![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 16, 13494-13500, April 19, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Pharmacology, University of Sydney, Sydney,
New South Wales 2006, Australia
Received for publication, October 16, 2001, and in revised form, January 22, 2002
Glutamate transport by the excitatory
amino acid transporters (EAATs) is coupled to the
co-transport of 3 Na+, 1 H+, and the
counter-transport of 1 K+ ion. In addition to coupled ion
fluxes, glutamate and Na+ binding to the transporter
activates a thermodynamically uncoupled anion conductance through the
transporter. In this study, we have distinguished between these two
conductance states of the EAAT-1 transporter using a
[2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]methanethiosulfonate-modified V452C mutant transporter. Glutamate binds to the modified mutant transporter and activates the uncoupled anion conductance but is
not transported. The selective alteration of the transport function
without altering the anion channel function of the V452C mutant
transporter suggests that the two functions are generated by distinct
conformational states of the transporter.
Glutamate is the predominant excitatory neurotransmitter in the
mammalian central nervous system, and the role of the excitatory amino
acid transporters (EAATs)1 is
to regulate synaptic glutamate concentrations to maintain dynamic
signaling between the presynaptic and postsynaptic membranes and also
to prevent a build-up of toxic levels of glutamate. The energy used to
drive the uphill transport of glutamate into the cell against a
significant concentration gradient is derived from the coupling of
transport to the co-transport of 3 Na+ and 1 H+
and the counter-transport of 1 K+ for each glutamate
molecule (1, 2). In addition to these coupled ion fluxes, glutamate
bound to the transporter activates a thermodynamically uncoupled anion
conductance through the transporter (3-5).
Five different glutamate transporters have been identified, and their
amino acid sequences were determined from the cDNA sequences. The
human glutamate transporters are termed EAAT-1 to EAAT-5 (3, 6, 7),
whereas the rat homologs of EAAT-1 and EAAT-2 are termed
glutamate/aspartate transporter-1 (8) and glutamate transporter-1 (9) and the rabbit homolog of EAAT-3 is termed excitatory
amino-acid carrier-1 (10). The five different transporter subtypes show
a high degree of similarity and are likely to form similar structures
in the membrane. A number of models for the membrane topology of
glutamate transporters have been proposed. Initial predictions of the
topology from hydrophobicity analysis of the amino acid sequence lead
to three different models with 8, 10, and 12 transmembrane domains
(8-10), but more direct structural information has been obtained from
method studies of substituted cysteine accessibility (11, 12). The
models proposed from these studies both predict six The reentrant loop and membrane-associated structures are highly
conserved in their amino acid sequences, and from mutagenesis studies,
it has been proposed that this region forms the pore structure through
which glutamate and the various co-transported and counter-transported
ions pass. However, it remains to be demonstrated whether any of these
residues also interact with anions, which raises the question as to
whether the same region of the transporter that mediates the transport
process is also responsible for allowing the uncoupled anion
conductance. In a recent study (13), we demonstrated that
Zn2+ ions selectively inhibit the anion conductance with no
significant effect on the transport characteristics of the glutamate
transporter EAAT-4, which suggests that the transport and anion
conductances are mediated by distinct conformational states of the
transporter. The Zn2+ binding site was found to be in the
large second extracellular loop, which is in a region that is distinct
from the reentrant loops and transmembrane domains that interact with
glutamate and the co-transported and counter-transported cations.
The aim of this study is to further investigate the conformational
states responsible for the transport and anion channel functions of the
transporter. We have attempted to identify amino acid residues, which
when changed to cysteine and modified with the methanethiosulfonate
(MTS) class of compounds (14, 15), differentially alter the transport
and anion channel properties of the transporter. To achieve this
result, amino acid residues, which are accessible to MTS reagents and
in close proximity to the pore region but do not directly interact with
either glutamate or the co-transported and counter-transported cations,
were targeted. Seal et al., (12) identified a number of
amino acid residues in a membrane-associated linker region that are
accessible to MTS reagents, which appear to satisfy these criteria. In
this study, we report
[2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]methanethiosulfonate (MTSET)
modification of the EAAT-1 mutant V452C blocks glutamate transport but
does not interfere with glutamate binding to the transporter and
activation of the uncoupled anion conductance. The selective disruption
of transport while maintaining the anion channel function of EAAT-1
suggests that different conformational states of the transporter
mediate the two functions.
