![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 15, 12491-12494, April 12, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
§¶,
**,
**,
¶
From the
Biology Department, Brookhaven National
Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, the § Laboratory of Cell
Biology, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, and the
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
Received for publication, February 13, 2002, and in revised form, March 1, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The p53 tumor suppressor protein preserves genome
integrity by regulating growth arrest and apoptosis in response to DNA
damage. In response to ionizing radiation (IR), ATM, the gene product mutated in ataxia telangiectasia, stabilizes and activates p53 through phosphorylation of Ser15 and (indirectly)
Ser20. Here we show that phosphorylation of p53 on
Ser46, a residue important for p53 apoptotic activity, as
well as on Ser9, in response to IR also is dependent on the
ATM protein kinase. IR-induced phosphorylation at Ser46 was
inhibited by wortmannin, a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor, but
not PD169316, a p38 MAPK inhibitor. p53 C-terminal acetylation at
Lys320 and Lys382, which may stabilize p53 and
activate sequence-specific DNA binding, required Ser15
phosphorylation by ATM and was enhanced by phosphorylation at nearby
residues including Ser6, Ser9, and
Thr18. These observations, together with the proposed role
of Ser46 phosphorylation in mediating apoptosis, suggest
that ATM is involved in the initiation of p53-dependent
apoptosis after IR in human lymphoblastoid cells.
In response to DNA damage, the p53 tumor suppressor protein is
phosphorylated on each of the seven serines and one threonine the in
the first 50 amino acids of its N-terminal transactivation domain as
well as at several sites in its carboxyl (C)-terminal tetramerization/regulatory domain (1, 2). As a transcription factor,
p53 induces or represses several genes that regulate cell cycle arrest,
DNA repair or apoptosis, including p21WAF1,
MDM2, GADD45, p53R2, and
p53AIP1. Recent studies suggest that specific p53
phosphorylation events are important for the activation or repression
of specific promoters (3-6). Optimal induction and activation of p53
after exposure to IR requires phosphorylation by the ATM protein kinase
(1, 2, 7). ATM is thought to directly phosphorylate Ser15
in vivo (8, 9) and also is required for phosphorylation of
Ser20 through activation of the Chk2 protein kinase, which
phosphorylates Ser20 in vitro (10-12). However,
the potential role for ATM in regulating p53 modifications at other
sites has not previously been explored.
Cell Cultures and Inhibitors--
Epstein-Barr virus
immortalized normal (GM02254) and
A-T1 (GM01526) human
lymphoblast cultures were obtained from the Human Genetic Mutant Cell
Repository (Camden, NJ). H1299 (ATCC CRL-5803), a human lung carcinoma
cell line that is null for both TP53 alleles, and A549 (ATCC
CCL-185), a human lung carcinoma cell line that expresses wild-type
p53, were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas,
VA). All cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified minimal
essential medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 15%
(lymphoblasts) or 10% (H1299) fetal bovine serum, 100 nM
glutamine and penicillin/streptomycin in a humidified atmosphere with
5% CO2. Wortmannin (Sigma) was prepared as a 10 mM stock and PD169316 (Calbiochem, Inc.) as a 1 mM stock in Me2SO; both were stored at
Induction of DNA Damage, Immunoprecipitation, and Western
Immunoblot Analysis--
Asynchronously growing cultures in
75-cm2 flasks were irradiated using a Shepherd Mark I
137Cs irradiator at a dose rate of 3.2 Gy/min. To detect
p53 acetylation, the deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A (Wako,
Osaka, Japan) was added at a final concentration of 5 µM
4 h before harvesting. Cultures were harvested at the indicated
times after treatment, washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered
saline, and lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl
at pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton
X-100, 50 mM NaF, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 25 mM Phosphorylation- and Acetylation-specific p53
Antibodies--
Rabbit polyclonal antibodies specific for p53
phosphorylated at Ser6, Ser9,
Ser15, Ser20, Ser33,
Ser37, and Thr18 or acetylated at
Lys320 or Lys382 have been described
(13-15). A similar approach was used to generate antibodies specific
for p53 phosphorylated at Ser46, Ser315, or
Ser392. Briefly, rabbit antibodies that recognize p53
phosphorylated at Ser46 (PAbSer(P)46), Ser315
(PAbSer(P)315), or Ser392 (PAbSer(P)392) were elicited
against the human p53 sequences Ac-41-51(46P)C, Ac-310-321(315P)C or
Ac-C-385-393(392P) coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin, respectively.
