|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M111958200 on January 25, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 14, 11709-11714, April 5, 2002
A Principal Role for the Proteasome in Endoplasmic
Reticulum-associated Degradation of Misfolded Intracellular Cystic
Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator*
Marina S.
Gelman ,
Elisa S.
Kannegaard, and
Ron R.
Kopito§
From the Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University,
Stanford, California 94305-5020
Received for publication, December 14, 2001, and in revised form, January 16, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Endoplasmic reticulum-associated
degradation of misfolded cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance
regulator (CFTR) protein is known to involve the ubiquitin-proteasome
system. In addition, an ATP-independent proteolytic system has been
suggested to operate in parallel with this pathway and become
up-regulated when proteasomes are inhibited (Jensen, T. J., Loo,
M. A., Pind, S., Williams, D. B., Goldberg, A. L., and
Riordan, J. R. (1995) Cell 83, 129-135). In this
study, we use two independent techniques, pulse-chase labeling and a
noninvasive fluorescence cell-based assay, to investigate the
proteolytic pathways underlying the degradation of misfolded CFTR. Here
we report that only inhibitors of the proteasome have a significant
effect on preventing the degradation of CFTR, whereas cell-permeable
inhibitors of lysosomal degradation, autophagy, and several classes of
protease had no measurable effect on CFTR degradation, when used either
alone or in combination with the specific proteasome inhibitor
carbobenzoxy-L-leucyl-leucyl-L-leucinal (MG132). Our results suggest that ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation is the dominant pathway for disposal of misfolded CFTR in
mammalian cells and provide new mechanistic insight into endoplasmic
reticulum-associated degradation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The endoplasmic reticulum
(ER)1 is the site of
synthesis of membrane and secretory proteins and the site of their
conformational maturation and assembly into correctly folded functional
molecules. "Quality control" refers to the system that monitors the
folding and assembly of proteins in the ER, ensuring that only
correctly folded proteins can mature to later compartments of the
secretory pathway (1, 2). Nascent proteins that fail to fold or
assemble in the ER are degraded by a process known as ER-associated
degradation (ERAD) (3). Studies in mammalian cells and in yeast have
led to the formulation of a general model for ERAD in which substrates are degraded by cytoplasmic proteasomes following retrotranslocation (i.e. "dislocation") across the ER membrane by a process
that requires the Sec61 translocon and functional ubiquitylation
machinery at the cytosolic face of the ER membrane (4-6). Dislocation
of ERAD substrates across the ER membrane is kinetically coupled to
their degradation by proteasomes, and in many cases, cytosolic intermediates of degradation are hard to detect (7, 8). Although a
central role for proteasomes in ERAD is widely accepted, a number of
studies have suggested that other, nonproteasomal, proteolytic systems
may also contribute to the elimination of misfolded proteins from the
ER (9-12).
The polytopic membrane protein cystic fibrosis transmembrane
conductance regulator (CFTR) is a chloride channel expressed at the
apical surface of polarized epithelial cells and one of the first
integral membrane proteins demonstrated to be a substrate of the
ubiquitin-proteasome system (9, 13). Mutations in the CFTR
gene cause the recessively inherited fatal disease cystic fibrosis.
Although nearly 1000 mutations have been linked to cystic fibrosis, the
majority of Caucasian cystic fibrosis patients have at least one copy
of the F508 mutation, a temperature-sensitive allele that is unable
to fold correctly at physiological temperature. As a
consequence, F508 CFTR ( F508) is not deployed to the
plasma membrane and is instead rapidly degraded without being processed in the Golgi apparatus (14, 15).
Several lines of evidence support a role for the ubiquitin-proteasome
pathway in F508 turnover. First, CFTR undergoes both co-translational and posttranslational ubiquitylation when expressed in
a cell-free system (16, 17). Second, inhibition of proteasome function
with chemical inhibitors or with a dominant negative form of ubiquitin
leads to accumulation of multiubiquitylated, undegraded forms of CFTR
and F508 (13). Third, degradation of F508 in a cell-free system
is sensitive to inhibitors of both the 19 S and 20 S subunits of the
proteasome (17, 18). Curiously, despite this compelling evidence in
support of a role for proteasomes in the degradation of misfolded CFTR,
the effect of proteasome inhibition on the disappearance of F508
from pulse-chase studies is minimal (9, 13). This observation has led
some investigators to conclude that other proteolytic systems are
primarily responsible for the ERAD of misfolded CFTR molecules (9).
However, no other proteases or proteolytic systems have been
convincingly demonstrated to contribute to the degradation of CFTR or
other ERAD substrates. Therefore, the intracellular fate of F508 and
the identity of the proteases that participate in its degradation
remain unresolved.
In this study, we used a reporter (GFP- F508) consisting of a fusion
of GFP with F508 (19) to assess the participation of proteasomes and
other proteolytic systems in F508 degradation. Our data establish
that proteolytic activities of the proteasome are responsible
for vast majority of intracellular degradation of misfolded CFTR molecules.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Reagents--
Most chemicals (with the exception of some
proteasome inhibitors) were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. Epoxomicin
and carbobenzoxy-L-leucyl-leucyl-L-leucinal (MG132) were obtained from Calbiochem. YU102 was generously provided by
Dr. Graig Crews (Yale University, New Haven, CT). Polyclonal anti-GFP
antibody was a kind gift from Dr. Michael Rexach (Stanford University).
Constructs and Cell Lines--
pGFP-CFTR in a pEGFP-C1 vector
(CLONTECH) was obtained from Dr. B. Stanton
(Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH) and subsequently subcloned into
pcDNA3.1 vector (Invitrogen) using NheI and
EcoRV. F508 mutation was introduced by replacing the
[Pml1-Blp1] cassette within the CFTR sequence. For selection of
stable CHO cell lines, GFP- F508/pcDNA3 plasmid was linearized
and transfected into CHO cells by calcium phosphate precipitation. The
cells were subjected to selection in G418-containing medium. Stable
transfectants were expanded in culture and enriched for
GFP- F508-expressing cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting of
highly fluorescent cells after overnight incubation of these cells with
the proteasome inhibitor
N-acetyl-L-leucinyl-L-leucinyl-L-norleucinal.
Cells were then cloned into 96-well dishes at a density of 1 cell/well. Clonal cell lines were expanded and analyzed for full-length
GFP- F508 expression by immunoblotting, and a single clone (clone 2)
was selected for this study. Generation of human embryonic kidney HEK293 cells stably expressing GFPu was described elsewhere
(20).
35S Labeling and Immunoprecipitation--
CHO clone
2 cells were plated on 10 × 10-cm dishes and treated with 5 mM butyrate overnight to increase GFP- F508 expression. The next day, cells were starved in cysteine/methionine-free
media for 30 min and then labeled with
[35S]cysteine/methionine (specific activity, 1 mCi/ml)
for 30 min in the presence of 5 mM butyrate. Two 10-cm
dishes were harvested immediately after the pulse (t = 0 h), whereas the remaining dishes were chased in the presence of
the protein synthesis inhibitor emetine (75 µM) or
emetine and MG132 (25 µM) together. At specified time
intervals, cells were solubilized in buffer A (10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40,
0.05% deoxycholate) containing a CompleteTM protease
inhibitor mixture (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) for 30 min. Cell lysates
were precleared with protein A-Sepharose beads and incubated with
anti-GFP antibody and protein A-Sepharose. The immunoprecipitates were
washed extensively with buffer A and fractionated by 4-15% gradient
SDS-PAGE (Bio-Rad). Quantitation of radioactive bands was done using
PhosphorImager SI and ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics).
Fluorescence-activated Cell-sorting Assay--
Analysis of
GFP- F508 CFTR fluorescence by flow cytometry was performed using
Coulter® Epics® XL-MCL Flow Cytometer and
EXPO v.2 cytometer software. Cells were typically incubated with 5 mM butyrate overnight to increase GFP- F508 CFTR
expression or with 10 µg/ml
N-acetyl-L-leucinyl-L-leucinyl-L-norleucinal for 3 h to increase GFPu steady-state level. After the
addition of emetine with or without protease inhibitors, cultures were
incubated for different time intervals before analysis. Data from
10,000 cells were collected, and the mean fluorescence of the cell
population was used as a measure of GFP- F508 levels after each treatment.
ATP Depletion--
CHO cl.2 cells expressing GFP- F508 and
HEK293 cells expressing GFPu were ATP-depleted by
incubating the cells in glucose-free medium (Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium; Invitrogen) containing the metabolic inhibitors
cyanide (5 mM) and 2-deoxy-D-glucose (5 mM) as described previously (21). This procedure reduces
ATP content below 10% of the baseline value within 10 min and sustains
this low level of ATP content (22). Based on this determination, the
initial fluorescence measurement in ATP-depleted cells
(t = 0 h) was taken at 10 min after exposure of
cells to metabolic inhibitors.
 |
RESULTS |
Effect of Proteasome Inhibitors on GFP- F508 Degradation in
Metabolic Pulse-chase Analysis--
To validate the use of GFP- F508
as a model of F508 degradation, we performed pulse-chase analysis in
a clonal CHO cell line (cl.2) stably expressing this fusion protein.
cl.2 cells were selected for low basal expression levels to avoid
accumulation of GFP- F508 in detergent-insoluble aggresomes, which
are highly refractory to degradation (23). Before use, the cells were
treated with the transcriptional activator sodium butyrate to increase GFP- F508 expression. Under these conditions, aggregation of
GFP- F508 was undetectable by either immunoblot or fluorescence
microscopy (data not shown). Immunoprecipitation of metabolically
labeled cell lysates with anti-GFP antibody revealed a major
Mr ~170,000 band corresponding to
core-glycosylated GFP- F508 and high molecular weight (HMW) species
migrating near the top of the gel (Fig.
1A). During the chase, the
Mr 170,000 band disappeared with first-order kinetics (t1/2 = 50 min), consistent with previous
determinations of F508 (9, 24, 25) and GFP- F508 half-life (23).
In the presence of MG132, a specific proteasome inhibitor (26), the
half-life of this species was only modestly extended
(t1/2 = 1.5 h) (Fig. 1B, top
left panel). A minor band migrating at Mr
~50,000 probably corresponds to an amino-terminal fragment of the
GFP- 508 fusion protein comprising Mr
~20,000 of CFTR in addition to the GFP moiety because it reacted with
antibody to GFP, but not with an antibody raised against the carboxyl
terminus of CFTR (data not shown). Disappearance of the
Mr 50,000 fragment paralleled that of the Mr 170,000 band (t1/2 = 1.1 h) and was also only modestly inhibited by MG132
(t1/2 = 1.5 h) (Fig. 1B,
bottom left panel). HMW forms of GFP- F508 were detected
immediately after the pulse (top band in Fig.
1A). These complexes disappeared rapidly when the chase was
conducted in the absence of proteasome inhibitor
(t1/2 = 0.9 h), but in contrast to the
core-glycosylated protein and the Mr 50,000 fragment, they were strongly stabilized by the presence of MG132
(t1/2 = 6.6 h) (Fig. 1B, top
right panel).

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Pulse-chase analysis of GFP- F508 CFTR
degradation. A, butyrate-treated CHO cells were labeled with
[35S]cysteine/methionine and chased for the indicated
time intervals in the presence or absence of MG132 (25 µM). Cells were then solubilized, and lysates were
immunoprecipitated with anti-GFP antibody as described under
"Experimental Procedures." B, quantitation of individual
bands and total radioactivity in each lane was performed using
ImageQuant software. Filled symbols represent cells that
were chased without MG132, and open symbols represent cells
chased in the presence of 25 µM MG132. The
insets show semilog plots of these data. In the
insets, solid and broken lines
represent cells chased without or with MG132, respectively.
|
|
The HMW complexes could represent either polyubiquitylated forms of
monomeric GFP- F508 (16, 17) or detergent-insoluble aggregates of
CFTR (23). To distinguish between these possibilities, we sought to
determine whether the HMW material that accumulated during the chase in
the presence of MG132 could be degraded after washout of the inhibitor.
Our results (data not shown) indicate that the HMW material was soluble
in nonionic detergent and competent for degradation, strongly
suggesting that the increase in molecular weight was due to covalent
modification with Ub, as observed previously for CFTR in cell-free
extracts (17).
Quantification of the pulse-chase data indicates that MG132 was only
marginally effective at stabilizing the Mr
170,000 F508 band. Even when the total amount of GFP-immunoreactive
material is considered (the sum of all electrophoretic species, Fig.
1B, bottom right panel), only 40% of the initial
amount of GFP- F508 was stable at the end of a 4-h chase, despite
proteasome inhibition. This observation suggests several plausible
explanations. First, as suggested by Jensen et al. (9), in
addition to proteasomes, other proteolytic systems could also
contribute to F508 ERAD. Alternatively, it is possible that some
proteolytic activities within the proteasome remain uninhibited in the
presence of MG132 and continue to degrade the substrate. Finally,
immunoprecipitation of radiolabeled material from detergent extracts of
pulse-labeled cells may underestimate the amount of stable F508 if
some of the protein becomes insoluble, if the epitope used for
immunoprecipitation becomes inaccessible, or if the increased molecular
weight (due to polyubiquitylation and/or aggregation) of the protein
prevents it from being well resolved by SDS-PAGE. We reasoned that a
noninvasive method of monitoring the fluorescence of GFP- F508 in
intact cells using fluorescence-activated cell-sorting analysis may be
a more accurate way to measure protein stability because it does not rely upon efficient recovery of radiolabeled protein from cells or upon
the detection of a resolvable electrophoretic species. This would in
turn allow us to better evaluate the effect of protease inhibitors on
prevention of CFTR degradation.
Fluorescence-based Determination of GFP- F508
Degradation--
To circumvent the limitations of the pulse-chase
approach, we developed a fluorescence-based assay to measure
degradation of GFP- F508. Inhibition of GFP- F508 synthesis in
butyrate-treated cells with emetine, an inhibitor of translational
elongation, caused a rapid decrease in mean fluorescence, as measured
by flow cytometry (Fig. 2). Similar
results were obtained with other translation inhibitors including
cycloheximide and puromycin (data not shown). Emetine does not affect
the degradation kinetics of CFTR or F508 (13). The decrease in
GFP- F508 fluorescence fitted a first-order exponential with a
t1/2 = 60 min, in good agreement with the
GFP- F508 half-life measured in pulse-chase experiments (Fig. 2). In
a control experiment, CHO cells expressing GFP alone were incubated
with emetine for up to 10 h without any loss of total fluorescence
(data not shown), consistent with GFP being a stable protein (20) and
indicating that emetine treatment does not cause detectable cell lysis
during the course of the experiment. Together, these results suggest
that the decline in the fluorescence of cl.2 cells upon exposure to
protein synthesis inhibitor faithfully reflects the degradation of
F508 and constitutes a valid and convenient method for
characterization of this degradation process.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Fluorescence-based measurement of F508
CFTR degradation rate. Butyrate-treated cells were incubated with
75 µM emetine for the indicated time intervals, and
cellular fluorescence was measured by flow cytometry. The mean
fluorescence of 10,000 cells was determined at each time point and
represented as a percentage of initial fluorescence. The
inset shows a semilog plot of fluorescence decline
versus time in emetine, from which the half-time of
fluorescence decline was calculated.
|
|
Inhibition of GFP- F508 Degradation by Proteasome
Inhibitors--
To assess the effect of inhibition of different
proteolytic systems on the degradation of mutant CFTR using the
fluorescence assay, we evaluated the effect of a panel of protease
inhibitors on the decline in GFP- F508 fluorescence in
butyrate-treated cl.2 cells in the presence of emetine (Fig.
3A). Among the inhibitors tested, only those that are known to inhibit the proteasome
(N-acetyl-L-leucinyl-L-leucinyl-L-norleucinal, clasto-lactacystin -lactone, and MG132) significantly
slowed the degradation of GFP- F508. In contrast, inhibitors of
serine and cysteine proteases (TPCK,
N -tosyl-Lys-chloromethyl ketone, and
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), calpains (EDTA), lysosomal cathepsins
((2S,3S)-trans-epoxysuccinyl-L-leucylamido-3-methylbutane ethyl ester, chloroquine, and NH4Cl), and autophagy
(3-methyladenine and wortmannin) had no measurable effect on the
degradation process, either alone (Fig. 3A) or in
combination with MG132 (25 µM) (data not shown). These
data confirm a central role for proteasomes in the degradation of
F508 and suggest that other major proteolytic systems do not
contribute significantly to this process.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of protease inhibitors on GFP- F508
fluorescence. A, CHO cl.2 cells were treated with 5 mM butyrate overnight and incubated for 4 h with
emetine alone (75 µM) or with emetine and one of the
following protease inhibitors:
N-acetyl-L-leucinyl-L-leucinyl-L-norleucinal
(ALLN; 10 µg/ml),
(2S,3S)-trans-epoxysuccinyl-L-leucylamido-3-methylbutane
ethyl ester (EST; 10 µM), -lactone (25 µM); EDTA (2 mM), chloroquine (150 µM), NH4Cl (10 mM), MG132 (25 µM), N -tosyl-Lys-chloromethyl
ketone (TLCK; 2 µg/ml), 3-methyladenine (3-MA;
10 mM), TPCK (2 µg/ml), and wortmannin (100 nM). Fluorescence at the end of 4 h was expressed as a
percentage of initial fluorescence at t = 0, after
subtraction of background fluorescence (CHO cell autofluorescence).
B, CHO clone 2 cells expressing GFP- F508 (solid
line) or HEK293 cells expressing GFPu (broken
line) were incubated with 75 µM emetine ( or ,
respectively) or with 75 µM emetine and 25 µM MG132 ( or , respectively) for the indicated
time intervals. Mean cellular fluorescence was expressed as a
percentage of initial fluorescence at t = 0 h,
after subtraction of background fluorescence.
|
|
In the presence of MG132 (25 µM), the fluorescence of
GFP- F508 first increased, reaching almost 120% of the initial
fluorescence after 1 h of emetine chase (Fig. 3B). This
increase probably reflects slow fluorogenesis of the GFP moiety
(t1/2 = 30-90 min; 27, 28) in the absence of CFTR
degradation. Indeed, this transient increase in fluorescence is
also observed with GFPu, a GFP molecule that is targeted to
the ubiquitin-proteasome system for degradation via a short
carboxyl-terminal degron (20) (Fig. 3B). However, in
contrast to GFPu, which was completely stabilized by 25 µM MG132, the fluorescence of GFP- F508 started to
decline after the first hour and dropped to about 70% of initial
fluorescence after 4 h of emetine chase. The half-time of the
decline of GFP- F508 fluorescence in the presence of MG132 (25 µM) was 6.8 h, indicating that proteasome inhibition
results in substantial stabilization of GFP- F508.
To determine whether the continued decline in GFP- F508 fluorescence
in the presence of MG132 was due to degradation by the proteasome, we
examined the effect of increased inhibitor concentration on the
fluorescence remaining at the 4 h chase point (Fig.
4A). These data suggest that
GFP- F508 degradation is inhibited by MG132 biphasically with a
high-affinity component (IC50 10 µM) and a
low-affinity component that we were not able to saturate, even at
concentrations as high as 300 µM.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Dose dependence of proteasome inhibitors in
the fluorescence assay. A, fluorescence of butyrate-treated
CHO cl.2 cells was measured at 4 h after the addition of emetine
and the indicated concentrations of MG132 and expressed as a percentage
of the initial fluorescence at t = 0 h. Values
represent the average of three experiments. B, CHO cl.2
cells were incubated with emetine alone ( ) or emetine plus the
following concentrations of epoxomicin: 1 µM ( ), 5 µM ( ), 10 µM ( ), 20 µM
( ), and 50 µM ( ). Inset, rate constants
of GFP- F508 degradation were calculated and plotted as a function of
epoxomicin concentration. C, CHO cl.2 cells were incubated
with increasing concentrations of epoxomicin in the absence ( ) or
presence ( ) of 500 µM YU102. Values represent the
average of three separate experiments + S.E.
|
|
To further investigate the role of proteasomes in GFP- F508
degradation, we performed a titration of epoxomicin, a highly specific
and potent proteasome inhibitor (29). Like MG132, epoxomicin inhibited
GFP- F508 fluorescence decay biphasically with a high-affinity component (IC50 < 1 µM) and a low-affinity
component (Fig. 4B). Although epoxomicin can inhibit all
three of the characterized activities of the proteasomes, it is 66- and
500- fold more effective at inhibiting the chymotrypsin-like (CT-L)
activity than the trypsin-like or peptidyl-glutamyl hydrolyzing
activities, respectively (30). To investigate whether the low-affinity
component of the MG132 and epoxomicin titrations was due to non-CT-L
activities, we performed a titration of epoxomicin in the presence of
500 µM YU102, an ', '-epoxyketone inhibitor that is
selective for the peptidyl-glutamyl hydrolyzing activity of the
proteasome (30). This treatment resulted in a small (10-15%) but
significant increase in the degree of inhibition of GFP- F508
fluorescence decay at all epoxomicin concentrations (Fig.
4C). These results suggest that the CT-L and
peptidyl-glutamyl hydrolyzing activities of the proteasome may
contribute independently to the degradation of GFP- F508.
A hallmark of proteolysis by the Ub-proteasome system is its dependence
on ATP hydrolysis. ATP is required for at least two steps in
Ub-dependent degradation: activation of Ub, and substrate unfolding (31, 32). However, previous studies suggested that the
fraction of CFTR degradation that is insensitive to proteasome inhibitors is independent of ATP (9). To assess the dependence of
GFP- F508 degradation on ATP, we assayed GFP- F508 fluorescence in
ATP-depleted cl.2 cells (Fig.
5A). These data demonstrate
that GFP- F508 degradation is absolutely dependent on the presence of
cellular ATP. The degradation of GFPu was similarly
dependent upon ATP (Fig. 5B).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effect of ATP depletion on
GFP- F508 and GFPu degradation. CHO cl.2
cells expressing GFP- F508 (A) or HEK293 cells expressing
GFPu (B) were subjected to emetine chase for up
to 4 h in either high-glucose medium ( ) or glucose-free medium
containing 5 mM cyanide and 5 mM
2-deoxy-D-glucose ( ). Each data point represents an
average of three separate experiments + S.E.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
ER-associated degradation is a central element of the quality
control pathways that ensure that only correctly folded and assembled
proteins are deployed in the secretory pathway of eukaryotic cells.
Although many studies have confirmed a primary role of the
Ub-proteasome system in ERAD, the apparently minimal effect of highly
potent proteasome inhibitors on the degradation of CFTR has remained an
enigma and has suggested that other ATP-independent proteolytic systems
also contribute to ERAD. In this study, we have used a fluorescent
substrate to re-evaluate the role of the UPS in ERAD. Our data
establish the primacy of the UPS in the degradation of ER-associated
misfolded CFTR and suggest that the different proteolytic
functionalities of the proteasome, associated with the three active
-subunits, may operate independently in the degradation of an ERAD
substrate (GFP- F508), but apparently not in the degradation of a
cytoplasmic substrate (GFPu). Three lines of evidence
support our conclusion that the UPS is the principal pathway for
degradation of misfolded CFTR. First, proteasome inhibitors, but not
inhibitors of serine or cysteine proteases or inhibitors of lysosomal
or autophagic pathways, strongly stabilize GFP- F508 fluorescence.
Second, GFP- F508 degradation was inhibited by MG132 and epoxomicin
in a dose-dependent fashion, with biphasic apparent
IC50 values in the expected range for CT-L and non-CT-L
activities (30). Third, GFP- F508 degradation was strictly dependent
on ATP, a hallmark of UPS-mediated proteolysis (31, 32). The
possibility that other proteases initiate the clipping of the CFTR
molecule while it is situated in the ER membrane, followed by
proteasome-mediated proteolysis, is also unlikely because simultaneous
addition of protease and proteasome inhibitors did not protect
CFTR from degradation. Although our results do not rule out
participation in CFTR degradation of protease classes for which
cell-permeable inhibitors are not available (i.e. aspartic proteases, aminopeptidases, and so forth) or of substrate-specific proteases (e.g. colligin is a specific inhibitor of
procollagen degradation (33)), these data establish that inhibition of
proteolytic activities of the proteasome alone is sufficient to prevent
the degradation of the majority of F508 molecules in living cells.
In previous studies using metabolic pulse-chase labeling and
immunoprecipitation, proteasome inhibitors including MG132 and lactacystin had a very modest effect at inhibiting the decay of the
electrophoretic species corresponding to core-glycosylated F508
degradation (9, 13). In the present work, we show that at least part of
radiolabel lost from core-glycosylated GFP- F508 could be recovered
as high molecular weight material. Because this HMW material remains
competent for degradation, our data suggest that in the absence of
proteasome function, a significant fraction of radiolabeled GFP- F508
molecules are converted to multiubiquitylated forms. Accumulation of
HMW forms in the presence of proteasome inhibition is not observed for
most other ERAD substrates such as the -subunit of the T-cell
receptor (7, 34) and soluble proteins such as IgG light chains (8),
which tend to accumulate as core-glycosylated detergent-soluble
monomers in the ER after proteasome inhibition. It is likely that this
difference is a consequence of the topology of CFTR, in which most of
the mass of the protein is accessible to the cytoplasmic face of the ER
and hence to components of the ubiquitin conjugation system. A recent
study reported that inhibition of proteasome function leads to
accumulation of a substantial fraction of CFTR in reconstituted cell-free extracts as high molecular weight multiubiquitylated protein
(17).
In our studies, no proteasome inhibitor or combination thereof was able
to completely suppress the decay of GFP- F508 fluorescence. It is
unlikely that this apparent degradation (a ~20-30% decrease of
fluorescence after a 4-h chase in the presence of proteasome inhibitors) is the result of cell death due to toxic effects of simultaneous exposure to emetine and proteasome inhibitor because >98% of cells were able to exclude propidium iodide staining at the
end of a 4-h chase. Alternatively, the decrease in GFP- F508 fluorescence could, in principle, be due to self-quenching of GFP
fluorescence in closely packed aggregates of GFP- F508, which are
known to form upon chronic exposure to proteasome inhibitors (23). Such
self-quenching is a form of fluorescence resonance energy transfer
(fluorescence resonance energy transfer homotransfer). Because
we do not observe heterotransfer between the compatible fluorescence resonance energy transfer heterotransfer pair CFP- F508 and YFP- F508, even under conditions designed to maximize
aggregation,2 it is unlikely
that homotransfer between adjacent GFP- F508 molecules could account for the observed decrease in fluorescence. It is also
formally possible that the small decrease in GFP- F508 fluorescence could be due to partial unfolding of the GFP moiety by the ATPase activity of the 19 S proteasome cap, without actual degradation of CFTR
itself. However, the simplest explanation may be that none of the
proteasome inhibitors used, alone or in combination, are able to fully
inhibit all of the three proteasomal -subunits. This explanation is
consistent with conversion of a similar fraction (~30%) of labeled
GFP- F508 as high molecular weight multiubiquitin conjugates in the
presence of MG132 in both our pulse-labeling experiments (Fig. 1) and
in the cell-free experiments of Oberdorf et al. (18). It is
likely, therefore, that the proteolytic activities of the proteasome
associated with individual -subunits do not act in a strictly
cooperative fashion in ERAD. Our findings with GFP- F508 in
vivo are consistent with those of Oberdorf et al. (18),
who found that complete inhibition of the 5-subunit (associated with
CT-L activity) led to only a 40% reduction in cell-free CFTR degradation, and with those of Myung et al. (30), who
reported recently that selective peptidyl-glutamyl hydrolyzing
inhibition is insufficient to inhibit protein degradation in
vivo. These data all strongly indicate that the catalytic sites of
the proteasome function independently. It is not clear why, in our
studies, the degradation of GFPu, a small soluble substrate
of the UPS, is completely inhibited by MG132, whereas degradation of
GFP- F508 is not. Perhaps this discrepancy is a reflection of
functional differences in the mechanisms by which proteasomes engage
substrates delivered from the cytosol and those that are dislocated
across the ER membrane.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Neil Bence for providing HEK293
cells expressing GFPu and Karim Helmy for help with
epoxomicin and ATP depletion experiments. We are grateful to Dr. Craig
Crews for a kind gift of YU102. We also thank members of the Kopito
laboratory for helpful comments.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grant R01 DK43994 (to R. R. K.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported in part by a postdoctoral training grant from the
National Institutes of Health.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biological
Sciences, Stanford University, 371 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305-5020. Tel.: 650-723-7581; Fax: 650-723-8475; E-mail:
kopito@stanford.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 25, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111958200
2
R. Rajan and R. R. Kopito, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ER, endoplasmic reticulum;
ERAD, endoplasmic reticulum-associated
degradation;
UPS, ubiquitin-proteasome system;
TPCK, tosylphenylalanyl
chloromethyl ketone;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary, CFTR, cystic fibrosis
transmembrane conductance regulator;
GFP, green fluorescent protein;
cl.2, clone 2;
HMW, high molecular weight;
Ub, ubiquitin;
CT-L, chymotrypsin-like.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Helenius, A.
(2001)
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.
356,
147-150[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Ellgaard, L.,
and Helenius, A.
(2001)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
13,
431-437[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Brodsky, J. L.,
and McCracken, A. A.
(1999)
Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.
10,
507-513[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Kopito, R. R.
(1997)
Cell
88,
427-430[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Plemper, R. K.,
and Wolf, D. H.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Rep.
26,
125-130[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Johnson, A. E.,
and Haigh, N. G.
(2000)
Cell
102,
709-712[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Yu, H.,
and Kopito, R. R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
36852-36858[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
O'Hare, T.,
Wiens, G. D.,
Whitcomb, E. A.,
Enns, C. A.,
and Rittenberg, M. B.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
163,
11-14[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Jensen, T. J.,
Loo, M. A.,
Pind, S.,
Williams, D. B.,
Goldberg, A. L.,
and Riordan, J. R.
(1995)
Cell
83,
129-135[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Loayza, D.,
and Michaelis, S.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
779-789[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Liao, W.,
and Chan, L.
(2001)
Biochem. J.
353,
493-501[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Umebayashi, K.,
Fukuda, R.,
Hirata, A.,
Horiuchi, H.,
Nakano, A.,
Ohta, A.,
and Takagi, M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
41444-41454[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Ward, C. L.,
Omura, S.,
and Kopito, R. R.
(1995)
Cell
83,
121-127[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Kopito, R. R.
(1999)
Physiol. Rev.
79,
S167-S173[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Bannykh, S. I.,
Bannykh, G. I.,
Fish, K. N.,
Moyer, B. D.,
Riordan, J. R.,
and Balch, W. E.
(2000)
Traffic
1,
852-870[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Sato, S.,
Ward, C. L.,
and Kopito, R. R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
7189-7192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Xiong, X.,
Chong, E.,
and Skach, W. R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
2616-2624[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Oberdorf, J.,
Carlson, E. J.,
and Skach, W. R.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
13397-13405[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Moyer, B. D.,
Loffing, J.,
Schwiebert, E. M.,
Loffing-Cueni, D.,
Halpin, P. A.,
Karlson, K. H.,
Ismailov, I. I.,
Guggino, W. B.,
Langford, G. M.,
and Stanton, B. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
21759-21768[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Bence, N. F.,
Sampat, R. M.,
and Kopito, R. R.
(2001)
Science
292,
1552-1555[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Wang, Y. H., Li, F.,
Schwartz, J. H.,
Flint, P. J.,
and Borkan, S. C.
(2001)
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol
281,
C1667-C1675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Wang, Y. H.,
and Borkan, S. C.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
270,
F1057-F1065[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Johnston, J. A.,
Ward, C. L.,
and Kopito, R. R.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
143,
1883-1898[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Ward, C. L.,
and Kopito, R. R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
25710-25718[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Lukacs, G. L.,
Mohamed, A.,
Kartner, N.,
Chang, X. B.,
Riordan, J. R.,
and Grinstein, S.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
6076-6086[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Rock, K. L.,
Gramm, C.,
Rothstein, L.,
Clark, K.,
Stein, R.,
Dick, L.,
Hwang, D.,
and Goldberg, A. L.
(1994)
Cell
78,
761-771[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Crameri, A.,
Whitehorn, E. A.,
Tate, E.,
and Stemmer, W. P.
(1996)
Nat. Biotechnol.
14,
315-319[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Waldo, G. S.,
Standish, B. M.,
Berendzen, J.,
and Terwilliger, T. C.
(1999)
Nat. Biotechnol.
17,
691-695[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Meng, L.,
Mohan, R.,
Kwok, B. H.,
Elofsson, M.,
Sin, N.,
and Crews, C. M.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
10403-10408[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Myung, J.,
Kim, K. B.,
Lindsten, K.,
Dantuma, N. P.,
and Crews, C. M.
(2001)
Mol. Cell
7,
411-420[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Hershko, A.,
and Ciechanover, A.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67,
425-479[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Ciechanover, A.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
7151-7160[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Jain, N.,
Brickenden, A.,
Ball, E. H.,
and Sanwal, B. D.
(1994)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
314,
23-30[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Yu, H.,
Kaung, G.,
Kobayashi, S.,
and Kopito, R. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
20800-20804[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. H. Brush and S. Shenolikar
Control of Cellular GADD34 Levels by the 26S Proteasome
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
December 1, 2008;
28(23):
6989 - 7000.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Cebotaru, N. Vij, I. Ciobanu, J. Wright, T. Flotte, and W. B. Guggino
Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Regulator Missing the First Four Transmembrane Segments Increases Wild Type and {Delta}F508 Processing
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 8, 2008;
283(32):
21926 - 21933.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Kelly, J. K. VanSlyke, and L. S. Musil
Regulation of Ubiquitin-Proteasome System mediated Degradation by Cytosolic Stress
Mol. Biol. Cell,
November 1, 2007;
18(11):
4279 - 4291.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. S. Sabeva, E. J. Rouse, and G. A. Graf
Defects in the Leptin Axis Reduce Abundance of the ABCG5-ABCG8 Sterol Transporter in Liver
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 3, 2007;
282(31):
22397 - 22405.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. W. Wendeler, O. Nufer, and H.-P. Hauri
Improved maturation of CFTR by an ER export signal
FASEB J,
August 1, 2007;
21(10):
2352 - 2358.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. E. V. Worthington and N. H. Carbonetti
Evading the Proteasome: Absence of Lysine Residues Contributes to Pertussis Toxin Activity by Evasion of Proteasome Degradation
Infect. Immun.,
June 1, 2007;
75(6):
2946 - 2953.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Catley, E. Weisberg, T. Kiziltepe, Y.-T. Tai, T. Hideshima, P. Neri, P. Tassone, P. Atadja, D. Chauhan, N. C. Munshi, et al.
Aggresome induction by proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and {alpha}-tubulin hyperacetylation by tubulin deacetylase (TDAC) inhibitor LBH589 are synergistic in myeloma cells
Blood,
November 15, 2006;
108(10):
3441 - 3449.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Ito, I. Koshino, N. Arashiki, H. Adachi, M. Tomihari, S. Tamahara, K. Kurogi, T. Amano, K.-i. Ono, and M. Inaba
Ubiquitylation-independent ER-associated degradation of an AE1 mutant associated with dominant hereditary spherocytosis in cattle
J. Cell Sci.,
September 1, 2006;
119(17):
3602 - 3612.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. E. Machen
Innate immune response in CF airway epithelia: hyperinflammatory?
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
August 1, 2006;
291(2):
C218 - C230.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Harada, T. Okiyoneda, Y. Hashimoto, K. Ueno, K. Nakamura, K. Yamahira, T. Sugahara, T. Shuto, I. Wada, M. A. Suico, et al.
Calreticulin Negatively Regulates the Cell Surface Expression of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 5, 2006;
281(18):
12841 - 12848.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Oberdorf, E. J. Carlson, and W. R. Skach
Uncoupling proteasome peptidase and ATPase activities results in cytosolic release of an ER polytopic protein
J. Cell Sci.,
January 15, 2006;
119(2):
303 - 313.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. V. Soldovieri, P. Castaldo, L. Iodice, F. Miceli, V. Barrese, G. Bellini, E. M. del Giudice, A. Pascotto, S. Bonatti, L. Annunziato, et al.
Decreased Subunit Stability as a Novel Mechanism for Potassium Current Impairment by a KCNQ2 C Terminus Mutation Causing Benign Familial Neonatal Convulsions
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 6, 2006;
281(1):
418 - 428.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Bebok, J. F. Collawn, J. Wakefield, W. Parker, Y. Li, K. Varga, E. J. Sorscher, and J. P. Clancy
Failure of cAMP agonists to activate rescued {Delta}F508 CFTR in CFBE41o- airway epithelial monolayers
J. Physiol.,
December 1, 2005;
569(2):
601 - 615.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. K. VanSlyke and L. S. Musil
Cytosolic Stress Reduces Degradation of Connexin43 Internalized from the Cell Surface and Enhances Gap Junction Formation and Function
Mol. Biol. Cell,
November 1, 2005;
16(11):
5247 - 5257.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Farinha and M. D. Amaral
Most F508del-CFTR Is Targeted to Degradation at an Early Folding Checkpoint and Independently of Calnexin
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
June 15, 2005;
25(12):
5242 - 5252.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Sugita, H. Kongo, and Y. Shiba
Molecular Dissection of the Butyrate Action Revealed the Involvement of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase in Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Biogenesis
Mol. Pharmacol.,
November 1, 2004;
66(5):
1248 - 1259.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. T. Youker, P. Walsh, T. Beilharz, T. Lithgow, and J. L. Brodsky
Distinct Roles for the Hsp40 and Hsp90 Molecular Chaperones during Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Degradation in Yeast
Mol. Biol. Cell,
November 1, 2004;
15(11):
4787 - 4797.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Wang, J. Matteson, Y. An, B. Moyer, J.-S. Yoo, S. Bannykh, I. A. Wilson, J. R. Riordan, and W. E. Balch
COPII-dependent export of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator from the ER uses a di-acidic exit code
J. Cell Biol.,
October 11, 2004;
167(1):
65 - 74.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. A. Graf, J. C. Cohen, and H. H. Hobbs
Missense Mutations in ABCG5 and ABCG8 Disrupt Heterodimerization and Trafficking
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 4, 2004;
279(23):
24881 - 24888.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Richardson, S. S. Mohammad, and G. D. Pavitt
Mutations Causing Childhood Ataxia with Central Nervous System Hypomyelination Reduce Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 2B Complex Formation and Activity
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
March 15, 2004;
24(6):
2352 - 2363.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Okiyoneda, K. Harada, M. Takeya, K. Yamahira, I. Wada, T. Shuto, M. A. Suico, Y. Hashimoto, and H. Kai
{Delta}F508 CFTR Pool in the Endoplasmic Reticulum Is Increased by Calnexin Overexpression
Mol. Biol. Cell,
February 1, 2004;
15(2):
563 - 574.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Wright, P. L. Zeitlin, L. Cebotaru, S. E. Guggino, and W. B. Guggino
Gene expression profile analysis of 4-phenylbutyrate treatment of IB3-1 bronchial epithelial cell line demonstrates a major influence on heat-shock proteins
Physiol Genomics,
January 15, 2004;
16(2):
204 - 211.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. L. Zeitlin, D. B. Gail, and S. Banks-Schlegel
Protein Processing and Degradation in Pulmonary Health and Disease
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.,
November 1, 2003;
29(5):
642 - 645.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. W. Miller, R. Ahmad, S. Hague, M. J. Baptista, R. Canet-Aviles, C. McLendon, D. M. Carter, P.-P. Zhu, J. Stadler, J. Chandran, et al.
L166P Mutant DJ-1, Causative for Recessive Parkinson's Disease, Is Degraded through the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 19, 2003;
278(38):
36588 - 36595.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kalra, N. Li, S. Seetharam, D. H. Alpers, and B. Seetharam
Function and stability of human transcobalamin II: role of intramolecular disulfide bonds C98-C291 and C147-C187
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
July 1, 2003;
285(1):
C150 - C160.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Webb, B. Ravikumar, J. Atkins, J. N. Skepper, and D. C. Rubinsztein
{alpha}-Synuclein Is Degraded by Both Autophagy and the Proteasome
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 27, 2003;
278(27):
25009 - 25013.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Drisaldi, R. S. Stewart, C. Adles, L. R. Stewart, E. Quaglio, E. Biasini, L. Fioriti, R. Chiesa, and D. A. Harris
Mutant PrP Is Delayed in Its Exit from the Endoplasmic Reticulum, but Neither Wild-type nor Mutant PrP Undergoes Retrotranslocation Prior to Proteasomal Degradation
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 6, 2003;
278(24):
21732 - 21743.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. C. Zangar, T. A. Kocarek, S. Shen, N. Bollinger, M. S. Dahn, and D. W. Lee
Suppression of Cytochrome P450 3A Protein Levels by Proteasome Inhibitors
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
June 1, 2003;
305(3):
872 - 879.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Xu, J. C. Clark, B. J. Aronow, C. R. Dey, C. Liu, J. L. Wooldridge, and J. A. Whitsett
Transcriptional Adaptation to Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Deficiency
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 21, 2003;
278(9):
7674 - 7682.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W.-J. Wang, S. Mulugeta, S. J. Russo, and M. F. Beers
Deletion of exon 4 from human surfactant protein C results in aggresome formation and generation of a dominant negative
J. Cell Sci.,
February 15, 2003;
116(4):
683 - 692.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Fu and E. Sztul
Traffic-independent function of the Sar1p/COPII machinery in proteasomal sorting of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator
J. Cell Biol.,
January 21, 2003;
160(2):
157 - 163.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Garrigue-Antar, N. Hartigan, and K. E. Kadler
Post-translational Modification of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-1 Is Required for Secretion and Stability of the Protein
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 1, 2002;
277(45):
43327 - 43334.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|