JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.C200093200 on March 1, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 15, 12491-12494, April 12, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/15/12491    most recent
C200093200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saito, S.'i.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saito, S.'i.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, C. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

ACCELERATED PUBLICATION
ATM Mediates Phosphorylation at Multiple p53 Sites, Including Ser46, in Response to Ionizing Radiation*

Shin'ichi SaitoDagger §, Aaron A. Goodarzi||**, Yuichiro Higashimoto§, Yuka Noda§, Susan P. Lees-Miller||**, Ettore Appella§, and Carl W. AndersonDagger DaggerDagger

From the Dagger  Biology Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, the § Laboratory of Cell Biology, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, and the || Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada

Received for publication, February 13, 2002, and in revised form, March 1, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The p53 tumor suppressor protein preserves genome integrity by regulating growth arrest and apoptosis in response to DNA damage. In response to ionizing radiation (IR), ATM, the gene product mutated in ataxia telangiectasia, stabilizes and activates p53 through phosphorylation of Ser15 and (indirectly) Ser20. Here we show that phosphorylation of p53 on Ser46, a residue important for p53 apoptotic activity, as well as on Ser9, in response to IR also is dependent on the ATM protein kinase. IR-induced phosphorylation at Ser46 was inhibited by wortmannin, a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor, but not PD169316, a p38 MAPK inhibitor. p53 C-terminal acetylation at Lys320 and Lys382, which may stabilize p53 and activate sequence-specific DNA binding, required Ser15 phosphorylation by ATM and was enhanced by phosphorylation at nearby residues including Ser6, Ser9, and Thr18. These observations, together with the proposed role of Ser46 phosphorylation in mediating apoptosis, suggest that ATM is involved in the initiation of p53-dependent apoptosis after IR in human lymphoblastoid cells.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In response to DNA damage, the p53 tumor suppressor protein is phosphorylated on each of the seven serines and one threonine the in the first 50 amino acids of its N-terminal transactivation domain as well as at several sites in its carboxyl (C)-terminal tetramerization/regulatory domain (1, 2). As a transcription factor, p53 induces or represses several genes that regulate cell cycle arrest, DNA repair or apoptosis, including p21WAF1, MDM2, GADD45, p53R2, and p53AIP1. Recent studies suggest that specific p53 phosphorylation events are important for the activation or repression of specific promoters (3-6). Optimal induction and activation of p53 after exposure to IR requires phosphorylation by the ATM protein kinase (1, 2, 7). ATM is thought to directly phosphorylate Ser15 in vivo (8, 9) and also is required for phosphorylation of Ser20 through activation of the Chk2 protein kinase, which phosphorylates Ser20 in vitro (10-12). However, the potential role for ATM in regulating p53 modifications at other sites has not previously been explored.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Cultures and Inhibitors-- Epstein-Barr virus immortalized normal (GM02254) and A-T1 (GM01526) human lymphoblast cultures were obtained from the Human Genetic Mutant Cell Repository (Camden, NJ). H1299 (ATCC CRL-5803), a human lung carcinoma cell line that is null for both TP53 alleles, and A549 (ATCC CCL-185), a human lung carcinoma cell line that expresses wild-type p53, were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). All cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified minimal essential medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 15% (lymphoblasts) or 10% (H1299) fetal bovine serum, 100 nM glutamine and penicillin/streptomycin in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. Wortmannin (Sigma) was prepared as a 10 mM stock and PD169316 (Calbiochem, Inc.) as a 1 mM stock in Me2SO; both were stored at -20 °C and diluted into the cell media immediately before use.

Induction of DNA Damage, Immunoprecipitation, and Western Immunoblot Analysis-- Asynchronously growing cultures in 75-cm2 flasks were irradiated using a Shepherd Mark I 137Cs irradiator at a dose rate of 3.2 Gy/min. To detect p53 acetylation, the deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A (Wako, Osaka, Japan) was added at a final concentration of 5 µM 4 h before harvesting. Cultures were harvested at the indicated times after treatment, washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, and lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl at pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 50 mM NaF, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 25 mM beta -glycerolphosphate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM sodium molybdate, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 5 µg/ml pepstatin, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Immunoprecipitation and Western blot analyses were performed as described (13, 14). Anti-p53 monoclonal antibody DO-1 was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.; anti-p53 polyclonal antibody Ab-7 was from Calbiochem, Inc. In all Western blot analyses, uniform protein loading was confirmed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining of the SDS-polyacrylamide gels after transfer to the polyvinylidene difluoride membranes.

Phosphorylation- and Acetylation-specific p53 Antibodies-- Rabbit polyclonal antibodies specific for p53 phosphorylated at Ser6, Ser9, Ser15, Ser20, Ser33, Ser37, and Thr18 or acetylated at Lys320 or Lys382 have been described (13-15). A similar approach was used to generate antibodies specific for p53 phosphorylated at Ser46, Ser315, or Ser392. Briefly, rabbit antibodies that recognize p53 phosphorylated at Ser46 (PAbSer(P)46), Ser315 (PAbSer(P)315), or Ser392 (PAbSer(P)392) were elicited against the human p53 sequences Ac-41-51(46P)C, Ac-310-321(315P)C or Ac-C-385-393(392P) coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin, respectively. Phosphorylation-specific antibodies were affinity-selected. The specificity of each antibody was confirmed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using synthetically prepared p53 peptides and with immunoblot assays by probing GST-human p53 expressed in Escherichia coli.

Plasmids and cDNA Constructs-- Wild-type and the L22Q/W23S mutant p53 sequences were subcloned from the p53 expression vectors pC53-SN3 (16) or pCB6+p53-22/23 (17) into the pCAGGS expression plasmid behind the CAG (cytomegalovirus enhancer-chicken beta -actin hybrid) promoter (18). The serine codons at amino acid positions 6, 9, 15, 20, 33, 37, and 46, and the threonine codon at 18, were changed to alanine by site-directed mutagenesis. The entire p53 sequence in each vector was confirmed by DNA sequencing.

Transient Transfections-- The day prior to transfection, 106 H1299 cells were seeded in each 10-cm tissue culture plate. On the following day, the cultures were transfected with the expression vectors for wild-type p53 or p53 mutants using LipofectAMINE PLUS Reagent (Invitrogen) as recommended by the manufacturer. Cells were exposed to 8 Gy IR 18 h after transfection, and the cultures were harvested for immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis 2 h after IR.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Identification of ATM-dependent p53 Phosphorylation-- To determine whether other p53 posttranslational modifications depend on ATM, we prepared a panel of polyclonal antibodies that, respectively, recognize p53 modified at each of 12 sites at which it is phosphorylated or acetylated (13-15, 19). These antibodies were then used to examine the time course of phosphorylation at each site after exposure of normal (GM02254) and A-T (GM01526) human lymphoblasts to 8 Gy IR (Fig. 1). Acetylation at two C-terminal sites, Lys320 and Lys382, also was examined. p53 accumulated rapidly and reached a maximum at 4 h after irradiation in normal lymphoblasts, as detected with the p53-specific monoclonal antibody DO-1. As expected (19), delayed p53 accumulation was seen in A-T lymphoblasts. p53 increased slowly and was less that half that in normal cells before 2 h after IR; p53 then increased to ~80% of that in normal lymphoblasts by 4 h after irradiation. Although low levels of constitutive phosphorylation were observed at Ser6, Ser33, Ser315, and Ser392, phosphorylation increased rapidly at each of these sites and at Ser9, Ser15, Ser20, and Ser46, after exposure of normal lymphoblasts to IR. Phosphorylation at Thr18 may be cell line-dependent, and no IR-induced increase in phosphorylation was observed at Thr18 in either normal or A-T lymphoblasts. Likewise, phosphorylation at Ser37 is thought to occur primarily through activation of ATR after exposure to e.g. UV light (20), and phosphorylation of Ser37 was not observed in either the normal or A-T lymphoblasts. A very similar pattern of IR-induced p53 phosphorylation was observed in A549 lung and MCF7 breast carcinoma cell lines (data not shown), indicating that these modifications are not specific to lymphoblasts. In normal lymphoblasts, increased phosphorylation at Ser6, Ser9, Ser15, Ser20, Ser33, Ser46, Ser315, and Ser392 was observed within 15 min after IR. In contrast, in A-T lymphoblasts, phosphorylation at Ser15 was significantly delayed (until ~2 h after IR) and reduced compared with normal lymphoblasts, consistent with a previous report (19). Phosphorylation at Ser20 also was largely abrogated in A-T cells as reported previously (21), although some Ser20 phosphorylation was observed by 2 h after IR.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Phosphorylation of p53 on multiple N-terminal serines in response to ionizing radiation requires ATM. A, normal human lymphoblasts (GM02254) and A-T lymphoblasts (GM01526) were treated with 8 Gy IR and harvested at the indicated times. Extracts were immunoprecipitated using anti-p53 antibodies and analyzed for p53 and phosphorylation by Western immunoblot analysis; phosphorylation site-specific antibodies or monoclonal antibody to p53 (DO-1) are indicated (right). Extracts of SHEP human neuroblastoma cells, treated with adriamycin at 0.2 µg/ml for 8 h, served as a positive control (PC) (35). Phosphorylation at Ser9, Ser15, Ser20, and Ser46 was attenuated in the A-T lymphoblasts. B, the Western blot in A was scanned to compare the amount of phosphorylation at individual residues in A-T cells (GM01526) with the same residue in normal lymphoblasts (GM02254). The amount of phosphorylation at each residue was first normalized by dividing its value by the value for the amount of p53 at that time point. The normalized ratio was then multiplied by 100. Shown are data for 5 residues: Ser6, Ser15, Ser20, Ser46, and Ser392. The results show that phosphorylation at Ser15, Ser20, and Ser46 (and Ser9, data not shown) is reduced and delayed in A-T cells compared with normal cells. The amount of p53 in A-T cells was less than half of that in normal cells up to 0.5 h after exposure and then increased to ~80% of the level in normal cells at 4 h.

Unexpectedly, phosphorylation at Ser46 also was defective in A-T lymphoblasts after exposure to IR, and phosphorylation at Ser9 was reduced and delayed (Fig. 1, A and B). These data suggest that Ser9 and Ser46 also may be phosphorylated by an ATM-activated protein kinase (or possibly ATM itself); alternatively, in response to IR, these phosphorylations may depend upon prior phosphorylation of Ser15 or Ser20. In response to UV irradiation, Ser46 can be phosphorylated by the p38 MAPK (22), and recently Ser46 was reported to be phosphorylated by homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 2 (HIPK2), which also is activated by exposure of cells to UV light (23, 24). The kinase that phosphorylates Ser46 after IR has not been identified.

To further establish the importance of ATM in mediating phosphorylation of Ser46, we examined the effect of wortmannin, an inhibitor of ATM (25), and PD169316, a p38 MAPK-specific inhibitor (26), on Ser46 phosphorylation in A549 cells in response to IR. Fig. 2 shows that increasing concentrations of wortmannin inhibited IR-induced phosphorylation at both Ser15 and Ser46, consistent with dependence on ATM, while increasing concentrations of PD169316 had no effect on phosphorylation at either site. Similar results were obtained in BT normal lymphoblasts (data not shown). Phosphorylation at each of the sites shown in Fig. 1 after exposure to IR also was examined in two other pairs of normal and A-T lymphoblasts, C3ABR and AT24RM, and BT (normal) and L3 (A-T), with similar results; in neither A-T cell line did IR induce phosphorylation of Ser46, while robust phosphorylation at this site was observed in normal lymphoblasts (data not shown). That the p53 in A-T cells is capable of being phosphorylated in response to DNA damage was shown by examining the response in GM02254 and GM01526 cells exposed to UV light. In this case, no significant difference in p53 phosphorylation between the normal and A-T lymphoblasts was observed (data not shown), indicating that phosphorylation at Ser9, Ser15, Ser20, and Ser46 was unlikely to be masked in A-T cells. These findings fit previous observations that ATM acts specifically in the cellular responses to IR (7). Thus, the N-terminal p53 phosphorylation sites can be grouped into two categories with respect to dependence on ATM for rapid phosphorylation in response to IR. One group, consisting of Ser6, Ser33, Ser315, and Ser392, is independent of ATM and constitutively phosphorylated at low levels; the other group, consisting of Ser9, Ser15, Ser20, and Ser46, is ATM-dependent for a rapid response to IR-induced damage, presumably DNA double strand breaks.


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Phosphorylation at Ser15 and Ser46 is inhibited by wortmannin. Wortmannin (WM), an inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol-3-like kinases including ATM, or PD169316 (PD), a p38 MAPK-specific inhibitor, were added to A549 cultures as indicated, and 30 min later cultures were irradiated with 10 Gy. Two hour postirradiation cultures were harvested for Western immunoblot analysis as described in the legend to Fig. 1. A, wortmannin was added at 10 (lane 3), 50 (lane 4), or 100 (lane 5) µM. B, PD169316 was added at 2.5 (lane 3), 5 (lane 4), or 10 (lane 5) µM.

Dependence of C-terminal Acetylation on N-terminal Phosphorylation-- Previously, we and others suggested that acetylation of human p53 after DNA damage may be mediated through phosphorylation at N-terminal sites (4, 15, 27). To address this issue in vivo, we first examined the time course of p53 acetylation at Lys320 and Lys382 after exposure to 8 Gy IR in normal and A-T lymphoblasts (Fig. 3A). In normal lymphoblasts, acetylation at Lys320 was observed within 1 h after IR and at Lys382 by 2 h; both sites were well acetylated at 4 h after IR. In contrast, in A-T lymphoblasts, acetylation at both sites was significantly delayed and reduced (by 20-40%) at 4 h after IR compared with normal lymphoblasts (Fig. 3B). No differences in the acetylation of these sites was observed between normal and A-T lymphoblasts after UV radiation (data not shown).


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Efficient acetylation of p53 on C-terminal lysine residues in response to ionizing radiation requires phosphorylation at multiple N-terminal residues. A, normal lymphoblasts (GM02254) and A-T lymphoblasts (GM01526) were treated with 8 Gy IR and analyzed as described in the legend to Fig. 1 except that immunoblot analysis was with antibodies specific for acetylation at Lys320 (PAbLys(Ac)320) or Lys382 (PAbLys(Ac)382) as indicated. A549 human lung carcinoma cells, harvested 8 h after exposure to 25 J/m2 UV-C, served as a positive control (PC) (15). B, the ratio of acetylation at Lys320 and Lys382 in A-T to that in normal lymphoblasts (×100) was calculated after normalization for p53 amounts as described for phosphorylation in the legend to Fig. 1. The data show that acetylation in A-T cells was dramatically delayed before approaching levels in normal cells by 4 h after irradiation. C, H1299 cells (TP53-/-) were transiently transfected with vectors that expressed wild-type or p53 mutants with single amino acid substitutions (serine/threonine to alanine) at the indicated sites and were exposed or not to 8 Gy IR. Extracts were prepared 18 h after transfection and 2 h after irradiation for immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis as described (see "Experimental Procedures"). Ab-7 is a p53-specific polyclonal antibody.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Model for activation of p53 by IR-induced DNA double strand breaks. Exposure of cells to IR produces DNA double strand breaks, which leads to activation of ATM as well as other unidentified protein kinases that phosphorylate p53 at Ser6 and Ser33 in its N-terminal transactivation domain. ATM directly phosphorylates p53 on Ser15 and induces phosphorylation at Ser9, Ser20, and Ser46 through activation of additional protein kinases, including Chk2. In human lymphoblastoid cells, Thr18 and Ser37 were not phosphorylated in response to IR. Phosphorylation of p53 on Ser15 recruits HATs, including p300/CBP and PCAF, which acetylate Lys320 and Lys382 in the C-terminal domain. Phosphorylation at Ser6, Ser9, and Thr18 helps recruit HATs to p53. Posttranslational modifications also contribute to the stabilization of p53 and its activation as a transcription factor.

To determine which N-terminal phosphorylation site(s) are important for acetylation, we examined mutant p53s in which individual N-terminal phosphorylation sites were changed to Ala by transient transfection of p53-negative H1299 cells with the indicated p53 expression vectors (Fig. 3C). p53 protein levels from each transfection were comparable as shown by staining with the polyclonal, p53-specific antibody Ab-7, and wild-type p53 was acetylated at both sites with or without exposure to IR. Acetylation without IR was not unexpected, since the transfection procedure elicits a strong "stress-like" response in human cells, as reported previously (14, 22). In contrast to wild-type p53, acetylation of Lys382 in the p53 S15A mutant, as well as the L22Q/W23S double mutant, was virtually abrogated, while acetylation of Lys320 was reduced significantly. Acetylation at Lys382 also was significantly reduced by mutations that changed Ser6, Ser9, or Thr18 to Ala. In contrast, changing Ser20, Ser33, Ser37, or Ser46 to Ala had little, if any, effect on acetylation at Lys382. Except for the Ser15 to Ala change, the effects of phosphorylation site mutants on the acetylation of Lys320 were less clear, in part, due to weakness of the Ac-Lys320 signal.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Previous studies showed that phosphorylation of p53 at Ser15 and Ser20 in response to IR is mediated by the ATM protein kinase and that these modifications are important for stabilizing and activating p53 as a transcription factor. We show here, for the first time, that phosphorylation of Ser9 and Ser46 also are dependent on the ATM kinase (Figs. 1 and 4). Phosphorylation of Ser46 was shown to be important for the induction of apoptosis in response to damage caused by exposure of epithelial-derived cell lines to UV light (6, 22), and two protein kinases capable of phosphorylating Ser46, p38 MAPK (22) and HIPK2 (23, 24), both of which are activated after exposure of cells to UV light, have been described. In contrast to UV light, activation of p53 after exposure of epithelial cells to IR primarily induces cell cycle arrest in G1. However, human lymphoid and neuronal cells are much more sensitive to p53-dependent, IR-induced apoptosis, and both p53 and ATM are required for its induction (28, 29). We suggest that in lymphoid cells, activation of ATM in response to DNA double strand breaks mediates activation of an unidentified protein kinase that phosphorylates p53 at Ser46, possibly through recruitment of p53DINP1, the product of a recently identified p53-inducible gene that facilitates p53 phosphorylation at Ser46 in response to IR (30). This protein kinase is unlikely to be p38 MAPK, which phosphorylates Ser46 in response to UV, since PD169316, a p38 kinase-specific inhibitor, failed to block phosphorylation of Ser46 (Fig. 2).

We also found that ATM is required for phosphorylation of p53 at Ser9. We previously reported that Ser6 and Ser9 became strongly phosphorylated in response to both IR- and UV-induced DNA damage and suggested that Ser9 may be phosphorylated by CK1 in response to phosphorylation of Ser6 (13). In vitro CK1 phosphorylates serines and threonines two residues distal to a phosphorylated serine or threonine. The data presented here suggest that in response to IR, phosphorylation of Ser9 may be independent of phosphorylation at Ser6 and dependent upon activation of an unknown protein kinase by ATM. Thus, as for Ser20, the kinase that phosphorylates Ser9 in response to IR is likely to be activated by ATM. We cannot, however, rule out the possibility that recognition of Ser9 by its kinase requires either Ser15 or its phosphorylation.

The functional consequences of phosphorylation at Ser6 and Ser9 are unknown. Changing either serine to alanine had little effect on the ability of chimeric Gal4-p53(1-42) to activate transcription of a reporter in transient transfection assays (4), consistent with a report that these and other N-terminal phosphorylations are not essential for p53 activity (31). However, coupled with our previous results (15) and those of others (4, 27) showing that phosphorylation of Ser15 recruits CBP/p300 to p53, our current data (Fig. 3C) supports a cascade model in which phosphorylation at several N-terminal sites, of which phosphorylation of Ser15 appears to be most important, promotes acetylation at C-terminal sites (Fig. 4). Our data further suggest that the N-terminal region important for regulating p53 interactions with HATs includes the first 18 residues of human p53, since abrogation of phosphorylation by changing Ser20, Ser33, Ser37, and Ser46 to Ala did not affect C-terminal acetylation. While the double mutant L22Q/W23S also blocked C-terminal acetylation as did the equivalent mutations in mouse p53 (32), these changes most likely profoundly affect the structure of the amphipathic helical region (amino acids 17-28) that is likely to be important for interactions with both HATs and MDM2 (33). Thus, phosphorylation of Ser6 and Ser9, along with phosphorylation of Thr18, may serve to amplify a primary signal initiated by the ATM-mediated phosphorylation of Ser15 that is important for recruiting HATs to p53. We note, however, that changing Ser18 of mouse p53, the equivalent of human Ser15, to Ala did not block the acetylation of mouse p53 at Lys317 and Lys379, equivalent to human Lys320 and Lys382, respectively, in ES cells (34). Thus, regulation of p53 acetylation through phosphorylation may not be equivalent in mice and humans.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank K. H. Vousden for the pCB6+p53-22/23 plasmid, M. F. Lavin for the BT and L3 cell lines, and J. Miyazaki and I. Saito for the pCAGGS plasmid.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

These authors were supported in part by a Laboratory Directed Research and Development Grant at the Brookhaven National Laboratory under contract with the United States Department of Energy.

** These authors were supported by grants from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research and the National Cancer Institute of Canada Operating Grant 11053.

Dagger Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Biology Dept., 50 Bell Ave., Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973. Tel.: 631-344-3375; Fax: 631-344-6398; E-mail: cwa@bnl.gov.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 1, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C200093200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: A-T, ataxia telangiectasia; ATM, ataxia telangiectasia mutated; ATR, ATM-related; CBP, CREB-binding protein; HAT, histone acetyltransferase; HDAC, histone deacetylase; HIPK2, homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 2; IR, ionizing radiation; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MDM, mouse double minute; PCAF, p300/CBP-associated factor.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Appella, E., and Anderson, C. W. (2001) Eur. J. Biochem. 268, 2764-2772[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Wahl, G. M., and Carr, A. M. (2001) Nat. Cell Biol. 3, E277-E286[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Buschmann, T., Potapova, O., Bar-Shira, A., Ivanov, V. N., Fuchs, S. Y., Henderson, S., Fried, V. A., Minamoto, T., Alarcon-Vargas, D., Pincus, M. R., Gaarde, W. A., Holbrook, N. J., Shiloh, Y., and Ronai, Z. (2001) Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 2743-2754[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Dumaz, N., and Meek, D. W. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 7002-7010[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Jabbur, J. R., Huang, P., and Zhang, W. (2000) Oncogene 19, 6203-6208[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Oda, K., Arakawa, H., Tanaka, T., Matsuda, K., Tanikawa, C., Mori, T., Nishimori, H., Tamai, K., Tokino, T., Nakamura, Y., and Taya, Y. (2000) Cell 102, 849-862[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Abraham, R. T. (2001) Genes Dev. 15, 2177-2196[Free Full Text]
8. Banin, S., Moyal, L., Shieh, S.-Y., Taya, Y., Anderson, C. W., Chessa, L., Smorodinsky, N. I., Prives, C., Reiss, Y., Shiloh, Y., and Ziv, Y. (1998) Science 281, 1674-1677[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Canman, C. E., Lim, D.-S., Cimprich, K. A., Taya, Y., Tamai, K., Sakaguchi, K., Appella, E., Kastan, M. B., and Siliciano, J. D. (1998) Science 281, 1677-1679[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Chehab, N. H., Malikzay, A., Stavridi, E. S., and Halazonetis, T. D. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 13777-13782[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Hirao, A., Kong, Y.-Y., Matsuoka, S., Wakeham, A., Ruland, J., Yoshida, H., Liu, D., Elledge, S. J., and Mak, T. W. (2000) Science 287, 1824-1827[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Shieh, S.-Y., Taya, Y., and Prives, C. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 1815-1823[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Higashimoto, Y., Saito, S., Tong, X.-H., Hong, A., Sakaguchi, K., Appella, E., and Anderson, C. W. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 23199-23203[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Sakaguchi, K., Saito, S., Higashimoto, Y., Roy, S., Anderson, C. W., and Appella, E. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 9278-9283[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Sakaguchi, K., Herrera, J. E., Saito, S., Miki, T., Bustin, M., Vassilev, A., Anderson, C. W., and Appella, E. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 2831-2841[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Baker, S. J., Markowitz, S., Fearon, E. R., Willson, J. K., and Vogelstein, B. (1990) Science 249, 912-915[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Ludwig, R. L., Bates, S., and Vousden, K. H. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 4952-4960[Abstract]
18. Niwa, H., Yamamura, K.-i., and Miyazaki, J.-i. (1991) Gene (Amst.) 108, 193-199[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Siliciano, J. D., Canman, C. E., Taya, Y., Sakaguchi, K., Appella, E., and Kastan, M. B. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 3471-3481[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Tibbetts, R. S., Brumbaugh, K. M., Williams, J. M., Sarkaria, J. N., Cliby, W. A., Shieh, S.-Y., Taya, Y., Prives, C., and Abraham, R. T. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 152-157[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Chehab, N. H., Malikzay, A., Appel, M., and Halazonetis, T. D. (2000) Genes Dev. 14, 278-288[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Bulavin, D. V., Saito, S., Hollander, M. C., Sakaguchi, K., Anderson, C. W., Appella, E., and Fornace, A. J., Jr. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 6845-6854[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. D'Orazi, G., Cecchinelli, B., Bruno, T., Manni, I., Higashimoto, Y., Saito, S., Gostissa, M., Coen, S., Marchetti, A., Del Sal, G., Piaggio, G., Fanciulli, M., Appella, E., and Soddu, S. (2002) Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 11-19[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Hofmann, T. G., Möller, A., Sirma, H., Zentgraf, H., Taya, Y., Dröge, W., Will, H., and Schmitz, M. L. (2002) Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 1-10[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Sarkaria, J. N., Tibbetts, R. S., Busby, E. C., Kennedy, A. P., Hill, D. E., and Abraham, R. T. (1998) Cancer Res. 58, 4375-4382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Gallagher, T. F., Seibel, G. L., Kassis, S., Laydon, J. T., Blumenthal, M. J., Lee, J. C., Lee, D., Boehm, J. C., Fier-Thompson, S. M., Abt, J. W., Soreson, M. E., Smietana, J. M., Hall, R. F., Garigipati, R. S., Bender, P. E., Erhard, K. F., Krog, A. J., Hofmann, G. A., Sheldrake, P. L., McDonnell, P. C., Kumar, S., Young, P. R., and Adams, J. L. (1997) Bioorg. Med. Chem. 5, 49-64[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Lambert, P. F., Kashanchi, F., Radonovich, M. F., Shiekhattar, R., and Brady, J. N. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 33048-33053[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Karlseder, J., Broccoli, D., Dai, Y., Hardy, S., and de Lange, T. (1999) Science 283, 1321-1325[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Pettitt, A. R., Sherrington, P. D., Stewart, G., Cawley, J. C., Taylor, A. M. R., and Stankovic, T. (2001) Blood 98, 814-822[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Okamura, S., Arakawa, H., Tanaka, T., Nakanishi, H., Ng, C. C., Taya, Y., Monden, M., and Nakamura, Y. (2001) Mol. Cell 8, 85-94[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Ashcroft, M., Kubbutat, M. H. G., and Vousden, K. H. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 1751-1758[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Chao, C., Saito, S., Kang, J., Anderson, C. W., Appella, E., and Xu, Y. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 4967-4975[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Kussie, P. H., Gorina, S., Marechal, V., Elenbaas, B., Moreau, J., Levine, A. J., and Pavletich, N. P. (1996) Science 274, 948-953[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Chao, C., Saito, S., Anderson, C. W., Appella, E., and Xu, Y. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 11936-11941[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Isaacs, J. S., Saito, S., and Neckers, L. M. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 18497-18506[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
G. S. Shadel
Expression and Maintenance of Mitochondrial DNA: New Insights into Human Disease Pathology
Am. J. Pathol., June 1, 2008; 172(6): 1445 - 1456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
A. Kulkarni and K. C. Das
Differential roles of ATR and ATM in p53, Chk1, and histone H2AX phosphorylation in response to hyperoxia: ATR-dependent ATM activation
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): L998 - L1006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Wang, Y. Zhao, L. Li, M. A. McNutt, L. Wu, S. Lu, Y. Yu, W. Zhou, J. Feng, G. Chai, et al.
An ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR) Signaling Pathway and a Phosphorylation-Acetylation Cascade Are Involved in Activation of p53/p21Waf1/Cip1 in Response to 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine Treatment
J. Biol. Chem., February 1, 2008; 283(5): 2564 - 2574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. R. Loehberg, T. Thompson, M. B. Kastan, K. H. Maclean, D. G. Edwards, F. S. Kittrell, D. Medina, O. M. Conneely, and B. W. O'Malley
Ataxia Telangiectasia-Mutated and p53 Are Potential Mediators of Chloroquine-Induced Resistance to Mammary Carcinogenesis
Cancer Res., December 15, 2007; 67(24): 12026 - 12033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. V. Wang, M. Wade, E. Wong, Y.-C. Li, L. W. Rodewald, and G. M. Wahl
Quantitative analyses reveal the importance of regulated Hdmx degradation for P53 activation
PNAS, July 24, 2007; 104(30): 12365 - 12370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
I. Dauth, J. Kruger, and T. G. Hofmann
Homeodomain-Interacting Protein Kinase 2 Is the Ionizing Radiation-Activated p53 Serine 46 Kinase and Is Regulated by ATM
Cancer Res., March 1, 2007; 67(5): 2274 - 2279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y. Kubota, K. Kinoshita, K. Suetomi, A. Fujimori, and S. Takahashi
Mcl-1 Depletion in Apoptosis Elicited by Ionizing Radiation in Peritoneal Resident Macrophages of C3H Mice
J. Immunol., March 1, 2007; 178(5): 2923 - 2931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
Y. Bhuller and P. G. Wells
A Developmental Role for Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated in Protecting the Embryo from Spontaneous and Phenytoin-Enhanced Embryopathies in Culture
Toxicol. Sci., September 1, 2006; 93(1): 156 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
B. Cecchinelli, L. Lavra, C. Rinaldo, S. Iacovelli, A. Gurtner, A. Gasbarri, A. Ulivieri, F. Del Prete, M. Trovato, G. Piaggio, et al.
Repression of the Antiapoptotic Molecule Galectin-3 by Homeodomain-Interacting Protein Kinase 2-Activated p53 Is Required for p53-Induced Apoptosis
Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2006; 26(12): 4746 - 4757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
J. V. Thottassery, L. Westbrook, H. Someya, and W. B. Parker
c-Abl-independent p73 stabilization during gemcitabine- or 4'-thio-{beta}-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine-induced apoptosis in wild-type and p53-null colorectal cancer cells.
Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2006; 5(2): 400 - 410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
A. Tyagi, R. P. Singh, C. Agarwal, S. Siriwardana, R. A. Sclafani, and R. Agarwal
Resveratrol causes Cdc2-tyr15 phosphorylation via ATM/ATR-Chk1/2-Cdc25C pathway as a central mechanism for S phase arrest in human ovarian carcinoma Ovcar-3 cells
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2005; 26(11): 1978 - 1987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. Park, K. Kim, S. B. Rho, K. Choi, D. Kim, S.-H. Oh, J. Park, S.-H. Lee, and J.-H. Lee
Homeobox Msx1 Interacts with p53 Tumor Suppressor and Inhibits Tumor Growth by Inducing Apoptosis
Cancer Res., February 1, 2005; 65(3): 749 - 757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I. A. Stasinopoulos, Y. Mironchik, A. Raman, F. Wildes, P. Winnard Jr., and V. Raman
HOXA5-Twist Interaction Alters p53 Homeostasis in Breast Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., January 21, 2005; 280(3): 2294 - 2299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Med.Home page
J.-L. Perfettini, M. Castedo, R. Nardacci, F. Ciccosanti, P. Boya, T. Roumier, N. Larochette, M. Piacentini, and G. Kroemer
Essential role of p53 phosphorylation by p38 MAPK in apoptosis induction by the HIV-1 envelope
J. Exp. Med., January 18, 2005; 201(2): 279 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. E. Helt, W. A. Cliby, P. C. Keng, R. A. Bambara, and M. A. O'Reilly
Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) and ATM and Rad3-related Protein Exhibit Selective Target Specificities in Response to Different Forms of DNA Damage
J. Biol. Chem., January 14, 2005; 280(2): 1186 - 1192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Thompson, C. Tovar, H. Yang, D. Carvajal, B. T. Vu, Q. Xu, G. M. Wahl, D. C. Heimbrook, and L. T. Vassilev
Phosphorylation of p53 on Key Serines Is Dispensable for Transcriptional Activation and Apoptosis
J. Biol. Chem., December 17, 2004; 279(51): 53015 - 53022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. U. Kurz, P. Douglas, and S. P. Lees-Miller
Doxorubicin Activates ATM-dependent Phosphorylation of Multiple Downstream Targets in Part through the Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species
J. Biol. Chem., December 17, 2004; 279(51): 53272 - 53281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
S. Caporali, S. Falcinelli, G. Starace, M. T. Russo, E. Bonmassar, J. Jiricny, and S. D'Atri
DNA Damage Induced by Temozolomide Signals to both ATM and ATR: Role of the Mismatch Repair System
Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2004; 66(3): 478 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
H. R. McMurray and D. J. McCance
Degradation of p53, Not Telomerase Activation, by E6 Is Required for Bypass of Crisis and Immortalization by Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E6/E7
J. Virol., June 1, 2004; 78(11): 5698 - 5706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
W. Y. Siu, A. Lau, T. Arooz, J. P.H. Chow, H. T.B. Ho, and R. Y.C. Poon
Topoisomerase poisons differentially activate DNA damage checkpoints through ataxia-telangiectasia mutated-dependent and -independent mechanisms
Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2004; 3(5): 621 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
H. K. Sluss, H. Armata, J. Gallant, and S. N.