![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 16, 13449-13454, April 19, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, November 28, 2001, and in revised form, January 30, 2002
Biotin synthase (BioB) catalyzes the insertion of
a sulfur atom between the C6 and C9 carbons of dethiobiotin.
Reconstituted BioB from Escherichia coli contains a
[4Fe-4S]2+/1+ cluster thought to be involved in the
reduction and cleavage of S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet),
generating methionine and the reactive 5'-deoxyadenosyl radical
responsible for dethiobiotin H-abstraction. Using EPR and
Mössbauer spectroscopy as well as methionine quantitation we
demonstrate that the reduced S = 1/2 [4Fe-4S]1+ cluster is indeed capable of injecting one
electron into AdoMet, generating one equivalent of both methionine and
S = 0 [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster. Dethiobiotin
is not required for the reaction. Using site-directed mutagenesis we
show also that, among the eight cysteines of BioB, only three (Cys-53,
Cys-57, Cys-60) are essential for AdoMet reductive cleavage,
suggesting that these cysteines are involved in chelation of the
[4Fe-4S]2+/1+ cluster.
A new class of iron-sulfur enzymes has recently emerged. They are
defined on the basis of their absolute requirement for
S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet)1 (1). The
combination of a reduced iron-sulfur cluster and AdoMet is generally
considered to result in the reductive cleavage of AdoMet and the
generation of a 5'-deoxyadenosyl radical essential for initiation of
catalysis. The prototypes for this class of enzymes are the activating
components of anaerobic ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) and pyruvate
formate lyase (PFL), lysine aminomutase (LAM), and biotin synthase
(BioB) (2-5). The proteins of these systems have been shown to
assemble an oxygen-sensitive [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster, probably
chelated by the three cysteines in the
CXXXCXXC sequence that is conserved among
all enzymes and a fourth, not yet identified ligand (6-15). For RNR,
PFL activases, and LAM, it has been shown that the cluster has
to be reduced to the [4Fe-4S]1+ state before it can react
with AdoMet (6, 16-18). The reaction results in the production of one
equivalent of methionine, one equivalent of 5'-deoxyadenosine, and
approximately one equivalent of a substrate radical. The latter is a
protein-bound glycyl radical in RNR and PFL and a lysine-derived
radical in LAM (19-21). In all cases, electrons are not transferred
from the cluster to AdoMet in the absence of the substrate, showing
that the reaction is thermodynamically unfavorable. In this report we
present studies of the same reaction for BioB.
Biotin synthase (BioB) catalyzes the incorporation of a sulfur atom
into dethiobiotin to form biotin (see Scheme
1 below) (22). In vitro, this
reaction is very inefficient and the reported yields of biotin never
exceed 1-2 equivalents per protein after several hours reaction,
raising the possibility that BioB is not an enzyme but a reactant
(23-25). The protein from Escherichia coli is a 76-kDa
homodimer that binds a [4Fe-4S] center on each polypeptide chain (14,
26). Recently, Jarrett and co-workers (27) suggested that the active
form of BioB contained two clusters, one [4Fe-4S] and one [2Fe-2S],
per polypeptide chain. On the other hand, using a different procedure
for reconstitution of iron centers in BioB, we are able to generate
enzyme of similar activity with no more than 4 Fe and 4 S atoms per
monomer mainly in the form of a [4Fe-4S] cluster (14, 15).
In addition to an Fe-S cluster and AdoMet, several proteins and
cofactors are necessary for biotin formation: namely NADPH, DTT, iron,
sulfide, cysteine, flavodoxin, and flavodoxin reductase (23, 24). The
flavodoxin system is thought to effect in the reduction of the cluster.
Requirement of iron, sulfide, and DTT suggests that the cluster is
labile and has to be reconstituted during catalysis. Finally, the
source of the sulfur for the biosynthesis of dethiobiotin has not been
firmly established, although it has been suggested to be the cluster
itself (28). This function is proposed to specifically reside in the
[2Fe-2S] cluster in Jarrett's enzyme preparations (25). It should be
noted that, in vivo, the sulfur atom of biotin is derived
from cysteine (24). Finally, studies of site-directed mutants have
demonstrated the requirement of six cysteines for activity. Cys-53,
Cys-57, and Cys-60 (numbers referred to the Escherichia coli
enzyme) are thought to be important for chelation and function of the
[4Fe-4S] cluster (13, 15). The function of Cys-97, Cys-128, and
Cys-188, which are also absolutely required, is still unknown (24). It
has been suggested that these cysteines might provide the site for a
second cluster, namely the [2Fe-2S] center proposed by Jarrett and
collaborators (25).
As for RNR, PFL, and LAM, the [4Fe-4S] cluster in BioB is suggested
to play a key role in the reductive cleavage of AdoMet. The formation
of biotin from dethiobiotin requires abstraction of two hydrogen atoms.
