|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M110520200 on January 28, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 14, 12047-12052, April 5, 2002
Structural Basis for Binding Multiple Ligands by the Common
Cytokine Receptor -Chain*
Ferenc
Olosz and
Thomas R.
Malek
From the Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of
Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33101
Received for publication, November 1, 2001, and in revised form, January 16, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The common -chain ( c)
that functions both in ligand binding and signal transduction is a
shared subunit of the multichain receptors for interleukin (IL)-2,
IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, and IL-21. The structural basis by which the
ectodomain of c contributes to binding six distinct
cytokines is only partially defined. In the present study, epitope
mapping of antagonistic anti- c monoclonal antibodies led
to the identification of Asn-128 of mouse c that represents another potential contact residue that is required for
binding IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 but not IL-4. In addition, Tyr-103, Cys-161, Cys-210, and Cys-211, previously identified to contribute to
binding IL-2 and IL-7, were also found to be involved in binding IL-4
and IL-15. Collectively, these data favor a model in which c utilizes a common mechanism for its interactions with
multiple cytokines, and the binding sites are largely overlapping but
not identical. Asn-128 and Tyr-103 likely act as contact residues whereas Cys-161, Cys-210, and Gly-211 may stabilize the structure of
the proposed ligand-interacting surface formed by the two
extracytoplasmic domains.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Lymphocyte development, self-reactivity, T cell homeostasis, and
peripheral immune responses are importantly regulated by cytokines that
utilize the common -chain
( c)1 as a
receptor subunit (1, 2). c is a type I transmembrane glycoprotein that serves as a subunit for the receptors of interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, and IL-21. The IL-2 receptor (R) and
IL-15R are heterotrimers comprised of unique -chains and shared
IL-2R and c subunits whereas the IL-4R, IL-7R, IL-9R, and IL-21R are heterodimers comprised of unique -subunits and c (3-9). For each of these cytokine receptors,
c directly contributes to ligand binding through its
extracellular domain and to signal transduction through the association
of Jak-3 to its cytoplasmic tail (10, 11).
Mutations in c abolish the function in each of these
cytokine receptors and cause X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency disease (X-SCID) (12, 13). In humans this disease is characterized by
failed development of T and natural killer cells whereas B cell
development is largely normal, but their function is impaired. In
c-deficient mice, severe impairment in T, natural
killer, and B cell development occurs that is mainly due to lack of
IL-7R and IL-15R signaling (14). A number of mutations in
c from X-SCID patients have been identified (15, 16).
Many of these are nonsense mutations that lead to a premature stoppage
in translation of c, whereas several others are missense
mutations. For the most part, however, it is not possible to deduce
whether these latter mutations might selectively affect the
ligand-binding function of c or simply distort its
tertiary structure.
The structural basis by which c functions in binding six
distinct cytokines is still not defined. Recent structure-function analysis of the mouse c (m c) ectodomain
by site-directed mutagenesis (17), guided by predictions of theoretical
models of the c structure (18-20), identified four
amino acids of c that are necessary for binding IL-2 and
IL-7 (17). One of these residues, Tyr-103, may be directly involved in
IL-2 and IL-7 binding. The other three residues, Cys-161, Cys-210, and
Gly-211 may indirectly function in ligand binding by maintaining the
conformation of two proposed loops of c. Somewhat
surprisingly, none of the initial 25 mutations introduced into
m c substantially affected the binding of two well
characterized antagonistic anti-m c mAbs (4G3 and 3E12)
(21) suggesting that there remained other important ligand contact regions in c.
In the present report we have defined the epitopes on m c
for the 4G3 and 3E12 mAbs. Subsequent site-directed mutagenesis of
amino acids surrounding the putative 4G3 binding site led to the
identification of a novel residue that is more critical for the binding
of IL-7 than IL-2 or IL-15 and is not important for binding IL-4. In
addition, the importance of m c residues Tyr-103, Cys-161, Cys-210, and Gly-211 was extended to IL-4 and IL-15 binding. Collectively, these data favor a model in which c
utilizes a common mechanism for its interactions with multiple cytokines.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cloning of a Partial Rat c cDNA--
Reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed using
the GeneAmp PCR kit (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) following the
manufacturer's recommendations. Briefly, 0.1-1 µg of rat spleen
poly(A)+ RNA (CLONTECH Laboratories)
was reverse transcribed for 15 min at 42 °C, in the presence of
oligo(dT) primers. The cDNA was then amplified by AmpliTaq DNA
polymerase, using two c-specific primers (0.5 µM each). The primers corresponded to gene sequences of
the m c leader peptide (5'-AGATCCTTCT TAGTCCTNCAGC-3')
and the rat c cytoplasmic region
(5'-CACCACTCCAGGCCGAAAAGTTCCC-3'). Amplification reactions were
performed in a PerkinElmer DNA thermal cycler, starting with a 2-min
denaturation at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s for
melting at 95 °C and 45 s each for annealing/extension at 60 and 72 °C, respectively, and a final incubation of 7 min at
72 °C. The RT-PCR products were separated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, and the 800-900-bp major band was purified. The partial rat c cDNA was subsequently digested with
SacI and XbaI and was used to replace a
corresponding fragment of the m c gene in the pSI-m c
vector. Plasmids containing the longer c inserts (see
"Results") were designated pSI-rat c and encoded full-length c protein with rat extracellular and transmembrane
domains (residues 3-273) and the mouse carboxyl tail. Both the RT-PCR
products and the rat c inserts were analyzed by DNA sequencing.
