Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M110520200 on January 28, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 14, 12047-12052, April 5, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/14/12047    most recent
M110520200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olosz, F.
Right arrow Articles by Malek, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olosz, F.
Right arrow Articles by Malek, T. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Structural Basis for Binding Multiple Ligands by the Common Cytokine Receptor gamma -Chain*

Ferenc Olosz and Thomas R. MalekDagger

From the Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33101

Received for publication, November 1, 2001, and in revised form, January 16, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The common gamma -chain (gamma c) that functions both in ligand binding and signal transduction is a shared subunit of the multichain receptors for interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, and IL-21. The structural basis by which the ectodomain of gamma c contributes to binding six distinct cytokines is only partially defined. In the present study, epitope mapping of antagonistic anti-gamma c monoclonal antibodies led to the identification of Asn-128 of mouse gamma c that represents another potential contact residue that is required for binding IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 but not IL-4. In addition, Tyr-103, Cys-161, Cys-210, and Cys-211, previously identified to contribute to binding IL-2 and IL-7, were also found to be involved in binding IL-4 and IL-15. Collectively, these data favor a model in which gamma c utilizes a common mechanism for its interactions with multiple cytokines, and the binding sites are largely overlapping but not identical. Asn-128 and Tyr-103 likely act as contact residues whereas Cys-161, Cys-210, and Gly-211 may stabilize the structure of the proposed ligand-interacting surface formed by the two extracytoplasmic domains.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Lymphocyte development, self-reactivity, T cell homeostasis, and peripheral immune responses are importantly regulated by cytokines that utilize the common gamma -chain (gamma c)1 as a receptor subunit (1, 2). gamma c is a type I transmembrane glycoprotein that serves as a subunit for the receptors of interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, and IL-21. The IL-2 receptor (R) and IL-15R are heterotrimers comprised of unique alpha -chains and shared IL-2Rbeta and gamma c subunits whereas the IL-4R, IL-7R, IL-9R, and IL-21R are heterodimers comprised of unique alpha -subunits and gamma c (3-9). For each of these cytokine receptors, gamma c directly contributes to ligand binding through its extracellular domain and to signal transduction through the association of Jak-3 to its cytoplasmic tail (10, 11).

Mutations in gamma c abolish the function in each of these cytokine receptors and cause X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency disease (X-SCID) (12, 13). In humans this disease is characterized by failed development of T and natural killer cells whereas B cell development is largely normal, but their function is impaired. In gamma c-deficient mice, severe impairment in T, natural killer, and B cell development occurs that is mainly due to lack of IL-7R and IL-15R signaling (14). A number of mutations in gamma c from X-SCID patients have been identified (15, 16). Many of these are nonsense mutations that lead to a premature stoppage in translation of gamma c, whereas several others are missense mutations. For the most part, however, it is not possible to deduce whether these latter mutations might selectively affect the ligand-binding function of gamma c or simply distort its tertiary structure.

The structural basis by which gamma c functions in binding six distinct cytokines is still not defined. Recent structure-function analysis of the mouse gamma c (mgamma c) ectodomain by site-directed mutagenesis (17), guided by predictions of theoretical models of the gamma c structure (18-20), identified four amino acids of gamma c that are necessary for binding IL-2 and IL-7 (17). One of these residues, Tyr-103, may be directly involved in IL-2 and IL-7 binding. The other three residues, Cys-161, Cys-210, and Gly-211 may indirectly function in ligand binding by maintaining the conformation of two proposed loops of gamma c. Somewhat surprisingly, none of the initial 25 mutations introduced into mgamma c substantially affected the binding of two well characterized antagonistic anti-mgamma c mAbs (4G3 and 3E12) (21) suggesting that there remained other important ligand contact regions in gamma c.

In the present report we have defined the epitopes on mgamma c for the 4G3 and 3E12 mAbs. Subsequent site-directed mutagenesis of amino acids surrounding the putative 4G3 binding site led to the identification of a novel residue that is more critical for the binding of IL-7 than IL-2 or IL-15 and is not important for binding IL-4. In addition, the importance of mgamma c residues Tyr-103, Cys-161, Cys-210, and Gly-211 was extended to IL-4 and IL-15 binding. Collectively, these data favor a model in which gamma c utilizes a common mechanism for its interactions with multiple cytokines.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cloning of a Partial Rat gamma c cDNA-- Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed using the GeneAmp PCR kit (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) following the manufacturer's recommendations. Briefly, 0.1-1 µg of rat spleen poly(A)+ RNA (CLONTECH Laboratories) was reverse transcribed for 15 min at 42 °C, in the presence of oligo(dT) primers. The cDNA was then amplified by AmpliTaq DNA polymerase, using two gamma c-specific primers (0.5 µM each). The primers corresponded to gene sequences of the mgamma c leader peptide (5'-AGATCCTTCT TAGTCCTNCAGC-3') and the rat gamma c cytoplasmic region (5'-CACCACTCCAGGCCGAAAAGTTCCC-3'). Amplification reactions were performed in a PerkinElmer DNA thermal cycler, starting with a 2-min denaturation at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s for melting at 95 °C and 45 s each for annealing/extension at 60 and 72 °C, respectively, and a final incubation of 7 min at 72 °C. The RT-PCR products were separated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, and the 800-900-bp major band was purified. The partial rat gamma c cDNA was subsequently digested with SacI and XbaI and was used to replace a corresponding fragment of the mgamma c gene in the pSI-mgamma c vector. Plasmids containing the longer gamma c inserts (see "Results") were designated pSI-ratgamma c and encoded full-length gamma c protein with rat extracellular and transmembrane domains (residues 3-273) and the mouse carboxyl tail. Both the RT-PCR products and the rat gamma c inserts were analyzed by DNA sequencing.

