Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M110872200 on January 30, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 14, 12053-12060, April 5, 2002
Insulin-like Growth Factor-binding Protein 5 (IGFBP-5) Interacts
with a Four and a Half LIM Protein 2 (FHL2)*
Yousef G.
Amaar
§,
Garrett R.
Thompson
¶,
Thomas A.
Linkhart
¶
,
Shin-Tai
Chen
¶,
David J.
Baylink
§, and
Subburaman
Mohan
§¶**
From the
Musculoskeletal Disease Center, Jerry L. Pettis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Loma Linda, California 92357 and ¶ Department of Biochemistry,
Department of
Pediatrics, § Department of Medicine, and
** Department of Physiology, Loma Linda University,
Loma Linda, California 92350
Received for publication, November 13, 2001, and in revised form, January 22, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Recent studies using insulin-like growth factor I
(IGF-I) knockout mice demonstrate that IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-5,
an important bone formation regulator, itself is a growth factor with
cellular effects not dependent on IGFs. Because IGFBP-5 contains a
nuclear localization sequence that mediates transport of IGFBP-5 into the nucleus, we propose that IGFBP-5 interacts with nuclear proteins to affect transcription of genes involved in bone formation. We therefore undertook studies to identify proteins that bind to
IGFBP-5 using IGFBP-5 as bait in a yeast two-hybrid screen of a U2
human osteosarcoma cDNA library. Five related clones that interacted strongly with the bait corresponded to the FHL2 gene, which
contains four and a half LIM domains. Co-immunoprecipitation studies
with lysates from U2 cells overexpressing FHL2 and IGFBP-5 confirmed
that interaction between IGFBP-5 and FHL2 occurs in whole cells.
In vitro interaction studies revealed that purified FHL2
interacted with IGFBP-5 but not with IGFBP-3, -4, or -6. Northern blot
analysis showed that FHL2 was strongly expressed in human osteoblasts.
Nuclear localization of both FHL2 and IGFBP-5 was evident from
Western immunoblot analysis and immunofluorescence. The role of FHL2 as
an intracellular mediator of the effects of IGFBP-5 and other
osteoregulatory agents in osteoblasts will need to be verified in
future studies.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
IGFs1 are
growth-promoting peptides that play an important role in growth,
remodeling, and repair of skeletal tissues as well as in modulating
development, growth, and cell survival in many other tissues (1-4).
IGFs are the most abundant growth factors stored in bone, and they are
the most abundant growth factors produced by osteoblast cells in
culture (5). IGF-I serum levels correlate with serum levels of bone
formation markers (osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatase) as bone
formation increases during puberty and after growth hormone therapy or
decreases with growth hormone deficiency, menopause, and aging (1,
6-8). Bone formation is severely compromised in mice lacking a
functional IGF-I gene (9).
IGFs stimulate bone formation by regulating proliferation,
differentiation, and apoptosis of osteoblasts (1, 10). Actions of IGFs
on osteoblasts depend not only on the amounts of IGFs but also on the
other components of the IGF system including type-I and -II IGF
receptors, IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs), and IGFBP proteases (10, 11).
IGFBPs either stimulate (e.g. IGFBP-3 and -5) or inhibit
(e.g. IGFBP-4 and -6) IGF effects on target cells, and
hence, they are an important regulatory part of the IGF system in bone
(1, 10, 12, 13).
Of the various IGF system components, IGFBP-5 has several features that
suggest it is a key component of the IGF system. IGFBP-5 is the most
abundant IGFBP stored in bone, because it is also the only IGFBP that
binds avidly to hydroxyapatite (10). Decreased skeletal content of
IGFBP-5 has been shown to correlate with decreased skeletal content of
IGF-I that may contribute to the impairment in coupling of bone
formation to resorption (14). Among the IGFBPs known, IGFBP-5 has been
shown to stimulate both osteoblast cell proliferation and activity
in vitro (15-17).
Recent findings demonstrate that IGFBP-5 itself is a growth factor with
cellular effects that are not dependent on IGFs (18). In this regard,
IGFBP-5 treatment increased bone formation parameters in
vitro and in vivo in osteoblasts derived from IGF-I
knockout mice. IGFBP-5 binds to a putative receptor on the osteoblast
cell surface, which may induce downstream signaling pathways (10, 19,
20). IGFBP-5 also contains a nuclear localization sequence that
mediates transport of IGFBP-5 to the cell nucleus (21, 22), where it
may affect gene transcription. Based on these exciting findings, we
have proposed the concept that IGFBP-5 interacts with transcription
factors to stimulate transcription of genes that lead to increased
osteoblast proliferation.
The idea that IGFBPs may affect cells by IGF-independent mechanisms is
not restricted to IGFBP-5. For instance, IGFBP-3 has been shown to
mediate its effects on a variety of cell types in part via an
IGF-independent mechanism (23-26). Several IGFBP-3-interacting proteins have been discovered using the yeast two-hybrid assay (27,
28). For example, it has been shown that IGFBP-3 interacts with
retinoid X receptor-
, and this interaction results in the modulation
of the transcriptional activity of retinoid X receptor-
, which is
essential for mediating IGFBP-3 effects on apoptosis (28).
IGFBP-3-induced apoptosis was abolished in retinoid X receptor-
knockout cells, and IGFBP-3 and retinoid X receptor ligands enhanced
apoptosis in prostate cancer cells.
To understand the molecular mechanism of how IGFBP-5 stimulates bone
formation by an IGF-independent pathway, it is essential to identify
cellular proteins that interact with IGFBP-5. These proteins could
be IGFBP-5 receptors as well as nuclear proteins that regulate
transcription. We therefore utilized a yeast two-hybrid assay (29)
screen to identify proteins that bind to IGFBP-5 using human IGFBP-5 as
bait for screening a human osteosarcoma U2 cDNA library. We have
identified clones encoding the full or partial coding sequence of the
LIM-only protein FHL2 (30, 31) and have shown that FHL2 binds IGFBP-5
but not IGFBP-3, IGFBP-4, or IGFBP-6.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
FHL2 monoclonal antibody was a kind gift from Dr.
Muller, University of Freiberg, Germany (32). Recombinant human IGFBP-4 and -5 were expressed in Escherichia coli and purified as
previously described (17, 18). IGFBP-6 was purchased from Upstate
Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY. Recombinant human IGFBP-3 was a gift
from Dr. A. Sommer (Celtrix Corp., Palo Alto, CA). The yeast
Matchmaker two-hybrid system 3 was purchased from
CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA.
Construction of the GAL4 BD:Bait Gene
Fusion--
BamHI and SalI double-digestion
excised the cDNA fragment encoding the entire IGFBP-5 from the
plasmid pGEM-T. Then the cDNA fragment was gel-purified and cloned
into the BamHI/SalI-digested pGBKT7 vector, and
DNA sequencing confirmed that the cDNA encoding the IGFBP-5 (bait)
was in-frame with GAL4 BD (amino acids 1-147).
The bait vector was transformed into the yeast reporter strain AH109,
and protein samples were prepared from selected yeast cell lysates
using standard protocols or as recommended by the supplier of the
Matchmaker two-hybrid system 3 kit (CLONTECH). The
expression level of the bait IGFBP-5/GAL4 BD fusion protein was
determined by Western blot analysis using a GAL4 BD monoclonal antibody (CLONTECH).
Testing the BD:IGFBP-5 Plasmid for Auto-Activation--
It is
crucial to test each BD:bait plasmid construct for auto-activation of
reporter gene promoters before performing the two-hybrid screen. To
check for auto-activation, the yeast reporter strain AH109 was
transformed with the BD:IGFBP-5 plasmid using the Lithium acetate
method as described in the Matchmaker two-hybrid system 3 user manual.
The AH109 reporter contains three reporter genes, ADE2,
HIS3, and MEL1, with GAL4-responsive
upstream-activating sequences (AUS) and TATA boxes. ADE2,
HIS3, and MEL1 are expressed from GAL1 and
GAL2 promoters, which strongly respond to GAL4.
Transformed cells were plated on synthetic complete medium (CM) minus
adenine and histidine as well as on CM minus tryptophan (bait plasmid
contains a tryptophan as a selection marker for growth control).
-X-Gal was added to the medium at 20 mg/ml to screen for
auto-activation of MEL1.
Activation Domain (AD):cDNA Library Amplification--
The
GAL4 AD:cDNA library constructed in the yeast plasmid pACT2 from
U-2Os (U2) human osteosarcoma cell (ATCC HTB-96) mRNA was purchased
from CLONTECH. Because a library screen requires up
to 500 µg of AD:cDNA plasmid DNA, depending on the yeast strain and the BD:bait plasmid, the AD:cDNA plasmid library in pACT2 was
amplified according to the supplier's instructions. We prepared 6 mg
of plasmid DNA from amplified E. coli cells using the
Nucleobond Mega plasmid prep kit (CLONTECH). The
plasmid contains the ampicillin gene for selection in E. coli and a leucine marker for selection in the yeast host.
Library Screen--
The reporter strain AH109 containing the
BD:IGFBP-5 plasmid was transformed with the 0.5 mg of AD:cDNA
plasmid library using the lithium acetate method as outlined in the
THS3 manual. The transformed cells were plated onto low stringency
minimal selection medium (lacking histidine, leucine, and tryptophan)
and incubated for 4-21 days at 30 °C. The plates were checked for
colonies after 4 days of incubation at 30 °C, and positive colonies
were picked over a 3-week time period. Positive colonies were
transferred to high stringency minimal selection medium plates (lacking
Ade, His, Leu, and Trp and
containing
-X-gal) plates and incubated at 30 °C until sufficient
growth was achieved and colonies turned blue. Positive colonies were
maintained on high stringency selection media that select for reporter
gene activation.
Isolation of AD:cDNA Plasmid--
Colonies that activated
all of the reporter genes in the AH109 stain were further analyzed. The
AD:cDNA plasmid encoding the interacting protein was isolated from
yeast cells using a modified Qiagen (Valencia, CA) plasmid prep method
obtained from Qiagen technical support. The plasmid DNA prepared
was then used to transform E. coli (HB101), and colonies
containing AD:cDNA plasmid were selected with ampicillin (50 µg/ml). The AmpR colonies were picked and inoculated into
5 ml of LB-Amp medium and grown overnight at 37 °C with shaking.
Plasmid DNA was isolated using a Qiagen kit.
Reconfirmation of Positive Clones--
AD:cDNA plasmids
isolated from the primary screen were used to transform the AH109
strain containing the BD:IGFBP-5 plasmid to test for activation of
reporter genes. Transformed cells were plated on high stringency
selection medium containing
-X-gal. AD:cDNA clones that
confirmed positive were further characterized by DNA sequencing with an
automated Applied Biosystems 373A genetic analysis system. Clones that
failed to grow in the reconfirmation screen were not pursued for any
further analysis.
Osteoblast Cell Culture--
Normal human osteoblasts were
isolated as described (33) from calvaria and rib bone specimens
obtained from the Cooperative Human Tissue Network, which is supported
by the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health. For
the present study, cells isolated from calvaria and rib were grown from
frozen stocks made at the second passage and were used at passage 3-4.
These cells maintain an osteoblastic phenotype for more than six
passages (34). U-2 Os (HTB-96) and MG63 (CRL-1427) human osteogenic
sarcoma cells were from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). SaOs human osteosarcoma cells are a low alkaline phosphatase subline developed by Farley et al. (35). Cells were grown at 37 °C in humidified incubator with 5% CO2. Growth
medium consisted of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Invitrogen),
10% iron-supplemented newborn calf serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT), and 1%
antibiotics (Cellgro).
RNA Isolation and Northern Analysis--
Total RNA from
untransformed normal human osteoblasts derived from calvaria and rib
and human osteosarcoma cell lines (SaOs-2 and U2) was isolated using
the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). 20 µg of total RNA was loaded on a
1.2% agarose gel, and the gel was blotted using standard techniques
(36) after electrophoresis. FHL2 full-length cDNA was randomly
32P-labeled using a commercial kit (New England BioLabs)
for Northern hybridization. A glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
cDNA was used as a control probe. Probes were hybridized at
42 °C in the presence of 50% formamide using standard protocols.
Preparations of Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extracts--
Nuclear
and cytoplasmic extracts from normal human calvaria and rib osteoblasts
and from U2 cells were prepared as described (37). The nuclear extracts
were then used for Western blot analysis using the FHL2 monoclonal
antibody kindly provided by Dr. Muller, University of Freiburg,
Freiburg, Germany.
Immunofluorescent Microscopy--
MG63 cells were plated at 2000 cells/well in 96-well plates in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
supplemented with 10% calf serum. The next day the medium was replaced
with serum-free medium, and cells were incubated for an additional
24 h before 10 nM human recombinant IGFBP-5 was added.
After 48 h of incubation in the presence or absence of recombinant
IGFBP-5, cells were fixed, rendered permeable with ethanol, and rinsed
with PBS. IGFBP-5 protein localization was detected using IGFBP-5
guinea pig polyclonal antibody and fluorescent anti guinea pig
secondary antibody. After staining, cells were rinsed three times with
PBS, stored in 50% glycerol, and visualized using an Olympus IX70
epifluorescence microscope.