Removal of each hydrogen atom, sequentially, is presumably accomplished
by the product of the reductive cleavage of AdoMet, the reactive
5'-deoxyadenosyl radical. This is consistent with the observation that
formation of biotin requires at least two equivalents of AdoMet (29,
30). Radicals at C-9 or C-6 are thus thought to react with a sulfur
source to form the tetrahydrothiophene moiety of biotin.
In this report we specifically address the question of the role of the
[4Fe-4S] cluster during AdoMet activation. We show that in BioB from
E. coli only the reduced [4Fe-4S]1+ cluster is
able to reduce AdoMet into methionine and that the substrate
dethiobiotin is not required for the reaction. Mutations at Cys-97,
Cys-128, and Cys-188 do not affect AdoMet reduction activity of BioB.
In contrast, mutations at Cys-53, Cys-57, and Cys-60 abolished this activity.
Materials--
All chemicals were of reagent grade and obtained
from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. or Fluka unless otherwise stated.
57Fe2O3 was converted into ferric
chloride by dissolving it in a hot concentrated (35%) hydrochloric
acid of analytical grade (Carlo Erba) and repeatedly concentrated in
water. 5-Deaza-7,8-demethyl-10-methyl-isoalloxazine (5-DAF) was
prepared according to Ashton et al. (31).
Preparation of Reconstituted Biotin Synthase--
Mutants and
wild-type proteins were prepared as described previously (12, 15).
Reconstitution of apoproteins was achieved with either 56Fe
or 57Fe, as described (14, 15). In both cases the
reconstituted proteins were desalted over Sephadex G-25 to remove
adventitiously bound iron.
Preparation of Reduced Samples--
Reconstituted wild-type and
mutated proteins were reduced inside an anaerobic glove box. 5-DAF was
dissolved in Me2SO, diluted to a final concentration of 1 mM with water and stored inside the glove box in the dark.
The protein (100-160 µM) was prepared in 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, and irradiated in the presence of 5-DAF (20-50 µM). Reduction could be monitored using
UV-visible light directly inside the box. After a 40-min reaction, the
reduced protein solution was divided into two portions, one being
transferred to an EPR tube (190 µl) and the other to a
Mössbauer cup (400 µl). To avoid exposure to oxygen, EPR tubes
and Mössbauer cups were frozen directly inside the box in a well
filled with isopentane cooled from outside the box by liquid nitrogen.
Reduction of AdoMet--
All the experiments were done under
anaerobic conditions inside the glove box (<2 ppm O2,
18 °C). BioB, wild-type, or mutant protein (100-230
µM), in 1 ml of 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 30 mM KCl was first reduced as described above. After
reduction the solution was shielded from light using an aluminum foil,
and AdoMet (500 µM) was added anaerobically. At four time
intervals (from 0 to 120 min) two aliquots were removed, one (40 µl)
for methionine determination and one (190 µl) immediately frozen in
liquid nitrogen inside the glove box for EPR spectroscopic analysis. A
wild-type 57Fe-labeled BioB preparation was also analyzed
by Mössbauer spectroscopy.
Methionine Determination--
AdoMet reductase activity was
measured at 570 nm from the amount of the methionine
ninhydrine-derivative analyzed by high performance liquid
chromatography (System 7300, Beckman) calibrated with pure amino acid standards.
EPR Spectroscopy--
Spectra were recorded on a Bruker EMX (9.5 GHz) EPR spectrometer equipped with an ESR 900 helium flow cryostat
(Oxford Instruments). Double integrals of the EPR signals and spin
concentration were obtained through the Win-EPR software using the
spectrum of a 200 µM Cu(EDTA) standard recorded under
nonsaturating conditions.
Mössbauer
Spectroscopy--
57Fe-Mössbauer spectra were
recorded using 400-µl cuvettes containing 230 µM
protein. Spectra were recorded on a spectrometer operating in constant
acceleration mode using a cryostat that allowed temperatures from 1.5 to 300 K. Magnetic fields (0.05 T) were applied parallel to the
observed Analysis--
Protein concentration (by monomer) was determined
by the method of Bradford (32) standardized against bovine serum
albumin and multiplied by a correction factor of 1.1 for the biotin
synthase (33). Protein-bound iron was determined under reducing
conditions with bathophenanthroline disulfonate after acid denaturation
of the protein (34) and labile sulfide by the method of Beinert (35).
Reductive Cleavage of AdoMet by Reduced BioB--
In the following
experiments, all carried out inside an anaerobic glove box, BioB
designates purified preparations of anaerobically reconstituted biotin
synthase, containing 3.3-3.9 iron and 3.4-4.0 sulfide per monomer,
mainly in the form of [4Fe-4S]2+ clusters as shown by
Mössbauer spectroscopy (see Ref. 14 and below). Purification and
reconstitution have been described previously (12, 14, 15). Anaerobic
reaction of reduced BioB, containing mainly [4Fe-4S]1+
clusters, with AdoMet, was assayed for the formation of methionine, one
of the products of the reductive cleavage of AdoMet. The concentration of S = 1/2 [4Fe-4S]1+ cluster was
determined by quantifying its characteristic EPR signal (Fig.
1, inset); the
[4Fe-4S]2+ cluster form is EPR-silent, and the EPR
spectra of the S = 3/2 [4Fe-4S]1+
cluster, generally a minor species, are difficult to quantify because
of their broad features and small signal amplitudes.
In a typical experiment, BioB (0.1-0.16 mM) was first
reduced by illuminating in the presence of substoichiometric amounts of
deazaflavin (5-DAF), using a 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer pH 8.0 (buffer A). This procedure afforded a maximum of 50-60% of
polypeptides containing a [4Fe-4S]1+ cluster as
determined from the intensity of the EPR signal. When reduced BioB was
reacted with an excess of AdoMet (0.5 mM) in buffer A, the
EPR signal of the cluster slowly declined following first-order
kinetics with a rate constant of 0.025 ± 0.005 min
In the course of the reaction, methionine was formed with the same
rate, showing that methionine formation is associated with cluster
oxidation. All along the reaction, 0.9-1.0 mol of methionine was
formed per mol of cluster converted to the [4Fe-4S]2+
form. In three experiments the same ~1:1 ratio was obtained with different preparations having widely different amounts of reduced cluster (data not shown). Furthermore, when the final EPR-silent form
of BioB, obtained after reaction with AdoMet, was desalted, reduced a
second time and then exposed again to AdoMet, a second and comparable
burst of methionine formation was observed (0.8 mol of methionine per
mol of reoxidized cluster). Finally, the reaction proceeded with
similar rates and yields in the presence of an excess of either
dethiobiotin (2.5 mM) or DTT (5 mM). No formation of methionine was observed when either BioB or AdoMet was
omitted from the reaction mixture. Furthermore, in the absence of
AdoMet the S = 1/2 signal of the 1+ state did not
decline measurably within the same time range. We conclude that the
[4Fe-4S]1+ cluster is competent for AdoMet cleavage, even
in the absence of the dethiobiotin substrate. The reaction can be
described with the following reaction,
The same type of experiment was performed with each of the eight
Cys-to-Ala mutant proteins available in our laboratory. As reported
earlier, among the five mutated enzymes that still exhibit upon
anaerobic reduction the S = 1/2 EPR signal of the
[4Fe-4S]1+ cluster, only two, namely C276A and C288A,
were fully enzymatically active, whereas the three others, C97A, C128A,
and C188A, were inactive (Table I). The
other mutant proteins, C53A, C57A, and C60A, were both EPR-silent after
incubation with photoactivated deazaflavin and inactive (Table I).
Determination of methionine for each EPR-active mutant after 1 h
reaction with an excess of AdoMet gave the same results as the
wild-type protein (Table I). Only for the C188A mutant was a decreased
production of methionine observed. No methionine was detected with the
three EPR-silent C53A, C57A, and C60A mutants, treated exactly under
the same conditions.
AdoMet Oxidizes the Reduced [4Fe-4S]1+ Cluster of
BioB into [4Fe-4S]2+--
To characterize the EPR-silent
iron center after reaction with AdoMet, similar experiments were
carried out with a preparation of wild-type BioB reconstituted with
57Fe (sample A), reduced with photoactivated DAF (sample
B), and incubated for 15 min with AdoMet (sample C), as described
above. Aliquots of each sample (0.83 mM Fe) were
transferred into Mössbauer cups and EPR tubes, and a fraction was
set aside for analysis of methionine formation. The Mössbauer
spectrum of sample A (Fig. 2A)
exhibits a major species (the doublet drawn above the experimental spectrum) with isomer shift
A sample similar to the one shown in Fig. 2A, was incubated
for 15 min with 0.5 mM AdoMet before freezing at liquid
nitrogen. Its Mössbauer spectrum (not shown) was the same as that
of Fig. 2A, suggesting that under these conditions the
presence of AdoMet does not affect the [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster.
The 4.2 K Mössbauer spectrum of a photoreduced sample (sample B),
shown in Fig. 2B, exhibits a broad paramagnetic component very similar to the spectrum reported for the [4Fe-4S]1+
clusters of BioB (14). It is not possible to obtain for this sample a
precise estimate of the fraction of iron associated with the
[4Fe-4S]1+ state. Our analysis, however, indicates that
60-80% of the iron is associated with the 1+ state and that possibly
10% of the iron belongs to [4Fe-4S]2+ clusters. The
lower limit would suggest that all [4Fe-4S]2+ clusters
have been reduced. The upper limit is not inconsistent with our
observations for sample A if we take into account our previous
observation that, upon photoreduction, the iron of the [2Fe-2S]
cluster is used to build clusters with [4Fe-4S] cores (14).
Accordingly no [2Fe-2S] cluster could be detected in sample B. Moreover, some of the adventitiously bound iron is likely to be
recruited for cluster reconstitution during the extended (45 min)
photo-illumination process. Our estimate that 60-80% of the iron of
sample B belongs to [4Fe-4S]1+ is not inconsistent with
the EPR spectroscopic analysis of the sample, which suggest that 52%
of the total iron in the sample belongs to spin S = 1/2
[4Fe-4S]1+ clusters. The enhanced intensity in the
central portion of the spectrum of Fig. 2B suggests that the
sample contains some S = 3/2 [4Fe-4S]1+
clusters as well.
The effect of addition of AdoMet on the Mössbauer spectrum of the
photoreduced sample is shown in Fig. 2C. It can be seen that
the contribution of the [4Fe-4S]1+ form has decreased
(EPR showed that only 35% of total iron was in the S = 1/2 state) and that the doublet characteristic of the [4Fe-4S]2+ state has reappeared. We estimate that this
doublet accounts for
The distribution of iron within different species in samples A, B, and
C as derived from Mössbauer analysis is reported in Table
II. From these numbers and those from the
EPR analysis, a reasonably good correlation, within the uncertainties,
is observed between the amount of S = 1/2
[4Fe-4S]1+ (35 µM as determined by EPR
spectroscopy) being oxidized by AdoMet, the amount of
[4Fe-4S]2+ being formed (40 µM as
determined by Mössbauer spectroscopy), and that of methionine
formed (30 µM) after a 15-min reaction in this
experiment. The Mössbauer data show clearly that the loss of the
EPR signal in the course of incubation with AdoMet is due to a
one-electron oxidation of the [4Fe-4S]1+ cluster and not
due to the destruction of the iron-sulfur cluster, as witnessed by the
observation that no mononuclear Fe was generated during the
reaction.
A Mössbauer spectrum identical within the noise to that shown in
Fig. 2C was obtained when the incubation with AdoMet was done in the presence of the dethiobiotin substrate.
Formation of biotin from dethiobiotin (DTB) is a complex enzymatic
reaction that involves radical chemistry (22). Biotin synthase, a
member of the radical-SAM superfamily, contains at least one
iron-sulfur cluster, which is thought to catalyze the reduction of
AdoMet by reduced flavodoxin and its cleavage into methionine and the
5'-deoxyadenosyl radical. The latter is suggested to serve for
initiating C-H to C-S bond formation by abstraction of H atoms at
position 6 and 9 of DTB. In this work we report studies of the first
step of the reaction, namely the reductive cleavage of AdoMet.
The type of iron-sulfur cluster(s) in BioB is still a matter of
controversy. One proposal, based on spectroscopic studies (11),
envisioned a [2Fe-2S] center that could, under reducing conditions,
convert into one [4Fe-4S] center bridging the two subunits of the
dimer. This proposal was then challenged when we (14, 15) and others
(26, 28) demonstrated that anaerobic preparations of BioB could bind as
much as 4 Fe and 4 S per monomer in the form of
[4Fe-4S]2+/1+ clusters that undergo
degradation into [2Fe-2S] clusters upon exposure to
air (14, 26, 28). However, very recently Ugulava and co-workers (25,
27), on the basis of optical and electrochemical studies, reported that
each monomer of active BioB could bind one [4Fe-4S] and one
[2Fe-2S] cluster. From this study it was suggested that the former
was involved in the cleavage of AdoMet and that the latter served as a
sulfur donor during dethiobiotin to biotin conversion. Using a
different procedure, anaerobic reconstitution of BioB in our hands
resulted in an active protein containing 3.5 to 4 Fe per polypeptide
chain and equivalent amounts of sulfide. Characterization of our
preparations by Mössbauer spectroscopy generally shows the
presence of a mixture of [4Fe-4S]2+ and
[2Fe-2S]2+ clusters and mononuclear ferrous iron
impurities. The proportions of the different species vary from one
preparation to another, but more that 60% (up to 90% in previous
samples) of the iron is always associated with [4Fe-4S] clusters (14,
15). The sample used in the present study, for example, had The data presented here provide the first direct spectroscopic evidence
that the [4Fe-4S]1+ cluster, but not
[4Fe-4S]2+, is competent for AdoMet reduction and
cleavage. In single turnover experiments, the EPR signal of the reduced
cluster was shown to decay after addition of an excess of AdoMet (Fig.
1). This is in marked contrast to all studied members of the
radical-SAM superfamily of enzymes. Indeed, for the
Our Mössbauer study shows that the product of
[4Fe-4S]1+ cluster oxidation was exclusively the
[4Fe-4S]2+ form, with parameters identical to those of
the 2+ cluster before reduction. We have no evidence for the
destruction of the cluster even when the reaction was carried out in
the presence of the dethiobiotin substrate. This result does not lend
support to the hypothesis that the [4Fe-4S] cluster is the source of
sulfur during biotin formation (28). It rather shows that it is stable
under anaerobic conditions, only shuttling between the 2+ and 1+
oxidation states. The observation that several identical cycles of
cluster reduction and oxidation by AdoMet could be achieved with the
same preparation is indeed consistent with a stable cluster under these conditions. However, some caution is advised regarding this conclusion because our reaction did not include all the components required for
biotin formation.
During the course of the reaction we could not detect any significant
changes of the shape and saturation properties of the EPR signal of the
cluster. This is also in contrast with RNR and PFL whose clusters were
shown to be affected by the presence of AdoMet, as shown by EPR and
Mössbauer spectroscopy (6, 16, 18). We thus have not obtained
direct spectroscopic evidence here for an intermediate biotin
synthase-AdoMet complex.
That AdoMet is cleaved during reaction with the reduced cluster of BioB
is also shown in this study. Indeed methionine, a product of that
cleavage, was formed in roughly stoichiometric amounts with regard to
the [4Fe-4S] cluster being oxidized, as judged by EPR, all along the
reaction (Fig. 1). This is in accord with the notion that the
[4Fe-4S]1+ cluster reacts as a one-electron donor. When
compared with RNR and PFL, the reductive cleavage of AdoMet by reduced
BioB is much slower even in the presence of substrate (16, 18).
Considering that two molecules of AdoMet must be cleaved for the
production of one molecule of biotin, the sluggishness of this reaction
step raises the question whether, at least in vitro, the
very low enzymatic activity generally obtained is partly due to such an
inefficient electron transfer to and cleavage of AdoMet. Why this
reaction is so slow is presently not clear. Further experiments are
required to learn whether and how this reaction step can be
accelerated. Nevertheless, the rate constant from methionine formation
is significantly larger than that for biotin formation with our
preparations (14, 15), showing that reductive cleavage of AdoMet is
kinetically competent.
Finally, the effects of mutations of the cysteine residues of BioB on
the reaction have revealed interesting features. Recent site-directed
mutagenesis experiments on BioB led us to propose that Cys-53, Cys-57,
and Cys-60, which belong to the CXXXCXXC triad
characteristic of the members of the radical-SAM family, coordinate to
the cluster (15). The corresponding Cys-to-Ala mutants are unable to
access the 1+ state of the [4Fe-4S] cluster. We have shown here that
these mutants are also not able to catalyze the reductive cleavage of
AdoMet, further confirming the role of the cysteines of the triad as
ligands of the cluster.
Three additional cysteines, Cys-97, Cys-128, Cys-188 in E. coli BioB have also been shown to be essential for enzyme
activity. However, the corresponding Cys-to-Ala mutants were shown to
be able to access the [4Fe-4S]1+ state similar to that of
the wild-type enzyme (15). This led us to suggest that these
cysteines were not involved in the chelation of the [4Fe-4S] center
but were important for other functions not yet identified. Whether they
could serve as ligands for an additional cluster as suggested by
Ugulava et al. (25) remains open at this stage. It should be
noted that only Cys-97 and Cys-188, but not Cys-128, are fully
conserved among 15 BioB proteins from different species. The results
reported here show that these three cysteines are not required for
AdoMet reduction and cleavage by the [4Fe-4S]1+ cluster,
providing further indication that they are not ligands of the
[4Fe-4S] cluster. Accordingly, the corresponding mutants could react
with AdoMet with rates and yields of methionine production roughly
similar to those for the wild-type enzyme (Table I).
On the basis of the present studies we conclude that the
[4Fe-4S]1+ center bound to cysteines 53, 57, and 60 is
responsible for the one-electron reductive cleavage of AdoMet. This
reaction is essential because it provides the primary 5'-deoxyadenosyl
radical for dethiobiotin activation. This conclusion is not
inconsistent with Jarrett's recent hypothesis (25, 27) according to
which the [4Fe-4S] cluster functions as a redox catalyst for AdoMet
activation whereas the [2Fe-2S] cluster serves only in the later
phases of the reaction. The function of Cys-97, Cys-128, and Cys-188
remains a question that is currently being addressed in our laboratory.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant GM22701 (to E. M.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
Present address: NCSR, Demokritos, Institute of
Materials Science, 15310 Ag. Paraskevi, Attiki, Greece.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 7, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111324200
The abbreviations used are:
AdoMet (SAM), S-adenosylmethionine;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
RNR, ribonucleotide reductase;
PFL, pyruvate formate lyase;
LAM, lysine
aminomutase;
DTB, dethiobiotin;
5-DAF, 5-deazaflavin;
BioB, biotin
synthase;
Ado·, 5'-deoxyadenosyl radical.
Reductive Cleavage of S-Adenosylmethionine by Biotin
Synthase from Escherichia coli*
,
,

Laboratoire de Chimie et Biochimie des
Centres Rédox Biologiques, Departement de Biologie
Moléculaire et Structurale-Chimie Biologie,
CEA/CNRS/Université Joseph Fourier, UMR 5047, 17 Avenue des
Martyrs, 38054 Grenoble Cedex 09, France, § Carnegie Mellon
University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, the
Oxford Center
for Molecular Sciences, Dyson Perrins Laboratory, South Parks Road,
Oxford OX1 3QY, United Kingdom, and the ** Department of
Chemistry, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ,
United Kingdom
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (5K):
[in a new window]
Scheme 1.
Conversion of dethiobiotin to
biotin.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-rays.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Correlation between decay of the EPR signal
of reduced BioB and methionine formation. BioB (160 µM, 3.3 iron/polypeptide chain) in 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, was first reduced with 5-DAF under
argon. Then illumination was stopped, 500 µM AdoMet was
added anaerobically, and the solution was kept in darkness. At the
indicated times, the reduced iron-sulfur cluster (
) and methionine
(
) were assayed as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Inset, EPR spectrum of photoreduced BioB (200 µM). Temperature, 10 K; microwave power, 0.160 milliwatts; modulation amplitude, 10 G; receiver gain,
2.105; frequency, 9.447 GHz.
1, and the reaction was completed within about 1 h (Fig. 1). As shown below, the EPR-silent reaction product has been
identified as the corresponding [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster form.
In a control experiment reconstituted BioB lacking EPR-active
clusters and containing mainly EPR-silent [4Fe-4S]2+
clusters was incubated with an excess of AdoMet (0.5 mM) in
buffer A. After 1-h incubation no significant production of methionine (less than 0.01 mol/mol of monomer BioB) was observed, demonstrating that the [4Fe-4S]2+ center is not competent for AdoMet
cleavage to methionine.
AdoMet reductase activity of reconstituted wild-type and mutants
BioB
= 0.45 mm/s and quadrupole
splitting
EQ = 1.13 mm/s, accounting for
60% of the total iron. The parameters of this doublet are the same
as those reported for the [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster of BioB
(14). The spectrum also contains the contributions of four minority
species. Two doublets, each representing approximately 6% of the iron,
exhibit
EQ
3.1 mm/s,
1.2 mm/s and
EQ
3.1 mm/s,
0.7 mm/s (see also Fig. 3 of Ref. 14). The two broad lines between +2 mm/s
and +3 mm/s Doppler velocity are the high energy features of these
doublets. Most likely both doublets represent adventitiously bound
FeII. Isomer shifts of
0.7 mm/s are typical of
tetrahedral high spin FeIIS4 complexes
suggesting that this species represents mononuclear FeII
bound to cysteinyl sulfurs of sites lacking a cluster. A third minority
species, contributing 10-15% of the absorption in Fig. 2A,
exhibits a doublet with
EQ
0.55 mm/s and
0.27 mm/s, parameters identical to those of the
[2Fe-2S]2+ cluster in oxygen-exposed BioB samples (14).
Finally, the spectrum contains an unresolved paramagnetic component
(approximately 10% of Fe), recognizable by some shallow absorption
between
1 mm/s and
3 mm/s Doppler velocity. This paramagnetic
component, or at least a fraction of it, might belong to a
[4Fe-4S]1+ cluster, even though it is difficult to see in
the EPR spectrum (Table I).

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
4.2 K Mössbauer spectra of
57Fe-enriched BioB. A, reconstituted
protein (230 µM, 3.6 Fe/monomer). The solid
line drawn through the data is a simulation taking into account
the contributions of the [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster (60% of Fe),
the [2Fe-2S]2+ cluster (15%), and the two mononuclear
high spin ferrous sites (6% each). The doublet contributed by the
[4Fe-4S]2+ cluster is shown separately above the
data. BioB (B) after photoreduction for 1 h
in the presence of DAF and (C) after photoreduction and
15-min incubation with 500 µM AdoMet in darkness. The
solid line above the experimental spectrum is the
contribution of the [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster.
30% of the iron. This value may contain 10%
of the iron in [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster not reduced prior to
the addition of AdoMet (as in sample B). A spectrum recorded at
T = 100 K (not shown) revealed that no additional
mononuclear ferrous iron was generated, showing that cluster
destruction did not occur during the reaction.
Percentage of total iron in samples A, B, C
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
60% of
its total iron in the form of a [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster,
i.e. approximately 0.55 cluster/polypeptide. The incomplete [4Fe-4S] assembly or lack of clusters altogether in some monomers probably reflects the lability of the cluster and its sensitivity to
oxygen, as previously noted (14, 15, 28). In particular, the presence
of [2Fe-2S]2+ clusters (perhaps 0.2 cluster/polypeptide
in sample A) is usually an indication for contamination of the sample
by air. On the other hand, whether some of the observed [2Fe-2S]
clusters could be located in a second metal binding site is an opened
possibility, as suggested by Ugulava and collaborators (25). Under the
reducing conditions employed here, iron in [2Fe-2S] clusters are
mobilized to form almost exclusively [4Fe-4S] clusters. For sample B
described here 60-80% of the iron belongs to [4Fe-4S]1+
clusters, and no evidence for [2Fe-2S] centers could be obtained.
2-activating component of the anaerobic ribonucleotide reductase (RNR), the activase of the pyruvate formate lyase (PFL), and, for lysine aminomutase, the reaction between the
reduced cluster and AdoMet occur only in the presence of the substrate
(the
2 component of the RNR, PFL, and lysine
aminomutase, respectively, (16, 18, 21)). Reduction of AdoMet is a
thermodynamically unfavorable reaction, as a consequence of the
extremely low redox potential of sulfonium in general. The required
presence of substrate has been attributed to the required coupling of
this reaction to thermodynamically favorable reactions of radical
formation. For BioB we show that the oxidation of the cluster by AdoMet
occurs even in the absence of substrate and thus seems to be
thermodynamically more favorable. In fact, addition of DTB substrate
did not affect the reaction.
![]()
FOOTNOTES

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Tel.:
33-4-38-78-9112; Fax: 33-4-38-78-9124; E-mail:
mfontecave@cea.fr.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Sofia, H. J.,
Chen, G.,
Hetzler, B. G.,
Reyes-Spindola, J. F.,
and Miller, N. E.
(2001)
Nucleic Acids Res.
29,
1097-1106 2.
Cheek, J.,
and Broderick, J. B
(2001)
J. Biol. Inorg. Chem.
6,
209-226[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 3.
Fontecave, M.,
Mulliez, E.,
and Ollagnier-de Choudens, S.
(2001)
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.
5,
506-511[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 4.
Frey, P. A.
(2001)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
70,
121-148[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 5.
Frey, P. A.,
and Booker, S. J.
(2001)
Adv. Protein Chem.
58,
1-45[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 6.
Ollagnier, S.,
Mulliez, E.,
Schmidt, P. P.,
Eliasson, R.,
Gaillard, J.,
Deronzier, C.,
Bergman, T.,
Gräslund, A.,
Reichard, P.,
and Fontecave, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
24216-24223 7.
Tamarit, J.,
Gerez, C.,
Meier, C.,
Mulliez, E.,
Trautwein, A.,
and Fontecave, M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
15669-15675 8.
Külzer, R.,
Pils, T.,
Kappl, R.,
Hüttermann, J.,
and Knappe, J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
4897-4903 9.
Petrovich, R. M.,
Ruzicka, F. J.,
Reed, G. H.,
and Frey, P.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
10774-10781[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 10.
Ruzicka, F. J.,
Lieder, W.,
and Frey, P. A
(2000)
J. Bacteriol.
182,
469-476 11.
Duin, E. C.,
Lafferty, M. E.,
Crouse, B. R.,
Allen, R. M.,
Sanyal, I.,
Flint, D. H.,
and Johnson, M. K.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
11811-11820[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 12.
Hewitson, K. S.,
Baldwin, J. E.,
Shaw, N. M.,
and Roach, P. L.
(2000)
FEBS Lett.
466,
372-376[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 13.
McIver, L.,
Baxter, R. L.,
and Campopiano, D. J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
13888-13894 14.
Ollagnier-de Choudens, S.,
Sanakis, Y.,
Hewitson, K. S.,
Roach, P.,
Baldwin, J. E.,
Münck, E.,
and Fontecave, M.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
4165-4173[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 15.
Hewitson, K.,
Ollagnier-de Choudens, S.,
Sanakis, Y.,
Shaw, N. M.,
Baldwin, J. E.,
Münck, E.,
Roach, P. L.,
and Fontecave, M.
(2002)
J. Biol. Inorg. Chem.
7,
83-93[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 16.
Henshaw, T. F.,
Cheek, J.,
and Broderick, J. B.
(2000)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
122,
8331-8332[CrossRef] 17.
Lieder, K. W.,
Booker, L. S.,
Ruzicka, F. J.,
Beinert, H., K. W.,
Reed, G. H.,
and Frey, P. A.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
2578-2585[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 18.
Padovani, D.,
Thomas, F.,
Trautwein, A. X.,
Mulliez, E.,
and Fontecave, M.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
6713-6719[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 19.
Wagner, A. F. V.,
Frey, M.,
Neugebauer, F. A.,
and Schäfer, W.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
996-1000 20.
Sun, X.,
Ollagnier, S.,
Schmidt, P. P.,
Atta, M.,
Mulliez, E.,
LePape, L.,
Eliasson, R.,
Gräslund, A.,
Fontecave, M.,
Reichard, P.,
and Sjöberg, B-M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
6827-6831 21.
Wu, W.,
Booker, S.,
Lieder, K. W.,
Bandarian, V.,
Reed, G. H.,
and Frey, P. A.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
9561-9570[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 22.
Marquet, A.,
Tse Sum Bui, B.,
and Florentin, D.
(2001)
Vitamins and Hormones
61,
51-85[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 23.
Sanyal, I.,
Cohen, G.,
and Flint, D. H
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
3625-3631[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 24.
Birch, O. M.,
Furhmann, M.,
and Shaw, N. M .
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
19158-19165 25.
Ugulava, N. B.,
Sacanell, C. J.,
and Jarrett, J. T.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
8352-8358[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 26.
Ugulava, N. B.,
Gibney, B. R.,
and Jarrett, J. T.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
5206-5214[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 27.
Ugulava, N. B.,
Gibney, B. R.,
and Jarrett, J. T.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
8343-8351[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 28.
Tse Sum Bui, B.,
Florentin, D.,
Fournier, F.,
Ploux, O.,
Mejan, A.,
and Marquet, A.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
440,
226-230[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 29.
Shaw, N. M.,
Birch, O. M.,
Tinschert, A.,
Venetz, V.,
Dietrich, R.,
and Savoy, L. A.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
330,
1079-1085 30.
Guianvarc'h, D.,
Florentin, D.,
Bui, B. T. S.,
Nunzi, F.,
and Marquet, A.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
236,
402-406[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 31.
Ashton, W. T.,
Brown, R.,
and Tolman, R. L.
(1978)
J. Heterocycl. Chem.
15,
489-491 32.
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 33.
Nozaki, Y.
(1986)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
249,
437-446[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 34.
Fish, W. W.
(1988)
Methods Enzymol.
158,
357-364[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 35.
Beinert, H.
(1983)
Anal. Biochem.
131,
373-378[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
U. Muhlenhoff, M. J. Gerl, B. Flauger, H. M. Pirner, S. Balser, N. Richhardt, R. Lill, and J. Stolz The Iron-Sulfur Cluster Proteins Isa1 and Isa2 Are Required for the Function but Not for the De Novo Synthesis of the Fe/S Clusters of Biotin Synthase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Eukaryot. Cell, March 1, 2007; 6(3): 495 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Chandor, O. Berteau, T. Douki, D. Gasparutto, Y. Sanakis, S. Ollagnier-de-Choudens, M. Atta, and M. Fontecave Dinucleotide Spore Photoproduct, a Minimal Substrate of the DNA Repair Spore Photoproduct Lyase Enzyme from Bacillus subtilis J. Biol. Chem., September 15, 2006; 281(37): 26922 - 26931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Layer, K. Grage, T. Teschner, V. Schunemann, D. Breckau, A. Masoumi, M. Jahn, P. Heathcote, A. X. Trautwein, and D. Jahn Radical S-Adenosylmethionine Enzyme Coproporphyrinogen III Oxidase HemN: FUNCTIONAL FEATURES OF THE [4Fe-4S] CLUSTER AND THE TWO BOUND S-ADENOSYL-L-METHIONINES J. Biol. Chem., August 12, 2005; 280(32): 29038 - 29046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Posewitz, P. W. King, S. L. Smolinski, L. Zhang, M. Seibert, and M. L. Ghirardi Discovery of Two Novel Radical S-Adenosylmethionine Proteins Required for the Assembly of an Active [Fe] Hydrogenase J. Biol. Chem., June 11, 2004; 279(24): 25711 - 25720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Berkovitch, Y. Nicolet, J. T. Wan, J. T. Jarrett, and C. L. Drennan Crystal Structure of Biotin Synthase, an S-Adenosylmethionine-Dependent Radical Enzyme Science, January 2, 2004; 303(5654): 76 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Cosper, N. J. Cosper, W. Hong, J. E. Shokes, W. E. Broderick, J. B. Broderick, M. K. Johnson, and R. A. Scott Structural studies of the interaction of S-adenosylmethionine with the [4Fe-4S] clusters in biotin synthase and pyruvate formate-lyase activating enzyme Protein Sci., July 1, 2003; 12(7): 1573 - 1577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Picciocchi, R. Douce, and C. Alban The Plant Biotin Synthase Reaction: IDENTIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF ESSENTIAL MITOCHONDRIAL ACCESSORY PROTEIN COMPONENTS J. Biol. Chem., June 27, 2003; 278(27): 24966 - 24975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ollagnier-de Choudens, L. Nachin, Y. Sanakis, L. Loiseau, F. Barras, and M. Fontecave SufA from Erwinia chrysanthemi. CHARACTERIZATION OF A SCAFFOLD PROTEIN REQUIRED FOR IRON-SULFUR CLUSTER ASSEMBLY J. Biol. Chem., May 9, 2003; 278(20): 17993 - 18001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||