Chemicals--
DL-Threo- Site-directed Mutagenesis--
EAAT-1 subcloned into the plasmid
oocyte transcription vector (pOTV) was kindly supplied by Susan Amara
(The Vollum Institute, Portland, OR). A cysteine-less EAAT-1 (CLE1) was
engineered by making conservative substitutions of the three native
cysteine residues in EAAT-1 (C186A, C252A, and C375A) using the
QuikChangeTM site-directed mutagenesis kit and recommended
protocol (Stratagene). Valine 452 was also mutated to a cysteine
residue, V452C, using the same protocol. Both CLE1 and V452C were
sequenced on both strands by dye terminator cycle sequencing (ABI
PRISM, PerkinElmer Life Sciences) at the Sydney University Prince
Alfred Macromolecular Analysis Center.
Transporter Expression in Xenopus laevis Oocytes and
Electrophysiological Recordings--
The CLE1 and V452C transporter
cDNAs were linearized with BamHI and cRNA transcribed
with T7 RNA polymerase and capped with 5'-7-methylguanosine using the
mMessage mMachine kit (Ambion, Inc., TX). Oocytes were harvested from
X. laevis as described previously (16), and 50 nl of cRNA
was injected into defoliculated stage V oocytes and incubated in
standard frog Ringer's solution called ND96 (96 mM
NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.55)
supplemented with 2.5 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.5 mM theophylline, 50 µg/ml gentamicin. Current recordings
were made 2-5 days later using the two-electrode voltage clamp
technique with a Geneclamp 500 amplifier (Axon instruments, Foster
City, CA) interfaced with a MacLab 2e chart recorder (ADI Instruments, Sydney, Australia) using the Chart software and a Digidata 1200 (Axon
Instruments), which is controlled by an IBM-compatible computer installed with pClamp software, version 7.0 (Axon Instruments).
The current-voltage relationships for substrate-elicited conductances
were determined by subtraction of steady-state current measurements in
the absence of substrate obtained during 200-ms voltage pulses from
Radiotracer Flux Experiments--
The uptake of
L-[3H]glutamate (Amersham Biosciences) was
measured in oocytes expressing CLE1, V452C, and uninjected oocytes by
placing five oocytes in ND96 buffer containing 10 µM
L-[3H]glutamate. MTSET-treated cells were
incubated in 1 mM MTSET for 5 min and washed three times in
ND96 at room temperature before uptake was performed. After 5 min,
L-[3H]glutamate uptake was terminated by
three rapid washes in ice-cold ND96 buffer followed by lysis in 50 mM NaOH and scintillation counting.
The effects of MTSET treatment of V452C and CLE1 on
D-[3H]aspartate (Amersham Biosciences)
reverse transport were also measured. Oocytes were incubated with 10 µM D-[3H]aspartate in ND96 for
1 h at room temperature to load the oocytes with
D-[3H]aspartate followed by washing the cells
three times in ice-cold buffer.
D-[3H]Aspartate-loaded cells were incubated
in the presence or absence of 1 mM MTSET for 5 min at room
temperature and washed three times in buffer before release was
initiated. Single oocytes were placed in 500 µl of high
K+ buffer (46 mM NaCl, 50 mM KCl)
for 90 s, and 400 µl of the external solution was then removed
for scintillation counting and measurement of the extent of reverse
transport. Background rates of release were measured in the presence of
1 mM TBOA. Oocytes were also removed, and the level of
radioactivity was measured to confirm the extent of loading of
D-[3H]aspartate.