Preparation of Chimeric Rat-Mouse c--
A
conserved EcoRV site within the rat and mouse
c genes and a XhoI site in the pSI vector
were used to digest the 5' c gene fragments from both
the pSI-m c and pSI-rat c plasmids. These fragments, which encode
the leader peptide and amino acids 1-99 of the c, were
then swapped between the two vectors, resulting in c
cDNA that partially encodes rat and mouse sequences corresponding to the extracellular domains.
Expression Constructs and Mutagenesis of Mouse
c--
Full-length cDNAs for the m c,
human IL-2R (hIL-2R ), and mouse IL-7R (mIL-7R ) were
inserted into the pSI mammalian expression vector (Promega, Madison,
WI). The pDC302 expression vector containing the full-length mouse
IL-4R (mIL-4R ) cDNA was described previously (22) (provided
by Immunex Corp., Seattle, WA). Site-directed mutagenesis of the
m c gene was performed by the QuikChange method (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), as previously described (17). Mutations were verified by DNA sequencing.
Cell Culture and Transient Transfections--
COS7 monkey kidney
cells were maintained and transfected as previously described (17). All
assays were done 3 days post-transfection, using COS7 cells harvested
with 5 mM EDTA in phosphate-buffered saline.
Fluorescence-activated Cell Sorter (FACS) Analysis--
Cytokine
receptor surface expression in COS7 cells was analyzed as previously
described using a FACScan flow cytometer (BD PharMingen) (17). The mAbs
used were anti-m c (4G3 and 3E12, Ref. 21; TUGm2; BD
PharMingen), anti-IL-2R (Mik 3; BD PharMingen), or
anti-IL-7R (A7R34; kindly provided by S. Nishikawa, Kyoto University, Japan) (23).
Radioligand Binding Assays--
Recombinant human IL-2, IL-7,
and IL-15 (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ) and mouse IL-4 (Immunex, Seattle,
WA) were radiolabeled with 125I using IODO-GEN tubes
(Pierce) to 15-60 µCi/µg. IL-2 and IL-7 binding was measured as
previously described (17). IL-15 binding was measured on COS7 cells
expressing hIL-2R and m c, as described for IL-2.
c-specific IL-2 and IL-15 binding was calculated as the
cpm associated with COS7-hIL-2R /m c transfectants
minus the cpm associated with control cells expressing hIL-2R alone.
c-specific binding for IL-7 was calculated as the cpm
associated with COS7-mIL-7R /m c cells minus the cpm
associated with COS7-mIL-7R cells. c-specific ligand
binding to COS7 cells bearing mutant receptors was expressed as
percentage of the wild-type control. Nonspecific binding was always
assessed by evaluating binding by mock transfected COS7 cells. This
control was equivalent to that observed when blocking binding using an
excess of unlabeled cytokine.
IL-4 Cross-linking Assays--
COS7 cells (4-5 × 106 cells) expressing mIL-4R in the presence or absence
of m c were incubated with 1 nM
125I-IL-4 for 2-3 h at 4 °C. The cells were then washed
three times with phosphate-buffered saline and treated for 30-60 min
at 4 °C with 1 mM dissucinimidyl suberate in 1 ml of
phosphate-buffered saline. After centrifugation, the cells were
extracted with 200 µl of 0.5% Nonidet P-40 as described previously
(24). The extracts were subjected to immunoprecipitation with 4G3 and
3E12 mAbs conjugated to Sepharose 4B beads at 4 °C. Finally, the
beads were washed three times with 0.5% Nonidet P-40, and bound
radioactivity was measured in a -counter. In some experiments, the
precipitated material was eluted with 1% SDS, separated by 10%
reducing SDS-PAGE, and visualized by autoradiography (24).
 |
RESULTS |
Mapping the 4G3 and 3E12 Epitopes--
The 4G3 and 3E12 mAbs to
m c recognize distinct epitopes (21), and their binding
does not overlap with the epitope for TUGm2 (data not shown). 4G3 is a
potent antagonist of IL-7, IL-9, and IL-15 bioactivity, whereas 3E12 is
most effective against IL-4 (21, 25). As 4G3 and 3E12 are of rat
origin, the epitopes recognized by these mAbs should reflect
differences in the primary structure between mouse and rat
c. Therefore, our strategy to define the epitopes to
these two mAbs relied on comparing the amino acid sequences of mouse
and rat c. This first required determination of the
sequence of the rat c ectodomain.