Bacterial Expression of cDNA Clones of Interest--
A
full-length cDNA clone corresponding to the FHL2 was cloned into
the expression vector pQE32 (Qiagen) in-frame with the 6-His tag. The
FHL2 coding sequence was amplified by PCR from the selected AD:cDNA
plasmid template. We used a primer pair to create BamHI and
SalI restriction enzyme sites at 5' and 3' ends, respectively. The forward primer was
5'-CGCGGATCCTGACTGAGCGCTT-3' (the bold sequence
corresponds to BamHI site, and the underlined sequence
correspond to the N terminus of FHL2), and the reverse primer was
5'-ACGCGTCGACAAGTGAACTTGCGGGGTTTTCAGTATCTACG-3' (the bold sequence corresponds to the SalI restriction site,
and the underlined sequence corresponds to the pACT2 vector 3'
sequence). The PCR product was subsequently purified using QIAXII
(Qiagen), digested with BamHI and SalI, and
ligated to the vector pQE32. A selected clone was confirmed by DNA
sequencing to be in-frame with the 6-His tag. The pQE32 expression
vector was transformed into E. coli host M15, and expression
was induced with isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside. The
rFHL2 was purified according to instructions in the Qiagen Expressionist handbook.
Construction of FHL2 and IGFBP-5 Murine Leukemia
Retroviral Vectors--
To overexpress the FHL2 and IGFBP-5 cDNAs
in bone cells, we constructed a retroviral expression vector. We cloned
the FHL2 and IGFBP-5 cDNA coding sequences of 850 and 750 bp,
respectively, in place of the
-galactosidase gene in a murine
leukemia virus-based retroviral vector plasmid, pCLSA
-gal (38). The
FHL2 850-bp cDNA fragment was generated by PCR using a pair of
oligonucleotides; the forward primer was
5'-ACGCGTCGACATGACTGAGCGCTTT-3', and the reverse primer was
5'-GCGCGGATCCAATTCAGATGTCTTTCCCAC-3'; the IGFBP-5 cDNA
fragment was generated by PCR using the forward primer
5'-ACGCGTCGACATGGGCTCCTTCGTGCAC-3' and the reverse primer
5'-CGCGGATCCATCACTCAACGTTGCTGCTG-3' (restriction sites noted
in bold). The PCR product was digested
SalI/BamHI, purified, and ligated to
SalI/BamHI-digested retroviral vector plasmid,
pCLSA
-gal. The transcription of the FHL2 and IGFBP-5 cDNAs
in pCLSA-FHL2 and pCLSA-IGFBP-5 was under the control of the murine
leukemia virus long terminal repeat promoter. To produce retroviral
expression vector, 293T cells were co-transfected with the pCLSA-FHL2
or pCLSA-IGFBP-5 plasmid and a viral envelope expression plasmid pCMV-G
using the calcium phosphate method (39). The viral vectors were
harvested 36 h post-transfection, and the titer of the viral
vector was determined by end point dilution and by transducing HT1080
cells as described (38).
U2 cells were seeded at 1 × 105 cells/well in 6-well
plates. After 24 h of incubation, the cells were transduced with
100 µl each of the viral stocks of pCLSA-FHL2 plus pCLSA
-gal,
pCLSA-IGFBP-5 plus pCLSA
-gal, or pCLSA-FHL2 plus pCLSA-IGFBP-5
vectors as described (38). Multiplicity of infection was 10 based on
viral vector titer of ~1 × 107 transforming
units/ml. Twenty-four hours after transduction, the cells were
rinsed and passaged twice for expansion. The transduction efficiency
was determined by staining the cells for
-galactosidase expression
was estimated to be ~90% after two passages. U2 cells transduced
with pCLSA-FHL2 were used to prepare cytoplasmic and nuclear extracts
for Western blot analysis using the FHL2 monoclonal antibody. U2 cells
transduced with pCLSA-FHL2 and pCLSA-IGFBP-5 were used to prepare whole
cell lysates.
Co-immunuoprecipitation of FHL2/IGFBP-5 in Whole Cell
Lysates--
U2 cells transduced with pCLSA-FHL2 and pCLSA-IGFBP-5
were used to prepare whole cell lysates using a procedure recommended by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). 250 µl of cell
lysates were incubated in presence of 25 µl of protein A-Sepharose conjugated to FHL2 monoclonal antibody or to only 25 µl of protein A-Sepharose at 4 °C for 14 h on a rotary shaker. After
incubation, samples were centrifuged for 1 min at 14,000 rpm. The
protein A-Sepharose pellets were washed four times with the lysis
buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 1.0%
Triton X-100) and resuspended in 50 µl of SDS sample buffer. The
immune complex was dissociated from protein A by boiling, and 20 µl
was removed and analyzed by SDS-PAGE in 12% acrylamide gel. The
IGFBP-5 in the immune precipitate was detected by IGFBP-5 antibody in
Western blot analysis according to standard protocols (42).
Co-immunoprecipitation of FHL2/IGFBP-5 in Vitro--
IGFBP-5,
IGFBP-4, and IGFBP-6 were 125I-labeled as described
previously (40). The ability of FHL2 to bind to IGFBP-5 was analyzed by
immunoprecipitation. The FHL2 protein (100 ng/ml) was incubated with
FHL2 monoclonal antibody (1:500 dilution) and 125I-IGFBP-5
(100,000 cpm/ml) for 14 h at 4 °C in 250 µl of incubation buffer (30 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 10 mM
EDTA, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, and 0.5% Tween 80) (41). For
competitive binding experiments, 1 µg/ml unlabeled IGFBP-5 was
included in addition to 125I-IGFBP-5. After incubation, 10 µl of protein A-Sepharose (Upstate Biotechnology) was added, and the
samples were incubated at room temperature for 1 h with mixing
every 10 min, then were centrifuged for 10 min at 12,000 × g. The pellets were washed three times with incubation
buffer and re-suspended in 50 µl of SDS sample buffer. The immune
complex was dissociated from protein A by boiling, and 20 µl were
removed and analyzed by SDS-PAGE in 12% acrylamide gel. The
125I-IGFBP-5 precipitated by FHL2 anti-body was detected by
autoradiography. The same procedure was used to test binding of FHL2 to
125I-IGFBP-4 and -6.
IGFBP-5/FHL2 interaction using unlabeled proteins was also performed
with IGFBP-5 polyclonal antibodies to immune precipitate and the
6-His-tag monoclonal antibody to detect FHL2 using the same procedure
as mentioned above. FHL2 in the immune precipitate was detected by
Western blot according to standard protocols (42).
