![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 16, 13463-13472, April 19, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, November 15, 2001, and in revised form, January 17, 2002
Retroviruses induce leukemia in inbred strains of
mice by activating cellular proto-oncogenes and/or inactivating tumor
suppressors. The proviral integration sites in these leukemias provide
powerful genetic tags for disease gene identification. Here we show
that Evi24, a common site of retroviral integration in AKXD
B cell and BXH-2 myeloid leukemias, contains a novel Dbl family guanine nucleotide exchange factor gene. We have designated this gene Clg (common-site lymphoma/leukemia
guanine nucleotide exchange factor). Proviral integrations
on chromosome 7 at Evi24 are located 7.6-10.3 kb upstream
of Clg and increased Clg expression 2-5-fold compared with leukemias lacking proviral integrations at
Evi24. Clg contains Dbl/pleckstrin
homology domains with substantial sequence homology to many Rho family
activators, including the transforming Dbl and
Dbs/Ost oncogenes. Nucleotide exchange assays indicated
that Clg specifically activated nucleotide exchange on Cdc42, but not
RhoA or Rac1, in vitro. NIH 3T3 transfection studies showed
that overexpression of full-length and carboxyl-terminally truncated forms of Clg morphologically transformed NIH 3T3 cells. This study and studies showing that the human homolog of
EVI24 is located in a region of 19q13 frequently amplified
in B cell lymphomas and pancreatic and breast cancers implicate
Clg and Cdc42 activation in mouse and human cancers.
Slow-transforming retroviruses cause cancer in experimental
organisms in part by acting as insertional mutagens (1, 2). Proviruses
can insert within tumor suppressor genes and inactivate them (3, 4).
Alternatively, activation of proto-oncogenes occurs in many different
ways due to proviral insertion, including promoter insertion,
truncation of the open reading frame, mRNA stabilization, and
enhancement of the transcriptional activity of the endogenous promoter
by elements in the long terminal repeats (LTRs)1 of the provirus. This
transcriptional enhancement mechanism often occurs in the activation of
proto-oncogenes in the BXH-2 and AKXD models of acute myeloid leukemia
(AML) and B and T cell malignancies (5, 6).
BXH-2 is one of a series of recombinant inbred strains created by
crosses of the C57BL/6J and C3H/HeJ strains. Unlike either parental
strain, ~95% of BXH-2 strain mice will develop AML by 1 year of age
(7, 8). AML induction is causally associated with chronic infection
with a B ecotropic murine leukemia virus (MuLV), which is passed from
mother to offspring (7). A large number of common integration sites,
chromosomal sites that harbor an integrated provirus in multiple
independent tumors, have been identified in BXH-2 strain AML (2, 5) and
in B cell tumors, developing as a consequence of MuLV infection, in
various AKXD recombinant inbred strains made from crosses between the
AKR and DBA strains (5, 9). Many of these common insertion sites were
discovered using a powerful PCR-based system for cloning proviral
insertions near CpG islands (5). In two BXH-2 and four AKXD mice, a
common integration site called Evi24 (ecotropic viral integration site 24) was
mapped to the promoter region of the Zfp36/tristetraprolin
gene. Evi24 thus appears to contain a novel oncogene that
predisposes B cell and myeloid leukemias.
In this work, we demonstrate that a novel Dbl family gene downstream of
Zfp36 appears to be the target of proviral insertions at
Evi24. We have designated the gene Clg (for
common-site lymphoma/leukemia GEF)
and show that it encodes a transforming oncogene with exchange activity
for Cdc42, but not RhoA or Rac1. DBL is the prototypical member of a class of genes that encode GEFs for the Rho subfamily of
the Ras superfamily small GTPases (10). All members of this class of
GEFs are characterized by the presence of a similar ~180-amino acid
Dbl homology (DH) domain, which catalyzes the exchange of bound GDP for
GTP on Rho subfamily members such as Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 (11, 12). In
all Dbl-like GEFs described to date, the DH domain is located
amino-terminal to a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, which has been
shown to bind to other proteins or lipids produced as a consequence of
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-K) activity (13). Many of the
Dbl family GEFs have been shown to be transforming oncogenes in
fibroblasts, and this transforming activity has been shown to require
GEF activity and signaling via one or more of the small GTPases in the
Rho subfamily (10). These proteins, like Ras, act as binary molecular
switches in signal transduction pathways and are turned on when bound
to GTP, interacting with various downstream effector molecules. They
are inactive in the GDP-bound form and require Dbl family GEFs to exchange bound GDP for cytosolic GTP, resulting in activation. The Rho,
Rac, and Cdc42 activities have been shown to be intimately involved in
cytoskeletal organization (14-16); cell cycle control (17); and
transcription activation, endocytosis and exocytosis, and
transformation of fibroblasts (18, 19). At least two DH domain genes,
LARG and BCR, are partners in chromosomal
translocations that cause human myeloid leukemia (20, 21). The
discovery of Clg activation by proviral insertion in myeloid
and B cell malignancies implicates Dbl family genes and possibly Cdc42
activity in the hematological malignancies as well. Indeed, the
CLG gene is a candidate oncogene in human diffuse large cell
lymphoma, as it maps to 19q13.1, a region of frequent amplification in
these B cell cancers and in ovarian, breast, and pancreatic
adenocarcinomas (22).
Molecular Cloning of Clg Proviral Insertions--
Proviral
insertions at Evi24 were discovered as part of a large-scale
cloning effort that utilized a long template, inverse PCR method
described in detail elsewhere (5). Briefly, 5 µg of genomic DNAs from
individual BXH-2 AML and AKXD malignant clones were digested with
SacII endonuclease (New England Biolabs Inc.) overnight. The
enzyme was then inactivated by heating at 65 °C for 30 min, and the
DNA fragments were ligated in 500-µl reactions using 25 units of T4
DNA ligase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) at 4 °C overnight to
produce circular provirus/cellular DNA templates for PCR amplification.
The ligated material was precipitated in ethanol and resuspended in 20 µl of Tris/EDTA (pH 8.0). Primary PCR was performed using a
5'-end-biotinylated forward primer, which allowed purification of the
PCR products on M-280 streptavidin Dynabeads®
(Dynal, Inc., Lake Success, NY) before subsequent secondary PCR. 3.5 µl of the precipitated ligated tumor DNA were used as template for
primary PCR in a 50-µl reaction volume containing 20 nmol of each
dNTP, 15 pmol of forward (biotinylated) primer, 45 pmol of reverse
primer, 1× Expand Long TemplateTM buffer 2, and 2.5 units of enzyme mixture in the ExpandTM Long Template PCR
system (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Amplification was performed with
an Omnigene Hybaid thermocycler with the following program:
92 °C for 2 min; 10 cycles at 92 °C for 10 s, 63 °C for 30 s, and 68 °C for 10 min; and 20 cycles at 92 °C for
10 s, 63 °C for 30 s, and 68 °C for 10 min with 20 s of autoextension. Primary PCR products were then subjected to bead
purification following the manufacturer's instructions (Dynal, Inc.).
Briefly, for each sample, 200 µg of beads were washed and resuspended
in 40 µl of binding and washing buffer before adding to 40 µl of primary PCR products. After incubation at room temperature for 15 min,
the tubes were placed in a Magnetic Particle Concentrator®
for 1 min, and the solution was removed. The beads were then washed
twice with 50 µl of binding and washing buffer before being resuspended in 20 µl of Expand Long TemplateTM buffer 2. Secondary PCR was performed as described by Li et al. (5),
except that the template DNA was bound to beads. 5% of the purified,
bead-bound PCR products (1 µl of 20) and 15 pmol of each secondary
primer were used in 50-µl PCRs carried out exactly as described for
the primary PCRs. The secondary PCR products were separated on a 1%
agarose gel, purified using the Geneclean II® kit (BIO
101, Inc.), and directly cloned using the CloneAmp® pAMP1
system (Invitrogen) according to the supplied protocol. The primers
used in the primary PCRs were AKV5-For 5' biotinylated (5'-CGAAGTAGTGTTACAGAATCGTAGAGGC-3') and SacII-Rev1
(5'-GCAACTGACCATTACCCCCC-3'). The primers used in the secondary PCRs
were U5-For (5'-CUACUACUACUAGAGTGATTGACTGCCCAGCC-3') and SacII-Rev2
(5'-CAUCAUCAUCAUGAAAGCCCGAGAGGTGGTGG-3'). The cloned PCR products were
sequenced using a PRISM BigDyeTM cycle sequencing kit
(PerkinElmer Life Sciences) on an ABI Model 373A DNA Sequencer (Applied
Biosystems). SP6 and T7 sequencing primers were purchased from Invitrogen.
Cloning Full-length Clg and Clg Clone 1e cDNAs--
Using
BLAST analysis at the NCBI
Database,2 it was discovered
that Evi24 is located on a segment of mouse chromosome 7 that had been deposited in the GenBankTM/EBI Data
Bank (accession number AC002327). Genomic sequence ~20 kb on either
side of Evi24 was analyzed for putative exons using BLAST
against the mouse expressed sequence tag data base as well as by
employing the GRAIL3 and Gene
Finder4 algorithms. The
full-length Clg used in the
studies herein was generated in two segments by RT-PCR using RNA from
BXH-2 tumor 134 (GenBankTM/EBI accession number AF465238).
However, multiple cDNA clones were generated and sequenced from
both BXH-2 tumor 134 and normal bone marrow RNAs, and it was determined
that there are no sequence differences between the two. The first
segment of the full-length Clg cDNA was cloned as
follows: the 5'-primer (5'-CAGGCAGCCACCACCAT-3') and 3'-primer
(5'-GTTGCATCTGCTGGATACGC-3') were used to generate a 2353-bp PCR
product that was cloned into pcDNA3.1/V5/His-TOPO (Invitrogen). The
resultant plasmid was then digested with KpnI restriction
endonuclease (New England Biolabs), and the 1902-bp fragment was cloned
into the KpnI site of pMSCVneo
(CLONTECH). This plasmid was then digested in a
SmaI/HindIII double digest, and the resultant
1384-bp fragment was cloned into SmaI/HindIII-cut pCMVTag2A (Stratagene), which put the cDNA in-frame with an
upstream FLAG epitope. The second segment of the full-length
Clg cDNA was generated using the 5'-primer
(5'-GCCGCAGGCAGTCTGAGCCAGCAA-3') and 3'-primer
(5'-CTCCTGGGCTAGAAAGCTACAG-3'). The 2742-bp PCR product was cloned into
pcDNA3.1/V5/His-TOPO. The resultant vector was digested with
HindIII, and the 2615-bp fragment was cloned into the
HindIII site of the pCMVTag2A vector containing the first segment of the cDNA (see above). After sequencing, it was
determined that the full-length cDNA clone exactly matched the
sequence of all exons from the genomic clone (GenBankTM/EBI
accession number AC002327). Neither 5'-rapid amplification of cDNA
ends nor RT-PCR revealed the presence of any additional 5'-exons.
Clg clone 1e was generated using the same 5'-primer as was
used in generating the first segment of full-length Clg above (5'-CAGGCAGCCACCACCAT-3') and a different 3'-primer
(5'-GGGTTCTGGGATATGTTTGCTC-3'). The 1208-bp PCR product was cloned into
pcDNA3.1/V5/His-TOPO in-frame with the downstream
V5/His6 epitope.
Southern Blot Analysis--
Genomic DNAs from BXH-2 and AKXD
frozen tissues were isolated, and 5 µg were digested overnight using
KpnI endonuclease. The resultant DNA fragments were
electrophoresed through a 1% agarose gel and transferred to
HybondTM N+ membrane (Amersham Biosciences)
before hybridization. Labeling of the SacII/BlpI
fragment from the inverse PCR product in pAMP1 from tumor 134 was
performed by random-primed [32P]dCTP labeling (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) essentially as described previously (7).
Northern Blot Analysis--
Total RNA was isolated from tumor
samples using the RNA STAT-60TM isolation reagent
(TEL-TEST, Inc., Friendswood, TX). Subsequent purification of
poly(A)+ mRNA on oligo(dT)-cellulose columns was
performed with an Amersham Biosciences mRNA purification kit. 3.0 µg of poly(A)+ tumor RNA were electrophoresed through a
formaldehyde-containing 1.0% agarose gel and transferred to
HybondTM N+ membrane before hybridization. A
541-bp Clg fragment probe from the coding region was
generated by RT-PCR using 5'-primer C (5'-CAGGCAGCCACCACCAT-3') and 3'-primer C (5'-GGGCCTGACGCTCCTGT-3'). The PCR products were directly radiolabeled by random-primed [32P]dCTP labeling
and hybridized to the blot. Blots were then stripped and rehybridized
with a GAPDH probe as a loading control.
Western Blot Analysis--
Transiently transfected HEK 293 cells
(calcium phosphate-transfected using a CellPhectTM
transfection kit from Amersham Biosciences) were lysed by vortexing in
radioimmune precipitation assay buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40,
0.5% deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS) and protease inhibitors (2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml
pepstatin, and 2.5 µg/ml aprotinin) at a concentration of 10 × 106 cells/ml at 4 °C for 30 min. The lysates were
clarified by centrifugation for 30 min at 14,000 rpm to remove
insoluble material. The concentration of protein was determined using
the Pierce Coomassie Plus® protein assay. 60 µg of
protein were loaded onto 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gels, electrophoresed,
and transferred to nitrocellulose as described (3). The blots were
hybridized with anti-FLAG (M2; Sigma) or anti-V5 (Invitrogen) antibody
according to the manufacturers' instructions and visualized with an
enhanced chemiluminescence kit (ECL, Amersham Biosciences).
Focus Formation Assays--
NIH 3T3 fibroblasts were calcium
phosphate-transfected (CellPhectTM transfection kit) with
10 µg of Clg expression constructs or empty vector and
selected in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Invitrogen), 10%
fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 0.4 mg/ml G418 for
14 days. Cells (0.5 × 106) were then plated in
triplicate in 6-cm plates and grown for 7 days before staining with
50% methanol and 0.01 g/ml methylene blue.
Luciferase Reporter Assays--
A Dual-Luciferase®
reporter assay system (Promega) and a MercuryTM pathway
profiling system (CLONTECH) were used to assess
signal transduction pathways that could be influenced by Clg.
Experiments were conducted as outlined in the manufacturers'
protocols. Briefly, HEK 293 cells were plated at 0.5 × 106 cells/well using six-well culture plates. 24 h
later, 1.3 µg of reporter vector (CLONTECH) and
0.2 µg of Renilla luciferase reporter vector (Promega) to
control for transfection efficiency and 0.7 µg of Clg
vector or corresponding empty vector were combined in a total
volume of 120 µl and calcium phosphate-transfected in triplicate
using the CellPhectTM transfection kit as recommended by
the manufacturer. Transfected cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium without added serum for 16 h before lysis and
luciferase detection. Levels of protein in each lysate were determined
using the Pierce Coomassie Plus® protein assay, and
separate luciferase readings were taken for both the reporter plasmid
and the Renilla luciferase reporter plasmid to control for
transfection efficiency of each sample. For analysis, luciferase levels
for empty vectors were set equal to 1, and all sample readings were
normalized to protein content and transfection efficiency.
Clg-Small GTPase Complex Formation Assay--
COS-7 cells were
transfected with the V5/His6-Clg 1e
construct by the LipofectAMINE method (Invitrogen). 48 h
post-transfection, complex formation between V5/His6-tagged
Clg 1e and GST-fused dominant-negative Cdc42 (N17Cdc42), Rac1
(N17Rac1), RhoA (N19RhoA), or Ha-Ras protein was carried out by
incubation of the Clg 1e-expressing cell lysates with the GST fusion
proteins (1 µg). The coprecipitated complexes with immobilized
Ni2+-agarose beads were washed three times with ice-cold
lysis buffer. The coprecipitates containing the V5/His6-Clg
1e input and GST fusion proteins were probed with anti-V5 and anti-GST
monoclonal antibodies, respectively, on Western blots visualized by
chemiluminescence reagents (Amersham Biosciences).
In Vitro GDP/GTP Exchange Assay--
The time courses for
[3H]GDP/GTP exchange of Rho family GTPases in the
presence or absence of purified His6-Clg 1e,
HA3-Dbl (where HA is hemagglutinin), or
His6-TrioN were determined as previously described using
the nitrocellulose filtration method (23). The GEF reaction buffer
contained [3H]GDP-loaded Rho proteins with 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM GTP, and 1 mM dithiothreitol supplemented with purified
His6-Clg 1e.
Previous experiments using a long template, inverse PCR cloning
procedure identified two BXH-2 myeloid leukemias with proviral integration in the promoter region of the
Zfp36/tristetraprolin gene (GenBankTM/EBI
accession numbers AC002327 and L42317) (5). This common viral
integration site was named Evi24. More recently, four
additional AKXD malignancies (three B cell lymphomas and one mixed T
and B cell lymphoma) were identified that have proviral integrations at
Evi24 (Fig. 1). All but one
viral integration (A034) is oriented in the same transcriptional
direction as the Zfp36 gene. Zfp36 encodes an
RNA-binding protein that regulates the stability of mRNAs such as
TNF- Additional genomic sequence around the Zfp36 gene, which
maps to mouse chromosome 7 (27), has been deposited in the
GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank (accession number AC002327). By
comparing sequences within 20 kb on each side of the Zfp36
gene with the dbEST Database as well as using the GRAIL and Gene Finder
algorithms (28, 29), three additional genes in the Evi24
region were identified. Two genes, designated UsgA
(upstream gene A) and
UsgB (upstream gene B), are located 6-17 kb upstream of
Zfp36, whereas Clg (see below) is located 4 kb
downstream of Zfp36 (Fig. 1). Analysis of the predicted
nucleotide and amino acid sequences of UsgA and
UsgB did not reveal any information about their potential
functions. However, UsgB appears to be the mouse homolog of
a human gene called PD2, which is deposited in the
GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank without a publication, but the
annotation of which indicates that this gene is amplified and
overexpressed in pancreatic cancer (accession number CAC20564).
Analysis of putative exons by GRAIL and Gene Finder in the gene
downstream of Zfp36 revealed the possible presence of DH and
PH domains. Subsequent RT-PCR and an independent cDNA cloning
project in human (GenBankTM/EBI accession number AK024429)
have confirmed that this gene encodes a Dbl family GEF. We thus named
the gene Clg, for common-site lymphoma/leukemia GEF. We detected no other
known protein motifs in Clg. Southern blot analysis of the six tumor
DNAs containing Evi24 viral integrations using an
Evi24-specific probe showed that two tumors (BXH-2 tumors
134 and 154) contained rearranged bands that were equal in intensity to
the unrearranged wild-type Evi24 allele (Fig.
2A). Thus, these two tumors
harbor clonally integrated proviruses at the Evi24 locus.
The other four tumor DNAs did not show rearrangements at the Southern
blot level and presumably harbor subclonal proviral insertions at
Evi24 (Fig. 2A and data not shown).
Activation of Clg, a Novel Dbl Family Guanine
Nucleotide Exchange Factor Gene, by Proviral Insertion at
Evi24, a Common Integration Site in B Cell and Myeloid
Leukemias*
§,
,
,
,
**
University of Minnesota Cancer
Center, Institute of Human Genetics, and the Department of Genetics,
Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis,
Minnesota 55455, the ¶ Department of Molecular Sciences,
University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
38163, and the
Mouse Cancer Genetics Program, NCI-Frederick
Cancer Research and Development Center, Frederick, Maryland 21702
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(tumor necrosis factor-
) and GM-CSF (granulocyte-macrophage
colony-stimulating factor) by binding to their AU-rich elements (24,
25). A Zfp36 knockout has been made and has symptoms
characteristic of TNF-
transgene overexpression, including myeloid
hyperplasia (26).

View larger version (5K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Gene content near
Evi24. In two independent BXH-2 strain AML
(gray arrows) and four independent AKXD strain B cell
(black arrows) lymphomas, proviruses integrated into a
2.6-kb region of chromosome 7 (GenBankTM/EBI accession
number AC002327) upstream of the Zfp36 gene. Three
additional putative genes also reside in this region. A novel Dbl
family GEF gene, which was named Clg, lies 7.5-10 kb
downstream of the proviral insertions. Two as yet uncharacterized
genes, named UsgA and UsgB, lie upstream of the
insertions. UsgB appears to be the mouse homolog of a
putative human gene, PD2 (GenBankTM/EBI
accession number CAC20564). Large arrows indicate direction
of transcription.

View larger version (46K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Expression of Clg. A,
rearrangement at Evi24. Southern blot analysis was performed
on BXH-2 and AKXD tumor DNAs digested with KpnI
endonuclease. The cloned inverse PCR product from tumor 134 was used as
a probe. Due to a KpnI site in the LTR of the provirus,
fragments 2.3 and 1.8 kb smaller than germ line KpnI
fragments were detected in the tumor 134 and 154 (BXH-2 tumors) lanes,
respectively, showing that the locus is rearranged in a high percentage
of tumor 134 and 154 cells. Rearrangement was not detected in tumors
10928 and X090 (AKXD tumors). Arrows indicate rearranged
bands. B, Northern blot analysis of Clg
expression levels. 3.0 µg of BXH-2 tumor poly(A)+ RNAs
were run on a formaldehyde-containing 1.0% agarose gel. A
Clg probe was generated by RT-PCR using primers designed
from coding sequences. The major transcript is ~5 kb in size. The
blot was then stripped and rehybridized with a GAPDH probe as a loading
control. Samples with Evi24 insertions are indicated with
asterisks. C, tissue distribution of
Clg mRNA. A CLONTECH mouse
poly(A)+ RNA Master BlotTM was hybridized with
a Clg cDNA BlpI fragment probe. Expression
levels were highest in embryonic day (E) 7, 11, and 17 tissues as well as in pancreas, thymus, uterus, skeletal muscle, lung,
and heart. In addition, the level of Clg expression in
testis was higher than it appears because subsequent hybridization with
a hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase control cDNA probe
revealed underloading of the testis RNA sample. skel. mus.,
skeletal muscle; smooth mus., smooth muscle; submax.
gland, submaxillary gland; prost., prostate;
epidid., epididymis.
To determine whether any of the nearby genes are affected by proviral integration at Evi24, the two tumors with clonally integrated proviruses were analyzed by Northern blotting for UsgA, UsgB, Zfp36, and Clg expression. Surprisingly, Zfp36 expression was not affected by proviral integration when normalized to GAPDH and compared with other tumors without proviral insertions at Evi24. Likewise, the expression of UsgA and UsgB was also unaffected by proviral integration (data not shown). Instead, both tumors showed increased Clg expression or an additional Clg transcript that was larger than normal (Fig. 2B). The nature of these larger transcripts is not currently understood. They may represent fusion transcripts between the provirus and the Clg gene. However, attempts to amplify such a fusion using Clg- and virus-specific primers were not successful (data not shown).
Northern blot analysis of a multiple-tissue mouse mRNA dot blot
with a Clg probe revealed expression in thymus, skeletal
muscle, lung, testis, uterus, pancreas, and heart and during
embryogenesis (Fig. 2C). A combination of RT-PCR and rapid
amplification of cDNA ends was used to obtain a cDNA clone for
the Clg gene, which was deposited in the
GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank (accession number AF465238).
Multiple Clg cDNA clones from normal bone marrow and
BXH-2 AML tumor 134 were obtained and sequenced. No differences were
observed between any of these cDNA clones and the sequences of the
corresponding exons in the genomic DNA clone (GenBankTM/EBI
accession number AC002327). The 5'-end of this cDNA maps 4.2 kb
downstream of the last exon of Zfp36. The Clg
coding region contains 19 exons and covers 13 kb of genomic DNA (Fig.
3A). The putative
Clg start site is in exon 3, and the predicted
Clg open reading frame codes for a 1298-amino acid protein
(GenBankTM/EBI accession number AF465238) that terminates
in exon 19 (Fig. 3, A and B). The human CLG
protein (GenBankTM/EBI accession number AC011500) is 70%
identical to the mouse protein overall, with 94% identity in the DH/PH
domains. The Clg DH and PH domains are located in the N-terminal
region of the protein. Very similar DH domains were also found in
hypothetical proteins from human (GenBankTM/EBI accession
numbers BAB15719, BAB15364, CAB54806, and BAA86523),
Caenorhabditis elegans (accession number T21663), and
Drosophila (accession number AAF57673). The Clg DH domain is
more distantly related to those from Dbl, Vav2, and Dbs/Ost (Fig. 3,
C and D).
|
To determine whether Clg encodes a true guanine nucleotide
exchange factor that can activate various signaling pathways and transform cells in culture, as might be expected for a putative oncogene, we generated Clg expression vectors. Full-length Clg was
N-terminally tagged with a FLAG epitope and expressed from the CMV
immediate-early enhancer/promoter. In addition, the tagged cDNA was
cloned into the pMSCVneo retroviral vector (30), in which
expression is driven by the viral LTR. Similarly, a
carboxyl-terminally truncated form of Clg called 1e, which contains the
DH/PH domains and 33 adjacent amino acids, was produced and tagged with
a V5/His6 epitope at the C terminus and cloned into
CMV expression and MSCVneo plasmid vectors (Fig.
4A). The CMV-driven vectors
were tested for the ability to drive expression of the tagged proteins
by transient transfection into HEK 293 cells. Recombinant tagged proteins of the anticipated size were detected by Western blotting (Fig. 4B).
|
To investigate the function of the DH and PH domains of Clg, we
transfected Clg 1e cDNA, encoding amino acid residues
1-397, encompassing the DH domain (residues 60-236) and the PH domain (residues 256-364), into COS-7 cells. To test whether the Clg 1e
fragment can directly bind to Ras or Rho family GTP-binding proteins,
we employed the complex formation assay to detect the association
between the Clg 1e polypeptide in cell lysates and GST fusion proteins
of Cdc42, Rac1, RhoA, and Ras. The dominant-negative form of the Rho
proteins (N17Cdc42, N17Rac1, and N19RhoA), which bear a Thr-to-Asn
mutation at the corresponding positions, were used in these assays
because of their relative higher affinity for known Dbl family GEFs.
The anti-V5 and anti-GST antibodies were employed to probe the
Ni2+-agarose-bound protein coprecipitates. Among the panel
of small GTP-binding proteins, GST-N17Cdc42, GST-N17Rac1, and
GST-N19RhoA were detected in the precipitates of
V5/His6-Clg 1e, whereas the GST control alone or GST-Ras
showed no detectable affinity (Fig. 5A), suggesting that the Clg
polypeptide containing the DH and PH domains is capable of specifically
associating with Rho proteins in vitro.
|
To further determine whether the Clg polypeptide could act as a GEF toward the Rho GTPases, we expressed the V5/His6-Clg 1e fusion fragment product in COS-7 cells and purified it by Ni2+-agarose affinity chromatography. The ability of purified His6-Clg 1e to stimulate guanine nucleotide exchange of Cdc42, Rac1, and RhoA was examined in a [3H]GDP dissociation assay. As shown in Fig. 5B, isolated Clg 1e could efficiently promote the exchange of [3H]GDP for GTP only for Cdc42, very weakly for Rac1, and not at all for RhoA, indicating that Clg may function as a Cdc42-specific exchange factor.
To discover signal transduction pathways that can be activated by Clg
and that are required for its ability to function as an oncoprotein, we
performed transient transfection experiments utilizing Clg
vectors and luciferase reporter plasmids containing promoters sensitive
to various different signaling pathways. These experiments were
performed in the HEK 293 cell line. Reporter vectors responsive to the
p53, Rb, GAS (
-interferon activation sequence), STAT3 (signal
transducer and activator of transcription-3), SRE (serum-response
element), AP1 (activator protein 1), NF
B (nuclear factor of
B
cells), NFAT (nuclear factor of activated T cells), Myc, E2F, CRE
(cAMP-response element), and ISRE (interferon-stimulated response
element) pathways (Promega) were used in these experiments. Signal values were normalized to total protein in the lysate and to the
level of expression of a Renilla luciferase gene included in
the transfection mixture to control for differences in cell number and
transfection efficiency in each sample (Fig.
6). The level of reporter activation was
compared between triplicate samples of empty vector and full-length Clg
or Clg 1e for each reporter. Transfection of the Clg vectors
significantly up-regulated expression from the promoter containing the
SRE. The truncated Clg 1e vector also more modestly up-regulated the
Myc-, E2F-, and AP1-responsive promoters. These results suggest that
Clg can signal through small GTPase proteins, which in turn activate
the MAPK and/or JNK pathways.
|
NIH 3T3 cells were also transfected with the different Clg
constructs to determine whether they are capable of transforming NIH
3T3 cells in vitro. As a positive control, NIH 3T3 cells
were also transfected with an activated form of the prototypical DH/PH domain-containing Dbl oncogene. As shown in Fig.
7, the various Clg constructs
were able to transform NIH 3T3 cells in vitro. In contrast,
very few colonies were detected when NIH 3T3 cells were transfected
with an empty vector control.
|
Full-length and truncated forms of Clg were also
overexpressed in interleukin-3-dependent 32Dcl3 myeloblasts
to determine whether Clg affects the growth of these cells. There was
no significant difference in the growth of these cells in interleukin-3
or in the rate of apoptosis after interleukin-3 withdrawal between
cells transfected with Clg and empty vectors (data not shown).
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Here we show that Evi24, a common viral integration site in BXH-2 and AKXD leukemias, contains four genes, but that only one of these genes (Clg) is up-regulated by proviral integration at Evi24. Clg is a new member of a large family of DH/PH domain-containing transforming oncogenes (10) that can morphologically transform NIH 3T3 cells in vitro. We also show that Clg can catalyze the exchange of GDP for GTP on Cdc42. This exchange activity likely accounts for the transforming activity of Clg because a truncated form of Clg containing only the DH/PH domains also transforms NIH 3T3 cells in vitro. Formal proof that Clg overexpression is causally associated with leukemogenesis will, however, require the production of Clg transgenic mice that have an increased frequency of leukemia induction or studies showing that CLG mutations also occur in human leukemias.
The location and orientation of proviral integrations at Evi24 suggest that Clg activation occurs through an enhancer mechanism. It is presently unclear why proviral integrations occur in this region rather than immediately upstream or downstream of Clg. No insertions were detected in the promoter region or 3' of Clg in a Southern blot screen of >200 BXH-2 tumors (data not shown). Perhaps this region affords a more favorable site for proviral integration than other sequences near Clg (i.e. its chromatin is more open). It is also possible that this region encodes a long-range negative regulatory element for Clg expression that is disrupted by proviral integration. However, overexpression of Zfp36 in NIH 3T3 cells did not lead to focus formation (data not shown).
The Dbl family contains many transforming oncogenes (10). Most of these genes require amino-terminal truncation (for example, see Ref. 31) or cotransfection with activated c-Raf kinase (for example, see Ref. 32) to show potent transforming effects in NIH 3T3 cells. In this report, however, we have shown that stable overexpression of Clg can transform NIH 3T3 cells without truncation. Thus, it seems entirely possible that simple overexpression of Clg, caused by proviral insertion at Evi24, contributes to leukemia development. Indeed, we have sequenced multiple Clg cDNA clones from BXH-2 tumor 134 and did not observe any nucleotide changes from the wild-type sequence. A combination of provirally mediated overexpression and gene point mutation is a plausible mode of oncogene activation in MuLV-induced cancer. However, this has never been observed in MuLV-induced models of leukemia.
The amino-terminal portion of Clg, upstream of the DH/PH domains, is 59 amino acids in length, and carboxyl-terminal truncation did not substantially increase its transforming activity. Nevertheless, transient Clg expression caused very few foci in primary focus forming assays compared with activated Dbl and did not result in appreciable colony formation in soft agar compared with activated Dbl (data not shown). It is likely that Clg transformation would be enhanced by other factors such as Ras signaling and could require additional oncogenic changes to cause myeloid leukemia or B cell lymphoma. Indeed, each cell in BXH-2 and AKXD tumors harbors three to four proviral insertions on average. We have cloned another proviral insertion from BXH-2 tumor 134, which is in the 5'-untranslated region of the gene encoding the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase that reduces all-trans-retinal (data not shown). Perhaps changes in retinoid signaling, which is known to play a role in myeloid cell differentiation, can cooperate with Clg overexpression.
Several other genes involved in Ras signaling have also been implicated in BXH-2 and AKXD leukemias. These include guanine exchange factor genes such as Cal-Dag-GEFI and Cal-Dag-GEFII and GTPase-activating protein genes such as Nf1 (3, 5, 33, 34). These genes encode proteins that regulate various Ras-like subfamily members, including the true Ras proteins (N-, Ha-, and Ki-Ras) as well as TC21, Rap1, and R-Ras (35). Cal-Dag-GEFI and Cal-Dag-GEFII have Cdc25 catalytic domains, which are found in GEFs of this subfamily. In contrast, Clg has DH and PH domains, which are found in GEFs specific for the Rho subfamily of small GTPases (12). There is a great deal of evidence to support the interconnectivity between Ras and Rho/Rac/Cdc42 signaling. For instance, Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 activities are required for transformation of fibroblasts by activated forms of Ras (18, 19, 36, 37), and many DH domain-containing oncogenes cooperate with Ras signaling for transformation of rodent fibroblasts (10, 38). It seems possible that activation of the Ras pathway is critical for Clg-mediated transformation.
The Rho subfamily of GTPases, containing Rho/Rac/Cdc42-like proteins, has been implicated in many biological processes, including cellular transformation (16, 39, 40). Most data demonstrate the ability of activated forms of these proteins or their nucleotide exchange factors to cause transformation in experimental settings. Most often, these experiments have involved transformation of NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblasts. However, data exist showing that small GTPases of this class can actively participate in the transformation of other cell types and in human cancer. For example, human breast cancer cell lines and primary tumors show high levels of activated Rac3, which apparently drives their proliferation (41).
Various physiological effects of Cdc42 activation have been observed, and a number of effector molecules have been discovered (42). Among the possible effectors for Cdc42-mediated, Clg-induced cellular transformation are the coatomer complex (43) and PAK4 kinase (44). Aside from protection from apoptosis (45), the Cdc42 effector PAK4 can induce morphological changes, actin reorganization, and colony formation in soft agar (46). It is well established that Cdc42 activation can result in JNK and MAPK activation (47-49), and our own data on Clg are consistent with SRE and AP1 activation via Cdc42/JNK/MAPK pathways. Certainly, MAPK activation could contribute to tumor growth. Hyperactivated PI3-K signaling through an undetermined DH/PH domain-containing exchange factor(s) to Rac2, to a PAK family kinase, and finally to MAPK has been implicated in myeloid cell hyperproliferation after loss of the Nf1 tumor suppressor gene (50). Cdc42 activation has also been linked to resistance to Fas-mediated apoptosis (51), which is a feature of some human B cell lymphomas (52-54). It has also been shown that inactivation of the Fas pathway, together with overexpression of Bcl-2, can result in myeloid leukemia in mice (55). Thus, loss of susceptibility to Fas-mediated apoptosis could provide a common mechanism by which CLG expression would be selected for in other malignancies as well.
An analysis of the human genome indicates that there are a fairly large number of Dbl domain-containing genes, perhaps as many as 46 (56, 57). These genes seem to play a variety of biological roles in vivo. Mutations in the FGD1 gene cause a human genetic disease called Aarskog-Scott syndrome, which is characterized by impaired growth and facial, skeletal, and urogenital abnormalities (58). The Vav1 and Vav2 genes are required for aspects of B and T cell development (59). The Trio gene is required for proper secondary myogenesis and aspects of neuronal development (60). Clg is expressed at high levels in heart and lung, where it may have a role in cardiovascular development and/or function.
The human CLG gene maps to chromosome 19q13. This region is associated with recurrent translocations involving chromosome 11q23 (61), which is the site of the MLL gene. MLL is fused to a large number of different genes in human leukemia, including LARG, a Dbl domain-containing gene (21). LARG ties G-protein-coupled receptors to RhoA activation (62) and can cooperate with activated Raf to transform NIH 3T3 cells (32). It is unclear whether the GEF activity of LARG plays a role in transformation by the MLL-LARG fusion oncoprotein. Loss-of-function mutations or fusion to the MLL gene has also been observed for a Rho GTPase-activating protein gene, GRAF, in human leukemia with deletions of 5q or the t(5;11)(q31;q23) translocation, respectively (63). Our studies showing a possible role for Clg in mouse AML provide further evidence for a role for DH domain catalytic activity and Rho family activation in leukemogenesis.
The 19q13 region is also frequently amplified in human cancer,
especially in diffuse large cell lymphoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and breast cancer (61). These results, combined with our results demonstrating an apparent role for Clg in MuLV-induced
leukemia/lymphoma development, suggest that CLG may be causally
associated with other types of cancers as well. The CLG gene
copy number and mRNA expression levels in pancreatic adenocarcinoma
cells are currently under investigation. It seems possible that changes
in adhesion, apoptosis sensitivity, or cell migration caused by
inappropriate Cdc42 activation after CLG amplification could
be selected for during adenocarcinoma progression. If this hypothesis
is true, it will be important to determine how the GEF activity of Clg is regulated and why its overexpression can overcome such regulation.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Adam J. Dupuy and Scott J. Dylla for helpful discussions and technical assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by NCI Grant CA81051 from the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AF465238.
§ Supported by NCI Cancer Biology Training Grant CA09138 from the National Institutes of Health.
** To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 612-626-4979; Fax: 612-626-3941; E-mail: larga002@tc.umn.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 11, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110981200
2 Available at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST.
3 Available at compbio.ornl.gov/Grail-1.3/.
4 Available at dot.imgen.bcm.tmc.edu:9331/gene-finder/gf.html.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: LTRs, long terminal repeats; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; MuLV, murine leukemia virus; GEF, guanine nucleotide exchange factor; DH, Dbl homology; PH, pleckstrin homology; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; MSCV, murine stem cell virus; CMV, cytomegalovirus; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; HEK, human embryonic kidney; GST, glutathione S-transferase; SRE, serum response element; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; PAK, p21-activated kinase; PI3-K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Jonkers, J.,
and Berns, A.
(1996)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1287,
29-57[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Largaespada, D. A.
(2000)
Leukemia (Baltimore)
14,
1174-1184 |
| 3. |
Largaespada, D. A.,
Shaughnessy, J. D.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
and Copeland, N. G.
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
5095-6002[Abstract] |
| 4. |
Cho, B. C.,
Shaughnessy, J. D., Jr.,
Largaespada, D. A.,
Bedigian, H. G.,
Buchberg, A. M.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
and Copeland, N. G.
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
7138-7146[Abstract] |
| 5. |
Li, J.,
Shen, H.,
Himmel, K. L.,
Dupuy, A. J.,
Largaespada, D. A.,
Nakamura, T.,
Shaughnessy, J. D., Jr.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
and Copeland, N. G.
(1999)
Nat. Genet.
23,
348-353[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Nakamura, T.,
Largaespada, D. A.,
Shaughnessy, J. D., Jr.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
and Copeland, N. G.
(1996)
Nat. Genet.
12,
149-153[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Jenkins, N. A.,
Copeland, N. G.,
Taylor, B. A.,
Bedigian, H. G.,
and Lee, B. K.
(1982)
J. Virol.
42,
379-388 |
| 8. |
Bedigian, H. G.,
Johnson, D. A.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
Copeland, N. G.,
and Evans, R.
(1984)
J. Virol.
51,
586-594 |
| 9. |
Hansen, G. M.,
Skapura, D.,
and Justice, M. J.
(2000)
Genome Res.
10,
237-243 |
| 10. |
Cerione, R. A.,
and Zheng, Y.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8,
216-222[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. |
Bokoch, G. M.
(2000)
Immunol. Res.
21,
139-148[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Bishop, A. L.,
and Hall, A.
(2000)
Biochem. J.
348,
241-255[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Cantrell, D. A.
(2001)
J. Cell Sci.
114,
1439-1445[Abstract] |
| 14. |
Sawamoto, K.,
Yamada, C.,
Kishida, S.,
Hirota, Y.,
Taguchi, A.,
Kikuchi, A.,
and Okano, H.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
1967-1974[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Bourguignon, L. Y.,
Zhu, H.,
Shao, L.,
and Chen, Y. W.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
150,
177-191 |
| 16. |
Michiels, F.,
and Collard, J. G.
(1999)
Biochem. Soc. Symp.
65,
125-146[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. |
Olson, M. F.,
Ashworth, A.,
and Hall, A.
(1995)
Science
269,
1270-1272 |
| 18. |
Qiu, R. G.,
Chen, J.,
McCormick, F.,
and Symons, M.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
11781-11785 |
| 19. |
Zohn, I. M.,
Campbell, S. L.,
Khosravi-Far, R.,
Rossman, K. L.,
and Der, C. J.
(1998)
Oncogene
17,
1415-1438[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Maru, Y.
(2001)
Int. J. Hematol.
73,
308-322[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Kourlas, P. J.,
Strout, M. P.,
Becknell, B.,
Veronese, M. L.,
Croce, C. M.,
Theil, K. S.,
Krahe, R.,
Ruutu, T.,
Knuutila, S.,
Bloomfield, C. D.,
and Caligiuri, M. A.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
2145-2150 |
| 22. |
Mitelman, F.,
Mertens, F.,
and Johansson, B.
(1997)
Nat. Genet.
15,
417-474[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. |
Zheng, Y.,
Hart, M. J.,
and Cerione, R. A.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
256,
77-84[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
Carballo, E.,
Lai, W. S.,
and Blackshear, P. J.
(2000)
Blood
95,
1891-1899 |
| 25. |
Lai, W. S.,
Carballo, E.,
Strum, J. R.,
Kennington, E. A.,
Phillips, R. S.,
and Blackshear, P. J.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
4311-4323 |
| 26. |
Taylor, G. A.,
Carballo, E.,
Lee, D. M.,
Lai, W. S.,
Thompson, M. J.,
Patel, D. D.,
Schenkman, D. I.,
Gilkeson, G. S.,
Broxmeyer, H. E.,
Haynes, B. F.,
and Blackshear, P. J.
(1996)
Immunity
4,
445-454[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. |
Taylor, G. A.,
Lai, W. S.,
Oakey, R. J.,
Seldin, M. F.,
Shows, T. B.,
Eddy, R. L., Jr.,
and Blackshear, P. J.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
3454 |
| 28. |
Uberbacher, E. C.,
and Mural, R. J.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
11261-11265 |
| 29. |
Solovyev, V. V.,
Salamov, A. A.,
and Lawrence, C. B.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
5156-5163 |
| 30. |
Hawley, R. G.,
Lieu, F. H.,
Fong, A. Z.,
and Hawley, T. S.
(1994)
Gene Ther.
1,
136-138[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. |
Abe, K.,
Rossman, K. L.,
Liu, B.,
Ritola, K. D.,
Chiang, D.,
Campbell, S. L.,
Burridge, K.,
and Der, C. J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
10141-10149 |
| 32. |
Reuther, G. W.,
Lambert, Q. T.,
Booden, M. A.,
Wennerberg, K.,
Becknell, B.,
Marcucci, G.,
Sondek, J.,
Caligiuri, M. A.,
and Der, C. J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
27145-27151 |
| 33. |
Buchberg, A. M.,
Bedigian, H. G.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
and Copeland, N. G.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
4658-4666 |
| 34. |
Dupuy, A. J.,
Morgan, K.,
von Lintig, F. C.,
Shen, H.,
Acar, H.,
Hasz, D. E.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
Copeland, N. G.,
Boss, G. R.,
and Largaespada, D. A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
11804-11811 |
| 35. |
Overbeck, A. F.,
Brtva, T. R.,
Cox, A. D.,
Graham, S. M.,
Huff, S. Y.,
Khosravi-Far, R.,
Quilliam, L. A.,
Solski, P. A.,
and Der, C. J.
(1995)
Mol. Reprod. Dev.
42,
468-476[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. |
Roux, P.,
Gauthier-Rouviere, C.,
Doucet-Brutin, S.,
and Fort, P.
(1997)
Curr. Biol.
7,
629-637[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. |
Qiu, R. G.,
Chen, J.,
Kirn, D.,
McCormick, F.,
and Symons, M.
(1995)
Nature
374,
457-459[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. |
Reid, T.,
Bathoorn, A.,
Ahmadian, M. R.,
and Collard, J. G.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
33587-33593 |
| 39. |
Takai, Y.,
Sasaki, T.,
and Matozaki, T.
(2001)
Physiol. Rev.
81,
153-208 |
| 40. |
Olson, M. F.
(1996)
J. Mol. Med.
74,
563-571[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. |
Mira, J. P.,
Benard, V.,
Groffen, J.,
Sanders, L. C.,
and Knaus, U. G.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
185-189 |
| 42. |
Erickson, J. W.,
and Cerione, R. A.
(2001)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
13,
153-157[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. |
Wu, W. J.,
Erickson, J. W.,
Lin, R.,
and Cerione, R. A.
(2000)
Nature
405,
800-804[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. |
Abo, A., Qu, J.,
Cammarano, M. S.,
Dan, C.,
Fritsch, A.,
Baud, V.,
Belisle, B.,
and Minden, A.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
6527-6540[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 45. |
Gnesutta, N., Qu, J.,
and Minden, A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
14414-14419 |
| 46. |
Qu, J.,
Cammarano, M. S.,
Shi, Q., Ha, K. C.,
de Lanerolle, P.,
and Minden, A.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
3523-3533 |
| 47. |
Hill, C. S.,
Wynne, J.,
and Treisman, R.
(1995)
Cell
81,
1159-1170[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 48. |
Bagrodia, S.,
Derijard, B.,
Davis, R. J.,
and Cerione, R. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
27995-27998 |
| 49. |
Coso, O. A.,
Chiariello, M., Yu, J. C.,
Teramoto, H.,
Crespo, P., Xu, N.,
Miki, T.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(1995)
Cell
81,
1137-1146[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 50. |
Ingram, D. A.,
Hiatt, K.,
King, A. J.,
Fisher, L.,
Shivakumar, R.,
Derstine, C.,
Wenning, M. J.,
Diaz, B.,
Travers, J. B.,
Hood, A.,
Marshall, M.,
Williams, D. A.,
and Clapp, D. W.
(2001)
J. Exp. Med.
194,
57-69 |
| 51. |
Tu, S.,
and Cerione, R. A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
19656-19663 |
| 52. |
Xerri, L.,
Bouabdallah, R.,
Devilard, E.,
Hassoun, J.,
Stoppa, A. M.,
and Birg, F.
(1998)
Br. J. Cancer
78,
225-232[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 53. | Seeberger, H., Starostik, P., Schwarz, S., Knorr, C., Kalla, J., Ott, G., Muller-Hermelink, H. K., and Greiner, A. |