Homology search of the nucleotide data bases with a m c
query sequence returned two rat ESTs (GenBankTM accessions
AI172304 and AI178808) aligning with the m c ectodomain
and the m c cytoplasmic tail, respectively. This sequence information was used to amplify a partial rat c cDNA
from rat spleen by using RT-PCR. The products appeared as a diffuse
band of 800-900 bp on agarose gels and were later subcloned into the pSI mammalian expression vector. Interestingly, sequence analysis of
the RT-PCR products and the subcloned inserts indicated the presence of
at least two types of rat c cDNA. Both appeared to be transcripts of the same gene; however, the shorter cDNA had a
97-bp deletion corresponding to putative exon 6 encoding the transmembrane region, suggesting that it was a splice variant of
c (Fig.
1A).

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Sequence of rat
c. A, partial
nucleotide and amino acid sequence determined from resulting cDNA
amplified from rat spleen RNA by RT-PCR. The sequence was derived from
a consensus of three independent clones and lacks only a segment
corresponding to most of the cytoplasmic tail. Only amino acids of the
mature rat c are indicated. The 5' PCR primer, the start
of the rat sequence, a conserved EcoRV site, and predicted
exon boundaries are marked. Exon 6, absent from a short form of rat
c, is underlined. B, amino acid
sequence alignment of the mouse and rat c extracellular
domains. The putative TUGm2 epitope is boxed, and sites
previously shown to be required for ligand binding by m c
are underlined. New m c mutations are
shaded in gray, and arrows indicate
residues Val-121, Asn-128, and Arg-197. The rat c
sequence is found as GenBankTM accession number
AF410926.
|
|
As anticipated, all defining features of the type I cytokine receptor
superfamily were conserved between rat and mouse (Fig. 1B).
The deduced amino acid sequences of the mature rat and mouse c ectodomains (residues 1-241) were 88% identical to
each other (Fig. 1B). The N-terminal 34 amino acids of
c were much less conserved (9 mismatches) than residues
35-241, which correspond to the cytokine receptor homology region (18 mismatches). It is also noteworthy that a lysine inserted into the
mouse sequence at position 158 corresponds to a position previously
identified to contribute to the binding of the TUGm2 mAb (17).
Because the number of mismatches between the rat and mouse
c ectodomain sequences was relatively large, we first
assessed which segments of the m c ectodomain contain the
residues involved in the binding of mAbs by analyzing chimeric
rat/mouse c molecules. A conserved EcoRV site
(Fig. 1A) was utilized for swapping cDNA fragments
between the two species. After co-transfection of these chimeric
cDNAs with the hIL-2R into COS7 cells, the expressed proteins
were examined for mAb and IL-2 binding (Table
I). The latter assay was performed to
ensure that the chimeric c molecules were functional
(Fig. 2). 4G3, 3E12, and TUGm2 mAbs
readily stained cells transfected with wild-type m c but
not wild-type rat or mouse (amino acids 1-99)/rat (amino acids
100-241) chimeric c molecules. By contrast, rat (aa
1-99)/mouse (aa 100-241) c chimeras fully retained
their ability to bind 4G3, 3E12, and TUGm2. Thus, all three mAb
epitopes were mapped to the membrane-proximal 141-amino acid segment of
the m c ectodomain.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Localization of the 4G3 and 3E12
epitopes. The indicated mutant m c molecules were
expressed in COS7 cells and analyzed by FACS using 4G3, 3E12, and
TUGm2. Histograms are representative of four independent experiments
and show staining of cells expressing mutant m c
(shaded histograms) in comparison with untransfected COS7
controls (open histograms).
|
|
Based on our past mutagenesis of m c and that 5 of the 15 differences between positions 100 and 241 were conservative
substitutions, six other m c residues were replaced with
their rat counterparts and then analyzed for their ability to bind mAbs
to m c after transfection into COS7 cells. The mutation
V121E completely abrogated 4G3 binding, whereas staining with 3E12 and
TUGm2 was unaffected (Fig. 2). Similarly, the R197L mutation
dramatically reduced the binding of 3E12 but not the other mAbs to
m c. No other point mutations were found to inhibit the
binding of 4G3 or 3E12. Thus, 4G3 likely recognizes an epitope near
Val-121 in the first domain of m c, whereas 3E12 may bind
to a membrane-proximal part of domain 2. It is important to note,
however, that whereas mutant V121E was defective in 4G3 binding, mutant
V121A was not, suggesting that the side chain of Val-121 may not be
directly involved in the m c-4G3 interaction (Fig.
3A). Thus, this analysis may
not have precisely defined the composition of these epitopes.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Cell surface expression and ligand binding by
m c with mutations near the
putative 4G3 epitope. A and B, cell surface
expression. Shaded histograms indicate 4G3 staining of COS7
cells transfected with m c, compared with similarly
stained untransfected COS7 cells (open histograms). Except
for L124A, which was not detectable, all mutants readily bound 3E12 and
TUGm2 (not shown). Two experiments are shown, which are representative
of at least three measurements for each mutant. C, IL-2 and
IL-7 binding. c-dependent
125I-IL-2 or 125I-IL-7 binding was measured as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Shown are
± S.E. of c-dependent
binding from n experiments as indicated on the
bars.
|
|
Point Mutations in m c That Inhibit the Binding of
IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15--
We have previously established a
ligand-receptor binding assay using transient transfected COS7 cells
that distinguish m c-dependent binding by
IL-2 or IL-7 (17). Under our binding conditions (0.3-1 nM
of radiolabeled ligand), readily measurable binding by IL-2 is strictly
dependent upon expression of both the hIL-2R and m c
subunits whereas m c enhances the binding by mIL-7R .
In the case of IL-2 binding, it was necessary to use hIL-2R because co-expression of the mIL-2R and m c heterodimer does
not detectably bind IL-2. In these experiments, the difference between
the radioactivity bound to cells with heterodimeric receptors
versus cells expressing only hIL-2R or mIL-7R was
considered as m c-dependent ligand binding
and was used for comparison of the mutant m c chains to the wild-type.
Because 4G3 efficiently blocks the detection of IL-7 and IL-2
cross-linked to m c (21) and its epitope is
membrane-distal, we hypothesized that mutagenesis of m c
near the 4G3 epitope may lead to the identification of novel contact
residues involved in the binding of
m c-dependent cytokines. Using a structural model of c as a guide (20), a number of amino acids in
the vicinity of Val-121 were mutated to alanine. With the exception of
the L124A mutant, which was undetectable, all the other
m c mutants were normally expressed on the cell surface
(>70% compared with the wild-type control) after co-transfection into
COS7 cells with either hIL-2R or mIL-7R . (Fig. 3, A
and B). These same cells were also used in
125I-radiolabeled IL-2 or IL-7 binding assays (Fig.
3C). For all transfected COS7 cells that expressed cell
surface m c, there was a notable decrease (at least
2-fold) in m c-dependent binding only for
IL-7 when COS7 cells expressed mIL-7R and the m c
mutant N128A. Because the expression of hIL-2R and mIL-7R was
similar among these transfectants (data not shown), these results
implicate Asn-128 in binding IL-7.
Mutations of Tyr-103, Cys-161, Cys-210, and Gly-211 of
m c have been previously shown to impair the binding of
IL-2 and IL-7 (17). Therefore, we tested the contribution of these
residues as well as those surrounding the 4G3 epitope for binding IL-15 (Fig. 4). Similar to IL-2, IL-15 also
readily binds to hIL-2R and m c but only in the
presence of both subunits (8). Therefore, the same populations of
transfected COS7 cells were examined for binding IL-2 or IL-15. This
analysis indicated that COS7 cells expressing the Y103A or Y103R
mutation of m c were impaired in binding both IL-2 and
IL-15 (Fig. 4A). IL-15 binding was consistently more
sensitive to the Y103R mutation than IL-2, perhaps due to different
surface properties of the two cytokines. The C161S, C210S, and G211R
mutant m c molecules also did not support IL-15 binding
(Fig. 4A). In contrast to the mutations at Tyr-103 and Asn-128 that do not affect m c expression, these other
three mutations typically resulted in lower m c surface
expression (Ref. 17; data not shown). However, based on our past work
that established the relationship between expression of
m c as a function of IL-2 or IL-7 binding by their
respective receptors (17), the virtually complete loss of IL-15 binding
cannot be due to this suboptimal expression of
m c.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 binding by selected
m c mutants. A,
COS7 cells were co-transfected with hIL-2R and m c,
and the same populations of cells were subjected to parallel IL-2 and
IL-15 binding assays. Surface expression of m c, verified
by FACS, was near normal for mutants Y103A and Y103R, and 15-35% of
the wild-type m c for mutants C161S, C210S, and G211.
Shown are c-dependent IL-2 and IL-15 binding
of triplicate samples ( ± S.E.). The data are
representative of two experiments. B, COS7 cells were
simultaneously transfected with hIL-2R , mIL-7R , and
m c, and the cells were analyzed in parallel IL-2, IL-7,
and IL-15 binding assays. Average surface expression of the
m c mutants is shown at the top. The
expression of hIL-2R and mIL-7R , also verified by FACS, was
similar among the different COS7 transfectants. Shown are
± S.E. of c-dependent
binding from n experiments as indicated on the
bars.
|
|
With respect to the mutations near the 4G3 epitope, only the N128A
mutation somewhat inhibited IL-15 binding (Fig. 4B and data
not shown). In these later experiments, COS7 cells were co-transfected with hIL-2R , mIL-7R , and m c to evaluate the effect
of a given m c mutation for IL-2, IL-7, or IL-15 binding
on a single population of cells. To further assess the role of Tyr-103
and Asn-128 in binding these cytokines, m c was mutated
to contain both the Y103R and N128A mutations. After transfecting
m c containing either the individual or double mutations
into COS7 cells with hIL-2R and mIL-7R , ligand binding assays
were performed (Fig. 4B). In this analysis, the binding of
IL-2, IL-15, and IL-7 was decreased at least 2- to 3-fold by mutations
at Tyr-103 whereas the N128A mutation caused a 2-fold decrease in the
binding of IL-7 and a more modest decrease in IL-2 and IL-15 binding.
However, the Y103R/N128A double mutation caused a 10-fold reduction in
the binding of IL-2 and IL-7 and virtually abolished the binding of
IL-15. Thus, these data indicate that both Tyr-103 and Asn-128
contribute to the binding of IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15, with Asn-128
playing a more critical role in the binding of IL-7. Collectively, our
results indicate that IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 exhibit similar
requirements for Tyr-103, Asn-128, Cys-161, Cys-210, and Gly-211 in the
putative m c ligand-binding interface.
Effect of Selected m c Mutations on the Binding of
IL-4--
IL-4R / c heterodimers have been reported to
bind IL-4 with 3- to 5-fold higher affinity than IL-4R (3). However,
in our hands COS7 cells expressing only mIL-4R always bound similar amounts of radiolabeled IL-4 as cells expressing both the mIL-4R and
m c subunits (data not shown). Therefore, we assessed the contribution of m c to the binding of IL-4 by the
capacity to cross-link radiolabeled IL-4 to m c after its
association to the IL-4R. The amount of radioactivity precipitated with
anti-m c was used to represent
m c-dependent IL-4R binding. This included both covalently cross-linked m c·IL-4 complexes and
IL-4 noncovalently associated to its receptor, as shown by the presence
of two major bands after SDS-PAGE analysis of the immunoprecipitated
material (Fig. 5A). This type
of analysis revealed that the m c mutations, K158A, which
in part defines the epitope for TUGm2, and (4-34), which lacks
amino acids 4-34 of the mature protein, readily binds IL-4. Therefore,
as previously shown for m c-dependent IL-2
and IL-7 binding (17), these regions of m c are also not
important for IL-4 binding.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
IL-4 binding by selected
m c mutants. COS7 cells were
transfected with mIL-4R and wild-type or mutant m c
and were used in 125I-IL-4 cross-linking assays as
described under "Experimental Procedures."
m c-containing complexes were precipitated from cell
extracts with 4G3/3E12-Sepharose, and radioactivity bound to the beads
was measured. A, SDS-PAGE analysis of the precipitated
complexes from a representative IL-4 cross-linking experiment.
B, IL-4 binding as a function of anti-m c
immunoprecipitation and m c cell surface expression. The
levels of cell surface wild-type m c was varied by using
decreasing concentrations of the pSI cWT expression vector (17).
c cell surface expression and IL-4 binding were measured
by FACS and anti-m c immunoprecipitation, respectively,
and these resulting data were plotted to represent a standard curve for
c-dependent IL-4 binding as a function of
m c cell surface expression. Symbols represent
c-dependent IL-4 binding versus
surface expression of individual m c mutants
( ± S.E. from three to six experiments). Control
experiments demonstrated that minimal 125I-IL-4 was
precipitated by anti-m c from extracts of COS7 cells
transfected with only mIL-4R or mock transfected (data not
shown).
|
|
All m c mutations implicated in the binding of IL-2,
IL-7, and IL-15 were also analyzed for their ability to contribute to the binding of IL-4. COS7 transfectants expressing mIL-4R and wild-type or mutant m c were subjected to both IL-4
cross-linking assays and FACS analysis with anti-m c.
mIL-4R expression did not significantly vary among transfectants as
verified by Western blot analysis (data not shown). However, our past
analysis has shown that some of these mutations cause low
m c cell surface expression (17). This observation and
the importance of m c cell surface levels in this assay
led us to first establish the relationship between the levels of cell
surface wild-type m c expression and the amount of
125I-IL-4 precipitated from extracts of cross-linked
transfected COS7 cells. As expected, the fraction of
m c-dependent binding was proportional to the
expression of m c (Fig. 5B). These data served
as a standard curve for the comparison of IL-4 binding by
m c mutants to similarly expressed wild-type
m c. The poorly expressed m c mutants
C161S, C210S, and G211R, bound 3- to 8-fold less IL-4 than similarly
expressed wild-type (dotted line) or Q163A m c
(Fig. 5B). These results correspond to the detection of
minimal 125I-IL-4 for the C210A/G211A mutations when the
precipitated material was analyzed on SDS-PAGE (Fig. 5A).
Mutations at Y103A, Y103R, or N128A did not severely alter
m c expression, as measured by staining with 4G3.
Nevertheless, both mutations of Tyr-103 caused a partial (2- to 3-fold)
decrease in the binding of IL-4, whereas N128A did not have a readily
detectable effect when tested either alone or in combination with Y103R
(Fig. 5B). These results suggest that Cys-161, Cys-210,
Gly-211, and Tyr-103 are required for IL-4 binding, whereas Asn-128 is
not necessary.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Our past work relied solely on molecular models of
c to identify regions and amino acids within
c that regulate ligand binding (17). In this report our
strategy was to identify epitopes on m c for the
inhibitory mAbs 4G3 and 3E12 as a means to further explore the
structural basis of m c-cytokine interactions.