Surface-enhanced Laser Desorption Ionization (SELDI) ProteinChip
Analysis--
PS1 ProteinChip arrays were used for the analysis of
FHL2 interactions with IGFBPs. The spots in PS1 ProteinChip were
pre-activated with iminodiacetate chemistry that covalently binds to
the free primary amine groups (Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc., Fremont,
CA). Briefly, 200 ng of FHL2 (50 µl) was added to each spot,
incubated for 2 h at room temperature on an orbital shaker, and
blocked with 0.1 M Tris, pH 8.0, for 30 min to remove
nonspecific binding. After rinsing the spots with PBS, 50 µl of PBS
or PBS containing 200 ng of IGFBP was added to each spot and incubated
for 1 h at room temperature on an orbital shaker. The spots were
are then rinsed with 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, containing 150 mM NaCl and 1% Triton X-100 before the addition of energy
absorbing molecule (
-cyano-4-hydroxy cinnamic acid) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. The spots were air-dried and analyzed
using the SELDI ProteinChip system (PBS-1, Ciphergen) as described
previously (43). Data were collected using laser intensity of 80% and
mass calibrated with protein standards (43).
 |
RESULTS |
Verification of the Expression of GAL4 DNA Binding Domain-IGFBP-5
Fusion Protein in the Yeast Strain AH109--
We used the THS3 to
identify candidate proteins that interact with our protein of interest,
IGFBP-5. The IGFBP-5 cDNA sequence was fused to the DNA binding
domain sequence of GAL4 in the expression vector pGBDT7. The yeast
reporter strain AH109 was transformed with this plasmid, and cells were
plated on the appropriate selection medium. Expression of the
GAL4-IGFBP-5 fusion protein in AH109 cells was subsequently confirmed
by Western blot analysis using an antibody
(CLONTECH) to the GAL4 DNA binding domain of
the fusion protein (Fig. 1). AH109 cells
containing the bait but not control AH109 cells expressed BD-IGFBP-5
fusion protein of the anticipated molecular mass.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Western immunoblot analysis of the GAL4
BD-IGFBP-5 bait using GAL4 BD antibody. Yeast strain AH109 protein
extracts were prepared as outlined in the Yeast Protocol Hand Book
(CLONTECH) and were separated using SDS-PAGE.
The antibody detected a single band in extracts of AH109 transformed
with BD-IGFBP5 (baits 1 and 3) construct, but no band was
detected in untransformed AH109 cells.
|
|
Once the expression of our bait in yeast AH109 cells was confirmed, we
tested for auto-activation by plating the reporter strain AH109
containing the IGFBP-5 construct on selection medium lacking the amino
acids adenine, histidine, and tryptophan. In addition, the selection
medium contained
-X-gal as a color indicator for the expression of
the MEL1 reporter gene that encodes
-galactosidase. The results indicated that the IGFBP-5 construct did
not auto-activate the reporter genes since no colonies appeared on the
test plates.
Identification of Proteins That Potentially Interact with
IGFBP-5--
We transformed the AH109-IGFBP-5 with an amplified U2
human osteosarcoma cDNA library fused to the GAL AD in the
expression vector pACT2. We picked several clones from our initial low
stringency screen of the human osteosarcoma cDNA library, which
were subsequently transferred to high stringency medium for a second
screen. Positive clones were then picked for AD:cDNA plasmid DNA
isolation as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Sequence Analyses of Positive AD:cDNA Clones--
The positive
AD:cDNA plasmids that activated all of the three reporter genes in
the AH109 strain were isolated and were used to transform the E. coli strain HB101. We then partially sequenced the positive clones
and assessed the cDNA sequences using the BLAST program. Five
clones matched a known gene sequence in the GenBankTM
(Table I); of these we chose a 1.4-kb
EcoRI/XhoI full-length (clone 41) and a 0.8-kb
cDNA (clone 2) for further characterizations. Upon obtaining the
entire sequence of clone 41, we found it encodes a protein product of
279 amino acids (Fig. 2). The BLAST
search identified our sequence as a LIM-only protein that contains four and a half LIM domains (FHL2) (31, 32). The 0.8-kb cDNA clone encoded amino acids 158-279 of the FHL2 protein and strongly
interacted with IGFBP-5 as demonstrated by the two-hybrid assay.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Five positive clones obtained using the yeast two-hybrid system 3 to
screen the human osteosarcoma cDNA library
The five AD-cDNA clones listed contained different lengths of
cDNA sequence identical to human FHL2 cDNA. Co-transfection of
the reporter yeast strain with each isolated clone together with the
BD:bait plasmid activated all three reporter genes. pGBKT7-BP-5, -Lam,
and -53 encode fusions of Gal4 BD and human JGFBP-5, human lamin C, and
murine p53, respectively. pGADT7-T is a positive control that encodes a
fusion of Gal4 AD and SV40 large T-antigen that is known to bind p53. + indicates that the transformed AH109 strain grew on high stringency
selection medium. indicates that the transformed AH109 strain did
not grow on high stringency medium.
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Sequence alignments of the five clones
recovered from the yeast two-hybrid screen and full-length FHL2.
The four and a half LIM domains of FHL2 are shown in the top
line. The full-length clone 41 encoding 279 amino acids of the
four and a half LIM domain protein and the four partial clones are
aligned below. A half LIM domain sequence contains
CX2CX17CX2C,
and a complete LIM domain sequence contains
CX2CX17-21CX2CX17-21CX2(H/D/C)
(X represents variable amino acids). UTR,
untranslated region.
|
|
Reconfirmation of IGFBP-5/FHL2 Interaction in Yeast--
After
identifying the FHL2 AD:cDNA clones by DNA sequencing, we
transformed AH109 yeast cells with the BD-IGFBP-5 and AD:cDNA plasmids to reconfirm the IGFBP-5/FHL2 interaction. Table I summarizes the reconfirmation screen and essential control plasmid
transformations. The results indicate that both the full-length and the
truncated cDNA clones of FHL2 strongly interact with IGFBP-5 as
judged by growth of the AH109 reporter strain on high stringency
medium. No growth was observed when either the BD-IGFBP-5 or the
AD:FHL2 plasmids were tested with control plasmids pGADT7-T and
pGBKT7-53 to transform the reporter strain, respectively. Hence, the
IGFBP-5/FHL2 interaction was specific.
The FHL2 Gene Is Strongly Expressed in Bone Cells--
To
determine whether FHL2 is expressed in other bone cell types besides U2
human osteosarcoma cells, total RNA (10 µg/lane) from HBC, HBR, U2,
and SaOs-2 human osteosarcoma cells was probed with the
EcoRI-XhoI FHL2 cDNA fragment. Northern
analysis shows that the FHL2 is expressed in all of the human
osteoblast cell types tested. The FHL2 cDNA probe detected a
1.4-1.5-kb band, the size of which is similar to that reported in
other cell types (Fig. 3).

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Northern blot analysis of total RNA extracted
from various human osteoblast cell preparations using the FHL2 cDNA
as a probe. RNA was extracted from 70-80% confluent cultures of
normal human osteoblasts derived from calvaria (HBC) and rib
(HBR) and from SaOs-2 and U2 osteosarcoma cells. 20 µg of
total RNA was loaded per lane, and the blot was probed with
32P-labeled FHL2 cDNA. The probe detected a 1.4-1.5-kb
band in all cell lines tested. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
(GAPDH) expression detection was used as an internal control
to monitor loading and transfer.
|
|
FHL2 Protein Localizes in the Nucleus and Cytoplasm of Bone
Cells--
Western blot analysis of nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts
from U2, HBC, and HBR cells were performed using the FHL2 monoclonal antibody. The FHL2 protein was detected in the nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts of both normal human osteoblasts and U2 osteosarcoma cells
(Fig. 4, A and B).
In addition to the 32-kDa band that corresponds to FHL2, high molecular
weight bands were seen in the nuclear extracts. These additional bands
may represent higher molecular weight forms of FHL2 (dimer or complex
of FHL2 with another protein) or other proteins that cross-react with
the FHL2 monoclonal antibody used in this study. No band was detected
when normal mouse IgG was used for Western blotting (data not
shown).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Western immunoblot analysis of FHL2 protein
in normal human osteoblasts using FHL2 monoclonal antibody in various
human osteoblast cell types. Nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts from
U2 (A and B), calvaria (HBC;
B), and rib (HBR; B) cells were
separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nylon membrane, and the blot
was developed with FHL2 monoclonal antibody. Note that U2 nuclear and
cytoplasmic extracts in B were prepared from cells
overexpressing FHL2 from the retroviral vector pCLSA-FHL2, and hence, a
much stronger signal was detected compared with that of calvaria and
rib. CE, cytoplasmic extract; NE, nuclear
extract.
|
|
Evidence of IGFBP-5 Localization in the Nucleus--
Localization
of exogenous IGFBP-5 in human osteoblast was determined in MG63
osteosarcoma cells that have low endogenous levels. IGFBP-5 protein (10 nM) added to the cells found to localize to the nucleus of
MG63 cells as determined by IGFBP-5 antibody and fluorescent-conjugated
secondary antibody staining (Fig. 5).
There was no evidence of nuclear localization in the absence of
exogenous recombinant IGFBP-5 in MG63 cells, which do not produce
detectable levels of IGFBP-5 (10). The addition of IGFBP-5 resulted in accumulation of IGFBP-5 in nuclei.

View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Nuclear localization of IGFBP-5 in MG63
cells. IGFBP-5 protein (10 nM) added to the cells was
found to localize to the nucleus of MG63 cells as determined by IGFBP-5
antibody and fluorescent-conjugated secondary antibody staining
(b). No IGFBP-5 was detected in cells without the addition
of IGFBP-5 protein (d). Cells were stained with propidium
iodide to visualize nuclei (a and c).
|
|
Untransformed normal human osteoblasts derived from
calvaria, which express IGFBP-5 (43), contained IGFBP-5 in the nucleus in the absence of exogenous IGFBP-5. The addition of exogenous IGFBP-5
further increased accumulation of IGFBP-5 in the nucleus (data are
not shown).
Recombinant Expression of FHL2--
An FHL2 full-length coding
sequence PCR product was fused in-frame with the 6-His-tag sequences in
the expression vector pQE32. The fusion protein was expressed in the
E. coli M15 and was purified using Nickel beads. Expression
of FHL2 was confirmed by Western blot analysis using a His-tag antibody
(Fig. 6A) and the specific FHL2 monoclonal antibody (Fig. 6B).

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Characterization of recombinant FHL2 protein
expressed in E. coli using the pQE32 expression
vector. Purified FHL2 protein was separated on SDS-PAGE,
transferred to a nylon membrane, and detected as a 33-kDa band by both
FHL2 (A) and His tag (B) monoclonal
antibodies.
|
|
FHL2-IGFBP-5 Interaction Determined by
Co-immunoprecipitation--
We performed co-immunoprecipitation
studies by incubating the FHL2 protein with 125I-labeled
IGFBP-5 in the presence of FHL2 monoclonal antibody in test tubes. Fig.
7 shows that FHL2 interacts specifically
with IGFBP-5 in an in vitro reaction. Binding of
125I-IGFBP-5 to FHL2 was competed with unlabeled IGFBP-5.
FHL2 specificity for binding IGFBP-5 was tested using
125I-IGFBP-4 and -6 proteins in the co-immunoprecipitation
assay (Fig. 7). FHL2 did not interact with IGFBP-4 or -6, suggesting that FHL2 binding to IGFBP-5 is specific.

View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
In vitro binding of FHL2 with
125I-IGFBP5. FHL2/125I-IGFBP5 binding was
tested by co-immunoprecipitation with the FHL2 monoclonal antibody. 250 ng of 125I-IGFBP-5 and FHL2 protein were incubated at
4 °C overnight in the presence of FHL2 monoclonal antibody
(ab). Controls lacked 125I-IGFBP5 or FHL2
antibody. The protein complexes were precipitated using protein
A-agarose beads. Precipitates were analyzed by direct exposure of x-ray
film. Lane 1 of each gel contained an aliquot of the
125I-labeled IGFBP used in the immune precipitation.
Lanes 2-4 contained the precipitated proteins. The
co-immunoprecipitation results indicate that FHL2 interacts
specifically with IGFBP-5, and the interaction was competed for with
unlabeled IGFBP-5. FHL2 was incubated with IGFBP-4 and -6, but no
binding was detected.
|
|
We further examined in vitro the IGFBP-5/FHL2 interaction by
incubating IGFBP-5/rFHL2 in the presence of protein A-bound IGFBP-5 polyclonal antibodies. The immunoprecipitated complex was analyzed by
Western blots using IGFBP-5 antibodies and the 6-His-tag monoclonal antibody (Fig. 8, A and
B). The results indicate that FHL2 was precipitated by
IGFBP-5 antibody but not by normal guinea pig IgG.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Co-immunoprecipitation of FHL2/IGFBP-5 by
IGFBP-5 antibody in vitro. Lane 1, 0.6 µg of IGFBP-5 protein was incubated with 0.2 µg of His-tagged rFHL2
protein overnight. Then 100 µl of IGFBP-5 polyclonal antibodies
conjugated to protein A was used to pull down the IGFBP-5/FHL2 protein
complex. After SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting, the IGFBP-5 protein in
lanes 1 and 4 was detected using
affinity-purified IGFBP-5 polyclonal antibody (A).
