deviations) provided by the CE program (Table I). Thus, our study confirms the capacity of the CE program to detect specific motifs in unrelated proteins sharing little sequence homology (18, 23).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Structural homology between prion, Alzheimer, and HIV-1 gp120 proteins. a, structure-based sequence alignment of human PrP, Alzheimer, beta -amyloid peptide, and HIV-1 gp120 (V3 loop). For each sequence, PDB entry name and starting and ending residues are given. The alignment parameters are given in Table I. b, superposition of the putative GalCer-binding motif in the V3 loop of HIV-1 gp120 (red), the Cys179-Cys214 polypeptide chain of human PrP (blue), and the beta -amyloid peptide (black). The lateral chains of the aromatic residues potentially involved in binding to GalCer are shown (left panel, Phe198 of PrP in green, and Tyr21 of gp120 loop in yellow; right panel, Tyr10 of Alzheimer peptide in yellow, and Phe20 of gp120 V3 loop in green).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Structure-based alignment parameters obtained with the CE program
The proteins are identified with their PDB entry numbers: 1CE4, HIV-1 gp120 V3 loop; 1QLX, human PrP; 1BJB, human Alzheimer peptide. r.m.s.d., root mean square deviation.

The V3-like Region of Human PrP Is a Sphingolipid-binding Domain-- GalCer and sphingomyelin were detected in highly purified infectious prion rods, suggesting that PrP may specifically interact with these sphingolipids during its stay in lipid rafts (4). The identification of a V3-like domain in human PrP prompted us to study the interaction of this domain with GalCer and sphingomyelin. A peptide (P1) derived from the putative glycolipid-binding motif of human PrP (KQHTVTTTTKGENFTETDVKMMER) was synthesized, and its interaction with sphingolipids analyzed using the Langmuir film balance technology. In these experiments, the peptide P1 was added in the aqueous subphase underneath a monomolecular film of lipid, and the resulting interaction was measured as an increase in the surface pressure of the film (6). This technique is one of the most sensitive for studying lipid-ligands interactions (24). The synthetic peptide P1 was found to interact specifically with GalCer, and the interaction was definitely dose-dependent (Fig. 2). The maximal surface pressure increase (Delta pi max = 8 mN/m) was obtained with a peptide concentration of 100 nM. Similar data were previously obtained in our laboratory with a synthetic peptide derived from the conserved motif of the V3 loop crown (i.e. GPGRAF) (6).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Dose-dependent interaction between human PrP-derived synthetic peptides and a monomolecular film of GalCer prepared at an initial pressure (pi i) of 10 mN/m. Increases in the surface pressure induced by the indicated concentrations of peptide P1 (wild-type sequence, squares) or P2 (E200K mutant sequence, circles) added in the aqueous subphase were determined. Results are expressed as the mean of three determinations ± S.D.

To assess the specificity of GalCer-peptide P1 interaction, monomolecular films of GalCer were prepared at various initial pressures (pi i) and the maximal surface pressure increase (Delta pi max) induced by the peptide on these films was determined after equilibrium had been reached. Below a pi i of 30 mN/m, which corresponds to a fluid disordered (Lc) phase, the Delta pi max induced by the peptide was between 5 and 10 mN/m (Fig. 3a). At a pi i of 30 mN/m, the value of Delta pi max reached 16 mN/m. Then, for values of pi i above 30 mN/m, which do correspond to raft-like liquid-ordered (Lo) phase domains, Delta pi max gradually decreased as pi i increased. The influence of the initial surface pressure on the compressibility of the sphingolipid monolayer demonstrates the high specificity of the interaction as previously established for several other lipids and ligands (6, 24). The critical pressure of insertion (i.e. the theoretical value of pi i extrapolated for Delta pi max = 0 mN/m) was 45 mN/m. Interestingly, the mean lipid density of cellular membranes corresponds to a surface pressure of at least 30 mN/m (25). Thus, these data suggest that the interaction of peptide P1 with GalCer requires a densely packed organization of the glycosphingolipid, which is likely to occur within a lipid raft (26).


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Maximal surface pressure increase (Delta pi max) reached after injection of human PrP peptides P1 (a) or P2 (b) under GalCer films at various initial surface pressures (pi i). The peptides were used at a final concentration of 500 nM.