Localization of these epitopes was first dependent upon determining the
sequence of rat c ectodomain. As expected, the rat- and
mouse-deduced amino acid sequences were highly conserved. However, one
unanticipated finding was that two forms of c cDNA
were amplified by RT-PCR from rat spleen mRNA, one of which encodes
a protein that lacks the sequence corresponding to exon 6 and is
predicted to be secreted. These two forms likely represent products of
alternative splicing. We have identified an identical spliced form of
m c lacking the transmembrane domain for a variant of the
mouse EL4 thymoma (Ref. 26).2
Although the overall biological relevance of this form of
c remains to be determined, it is noteworthy that
soluble c has been identified in human and mouse sera
(27).
In this and a previous report (17), we have analyzed the ligand binding
function of 33 mutant m c molecules harboring 39 distinct
mutations. The extent and relative location of these mutations is
displayed in Fig. 6A. Analysis
of anti-m c mAb binding to these mutant molecules has
revealed their epitopes (Fig. 6B). The 3E12 epitope is
located in a membrane-proximal portion of m c near
Arg-197 of domain 2. It is likely that 3E12 inhibits cytokine
bioactivity by interfering with receptor-receptor interactions or by
inducing a conformational shift in m c that indirectly
affects receptor function. These two possibilities are not mutually
exclusive. By contrast, the 4G3 epitope was localized to the vicinity
of residue Val-121 in domain 1 because mutation of Val-121 of the m c to the corresponding rat residue (glutamate)
abrogated 4G3 binding. However, Val-121 by itself does not define the
4G3 epitope as the V121A mutation did not interfere with 4G3 binding,
and the surrounding sequences are almost identical between rat and mouse. Therefore, the 4G3 epitope likely depends on additional amino
acids. One candidate region is located between amino acids 1 and 34 of
m c because the deletion of this poorly conserved sequence, which is not required for IL-2, IL-4, and IL-7 binding, slightly inhibited the binding of 4G3 (17). The TUGm2 epitope, identified earlier (17), is centered around a unique lysine residue
(Lys-158) of the m c sequence. The predicted locations of
these epitopes and the inhibitory properties of the mAbs (3, 7, 21, 25,
28) suggest that it is highly likely that 4G3 and TUG2 antagonize
c-dependent cytokines by directly
interfering with ligand-receptor interactions.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Summary of mutagenesis analysis of
m c. Location of
m c residues analyzed by alanine scanning mutagenesis
(A), putative antibody epitopes (B), and
potential ligand-interacting sites (C), illustrated on a
theoretical model of the IL-7 receptor complex (20). The
highlighted regions are amino acid side chains.
|
|
Based on this hypothesis, our search for new ligand-interacting sites
was restricted to mutagenesis of selected residues of m c
near the putative 4G3 epitope. This analysis led to the identification of amino acid Asn-128 in the linker region of m c that is
necessary for the binding of IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 but not IL-4. The
N128A mutation caused a 2-3-fold reduction in
m c-dependent IL-7 binding while only
modestly affecting the binding of IL-2 and IL-15. However, simultaneous
mutation of Asn-128 and Tyr-103, a residue previously shown to
contribute to IL-2 and IL-7 binding (17), essentially abrogated
m c-dependent IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 binding
whereas the individual mutations had only a partial effect. This result clearly implicates both Asn-128 and Tyr-103 in
m c-dependent binding of all three of these
cytokines. We cannot unambiguously distinguish by our assays whether
this is an additive or synergistic effect.
The amino acids of the linker region, including Asn-128, are highly
conserved in mammalian c, consistent with an important role of this region in c structure and/or function.
Although only one theoretical model of c (19) predicted
a direct participation of Asn-128 in ligand binding, other residues of
the c linker region have been proposed to interact with
IL-7 (20). The linker region of c has also been
implicated in ligand binding based on epitope mapping studies of the
anti-human c mAb PC.B8 (29). Although no X-SCID patients
have yet been identified with mutations at Asn-128, at least four
neighboring mutations have been shown to cause X-SCID (15, 16).
Interestingly, one of these mutations, A134V, resulted in a selective
defect in c-dependent IL-4 and IL-7 but not
IL-2 and IL-15 signaling (30). This finding further supports the
importance of this region in the binding of multiple cytokines and
suggests that it may impart ligand specificity.
Of the large number of residues mutated and analyzed (Fig.
6A), relatively few have been implicated to participate in
ligand binding (Fig. 6C). These include Cys-161 and Cys-210
that were proposed to form a putative intrachain disulfide bond (20), as well as Asn-128 and Tyr-103. It should be stressed that although mutations of these residues interfered with cytokine binding, they did
not affect the binding of the conformationally sensitive 4G3 and 3E12
mAbs, indicating that the folding of m c was not drastically changed (17). Importantly, most of these sites were required for the m c-dependent binding of
each of the four cytokines that we tested. The only exception was
Asn-128, which did not obviously contribute to IL-4 binding, as
mentioned above. Thus, our data favor a model in which
c-dependent cytokines use overlapping binding surfaces that include at least three loops (EF1, BC2, and FG2)
of the m c ectodomain (Fig. 6C). Tyr-103 is
analogous to a structurally conserved aromatic amino acid present in
several other members of the cytokine receptor superfamily (31) and which has been shown to directly participate in the binding of growth
hormone and erythropoietin (32-34). Thus, Tyr-103 is an attractive
candidate to directly participate in the binding of IL-2, IL-4, IL-7,
and IL-15. Furthermore, Asn-128 is modeled to be in a position where it
is exposed to solvent and also might directly interact with the
cytokines. The ability of the Y103R/N128A double mutation to almost
completely prevent IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 binding is consistent with
this view. The role of Cys-161 and Cys-210 in the binding of all four
cytokines is less clear. As previously suggested (17), these two
cysteines may maintain the conformation of the BC2 and FG2 loops,
contributing to the local structure of the ligand binding interface
rather than directly contacting the cytokines.
The IL-2R and IL-15R are also found as heterotrimers comprised of a
unique -subunit while sharing IL-2R and c
subunits. The trimeric forms of these receptors are the main
physiological structures in vivo. In this study we have
examined IL-2 and IL-15 binding to only IL-2R and m c
heterodimers as this permitted a direct evaluation of the effect of a
particular m c mutation on IL-2 or IL-15 binding without
complication from the substantial intrinsic binding by the
-subunits. We anticipate that these same structural elements, as
discussed above, are required for binding or stabilizing
m c in the context of the heterotrimeric IL-2R and
IL-15R, but this must be experimentally verified.
Although there appears to be a conserved structural strategy by which
m c participates in binding multiple cytokines, our data
clearly illustrate that there are some differences in the relative
contribution of individual m c residues to ligand
binding. For example, mutations of Tyr-103 appeared to have a more
severe effect on the binding of IL-15 than on IL-2. Similarly, the
single mutation N128A had a more noticeable effect on IL-7
versus IL-2 and IL-15 binding. Therefore, Tyr-103 may
function as a structurally conserved anchor residue for cytokine
binding whereas amino acids surrounding Asn-128 may be related to fine
specificity in binding. The inability to detect a role for Asn-128 in
binding IL-4 in m c and the selective effect of the A134V
mutation in human c (30), as discussed above, raise the
possibility that there may be other yet undefined contacts on
c for these cytokines. A more precise view of
c-cytokine interactions awaits solving the crystal structure of c in the context of a heterodimeric
receptor with bound ligand.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Immunex for IL-4 and the IL-4R
expression vector.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant AI401114.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Microbiology
and Immunology (R138), University of Miami School of Medicine, P. O.
Box 016960, Miami, FL 33101. Tel.: 305-243-5627; Fax: 305-243-4623; E-mail: tmalek@med.miami.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 28, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110520200
2
R. K. Furse and T. R. Malek, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
c, common -chain;
m, mouse;
R, receptor;
FACS, fluorescence-activated
cell sorter;
h, human;
IL, interleukin;
RT, reverse transcription;
WT, wild-type;
X-SCID, X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency disease;
mAb, monoclonal antibody.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
He, Y. W.,
and Malek, T. R.
(1998)
Crit. Rev. Immunol.
18,
503-524[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Nelson, B. H.,
and Willerford, D. M.
(1998)
Adv. Immunol.
70,
1-81[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Kondo, M.,
Takeshita, T.,
Ishii, N.,
Nakamura, M.,
Watanabe, S.,
Arai, K.,
and Sugamura, K.
(1993)
Science
262,
1874-1877[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Russell, S. M.,
Keegan, A. D.,
Harada, N.,
Nakamura, Y.,
Noguchi, M.,
Leland, P.,
Friedmann, M. C.,
Miyajima, A.,
Puri, R. K.,
Paul, W. E.,
et al..
(1993)
Science
262,
1880-1883[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Kondo, M.,
Takeshita, T.,
Higuchi, M.,
Nakamura, M.,
Sudo, T.,
Nishikawa, S.,
and Sugamura, K.
(1994)
Science
263,
1453-1454[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Noguchi, M.,
Nakamura, Y.,
Russell, S. M.,
Ziegler, S. F.,
Tsang, M.,
Cao, X.,
and Leonard, W. J.
(1993)
Science
262,
1877-1880[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Kimura, Y.,
Takeshita, T.,
Kondo, M.,
Ishii, N.,
Nakamura, M.,
Van Snick, J.,
and Sugamura, K.
(1995)
Int. Immunol.
7,
115-120[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Giri, J. G.,
Ahdieh, M.,
Eisenman, J.,
Shanebeck, K.,
Grabstein, K.,
Kumaki, S.,
Namen, A.,
Park, L. S.,
Cosman, D.,
and Anderson, D.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
2822-2830[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Asao, H.,
Okuyama, C.,
Kumaki, S.,
Ishii, N.,
Tsuchiya, S.,
Foster, D.,
and Sugamura, K.
(2001)
J. Immunol.
167,
1-5[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Ihle, J. N.,
Thierfelder, W.,
Teglund, S.,
Stravapodis, D.,
Wang, D.,
Feng, J.,
and Parganas, E.
(1998)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
865,
1-9[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
O'Shea, J. J.
(1997)
Immunity
7,
1-11[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Puck, J. M.,
Deschenes, S. M.,
Porter, J. C.,
Dutra, A. S.,
Brown, C. J.,
Willard, H. F.,
and Henthorn, P. S.
(1993)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
2,
1099-1104[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Noguchi, M., Yi, H.,
Rosenblatt, H. M.,
Filipovich, A. H.,
Adelstein, S.,
Modi, W. S.,
McBride, O. W.,
and Leonard, W. J.
(1993)
Cell
73,
147-157[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Porter, B. O.,
and Malek, T. R.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
163,
5906-5912[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Puck, J. M.
(1996)
Immunol. Today
17,
507-511[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Puck, J. M.,
Pepper, A. E.,
Henthorn, P. S.,
Candotti, F.,
Isakov, J.,
Whitwam, T.,
Conley, M. E.,
Fischer, R. E.,
Rosenblatt, H. M.,
Small, T. N.,
and Buckley, R. H.
(1997)
Blood
89,
1968-1977[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Olosz, F.,
and Malek, T. R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
30100-30105[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Bamborough, P.,
Hedgecock, C. J.,
and Richards, W. G.
(1994)
Structure
2,
839-851[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Gustchina, A.,
Zdanov, A.,
Schalk-Hihi, C.,
and Wlodawer, A.
(1995)
Proteins
21,
140-148[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Kroemer, R. T.,
and Richards, W. G.
(1996)
Protein Eng.
9,
1135-1142[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
He, Y. W.,
Adkins, B.,
Furse, R. K.,
and Malek, T. R.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
154,
1596-1605[Abstract]
|
| 22.
|
Mosley, B.,
Beckmann, M. P.,
March, C. J.,
Idzerda, R. L.,
Gimpel, S. D.,
VandenBos, T.,
Friend, D.,
Alpert, A.,
Anderson, D.,
Jackson, J.,
et al..
(1989)
Cell
59,
335-348[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Sudo, T.,
Nishikawa, S.,
Ohno, N.,
Akiyama, N.,
Tamakoshi, M.,
and Yoshida, H.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
9125-9129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Saragovi, H.,
and Malek, T. R.
(1987)
J. Immunol.
139,
1918-1926[Abstract]
|
| 25.
|
Malek, T. R.,
Levy, R. B.,
Adkins, B.,
and He, Y. W.
(1998)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
63,
643-649[Abstract]
|
| 26.
|
Malek, T. R.,
Furse, R. K.,
Fleming, M. L.,
Fadell, A. J.,
and He, Y. W.
(1995)
J. Interferon Cytokine Res.
15,
447-454[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Meissner, U.,
Blum, H.,
Schnare, M.,
Rollinghoff, M.,
and Gessner, A.
(2001)
Blood
97,
183-191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Sugamura, K.,
Asao, H.,
Kondo, M.,
Tanaka, N.,
Ishii, N.,
Nakamura, M.,
and Takeshita, T.
(1995)
Adv. Immunol.
59,
225-277[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Raskin, N.,
Jakubowski, A.,
Sizing, I. D.,
Olson, D. L.,
Kalled, S. L.,
Hession, C. A.,
Benjamin, C. D.,
Baker, D. P.,
and Burkly, L. C.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
161,
3474-3483[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Kumaki, S.,
Ishii, N.,
Minegishi, M.,
Tsuchiya, S.,
Cosman, D.,
Sugamura, K.,
and Konno, T.
(1999)
Blood
93,
607-612[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Bazan, J. F.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
6934-6938[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
de Vos, A. M.,
Ultsch, M.,
and Kossiakoff, A. A.
(1992)
Science
255,
306-312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Middleton, S. A.,
Johnson, D. L.,
Jin, R.,
McMahon, F. J.,
Collins, A.,
Tullai, J.,
Gruninger, R. H.,
Jolliffe, L. K.,
and Mulcahy, L. S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
14045-14054[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Middleton, S. A.,
Barbone, F. P.,
Johnson, D. L.,
Thurmond, R. L.,
You, Y.,
McMahon, F. J.,
Jin, R.,
Livnah, O.,
Tullai, J.,
Farrell, F. X.,
Goldsmith, M. A.,
Wilson, I. A.,
and Jolliffe, L. K.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
14163-14169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. K. Olsen, N. Ota, S. Kishishita, M. Kukimoto-Niino, K. Murayama, H. Uchiyama, M. Toyama, T. Terada, M. Shirouzu, O. Kanagawa, et al.
Crystal Structure of the Interleukin-15{middle dot}Interleukin-15 Receptor {alpha} Complex: INSIGHTS INTO TRANS AND CIS PRESENTATION
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 21, 2007;
282(51):
37191 - 37204.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Jahn, S. Sindhu, S. Gooch, P. Seipel, P. Lavori, E. Leifheit, and K. Weinberg
Direct interaction between Kit and the interleukin-7 receptor
Blood,
September 15, 2007;
110(6):
1840 - 1847.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Wang, M. Rickert, and K. C. Garcia
Structure of the Quaternary Complex of Interleukin-2 with Its {alpha}, {beta}, and {gamma}c Receptors
Science,
November 18, 2005;
310(5751):
1159 - 1163.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|