Phosphorylation-specific antibodies were affinity-selected. The
specificity of each antibody was confirmed by enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay using synthetically prepared p53 peptides and with
immunoblot assays by probing GST-human p53 expressed in
Escherichia coli.
Plasmids and cDNA Constructs--
Wild-type and the
L22Q/W23S mutant p53 sequences were subcloned from the p53 expression
vectors pC53-SN3 (16) or pCB6+p53-22/23 (17) into the pCAGGS
expression plasmid behind the CAG (cytomegalovirus enhancer-chicken
Transient Transfections--
The day prior to transfection,
106 H1299 cells were seeded in each 10-cm tissue culture
plate. On the following day, the cultures were transfected with the
expression vectors for wild-type p53 or p53 mutants using LipofectAMINE
PLUS Reagent (Invitrogen) as recommended by the manufacturer. Cells
were exposed to 8 Gy IR 18 h after transfection, and the cultures
were harvested for immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis 2 h after IR.
Identification of ATM-dependent p53
Phosphorylation--
To determine whether other p53 posttranslational
modifications depend on ATM, we prepared a panel of polyclonal
antibodies that, respectively, recognize p53 modified at each of 12 sites at which it is phosphorylated or acetylated (13-15, 19). These antibodies were then used to examine the time course of phosphorylation at each site after exposure of normal (GM02254) and A-T (GM01526) human
lymphoblasts to 8 Gy IR (Fig. 1).
Acetylation at two C-terminal sites, Lys320 and
Lys382, also was examined. p53 accumulated rapidly and
reached a maximum at 4 h after irradiation in normal lymphoblasts,
as detected with the p53-specific monoclonal antibody DO-1. As expected
(19), delayed p53 accumulation was seen in A-T lymphoblasts. p53
increased slowly and was less that half that in normal cells before
2 h after IR; p53 then increased to ~80% of that in
normal lymphoblasts by 4 h after irradiation. Although low levels
of constitutive phosphorylation were observed at Ser6,
Ser33, Ser315, and Ser392,
phosphorylation increased rapidly at each of these sites and at
Ser9, Ser15, Ser20, and
Ser46, after exposure of normal lymphoblasts to IR.
Phosphorylation at Thr18 may be cell
line-dependent, and no IR-induced increase in
phosphorylation was observed at Thr18 in either normal or
A-T lymphoblasts. Likewise, phosphorylation at Ser37 is
thought to occur primarily through activation of ATR after exposure to
e.g. UV light (20), and phosphorylation of Ser37
was not observed in either the normal or A-T lymphoblasts. A very
similar pattern of IR-induced p53 phosphorylation was observed in A549
lung and MCF7 breast carcinoma cell lines (data not shown), indicating
that these modifications are not specific to lymphoblasts. In normal
lymphoblasts, increased phosphorylation at Ser6,
Ser9, Ser15, Ser20,
Ser33, Ser46, Ser315, and
Ser392 was observed within 15 min after IR. In contrast, in
A-T lymphoblasts, phosphorylation at Ser15 was
significantly delayed (until ~2 h after IR) and reduced compared with
normal lymphoblasts, consistent with a previous report (19). Phosphorylation at Ser20 also was largely abrogated in A-T
cells as reported previously (21), although some Ser20
phosphorylation was observed by 2 h after IR.
Unexpectedly, phosphorylation at Ser46 also was defective
in A-T lymphoblasts after exposure to IR, and phosphorylation at
Ser9 was reduced and delayed (Fig. 1, A and
B). These data suggest that Ser9 and
Ser46 also may be phosphorylated by an ATM-activated
protein kinase (or possibly ATM itself); alternatively, in response to
IR, these phosphorylations may depend upon prior phosphorylation of
Ser15 or Ser20. In response to UV irradiation,
Ser46 can be phosphorylated by the p38 MAPK (22), and
recently Ser46 was reported to be phosphorylated by
homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 2 (HIPK2), which also is
activated by exposure of cells to UV light (23, 24). The kinase that
phosphorylates Ser46 after IR has not been identified.