Lane 2 is the same as lane 1, except that normal
guinea pig serum conjugated to protein A was used instead of IGFBP-5
antibodies. This lane showed nonspecific immunoreactive bands but no
IGFBP-5 band. Lane 3 is the rFHL2 standard, and lane
4 is recombinant IGFBP-5 standard. After the first
immunodetection, the blot was stripped and redeveloped with the His-tag
monoclonal antibody. The HIS-tag monoclonal antibody detected rFHL2
protein in lanes 1 and 3 (B). In
addition to the band that corresponds to intact FHL2, additional bands
were detected by the His-tag monoclonal antibody in lane 3.
Because FHL2 preparation used in this experiment contained both intact
and fragment forms of FHL2, the lower molecular weight bands probably
represent the proteolytic fragments of FHL2.
|
|
To evaluate if the interaction between FHL2 and IGFBP-5 occurs in whole
cells, cell lysate from U2 cells overexpressing FHL2 and IGFBP-5 was
immunoprecipitated with FHL2 monoclonal antibody and then probed with
IGFBP-5-specific antibody by western immunoblot analysis. Fig.
9 shows that IGFBP-5/FHL2 was
co-immunoprecipitated by FHL2 antibody in whole U2 cell lysate. These
data together with the yeast two-hybrid data provide evidence that the
interaction between FHL2 and IGFBP-5 occurs in whole cells after
transfection and overexpression of both FHL2 and IGFBP-5.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Co-immunoprecipitation of FHL2/IGFBP-5 in
whole U2 cells over-expressing FHL2 and IGFBP-5. Lane 1, 250 µl of cell lysate incubated with 25 µl protein A-Sepharose
conjugated to FHL2 monoclonal antibody (mab) were incubated
for 14 h at 4 °C on a rotary shaker. Then the protein complex
was washed and subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using IGFBP-5
polyclonal antibody. Lane 2 is the same as lane 1 except that protein A-Sepharose used was not conjugated to FHL2
monoclonal antibody, and hence, no IGFBP-5 was
co-immunoprecipitated.
|
|
SELDI ProteinChip Analysis--
The specificity of FHL2-IGFBP-5
interaction was verified using an alternate technology, namely SELDI
ProteinChip technology (43). The ProteinChip system detects proteins
captured on ProteinChip arrays and provides accurate molecular weight
determinations with deviations less than 0.2%. FHL2 was immobilized
covalently on the surface of the PS-1 ProteinChip array and used to
determine if the 29-kDa IGFBP-5 could be captured on the array. The
bound IGFBP released by laser was detected, and the mass was analyzed by a time of flight mass spectrophotometer. Fig.
10 shows that 29-kDa IGFBP-5 was
captured by FHL2 covalently linked to the PS1 surface. None of the
other IGFBPs (IGFBP-3, -4, or -6) was captured by FHL2 covalently
linked to PS1 surface under identical conditions. These data together
with the co-immunoprecipitation data provide evidence that the binding
of FHL2 to IGFBP-5 is specific.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
IGFBP-5 was captured by FHL2 covalently
bound to pre-activated ProteinChip array. FHL2 was immobilized
covalently on the surface of the PS1 ProteinChip array and incubated
with 50 µl of PBS containing IGFBP-3 (A), IGFBP-4
(B), IGFBP-5 (C), IGFBP-6 (D), or
buffer control (E). The bound protein was released by laser
and detected using ProteinChip Reader (SELDI ProteinChip System,
Ciphergen). IGFBP-5 but not other IGFBPs (-3, -4, or -6) was retained
by the immobilized FHL2.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Using the yeast two-hybrid system and IGFBP-5 as bait, we isolated
several FHL2 cDNAs from a human osteosarcoma cDNA library. This
evidence for IGFBP-5-FHL2 interaction was further supported by in
vitro protein-protein data and by localization of both FHL2 and
IGFBP-5 in the nucleus. Although the functional significance of the
association between IGFBP-5 and FHL2 has not been established, the
findings that IGFBP-5 itself is a growth factor that translocates to
nucleus (21, 22) and that FHL2 acts as a coactivator of the androgen
receptor (32) supports the conclusion that FHL2-IGFBP-5 interaction may
play a significant role in the modulation of osteoblast cell
proliferation and/or differentiation. To our knowledge, this report is
the first one to describe identification of an IGFBP-5 binding partner
in any cell type using the yeast two-hybrid system.
We chose to screen for IGFBP-5-interacting proteins in osteoblasts
based on the established importance of IGFBP-5 in bone (15-18) and on
the discoveries that IGFBP-5 has IGF-independent mitogenic effects on
cells and translocates to the nucleus (18, 20-22). We hypothesized
that IGFBP-5 interacts with other cellular proteins, perhaps nuclear
proteins. Consistent with this hypothesis, five independent clones
selected under high stringency conditions corresponded to a four and a
half LIM domain gene 2, FHL2, which is also known as SLIM-3. (30, 31).
One clone encoded the entire open reading frame of 297 amino acids of
FHL2, whereas the other four were partial clones. The finding that the
smallest clone identified in the yeast-two hybrid screen encoded only
LIM domains 3 and 4 suggests that the C-terminal region of FHL2
containing the last two LIM domains is sufficient for FHL2 interaction
with IGFBP-5.
We have confirmed the interaction between FHL2 and
IGFBP-5 observed in yeast with in vitro
co-immunoprecipitation studies using purified recombinant human FHL2,
purified recombinant human IGFBP-5, and antibodies directed against
FHL2 or IGFBP-5. FHL2/IGFBP-5 was also co-immunoprecipitated in whole
cell lysate from U2 cells overexpressing FHL2 and IGFBP-5. Furthermore,
IGFBP-5 binding to FHL2 was verified using a ProteinChip array in which
IGFBP-5 was captured using FHL2 covalently linked to preactivated PS1 surface. We believe that the interaction between IGFBP-5 and FHL2 is
specific based on the following findings. 1) FHL2 interacted with
IGFBP-5 but not with either IGFBP-3, -4, or -6, which are known to be
produced by human osteoblasts (44). The lack of FHL2 binding to
IGFBP-3, which is highly homologous to IGFBP-5 in the N-terminal and
C-terminal domains suggests that mid-region of IGFBP-5 may be critical
for FHL2 binding. Alternatively, IGFBP-3 may bind to FHL2 but with a
reduced affinity compared with IGFBP-5 and that this binding could not
be detected by the experimental technique used in this study. 2)
Although rat osteoblasts in culture have been shown to express another
LIM domain-containing protein, namely LMP-1 (45), we did not identify
any homologs of LMP-1 in our yeast two-hybrid screen.
In this study, co-immunoprecipitation experiments were performed in
lysates of U2 cells overexpressing both FHL2 and IGFBP-5. Although
these data provide evidence that the interaction between FHL2 and
IGFBP-5 could occur in whole cells that are induced to overexpress both
of these proteins, they do not prove that these two proteins bind under
normal physiological conditions. Further interaction studies using
normal human osteoblasts without forced overexpression of either FHL2
or IGFBP-5 are needed to establish that the interaction between FHL2
and IGFBP-5 occurs under physiological conditions.
To determine that the FHL2 interaction with IGFBP-5 could occur in
other osteoblast cell types besides U2 human osteosarcoma cells, we
evaluated FHL2 expression in untransformed normal human osteoblasts as
well as in other human osteosarcoma cell types. Northern analysis
showed that the FHL2 is strongly expressed in human osteoblasts derived
from calvaria and rib and in U2 cells. Of the various human osteoblast
cell types tested, FHL2 expression was low in SaOs-2 human osteosarcoma
cells compared with other human osteoblast cell types. Based on the
findings that SaOs-2 cells lack functional p53 and that FHL2 expression
is up-regulated in cell lines expressing functional p53 and
down-regulated in cell lines expressing p53 mutants (46), it is
possible that p53 is an important regulator of FHL2 expression. In
addition, our data that FHL2 is strongly expressed in normal human
osteoblasts argue against the previous conclusion that FHL2 expression
is restricted to the cardiovascular system (45-48).
Besides IGFBP-5, FHL2 has been shown to interact with other proteins.
In this regard, it is known that FHL2, a member of the LIM domain-only
proteins, can participate in protein-protein interactions by forming
homodimers (LIM-LIM) (49) or heterodimers (LIM-non-LIM) (50). By using
the yeast two-hybrid assay, FHL2 has also been shown to interact with
androgen receptor, hCDC7 (51),
- and
-integrin subunits (52), the
polypyrimidine tract-binding protein-associated splicing factors (53),
and Alzheimer's disease-associated presenilin 2 (54). Because FHL2
contains four and a half LIM domains, each of which contains zing
finger motifs, it is possible that different LIM domains may be
involved in FHL2 interaction with the various binding partners
(52-53). In this regard, our data on the identification of a partial
FHL2 cDNA clone, which encodes for amino acids 158-279 in the
yeast two-hybrid screen, suggests that the last two LIM domains may be
sufficient for interaction with IGFBP-5.
The significance of a potential interaction between FHL2 and IGFBP-5 in
osteoblasts can only be speculated at this time. In this regard, it has
been shown by Muller et al. (32) that FHL2 binds and
selectively activates the transcriptional activity of androgen
receptors in an agonist- and AF-2-dependent manner.
Furthermore, Boden et al. (45) show that LIM
domain-containing protein (LMP-1) is an essential intracellular
positive regulator of rat osteoblast differentiation, which acts to
mediate BMP-6 effects on bone formation in osteoblasts, thus raising
the possibility that FHL2 could function as an intracellular mediator
of IGFBP-5 actions. Future demonstration that the interaction between
IGFBP-5 and FHL2 occurs under physiological conditions and that these
two proteins are co-localized in the nucleus of normal human
osteoblasts could provide the basis for the hypothesis that IGFBP-5 may
bind to FHL2, a transcription modulator, to stimulate transcription of
putative IGFBP-5 target genes that may be involved in regulation of
osteoblast cell proliferation and differentiation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We acknowledge the technical assistance
provided by Joe Rung-Aroon, Rongqing Guo, and Melanie
Hamilton-Ulland. We thank Dr. John Farley for providing SaOs-2 cells.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants AR31062 and AR07543 and grants from Veterans Affairs and Loma Linda University.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Musculoskeletal
Disease Center (151), Jerry L. Pettis Veterans Affairs Medical Center,
11201 Benton St., Loma Linda, CA 92357. Tel.: 909-825-7084 (ext. 2932);
Fax: 909-796-1680; E-mail: mohans@lom.med.va.gov.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 30, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110872200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
IGF, insulin-like
growth factor;
IGFBP-5, IGF-binding protein 5;
-X-gal, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl
-D-galactopyranoside;
AD, activation domain;
BD, binding domain;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
rFHL2, recombinant FHL2;
bp, base pair(s);
SELDI, surface-enhanced
laser desorption ionization;
kb, kilobase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Rosen, C. J.,
and Donahue, L. R.
(1998)
Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.
219,
1-7[Abstract]
|
| 2.
|
Collett-Solberg, P. F.,
and Cohen, P.
(2000)
Endocrine
12,
121-136[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Butt, A. J.,
Firth, S. M.,
and Baxter, R. C.
(1999)
Immunol. Cell Biol.
77,
256-262[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Bayes-Genis, A.,
Conover, C. A.,
and Schwartz, R. S.
(2000)
Circ. Res.
86,
125-130[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Mohan, S.,
and Baylink, D. J.
(1996)
Horm. Res. (Basel)
45,
59-62
|
| 6.
|
Rajaram, S.,
Baylink, D. J.,
and Mohan, S.
(1997)
Endocr. Rev.
18,
801-831[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Mohan, S.,
and Baylink, D. J.
(1997)
Endocrine
7,
87-91[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Boonen, S.,
Mohan, S.,
Dequeker, J.,
Aerssens, J.,
Vanderschueren, D.,
Verbeke, G.,
Broos, P.,
Bouillon, R.,
and Baylink, D. J.
(1999)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
14,
2150-2158[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Liu, J. P.,
Baker, J.,
Perkins, A. S.,
Robertson, E. J.,
and Efstratiadis, A.
(1993)
Cell
75,
59-72[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Mohan, S.,
and Baylink, D. J.
(1999)
in
The IGF System, Molecular Biology, Physiology, and Clinical Applications
(Rosenfeld, R. G.
, and Roberts, C. T., eds)
, pp. 457-496, Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
|
| 11.
|
Mohan, S.,
and Baylink, D. J.
(1996)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
81,
3817-3820[Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Ferry, R. J., Jr.,
Katz, L. E.,
Grimberg, A.,
Cohen, P.,
and Weinzimer, S. A.
(1999)
Horm. Metabol. Res.
31,
192-202[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Clemmons, D. R.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
140,
19-24[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Nicolas, V.,
Mohan, S.,
Honda, Y.,
Prewett, A.,
Finkelman, R. D.,
Baylink, D. J.,
and Farley, J. R.
(1995)
Calcif. Tissue Int.
57,
206-212[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Andress, D. L.,
Loop, S. M.,
Zapf, J.,
and Kiefer, M. C.
(1993)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
195,
25-30[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Kling, L.,
Dony, C.,
Leser, U.,
Popp, F.,
Bauss, F.,
and Lang, K.
(1996)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
11 (suppl.),
153 (Abstr. P249)
|
| 17.
|
Richman, S.,
Baylink, D. J.,
Lang, K.,
Dony, C.,
and Mohan, S.
(1999)
Endocrinology
140,
4699-4705[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Miyakoshi, N.,
Richman, C.,
Kasukawa, Y.,
Linkhart, T. A.,
Baylink, D. J.,
and Mohan, S.
(2001)
J. Clin. Invest.
107,
73-81[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Mohan, S.,
Nakao, Y.,
Honda, Y.,
Landale, E.,
Leser, U.,
Dony, C.,
Lang, K.,
and Baylink, D. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
20424-20431[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Andress, D. L.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
274,
E744-E750[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Schedlich, L. J., Le,
Page, S. L.,
Firth, S. M.,
Briggs, L. J.,
Jans, D. A.,
and Baxter, R. C.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
23462-23470[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Schedlich, L. J.,
Young, T. F.,
Firth, S. M.,
and Baxter, R. C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
18347-18352[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Oh, Y.,
Muller, H. L.,
Lamson, G.,
and Rosenfeld, R. G.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
14964-14971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Rajah, R.,
Valentinis, B.,
and Cohen, P.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
12181-12188[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Fanayan, S.,
Firth, S. M.,
Butt, A. J.,
and Baxter, R. C.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
39146-39151[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Spagnoli, A.,
Hwa, V.,
Horton, W. A.,
Lunstrum, G. P.,
Roberts, C. T., Jr.,
Chiarelli, F.,
Torello, M.,
and Rosenfeld, R. G.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
5533-5540[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Shi, Z., Xu, W.,
Loechel, F.,
Wewer, U. M.,
and Murphy, L. J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
18574-18580[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Liu, B.,
Lee, H. Y.,
Weinzimer, S. A.,
Powell, D. R.,
Clifford, J. L.,
Kurie, J. M.,
and Cohen, P.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
33607-33613[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Fields, S.,
and Song, O.
(1989)
Nature
340,
245-246[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Genini, M.,
Schwalbe, P.,
Scholl, F. A.,
Remppis, A.,
Mattei, M. G.,
and Schafer, B. W.
(1997)
DNA Cell Biol.
16,
433-442[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Chan, K. K.,
Tsui, S. K.,
Lee, S. M.,
Luk, S. C.,
Liew, C. C.,
Fung, K. P.,
Waye, M. M.,
and Lee, C. Y.
(1998)
Gene
210,
345-350[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Muller, J. M.,
Isele, U.,
Metzger, E.,
Rempel, A.,
Moser, M.,
Pscherer, A.,
Breyer, T.,
Holubarsch, C.,
Buettner, R.,
and Schule, R.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
359-369[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Linkhart, T. A.,
Linkhart, S. G.,
MacCharles, D. C.,
Long, D. L.,
and Strong, D. D.
(1991)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
6,
1285-1294[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Chevalley, T.,
Strong, D. D.,
Mohan, S.,
Baylink, D.,
and Linkhart, T. A.
(1996)
Eur. J. Endocrinol.
134,
591-601[Abstract]
|
| 35.
|
Farley, J. R.,
Hall, S. L.,
Herring, S.,
Tarbaux, N. M.,
Matsuyama, T.,
and Wergedal, J. E.
(1991)
Metabolism
40,
664-671[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 37.
|
Dailly, Y. P.,
Zhou, Y.,
Linkhart, T. A.,
Baylink, D. J.,
and Strong, D. D.
(2001)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1518,
145-151[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Peng, H.,
Chen, S-T.,
Wergedal, J. E.,
Polo, J. M.,
Yee, J-K.,
Lau, W. K.-H.,
and Baylink, D. J.
(2001)
Mol. Ther.
4,
95-104[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Gasmi, M.,
Glynn, J.,
Jin, M. J.,
Jolly, D. J.,
Yee, J. K.,
and Chen, S. T.
(1999)
J. Virol.
73,
1828-1834[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Mohan, S.,
Jennings, J. C.,
Linkhart, T. A.,
and Baylink, D. J.
(1988)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
966,
44-55[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Nam, T. J.,
Busby, W. H., Jr.,
Rees, C.,
and Clemmons, D. R.
(2000)
Endocrinology
141,
1100-1106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Harlow, E.,
and Lane, D.
(1998)
Using Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual
, pp. 269-309, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 43.
|
Li, X.,
Mohan, S., Gu, W.,
Miyakoshi, N.,
and Baylink, D. J.
(2000)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1524,
102-109[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Malpe, R.,
Baylink, D. J.,
Linkhart, T. A.,
Wergedal, J. E.,
and Mohan, S.
(1997)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
12,
423-430[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Boden, S. D.,
Liu, Y.,
Hair, G. A.,
Helms, J. A., Hu, D.,
Racine, M.,
Nanes, M. S.,
and Titus, L.
(1998)
Endocrinology
139,
5125-5134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Scholl, F. A.,
McLoughlin, P.,
Ehler, E.,
de Giovanni, C.,
and Schafer, B. W.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
151,
495-506[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Li, H. Y.,
Kotaka, M.,
Kostin, S.,
Lee, S. M.,
Kok, L. D.,
Chan, K. K.,
Tsui, S. K.,
Schaper, J.,
Zimmermann, R.,
Lee, C. Y.,
Fung, K. P.,
and Waye, M. M.
(2001)
Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton
48,
11-23[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Chu, P. H.,
Ruiz-Lozano, P.,
Zhou, Q.,
Cai, C.,
and Chen, J.
(2000)
Mech. Dev.
95,
259-265[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Li, H. Y., Ng, E. K.,
Lee, S. M.,
Kotaka, M.,
Tsui, S. K.,
Lee, C. Y.,
Fung, K. P.,
and Waye, M. M.
(2001)
J. Cell. Biochem.
80,
293-303[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Dawid, I. B.,
Breen, J. J.,
and Toyama, R.
(1998)
Trends Genet.
14,
156-162[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Chan, K. K.,
Tsui, S. K.,
Ngai, S. M.,
Lee, S. M.,
Kotaka, M.,
Waye, M. M.,
Lee, C. Y.,
and Fung, K. P.
(2000)
J. Cell. Biochem.
76,
499-508[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Wixler, V.,
Geerts, D.,
Laplantine, E.,
Westhoff, D.,
Smyth, N.,
Aumailley, M.,
Sonnenberg, A.,
and Paulsson, M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
33669-33678[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Dye, B. T.,
and Patton, J. G.
(2001)
Exp. Cell Res.
263,
131-144[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Tanahashi, H.,
and Tabira, T.
(2000)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
9,
2281-2289[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike