|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M200818200 on January 30, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 15, 12906-12914, April 12, 2002
The Erbin PDZ Domain Binds with High Affinity and Specificity to
the Carboxyl Termini of -Catenin and ARVCF*
Richard P.
Laura ,
Andrea S.
Witt§,
Heike A.
Held¶,
Resi
Gerstner¶,
Kurt
Deshayes¶,
Michael F. T.
Koehler¶,
Kenneth S.
Kosik§,
Sachdev S.
Sidhu¶ , and
Laurence A.
Lasky **
From the Departments of Molecular Oncology and
¶ Protein Engineering, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco,
California 94080 and the § Department of Neurology, Center
for Neurologic Disease, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard
Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Received for publication, January 25, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Erbin is a recently described member of the LAP
(leucine-rich repeat and PDZ
domain) protein family. We used a C-terminally displayed phage peptide
library to identify optimal ligands for the Erbin PDZ domain.
Phage-selected peptides were type 1 PDZ ligands that bound with high
affinity and specificity to the Erbin PDZ domain in vitro.
These peptides most closely resembled the C-terminal PDZ domain-binding
motifs of three p120-related catenins: -catenin, ARVCF, and p0071
(DSWV-COOH). Analysis of the interactions of the Erbin PDZ domain with
synthetic peptides matching the C termini of ARVCF or -catenin also
demonstrated specific high affinity binding. We characterized the
interactions between the Erbin PDZ domain and both ARVCF and
-catenin in vitro and in vivo. The Erbin PDZ
domain co-localized and coprecipitated with ARVCF or -catenin
complexed with -catenin and E/N-cadherin. Mutagenesis and peptide
competition experiments showed that the association of Erbin with the
cadherin-catenin complex was mediated by the interaction of its PDZ
domain with the C-terminal PDZ domain-binding motifs (DSWV-COOH) of
ARVCF and -catenin. Finally, we showed that endogenous -catenin
and Erbin co-localized in and co-immunoprecipitated from neurons. These
results suggest that -catenin and ARVCF may function to mediate the
association of Erbin with the junctional cadherin-catenin complex. They
also demonstrate that C-terminal phage-display technology can be used
to predict physiologically relevant ligands for PDZ domains.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
PDZ1 domains are
80-100-amino acid compact globular motifs that are usually embedded in
larger multidomain scaffolding proteins (1-3). PDZ domains
predominantly mediate protein/protein interactions by recognizing the C
termini of various intracellular and cell-surface proteins. Type 1 PDZ
domains interact with the C-terminal consensus sequence
X(S/T)X(V/I/L)-COOH, whereas type 2 domains bind
to the C-terminal consensus sequence
X-hydrophobe-X-hydrophobe-COOH (3-5). Structural analyses
of peptides bound to PDZ domains suggest necessary interactions at both
positions 0 and 2 (6-8). However, among type 1 PDZ ligands,
these residues are relatively invariant, indicating that other residues
within the C terminus likely contribute to the specificity of PDZ
domain/ligand interactions (3). For example, two previous studies
(9-11), as well as those presented here, demonstrated the importance
of residues 1 and 3 for binding specificity and affinity for some
PDZ domain/ligand interactions.
Genetic evidence supports a role for several families of PDZ
domain-containing proteins as scaffolding molecules that target signaling complexes to various subcellular locations. For example, the
multi-PDZ domain protein INAD was found to assemble components of the
Drosophila visual transduction system to allow for efficient signaling in response to light (12, 13). Another study in the nematode
Caenorhabditis elegans demonstrated that the basolateral localization of the LET-23 receptor tyrosine kinase is dependent upon
direct binding to the PDZ domain of LIN7 (14, 15). Mutations that
disrupt this interaction cause the mislocalization of the LET-23
receptor tyrosine kinase and a subsequent loss of LET-23 signal
transduction activity. Together with a variety of other studies, these
data suggest that a major function of the PDZ domains embedded within
scaffolding proteins is to assemble signaling complexes at specific
subcellular locations.
Erbin is a recently described member of the LAP protein family (16).
LET-413, the ortholog most closely related to human Erbin (and human
Densin-180) in the C. elegans genome, is a basolateral protein that plays a critical role in the polarization of adherens junctions. Specifically, loss of LET-413 expression causes a failure in
apically directed compaction of the adherens junction during epidermal
cell maturation and results in defective cell/cell adhesion (17, 18).
HER2 is an epidermal growth factor receptor-related tyrosine kinase
that is amplified in a high percentage of metastatic breast tumors and
is a causal factor in the development of some breast cancers (19). HER2
is found on the basolateral membrane of epithelial cells and has a
putative PDZ domain-binding motif at its C terminus that is required
for this localization (16). Analogous to the LET-23 receptor tyrosine
kinase described above, deletion of the HER2 PDZ domain-binding motif
results in the aberrant accumulation of HER2 on the apical plasma
membrane, presumably due to an inability to interact with a PDZ
domain-containing protein necessary for its targeting to or retention
at the basolateral membrane (16). Erbin has been reported as the
protein that mediates basolateral localization of the HER2 receptor
through direct binding of its single PDZ domain to the HER2 C terminus
(16).
Because of the potential therapeutic value of disrupting HER2
basolateral targeting, we initially set out to identify peptide ligands
for the Erbin PDZ domain that could block its interaction with the HER2
C terminus. To do this, we used a recently described phage system that
displays a highly diverse and random assortment of short peptides fused
to the C terminus of the M13 gene-8 major coat protein (9). Using two
PDZ domains from the protein MAGI-3, it was previously demonstrated
that this system could be utilized to obtain high affinity peptides
that resemble either type 1 or 2 PDZ domain-binding motifs, depending
on the PDZ domain used for selection. We used this system to isolate
peptides that bind optimally to the Erbin PDZ domain. Surprisingly,
analysis of the Erbin PDZ domain-binding peptides revealed that
they more closely resembled the C termini of three p120-like
catenins ( -catenin, ARVCF, and p0071) than the C terminus of HER2
(20). Subsequent biochemical and cell biological studies focusing on
-catenin and ARVCF demonstrated that the interaction with Erbin is
of high affinity and specificity. Together, these results suggest that -catenin and ARVCF bind to the Erbin PDZ domain in
vivo.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Isolation of Erbin PDZ Domain-binding Peptides
A previously described library of random heptapeptides fused to
the C terminus of the M13 gene-8 major coat protein was cycled through
rounds of binding selections with a bacterially expressed GST-Erbin PDZ
domain fusion protein coated on 96-well Maxisorp immunoplates (NUNC) as
the capture target. Phage were propagated in Escherichia
coli XL1-Blue (Stratagene) in medium supplemented with M13-VCS
helper phage (Stratagene) to facilitate phage production and 10 µM isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranoside
to induce expression of the library. After three rounds of selection,
individual phage were isolated and analyzed in a phage ELISA (21).
Phage that bound to the GST-Erbin PDZ domain fusion protein, but not to
a control GST fusion protein, were subjected to DNA sequence analysis.
Binding Assays
The binding affinities of peptides for the Erbin PDZ domain were
determined as IC50 values using a previously described
competition ELISA (9). The IC50 value was defined as the
concentration of peptide that blocked 50% of PDZ domain binding to
immobilized peptide. Assay plates were prepared by immobilizing an
N-terminally biotinylated peptide (TGWETWV-COOH) on Maxisorp plates
coated with neutravidin (Pierce) and blocked with bovine serum albumin (Sigma). A fixed concentration of the GST-Erbin PDZ domain fusion protein (50 nM) in PBT buffer (PBS containing 0.5% bovine
serum albumin and 0.1% Tween 20 (Sigma)) was preincubated for 3 h
with serial dilutions of peptide and then transferred to the assay plates. After a 15-min incubation, the plates were washed with PBS
containing 0.05% Tween 20, incubated with a mixture of anti-GST antibody (0.5 µg/ml; Zymed Laboratories Inc.) and
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG antibody
(1:2000 dilution; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.) in PBT
buffer, washed again, and detected with
3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine/H2O2 peroxidase substrate (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories Inc.)
Data Base Search of Protein C Termini
A motif-searching algorithm was used to identify proteins with C
termini that resemble the phage-displayed peptides selected for binding
to the Erbin PDZ domain. Alignment of phage-derived peptides
established a clear consensus sequence of (D/E)(T/S)WV-COOH as the
preferred motif for tight binding to the Erbin PDZ domain. We used this
consensus sequence to search the Dayhoff Database, restricting our
search criteria to the C-terminal residues of proteins within the data
base. Using these criteria, we identified 25 proteins that end with
this C-terminal motif. Non-vertebrate proteins as well as one
extracellular protein (PDZ domains are cytoplasmic) were manually
filtered out, leaving a total of 18 sequences that fit our criteria. Of
these, several are orthologs or simply separate
GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank entries of the same gene product.
Final examination of the 18 sequences indicated that three unique
intracellular gene products were represented: -catenin, ARVCF, and
p0071 (plakophilin-4). These three proteins are all members of the
Armadillo family of proteins, which, based on their four C-terminal
residues, are candidate in vivo ligands for the Erbin PDZ domain.
Plasmids and Constructs
Mammalian--
Expression constructs containing the six
individual PDZ domains of MAGI-3 were constructed by PCR cloning using
a full-length cDNA of human MAGI-3 (22) cloned into the
pcDNA3.1V5/His-TOPO cloning vector (Invitrogen) as the template.
The PDZ1 (amino acids 417-535), PDZ2 (amino acids 584-707), PDZ3
(amino acids 741-840), and PDZ4 (amino acids 870-976) domains were
cloned into the BamHI/NotI sites of pEBG,
creating fusions with the C terminus of GST. Regions of MAGI-3
containing the PDZ0 (amino acids 1-406) and PDZ5 (amino acids
980-1150) domains were cloned into the
HindIII/SalI sites of pEGFP-N3
(CLONTECH), creating fusions with the N terminus of EGFP. The PDZ domain of human Erbin (amino acids 1273-1371,
corresponding to GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank accession number
AF263744) was amplified from expressed sequence tag AA992250 and cloned
into three different vectors: 1) the pcDNA3.1NT/GFP-TOPO TA cloning
vector (Invitrogen), creating a fusion with the C terminus of GFP; 2)
the XhoI/SacII sites of pDsRed1-N1
(CLONTECH), creating a fusion with the N terminus of RFP; and 3) the BamHI/NotI sites of pEBG,
creating a fusion with the C terminus of GST. Human HER2 was cloned
into pRK, and this construct has been previously described (23). Human
-catenin and -catenin c6, a form of -catenin missing the
C-terminal six amino acid residues, were PCR-cloned into pEGFP-C1
(CLONTECH), creating fusions with the C terminus of
EGFP. A proteolytically stable mutant form of -catenin (24) was
cloned into pEGFP-C1, creating a fusion with the C terminus of EGFP.
Human ARVCF cloned into the pcDNA3.1 vector (Invitrogen) has been
described (25) and was a gift from the laboratory of Dr. Albert
Reynolds. Full-length Myc-tagged Erbin has been described (26) and was
a gift from the laboratory of Dr. Lin Mei.
Prokaryotic--
The Erbin PDZ domain (amino acids 1217-1371)
or the MAGI-3 PDZ2 domain (amino acids 584-707) were cloned into the
EcoRI/NotI or BamHI/NotI
sites of the E. coli expression vectors pGEX6P-1 and
pGEX4T-3 (Amersham Biosciences), respectively. The PDZ domain of human
Densin-180 (amino acids 1424-1537, corresponding to
GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank accession number AF434715) was
cloned into the BamHI/NotI sites of pGEX.
Expression and affinity purification of E. coli
cell-expressed GST proteins (Amersham Biosciences) were carried out as
recommended by the manufacturer.
Protein Extracts
HEK 293 and Caco-2 cells were grown in high glucose Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium, 10% fetal calf serum, 1× nonessential amino
acid supplement, 1× L-glutamine supplement, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), and penicillin/streptomycin
(Invitrogen). For heterologous expression of proteins, HEK 293 cells
were grown to ~70% confluence and transfected with DNA using FuGENE
6 reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Transfected cells
(20-36 h) were rinsed with PBS, scraped into 1 ml/10-cm dish of
homogenization buffer (20 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 1% Triton
X-100, 125 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and protease inhibitor mixture with EDTA (Roche Molecular Biochemicals)), incubated on ice for 10 min, triturated five times, and clarified by
centrifugation for 10 min at 12,000 rpm in a refrigerated Eppendorf tabletop centrifuge. Protein concentrations in the clarified extracts were determined using BCA reagents (Pierce) and then normalized for all
transfectants by addition of homogenization buffer. Extracts were
snap-frozen as aliquots in a dry ice/ethanol bath and stored at
80 °C until used. Caco-2 extracts were prepared from cells grown
for 10 days post-confluence. Cells from each 10-cm dish were
homogenized with five strokes of a Dounce with a loose pestle (Wheaton)
in 1 ml of homogenization buffer, and subsequent extracts were then
prepared and stored exactly as described for HEK 293 cells. For brain
extracts, mouse brain neocortices were dissected and homogenized in
homogenization buffer using 5 ml of buffer/g of tissue. Lysates
were precleared at 13,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C.
Protein concentrations in the clarified extracts were determined using
BCA reagents. Extracts were snap-frozen as aliquots in a dry
ice/ethanol bath and stored at 80 °C until used.
Peptide and GST Pull-down Assays and Immunoprecipitations
For peptide pull-down experiments with individually expressed
PDZ domains (see Fig. 1), 50-100 µl of HEK 293 cell extract was
diluted to 400 µl with homogenization buffer and incubated with 10 µM N-terminally biotinylated peptide and 100 µl of
streptavidin-agarose (Sigma) for 2 h on a rotator at 4 °C. The
beads were washed three times with 1 ml of binding buffer and boiled in
60 µl of Laemmli reducing sample buffer, 15 µl of which was loaded
onto SDS gels along with 10 µl of diluted extract for immunoblot
analysis. Peptide pull-down experiments with Caco-2 cell extracts were
slightly modified such that 700 µl of undiluted protein extract and
150 µl of streptavidin-agarose beads were used for these experiments.
For GST pull-down experiments with HEK 293 cell-expressed -catenin,
-catenin c6, ARVCF, -catenin, and HER2, 100 µl of extract
was diluted to 800 µl in homogenization buffer and re-clarified by
centrifugation. The diluted extracts were then incubated with 3 µg of
E. coli cell-expressed GST fusion protein plus 35 µl of glutathione-Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences) for 2 h on a rotator at 4 °C. Beads were washed three times, and bound proteins were detected by immunoblot analysis. For GST pull-down assays of brain, 1 mg of total brain extract was diluted to a final concentration of 1 mg/ml with homogenization buffer and then re-clarified by centrifugation. Using 800 µl of the diluted clarified extract, GST
pull-down assays were carried out exactly as described for HEK 293 cell
extracts. For coprecipitation and co-immunoprecipitation experiments
(see Fig. 2), cotransfected HEK 293 cells were solubilized in 1 ml of
homogenization buffer/10-cm dish, and clarified extracts were obtained
as described above. 800 µl of fresh undiluted extract was then mixed
with 35 µl of glutathione-Sepharose for coprecipitation or with 5 µg of anti-Myc monoclonal antibody + 30 µl of protein A/G-Sepharose
(Pierce) for co-immunoprecipitation and incubated for 2 h at
4 °C on a wheel. The beads were washed three times with 1 ml of
homogenization buffer, and precipitated proteins were detected by immunoblotting.
To test whether Erbin PDZ domain-binding peptides could block in
vivo coprecipitations, cotransfected cells were incubated with
peptides for either 6 h (Antennapedia-coupled peptides) or 24 h (fluorescein-coupled peptides) prior to cell harvest. The Antennapedia peptide (CRQIKIWFQNRRMKWKK) was disulfide-linked to a
cysteine residue located at the N terminus of either a high affinity
phage-derived peptide (CTGWETWV) or a cognate Val-to-Ala substituted
negative control peptide (CTGWETWA). Entry into the reducing
intracellular environment results in cleavage of the disulfide bond,
thus releasing the free PDZ domain-binding peptide in the cytoplasm.
For co-immunoprecipitations from brain, brain extracts were thawed,
diluted to 1 mg/ml in homogenization buffer, centrifuged, and
pre-absorbed against normal mouse IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) bound
to protein A/G-Sepharose for 1 h on a rotating wheel. The pre-clarified brain extracts (0.5 ml) were then immunoprecipitated with
5 µg of the indicated monoclonal antibody and 20 µl of protein A/G-Sepharose. Immunoprecipitated protein-antibody complexes were eluted from the beads by boiling for 5 min in the presence of 30 µl
of 2× Laemmli sample buffer. 15 µl of the immunoprecipitated samples
and 20 µl of both pre- and post-immunoprecipitation extracts were
loaded onto 6% Tris/glycine-acrylamide gels and transferred to
nitrocellulose for immunoblot analysis. For peptide-blocking experiments, the only modification was that, prior to
immunoprecipitations, clarified extracts were preincubated with
peptides for 2 h on ice.
Co-localization in Transfected HEK 293 Cells
HEK 293 cells were grown to 70% confluence on collagen
IV-coated coverslips and then transfected with the indicated DNA
constructs using FuGENE 6 reagent. 24 h post-transfection, the
cells were washed with PBS, fixed for 30 min in 2.5% formaldehyde,
permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X-100 in PBS, and blocked with 5%
donkey serum. The Erbin PDZ domain and -catenin constructs were RFP
and EGFP fusions, respectively; and thus, they could be directly
visualized. ARVCF and HER2 were visualized by staining cells with
antibodies directed against these proteins and with fluorescein-coupled
anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories,
Inc.). Coverslips were mounted on slides using Vectashield mounting
medium with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Vector Labs, Inc.) and sealed with rubber cement. Images were taken on a Zeiss Axiophot fluorescence microscope attached to a digital CCD camera with a ×63 oil immersion objective using SPOT imaging software (Research Diagnostics Inc.).
Immunostaining of Brain Cortex and Cultured Hippocampal
Neurons
Hippocampal neurons were dissected from the cortices of
embryonic day 18 rats (Taconic Farms Inc.), dissociated, and plated onto poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips in neurobasal medium
supplemented with 2 mM glutamine and vitamin
B27 supplements (Invitrogen). After 3 weeks in culture,
neurons were fixed for 15 min in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4),
washed with PBS, and permeabilized using 0.25% Triton X-100 in PBS.
Nonspecific sites were blocked with 10% goat serum diluted in 0.025%
Triton X-100 in PBS. Primary antibodies were diluted to a final
concentration of 2 µg/ml for Erbin and 2.5 µg/ml for -catenin in
1% goat serum and 0.025% Triton X-100 in PBS. The neurons were
incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4 °C and then washed
three times with PBS before being placed with Alexa 594-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit antibody (Molecular Probes, Inc.) diluted to a final
concentration of 4 µg/ml in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. The
neurons were washed again three times with PBS and incubated with Alexa
484-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody diluted to a final
concentration of 4 µg/ml in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. The
coverslips were washed twice with PBS, followed by a 5-min wash with
Sörenson's phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) to rinse off excess salt.
Finally, the coverslips were mounted on microscope slides using an
aqueous mounting solution supplemented with antifade reagents
(Gel/Mount, Biomeda). Images were acquired using a Zeiss
Axiovert S100 microscope with a ×100 objective coupled to a Bio-Rad
MRC1024 confocal laser scanning unit equipped with a krypton/argon
lamp. Any pixel labeled with an emitted fluorescent signal of intensity
>130 units/pixel in both the red and green channels was considered to
be a region of protein co-localization.
Female adult Sprague-Dawley rats (Taconic Farms Inc.) were anesthetized
with an intraperitoneal injection of 3% chloral hydrate solution (3.5 mg/10 g of body weight) and transcardially perfused using an ice-cold
fix solution composed of 4% paraformaldehyde and 7% picric
acid in 0.1 M Sörenson's phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The cerebellum and cortex were removed and post-fixed for 2 h in
the fix solution at 4 °C and then transferred overnight to a
solution of 30% sucrose and 0.1 M Sörenson's
phosphate buffer at 4 °C. 30-µm-thick coronal sections were cut
using a freezing microtome. Free floating sections were rinsed with 0.1 M PBS and blocked with 1% normal goat serum (Vector Labs,
Inc.) and 0.02% Triton X-100 in PBS for 1 h at room temperature.
The sections were then incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary
antibody diluted in 1% normal goat serum and 0.02% Triton X-100 in
PBS. Anti-Erbin and anti- -catenin antibodies were diluted to 2 and
2.5 µg/ml final concentrations, respectively. Sections were washed
three times with PBS and then incubated for 1 h with Alexa
594-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody diluted to a 4 µg/ml final
concentration in 1% normal goat serum in PBS. Excess antibody was
removed by three washes with PBS. The sections were then incubated with
Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody diluted to a final
concentration of 4 µg/ml in 1% normal goat serum in PBS. Finally,
the sections were washed twice with PBS and once with 0.1 M
Sörenson's phosphate buffer before being mounted onto positively
charged slides (ProbeOn Plus, Fisher). The sections were imaged as
described above.
Antibodies
Anti-Erbin antibodies were obtained from rabbits injected with
residues 1217-1371 of this protein fused to GST. Antibodies were
affinity-purified against the antigen immobilized on cyanogen bromide-activated Sepharose. From this purified pool of antibodies reactive against both GST and Erbin, the GST-reactive antibodies were
completely depleted against similarly immobilized GST-Sepharose, creating pure pools of antibodies against either Erbin or GST. Monoclonal antibodies against -catenin, p120 catenin,
-catenin, and -catenin were from BD Transduction Labs. Rabbit
anti-GFP antibody was from CLONTECH. Rabbit
anti-HER2 antibody was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Rabbit
anti-LIN7-3 antibody (Velis-3) and monoclonal antibodies against
N-cadherin or E-cadherin (HECD-1) were from Zymed
Laboratories Inc. Anti-ARVCF antibodies were a gracious
gift from the laboratory of Dr. Albert Reynolds.
 |
RESULTS |
Peptides Selected for Binding to the Erbin PDZ Domain Identify
p120-like Catenins as Candidate Protein Ligands--
Previously
described C-terminally displayed phage peptide libraries (9) were
utilized to select peptides that bound with high affinity to a
bacterially expressed protein consisting of the PDZ domain of Erbin
fused to GST. Phage particles that bound to the Erbin PDZ domain were
isolated, and the sequences of the displayed C-terminal peptides were
examined. A clear consensus sequence was present in the phage-selected
peptides (Table I). As has been found
with virtually all previously examined ligands for type 1 PDZ domains
(3), the C-terminal residue (position 0) was found to be hydrophobic.
The Erbin PDZ domain specifically favored Val over Ile and Leu, which
are also commonly found at this position. The residue selected at
position 1 was exclusively Trp. Position 2 was observed to be
either Thr or Ser, with a rare Val residue selected. Because of the
preponderance of Thr or Ser at this position, the Erbin PDZ domain
appears to be a type 1 domain. A strong consensus for an acidic residue
(Glu or Asp) was observed at position 3. A more variable consensus
was found at position 4, where many of the selected peptides
contained a hydrophobic or aromatic residue. No obvious consensus
was detectable at position 5 or 6.
Comparison of the selected consensus sequence ((DE)(T/S)WV-COOH) with
the C-terminal sequence of HER2 and all C-terminal sequences in the
current Human Genome Database revealed that the Erbin PDZ domain may
bind to multiple proteins (Table I). Interestingly, the only human
protein C termini that match this consensus sequence belong to a set of
three related proteins in the p120 catenin family (which all terminate
with the sequence DSWV-COOH) (20). In contrast, examination of the HER2
C terminus revealed some conservation with the phage-selected peptides,
but also some significant differences. Val at position 2 is notable
because this would be the type of residue preferred by a type 2 PDZ
domain, whereas the Erbin PDZ domain, based upon conservation of
His1347 and phage-selected peptide sequences, appears to be
a type 1 PDZ domain. Nonetheless, Val at position 2 was present in a
single phage-selected peptide, suggesting that binding of a type 2 ligand is possible, although not preferred. The HER2 C terminus also has Pro at position 1, whereas all phage-selected peptides against the Erbin PDZ domain as well as the C termini of the three p120-like catenins have Trp at this position. Together, these results suggest that the Erbin PDZ domain may bind most optimally to the p120-like catenins -catenin, ARVCF, and p0071.
To quantify the interactions between the Erbin PDZ domain and various
peptides, we used an ELISA designed to measure the intrinsic binding
affinities between the Erbin PDZ domain and peptides free in solution.
We (9) and others (3, 27) feel that this type of analysis more
accurately reflects the true binding affinities of PDZ ligands because
the peptides in solution are monomeric; and thus, the assay is free
from artifacts due to avidity effects that can arise with immobilized
ligands. Table II illustrates that the
affinities of the phage-selected peptides are relatively high, with the
sequence TGWETWV-COOH binding at submicromolar levels (IC50 ~ 0.6 µM). Peptides derived from the C termini of ARVCF
(QPVDSWV-COOH) or -catenin (ASPDSWV-COOH) bound the Erbin PDZ domain
with affinities in the low micromolar range (Table II). Although these
affinities are lower than that of the phage-optimized peptide, they are
much higher than the affinities measured for the PDZ domain-binding
C-terminal motifs of HER2 (EYLGLDVPV-COOH) and -catenin
(AWFDTDL-COOH) (Table II).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
IC50 values for PDZ domain-binding synthetic peptides
The IC50 values are the concentrations of peptide that blocked
50% of PDZ domain binding to immobilized peptide in an ELISA. Peptides
were synthesized with acylated N termini.
|
|
It is apparent that deviations from the optimal consensus-binding
sequence for the Erbin PDZ domain result in reduced ligand affinity.
Even within the allowable residues at each position as defined by the
phage display, there is likely a rank order of preference. For example,
the substitution of Asp for Glu at position 3 reduced peptide
affinity by ~5-fold (compare TGWDTWV with TGWETWV in Table II), even
though Glu and Asp are both well represented among the phage selectants
(Table I). Larger deviations from the consensus sequence resulted in
correspondingly larger reductions in affinity, as evidenced by the
effects of substitutions at position 1, where replacement of the
highly conserved Trp with either Phe (the most similar natural amino
acid) or Ala led to very large decreases in affinity (Table II). Thus,
ARVCF and -catenin bind the Erbin PDZ domain with affinities close
to those of optimal phage-derived ligands because their C-terminal
sequences almost perfectly match the phage-derived consensus-binding
motif. In contrast, both HER2 and -catenin exhibit significant
mismatches when their C termini are compared with the high affinity
consensus sequence (especially at position 1); and consequently, the
C termini of these proteins exhibit extremely low affinities for the
Erbin PDZ domain. Taken together, these results suggest that, based
solely on their C-terminal sequences, ARVCF and -catenin (and likely
p0071) are high affinity ligands for the Erbin PDZ domain.
-Catenin and ARVCF Bind Strongly and Specifically to the Erbin
PDZ Domain--
To examine whether a short C-terminal peptide is
sufficient to interact with the Erbin PDZ domain, we investigated the
ability of these fragments to precipitate fusion proteins containing
the PDZ motif. Previously, we used the second PDZ domain of MAGI-3 as a
target for C-terminal phage display and obtained the high affinity
ligand ATQITWV-COOH (9, 22). We examined the specificity of this
peptide as well as that of the Erbin-binding peptide (TGWETWV-COOH) in
coprecipitation experiments using all six PDZ domains from the MAGI-3
protein (22) as well as the Erbin PDZ domain. Fig. 1A illustrates that each
biotinylated peptide interacted specifically and exclusively with the
PDZ domain against which it was selected. Thus, the ATQITWV-COOH
peptide precipitated only the MAGI-3 PDZ2 domain, whereas the
TGWETWV-COOH peptide precipitated only the Erbin PDZ domain. We noted
that the two phage-selected peptides were identical at three of the
four most critical residues for PDZ binding; and yet, in both the ELISA
(Table II) and the pull-down assay, the peptide selected for binding to
the MAGI-3 PDZ2 domain bound poorly to the Erbin PDZ domain. Therefore,
we examined whether the glutamate residue at position 3 of the Erbin
PDZ domain-selected peptide would confer Erbin PDZ domain-binding
specificity on the MAGI-3 PDZ2 domain-selected peptide. We synthesized
a peptide (ATQETWV-COOH) by substituting Ile at position 3 of the
MAGI-3 PDZ2 domain-selected peptide for Glu found in the Erbin PDZ
domain-selected peptide. Fig. 1A shows that the new peptide
interacted well with the Erbin PDZ domain, but not with the MAGI-3 PDZ2
domain, demonstrating the importance of residue 3 in binding
discrimination. These results are also consistent with analysis of
phage-selected peptides against the Erbin PDZ domain, which showed that
the last four residues are most invariant. However, the phage
selections also suggested some preference for a hydrophobic amino acid
at position 4 in Erbin PDZ domain-binding peptides. Clearly, the
contribution of the side chain at position 4 is small relative to the
combined contributions of the side chains at positions 0 through 3,
and this contribution did not register in the in vitro
pull-down assay. Finally, we used these peptides to show that the
Ile-to-Glu change is sufficient for discriminate precipitation of
endogenous Erbin, but not the single PDZ domain-containing protein
LIN7-3 (Velis-3), from Caco-2 cell lysates (Fig. 1B).

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Phage-selected peptides bind specifically to
the Erbin PDZ domain in vitro, as do protein ligands
predicted from their consensus sequences. A, the Erbin
PDZ domain and six control PDZ domains were expressed in HEK 293 cells
as GFP (indicated by asterisks) or GST fusions, and extracts
were made from each. Biotinylated versions of peptides phage-selected
for high affinity binding to either the MAGI-3 PDZ2 domain
(ATQITWV-COOH) or the Erbin PDZ domain (TGWETWV-COOH) were tested for
their ability to precipitate the various PDZ domains. Each peptide
specifically precipitated only the PDZ domain against which it was
selected. A single substitution of Glu for Ile at position 3 of the
MAGI-3 PDZ2 domain-specific peptide produced a peptide (ATQETWV-COOH)
that no longer precipitated the MAGI-3 PDZ2 domain, but specifically
precipitated only the Erbin PDZ domain (right lane). Peptide
concentrations were 10 µM, and readout was by
immunoblotting with either anti-GFP or anti-GST antibodies.
B, the indicated peptides (10 µM) were assayed
for their ability to precipitate Erbin from Caco-2 cell extracts.
Immunoblot (IB) analysis with the indicated antibodies
showed that Erbin was precipitated with a peptide ending in ETWV, but
not ITWV. Similar to Erbin, LIN7-3 has a single PDZ domain, but was not
precipitated by either peptide. C, potential protein ligands
for the Erbin PDZ domain were expressed in HEK 293 cells and assayed
for their ability to be precipitated by 3 µg of E. coli
cell-expressed GST-Erbin PDZ domain fusion protein. The expressed
proteins were as follows: ARVCF and -catenin ( -cat),
the previously reported putative Erbin PDZ ligand HER2, and the
negative controls -catenin c6 and -catenin. For immunoblot
analysis with the indicated antibodies, 1% of the precipitated
extracts or 30% of the precipitated protein was used. D,
precipitation of -catenin or HER2 by 6 µg of E. coli
cell-expressed GST-Erbin PDZ domain fusion protein could be efficiently
blocked by co-incubation with a phage-selected peptide (TGWETWV-COOH)
that binds the Erbin PDZ domain with high affinity, but not by a
control peptide (ATQITWV-COOH). Note that 1 µM peptide
was approximately a 3-fold molar excess over the Erbin PDZ domain.
Immunoblot analysis showed the relative amounts of -catenin or HER2
precipitated by the GST-Erbin PDZ domain fusion protein in the absence
or presence of varying concentrations of the indicated peptide.
|
|
Pull-down experiments using a bacterially produced GST fusion of the
Erbin PDZ domain were performed to determine whether full-length ARVCF
and -catenin are in fact high affinity ligands for the Erbin PDZ
domain, as suggested by the peptide binding studies. Fig. 1C
illustrates that -catenin and ARVCF were efficiently precipitated
when incubated with the GST-Erbin PDZ domain fusion. The role of the C
terminus in the -catenin interaction was demonstrated by the
observation that a mutant form of -catenin lacking the C-terminal
six amino acids was unable to bind to the Erbin PDZ domain. Fig.
1C also illustrates that neither HER2 nor -catenin was
efficiently precipitated from transfected cell extracts by the
GST-Erbin PDZ domain fusion protein, although we were able to detect a
small amount of HER2 in the precipitate. These data suggest that, as
predicted from the peptide affinity measurements in Table II,
-catenin and ARVCF bind much more tightly to the Erbin PDZ domain
than do HER2 and -catenin.
An interaction between HER2 and the Erbin PDZ domain has been
previously reported (16), and the slight HER2 precipitate observed in
Fig. 1C suggested that this interaction resulted from the
binding of the HER2 C terminus to the peptide-binding site of the Erbin
PDZ domain. Thus, we used competition assays to determine whether
-catenin and HER2 bind to the same site on the Erbin PDZ domain as
do the phage-selected peptides. Fig. 1D illustrates that a
phage-selected peptide was able to effectively compete with the
interactions between the Erbin PDZ domain and -catenin or HER2,
suggesting that both proteins interact with the peptide-binding site of
the Erbin PDZ domain. As expected from the affinity measurements, the
interaction between -catenin and the Erbin PDZ domain appears to be
stronger than that between HER2 and the Erbin PDZ domain. Interestingly, the peptide (ATQITWV-COOH) that bound to the MAGI-3 PDZ2
domain and that shares three residues with the Erbin PDZ domain-binding
peptide (TGWETWV-COOH) was completely ineffective at competing the
-catenin interaction, but it showed a significant level of
competition with the HER2 interaction, suggesting that other low
affinity (see Table II) interactions may also occur with the
peptide-binding site of the Erbin PDZ domain.
-Catenin and ARVCF Interact with Erbin in Transfected
Cells--
Membrane localization of p120-like catenins is reportedly
mediated by an interaction between their Armadillo repeats and the juxtamembrane region of cadherin adhesion proteins (28). Previous reports demonstrated that -catenin associates with the cell surface at points of cell/cell contact when expressed heterologously (29). In
contrast, the Erbin PDZ domain has a diffuse cytoplasmic localization when expressed alone in HEK 293 cells (Fig.
2A). Fig. 2B
illustrates that, when coexpressed, the Erbin PDZ domain and
-catenin completely co-localized, resulting from the recruitment of
the Erbin PDZ domain to the cell junction. The co-localization was
observed in all coexpressing cells in several transfection experiments. Importantly, although a C-terminal six-amino acid truncation of -catenin ( c6) still associated normally with the cell junction, the deletion resulted in a large decrease in the amount of the Erbin
PDZ domain recruited to the cell junction (Fig. 2C). In fact, no co-localization was observed in ~90% of cells coexpressing -catenin c6 and the Erbin PDZ domain. Partial co-localization (as
in Fig. 2C) was observed only in cells expressing the
highest levels of -catenin c6 and the Erbin PDZ domain.
Nonetheless, the observed partial co-localization in some cells may
suggest that there is an additional weak interaction between the Erbin PDZ domain and -catenin that is independent of the C-terminal six
amino acids of -catenin. Whether or not this is true, an intact C
terminus was absolutely required for coprecipitation of -catenin
with the Erbin PDZ domain in pull-down assays (Fig. 1A).

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
-Catenin and ARVCF form a
stable complex with the Erbin PDZ domain when coexpressed in HEK 293 cells. A, shown is the expression of the
RFP-Erbin PDZ domain fusion protein in HEK 293 cells. The bright
aggregates observed in the cytoplasm are a result of RFP, which forms
identical structures when expressed alone. B, -catenin
was coexpressed with the RFP-Erbin PDZ domain fusion protein. All
RFP-Erbin PDZ domain fusion proteins, both cytoplasmic and that present
in aggregates, were recruited to the cell junction by -catenin.
C, -catenin c6 was coexpressed with the RFP-Erbin PDZ
domain fusion protein. Although some co-localization was observed at
the cell junction, most of the RFP-Erbin PDZ domain fusion protein was
present in the cytoplasm or intracellular aggregates, similar to when
the RFP-Erbin PDZ domain fusion protein was expressed alone.
D, ARVCF was coexpressed with the RFP-Erbin PDZ domain
fusion protein. E, ARVCF and the GST-Erbin PDZ or GST-MAGI-3
PDZ1 (control PDZ) domain fusion protein were cotransfected into HEK
293 cells. The ability of each PDZ domain to coprecipitate ARVCF from
cell extracts was assessed using glutathione-Sepharose to precipitate
the GST-PDZ domain fusions. Immunoblots were used to analyze 1% of the
cell extracts (ex) or 30% of the precipitated protein
(p). F, ARVCF and the GST-Erbin PDZ domain fusion
protein were cotransfected into HEK 293 cells; and subsequently, the
cells were treated with either a peptide phage-selected against the
Erbin PDZ domain (TGWETWV-COOH) or an analogous peptide with a
Val-to-Ala substitution at the C terminus (TGWETWA-COOH). The peptides
were either attached to the Antennapedia peptide (left
panels) or labeled with fluorescein (right panels). At
20 h post-transfection, the cells were incubated with peptides (35 µM) for an additional 6 h (Antennapedia conjugates)
or 24 h (fluorescein conjugates). Cells were then washed; extracts
were made; and the ability of the peptides to disrupt in
vivo complex formation between the Erbin PDZ domain and ARVCF was
assessed by coprecipitation and immunoblotting, as described for
E. G, ARVCF was transfected alone or with
full-length Myc-tagged Erbin into HEK 293 cells. Immunoprecipitations
(IP) were carried out on transfected cell extracts with
anti-Myc monoclonal antibodies. Immunoprecipitated proteins were
detected by immunoblotting (IB) using monoclonal antibodies
against ARVCF (upper panel) or rabbit anti-Erbin polyclonal
antibody (lower panel).
|
|
In contrast to the cell-surface localization of -catenin, ARVCF
appears to be predominantly located in punctate cytoplasmic granules,
with a lesser, discontinuous amount observed at the cell junction (Fig.
2D), consistent with the reported localization of the
overexpressed protein in transfected fibroblasts (25). As with
-catenin, all of the ARVCF completely co-localized with the Erbin
PDZ domain. Thus, these data agree with the binding experiments
described above, and they suggest that a potential function of
-catenin and ARVCF in vivo is to recruit the Erbin protein to the cadherin-catenin complex via PDZ domain-mediated interactions.
We performed cotransfection and coprecipitation experiments to
determine whether the interaction between ARVCF and the Erbin PDZ
domain observed in Fig. 2D could be inhibited in
vivo by a phage-derived peptide. Fig. 2E shows that
ARVCF could be coprecipitated with the GST-Erbin PDZ domain fusion
protein when both were coexpressed in HEK 293 cells. Fig. 2F
illustrates that this interaction was inhibited when cotransfected
cells were incubated for 6 h with a phage-derived peptide coupled
to a fragment of the Antennapedia protein, but not when the cells were
similarly incubated with a peptide in which the C-terminal Val residue
was changed to Ala. Although the Antennapedia peptide is known to
rapidly transport attached molecules across plasma membranes into the
cell, we found that it was not necessary, as with a longer incubation,
the same peptides coupled to fluorescein could also enter the cell and disrupt the Erbin PDZ domain/ARVCF interaction (Fig. 2F).
These data suggest that binding between Erbin and -catenin or ARVCF in vivo requires an interaction between the PDZ domain and
the C terminus of these proteins, respectively.
Finally, to determine whether binding of the Erbin PDZ domain to its
C-terminal ligands is influenced by other domains within the
full-length Erbin protein, we carried out a cotransfection and
co-immunoprecipitation experiment with full-length Myc-tagged Erbin and
ARVCF. Fig. 2G shows that ARVCF was precipitated by anti-Myc
antibodies in the presence (but not absence) of full-length Myc-tagged
Erbin. Coprecipitation of ARVCF with both the Erbin PDZ domain and
full-length Erbin suggests that the binding characteristics of the
Erbin PDZ domain are not directly regulated by other domains within the
Erbin protein. The faint band visible in the first lane of
the anti-Erbin immunoblot in Fig. 2G indicates that
endogenous Erbin is present in HEK 293 cells. The presence of
endogenous Erbin (and potentially ARVCF or p0071) did not affect the
results of our experiments carried out in this cell line. This is
likely because of the relatively low expression levels of endogenous protein compared with the expression of proteins in transfected HEK 293 cells. This point is underscored by comparing the levels of endogenous
Erbin with those of transfected Myc-tagged Erbin in HEK 293 cell
extracts (Fig. 2G, lower panel).
Erbin Associates with the Cadherin-Catenin Complex in
Brain--
Both Erbin (26) and -catenin (30) are reportedly
expressed in brain, so we chose this tissue to determine whether an Erbin- -catenin complex could be detected endogenously. Examination of adult rat cortex revealed that both proteins were present in the
dendrites of the same population of cortical neurons (Fig. 3A, left panels).
To examine whether these proteins co-localize at the subcellular level,
hippocampal neurons were isolated, cultured for 21 days, and examined
with antibodies directed against Erbin and -catenin. High
magnification confocal microscopy analysis of these neurons revealed
significant regions of co-localization (white arrowheads) on
the plasma membrane of dendrites (Fig. 3A, right
panels).

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Endogenous interaction of Erbin and
-catenin in brain. A, cultured
hippocampal neurons (right panels) or a section of rat
cerebral cortex (left panels) was double-labeled with a
monoclonal antibody directed against -catenin and polyclonal
antibodies directed against Erbin to assess the level of
co-localization for these proteins. Arrowheads point out
dendritic shafts of pyramidal neurons in cortex (left
panels) and dendritic shafts of cultured hippocampal neurons
(right panels). B, E. coli
cell-expressed GST-Erbin PDZ domain fusion protein (3 µg) and a
control GST-PDZ domain fusion protein (3 µg) were assayed for the
ability to precipitate, from mouse brain extracts, endogenous
-catenin and proteins with which -catenin is know to associate. Precipitated proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting.
C, HEK 293 cells were cotransfected or tri-transfected with
the indicated constructs, and the ability of E. coli
cell-expressed GST-Erbin PDZ domain fusion protein to precipitate
-catenin-associated proteins was analyzed by immunoblotting
(IB). The results show that the association of E-cadherin
(E-cad) with -catenin was direct (left
panels), whereas the association with -catenin
( -cat) was indirect and required E-cadherin (left
and right panels) and, finally, that precipitation of this complex
by the Erbin PDZ domain required the C terminus of -catenin.
D, -catenin and p120 catenin (p120ctn)
were immunoprecipitated with 5 µg of each antibody from 0.5 mg of
mouse brain extract. An equal volume of the extract (ex) and
the post-immunoprecipitation (IP) depleted extract
(dex) and 50% of the precipitated protein (p)
were analyzed by immunoblotting. Erbin co-immunoprecipitated only with
-catenin, but not with the related family member p120 catenin.
E, co-immunoprecipitation of Erbin with -catenin was
disrupted by preincubating the brain extract with the Erbin PDZ
domain-binding peptide TGWETWV-COOH, but not with the negative control
peptide TGWETWA-COOH, at the indicated concentrations prior to
immunoprecipitation. Mab, monoclonal antibody.
|
|
To examine whether the Erbin PDZ domain can associate with the
endogenous cadherin-catenin complexes in brain, pull-down experiments were carried out with brain extracts, and proteins in the precipitate were analyzed by Western blotting with various antibodies. Fig. 3B illustrates that, as expected from previous experiments,
the GST-Erbin PDZ domain fusion protein was able to efficiently
interact with -catenin in brain extracts. -Catenin associated
with the N-cadherin- / -catenin complex in brain, and Fig.
3B also illustrates that these three proteins are found in
the -catenin-Erbin PDZ domain complex. The specificity of this
interaction is demonstrated by the observation that p120 catenin, which
binds to cadherin in a manner mutually exclusive from -catenin, but
which does not possess a PDZ domain-binding motif (20), was completely absent from the GST-Erbin PDZ domain precipitate (Fig. 3B).
These data thus suggest that Erbin, -catenin, -catenin, and
N-cadherin can form an oligomeric complex. To discount the possibility
that the Erbin PDZ domain also interacted directly with E/N-cadherin and/or -catenin, we used cotransfection experiments to show that E/N-cadherin and/or -catenin was precipitated only when -catenin was present and, even then, only when -catenin had an intact PDZ
domain-binding motif (Fig. 3C). This is also consistent with ELISA experiments, in which the interaction of the PDZ domain-binding motif of -catenin with the Erbin PDZ domain was barely detectable.
The GST-Erbin PDZ domain precipitate contained no detectable HER2, as
one would expect based on the low affinity of the interaction between
the HER2 C terminus and the Erbin PDZ domain. However, this result
contrasted with the observation that detectable HER2 was precipitated
from transfected HEK 293 cells. Upon further examination, we found that
HER2 oligomerized into large complexes, as evidenced by the presence of
disulfide-linked aggregates detected by immunoblot analysis of
heterologously expressed HER2 under nonreducing conditions (data not
shown). No such aggregates were detected with endogenously expressed
HER2 in Caco-2 cells. The oligomerization of overexpressed HER2
resulted in the coupling of several low affinity C termini at close
proximity, and it is likely that this served to artificially increase
the apparent affinity of the HER2/Erbin PDZ domain interaction through
avidity effects in the pull-down assay.
Finally, we showed that endogenous Erbin and -catenin could be
co-immunoprecipitated from brain extracts (Fig. 3D). The
specificity of this interaction is again underscored by the finding
that immunoprecipitation of p120 catenin did not bring down Erbin.
Importantly, the interaction of endogenous Erbin and -catenin could
be disrupted by incubation of brain lysates with a phage-derived
peptide, but not with a similar peptide containing a Val-to-Ala
substitution at the C terminus (Fig. 3E). Together, these
results suggest that Erbin is contained within a physiologically
relevant cadherin-catenin complex in brain.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Our results show that -catenin and ARVCF are likely in
vivo ligands of the Erbin PDZ domain. -Catenin, ARVCF, and
p0071 are three p120-like catenins that share virtually identical PDZ domain-binding motifs and are the only proteins within the human genome
that contain optimal Erbin PDZ domain-binding motifs predicted by
C-terminal peptide phage display. In vitro and in
vivo characterization of the interactions between the Erbin PDZ
domain and ARVCF or -catenin showed that the interactions are
specific and of sufficient affinity to be detected endogenously.
Specifically, we have shown that this interaction occurs endogenously
in neurons, but it is also likely to occur at the cell junctions of
epithelia, where ARVCF and/or p0071 may be found (20). Our data also
show that the previously reported interaction between the Erbin PDZ
domain and HER2 (16, 31) is of low affinity compared with that of the
Erbin PDZ domain and the p120-like catenins. However, we cannot rule
out the possibility that this interaction is physiologically relevant
based on the experiments presented here.
One possible function of the interaction between the Erbin PDZ domain
and the C termini of the p120-like catenins is to recruit Erbin into a
cadherin-catenin complex. Because there are several possible
combinations that make up the cadherin-catenin complex in distinct
cellular contexts, it is not surprising that three different catenins
interact with Erbin. Although we have shown that Erbin can be
integrated into this complex, the precise function of the different
catenins and the functional consequences of these interactions remain
to be elucidated. Possible functional consequences are further
complicated by the existence of Densin-180, an isoform of Erbin (32).
Erbin and Densin-180 are highly identical at the N terminus in the
region of leucine-rich repeats, diverge significantly in the central
region, and terminate with virtually identical PDZ domain sequences.
While preparing this manuscript, we obtained results from a phage
selection against the PDZ domain of Densin-180; the consensus sequence
for the binding peptides was ETW(V/L)-COOH, which closely
resembles the consensus-binding sequence for the Erbin PDZ domain. This
suggests that Densin-180 likely associates with the cadherin-catenin
complex as well. It is interesting to note that Erbin, ARVCF, and p0071
are widely expressed in many tissues, including brain (20), whereas
-catenin and Densin-180 expression is restricted to brain (30, 32). Thus, even though all three catenins could likely bind both Erbin and
Densin-180 PDZ domains in vitro, restricted expression
patterns or subcellular localizations would dictate which interactions occur endogenously. Because our anti-Erbin antibodies were directed against an antigen largely consisting of the PDZ domain, it is possible
that we actually detected Densin-180 rather than Erbin coprecipitating
with -catenin from brain extracts. Even if this were the case, it
would not alter the significance or interpretation of our findings that
a LAP protein family member interacts with the cadherin-catenin complex
in a physiologically relevant manner.
Two previously described genetic analyses highlight the possible
functions for this class of protein/protein interactions. Analysis of
mutations in Drosophila melanogaster that disrupt epithelial
formation and growth control demonstrated that Scribble, a LAP protein
containing four PDZ domains, appears to be a critical mediator of
epithelial cell polarity (33-35). A similar screen in C. elegans revealed that LET-413, a LAP protein that may be the
nematode ortholog of mammalian Erbin, appears to also be involved in
the assembly of the epithelial cell adherens junction (17, 18).
Together, these data suggested that LAP proteins are involved in the
appropriate assembly and polarization of epithelial cells. Mutations in
either of these genes induce cytoskeletal changes in the affected
epithelial cells, suggesting that one role for these proteins is to
integrate cytoskeletal functions with epithelial cell morphology and polarization.
The importance of the link between the cadherin-catenin complex and the
actin cytoskeleton is well established, and it is therefore significant
that we have observed an interaction between the cadherin-catenin
complex and a LAP protein that is related to both Scribble and LET-413.
Interestingly, overexpression of -catenin in Madin-Darby canine
kidney epithelial cells alters their morphology and promotes hepatocyte
growth factor-mediated cell spreading, consistent with this protein and
its interaction with Erbin having an effect on the cytoskeleton (29).
Currently, we can only speculate on the mechanism by which this
cytoskeletal regulation is accomplished. For example, the leucine-rich
repeat regions in LET-413 and in Erbin are strongly homologous to a
similar region in SUR-8/SOC-2, a protein that binds to and regulates
the Ras GTPase (36, 37). Other Ras-related GTPases, particularly in the
Rho/Rac class, are known to regulate the cytoskeleton (38). Thus, it is
possible that LAP proteins help to unite the adherens junction-localized cadherin-catenin complex and the cytoskeleton by
bringing cytoskeleton-regulating GTPases in close juxtaposition with
this subcellular site. It is of particular interest that the gene
jac1 (GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank accession
number CAB60320), which encodes the most closely related C. elegans ortholog of -catenin and ARVCF, also terminates with
the sequence DSWV-COOH. Furthermore, most residues within the Erbin PDZ
domain predicted to interact with each of positions 0 through 3 by
molecular modeling (9) are also conserved in the PDZ domain of LET-413.
This suggests that mutation of jac1 may yield a similar
phenotype to that of LET-413 and provides insight into the mechanism of
its role in cell polarization. In summary, the work reported here
introduces a new paradigm for signaling to the cytoskeleton by the
cadherin-catenin complex via an interaction with LAP family proteins.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence may be addressed: Dept. of Protein
Engineering, Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080. Tel.: 650-225-1056; Fax: 650-225-3734; E-mail: sidhu@gene.com.
**
To whom correspondence may be addressed: Dept. of Molecular
Oncology, Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080. Tel.: 650-225-1123; Fax: 650-225-6127; E-mail:
larsky@earthlink.net.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 30, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200818200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PDZ, PSD-95/Discs Large/ZO-1;
Erbin, Erb2-interacting protein;
LAP, leucine-rich repeat and PDZ domain;
MAGI, membrane-associated guanylate
kinase with inverted orientation;
ARVCF, Armadillo protein deleted in
velo-cardiofacial syndrome;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
ELISA, enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
GFP, green
fluorescent protein;
EGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein;
RFP, red
fluorescent protein;
HEK, human embryonic kidney.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Craven, S.,
and Bredt, D.
(1998)
Cell
93,
495-498[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Fanning, A.,
and Anderson, J.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
103,
767-772[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Harris, B.,
and Lim, W.
(2001)
J. Cell Sci.
114,
3219-3231[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Songyang, Z.,
Fanning, A. S., Fu, C., Xu, J.,
Marfatia, S. M.,
Chishti, A. H.,
Crompton, A.,
Chan, A. C.,
Anderson, J. M.,
and Cantley, L. C.
(1997)
Science
275,
73-77[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Harrison, S.
(1996)
Cell
86,
341-343[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Doyle, D. A.,
Lee, A.,
Lewis, J.,
Kim, E.,
Sheng, M.,
and Mackinnon, R.
(1996)
Cell
85,
1067-1076[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Daniels, D. L.,
Cohen, A. R.,
Anderson, J. M.,
and Brunger, A. T.
(1998)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
5,
317-325[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Tochio, H.,
Zhang, Q.,
Mandal, P., Li, M.,
and Zhang, M.
(1999)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
6,
417-421[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Fuh, G.,
Pisabarro, M. T., Li, Y.,
Quan, C.,
Lasky, L. A.,
and Sidhu, S.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
21486-21491[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Karthikeyan, S.,
Leung, T.,
Birrane, G.,
Webster, G.,
and Ladias, J.
(2001)
J. Mol. Biol.
308,
963-973[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Karthikeyan, S.,
Leung, T.,
and Ladias, J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
19683-19686[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Tsunoda, S.,
Sierralta, J.,
Sun, Y. M.,
Bodner, R.,
Suzuki, E.,
Becker, A.,
Socolich, M.,
and Zuker, C. S.
(1997)
Nature
388,
243-249[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Tsunoda, S.,
Sierralta, J.,
and Zuker, C. S.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
8,
419-422[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Kaech, S. M.,
Whitfield, C. W.,
and Kim, S. K.
(1998)
Cell
94,
761-771[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Rongo, C.,
Whitfield, C. W.,
Rodal, A.,
Kim, S. K.,
and Kaplan, J. M.
(1998)
Cell
94,
751-759[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Borg, J.,
Marchetto, S.,
LeBivic, A.,
Ollendorf, V.,
Jaulin-Bastard, F.,
Saito, H.,
Fournier, E.,
Adelaide, J.,
Margolis, B.,
and Birnbaum, D.
(2000)
Nat. Cell Biol.
2,
407-414[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Legouis, R.,
Gansmuller, A.,
Sookhareea, S.,
Bosher, J.,
Baillie, D.,
and Labouesse, M.
(2000)
Nat. Cell Biol.
2,
415-422[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
McMahon, L.,
Legouis, R.,
Vonesch, J.,
and Labouesse, M.
(2001)
J. Cell Sci.
114,
2265-2277[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Klapper, L.,
Kirschbaum, M.,
Sela, M.,
and Yarden, Y.
(2000)
Adv. Cancer Res.
77,
25-79[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Anastasiadis, P.,
and Reynolds, A.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
1319-1334[Abstract]
|
| 21.
|
Sidhu,
Lowman, S.,
Cunningham, H. B.,
and Wells, J.
(2000)
Methods Enzymol.
328,
333-363[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Wu, Y.,
Dowbenko, D.,
Spencer, S.,
Laura, R.,
Lee, J., Gu, Q.,
and Lasky, L. A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
21477-21485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Schaefer, G.,
Akita, R.,
and Sliwkowski, M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
859-866[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Munemitsu, S.,
Albert, I.,
Rubenfeld, B.,
and Polakis, P.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
4088-4094[Abstract]
|
| 25.
|
Mariner, D.,
Wang, J.,
and Reynolds, A.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
1481-1490[Abstract]
|
| 26.
|
Huang, Y.,
Wang, Q.,
Xiong, W.,
and Mei, L.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
19318-19326[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Harris, B.,
Hillier, B.,
and Lim, W.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
5921-5930[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Kaufman, U.,
Zuppinger, C.,
Walber, Z.,
Rudiger, M.,
Urbich, C.,
Martin, B.,
Jockusch, B.,
Eppenberger, H.,
and Starzinski-Powitz, A.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
4121-4136[Abstract]
|
| 29.
|
Lu, Q.,
Paredes, M.,
Medina, M.,
Zhou, J.,
Cavallo, R.,
Peifer, M.,
Orecchio, L.,
and Kosik, K. S.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
144,
519-532[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Paffenholz, R.,
and Franke, W.
(1997)
Differentiation
61,
293-304[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Jaulin-Bastard, F.,
Saito, H.,
LeBivic, A.,
Ollendorf, V.,
Marchetto, S.,
Birnbaum, D.,
and Borg, J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
15256-15263[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Apperson, M.,
Moon, I.,
and Kennedy, M.
(1996)
J. Neurosci.
16,
6839-6852[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Bilder, D.,
and Perrimon, N.
(2000)
Nature
403,
676-680[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Bilder, D., Li, M.,
and Perrimon, N.
(2000)
Science
289,
113-116[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Wodarz, A.
(2000)
Curr. Biol.
10,
624-626
|
| 36.
|
Sieburth, D.,
Sun, Q.,
and Han, M.
(1998)
Cell
94,
119-130[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Selfors, L.,
Schutzman, J.,
Borland, C.,
and Stern, M.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
6903-6908[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Matozaki, T.,
Nakanishi, H.,
and Takai, Y.
(2000)
Cell. Signal.
12,
515-524[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Tao, P. Dai, Y. Liu, S. Marchetto, W.-C. Xiong, J.-P. Borg, and L. Mei
Erbin regulates NRG1 signaling and myelination
PNAS,
June 9, 2009;
106(23):
9477 - 9482.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Arikkath, I-F. Peng, Y. Gie Ng, I. Israely, X. Liu, E. M. Ullian, and L. F. Reichardt
{delta}-Catenin Regulates Spine and Synapse Morphogenesis and Function in Hippocampal Neurons during Development
J. Neurosci.,
April 29, 2009;
29(17):
5435 - 5442.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Abu-Elneel, T. Ochiishi, M. Medina, M. Remedi, L. Gastaldi, A. Caceres, and K. S. Kosik
A {delta}-Catenin Signaling Pathway Leading to Dendritic Protrusions
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 21, 2008;
283(47):
32781 - 32791.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Arikkath, I. Israely, Y. Tao, L. Mei, X. Liu, and L. F. Reichardt
Erbin Controls Dendritic Morphogenesis by Regulating Localization of {delta}-Catenin
J. Neurosci.,
July 9, 2008;
28(28):
7047 - 7056.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Izawa, M. Nishizawa, Y. Hayashi, and M. Inagaki
Palmitoylation of ERBIN is required for its plasma membrane localization.
Genes Cells,
July 1, 2008;
13(7):
691 - 701.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. D. Mruk, B. Silvestrini, and C. Y. Cheng
Anchoring Junctions As Drug Targets: Role in Contraceptive Development
Pharmacol. Rev.,
June 1, 2008;
60(2):
146 - 180.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Liu, J. Zhang, J. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Liu, and D. Zheng
Erbin-regulated Sensitivity of MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells to TRAIL via ErbB2/AKT/NF-{kappa}B Pathway
J. Biochem.,
June 1, 2008;
143(6):
793 - 801.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Huang, A. Koide, K. Makabe, and S. Koide
Design of protein function leaps by directed domain interface evolution
PNAS,
May 6, 2008;
105(18):
6578 - 6583.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Kim, J.-R. Han, J. Park, M. Oh, S. E. James, S. Chang, Q. Lu, K. Y. Lee, H. Ki, W.-J. Song, et al.
{delta}-Catenin-induced Dendritic Morphogenesis: AN ESSENTIAL ROLE OF p190RhoGEF INTERACTION THROUGH AKT1-MEDIATED PHOSPHORYLATION
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 11, 2008;
283(2):
977 - 987.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. M. Alto, A. W. Weflen, M. J. Rardin, D. Yarar, C. S. Lazar, R. Tonikian, A. Koller, S. S. Taylor, C. Boone, S. S. Sidhu, et al.
The type III effector EspF coordinates membrane trafficking by the spatiotemporal activation of two eukaryotic signaling pathways
J. Cell Biol.,
September 24, 2007;
178(7):
1265 - 1278.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Dai, C. Chang, X. Lin, P. Dai, L. Mei, and X.-H. Feng
Erbin Inhibits Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Signaling through a Novel Smad-Interacting Domain
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
September 1, 2007;
27(17):
6183 - 6194.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. A. Appleton, Y. Zhang, P. Wu, J. P. Yin, W. Hunziker, N. J. Skelton, S. S. Sidhu, and C. Wiesmann
Comparative Structural Analysis of the Erbin PDZ Domain and the First PDZ Domain of ZO-1: INSIGHTS INTO DETERMINANTS OF PDZ DOMAIN SPECIFICITY
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 4, 2006;
281(31):
22312 - 22320.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Zhang, S. Yeh, B. A. Appleton, H. A. Held, P. J. Kausalya, D. C. Y. Phua, W. Lee Wong, L. A. Lasky, C. Wiesmann, W. Hunziker, et al.
Convergent and Divergent Ligand Specificity among PDZ Domains of the LAP and Zonula Occludens (ZO) Families
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 4, 2006;
281(31):
22299 - 22311.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Song, S. Gao, R. Tian, S. Ma, H. Huang, J. Guo, Y. Li, L. Zhang, and Y. Gao
A High Efficiency Strategy for Binding Property Characterization of Peptide-binding Domains
Mol. Cell. Proteomics,
August 1, 2006;
5(8):
1368 - 1381.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Takizawa, K. Nagasaka, S. Nakagawa, T. Yano, K. Nakagawa, T. Yasugi, T. Takeuchi, T. Kanda, J. M. Huibregtse, T. Akiyama, et al.
Human scribble, a novel tumor suppressor identified as a target of high-risk HPV E6 for ubiquitin-mediated degradation, interacts with adenomatous polyposis coli
Genes Cells,
April 1, 2006;
11(4):
453 - 464.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Dai, W. C. Xiong, and L. Mei
Erbin Inhibits RAF Activation by Disrupting the Sur-8-Ras-Raf Complex
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 13, 2006;
281(2):
927 - 933.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. McDonald, F. F. Chen, V. Ollendorff, Y. Ogura, S. Marchetto, P. Lecine, J.-P. Borg, and G. Nunez
A Role for Erbin in the Regulation of Nod2-dependent NF-{kappa}B Signaling
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 2, 2005;
280(48):
40301 - 40309.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Rangwala, F. Banine, J.-P. Borg, and L. S. Sherman
Erbin Regulates Mitogen-activated Protein (MAP) Kinase Activation and MAP Kinase-dependent Interactions between Merlin and Adherens Junction Protein Complexes in Schwann Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 25, 2005;
280(12):
11790 - 11797.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Quitsch, K. Berhorster, C. W. Liew, D. Richter, and H.-J. Kreienkamp
Postsynaptic Shank Antagonizes Dendrite Branching Induced by the Leucine-Rich Repeat Protein Densin-180
J. Neurosci.,
January 12, 2005;
25(2):
479 - 487.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Albertson, C. Chabu, A. Sheehan, and C. Q. Doe
Scribble protein domain mapping reveals a multistep localization mechanism and domains necessary for establishing cortical polarity
J. Cell Sci.,
December 1, 2004;
117(25):
6061 - 6070.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Kausalya, D. C.Y. Phua, and W. Hunziker
Association of ARVCF with Zonula Occludens (ZO)-1 and ZO-2: Binding to PDZ-Domain Proteins and Cell-Cell Adhesion Regulate Plasma Membrane and Nuclear Localization of ARVCF
Mol. Biol. Cell,
December 1, 2004;
15(12):
5503 - 5515.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-J. Kim, J.-H. Kim, Y.-G. Kim, H.-S. Lim, and J.-W. Oh
Protein Kinase C-related Kinase 2 Regulates Hepatitis C Virus RNA Polymerase Function by Phosphorylation
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 26, 2004;
279(48):
50031 - 50041.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. J. Im, J. H. Lee, S. H. Park, S. J. Park, S.-H. Rho, G. B. Kang, E. Kim, and S. H. Eom
Crystal Structure of the Shank PDZ-Ligand Complex Reveals a Class I PDZ Interaction and a Novel PDZ-PDZ Dimerization
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 28, 2003;
278(48):
48099 - 48104.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. C. Miranda, S. R. Joseph, A. S. Yap, R. D. Teasdale, and J. L. Stow
Contextual Binding of p120ctn to E-cadherin at the Basolateral Plasma Membrane in Polarized Epithelia
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 31, 2003;
278(44):
43480 - 43488.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Kolch
Erbin: Sorting Out ErbB2 Receptors or Giving Ras a Break?
Sci. Signal.,
September 9, 2003;
2003(199):
pe37 - pe37.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Pettitt, E. A. Cox, I. D. Broadbent, A. Flett, and J. Hardin
The Caenorhabditis elegans p120 catenin homologue, JAC-1, modulates cadherin-catenin function during epidermal morphogenesis
J. Cell Biol.,
July 7, 2003;
162(1):
15 - 22.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Nourry, S. G. N. Grant, and J.-P. Borg
PDZ Domain Proteins: Plug and Play!
Sci. Signal.,
April 22, 2003;
2003(179):
re7 - re7.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Hatzfeld, K. J. Green, and H. Sauter
Targeting of p0071 to desmosomes and adherens junctions is mediated by different protein domains
J. Cell Sci.,
April 1, 2003;
116(7):
1219 - 1233.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. J. Skelton, M. F. T. Koehler, K. Zobel, W. L. Wong, S. Yeh, M. T. Pisabarro, J. P. Yin, L. A. Lasky, and S. S. Sidhu
Origins of PDZ Domain Ligand Specificity. STRUCTURE DETERMINATION AND MUTAGENESIS OF THE ERBIN PDZ DOMAIN
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 21, 2003;
278(9):
7645 - 7654.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Birrane, J. Chung, and J. A. A. Ladias
Novel Mode of Ligand Recognition by the Erbin PDZ Domain
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 10, 2003;
278(3):
1399 - 1402.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. C. Calkins, B. L. Hoepner, C. M. Law, M. R. Novak, S. V. Setzer, M. Hatzfeld, and A. P. Kowalczyk
The Armadillo Family Protein p0071 Is a VE-cadherin- and Desmoplakin-binding Protein
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 10, 2003;
278(3):
1774 - 1783.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Z. Huang, M. Zang, W. C. Xiong, Z. Luo, and L. Mei
Erbin Suppresses the MAP Kinase Pathway
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 3, 2003;
278(2):
1108 - 1114.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|