To further establish the importance of ATM in mediating phosphorylation
of Ser46, we examined the effect of wortmannin, an
inhibitor of ATM (25), and PD169316, a p38 MAPK-specific inhibitor
(26), on Ser46 phosphorylation in A549 cells in response to
IR. Fig. 2 shows that increasing
concentrations of wortmannin inhibited IR-induced phosphorylation at
both Ser15 and Ser46, consistent with
dependence on ATM, while increasing concentrations of PD169316 had no
effect on phosphorylation at either site. Similar results were obtained
in BT normal lymphoblasts (data not shown). Phosphorylation at each of
the sites shown in Fig. 1 after exposure to IR also was examined in two
other pairs of normal and A-T lymphoblasts, C3ABR and AT24RM, and BT
(normal) and L3 (A-T), with similar results; in neither A-T cell line
did IR induce phosphorylation of Ser46, while robust
phosphorylation at this site was observed in normal lymphoblasts (data
not shown). That the p53 in A-T cells is capable of being
phosphorylated in response to DNA damage was shown by examining the
response in GM02254 and GM01526 cells exposed to UV light. In this
case, no significant difference in p53 phosphorylation between the
normal and A-T lymphoblasts was observed (data not shown), indicating
that phosphorylation at Ser9, Ser15,
Ser20, and Ser46 was unlikely to be masked in
A-T cells. These findings fit previous observations that ATM acts
specifically in the cellular responses to IR (7). Thus, the N-terminal
p53 phosphorylation sites can be grouped into two categories with
respect to dependence on ATM for rapid phosphorylation in response to
IR. One group, consisting of Ser6, Ser33,
Ser315, and Ser392, is independent of ATM and
constitutively phosphorylated at low levels; the other group,
consisting of Ser9, Ser15, Ser20,
and Ser46, is ATM-dependent for a rapid
response to IR-induced damage, presumably DNA double strand breaks.
Dependence of C-terminal Acetylation on N-terminal
Phosphorylation--
Previously, we and others suggested that
acetylation of human p53 after DNA damage may be mediated through
phosphorylation at N-terminal sites (4, 15, 27). To address this issue in vivo, we first examined the time course of p53
acetylation at Lys320 and Lys382 after exposure
to 8 Gy IR in normal and A-T lymphoblasts (Fig. 3A). In normal lymphoblasts,
acetylation at Lys320 was observed within 1 h after IR
and at Lys382 by 2 h; both sites were well acetylated
at 4 h after IR. In contrast, in A-T lymphoblasts, acetylation at
both sites was significantly delayed and reduced (by 20-40%) at
4 h after IR compared with normal lymphoblasts (Fig.
3B). No differences in the
acetylation of these sites was observed between normal and A-T
lymphoblasts after UV radiation (data not shown).
To determine which N-terminal phosphorylation site(s) are important for
acetylation, we examined mutant p53s in which individual N-terminal
phosphorylation sites were changed to Ala by transient transfection of
p53-negative H1299 cells with the indicated p53 expression vectors
(Fig. 3C). p53 protein levels from each transfection were
comparable as shown by staining with the polyclonal, p53-specific antibody Ab-7, and wild-type p53 was acetylated at both sites with or
without exposure to IR. Acetylation without IR was not unexpected,
since the transfection procedure elicits a strong "stress-like"
response in human cells, as reported previously (14, 22). In contrast
to wild-type p53, acetylation of Lys382 in the p53 S15A
mutant, as well as the L22Q/W23S double mutant, was virtually
abrogated, while acetylation of Lys320 was reduced
significantly. Acetylation at Lys382 also was significantly
reduced by mutations that changed Ser6, Ser9,
or Thr18 to Ala. In contrast, changing Ser20,
Ser33, Ser37, or Ser46 to Ala had
little, if any, effect on acetylation at Lys382. Except for
the Ser15 to Ala change, the effects of phosphorylation
site mutants on the acetylation of Lys320 were less clear,
in part, due to weakness of the Ac-Lys320 signal.
Previous studies showed that phosphorylation of p53 at
Ser15 and Ser20 in response to IR is mediated
by the ATM protein kinase and that these modifications are important
for stabilizing and activating p53 as a transcription factor. We show
here, for the first time, that phosphorylation of Ser9 and
Ser46 also are dependent on the ATM kinase (Figs. 1 and 4).
Phosphorylation of Ser46 was shown to be important for the
induction of apoptosis in response to damage caused by exposure of
epithelial-derived cell lines to UV light (6, 22), and two protein
kinases capable of phosphorylating Ser46, p38 MAPK (22) and
HIPK2 (23, 24), both of which are activated after exposure of cells to
UV light, have been described. In contrast to UV light, activation of
p53 after exposure of epithelial cells to IR primarily induces cell
cycle arrest in G1. However, human lymphoid and neuronal
cells are much more sensitive to p53-dependent, IR-induced
apoptosis, and both p53 and ATM are required for its induction (28,
29). We suggest that in lymphoid cells, activation of ATM in response
to DNA double strand breaks mediates activation of an unidentified
protein kinase that phosphorylates p53 at Ser46, possibly
through recruitment of p53DINP1, the product of a recently identified
p53-inducible gene that facilitates p53 phosphorylation at
Ser46 in response to IR (30). This protein kinase is
unlikely to be p38 MAPK, which phosphorylates Ser46 in
response to UV, since PD169316, a p38 kinase-specific inhibitor, failed
to block phosphorylation of Ser46 (Fig. 2).
We also found that ATM is required for phosphorylation of p53 at
Ser9. We previously reported that Ser6 and
Ser9 became strongly phosphorylated in response to both IR-
and UV-induced DNA damage and suggested that Ser9 may be
phosphorylated by CK1 in response to phosphorylation of Ser6 (13). In vitro CK1 phosphorylates serines
and threonines two residues distal to a phosphorylated serine or
threonine. The data presented here suggest that in response to IR,
phosphorylation of Ser9 may be independent of
phosphorylation at Ser6 and dependent upon activation of an
unknown protein kinase by ATM. Thus, as for Ser20, the
kinase that phosphorylates Ser9 in response to IR is likely
to be activated by ATM. We cannot, however, rule out the possibility
that recognition of Ser9 by its kinase requires either
Ser15 or its phosphorylation.
The functional consequences of phosphorylation at Ser6 and
Ser9 are unknown. Changing either serine to alanine had
little effect on the ability of chimeric Gal4-p53(1-42) to activate
transcription of a reporter in transient transfection assays (4),
consistent with a report that these and other N-terminal
phosphorylations are not essential for p53 activity (31). However,
coupled with our previous results (15) and those of others (4, 27)
showing that phosphorylation of Ser15 recruits CBP/p300 to
p53, our current data (Fig. 3C) supports a cascade model in
which phosphorylation at several N-terminal sites, of which
phosphorylation of Ser15 appears to be most important,
promotes acetylation at C-terminal sites (Fig. 4). Our data further
suggest that the N-terminal region important for regulating p53
interactions with HATs includes the first 18 residues of human p53,
since abrogation of phosphorylation by changing Ser20,
Ser33, Ser37, and Ser46 to Ala did
not affect C-terminal acetylation. While the double mutant L22Q/W23S
also blocked C-terminal acetylation as did the equivalent mutations in
mouse p53 (32), these changes most likely profoundly affect the
structure of the amphipathic helical region (amino acids 17-28) that
is likely to be important for interactions with both HATs and MDM2
(33). Thus, phosphorylation of Ser6 and Ser9,
along with phosphorylation of Thr18, may serve to amplify a
primary signal initiated by the ATM-mediated phosphorylation of
Ser15 that is important for recruiting HATs to p53. We
note, however, that changing Ser18 of mouse p53, the
equivalent of human Ser15, to Ala did not block the
acetylation of mouse p53 at Lys317 and Lys379,
equivalent to human Lys320 and Lys382,
respectively, in ES cells (34). Thus, regulation of p53 acetylation through phosphorylation may not be equivalent in mice and humans.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
20 °C and diluted into the cell media immediately before use.
-glycerolphosphate, 1 mM sodium
orthovanadate, 1 mM sodium molybdate, 10 µg/ml aprotinin,
10 µg/ml leupeptin, 5 µg/ml pepstatin, 0.5 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Immunoprecipitation and Western
blot analyses were performed as described (13, 14). Anti-p53
monoclonal antibody DO-1 was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Inc.; anti-p53 polyclonal antibody Ab-7 was from Calbiochem, Inc. In
all Western blot analyses, uniform protein loading was confirmed by
Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining of the SDS-polyacrylamide gels after
transfer to the polyvinylidene difluoride membranes.
-actin hybrid) promoter (18). The serine codons at amino acid
positions 6, 9, 15, 20, 33, 37, and 46, and the threonine codon at 18, were changed to alanine by site-directed mutagenesis. The entire p53
sequence in each vector was confirmed by DNA sequencing.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Phosphorylation of p53 on multiple N-terminal
serines in response to ionizing radiation requires ATM.
A, normal human lymphoblasts (GM02254) and A-T lymphoblasts
(GM01526) were treated with 8 Gy IR and harvested at the indicated
times. Extracts were immunoprecipitated using anti-p53 antibodies and
analyzed for p53 and phosphorylation by Western immunoblot analysis;
phosphorylation site-specific antibodies or monoclonal antibody to p53
(DO-1) are indicated (right). Extracts of SHEP
human neuroblastoma cells, treated with adriamycin at 0.2 µg/ml for
8 h, served as a positive control (PC) (35).
Phosphorylation at Ser9, Ser15,
Ser20, and Ser46 was attenuated in the A-T
lymphoblasts. B, the Western blot in A was
scanned to compare the amount of phosphorylation at individual residues
in A-T cells (GM01526) with the same residue in normal
lymphoblasts (GM02254). The amount of phosphorylation at
each residue was first normalized by dividing its value by the value
for the amount of p53 at that time point. The normalized ratio was then
multiplied by 100. Shown are data for 5 residues: Ser6,
Ser15, Ser20, Ser46, and
Ser392. The results show that phosphorylation at
Ser15, Ser20, and Ser46 (and
Ser9, data not shown) is reduced and delayed in A-T cells
compared with normal cells. The amount of p53 in A-T cells was less
than half of that in normal cells up to 0.5 h after exposure and
then increased to ~80% of the level in normal cells at 4 h.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Phosphorylation at Ser15 and
Ser46 is inhibited by wortmannin. Wortmannin
(WM), an inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol-3-like kinases
including ATM, or PD169316 (PD), a p38 MAPK-specific
inhibitor, were added to A549 cultures as indicated, and 30 min later
cultures were irradiated with 10 Gy. Two hour postirradiation cultures
were harvested for Western immunoblot analysis as described in the
legend to Fig. 1. A, wortmannin was added at 10 (lane
3), 50 (lane 4), or 100 (lane 5)
µM. B, PD169316 was added at 2.5 (lane
3), 5 (lane 4), or 10 (lane 5)
µM.

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Efficient acetylation of p53 on C-terminal
lysine residues in response to ionizing radiation requires
phosphorylation at multiple N-terminal residues. A,
normal lymphoblasts (GM02254) and A-T lymphoblasts
(GM01526) were treated with 8 Gy IR and analyzed as
described in the legend to Fig. 1 except that immunoblot analysis was
with antibodies specific for acetylation at Lys320
(PAbLys(Ac)320) or Lys382 (PAbLys(Ac)382) as indicated.
A549 human lung carcinoma cells, harvested 8 h after exposure to
25 J/m2 UV-C, served as a positive control (PC)
(15). B, the ratio of acetylation at Lys320 and
Lys382 in A-T to that in normal lymphoblasts (×100) was
calculated after normalization for p53 amounts as described for
phosphorylation in the legend to Fig. 1. The data show that acetylation
in A-T cells was dramatically delayed before approaching levels in
normal cells by 4 h after irradiation. C, H1299 cells
(TP53
/
) were transiently transfected with
vectors that expressed wild-type or p53 mutants with single amino acid
substitutions (serine/threonine to alanine) at the indicated sites and
were exposed or not to 8 Gy IR. Extracts were prepared 18 h after
transfection and 2 h after irradiation for immunoprecipitation and
Western blot analysis as described (see "Experimental Procedures").
Ab-7 is a p53-specific polyclonal antibody.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Model for activation of p53 by IR-induced DNA
double strand breaks. Exposure of cells to IR produces DNA double
strand breaks, which leads to activation of ATM as well as other
unidentified protein kinases that phosphorylate p53 at Ser6
and Ser33 in its N-terminal transactivation domain. ATM
directly phosphorylates p53 on Ser15 and induces
phosphorylation at Ser9, Ser20, and
Ser46 through activation of additional protein kinases,
including Chk2. In human lymphoblastoid cells, Thr18 and
Ser37 were not phosphorylated in response to IR.
Phosphorylation of p53 on Ser15 recruits HATs, including
p300/CBP and PCAF, which acetylate Lys320 and
Lys382 in the C-terminal domain. Phosphorylation at
Ser6, Ser9, and Thr18 helps recruit
HATs to p53. Posttranslational modifications also contribute to the
stabilization of p53 and its activation as a transcription
factor.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank K. H. Vousden for the pCB6+p53-22/23 plasmid, M. F. Lavin for the BT and L3 cell lines, and J. Miyazaki and I. Saito for the pCAGGS plasmid.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ These authors were supported in part by a Laboratory Directed Research and Development Grant at the Brookhaven National Laboratory under contract with the United States Department of Energy.
** These authors were supported by grants from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research and the National Cancer Institute of Canada Operating Grant 11053.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Biology Dept., 50 Bell Ave., Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973. Tel.:
631-344-3375; Fax: 631-344-6398; E-mail: cwa@bnl.gov.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 1, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C200093200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: A-T, ataxia telangiectasia; ATM, ataxia telangiectasia mutated; ATR, ATM-related; CBP, CREB-binding protein; HAT, histone acetyltransferase; HDAC, histone deacetylase; HIPK2, homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 2; IR, ionizing radiation; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MDM, mouse double minute; PCAF, p300/CBP-associated factor.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Appella, E.,
and Anderson, C. W.
(2001)
Eur. J. Biochem.
268,
2764-2772[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Wahl, G. M.,
and Carr, A. M.
(2001)
Nat. Cell Biol.
3,
E277-E286[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Buschmann, T.,
Potapova, O.,
Bar-Shira, A.,
Ivanov, V. N.,
Fuchs, S. Y.,
Henderson, S.,
Fried, V. A.,
Minamoto, T.,
Alarcon-Vargas, D.,
Pincus, M. R.,
Gaarde, W. A.,
Holbrook, N. J.,
Shiloh, Y.,
and Ronai, Z.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
2743-2754 |
| 4. |
Dumaz, N.,
and Meek, D. W.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
7002-7010[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. |
Jabbur, J. R.,
Huang, P.,
and Zhang, W.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
6203-6208[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Oda, K.,
Arakawa, H.,
Tanaka, T.,
Matsuda, K.,
Tanikawa, C.,
Mori, T.,
Nishimori, H.,
Tamai, K.,
Tokino, T.,
Nakamura, Y.,
and Taya, Y.
(2000)
Cell
102,
849-862[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Abraham, R. T.
(2001)
Genes Dev.
15,
2177-2196 |
| 8. |
Banin, S.,
Moyal, L.,
Shieh, S.-Y.,
Taya, Y.,
Anderson, C. W.,
Chessa, L.,
Smorodinsky, N. I.,
Prives, C.,
Reiss, Y.,
Shiloh, Y.,
and Ziv, Y.
(1998)
Science
281,
1674-1677 |
| 9. |
Canman, C. E.,
Lim, D.-S.,
Cimprich, K. A.,
Taya, Y.,
Tamai, K.,
Sakaguchi, K.,
Appella, E.,
Kastan, M. B.,
and Siliciano, J. D.
(1998)
Science
281,
1677-1679 |
| 10. |
Chehab, N. H.,
Malikzay, A.,
Stavridi, E. S.,
and Halazonetis, T. D.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
13777-13782 |
| 11. |
Hirao, A.,
Kong, Y.-Y.,
Matsuoka, S.,
Wakeham, A.,
Ruland, J.,
Yoshida, H.,
Liu, D.,
Elledge, S. J.,
and Mak, T. W.
(2000)
Science
287,
1824-1827 |
| 12. |
Shieh, S.-Y.,
Taya, Y.,
and Prives, C.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
1815-1823[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Higashimoto, Y.,
Saito, S.,
Tong, X.-H.,
Hong, A.,
Sakaguchi, K.,
Appella, E.,
and Anderson, C. W.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
23199-23203 |
| 14. |
Sakaguchi, K.,
Saito, S.,
Higashimoto, Y.,
Roy, S.,
Anderson, C. W.,
and Appella, E.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
9278-9283 |
| 15. |
Sakaguchi, K.,
Herrera, J. E.,
Saito, S.,
Miki, T.,
Bustin, M.,
Vassilev, A.,
Anderson, C. W.,
and Appella, E.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2831-2841 |
| 16. |
Baker, S. J.,
Markowitz, S.,
Fearon, E. R.,
Willson, J. K.,
and Vogelstein, B.
(1990)
Science
249,
912-915 |
| 17. |
Ludwig, R. L.,
Bates, S.,
and Vousden, K. H.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
4952-4960[Abstract] |
| 18. |
Niwa, H.,
Yamamura, K.-i.,
and Miyazaki, J.-i.
(1991)
Gene (Amst.)
108,
193-199[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Siliciano, J. D.,
Canman, C. E.,
Taya, Y.,
Sakaguchi, K.,
Appella, E.,
and Kastan, M. B.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
3471-3481 |
| 20. |
Tibbetts, R. S.,
Brumbaugh, K. M.,
Williams, J. M.,
Sarkaria, J. N.,
Cliby, W. A.,
Shieh, S.-Y.,
Taya, Y.,
Prives, C.,
and Abraham, R. T.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
152-157 |
| 21. |
Chehab, N. H.,
Malikzay, A.,
Appel, M.,
and Halazonetis, T. D.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
278-288 |
| 22. |
Bulavin, D. V.,
Saito, S.,
Hollander, M. C.,
Sakaguchi, K.,
Anderson, C. W.,
Appella, E.,
and Fornace, A. J., Jr.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
6845-6854[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. |
D'Orazi, G.,
Cecchinelli, B.,
Bruno, T.,
Manni, I.,
Higashimoto, Y.,
Saito, S.,
Gostissa, M.,
Coen, S.,
Marchetti, A.,
Del Sal, G.,
Piaggio, G.,
Fanciulli, M.,
Appella, E.,
and Soddu, S.
(2002)
Nat. Cell Biol.
4,
11-19[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
Hofmann, T. G.,
Möller, A.,
Sirma, H.,
Zentgraf, H.,
Taya, Y.,
Dröge, W.,
Will, H.,
and Schmitz, M. L.
(2002)
Nat. Cell Biol.
4,
1-10[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Sarkaria, J. N.,
Tibbetts, R. S.,
Busby, E. C.,
Kennedy, A. P.,
Hill, D. E.,
and Abraham, R. T.
(1998)
Cancer Res.
58,
4375-4382 |
| 26. |
Gallagher, T. F.,
Seibel, G. L.,
Kassis, S.,
Laydon, J. T.,
Blumenthal, M. J.,
Lee, J. C.,
Lee, D.,
Boehm, J. C.,
Fier-Thompson, S. M.,
Abt, J. W.,
Soreson, M. E.,
Smietana, J. M.,
Hall, R. F.,
Garigipati, R. S.,
Bender, P. E.,
Erhard, K. F.,
Krog, A. J.,
Hofmann, G. A.,
Sheldrake, P. L.,
McDonnell, P. C.,
Kumar, S.,
Young, P. R.,
and Adams, J. L.
(1997)
Bioorg. Med. Chem.
5,
49-64[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. |
Lambert, P. F.,
Kashanchi, F.,
Radonovich, M. F.,
Shiekhattar, R.,
and Brady, J. N.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
33048-33053 |
| 28. |
Karlseder, J.,
Broccoli, D.,
Dai, Y.,
Hardy, S.,
and de Lange, T.
(1999)
Science
283,
1321-1325 |
| 29. |
Pettitt, A. R.,
Sherrington, P. D.,
Stewart, G.,
Cawley, J. C.,
Taylor, A. M. R.,
and Stankovic, T.
(2001)
Blood
98,
814-822 |
| 30. |
Okamura, S.,
Arakawa, H.,
Tanaka, T.,
Nakanishi, H., Ng, C. C.,
Taya, Y.,
Monden, M.,
and Nakamura, Y.
(2001)
Mol. Cell
8,
85-94[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. |
Ashcroft, M.,
Kubbutat, M. H. G.,
and Vousden, K. H.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
1751-1758 |
| 32. |
Chao, C.,
Saito, S.,
Kang, J.,
Anderson, C. W.,
Appella, E.,
and Xu, Y.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
4967-4975[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. |
Kussie, P. H.,
Gorina, S.,
Marechal, V.,
Elenbaas, B.,
Moreau, J.,
Levine, A. J.,
and Pavletich, N. P.
(1996)
Science
274,
948-953 |
| 34. |
Chao, C.,
Saito, S.,
Anderson, C. W.,
Appella, E.,
and Xu, Y.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
11936-11941 |
| 35. |
Isaacs, J. S.,
Saito, S.,
and Neckers, L. M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
18497-18506 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. S. Shadel Expression and Maintenance of Mitochondrial DNA: New Insights into Human Disease Pathology Am. J. Pathol., June 1, 2008; 172(6): 1445 - 1456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kulkarni and K. C. Das Differential roles of ATR and ATM in p53, Chk1, and histone H2AX phosphorylation in response to hyperoxia: ATR-dependent ATM activation Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): L998 - L1006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wang, Y. Zhao, L. Li, M. A. McNutt, L. Wu, S. Lu, Y. Yu, W. Zhou, J. Feng, G. Chai, et al. An ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR) Signaling Pathway and a Phosphorylation-Acetylation Cascade Are Involved in Activation of p53/p21Waf1/Cip1 in Response to 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine Treatment J. Biol. Chem., February 1, 2008; 283(5): 2564 - 2574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Loehberg, T. Thompson, M. B. Kastan, K. H. Maclean, D. G. Edwards, F. S. Kittrell, D. Medina, O. M. Conneely, and B. W. O'Malley Ataxia Telangiectasia-Mutated and p53 Are Potential Mediators of Chloroquine-Induced Resistance to Mammary Carcinogenesis Cancer Res., December 15, 2007; 67(24): 12026 - 12033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. V. Wang, M. Wade, E. Wong, Y.-C. Li, L. W. Rodewald, and G. M. Wahl Quantitative analyses reveal the importance of regulated Hdmx degradation for P53 activation PNAS, July 24, 2007; 104(30): 12365 - 12370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Dauth, J. Kruger, and T. G. Hofmann Homeodomain-Interacting Protein Kinase 2 Is the Ionizing Radiation-Activated p53 Serine 46 Kinase and Is Regulated by ATM Cancer Res., March 1, 2007; 67(5): 2274 - 2279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kubota, K. Kinoshita, K. Suetomi, A. Fujimori, and S. Takahashi Mcl-1 Depletion in Apoptosis Elicited by Ionizing Radiation in Peritoneal Resident Macrophages of C3H Mice J. Immunol., March 1, 2007; 178(5): 2923 - 2931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Bhuller and P. G. Wells A Developmental Role for Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated in Protecting the Embryo from Spontaneous and Phenytoin-Enhanced Embryopathies in Culture Toxicol. Sci., September 1, 2006; 93(1): 156 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Cecchinelli, L. Lavra, C. Rinaldo, S. Iacovelli, A. Gurtner, A. Gasbarri, A. Ulivieri, F. Del Prete, M. Trovato, G. Piaggio, et al. Repression of the Antiapoptotic Molecule Galectin-3 by Homeodomain-Interacting Protein Kinase 2-Activated p53 Is Required for p53-Induced Apoptosis Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2006; 26(12): 4746 - 4757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. V. Thottassery, L. Westbrook, H. Someya, and W. B. Parker c-Abl-independent p73 stabilization during gemcitabine- or 4'-thio-{beta}-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine-induced apoptosis in wild-type and p53-null colorectal cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2006; 5(2): 400 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tyagi, R. P. Singh, C. Agarwal, S. Siriwardana, R. A. Sclafani, and R. Agarwal Resveratrol causes Cdc2-tyr15 phosphorylation via ATM/ATR-Chk1/2-Cdc25C pathway as a central mechanism for S phase arrest in human ovarian carcinoma Ovcar-3 cells Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2005; 26(11): 1978 - 1987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Park, K. Kim, S. B. Rho, K. Choi, D. Kim, S.-H. Oh, J. Park, S.-H. Lee, and J.-H. Lee Homeobox Msx1 Interacts with p53 Tumor Suppressor and Inhibits Tumor Growth by Inducing Apoptosis Cancer Res., February 1, 2005; 65(3): 749 - 757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. A. Stasinopoulos, Y. Mironchik, A. Raman, F. Wildes, P. Winnard Jr., and V. Raman HOXA5-Twist Interaction Alters p53 Homeostasis in Breast Cancer Cells J. Biol. Chem., January 21, 2005; 280(3): 2294 - 2299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-L. Perfettini, M. Castedo, R. Nardacci, F. Ciccosanti, P. Boya, T. Roumier, N. Larochette, M. Piacentini, and G. Kroemer Essential role of p53 phosphorylation by p38 MAPK in apoptosis induction by the HIV-1 envelope J. Exp. Med., January 18, 2005; 201(2): 279 - 289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Helt, W. A. Cliby, P. C. Keng, R. A. Bambara, and M. A. O'Reilly Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) and ATM and Rad3-related Protein Exhibit Selective Target Specificities in Response to Different Forms of DNA Damage J. Biol. Chem., January 14, 2005; 280(2): 1186 - 1192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Thompson, C. Tovar, H. Yang, D. Carvajal, B. T. Vu, Q. Xu, G. M. Wahl, D. C. Heimbrook, and L. T. Vassilev Phosphorylation of p53 on Key Serines Is Dispensable for Transcriptional Activation and Apoptosis J. Biol. Chem., December 17, 2004; 279(51): 53015 - 53022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. U. Kurz, P. Douglas, and S. P. Lees-Miller Doxorubicin Activates ATM-dependent Phosphorylation of Multiple Downstream Targets in Part through the Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species J. Biol. Chem., December 17, 2004; 279(51): 53272 - 53281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Caporali, S. Falcinelli, G. Starace, M. T. Russo, E. Bonmassar, J. Jiricny, and S. D'Atri DNA Damage Induced by Temozolomide Signals to both ATM and ATR: Role of the Mismatch Repair System Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2004; 66(3): 478 - 491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. R. McMurray and D. J. McCance Degradation of p53, Not Telomerase Activation, by E6 Is Required for Bypass of Crisis and Immortalization by Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E6/E7 J. Virol., June 1, 2004; 78(11): 5698 - 5706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Y. Siu, A. Lau, T. Arooz, J. P.H. Chow, H. T.B. Ho, and R. Y.C. Poon Topoisomerase poisons differentially activate DNA damage checkpoints through ataxia-telangiectasia mutated-dependent and -independent mechanisms Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2004; 3(5): 621 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. K. Sluss, H. Armata, J. Gallant, and S. N. |