Preparation of Chimeric Rat-Mouse gamma c-- A conserved EcoRV site within the rat and mouse gamma c genes and a XhoI site in the pSI vector were used to digest the 5' gamma c gene fragments from both the pSI-mgamma c and pSI-ratgamma c plasmids. These fragments, which encode the leader peptide and amino acids 1-99 of the gamma c, were then swapped between the two vectors, resulting in gamma c cDNA that partially encodes rat and mouse sequences corresponding to the extracellular domains.

Expression Constructs and Mutagenesis of Mouse gamma c-- Full-length cDNAs for the mgamma c, human IL-2Rbeta (hIL-2Rbeta ), and mouse IL-7Ralpha (mIL-7Ralpha ) were inserted into the pSI mammalian expression vector (Promega, Madison, WI). The pDC302 expression vector containing the full-length mouse IL-4Ralpha (mIL-4Ralpha ) cDNA was described previously (22) (provided by Immunex Corp., Seattle, WA). Site-directed mutagenesis of the mgamma c gene was performed by the QuikChange method (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), as previously described (17). Mutations were verified by DNA sequencing.

Cell Culture and Transient Transfections-- COS7 monkey kidney cells were maintained and transfected as previously described (17). All assays were done 3 days post-transfection, using COS7 cells harvested with 5 mM EDTA in phosphate-buffered saline.

Fluorescence-activated Cell Sorter (FACS) Analysis-- Cytokine receptor surface expression in COS7 cells was analyzed as previously described using a FACScan flow cytometer (BD PharMingen) (17). The mAbs used were anti-mgamma c (4G3 and 3E12, Ref. 21; TUGm2; BD PharMingen), anti-IL-2Rbeta (Mikbeta 3; BD PharMingen), or anti-IL-7Ralpha (A7R34; kindly provided by S. Nishikawa, Kyoto University, Japan) (23).

Radioligand Binding Assays-- Recombinant human IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ) and mouse IL-4 (Immunex, Seattle, WA) were radiolabeled with 125I using IODO-GEN tubes (Pierce) to 15-60 µCi/µg. IL-2 and IL-7 binding was measured as previously described (17). IL-15 binding was measured on COS7 cells expressing hIL-2Rbeta and mgamma c, as described for IL-2. gamma c-specific IL-2 and IL-15 binding was calculated as the cpm associated with COS7-hIL-2Rbeta /mgamma c transfectants minus the cpm associated with control cells expressing hIL-2Rbeta alone. gamma c-specific binding for IL-7 was calculated as the cpm associated with COS7-mIL-7Ralpha /mgamma c cells minus the cpm associated with COS7-mIL-7Ralpha cells. gamma c-specific ligand binding to COS7 cells bearing mutant receptors was expressed as percentage of the wild-type control. Nonspecific binding was always assessed by evaluating binding by mock transfected COS7 cells. This control was equivalent to that observed when blocking binding using an excess of unlabeled cytokine.

IL-4 Cross-linking Assays-- COS7 cells (4-5 × 106 cells) expressing mIL-4Ralpha in the presence or absence of mgamma c were incubated with 1 nM 125I-IL-4 for 2-3 h at 4 °C. The cells were then washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline and treated for 30-60 min at 4 °C with 1 mM dissucinimidyl suberate in 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline. After centrifugation, the cells were extracted with 200 µl of 0.5% Nonidet P-40 as described previously (24). The extracts were subjected to immunoprecipitation with 4G3 and 3E12 mAbs conjugated to Sepharose 4B beads at 4 °C. Finally, the beads were washed three times with 0.5% Nonidet P-40, and bound radioactivity was measured in a gamma -counter. In some experiments, the precipitated material was eluted with 1% SDS, separated by 10% reducing SDS-PAGE, and visualized by autoradiography (24).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mapping the 4G3 and 3E12 Epitopes-- The 4G3 and 3E12 mAbs to mgamma c recognize distinct epitopes (21), and their binding does not overlap with the epitope for TUGm2 (data not shown). 4G3 is a potent antagonist of IL-7, IL-9, and IL-15 bioactivity, whereas 3E12 is most effective against IL-4 (21, 25). As 4G3 and 3E12 are of rat origin, the epitopes recognized by these mAbs should reflect differences in the primary structure between mouse and rat gamma c. Therefore, our strategy to define the epitopes to these two mAbs relied on comparing the amino acid sequences of mouse and rat gamma c. This first required determination of the sequence of the rat gamma c ectodomain.

Homology search of the nucleotide data bases with a mgamma c query sequence returned two rat ESTs (GenBankTM accessions AI172304 and AI178808) aligning with the mgamma c ectodomain and the mgamma c cytoplasmic tail, respectively. This sequence information was used to amplify a partial rat gamma c cDNA from rat spleen by using RT-PCR. The products appeared as a diffuse band of 800-900 bp on agarose gels and were later subcloned into the pSI mammalian expression vector. Interestingly, sequence analysis of the RT-PCR products and the subcloned inserts indicated the presence of at least two types of rat gamma c cDNA. Both appeared to be transcripts of the same gene; however, the shorter cDNA had a 97-bp deletion corresponding to putative exon 6 encoding the transmembrane region, suggesting that it was a splice variant of gamma c (Fig. 1A).


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Sequence of rat gamma c. A, partial nucleotide and amino acid sequence determined from resulting cDNA amplified from rat spleen RNA by RT-PCR. The sequence was derived from a consensus of three independent clones and lacks only a segment corresponding to most of the cytoplasmic tail. Only amino acids of the mature rat gamma c are indicated. The 5' PCR primer, the start of the rat sequence, a conserved EcoRV site, and predicted exon boundaries are marked. Exon 6, absent from a short form of rat gamma c, is underlined. B, amino acid sequence alignment of the mouse and rat gamma c extracellular domains. The putative TUGm2 epitope is boxed, and sites previously shown to be required for ligand binding by mgamma c are underlined. New mgamma c mutations are shaded in gray, and arrows indicate residues Val-121, Asn-128, and Arg-197. The rat gamma c sequence is found as GenBankTM accession number AF410926.

As anticipated, all defining features of the type I cytokine receptor superfamily were conserved between rat and mouse (Fig. 1B). The deduced amino acid sequences of the mature rat and mouse gamma c ectodomains (residues 1-241) were 88% identical to each other (Fig. 1B). The N-terminal 34 amino acids of gamma c were much less conserved (9 mismatches) than residues 35-241, which correspond to the cytokine receptor homology region (18 mismatches). It is also noteworthy that a lysine inserted into the mouse sequence at position 158 corresponds to a position previously identified to contribute to the binding of the TUGm2 mAb (17).

Because the number of mismatches between the rat and mouse gamma c ectodomain sequences was relatively large, we first assessed which segments of the mgamma c ectodomain contain the residues involved in the binding of mAbs by analyzing chimeric rat/mouse gamma c molecules. A conserved EcoRV site (Fig. 1A) was utilized for swapping cDNA fragments between the two species. After co-transfection of these chimeric cDNAs with the hIL-2Rbeta into COS7 cells, the expressed proteins were examined for mAb and IL-2 binding (Table I). The latter assay was performed to ensure that the chimeric gamma c molecules were functional (Fig. 2). 4G3, 3E12, and TUGm2 mAbs readily stained cells transfected with wild-type mgamma c but not wild-type rat or mouse (amino acids 1-99)/rat (amino acids 100-241) chimeric gamma c molecules. By contrast, rat (aa 1-99)/mouse (aa 100-241) gamma c chimeras fully retained their ability to bind 4G3, 3E12, and TUGm2. Thus, all three mAb epitopes were mapped to the membrane-proximal 141-amino acid segment of the mgamma c ectodomain.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Localization of the 4G3 and 3E12 epitopes. The indicated mutant mgamma c molecules were expressed in COS7 cells and analyzed by FACS using 4G3, 3E12, and TUGm2. Histograms are representative of four independent experiments and show staining of cells expressing mutant mgamma c (shaded histograms) in comparison with untransfected COS7 controls (open histograms).

Based on our past mutagenesis of mgamma c and that 5 of the 15 differences between positions 100 and 241 were conservative substitutions, six other mgamma c residues were replaced with their rat counterparts and then analyzed for their ability to bind mAbs to mgamma c after transfection into COS7 cells. The mutation V121E completely abrogated 4G3 binding, whereas staining with 3E12 and TUGm2 was unaffected (Fig. 2). Similarly, the R197L mutation dramatically reduced the binding of 3E12 but not the other mAbs to mgamma c. No other point mutations were found to inhibit the binding of 4G3 or 3E12. Thus, 4G3 likely recognizes an epitope near Val-121 in the first domain of mgamma c, whereas 3E12 may bind to a membrane-proximal part of domain 2. It is important to note, however, that whereas mutant V121E was defective in 4G3 binding, mutant V121A was not, suggesting that the side chain of Val-121 may not be directly involved in the mgamma c-4G3 interaction (Fig. 3A). Thus, this analysis may not have precisely defined the composition of these epitopes.


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Cell surface expression and ligand binding by mgamma c with mutations near the putative 4G3 epitope. A and B, cell surface expression. Shaded histograms indicate 4G3 staining of COS7 cells transfected with mgamma c, compared with similarly stained untransfected COS7 cells (open histograms). Except for L124A, which was not detectable, all mutants readily bound 3E12 and TUGm2 (not shown). Two experiments are shown, which are representative of at least three measurements for each mutant. C, IL-2 and IL-7 binding. gamma c-dependent 125I-IL-2 or 125I-IL-7 binding was measured as described under "Experimental Procedures." Shown are <A><AC>x</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A> ± S.E. of gamma c-dependent binding from n experiments as indicated on the bars.

Point Mutations in mgamma c That Inhibit the Binding of IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15-- We have previously established a ligand-receptor binding assay using transient transfected COS7 cells that distinguish mgamma c-dependent binding by IL-2 or IL-7 (17). Under our binding conditions (0.3-1 nM of radiolabeled ligand), readily measurable binding by IL-2 is strictly dependent upon expression of both the hIL-2Rbeta and mgamma c subunits whereas mgamma c enhances the binding by mIL-7Ralpha . In the case of IL-2 binding, it was necessary to use hIL-2Rbeta because co-expression of the mIL-2Rbeta and mgamma c heterodimer does not detectably bind IL-2. In these experiments, the difference between the radioactivity bound to cells with heterodimeric receptors versus cells expressing only hIL-2Rbeta or mIL-7Ralpha was considered as mgamma c-dependent ligand binding and was used for comparison of the mutant mgamma c chains to the wild-type.

Because 4G3 efficiently blocks the detection of IL-7 and IL-2 cross-linked to mgamma c (21) and its epitope is membrane-distal, we hypothesized that mutagenesis of mgamma c near the 4G3 epitope may lead to the identification of novel contact residues involved in the binding of mgamma c-dependent cytokines. Using a structural model of gamma c as a guide (20), a number of amino acids in the vicinity of Val-121 were mutated to alanine. With the exception of the L124A mutant, which was undetectable, all the other mgamma c mutants were normally expressed on the cell surface (>70% compared with the wild-type control) after co-transfection into COS7 cells with either hIL-2Rbeta or mIL-7Ralpha . (Fig. 3, A and B). These same cells were also used in 125I-radiolabeled IL-2 or IL-7 binding assays (Fig. 3C). For all transfected COS7 cells that expressed cell surface mgamma c, there was a notable decrease (at least 2-fold) in mgamma c-dependent binding only for IL-7 when COS7 cells expressed mIL-7Ralpha and the mgamma c mutant N128A. Because the expression of hIL-2Rbeta and mIL-7Ralpha was similar among these transfectants (data not shown), these results implicate Asn-128 in binding IL-7.

Mutations of Tyr-103, Cys-161, Cys-210, and Gly-211 of mgamma c have been previously shown to impair the binding of IL-2 and IL-7 (17). Therefore, we tested the contribution of these residues as well as those surrounding the 4G3 epitope for binding IL-15 (Fig. 4). Similar to IL-2, IL-15 also readily binds to hIL-2Rbeta and mgamma c but only in the presence of both subunits (8). Therefore, the same populations of transfected COS7 cells were examined for binding IL-2 or IL-15. This analysis indicated that COS7 cells expressing the Y103A or Y103R mutation of mgamma c were impaired in binding both IL-2 and IL-15 (Fig. 4A). IL-15 binding was consistently more sensitive to the Y103R mutation than IL-2, perhaps due to different surface properties of the two cytokines. The C161S, C210S, and G211R mutant mgamma c molecules also did not support IL-15 binding (Fig. 4A). In contrast to the mutations at Tyr-103 and Asn-128 that do not affect mgamma c expression, these other three mutations typically resulted in lower mgamma c surface expression (Ref. 17; data not shown). However, based on our past work that established the relationship between expression of mgamma c as a function of IL-2 or IL-7 binding by their respective receptors (17), the virtually complete loss of IL-15 binding cannot be due to this suboptimal expression of mgamma c.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 binding by selected mgamma c mutants. A, COS7 cells were co-transfected with hIL-2Rbeta and mgamma c, and the same populations of cells were subjected to parallel IL-2 and IL-15 binding assays. Surface expression of mgamma c, verified by FACS, was near normal for mutants Y103A and Y103R, and 15-35% of the wild-type mgamma c for mutants C161S, C210S, and G211. Shown are gamma c-dependent IL-2 and IL-15 binding of triplicate samples (<A><AC>x</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A> ± S.E.). The data are representative of two experiments. B, COS7 cells were simultaneously transfected with hIL-2Rbeta , mIL-7Ralpha , and mgamma c, and the cells were analyzed in parallel IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 binding assays. Average surface expression of the mgamma c mutants is shown at the top. The expression of hIL-2Rbeta and mIL-7Ralpha , also verified by FACS, was similar among the different COS7 transfectants. Shown are <A><AC>x</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A> ± S.E. of gamma c-dependent binding from n experiments as indicated on the bars.

With respect to the mutations near the 4G3 epitope, only the N128A mutation somewhat inhibited IL-15 binding (Fig. 4B and data not shown). In these later experiments, COS7 cells were co-transfected with hIL-2Rbeta , mIL-7Ralpha , and mgamma c to evaluate the effect of a given mgamma c mutation for IL-2, IL-7, or IL-15 binding on a single population of cells. To further assess the role of Tyr-103 and Asn-128 in binding these cytokines, mgamma c was mutated to contain both the Y103R and N128A mutations. After transfecting mgamma c containing either the individual or double mutations into COS7 cells with hIL-2Rbeta and mIL-7Ralpha , ligand binding assays were performed (Fig. 4B). In this analysis, the binding of IL-2, IL-15, and IL-7 was decreased at least 2- to 3-fold by mutations at Tyr-103 whereas the N128A mutation caused a 2-fold decrease in the binding of IL-7 and a more modest decrease in IL-2 and IL-15 binding. However, the Y103R/N128A double mutation caused a 10-fold reduction in the binding of IL-2 and IL-7 and virtually abolished the binding of IL-15. Thus, these data indicate that both Tyr-103 and Asn-128 contribute to the binding of IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15, with Asn-128 playing a more critical role in the binding of IL-7. Collectively, our results indicate that IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 exhibit similar requirements for Tyr-103, Asn-128, Cys-161, Cys-210, and Gly-211 in the putative mgamma c ligand-binding interface.

Effect of Selected mgamma c Mutations on the Binding of IL-4-- IL-4Ralpha /gamma c heterodimers have been reported to bind IL-4 with 3- to 5-fold higher affinity than IL-4Ralpha (3). However, in our hands COS7 cells expressing only mIL-4Ralpha always bound similar amounts of radiolabeled IL-4 as cells expressing both the mIL-4Ralpha and mgamma c subunits (data not shown). Therefore, we assessed the contribution of mgamma c to the binding of IL-4 by the capacity to cross-link radiolabeled IL-4 to mgamma c after its association to the IL-4R. The amount of radioactivity precipitated with anti-mgamma c was used to represent mgamma c-dependent IL-4R binding. This included both covalently cross-linked mgamma c·IL-4 complexes and IL-4 noncovalently associated to its receptor, as shown by the presence of two major bands after SDS-PAGE analysis of the immunoprecipitated material (Fig. 5A). This type of analysis revealed that the mgamma c mutations, K158A, which in part defines the epitope for TUGm2, and Delta (4-34), which lacks amino acids 4-34 of the mature protein, readily binds IL-4. Therefore, as previously shown for mgamma c-dependent IL-2 and IL-7 binding (17), these regions of mgamma c are also not important for IL-4 binding.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   IL-4 binding by selected mgamma c mutants. COS7 cells were transfected with mIL-4Ralpha and wild-type or mutant mgamma c and were used in 125I-IL-4 cross-linking assays as described under "Experimental Procedures." mgamma c-containing complexes were precipitated from cell extracts with 4G3/3E12-Sepharose, and radioactivity bound to the beads was measured. A, SDS-PAGE analysis of the precipitated complexes from a representative IL-4 cross-linking experiment. B, IL-4 binding as a function of anti-mgamma c immunoprecipitation and mgamma c cell surface expression. The levels of cell surface wild-type mgamma c was varied by using decreasing concentrations of the pSIgamma cWT expression vector (17). gamma c cell surface expression and IL-4 binding were measured by FACS and anti-mgamma c immunoprecipitation, respectively, and these resulting data were plotted to represent a standard curve for gamma c-dependent IL-4 binding as a function of mgamma c cell surface expression. Symbols represent gamma c-dependent IL-4 binding versus surface expression of individual mgamma c mutants (<A><AC>x</AC><AC>&cjs1171;</AC></A> ± S.E. from three to six experiments). Control experiments demonstrated that minimal 125I-IL-4 was precipitated by anti-mgamma c from extracts of COS7 cells transfected with only mIL-4Ralpha or mock transfected (data not shown).

All mgamma c mutations implicated in the binding of IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 were also analyzed for their ability to contribute to the binding of IL-4. COS7 transfectants expressing mIL-4Ralpha and wild-type or mutant mgamma c were subjected to both IL-4 cross-linking assays and FACS analysis with anti-mgamma c. mIL-4Ralpha expression did not significantly vary among transfectants as verified by Western blot analysis (data not shown). However, our past analysis has shown that some of these mutations cause low mgamma c cell surface expression (17). This observation and the importance of mgamma c cell surface levels in this assay led us to first establish the relationship between the levels of cell surface wild-type mgamma c expression and the amount of 125I-IL-4 precipitated from extracts of cross-linked transfected COS7 cells. As expected, the fraction of mgamma c-dependent binding was proportional to the expression of mgamma c (Fig. 5B). These data served as a standard curve for the comparison of IL-4 binding by mgamma c mutants to similarly expressed wild-type mgamma c. The poorly expressed mgamma c mutants C161S, C210S, and G211R, bound 3- to 8-fold less IL-4 than similarly expressed wild-type (dotted line) or Q163A mgamma c (Fig. 5B). These results correspond to the detection of minimal 125I-IL-4 for the C210A/G211A mutations when the precipitated material was analyzed on SDS-PAGE (Fig. 5A). Mutations at Y103A, Y103R, or N128A did not severely alter mgamma c expression, as measured by staining with 4G3. Nevertheless, both mutations of Tyr-103 caused a partial (2- to 3-fold) decrease in the binding of IL-4, whereas N128A did not have a readily detectable effect when tested either alone or in combination with Y103R (Fig. 5B). These results suggest that Cys-161, Cys-210, Gly-211, and Tyr-103 are required for IL-4 binding, whereas Asn-128 is not necessary.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Our past work relied solely on molecular models of gamma c to identify regions and amino acids within gamma c that regulate ligand binding (17). In this report our strategy was to identify epitopes on mgamma c for the inhibitory mAbs 4G3 and 3E12 as a means to further explore the structural basis of mgamma c-cytokine interactions. Localization of these epitopes was first dependent upon determining the sequence of rat gamma c ectodomain. As expected, the rat- and mouse-deduced amino acid sequences were highly conserved. However, one unanticipated finding was that two forms of gamma c cDNA were amplified by RT-PCR from rat spleen mRNA, one of which encodes a protein that lacks the sequence corresponding to exon 6 and is predicted to be secreted. These two forms likely represent products of alternative splicing. We have identified an identical spliced form of mgamma c lacking the transmembrane domain for a variant of the mouse EL4 thymoma (Ref. 26).2 Although the overall biological relevance of this form of gamma c remains to be determined, it is noteworthy that soluble gamma c has been identified in human and mouse sera (27).

In this and a previous report (17), we have analyzed the ligand binding function of 33 mutant mgamma c molecules harboring 39 distinct mutations. The extent and relative location of these mutations is displayed in Fig. 6A. Analysis of anti-mgamma c mAb binding to these mutant molecules has revealed their epitopes (Fig. 6B). The 3E12 epitope is located in a membrane-proximal portion of mgamma c near Arg-197 of domain 2. It is likely that 3E12 inhibits cytokine bioactivity by interfering with receptor-receptor interactions or by inducing a conformational shift in mgamma c that indirectly affects receptor function. These two possibilities are not mutually exclusive. By contrast, the 4G3 epitope was localized to the vicinity of residue Val-121 in domain 1 because mutation of Val-121 of the mgamma c to the corresponding rat residue (glutamate) abrogated 4G3 binding. However, Val-121 by itself does not define the 4G3 epitope as the V121A mutation did not interfere with 4G3 binding, and the surrounding sequences are almost identical between rat and mouse. Therefore, the 4G3 epitope likely depends on additional amino acids. One candidate region is located between amino acids 1 and 34 of mgamma c because the deletion of this poorly conserved sequence, which is not required for IL-2, IL-4, and IL-7 binding, slightly inhibited the binding of 4G3 (17). The TUGm2 epitope, identified earlier (17), is centered around a unique lysine residue (Lys-158) of the mgamma c sequence. The predicted locations of these epitopes and the inhibitory properties of the mAbs (3, 7, 21, 25, 28) suggest that it is highly likely that 4G3 and TUG2 antagonize gamma c-dependent cytokines by directly interfering with ligand-receptor interactions.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Summary of mutagenesis analysis of mgamma c. Location of mgamma c residues analyzed by alanine scanning mutagenesis (A), putative antibody epitopes (B), and potential ligand-interacting sites (C), illustrated on a theoretical model of the IL-7 receptor complex (20). The highlighted regions are amino acid side chains.

Based on this hypothesis, our search for new ligand-interacting sites was restricted to mutagenesis of selected residues of mgamma c near the putative 4G3 epitope. This analysis led to the identification of amino acid Asn-128 in the linker region of mgamma c that is necessary for the binding of IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 but not IL-4. The N128A mutation caused a 2-3-fold reduction in mgamma c-dependent IL-7 binding while only modestly affecting the binding of IL-2 and IL-15. However, simultaneous mutation of Asn-128 and Tyr-103, a residue previously shown to contribute to IL-2 and IL-7 binding (17), essentially abrogated mgamma c-dependent IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 binding whereas the individual mutations had only a partial effect. This result clearly implicates both Asn-128 and Tyr-103 in mgamma c-dependent binding of all three of these cytokines. We cannot unambiguously distinguish by our assays whether this is an additive or synergistic effect.

The amino acids of the linker region, including Asn-128, are highly conserved in mammalian gamma c, consistent with an important role of this region in gamma c structure and/or function. Although only one theoretical model of gamma c (19) predicted a direct participation of Asn-128 in ligand binding, other residues of the gamma c linker region have been proposed to interact with IL-7 (20). The linker region of gamma c has also been implicated in ligand binding based on epitope mapping studies of the anti-human gamma c mAb PC.B8 (29). Although no X-SCID patients have yet been identified with mutations at Asn-128, at least four neighboring mutations have been shown to cause X-SCID (15, 16). Interestingly, one of these mutations, A134V, resulted in a selective defect in gamma c-dependent IL-4 and IL-7 but not IL-2 and IL-15 signaling (30). This finding further supports the importance of this region in the binding of multiple cytokines and suggests that it may impart ligand specificity.

Of the large number of residues mutated and analyzed (Fig. 6A), relatively few have been implicated to participate in ligand binding (Fig. 6C). These include Cys-161 and Cys-210 that were proposed to form a putative intrachain disulfide bond (20), as well as Asn-128 and Tyr-103. It should be stressed that although mutations of these residues interfered with cytokine binding, they did not affect the binding of the conformationally sensitive 4G3 and 3E12 mAbs, indicating that the folding of mgamma c was not drastically changed (17). Importantly, most of these sites were required for the mgamma c-dependent binding of each of the four cytokines that we tested. The only exception was Asn-128, which did not obviously contribute to IL-4 binding, as mentioned above. Thus, our data favor a model in which gamma c-dependent cytokines use overlapping binding surfaces that include at least three loops (EF1, BC2, and FG2) of the mgamma c ectodomain (Fig. 6C). Tyr-103 is analogous to a structurally conserved aromatic amino acid present in several other members of the cytokine receptor superfamily (31) and which has been shown to directly participate in the binding of growth hormone and erythropoietin (32-34). Thus, Tyr-103 is an attractive candidate to directly participate in the binding of IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, and IL-15. Furthermore, Asn-128 is modeled to be in a position where it is exposed to solvent and also might directly interact with the cytokines. The ability of the Y103R/N128A double mutation to almost completely prevent IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 binding is consistent with this view. The role of Cys-161 and Cys-210 in the binding of all four cytokines is less clear. As previously suggested (17), these two cysteines may maintain the conformation of the BC2 and FG2 loops, contributing to the local structure of the ligand binding interface rather than directly contacting the cytokines.

The IL-2R and IL-15R are also found as heterotrimers comprised of a unique alpha -subunit while sharing IL-2Rbeta and gamma c subunits. The trimeric forms of these receptors are the main physiological structures in vivo. In this study we have examined IL-2 and IL-15 binding to only IL-2Rbeta and mgamma c heterodimers as this permitted a direct evaluation of the effect of a particular mgamma c mutation on IL-2 or IL-15 binding without complication from the substantial intrinsic binding by the alpha -subunits. We anticipate that these same structural elements, as discussed above, are required for binding or stabilizing mgamma c in the context of the heterotrimeric IL-2R and IL-15R, but this must be experimentally verified.

Although there appears to be a conserved structural strategy by which mgamma c participates in binding multiple cytokines, our data clearly illustrate that there are some differences in the relative contribution of individual mgamma c residues to ligand binding. For example, mutations of Tyr-103 appeared to have a more severe effect on the binding of IL-15 than on IL-2. Similarly, the single mutation N128A had a more noticeable effect on IL-7 versus IL-2 and IL-15 binding. Therefore, Tyr-103 may function as a structurally conserved anchor residue for cytokine binding whereas amino acids surrounding Asn-128 may be related to fine specificity in binding. The inability to detect a role for Asn-128 in binding IL-4 in mgamma c and the selective effect of the A134V mutation in human gamma c (30), as discussed above, raise the possibility that there may be other yet undefined contacts on gamma c for these cytokines. A more precise view of gamma c-cytokine interactions awaits solving the crystal structure of gamma c in the context of a heterodimeric receptor with bound ligand.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Immunex for IL-4 and the IL-4R expression vector.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant AI401114.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Microbiology and Immunology (R138), University of Miami School of Medicine, P. O. Box 016960, Miami, FL 33101. Tel.: 305-243-5627; Fax: 305-243-4623; E-mail: tmalek@med.miami.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 28, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110520200

2 R. K. Furse and T. R. Malek, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: gamma c, common gamma -chain; m, mouse; R, receptor; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorter; h, human; IL, interleukin; RT, reverse transcription; WT, wild-type; X-SCID, X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency disease; mAb, monoclonal antibody.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. He, Y. W., and Malek, T. R. (1998) Crit. Rev. Immunol. 18, 503-524[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Nelson, B. H., and Willerford, D. M. (1998) Adv. Immunol. 70, 1-81[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Kondo, M., Takeshita, T., Ishii, N., Nakamura, M., Watanabe, S., Arai, K., and Sugamura, K. (1993) Science 262, 1874-1877[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Russell, S. M., Keegan, A. D., Harada, N., Nakamura, Y., Noguchi, M., Leland, P., Friedmann, M. C., Miyajima, A., Puri, R. K., Paul, W. E., et al.. (1993) Science 262, 1880-1883[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Kondo, M., Takeshita, T., Higuchi, M., Nakamura, M., Sudo, T., Nishikawa, S., and Sugamura, K. (1994) Science 263, 1453-1454[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Noguchi, M., Nakamura, Y., Russell, S. M., Ziegler, S. F., Tsang, M., Cao, X., and Leonard, W. J. (1993) Science 262, 1877-1880[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Kimura, Y., Takeshita, T., Kondo, M., Ishii, N., Nakamura, M., Van Snick, J., and Sugamura, K. (1995) Int. Immunol. 7, 115-120[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Giri, J. G., Ahdieh, M., Eisenman, J., Shanebeck, K., Grabstein, K., Kumaki, S., Namen, A., Park, L. S., Cosman, D., and Anderson, D. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 2822-2830[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Asao, H., Okuyama, C., Kumaki, S., Ishii, N., Tsuchiya, S., Foster, D., and Sugamura, K. (2001) J. Immunol. 167, 1-5[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Ihle, J. N., Thierfelder, W., Teglund, S., Stravapodis, D., Wang, D., Feng, J., and Parganas, E. (1998) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 865, 1-9[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. O'Shea, J. J. (1997) Immunity 7, 1-11[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Puck, J. M., Deschenes, S. M., Porter, J. C., Dutra, A. S., Brown, C. J., Willard, H. F., and Henthorn, P. S. (1993) Hum. Mol. Genet. 2, 1099-1104[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Noguchi, M., Yi, H., Rosenblatt, H. M., Filipovich, A. H., Adelstein, S., Modi, W. S., McBride, O. W., and Leonard, W. J. (1993) Cell 73, 147-157[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Porter, B. O., and Malek, T. R. (1999) J. Immunol. 163, 5906-5912[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Puck, J. M. (1996) Immunol. Today 17, 507-511[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Puck, J. M., Pepper, A. E., Henthorn, P. S., Candotti, F., Isakov, J., Whitwam, T., Conley, M. E., Fischer, R. E., Rosenblatt, H. M., Small, T. N., and Buckley, R. H. (1997) Blood 89, 1968-1977[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Olosz, F., and Malek, T. R. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 30100-30105[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Bamborough, P., Hedgecock, C. J., and Richards, W. G. (1994) Structure 2, 839-851[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Gustchina, A., Zdanov, A., Schalk-Hihi, C., and Wlodawer, A. (1995) Proteins 21, 140-148[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Kroemer, R. T., and Richards, W. G. (1996) Protein Eng. 9, 1135-1142[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. He, Y. W., Adkins, B., Furse, R. K., and Malek, T. R. (1995) J. Immunol. 154, 1596-1605[Abstract]
22. Mosley, B., Beckmann, M. P., March, C. J., Idzerda, R. L., Gimpel, S. D., VandenBos, T., Friend, D., Alpert, A., Anderson, D., Jackson, J., et al.. (1989) Cell 59, 335-348[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Sudo, T., Nishikawa, S., Ohno, N., Akiyama, N., Tamakoshi, M., and Yoshida, H. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 9125-9129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Saragovi, H., and Malek, T. R. (1987) J. Immunol. 139, 1918-1926[Abstract]
25. Malek, T. R., Levy, R. B., Adkins, B., and He, Y. W. (1998) J. Leukocyte Biol. 63, 643-649[Abstract]
26. Malek, T. R., Furse, R. K., Fleming, M. L., Fadell, A. J., and He, Y. W. (1995) J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 15, 447-454[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Meissner, U., Blum, H., Schnare, M., Rollinghoff, M., and Gessner, A. (2001) Blood 97, 183-191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Sugamura, K., Asao, H., Kondo, M., Tanaka, N., Ishii, N., Nakamura, M., and Takeshita, T. (1995) Adv. Immunol. 59, 225-277[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Raskin, N., Jakubowski, A., Sizing, I. D., Olson, D. L., Kalled, S. L., Hession, C. A., Benjamin, C. D., Baker, D. P., and Burkly, L. C. (1998) J. Immunol. 161, 3474-3483[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Kumaki, S., Ishii, N., Minegishi, M., Tsuchiya, S., Cosman, D., Sugamura, K., and Konno, T. (1999) Blood 93, 607-612[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Bazan, J. F. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 6934-6938[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. de Vos, A. M., Ultsch, M., and Kossiakoff, A. A. (1992) Science 255, 306-312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Middleton, S. A., Johnson, D. L., Jin, R., McMahon, F. J., Collins, A., Tullai, J., Gruninger, R. H., Jolliffe, L. K., and Mulcahy, L. S. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 14045-14054[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Middleton, S. A., Barbone, F. P., Johnson, D. L., Thurmond, R. L., You, Y., McMahon, F. J., Jin, R., Livnah, O., Tullai, J., Farrell, F. X., Goldsmith, M. A., Wilson, I. A., and Jolliffe, L. K. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 14163-14169[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. K. Olsen, N. Ota, S. Kishishita, M. Kukimoto-Niino, K. Murayama, H. Uchiyama, M. Toyama, T. Terada, M. Shirouzu, O. Kanagawa, et al.
Crystal Structure of the Interleukin-15{middle dot}Interleukin-15 Receptor {alpha} Complex: INSIGHTS INTO TRANS AND CIS PRESENTATION
J. Biol. Chem., December 21, 2007; 282(51): 37191 - 37204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
T. Jahn, S. Sindhu, S. Gooch, P. Seipel, P. Lavori, E. Leifheit, and K. Weinberg
Direct interaction between Kit and the interleukin-7 receptor
Blood, September 15, 2007; 110(6): 1840 - 1847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
X. Wang, M. Rickert, and K. C. Garcia
Structure of the Quaternary Complex of Interleukin-2 with Its {alpha}, {beta}, and {gamma}c Receptors
Science, November 18, 2005; 310(5751): 1159 - 1163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/14/12047    most recent
M110520200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olosz, F.
Right arrow Articles by Malek, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olosz, F.
Right arrow Articles by Malek, T. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement