![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 13, 11292-11296, March 29, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Institut Méditerranéen de Recherche en Nutrition, Unité Mixte de Recherche-Institut National de la recherche Agronomique 1111, Faculté des Sciences St-Jérôme, 13397 Marseille Cedex 20, France
Received for publication, December 7, 2001, and in revised form, January 14, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The V3 loop of the human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV)-1 surface envelope glycoprotein gp120 is a sphingolipid-binding
domain mediating the attachment of HIV-1 to plasma membrane
microdomains (rafts). Sphingolipid-induced conformational changes in
gp120 are required for HIV-1 fusion. Galactosylceramide and
sphingomyelin have been detected in highly purified preparations of
prion rods, suggesting that the prion protein (PrP) may interact with
selected sphingolipids. Moreover, a major conformational transition of the Alzheimer One of the hallmarks of prion diseases is the cerebral
accumulation of an abnormal form of prion protein
(PrP),1 the so-called
PrPsc, which is derived from the normal cell surface
glycoprotein, PrPc (1). The conformational change
associated with the PrPc The binding of HIV-1 to GalCer is mediated by the third variable (V3)
loop of gp120, as demonstrated by various immunological, biochemical
and biophysical approaches (15-17). Since GalCer is bound by both
HIV-1 gp120 and prion proteins, we looked for a potential V3-like
glycolipid-binding domain in human PrP. As a matter of fact, the search
for molecules interacting with PrPc is a major issue in the
transmissible encephalopathies field. The presence of a similar motif
in the Alzheimer Materials--
The chemicals used in this study, including
GalCer, sphingomyelin, and the Structure Analysis--
Structure similarity searches were
performed using the two chains calculation routine of the CE program
(Ref. 18 and cl.sdsc.edu/ce.html). CE aligns two polypeptide
chains using characteristics of their local geometry as defined by
vectors between carbon Surface Pressure Measurements--
The surface pressure was
measured with a fully automated microtensiometer (µTROUGH SX,
Kibron Inc.). The apparatus allowed the recording of pressure-area
compression isotherms and the kinetics of interaction of a ligand with
the monomolecular film using a set of specially designed Teflon
troughs. All experiments were carried out in a controlled atmosphere at
20 °C ± 1 °C. Monomolecular films of the indicated lipids
were spread on pure water subphases (volume of 800 µl) from
hexane:chloroform:ethanol (11:5:4, v/v/v) as described previously (6).
After spreading of the film, 5 min was allowed for solvent evaporation.
To measure the interaction of the peptide with lipid monolayers,
various concentrations of the ligand were injected in the subphase with
a 10-µl Hamilton syringe, and pressure increases produced were
recorded until reaching the equilibrium (maximal surface pressure
increase A V3-like Domain in PrP and Alzheimer The V3-like Region of Human PrP Is a Sphingolipid-binding
Domain--
GalCer and sphingomyelin were detected in highly purified
infectious prion rods, suggesting that PrP may specifically interact with these sphingolipids during its stay in lipid rafts (4). The
identification of a V3-like domain in human PrP prompted us to study
the interaction of this domain with GalCer and sphingomyelin. A peptide
(P1) derived from the putative glycolipid-binding motif of human PrP
(KQHTVTTTTKGENFTETDVKMMER) was synthesized, and its interaction with
sphingolipids analyzed using the Langmuir film balance technology. In
these experiments, the peptide P1 was added in the aqueous subphase
underneath a monomolecular film of lipid, and the resulting interaction
was measured as an increase in the surface pressure of the film (6).
This technique is one of the most sensitive for studying lipid-ligands
interactions (24). The synthetic peptide P1 was found to interact
specifically with GalCer, and the interaction was definitely
dose-dependent (Fig. 2). The
maximal surface pressure increase (
To assess the specificity of GalCer-peptide P1 interaction,
monomolecular films of GalCer were prepared at various initial pressures ( Effect of Mutation E200K in Human PrP for Sphingolipid
Recognition--
The V3-like region of human PrP contains a mutation
site (E200K) corresponding to the most common familial form of the
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (1). Residue 200 is located at the N-terminal
end of the second
However, the redistribution of surface charges induced by the E200K
mutation may dramatically affect the interaction of PrP with charged
lipids such as sphingomyelin. As shown in Fig.
4b, the mutated peptide (P2)
could interact with sphingomyelin only when the film was prepared at a
very low The Conclusion--
The finding of a common sphingolipid-binding motif
in Alzheimer, prion, and HIV-1 proteins underscores the role of
membrane rafts in the pathogenesis of the corresponding diseases.