Effect of Mutation E200K in Human PrP for Sphingolipid Recognition-- The V3-like region of human PrP contains a mutation site (E200K) corresponding to the most common familial form of the Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (1). Residue 200 is located at the N-terminal end of the second alpha -helix of the sphingolipid-binding motif (i.e. alpha 3 of human PrP). Another synthetic peptide similar to P1 but bearing the E200K substitution was therefore synthesized (P2), and its interaction with sphingolipids was also analyzed using the lipid monolayer assay. As for peptide P1, the interaction of peptide P2 with a monomolecular film GalCer (pi i = 10 mN/m) was dose-dependent (Fig. 2). When the interaction was analyzed at various values of pi i, a triphasic pattern of interaction was evidenced (Fig. 3b). When pi i was between 10 and 15 mN/m, the maximal surface pressure increase induced by the peptide gradually decreased as pi i increased. Between 15 and 25 mN/M, the peptide did not affect the surface pressure of the GalCer monolayer. Finally, for values of pi i greater than 25 mN/m, a specific interaction occurred, with a critical pressure of insertion of 42 mN/m. These data indicate that both peptides P1 and P2 could interact with GalCer, with a marked preference for densely packed films that mimic the organization of sphingolipids found in membrane rafts. The minor differences observed at low surface pressures (pi i < 25 mN/m) may not have important implications, since these values of the surface pressure do not reflect the organization of lipids commonly found in biological membranes (25). From a structural point of view, these data are consistent with the high level of structural homology between the wild-type and the E200K mutant of human PrP (27). The main effects of the E200K mutation are (i) major changes in the distribution of charges on the protein surface and (ii) the loss of a salt-bridge interaction between the side chains of Glu200 and Lys204. In any case, the E200K mutation has little (if any) effect on the orientation and accessibility of aromatic residues that are involved in binding to GalCer.

However, the redistribution of surface charges induced by the E200K mutation may dramatically affect the interaction of PrP with charged lipids such as sphingomyelin. As shown in Fig. 4b, the mutated peptide (P2) could interact with sphingomyelin only when the film was prepared at a very low pi i (<15 mN/m). In particular, no interaction occurred at the physiological pressure of 30 mN/m. In contrast, the wild-type peptide (P1) interacted with sphingomyelin films prepared at low and at high pi i (critical pressures of insertion of 25 and 40 mN/m, respectively) (Fig. 4a). These data show that the E200K mutation specifically affected the recognition of sphingomyelin. The replacement of an acid residue (Glu) by a basic one (Lys) in the sphingolipid binding site is likely to affect the binding of PrP to this positively charged lipid. Impaired recognition of sphingomyelin in the raft environment may destabilize membrane-PrPc interactions and thus facilitate the conformational change associated with the PrPc right-arrow PrPsc transition. Indeed, the depletion of sphingomyelin in neural cells treated with either a ceramide synthase inhibitor or sphingomyelinase resulted in a marked stimulation of the PrPc right-arrow PrPsc conversion (28). Most importantly, the V3-like domain of PrP identified in the present study is involved in the dimerization of PrP, an early event that constitutes an important step on the pathway of the PrPc right-arrow PrPsc conversion (29). Moreover, amino acid residues located in the vicinity of the putative raft-binding domain of PrP are thought to bind an auxiliary molecule essential to prion propagation (30). Taken together, these data support the view that the V3-like domain of PrP is involved in the PrPc right-arrow PrPsc conversion and that raft sphingolipids may play an active role in this process. This hypothesis is consistent with recent data showing that the conformation of prion proteins is highly sensitive to the membrane environment (31). We propose that sphingolipids such as GalCer and sphingomyelin stabilize the non-pathological conformation of PrPc in the lipid raft through specific interactions with the V3-like domain of PrPc.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Maximal surface pressure increase (Delta pi max) reached after injection of human PrP peptides P1 (a) or P2 (b) under sphingomyelin films at various initial surface pressures (pi i). The peptides were used at a final concentration of 500 nM.

The beta -Amyloid Peptide Interacts with GalCer and Sphingomyelin-- Since a similar domain was characterized in Alzheimer beta -amyloid peptide, we studied the interaction of this peptide with GalCer and sphingomyelin using the monomolecular film binding assay (Fig. 5). In both cases, Delta pi max gradually decrease as pi i increased (critical pressures of insertion of 45 and 56 mN/m for GalCer and sphingomyelin, respectively). The ability of the beta -amyloid peptide (fragment 1-40) to recognize both GalCer and sphingomyelin is likely due to the presence of both sugar-binding residues (Tyr10, His13, His14, Phe20, Phe21) and acid residues (Asp7, Glu11) within the V3-like motif.


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Maximal surface pressure increase (Delta pi max) reached after injection of Alzheimer beta -amyloid peptide under GalCer (a) or sphingomyelin (b) films at various initial surface pressures (pi i). The peptide was used at a final concentration of 500 nM.

Conclusion-- The finding of a common sphingolipid-binding motif in Alzheimer, prion, and HIV-1 proteins underscores the role of membrane rafts in the pathogenesis of the corresponding diseases. Further studies are warranted to assess whether raft lipids act as auxiliary molecules implicated in the conformational change of PrP (2, 3), as recently established for HIV-1 gp120 (13) and for the Alzheimer beta -amyloid peptide (14). In any case, the main outcome of the present study is the finding of a structural homology between unrelated proteins known to induce major morphological and functional alterations of the central nervous system. Synthetic soluble analogs of GalCer bind to the V3 loop of gp120 and inhibit HIV-1 fusion (32). It would be of interest to evaluate the activity of such glycolipid analogs on the PrPc right-arrow PrPsc conversion as well as on the formation of amyloid fibrils.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 33-491-288-761; Fax: 33-491-288-440; E-mail: jacques.fantini@univ.u-3mrs.fr.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 15, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111679200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PrP, prion protein; GalCer, galactosylceramide; CE, combinatorial extension.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Prusiner, S. B. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 13363-13387[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Vey, M., Pilkuhn, S., Wille, H., Nixon, R., DeArmond, S. J., Smart, E. J., Anderson, R. G. W., Taraboulos, A., and Prusiner, S. B. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 11945-14949[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Kaneko, K., Vey, M., Scott, M., Pilkuhn, S., Cohen, F. E., and Prusiner, S. B. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 2333-2338[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Klein, T. R., Kirsch, D., Kaufmann, R., and Riesner, D. (1998) Biol. Chem. 379, 655-666[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Harouse, J. M., Bhat, S., Spitalnik, S. L., Laughlin, M., Stefano, K., Silberberg, D. H., and Gonzalez-Scarano, F. (1991) Science 253, 320-323[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Hammache, D., Piéroni, G., Yahi, N., Delézay, O., Koch, N., Lafont, H., Tamalet, C., and Fantini, J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 7967-7971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Hammache, D., Yahi, N., Piéroni, G., Ariasi, F., Tamalet, C., and Fantini, J. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 246, 117-122[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Puri, A., Hug, P., Jernigan, K., Barchi, J., Kim, H. Y., Hamilton, J., Wiels, J., Murray, G. J., Brady, R. O., and Blumenthal, R. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 14435-14440[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Hammache, D., Yahi, N., Maresca, M., Piéroni, G., and Fantini, J. (1999) J. Virol. 73, 5244-5248[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Van Mau, N., Misse, D., Le, Grimellec, C., Divita, G., Heitz, F., and Veas, F. (2000) J. Membr. Biol. 177, 251-257[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Puri, A., Hug, P., Jernigan, K., Rose, P., and Blumenthal, R. (1999) Biosci. Rep. 19, 317-325[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Manes, S., del Real, G., Lacalle, R. A., Lucas, P., Gomez-Mouton, C., Sanchez-Palomino, S., Delgado, R., Alcami, J., Mira, E., and Martinez, A. C. (2000) EMBO J. 1, 190-196[CrossRef]
13. Hug, P., Lin, H., Korte, T., Xiao, X., Dimitrov, D. S., Wang, J. M., Puri, A., and Blumenthal, R. (2000) J. Virol. 74, 6377-6385[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Choo-Smith, L. P., and Surewicz, W. K. (1997) FEBS Lett. 402, 95-98[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Cook, D. G., Fantini, J., Spitalnik, S. L., and Gonzalez-Scarano, F. (1994) Virology 201, 206-214[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Yahi, N., Sabatier, J. M., Baghdiguian, S., Gonzalez-Scarano, F., and Fantini, J. (1995) J. Virol. 69, 320-325[Abstract]
17. Fujita, E., and Nishimura, S. I. (2000) Carbohydr. Lett. 4, 53-60[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Shindyalov, I. N., and Bourne, P. E. (1998) Protein Eng. 11, 739-747[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Guex, N., and Peitsch, M. C. (1997) Electrophoresis 18, 2714-2723[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Sutton, J. M., Chow-Worn, O., Spaven, L., Silman, N. J., Hallis, B., and Shone, C. C. (2001) FEBS Lett. 493, 45-49[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Nyholm, P. G., Brunton, J. L., and Lingwood, C. A. (1995) Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 17, 199-204[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Sinha, K., Box, M., Lalli, G., Schiavo, G., Schneider, H., Groves, M., Siligardi, G., and Fairweather, N. (2000) Mol. Microbiol. 37, 1041-1051[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Shao, X., and Grishin, N. V. (2000) Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 2643-2650[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Maggio, B. (1994) Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 62, 55-117[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Quinn, P. J. (1994) in The Lipid Handbook (Gunstone, F. D. , Harwood, J. L. , and Padley, F. B., eds) , pp. 465-485, Chapman and Hall, New York
26. Brown, R. E. (1998) J. Cell Sci. 111, 1-9[Abstract]
27. Zhang, Y., Swietnicki, W., Zagorski, M. G., Surewicz, W. K., and Sönnichsen, F. D. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 33650-33654[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Naslavsky, N, Shmeeda, H., Friedlander, G., Yanai, A., Futerman, A. H., Barenholz, Y., and Taraboulos, A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 20763-20771[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Knaus, K. J., Morillas, M., Swietnicki, W., Malone, M., Surewicz, W. K., and Yee, V. C. (2001) Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 770-774[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Kaneko, K., Zulianello, L., Scott, M., Cooper, C. M., Wallace, A. C., James, T. L., Cohen, F. E., and Prusiner, S. B. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 10069-10074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Morillas, M., Swietnicki, W., Gambetti, P., and Surewicz, W. K. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 36859-36865[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Fantini, J. (2000) Methods Enzymol. 311, 626-638[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Bakrac, I. Gutierrez-Aguirre, Z. Podlesek, A. F.-P. Sonnen, R. J. C. Gilbert, P. Macek, J. H. Lakey, and G. Anderluh
Molecular Determinants of Sphingomyelin Specificity of a Eukaryotic Pore-forming Toxin
J. Biol. Chem., July 4, 2008; 283(27): 18665 - 18677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
S. Hebbar, E. Lee, M. Manna, S. Steinert, G. S. Kumar, M. Wenk, T. Wohland, and R. Kraut
A fluorescent sphingolipid binding domain peptide probe interacts with sphingolipids and cholesterol-dependent raft domains
J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 1077 - 1089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. Prior, S. Lehmann, M.-S. Sy, B. Molloy, and H. E. M. McMahon
Cyclodextrins Inhibit Replication of Scrapie Prion Protein in Cell Culture
J. Virol., October 15, 2007; 81(20): 11195 - 11207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. R. Race, J. H. Lakey, and M. J. Banfield
Insertion of the Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Tir Virulence Protein into Membranes in Vitro
J. Biol. Chem., March 24, 2006; 281(12): 7842 - 7849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. R. Sepulveda, M. Berrocal-Carrillo, M. Gasset, and A. M. Mata
The Plasma Membrane Ca2+-ATPase Isoform 4 Is Localized in Lipid Rafts of Cerebellum Synaptic Plasma Membranes
J. Biol. Chem., January 6, 2006; 281(1): 447 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
C. S. Rao, T. Chung, H. M. Pike, and R. E. Brown
Glycolipid Transfer Protein Interaction with Bilayer Vesicles: Modulation by Changing Lipid Composition
Biophys. J., December 1, 2005; 89(6): 4017 - 4028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. E. A. Openshaw, P. R. Race, H. J. Monzo, J.-A. Vazquez-Boland, and M. J. Banfield
Crystal Structure of SmcL, a Bacterial Neutral Sphingomyelinase C from Listeria
J. Biol. Chem., October 14, 2005; 280(41): 35011 - 35017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
E. Avota, N. Muller, M. Klett, and S. Schneider-Schaulies
Measles Virus Interacts with and Alters Signal Transduction in T-Cell Lipid Rafts
J. Virol., September 1, 2004; 78(17): 9552 - 9559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
D. Sarnataro, V. Campana, S. Paladino, M. Stornaiuolo, L. Nitsch, and C. Zurzolo
PrPC Association with Lipid Rafts in the Early Secretory Pathway Stabilizes Its Cellular Conformation
Mol. Biol. Cell, September 1, 2004; 15(9): 4031 - 4042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. R. Walmsley, F. Zeng, and N. M. Hooper
The N-terminal Region of the Prion Protein Ectodomain Contains a Lipid Raft Targeting Determinant
J. Biol. Chem., September 26, 2003; 278(39): 37241 - 37248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
B. Steinbauer, T. Mehnert, and K. Beyer
Hydration and Lateral Organization in Phospholipid Bilayers Containing Sphingomyelin: A 2H-NMR Study
Biophys. J., August 1, 2003; 85(2): 1013 - 1024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. S. Baron and B. Caughey
Effect of Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Anchor-dependent and -independent Prion Protein Association with Model Raft Membranes on Conversion to the Protease-resistant Isoform
J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2003; 278(17): 14883 - 14892.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Yamabhai and R. G. W. Anderson
Second Cysteine-rich Region of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Contains Targeting Information for Caveolae/Rafts
J. Biol. Chem., July 5, 2002; 277(28): 24843 - 24846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/13/11292    most recent
M111679200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahfoud, R.
Right arrow Articles by Fantini, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mahfoud, R.
Right arrow Articles by Fantini, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.