Analysis of Kinetic Data--
An analysis of kinetic data was
carried out using the Kaleidagraph Software version 3.1. L-Glutamate dose responses were fitted by least squares as
a function of current (I) to I/Imax = [S]/(EC50 + [S]), where Imax is
the maximal current, EC50 is the concentration of
L-glutamate that generates half-maximal current, and [S]
is the L-glutamate concentration. TBOA is a competitive
blocker of glutamate transport (17), and the following equation was
used to estimate the IC50 for TBOA,
I/Iglu = 1 The application of MTS derivatives to the wild-type EAAT-1
transporter does not alter its transport activity (19). However, to
ensure that further mutations do not expose a previously unreactive cysteine residue, a cysteine-less transporter was constructed. Conservative substitutions for the three endogenous cysteine residues (C186A, C252A, and C375A) resulted in a transporter termed CLE1. The
application of L-glutamate or D-aspartate to
oocytes expressing CLE1 elicits a conductance that is qualitatively
similar to wild type in terms of current amplitude, rectification, and
apparent substrate affinity (Fig. 1,
A and C). The application of 1 mM MTSET for 5 min caused no change in the
L-glutamate-elicited or D-aspartate-elicited
conductances (Fig. 1, A and C).
The application of 100 µM L-glutamate to
oocytes expressing CLE1 or the V452C mutant generates similar
conductances, which suggests that the cysteine mutation does not alter
the structure or function of the transporter. The application of 1 mM MTSET does not affect the
L-glutamate-activated conductance of CLE1 but does cause
significant changes in the L-glutamate-activated conductance of the V452C mutant (Fig. 1B). The amplitude of
the current is decreased at negative potentials, and the reversal potential of the current is shifted 40 mV to more negative membrane potentials to
Distinct Conformational States Mediate the Transport and Anion
Channel Properties of the Glutamate Transporter EAAT-1*
and
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-helical
transmembrane domains in the amino-terminal portion of the protein
followed by a series of reentrant loops and membrane-associated
structures followed by a final
-helical transmembrane domain and an
intracellular carboxyl-terminal domain.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-benzyloxyaspartate
(TBOA) was obtained from Tocris (Bristol, UK), and MTS derivatives were
obtained from Toronto Research Chemicals (Toronto, Ontario, Canada).
All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma unless otherwise stated.
30 mV to potentials between
100 and +40 mV in 10 mV steps
from corresponding current measurements in the presence of substrate.
Current voltage measurements were normalized to the current generated
by L-glutamate at
100 mV unless otherwise stated. In
recordings in which the extracellular Cl
concentration
was altered, equimolar substitutions were made with bromide
(Br
), iodide (I
), or nitrate (N
O
30 mV to potentials between
100 and +40 mV in 10 mV steps were subtracted from
corresponding current measurements in high K+ buffer alone.
([TBOA]/[TBOA + IC50]). All values presented are the means of at least
three cells ± S.E. One-way ANOVA test with the Bonferroni's
post hoc test or the Student's t test were
performed using GraphPad Prism (18) to assess the difference in the
means. p < 0.05 were taken to be significant and are
indicated in figures with an asterisk.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
MTSET changes the substrate-activated
conductance of V452C but not of CLE1. Current voltage plots of
substrate-elicited conductances of CLE1 and V452C were measured in the
presence of 100 µM L-glutamate (A
and B) or 100 µM D-aspartate
(C and D) before (
) and after (
) 5-min
incubation with 1 mM MTSET (I(100
µM substrate in buffer)
I(buffer)).
The data represented are normalized to the current elicited by 100 µM L-glutamate at
100 mV and represent the
mean currents ± S.E. from five or more cells. After MTSET
treatment of the V452C mutant transporter, the reversal potential of
the L-glutamate-activated conductance shifted from
+19.3 ± 1.7 mV to
18 ± 0.9 mV (n = 6).
Similarly, D-aspartate-activated conductances were shifted
from
1.3 ± 1.6 mV to
18 ± 0.9 mV (n = 6). The Student's t test showed that these reversal
potential shifts were significant (p < 0.0001).
18.7 ± 0.9 mV (n = 6, p < 0.0001). Similar reductions in current amplitude
and reversal potential measurements are also observed for
D-aspartate-activated conductances (Fig. 1D).
Despite these differences, the EC50 for the
L-glutamate-activated conductances of the V452C mutant were
not significantly different before and after treatment with MTSET or
compared with the CLE1 transporter (Fig.
2) and the wild-type transporter (4,
20-22).

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
MTSET does not change the apparent affinity
of L-glutamate for CLE1 or V452C.
L-Glutamate dose responses were measured for CLE1
(
) and V452C both before (
) and after (
) 1 mM
MTSET application for 5 min with apparent affinity values for CLE1
(31 ± 7.8 µM) and for V452C before MTSET (20.5 ± 3.9 µM) and after MTSET treatment (23.7 ± 1.0 µM). Current measurements at
60 mV were normalized to
the maximal current, and the data represent the mean ± S.E. from
five cells for each condition. One-way ANOVA test with the
Bonferroni's post hoc test showed no significance between
the apparent affinity values.
In wild-type EAAT-1, the glutamate-activated conductance is composed of
an inwardly rectifying glutamate transport conductance and an uncoupled
chloride conductance (4, 22). In Xenopus laevis
oocytes, the reversal potential for chloride ions is
~
20 mV (3, 4, 23), which is similar to the reversal potential observed for the V452C mutant after MTSET treatment (
18.7 ± 0.9 mV). Thus, the effect of MTSET may be to selectively reduce the transport component of the conductance with chloride contributing a
greater proportion of the current, resulting in the current reversing
the direction closer to the reversal potential for chloride ions. To
confirm this hypothesis, L-[3H]glutamate
uptake by oocytes expressing CLE1 and the V452C mutant with and without
MTSET treatment was measured. Under control conditions with no MTSET
treatment, the rates of L-[3H]glutamate
uptake by oocytes expressing CLE1 and V452C-expressing oocytes are
similar (Fig. 3). After incubation of the
oocytes with 1 mM MTSET, the rate of
L-[3H]glutamate uptake by oocytes expressing
CLE1 is unaffected, whereas the rate of uptake by oocytes expressing
the V452C mutant is reduced to background levels (Fig. 3). These
results confirm that the rate of glutamate transport is unaffected by
the V452C mutation and that application of MTSET to the V452C mutant
transporter selectively inhibits the transport component of the
glutamate-activated conductance.
|
The uncoupled anion conductance of the glutamate transporter family
displays a chaotropic selectivity sequence in which some anions are
more permeant than others (4, 5, 22). With the more permeant anions in
the extracellular solution, the substrate-induced currents are larger
in amplitude and the reversal potential of these currents shifts to
more hyperpolarized potentials as the proportion of the current being
carried by the anions increases. When extracellular Cl
is
substituted with either bromide (Br
), iodide
(I
), or nitrate (NO
|
The results presented thus far suggest that MTSET modification of the V452C mutant EAAT-1 does not affect glutamate binding and activation of the anion conductance but does inhibit glutamate transport. We have also investigated whether reverse transport and the reverse transport-activated chloride conductance (5) are similarly affected. To isolate reverse transport and reverse transport-activated chloride conductances, it was necessary to use the glutamate transport blocker TBOA (17). TBOA is a non-transportable competitive inhibitor of glutamate transport that binds to the extracellular-facing glutamate binding site. However, before using TBOA to characterize reverse transport, we investigated its effect on forward transport under standard ionic conditions to confirm that it still binds to the mutant transporter. After MTSET treatment, increasing doses of TBOA caused a progressive reduction in the glutamate-activated conductance with an IC50 of 43 µM for CLE1 and 181 µM for the V452C transporter (n = 2, data not shown). Thus, although glutamate binding to either CLE1 or V452C is unaffected by MTSET treatment (see above), the affinity of TBOA for the MTSET-modified mutant is reduced. Nonetheless, high doses of TBOA used in the following experiment still block a large proportion of the conductance elicited by 30 µM L-glutamate.
Under conditions of elevated extracellular K+ and reduced
extracellular Na+, glutamate transporters may function in
reverse (1, 24). In X. laevis oocytes, this procedure may
lead to the activation of a variety of conductances, but with the use
of TBOA, it is possible to isolate the conductance changes that are
specific to reverse operation of glutamate transporters. Under
conditions of elevated extracellular K+ (50 mM)
and reduced extracellular Na+ (46 mM, the
application of 300 µM TBOA blocks conductances because of
reverse transport in both CLE1 and the mutant transporter V452C, which
reverse the direction at
48 ± 5 mV (n = 3) and
52 ± 1 mV (n = 3), respectively, and are
~10% of the forward transport conductance activated by 30 µM L-glutamate (Fig.
5, A and B). After
MTSET treatment, TBOA block of the reverse transport conductance of
CLE1 is unaffected. However, high extracellular K+ does not
activate any conductance of the MTSET-modified mutant V452C, which can
be blocked by TBOA. The conductance activated by reverse transport in
the wild-type transporter will also have two components comprised of
the coupled movement of
glutamate/3Na+/H+/K+, and the
reverse transport-activated chloride conductance (5, 22, 25). The lack
of any conductance blocked by TBOA after MTSET treatment of V452C
suggests that both the reverse transport and reverse
transport-activated chloride conductance are not activated by high
extracellular K+.
|
To confirm these findings, the reverse transport of
D-[3H]aspartate was measured. Oocytes
expressing CLE1 or V452C oocytes were preloaded with
D-[3H]aspartate, which was chosen as it is a
non-metabolized substrate of EAAT-1. Control oocytes were placed in
ND96 at room temperature, whereas MTSET-treated cells were incubated
with 1 mM MTSET for 5 min. Oocytes were washed and then
placed in the same high K+ buffer used for the
electrophysiological recordings. Transporter-specific release of
D-[3H]aspartate was determined by the
subtraction of the amount of release measured in the presence of 1 mM TBOA. MTSET treatment significantly reduced the amount
of V452C-specific release to background levels (Fig. 5C) but
did not affect the amount of CLE1-specific D-[3H]aspartate release (data not shown). The
lack of D-[3H]aspartate release and the lack
of any conductance blocked by TBOA after MTSET treatment of V452C
suggest that both the reverse transport and reverse transport-activated
chloride conductance are prevented by the MTSET treatment. These
results are in contrast to that observed for the effects of MTSET on
forward transport where only the coupled transport conductance was
inhibited, and these results suggest that the effects of MTSET are
asymmetrical with respect to forward and reverse transport activation
of the chloride conductance.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The observation that glutamate transporters may have a secondary
function as glutamate-activated anion channels (3, 26, 27) has raised a
number of questions. 1) What is the structural basis for the different
functions? 2) How are these two processes coordinated? 3) Is it
possible to independently modulate the two processes? In this
study, we have described a mutant EAAT-1 transporter V452C that when
modified with MTSET selectively blocks glutamate transport while
retaining the glutamate-activated uncoupled chloride channel function
of the transporter. The EC50 for glutamate activation of
the anion conductance of the MTSET-modified transporter is not
significantly different from the EC50 for glutamate
transport and anion conductance activation of the CLE1 or wild-type
EAAT-1, which demonstrates that the glutamate recognition site is not significantly altered in the MTSET-modified mutant transporter. Valine
452 is located in a hydrophobic "linker" region that is exposed to
the extracellular solution and lies between the reentrant loop that is
likely to form the glutamate recognition site (12, 19, 20, 28-32) and
is a putative
-helical transmembrane domain containing an arginine
residue that may interact with the
-carboxyl group of glutamate
(33). The results presented in this study confirm that this
linker region is unlikely to be directly involved in glutamate
recognition and activation of the anion conductance but do suggest that
conformational changes mediated by this region may be required for the
translocation of glutamate through the transporter.
The activation of the anion conductance of the MTSET-modified V452C mutant transporter requires glutamate binding but clearly does not require active transport, which confirms previous studies (5, 22) suggesting that the binding of glutamate to the transporter without transport is sufficient for activation of the anion conductance. The anion conductance of the MTSET-modified mutant transporter shows some subtle differences compared with the anion conductance that is activated by glutamate binding/transport of the wild-type EAAT-1 and the CLE1 transporter. In addition to the shift in reversal potential of the glutamate-activated conductance before and after MTSET treatment because of the removal of the transport component of the conductance, the amplitude of the anion conductance is significantly greater. These changes in anion conductance amplitude are most apparent with the more permeant anions iodide and nitrate, and in the case of nitrate, the slope conductance measured between 0 and +40 mV was increased 1.9-fold after MTSET treatment. The simplest explanation for these differences in the anion conductance properties is that the MTSET treatment prevents the transporter from undergoing conformational changes required for transport and increases either the open time for the anion channel or the frequency of anion channel opening resulting in a larger anion conductance.
The results presented suggest that MTSET modification of V452C locks the transporter into a conformation that allows glutamate binding and activation of the anion conductance but does not allow translocation of glutamate through the transporter. However, under the conditions that cause the wild-type and CLE1 transporters to function in reverse, MTSET modification of the mutant appears to prevent both reverse transport and reverse transport activation of the anion conductance. This observation can be explained by postulating that MTSET modification of the mutant transporter locks the transporter into a conformation that allows glutamate to bind to an outward facing recognition site but does not allow reorientation of the transporter to bind glutamate from the intracellular surface. Thus, in the absence of glutamate binding to the intracellular recognition site, there is no anion conductance activated and no transporter-associated conductances for TBOA to block (Fig. 5, B and C).
The selective manipulation of the transport properties of EAAT-1 without affecting the anion conductance is in contrast to the effects of Zn2+ on the glutamate transporter EAAT-4 in which Zn2+ selectively inhibits the anion conductance without affecting transport (13). These two studies (34, 35) clearly demonstrate that it is possible to selectively manipulate the two functions of glutamate transporters, which highlights the possibility that the two functions are mediated via separate pore structures. The quaternary structure of the glutamate transporters is unknown, but two studies have suggested that that the transporters associate to form homomultimeric complexes. Electron micrograph studies of EAAT-3 expressed in oocyte membranes suggest that the transporters exist as a pentameric assembly (35). It was suggested that each transporter "subunit" conducted coupled glutamate transport, whereas the association of the subunits allows the formation of a central chloride channel. If this model is correct, MTSET modification of the mutant transporter may prevent translocation of glutamate by each of the subunits but not alter the conformational changes required for the opening of the central chloride ion channel. Although the structural model proposed by Eskandari et al. (35) can explain how it is possible to independently manipulate the transport and anion channel functions of the transporter, the results presented in this study can also be equally well explained by a common pathway for transport and chloride ion permeation in which the transporter is able to switch between the two modes of operation. Nevertheless, our results do suggest that the transport and chloride channel properties are mediated by different conformational states of the transporter, and additional site-directed mutagenesis studies, which identify distinct molecular determinants of the two functions, will be required to distinguish between the single and multiple pore models for glutamate transporter function.
Since the original submission of this paper, a similar study has been
published by Seal et al. (36). This study
investigated the effects of MTS reagents on a valine residue 449 to
cysteine mutation in EAAT-1 (36) and also showed that MTS reagents
abolish glutamate transport but do not affect the anion conductance. If the domain containing these residues is an
-helix, the two residues (449 and 452) would be located on the same side of the helix and suggests that this domain may form part of a structure necessary for
the transduction of substrate binding into substrate translocation through the transporter.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. Hue Tran and Kong Li for the maintenance of the X. laevis colony and the isolation and preparation of oocytes.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported by an Australian postgraduate award.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 61-2-9351-6734; Fax: 61-2-9351-3868; E-mail: robv@pharmacol.usyd.edu.au.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 28, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M109970200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
EAATs, excitatory amino acid transporters;
CLE1, cysteine-less
EAAT-1;
V452C, CLE1 mutant V452C;
MTS, methanethiosulfonate;
MTSET, [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]methanethiosulfonate;
TBOA, DL-threo-
-benzyloxyaspartate;
ANOVA, analysis of
variance.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Zerangue, N.,
and Kavanaugh, M. P.
(1996)
Nature
45,
634-637 |
| 2. |
Levy, L. M.,
Warr, O.,
and Atwell, D.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
9620-9628 |
| 3. |
Fairman, W. A.,
Vandenberg, R. J.,
Arizza, J. L.,
Kavanaugh, M. P.,
and Amara, S. G.
(1995)
Nature
375,
599-603[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. |
Wadiche, J. I.,
Amara, S. G.,
and Kavanaugh, M. P.
(1995)
Neuron
15,
721-728[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. |
Billups, B.,
Rossi, D.,
and Atwell, D.
(1996)
J. Neurosci.
16,
6722-6731 |
| 6. |
Arizza, J. L.,
Fairman, W. A.,
Wadiche, J. I.,
Murdoch, G. H.,
Kavanaugh, M. P.,
and Amara, S. G.
(1994)
J. Neurosci.
14,
5559-5569[Abstract] |
| 7. |
Arizza, J. L.,
Eliasof, S.,
Kavanaugh, M. P.,
and Amara, S. G.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
4155-4160 |
| 8. |
Stork, T.,
Schulte, S.,
Hofmann, K.,
and Stoffel, W.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
10955-10959 |
| 9. |
Pines, G.,
Danbolt, N. C.,
Bjoras, M.,
Zhang, Y.,
Bendahan, A.,
Eide, L.,
Koespell, H.,
Storm-Mathisen, J.,
Seeberg, E.,
and Kanner, B. I.
(1992)
Nature
360,
464-467[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Kanai, Y.,
and Hediger, M. A.
(1992)
Nature
360,
467-471[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. |
Grunewald, M.,
and Kanner, B. I.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
9684-9689 |
| 12. |
Seal, R. P.,
Leighton, B. H.,
and Amara, S. G.
(2000)
Neuron
25,
695-706[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Mitrovic, A. D,
Plesko, F.,
and Vandenberg, R. J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
26071-26076 |
| 14. |
Akabas, M. H.,
Stauffer, D. A., Xu, M.,
and Karlin, A.
(1992)
Science
258,
307-310 |
| 15. |
Akabas, M. H.,
Kaufmann, C.,
Archdeacon, P.,
and Karlin, A.
(1994)
Neuron
13,
919-927[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
Vandenberg, R. J.,
Mitrovic, A. D.,
Chebib, M.,
Balcar, V. J.,
and Johnston, G. A.
(1997)
Mol. Pharmacol.
51,
809-815 |
| 17. |
Shimamoto, K.,
LeBrun, B.,
Yasuda-Kamatani, Y.,
Sakaitani, M.,
Shigeri, Y.,
Yumoto, N.,
and Nakajima, T.
(1998)
Mol. Pharmacol.
53,
195-201 |
| 18. | Motulsky, H. (1999) Analysing Data with GraphPad Prism, pp. 45, 69, and 70, GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA |
| 19. |
Seal, R. P.,
and Amara, S. G.
(1998)
Neuron
21,
1487-1498[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Vandenberg, R. J.,
Arizza, J. L.,
Amara, S. G.,
and Kavanaugh, M. P.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
17668-17671 |
| 21. |
Vandenberg, R. J.,
Mitrovic, A. D.,
and Johnston, G. A. R.
(1998)
Mol. Pharmacol.
54,
189-196 |
| 22. |
Wadiche, J. I.,
and Kavanaugh, M. P.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
7650-7661 |
| 23. |
Barish, M. E.
(1983)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
342,
309-325 |
| 24. |
Szatkowski, M.,
Barbour, B.,
and Attwell, D.
(1990)
Nature
348,
443-446[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Watzke, N.,
and Grewer, C.
(2001)
FEBS Lett.
503,
121-125[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Sarantis, M.,
Everett, K.,
and Attwell, D.
(1988)
Nature
332,
451-453[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. |
Grant, G. B.,
and Dowling, J. E.
(1995)
J. Neurosci.
15,
3852-3862[Abstract] |
| 28. |
Pines, G.,
Zhang, Y.,
and Kanner, B. I.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
17093-17097 |
| 29. |
Mitrovic, A. D.,
Amara, S. G.,
Johnston, G. A.,
and Vandenberg, R. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
14698-14706 |
| 30. |
Kavanaugh, M. P.,
Bendahan, A.,
Zerangue, N.,
Zhang, Y.,
and Kanner, B. I.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
1703-1708 |
| 31. |
Zarbiv, R.,
Grunewald, M.,
Kavanaugh, M. P.,
and Kanner, B. I.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
14231-14237 |
| 32. |
Grunewald, M.,
Bendahan, A.,
and Kanner, B. I.
(1998)
Neuron
21,
623-632[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. |
Bendahan, A.,
Armon, A.,
Madani, N.,
Kavanaugh, M. P.,
and Kanner, B. I.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
37436-37442 |
| 34. |
Haugeto, O.,
Ullensvang, K.,
Levy, L. M.,
Chaudhry, F. A.,
Honore, T.,
Nielsen, M.,
Lehre, K. P.,
and Danbolt, N. C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
27715-27722 |
| 35. |
Eskandari, S.,
Kreman, M.,
Kavanaugh, M. P.,
Wright, E. M.,
and Zampighi, G. A.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
8641-8646 |
| 36. |
Seal, R. P.,
Shigeri, Y.,
Eliasof, S.,
Leighton, B. H.,
and Amara, S. G.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
15324-15329 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Huang and E. Tajkhorshid Dynamics of the Extracellular Gate and Ion-Substrate Coupling in the Glutamate Transporter Biophys. J., September 1, 2008; 95(5): 2292 - 2300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-Y. Chen and T.-C. Hwang CLC-0 and CFTR: Chloride Channels Evolved From Transporters Physiol Rev, April 1, 2008; 88(2): 351 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Teichman and B. I. Kanner Aspartate-444 Is Essential for Productive Substrate Interactions in a Neuronal Glutamate Transporter J. Gen. Physiol., June 1, 2007; 129(6): 527 - 539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Zhang and C. Grewer The Sodium-Coupled Neutral Amino Acid Transporter SNAT2 Mediates an Anion Leak Conductance that Is Differentially Inhibited by Transported Substrates Biophys. J., April 1, 2007; 92(7): 2621 - 2632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-P. Schneider, S. Broer, A. Broer, and J. W. Deitmer Heterologous Expression of the Glutamine Transporter SNAT3 in Xenopus Oocytes Is Associated with Four Modes of Uncoupled Transport J. Biol. Chem., February 9, 2007; 282(6): 3788 - 3798. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Rosental, A. Bendahan, and B. I. Kanner Multiple Consequences of Mutating Two Conserved beta-Bridge Forming Residues in the Translocation Cycle of a Neuronal Glutamate Transporter J. Biol. Chem., September 22, 2006; 281(38): 27905 - 27915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Funicello, P. Conti, M. De Amici, C. De Micheli, T. Mennini, and M. Gobbi Dissociation of [3H]L-Glutamate Uptake from L-Glutamate-Induced [3H]D-Aspartate release by 3-Hydroxy-4,5,6,6a-tetrahydro-3aH-pyrrolo[3,4-d]isoxazole-4-carboxylic Acid and 3-Hydroxy-4,5,6,6a-tetrahydro-3aH-pyrrolo[3,4-d]isoxazole-6-carboxylic Acid, Two Conformationally Constrained Aspartate and Glutamate Analogs Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2004; 66(3): 522 - 529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Ryan, A. D. Mitrovic, and R. J. Vandenberg The Chloride Permeation Pathway of a Glutamate Transporter and Its Proximity to the Glutamate Translocation Pathway J. Biol. Chem., May 14, 2004; 279(20): 20742 - 20751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Borre and B. I. Kanner Arginine 445 Controls the Coupling between Glutamate and Cations in the Neuronal Transporter EAAC-1 J. Biol. Chem., January 23, 2004; 279(4): 2513 - 2519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Umesh, B. N. Cohen, L. S. Ross, and S. S. Gill Functional characterization of a glutamate/aspartate transporter from the mosquito Aedes aegypti J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2003; 206(13): 2241 - 2255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. I. Kanner Transmembrane Domain I of the gamma -Aminobutyric Acid Transporter GAT-1 Plays a Crucial Role in the Transition between Cation Leak and Transport Modes J. Biol. Chem., January 31, 2003; 278(6): 3705 - 3712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. H. Leighton, R. P. Seal, K. Shimamoto, and S. G. Amara A Hydrophobic Domain in Glutamate Transporters Forms an Extracellular Helix Associated with the Permeation Pathway for Substrates J. Biol. Chem., August 9, 2002; 277(33): 29847 - 29855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Borre, M. P. Kavanaugh, and B. I. Kanner Dynamic Equilibrium between Coupled and Uncoupled Modes of a Neuronal Glutamate Transporter J. Biol. Chem., April 12, 2002; 277(16): 13501 - 13507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||