Further studies are warranted to assess whether raft lipids act as
auxiliary molecules implicated in the conformational change of PrP (2, 3), as recently established for HIV-1 gp120 (13) and for the Alzheimer
-amyloid peptide has been observed upon
interaction with sphingolipid-containing membranes. Structure
similarity searches with the combinatorial extension method
revealed the presence of a V3-like domain in the human prion protein
PrP and in the Alzheimer
-amyloid peptide. In each case, synthetic
peptides derived from the predicted V3-like domain were found to
interact with monomolecular films of galactosylceramide and
sphingomyelin at the air-water interface. The V3-like domain of PrP is
a disulfide-linked loop (Cys179-Cys214)
that includes the E200K mutation site associated with familial Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. This mutation abrogated sphingomyelin recognition. The identification of a common sphingolipid-binding motif
in gp120, PrP, and
-amyloid peptide underscores the role of lipid
rafts in the pathogenesis of HIV-1, Alzheimer, and prion diseases and
may provide new therapeutic strategies.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
PrPsc transition
(chiefly an
-helix
-sheet transformation) occurs in membrane
microdomains enriched in sphingolipids and cholesterol (i.e.
lipid rafts) (2, 3). Correspondingly, infectious prion rods were found
to contain the two sphingolipids galactosylceramide (GalCer) and
sphingomyelin, suggesting that both lipids may interact with normal
and/or pathogenic prion proteins (4). Interestingly, the HIV-1 surface
envelope glycoprotein gp120 also interacts with GalCer (5, 6), as well
as with a few other sphingolipids found in membrane rafts,
i.e. the ceramide trihexoside Gb3, the monosialoganglioside
GM3, and sphingomyelin (6-10). Raft glycosphingolipids mediate lateral
assemblies of the HIV-1 fusion complex and stimulate the conformational
changes in HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins required for initiating the
fusion process (9, 11-13). Moreover, a major conformational transition
of the Alzheimer
-amyloid peptide is observed upon binding of the
1-40
-amyloid peptide to ganglioside GM1-containing membranes (14).
Taken together, these data suggest that conformational changes in
prion, Alzheimer, and HIV-1 proteins may occur in lipid rafts under the
control of specific sphingolipids.
-amyloid peptide was also investigated. Structure
similarity searches were carried out using the combinatorial extension
(CE) method (18). A putative GalCer-binding motif was identified in the
human PrP protein on the basis of its structural homology with the V3
loop. A similar motif was also found in Alzheimer
-amyloid peptide.
The interaction of sphingolipids with the V3-like domain of human PrP
and Alzheimer
-amyloid peptide was analyzed using the Langmuir
film balance technology.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-amyloid synthetic peptide (fragment
1-40) of the higher purity available were purchased from Sigma. The
synthetic peptides P1 (KQHTVTTTTKGENFTETDVKMMER) and P2
(KQHTVTTTTKGENFTKTDVKMMER) respectively derived from the human
PrP protein and the E200K mutant were purchased from Euro Sequence Gene
service (Evry, France). The peptides were purified by high performance
liquid chromatography (purity >95%) and characterized by electrospray
mass spectrometry (experimental Mr of 2812.4 and
2810.8 for peptides P1 and P2, with a theoretical
Mr of 2811.4 and 2810.4, respectively).
positions. Molecular structures were
visualized using the SWISS-PDB viewer (Ref. 19 and expasy.ch/spdbv/).
PDB identification numbers were 1CE4 (HIV-1 gp120 V3 loop
peptide), 1QLX (human PrP), and 1BJB (human Alzheimer peptide).

max usually obtained after 100-200 min of
interaction). The data were analyzed with the Filmware 2.3 program
(Kibron Inc.). The accuracy of the system under our experimental
conditions was ± 0.25 mN m
1 for surface pressure.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-Amyloid
Peptide--
Structure similarity searches revealed the presence of a
HIV-1 gp120 V3-like motif in the human prion protein PrP and in the Alzheimer
-amyloid peptide (Fig.
1a). The V3-like domain of PrP consists of a helix-turn-helix motif formed by 33 of the 36 amino acid
residues of a disulfide-linked loop
(Cys179-Cys214). This loop includes the
2
and
3 helix of PrPc (Fig. 1a). In the V3 loop
of HIV-1 gp120, the motif is a hairpin structure with only one
-helix corresponding to
3 in PrP. This is also the case for the
Alzheimer
-amyloid peptide. The V3-like motif of PrP and Alzheimer
proteins has the same size as the V3 loop so that they can be easily
superimposed (Fig. 1b). Moreover, the motif contains His,
Tyr, and/or Phe residues that mediate binding to individual sugar rings
of complex carbohydrates (20-22). In particular, an aromatic residue
essential for GalCer recognition (16) is found at the same position and
has a similar orientation in both loops, namely Tyr21 in
the V3 loop, and Phe198 in human PrP (Fig. 1b).
In the same way, residues Tyr10 of the Alzheimer
-amyloid peptide and Phe20 of the gp120 V3 loop could be
partially superimposed. These observations suggest that the structural
alignments are highly significant, in agreement with the alignment
parameters (including root mean square deviations) provided by the CE
program (Table I). Thus, our study
confirms the capacity of the CE program to detect specific motifs in
unrelated proteins sharing little sequence homology (18, 23).

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Structural homology between prion,
Alzheimer, and HIV-1 gp120 proteins. a,
structure-based sequence alignment of human PrP, Alzheimer,
-amyloid
peptide, and HIV-1 gp120 (V3 loop). For each sequence, PDB entry name
and starting and ending residues are given. The alignment parameters
are given in Table I. b, superposition of the putative
GalCer-binding motif in the V3 loop of HIV-1 gp120 (red),
the Cys179-Cys214 polypeptide chain of human
PrP (blue), and the
-amyloid peptide (black).
The lateral chains of the aromatic residues potentially involved in
binding to GalCer are shown (left panel, Phe198
of PrP in green, and Tyr21 of gp120 loop in
yellow; right panel, Tyr10 of Alzheimer peptide
in yellow, and Phe20 of gp120 V3 loop in
green).
Structure-based alignment parameters obtained with the CE program

max = 8 mN/m) was obtained with a peptide concentration of 100 nM. Similar
data were previously obtained in our laboratory with a synthetic
peptide derived from the conserved motif of the V3 loop crown
(i.e. GPGRAF) (6).

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Dose-dependent interaction
between human PrP-derived synthetic peptides and a monomolecular film
of GalCer prepared at an initial pressure (
i)
of 10 mN/m. Increases in the surface pressure induced by the
indicated concentrations of peptide P1 (wild-type sequence,
squares) or P2 (E200K mutant sequence, circles)
added in the aqueous subphase were determined. Results are expressed as
the mean of three determinations ± S.D.
i) and the maximal surface pressure increase (
max) induced by the peptide on these films was determined after equilibrium had been reached. Below a
i of 30 mN/m, which corresponds to a fluid
disordered (Lc) phase, the 
max induced by the peptide was
between 5 and 10 mN/m (Fig.
3a). At a
i of 30 mN/m, the
value of 
max reached 16 mN/m. Then, for values of
i above 30 mN/m, which do correspond to raft-like liquid-ordered (Lo) phase
domains, 
max gradually decreased as
i increased. The
influence of the initial surface pressure on the compressibility of the
sphingolipid monolayer demonstrates the high specificity of the
interaction as previously established for several other lipids and
ligands (6, 24). The critical pressure of insertion (i.e.
the theoretical value of
i extrapolated for 
max = 0 mN/m) was 45 mN/m. Interestingly, the mean lipid density of cellular
membranes corresponds to a surface pressure of at least 30 mN/m (25).
Thus, these data suggest that the interaction of peptide P1 with GalCer
requires a densely packed organization of the glycosphingolipid, which is likely to occur within a lipid raft (26).

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Maximal surface pressure increase
( 
max) reached after injection
of human PrP peptides P1 (a) or P2
(b) under GalCer films at various initial surface
pressures (
i). The peptides were
used at a final concentration of 500 nM.
-helix of the sphingolipid-binding motif
(i.e.
3 of human PrP). Another synthetic peptide similar
to P1 but bearing the E200K substitution was therefore synthesized
(P2), and its interaction with sphingolipids was also analyzed using
the lipid monolayer assay. As for peptide P1, the interaction of
peptide P2 with a monomolecular film GalCer (
i = 10 mN/m) was
dose-dependent (Fig. 2). When the interaction was analyzed
at various values of
i, a triphasic pattern of interaction was
evidenced (Fig. 3b). When
i was between 10 and 15 mN/m,
the maximal surface pressure increase induced by the peptide gradually
decreased as
i increased. Between 15 and 25 mN/M, the peptide did
not affect the surface pressure of the GalCer monolayer. Finally, for
values of
i greater than 25 mN/m, a specific interaction occurred,
with a critical pressure of insertion of 42 mN/m. These data indicate
that both peptides P1 and P2 could interact with GalCer, with a marked
preference for densely packed films that mimic the organization of
sphingolipids found in membrane rafts. The minor differences observed
at low surface pressures (
i < 25 mN/m) may not have important
implications, since these values of the surface pressure do not reflect
the organization of lipids commonly found in biological membranes (25).
From a structural point of view, these data are consistent with the
high level of structural homology between the wild-type and the E200K
mutant of human PrP (27). The main effects of the E200K mutation are
(i) major changes in the distribution of charges on the protein surface
and (ii) the loss of a salt-bridge interaction between the side chains
of Glu200 and Lys204. In any case, the E200K
mutation has little (if any) effect on the orientation and
accessibility of aromatic residues that are involved in binding to
GalCer.
i (<15 mN/m). In particular, no interaction occurred at
the physiological pressure of 30 mN/m. In contrast, the wild-type
peptide (P1) interacted with sphingomyelin films prepared at low and at
high
i (critical pressures of insertion of 25 and 40 mN/m,
respectively) (Fig. 4a). These data show that the E200K
mutation specifically affected the recognition of sphingomyelin. The
replacement of an acid residue (Glu) by a basic one (Lys) in the
sphingolipid binding site is likely to affect the binding of PrP to
this positively charged lipid. Impaired recognition of sphingomyelin in
the raft environment may destabilize membrane-PrPc
interactions and thus facilitate the conformational change associated with the PrPc
PrPsc transition. Indeed, the
depletion of sphingomyelin in neural cells treated with either a
ceramide synthase inhibitor or sphingomyelinase resulted in a marked
stimulation of the PrPc
PrPsc conversion
(28). Most importantly, the V3-like domain of PrP identified in the
present study is involved in the dimerization of PrP, an early event
that constitutes an important step on the pathway of the
PrPc
PrPsc conversion (29). Moreover, amino
acid residues located in the vicinity of the putative raft-binding
domain of PrP are thought to bind an auxiliary molecule essential to
prion propagation (30). Taken together, these data support the view
that the V3-like domain of PrP is involved in the PrPc
PrPsc conversion and that raft sphingolipids may play an
active role in this process. This hypothesis is consistent with recent
data showing that the conformation of prion proteins is highly
sensitive to the membrane environment (31). We propose that
sphingolipids such as GalCer and sphingomyelin stabilize the
non-pathological conformation of PrPc in the lipid raft
through specific interactions with the V3-like domain of
PrPc.

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Maximal surface pressure increase
( 
max) reached after injection
of human PrP peptides P1 (a) or P2
(b) under sphingomyelin films at various initial
surface pressures (
i). The peptides were
used at a final concentration of 500 nM.
-Amyloid Peptide Interacts with GalCer and
Sphingomyelin--
Since a similar domain was characterized in
Alzheimer
-amyloid peptide, we studied the interaction of this
peptide with GalCer and sphingomyelin using the monomolecular film
binding assay (Fig. 5). In both cases,

max gradually decrease as
i increased (critical pressures of
insertion of 45 and 56 mN/m for GalCer and sphingomyelin, respectively). The ability of the
-amyloid peptide (fragment 1-40)
to recognize both GalCer and sphingomyelin is likely due to the
presence of both sugar-binding residues (Tyr10,
His13, His14, Phe20,
Phe21) and acid residues (Asp7,
Glu11) within the V3-like motif.

View larger version (10K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Maximal surface pressure increase
( 
max) reached after injection
of Alzheimer
-amyloid peptide under GalCer
(a) or sphingomyelin (b) films at
various initial surface pressures (
i).
The peptide was used at a final concentration of 500 nM.
-amyloid peptide (14). In any case, the main outcome of the present
study is the finding of a structural homology between unrelated
proteins known to induce major morphological and functional alterations
of the central nervous system. Synthetic soluble analogs of GalCer bind
to the V3 loop of gp120 and inhibit HIV-1 fusion (32). It would be of
interest to evaluate the activity of such glycolipid analogs on the
PrPc
PrPsc conversion as well as on the
formation of amyloid fibrils.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 33-491-288-761;
Fax: 33-491-288-440; E-mail: jacques.fantini@univ.u-3mrs.fr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 15, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111679200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: PrP, prion protein; GalCer, galactosylceramide; CE, combinatorial extension.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Prusiner, S. B.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
13363-13387 |
| 2. |
Vey, M.,
Pilkuhn, S.,
Wille, H.,
Nixon, R.,
DeArmond, S. J.,
Smart, E. J.,
Anderson, R. G. W.,
Taraboulos, A.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
11945-14949 |
| 3. |
Kaneko, K.,
Vey, M.,
Scott, M.,
Pilkuhn, S.,
Cohen, F. E.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2333-2338 |
| 4. |
Klein, T. R.,
Kirsch, D.,
Kaufmann, R.,
and Riesner, D.
(1998)
Biol. Chem.
379,
655-666[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. |
Harouse, J. M.,
Bhat, S.,
Spitalnik, S. L.,
Laughlin, M.,
Stefano, K.,
Silberberg, D. H.,
and Gonzalez-Scarano, F.
(1991)
Science
253,
320-323 |
| 6. |
Hammache, D.,
Piéroni, G.,
Yahi, N.,
Delézay, O.,
Koch, N.,
Lafont, H.,
Tamalet, C.,
and Fantini, J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
7967-7971 |
| 7. |
Hammache, D.,
Yahi, N.,
Piéroni, G.,
Ariasi, F.,
Tamalet, C.,
and Fantini, J.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
246,
117-122[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Puri, A.,
Hug, P.,
Jernigan, K.,
Barchi, J.,
Kim, H. Y.,
Hamilton, J.,
Wiels, J.,
Murray, G. J.,
Brady, R. O.,
and Blumenthal, R.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
14435-14440 |
| 9. |
Hammache, D.,
Yahi, N.,
Maresca, M.,
Piéroni, G.,
and Fantini, J.
(1999)
J. Virol.
73,
5244-5248 |
| 10. |
Van Mau, N.,
Misse, D., Le,
Grimellec, C.,
Divita, G.,
Heitz, F.,
and Veas, F.
(2000)
J. Membr. Biol.
177,
251-257[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. |
Puri, A.,
Hug, P.,
Jernigan, K.,
Rose, P.,
and Blumenthal, R.
(1999)
Biosci. Rep.
19,
317-325[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Manes, S.,
del Real, G.,
Lacalle, R. A.,
Lucas, P.,
Gomez-Mouton, C.,
Sanchez-Palomino, S.,
Delgado, R.,
Alcami, J.,
Mira, E.,
and Martinez, A. C.
(2000)
EMBO J.
1,
190-196[CrossRef] |
| 13. |
Hug, P.,
Lin, H.,
Korte, T.,
Xiao, X.,
Dimitrov, D. S.,
Wang, J. M.,
Puri, A.,
and Blumenthal, R.
(2000)
J. Virol.
74,
6377-6385 |
| 14. |
Choo-Smith, L. P.,
and Surewicz, W. K.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
402,
95-98[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Cook, D. G.,
Fantini, J.,
Spitalnik, S. L.,
and Gonzalez-Scarano, F.
(1994)
Virology
201,
206-214[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
Yahi, N.,
Sabatier, J. M.,
Baghdiguian, S.,
Gonzalez-Scarano, F.,
and Fantini, J.
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
320-325[Abstract] |
| 17. | Fujita, E., and Nishimura, S. I. (2000) Carbohydr. Lett. 4, 53-60[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Shindyalov, I. N.,
and Bourne, P. E.
(1998)
Protein Eng.
11,
739-747 |
| 19. |
Guex, N.,
and Peitsch, M. C.
(1997)
Electrophoresis
18,
2714-2723[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Sutton, J. M.,
Chow-Worn, O.,
Spaven, L.,
Silman, N. J.,
Hallis, B.,
and Shone, C. C.
(2001)
FEBS Lett.
493,
45-49[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Nyholm, P. G.,
Brunton, J. L.,
and Lingwood, C. A.
(1995)
Int. J. Biol. Macromol.
17,
199-204[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. |
Sinha, K.,
Box, M.,
Lalli, G.,
Schiavo, G.,
Schneider, H.,
Groves, M.,
Siligardi, G.,
and Fairweather, N.
(2000)
Mol. Microbiol.
37,
1041-1051[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. |
Shao, X.,
and Grishin, N. V.
(2000)
Nucleic Acids Res.
28,
2643-2650 |
| 24. |
Maggio, B.
(1994)
Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.
62,
55-117[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Quinn, P. J. (1994) in The Lipid Handbook (Gunstone, F. D. , Harwood, J. L. , and Padley, F. B., eds) , pp. 465-485, Chapman and Hall, New York |
| 26. |
Brown, R. E.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
1-9[Abstract] |
| 27. |
Zhang, Y.,
Swietnicki, W.,
Zagorski, M. G.,
Surewicz, W. K.,
and Sönnichsen, F. D.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
33650-33654 |
| 28. |
Naslavsky, N,
Shmeeda, H.,
Friedlander, G.,
Yanai, A.,
Futerman, A. H.,
Barenholz, Y.,
and Taraboulos, A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
20763-20771 |
| 29. |
Knaus, K. J.,
Morillas, M.,
Swietnicki, W.,
Malone, M.,
Surewicz, W. K.,
and Yee, V. C.
(2001)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
8,
770-774[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. |
Kaneko, K.,
Zulianello, L.,
Scott, M.,
Cooper, C. M.,
Wallace, A. C.,
James, T. L.,
Cohen, F. E.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
10069-10074 |
| 31. |
Morillas, M.,
Swietnicki, W.,
Gambetti, P.,
and Surewicz, W. K.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
36859-36865 |
| 32. |
Fantini, J.
(2000)
Methods Enzymol.
311,
626-638[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Bakrac, I. Gutierrez-Aguirre, Z. Podlesek, A. F.-P. Sonnen, R. J. C. Gilbert, P. Macek, J. H. Lakey, and G. Anderluh Molecular Determinants of Sphingomyelin Specificity of a Eukaryotic Pore-forming Toxin J. Biol. Chem., July 4, 2008; 283(27): 18665 - 18677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hebbar, E. Lee, M. Manna, S. Steinert, G. S. Kumar, M. Wenk, T. Wohland, and R. Kraut A fluorescent sphingolipid binding domain peptide probe interacts with sphingolipids and cholesterol-dependent raft domains J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 1077 - 1089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Prior, S. Lehmann, M.-S. Sy, B. Molloy, and H. E. M. McMahon Cyclodextrins Inhibit Replication of Scrapie Prion Protein in Cell Culture J. Virol., October 15, 2007; 81(20): 11195 - 11207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R. Race, J. H. Lakey, and M. J. Banfield Insertion of the Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Tir Virulence Protein into Membranes in Vitro J. Biol. Chem., March 24, 2006; 281(12): 7842 - 7849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Sepulveda, M. Berrocal-Carrillo, M. Gasset, and A. M. Mata The Plasma Membrane Ca2+-ATPase Isoform 4 Is Localized in Lipid Rafts of Cerebellum Synaptic Plasma Membranes J. Biol. Chem., January 6, 2006; 281(1): 447 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Rao, T. Chung, H. M. Pike, and R. E. Brown Glycolipid Transfer Protein Interaction with Bilayer Vesicles: Modulation by Changing Lipid Composition Biophys. J., December 1, 2005; 89(6): 4017 - 4028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. A. Openshaw, P. R. Race, H. J. Monzo, J.-A. Vazquez-Boland, and M. J. Banfield Crystal Structure of SmcL, a Bacterial Neutral Sphingomyelinase C from Listeria J. Biol. Chem., October 14, 2005; 280(41): 35011 - 35017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Avota, N. Muller, M. Klett, and S. Schneider-Schaulies Measles Virus Interacts with and Alters Signal Transduction in T-Cell Lipid Rafts J. Virol., September 1, 2004; 78(17): 9552 - 9559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Sarnataro, V. Campana, S. Paladino, M. Stornaiuolo, L. Nitsch, and C. Zurzolo PrPC Association with Lipid Rafts in the Early Secretory Pathway Stabilizes Its Cellular Conformation Mol. Biol. Cell, September 1, 2004; 15(9): 4031 - 4042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Walmsley, F. Zeng, and N. M. Hooper The N-terminal Region of the Prion Protein Ectodomain Contains a Lipid Raft Targeting Determinant J. Biol. Chem., September 26, 2003; 278(39): 37241 - 37248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Steinbauer, T. Mehnert, and K. Beyer Hydration and Lateral Organization in Phospholipid Bilayers Containing Sphingomyelin: A 2H-NMR Study Biophys. J., August 1, 2003; 85(2): 1013 - 1024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Baron and B. Caughey Effect of Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Anchor-dependent and -independent Prion Protein Association with Model Raft Membranes on Conversion to the Protease-resistant Isoform J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2003; 278(17): 14883 - 14892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yamabhai and R. G. W. Anderson Second Cysteine-rich Region of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Contains Targeting Information for Caveolae/Rafts J. Biol. Chem., July 5, 2002; 277(28): 24843 - 24846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |